GOLF TEE WITH SUPPORT PRONGS
Field of the Invention The present invention relates generally to golf equipment, and more specifically to golf tees employed in striking a golf ball.
Background of the Invention The overwhelming majority of golfers use golf tees during their rounds of golf. As is well-known, a golf tee is placed in the ground or other underlying surface, and the ball rests atop the tee; because the ball resides above the ground, there is more margin for error in striking the ball with a golf club, and often greater distance can be achieved when a tee is used. A golfer is permitted to use a tee on the first shot of every hole. A conventional golf tee is formed of wood and typically includes a cupped support surface upon which a golf ball rests and a cylindrical shaft underlying the support surface that penetrates the ground. The support surface has a radius of curvature that is approximately equal to that of a golf ball. The πm of the support surface, which typically has a diameter of about 0.500 inch, ordinarily has a relatively sharp edge. The shaft of a conventional tee is substantially cylindrical and terminates in a pointed tip to facilitate insertion into the ground.. One of the problems with a conventional tee results from the interaction between the support surface and the ball as the ball is struck. More specifically, most, if not all, of the support surface of the tee is in contact with the ball as the ball rests thereon. This contact
creates friction that can negatively impact the launch of the ball from the tee. In addition, the sharp edges and any imperfections of the rim of the tee can "catch" on the surface of the ball and further increase the friction on the launched ball as well as impart a degree of side spin onto the ball that can reduce accuracy. Also, the sharp rim of the tee is also somewhat fragile and can be damaged as the club face strikes it. In addition, the cylindrical shank of a conventional tee typically has a cylindrical shank that is uniform in diameter from just below the cupped support surface to within about 0.150" of the tee bottom, at which point the tee tapers sharply to the tip. The uniform diameter of a conventional tee tends to create a cylindrical hole in the ground. When the ball/tee is struck with a golf club, a significant force of the force (often about 30-40 lbs) is concentrated into the tee to ground interface. A common failure mechanism of wooden tees is fracture at that interface point because the tee cannot smoothly exit the ground from the cylindrical hole.
Summary of the Invention These and other issues may be addressed by a golf tee of the present invention. As a first aspect, the present invention is directed to embodiments of a golf tee comprising: an elongate shaft having opposed upper and lower ends, the lower end configured to be inserted into an underlying surface; and a support cup that is configured to support a golf ball from beneath and that merges with the shaft. The support cup has a base portion with a generally concave upper surface and further includes at least three arcuate support prongs projecting upwardly from the base portion. The support prongs define a discontinuous annulus about the periphery of the support cup. In this configuration, the contact area between the support cup and the ball can be reduced, which can in turn reduce the amount of friction between the ball and tee and decrease the risk of imperfections in the tee negatively impacting ball flight. In some embodiments, the upper surface of the base portion of the support cup is recessed from the support prongs. In certain embodiments, the shaft includes flutes or other projections or recesses that can resist twisting of the tee during impact. As a second aspect, the present invention is directed to embodiments of a golf tee comprising: an elongate shaft having opposed upper and lower ends, the lower end configured to be inserted into an underlying surface; and a support cup that is configured to support a golf ball from beneath and that merges with the shaft. As with the embodiments
described above, the support cup has a base portion with a generally concave upper surface and further includes at least three arcuate support prongs projecting upwardly from the base portion. In these embodiments, each of the support prongs has a convex contact surface and is of a secant length that is greater than that of a dimple of a golf ball. Again, in this configuration, the contact area between the support cup and the ball can be reduced to that portion of the golf ball that is outside the golf ball dimples. As a third aspect, the present invention is directed to embodiments of a golf tee comprising a shaft and a support cup as described immediately above, wherein each of the support prongs has a convex contact surface and a secant length such that the total contact area between the contact surfaces and a golf ball resting on the contact surfaces is between about 0.0036 and 0.0045 in2.
Brief Description of the Figures Figure 1 is a bottom perspective view of an embodiment of a golf tee in accordance with the present invention. Figure 2 is a top view of the golf tee of Figure 1. Figure 2 A is a top view of the golf tee of Figure 1 with a golf ball illustrated in phantom line. Figure 3 is an enlarged partial top perspective view of the golf tee of Figure 1 showing an exemplary golf ball dimple in comparison to the support prong. Figure 4 is a side view of the golf tee of Figure 1 inserted into the ground with a golf ball resting on the support prongs of the tee. Figure 5 is a section view of the golf tee of Figure 1 inserted into the ground. Figure 5A is an enlarged section view taken from inset 3A of Figure 3 showing a support prong.
Detailed Description of Embodiments of the Invention The present invention will be described more particularly hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings. The invention is not intended to be limited to the illustrated embodiments; rather, these embodiments are intended to fully and completely disclose the invention to those skilled in this art. Like numbers refer to like components throughout, and certain dimensions and thicknesses may be exaggerated for clarity.
Referring now to Figure 1, a golf tee, designated broadly at 10, is illustrated therein. The tee 10 includes an elongate shaft 12 and a support cup 20 attached to and merging with the upper end thereof. These structures are described in greater detail below. Referring now to Figures 1 and 3, the shaft 12 comprises a main body 14 and a tip 18 at its lower end. The body 14 has a length of between about 2.7 and 3.0 inches. In the illustrated embodiment, the body 14 is tapered (i.e., it decreases in diameter with increasing distance from the support cup 20), with the maximum dimension being between about 0.2 and 0.3 inch and the minimum dimension being between about 0.16 and 0.19 inch. When viewed from the side as in Figure 5, the taper of the body 14 is such that the body defines a taper angle α of between about 0.75 and 1.5 degrees. The body 14 may optionally include one or more recessed flutes 16a, 16b that are positioned diametrically opposed from one another and that extend over a major portion of the length of the body 14. The flutes 16a, 16b (or other recesses into or projections from the main body 14) may prevent twisting of the tee 10 during impact. The tip 18 tapers quickly from the end of the body 14 to terminate in a sharp point; the tip typically has a length of between about 0.15 and 0.25 inch. Referring now to Figures 1, 2 and 3, the support cup 20 includes a base portion 22 and four support prongs 26a, 26b, 26c, 26d. The base portion 22 is connected to and merges with the upper end of the shaft body 14. The base portion 22 has a concave upper surface 24. In certain embodiments, the upper surface 24 has a radius of curvature pi (see Figure 5) that is less than that of a conventional golf ball (a conventional golf ball has a radius of curvature of about 0.84 inch); typically, the radius of curvature pi of the upper surface 24 is less than 0.6 inch, and can be between 0.3 and 0.5 inch. Having a radius of curvature pi that is less than the diameter of a golf ball can result in the golf ball resting above the upper surface 24 when on the tee 10, thereby reducing the contact area (and, in some embodiments, friction and surface irregularities) between the golf ball and the tee. Referring now to Figures 1, 2, 3 and 5A, the prongs 26a, 26b, 26c, 26d project upwardly from the periphery of the base portion 22. In the illustrated embodiment, each of the prongs 26a, 26b, 26c, 26d is identical to the other prongs. As such, only one prong 26a will be described in detail herein; those skilled in this art will appreciate that the discussion is applicable to the remaining prongs 26b, 26c, 26d also. The prong 26a is arcuate when viewed from above (Figures 2 and 3). In some embodiments, the prong 26a has a secant length β that is greater than the diameter of the
largest dimple of a conventional golf ball (i.e., about 0.160 inch). Typically, the secant length of the prong 26a is between about 0.170 and 0.200 inch. With a prong that has a secant length that is greater than the diameter of a golf ball dimple D (see Figure 3), the interaction between the prong and the golf ball should be limited to the outer skin of the golf ball (i.e., that portion of the outer surface of the golf between the dimples), which can reduce the friction between the tee 10 and the golf ball. Referring now to Figure 5A, the prong 26a also has a convex contact surface 28 upon which a golf ball rests. This contact surface 28 typically has a radius of curvature p2 that is between about 0.040 and 0.060 inch. The inclusion of the convex contact surface 28 on the prong 26a can reduce the amount of contact area between the tee and a golf ball resting thereon, which in turn can reduce the friction between the ball and the tee 10 and the influence of surface imperfections in the tee on ball flight. As can be seen in Figure 2, the prongs 26a, 26b, 26c, 26d are separated from each other by notches 30. As such, they define a discontinuous annulus A about the periphery of the support cup 20 that can support a golf ball. This discontinuous annulus A typically has a diameter of between about 0.4 and 0.6 inch. In the illustrated embodiment, the prongs 26a, 26b, 26c, 26d are positioned diametrically opposite from one another across the base portion 22; however, in other embodiments prongs may be arranged about the periphery of the support cup 22 differently. Also, although four prongs 26a, 26b, 26c, 26d are included in the illustrated embodiment, other embodiments in which at least three prongs are included are also contemplated (e.g., a tee of the present invention may have three, five or six prongs). As can be seen in Figure 5A, a golf ball G resting on the tee 10 contacts the tee 10 only along four contact arcs C (one arc for each prong), with the result that the ball has very little contact area in its interaction with the tee 10. As a result, a golf ball struck from a resting position atop the tee 10 may experience less friction and, thus, may travel farther than a golf ball struck with a conventional tee. Further, the reduced contact area can diminish the possibility of surface imperfections in the tee 10 influencing ball flight. In some embodiments, the contact area may be less than 0.0045 in , and even as low as 0.0036 in . Other aspects of the tee 10 may also improve performance. For example, the presence of the flutes 16a, 16b may assist in preventing twisting of the tee 10 on off-center shots. An off-center shot can tend to "spin" a tee into the ground; this twisting motion can adversely
impact the launch of the golf ball at impact. The presence of the flutes 16a, 16b can prevent such twisting and thereby provide a more stable launch platform. Also, the tapering of the main body 14 can improve the life of the tee 10. As described above, a tee can experience significant force when struck with a golf club and tends to fracture at its interface with the ground. The tapered shape of the main body 14 creates a tapered hole in the ground upon insertion. As a result, at impact the tee 10 can easily exit the tapered hole rather than simply snapping, enabling the tee 10 to be re-used. The tee 10 may be made of any number of materials known to those skilled in this art to be suitable for tees. Exemplary materials include polymers such as polylactic acid (PLA), PHA, and, in some instances, wood. In some embodiments, the tee 10 may be formed of a biodegradable material such as those described in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,844,066 to Kakizawa, 5,914,381 to Terado et al., and 6,213,970 to Anderson et al., the disclosures of each of which are hereby incorporated herein in their entireties. In certain embodiments, it may be desirable to employ a biodegradable polymer, such as a polylactic acid-based material, and in some embodiments it may even be desirable to employ a biocompostable material. An exemplary material is a polylactic acid-based material with flax fiber or other impact modifier. It may be desirable to select a material that has a low coefficient of friction, as doing so may decrease the amount of ball -tee friction. The tee 10 may be formed by any technique known to those skilled in this art to be suitable for the production of items formed of the material of choice. For example, if a polymeric material is used, injection or compression molding or machining may be a suitable manufacturing technique. The present invention is described in greater detail in the following non-limiting examples.
EXAMPLE 1 Driving Distance and Dispersion Test Procedure Testing was conducted to compare golf tees of the present invention with conventional wood tees. The testing was conducted with a swing robot of a proprietary design owned by Golf Laboratories, Inc.. The swing robot was loaded with a driver (Titleist
Model 975D, 8.5° loft, Aldila HM 2K "X" Flex shaft) and set to produce a club head speed at impact of 100 mph. Titleist NXT Tour golf balls were employed in the testing.
Initially, the robot struck golf balls from its standard rubber post (set at a height of 1.0 inches) and adjusted until it was producing straight golf shots. At this point, eight balls were struck to establish a baseline performance for the robot. Carry distance, total distance, carry dispersion, total dispersion, launch angle, ball spin, and trajectory were measured. "Dispersion" refers to the distance from a centerline to which a ball carried or traveled. "Trajectory" is determined through a 1 inch mesh wire screen at the apex of ball flight and is a measure of height and distance for comparison between different shots. The baseline performance characteristics for the baseline robot testing are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
After the baseline was established for the robot, comparative testing commenced between a conventional wooden tee and a tee resembling that illustrated in Figure 1 and formed of a polymeric material. The swing robot parameters from the baseline testing were maintained, with the only variables being the difference in tees and the swing speed, which was increased from 100 to 110 mph. Six shots were struck from each type of tee, and the performance characteristics set forth above were measured and recorded.
EXAMPLE 2 Results of Driving Distance and Dispersion Testing The results of the testing performed in Example 1 above are set forth in Table 2.
The following results can be discerned from Table 2.
1. Average Carry for the pronged tee is 8.71 yards longer than the wood tee and 2.00 yards longer than the established baseline of the swing robot. 2. Average Carry Dispersion for the pronged tee is reduced by 3.83 yards over the wood tee with a slight increase of 1.54 yards above the robot baseline. 3. Average Total Distance for the pronged tee is 10.83 yards longer than the wood tee and equivalent to the swing robot. 4. Average Total Dispersion for the pronged tee is reduced by 3.33 yards over the wood tee and is reduced by 2.38 yards over the robot baseline. 5. Launch Angle for the pronged tee is improved by 1.0 degree over the wood tee and 0.41 degrees over the robot baseline. 6. Spin for the pronged tee is increased by 159.83 RPM over the robot baseline but is reduced by 335.04 below the wood tee. It has been stated that a spin of 3,200 RPM is ideal for many of the golf balls on the marker, so the pronged tee more closely approaches that desirable spin rate than does the wood tee. 7. Trajectory post launch is improved over the wood tee by 4.31 degrees and by 5.43 degrees above the robot standard. 8. Roll distance is essentially the same with the pronged tee being 1.68 yards greater than the wood tee and 1.2 yards less than the robot standard. As another measure of performance, a "deflection percentage" can be calculated by dividing the average total dispersion by the average total distance. This number should
provide insight into the combined distance and accuracy of shots hit from the various tees. The values for the robot, wood tee and inventive tee are provided in Table 3.
It can be seen that the pronged tee produced longer, more consistent shots than either the wood tee or the swing robot. The foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting thereof. Although exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. As such, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention. The scope of the invention is to be defined by the following claims.