WO2004056017A1 - Systeme optique d'interrogation et systeme detecteur - Google Patents

Systeme optique d'interrogation et systeme detecteur Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004056017A1
WO2004056017A1 PCT/GB2003/005497 GB0305497W WO2004056017A1 WO 2004056017 A1 WO2004056017 A1 WO 2004056017A1 GB 0305497 W GB0305497 W GB 0305497W WO 2004056017 A1 WO2004056017 A1 WO 2004056017A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
optical
soa
interrogation system
amplifying
gating means
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2003/005497
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Lorna Anne Everall
Glynn David Lloyd
Original Assignee
Aston Photonic Technologies Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from EP02258640A external-priority patent/EP1432149B1/fr
Application filed by Aston Photonic Technologies Limited filed Critical Aston Photonic Technologies Limited
Priority to JP2005502463A priority Critical patent/JP4817423B2/ja
Priority to AU2003288565A priority patent/AU2003288565A1/en
Priority to CN2003801063120A priority patent/CN1726664B/zh
Publication of WO2004056017A1 publication Critical patent/WO2004056017A1/fr
Priority to NO20052616A priority patent/NO341810B1/no

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01D—MEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01D5/00—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable
    • G01D5/26—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable characterised by optical transfer means, i.e. using infrared, visible, or ultraviolet light
    • G01D5/32—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable characterised by optical transfer means, i.e. using infrared, visible, or ultraviolet light with attenuation or whole or partial obturation of beams of light
    • G01D5/34—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable characterised by optical transfer means, i.e. using infrared, visible, or ultraviolet light with attenuation or whole or partial obturation of beams of light the beams of light being detected by photocells
    • G01D5/353—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable characterised by optical transfer means, i.e. using infrared, visible, or ultraviolet light with attenuation or whole or partial obturation of beams of light the beams of light being detected by photocells influencing the transmission properties of an optical fibre
    • G01D5/35383—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable characterised by optical transfer means, i.e. using infrared, visible, or ultraviolet light with attenuation or whole or partial obturation of beams of light the beams of light being detected by photocells influencing the transmission properties of an optical fibre using multiple sensor devices using multiplexing techniques
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04B—TRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/07—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems
    • H04B10/071—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems using a reflected signal, e.g. using optical time domain reflectometers [OTDR]

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an optical interrogation system and to an optical sensor system incorporating the optical interrogation system.
  • WDM wavelength division multiplexing
  • TDM time division multiplexing
  • each grating within the array is fabricated to have a different resonant wavelength, located within a different wavelength window.
  • a continuous wave broad bandwidth optical source is used to illuminate all of the gratings simultaneously, and the resulting reflected signal from each grating is simultaneously present in the output spectrum presented to a wavelength measuring system.
  • the wavelength measuring system must therefore be able to measure multiple wavelengths simultaneously. This is an inherent feature of a scanning instrument such as an optical spectrum analyser, but presents a problem for instruments like wave-meters.
  • Another disadvantage of WDM based systems is that as the number of gratings in the array increases so does the required operating bandwidth of the optical source and the wavelength measuring system.
  • TDM based systems usually allow all of the gratings within the array to be located within the same wavelength window, with the gratings being illuminated by a pulsed optical source.
  • a single short broad bandwidth pulse launched into one end of a fibre will reach a particular grating in the array at a particular moment in time.
  • the grating will reflect part of the optical pulse, and the reflected signal will propagate back down the fibre towards the optical source and a wavelength measurement system. Pulses reflected from other gratings within the array will arrive at the measurement system at different times, since they will have travelled different distances.
  • Differentiation of the absolute wavelength of each grating utilises the fact that light travels in a fibre at a calculable velocity of around 200,000,000 metres per second.
  • the difficulty in operating this type of TDM based system is that it requires a wavelength measuring system that can operate at high speed. This is because the wavelength of each reflected pulse must be determined before the next pulse arrives. Due to the velocity of light and typical grating spacing, the reflected pulses are typically only nanoseconds apart.
  • An alternative TDM technique which does not rely on high-speed wavelength determination, utilises short optical pulses of a single known wavelength. Only gratings within the array whose resonant wavelength matches that of the pulse will reflect the pulse.
  • the full spectrum of the grating array may be scanned and wavelength of each of the gratings determined.
  • the difficulty with this TDM technique is that it requires high-speed photodiodes to detect the reflected pulses and high-speed signal processing electronics.
  • the need to have a scanning optical source, such as a tuneable laser diode or a broadband light source and scanning filter, is also a problem since these devices are often bulky and expensive.
  • a problem faced by all of these grating interrogation systems is that it is difficult to obtain high-power broad bandwidth optical sources. Since a broad bandwidth source by its very nature covers a large range of wavelengths, the power at any one wavelength is usually very low (typically -30dB/nm). In a TDM based system, this problem is compounded by the fact that only short pulses with long inter-pulse delays are received at the measurement system, resulting in a further (often profound) reduction in the average optical power received by the measurement system.
  • a second type of optical interrogation system is the optical time domain reflectometer (OTDR).
  • OTDR optical time domain reflectometer
  • a light source light emitting diode or laser diode
  • the light travels along, for example, a piece of optical fibre under test and is reflected from any reflection points within the fibre.
  • the reflection points are generally breaks in the fibre or optical components, such as patchcord connectors. Reflections may also arise due to general fibre backscatter.
  • the reflected signals are recorded as a series of pulses at a detector. The timing of the reflected pulses relative to the outbound optical pulse determines the position of the break or component along the fibre.
  • the magnitude of the reflected optical signal depends upon the type of reflection point. For example, a reflection from a flat patchcord connector would be around 4%, while the amount of reflection from a broken fibre would be less than this.
  • the main problem with existing OTDR technology is that it requires very fast signal processing electronics in order to distinguish the arrival times of different reflected pulses.
  • the use of fast electronics means that the measurement accuracy of the magnitude of reflected pulses is low.
  • the reflected optical signals are generally of low optical power, resulting in poor signal-to-noise ratios.
  • an optical interrogation system comprising: an optical source operable to generate optical pulses, to be coupled into one end of an optical waveguide, the waveguide being optically coupled at its other end to one or more reflective optical elements to be interrogated; optical amplifying and gating means to be optically coupled to the waveguide and being operable to selectively transmit an optical pulse returned from a reflective optical element under interrogation, and being further operable to optically amplify an optical signal transmitted therethrough; and optical detection means optically coupled to the optical amplifying and gating means, and being operable to detect a returned optical pulse transmitted by the optical amplifying and gating means.
  • the optical amplifying and gating means is preferably an optical amplifying device capable of switched operation; when switched on the optical amplifying and gating means transmits and amplifies an optical signal, and when switched off the transmission and amplification of optical signals is prevented.
  • the optical amplifying and gating means is preferably bi-directionally operable, and most preferably comprises a semiconductor optical amplifier, which may be gain clamped.
  • the interrogation system preferably further comprises drive apparatus for the optical amplifying and gating means, the drive apparatus being operable to cause the optical amplifying and gating means to switch on and off.
  • the drive apparatus is preferably operable to generate electrical drive pulses of variable frequency and duration.
  • the drive apparatus may generate pairs of electrical drive pulses.
  • the drive apparatus may alternatively generate a stream of pairs of electrical drive pulses.
  • the drive apparatus may further alternatively generate a continuous stream of electrical drive pulses, at a selected frequency and each having the same duration.
  • the duration of an electrical drive pulse is preferably shorter than twice the time required for an optical signal to travel between closest adjacent reflective optical elements.
  • the drive apparatus may comprise an electrical pulse generator triggered by a variable frequency oscillator, or may alternatively comprise digitally programmable electrical pulse generating apparatus.
  • a plurality of optical amplifying and gating means may be provided, each to be optically coupled to a respective optical waveguide containing one or more reflective optical elements to be interrogated.
  • each of the optical amplifying and gating means are controlled by a single drive apparatus, the drive apparatus being selectively connectable to the respective optical amplifying and gating means of the optical waveguide containing a selected reflective optical element to be interrogated.
  • the optical source preferably comprises the optical amplifying and gating means, wherein when the optical amplifying and gating means is switched on it simultaneously generates an optical signal, in the form of amplified spontaneous emission, and gates the optical signal into an optical pulse.
  • the optical source may additionally comprise an optical filter provided between the optical amplifying and gating means and the optical waveguide.
  • the optical source may alternatively comprise a continuous wave optical source operable to generate a continuous wave optical signal, coupled to the optical amplifying and gating means, wherein as the optical amplifying and gating means is switched on and off it gates the continuous wave optical signal into optical pulses.
  • the continuous wave optical source may be a super-luminescent optical diode.
  • the optical source may additionally comprise an optical filter provided between the continuous wave optical source and the optical amplifying and gating means, or between the optical amplifying and gating means and the optical waveguide.
  • the optical source may further alternatively comprise a pulsed optical source operable to generate optical pulses.
  • the optical source may additionally comprise an optical filter provided after the pulsed optical source.
  • the interrogation system preferably further comprises optical coupling means for coupling the optical pulses into the optical waveguide.
  • the optical coupling means may comprise an optical waveguide routing device, such as an optical waveguide coupler, or may alternatively comprise an optical switching device.
  • the optical filter preferably has a transmission profile which substantially matches the spectral range occupied by the one or more reflective optical elements to be interrogated, the optical filter thereby acting to wavelength limit the optical bandwidth of the pulses.
  • an optical source may be provided for each optical waveguide.
  • a single optical source may be used, the optical source being coupled to the optical waveguides via an optical routing element, such as an optical waveguide coupler or an optical switch.
  • the optical detection means may comprise a photodetector.
  • the optical detection means may alternatively comprise wavelength evaluation apparatus optically coupled to the optical amplifying and gating means, and being operable to evaluate the wavelength of a returned optical pulse transmitted by the optical amplifying and gating means.
  • the wavelength evaluation apparatus may comprise an optical filter element having a wavelength dependent filter response followed by optical detection means, such as a photodetector, the electrical output from the optical detection means being processed by signal processing means operable to determine the wavelength of a detected optical signal; the gating of the optical amplifying and gating means identifying which grating it was returned from and the optical power of the filtered optical signal identifying its wavelength.
  • the optical filter element may comprise a bulk optic optical filter.
  • the optical filter may alternatively comprise an optical waveguide grating, such as a chirped Bragg grating having a reflectivity which varies substantially linearly with wavelength across the spectral profile of the grating, or a tilted optical waveguide grating having a coupling coefficient which varies with wavelength across the spectral profile of the grating.
  • an optical waveguide grating such as a chirped Bragg grating having a reflectivity which varies substantially linearly with wavelength across the spectral profile of the grating, or a tilted optical waveguide grating having a coupling coefficient which varies with wavelength across the spectral profile of the grating.
  • the wavelength evaluation apparatus may alternatively comprise a wavemeter or an optical spectrum analyser; the gating of the optical amplifying and gating means identifying which reflective optical element an optical signal was returned from and the wavemeter or optical spectrum analyser measuring the wavelength of the optical signal.
  • the interrogation system may further comprise a section of optical waveguide coupled between an optical amplifying and gating means and its respective optical waveguide containing one or more reflective optical elements to be interrogated.
  • the interrogation system may alternatively or additionally further comprise optical signal routing means configured to route an optical pulse returned from a reflective optical element being interrogated back through the optical amplifying and gating means, in the direction towards the reflective optical element under interrogation.
  • optical signal routing means causes an optical pulse that has been reflected from a reflective optical element being interrogated to be reflected back through the optical amplifying and gating means, back into the optical waveguide and back to the reflective optical element being interrogated, where it is again reflected, and so on.
  • optical pulse experiences multiple amplifications as it cycles back and forth from the reflective optical element under interrogation, passing through the optical amplifying and gating means each time.
  • the optical signal routing means preferably comprises an optical reflector provided after the optical amplifying and gating means, the reflector being located sufficiently close to the optical amplifying and gating means to ensure that the time it takes an optical signal to propagate from the optical amplifying and gating means to the reflector and back to the optical amplifying and gating means is shorter than the duration of the electrical drive pulse switching the optical amplifying and gating means on.
  • the spectral profile in reflection of the optical reflector preferably covers the same spectral range as that occupied by the one or more reflective optical element to be interrogated.
  • the optical reflector may have a reflectivity of less than 100 percent, thereby transmitting part of the optical signal which is then routed to the wavelength evaluation apparatus.
  • the optical reflector may be coupled to an optical signal tapping element, such as an optical waveguide coupler, thereby enabling the optical reflector to have a reflectivity of up to 100 percent, part of the optical signal reflected from the optical reflector being tapped off and routed to the wavelength evaluation apparatus.
  • the interrogation system may alternatively further comprise a series of optical reflectors provided after the optical amplifying and gating means, each reflector being located at a different distance from the optical amplifying and gating means, the most distant reflector being located sufficiently close to the optical amplifying and gating means to ensure that the time it takes an optical signal to propagate from the optical amplifying and gating means to the most distant reflector and back to the optical amplifying and gating means is shorter than the duration of the electrical drive pulse switching the optical amplifying and gating means on.
  • the spectral profile in reflection of each optical reflector preferably covers a different spectral range.
  • the or each optical reflector is preferably an optical waveguide grating, and is most preferably a Bragg grating.
  • the optical signal routing means may alternatively comprise a second optical waveguide, extending between, and optically coupled to, the optical waveguide coupled to the one or more reflective optical elements and the optical amplifying and gating means, such that optical pulses travel through the optical amplifying and gating means in one direction only, being towards the one or more reflective optical elements.
  • the interrogation system may additionally comprise an optical filter provided in front of (as seen by an optical signal) the wavelength evaluation apparatus, the optical filter having a transmission profile which substantially matches the spectral range occupied by the one or more reflective optical elements to be interrogated, the optical filter thereby acting to substantially remove any part of a returned optical signal at wavelengths outside the spectral range of the one ore more reflective optical elements.
  • the or each optical waveguide may be an optical fibre or a planar optical waveguide.
  • an optical sensor system comprising: an optical waveguide coupled at one end to one or more reflective optical elements; the optical waveguide being coupled at its other end to an optical interrogation system according to the first aspect of the invention.
  • the optical sensor system preferably comprises an optical waveguide coupled to a spaced array of optical waveguide gratings.
  • the resonant wavelength of each grating within the array preferably lies within the same wavelength window, all of the gratings thereby operating within a single optical channel.
  • the gratings within the array may be arranged in groups, each group containing a substantially identical set of gratings, the resonant wavelength of each grating within a group lying within a different wavelength window, and thus operating within a different optical channel, such that the time of flight of a returned optical pulse identifies which group a grating being interrogated belongs to.
  • the sensor system may comprise a plurality of optical waveguides each containing a spaced array of optical waveguide gratings, each waveguide being coupled to a respective optical amplifying and gating means.
  • the or each optical waveguide may be an optical fibre or a planar optical waveguide.
  • the array optical waveguide gratings are preferably Bragg gratings.
  • the or each reflective optical element may alternatively comprise a Fabry-Perot etalon device, which may be a bulk optic Fabry-Perot etalon, an optical fibre Fabry-Perot etalon, or an optical waveguide grating based Fabry-Perot etalon.
  • the or each reflective optical element may further alternatively comprise an end of an optical fibre, which may be a mirrored end, the end of an optical fibre patch-cord, a break within a section of optical fibre, a crystal based reflective optical element, or a mirror element.
  • Figure 1(a) is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a first embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a second embodiment of the invention;
  • Figure 1 (b) is a schematic representation of a digitally programmable alternative drive means suitable for use in the interrogation system of Fig.1 (a);
  • Figure 2 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a third embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a fourth embodiment of the invention;
  • Figure 3 is a diagrammatic illustration of the interference that occurs when multiple pulses propagate within an optical sensor system
  • Figure 4 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a fifth embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a sixth embodiment of the invention;
  • Figure 5 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a seventh embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to an eighth embodiment of the invention;
  • Figure 6 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a ninth embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a tenth embodiment of the invention
  • Figure 7 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to an eleventh embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a twelfth embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 8 is a diagrammatic representation of the wavelength evaluation apparatus of
  • Figure 9 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a thirteenth embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a fourteenth embodiment of the invention
  • Figure 10 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a fifteenth embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a sixteenth embodiment of the invention
  • Figure 11 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a seventeenth embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to an eighteenth embodiment of the invention;
  • Figure 12 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a nineteenth embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a twentieth embodiment of the invention;
  • Figure 13 is a diagrammatic representation of an electrical drive pulse to be applied to the SOA of Fig. 12;
  • Figure 14 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a twenty-first embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a twenty-second embodiment of the invention
  • Figure 15 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a twenty-third embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a twenty-fourth embodiment of the invention
  • Figure 16 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a twenty-fifth embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a twenty-sixth embodiment of the invention;
  • Figure 17 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a twenty-seventh embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a twenty-eighth embodiment of the invention;
  • Figure 18 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a twenty-ninth embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a thirtieth embodiment of the invention;
  • Figure 19 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a thirty-first embodiment of the invention and an optical sensor system according to a thirty-second embodiment of the invention
  • Figure 20 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical sensor system according to a thirty-third embodiment of the invention
  • Figure 21 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a thirty-fourth embodiment of the invention
  • Figure 22 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a thirty-fifth embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 23 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a thirty-sixth embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 24 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a thirty-seventh embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 25 is a diagrammatic representation of an optical interrogation system according to a thirty-eighth embodiment of the invention.
  • a first embodiment of the invention provides an optical interrogation system 10, as shown in Fig. 1(a).
  • the interrogation system 10 comprises an optical source 12, 14 operable to generate optical pulses, to be coupled into an optical waveguide 16 containing reflective optical elements, in this example gratings G, to be interrogated.
  • the interrogation system 10 further comprises optical amplifying and gating means, which in this example takes the form of a bi-directionally operable semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) 14.
  • SOA 14 is optically coupled to the waveguide 16 containing the gratings G to be interrogated.
  • the interrogation system 10 also comprises optical detection means, which in this example takes the form of a wavemeter 18 optically coupled to the SOA 14.
  • the wavemeter 18 is operable to evaluate the wavelength of a returned optical pulse transmitted by the SOA 14.
  • the optical source comprises a continuous wave (CW) optical source, in the form of a super-luminescent diode (SLD) 12, which is gated into optical pulses by the SOA 14.
  • the output of the SLD 12 is coupled via ports A and B of a signal splitting device, which in this example is an optical fibre coupler 20, but could alternatively be a circulator, to the SOA 14.
  • the interrogation system 10 further comprises drive means 22 operable to cause the SOA 14 to switch on and off.
  • SOAs are usually used entirely as amplifiers in single or multi-channel telecommunications networks, where they operated in a 'continuously-on' mode, being driven by a DC electrical drive signal.
  • the SOA 14 is operated in a pulsed drive mode, and is required to operate with nanosecond switching times.
  • the drive means 22 generates electrical drive pulses (see inset (a)) which are applied to the SOA 14.
  • the drive means 22 comprises an electrical pulse generator triggered by a variable frequency oscillator (not shown).
  • variable frequency oscillator may be constructed using a direct digital synthesis (DDS), or frequency synthesizer integrated circuit, with the frequency selection performed digitally under the control of a microprocessor.
  • DDS direct digital synthesis
  • the pulse generator may be constructed from an analogue or digital delay line, a simple RC timing circuit or logic gate delays.
  • the drive means 22 may alternatively comprise a single programmable device operable to digitally perform the functions of a variable frequency oscillator, delay generators and pulse generators.
  • a suitable digitally programmable drive means 22 is shown in Fig. 1 (b).
  • the frequency, duration and delay between pulses can be controlled to quartz crystal accuracy. With a typical clock frequency of 200 MHz, timing resolutions of at least 5ns are possible. More advanced designs employing multi-phased clocking will increase the timing resolution still further.
  • the SOA 14 When an electrical drive pulse is applied to the SOA 14, the SOA 14 is switched on, allowing an incident optical signal to be transmitted and amplified by the SOA 14. When no electrical power is applied to the SOA 14, the SOA 14 is switched off and has a high optical absorption, thereby substantially preventing the transmission of an incident optical signal.
  • the SOA 24 is thereby operable to selectively transmit an optical signal, in particular an optical pulse returned from a grating G under interrogation.
  • a series of electrical drive pulses in this example a series of pairs of drive pulses
  • the CW optical signal from the SLD 12 is thereby gated into a series of optical pulses.
  • the approximate spatial length of an optical pulse is selected to be -0.2 metres per 1 ns.
  • the interrogation system 10 is coupled to an optical waveguide containing one or more reflective optical elements to be interrogated.
  • the interrogation system 10 is shown coupled to an optical fibre 16 including a sensing section 24 in which an array of fibre Bragg gratings (Gi to G n ) are.provided.
  • the interrogation system 10 and the array of gratings together form an optical sensor system 26 according to a second embodiment of the invention, each of the gratings G within the array forming a sensing element.
  • the resonant wavelengths of each of the gratings G are substantially the same in this example, each grating G therefore operating within the same optical channel.
  • the gratings G are 2.5mm in length and have a resonant wavelength of 1550nm, a spectral bandwidth of 0.2nm and a transmission loss of 4%.
  • the four gratings shown in Fig. 1 (a) are intended to illustrate an array of up to n gratings, where n can be up to 1000.
  • optical waveguide gratings and in particular optical fibre Bragg gratings, as sensors will be well known to the person skilled in the art and so their operation and use will not be described in detail here.
  • the application of a first electrical drive pulse to the SOA 14 generates a first optical pulse, which is coupled into the fibre 16.
  • the optical pulse propagates along the fibre 16 it will meet each of the gratings G within the array in turn, and part of the pulse will be reflected by each grating.
  • the result will be a series of reflected optical pulses, each of similar length to the original optical pulse, but separated in time and space according to the difference in total propagation time of each of the reflected optical pulses from their respective gratings G.
  • the reflected optical pulses propagating back towards the SOA 14 will consequently arrive at the SOA 14 at different times. The time of flight of each reflected optical pulse therefore identifies the grating from which it was reflected.
  • the CW optical source SLD 12
  • the timing of the electrical drive pulses to the SOA 14 would then be adjusted to allow selected ones of the optical pulses generated by the pulsed optical source to be launched into the optical fibre 16.
  • the selection of a particular reflective optical element, in this example a grating G, for interrogation is achieved by adjusting the time period T 1 between the electrical drive pulses.
  • the frequency of the electrical drive pulses is set such that the period Ti between the first and second pulses within each pair is equal to the time of flight of the optical pulse generated as a result of the first drive pulse from the SOA 14 to a selected grating, G in Fig. 1(a), and back, as shown by arrow 28.
  • the SOA 14 therefore receives a second electrical drive pulse from the drive means 22 as the reflected optical pulse (from grating G ⁇ ) arrives back at the SOA 14.
  • the SOA 14 is switched on as the reflected pulse arrives, allowing the reflected pulse to be transmitted through the SOA 14, the reflected pulse being amplified at the same time.
  • Any reflected optical pulse which arrives before or after the SOA 14 is switched on, i.e. from another grating within the array, will be absorbed, and thus will not be transmitted.
  • the duration of the optical pulses is selected to be shorter than twice the time of flight of an optical pulse between closest adjacent gratings within the array.
  • the gated reflected optical pulse is then routed from the SOA 14 to the wavemeter 18, via ports B and C of the coupler 20, where the wavelength of the reflected optical pulse, and thus the wavelength of the interrogated grating G ⁇ is measured and recorded.
  • the application of the second electrical drive pulse to the SOA 14 has another effect, in addition to the gating of the reflected optical pulse: a second optical pulse is generated and coupled into the optical fibre 16.
  • FIG. 2 An optical interrogation system 30 according to a third embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig. 2.
  • the interrogation system 30 is substantially the same as the interrogation system 10 according to the first embodiment of the invention, with the following modifications.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • the drive means 22 is operable to generate a series of electrical drive pulses, as shown in inset (a).
  • Each electrical drive pulse is of the same duration and the period between the pulses is constant.
  • the duration of the electrical drive pulses is chosen to be no longer than twice the time required for an optical signal to propagate between closest adjacent reflective optical elements, gratings G, within the array.
  • the frequency of the variable frequency oscillator, and thus the frequency of the electrical drive pulses, is changed in order to select a particular grating within the array for interrogation.
  • the frequency of the variable frequency oscillator is chosen so that the period T between electrical drive pulses is equal to the time of flight of an optical pulse from the SOA 14 to the chosen grating G ⁇ in this example) and back to the SOA 14.
  • An approximate figure would be 10ns for each meter of optical fibre between the SOA 14 and the selected grating (assuming standard optical fibre).
  • the SOA 14 is therefore switched on and off at regular intervals. Each time the SOA 14 is switched on an optical pulse is generated and launched into the optical fibre 16, at the same time gating the correct reflected optical pulse, which then propagates on to the wavemeter 18, as described above.
  • an additional section of optical waveguide in this example a length of optical fibre 32, after the SOA 14 i.e. in use, between the SOA 14 and the optical fibre 16 containing the reflective optical elements (gratings G) to be interrogated.
  • This additional length of optical fibre 32 is included to remove the possibility of interference from simultaneous reception at the SOA 14 of reflected optical pulses from more than one grating G.
  • the interrogation system 30 is coupled to an optical fibre containing an array of three gratings (G 1 . 3 ), spaced at 1 metre intervals from the SOA 14. If, for example, the interrogation system 30 was set to monitor the wavelength of the first grating G-i, located 1 meter from the SOA 14, the following events would occur.
  • a first electrical drive pulse is applied to the SOA 14 and an optical pulse A is generated and launched into the fibre 16, where it propagates towards the gratings G.
  • T s later (where T s «5ns, being the time taken for an optical signal to travel 1 m in standard optical fibre), part of optical pulse A will be reflected off the first grating Gi and this first reflected pulse will propagate back towards the SOA 14. The remainder of the optical pulse A will continue towards the second and third gratings, G 2 and G 3 .
  • a second electrical drive pulse is applied to the SOA 14, causing a second optical pulse B to be generated and launched into the fibre 16, where it too propagates towards the gratings G.
  • the first reflected pulse ⁇ arrives back at the SOA 14. Since the SOA 14 is switched on (i.e. the gate is open and amplifying) it will be transmitted and amplified as described above. The first reflected pulse will then propagate to the wavemeter, as intended. However, at this same time (2T S ) the remainder of the first optical pulse A will arrive at the second grating G 2 , where part of it will be reflected, creating a second reflected pulse ⁇ .
  • the remainder of the first optical pulse A will arrive at the third grating G 3 , where part of it will be reflected, creating a third reflected pulse ⁇ .
  • the second optical pulse B will arrive at the first grating G-i, where part of it will be reflected, creating a fourth reflected pulse ⁇ .
  • the second reflected pulse ⁇ will arrive back at the first grating G ⁇ .
  • Part of the second reflected pulse ⁇ will be reflected by the first grating G 1; back towards the second grating G 2 , whilst the remainder of the second reflected pulse ⁇ will be transmitted through the first grating G ⁇
  • the transmitted part of the second reflected pulse ⁇ will therefore propagate along with the fourth reflected pulse ⁇ .
  • a third electrical drive pulse is applied to the SOA 14, causing a third optical pulse C to be generated and launched into the fibre 16.
  • the fourth reflected pulse ⁇ (from the selected grating G and the second reflected pulse ⁇ (from the second grating G 2 i.e. not from the selected grating) will both arrive at the SOA 14, where they will be transmitted and amplified.
  • the result is that two reflected optical signals will arrive at the wavelength measurement apparatus. Interference will occur between the two reflected optical signals, making them largely indistinguishable from each other.
  • the distance between the SOA 14 and the first grating G- is not longer than the distance between the first and last gratings in the array, this type of interference is likely to occur, the interference being most prominent when the gratings are evenly spaced.
  • the inclusion of the additional length of fibre 32 between the SOA 14 and optical fibre 16 eliminates the most dominant form of this type of interference.
  • the length of the additional fibre 32 must be longer than the distance between the first and last gratings within the grating array to be interrogated. There is still the possibility that 3-reflection interference may occur, but this can be ignored if grating reflectivity values are low, as discussed in more detail below.
  • the additional length of optical fibre 32 is longer than the minimum length required it may be possible to increase the frequency of the electrical drive pulses, and thus of the optical pulses, to a multiple of the basic frequency. In this manner more than one optical pulse would be propagating within the optical fibre 16 at any one time. For example, to increase the frequency by a factor of two would require the length of the additional fibre 32 to be at least twice the distance between the first and last gratings in the array.
  • Providing the additional length of optical fibre 32 therefore ensures that for every optical pulse generated by the SOA 14, and launched into the optical fibre 16, one reflected optical pulse is delivered to the wavemeter.
  • optical waveguide containing the array of gratings to be interrogated is an optical fibre.
  • optical waveguide containing the reflective optical elements to be interrogated is instead a planar optical waveguide, an additional section of planar optical waveguide may be used instead.
  • the interrogation system 30 When the interrogation system 30 is coupled to the optical fibre 16 containing an array of gratings G to be interrogated, as described above, they together form an optical fibre grating sensor system 34 according to a fourth embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows an optical interrogation system 40 according to a fifth embodiment of the invention.
  • the interrogation system 40 of this embodiment is substantially the same as the interrogation system 30 according to the third embodiment, with the following modification.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • the CW optical source 12 of the third embodiment is replaced by a pulsed optical source 42 operable to generate optical pulses.
  • the pulsed optical source is coupled to the optical fibre 16 between the SOA 14 and the additional length of fibre 32.
  • optical pulses generated by the pulsed optical source 42 are coupled into the additional optical fibre 32 via ports C and B of the optical coupler 20.
  • the optical pulses then propagate along the additional optical fibre 32 and from there along the optical fibre 16, where they encounter and are reflected by one or more of the gratings G.
  • the reflected optical pulses then propagate back along the fibres 16 and 32 to the SOA 14, via ports B and A of the coupler 20.
  • the frequency of the electrical drive pulses applied from the drive means 22 to the SOA 14 is set to gate (and amplify) only those pulses reflected from a selected one of the gratings G within the array.
  • the pulses transmitted through the SOA 14 are then routed to the wavelength measurement apparatus 18.
  • the interrogation apparatus 40 and the array of reflective optical elements, in this example gratings, within the optical fibre 16 together form an optical sensor system 44 according to a sixth embodiment of the invention.
  • a seventh embodiment of the invention provides an optical interrogation system 50 as shown in Fig. 5.
  • the interrogation system 50 further comprises a second SOA 52, and a second additional length of fibre 54.
  • the second SOA 52 is coupled to the SLD 12 via ports A and D of the coupler 20.
  • the second SOA 52 is to be coupled, via the second additional fibre 54, to a second optical waveguide containing one or more reflective optical elements to be interrogated, in this example a second optical fibre 56 containing an array of fibre Bragg gratings (G 2 ⁇ to G 2n ).
  • the same drive means 22 (an electrical pulse generator triggered by a variable frequency oscillator, as before) is used to control both SOAs 14, 52.
  • An electrical switch 56 is provided for selecting which SOA 14, 52 is to be driven at any specific time, thereby selecting which array of gratings is to be interrogated. Therefore only one wavelength measurement apparatus, such as a wavemeter 18, is required, since only one grating array will be selected at any one time.
  • This arrangement thus allows the gratings within more than one optical waveguide to be interrogated using a single drive means 22 and a single wavemeter 18. It will be appreciated that the described interrogation system 50 may be further expanded to interrogate gratings within more than two optical waveguides by providing additional SOAs, coupled to the SLD 12 and the wavemeter 18 via a more complex optical routing element.
  • the interrogation system 50 operates in the same manner as previously described once a particular SOA 14, 52 and its respective grating array has been selected by activation of the electrical switch 58.
  • SLD 12 and SOA 14, 52 combination optical pulse source may be replaced by a pulsed optical source, as shown in Fig. 4.
  • the pulsed source would similarly be coupled to the optical fibres 16, 56 between the respective SOAs 14, 52 and additional lengths of fibre 32, 54.
  • a single pulsed source may be coupled to the two fibres 16, 56 via the two output ports (B and D) of a single coupler, or two pulsed sourced may be coupled to their respective fibres 16, 56 via two separate couplers.
  • the interrogation system 50 When the interrogation system 50 is coupled to the two optical fibres 16, 56, containing their respective arrays of gratings Gn to G ⁇ dress and G 2 ⁇ to G 2n , the interrogation system 50 and the optical fibres 16, 56 together form an optical sensor system 60 according to an eighth embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 An optical interrogation system 70 according to a ninth embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig. 6.
  • the interrogation system 70 of this embodiment is substantially the same as the interrogation system 30 shown in Fig.2, with the following modification.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • an optical filter 72 is provided between the SLD 12 and the SOA 14.
  • the filter 72 is included because SOAs have a finite maximum total optical power output.
  • the filter 72 has a filter function, shown in inset (a), having a spectral range corresponding to the operating range of the gratings G to be interrogated.
  • a filter function
  • the bandwidth of the CW optical signal that reaches the SOA 14 only covers the maximum tuning range of the gratings G to be interrogated. All of the wavelengths within the CW optical signal generated by the SLD 12 which fall outside the operating range of the gratings G are blocked.
  • This reduction in the bandwidth of the CW optical signal to be gated into pulses (and amplified) by the SOA 14 means that the SOA 14 can amplify the pulses to a higher average optical power level.
  • the higher optical power of the pulses improves the performance of the interrogation system 70, specifically the signal to noise ratio at the wavelength measurement apparatus, and enables the interrogation system 70 to be used to interrogate lower reflectivity gratings.
  • the interrogation system 70 When the interrogation system 70 is coupled to the optical fibre 16 containing the array of gratings G to be interrogated, they together form an optical sensor system 74 according to a tenth embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG 7 shows an optical waveguide interrogation system 80 according to an eleventh embodiment of the invention.
  • the interrogation system 80 comprises optical amplifying and gating means in the form of an SOA 82, the SOA 82 being controlled by drive means 84, which is substantially the same as the drive means 22 of Figs. 1 (a) and 1 (b), and wavelength evaluation apparatus 86.
  • the SOA 82 acts as an optical source in addition to it being a bi- directionally operable optical amplifying and gating device.
  • the SOA 82 receives an electrical drive pulse it simultaneously generates an optical signal, in the form of amplified spontaneous emission, and gates the optical signal into an optical pulse.
  • an optical signal in the form of amplified spontaneous emission
  • the optical pulse being generated entirely within the SOA 82 and not as a result of gating the separate CW broad bandwidth optical signal. Consequently there also is no longer a requirement for the coupler of the previous embodiments.
  • the SOA 82 When coupled to an optical waveguide containing one or more reflective optical elements to be interrogated, in this example optical fibre 94 containing an array of gratings Gi to G n , the SOA 82 is operated in the same manner as described above, the frequency of the electrical drive pulses being set to select which grating within the array is to be interrogated.
  • the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86 shown in Fig.8, comprises an optical filter element 88 having a wavelength dependent filter response (see inset (a)), followed by optical detection means in the form of a photodetector 90.
  • the electrical output of the photodetector 90 is connected to signal processing means 92 operable to determine the wavelength of a detected optical signal.
  • the optical power of the filtered reflected optical pulse identifies the wavelength of the reflected pulse, and hence the wavelength of the grating being interrogated.
  • the interrogation system 80 When the interrogation system 80 is coupled to the optical fibre 94 containing an array of gratings G to be interrogated, they together form an optical sensor system 96 according to a twelfth embodiment of the invention. Similarly to the arrays of gratings provided within fibres 16 and 56 of the previous embodiments, the resonant wavelengths of each of the gratings G are substantially the same, each grating G again operating within the same optical channel.
  • the interrogation system 100 of the embodiment shown in Fig. 9 is substantially the same as the interrogation system 80 of the previous embodiment, with the following modifications.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • the SOA 82 performs only as an optical amplifying and gating device, the broad bandwidth optical pulses being generated by a separate pulsed optical source 102.
  • the pulsed optical source 102 is coupled into the interrogation system 100 after the SOA 82, via an optical coupler 104. This means that when the interrogation system 100 is coupled to an optical fibre 94 containing an array of gratings G to be interrogated, the optical pulses generated by the pulsed optical source 102 are coupled into the optical fibre 94 without passing through the SOA 82, as described above in connection with Fig. 4.
  • FIG. 10 shows an interrogation system 110 according to a fifteenth embodiment of the invention.
  • the interrogation system 110 is substantially the same as the interrogation system 80 of the eleventh embodiment, with the following modification.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • an additional section of optical waveguide in this example a length of optical fibre 112 is provided after the SOA 82 i.e. when the interrogation system 110 is coupled to the optical fibre 94 containing gratings G to be interrogated, the additional fibre 112 is located between the SOA 82 and the optical fibre 94.
  • this additional length of optical fibre 112 is included to remove the possibility of interference from simultaneous reception at the SOA 82 of reflected optical pulses from more than one grating G, thereby enabling the SOA 82 to be driven by a continuous stream of electrical drive pulses.
  • an optical sensor system 114 When the interrogation system 110 is coupled to the optical fibre 94 containing an array of gratings G to be interrogated an optical sensor system 114 according to a sixteenth embodiment of the invention is formed.
  • FIG. 11 An optical interrogation system 120 according to a seventeenth embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig. 11.
  • This interrogation system 120 is substantially the same as the interrogation system 110 shown in Fig. 10, with the following modification.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • an optical filter 122 is provided between the SOA 82 and the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86.
  • the filter 122 has a top-hat filter function (shown in inset (a)) having a spectral range corresponding to the operating range of the reflective optical elements, in this example gratings G, to be interrogated.
  • the filter 122 acts to remove broadband background noise (i.e. wavelengths which lie outside the operating range of the gratings G to be interrogated) present on a reflected optical signal transmitted by the SOA 82.
  • the background noise is generated by the SOA 82 and added to a reflected optical signal as it is transmitted (and amplified) by the SOA 82. Removing any such background noise will improve the signal to noise ratio of the reflected optical signal which reaches the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86.
  • an optical sensor system 124 By coupling the interrogation apparatus 120 to an optical fibre 94 containing an array of gratings G to be interrogated an optical sensor system 124 according to an eighteenth embodiment of the invention is provided.
  • Figure 12 shows an optical interrogation system 130 according to a nineteenth embodiment of the invention.
  • the interrogation system 130 of this embodiment is substantially the same as the interrogation system 110 shown in Fig. 10, with the following modification.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • the interrogation system 130 includes an optical reflector, in the form of a chirped fibre Bragg grating (CFBG) 132 in this example, between the SOA 82 and the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86.
  • the CFBG 132 has a reflectivity of less than 100%, -99% in this example.
  • the function of the CFBG 132 is to reflect part (-99%) of a reflected optical pulse back towards the SOA 82, and transmit the remainder ( ⁇ 1 %) of the reflected optical pulse to the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86.
  • optical reflector depends on the operating characteristics required. Some of the design criteria which must be considered when selecting which type of optical reflector to use are as follows:
  • optical reflector having a high reflectivity will reduce the number of cycles which a reflected optical pulse must make through the system before it reaches its maximum optical power.
  • the maximum optical power that a pulse can achieve is determined by the losses within the interrogation system 130 and the optical saturation and gain characteristics of the SOA 82. This would be an advantage where the interrogation system 130 is required to have a fast response.
  • having a highly reflective optical reflector will enable the interrogation system 130 to tolerate a higher level of optical loss within the system. This could mean that an array containing a larger number of reflective optical elements and/or more weakly reflective optical elements could be interrogated.
  • optical reflector having a lower reflectivity to that described would result in a higher proportion of the reflected optical signal being delivered to the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86. This can reduce the length of time required to interrogate each reflective optical element, since a higher power optical signal would be delivered to the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86. Having a higher power optical signal would also enable wavelength evaluation apparatus requiring higher optical signal levels to be used.
  • CFBG 132 If the spectral bandwidth of the optical reflector, CFBG 132, only covers the operating range of the reflective optical elements to be interrogated, then only the broadband background noise at wavelength within that spectral range will be reflected back into the SOA 82 for further amplification. This will reduce the output of out-of-band signals from the SOA 82, and concentrate the amplification power on the wavelengths reflected by the reflective optical element under interrogation.
  • the CFBG 132 is located sufficiently close (in terms of fibre length) to the SOA 82 to ensure that the propagation time T R for a reflected optical pulse to travel from the SOA 82 to the CFBG 132 and back to the SOA 82 (as indicated by arrow 134) is shorter than the duration T P of the electrical drive pulses applied to the SOA 82 (see inset (a)).
  • a reflected optical pulse transmitted (and amplified) by the SOA 82 meets the back reflecting CFBG 132, part (-1%) of the reflected optical pulse being transmitted to the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86 and the rest (-99%) of the optical pulse being re-reflected back towards the SOA 82.
  • the SOA 82 is still switched on (i.e. the gate is still open) when the re-reflected optical pulse arrives back at the SOA 82.
  • the duration (also T P ) of this first re-reflected optical pulse is also longer than the pulse propagation time T R , therefore part of the re-reflected optical pulse, being the portion of the optical pulse which is longer than the pulse propagation time, experiences further amplification as it is again transmitted through the SOA 82. This is illustrated in Fig. 13.
  • the propagation time T R therefore determines the portion of the reflected optical pulse that is able to under go multiple amplification and reflection (cycling) within the interrogation system 130.
  • the SOA 82 will add some broadband background noise to the reflected optical pulse, the re-reflected optical pulse is dominated by the wavelengths reflected by the grating under interrogation. Therefore, although some interference will result if the electrical drive pulse applied to the SOA 82 is longer than twice the time taken by an optical pulse to propagate between closest adjacent gratings within the array being interrogated, the resulting interference is less significant than that experienced by the previously described interrogation systems where the optical pulses do not undergo cyclical amplification. Adjustment can therefore be made to the distance between the CFBG 132 and the SOA 82 to allow the use of a slower operating SOA 82, or lower speed electronics within the drive means 84.
  • the re-reflected, re-amplified optical pulse which leaves the SOA 82, contains the wavelengths that were originally reflected by the grating being interrogated, plus lower level broadband background noise from the SOA 82.
  • the optical pulse propagates along the optical fibre 94 towards the gratings G, as described earlier. Again a portion of the pulse is reflected from each grating within the array and again a series of reflected optical pulses (separated in time and space) arrive back at the SOA 82. As before, only one reflected optical pulse arrives while the SOA 82 is switched on, since all others will arrive either before or after the electrical drive pulse is applied to the SOA 82.
  • the selected optical pulse is again amplified as it to passes through the SOA 82, and propagates on to the CFBG 132 where the cycle begins once more.
  • the narrow band of wavelengths that are reflected by the reflective optical element, in this example a fibre grating, being interrogated experience multiple amplifications in a cyclical trip back and forth through the SOA 82.
  • An initial low power broad bandwidth optical pulse generated by the SOA 82 undergoes multiple cycles through the interrogation system 130, and, as a result of the optical amplification it experiences on each pass through the SOA 82, rapidly forms into a strong narrow bandwidth optical pulse.
  • the ultimate optical power that an optical pulse can achieve is dependant on the nature of the losses within the interrogation system 130 and the saturation and gain characteristics of the SOA 82 used.
  • the selection of a particular grating within an array for interrogation is controlled by adjustment of the frequency of the electrical drive pulses applied to the SOA 82.
  • the duration of each pulse is chosen to take into account the effect of the fibre length between the CFBG 132 and the SOA 82.
  • an optical sensor system 136 is formed.
  • the cyclical operation of the interrogation system 130 and the grating sensor system 136 provides various advantages. Very strong, narrow bandwidth optical pulses can rapidly build up around the resonant wavelength the grating being interrogated. Such a strong and narrowed wavelength optical signal is easier for various types of wavelength evaluation apparatus to measure.
  • the broad bandwidth background noise generated by an SOA 82 reduces when the
  • SOA 82 is required to amplify a strong narrow bandwidth optical signal. This transfer, or narrowing, of power into the dominant (strongly reflected) wavelengths causes a reduction in the broadband background noise once a reflected optical pulse has undergone a number of cycles within the interrogation system 130, and the dominant (wanted) optical signal has built up. This results in a further increase in the signal to noise ratio.
  • FIG 14 shows an optical interrogation system 140 according to a twenty-first embodiment of the invention.
  • the interrogation system 140 is substantially the same as the interrogation system of the previous embodiment, with the following modifications.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • the interrogation system further includes an optical routing device in the form of an optical fibre coupler 142.
  • the coupler 142 is located between the CFBG 144 and the SOA 82, the CFBG 144 being coupled to the SOA 82 via ports C and D of the coupler 142.
  • the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86 is coupled to port B of the coupler 142.
  • This new optical arrangement means that it is the optical signal reflected by the CFBG 144 which is transmitted to the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86.
  • the CFBG 144 can therefore now be made to 100% reflective if required.
  • the spectral range covered by the CFBG 144 can be selected such that it only covers the operating range of the gratings to be interrogated.
  • the optical signal routed to the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86 will only contain wavelengths located within the spectral range of the CFBG 144. Consequently, the only SOA-generated noise seen by the wavelength evaluation apparatus will be that which lies within the spectral range of the CFBG 144 (and thus the operating range of the gratings G). All the optical signals at wavelengths falling outside this spectral range will not be reflected by the CFBG 144, and will therefore not reach the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86. This will lead to an increase in the signal to noise ratio at the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86.
  • the spectral profile of the CFBG 144 since the spectral profile of the CFBG 144 only covers the operating spectral range of the gratings to be interrogated, the presence of the CFBG 144 will reduce the out-of-band signal amplified by the SOA 82, thereby improving its efficiency.
  • the minimum separation distance between the SOA 82 and the CFBG 144 must be increased. Consequently, the duration of the electrical drive pulses to the SOA 82 must also be increased.
  • the presence of the coupler 142 will result in an increase in the optical loss within the interrogation system 140.
  • the amount of loss (through port A) is determined by the coupling ratio (50:50, 60:40 etc) of the selected coupler. Choosing a lower coupling ratio will cause a lower loss, but will provide a lower optical signal level to the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86.
  • the increased gain within the interrogation system 140 produced by using a higher reflectivity CFBG 144, and the lower out-of-band noise experienced by the SOA 82 can be used to offset some of the loss incurred by the coupler 142.
  • the interrogation system 140 When the interrogation system 140 is coupled to the fibre 94 containing an array of gratings G to be interrogated, they together form an optical sensor system 146 according to a twenty-second embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG 15. An optical interrogation system according to a twenty-third embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig 15. This embodiment is substantially the same as the previous embodiment, with the following modification. The same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • the coupler 142 is positioned on the other side of the SOA 82, being coupled, via ports A and B, between the SOA 82 and the additional fibre 112.
  • the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86 receives reflected optical pulses directly from grating being interrogated, without the pulses first passing through the SOA 82. This means that the reflected optical pulses received by the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86 do not contain any out-of-band noise from the SOA 82. The signal-to- noise ratio of the optical pulses transmitted to the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86 is therefore improved.
  • the interrogation system 150 When the interrogation system 150 is coupled to the optical fibre 94 containing an array of gratings to be interrogated, they together form an optical sensor system 152 according to a twenty-fourth embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 16 shows an optical waveguide interrogation system 160 according to a twenty- fifth embodiment of the invention which is substantially the same as the interrogation system 140 shown in Fig. 14, with the following modification.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • the leading part of the electrical drive pulse will cause a reflected optical signal arriving from a grating being interrogated to be amplified as it passes through the open SOA 82.
  • the trailing part of the electrical drive pulse will cause the re-reflected optical pulse, returned from the CFBG 144, to be further amplified as it passes back through the SOA 82 towards the gratings G.
  • the central part of the electrical drive pulse serves no useful purpose, because during this part of the electrical drive pulse the reflected optical pulse is propagating between the SOA 82 and the CFBG 144. Consequently, any electrical drive signal applied to the SOA 82 at this time will generate unwanted noise.
  • the result is that the extended electrical drive pulses serve only to reduce the electrical efficiency of the SOA 82, and degrade the signal to noise ratio of the interrogation system 140.
  • each electrical drive pulse is set to be shorter than twice the time taken for an optical pulse to propagate between closest adjacent gratings G within the array of gratings to be interrogated, as described above.
  • the total repetition period (T ⁇ ) for a complete cycle of pulse pairs is equal to twice the time required for a reflected optical pulse to propagate from the grating under interrogation to the CFBG 144, as described above.
  • the period (T R ) between the two pulses within each pair is set to be equal to the time required for a reflected optical pulse to propagate from the SOA 82 to the CFBG 144, and back to the SOA 82.
  • the central region is effectively removed, leaving is two short electrical drive pulses.
  • the first electrical drive pulse in each pair serves to switch the SOA 82 on as a reflected optical pulse arrives from a grating being interrogated, thereby transmitting and amplifying the reflected optical pulse.
  • the second electrical drive pulse acts to switch the SOA 82 on again as the re-reflected optical pulse arrives back from the CFBG 144, thereby transmitting (and amplifying) the optical pulse back to the grating being interrogated.
  • Coupling the interrogation system 160 to the optical fibre 94 containing an array of gratings G to be interrogated forms an optical sensor system 162 according to a twenty- sixth embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG.17 An optical interrogation system 170 according to a twenty-seventh embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig.17.
  • This interrogation system 170 is substantially the same as the interrogation system 160 shown in Fig.16, with the following modifications.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • each reflective optical element is shown in previous embodiments at a particular position within an array of reflective optical elements to be interrogated, it is actually possible to position a group of reflective optical element, in this example gratings 172.
  • Each grating 172 within the group operates within a different wavelength window.
  • the interrogation system 170 of this embodiment is intended for interrogating such an array of groups of gratings. Since the resonant wavelength of each grating within a group 172 lies within a different wavelength window, each grating therefore operates within a different optical channel.
  • each group 172 may contain seven FBGs, suitable resonant wavelengths within the C-band being 1530nm, 1535nm, 1540nm, 1545nm, 1550nm, 1555nm and 1560nm, making each optical channel 5nm wide.
  • the gratings each have a length of 2.5mm, a bandwidth of 0.2nm and a transmission loss of 4%.
  • the gratings within each group 172 are required to be separated by a distance which is shorter than the propagation distance covered an optical signal during half of an electrical drive pulse, and in this example are separated by 10cm.
  • Each group 172 contains the same number of gratings, of the same set of resonant wavelengths. Equivalent gratings in adjacent groups 172 are separated by 1m: for example, the 1540nm grating within one group is separated from the 1540nm grating in the adjacent group or groups by 1m.
  • the result of having the gratings to be interrogated arranged in such groups 172, is that, during operation, for each broad bandwidth optical pulse generated by the SOA 82, multiple reflected optical pulses (the reflections from each grating within a group 172) arrive back at the SOA 82 at approximately the same time. Therefore, the first electrical drive pulse in each pair applied to the SOA 82 will cause the SOA 82 to transmit all of the reflected optical pulses corresponding to a particular group of gratings 172.
  • the single CFBG 144 optical reflector of the previous embodiment is replaced with a series of optical reflectors, in the form of an array (only the first two are shown in Fig. 17 for clarity) of FBGs 174, 176.
  • Each FBG 174, 176 reflects wavelengths within a different spectral range, each spectral range corresponding to the wavelength window covered by one of the optical channels in which the gratings to be interrogated operate.
  • the bandwidth of each of the FBG reflectors 174, 176, and thus of the optical channels is 5nm.
  • Each FBG reflector 174, 176 is positioned at a different distance from the SOA 82.
  • adjacent FBG reflectors 174, 176 are separated by 1m.
  • the time of flight of a reflected optical pulse from the SOA 82 to its respective FBG reflector 174, 176 and back to the SOA 82 will be dependent upon which grating within the group 172 the optical pulse was reflected from.
  • an optical sensor system 178 By coupling the interrogation system 170 to the fibre 94 containing the groups 172 of gratings to be interrogated, an optical sensor system 178 according to a twenty-eighth embodiment of the invention is formed.
  • the second electrical drive pulse in the first pair will cause the SOA 82 to generate an optical pulse, which propagates towards the gratings to be interrogated. Part of the optical pulse will be reflected by each grating, giving rise to a series of reflected optical pulses, each having a peak wavelength corresponding to its respective grating.
  • the reflected optical signals from the gratings within a particular group 172 will arrive back at the SOA 82 at approximately the same time, corresponding to the application of the first electrical drive pulse in the following electrical drive pulse pair to the SOA 82.
  • This group of reflected optical signals are therefore transmitted and amplified by the SOA 82, from where they continue onwards to the array of FBG reflectors 174, 176.
  • each FBG reflector 174, 176 covers a different optical channel
  • each of the reflected optical signals will be re-reflected from a different FBG reflector 174, 176.
  • the re-reflected optical signals will therefore propagate back towards the SOA 82 separated in time and space. Only one of the re-reflected optical pulses will arrive at the SOA 82 while the SOA 82 is switched on by the second electrical drive pulse in the second pair of electrical drive pulses. All of the other re-reflected optical signals will arrive at the SOA 82 while it is off and will therefore be blocked from further cycling within the sensor system 178.
  • the selected optical pulse is transmitted and amplified by the SOA 82 and propagates once again towards the gratings, where it is again reflected by the grating selected for interrogation, and the cycle repeats.
  • the interrogation system 170 and the sensor system 178 provide the following advantages. Only one reflected optical signal is presented to the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86. This increases the range of possible wavelength evaluation techniques that may be employed. In particular it allows the use of a colourless, repeated function, wavelength evaluation apparatus that is able to operate over a range of wavelength windows.
  • the optical filter described above, having a wavelength dependent transmission function may be replaced by a Fabry-Perot filter or an etalon slope filter, both of which can be fabricated in optical fibre to reduce optical loss.
  • optical amplification power of the SOA 82 can be concentrated into this single optical pulse.
  • the optical power of the SOA 82 does not have to be shared between a number of reflected optical signals and there is therefore no possibility of instability or power conflict between optical channels.
  • Figure 18 shows an optical interrogation system 180 according to a twenty-ninth embodiment of the invention.
  • the interrogation system 180 is substantially the same as the interrogation system 170 of Fig. 17, with the following modification.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • the optical pulses are generated by a pulsed optical source 182, the SOA 82 being restricted to acting as an optical amplifying and gating device.
  • the pulsed optical source is coupled via a fibre coupler 184 to the optical fibre 94 between the SOA 82 and the additional length of fibre 112.
  • an optical sensor system 186 By coupling the interrogation system 180 to an optical fibre 94 containing an array of groups 172 of gratings to be interrogated, an optical sensor system 186 according to a thirtieth embodiment of the invention is formed.
  • FIG. 19 An optical waveguide interrogation system 190 according to a thirty-first embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig. 19.
  • This interrogation system 190 is substantially the same as the interrogation system 170 shown in Fig. 17, with the following modification.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • the coupler 142 and the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86 are moved to the grating array side of the SOA 82.
  • the optical pulses reflected from the FBG reflectors 174, 176 will arrive back at the SOA 82 while the SOA 82 is switched on. All of the other re-reflected optical signals will arrive at the SOA 82 while it is off and will therefore be blocked from further transmission.
  • Locating the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86 on this side of the SOA 82 therefore has the advantage of increasing the selectivity of the desired reflected optical signal and removing other wavelengths from the optical signal presented to the wavelength evaluation apparatus 86.
  • Coupling the interrogation system 190 to the fibre 94 containing an array of gratings to be interrogated forms an optical sensor system 192 according to a thirty-second embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG.20 An optical sensor system 200 according to a thirty-third embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig.20.
  • the sensor system 200 makes use of an optical interrogation system 170 as shown in Fig. 17, although an optical interrogation system 180 as shown in Fig.18 or 190 as shown in Fig.19 may alternatively be used.
  • the sensor system 200 also comprises two fibres 202, 204 containing arrays of sensor gratings 206, 208 respectively.
  • the fibres 202, 204 are coupled to the interrogation system 170 via a WDM multiplexer-de-multiplexer (MUX-DEMUX) 210.
  • MUX-DEMUX WDM multiplexer-de-multiplexer
  • a MUX-DEMUX 210 de-multiplexes a combined optical signal containing many optical channels presented at the single port 212 on one side into a plurality of optical signals (one for each optical channel).
  • Each of the de-multiplexed optical signals is output through a different one of the output ports on the opposite side of the MUX- DEMUX.
  • Each output port supports a different optical channel.
  • the MUX-DEMUX 210 also operates in reverse to multiplex a plurality of optical signals into a single combined optical signal. In this example only two of the output ports 214, 216 are used, since there are
  • Each of the gratings 206, 208 within an array has the same resonant wavelength, i.e. all of the gratings 206, 208 within an array operate within the same optical channel.
  • the optical channel in which the gratings 206, 208 in a particular fibre 202, 204 operate corresponds with the optical channel supported by the output port 214, 216 of the MUX- DEMUX 210 to which that fibre 202, 204 is coupled.
  • the interrogation system 170 is operable to differentiate gratings both spatially and by wavelength channel. It is therefore possible to individually interrogate any of the gratings 206, 208 within two fibres 202, 204.
  • the use of the WDM MUX-DEMUX 210 to couple multiple arrays of gratings 206, 208 to a single interrogator 170 reduces the optical loss present within the sensor system 200, as compared to using a coupler (as shown in Fig. 5).
  • the ability to having a large number of arrays of gratings within a single sensor system 200 is an advantage in sensing applications where measurements must be made in relatively widely spaced locations.
  • FIG.21 An optical interrogation system 220 according to a thirty-fourth embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig.21.
  • the optical interrogation system 220 of this embodiment is substantially the same as the optical interrogation system 80 shown in Fig.7, with the following modification.
  • the same reference numbers are retained for corresponding features.
  • the optical detection means takes the form of a photodetector 222.
  • the optical interrogation system 220 is operable as an optical time domain reflectometer (OTDR). As shown in Fig.21, the OTDR 220 can be used to interrogate, for example, reflective optical elements in the form of breaks 224 or patchcord connections 226 within an optical fibre 228, or the end 230 of the optical fibre 228.
  • OTDR optical time domain reflectometer
  • Figure 22 shows an optical interrogation system 240 according to a thirty-fifth embodiment of the invention.
  • the optical interrogation system 240 is substantially the same as the system 220 of the previous embodiment, with the following modification.
  • the same reference numbers are retained for corresponding features.
  • the optical interrogation system 240 further comprises optical signal routing means in the form of a fibre Bragg grating (FBG) 242 provided in the optical path of a returned optical signal, between the SOA 82 and the photodetector 222.
  • the FBG 242 has a reflectivity of less than 100% so that the majority of a returned optical sign is reflected by the FBG 242, while part of the returned optical signal is transmitted to the photodetector 222.
  • the reflected part of the returned optical signal passes back through the SOA 82 and propagates back towards a reflective optical element under investigation.
  • the optical interrogation system 240 is operable as an OTDR.
  • FIG. 23 An optical interrogation system 250 according to a thirty-sixth embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig. 23.
  • This optical interrogation system 250 is substantially the same as the interrogation system 240 of the previous embodiment, with the following modification.
  • the same reference numerals are retained for corresponding features.
  • the photodetector 222 is located on the opposite side of the FBG 242, between the FBG 242 and the SOA 82.
  • the photodetector 222 is coupled into the optical interrogation system 250 using a low percentage optical coupler 252.
  • This arrangement has the advantage that only the part of the returned optical signal reflected by the FBG 242 is routed to the photodetector 222. Any amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise generated by the SOA 82 outside the reflection bandwidth of the FBG 242 is transmitted and thereby removed.
  • ASE amplified spontaneous emission
  • FIG. 24 An optical interrogation system 260 according to a thirty-seventh embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig. 24.
  • This optical interrogation system 260 is substantially the same as the system 250 according to the previous embodiment, with the following modification.
  • the photodetector 222 located on the other side of the SOA 82, being coupled into the system 260 via the optical coupler 252.
  • This arrangement provides the advantage that the reflected part of the returned optical signal has been further amplified by the SOA 82 before being passed to the photodetector 222.
  • FIG. 25 An optical interrogation system 270 according to a thirty-eighth embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig. 25.
  • the optical interrogation system 270 according to this embodiment is substantially the same as the system 250 shown in Fig. 23, with the following modifications.
  • a second optical signal routing means in the form of a second FBG 272 is provided adjacent to the first FBG 242.
  • the two FBGs 242, 272 have different resonant wavelengths.
  • the drive means 84 generates pairs of drive pulses.
  • the first drive pulse in each pair causes an optical signal pulse to be generated and launched into the optical fibre 228 containing reflective optical elements to be interrogated.
  • the first drive pulse also gates returned optical signals, selecting which one will be transmitted to the FBGS 242, 272.
  • the transmitted returned optical signal is reflected by one of the FBGs 242, 272, depending upon its wavelength.
  • the separation between the first drive pulse and the second drive pulse selects which of the FBGs 242, 272 is in use, thereby selecting the operating wavelength bandwidth.
  • This arrangement is advantageous for an optical system which includes reflective optical elements that have wavelength dependent reflective properties. This enables, for example, fibre breaks (which will affect all wavelengths) to be distinguished from wavelength drift of specific reflective optical elements, which will not generally affect all wavelengths.
  • the described embodiments provide various advantages, as follows.
  • Using the SOA simultaneously as a broadband source and a combined optical gate and amplifier means that the interrogation systems can be constructed with a single active optical component, or one active component for each separate array of reflective optical elements to be interrogated. This reduces the overall size and cost of the interrogation systems, and provides improved efficiency and reliability, as compared to many known existing systems.
  • all of the gratings can be identical which simplifies both manufacturing and installation procedures.
  • the gratings may alternatively be replaced by a different type of reflective optical element, each element again being identical.
  • an additional length of optical fibre between the SOA and an array of reflective optical elements to be interrogated enables the SOA to be driven by a continuous stream of electrical drive pulses, and, where the SOA forms part of the optical pulse source, permits arrays of reflective optical elements to be interrogated using a continuous stream of optical pulses. This results in the interrogation systems having improved efficiency as compared to a basic known TDM based interrogation systems.
  • Incorporating one or more FBG back reflectors in the interrogation systems and allowing the optical pulses to cycle in the sensor systems provides various advantages.
  • Low reflectivity reflective optical elements such as low reflectivity FBGs, can be used within the optical sensor systems.
  • Low reflectivity FBGs are cheaper to make, suffer less from 3-refIection interference and allow a greater number of gratings to be used within an array before power levels fall to unacceptable levels than high reflectivity gratings.
  • Cycling the optical pulses also means that high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) are achieved because the power of the SOA is focused into the dominant cycling wavelength, causing the broad band ASE noise generated by the SOA to reduce.
  • SNRs signal-to-noise ratios
  • Cycling pulses are also more tolerant of slower electrical and optical response times (for a given SNR) than would be expected for non-cycling pulses. This means that the reflective optical elements within an optical sensor system can have a smaller separation between them than is possible when non-cycling pulses are used.
  • the SNR of an interrogation system and a sensor system can be increased yet further, and the electrical efficiency is improved.
  • adjustment of the electrical drive pulse timing allows active selection of which reflected optical signal, and thus which reflective optical element, is to be interrogated by selecting which FBG back reflector is the correct distance from the SOA to allow re- reflected signals to be re-transmitted by the SOA.
  • the use multiple back reflectors enables interrogation systems to use both WDM and TDM. This can be used to further reduce the spacing between reflective optical elements to be interrogated, to thereby increase the total number of reflective optical elements within an optical sensor system, or to allow a sensor system to incorporate multiple separate arrays of reflective optical elements.
  • the interrogation system uses both TDM and WDM the interrogation system is able to output a single optical signal at a time, which allows the use of a greater range of wavelength interrogation techniques at the wavelength evaluation apparatus.
  • a reflective optical element may be any one of the following: a Fabry-Perot etalon device, which may be a bulk optic Fabry- Perot etalon; an optical fibre Fabry-Perot etalon; an optical waveguide grating based Fabry-Perot etalon; an end of an optical fibre, which may be a mirrored end; the end of an optical fibre patch-cord; a break within a section of optical fibre; a crystal based reflective optical element; or a mirror element.
  • the three different broad bandwidth optical pulse sources described namely the CW broad bandwidth optical source plus the SOA, the SOA on its own, and the pulsed optical source, may be used interchangeably.
  • the SLD described may be replaced by any other suitable CW broad bandwidth optical source.
  • the selection of the optical source will at least in part depend upon the wavelength range of the reflective optical elements to be interrogated, since the optical source must be operable to generate an optical signal including those wavelengths.
  • the reflective optical elements to be interrogated are described as gratings, a different number of gratings may be used, and the gratings may have different resonant wavelengths, to those described.
  • the gratings within an array may also be separated by a different distance to that described.
  • Each interrogation system may be used to interrogate more than one array of reflective optical elements, such as the gratings shown in Fig. 5, and therefore each sensor system may include more than one array of reflective optical elements.
  • planar Bragg gratings may alternatively be used, and Bragg gratings may be replaced by other types of optical waveguide gratings.
  • Bragg gratings may be replaced by other types of optical waveguide gratings.
  • planar optical waveguide gratings are used, the optical fibres described would be replaced by planar optical waveguides. This would enable an entire interrogation system to be fabricated as a hybrid planar light-wave circuit that incorporated the SOA, drive electronics and optical devices such as the optical filters and back reflectors, and optical couplers or circulators
  • the SOAs described may be replaced by other optical amplifying and gating means capable of pulsed operation.
  • a gain clamped SOA may alternatively be used.
  • the wavelength evaluation apparatus described namely the wavemeter and the optical filter plus photodetector, may be used interchangeably.
  • the optical filter having a wavelength dependent transmission function may be a bulk optic device, or may be an optical waveguide grating device, such as a tilted Bragg grating (as described in our co- pending UK patent application GB 0013411.4 and PCT application PCT/GB01/02422).
  • the optical filters provided within or following the optical pulse sources may have a different spectral transmission profile to that described.
  • the optical filters provided in front of the wavelength evaluation apparatus may have a different spectral transmission profile to that described.
  • the CFBG back reflectors described may have different spectral profiles to those described, and may be replaced by different optical reflectors, in particular different optical fibre gratings or different planar optical waveguide gratings. Where more than one back reflector is used a different number of back reflectors may be used to that described and there may be a different separation between adjacent back reflectors.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Optical Transform (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un système d'interrogation optique (10) qui comprend : des moyens optiques d'amplification et de déclenchement présentés sous forme d'un amplificateur optique semi-conducteur (SOA) (14) ; et une source optique (12, 14). L'invention concerne des moyens de commande (22) (un générateur d'impulsions électriques entraîné par un oscillateur à fréquence variable) qui génèrent des impulsions électriques de commande (voir a)) qui sont appliquées à l'amplificateur optique semi-conducteur (14), de façon à le mettre en marche et le mettre hors circuit. La source optique comprend une diode superluminescente (DSL) (12), dont le signal non modulé de sortie est déclenché sous forme d'impulsions optiques par l'amplificateur optique semi-conducteur (14). Ledit amplificateur optique semi-conducteur (14) est couplé optiquement au guide d'ondes (16) contenant un faisceau d'éléments optiques de réflexion (réseaux G) à interroger. Le système d'interrogation comprend en outre des moyens de détection optiques (18), couplés optiquement à l'amplificateur optique semi-conducteur (14), pouvant évaluer la longueur d'ondes d'une impulsion optique renvoyée par l'amplificateur optique semi-conducteur (14).
PCT/GB2003/005497 2002-12-16 2003-12-15 Systeme optique d'interrogation et systeme detecteur WO2004056017A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005502463A JP4817423B2 (ja) 2002-12-16 2003-12-15 光インターロゲーションシステムおよびセンサシステム
AU2003288565A AU2003288565A1 (en) 2002-12-16 2003-12-15 Optical interrogation system and sensor system
CN2003801063120A CN1726664B (zh) 2002-12-16 2003-12-15 光学询问系统和传感器系统
NO20052616A NO341810B1 (no) 2002-12-16 2005-05-31 Optisk bølgelengdegitter-spørresystem og bølgelengdegitter-sensorsystem

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP02258640.8 2002-12-16
EP02258640A EP1432149B1 (fr) 2002-12-16 2002-12-16 Système d'interrogation d'un réseau de guide d'onde optique et système de capteur
US10/665,840 2003-09-19
US10/665,840 US7046349B2 (en) 2002-12-16 2003-09-19 Optical interrogation system and sensor system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004056017A1 true WO2004056017A1 (fr) 2004-07-01

Family

ID=32598799

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2003/005497 WO2004056017A1 (fr) 2002-12-16 2003-12-15 Systeme optique d'interrogation et systeme detecteur

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2003288565A1 (fr)
NO (1) NO341810B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2004056017A1 (fr)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006021751A1 (fr) * 2004-08-27 2006-03-02 Insensys Limited Rayon de pliage d'organe structurel et capteur de forme et appareil de mesure
EP1758279A1 (fr) 2005-08-22 2007-02-28 Tyco Telecommunications (US) Inc. Système et procédé de surveillance d'un système de communication
GB2440953A (en) * 2006-08-18 2008-02-20 Insensys Ltd Monitoring wind turbine blades
NO20085256L (no) * 2006-06-29 2009-01-08 Schlumberger Technology Bv Fiberoptisk sensor for bruk på undersjøiske rørledninger
EP2112375A2 (fr) 2008-03-28 2009-10-28 Insensys Limited Détection de givrage pour éolienne
US7809279B2 (en) 2007-07-27 2010-10-05 Tyco Electronics Subsea Communications Llc System and method using differential loop gain for fault identification in line monitoring equipment
WO2011051723A1 (fr) 2009-10-31 2011-05-05 The Centre For Integrated Photonics Limited Dispositifs optiques, rétroréflecteurs et/ou procédés de filtrage d'une source optique
WO2012003841A3 (fr) * 2010-11-02 2012-05-10 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Système et procédé pour identifier la probabilité d'une collision avec le mât d'une éolienne
CN102674144A (zh) * 2012-05-24 2012-09-19 同济大学 一种基于光纤光栅传感器的起重机吊具测力装置
US8276461B2 (en) 2006-05-24 2012-10-02 Lasstec Lifting member with load and/or stress measuring means
US8339591B2 (en) 2008-10-15 2012-12-25 Moog Insensys Limited Apparatus for interrogating fibre Bragg gratings
WO2015088967A1 (fr) 2013-12-11 2015-06-18 Moog Inc. Système de commande et de détection à fibre optique
EP2865317A4 (fr) * 2012-06-20 2016-03-02 Olympus Corp Détecteur de courbe
CN104583747B (zh) * 2012-08-15 2018-09-14 西门子能量股份有限公司 采用光纤传感技术的机架底脚载荷测量系统
EP3601783B1 (fr) 2017-05-09 2022-04-06 Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S Pale de rotor d'éolienne avec capteurs incorporés

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20010013934A1 (en) * 1997-11-15 2001-08-16 Malcolm Paul Varnham Seismic sensor with interferometric sensing apparatus
US20020025097A1 (en) * 1999-10-07 2002-02-28 Cooper David J.F. Method and devices for time domain demultiplexing of serial fiber bragg grating sensor arrays

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20010013934A1 (en) * 1997-11-15 2001-08-16 Malcolm Paul Varnham Seismic sensor with interferometric sensing apparatus
US20020025097A1 (en) * 1999-10-07 2002-02-28 Cooper David J.F. Method and devices for time domain demultiplexing of serial fiber bragg grating sensor arrays

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
STUBKJAER K E ET AL: "Recent advances in semiconductor optical amplifiers and their applications", PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDIUM PHOSPHIDE AND RELATED MATERIALS. NEWPORT, APR. 21 - 24, 1992, NEW YORK, IEEE, US, vol. CONF. 4, 21 April 1992 (1992-04-21), pages 242 - 245, XP010058407, ISBN: 0-7803-0522-1 *
VOLANTHEN M ET AL: "Low coherence technique to characterise reflectivity and time delay as a function of wavelength within a long fibre grating", ELECTRONICS LETTERS, IEE STEVENAGE, GB, vol. 32, no. 8, 11 April 1996 (1996-04-11), pages 757 - 758, XP006005016, ISSN: 0013-5194 *

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006021751A1 (fr) * 2004-08-27 2006-03-02 Insensys Limited Rayon de pliage d'organe structurel et capteur de forme et appareil de mesure
US7646945B2 (en) 2004-08-27 2010-01-12 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Structural member bend radius and shape sensor and measurement apparatus
EP1635034A1 (fr) * 2004-08-27 2006-03-15 Insensys Limited Capteur et système de mesure pour déterminer le rayon de courbure et la forme d'un élément structurel
US7872738B2 (en) 2005-08-22 2011-01-18 Tyco Electronics Subsea Communications Llc System and method for monitoring an optical communication system
EP1758279A1 (fr) 2005-08-22 2007-02-28 Tyco Telecommunications (US) Inc. Système et procédé de surveillance d'un système de communication
US7388657B2 (en) 2005-08-22 2008-06-17 Tyco Telecommunications (Us) Inc. System and method for monitoring an optical communication system
US8276461B2 (en) 2006-05-24 2012-10-02 Lasstec Lifting member with load and/or stress measuring means
NO20085256L (no) * 2006-06-29 2009-01-08 Schlumberger Technology Bv Fiberoptisk sensor for bruk på undersjøiske rørledninger
NO343106B1 (no) * 2006-06-29 2018-11-05 Schlumberger Technology Bv Fiberoptisk sensor for bruk på undersjøiske rørledninger
GB2440953A (en) * 2006-08-18 2008-02-20 Insensys Ltd Monitoring wind turbine blades
GB2440953B (en) * 2006-08-18 2009-09-30 Insensys Ltd Wind turbines
US8545179B2 (en) 2006-08-18 2013-10-01 Moog Insensys Limited Structural monitoring of wind turbine with fibre bragg grating sensors in each blade
US7809279B2 (en) 2007-07-27 2010-10-05 Tyco Electronics Subsea Communications Llc System and method using differential loop gain for fault identification in line monitoring equipment
EP2112375A2 (fr) 2008-03-28 2009-10-28 Insensys Limited Détection de givrage pour éolienne
US8339591B2 (en) 2008-10-15 2012-12-25 Moog Insensys Limited Apparatus for interrogating fibre Bragg gratings
WO2011051723A1 (fr) 2009-10-31 2011-05-05 The Centre For Integrated Photonics Limited Dispositifs optiques, rétroréflecteurs et/ou procédés de filtrage d'une source optique
WO2012003841A3 (fr) * 2010-11-02 2012-05-10 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Système et procédé pour identifier la probabilité d'une collision avec le mât d'une éolienne
US9347435B2 (en) 2010-11-02 2016-05-24 Vestas Wind Systems A/S System and method for identifying the likelihood of a tower strike where a rotor blade strikes the tower of a wind turbine
CN102674144A (zh) * 2012-05-24 2012-09-19 同济大学 一种基于光纤光栅传感器的起重机吊具测力装置
EP2865317A4 (fr) * 2012-06-20 2016-03-02 Olympus Corp Détecteur de courbe
US9766059B2 (en) 2012-06-20 2017-09-19 Olympus Corporation Curve sensor
CN104583747B (zh) * 2012-08-15 2018-09-14 西门子能量股份有限公司 采用光纤传感技术的机架底脚载荷测量系统
WO2015088967A1 (fr) 2013-12-11 2015-06-18 Moog Inc. Système de commande et de détection à fibre optique
EP3601783B1 (fr) 2017-05-09 2022-04-06 Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S Pale de rotor d'éolienne avec capteurs incorporés

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO20052616D0 (no) 2005-05-31
NO20052616L (no) 2005-09-12
NO341810B1 (no) 2018-01-29
AU2003288565A1 (en) 2004-07-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7046349B2 (en) Optical interrogation system and sensor system
WO2004056017A1 (fr) Systeme optique d'interrogation et systeme detecteur
US6571027B2 (en) Method and devices for time domain demultiplexing of serial fiber bragg grating sensor arrays
US7466422B2 (en) Method and apparatus for suppression of crosstalk and noise in time-division multiplexed interferometric sensor systems
US6680472B1 (en) Device for measuring of optical wavelengths
US6212306B1 (en) Method and device for time domain demultiplexing of serial fiber Bragg grating sensor arrays
CA2515705C (fr) Procede et dispositif de production et d'emission d'impulsions optiques de haute energie pour mesures de grandes distances
Dai et al. A novel time-division multiplexing fiber Bragg grating sensor interrogator for structural health monitoring
US6542228B1 (en) Optical time domain reflectometry method and apparatus
US20070252998A1 (en) Apparatus for continuous readout of fabry-perot fiber optic sensor
US6892031B2 (en) Signal processing system of multiplexed fiber bragg grating sensor using CDMA
US20150285683A1 (en) Apparatus for measuring optical signals from multiple optical fiber sensors
JP2007139482A (ja) 光ファイバセンサ装置
Lloyd et al. Resonant cavity time-division-multiplexed fiber Bragg grating sensor interrogator
US7127132B1 (en) Cascade fiber-optic grating-based sensor apparatus and method
US10958995B2 (en) Determination of the latency of an optical transmission link
JP4057333B2 (ja) 光伝送路障害検出システム
US6912046B2 (en) Instrument measuring chromatic dispersion in optical fibers
CA2379900C (fr) Methode et dispositifs pour le demultiplexage dans le domaine temporel de capteurs en reseau bragg a fibre serie
JP2004334712A (ja) 長距離伝送ｆｂｇセンサシステム
KR101752853B1 (ko) 센서 장치
CN211717662U (zh) 一种自校准功能的分布式单模拉曼精准测温装置
JPH05241030A (ja) 分布型光ファイバセンサ
Dai et al. A novel fiber Bragg grating sensor interrogator based on time division multiplexing technique
CN114777822A (zh) 基于多波长可调谐激光器的光纤光栅阵列同步传感系统

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2005502463

Country of ref document: JP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20038A63120

Country of ref document: CN

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase