WO2005039127A1 - High speed media access control - Google Patents
High speed media access control Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2005039127A1 WO2005039127A1 PCT/US2004/034061 US2004034061W WO2005039127A1 WO 2005039127 A1 WO2005039127 A1 WO 2005039127A1 US 2004034061 W US2004034061 W US 2004034061W WO 2005039127 A1 WO2005039127 A1 WO 2005039127A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- frames
- frame
- sta
- station
- mac
- Prior art date
Links
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 231
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 155
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 51
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 abstract description 32
- XDLMVUHYZWKMMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-trimethoxysilylpropyl 2-methylprop-2-enoate Chemical compound CO[Si](OC)(OC)CCCOC(=O)C(C)=C XDLMVUHYZWKMMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 70
- OVGWMUWIRHGGJP-WTODYLRWSA-N (z)-7-[(1r,3s,4s,5r)-3-[(e,3r)-3-hydroxyoct-1-enyl]-6-thiabicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-4-yl]hept-5-enoic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)CCC\C=C/C[C@H]1[C@H](/C=C/[C@H](O)CCCCC)C[C@H]2S[C@@H]1C2 OVGWMUWIRHGGJP-WTODYLRWSA-N 0.000 description 35
- 101100366889 Caenorhabditis elegans sta-2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 35
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 31
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 31
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 31
- 101150081243 STA1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 27
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 25
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 22
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 20
- 108700026140 MAC combination Proteins 0.000 description 17
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 16
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 16
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 16
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 14
- 101100172132 Mus musculus Eif3a gene Proteins 0.000 description 13
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000002592 echocardiography Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005538 encapsulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003139 buffering effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009172 bursting Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006837 decompression Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013467 fragmentation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006062 fragmentation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007480 spreading Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920008347 Cellulose acetate propionate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 241000288140 Gruiformes Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000037656 Respiratory Sounds Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000004931 aggregating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007596 consolidation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009470 controlled atmosphere packaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000001351 cycling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009365 direct transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011017 operating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 206010037833 rales Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007723 transport mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/0001—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
- H04L1/0023—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff characterised by the signalling
- H04L1/0025—Transmission of mode-switching indication
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
- H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
- H04L1/1607—Details of the supervisory signal
- H04L1/1621—Group acknowledgement, i.e. the acknowledgement message defining a range of identifiers, e.g. of sequence numbers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
- H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
- H04L1/1607—Details of the supervisory signal
- H04L1/1635—Cumulative acknowledgement, i.e. the acknowledgement message applying to all previous messages
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/28—Data switching networks characterised by path configuration, e.g. LAN [Local Area Networks] or WAN [Wide Area Networks]
- H04L12/40—Bus networks
- H04L12/403—Bus networks with centralised control, e.g. polling
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/28—Data switching networks characterised by path configuration, e.g. LAN [Local Area Networks] or WAN [Wide Area Networks]
- H04L12/46—Interconnection of networks
- H04L12/4633—Interconnection of networks using encapsulation techniques, e.g. tunneling
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
- H04L27/26—Systems using multi-frequency codes
- H04L27/2601—Multicarrier modulation systems
- H04L27/2602—Signal structure
- H04L27/2605—Symbol extensions, e.g. Zero Tail, Unique Word [UW]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
- H04L27/26—Systems using multi-frequency codes
- H04L27/2601—Multicarrier modulation systems
- H04L27/2602—Signal structure
- H04L27/261—Details of reference signals
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
- H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
- H04L5/0078—Timing of allocation
- H04L5/0082—Timing of allocation at predetermined intervals
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
- H04L5/14—Two-way operation using the same type of signal, i.e. duplex
- H04L5/1469—Two-way operation using the same type of signal, i.e. duplex using time-sharing
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/08—Protocols for interworking; Protocol conversion
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/40—Network security protocols
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/04—TPC
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W52/00—Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
- H04W52/04—TPC
- H04W52/38—TPC being performed in particular situations
- H04W52/383—TPC being performed in particular situations power control in peer-to-peer links
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W74/00—Wireless channel access
- H04W74/04—Scheduled access
- H04W74/06—Scheduled access using polling
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W74/00—Wireless channel access
- H04W74/08—Non-scheduled access, e.g. ALOHA
- H04W74/0833—Random access procedures, e.g. with 4-step access
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/004—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
- H04L1/0072—Error control for data other than payload data, e.g. control data
- H04L1/0073—Special arrangements for feedback channel
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/0078—Avoidance of errors by organising the transmitted data in a format specifically designed to deal with errors, e.g. location
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/02—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by diversity reception
- H04L1/06—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by diversity reception using space diversity
- H04L1/0618—Space-time coding
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
- H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
- H04L1/1607—Details of the supervisory signal
- H04L1/1671—Details of the supervisory signal the supervisory signal being transmitted together with control information
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/24—Negotiation of communication capabilities
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W28/00—Network traffic management; Network resource management
- H04W28/02—Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control
- H04W28/04—Error control
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W28/00—Network traffic management; Network resource management
- H04W28/02—Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control
- H04W28/06—Optimizing the usage of the radio link, e.g. header compression, information sizing, discarding information
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W48/00—Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
- H04W48/08—Access restriction or access information delivery, e.g. discovery data delivery
Definitions
- MAC Medium Access Control
- ACF Adaptive Coordination Function
- the present invention relates generally to communications, and more specifically to medium access control.
- Wireless communication systems are widely deployed to provide various types of communication such as voice and data.
- a typical wireless data system, or network provides multiple users access to one or more shared resources.
- a system may use a variety of multiple access techniques such as Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM), Time Division Multiplexing (TDM), Code Division Multiplexing (CDM), and others.
- FDM Frequency Division Multiplexing
- TDM Time Division Multiplexing
- CDM Code Division Multiplexing
- Example wireless networks include cellular-based data systems.
- 3GPP 3rd Generation Partnership Project
- 3G TS 25.211, 3G TS 25.212, 3G TS 25.213, and 3G TS 25.214 (the W-CDMA standard)
- 3GPP2 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2
- TR-45.5 Physical Layer Standard for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Systems the IS-2000 standard
- HDR high data rate
- WLANs such as the IEEE 802.11 standards (i.e. 802.11 (a), (b), or (g)). Improvements over these networks may be achieved in deploying a Multiple Input Multiple Output (MLMO) WLAN comprising Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) modulation techniques.
- MLMO Multiple Input Multiple Output
- OFDM Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing
- MAC Medium Access Control
- MAC protocols are commonly used to allocate a shared communication resource between a number of users. MAC protocols commonly interface higher layers to the physical layer used to transmit and receive data. To benefit f om an increase in data rates, a MAC protocol must be designed to utilize the shared resource efficiently.
- a data transmission structure comprises a consolidated poll and one or more frames transmitted in accordance with the consolidated poll.
- a Time Division Duplexing (TDD) data transmission structure comprises a pilot, a consolidated poll, and zero or more access point to remote station f ames in accordance with the consolidated poll.
- f ames are transmitted sequentially with no or substantially reduced interf ame spacing
- a guard interf ame spacing may be introduced between frames transmitted f om different sources, or with substantially different power levels.
- a single preamble is transmitted in association with one or more f ames.
- a block acknowledgement is transmitted subsequent to the transmission of one or more sequential f ames, h another aspect, a consolidated poll is transmitted, and one or more f ames are transmitted in association therewith.
- Various other aspects are also presented.
- FIG. 1 is an example embodiment of a system including a high-speed WLAN
- FIG. 2 depicts an example embodiment of a wireless communication device, which may be configured as an access point or user terminal;
- FIG. 3 depicts 802.11 interframe spacing parameters;
- FIG. 4 depicts an example physical layer (PHY) transmission segment illustrating the use of DLFS plus backoff for access according to the DCF;
- FIG. 5 depicts an example physical layer (PHY) transmission segment illustrating the use of SLFS before an ACK, with higher priority than a DLFS access;
- FIG. 6 illustrates segmenting large packets into smaller fragments with associated SLFS;
- FIG. 7 depicts an example physical layer (PHY) transmission segment illustrating a TXOP with per-frame acknowledgment;
- FIG. 8 illustrates a TXOP with block acknowledgment;
- FIG. 9 depicts an example physical layer (PHY) transmission segment illustrating a polled TXOP using HCCA;
- FIG. 10 is an example embodiment of a TXOP including multiple consecutive transmissions without any gaps;
- FIG. 11 depicts an example embodiment of a TXOP illustrating reducing the amount of preamble transmission required;
- FIG. 12 depicts an example embodiment of a method for incorporating various aspects, including consolidating preambles, removing gaps such as SLFS, and inserting GLFs as appropriate;
- FIG. 13 depicts an example physical layer (PHY) transmission segment illustrating consolidated polls and their respective TXOPs;
- FIG. 14 depicts an example embodiment of a method for consolidating polls;
- FIG. 15 illustrates an example MAC frame
- FIG. 16 illustrates an example MAC PDU
- FIG. 17 depicts an example peer-to-peer communication
- FIG. 18 depicts a prior art physical layer burst
- FIG. 19 depicts an example physical layer burst, which may be deployed for peer-peer transmission;
- FIG. 20 depicts an example embodiment of a MAC frame including an optional ad hoc segment;
- FIG. 21 depicts an example physical layer burst;
- FIG. 22 depicts an example method for peer-peer data transmission
- FIG. 23 depicts an example method for peer-peer communication
- FIG. 24 depicts an example method for providing rate feedback for use in peer- peer connection
- FIG. 25 illustrates managed peer-peer connection between two stations and an access point
- FIG. 26 illustrates a contention based (or ad hoc) peer-peer connection
- FIG. 27 depicts an example MAC frame illustrating managed peer-peer communication between stations; [0037] FIG. 28 illustrates supporting both legacy and new class stations on the same frequency assignment; [0038] FIG. 29 illustrates the combination of legacy and new class media access control; [0039] FIG. 30 depicts an example method for earning a transmit opportunity;
- FIG. 31 depicts an example method for sharing a single FA with multiple BSSs
- FIG. 32 illustrates overlapping BSSs using a single FA
- FIG. 33 depicts an example method for performing high-speed peer-peer communication while interoperating with a legacy BSS;
- FIG. 34 illustrates peer-peer communication using MLMO techniques by contending for access on a legacy BSS;
- FIG. 35 depicts encapsulation of one or more MAC frames (or fragments) within an aggregated frame;
- FIG. 36 depicts a legacy MAC frame;
- FIG. 37 illustrates an example uncompressed frame
- FIG. 38 illustrates an example compressed frame
- FIG. 39 illustrates another example compressed frame
- FIG. 40 illustrates an example Aggregation Header
- FIG. 41 illustrates an example embodiment of a Scheduled Access Period Frame (SCAP) for use in the ACF;
- FIG. 42 illustrates how the SCAP may be used in conjunction with HCCA and EDCA;
- FIG. 43 illustrates Beacon intervals comprising a number of SCAPs interspersed with contention-based access periods;
- FIG. 44 illustrates low-latency operation with a large number of MLMO STAs;
- FIG. 45 illustrates an example SCHED message
- FIG. 46 depicts an example Power Management field
- FIG. 47 depicts an example MAP field
- FIG. 48 illustrates example SCHED control frames for TXOP assignment
- FIG.49 depicts a legacy 802.11 PPDU
- FIG. 50 depicts an example MLMO PPDU format for data transmissions
- FIG. 51 depicts an example SCHED PPDU
- FIG. 52 depicts an example FRACH PPDU
- FIG. 53 illustrates an alternative embodiment of a method of interoperability with legacy systems.
- Example embodiments are disclosed herein that support highly efficient operation in conjunction with very high bit rate physical layers for a wireless LAN (or similar applications that use newly emerging transmission technologies).
- the example WLAN supports bit rates in excess of 100 Mbps (million bits per second) in bandwidths of 20 MHz.
- Various example embodiments preserve the simplicity and robustness of the distributed coordination operation of legacy WLAN systems, examples of which are found in 802.11 (a-e).
- the advantages of the various embodiments may be achieved while maintaining backward compatibility with such legacy systems.
- 802.11 systems are described as example legacy systems. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the improvements are also compatible with alternate systems and standards.
- An example WLAN may comprise a sub-network protocol stack.
- the subnetwork protocol stack may support high data rate, high bandwidth physical layer transport mechanisms in general, including, but not limited to, those based on OFDM modulation, single carrier modulation techniques, systems using multiple transmit and multiple receive antennas (Multiple Input Multiple Output (MLMO) systems, including Multiple Input Single Output (MISO) systems) for very high bandwidth efficiency operation, systems using multiple transmit and receive antennas in conjunction with spatial multiplexing techniques to transmit data to or from multiple user terminals during the same time interval, and systems using code division multiple access (CDMA) techniques to allow transmissions for multiple users simultaneously.
- Alternate examples include Single Input Multiple Output (SLMO) and Single Input Single Output (SISO) systems.
- One or more exemplary embodiments described herein are set forth in the context of a wireless data communication system. While use within this context is advantageous, different embodiments of the invention may be incorporated in different environments or configurations, hi general, the various systems described herein may be formed using software-controlled processors, integrated circuits, or discrete logic.
- the data, instructions, commands, information, signals, symbols, and chips that may be referenced throughout the application are advantageously represented by voltages, currents, electromagnetic waves, magnetic fields or particles, optical fields or particles, or a combination thereof.
- the blocks shown in each block diagram may represent hardware or method steps. Method steps can be interchanged without departing from the scope of the present invention.
- the word "exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as "exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments.
- FIG. 1 is an example embodiment of system 100, comprising an Access Point (AP) 104 connected to one or more User Terminals (UTs) 106A - N.
- AP Access Point
- UTs User Terminals
- the AP and the UTs communicate via Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) 120.
- WLAN 120 is a high speed MLMO OFDM system.
- WLAN 120 may be any wireless LAN.
- Access point 104 communicates with any number of external devices or processes via network 102.
- Network 102 may be the Internet, an intranet, or any other wired, wireless, or optical network.
- Connection 110 carries the physical layer signals from the network to the access point 104.
- Devices or processes may be connected to network 102 or as UTs (or via connections therewith) on WLAN 120.
- Examples of devices that may be connected to either network 102 or WLAN 120 include phones, Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), computers of various types (laptops, personal computers, workstations, terminals of any type), video devices such as cameras, camcorders, webcams, and virtually any other type of data device.
- PDAs Personal Digital Assistants
- Processes may include voice, video, data communications, etc.
- Various data streams may have varying transmission requirements, which may be accommodated by using varying Quality of Service (QoS) techniques.
- QoS Quality of Service
- System 100 may be deployed with a centralized AP 104. All UTs 106 communicate with the AP in one example embodiment. In an alternate embodiment, direct peer-to-peer communication between two UTs may be accommodated, with modifications to the system, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art, examples of which are illustrated below. Access may be managed by an AP, or ad hoc (i.e. contention based), as detailed below.
- AP 104 provides Ethernet adaptation.
- an IP router may be deployed in addition to the AP to provide connection to network 102 (details not shown). Ethernet frames may be transferred between the router and the UTs 106 over the WLAN sub-network (detailed below). Ethernet adaptation and connectivity are well known in the art.
- the AP 104 provides LP Adaptation, hi this case, the AP acts as a gateway router for the set of connected UTs (details not shown). In this case, UP datagrams may be routed by the AP 104 to and from the UTs 106. UP adaptation and connectivity are well known in the art.
- FIG. 2 depicts an example embodiment of a wireless communication device, which may be configured as an access point 104 or user terminal 106.
- An access point may be configured as an access point 104 or user terminal 106.
- Transceiver 210 receives and transmits on connection 110 according to the physical layer requirements of network 102.
- Data from or to devices or applications connected to network 102 are delivered to MAC processor 220. These data are referred to herein as flows 260.
- Flows may have different characteristics and may require different processing based on the type of application associated with the flow. For example, video or voice may be characterized as low- latency flows (video generally having higher throughput requirements than voice). Many data applications are less sensitive to latency, but may have higher data integrity requirements (i.e., voice may be tolerant of some packet loss, file transfer is generally intolerant of packet loss).
- MAC processor 220 receives flows 260 and processes them for transmission on the physical layer. MAC processor 220 also receives physical layer data and processes the data to form packets for outgoing flows 260. Internal control and signaling is also communicated between the AP and the UTs. MAC Protocol Data Units (MAC PDUs), also referred to as Physical layer (PHY) Protocol Data Units (PPDUs), or frames (in 802.11 parlance) are delivered to and received from wireless LAN transceiver 240 on connection 270.
- PHY Physical layer
- PPDUs Physical layer Protocol Data Units
- Example techniques for conversion from flows and commands to MAC PDUs, and vice versa, are detailed below. Alternate embodiments may employ any conversion technique.
- Feedback 280 corresponding to the various MAC IDs may be returned from the physical layer (PHY) 240 to MAC processor 220 for various purposes.
- Feedback 280 may comprise any physical layer information, including supportable rates for channels (including multicast as well as unicast channels), modulation format, and various other parameters.
- Adaptation layer (ADAP) and Data Link Control layer (DLC) are performed in MAC processor 220.
- the physical layer (PHY) is performed on wireless LAN transceiver 240.
- MAC processor 220 may perform some or all of the processing for the physical layer.
- a wireless LAN transceiver may include a processor for performing MAC processing, or subparts thereof. Any number of processors, special purpose hardware, or combination thereof may be deployed.
- MAC processor 220 may be a general-purpose microprocessor, a digital signal processor (DSP), or a special-purpose processor.
- MAC processor 220 may be connected with special-purpose hardware to assist in various tasks (details not shown).
- Various applications may be run on externally connected processors, such as an externally connected computer or over a network connection, may run on an additional processor within access point 104 (not shown), or may run on MAC processor 220 itself.
- MAC processor 220 is shown connected with memory 255, which may be used for storing data as well as instructions for performing the various procedures and methods described herein.
- memory 255 may be comprised of one or more memory components of various types, that may be embedded in whole or in part within MAC processor 220.
- memory 255 may also be used for storing data associated with various queues.
- Wireless LAN transceiver 240 may be any type of transceiver.
- wireless LAN transceiver 240 is an OFDM transceiver, which may be operated with a MLMO or MISO interface.
- OFDM, MLMO, and MISO are known to those of skill in the art.
- Various example OFDM, MLMO and MISO transceivers are detailed in co-pending U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 10/650,295, entitled "FREQUENCY-INDEPENDENT SPATIAL-PROCESSL G FOR WIDEBAND MISO AND MLMO SYSTEMS", filed August 27, 2003, assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
- Alternate embodiments may include SLMO or SISO systems.
- Wireless LAN transceiver 240 is shown connected with antennas 250 A-N. Any number of antennas may be supported in various embodiments. Antennas 250 may be used to transmit and receive on WLAN 120.
- Wireless LAN transceiver 240 may comprise a spatial processor connected to each of the one or more antennas 250.
- the spatial processor may process the data for transmission independently for each antenna or jointly process the received signals on all antennas. Examples of the independent processing may be based on channel estimates, feedback from the UT, channel inversion, or a variety of other techniques known in the art.
- the processing is performed using any of a variety of spatial processing techniques.
- Various transceivers of this type may use beam forming, beam steering, eigen-steering, or other spatial techniques to increase throughput to and from a given user terminal, hi an example embodiment, in which OFDM symbols are transmitted, the spatial processor may comprise sub-spatial processors for processing each of the OFDM subchannels, or bins.
- the AP may have N antennas, and an example UT may have M antennas. There are thus M x N paths between the antennas of the AP and the UT.
- M x N paths between the antennas of the AP and the UT.
- a variety of spatial techniques for improving throughput using these multiple paths are known in the art.
- STTD Space Time Transmit Diversity
- M transmit antennas and N receive antennas there may be ML (M, N) independent channels that may be formed. Spatial multiplexing exploits these independent paths and may transmit different data on each of the independent paths, to increase the transmission rate.
- Various techniques are known for learning or adapting to the characteristics of the channel between the AP and a UT.
- Unique pilots may be transmitted from each transmit antenna. The pilots are received at each receive antenna and measured. Channel state information feedback may then be returned to the transmitting device for use in transmission.
- Eigen decomposition of the measured channel matrix may be performed to determine the channel eigenmodes.
- An alternate technique, to avoid eigen decomposition of the channel matrix at the receiver, is to use eigen-steering of the pilot and data to simplify spatial processing at the receiver.
- the specific link between the AP and each UT may be higher performance than a multicast or broadcast link that may be shared from the AP to more than one UT. Examples of this are detailed further below.
- the wireless LAN transceiver 240 may determine the supportable rate based on whichever spatial processing is being used for the physical link between the AP and the UT. This information may be fed back on connection 280 for use in MAC processing.
- the number of antennas may be deployed depending on the UT's data needs as well as size and form factor.
- a high definition video display may comprise, for example, four antennas, due to its high bandwidth requirements, while a PDA may be satisfied with two.
- An example access point may have four antennas.
- a user terminal 106 may be deployed in similar fashion to the access point 104 depicted in FIG. 2. Rather than having flows 260 connect with a LAN transceiver (although a UT may include such a transceiver, either wired or wireless), flows 260 are generally received from or delivered to one or more applications or processes operating on the UT or a device connected therewith. The higher levels connected to either AP 104 or UT 106 may be of any type. Layers described herein are illustrative only.
- the LEEE 802.11(e) feature set (which is turn backward compatible with earlier 802.11 standards), includes various features that will be summarized in this section, along with features introduced in earlier standards. For a detailed description of these functions, refer to the respective JEEE 802.11 standard.
- the basic 802.11 MAC consists of a Carrier Sense Multiple Access/Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA) based Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) and a Point Coordination Function (PCF).
- the DCF allows for access of the medium without central control.
- the PCF is deployed at an AP to provide central control.
- the DCF and PCF utilize various gaps between consecutive transmissions to avoid collisions. Transmissions are referred to as frames, and a gap between frames is referred to as an Interframe Spacing (LFS). Frames may be user data frames, control frames or management frames.
- CSMA/CA Carrier Sense Multiple Access/Collision Avoidance
- PCF Point Coordination Function
- the DCF allows for access of the medium without central control.
- the PCF is deployed at an AP to provide central control.
- the DCF and PCF utilize various gaps between consecutive transmissions to avoid collisions. Transmissions are referred to as frames, and a gap between frames is referred to as an Interframe Spacing (LFS
- Interframe spacing time durations vary depending on the type of gap inserted.
- FIG. 3 depicts 802.11 interframe spacing parameters: a Short Interframe Spacing (SLFS), a Point Interframe Spacing (PIFS), and a DCF Interframe Spacing (DLFS). Note that SLFS ⁇ PLFS ⁇ DLFS. Thus, a transmission following a shorter time duration will have a higher priority than one which must wait longer before attempting to access the channel.
- SLFS Short Interframe Spacing
- PIFS Point Interframe Spacing
- DLFS DCF Interframe Spacing
- a station may gain access to the channel after sensing the channel to be idle for at least a DLFS duration.
- STA may refer to any station accessing a WLAN, and may include access points as well as user terminals.
- each STA waits a randomly selected backoff in addition to DLFS before accessing the channel. STAs with a longer backoff will notice when a higher priority STA begins transmitting on the channel, and will thus avoid colliding with that STA.
- Each waiting STA may reduce its respective backoff by the amount of time it waited before sensing an alternate transmission on the channel, thus maintaining its relative priority.
- the STA backs-off a random period of time between [0, CW] where CW is initially chosen to be CWmin, but increases by a factor of two at every collision, until a maximum value of CWmax.
- FIG. 4 depicts example physical layer (PHY) transmission segment 400, which illustrates the use of DLFS plus backoff for access according to the DCF.
- An existing transmission 410 utilizes the channel.
- new transmission 420 begins after DLFS and the associated backoff period.
- the STA making transmission 420 is said to have earned this opportunity to transmit, in this case through contention.
- SLFS is used during a frame sequence in which only a specific STA is expected to respond to the current transmission. For example, when an Acknowledgement (ACK) is transmitted in response to a received frame of data, that ACK may be transmitted immediately following the received data plus SLFS. Other transmission sequences may also use SLFS between frames.
- a Request To Send (RTS) frame may be followed after SLFS with a Clear To Send (CTS) frame, then the data may be transmitted a SLFS after the CTS, after which an ACK may follow the data after SLFS.
- RTS Request To Send
- CTS Clear To Send
- frame sequences are all interspersed with SLFS.
- the SLFS duration may be used for (a) the detection of energy on the channel, and to determine whether energy has gone away (i.e., the channel clears), (b) time to decode the previous message and determine whether an ACK frame will indicate the transmission was received correctly, and (c) time for the STA transceivers to switch from receive to transmit, and vice versa.
- FIG. 5 depicts example physical layer (PHY) transmission segment 500, which illustrates the use of SLFS before an ACK, with higher priority than a DLFS access.
- An existing transmission 510 utilizes the channel.
- ACK 520 follows the end of transmission 510 after a SLFS. Note that ACK 520 begins before a DLFS expires, thus any other STAs attempting to earn a transmission would not succeed. In this example, after the ACK 520 completes, no higher priority accesses occur, and so new transmission 530 begins after DLFS and the associated backoff period, if any.
- the RTS/CTS frame sequence (in addition to providing flow control features) may be used to improve protection for the data frame transmission.
- the RTS and CTS contain duration information for the subsequent data frame and ACK and any intervening SLFS.
- STAs hearing either the RTS or the CTS mark out the occupied duration on their Network Allocation Vector (NAV) and treat the medium as busy for the duration.
- NAV Network Allocation Vector
- frames longer than a specified length are protected with RTS/CTS, while shorter frames are transmitted unprotected.
- the PCF may be used to allow an AP to provide centralized control of the channel.
- An AP may gain control of the medium after sensing the medium to be idle for a PLFS duration.
- the PLFS is shorter than the DLFS and thus has higher priority than DLFS.
- SLFS has higher priority than PLFS, so the PCF must wait until any SLFS sequences complete before taking control of the channel.
- the AP can establish a Contention-Free Period (CFP) during which the AP can provide polled access to associated STAs.
- CCP Contention-Free Period
- the contention-free poll (CF-Poll) or simply poll, is fransmitted by the AP and is followed by a transmission from the polled STA to the AP.
- CF-Poll contention-free poll
- the STA must wait for a SLFS duration following the CF-Poll, although the polled STA need not wait for DLFS, or any backoff.
- 802.11(e) introduced various enhancements, including enhancements to polling, an example of which is detailed further below with respect to FIG. 9.
- the Beacon transmitted by the AP establishes the duration of the CFP. This is similar to using RTS or CTS to prevent contention access. However, hidden terminal problems can still occur from terminals that are unable to hear the Beacon, but whose transmissions may interfere with fransmissions scheduled by the AP. Further protection is possible through the use of a CTS-to-self by each terminal that begins a transmission in the CFP.
- ACKs and CF-Polls are permitted to be included in one frame, and may be included with data frames to improve MAC efficiency.
- SIFS ⁇ PLFS ⁇ DLFS relationship provides a deterministic priority mechanism for channel access.
- the contention access between STAs in the DCF is probabilistic based on the back-off mechanism.
- the first STA transmits N fragments 640A - 640N to a second STA, after which N respective delays of SLFS 650A - 650N must transpire.
- the second STA transmits N ACK frames 660A - 660N. Between each fragment, the first STA must wait SLFS, so there are N-l SLFS 670A - 670N-1 as well.
- N ACKs and 2N-1 SLFS in contrast to sending one packet, one ACK, and one SLFS, a segmented packet requires the same time of packet transmission, with N ACKs and 2N-1 SLFS.
- the 802.11(e) standard adds enhancements to improve on the prior MAC from 802.11(a), (b), and (g).
- 802.11(g) and (a) are both OFDM systems, which are very similar, but operate in different bands.
- Various features of lower speed MAC protocols, such as 802.11(b) were carried forward to systems with much higher bit rates, introducing ineffiencies, detailed further below.
- the DCF is enhanced and referred to as the Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA).
- the primary Quality of Service (QoS) enhancements of the EDCA are the introduction of an Arbitration Interframe Spacing (ALFS).
- ALFS[i] is associated with a Traffic Class (TC) identified with index i.
- the AP may use ALFS[i] values different from the ALFS[i] values that are allowed to be used by the other STAs. Only the AP may use an ALFS[i] value that is equal to the PLFS. Otherwise ALFS[i] is greater than or equal to DLFS.
- the ALFS for "voice" and "video” fraffic classes is chosen to be equal to DLFS.
- a larger ALFS implying lower priority is chosen for traffic classes "best effort" and "background”.
- the size of contention window is also made a function of the TC.
- the different contention window sizes provide a probabilistic relative priority, but cannot be used to achieve delay guarantees.
- 802.11(e) introduced the Transmission Opportunity (TXOP).
- TXOP Transmission Opportunity
- the STA may be permitted to transmit more than a single frame.
- the one or more frames are referred to as the TXOP.
- the maximum length of a TXOP on the medium depends on the traffic class and is established by the AP.
- the AP indicates the permitted duration of the TXOP.
- the STA can transmit a series of frames, interspersed with SLFS and ACKs from the destination. In addition to removing the need to wait DLFS plus backoff for each frame, the STA having earned a TXOP has certainty that it can retain the channel for subsequent transmissions.
- ACKs from the destination may be per frame (as in earlier 802.11 MACs), or may use an immediate or delayed block ACK as discussed below. Also, a no ACK policy is permitted for certain traffic flows, e.g., broadcast or multicast.
- FIG. 7 depicts example physical layer (PHY) transmission segment 700, illustrating a TXOP with per-frame acknowledgment.
- An existing transmission 710 is transmitted.
- TXOP 790 comprises N frames 740A - 740N, each frame followed by N respective SLFS 750A - 750N.
- the receiving STA responds with N respective ACKS 760A - 760N.
- the ACKs 760 are followed by N-l SLFS 770 A - 770N-1.
- each frame 740 comprises a preamble 770 as well as header and packet 780.
- Example embodiments, detailed below, allow for greatly reducing the amount of transmission time reserved for preambles.
- FIG. 8 illustrates a TXOP 810 with block acknowledgment.
- the TXOP 810 may be earned through contention or polling.
- TXOP 810 comprises N frames 820A - 820N, each frame followed by N respective SLFS 830A - 830N.
- a block ACK request 840 is transmitted.
- the receiving STA responds to the block ACK request at a time in the future.
- the Block ACK may be immediate following the completion of the transmission of a block of frames, or may be delayed to permit receiver processing in software.
- Example embodiments allow for greatly reducing the amount of fransmission time between frames (SLFS in this example). In some embodiments, there is no need to delay between consecutive transmissions (i.e. frames).
- the Block ACK feature provides improved efficiency.
- up to 64 MAC Service Data Units (SDUs) (each possibly fragmented to 16 fragments) corresponding to 1024 frames may be transmitted by a STA, while the destination STA is permitted to provide a single response at the end of the block of frames indicating the ACK status of each of the 1024 frames.
- the MAC SDU will not be fragmented, and for low latency, fewer than 64 MAC SDUs may be transmitted before requiring a Block ACK from the destination.
- to transmit M frames the total time is reduced from M frames + M SLFS + M ACKs + M-l SLFS, to M frames + M SLFS + Block ACK.
- Embodiments detailed below improve on the block ACK efficiency even further.
- the Direct Link Protocol introduced by 802.11(e), allows a STA to forward frames directly to another destination STA within a Basic Service Set (BSS) (controlled by the same AP).
- BSS Basic Service Set
- the AP may make a polled TXOP available for this direct transfer of frames between STAs.
- the destination of frames from the polled STA was always the AP, which would in turn forward the frames to the destination STA.
- medium efficiency is improved.
- Embodiments detailed further below add substantial efficiency to DLP transfers.
- 802.11(e) also introduces an enhanced PCF, called the Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) In HCF Controlled Channel Access (HCCA), the AP is allowed to access the channel at any time either to establish a Controlled Access Phase (CAP), which is like the CFP and is used to provide transmission opportunities at any time during the contention phase, not only immediately following the Beacon.
- CAP Controlled Access Phase
- the AP accesses the medium by waiting for a PLFS with no back-off.
- FIG. 9 depicts example physical layer (PHY) transmission segment 800, illustrating a polled TXOP using HCCA.
- PHY physical layer
- the AP contends for the poll.
- An existing transmission 910 is transmitted.
- the AP waits PLFS, and then transmits poll 920, addressed to a STA.
- the polled STA transmits polled TXOP 940 following the poll 920 and SLFS 930.
- the AP may continue to poll, waiting PLFS between each polled TXOP 940 and poll 920.
- the AP may establish a CAP by waiting PLFS from a transmission 910.
- the AP may transmit one or more polls during the CAP.
- TXOP 10 is an example embodiment of a TXOP 1010 including multiple consecutive transmissions without any gaps.
- TXOP 1010 comprises N frames 1020 A - 1020N which are transmitted sequentially without any gaps (compare this with the SLFS required in TXOP 810, depicted in FIG. 8).
- the number of frames in the TXOP is limited only by the buffer and the decoding capability of the receiver.
- An optional block ACK request 1030 is appended to the N frames. Certain classes of traffic may not require acknowledgement.
- a block ACK request may be responded to immediately following the TXOP, or may be transmitted at a later time.
- the frames 1020 do not require signal extensions.
- TXOP 1010 may be deployed in any of the embodiments detailed herein where a TXOP is called for.
- the fransmission of SLFS between consecutive frames in a TXOP, when all frames are transmitted by the same STA, may be eliminated.
- 802.11(e) such gaps were retained to limit the complexity requirement at the receiver.
- the 10 ⁇ s SLFS period and the 6 ⁇ s OFDM signal extension provide the receiver with a total of 16 ⁇ s for processing the received frame (including demodulation and decoding).
- this 16 ⁇ s results in significant inefficiency, hi some embodiments, with the introduction of MLMO processing, even the 16 ⁇ s may be insufficient to complete processing.
- the SLFS and OFDM signal extension between consecutive transmissions from one STA to the AP or to another STA are eliminated.
- a receiver requiring an additional period after the completion of the transmission for MLMO receiver processing and channel decoding (e.g. turbo/convolutional/LDPC decoding) may perform those functions while the medium is utilized for additional transmission.
- An acknowledgment may be transmitted at a later time, as described above (using block ACK, for example).
- guard periods Due to different propagation delays between STAs, transmissions between different pairs of STAs may be separated by guard periods to avoid collisions at a receiver between consecutive transmissions on the medium from different STAs (not shown in FIG. 10, but detailed further below).
- a guard period of one OFDM symbol (4 ⁇ s) is sufficient for all operating environments for 802.11. Transmissions from the same STA to different destination STAs do not need to be separated by guard periods (as shown in FIG. 10). Detailed further below, these / guard periods may be referred to as Guardband Interframe Spacings (GLFS).
- GLFS Guardband Interframe Spacings
- the required receiver processing time may be provided through the use of a window-based ARQ scheme (e.g. go back N or selective repeat), techniques known to those of skill in the art.
- a window-based ARQ scheme e.g. go back N or selective repeat
- the stop-and-wait MAC layer ACK of legacy 802.11 has been enhanced in 802.11(e) to a window-like mechanism with up to 1024 frames and Block ACK, in this example. It may be preferable to introduce a standard window- based ARQ mechanism rather than the ad-hoc Block ACK scheme designed in 802.11(e).
- the maximum permitted window may be determined by receiver processing complexity and buffering.
- the transmitter may be permitted to transmit enough data to fill the receiver window at the peak PHY rate achievable between the transmitter- receiver pair. For example, since the receiver processing may not be able to keep up with the PHY rate, the receiver may need to store soft demodulator outputs until they can be decoded. Therefore, the buffering requirements for physical layer processing at the peak PHY rate may be used to determine the maximum permitted window.
- the receiver may advertise the maximum permitted PHY block size that it can process at a given PHY rate without overflowing its physical layer buffers. Alternately, the receiver may advertise the maximum permitted PHY block size that it can process at the maximum PHY rate without overflowing its physical layer buffers. At lower PHY rates, longer block sizes may be processed without buffer overflow.
- a known formula may be used by transmitters to compute the maximum permitted PHY block size for a given PHY rate, from the advertised maximum permitted PHY block size at the maximum PHY rate.
- the advertised maximum PHY block size is a static parameter, then the amount of time before the physical layer buffers may be processed and the receiver is ready for the next PHY burst is another receiver parameter that may be known at the transmitter and also at the scheduler. Alternately, the advertised maximum PHY block size may be varied dynamically according to the occupancy of the physical layer buffers. [00118] The receiver processing delay may be used to determine the round-trip delay for the ARQ, which in turn may be used to determine the delays seen by the applications. Therefore, to enable low-latency services, the permitted PHY block size maybe limited.
- FIG. 11 depicts an example embodiment of a TXOP 1110 illustrating reducing the amount of preamble transmission required.
- TXOP 1110 comprises preamble 1120 followed by N consecutive transmissions 1130A - 1130N.
- An optional block ACK request 1140 may be appended.
- a transmission 1130 comprises a header and a packet. Contrast TXOP 1110 with TXOP 790 of FIG. 7, in which each frame 740 comprises a preamble, in addition to the header and packet.
- the required preamble transmission is one preamble instead of N preambles, for the same amount of transmitted data.
- the preamble 1120 may be eliminated from successive transmissions.
- the initial preamble 1120 may be used by the receiver to acquire the signal, as well as for fine frequency acquisition for OFDM.
- the initial preamble 1120 may be extended compared to the current OFDM preamble to enable the receiver to estimate the spatial channels.
- subsequent frames within the same TXOP may not require additional preambles. Pilot tones within the OFDM symbols are generally sufficient for signal tracking.
- additional (preamble-like) symbols may be interspersed periodically during the TXOP 1110.
- the overall preamble overhead may be significantly reduced.
- the preamble may be sent only as necessary, and may be sent differently based on the amount of time elapsed since a previously transmitted preamble.
- the TXOP 1110 may incorporate features of legacy systems as well.
- the block ACK is optional. More frequent ACKs may be supported. Even so, a lesser gap, such as GIFS, may be substituted for the longer SLFS (plus signal extension, if used).
- the consecutive transmissions 1130 may also include segments of a larger packet, as described above. Note further that the header for consecutive transmissions 1130 to the same receiving STA may be compressed. An example of compressing headers is detailed further below.
- FIG. 12 depicts an example embodiment of a method 1200 for incorporating various aspects just described, including consolidating preambles, removing gaps such as SLFS, and inserting GLFs as appropriate.
- the process begins in block 1210, where a STA earns a TXOP using any of the techniques detailed herein.
- a preamble is transmitted as necessary. Again, the preamble may be longer or shorter than a legacy preamble, and may vary depending on various parameters such as time elapsed since the last transmitted preamble as necessary to enable the receiving STA to estimate the MLMO spatial channel.
- the STA transmits one or more packets (or, more generally, consecutive transmissions of any kind), to a destination.
- the STA may optionally transmit to an additional receiving STA.
- a GLFS is inserted as necessary, and one or more consecutive transmissions may be transmitted to the additional receiving STA. Then the process may stop.
- the STA may continue to transmit to more than two STAs, inserting GLFS and/or preambles as required for the desired level of performance.
- MAC efficiency may be further improved by consolidating transmissions from a STA to multiple destination STAs into consecutive transmissions, thus eliminating many or all of the guard periods and reducing preamble overhead.
- a single preamble (or pilot transmission) may be used for multiple consecutive transmissions from the same STA to different destination STAs.
- a poll consolidation may be gained through poll consolidation.
- several polls may be consolidated into a control channel, examples of which are detailed below.
- the AP may transmit to multiple destination STAs a signal including poll messages to assign TXOPs.
- each TXOP is preceded by a CF-Poll from the AP followed by a SLFS.
- a SCHED message in an example embodiment, detailed below
- any period of time may be allocated for consolidated polls and their respective TXOPs. An example embodiment is detailed below with respect to FIG. 15, and further examples are also included herein.
- a confrol channel (i.e. SCHED) message may be encoded with a tiered rate structure to further improve efficiency. Accordingly, a poll message to any STA may be encoded according to the channel quality between the AP and the STA.
- the order of transmission of poll messages need not be the order of the assigned TXOPs, but may be ordered according to coding robustness.
- FIG. 13 depicts example physical layer (PHY) transmission segment 1300, illustrating consolidated polls and their respective TXOPs.
- Consolidated polls 1310 are transmitted.
- the polls may be transmitted using a control channel structure, examples of which are detailed herein, or may be transmitted using myriad alternate techniques, which will be readily apparent to one of skill in the art.
- forward link TXOPs 1320 are fransmitted directly after the consolidated polls 1310.
- various reverse link TXOPs 1330A - 1330N are transmitted, with GLFS 1340 inserted as appropriate.
- reverse link TXOPs include STA to STA (i.e. peer to peer) TXOPs (using DLP, for example). Note that the order of transmission shown is for illustration only. Forward and reverse link TXOPs (including peer to peer transmission) may be interchanged, or interspersed. Some configurations may not results in the elimination of as many gaps as other configurations. Those of skill in the art will readily adapt myriad alternate embodiments in light of the teaching herein.
- FIG. 14 depicts an example embodiment of a method 1400 for consolidating polls.
- the process begins in block 1410, where channel resources are allocated into one or more TXOPs. Any scheduling function may be deployed to make the TXOP allocation determination.
- polls for assigning TXOPs according to the allocation are consolidated.
- the consolidated polls are transmitted to one or more STAs on one or more confrol channels (i.e. the CTRLJ segments of the SCHED message, in an example embodiment detailed below).
- any messaging technique may be deployed to transmit the consolidated polls.
- STAs transmit TXOPs according to the polled allocations in the consolidated polls. Then the process may stop.
- This method may be deployed in conjunction with consolidated poll intervals of any length, which may comprise all or part of the system Beacon interval. Consolidated polling may be used intermittently with contention based access, or legacy polling, as described above. In an example embodiment, method 1400 may be repeated periodically, or in accordance with other parameters, such as system loading or data transmission demand.
- FIGS. 15 and 16 An example embodiment of a MAC protocol illustrating various aspects is detailed with respect to FIGS. 15 and 16. This MAC protocol is detailed further in co- pending U.S. Patent Application Serial Nos. XX/XXX,XXX, XX/XXX,XXX, and XX/XXX,XXX (Attorney Docket Nos. 030428, 030433, 030436) entitled "WIRELESS LAN PROTOCOL STACK,” filed concurrently herewith, assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
- TDD MAC frame interval 1500 An example TDD MAC frame interval 1500 is illustrated in FIG. 15.
- the use of the term TDD MAC frame interval in this context refers to the period of time in which the various fransmission segments detailed below are defined.
- the TDD MAC frame interval 1500 is distinguished from the generic use of the term frame to describe a transmission in an 802.11 system.
- TDD MAC frame interval 1500 may be analogous to the Beacon interval or a fraction of the Beacon interval.
- the parameters detailed with respect to FIGS. 15 and 16 are illustrative only. One of ordinary skill in the art will readily adapt this example to myriad alternate embodiments, using some or all of the components described, and with various parameter values.
- MAC function 1500 is allocated among the following transport channel segments: broadcast, control, forward and reverse traffic (referred to as the downlink phase and uplink phase, respectively), and random access.
- a TDD MAC frame interval 1500 is Time Division Duplexed (TDD) over a 2 ms time interval, divided into five transport channel segments 1510 - 1550 as shown. Alternate orders and differing frame sizes may be deployed in alternate embodiments. Durations of allocations on the TDD MAC frame interval 1500 may be quantized to some small common time interval.
- TDD Time Division Duplexed
- the example five transport channels within TDD MAC frame interval 1500 include: (a) the Broadcast Channel (BCH) 1510, which carries the Broadcast Control Channel (BCCH); (b) the Control Channel (CCH) 1520, which carries the Frame Control Channel (FCCH) and the Random Access Feedback Channel (RFCH) on the forward link; (c) the Traffic Channel (TCH), which carries user data and control information, and is subdivided into (i) the Forward Traffic Channel (F-TCH) 1530 on the forward link and (ii) the Reverse Traffic Channel (R-TCH) 1540 on the reverse link; and (d) the Random Access Channel (RCH) 1550, which carries the Access Request Channel (ARCH) (for UT access requests).
- a pilot beacon is transmitted as well in segment 1510.
- the downlink phase of frame 1500 comprises segments 1510 - 1530.
- the uplink phase comprises segments 1540-1550.
- Segment 1560 indicates the beginning of a subsequent TDD MAC frame interval.
- An alternate embodiment encompassing peer- to-peer transmission is illustrated further below.
- the Broadcast Channel (BCH) and beacon 1510 is transmitted by the AP.
- the first portion of the BCH 510 contains common physical layer overhead, such as pilot signals, including timing and frequency acquisition pilot.
- the beacon consists of 2 short OFDM symbols used for frequency and timing acquisition by the UTs followed by 8 short OFDM symbols of common MLMO pilot used by the UTs to estimate the channel.
- the second portion of the BCH 1510 is the data portion.
- the BCH data portion defines the allocation of the TDD MAC frame interval with respect to the transport channel segments: CCH 1520, F-TCH 1530, R-TCH 1540 and RCH 1550, and also defines the composition of the CCH with respect to subchannels, hi this example, the BCH 1510 defines the coverage of the wireless LAN 120, and so is transmitted in the most robust data transmission mode available.
- the length of the entire BCH is fixed.
- the BCH defines the coverage of a MLMO- WLAN, and is transmitted in Space Time Transmit Diversity (STTD) mode using rate 1/4 coded Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK).
- STTD Space Time Transmit Diversity
- BPSK Binary Phase Shift Keying
- the length of the BCH is fixed at 10 short OFDM symbols.
- BPSK Binary Phase Shift Keying
- the Control Channel (CCH) 1520 transmitted by the AP, defines the composition of the remainder of the TDD MAC frame interval, and illustrates the use of consolidated polls.
- the CCH 1520 is transmitted using highly robust transmission modes in multiple subchannels, each subchannel with a different data rate.
- the first subchannel is the most robust and is expected to be decodable by all the UTs.
- rate 1/4 coded BPSK is used for the first CCH sub-channel.
- Several other subchannels with decreasing robustness (and increasing efficiency) are also available.
- up to three additional sub-channels are used.
- Each UT attempts to decode all subchannels in order until a decoding fails.
- the CCH transport channel segment in each frame is of variable length, the length depending on the number of CCH messages in each subchannel. Acknowledgments for reverse link random access bursts are carried on the most robust (first) subchannel of the CCH.
- the CCH contains assignments of physical layer bursts on the forward and reverse links, (analogous to consolidated polls for TXOPs). Assignments may be for transfer of data on the forward or reverse link.
- a physical layer burst assignment comprises: (a) a MAC LD; (b) a value indicating the start time of the allocation within the frame (in the F-TCH or the R-TCH); (c) the length of the allocation; (d) the length of the dedicated physical layer overhead; (e) the fransmission mode; and (f) the coding and modulation scheme to be used for the physical layer burst.
- CCH may also define portions of the frame that are to be left unused. These unused portions of the frame may be used by UTs to make noise floor (and interference) estimates as well as to measure neighbor system beacons.
- the Random Access Channel (RCH) 1550 is a reverse link channel on which a UT may transmit a random access burst.
- the variable length of the RCH is specified for each frame in the BCH.
- the Forward Traffic Channel (F-TCH) 1530 comprises one or more physical layer bursts transmitted from the AP 104. Each burst is directed to a particular MAC LD as indicated in the CCH assignment. Each burst comprises dedicated physical layer overhead, such as a pilot signal (if any) and a MAC PDU transmitted according to the transmission mode and coding and modulation scheme indicated in the CCH assignment.
- the F-TCH is of variable length.
- the dedicated physical layer overhead may include a dedicated MLMO pilot.
- An example MAC PDU is detailed with respect to FIG. 16.
- the Reverse Traffic Channel (R-TCH) 1540 comprises physical layer burst fransmissions from one or more UTs 106. Each burst is fransmitted by a particular UT as indicated in the CCH assignment. Each burst may comprise a dedicated pilot preamble (if any) and a MAC PDU transmitted according to the fransmission mode and coding and modulation scheme indicated in the CCH assignment.
- the R-TCH is of variable length.
- the F-TCH 530, the R-TCH 540, or both may use spatial multiplexing or code division multiple access techniques to allow simultaneous transmission of MAC PDUs associated with different UTs.
- a field containing the MAC ID with which the MAC PDU is associated may be included in the MAC PDU header. This may be used to resolve any addressing ambiguities that may arise when spatial multiplexing or CDMA are used, hi alternate embodiments, when multiplexing is based strictly on time division techniques, the MAC LD is not required in the MAC PDU header, since the addressing information is included in the CCH message allocating a given time period in the TDD MAC frame interval to a specific MAC LD. Any combination of spatial multiplexing, code division multiplexing, time division multiplexing, and any other technique known in the art may be deployed.
- FIG. 16 depicts the formation of an example MAC PDU 1660 from a packet 1610, which may be an LP datagram or an Ethernet segment, in this example.
- a packet 1610 which may be an LP datagram or an Ethernet segment, in this example.
- Example sizes and types of fields are described in this illustration. Those of skill in the art will recognize that various other sizes, types, and configurations are contemplated within the scope of the present invention.
- the data packet 1610 is segmented at an adaptation layer.
- Each adaptation sublayer PDU 1630 carries one of these segments 1620.
- data packet 1610 is segmented into N segments 1620 A - N.
- An adaptation sublayer PDU 1630 comprises a payload 1634 containing the respective segment 1620.
- a type field 1632 (one byte in this example) is attached to the adaptation sublayer PDU 1630.
- a Logical Link (LL) header 1642 (4' bytes in this example) is attached to the payload 1644, which comprises the adaptation layer PDU 1630.
- Example information for LL header 1642 includes a stream identifier, control information, and sequence numbers.
- a CRC 1646 is computed over the header 1642 and the payload 1644, and appended to form a logical link sublayer PDU (LL PDU) 1640.
- Logical Link Confrol (LLC) and Radio Link Control (RLC) PDUs may be formed in similar fashion.
- LL PDUs 1640, as well as LLC PDUs and RLC PDUs, are placed in queues (for example, a high QoS queue, a best effort queue, or confrol message queue) for service by a MUX function.
- a MUX header 1652 is attached to each LL PDU 1640.
- An example MUX header 1652 may comprise a length and a type (the header 1652 is two bytes in this example).
- a similar header may be formed for each control PDU (i.e. LLC and RLC PDUs).
- the LL PDU 1640 (or LLC or RLC PDU) forms the payload 1654.
- the header 1652 and payload 1654 form the MUX sublayer PDU (MPDU) 1650 (MUX sublayer PDUs are also referred to herein as MUX PDUs).
- Communication resources on the shared medium are allocated by the MAC protocol in a series of TDD MAC frame intervals, in this example.
- these type of TDD MAC frame intervals may be interspersed with various other MAC functions, including contention based or polled, and including interfacing with legacy systems using other types of access protocols.
- a scheduler may determine the size of physical layer bursts allocated for one or more MAC LDs in each TDD MAC frame interval (analogous to consolidated polled TXOPs). Note that not every MAC LD with data to be transmitted will necessarily be allocated space in any particular TDD MAC frame interval. Any access control or scheduling scheme may be deployed within the scope of the present invention.
- a respective MUX function for that MAC LD When an allocation is made for a MAC ID, a respective MUX function for that MAC LD will form a MAC PDU 1660, including one or more MUX PDUs 1650 for inclusion in the TDD MAC frame interval.
- One or more MUX PDUs 1660, for one or more allocated MAC LDs will be included in a TDD MAC frame interval (i.e. TDD MAC frame interval 1500, detailed with respect to FIG. 15, above).
- one aspect allows for a partial MPDU 1650 to be transmitted, allowing for efficient packing in a MAC PDU 1660.
- the untransmitted bytes of any partial MPDUs 1650 left over from a previous transmission may be included, identified by partial MPDU 1664. These bytes 1664 will be transmitted ahead of any new PDUs 1666 (i.e. LL PDUs or control PDUs) in the current frame.
- Header 1662 (two bytes in this example) includes a MUX pointer, which points to the start of the first new MPDU (MPDU 1666 A in this example) to be transmitted in the current frame. Header 1662 may also include a MAC address.
- the MAC PDU 1660 comprises the MUX pointer 1662, a possible partial MUX PDU 1664 at the start (left over from a previous allocation), followed by zero or more complete MUX PDUs 1666A - N, and a possible partial MUX PDU 1668 (from the current allocation) or other padding, to fill the allocated portion of the physical layer burst.
- the MAC PDU 1660 is carried in the physical layer burst allocated to the MAC LD.
- the example MAC PDU 1660 illustrates a transmission (or frame, in 802.11 terminology), that may be fransmitted from one STA to another, including portions of data from one or more flows directed to that destination STA. Efficient packing is achieved with the optional use of partial MUX PDUs.
- Each MAC PDU may be transmitted in a TXOP (using 802.11 terminology), at a time indicated in the consolidated poll included in the CCH.
- FIGS. 15-16 illustrates various aspects, including consolidated polls, reduced preamble fransmission, and ehmination of gaps by sequentially transmitting physical layer bursts from each STA (including the AP). These aspects are applicable to any MAC protocol, including 802.11 systems. Detailed further below are alternate embodiments illustrating various other techniques for achieving MAC efficiency, as well as supporting peer-to-peer transmission, and integrating with and/or cooperating with existing legacy protocols or systems.
- various embodiments detailed herein may employ channel estimation and tight rate control.
- Enhanced MAC efficiency may be gained through minimizing unnecessary transmission on the medium, but inadequate rate control feedback may, in some cases, reduce the overall throughput.
- sufficient opportunities may be provided for channel estimation and feedback to maximize the transmitted rate on all MLMO modes, in order to prevent the loss of throughput due to inadequate channel estimation, which may offset any MAC efficiency gains. Therefore, as described above, and detailed further below, example MAC embodiments may be designed to provide sufficient preamble transmission opportunities, as well opportunities for receivers to provide rate confrol feedback to the transmitter.
- the AP periodically intersperses MLMO pilot in its transmissions (at least every TP ms, where TP may be a fixed or variable parameter).
- TP may be a fixed or variable parameter.
- Each STA may also begin its polled TXOP with a MLMO pilot that may be used by other STAs and the AP to estimate the channel.
- the MLMO pilot may be a steered reference to help simplify receiver processing at the destination STA.
- the AP may also provide opportunities to the destination STA to provide ACK feedback.
- the destination STA may also use these feedback opportunities to provide rate control feedback for available MLMO modes to the transmitting STA.
- rate control feedback is not defined in legacy 802.11 systems, including 802.11(e).
- the introduction of MLMO may increase the total amount of rate control information (per MLMO mode). In some instances, to maximize the benefit of improvements in MAC efficiency, these may be complemented by tight rate control feedback.
- Another aspect introduced here, and detailed further below, is backlog information and scheduling for STAs. Each STA may begin its TXOP with a preamble followed by a requested duration of the next TXOP. This information is destined for the AP.
- the AP collects information on the next requested TXOP from several different STAs and determines the allocation of duration on the medium of TXOPs for a subsequent TDD MAC frame interval.
- the AP may use different priority or QoS rules to determine how to share the medium, or it may use very simple rales to proportionally share the medium according to the requests from the STAs. Any other scheduling technique may also be deployed.
- the allocations for the TXOPs for the next TDD MAC frame interval are assigned in the subsequent control channel message from the AP.
- a network may support operation with or without a true access point.
- a true AP When a true AP is present, it may be connected, for example, to a wired fat pipe connection (i.e. cable, fiber, DSL or T1/T3, Ethernet) or a home entertainment server.
- the true AP may be the source and sink for the majority of data flowing between devices in the network.
- stations may still communicate with one another using techniques like the Distributed Coordination Function (DCF) or 802.11b/g/a or the Enhanced Distributed Channel Access of 802.1 le, as described above.
- DCF Distributed Coordination Function
- 802.11b/g/a the Enhanced Distributed Channel Access of 802.1 le
- ACF Adaptive Coordination Function
- non-AP devices may have enhanced MAC capability and are suitable for operation as a designated AP. It should be noted that not all devices need to be designed to be capable of designated AP MAC capability. When QoS (e.g., guaranteed latency), high throughput, and/or efficiency is critical, it may be necessary that one of the devices in the network be capable of designated AP operation.
- QoS e.g., guaranteed latency
- high throughput e.g., high throughput
- efficiency e.g., it may be necessary that one of the devices in the network be capable of designated AP operation.
- designated AP capability will generally be associated with devices with higher capability, e.g., with one or more attributes such as line power, large number of antennas and/or transmit/receive chains, or high throughput requirement. (Additional factors for selecting a designated AP are detailed further below.)
- a low-end device such as a low-end camera or phone need not be burdened with designated AP capability
- a high-end device such as high-end video source or a high definition video display may be equipped with designated AP capability.
- a designated AP assumes the role of the true AP and may or may not have reduced functionality.
- a designated AP may perform the following: (a) establish the network Basic Service Set (BSS) LD; (b) set network timing by transmitting a beacon and broadcast channel (BCH) network configuration information (the BCH may define composition of the medium until the next BCH); (c) manage connections by scheduling transmissions of stations on the network using a Forward Control Channel (FCCH); (d) manage association; (e) provide admission control for QoS flows; and/or (f) various other functions.
- BSS Basic Service Set
- BCH beacon and broadcast channel
- FCCH Forward Control Channel
- the designate AP may implement a sophisticated scheduler, or any type of scheduling algorithm. A simple scheduler may be deployed, an example of which is detailed further below.
- a modified Physical Layer Convergence Protocol (PLCP) header is detailed below with respect to peer-peer communications, that is also applicable for designated APs.
- the PLCP header of all transmissions is transmitted at the basic data rate that can be decoded by all stations (including the designated AP).
- the PLCP header of transmissions from stations contains data backlog at the station associated with a given priority or flow. Alternately, it contains a request for duration of a subsequent transmission opportunity for a given priority or a flow.
- the designated AP may determine backlog or transmission opportunity durations requested by the stations by "snooping" in the PLCP Headers of all station transmissions.
- the designated AP may determine the fraction of time to be allocated to EDCA-based (distributed access) and the fraction of time allocated to contention-free polled (centralized) access based on load, collisions, or other congestion measures.
- the designated AP may run a rudimentary scheduler that allocates bandwidth in proportion to the requests and schedules them in the contention-free period. Enhanced schedulers are permitted but not mandated.
- the scheduled fransmissions may be announced by the designated AP on the CCH (control channel).
- a designated AP may not be required to echo one station's transmission to another station (i.e. serve as a hop point), although this functionality is allowed.
- a true AP maybe capable of echoing.
- a hierarchy may be created to determine which device should serve as access point.
- Example factors that may be incorporated in selecting a designated access point include the following: (a) user override; (b) higher preference level; (c) security level; (d) capability: line power; (e) capability: number of antennas; (f) capability: max transmit power; (g) to break a tie based on other factors: Medium Access Control (MAC) address; (h) first device powered on; (i) any other factors.
- MAC Medium Access Control
- the designated AP may be centrally located and have the best aggregate Rx SNR CDF (i.e. be able to receive all stations with a good SNR).
- the designated AP may have a higher transmit power so that the designated AP may be heard by a large number of stations.
- Peer-to-peer connections may be supported in cases where the network is configured with a true AP or a designated AP. Peer-to-peer connections, in general, are detailed in the next section below. In one embodiment, two types of peer-to-peer connections may be supported: (a) managed peer-to-peer, where the AP schedules transmissions for each station involved; and (b) ad-hoc, where the AP is not involved in the management or scheduling of station fransmissions.
- the designated AP may set the MAC frame interval and transmit a beacon at the start of the frame.
- the broadcast and control channels may specify allocated durations in the frame for the stations to transmit.
- the AP may provide scheduled allocations.
- the AP may announce these allocations in the control channel, such as, for example, with every MAC frame.
- the AP may also include an A-TCH (ad hoc) segment in the MAC frame (detailed further below).
- the presence of the A-TCH in the MAC frame may be indicated in the BCH and FCCH.
- stations may conduct peer-to- peer communication using CSMA CA procedures.
- the CSMA CA procedures of the IEEE Wireless LAN Standard 802.11 may be modified to exclude the requirement for immediate ACK.
- a station may transmit a MAC-PDU (Protocol Data Unit) consisting of multiple LLC-PDUs when the station seizes the channel.
- the maximum duration that may be occupied by a station in the A-TCH may be indicated in the BCH.
- For acknowledged LLC the window size and maximum acknowledgment delay may be negotiated according to the required application delay.
- a modified MAC frame with an A-TCH segment, for use with both true APs and designated APs, is detailed further below with respect to FIG. 20.
- the unsteered MLMO pilot may enable all stations to learn the channel between themselves and the transmitting station. This may be useful in some scenarios. Further, the designated AP may use the unsteered MLMO pilot to allow channel estimation and facilitate demodulation of the PCCH from which allocations can be derived. Once the designated AP receives all requested allocations in a given MAC frame, it may schedule these for the subsequent MAC frame. Note that rate control information does not have to be included in the FCCH.
- the scheduler may perform the following operations: First, the scheduler collects all the requested allocations for the next MAC frame and computes the aggregate requested allocation (Total Requested). Second, the scheduler computes the total resource available for allocation to the F-TCH and the R-TCH (Total Available). Third, if Total Requested exceeds Total Available, all requested allocations are scaled by the ratio defined by Total Available/Total Requested. Fourth, for any scaled allocations that are less than 12 OFDM symbols, these allocations are increased to 12 OFDM symbols (in the example embodiment; alternate embodiments may be deployed with alternate parameters).
- any excess OFDM symbols and/or guard times may be accommodated by reducing all allocations larger than 12 OFDM symbols, one symbol at a time in round-robin fashion starting from the largest.
- the designated AP when the designated AP is present, it may establish the Beacon for the BSS and set network timing. Devices associate with the designated AP. When two devices associated with a designated AP require a QoS connection, e.g. a HDTV link with low latency and high throughput requirement, they provide the traffic specification to the designated AP for admission confrol. The designated AP may admit or deny the connection request.
- a QoS connection e.g. a HDTV link with low latency and high throughput requirement
- the entire duration of the medium between beacons may be set aside for EDCA operation using CSMA/CA. If the EDCA operation is running smoothly, e.g., there are no excessive collisions, back-offs and delays, the designated AP does not need to provide a coordination function.
- the designated AP may continue to monitor the medium utilization by listening to the PLCP headers of station transmissions. Based on observing the medium, as well as the backlog or transmission opportunity duration requests, the designated AP may determine when EDCA operation is not satisfying the required QoS of admitted flows. For example it may observe the trends in the reported backlogs or requested durations, and compare them against the expected values based on the admitted flows.
- Designated AP determines that the required QoS is not being met under distributed access, it can transition operation on the medium to operation with polling and scheduling. The latter provides more deterministic latency and higher throughput efficiency. Examples of such operation are detailed further below.
- DLP Direct Link Protocol
- peer-to-peer (or simply referred to as “peer-peer”) transmission allows one STA to transmit data directly to another STA, without sending the data first to an AP.
- DLP Direct Link Protocol
- FIG. 17 depicts an example peer-to-peer communication within a system 100.
- system 100 which, may be similar to system 100 depicted in FIG. 1, is adapted to allow direct transmission from one UT to another (in this example, transmission between UT 106A and UT 106B is illustrated).
- UTs 106 may perform any communication directly with AP 104 on WLAN 120, as detailed herein.
- two types of peer-peer connections may be supported: (a) Managed peer-peer, in which the AP schedules transmissions for each STA involved, and (b) Ad-hoc, in which the AP is not involved in the management or scheduling of STA transmissions.
- An embodiment may include either or both types of connections.
- a transmitted signal may comprise a portion including common information that is receivable by one or more stations, possibly including an access point, as well as information specifically formatted for reception by a peer-peer receiving station. The common information may be used for scheduling (as shown in FIG. 25, for example) or for contention backoff by various neighbor stations (shown in FIG. 26, for example).
- FIG. 25 for example
- FIG. 26 For example embodiments, detailed below, illustrate closed loop rate control for peer-peer connections. Such rate control may be deployed to take advantage of available high data rates.
- FIG. 18 depicts a prior art physical layer burst 1800.
- a preamble 1810 may be transmitted, followed by a Physical Layer Convergence Protocol Header (PLCP) header 1820.
- PLCP Physical Layer Convergence Protocol Header
- Legacy 802.11 systems define a PLCP header to include rate type and modulation format for data transmitted as data symbols 1830.
- FIG. 19 depicts an example physical layer burst 1900, which may be deployed for peer-peer transmission.
- preamble 1810 and PLCP header 1820 may be included, followed by a peer-peer fransmission, labeled P2P 1940.
- P2P 1940 may comprise a MLMO pilot 1910 for use by the receiving UT.
- MLMO rate feedback 1920 may be included for use by the receiving UT in future transmission back to the sending UT. Rate feedback may be generated in response to a previous transmission from the receiving station to the transmitting station.
- data symbols 1930 may be fransmitted according to the selected rate and modulation format for the peer-peer connection.
- a physical layer burst such as PHY burst 1900, may be used with AP managed peer-peer connection, as well as with ad hoc peer-peer transmission.
- Example rate feedback embodiments are described below. Alternate embodiments of physical layer transmission bursts including these aspects are also included below.
- an AP sets the TDD MAC frame interval. Broadcast and control channels may be deployed to specify allocated durations in the TDD MAC frame interval. For STAs that have requested allocations for peer-peer fransmissions (and known to the AP), the AP may provide scheduled allocations and announce these in the control channel every TDD MAC frame interval.
- An example system is described above with respect to FIG. 15.
- FIG. 20 depicts an example embodiment of a TDD MAC frame interval 2000 including an optional ad hoc segment, identified as A-TCH 2010.
- the like numbered sections of TDD MAC frame interval 2000 may be included an operate substantially as described above with respect to FIG. 15.
- the presence of the A-TCH 2010 in the TDD MAC frame interval 2000 may be indicated in the BCH 510 and/or CCH 520.
- STAs may conduct peer-to-peer communication using any contention procedure.
- 802.11 techniques such as SLFS, DLFS, backoff, etc., as detailed above may be deployed.
- QoS techniques such as those introduced in 802.11(e) (i.e. ALFS) may optionally be deployed.
- Various other contention based schemes may be deployed as well.
- CSMA/CA procedures for contention may be modified as follows. Immediate ACK is not required.
- a STA may transmit a MAC Protocol Data Unit (MAC-PDU) consisting of multiple PDUs (i.e. LLC-PDUs) when it seizes the channel.
- MAC-PDU MAC Protocol Data Unit
- a maximum duration occupied by a STA in the A-TCH may be indicated in the BCH.
- MAC-PDU MAC Protocol Data Unit
- MAC-PDU MAC Protocol Data Unit
- MAC-PDU MAC Protocol Data Unit
- a maximum duration occupied by a STA in the A-TCH may be indicated in the BCH.
- a window size and maximum acknowledgment delay may be negotiated according to the required application delay.
- the F-TCH 530 is the portion of the TDD MAC frame interval for fransmissions from the AP to STAs.
- Peer-to-peer communications between STAs using contention techniques may be conducted in the A-TCH 2010.
- Scheduled peer-to- peer communications between STAs may be conducted in the R-TCH 540. Any of these three segments may be set to null.
- FIG. 21 depicts an example physical layer burst 2100, also referred to as a "PHY burst".
- PHY burst 2100 may be deployed with scheduled peer-peer connections, such as during R-TCH 540, or during ad hoc connections such as A-TCH 2010, as detailed above with respect to FIG. 20.
- PHY burst 2100 comprises un-steered MLMO pilot 2110, Peer Common Control Channel (PCCH) 2120, and one or more data symbols 2130.
- the unsteered MLMO pilot 2110 may be received at one or more stations, and may be used as a reference by a receiving station to estimate the respective channel between the transmitting station and the receiving station.
- PCCH Peer Common Control Channel
- This example PCCH comprises the following fields: (a) a destination MAC-LD, (b) an allocation request for a desired transmission duration for the next TDD MAC frame interval, (c) a transmission rate indicator to indicate the transmission format for the current data packet, (d) a control channel (i.e. CCH) subchannel for receiving any allocation from the AP, and (e) a CRC.
- the PCCH 2120, along with un-steered MLMO pilot 2110, is a common segment that may be received by various listening stations, including the access point.
- a request for allocation may be inserted in the PCCH to allow for a managed peer-peer connection in a future TDD MAC frame interval.
- Such a PHY burst may be included in an ad-hoc connection, and may still request an allocation for scheduled peer to peer in a future TDD MAC frame interval.
- the unsteered MLMO pilot is eight OFDM symbols (in alternate embodiments, detailed below, fewer symbols may be sufficient for channel estimation) and the PCCH is two OFDM symbols.
- the common segment, comprising unsteered MLMO pilot 2110 and PCCH 2120 one or more data symbols 2130 are transmitted using spatial multiplexing and/or higher modulation formats as determined by each STA in the peer-peer connection. This portion of the transmission is coded according to rate control information embedded in the data portion of the transmission.
- Data at 2130 may be transmitted as allocated by an access point, or may be fransmitted in accordance with an ad-hoc connection (i.e. CSMA/CA contention based procedures).
- An example embodiment of a PHY burst comprises a preamble consisting of 8 OFDM symbols of un-steered MLMO reference.
- the MAC-LD is 12 bits.
- An 8-bit allocation request is included for reception by the AP for a desired duration in the next TDD MAC frame interval (thus the maximum request is 256 short OFDM symbols).
- the TX Rate is 16 bits to indicate the rate being used in the current packet.
- the FCCH subchannel preference is two bits, corresponding to a preference between up to four subchannels, on which the AP should make any applicable allocation.
- the CRC is 10 bits. Any number of other fields and/or field sizes maybe included in an alternate PHY burst embodiment.
- the remainder of the MAC-PDU transmission uses spatial multiplexing and higher modulations as determined by each STA in the peer-peer connection.
- This portion of the fransmission is coded according to the rate control information embedded in the data portion of the transmission.
- FIG. 22 depicts example method 2200 for peer-peer data transmission.
- the process begins in block 2210 where a station transmits an unsteered MLMO pilot.
- the station transmits commonly decodable information.
- unsteered MLMO pilot 2110 and PCCH 2120 serve as an example of a mechanism for requesting allocation in a managed connection, for which the AP, or other scheduling station, would need to be able to decode the portion of the signal comprising the request.
- Those of skill in the art will recognize myriad alternate request mechanisms for scheduling peer-peer connections on a shared channel.
- data is transmitted from one station to another in accordance with negotiated transmission formats.
- steered data is fransmitted using rates and parameters as determined in accordance with measurements of unsteered MLMO pilot 2110.
- Those of skill in the art will recogmze various alternate means for transmitting data tailored for a specific peer-peer channel.
- FIG. 23 depicts example method 2300 for peer-peer communication. This example method 2300 illustrates several aspects, subsets of which may be deployed in any given embodiment.
- the process begins in decision block 2310. In decision block 2310, if there is data for STA-STA fransfer, proceed to decision block 2320. If not, proceed to block 2370 and perform any other type of communication, including other access types, if any. Proceed to decision block 2360 where the process may repeat by returning to decision block 2310, or the process may stop.
- decision block 2320 if there is STA-STA data for transmission, determine whether the peer-peer connection is to be scheduled or ad hoc. If the transmission is to be scheduled proceed to block 2320 and request an allocation to earn a TXOP. Note that an allocation request may be made during a random access portion of a TDD MAC frame interval, as described above, or may be included in an ad hoc transmission. Once an allocation is made, in block 2350 a STA-STA physical burst may be transmitted. In an example embodiment, method 2200 may serve as one type of STA-STA PHY burst.
- decision block 2320 if scheduled peer-peer connection is not desired, proceed to block 2340 to contend for access.
- the A-TCH 2010 segment of TDD MAC frame interval 2000 may be used.
- an access has been earned successfully through contention proceed to block 2350 and transmit a STA-STA PHY burst, as described above.
- FIG. 24 depicts example method 2400 for providing rate feedback for use in peer-peer connection.
- This FIG illustrates various transmissions and other steps that may be performed by two stations, STA 1 and STA 2.
- STA 1 transmits an unsteered pilot 2410 to STA 2.
- STA 2 measures the channel 2420 while receiving unsteered pilot 2410.
- STA 2 determines a supportable rate for transmission on the channel as measured. This rate determination is transmitted as rate feedback 2430 to STA 1.
- alternate parameters may be delivered to allow for a rate feedback decision to be made at STA 1.
- STA 1 receives a scheduled allocation or contends for a transmit opportunity, for example during A-TCH. Once a transmit opportunity has been earned, at 2450, STA 1 fransmits to STA 2 data at a rate and modulation format determined in response to rate feedback 2430.
- FIG. 24 The method illustrated in FIG. 24 may be generalized and applied to various embodiments, as will be readily apparent to those with skill in the art. Some examples incorporating peer-peer rate feedback, as well as other aspects are detailed further below.
- FIG. 25 depicts method 2500 illustrating managed peer-peer connection between two stations, STA 1 and STA 2, and an access point (AP).
- STA 1 fransmits an unsteered pilot as well as a request for an allocation.
- Data may also be transmitted according to an earlier allocation and previous rate feedback, as will be illustrated below. Further, any such data may be transmitted according to rate feedback from a previous managed peer-peer connection or from ad hoc communication originated by either STA 1 or STA 2.
- the unsteered pilot and request for transmission is received by both STA 2 and the access point (and may be receivable by various other stations in the area).
- the access point receives the request for transmission and, in accordance with one of any number of scheduling algorithms, makes a determination of when and whether to make an allocation for the peer-peer communication.
- STA 2 measures the channel while the unsteered pilot in 2505 is fransmitted and may make a determination about the supportable rate for peer-peer communication with STA 1.
- STA 2 may also receive rate feedback and/or data from STA 1 in accordance with a previous fransmission.
- the access point has determined an allocation will be made for the requested fransmission.
- an allocation is fransmitted from the access point to STA 1.
- allocations on the R-TCH 540 are transmitted during the control channel, such as CCH 520, illustrated above.
- an allocation on the R-TCH is made for STA 2.
- STA 1 receives the allocation from the access point.
- STA 2 receives the allocation from the access point.
- STA 2 transmits rate feedback at 2535, in accordance with allocation 2520.
- a request for scheduled transmission may be included, as described above, as well as any data to be transmitted in accordance with a previous request.
- the rate feedback transmitted is selected in accordance with the channel measurement 2510, as described above.
- the PHY burst of 2535 may include an unsteered pilot as well.
- STA 1 measures the channel from STA 2, receives the rate feedback, and may receive optional data as well.
- STA 1 fransmits data in accordance with the rate feedback information received.
- a request may be made for a future allocation as well as rate feedback in accordance with the channel measurement at 2540.
- the data is transmitted according to the specific channel measurement for the peer-peer communication.
- STA 2 receives the data as well as any optionally transmitted rate feedback. STA 2 may also measure the channel to provide rate feedback for future transmissions.
- both transmissions 2535 and 2545 are receivable by the access point, at least the unsteered portion, as described above.
- the access point may make additional allocations for future transmissions as indicated by allocations 2555 and 2560 to STA 1 and STA 2, respectively.
- STA 1 and STA 2 receive their respective allocations.
- the process may then iterate indefinitely with the access point managing access on the shared medium and STA 1 and STA 2 transmitting peer-peer communication directly to each other at rates and modulation formats selected as supportable on the peer-peer channel.
- ad hoc peer-peer communication may also be performed along with the managed peer-peer communication illustrated in FIG. 25.
- FIG. 26 illustrates a contention based (or ad hoc) peer-peer connection.
- STA 1 and STA 2 will communicate with each other. Other STAs may also be in receiving range and may access the shared channel.
- STA 1 having data to transmit to STA 2, monitors the shared channel and contends for access.
- peer-peer PHY burst 2615 is transmitted to STA 2 which may also be received by other STAs.
- other STAs, monitoring the shared channel may receive the transmission from STA 1 and know to avoid accessing the channel.
- a PCCH described above, may be included in the transmission 2615.
- STA 2 measures the channel in accordance with an unsteered pilot, and contends for return access on the shared channel. STA 2 may also transmit data, as necessary. Note that contention time may vary. For example, an ACK may be returned following SLFS in a legacy 802.11 system. Since SLFS is highest priority, STA 2 may responds without losing the channel. Various embodiments may allow for less delay, and may provide for return data with high priority.
- STA 2 transmits rate feedback along with optional data to STA 1.
- STA 1 receives the rate feedback, contends once more for access to the shared medium, and transmits at 2645 to STA 2 in accordance with the received rate feedback.
- STA 1 may also measure the channel to provide rate feedback to STA 2 for future transmission, and may receive any optional data transmitted by STA 2.
- STA 2 receives the data transmission 2645 in accordance with the rate and modulation format determined by the measured channel conditions.
- STA 2 may also receive rate feedback for use in returning a transmission to STA 1.
- STA 2 may also measure the channel to provide future rate feedback. The process may thus repeat by returning to 2635 for STA 2 to return rate feedback as well as data.
- two stations may perform ad hoc communication in both directions by contending for access.
- the peer-peer connection itself is made efficient by use of rate feedback and tailoring the fransmission to the receiving station.
- a commonly receivable portion of the PHY burst such as the PCCH
- other STAs may access the information and may avoid interfering on the channel at times known to be occupied, as indicated in the PCCH.
- either managed or ad hoc peer-peer communication may initiate data transfer prior to the steps illustrated in FIG. 26, and may be used to continue peer-peer communication subsequently.
- any combination of scheduled and ad hoc peer-peer communication may be deployed.
- FIG. 27 depicts example TDD MAC frame interval 2700, illustrating managed peer-peer communication between stations, hi this example, both the F-TCH and the A- TCH durations have been set to zero.
- Beacon/BCH 510 and CCH 520 are transmitted as before.
- Beacon/BCH 560 indicates the start of the next frame.
- CCH 520 indicates allocations for peer-peer communications.
- STA 1 transmits to STA 2 in allocated burst 2710. Note that, in the same TDD MAC frame interval, STA 2 is allocated segment 2730 for responding to STA 1.
- any of the various components, detailed above, such as rate feedback, requests, steered and/or unsteered pilots, and steered and/or unsteered data may be included in any given peer-peer PHY layer burst.
- STA 3 transmits to STA 4 in allocation 2720.
- STA 4 transmits to STA 3 in allocation 2740, in similar fashion.
- Various other reverse link fransmissions, including non peer-peer connections, may be included in the R-TCH. Additional example embodiments illustrating these and other aspects are detailed further below.
- guard intervals may be scheduled between segments, as necessary.
- a key issue regarding peer-peer communications is that generally the path delay between the two STAs is unknown.
- One method of handling this is to make each STA keep its transmit times fixed so that they arrive at the AP in synch with the AP's clock.
- the AP may provide for guard time on either side of each peer-to- peer allocation to compensate for unknown path delays between the two communicating STAs.
- a cyclic prefix will be adequate and no adjustments will need to be made at the STA receivers.
- the STAs must then determine their respective time offsets to know when to receive the other STA's transmission.
- the STA receivers may need to maintain two receive clocks: one for the AP frame timing and another for the peer-peer connection.
- acknowledgments and channel feedback may be derived by a receiver during its allocation and fed back to a transmitter. Even if the overall traffic flow is one-way, the receiver sends reference and requests to obtain allocations. The AP scheduler ensures that adequate resources for feedback are provided.
- new class will be used to differentiate from legacy systems.
- a new class system may incorporate one or more of the aspects or features detailed herein.
- An example new class system is the MLMO OFDM system described below with respect to FIGS. 35-52.
- the aspects detailed below for interoperating a new class system with a legacy system are also applicable to other systems, yet to be developed, whether or not any particular improvement detailed herein is included in such a system.
- backward compatibility with alternate systems may be provided by using separate Frequency Assignments (FA) to allow the operation of a new class system on a separate FA from legacy users.
- FA Frequency Assignments
- a new class system may search for an available FA on which to operate.
- a Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) algorithm may be implemented in the new class WLAN to accommodate this. It may be desirable to deploy an AP to be multi-carrier.
- Legacy STAs attempting to access a WLAN may employ two methods of scanning: passive and active.
- passive scanning a STA develops a list of viable Basic Service Sets (BSSs) in its vicinity by scanning the operating bands.
- BSSs Basic Service Sets
- active scanning a STA fransmits a query to solicit a response from other STAs in the BSS.
- Legacy standards are silent as to how a STA decides which BSS to join, but, once a decision is made, association may be attempted. If unsuccessful, the STA will move through its BSS list until successful.
- a legacy STA may not attempt to associate with a new class WLAN when the beacon information transmitted would not be understood by that STA.
- a new class AP (as well as UTs) may ignore requests from legacy STAs as one method for maintaining a single WLAN class on a single FA.
- An alternate technique is for new class AP or new class STAs to reject any legacy STA's request using valid legacy (i.e., 802.11) messaging. If a legacy system supports such messaging, the legacy STA may be provided with a redirection message.
- legacy i.e. 802.11
- FIG. 28 depicts method 2800 for supporting both legacy and new class stations on the same frequency assignment.
- the BSS is operating in isolation (i.e., there is no coordination between multiple overlapping BSSs).
- the process starts at block 2810 where legacy signaling is used to establish a contention free period.
- the new class WLAN AP may use the hooks built into the legacy 802.11 standard to reserve time for exclusive use by new class stations. Any number of additional signaling techniques, in addition to these, may be used for establishing a contention free period, for various types of legacy systems.
- One technique is to establish contention free periods (CFP) in PCF/HCF mode.
- the AP may establish a Beacon interval and announce a contention free period within the Beacon interval where it can serve both new class and legacy STAs in polled mode.
- This causes all legacy STAs to set their Network Allocation Vectors (NAVs), which are counters used to keep track of the CFP, to the duration of the announced CFP.
- NAVs Network Allocation Vectors
- Another technique is to establish a CFP, and setting NAV, via an RTS/CTS and duration/ID field, hi this case, the new class AP may send out a special RTS which has a Reserved Address (RA) indicating to all new class STAs that the AP is reserving the channel.
- Legacy STAs interpret the RA field as being directed to a specific STA and do not respond.
- the new class STAs respond with a special CTS to clear out the BSS for the time period specified in the duration/ID field in the CTS/RTS message pair. At this point, the new class stations are free to use the channel for the reserved duration without conflict.
- RA Reserved Address
- legacy class STAs having received the signal to establish the contention free period, wait until polled or the contention free period ends.
- the access point has successfully allocated the shared medium for use with the new class MAC protocol.
- new STAs may access according to this protocol. Any set or subset of the aspects detailed herein may be deployed in such a new class MAC protocol. For example, scheduled forward and reverse link transmissions as well as managed peer-peer transmissions, ad hoc or contention based communication (including peer-peer), or any combination of the above may be deployed.
- the new class access period is terminated, using any of a variety of signal types, which may vary according to the legacy system deployed. In the example embodiment, a contention free period end signal is transmitted. In an alternate embodiment, legacy STAs may also be polled during a contention free period. Such accesses may be subsequent to new class accesses, or may be interspersed within them.
- all STAs may contend for access, if a contention period is defined for the legacy system. This allows legacy systems, not able to communicate during the contention free period, to make requests and or attempt to transmit.
- decision block 2860 the process may continue by returning to block 2810, or may stop.
- FIG. 29 illustrates the combination of legacy and new class media access confrol.
- a legacy MAC protocol 2910 is shown above a new class protocol 2930, which, when combined, form a MAC protocol such as combined MAC protocol 2950.
- 802.11 legacy signaling is used for illustration purposes.
- Legacy MAC protocol 2910 comprises beacons 2902, which identify the Beacon interval.
- the legacy Beacon interval comprises contention free period 2904 followed by contention period 2906.
- Various contention free polls 2908A-N may be generated during the contention free period 2904.
- the contention free period 2904 is terminated by contention free period end 2910.
- Each beacon 2902 is fransmitted at Target Beacon Transmission Time (TBTT) in 802.11 example embodiments.
- New class MAC protocol 2930 comprises MAC frames 2932A-N.
- the combined Beacon interval 2950 illustrates the interoperability of legacy and new class MAC protocols during the contention free period 2904.
- New class TDD MAC frame intervals 2932 are included followed by legacy polls CF poll 2908A-N.
- the contention free period terminates with CFPEND 2910, followed by a contention period 2906.
- New class TDD MAC frame intervals 2932 may be any type optionally including various aspects detailed herein.
- new class TDD MAC frame interval 2932 comprises various segments such as those illustrated with respect to FIG. 20 above.
- a new class TDD MAC frame interval in this example, comprises pilot 510, a control channel 520, a forward fransmit channel 530, ad hoc peer- peer section (A-TCH) 2010, a reverse link transmit channel 540, and a random access channel 550.
- legacy STAs should not interfere with any new class WLAN transmission.
- the AP may poll any legacy STA during the CFP, permitting mixed mode operation in the segment.
- the AP may reserve the entire CFP 2904 for new class usage and push all legacy traffic to the contention period (CP) 2906 near the end of the Beacon interval.
- CP contention period
- the example 802.11 legacy standard requires the CP 2906 be long enough to support an exchange between two legacy terminals.
- the beacon may be delayed, resulting in time jitter in the system.
- the CFP interval may be shortened to maintain a fixed beacon interval.
- Timers used to establish the CFP and CP may be set such that the CFP is long (i.e., around 1.024 sec) relative to the CP (i.e., less than 10 msec).
- the duration of their fransmission may be unknown and may cause additional time jitter.
- the legacy 802.11 standard synchronizes to Time Units (TU) of 1.024 msec.
- the new class MAC may be designed to be synchronous with a legacy system, employing a MAC frame duration of 2 TUs or 2.048 msec, in this example.
- the new class MAC frame may be made synchronous. That is, the MAC frame clock for the system may be continuous and that MAC frame boundaries, when fransmitted, start on multiples of the 2.048 msec frame interval, hi this way, sleep mode for STAs may be easily maintained.
- New class transmissions do not need to be compatible with legacy transmissions.
- the headers, preambles, etc. may all be unique to the new class system, examples of which are detailed throughout this specification.
- Legacy STAs may attempt to demodulate these, but will fail to decode properly.
- Legacy STAs in sleep mode will generally not be affected.
- FIG. 30 depicts method 3000 for earning a transmit opportunity.
- Method 3000 may be deployed as block 2830 in an example embodiment of method 2800, illustrated above.
- the process begins with decision block 3010, in which an access may be scheduled or unscheduled. Those of skill in the art will recognize that, while this example illustrates two types of access, in any given embodiment either one or both of these access types may be supported.
- decision block 3010 if unscheduled access is desired, proceed to block 3040 to contend for access. Any number of the contention based access techniques may be deployed.
- TXOP transmission opportunity
- block 3010 if scheduled access is desired, proceed to block 3020 to request access.
- This access request may be made on a random access channel, during ad hoc contention, or any of the other techniques disclosed herein, hi block 3030, when the access request is granted, an allocation will be received. Proceed to block 3050 to transmit the TXOP according to the received allocation.
- the legacy BSS may be operating in DCF or PCF/HCF mode, and so synchronization between the new class BSS and legacy BSS may not always be achievable.
- the new class AP may attempt to synchronize to the TBTT. If this is possible, the new class AP may seize the channel during the contention period, using any of various mechanisms, examples of which are described above, to operate within the overlapped BSS area. If the legacy BSS is operating under DCF, the new class AP may also attempt to seize the channel and announce a CFP to clear the channel.
- the new class stations may default to CSMA-based operation and rely on peer-peer transmissions (this is detailed further below with respect to FIGS. 33-34).
- FIG. 31 depicts example method 3100 for sharing a single FA with multiple BSSs.
- a legacy access point transmits a beacon.
- a new class access point may synch to the TBTT associated with the beacon (optional).
- block 3120 if a legacy contention free period has been prescribed according to the beacon, it is carried out. Once the contention free period, if any, is complete, then all STAs may contend for access during a prescribed contention period, h block 3130, the new class access point contends for access during the contention period.
- new class STAs may access the shared medium during the period for which the new class access point has contended for access.
- the types of access during this new class access may include any of the aspects detailed herein.
- a variety of techniques may be used, such as those detailed above, to indicate to legacy STAs the amount of time for which the access point is reserving the channel. Once this period has completed, then legacy STAs may contend in block 3150. In decision block 3160 the process may continue by returning to block 3110 or may stop.
- FIG. 32 illustrates overlapping BSSs using a single FA.
- Legacy system 3210 transmits beacons 3205 (3205A and 3205B are shown illustrating the TBTT and the overall Beacon interval of the legacy system).
- Beacon 3205 A identifies contention free period 3210 and contention period 3215.
- legacy contention free polls 3220A-N may be carried out followed by the indicator of the end of the contention free period 3225.
- Stations in new class WLAN 3240 monitor the channel, receive beacon 3205, and refrain from accessing media until an opportunity to contend for access arrives. In this example, the earliest opportunity is during the contention free period.
- the new class access point fransmits a legacy signal 3245 to indicate to legacy stations the amount of time that the channel will be occupied. A variety of symbols may be used to perform this function, examples of which have been detailed above. Various other signals may be deployed depending on the legacy system with which interoperability is desired.
- Legacy STAs within reception range of legacy signal 3245 may avoid accessing a channel until the end of new class access period 3250.
- Period 3250 comprises one or more TDD MAC frame intervals 3260 ' (3260A-N, in this example).
- TDD MAC frame intervals 3260 may be any type, examples of which comprise one or more of the aspects detailed herein.
- the new class AP seizes the channel at timed intervals (i.e., every 40 msec the new class AP seizes the channel for 20 msec).
- the new class AP may maintain a timer to insure it is only holding the channel for a desired duration, thereby guaranteeing fair sharing of the channel.
- the new class AP may use various signaling techniques. For example, CTS/RTS or a legacy beacon announcing a new CFP may be fransmitted.
- an example first TDD MAC frame interval may be defined as follows: First, send a beacon plus F-CCH indicating the UTs on the list to be polled in the current MAC frame. After the F-CCH, broadcast a stretch of MLMO pilot to allow the STAs to acquire and form an accurate measure of the MLMO channel. In an example embodiment, excellent performance may be achieved with 2 short OFDM symbols per antenna. This implies that the F-TCH in the initial MAC frame may be composed of roughly 8 MLMO pilot symbols.
- the R-TCH portion of the first MAC frame may be structured such that STAs on the poll list transmit steered MLMO pilot and a rate indicator (for the downlink) with acknowledgement back to the AP.
- STAs on the poll list transmit steered MLMO pilot and a rate indicator (for the downlink) with acknowledgement back to the AP.
- all terminals on the poll list are ready to operate in a normal scheduled manner in the next TDD MAC frame interval.
- the TDD MAC frame intervals following the first TDD MAC frame interval may then be used to exchange data, coordinated by the AP, using any of the techniques disclosed herein.
- new class stations may default to CSMA-based operation and rely on peer-peer transmissions in certain situations (for example, situations when some or all of the STAs in the legacy BSS do not receive the new class AP transmissions). In such cases, the On/Off cycling described above might not be advantageous, or even possible. In these cases, new class stations may default to peer- peer operation.
- FIG. 33 depicts example method 3300 for performing high-speed peer-peer communication, using various techniques disclosed herein, while interoperating with a legacy BSS.
- the process begins in block 3310, where a first STA having data to send to a second STA contends for access.
- the station clears the medium using a legacy signal, such as those described above.
- the first STA fransmits a request (along with a pilot) to a second STA.
- the second STA is able to measure the channel according to the pilot transmitted.
- the second STA transmits channel feedback to the first STA.
- the first station receives a response with channel feedback (rate feedback, for example).
- the first STA fransmits the pilot and steered data to the second station according to the feedback.
- the second STA may transmit to the first STA acknowledgement, and may transmit continued rate feedback for use in further transmission.
- the legacy signal used to clear the medium allows blocks 3330 to 3360 to be carried out using any of the high-speed techniques and improvements to legacy systems such as those disclosed herein.
- any peer-peer MAC protocol may be deployed within the scope of the present invention period. The process may continue as depicted in decision block 3370 by returning to block 3310, or the process may stop.
- the STA seizes the channel.
- the first fransmission consists of sufficient MLMO pilot plus some message requesting a connection to be established.
- CTS and RTS may be employed to clear out the area and reserve time.
- the requesting STAs message must contain the STAs BSS LD, the STAs MAC LD, and the target STAs MAC LD (if known).
- the response should contain the BSS LD of the responding STA.
- a response may contain MLMO pilot (steered, if employed) plus some indication of rate. Once this exchange has occurred, steering is possible on each link. However, if the STAs belong to different BSSs, the first steered transmission between the STA that initiated the connection may contain steered MLMO pilot to allow the responding STA's receiver to co ⁇ ect for the phase differential between the different BSSs.
- FIG. 34 illustrates peer-peer communication using MLMO techniques by contending for access (i.e. unmanaged) on a legacy BSS.
- initiating station 106A contends for access on the channel.
- MLMO pilot 3405 is transmitted, followed by request 3410.
- the message may contain the BSS ED, the initiating STA's MAC LD and a target STA's MAC LD, if known.
- Other signaling may be used to further clear the channel, such as CTS and RTS.
- the responding STA 106B transmits steered pilot 3420 followed by acknowledgement and rate feedback 3425.
- Steered pilot 3420 is fransmitted SLFS 3415 following request 3410.
- the legacy access point is an 802.11 access point
- the various fransmissions detailed in FIG. 34 may be transmitted SLFS apart from each other to maintain control of the channel until the peer- peer communication is complete.
- a maximum duration for channel occupation may be determined.
- Steered pilot 3430, subsequent to rate feedback 3425, and data 3435 are transmitted from the initiating STA 106A to the responding STA 106B in accordance with that rate feedback.
- the responding STA 106B transmits steered pilot 3440 and acknowledgement and rate confrol 3445.
- initiating station 106A transmits steered pilot 3450 followed by data 3455.
- the process may continue indefinitely or up to the maximum time allowed for channel access, depending on the deployment period.
- the responding STA may also transmit data and the initiating station may fransmit rate confrol as well. These data segments may be combined with those shown at FIG. 34 to maximize efficiency (i.e., SLFS need not be interjected between these transmissions).
- a first example mechanism is Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS).
- DFS Dynamic Frequency Selection
- WLANs may be required to search the wireless medium to determine the best Frequency Allocation (FA) to establish operations for the BSS.
- FA Frequency Allocation
- an AP may also create a neighbor list to facilitate redirection and inter-AP handoff.
- the WLAN may synchronize MAC frame timing with neighbor BSSs (described further below).
- DFS may be used to distribute BSSs to minimize the need for inter-BSS synchronization.
- a second example mechanism is inter-BSS Synchronization. During a DFS procedure, an AP may acquire the timing of the neighbor BSSs.
- the newly arriving AP may alert the established AP of its presence and institute a resource sharing protocol, as follows.
- a third example mechanism is a resource sharing protocol.
- Overlapping BSSs on the same FA may equitably share the channel. This may be done by alternating MAC frames between BSSs in some defined fashion. This allows traffic in each BSS to use the channel without risking interference from neighbor BSSs.
- the sharing may be done between all overlapping BSSs. For example, with 2 overlapping BSSs, one AP uses even numbered MAC frames and the other AP uses odd numbered MAC frames. With 3 overlapping BSSs, the sharing may be performed modulo-3, etc. Alternate embodiments may deploy any type of sharing scheme. Confrol fields in the BCH overhead message may indicate if resource sharing is enabled and the type of sharing cycles, hi this example, timing for all STAs in the BSS adjust to the appropriate sharing cycle, hi this example, latency will be increased with overlapping BSSs.
- a fourth example mechanism is STA assisted re-synchronization. It is possible that two BSSs do not hear each other, but a new STA in the overlapped area can hear both.
- the STA can determine the timing of both BSSs and report this to both.
- the STA can determine the time offset and indicate which AP should slip its frame timing and by how much. This information has to be propagated to all BSSs connected to the AP and they all have to re-establish frame timing to achieve synchronization.
- Frame resynchronization can be announced in the BCH.
- the algorithm can be generalized to handle more unaware overlapping BSSs.
- Synchronization may be performed by AP's on power-up, or at other designated times.
- System timing may be determined by searching all FA's for nearby systems.
- a set of orthogonal codes may be used to aid in discriminating different APs.
- APs have known beacons repeated every MAC frame. These beacons may be covered with Walsh sequences (e.g. of length 16).
- a , device such as an AP or STA, may perform Pilot Strength Measurements (PSMs) of the local APs to determine the overlapping BSSs.
- PSMs Pilot Strength Measurements
- active STAs associated with an AP, may transmit echoes to assist in synchronization. The echoes may use timing and covering corresponding to the AP cover.
- a STA echo may be receivable by a neighbor AP, thus providing information about its AP, and a signal with which the neighbor AP may synchronize.
- orthogonal cover codes may be reused on different FAs.
- Selection of a Walsh cover may be done deterministically based on the set of undetected Walsh covers (i.e., select a Walsh cover that is not detected on a neighboring AP). If all covers are present, the code corresponding to the weakest Received Signal Level (RSL) may be re-used by the new AP. Otherwise, in one embodiment, the code may be selected that maximizes the' operating point for the AP (see structured power backoff for adaptive reuse, detailed below).
- RSS Received Signal Level
- frame counters transmitted by each AP are staggered relative to each other.
- the stagger employed corresponds to the Walsh cover index.
- APO uses Walsh code 0.
- an AP listens for neighbor AP beacons and/or STA echoes. Upon no detection of neighbor systems, the AP establishes its own time reference. This can be arbitrary, or related to GPS, or any other local time reference. Upon detection of a single system, the local timing is established accordingly. If the AP detects two or more systems operating with different time lines, the AP may synchronize with system having the strongest signal. If the systems are operating on the same frequency assignment (FA), the AP may attempt to associate with the weaker AP to inform it of the other nearby AP operating on an independent clock.
- FA frequency assignment
- the new AP attempts to inform the weaker AP of the timing skew required to synchronize both AP zones.
- the weaker zone AP may then skew its timing. This may be repeated for multiple neighbor APs.
- the new AP can establish its timing with the synchronized timing of the two or more systems. In a situation where all neighbor APs are unable, for whatever reason, to synchronize to a single timing, the new AP may synchronize to any of the neighboring APs.
- Dynamic frequency selection may be performed by AP's on power-up.
- the new AP may select the FA that has the minimum RSL associated with it (i.e. when measuring neighbor APs, or during the echo period). Periodically, the AP may query the STAs for AP pilot measurements. Similarly, the AP may schedule silent periods to enable assessment of the interference levels at the AP caused by STAs from other zones (i.e. neighboring BSSs). If the RSL levels are excessive, the AP may attempt to find another FA during unscheduled periods, and/or institute a power backoff policy, as described below.
- APs may be organized according to a pilot cover code.
- Each AP may use a Walsh sequence cover of length 16, in this example. Any number of codes of various lengths may be deployed.
- the pilot cover is used to modulate the sign of the beacon over a super-frame period. In this example, the super-frame period is equivalent to 32 ms (i.e. 16 consecutive MAC frame beacons).
- STAs may then coherently integrate over the superframe interval to determine the pilot power associated with a given AP.
- an AP may select its Walsh code from the pool of undetected Walsh codes available. If all codes are detected (on the same FA), then the AP may rank these in order of strongest to weakest. The AP may re-use the Walsh code that corresponds to the weakest detected Walsh code.
- STAs may be used to transmit an echo to identify their respective AP.
- an AP that doesn't detect a neighbor AP may detect a corresponding STA echo, thus identifying the AP and its timing.
- Each AP may transmit configuration information in its beacon, and each STA may operate as a repeater to retransmit the AP configuration information, as well as timing, to any receiving neighbor AP.
- Active STAs may be required to fransmit, upon command from the AP, a predefined pattern that allows nearby APs operating on the same FA to detect the presence of the neighbor system.
- a simple way to facilitate this is to define an observation interval in the MAC frame (e.g. between the FCH and RCH segments) that is not used by the AP for any traffic.
- the duration of the observation interval may be defined to be long enough to handle the maximum differential propagation delay between STAs associated with the AP and STAs associated with a neighbor AP (e.g. 160 chips or 2 OFDM symbols).
- Structured power backoff for adaptive reuse may be deployed.
- a system becomes congested to the point where each FA must be reused in the vicinity of another AP, it may be desirable to impose a structured power backoff scheme to allow terminals in both zones to operate at maximum efficiency.
- power control can be used to improve the system's efficiency. That is, instead of transmitting at full power all of the time, the APs may use a structured power back-off scheme that is synchronized with their MAC frame counter.
- APs may institute a known power backoff policy.
- both APs use a backoff scheme that permits full power, Ptot, on MAC frame 0, Ptot(15/16) on MAC frame 1, ... Ptot/16 on MAC frame 15. Since the APs are synchronized, and their frame counters staggered, neither AP zone is using full power simultaneously. The objective is to select the backoff pattern that allows STAs in each AP zone to operate at the highest possible throughput.
- the backoff pattern used by a given AP may be a function of the degree of interference detected. In this example, up to 16 known backoff patterns may be used by a given AP.
- the backoff pattern used may be conveyed by the APs in the BCH and in the echoes fransmitted by STAs associated with an AP.
- FIG. 53 Another example embodiment of a technique for interoperability with legacy systems is depicted in FIG. 53.
- An example MAC frame 1500 is shown, as detailed above with respect to FIG. 15.
- a slotted mode is introduced in which slot intervals 5310 are defined.
- a slot interval 5310 comprises a MLMO pilot interval 5315 and slot gap 5320. Pilots 5315 are inserted, as shown, to reserve the channel from interference by other stations (including APs) that operate according to rules, such as EDCA.
- Modified MAC frame 5330 comprises substantially the MAC frame 1500 with pilots 5315 inserted to retain control of the medium.
- FIG. 53 is illustrative only, as will be evident to one of skill in the art.
- a slotted mode may be incorporated with any type of MAC frame, various examples of which are detailed herein.
- a legacy 802.11 system that uses MAC frames that are multiples of 1.204 ms.
- the MAC frame may be set to be 2.048 ms to be synchronous.
- TTT Target Beacon Transmit Time
- an announce CFP duration to get STAs to set their NAV's.
- STAs in the BSS should not transmit unless polled.
- an AP may send out an RTS and have STAs echo an identical CTS to clear out the BSS further.
- This CTS may be a synchronized transmission from all the STAs.
- jitter may be eliminated by insuring MAC frames always start on 2.048 ms boundaries.
- slotted mode may be deployed to maintiain possession of the medium, to prevent a legacy STA from interfering with the scheduled transmissions, thus potentially reducing throughput gains of a new class system (i.e. one using a scheme such as shown in FIG. 15 or FIG. 53, or various others detailed herein).
- the new class AP is subject to CSMA rules to seize the channel. Prior to this however, it should attempt to determine the presence of another BSS, either by listening for the beacon, or other STAs. Synchronization is not required, however, to permit fair resource sharing.
- the new class AP may set a timer that allows it to occupy the channel for a fixed duration determined to be fair. This may be roughly synchronized with the legacy AP's beacon period or asynchronous (i.e. 100 msec every 200 msec).
- the new class AP may seize the channel at any point during its permitted interval, which can be delayed by legacy BSS users.
- the new class AP may relinquish the channel before its time has expired if there is no traffic to serve.
- the new class AP seizes the channel, it have its use limited for an equitable period of time.
- the timing established by the new class AP may be consistent with the MAC frame timing established. That is, new class beacons occur on 2.048 msec boundaries of the new class AP clock. This way, new class STAs may maintain synchronization by looking at these specific intervals to determine if the HT AP has seized the channel.
- the new class AP may announce its frame parameters in a beacon. Part of the frame parameters may include the pilot interval spacing indicating the frequency of pilot transmission throughout the MAC frame. Note that the new class AP may schedule STAs such that their transmission overlaps the periodic burst pilot. In this case, the STA whose assignment overlaps knows this and ignores the pilot during that period. Other STAs do not know this and therefore use a threshold detector to validate whether the pilot was fransmitted during the prescribed interval.
- a STA may transmit a pilot at the instant the AP is supposed to transmit, or that the AP is transmitting steered pilot to a STA during this interval.
- the AP pilot may use Walsh covers that are orthogonal to common pilot Walsh covers.
- a structure for assigning Walsh covers may be deployed. For example, when STAs and APs use different Walsh covers, the Walsh space may include 2N covers, with N covers reserved for APs, and the remainder for STAs associated with a given AP using a cover that is coupled in a known manner with the respective AP's Walsh cover.
- the new class AP When the new class AP transmits an assignment to a STA, it is expecting the STA to transmit to it during the prescribed interval. It is possible the STA fails to receive the assignment, in which case the channel could go unused for an interval longer than PLFS. To prevent this from occurring, the AP may sense the channel for t ⁇ SLFS and determine if it is occupied. If not, the AP may immediately seize the channel by transmitting pilot, phased accordingly.
- New class channel assignments may be slotted to intervals of SLFS (16 usec). This way channel occupancy can be guaranteed to keep off legacy users during the period of new class exclusive usage.
- the RCH must be designed to accommodate interoperability since the duration of the RCH could exceed 16 usec. If the RCH cannot be easily accommodated in a given embodiment, the RCH may be allocated to work in the legacy modes when the new class MAC does not have confrol of the channel (i.e. coexist in legacy mode).
- the F-RCH may be accommodated by permitting STAs to transmit access requests anytime following a pilot transmission (i.e. wait 4 usec and transmit for 8 usec), as illustrated in FIG. 53.
- Example Embodiment Enhanced 802.11 MEMO WLAN
- the example embodiment features interoperability with legacy 802.11a, 802.1 lg STAs as well as with the 802. lie draft and anticipated final standard.
- the example embodiment comprises a MEMO OFDM AP, so named to distinguish from legacy APs. Due to backward compatibility, as detailed below, legacy STAs are able to associate with a MEMO OFDM AP. However, the MEMO OFDM AP may explicitly reject an association request from a legacy STA, if desired. DFS procedures may direct the rejected STA to another AP that supports legacy operation (which may be a legacy AP or another MEMO OFDM AP).
- MEMO OFDM STAs are able to associate with an 802.11a or 802.1 lg BSS or Independent BSS (LBSS) where no AP is present.
- 802.11a or 802.1 lg BSS or Independent BSS (LBSS) where no AP is present.
- LBSS Independent BSS
- such a STA will implement all the mandatory features of 802.11a, 802.1 lg as well as the anticipated final draft of 802. lie.
- the proposed MEMO OFDM PHY spectral mask is compatible with the existing 802.11a, 802.1 lg spectral mask so that no additional adjacent channel interference is introduced to legacy STAs.
- the extended SIGNAL field in the PLCP Header (detailed below) is backward compatible with the SIGNAL field of legacy 802.11. Unused RATE values in the legacy SIGNAL field are set to define new PPDU types (detailed below).
- the Adaptive Coordination Function (ACF) permits arbitrary sharing of the medium between legacy and MLMO OFDM STAs. Periods of 802.1 le EDCA, 802.1 le CAP and the SCAP (introduced below) may be arbitrarily interspersed in any Beacon interval, as determined by the AP scheduler.
- a high performance MAC is required to effectively leverage the high data rates enabled by the MEMO WLAN physical layer.
- Various attributes of this example MAC embodiment are detailed below. Following are several example attributes:
- Low latency service of the PHY provides low end-to-end delays to address the requirements of high throughput (e.g. multimedia) applications.
- Low latency operation may be achieved with contention-based MAC techniques at low loads, or using centralized or distributed scheduling in heavily loaded systems.
- Low latency provides many benefits. For example, low latency permits fast rate adaptation to maximize the physical layer data rate.
- Low latency permits inexpensive MAG implementation with small buffers, without stalling ARQ. Low latency also minimizes end-to-end delay for multimedia and high throughput applications.
- Another attribute is high MAC efficiency and low contention overhead.
- contention based MACs at high data rates, the time occupied by useful transmissions shrinks while an increasing fraction of the time is wasted in overhead, collisions and idle periods. Wasted time on the medium may be reduced through scheduling, as well as through aggregation of multiple higher layer packets (e.g. LP datagrams) into a single MAC frame. Aggregated frames may also be formed to minimize preamble and training overhead.
- higher layer packets e.g. LP datagrams
- the example MAC enhancements are designed to address the above performance criteria in a manner that is backward compatible with 802.1 lg and 802.11a.
- DLP Direct Link Protocol
- FIG. 35 depicts encapsulation of one or more MAC frames (or fragments) within an aggregated frame.
- Frame aggregation permits the encapsulation of one or more MAC frames (or fragments) 3510 within an aggregated frame 3520, which may incorporate header compression, detailed below.
- Aggregated MAC frame 3520 forms PSDU 3530, which may be fransmitted as a single PPDU.
- the aggregated frame 3520 may contain encapsulated frames (or fragments) 3510 of type data, management or control.
- the frame payload may be encrypted.
- the MAC frame header of an encrypted frame is fransmitted "in the clear.”
- This MAC-level frame aggregation permits fransmission of frames with zero LFS or BLFS (Burst Interframe Spacing, detailed further below) to the same receiving STA.
- LFS Back Interframe Spacing
- the SCHED frame defines the start time of multiple TXOPs. Preambles and LFS may be eliminated when the AP makes back-to-back transmissions to multiple receiving STAs. This is referred to as PPDU aggregation to distinguish from MAC-level frame aggregation.
- An example aggregated MAC frame fransmission starts with a preamble followed by the MEMO OFDM PLCP HEADER (including a SIGNAL field, which may comprise two fields, SIGNAL1 and SIGNAL2), followed by MEMO OFDM training symbols (if any).
- Example PPDU formats are detailed further below with respect to FIGS. 49-52.
- the aggregated MAC frame flexibly aggregates one or more encapsulated frames or fragments that are to be transmitted to the same receiving STA. (The SCHED message, detailed below, permits aggregation of TXOPs from the AP to multiple receiving STAs.) There is no restriction on the number of frames and fragments that may be aggregated.
- the maximum size of an aggregated frame may be established through negotiation.
- the first and last frames in the aggregated frame may be fragments that are created for efficient packing.
- the MAC headers of the data and QoS data frames may be compressed, as detailed below.
- the transmitting MAC may attempt to minimize PHY and PLCP overheads and idle periods through the use of flexible frame aggregation. This may be accomplished by aggregating frames to eliminate inter-frame spacing and PLCP headers, as well as flexible frame fragmentation, to fully occupy the available space in a TXOP.
- the MAC first computes the number of octets to be provided to the PHY based on the current data rate and the duration of the assigned or contention-based TXOP. Complete and fragmented MAC frames may then be packed to occupy the entire TXOP.
- the MAC may fragment the next frame to occupy as much as possible of the remaining octets in the TXOP.
- Frames may be fragmented arbitrarily for efficient packing. In an example embodiment, this arbitrary fragmentation is subject to the restriction of a maximum of 16 fragments per frame. In alternate embodiments, this limitation may not be required.
- Remaining fragments) of the MAC frame may be transmitted in a subsequent TXOP. In the subsequent TXOP, the MAC may give higher priority to fragments of an incompletely transmitted frame, if desired.
- An Aggregation Header (2 octets, in this example), described further below, is inserted in the MAC Header of each encapsulated frame (or fragment) that is inserted in the aggregated frame.
- a Length field in the Aggregation Header indicates the length (in octets) of the encapsulated MAC frame, and is used by the receiver to extract frames (and fragments) from the aggregated frame.
- the PPDU Size field in the proposed SIGNAL field provides the size of the MEMO OFDM PPDU fransmission (number of OFDM symbols) while the length of each encapsulated MAC frame (in octets) is indicated by the Aggregation Header.
- FIG. 36 depicts a legacy MAC frame 3600, comprising MAC Header 3660, followed by a frame body 3650 (which may include a variable number of octets, N) and a Frame Check Symbol (FCS) 3655 (4 octets, in this example).
- FCS Frame Check Symbol
- This prior art MAC frame format is detailed in 802.1 le.
- MAC Header 3660 comprises a frame control field 3610 (2 octets), a duration/ID field 3615 (2 octets), a sequence control field 3635 (2 octets), and a QoS confrol field 3645 (2 octets).
- Address 1 3620 Address 1 3620
- Address 2 3625 Address 3 3630
- Address 4 3640 Address 4 3640
- TA is the transmitting station address.
- RA is the receiving station address.
- SA is the source station address.
- DA is the destination station address.
- the MAC headers of the data and QoS data frames may be compressed.
- Example compressed MAC headers for QoS data frames are shown in FIGS. 37-39. Note that the FCS is computed on the compressed MAC header and the (encrypted or unencrypted) payload.
- FIG. 37-39 when frames are transmitted using a MLMO Data PPDU (Type 0000), an aggregation header field is infroduced into the MAC Header 3660 of the MAC frame 3600 to create an encapsulated MAC frame, i.e. 3705, 3805, or 3905, respectively.
- the MAC Header including the Aggregation Header field, is called the Extended MAC Header (i.e. 3700, 3800, or 3900).
- One or more encapsulated management, confrol and/or data frames may be aggregated into an aggregated MAC frame.
- the payload of the data or QoS data frames may be encrypted.
- the Aggregation Header 3710 is inserted for each frame (or fragment) inserted in the aggregated frame (3705, 3805, or 3905, respectively). Header compression is indicated by the Aggregation Header type field, detailed below. Frame headers of data and QoS data frames may be compressed to eliminate redundant fields.
- Aggregated frame 3705 depicted in FIG. 37, illustrates an uncompressed frame, which includes all four addresses and the Duration/ID field.
- the Duration/ID field 3615 does not need to be included for subsequent frames in the aggregated frame. Duration may be used to set the NAV.
- the Duration/ID field is overloaded based on context. In Poll messages, it contains the Access LD (ALD). In other messages, the same field specifies the duration to set the NAV.
- the corresponding frame 3805 is illustrated in FIG. 38.
- the receiver may insert the corresponding field from the previous header (after decompression) in the aggregated frame, hi this example, the first frame in an aggregated frame always uses the uncompressed header.
- Decryption of the payload may require some fields from the MAC Header that may have been removed for header compression. After decompression of the frame header, these fields may be made available to the decryption engine.
- the Length field is used by the receiver to extract frames (and fragments) from the aggregated frame.
- the Length field indicates the length of the frame with the compressed header (in octets).
- the Aggregation header field is removed.
- the decompressed frame is then passed to the decryption engine. Fields in the (decompressed) MAC headers may be required for message integrity verification during decryption.
- FIG. 40 illustrates an example Aggregation Header 3710.
- the Aggregation Header field is added to each frame (or fragment) header for one or more frames (encrypted or un-encrypted) that are transmitted in a MEMO Data PPDU.
- the Aggregation Header comprises a 2 bit Aggregation Header Type field 4010 (to indicate whether or not header compression is employed, and which type) and a 12 bit Length field 4030.
- Type 00 frames do not employ header compression.
- Type 01 frames have the Duration/ID, Address 1 and Address 2 fields removed.
- Type 10 frames have the same removed fields as type 01 frames, with the Address 3 and Address 4 fields also removed.
- the Length field 4030 in the Aggregation Header indicates the length of the frame in octets with the compressed header. 2 bits 4020 are reserved.
- the Aggregation Header types are summarized in Table 2. '
- all management and confrol frames that are encapsulated in an aggregated frame use the uncompressed frame header with Aggregation Header type 00.
- the following management frames may be encapsulated along with data frames in an aggregated frame: association request, association response, reassociation request, reassociation response, probe request, probe response, disassociation, authentication, and deauthentication.
- the following control frames may be encapsulated along with data frames in an aggregated frame: BlockAck and BlockAckRequest. In alternate embodiments, any type of frames maybe encapsulated.
- the Adaptive Coordination Function is an extension of the HCCA and EDCA that permits flexible, highly efficient, low latency scheduled operation suitable for operation with the high data rates enabled by the MEMO PHY.
- FIG. 41 illustrates an example embodiment of a Scheduled Access Period Frame (SCAP) for use in the ACF.
- SCAP Scheduled Access Period Frame
- an AP may simultaneously schedule one or more AP- STA, STA-AP or STA-STA TXOPs over the period known as the Scheduled Access Period 4130. These scheduled fransmissions are identified as scheduled fransmissions 4140.
- the SCHED message 4120 is an alternative to the legacy HCCA Poll, detailed above.
- the maximum permitted value of the SCAP is 4 ms.
- Example scheduled transmissions 4140 are shown in FIG. 41 for illustration, including AP to STA transmissions 4142, STA to AP transmissions 4144, and STA to STA transmissions 4146.
- the AP transmits to STA B 4142A, then to STA D 4142B, and then to STA G 4142C.
- gaps need not be introduced between these TXOPs, as the source (the AP) is the same for each fransmission. Gaps are shown between TXOPs when the source changes (example gap spacings are detailed further below).
- STA G fransmits to the AP 4144B
- STA E fransmits to the AP 4144C.
- a peer to peer TXOP 4146 is then scheduled.
- STA E remains as the source (transmitting to STA F), so no gap needs to be infroduced if the STA E transmit power is unchanged, otherwise a BLFS gap may be used.
- Additional STA to STA transmissions may be scheduled, but are not shown in this example. Any combination of TXOPs may be scheduled, in any order. The order of TXOP types shown is an example convention only. While it may be desirable to schedule TXOPs to minimize the required number of gaps, it is not mandatory.
- the Scheduled Access Period 4130 may also contain a FRACH Period 4150 dedicated to Fast Random Access Channel (FRACH) transmissions (wherein a STA may make a request for an allocation) and/or a MEMO OFDM EDCA 4160 period where MEMO STAs may use EDCA procedures.
- FRACH Fast Random Access Channel
- MEMO OFDM EDCA 4160 period where MEMO STAs may use EDCA procedures.
- These contention-based access periods are protected by the NAV set for the SCAP.
- MEMO OFDM EDCA 4160 period MEMO STAs use EDCA procedures to access the medium without having to contend with legacy STAs. Transmissions during either protected contention period use the MEMO PLCP header (detailed further below).
- the AP provides no TXOP scheduling during the protected contention period, in this embodiment.
- the NAV for the SCAP may be set through a Duration field in the SCHED frame (the SCHED frame is detailed further below).
- the AP may precede the SCHED frame 4120 with a CTS-to-Self 4110 to establish the NAV for the SCAP at all STAs in the BSS.
- MEMO STAs obey the SCAP boundary. The last STA to transmit in a SCAP must terminate its TXOP at least PLFS duration before the end of the SCAP. MEMO STAs also obey the scheduled TXOP boundaries and complete their fransmission prior to the end of the assigned TXOP. This allows the subsequent scheduled STA to start its TXOP without sensing the channel to be idle.
- the SCHED message 4120 defines the schedule. Assignments of TXOPs (AP- STA, STA-AP and/or STA-STA) are included in the CTRLJ elements (4515 - 4530 in FIG. 45, detailed below) in the SCHED frame.
- the SCHED message may also define the portion of the SCAP 4100 dedicated to FRACH 4150, if any, and a protected portion for EDCA operation 4160, if any. If no scheduled TXOP assignments are included in the SCHED frame, then the entire SCAP is set aside for EDCA fransmissions (including any FRACH) protected from legacy STAs by the NAV set for the SCAP.
- the maximum length of scheduled or contention-based TXOP permitted during the SCAP may be indicated in an ACF capabilities element.
- the length of the SCAP does not change during a Beacon interval.
- the length may be indicated in the ACF capabilities element.
- An example ACF element comprises a SCAP Length (10 bits), a Maximum SCAP TXOP Length (10 bits), a Guard LFS (GLFS) Duration (4 bits), and a FRACH RESPONSE (4 bits).
- the SCAP Length indicates the length of the SCAP for the current Beacon interval.
- the field is encoded in units of 4 ⁇ s.
- the Maximum SCAP TXOP Length indicates the maximum permissible TXOP length during a SCAP.
- the field is encoded in units of 4 ⁇ s.
- GLFS Duration is the guard interval between consecutive scheduled STA TXOPs.
- the field is encoded in units of 800 ns.
- FRACH RESPONSE is indicated in units of SCAPs. The AP must respond to a request received using an FRACH PPDU by providing the STA with a scheduled TXOP within FRACH RESPONSE SCAPs.
- FIG. 42 shows an example of how the SCAP may be used in conjunction with HCCA and EDCA.
- the AP has complete flexibility to adaptively intersperse duration of EDCA contention-based access with the 802.1 le CAP and the MLMO OFDM SCAP.
- the AP may operate as in HCCA, but with the additional capability of allocating periods for SCAP.
- the AP may use CFP and CP as in the PCF, allocate a CAP for polled operation as in HCCA, or may allocate a SCAP for scheduled operation.
- the AP may use any combination of periods for contention based access (EDCA) 4220A-F, CAP 4230A- F, and SCAP 4100A-I. (For simplicity, the example in FIG. 42 does not show any CFP.)
- EDCA contention based access
- the AP adapts the proportion of the medium occupied by different types of access mechanisms based on its scheduling algorithms and its observations of medium occupancy. Any scheduling technique may be deployed.
- the AP determines whether admitted QoS flows are being satisfied and may use other observations including measured occupancy of the medium for adaptation.
- HCCA and associated CAPs are decribed above.
- An illustrative example CAP 4230 is shown in FIG. 42.
- An AP TXOP 4232 is followed by a Poll 4234A.
- HCCA TXOP 4236A follows Poll 4234A.
- Another Poll 4234B is fransmitted, followed by anotheri respective HCCA TXOP 4236B.
- EDCA is described above.
- An illustrative example EDCA 4220 is shown in FIG. 42.
- Various EDCA TXOPs 4222A-C are shown.
- a CFP is omitted in this example.
- a SCAP 4100 may be of the format detailed in FIG. 41, including an optional CTS to Self 4110, SCHED 4120, and Scheduled Access Period 4130.
- the AP indicates scheduled operation using the 802.11 Delivery Traffic Indication Message (DTLM) message as follows.
- the DTLM contains a bitmap of Access LDs (ALDs) for which the AP or another STA in the BSS has backlogged data.
- ALDs Access LDs
- Using the DTLM all MLMO-capable STAs are signaled to stay awake following the Beacon.
- legacy STAs are scheduled first, immediately following the Beacon.
- the SCHED message is transmitted that indicates the composition of the Scheduled Access Period.
- MLMO-capable STAs not scheduled in a particular Scheduled Access Period may sleep for the remainder of the SCAP and wake up to listen for subsequent SCHED messages.
- FIG. 43 shows an example operation where each Beacon interval comprises a number of SCAPs 4100 interspersed with contention-based access periods 4220.
- This mode permits "fair" sharing of the medium where MEMO QoS flows are scheduled during the SCAP while MEMO non-QoS flows use the contention periods along with legacy STAs, if present. Interspersed periods permit low latency service for MEMO and legacy STAs.
- the SCHED message in the SCAP may be preceded by a CTS-to-Self for protection from legacy STAs. If no legacy STAs are present, CTS-to- Self (or other legacy clearing signal) is not required.
- the Beacon 4210 may set a long CFP to protect all SCAPs from any arriving legacy STAs. A CP at the end of the Beacon interval allows newly arriving legacy STAs to access the medium.
- Optimized low-latency operation with a large number of MEMO STAs may be enabled using the example operation shown in FIG. 44.
- the assumption is that legacy STAs, if present, require only limited resources.
- the AP transmits a Beacon, establishing a long CFP 4410 and a short CP 4420.
- a Beacon 4210 is followed by any broadcast/multicast messages for legacy STAs.
- SCAPs 4100 are scheduled back-to-back.
- This mode of operation also provides optimized power management, as the STAs need to awake periodically to listen to SCHED messages and may sleep for the SCAP interval if not scheduled in the current SCAP.
- Protected contention-based access for MEMO STAs is provided through the FRACH or MEMO EDCA periods included in the Scheduled Access Period 4130 of the SCAP 4100.
- Legacy STAs may obtain contention-based access to the medium during the CP 4420.
- Consecutive scheduled transmissions from the AP may be scheduled immediately following fransmission of the SCHED frame.
- the SCHED frame may be transmitted with a preamble.
- Subsequent scheduled AP fransmissions may be fransmitted without a preamble (an indicator of whether or not a preamble is included may be fransmitted).
- An example PLCP preamble is detailed further below. Scheduled STA transmissions will begin with a preamble in the example embodiment. Error Recovery
- the AP may use various procedures for recovery from SCHED receive errors. For example, if a STA is unable to decode a SCHED message, it will not be able to utilize its TXOP. If a scheduled TXOP does not begin at the assigned start time, the AP may initiate recovery by transmitting at a PLFS after the start of the unused scheduled TXOP. The AP may use the period of the unused scheduled TXOP as a CAP. During the CAP, the AP may fransmit to one or more STAs or Poll a STA. The Poll may be to the STA that missed the scheduled TXOP or another STA. The CAP is terminated prior to the next scheduled TXOP.
- the same procedures may also be used when a scheduled TXOP terminates early.
- the AP may initiate recovery by transmitting at a PLFS after the end of the last fransmission in the scheduled TXOP.
- the AP may use the unused period of a scheduled TXOP as a CAP, as just described.
- a SCAP may also contain a portion dedicated to FRACH transmissions and/or a portion where MEMO STAs may use EDCA procedures. These contention-based access periods may be protected by the NAV set for the SCAP.
- Protected contention complements low latency scheduled operation by permitting STAs to indicate TXOP requests to assist the AP in scheduling.
- MEMO OFDM STAs may transmit frames using EDCA based access (protected from contention with legacy STAs).
- STAs may indicate TXOP duration request or buffer status in the 802.1 le QoS Confrol field in the MAC Header.
- the FRACH is a more efficient means of providing the same function.
- STAs may use slotted Aloha like contention to access the channel in fixed size FRACH slots.
- the FRACH PPDU may include the TXOP duration request.
- MEMO frame transmissions use the MEMO PLCP Header, detailed below. Since legacy 802.11b, 802.11a, and 802.1 lg STAs are able to decode only the SIGNAL1 field of the MLMO PLCP header (detailed with respect to FIG. 50, below), in the presence of non-MLMO STAs, MEMO frames must be transmitted with protection. When both legacy and MEMO STAs are present, STAs using EDCA access procedures may use a legacy RTS/CTS sequence for protection. Legacy RTS/CTS refers to the transmission of RTS/CTS frames using legacy preamble, PLCP header and MAC frame formats.
- MEMO fransmissions may also utilize the protection mechanisms provided by the 802.1 le HCCA.
- fransmissions from the AP to STAs, polled fransmissions from STAs to the AP, or from a STA to another STA (using the Direct Link Protocol) may be provided protection using the Controlled Access Period (CAP).
- CAP Controlled Access Period
- the AP may also use legacy CTS-to-Self for protection of the MEMO Scheduled Access Period (SCAP) from legacy STAs.
- SCAP MEMO Scheduled Access Period
- an AP determines that all STAs present in the BSS are capable of decoding the MEMO PLCP header, it indicates this in a MEMO capabilities element in the Beacon. This is refe ⁇ ed to as a MEMO BSS.
- the start time of the TXOP is indicated in the SCHED message.
- the transmitting STA may begin its scheduled TXOP at the precise start time indicated in the SCHED message without determining that the medium is idle.
- consecutive scheduled AP transmissions during a SCAP are fransmitted with no minimum LFS.
- consecutive scheduled STA fransmissions are transmitted with an LFS of at least Guard LFS (GLFS).
- GLFS Guard LFS
- the default value of GLFS is 800 ns. A larger value may be chosen up to the value of Burst LFS (BLFS) defined next.
- BLFS Burst LFS
- the value of GLFS may be indicated in the ACF capabilities element, described above. Alternate embodiments may employ any values for GLFS and BLFS.
- Consecutive MEMO OFDM PPDU transmissions from the same STA (TXOP bursting) are separated by a BLFS.
- the BLFS When operating in the 2.4 GHz band, the BLFS is' equal to the 10 ⁇ s arid the MEMO OFDM PPDU does not include the 6 ⁇ s OFDM signal extension. When operating in the 5 GHz band, the BLFS is 10 ⁇ s. In an alternate embodiment, BLFS may be set to a smaller or larger value, including 0. To allow the receiving STA Automatic Gain Confrol (AGC) to switch between fransmissions, a gap larger than 0 may be used when the fransmitting STA fransmit power is changed.
- AGC Automatic Gain Confrol
- Frames that require an immediate response from the receiving STA are not transmitted using a MEMO OFDM PPDU. Instead, they are transmitted using the underlying legacy PPDU, i.e. Clause 19 in the 2.4 GHz band or Clause 17 in the 5 GHz band.
- legacy and MEMO OFDM PPDUs are multiplexed on the medium are shown below.
- EDCA TXOP using MEMO OFDM PPDU.
- the transmission sequence is as follows: MEMO OFDM PPDU - BLFS - Legacy BlockAckRequest - SLFS - ACK.
- the EDCA TXOP is obtained using EDCA procedures for the appropriate Access Class (AC).
- AC Access Class
- EDCA defines access classes that may use different parameters per AC, such as ALFS [AC], CWmin[AC], and CWmax[AC].
- the Legacy BlockAckRequest is transmitted with either signal extension or 16 ⁇ s SLFS. If the BlockAckRequest is transmitted in the aggregate frame within the MEMO OFDM PPDU, there is no ACK.
- the transmission sequence is as follows: STA A MEMO OFDM PPDU - GLFS - STA B MEMO OFDM PPDU. There may be an idle period after the fransmission of the STA A MEMO OFDM PPDU if the PPDU transmission is shorter than the assigned maximum permitted TXOP time.
- decoding and demodulation of coded OFDM transmissions imposes additional processing requirements at the receiving STA.
- 802.11a and 802.1 lg allow additional time for the receiving STA before the ACK must be transmitted.
- the SLFS time is set to 16 ⁇ s.
- the SLFS time is set to 10 ⁇ s but an additional 6 ⁇ s OFDM signal extension is introduced.
- an embodiment may be designed to increase the SLFS or OFDM signal extension, leading to further reduction in efficiency.
- the requirement of immediate ACK for all MEMO OFDM transmissions is eliminated.
- the signal extension is eliminated, and for many situations the required interframe spacing between consecutive fransmissions is reduced or eliminated, leading to greater efficiency.
- FIG. 45 illustrates the SCHED message, introduced above with respect to FIG. 41, and detailed further below.
- the SCHED message 4120 is a multiple poll message that assigns one or more AP-STA, STA-AP and STA-STA TXOPs for the duration of a Scheduled Access Period (SCAP).
- SCAP Scheduled Access Period
- Use of the SCHED message permits reduced polling and contention overhead, as well as eliminates unnecessary LFS.
- the SCHED message 4120 defines the schedule for the SCAP.
- SCHED message 4120 comprises a MAC Header 4510 (15 octets in the example embodiment), hi the example embodiment, each of the CTRL0, CTRLl, CTRL2 and CTRL3 segments (referred to generically herein as CTRLJ, where J may be 0 to 3 to illustrate segments 4515 - 4530, respectively) are of variable length and may be fransmitted at 6, 12, 18 and 24 Mbps, respectively, when present.
- the example MAC header 4510 comprises Frame Confrol 4535 (2 octets), Duration 4540 (2 octets), BSSLD 4545 (6 octets), Power Management 4550 (2 octets), and MAP 4555 (3 octets).
- Bits 13-0 of the Duration field 4540 specify the length of the SCAP in microseconds.
- the Duration field 4540 is used by STAs capable of MEMO OFDM transmissions to set the NAV for the duration of the SCAP.
- the AP may use other means to protect the SCAP, e.g. a legacy CTS-to-Self.
- the maximum value of the SCAP is 4 ms.
- the BSSLD field 4545 identifies the AP.
- the Power Management field 4550 is shown in FIG. 46. Power Management 4550 comprises SCHED Count 4610, a reserved field 4620 (2 bits), Transmit Power 4630, and Receive Power 4640. The AP transmit power and AP receive power are as indicated in the Power Management field and STA receive power level is measured at the STA.
- SCHED Count is a field that is incremented at each SCHED transmission (6 bits in this example). The SCHED Count is reset at each Beacon fransmission. SCHED Count may be used for various purposes. As an example, a power-saving feature using SCHED Count is described below.
- the Transmit Power field 4630 represents the transmit power level being used by the AP. i the example embodiment, the 4-bit field is encoded as follows: The value represents the number of 4 dB steps that the transmit power level is below the Maximum Transmit Power Level (in dBm) for that channel as indicated in an information element of the Beacon.
- the Receive Power field 4640 represents the receive power level expected at the AP.
- the 4-bit field is encoded as follows: The value represents the number of 4 dB steps that the receive power level is above the minimum Receiver Sensitivity Level (-82 dBm).
- the control segment is transmitted at a power level that may be decoded at both the AP as well as the receiving STA.
- a power control report from the AP or the Power Management field 4550 in the SCHED frame permits the STA to determine the transmit power level required so that the control segment may be decoded at the AP.
- This general aspect is detailed above with respect to FIG. 22.
- the PPDU is transmitted at the higher of the two power levels.
- the MAP field 4555 specifies the presence and duration of protected contention based access periods during the SCAP.
- MAP field 4555 comprises FRACH Count 4710, FRACH Offset 4720, and EDCA Offset 4730.
- the example FRACH Count 4710 (4 bits) is the number of FRACH slots scheduled starting at the FRACH Offset 4720 (10 bits). Each FRACH slot is 28 ⁇ s.
- An FRACH Count value of '0' indicates that there is no FRACH period in the current Scheduled Access Period.
- the EDCA Offset 4730 is the start of the protected EDCA period.
- the example EDCA Offset 4730 is 10 bits. Both the FRACH Offset 4720 and the EDCA Offset 4730 are in units of 4 ⁇ s starting from the beginning of the SCHED frame transmission.
- the SCHED message 4120 is transmitted as a special SCHED PPDU 5100 (Type 0010), detailed further below with respect to FIG. 51.
- the presence within SCHED message 4120 and length of the CTRL0 4515, CTRLl 4520, CTRL24525, and CTRL3 4530 segments are indicated in the SIGNAL field (5120 and 5140) of the PLCP Header of the SCHED PPDU 5100.
- FIG. 48 illustrates SCHED control frames for TXOP assignment.
- Each of the CTRL0 4515, CTRLl 4520, CTRL2 4525, and CTRL3 4530 segments are of variable length and each comprises zero or more assignment elements (4820, 4840, 4860, and 4880, respectively).
- a 16-bit FCS 4830, 4850, 4870, and 4890, respectively
- 6 tail bits (not shown) are added per CTRLJ segment.
- the FCS is computed over the MAC Header 4510 and any CTRLO assignment elements 4820 (thus MAC Header is shown prepended to CTRLO 4515 in FIG. 48).
- the FCS 4830 for CTRLO 4515 is included even if no assignment elements are included in the CTRLO segment.
- Assignment elements to different STAs are fransmitted in a CTRLJ segment as indicated by the STA in the SCHED Rate field of the PLCP header of its fransmissions.
- CTRLO through CTRL3 correspond to decreasing robustness.
- Each STA begins decoding the PLCP Header of the SCHED PPDU.
- the SIGNAL field indicates the presence and length of CTRLO, CTRLl, CTRL2 and CTRL3 segments in the SCHED PPDU.
- the STA receiver begins with decoding the MAC Header and CTRLO segment, decoding each assignment element until the FCS, and it continues to subsequently decode CTRLl, CTRL2 and CTRL3, stopping at the CTRLJ segment whose FCS it is unable to verify.
- Each assignment element specifies the transmitting STA Access ID (ALD), the receiving STA ALD, the start time of the scheduled TXOP and the maximum permitted length of the scheduled TXOP.
- the preamble may be eliminated in consecutive transmissions from the AP.
- the Preamble Present bit is set to 0 if the AP will not fransmit a preamble for a scheduled AP fransmission.
- An example benefit of preamble elimination is when the AP has low bandwidth, low latency flows to several STAs, such as in a BSS with many Voice over LP (VoLP) flows. Therefore, the SCHED frame permits the aggregation of fransmissions from the AP to several receiving STAs (i.e. PPDU aggregation, described above).
- Frame Aggregation permits the aggregation of frames to one receiving STA.
- the Start Offset field is in multiples of 4 ⁇ s referenced from the start time of the SCHED message preamble.
- the ALD is the Access LD of the assigned STA(s).
- the TXOP Duration field is the maximum permitted length of the scheduled TXOP in multiples of 4 ⁇ s.
- the actual PPDU Size of the transmitted PPDU is indicated in the SIGNAL1 field of the PPDU (detailed further below).
- the Max PPDU Size field is also the maximum permitted length of the scheduled TXOP in multiples of 4 ⁇ s, however additional rules may apply.
- the TXOP contains only one PPDU.
- the receiving STA uses the Max PPDU Size indicated in the assignment element to determine the number of OFDM symbols in the PPDU (since the PPDU Size field is replaced by a Request field in the SIGNAL1, detailed below with respect to FIG. 51).
- the receiving STA sets the PPDU Size for the scheduled TXOP to the Max PPDU Size indicated in the assignment element. If the STA-STA flow uses OFDM symbols with shortened GI, the receiving STA determines the PPDU Size by scaling up the Max PPDU Size field by a factor of 10/9 and rounding down. The fransmitting STA may transmit a PPDU shorter than the assigned Max PPDU Size. The PPDU Size does not provide the length of the aggregated MAC frame to the receiver. The length of the encapsulated f ames is included in the Aggregation header of each MAC frame.
- GI Guard Interval
- each assignment scheduled by the SCHED message specifies the transmitting STA ALD, the receiving STA ALD, the start time of the scheduled TXOP, and the maximum permitted length of the scheduled TXOP.
- the SCHED Count is incremented at each SCHED transmission and is reset at each Beacon transmission.
- STAs may indicate a power-save operation to the AP, and thus are provided specific SCHED Count values during which they may be assigned scheduled fransmit or receive TXOPs by the AP. STAs may then wake up periodically only to listen for SCHED messages with an appropriate SCHED Count.
- FIG. 49 depicts a legacy 802.11 PPDU 4970, comprising a PLCP preamble 4975 (12 OFSM symbols), a PLCP header 4910, a variable length PSDU 4945, a 6-bit tail 4950, and variable length pad 4955.
- PLCP header 4910 comprises SIGNAL 4980 and 16-bit Service field 4940 (which is included in DATA 4985, and fransmitted according to its format).
- SIGNAL field 4980 comprises Rate 4915 (4 bits), reserved field 4920 (1 bit), Length 4925 (12 bits), Parity bit 4930, and Tail 4935 (6 bits).
- PPDU Type Unused values of RATE are designated as PPDU Type.
- the PPDU Type also indicates the presence and length of a SIGNAL field extension designated SIGNAL2.
- New values of the RATE/Type field are defined in Table 4. These values of the RATE/Type field are undefined for legacy STAs. Therefore, legacy STAs will abandon decoding of the PPDU after successfully decoding the SIGNALl field and finding an undefined value in the RATE field.
- the Reserved bit in the legacy SIGNAL field may be set to '1' to indicate a MEMO OFDM transmission to a new class STA. Receiving STAs may ignore the Reserved bit and continue to attempt to decode the SIGNAL field and the remaining fransmission.
- the receiver is able to determine the length of the SIGNAL2 field based on the PPDU Type.
- the FRACH PPDU appears only in a designated portion of the SCAP and needs to be decoded only by the AP.
- FIG. 50 depicts MEMO PPDU format 5000 for data fransmissions.
- PPDU 5000 is referred to as PPDU Type 0000.
- PPDU 5000 comprises a PLCP preamble 5010, SIGNAL 1 5020 (1 OFDM symbol), SIGNAL 2 5040 (1 OFDM symbol), Training Symbols 5060 (0, 2, 3, or 4 symbols), and a variable length Data field 5080.
- PLCP preamble 5010 when present, is 16 ⁇ s in the example embodiment.
- SIGNAL 1 5020 and SIGNAL 2 5040 are transmitted using the PPDU confrol segment rate and modulation format.
- Data 5080 comprises Service 5082 (16 bits), Feedback 5084 (16 bits), a variable length PSDU 5086, Tail 5088 (6 bits per stream) where a separate convoutional channel code is applied to each stream, and variable length Pad 5090.
- Data 5080 is transmitted using the PPDU data segment rate and modulation format.
- the MEMO PLCP header for PPDU Type 0000 comprises the SIGNAL (including SIGNALl 5020 and SIGNAL2 5040), SERVICE 5082 and FEEDBACK 5084 fields.
- the SERVICE field is unchanged from legacy 802.11, and is fransmitted using the data segment rate and format.
- the FEEDBACK field 5084 is fransmitted using the data segment rate and format.
- the FEEDBACK field comprises the ES field (1 bit), the Data Rate Vector Feedback (DRVF) field (13 bits), and a Power Confrol field (2 bits).
- DRVF Data Rate Vector Feedback
- the ES field indicates the preferred steering method.
- Eigenvector Steering ES
- SS Spatial Spreading
- the Data Rate Vector Feedback (DRVF) field provides feedback to the peer station regarding the sustainable rate on each of up to four spatial modes.
- Explicit rate feedback allows stations to quickly and accurately maximize their transmission rates, dramatically improving efficiency of the system. Low latency feedback is desirable. However, feedback opportunities need not be synchronous. Transmission opportunities may be obtained in any manner, such as contention-based (i.e. EDCA), polled (i.e. HCF), or scheduled (i.e. ACF). Therefore, variable amounts of time may pass between fransmission opportunities and rate feedback. Based on the age of the rate feedback, the transmitter may apply a back-off to determine the fransmission rate.
- contention-based i.e. EDCA
- HCF polled
- ACF scheduled
- the PPDU data segment rate adaptation for fransmissions from STA A to STA B relies on feedback provided by STA B to STA A (described earlier, see FIG. 24, for example). For either ES or SS mode of operation, each time STA B receives MEMO OFDM Training Symbols from the STA A, it estimates the data rates that can be achieved on each spatial sfream. In any subsequent transmission from STA B to STA A, STA B includes this estimate in the DRVF field of FEEDBACK 5084. The DRVF field is transmitted at the data segment 5080 rate.
- STA A determines what fransmission rates to use based on the DRVF it received from STA B, with an optional back-off as necessary to account for delays.
- the SIGNAL field (detailed below) contains the 13-bit DRV field 5046 that allows the receiving STA B to decode the frame transmitted from STA A.
- the DRV 5046 is fransmitted at the control segment rate.
- the DRVF field is encoded comprising a STR field (4 bits), an R2 field (3 bits), an R3 field (3 bits), and an R4 field (3 bits).
- the STR field indicates the Rate for Stream 1. This field is coded as STR Value shown in Table 5.
- R2 indicates the difference between the STR Value for Sfream 1 and the STR Value for Stream 2.
- An R2 value of "111" indicates that Stream 2 is off.
- R3 indicates the difference between the STR Value for Sfream 2 and the STR Value for Stream 3.
- R4 indicates the difference between the STR Value for Stream 3 and the STR Value for Stream 4.
- STA B In addition to the DRVF, STA B also provides power confrol feedback to the fransmitting STA A. This feedback is included in the Power Control field and is also fransmitted at the data segment rate. This field is 2 bits and indicates either to increase or decrease power or to leave the power level unchanged. The resultant transmit power level is designated the Data Segment Transmit Power level.
- Example Power Confrol field values are illustrated in Table 6.. Alternate embodiments may deploy power control fields of various sizes, and with alternate power adjustment values.
- the transmit power level remains constant for the entire PPDU.
- the Data Segment Transmit Power Level and the Open Loop STA Transmit Power i.e. the power level required for the AP to decode the fransmission, detailed above
- the PPDU is fransmitted at the maximum of the two power levels. That is, PPDU Transmit Power Level is the maximum of the Open Loop STA Transmit Power (dBm) and the Data Segment Transmit Power (dBm).
- the Power Control field is set to "00" in the first frame of any frame exchange sequence. In subsequent frames, it indicates the increase or decrease of power in ldB steps. The receiving STA will use this feedback information in all subsequent frame transmissions to that STA.
- SIGNALl 5020 comprises RATE/Type field 5022 (4 bits), 1 Reserved Bit 5024, PPDU Size/Request 5026 (12 bits), Parity bit 5028, and a 6-bit Tail 5030.
- the SIGNALl field 5020 is fransmitted using the control segment rate and format (6 Mbit/s, in the example embodiment).
- the RATE/Type field 5022 is set to 0000.
- the Reserved bit 5024 may be set to 0.
- the PPDU Size/Request Field 5026 serves two functions, depending on the fransmission mode. In contention-based STA fransmissions and all AP fransmissions, this field denotes the PPDU Size. In this first mode, Bit 1 indicates that the PPDU uses expanded OFDM symbols, Bit 2 indicates that the PPDU uses OFDM symbols with shortened GI, and Bits 3-12 indicate the number of OFDM symbols.
- SCHED Rate indicates the highest numbered SCHED (0, 1, 2 or 3) field that may be used to fransmit an assignment to the STA.
- each non-AP STA estimates the rate at wliich it can robustly receive SCHED frame transmissions from the AP.
- this maximum permissible rate is included in the SCHED Rate field. This field is decoded . by the AP. The AP uses this information to schedule subsequent TXOPs for the STA and determines the CTRLJ (0, 1, 2, or 3) for issuing those allocations to the STA.
- Bits 3-4 indicate the QoS field, which identifies the fraction (in thirds) of the request that is for TC 0 or 1 (i.e. 0%, 33%, 67%, 100%).
- Bits 5-12 indicate the requested length of TXOP (in multiples of 16 ⁇ s, in the example embodiment).
- the SIGNALl field 5020 is checked by 1 Parity bit 5028 and terminated with a 6-bit Tail 5030 for the convolutional encoder.
- SIGNAL2 field 5040 The presence and length of the SIGNAL2 field 5040 is indicated by the RATE/Type field 5022 in SIGNALl 5020.
- the SIGNAL2 field 5040 is fransmitted using the confrol segment rate and format.
- SIGNAL2 5040 comprises a Reserved bit 5042, Training Type 5044 (3 bits), Data Rate Vector (DRV) 5046 (13 bits), Parity bit 5048, and Tail 5050 (6 bits).
- the 3-bit Training Type field indicates the length and format of the MEMO OFDM Training symbols. Bits 1-2 indicate the number of MEMO OFDM Training Symbols 5060 (0, 2, 3 or 4 OFDM symbols). Bit 3 is the Training Type field: 0 indicates SS, 1 indicates ES.
- the DRV 5046 provides the rate for each of up to four spatial modes.
- the DRV 5046 is encoded in the same manner as DRVF (included in FEEDBACK 5084, detailed above).
- the SIGNAL2 field 5040 is checked by 1 Parity bit 5048 and terminated with a 6-bit Tail 5050 for the convolutional encoder.
- SCHED PPDU 5100 comprises a PLCP preamble 5110, SIGNAL 1 5120 (1 OFDM symbol), SIGNAL 2 5140 (1 OFDM symbol), Training Symbols 5160 (0, 2, 3, or 4 symbols), and a variable length SCHED Frame 5180.
- PLCP preamble 5010 when present, is 16 ⁇ s in the example embodiment.
- SIGNAL 1 5020 and SIGNAL 2 5040 are transmitted using the PPDU confrol segment rate and modulation format.
- SCHED Frame 5180 may include various rates, as detailed above, with respect to the ACF description.
- SIGNALl 5120 comprises RATE/Type 5122 (4 bits), a Reserved bit 5124, CTRLO Size 5126 (6 bits), CTRLl Size 5128 (6 bits), Parity bit 5130, and Tail 5132 (6 bits).
- RATE/Type 5122 is set to 0010.
- the Reserved bit 5124 may be set to 0.
- CTRLO Size 5126 indicates the length of the segment of the SCHED PPDU fransmitted at the lowest rate (6 Mbps in this example). This segment includes the SERVICE field of the PLCP Header, the MAC Header and the CTRLO segment 5126. The value is encoded in multiples of 4 ⁇ s, in this example.
- CTRLl Size 5128 indicates the length of the segment of the SCHED PPDU fransmitted at the next higher rate (12 Mbps in this example). The value is encoded in multiples of 4 ⁇ s, in this example. A CTRLl Size of '0' indicates that the corresponding CTRLl segment is not present in the SCHED PPDU.
- the SIGNALl field 5120 is checked by 1 Parity bit 5130 and terminated with a 6-bit Tail 5132 for the convolutional encoder.
- SIGNAL2 5140 comprises a Reserved bit 5142, Training Type 5144 (3 bits), CTRL2 Size 5146 (5 bits), CTRL3 Size 5148 (5 bits), FCS 5150 (4 bits), and Tail 5152 (6 bits).
- the Reserved bit 5142 may be set to 0.
- Training Type 5144 is as specified for PPDU Type 0000 (Training Type 5044).
- CTRL2 Size 5146 indicates the length of the segment of the SCHED PPDU fransmitted at the next highest rate (18 Mbps in this example). The value is encoded in multiples of 4 ⁇ s, in this example.
- a CTRL2 Size of '0' indicates that the corresponding CTRL2 segment is not present in the SCHED PPDU.
- CTRL3 Size 5148 indicates the length of the segment of the SCHED PPDU fransmitted at the highest rate (24 Mbps in this example). The value is encoded in multiples of 4 ⁇ s, in this example.
- a CTRL2 Size of '0' indicates that the corresponding CTRL3 segment is not present in the SCHED PPDU.
- FCS 5150 is computed over the entire SIGNALl and SIGNAL2 fields.
- the SIGNAL2 field 5152 is terminated with a 6-bit Tail 5152 for the convolutional encoder.
- FRACH PPDU 5200 comprises a PLCP preamble 5210, SIGNAL 1 5220 (1 OFDM symbol), and SIGNAL 2 5240 (2 OFDM symbols).
- PLCP preamble 5210 when present, is 16 ⁇ s in the example embodiment.
- SIGNAL 1 5220 and SIGNAL 2 5240 are fransmitted using the PPDU confrol segment rate and modulation format.
- the FRACH PPDU 5200 is transmitted by a STA during the FRACH period within the MEMO Scheduled Access Period.
- the FRACH period is established by and therefore known to the AP (as detailed above).
- SIGNALl 5220 comprises RATE/Type 5222 (4 bits), a Reserved bit 5224, Request 5226 (12 bits), Parity bit 5228, and Tail 5230 (6 bits).
- RATE/Type 5222 is set to 0100.
- the Reserved bit 5124 maybe set to 0.
- the Request Field 5226 is as specified for PPDU Type 0000 (5000), detailed above.
- the SIGNALl field 5220 is checked by 1 Parity bit 5228 and terminated with a 6-bit Tail 5230 for the convolutional encoder.
- SIGNAL2 5240 comprises a Reserved bit 5242, Source ALD 5244 (16 bits), Destination ALD 5246 (16 bits), FCS 5248 (4 bits), and Tail 5250 (6 bits).
- the Reserved bit 5242 may be set to 0.
- Source ALD 5244 identifies the STA transmitting on the FRACH.
- Destination ALD 5246 identifies the destination STA for which a TXOP is being requested. In the example embodiment, in the case where the destination is the AP, the value of the Destination ALD field 5246 is set to 2048.
- a 4-bit FCS 5248 is computed over the entire SIGNALl and SIGNAL2 fields.
- a 6 bit Tail 5250 is added prior to convolutional encoding.
- STAs may use slotted Aloha to access the channel and fransmit the request message in the FRACH. If received successfully by the AP, the AP provides the requesting STA with a scheduled TXOP in a subsequent scheduled access period. The number of FRACH slots for the current scheduled access period is indicated in the SCHED message, NJFRACH.
- the STA may also maintain a variable B_FRACH. Following a fransmission on the FRACH, if the STA receives a TXOP assignment from the AP, it resets B_FRACH. If the STA does not receive a TXOP assignment within a predetermnined number, FRACH RESPONSE, of SCHED transmissions from the AP, B_FRACH is incremented by 1 up to a maximum value of 7.
- the parameter FRACH RESPONSE is included in an ACF element of the Beacon. During any FRACH, the STA picks a FRACH slot with probability (N_FRACH) _1 * 2 "B - FRACH .
- MEMO STAs may contend during the protected contention period during the SCAP using EDCA rules.
- DSP digital signal processor
- ASIC application specific integrated circuit
- FPGA field programmable gate array
- a general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine.
- a processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
- a software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art.
- An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium.
- the storage medium may be integral to the processor.
- the processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC.
- the ASIC may reside in a user terminal, i the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
- Small-Scale Networks (AREA)
- Time-Division Multiplex Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (8)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
ES04795248T ES2393104T3 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2004-10-15 | High speed media access control |
EP20040795248 EP1678893B1 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2004-10-15 | High speed media access control |
CN2004800372598A CN1894910B (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2004-10-15 | High speed media access control |
JP2006535340A JP4490432B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2004-10-15 | High speed media access control |
CA 2542380 CA2542380C (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2004-10-15 | High speed media access control |
KR1020067009420A KR100930136B1 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2004-10-15 | High speed media access control |
DK04795248T DK1678893T3 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2004-10-15 | Fast media access management |
PL04795248T PL1678893T3 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2004-10-15 | High speed media access control |
Applications Claiming Priority (22)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US51175003P | 2003-10-15 | 2003-10-15 | |
US51190403P | 2003-10-15 | 2003-10-15 | |
US60/511,904 | 2003-10-15 | ||
US60/511,750 | 2003-10-15 | ||
US51323903P | 2003-10-21 | 2003-10-21 | |
US60/513,239 | 2003-10-21 | ||
US52634703P | 2003-12-01 | 2003-12-01 | |
US52635603P | 2003-12-01 | 2003-12-01 | |
US60/526,347 | 2003-12-01 | ||
US60/526,356 | 2003-12-01 | ||
US53279103P | 2003-12-23 | 2003-12-23 | |
US60/532,791 | 2003-12-23 | ||
US54596304P | 2004-02-18 | 2004-02-18 | |
US60/545,963 | 2004-02-18 | ||
US57654504P | 2004-06-02 | 2004-06-02 | |
US60/576,545 | 2004-06-02 | ||
US58684104P | 2004-07-08 | 2004-07-08 | |
US60/586,841 | 2004-07-08 | ||
US60096004P | 2004-08-11 | 2004-08-11 | |
US60/600,960 | 2004-08-11 | ||
US10/964,321 | 2004-10-13 | ||
US10/964,321 US8483105B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2004-10-13 | High speed media access control |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2005039127A1 true WO2005039127A1 (en) | 2005-04-28 |
Family
ID=34468589
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2004/034061 WO2005039127A1 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2004-10-15 | High speed media access control |
Country Status (12)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8483105B2 (en) |
EP (5) | EP2618518B1 (en) |
JP (3) | JP4490432B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR100930136B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1894910B (en) |
CA (2) | CA2719486C (en) |
DK (2) | DK1678893T3 (en) |
ES (3) | ES2639947T3 (en) |
HU (1) | HUE035812T2 (en) |
PL (2) | PL2317687T3 (en) |
PT (2) | PT2317687E (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005039127A1 (en) |
Cited By (38)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2006134704A1 (en) * | 2005-06-17 | 2006-12-21 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Responder (e.g. 802.11n) transmitting acknowledgements in an extra physical frame at a first transmission rate |
WO2007024613A1 (en) * | 2005-08-19 | 2007-03-01 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method of band multiplexing to improve system capacity for a multi-band communication system |
WO2007033056A2 (en) * | 2005-09-14 | 2007-03-22 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for protecting high throughput stations |
WO2007038118A2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2007-04-05 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
JP2008507234A (en) * | 2005-06-09 | 2008-03-06 | サムスン エレクトロニクス カンパニー リミテッド | Method and apparatus for transmitting data while providing backward compatibility in a high speed wireless network |
WO2008072126A2 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2008-06-19 | Nokia Corporation | Flexible radio resource sharing in time and frequency domains among tdd communication systems |
US7454218B2 (en) | 2005-08-19 | 2008-11-18 | Panasonic Corporation | Method of band multiplexing to improve system capacity for a multi-band communication system |
JP2009504023A (en) * | 2005-07-27 | 2009-01-29 | インテロン・コーポレーション | Data encryption in communication networks |
EP2070242A1 (en) * | 2006-10-02 | 2009-06-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) | Optimal error protection coding for mimo ack/nack/pre/post information |
EP2120464A1 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2009-11-18 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Communication system, base station, and mobile station |
EP2171885A2 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2010-04-07 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for peer-to-peer (p2p) communications in a broadband wireless communication system |
JP2010519843A (en) * | 2007-02-22 | 2010-06-03 | サムスン エレクトロニクス カンパニー リミテッド | Frame configuration method and system in communication system |
US7882412B2 (en) | 2004-10-05 | 2011-02-01 | Sanjiv Nanda | Enhanced block acknowledgement |
US7894538B2 (en) | 2003-08-27 | 2011-02-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Frequency-independent spatial processing for wideband MISO and MIMO systems |
US8171363B2 (en) | 2007-08-10 | 2012-05-01 | Fujitsu Limited | Method and device for counting transmission times of data unit, transmission device, and computer program |
US8175190B2 (en) | 2005-07-27 | 2012-05-08 | Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. | Managing spectra of modulated signals in a communication network |
US8233462B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2012-07-31 | Qualcomm Incorporated | High speed media access control and direct link protocol |
US8284752B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2012-10-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method, apparatus, and system for medium access control |
US8315271B2 (en) | 2004-03-26 | 2012-11-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for an ad-hoc wireless communications system |
US8355372B2 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2013-01-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Transmission mode and rate selection for a wireless communication system |
US8401018B2 (en) | 2004-06-02 | 2013-03-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for scheduling in a wireless network |
US8462817B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2013-06-11 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method, apparatus, and system for multiplexing protocol data units |
US8472473B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2013-06-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Wireless LAN protocol stack |
US8483105B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2013-07-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | High speed media access control |
US8526461B2 (en) | 2008-11-10 | 2013-09-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus supporting adaptive decentralized traffic scheduling including a dynamic transmitter yielding threshold |
CN103404179A (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2013-11-20 | 华为技术有限公司 | Wireless local area network cooperated data transmission method, device and system |
US8600336B2 (en) | 2005-09-12 | 2013-12-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Scheduling with reverse direction grant in wireless communication systems |
EP2685759A1 (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2014-01-15 | Fujitsu Limited | Wireless communication systems |
US8654635B2 (en) | 2003-11-24 | 2014-02-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Medium access control layer that encapsulates data from a plurality of received data units into a plurality of independently transmittable blocks |
US8711835B2 (en) | 2007-07-10 | 2014-04-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | OFDM control signaling in the presence of timing asynchronization in a peer-to-peer network |
WO2014105387A1 (en) * | 2012-12-27 | 2014-07-03 | Motorola Mobility Llc | Methods for device-to-device communication |
US8842657B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2014-09-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | High speed media access control with legacy system interoperability |
US8989106B2 (en) | 2009-02-27 | 2015-03-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatuses for scheduling uplink request spatial division multiple access (RSDMA) messages in an SDMA capable wireless LAN |
EP3051714A1 (en) * | 2006-05-11 | 2016-08-03 | Intel Corporation | Systems and methods for frame tunnelling in wireless communications |
US9504032B2 (en) | 2012-09-13 | 2016-11-22 | Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. | Method, wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) and base station for transferring small packets |
WO2016191112A1 (en) * | 2015-05-27 | 2016-12-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Reservation coordination in a shared communication medium |
EP3258625A4 (en) * | 2015-02-13 | 2018-02-28 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | Wireless communication apparatus and wireless communication method |
US11026169B2 (en) | 2010-11-09 | 2021-06-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Physical layer power save facility |
Families Citing this family (251)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8194770B2 (en) | 2002-08-27 | 2012-06-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Coded MIMO systems with selective channel inversion applied per eigenmode |
US7986742B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2011-07-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Pilots for MIMO communication system |
US8169944B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2012-05-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Random access for wireless multiple-access communication systems |
US20040081131A1 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2004-04-29 | Walton Jay Rod | OFDM communication system with multiple OFDM symbol sizes |
US8218609B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2012-07-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Closed-loop rate control for a multi-channel communication system |
US8134976B2 (en) * | 2002-10-25 | 2012-03-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Channel calibration for a time division duplexed communication system |
US7002900B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2006-02-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Transmit diversity processing for a multi-antenna communication system |
US8570988B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2013-10-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Channel calibration for a time division duplexed communication system |
US8320301B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2012-11-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | MIMO WLAN system |
US8208364B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2012-06-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | MIMO system with multiple spatial multiplexing modes |
US8170513B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2012-05-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Data detection and demodulation for wireless communication systems |
US7324429B2 (en) * | 2002-10-25 | 2008-01-29 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Multi-mode terminal in a wireless MIMO system |
US7317687B2 (en) * | 2003-06-12 | 2008-01-08 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Transmitting data frames with less interframe space (ifs) time |
US9226308B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2015-12-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method, apparatus, and system for medium access control |
US9473269B2 (en) | 2003-12-01 | 2016-10-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for providing an efficient control channel structure in a wireless communication system |
US7944882B2 (en) * | 2003-12-17 | 2011-05-17 | Intel Corporation | Channel access apparatus, systems, and methods |
WO2005060198A1 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2005-06-30 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Transmission station, reception station, communication method, communication program, and computer-readable recording medium containing the communication program |
US7652995B2 (en) * | 2003-12-19 | 2010-01-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomic reassociation of clients in a wireless local area network |
JP4212548B2 (en) | 2003-12-26 | 2009-01-21 | 株式会社東芝 | Wireless transmission device, wireless reception device, wireless transmission method, and wireless reception method |
JP4005974B2 (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2007-11-14 | 株式会社東芝 | COMMUNICATION DEVICE, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM |
KR20050075477A (en) * | 2004-01-15 | 2005-07-21 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Communicating method between mimo stations |
US7818018B2 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2010-10-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Distributed hierarchical scheduling in an AD hoc network |
US8903440B2 (en) | 2004-01-29 | 2014-12-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Distributed hierarchical scheduling in an ad hoc network |
KR100959123B1 (en) * | 2004-02-11 | 2010-05-25 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Wireless communication method |
JP4398752B2 (en) * | 2004-02-19 | 2010-01-13 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Wireless relay system, wireless relay device, and wireless relay method |
US7742533B2 (en) | 2004-03-12 | 2010-06-22 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | OFDM signal transmission method and apparatus |
US7463642B2 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2008-12-09 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Multiple receiver aggregation |
US7688855B2 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2010-03-30 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Multi-rate multi-receiver multi-response aggregation |
US8432934B2 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2013-04-30 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Multi-rate multi-receiver multi-response aggregation |
KR100603561B1 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2006-07-24 | 삼성전자주식회사 | System of wireless local area network based on transmit power control and method thereof |
JP4433867B2 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2010-03-17 | ソニー株式会社 | Wireless communication system |
US7408909B2 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2008-08-05 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to enable multiple receivers |
US7668128B1 (en) * | 2004-05-17 | 2010-02-23 | Avaya Inc. | Features of power save in 802.11e wireless local area networks (WLANs) |
JP4012172B2 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2007-11-21 | 株式会社東芝 | Wireless communication apparatus and wireless communication method |
DE602005017392D1 (en) * | 2004-06-16 | 2009-12-10 | Philips Intellectual Property | DISTRIBUTED COMPANY RESERVATION IN A WIRELESS AD HOC NETWORK |
JP4440037B2 (en) * | 2004-08-11 | 2010-03-24 | 株式会社東芝 | Communication apparatus and communication method |
CN105142233B (en) * | 2004-08-12 | 2018-12-07 | 美商内数位科技公司 | 802.11 AP of the method used in 802.11 AP of IEEE and IEEE |
JP2008511213A (en) * | 2004-08-18 | 2008-04-10 | スタッカート・コミュニケーションズ・インコーポレーテッド | Merging beacons |
JP4130648B2 (en) * | 2004-10-19 | 2008-08-06 | 株式会社東芝 | Communication apparatus and communication method |
EP1805944A4 (en) * | 2004-10-28 | 2011-11-30 | Univ California | Dynamic adaptation for wireless communications with enhanced quality of service |
JP4331088B2 (en) * | 2004-11-01 | 2009-09-16 | 株式会社東芝 | Communication apparatus and communication method |
KR100909539B1 (en) * | 2004-11-09 | 2009-07-27 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for supporting various multi-antenna technologies in a broadband wireless access system using multiple antennas |
US7706338B2 (en) * | 2004-12-23 | 2010-04-27 | Broadcom Corporation | Method and system for a bandwidth efficient medium access control (MAC) protocol |
PL2363987T3 (en) * | 2004-12-23 | 2014-03-31 | Electronics & Telecommunications Res Inst | Apparatus for transmitting and receiving data to provide high-speed data comunication and method thereof |
US7787435B2 (en) * | 2005-01-13 | 2010-08-31 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and system for polling mobile stations in a wireless network |
US8068550B2 (en) * | 2005-01-28 | 2011-11-29 | Broadcom Corporation | Initiation of a MIMO communication |
US8184655B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2012-05-22 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Wireless communication method and WLAN for signaling deferral management messages |
US7466749B2 (en) | 2005-05-12 | 2008-12-16 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rate selection with margin sharing |
US8358714B2 (en) | 2005-06-16 | 2013-01-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Coding and modulation for multiple data streams in a communication system |
US7535858B2 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2009-05-19 | Intel Corporation | Apparatus and method of block acknowledgements with reduced recipient state information |
US8547960B2 (en) * | 2005-07-14 | 2013-10-01 | Honeywell International Inc. | Sub-frame synchronized signaling |
US20070058660A1 (en) * | 2005-07-22 | 2007-03-15 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Wireless communication method and apparatus for controlling access to Aloha slots |
JP2009507422A (en) * | 2005-09-01 | 2009-02-19 | オプティマル・イノヴェーションズ・インコーポレイテッド | Media access control architecture |
US20070115826A1 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2007-05-24 | Optimal Licensing Corporation | Systems and methods for increasing capacity in collision-based data networks |
US8194626B2 (en) * | 2005-11-11 | 2012-06-05 | Broadcom Corporation | Reduced interframe spacing in a wireless transmission system |
US8116290B2 (en) * | 2005-11-11 | 2012-02-14 | Broadcom Corporation | Reduced interframe spacing in a wireless LAN receiver |
US8009642B2 (en) * | 2005-11-14 | 2011-08-30 | Broadcom Corporation | System for transmitting high throughput data between multiple devices |
KR101118689B1 (en) * | 2005-11-16 | 2012-03-06 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for transmitting and receiving data frame which is applied advanced coding |
KR101246774B1 (en) * | 2005-11-22 | 2013-03-26 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus for transmitting/receiving a signal in a wireless local network mesh communication system |
KR100765776B1 (en) | 2005-12-13 | 2007-10-12 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus for avoiding collision in medium access of WLAN |
US20070133447A1 (en) * | 2005-12-13 | 2007-06-14 | Conexant Systems, Inc. | Dual CTS protection systems and methods |
US20070149132A1 (en) | 2005-12-22 | 2007-06-28 | Junyl Li | Methods and apparatus related to selecting control channel reporting formats |
US7489670B2 (en) * | 2005-12-27 | 2009-02-10 | Celeno Communications Ltd. | Device, system and method of uplink/downlink communication in wireless network |
US7583654B2 (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2009-09-01 | Honeywell International Inc. | Sub-frame synchronized multiplexing |
US9071435B2 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2015-06-30 | Celeno Communications Ltd. | System and method for tuning transmission parameters in multi-user multiple-input-multiple-output systems with aged and noisy channel estimation |
US20070153760A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2007-07-05 | Nir Shapira | Method, apparatus and system of spatial division multiple access communication in a wireless local area network |
US7672400B2 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2010-03-02 | Celeno Communications (Israel) Ltd. | Method of secure WLAN communication |
US7751353B2 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2010-07-06 | Celeno Communications (Israel) Ltd. | Device, system and method of securing wireless communication |
US7656965B2 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2010-02-02 | Celeno Communications (Israel) Ltd. | Method of secure WLAN communication |
US8689025B2 (en) * | 2006-02-21 | 2014-04-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Reduced terminal power consumption via use of active hold state |
KR101119455B1 (en) * | 2006-02-21 | 2012-03-20 | 퀄컴 인코포레이티드 | Method and apparatus for supporting ofdm and cdma schemes |
US8077595B2 (en) | 2006-02-21 | 2011-12-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Flexible time-frequency multiplexing structure for wireless communication |
US9461736B2 (en) * | 2006-02-21 | 2016-10-04 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for sub-slot packets in wireless communication |
US8781017B2 (en) | 2006-02-28 | 2014-07-15 | Intel Corporation | Techniques for explicit feedback delay measurement |
US7720030B2 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2010-05-18 | Intel Corporation | Techniques for explicit feedback delay measurement |
EP1845685B1 (en) * | 2006-04-11 | 2012-06-27 | Alcatel Lucent | Optimised transmission of content IP packets by adding to the IP packets content-related information |
AU2007243312A1 (en) | 2006-04-24 | 2007-11-08 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and signaling procedure for transmission opportunity usage in a wireless mesh network |
US7719994B2 (en) * | 2006-04-26 | 2010-05-18 | Honeywell International Inc. | Sub-frame synchronized ranging |
EP2039020B1 (en) * | 2006-07-07 | 2019-02-27 | LG Electronics Inc. | A method of utilizing resources efficiently in a reverse link transmission |
US8102853B2 (en) * | 2006-08-09 | 2012-01-24 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System and method for wireless communication of uncompressed video having fixed size MAC header with an extension |
US7688747B2 (en) * | 2006-08-30 | 2010-03-30 | Honeywell International Inc. | Sub-frame synchronized residual ranging |
JP4930512B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2012-05-16 | 富士通株式会社 | Wireless communication system, transmitting apparatus and receiving apparatus |
US7937060B2 (en) * | 2006-10-06 | 2011-05-03 | Palo Alto Research Alto Incorporated | Self-improving channel-access protocol for ad-hoc networks |
US8433312B2 (en) * | 2006-10-23 | 2013-04-30 | Research In Motion Limited | Methods and apparatus for scanning radio frequency bands in wireless local area networks |
WO2008064967A1 (en) * | 2006-12-01 | 2008-06-05 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Resource management in wireless lans |
US20080130561A1 (en) * | 2006-12-04 | 2008-06-05 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System and method for wireless communication |
US20080130538A1 (en) * | 2006-12-05 | 2008-06-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced management frame aggregation in a wireless network system |
KR20080079497A (en) * | 2007-02-27 | 2008-09-01 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method for constructing subchannel in communication system |
US9516580B2 (en) * | 2007-03-19 | 2016-12-06 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Enabling down link reception of system and control information from intra-frequency neighbors without gaps in the serving cell in evolved-UTRA systems |
EP2137633A4 (en) * | 2007-04-08 | 2012-07-11 | Entropic Communications Inc | Probing network nodes for optimization |
WO2008140907A1 (en) * | 2007-05-10 | 2008-11-20 | General Instrument Corporation | Method and system for providing contention-free channel access service in a communication network |
US8149752B2 (en) * | 2007-07-06 | 2012-04-03 | Alcatel Lucent | Media-access-control protocol for a network employing multi-user wireless channels |
US8432786B2 (en) * | 2007-07-10 | 2013-04-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Control channel design to support one-to-one, many-to-one, and one-to-many peer-to-peer communications |
JP5350380B2 (en) | 2007-07-18 | 2013-11-27 | マーベル ワールド トレード リミテッド | Access point for simultaneous downlink transmission of independent data to multiple client stations |
JP5054193B2 (en) | 2007-07-18 | 2012-10-24 | マーベル ワールド トレード リミテッド | Wireless network for simultaneous uplink transmission of independent data from multiple client stations |
US8275314B1 (en) | 2007-08-13 | 2012-09-25 | Marvell International Ltd. | Bluetooth scan modes |
US8577305B1 (en) | 2007-09-21 | 2013-11-05 | Marvell International Ltd. | Circuits and methods for generating oscillating signals |
US8773995B2 (en) * | 2007-10-10 | 2014-07-08 | Nokia Corporation | System and method for transmissions in power save mode |
DK3203799T3 (en) * | 2007-11-05 | 2018-11-26 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Improved timing alignment in an LTE system |
US8374163B2 (en) * | 2007-11-09 | 2013-02-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Synchronization of wireless nodes |
US20090147678A1 (en) * | 2007-12-05 | 2009-06-11 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Systems and methods for traffic flow based rate adaptation in packet-based networks |
FR2924887B1 (en) * | 2007-12-07 | 2011-07-15 | Thales Sa | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ROBUST TRANSMISSION OF COMPRESSED NETWORK HEADERS |
US8588705B1 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2013-11-19 | Marvell International Ltd. | System and method of determining Power over Ethernet impairment |
US8036167B2 (en) * | 2008-01-04 | 2011-10-11 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Multiple wireless local area networks for reliable video streaming |
US8824378B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-09-02 | Maarten Menzo Wentink | Unscheduled peer power save mode |
KR101423033B1 (en) * | 2008-02-01 | 2014-07-28 | 재단법인서울대학교산학협력재단 | Apparatus and method for data transmitting in wireless communication system |
JP5173526B2 (en) * | 2008-03-28 | 2013-04-03 | 株式会社東芝 | Wireless system, wireless base station and wireless terminal |
GB2460416B (en) * | 2008-05-28 | 2010-07-07 | Mirics Semiconductor Ltd | Broadcast receiver system |
WO2010005659A1 (en) | 2008-06-16 | 2010-01-14 | Marvell World Trade Ltd. | Short-range wireless communication |
US8600324B1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-12-03 | Marvell International Ltd | Circuit and method for adjusting a digitally controlled oscillator |
US7881274B2 (en) * | 2008-06-30 | 2011-02-01 | Xg Technology, Inc. | Tri-core architecture for reducing MAC layer processing latency in base stations |
US8982889B2 (en) | 2008-07-18 | 2015-03-17 | Marvell World Trade Ltd. | Preamble designs for sub-1GHz frequency bands |
US8472968B1 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2013-06-25 | Marvell International Ltd. | Location-based detection of interference in cellular communications systems |
US8706878B1 (en) | 2008-08-21 | 2014-04-22 | United Services Automobile Association | Preferential loading in data centers |
US8582492B2 (en) * | 2008-11-10 | 2013-11-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus supporting adaptive decentralized traffic scheduling including a dynamic receiver yielding threshold |
JP5197765B2 (en) | 2008-12-25 | 2013-05-15 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Communication management device and communication device |
US8369257B2 (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2013-02-05 | Stmicroelectronics, Inc. | Reliable and deterministic communication protocol |
US8670435B2 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2014-03-11 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Access and power management for centralized networks |
US9172455B2 (en) * | 2009-02-13 | 2015-10-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Start frame for distributed MIMO |
US8638772B2 (en) * | 2009-03-10 | 2014-01-28 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method for granting a transmission opportunity in a wireless LAN system that uses a combined channel constituted by a plurality of subchannels, and station supporting the method |
CN102369674B (en) | 2009-03-31 | 2014-07-23 | 马维尔国际贸易有限公司 | Method, device and system for wireless communications |
US8472427B1 (en) | 2009-04-06 | 2013-06-25 | Marvell International Ltd. | Packet exchange arbitration for coexisting radios |
KR101646721B1 (en) | 2009-04-13 | 2016-08-12 | 마벨 월드 트레이드 리미티드 | Physical layer frame format for wlan |
US8542620B2 (en) | 2009-05-05 | 2013-09-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Dynamic energy saving mechanism for access points |
US9706599B1 (en) * | 2009-07-23 | 2017-07-11 | Marvell International Ltd. | Long wireless local area network (WLAN) packets with midambles |
US9077594B2 (en) | 2009-07-23 | 2015-07-07 | Marvell International Ltd. | Coexistence of a normal-rate physical layer and a low-rate physical layer in a wireless network |
US9596715B1 (en) | 2009-07-23 | 2017-03-14 | Marvell International Ltd. | Long wireless local area network (WLAN) packets with midambles |
CN102484567B (en) | 2009-08-21 | 2016-02-10 | 阿瓦尔有限公司 | Header in packet-based ofdm system repeats |
US8744511B2 (en) * | 2009-09-04 | 2014-06-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Output power control for advanced WLAN and bluetooth-amp systems |
KR20110027533A (en) * | 2009-09-09 | 2011-03-16 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method and apparatus for transmitting control information in multiple antenna system |
US9042331B2 (en) | 2009-09-09 | 2015-05-26 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for transmitting control information in WLAN system |
US9066369B1 (en) | 2009-09-16 | 2015-06-23 | Marvell International Ltd. | Coexisting radio communication |
US8576761B1 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2013-11-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Power save delivery mechanism for wireless communication traffic |
EP2489231B1 (en) * | 2009-10-14 | 2018-05-09 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Wireless scheduling considering overhead cost estimate |
US20110103319A1 (en) | 2009-10-29 | 2011-05-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Access point scheduled peer-to-peer communication |
US8340034B1 (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2012-12-25 | Marvell International Ltd. | Bluetooth and wireless LAN arbitration |
EP3537834A1 (en) | 2009-11-24 | 2019-09-11 | Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute | Method for transmitting a response request frame and a response frame in a multi-user based wireless communication system |
AU2010327466B2 (en) * | 2009-12-03 | 2014-08-21 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for transmitting a frame in a wireless RAN system |
US8886755B1 (en) | 2009-12-09 | 2014-11-11 | Marvell International Ltd. | Method and apparatus for facilitating simultaneous transmission from multiple stations |
US8687611B2 (en) * | 2009-12-22 | 2014-04-01 | Intel Corporation | Methods and apparatus for weighted queuing in DL MU MIMO |
US20110200130A1 (en) * | 2010-02-11 | 2011-08-18 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Method and apparatus for transmitting/receiving data in mu-mimo system |
US8537733B1 (en) | 2010-02-12 | 2013-09-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Dynamic power mode switch in a wireless ad-hoc system |
KR101331674B1 (en) | 2010-02-12 | 2013-11-20 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method for transmitting control information and apparatus for the same |
US9311446B1 (en) | 2010-03-19 | 2016-04-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Multicast transmission for power management in an ad-hoc wireless system |
US8588156B1 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2013-11-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Direct data communication in infrastructure mode in wireless communication systems |
US8526346B1 (en) | 2010-04-28 | 2013-09-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Power save communication mechanism for wireless communication systems |
US8582551B2 (en) | 2010-05-26 | 2013-11-12 | Intel Corporation | Device, system and method of wireless communication over non-contiguous channels |
EP2589164B1 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2016-08-10 | LG Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for transmitting data frame in wlan system |
US20120151089A1 (en) * | 2010-12-08 | 2012-06-14 | Atheros Communications, Inc. | Direct data communication in a peer-to-peer network |
US8638767B2 (en) * | 2011-02-14 | 2014-01-28 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Multi-communication mode packet routing mechanism for wireless communications systems |
US8787159B2 (en) * | 2011-04-14 | 2014-07-22 | Alcatel Lucent | Mechanism for wireless access networks to throttle traffic during congestion |
US8611268B1 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2013-12-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Access point power save mechanism for wireless communication systems |
US9113490B2 (en) * | 2011-04-24 | 2015-08-18 | Broadcom Corporation | Short training field (STF) for use within single user, multiple user, multiple access, and/or MIMO wireless communications |
KR102002114B1 (en) * | 2011-04-29 | 2019-07-19 | 마벨 월드 트레이드 리미티드 | Multi-technology coexistence for ibss networks |
EP2706679B1 (en) * | 2011-05-03 | 2019-09-11 | LG Electronics Inc. | Method for terminal to transmit/receive signal to/from base station in wireless communication system and device therefor |
US9154363B2 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2015-10-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for wireless communication of packets having a plurality of formats |
US9515925B2 (en) * | 2011-05-19 | 2016-12-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and methods for media access control header compression |
CN102843220B (en) * | 2011-06-21 | 2014-12-24 | 华为技术有限公司 | Error recovery method, access point equipment, station equipment and error recovery system |
KR101933738B1 (en) | 2011-06-24 | 2018-12-28 | 인터디지탈 패튼 홀딩스, 인크 | Method and apparatus for supporting wideband and multiple bandwidth transmission protocols |
US8983557B1 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2015-03-17 | Marvell International Ltd. | Reducing power consumption of a multi-antenna transceiver |
US9049733B2 (en) * | 2011-07-07 | 2015-06-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Synchronous transmission methods and apparatus |
US9025466B2 (en) | 2011-07-07 | 2015-05-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for facilitating channel access in a communication system |
CN103765973B (en) | 2011-08-29 | 2017-11-10 | 马维尔国际贸易有限公司 | Normal speed physical layer and low rate physical layer coexisting in the wireless network |
KR101240552B1 (en) * | 2011-09-26 | 2013-03-11 | 삼성에스디에스 주식회사 | System and method for managing media keys and for transmitting/receiving peer-to-peer messages using the media keys |
US9125216B1 (en) | 2011-09-28 | 2015-09-01 | Marvell International Ltd. | Method and apparatus for avoiding interference among multiple radios |
CN103037448B (en) * | 2011-09-30 | 2015-05-27 | 华为技术有限公司 | Content publishing method and user device |
US8730960B2 (en) * | 2011-10-25 | 2014-05-20 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Providing multicast transmissions with partial state block acknowledgments and retries |
US9014093B2 (en) * | 2011-11-02 | 2015-04-21 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Direct communication method and direct communication device and coordinator device using the same |
WO2013067686A1 (en) * | 2011-11-08 | 2013-05-16 | Renesas Mobile Corporation | Method and apparatus for d2d transmission |
WO2013070173A1 (en) * | 2011-11-09 | 2013-05-16 | Agency For Science, Technology And Research | Method and a communication terminal for modulating a message for transmission in a wireless communication network |
US10149334B2 (en) * | 2011-11-14 | 2018-12-04 | Kyocera Corporation | Device-to-device communication management using macrocell communication resources |
US9351333B1 (en) | 2011-11-30 | 2016-05-24 | Marvell International Ltd. | Long wireless local area network (WLAN) packets with midambles |
US9185725B2 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2015-11-10 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Request-response procedure for wireless network |
US8923252B2 (en) | 2012-01-11 | 2014-12-30 | Intel Corporation | Device, system and method of communicating during a contention based access period |
CN103209044B (en) * | 2012-01-11 | 2017-04-26 | 华为终端有限公司 | Transmission method, device and system of messages with data to be transmitted |
US8923137B2 (en) * | 2012-02-06 | 2014-12-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method for information verification based on channel awareness |
US9215708B2 (en) | 2012-02-07 | 2015-12-15 | Marvell World Trade Ltd. | Method and apparatus for multi-network communication |
RU2569323C1 (en) * | 2012-02-09 | 2015-11-20 | Телефонактиеболагет Лм Эрикссон (Пабл) | Network node and method in node, which provides first unit with possibility of connection to or being connected to second unit in mode of self-organising network |
US9049658B2 (en) | 2012-03-06 | 2015-06-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Power save mechanism for peer-to-peer communication networks |
WO2013134259A2 (en) | 2012-03-06 | 2013-09-12 | Interdigital Patent Holdings Inc. | Supporting a large number of devices in wireless communications |
US8824414B2 (en) | 2012-03-13 | 2014-09-02 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | Time slot and frequency allocation in wireless communication networks |
WO2013147546A1 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2013-10-03 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus of link set-up in a wireless communication system |
US8811428B2 (en) * | 2012-05-29 | 2014-08-19 | Broadcom Corporation | DOCSIS upstream burst efficiency maximization and support for jumbo frames |
US9450649B2 (en) | 2012-07-02 | 2016-09-20 | Marvell World Trade Ltd. | Shaping near-field transmission signals |
US10142007B2 (en) * | 2012-07-19 | 2018-11-27 | Intel Deutschland Gmbh | Radio communication devices and methods for controlling a radio communication device |
EP2897419B1 (en) * | 2012-09-11 | 2017-08-30 | LG Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for scanning in wireless lan |
KR20150068461A (en) | 2012-10-12 | 2015-06-19 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving a frame supporting a short mac header in wireless lan system |
JP6022886B2 (en) | 2012-10-16 | 2016-11-09 | 株式会社日立国際電気 | Wireless surveillance camera system and wireless surveillance camera device |
GB2507786B (en) * | 2012-11-09 | 2015-01-28 | Canon Kk | Method, device, computer program and information storage means for wireless data exchange in a network comprising collaborative nodes |
JP6026641B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2016-11-16 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Wireless transmission system |
US9306866B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-04-05 | Aruba Networks, Inc. | Apparatus and method aggregation at one or more layers |
US9439142B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-09-06 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Power saving for low latency deterministic networks in wireless personal area networks |
US9125089B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-09-01 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and apparatus for packet aggregation in a network controller |
US9686719B2 (en) * | 2013-06-03 | 2017-06-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Beacon indication target wakeup time (TWT) |
US9807786B2 (en) * | 2013-09-11 | 2017-10-31 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for transmitting signal of device to device user equipment in wireless communication system |
US9825678B2 (en) | 2013-11-26 | 2017-11-21 | Marvell World Trade Ltd. | Uplink multi-user multiple input multiple output for wireless local area network |
WO2015081269A1 (en) | 2013-11-27 | 2015-06-04 | Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. | Sounding and tone block allocation for orthogonal frequency division multiple access (ofdma) in wireless local area networks |
US9166660B2 (en) | 2013-11-27 | 2015-10-20 | Marvell World Trade Ltd. | Uplink multi-user multiple input multiple output beamforming |
US9854605B2 (en) * | 2014-01-02 | 2017-12-26 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for transmitting uplink frame in wireless LAN |
US10182411B2 (en) * | 2014-01-06 | 2019-01-15 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and access point for implementing timing synchronization in a radio communication network |
US9839008B2 (en) * | 2014-02-24 | 2017-12-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Avoiding extended interframe space |
DE102015017324B4 (en) * | 2014-03-06 | 2023-12-21 | Apple Inc. | Low energy Wi-Fi preamble field |
EP3098995B1 (en) * | 2014-03-10 | 2020-01-08 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Data transmission method, sender device and receiver device |
US9585106B2 (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2017-02-28 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Network-assisted channel selection and power control for mobile devices |
US9497663B2 (en) * | 2014-03-28 | 2016-11-15 | Sony Corporation | Coordinated priority scheme for small data packet transmission |
KR20160148687A (en) | 2014-05-02 | 2016-12-26 | 마벨 월드 트레이드 리미티드 | Multiple user allocation signaling in a wireless communication network |
KR101838840B1 (en) | 2014-05-09 | 2018-03-14 | 후지쯔 가부시끼가이샤 | Wireless communications system, base station, and terminal |
US10455616B2 (en) | 2014-06-05 | 2019-10-22 | Intel IP Corporation | Interference management techniques for full-duplex wireless communications |
CN106664281B (en) | 2014-06-11 | 2020-07-10 | 马维尔国际有限公司 | Method and apparatus for padding OFDM symbols in wireless communication system |
US9538558B2 (en) * | 2014-06-26 | 2017-01-03 | Qualcomm Technologies International, Ltd. | Methods and apparatuses for managing acknowledgements for multicast data in a wireless network |
US10667293B2 (en) * | 2014-07-11 | 2020-05-26 | Sony Corporation | Information processing device, information processing method, and program |
JP6398728B2 (en) * | 2014-07-11 | 2018-10-03 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and information processing method |
US9408184B2 (en) * | 2014-08-01 | 2016-08-02 | Newracom, Inc. | Systems and methods for multi-user simultaneous transmissions |
US9942943B2 (en) | 2014-08-21 | 2018-04-10 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for triggering uplink data in wireless LAN |
KR20170051410A (en) * | 2014-09-01 | 2017-05-11 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method for measuring and reporting channel state in wireless access system supporting unlicensed band |
US9622263B2 (en) * | 2014-10-01 | 2017-04-11 | Fortinet, Inc. | Emulating virtual port control of airtime fairness using per station enhanced distributed channel access (EDCA) parameters |
US10158457B2 (en) * | 2014-12-02 | 2018-12-18 | Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited | Coordinating frequency division multiplexing transmissions |
CN107005723B (en) | 2014-12-31 | 2021-01-26 | Lg 电子株式会社 | Apparatus for transmitting broadcast signal, apparatus for receiving broadcast signal, method for transmitting broadcast signal and method for receiving broadcast signal |
US9693349B2 (en) * | 2015-02-22 | 2017-06-27 | Intel IP Corporation | Apparatus, system and method of dynamic allocation using a grant frame |
US20160316393A1 (en) * | 2015-04-27 | 2016-10-27 | Spreadtrum Hong Kong Limited | QCI Usage and Signaling for IP Flow Selection |
US10278117B2 (en) * | 2015-04-29 | 2019-04-30 | Blackberry Limited | Randomized beacon transmissions |
WO2016182220A1 (en) * | 2015-05-11 | 2016-11-17 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method for performing rlc retransmission based on contention-based pusch in a wireless communication system and a device therefor |
CN104811456B (en) * | 2015-05-18 | 2018-07-17 | 东南大学 | A kind of wireless communication MAC protocol implementation method |
US10524231B2 (en) | 2015-05-20 | 2019-12-31 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method for managing NAV in wireless LAN system and device for same |
US9762487B2 (en) * | 2015-06-02 | 2017-09-12 | Newracom, Inc. | ACK policy for uplink and downlink MU PPDU |
CN105101102B (en) * | 2015-07-01 | 2019-01-25 | 北京奇虎科技有限公司 | Multicast transmission method, information extracting method and corresponding terminal and equipment |
EP3349505B1 (en) * | 2015-09-08 | 2023-05-24 | LG Electronics Inc. | Method for transmitting data in wireless communication system and apparatus therefor |
EP4255097A3 (en) * | 2015-09-09 | 2023-11-01 | Sony Group Corporation | Communications device and communications method |
US10230498B2 (en) * | 2015-11-13 | 2019-03-12 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Data acknowledgment to multiple devices |
CN105704798B (en) * | 2016-01-21 | 2019-06-18 | 河南科技大学 | A kind of implementation method of asynchronous class MAC protocol |
AU2017259930B2 (en) * | 2016-05-02 | 2019-11-07 | Sew-Eurodrive Gmbh & Co. Kg | Method for integrating a further bus subscriber into a bus system, and bus system |
US20170347374A1 (en) * | 2016-05-28 | 2017-11-30 | Mediatek Singapore Pte. Ltd. | Apparatuses and methods for concurrent operations on multiple channels |
EP3525409A4 (en) * | 2016-10-09 | 2020-05-20 | Wuhan Syntek Ltd. | Hybrid time division multiplexing mechanism |
EP3635926B1 (en) | 2017-06-09 | 2024-03-27 | Marvell World Trade Ltd. | Packets with midambles having compressed ofdm symbols |
US10454538B2 (en) * | 2017-09-08 | 2019-10-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and systems for joint access point MIMO transmissions |
EP3685543A1 (en) | 2017-09-22 | 2020-07-29 | NXP USA, Inc. | Determining number of midambles in a packet |
US10694546B2 (en) * | 2017-09-22 | 2020-06-23 | Nxp Usa, Inc. | Media access control for duplex transmissions in wireless local area networks |
US10367608B2 (en) * | 2017-10-06 | 2019-07-30 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Wireless communication channel scan |
US11184854B2 (en) * | 2017-11-02 | 2021-11-23 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method for transmitting or receiving frame in wireless LAN and apparatus therefor |
US20190313311A1 (en) * | 2018-04-09 | 2019-10-10 | Mediatek Inc. | Apparatuses, service networks, and methods for handling plmn-specific parameters for an inter-plmn handover |
US11202286B2 (en) * | 2018-07-11 | 2021-12-14 | Intel Corporation | Methods for multi-link setup between a multi-link access point (AP) logical entity and a multi-link non-AP logical entity |
GB2576204B (en) | 2018-07-27 | 2021-02-17 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Operation of automatic repeat request (ARQ) |
WO2020022849A1 (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2020-01-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for wireless communication of wireless node in wireless communication system |
US11150817B2 (en) | 2019-02-08 | 2021-10-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Integrating kernel-bypass user-level file systems into legacy applications |
US11943054B2 (en) * | 2020-04-17 | 2024-03-26 | Apple Inc. | Block acknowledgment for a multicast transmission with multiple concurrent streams |
US11984985B2 (en) | 2020-08-19 | 2024-05-14 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method of performing wireless communication, wireless transmission device and wireless reception device performing the same |
US12096475B2 (en) | 2020-08-26 | 2024-09-17 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for coordinated spatial reuse in wireless communication |
CN112601255B (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2023-05-26 | 北京银牧微电子科技有限公司 | MAC frame transmitting method and device, PHY frame aggregation method and device |
GB2615916B (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2024-06-19 | Canon Kk | Managing EDCA parameters with low latency reliable traffic |
US20230044914A1 (en) * | 2021-08-04 | 2023-02-09 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System and method for managing growing beacon size in a wireless network |
US11882601B2 (en) | 2021-09-15 | 2024-01-23 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Dynamic control of data bursts |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0475682A2 (en) * | 1990-09-06 | 1992-03-18 | NCR International, Inc. | Local area network having a wireless transmission link |
WO2002028119A2 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2002-04-04 | Arraycomm, Inc. | Cooperative polling in a wireless data communication system having smart antenna processing |
US20020172186A1 (en) * | 2001-04-09 | 2002-11-21 | Peter Larsson | Instantaneous joint transmit power control and link adaptation for RTS/CTS based channel access |
Family Cites Families (310)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2082753B (en) * | 1980-08-29 | 1984-08-30 | British Gas Corp | Recuperative burner |
US4536874A (en) | 1983-07-21 | 1985-08-20 | Stoffel James C | Bandwidth efficient multipoint data communication system |
GB8606217D0 (en) | 1986-03-13 | 1986-04-16 | Univ Strathclyde | Local area network priority control system |
US4750171A (en) * | 1986-07-11 | 1988-06-07 | Tadiran Electronics Industries Ltd. | Data switching system and method |
US4747100A (en) * | 1986-08-11 | 1988-05-24 | Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. | Token passing network utilizing active node table |
EP0364638B1 (en) * | 1988-10-20 | 1994-04-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Communication network |
JPH0750880B2 (en) * | 1989-02-28 | 1995-05-31 | 日本電気株式会社 | Data packet transmission method |
US5133081A (en) | 1989-11-03 | 1992-07-21 | Mayo Scott T | Remotely controllable message broadcast system including central programming station, remote message transmitters and repeaters |
JPH04138739A (en) * | 1990-09-28 | 1992-05-13 | Toshiba Corp | Communication control system using asynchronous transmission mode network |
US5274841A (en) | 1990-10-29 | 1993-12-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods for polling mobile users in a multiple cell wireless network |
US5297144A (en) * | 1991-01-22 | 1994-03-22 | Spectrix Corporation | Reservation-based polling protocol for a wireless data communications network |
US5276703A (en) * | 1992-01-13 | 1994-01-04 | Windata, Inc. | Wireless local area network communications system |
CA2095755C (en) | 1992-08-17 | 1999-01-26 | Mark J. Baugher | Network priority management |
US5444702A (en) | 1992-09-14 | 1995-08-22 | Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. | Virtual network using asynchronous transfer mode |
DE69433194T2 (en) | 1993-03-12 | 2004-07-29 | Motorola, Inc., Schaumburg | METHOD FOR REDUCING COMPETITION AND RESOURCE ERROR ASSIGNMENTS |
US5384777A (en) | 1993-04-19 | 1995-01-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive medium access control scheme for wireless LAN |
GB9401092D0 (en) | 1994-01-21 | 1994-03-16 | Newbridge Networks Corp | A network management system |
US5677909A (en) | 1994-05-11 | 1997-10-14 | Spectrix Corporation | Apparatus for exchanging data between a central station and a plurality of wireless remote stations on a time divided commnication channel |
FI98586C (en) | 1995-01-10 | 1997-07-10 | Nokia Telecommunications Oy | Packet radio system and methods for protocol-independent routing of a data packet in packet radio networks |
WO1996025811A1 (en) | 1995-02-16 | 1996-08-22 | Metricom, Inc. | Method of resolving media contention in radio communication links |
US5638371A (en) * | 1995-06-27 | 1997-06-10 | Nec Usa, Inc. | Multiservices medium access control protocol for wireless ATM system |
US5742592A (en) | 1995-09-01 | 1998-04-21 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for communicating data in a wireless communication system |
US5729542A (en) * | 1995-06-28 | 1998-03-17 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for communication system access |
US5719868A (en) * | 1995-10-05 | 1998-02-17 | Rockwell International | Dynamic distributed, multi-channel time division multiple access slot assignment method for a network of nodes |
US5732076A (en) | 1995-10-26 | 1998-03-24 | Omnipoint Corporation | Coexisting communication systems |
US5684791A (en) | 1995-11-07 | 1997-11-04 | Nec Usa, Inc. | Data link control protocols for wireless ATM access channels |
US5751719A (en) | 1995-11-30 | 1998-05-12 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and system for data transfer in the presence of disconnects |
US6181918B1 (en) | 1995-12-29 | 2001-01-30 | At&T Corp | System and method for management of neighbor-channel interference with cellular reuse partitioning |
TW313734B (en) * | 1996-01-05 | 1997-08-21 | Motorola Inc | System controlled asymmetrical automatic repeat request protocol method |
US6014087A (en) * | 1996-03-08 | 2000-01-11 | Lucent Techologies Inc. | Variable contention transmission media access based on idle waiting time |
US5818826A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1998-10-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Media access control protocols in a wireless communication network supporting multiple transmission rates |
GB2315194B (en) * | 1996-07-11 | 2000-11-15 | Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd | Method and apparatus for resynchronizing two system clocks |
JPH1174868A (en) | 1996-09-02 | 1999-03-16 | Toshiba Corp | Information transmission method, coder/decoder in information transmission system adopting the method, coding multiplexer/decoding inverse multiplexer |
JP3302578B2 (en) | 1996-10-21 | 2002-07-15 | 富士通株式会社 | OAM processing equipment |
US6002691A (en) | 1996-10-22 | 1999-12-14 | Zenith Electronics Corporation | Dynamic search tree for resolution of contention between transmitting stations |
GB9720152D0 (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 1997-11-26 | Mayup Limited | Communications system and method |
US5946313A (en) | 1997-03-20 | 1999-08-31 | Northern Telecom Limited | Mechanism for multiplexing ATM AAL5 virtual circuits over ethernet |
US5914950A (en) | 1997-04-08 | 1999-06-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for reverse link rate scheduling |
US5923650A (en) | 1997-04-08 | 1999-07-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for reverse link rate scheduling |
US6049528A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2000-04-11 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Trunking ethernet-compatible networks |
CA2297253A1 (en) | 1997-07-22 | 1999-02-04 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Telecommunications system |
GB9717868D0 (en) | 1997-08-23 | 1997-10-29 | Philips Electronics Nv | Wireless network |
JP3774042B2 (en) | 1997-09-11 | 2006-05-10 | 富士通株式会社 | Short cell multiplexer |
US6567416B1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2003-05-20 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for access control in a multiple access system for communications networks |
US7237036B2 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2007-06-26 | Alacritech, Inc. | Fast-path apparatus for receiving data corresponding a TCP connection |
US7301944B1 (en) | 1997-10-24 | 2007-11-27 | Tranz-Send Broadcasting Network, Inc. | Media file distribution with adaptive transmission protocols |
US6574211B2 (en) | 1997-11-03 | 2003-06-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for high rate packet data transmission |
FI980616A (en) | 1997-11-05 | 1999-05-06 | Nokia Telecommunications Oy | The method improves the quality of the radio connection in the cellular radio network |
US6167056A (en) | 1997-11-10 | 2000-12-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Access channel slot sharing |
ES2293698T3 (en) | 1997-11-10 | 2008-03-16 | Qualcomm Incorporated | COMPARTMENT OF SLOTS IN AN ACCESS CHANNEL. |
US6681315B1 (en) | 1997-11-26 | 2004-01-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for bit vector array |
EP0924896A1 (en) | 1997-12-17 | 1999-06-23 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Communicating isochronous and asynchronous data |
US6188736B1 (en) * | 1997-12-23 | 2001-02-13 | At&T Wireless Svcs. Inc. | Near-optimal low-complexity decoding of space-time codes for fixed wireless applications |
US6512773B1 (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 2003-01-28 | Paradyne Corporation | System and method for transporting information over a communication channel |
US6751623B1 (en) | 1998-01-26 | 2004-06-15 | At&T Corp. | Flexible interchange of coded multimedia facilitating access and streaming |
US6256317B1 (en) | 1998-02-19 | 2001-07-03 | Broadcom Homenetworking, Inc. | Packet-switched multiple-access network system with distributed fair priority queuing |
US6895245B2 (en) | 1998-03-06 | 2005-05-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericssion(Publ) | Telecommunications interexchange measurement transfer |
KR100338662B1 (en) | 1998-03-31 | 2002-07-18 | 윤종용 | Apparatus and method for communication channel in a cdma communication system |
JPH11308253A (en) | 1998-04-20 | 1999-11-05 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Network system |
US6154654A (en) | 1998-05-07 | 2000-11-28 | Ericsson Inc. | System and method for frequency reuse in a four cell plan |
DE69929342D1 (en) * | 1998-07-21 | 2006-03-30 | Tachyon Inc | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MULTI-ACCESS IN A COMMUNICATION SYSTEM |
US6438104B1 (en) | 1998-08-07 | 2002-08-20 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Link-level flow control method for an ATM server |
US6098142A (en) | 1998-08-25 | 2000-08-01 | Leggett; John D. | Apparatus and method for using a communications port in polling mode and without interrupts |
US6404751B1 (en) * | 1998-09-15 | 2002-06-11 | Crisco Technology, Inc. | Common control channel dynamic frequency assignment method and protocol |
JP3473434B2 (en) | 1998-09-16 | 2003-12-02 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Wireless communication system and wireless communication method |
KR100619598B1 (en) | 1998-10-01 | 2006-12-01 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Signal Format Method in Mobile Communication System |
PT1119945E (en) | 1998-10-05 | 2009-12-28 | Nokia Corp | Frame control method and apparatus |
US6731627B1 (en) * | 1998-11-17 | 2004-05-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Virtual loop carrier system |
FI108203B (en) | 1998-11-27 | 2001-11-30 | Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd | Method and apparatus for transmitting information in a packet radio service |
US6643260B1 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2003-11-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for implementing a quality of service policy in a data communications network |
US6587441B1 (en) | 1999-01-22 | 2003-07-01 | Technology Alternatives, Inc. | Method and apparatus for transportation of data over a managed wireless network using unique communication protocol |
US6542490B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2003-04-01 | Nortel Networks Limited | Data link control proctocol for 3G wireless system |
US6377782B1 (en) | 1999-03-01 | 2002-04-23 | Mediacell, Inc. | Method and apparatus for communicating between a client device and a linear broadband network |
US6611529B1 (en) | 1999-03-03 | 2003-08-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Priority access for real-time traffic in contention-based networks |
JP3445520B2 (en) | 1999-03-04 | 2003-09-08 | 沖電気工業株式会社 | Monitoring device and method for managing cell assembly |
US6317435B1 (en) | 1999-03-08 | 2001-11-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for maximizing the use of available capacity in a communication system |
WO2000056113A1 (en) | 1999-03-17 | 2000-09-21 | Nokia Networks Oy | Internet protocol switch and method |
US6574237B1 (en) * | 1999-03-19 | 2003-06-03 | Agere Systems Inc. | Inoperable network device |
US6452917B1 (en) | 1999-04-08 | 2002-09-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Channel estimation in a CDMA wireless communication system |
WO2000064111A1 (en) | 1999-04-16 | 2000-10-26 | Unifree, L.L.C. | Media file distribution with adaptive transmission protocols |
IT1308484B1 (en) | 1999-05-13 | 2001-12-17 | Cselt Centro Studi Lab Telecom | EQUIPMENT FOR THE RE-MULTIPLATION OF AUDIO-VISUAL NUMBERED FLOWS |
JP3733784B2 (en) | 1999-05-21 | 2006-01-11 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Packet relay device |
US6600754B1 (en) | 1999-06-28 | 2003-07-29 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Method and apparatus for managing communication resources using standby slots |
JP2001024573A (en) * | 1999-07-02 | 2001-01-26 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Radio communication system |
US6532225B1 (en) * | 1999-07-27 | 2003-03-11 | At&T Corp | Medium access control layer for packetized wireless systems |
CN1149794C (en) | 1999-07-27 | 2004-05-12 | 信息产业部武汉邮电科学研究院 | Interfacing apparatus and method for adapting ethernet directly to physical channel |
US6580704B1 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2003-06-17 | Nokia Corporation | Direct mode communication method between two mobile terminals in access point controlled wireless LAN systems |
GB9921049D0 (en) | 1999-09-07 | 1999-11-10 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | Clustered networked devices |
US6633564B1 (en) | 1999-09-22 | 2003-10-14 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for inserting packets into a data stream |
JP4374725B2 (en) | 1999-09-22 | 2009-12-02 | パナソニック株式会社 | Communication method and communication station |
JP3408234B2 (en) | 1999-09-24 | 2003-05-19 | 三洋電機株式会社 | Semiconductor integrated circuit and digital camera having the same |
US6885868B1 (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2005-04-26 | Nortel Networks Limited | Fair packet scheduler and scheduling method for packet data radio |
US6611525B1 (en) | 1999-10-07 | 2003-08-26 | 3Com Corporation | Apparatus for and method of learning MAC addresses in a LAN emulation network |
US6788702B1 (en) | 1999-10-15 | 2004-09-07 | Nokia Wireless Routers, Inc. | Protocol for neighborhood-established transmission scheduling |
US6621805B1 (en) | 1999-10-25 | 2003-09-16 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | Method and apparatus for multicasting real-time variable bit-rate traffic in wireless Ad-Hoc networks |
JP2001217768A (en) | 1999-11-25 | 2001-08-10 | Fujitsu Ten Ltd | Polling device for mobile communication system |
JP3428538B2 (en) | 1999-12-02 | 2003-07-22 | 日本電気株式会社 | Access network remote control method |
DE60103500T2 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2005-06-16 | Interdigital Technology Corp., Wilmington | WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH SELECTIVELY DIMENSIONED DATA TRANSPORT BLOCKS |
US6907020B2 (en) | 2000-01-20 | 2005-06-14 | Nortel Networks Limited | Frame structures supporting voice or streaming communications with high speed data communications in wireless access networks |
US6963549B1 (en) | 2000-01-26 | 2005-11-08 | Ntt Multimedia Communications Laboratories, Inc. | Technique for reserving bandwidth for communications over a wireless system |
US6456599B1 (en) | 2000-02-07 | 2002-09-24 | Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. | Distribution of potential neighbor information through an ad hoc network |
DE60106706T2 (en) | 2000-02-17 | 2005-03-10 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ASSIGNING A COMMON PACKAGE CHANNEL IN A CDMA MESSAGE SYSTEM |
US6307846B1 (en) | 2000-02-24 | 2001-10-23 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and system in wireless communication system for scheduling messages to reduce the quick paging channel peak power level |
US6813260B1 (en) | 2000-03-16 | 2004-11-02 | Ericsson Inc. | Systems and methods for prioritized access in a contention based network |
US6473467B1 (en) | 2000-03-22 | 2002-10-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for measuring reporting channel state information in a high efficiency, high performance communications system |
US20020154705A1 (en) | 2000-03-22 | 2002-10-24 | Walton Jay R. | High efficiency high performance communications system employing multi-carrier modulation |
EP1281289A1 (en) | 2000-03-23 | 2003-02-05 | Siemens Mobile Communications S.p.A. | Handover procedures in a radio communication system |
US6934752B1 (en) | 2000-03-23 | 2005-08-23 | Sharewave, Inc. | Quality of service extensions for multimedia applications in wireless computer networks |
US6493331B1 (en) | 2000-03-30 | 2002-12-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for controlling transmissions of a communications systems |
US6795418B2 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2004-09-21 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Wireless MAC protocol based on a hybrid combination of slot allocation, token passing, and polling for isochronous traffic |
JP3507809B2 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2004-03-15 | ヒュンダイ エレクトロニクス インダストリーズ カムパニー リミテッド | Data transmission method for hybrid automatic retransmission request 2/3 scheme in uplink of broadband wireless communication system |
US6731623B2 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2004-05-04 | Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. | Data transmission method for hybrid ARQ type II/III downlink of a wide-band radio communication system |
US6934275B1 (en) | 2000-04-17 | 2005-08-23 | Motorola, Inc. | Apparatus and method for providing separate forward dedicated and shared control channels in a communications system |
US20020022483A1 (en) * | 2000-04-18 | 2002-02-21 | Wayport, Inc. | Distributed network communication system which allows multiple wireless service providers to share a common network infrastructure |
WO2001089167A2 (en) * | 2000-05-15 | 2001-11-22 | Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. | Method and system for overloaded array processing |
US7139324B1 (en) | 2000-06-02 | 2006-11-21 | Nokia Networks Oy | Closed loop feedback system for improved down link performance |
US7046669B1 (en) | 2000-06-28 | 2006-05-16 | Nortel Networks Limited | Communications network |
US6504506B1 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2003-01-07 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and device for fixed in time adaptive antenna combining weights |
US7054329B2 (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2006-05-30 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. | Collision avoidance in IEEE 802.11 contention free period (CFP) with overlapping basic service sets (BSSs) |
US7068633B1 (en) | 2000-07-14 | 2006-06-27 | At&T Corp. | Enhanced channel access mechanisms for QoS-driven wireless lans |
US7031287B1 (en) | 2000-07-14 | 2006-04-18 | At&T Corp. | Centralized contention and reservation request for QoS-driven wireless LANs |
AUPQ915600A0 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2000-08-24 | Ltdnetwork Pty Ltd | Online network and associated methods |
US6522650B1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2003-02-18 | Intellon Corporation | Multicast and broadcast transmission with partial ARQ |
US6721565B1 (en) | 2000-08-07 | 2004-04-13 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Handover of wireless calls between systems supporting circuit and packet call models |
US6621827B1 (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2003-09-16 | Xanboo, Inc. | Adaptive method for polling |
US6898441B1 (en) * | 2000-09-12 | 2005-05-24 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Communication system having a flexible transmit configuration |
US7330877B2 (en) * | 2000-09-18 | 2008-02-12 | Sharp Laboratories Of America | Devices, softwares and methods for rescheduling multi-party sessions upon premature termination of session |
US7046639B2 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2006-05-16 | The Regents Of The University Of California | System and method for ad hoc network access employing the distributed election of a shared transmission schedule |
DE10051144C2 (en) | 2000-10-16 | 2002-11-14 | Siemens Ag | Method for improving channel estimation in a radio communication system |
WO2002033582A2 (en) | 2000-10-16 | 2002-04-25 | Text Analysis International, Inc. | Method for analyzing text and method for builing text analyzers |
US7142580B1 (en) | 2000-10-24 | 2006-11-28 | Ericsson, Inc. | Systems, methods, and computer program products for providing traffic frequency diversification in a cellular communication system |
MXPA03003656A (en) * | 2000-10-26 | 2005-01-25 | Wave7 Optics Inc | Method and system for processing downstream packets of an optical network. |
US7058074B2 (en) * | 2000-11-01 | 2006-06-06 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Unified channel access for supporting quality of service (QoS) in a local area network |
US6930981B2 (en) | 2000-12-06 | 2005-08-16 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for data rate selection in a wireless communication system |
US7031274B2 (en) * | 2001-01-16 | 2006-04-18 | At&T Corp. | Method for enabling interoperability between data transmission systems conforming to IEEE 802.11 and HIPERLAN standards |
US7099671B2 (en) | 2001-01-16 | 2006-08-29 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Collaborative mechanism of enhanced coexistence of collocated wireless networks |
US7046690B2 (en) * | 2001-01-16 | 2006-05-16 | At&T Corp. | Interference suppression methods for 802.11 |
US20020093929A1 (en) | 2001-01-18 | 2002-07-18 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | System and method for sharing bandwidth between co-located 802.11a/e and HIPERLAN/2 systems |
GB0102316D0 (en) | 2001-01-30 | 2001-03-14 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | Radio communication system |
US7110380B2 (en) * | 2001-02-07 | 2006-09-19 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | System, method, and computer program product for sharing bandwidth in a wireless personal area network or a wireless local area network |
US7120134B2 (en) | 2001-02-15 | 2006-10-10 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Reverse link channel architecture for a wireless communication system |
EP2073065B1 (en) * | 2001-02-19 | 2014-12-31 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image forming system, control method therefor, and storage medium storing program for executing the control method |
JP4724928B2 (en) | 2001-02-27 | 2011-07-13 | ソニー株式会社 | Wireless transmission apparatus and wireless transmission method |
US7142527B2 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2006-11-28 | Nokia Inc. | System and method for transmission scheduling using network membership information and neighborhood information |
JP3973371B2 (en) | 2001-03-21 | 2007-09-12 | 三洋電機株式会社 | Radio base system and directivity control method |
US6771706B2 (en) * | 2001-03-23 | 2004-08-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for utilizing channel state information in a wireless communication system |
US8121296B2 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2012-02-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for security in a data processing system |
DE10115409A1 (en) | 2001-03-29 | 2002-10-10 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Bus master for a bus for connecting sensors and / or ignition devices |
CA2376962A1 (en) | 2001-04-02 | 2002-10-02 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and system for umts packet transmission scheduling on uplink channels |
US6625172B2 (en) | 2001-04-26 | 2003-09-23 | Joseph P. Odenwalder | Rescheduling scheduled transmissions |
JP3858746B2 (en) | 2001-05-08 | 2006-12-20 | ソニー株式会社 | Wireless communication system, wireless communication control device, wireless communication control method, and computer program |
WO2002093843A1 (en) | 2001-05-14 | 2002-11-21 | Opera Systems Limited | Router |
US6751187B2 (en) * | 2001-05-17 | 2004-06-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for processing data for transmission in a multi-channel communication system using selective channel transmission |
US6944688B1 (en) * | 2001-05-18 | 2005-09-13 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Queuing system using dual receive FIFO |
US7158504B2 (en) * | 2001-05-21 | 2007-01-02 | Lucent Technologies, Inc. | Multiple mode data communication system and method and forward and/or reverse link control channel structure |
US7000013B2 (en) | 2001-05-21 | 2006-02-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for providing gracefully degraded services on the internet under overloaded conditions responsive to HTTP cookies of user requests |
EP1261183A1 (en) | 2001-05-23 | 2002-11-27 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method and system for processing a data unit |
US7545792B2 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2009-06-09 | Sony Corporation | Channel allocation method, communication system, and wireless communication apparatus in wireless network |
JP2003060564A (en) | 2001-06-08 | 2003-02-28 | Sony Corp | Radio communication system in radio network, radio communication method, radio communication equipment, band allocation method and computer program |
US7570656B2 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2009-08-04 | Yitran Communications Ltd. | Channel access method for powerline carrier based media access control protocol |
US20040141522A1 (en) | 2001-07-11 | 2004-07-22 | Yossi Texerman | Communications protocol for wireless lan harmonizing the ieee 802.11a and etsi hiperla/2 standards |
US6945486B2 (en) * | 2001-07-11 | 2005-09-20 | Teng Eric Y | Rotary kitchen garlic tool |
JP2003060655A (en) * | 2001-08-15 | 2003-02-28 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Wireless access centralized control apparatus |
US7190964B2 (en) * | 2001-08-20 | 2007-03-13 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Reverse link power control in 1xEV-DV systems |
JP4105090B2 (en) | 2001-08-25 | 2008-06-18 | ノキア コーポレイション | System and method for collision-free transmission scheduling using proximity information and advertised transmission time |
JP2003078565A (en) | 2001-08-30 | 2003-03-14 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Wireless communication equipment |
US7123627B2 (en) * | 2001-09-11 | 2006-10-17 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Class of computationally parsimonious schedulers for enforcing quality of service over packet based AV-centric home networks |
GB2379722B (en) | 2001-09-12 | 2003-07-30 | Joker Ind Co Ltd | Expansion bolt |
EP1429494B1 (en) | 2001-09-17 | 2012-11-14 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Communication management method, communication terminal, communication management program, recording medium containing the communication management program, and communication system |
AU2002327681A1 (en) * | 2001-09-24 | 2003-04-07 | Atheros Communications, Inc. | Method and system for variable rate acknowledgement for wireless communication protocols |
US6768730B1 (en) | 2001-10-11 | 2004-07-27 | Meshnetworks, Inc. | System and method for efficiently performing two-way ranging to determine the location of a wireless node in a communications network |
US7599334B2 (en) | 2001-10-15 | 2009-10-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for processing shared sub-packets in a communication system |
US7548506B2 (en) | 2001-10-17 | 2009-06-16 | Nortel Networks Limited | System access and synchronization methods for MIMO OFDM communications systems and physical layer packet and preamble design |
US7116652B2 (en) * | 2001-10-18 | 2006-10-03 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Rate control technique for layered architectures with multiple transmit and receive antennas |
JP3730245B2 (en) | 2001-10-29 | 2005-12-21 | シャープ株式会社 | Communication management method, communication management program, recording medium recording communication management program, communication device, central management device, and network system |
WO2003039054A2 (en) | 2001-11-02 | 2003-05-08 | At & T Corp. | Wireless lans and neighborhood capture |
US7477876B2 (en) * | 2001-11-02 | 2009-01-13 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Variable rate channel quality feedback in a wireless communication system |
US20030125040A1 (en) | 2001-11-06 | 2003-07-03 | Walton Jay R. | Multiple-access multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication system |
WO2003041297A1 (en) | 2001-11-08 | 2003-05-15 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Ab (Publ) | Method for link adaptation and transmit power control |
JP2003163669A (en) | 2001-11-27 | 2003-06-06 | Canon Inc | Radio communication equipment |
DE60213469T2 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2007-09-27 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Austin | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMMUNICATING BETWEEN SEVERAL POINT COORDINATED WIRELESS NETWORKS |
ES2201024T3 (en) | 2001-11-30 | 2004-03-16 | Alcatel | IP PLATFORM FOR ADVANCED MULTIPOINT ACCESS SYSTEMS. |
CN100417151C (en) | 2001-11-30 | 2008-09-03 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Method and apparatus for realizing support circuit business in wireless access system |
US6760388B2 (en) * | 2001-12-07 | 2004-07-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Time-domain transmit and receive processing with channel eigen-mode decomposition for MIMO systems |
US8089888B2 (en) | 2001-12-10 | 2012-01-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for testing traffic and auxiliary channels in a wireless data communication system |
US7187691B2 (en) * | 2001-12-18 | 2007-03-06 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Securing the channel for a QoS manager in a CSMA/CA ad hoc network |
US7313104B1 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2007-12-25 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Wireless computer system with latency masking |
US6980541B2 (en) | 2002-01-03 | 2005-12-27 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Media access controller having pseudo-static guaranteed time slots |
US7471667B2 (en) | 2002-01-09 | 2008-12-30 | Nxp B.V. | Coexistence of modulation schemes in a WLAN |
US6977944B2 (en) | 2002-01-12 | 2005-12-20 | Conexant, Inc. | Transmission protection for communications networks having stations operating with different modulation formats |
EP1470675A1 (en) | 2002-01-22 | 2004-10-27 | Xtremespectrum, Inc. | Method for determining media qualities |
US7327748B2 (en) | 2002-01-28 | 2008-02-05 | Alcatel Lucent | Enterprise switching device and method |
US7050759B2 (en) | 2002-02-19 | 2006-05-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Channel quality feedback mechanism and method |
JP4112241B2 (en) | 2002-02-22 | 2008-07-02 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Communication system and communication method |
US20030162519A1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2003-08-28 | Martin Smith | Radio communications device |
US7274707B2 (en) | 2002-03-07 | 2007-09-25 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N. V. | Coexistence of stations capable of different modulation schemes in a wireless local area network |
US7046654B2 (en) * | 2002-03-12 | 2006-05-16 | Ericsson Inc. | Efficient radio reception method for automatic frequency planning |
US6795419B2 (en) | 2002-03-13 | 2004-09-21 | Nokia Corporation | Wireless telecommunications system using multislot channel allocation for multimedia broadcast/multicast service |
US7130289B2 (en) | 2002-03-14 | 2006-10-31 | Airmagnet, Inc. | Detecting a hidden node in a wireless local area network |
JP2003289309A (en) | 2002-03-28 | 2003-10-10 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Radio communication terminal |
JP3952277B2 (en) | 2002-03-28 | 2007-08-01 | ソニー株式会社 | Wireless communication system, wireless communication apparatus and method, and program |
US7095732B1 (en) | 2002-04-12 | 2006-08-22 | Bbn Technologies Corp. | Quality of service based media access control for mobile ad hoc networks |
US7577227B2 (en) | 2002-04-18 | 2009-08-18 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Link adaption in general packet radio service networks |
US6879590B2 (en) * | 2002-04-26 | 2005-04-12 | Valo, Inc. | Methods, apparatuses and systems facilitating aggregation of physical links into logical link |
US7149245B2 (en) | 2002-04-29 | 2006-12-12 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Link adaption in enhanced general packet radio service networks |
US7236459B1 (en) | 2002-05-06 | 2007-06-26 | Packeteer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling data transmission volume using explicit rate control and queuing without data rate supervision |
US20030206532A1 (en) * | 2002-05-06 | 2003-11-06 | Extricom Ltd. | Collaboration between wireless lan access points |
JP3895228B2 (en) | 2002-05-07 | 2007-03-22 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Wireless communication apparatus and direction of arrival estimation method |
EP1510024A4 (en) | 2002-05-29 | 2008-10-01 | Interdigital Tech Corp | Packet switched connections using dedicated channels |
KR20030092894A (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2003-12-06 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus for determining report period of channel quality in communication system using high speed data packet access scheme and method thereof |
US7203192B2 (en) * | 2002-06-04 | 2007-04-10 | Fortinet, Inc. | Network packet steering |
US20030223365A1 (en) | 2002-06-04 | 2003-12-04 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Class of dynamic programming schedulers |
US6791962B2 (en) | 2002-06-12 | 2004-09-14 | Globespan Virata, Inc. | Direct link protocol in wireless local area networks |
JP2005530395A (en) | 2002-06-17 | 2005-10-06 | アイピーアール ライセンシング インコーポレイテッド | Antenna steering scheduler for mobile stations in wireless local area networks |
US7301924B1 (en) | 2002-07-15 | 2007-11-27 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Media access control for MIMO wireless network |
KR100547842B1 (en) * | 2002-07-29 | 2006-01-31 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Device for transmitting different data types in a wireless packet data communication system |
CN102655430A (en) | 2002-07-30 | 2012-09-05 | 美商智慧财产权授权股份有限公司 | System and method for multiple-input multiple-output (mimo) radio communication |
US7092737B2 (en) | 2002-07-31 | 2006-08-15 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | MIMO systems with rate feedback and space time transmit diversity |
US7082117B2 (en) | 2002-08-12 | 2006-07-25 | Harris Corporation | Mobile ad-hoc network with intrusion detection features and related methods |
US8194770B2 (en) * | 2002-08-27 | 2012-06-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Coded MIMO systems with selective channel inversion applied per eigenmode |
US7277419B2 (en) | 2002-08-30 | 2007-10-02 | Intel Corporation | Supporting disparate packet based wireless communications |
US20040047319A1 (en) * | 2002-09-06 | 2004-03-11 | Johannes Elg | Contention-based medium access control for ad hoc wireless piconets |
US20040062206A1 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2004-04-01 | Soong Anthony C.K. | System and method for fast reverse link scheduling in a wireless communication network |
US7440573B2 (en) | 2002-10-08 | 2008-10-21 | Broadcom Corporation | Enterprise wireless local area network switching system |
AU2003274395A1 (en) * | 2002-10-17 | 2004-05-04 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | A scheduler system and method thereof |
AU2003271107A1 (en) | 2002-10-23 | 2004-05-13 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Communication management method, central control station, communication station, communication management program, and computer-readable recording medium storing communication management program |
US7324429B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2008-01-29 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Multi-mode terminal in a wireless MIMO system |
US8320301B2 (en) * | 2002-10-25 | 2012-11-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | MIMO WLAN system |
US20040120349A1 (en) * | 2002-11-14 | 2004-06-24 | Hughes Electronics | Systems and methods for transmitting internet protocol data via satellite |
DE10254384B4 (en) | 2002-11-17 | 2005-11-17 | Siemens Ag | Bidirectional signal processing method for a MIMO system with a rate-adaptive adaptation of the data transmission rate |
EP1563625A4 (en) | 2002-11-19 | 2009-12-16 | Bae Systems Information | Bandwidth efficient wirless network modem |
KR100561393B1 (en) * | 2002-11-30 | 2006-03-16 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Media access control method in the wireless network and apparatus thereof |
US7260073B2 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2007-08-21 | Nokia Corporation | Method for scheduling of plural packet data flows |
US20040109433A1 (en) * | 2002-12-06 | 2004-06-10 | Khan Farooq Ullah | Reverse link packet acknowledgement method |
US7154876B2 (en) * | 2002-12-16 | 2006-12-26 | Avaya Technology, Inc. | Exploratory polling for periodic traffic sources |
FR2849303B1 (en) | 2002-12-24 | 2005-03-11 | Cit Alcatel | METHOD FOR BROADCASTING INFORMATION TO TERMINALS IN A RADIO COMMUNICATION NETWORK, AND TERMINAL USING THE SAME |
TW589841B (en) | 2002-12-26 | 2004-06-01 | Newsoft Technology Corp | Method and system for improving transmission efficiency of wireless local area network |
CN1512721A (en) | 2002-12-26 | 2004-07-14 | �ʼҷ����ֵ��ӹɷ�����˾ | Radio local net work system and method with increased central coordination control |
FR2849730A1 (en) | 2003-01-02 | 2004-07-09 | Thomson Licensing Sa | Ethernet bus type communication network node reserving method, involves circulating token between nodes to send Ethernet packet one by one on bus, where preset fraction of band reserved for node corresponds to specific sequence |
US7372855B2 (en) * | 2003-01-08 | 2008-05-13 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | System and method for synchronizing an IEEE 802.11 power-save interval |
ATE383702T1 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2008-01-15 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | METHOD FOR SENDING A DATA STREAM OVER A WIRELESS MEDIUM OVER A WIRELESS NETWORK AND WIRELESS NETWORK |
US7525994B2 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2009-04-28 | Avaya Inc. | Packet data flow identification for multiplexing |
US7782898B2 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2010-08-24 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Wideband cable system |
US8149707B2 (en) | 2003-02-12 | 2012-04-03 | Rockstar Bidco, LP | Minimization of radio resource usage in multi-hop networks with multiple routings |
US20040156367A1 (en) | 2003-02-11 | 2004-08-12 | Magis Networks, Inc. | Hierarchically distributed scheduling apparatus and method |
US7269152B2 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2007-09-11 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for transmitting information within a communication system |
US7460473B1 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2008-12-02 | Istor Networks, Inc. | Network receive interface for high bandwidth hardware-accelerated packet processing |
KR20040076979A (en) | 2003-02-27 | 2004-09-04 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Wireless LAN and method for setting direct link protocol between wireless LAN stations |
US8064474B2 (en) | 2003-03-20 | 2011-11-22 | Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. | Method and apparatus for selecting a responder to enable reliable multicast |
US7295632B2 (en) | 2003-03-20 | 2007-11-13 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method and apparatus for decoding punctured subframes |
US20040190485A1 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2004-09-30 | Khan Farooq Ullah | Method of scheduling grant transmission in a wireless communication system |
US20040196812A1 (en) | 2003-04-07 | 2004-10-07 | Instant802 Networks Inc. | Multi-band access point with shared processor |
JP4127805B2 (en) | 2003-04-11 | 2008-07-30 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Base station, mobile station, communication system, transmission control method, and mobile station control program |
US7961705B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2011-06-14 | Lightwaves Systems, Inc. | High bandwidth data transport system |
US6961311B2 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2005-11-01 | Motorola, Inc. | Adaptive scheduling window management for a quality of service enabled local area network |
WO2004102889A1 (en) | 2003-05-16 | 2004-11-25 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Base station and radio terminal |
US7280513B2 (en) | 2003-06-10 | 2007-10-09 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method of transmission of a data frame from a first station to a second station, and a CDMA telecommunications network |
US7457973B2 (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2008-11-25 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | System and method for prioritizing data transmission and transmitting scheduled wake-up times to network stations based on downlink transmission duration |
US7512070B2 (en) * | 2003-06-23 | 2009-03-31 | Intel Corporation | Adaptive use of a transmit opportunity |
JP2005020163A (en) * | 2003-06-24 | 2005-01-20 | Sony Corp | Wireless communication system, wireless communication apparatus and wireless communication method, and computer program |
KR100586845B1 (en) | 2003-06-24 | 2006-06-07 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method for enhancing transfer rate using DLP and multi-channel in DCF-based wireless LAN network, and wireless network system thereof |
US20040266451A1 (en) | 2003-06-30 | 2004-12-30 | Aleksandr Stolyar | Method and apparatus for improving scheduler performance in wireless packet data systems |
US7817663B2 (en) * | 2003-07-14 | 2010-10-19 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for generating packet data to support multiple services in a wireless packet data communication system |
JP3880554B2 (en) | 2003-07-18 | 2007-02-14 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Space division multiple access wireless medium access controller |
JP2005057373A (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2005-03-03 | Ntt Docomo Inc | Radio packet communication apparatus |
US7336642B2 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2008-02-26 | Skypilot Networks, Inc. | Communication protocol for a wireless mesh architecture |
US7065144B2 (en) | 2003-08-27 | 2006-06-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Frequency-independent spatial processing for wideband MISO and MIMO systems |
EP1768442A3 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2007-08-08 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for controlling operational states of medium access control layer in a broadband wireless access communication system |
US7385998B2 (en) * | 2003-09-08 | 2008-06-10 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for encapsulating services for transportation over metallic physical mediums |
KR100975734B1 (en) | 2003-09-08 | 2010-08-12 | 엘지디스플레이 주식회사 | A array plate and the fabrication method for In-Plane-Switching mode LCD |
US7079552B2 (en) * | 2003-09-09 | 2006-07-18 | Harris Corporation | Mobile ad hoc network (MANET) with quality-of-service (QoS) protocol hierarchy and related methods |
JP4295051B2 (en) | 2003-09-12 | 2009-07-15 | パナソニック株式会社 | Transmitting apparatus and transmitting method |
US7158803B1 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2007-01-02 | Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. | Emergency services for wireless data access networks |
US8462817B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2013-06-11 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method, apparatus, and system for multiplexing protocol data units |
US9226308B2 (en) * | 2003-10-15 | 2015-12-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method, apparatus, and system for medium access control |
US8842657B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2014-09-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | High speed media access control with legacy system interoperability |
US8483105B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2013-07-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | High speed media access control |
US8284752B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2012-10-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method, apparatus, and system for medium access control |
US8233462B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2012-07-31 | Qualcomm Incorporated | High speed media access control and direct link protocol |
US8472473B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2013-06-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Wireless LAN protocol stack |
US7616698B2 (en) | 2003-11-04 | 2009-11-10 | Atheros Communications, Inc. | Multiple-input multiple output system and method |
US8406235B2 (en) * | 2003-11-26 | 2013-03-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Quality of service scheduler for a wireless network |
US7366202B2 (en) * | 2003-12-08 | 2008-04-29 | Colubris Networks, Inc. | System and method for interference mitigation for wireless communication |
US7706399B2 (en) * | 2003-12-19 | 2010-04-27 | Intel Corporation | Polling in wireless networks |
US7333556B2 (en) * | 2004-01-12 | 2008-02-19 | Intel Corporation | System and method for selecting data rates to provide uniform bit loading of subcarriers of a multicarrier communication channel |
US7505466B2 (en) | 2004-01-20 | 2009-03-17 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system for ethernet and ATM network interworking |
US8903440B2 (en) | 2004-01-29 | 2014-12-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Distributed hierarchical scheduling in an ad hoc network |
US7818018B2 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2010-10-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Distributed hierarchical scheduling in an AD hoc network |
US8315271B2 (en) * | 2004-03-26 | 2012-11-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for an ad-hoc wireless communications system |
US7417974B2 (en) | 2004-04-14 | 2008-08-26 | Broadcom Corporation | Transmitting high rate data within a MIMO WLAN |
CN1934837A (en) | 2004-04-20 | 2007-03-21 | 北电网络有限公司 | Method and system for quality of service support for Ethernet multiservice interworking over multiprotocol label switching |
US7564814B2 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2009-07-21 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Transmission mode and rate selection for a wireless communication system |
US8401018B2 (en) * | 2004-06-02 | 2013-03-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for scheduling in a wireless network |
CN1263675C (en) | 2004-08-30 | 2006-07-12 | 湖北教育学院 | Inert thick salt medium method for preparing nanometer powder |
JP4331088B2 (en) * | 2004-11-01 | 2009-09-16 | 株式会社東芝 | Communication apparatus and communication method |
GB0424704D0 (en) * | 2004-11-09 | 2004-12-08 | Nortel Networks Ltd | Atm over ethernet scheduler |
US7599340B2 (en) | 2005-01-25 | 2009-10-06 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus or eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes |
US20060268886A1 (en) | 2005-05-04 | 2006-11-30 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Wireless communication method and system for enhancing the capability of WLAN control frames |
US7733835B2 (en) * | 2005-07-20 | 2010-06-08 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and system for reducing power consumption of a wireless transmit/receive unit |
KR100902499B1 (en) * | 2005-08-02 | 2009-06-15 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for communicating frame data in wireless communication system |
US8600336B2 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2013-12-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Scheduling with reverse direction grant in wireless communication systems |
US7933236B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2011-04-26 | Nortel Networks Limited | Methods and systems for a wireless routing architecture and protocol |
PT3169016T (en) * | 2006-02-03 | 2018-12-03 | Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd | Uplink resource allocation in a mobile communication system |
EP3048849B1 (en) * | 2006-03-07 | 2017-06-21 | Panasonic Corporation | Overhead reduction of uplink control signaling in a mobile communication system |
US8179871B2 (en) | 2006-03-29 | 2012-05-15 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and system for channel access control for transmission of video information over wireless channels |
US20080130660A1 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2008-06-05 | Jordi Ros-Giralt | System and method of real-time control and scheduling for zero-queue distributed systems |
US7869432B1 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2011-01-11 | Force 10 Networks, Inc | Peer-to-peer link aggregation across a service provider network |
US7978646B2 (en) * | 2007-10-19 | 2011-07-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Hybrid contention-based and schedule-based access to a communication link |
US7881340B2 (en) * | 2007-10-22 | 2011-02-01 | The Johns Hopkins University | Decentralized media access control for ad-hoc mobile wireless network |
US8441975B2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2013-05-14 | Broadcom Corporation | Medium accessing mechanisms within multiple user, multiple access, and/or MIMO wireless communications |
-
2004
- 2004-10-13 US US10/964,321 patent/US8483105B2/en active Active
- 2004-10-15 DK DK04795248T patent/DK1678893T3/en active
- 2004-10-15 JP JP2006535340A patent/JP4490432B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-15 EP EP20130020004 patent/EP2618518B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-15 EP EP13020003.3A patent/EP2615771B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-15 PT PT100106145T patent/PT2317687E/en unknown
- 2004-10-15 CA CA 2719486 patent/CA2719486C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-15 CA CA 2542380 patent/CA2542380C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-15 PT PT04795248T patent/PT1678893E/en unknown
- 2004-10-15 EP EP20040795248 patent/EP1678893B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-15 ES ES13020003.3T patent/ES2639947T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-15 ES ES10010614T patent/ES2419662T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-15 EP EP20130020005 patent/EP2618519B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-15 EP EP20100010614 patent/EP2317687B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-15 DK DK10010614T patent/DK2317687T3/en active
- 2004-10-15 PL PL10010614T patent/PL2317687T3/en unknown
- 2004-10-15 WO PCT/US2004/034061 patent/WO2005039127A1/en active Application Filing
- 2004-10-15 KR KR1020067009420A patent/KR100930136B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2004-10-15 HU HUE13020003A patent/HUE035812T2/en unknown
- 2004-10-15 PL PL04795248T patent/PL1678893T3/en unknown
- 2004-10-15 ES ES04795248T patent/ES2393104T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-10-15 CN CN2004800372598A patent/CN1894910B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2009
- 2009-03-04 JP JP2009050958A patent/JP5149224B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2010
- 2010-02-08 JP JP2010025733A patent/JP5108039B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2013
- 2013-06-18 US US13/920,887 patent/US9137087B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0475682A2 (en) * | 1990-09-06 | 1992-03-18 | NCR International, Inc. | Local area network having a wireless transmission link |
WO2002028119A2 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2002-04-04 | Arraycomm, Inc. | Cooperative polling in a wireless data communication system having smart antenna processing |
US20020172186A1 (en) * | 2001-04-09 | 2002-11-21 | Peter Larsson | Instantaneous joint transmit power control and link adaptation for RTS/CTS based channel access |
Cited By (91)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7894538B2 (en) | 2003-08-27 | 2011-02-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Frequency-independent spatial processing for wideband MISO and MIMO systems |
US8842657B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2014-09-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | High speed media access control with legacy system interoperability |
US8472473B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2013-06-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Wireless LAN protocol stack |
US8462817B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2013-06-11 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method, apparatus, and system for multiplexing protocol data units |
US8582430B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2013-11-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for wireless LAN (WLAN) data multiplexing |
US8483105B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2013-07-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | High speed media access control |
US9137087B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2015-09-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | High speed media access control |
US8284752B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2012-10-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method, apparatus, and system for medium access control |
US8233462B2 (en) | 2003-10-15 | 2012-07-31 | Qualcomm Incorporated | High speed media access control and direct link protocol |
US9013989B2 (en) | 2003-11-24 | 2015-04-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Medium access control layer that encapsulates data from a plurality of received data units into a plurality of independently transmittable blocks |
US8654635B2 (en) | 2003-11-24 | 2014-02-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Medium access control layer that encapsulates data from a plurality of received data units into a plurality of independently transmittable blocks |
US8315271B2 (en) | 2004-03-26 | 2012-11-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for an ad-hoc wireless communications system |
US8355372B2 (en) | 2004-05-07 | 2013-01-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Transmission mode and rate selection for a wireless communication system |
US8401018B2 (en) | 2004-06-02 | 2013-03-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for scheduling in a wireless network |
US8578230B2 (en) | 2004-10-05 | 2013-11-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced block acknowledgement |
US7882412B2 (en) | 2004-10-05 | 2011-02-01 | Sanjiv Nanda | Enhanced block acknowledgement |
JP2008507234A (en) * | 2005-06-09 | 2008-03-06 | サムスン エレクトロニクス カンパニー リミテッド | Method and apparatus for transmitting data while providing backward compatibility in a high speed wireless network |
CN102801507B (en) * | 2005-06-17 | 2015-03-11 | 株式会社东芝 | Wireless communication apparatus |
US8503339B2 (en) | 2005-06-17 | 2013-08-06 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Wireless communication apparatus and method |
US7852791B2 (en) | 2005-06-17 | 2010-12-14 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Wireless communication apparatus and method |
EP2587878A3 (en) * | 2005-06-17 | 2016-11-30 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Responder (e.g. 802.11n) transmitting acknowledgements in an extra physical frame at a first transmission rate |
WO2006134704A1 (en) * | 2005-06-17 | 2006-12-21 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Responder (e.g. 802.11n) transmitting acknowledgements in an extra physical frame at a first transmission rate |
CN102801507A (en) * | 2005-06-17 | 2012-11-28 | 株式会社东芝 | Wireless communication apparatus and method |
JP2009504023A (en) * | 2005-07-27 | 2009-01-29 | インテロン・コーポレーション | Data encryption in communication networks |
US8175190B2 (en) | 2005-07-27 | 2012-05-08 | Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. | Managing spectra of modulated signals in a communication network |
US8416887B2 (en) | 2005-07-27 | 2013-04-09 | Qualcomm Atheros, Inc | Managing spectra of modulated signals in a communication network |
US7454218B2 (en) | 2005-08-19 | 2008-11-18 | Panasonic Corporation | Method of band multiplexing to improve system capacity for a multi-band communication system |
WO2007024613A1 (en) * | 2005-08-19 | 2007-03-01 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method of band multiplexing to improve system capacity for a multi-band communication system |
US8600336B2 (en) | 2005-09-12 | 2013-12-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Scheduling with reverse direction grant in wireless communication systems |
WO2007033056A3 (en) * | 2005-09-14 | 2007-06-28 | Interdigital Tech Corp | Method and apparatus for protecting high throughput stations |
JP2012044700A (en) * | 2005-09-14 | 2012-03-01 | Interdigital Technol Corp | Method and device for protecting high throughput stations |
JP2015039244A (en) * | 2005-09-14 | 2015-02-26 | インターデイジタル テクノロジー コーポレーション | Method and device for protecting high throughput stations |
JP2009508438A (en) * | 2005-09-14 | 2009-02-26 | インターデイジタル テクノロジー コーポレーション | Method and device for protecting high throughput terminals |
WO2007033056A2 (en) * | 2005-09-14 | 2007-03-22 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for protecting high throughput stations |
JP2013165516A (en) * | 2005-09-14 | 2013-08-22 | Interdigital Technology Corp | Method and device for protecting high throughput stations |
US8750932B2 (en) | 2005-09-14 | 2014-06-10 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for protecting high throughput stations |
US8619658B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2013-12-31 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
KR101496399B1 (en) * | 2005-09-21 | 2015-03-05 | 인터디지탈 테크날러지 코포레이션 | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
EP2608621A1 (en) * | 2005-09-21 | 2013-06-26 | InterDigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
US11849393B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2023-12-19 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
CN103298133A (en) * | 2005-09-21 | 2013-09-11 | 美商内数位科技公司 | Ieee802.11sta, ieee802.11ap and methods are used therein respectivley |
CN101268660B (en) * | 2005-09-21 | 2013-05-15 | 美商内数位科技公司 | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
US11470552B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2022-10-11 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
US10873907B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2020-12-22 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
US10631244B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2020-04-21 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
US10375635B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2019-08-06 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
US10117179B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2018-10-30 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
EP3327998A1 (en) * | 2005-09-21 | 2018-05-30 | InterDigital Technology Corporation | Access point and station for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
EP2608432A1 (en) * | 2005-09-21 | 2013-06-26 | InterDigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
US9681377B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2017-06-13 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
CN103298133B (en) * | 2005-09-21 | 2017-04-12 | 美商内数位科技公司 | Ieee802.11sta, ieee802.11ap and methods are used therein respectivley |
WO2007038118A2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2007-04-05 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
KR101613004B1 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2016-04-15 | 인터디지탈 테크날러지 코포레이션 | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
KR101553692B1 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2015-09-17 | 인터디지탈 테크날러지 코포레이션 | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
WO2007038118A3 (en) * | 2005-09-21 | 2007-07-05 | Interdigital Tech Corp | Method and apparatus for transmission management in a wireless communication system |
EP3249832A1 (en) * | 2006-05-11 | 2017-11-29 | Intel Corporation | Systems and methods for frame tunnelling in wireless communications |
EP3051714A1 (en) * | 2006-05-11 | 2016-08-03 | Intel Corporation | Systems and methods for frame tunnelling in wireless communications |
EP2120464A1 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2009-11-18 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Communication system, base station, and mobile station |
EP2120464A4 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2012-08-01 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Communication system, base station, and mobile station |
EP2070242A4 (en) * | 2006-10-02 | 2013-04-17 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Optimal error protection coding for mimo ack/nack/pre/post information |
EP2070242A1 (en) * | 2006-10-02 | 2009-06-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) | Optimal error protection coding for mimo ack/nack/pre/post information |
EP2685759A1 (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2014-01-15 | Fujitsu Limited | Wireless communication systems |
US8923187B2 (en) | 2006-10-13 | 2014-12-30 | Fujitsu Limited | Wireless communication systems |
WO2008072126A2 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2008-06-19 | Nokia Corporation | Flexible radio resource sharing in time and frequency domains among tdd communication systems |
WO2008072126A3 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2008-08-21 | Nokia Corp | Flexible radio resource sharing in time and frequency domains among tdd communication systems |
US8644270B2 (en) | 2007-02-22 | 2014-02-04 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and system for configuring a frame in a communication system |
JP2010519843A (en) * | 2007-02-22 | 2010-06-03 | サムスン エレクトロニクス カンパニー リミテッド | Frame configuration method and system in communication system |
EP2171885A4 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2014-10-15 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Apparatus and method for peer-to-peer (p2p) communications in a broadband wireless communication system |
US9320037B2 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2016-04-19 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for peer-to-peer (P2P) communications in a broadband wireless communication system |
EP2171885A2 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2010-04-07 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for peer-to-peer (p2p) communications in a broadband wireless communication system |
US8711835B2 (en) | 2007-07-10 | 2014-04-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | OFDM control signaling in the presence of timing asynchronization in a peer-to-peer network |
US8171363B2 (en) | 2007-08-10 | 2012-05-01 | Fujitsu Limited | Method and device for counting transmission times of data unit, transmission device, and computer program |
US8526461B2 (en) | 2008-11-10 | 2013-09-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus supporting adaptive decentralized traffic scheduling including a dynamic transmitter yielding threshold |
US8989106B2 (en) | 2009-02-27 | 2015-03-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatuses for scheduling uplink request spatial division multiple access (RSDMA) messages in an SDMA capable wireless LAN |
US11026169B2 (en) | 2010-11-09 | 2021-06-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Physical layer power save facility |
EP2725825A1 (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2014-04-30 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Wireless local area network cooperated data transmission method, device and system |
CN103404179A (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2013-11-20 | 华为技术有限公司 | Wireless local area network cooperated data transmission method, device and system |
EP2725825A4 (en) * | 2011-07-26 | 2014-07-23 | Huawei Tech Co Ltd | Wireless local area network cooperated data transmission method, device and system |
US9210614B2 (en) | 2011-07-26 | 2015-12-08 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Wireless local area network coordinated data transmission method, device, and system |
US10034245B2 (en) | 2012-09-13 | 2018-07-24 | Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. | Method, wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) and base station for transferring small packets |
US9504032B2 (en) | 2012-09-13 | 2016-11-22 | Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. | Method, wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) and base station for transferring small packets |
US10966152B2 (en) | 2012-09-13 | 2021-03-30 | Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc. | Method, wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) and base station for transferring small packets |
WO2014105387A1 (en) * | 2012-12-27 | 2014-07-03 | Motorola Mobility Llc | Methods for device-to-device communication |
US9185697B2 (en) | 2012-12-27 | 2015-11-10 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method and apparatus for device-to-device communication |
US9713145B2 (en) | 2012-12-27 | 2017-07-18 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method and apparatus for device-to-device communication |
EP3258625A4 (en) * | 2015-02-13 | 2018-02-28 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | Wireless communication apparatus and wireless communication method |
US10631203B2 (en) | 2015-02-13 | 2020-04-21 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | Wireless communication device and wireless communication method |
US11032741B2 (en) | 2015-02-13 | 2021-06-08 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | Wireless communication device and wireless communication method |
US11671121B2 (en) | 2015-02-13 | 2023-06-06 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | Wireless communication device and wireless communication method |
US12095482B2 (en) | 2015-02-13 | 2024-09-17 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | Wireless communication device and wireless communication method |
WO2016191112A1 (en) * | 2015-05-27 | 2016-12-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Reservation coordination in a shared communication medium |
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9137087B2 (en) | High speed media access control | |
US9072101B2 (en) | High speed media access control and direct link protocol | |
CA2542384C (en) | High speed media access control with legacy system interoperability | |
AU2004306899C1 (en) | High speed media access control with legacy system interoperability |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 200480037259.8 Country of ref document: CN |
|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DPEN | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2542380 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2004795248 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2022/DELNP/2006 Country of ref document: IN |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2006535340 Country of ref document: JP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1020067009420 Country of ref document: KR |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2004795248 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1020067009420 Country of ref document: KR |