WO1999011014A2 - Procede de definition de la qualite de transmission dans un systeme de transmission - Google Patents

Procede de definition de la qualite de transmission dans un systeme de transmission Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999011014A2
WO1999011014A2 PCT/FI1998/000652 FI9800652W WO9911014A2 WO 1999011014 A2 WO1999011014 A2 WO 1999011014A2 FI 9800652 W FI9800652 W FI 9800652W WO 9911014 A2 WO9911014 A2 WO 9911014A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
transmission
information
quality
test information
time
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/FI1998/000652
Other languages
English (en)
Finnish (fi)
Other versions
WO1999011014A3 (fr
Inventor
Jouni Saastamoinen
Original Assignee
Nemo Technologies Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nemo Technologies Oy filed Critical Nemo Technologies Oy
Priority to JP2000508161A priority Critical patent/JP2001514460A/ja
Priority to EP98940288A priority patent/EP1010289A2/fr
Priority to CA002302469A priority patent/CA2302469A1/fr
Priority to AU88656/98A priority patent/AU733335B2/en
Publication of WO1999011014A2 publication Critical patent/WO1999011014A2/fr
Publication of WO1999011014A3 publication Critical patent/WO1999011014A3/fr
Priority to NO20000740A priority patent/NO20000740L/no

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/24—Testing correct operation
    • H04L1/242—Testing correct operation by comparing a transmitted test signal with a locally generated replica

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method of defining the quality of transmission in a transmission system, in which method test information that can be recognized is transmitted over a transmission channel.
  • the quality of the connection between a base station and a subscriber terminal varies constantly. This variation is caused by interfering factors occurring on the radio path and radio wave attenuation as a function of distance. For example, when the terminal moves farther away from the base station, the attenuation on the transmission path between the terminal and the base station increases. Efforts are usually made to compensate for this attenuation by power regulation.
  • bit error rate denotes the number of erroneously received bits compared with all received bits.
  • BER bit error rate
  • a base station and a terminal continuously measure the bit error rate in the connection between them.
  • connection quality is based on the evalua- tion of the quality of the information transmitted on the connection; in view of speech, for example, how the receiver finds the quality of the speech.
  • the above mentioned interference on the signal path also affect the quality of received voice.
  • a so-called threshold phenomenon which means that the voice quality stays good for a long period of time when the distance between the base station and the terminal increases and then suddenly radically degrades, is typical for digital systems which allow error correction methods to be used. In analogue systems the quality degrades steadily.
  • Quality evaluation is a useful method when communication networks implemented by different techniques are compared with one another.
  • the bit error rates in different radio systems, for example, are not necessarily comparable, or even accessible (as in analogue systems).
  • a signal transmitted to the signal path is usually compared with a signal received over the signal path.
  • a discontinuous signal for example speech
  • the codecs in digital systems are not optimized for a continuous signal, for example a sine wave.
  • Another known method is based on an objective measurement in which speech quality is defined computationally by means of mathematical models.
  • speech quality is defined computationally by means of mathematical models.
  • the signal-to-noise ratio or the above bit error rate is used here to measure speech quality, and in more complex solutions, psy- choacoustically weighted computational methods are used.
  • the objective methods do not correlate closely with the speech quality experienced by persons.
  • the bit error rate for example, denotes poorly how well speech is recognized.
  • the combinations of the subjective and objective methods require heavy computational power.
  • the neuronetwork applications are complex and demanding to implement.
  • An object of the invention is to provide a method and an arrangement implementing the method in such a manner that the above prob- lems can be solved.
  • An object of the invention is to implement a method by which the evaluation of the quality of information can be cost-effectively and reliably implemented. This is achieved by a method of the type described in the introduction, the method being characterized in that the same predetermined symbol is repeatedly transmitted in the transmission of the test informa- tion, and that a measurement of information revealing whether the information is recognized or not is performed to the received test information, and that the measurements are performed over a predetermined period of time, and that the quality of transmission at the time is defined on the basis of the measurements performed during the time.
  • the invention further relates to an arrangement for defining the quality of transmission in a transmission system, which system comprises means for transmitting test information that can be recognized over a transmission channel.
  • the arrangement of the invention is characterized in that the arrangement comprises means for repeatedly transmitting the same predeter- mined test information symbol, means for performing a measurement of information revealing whether the information is recognized or not to the received test information, and means for defining the quality of transmission at the time on the basis of the measurements performed over a predetermined period of time.
  • the invention enables speech quality, for example, to be evaluated more reliably without expensive equipment and demanding com- putation.
  • the solution of the invention utilizes speech recognition methods and equipment to evaluate speech quality.
  • pattern recognition methods are utilized in the quality definition of image information.
  • the aim is not to define how closely a received signal resembles a transmitted one, but only to find out whether the received test information is recognized or not, and the quality of the connection is estimated on the basis of several successive recognition decisions.
  • the solution of the invention is also suitable to be used in any transmission system in which information is transferred via a transmission path subject to interference.
  • a typical example is a cellular radio system, but the invention can also be applied to transmission systems which employ fixed cabling.
  • Figures 2a and 2b are flow diagrams of a definition of a quality grade
  • Figure 3 is a flow diagram of changing test information
  • Figures 4a and 4b illustrate transmission and reception of test information
  • Figure 5 illustrates a structure of the arrangement in accordance with the invention.
  • a transmitter repeatedly transmits desired test information to the transmission path.
  • the same predetermined symbol is repeatedly transmitted in the test information transmission.
  • a receiver receives the information and performs a measurement of information revealing whether the information is recognized or not.
  • the measurements can be performed over a predetermined period of time, and the quality of transmission is defined on the basis of the measurements performed during the time.
  • Figure 1 illustrates the operation of the method in accordance with the invention.
  • a transmitter transmits the desired information which is preferably a particular predetermined word.
  • a receiver receives the word proceeded over the transmission path.
  • a recognition is performed which reveals whether the transmitted word is recognized or not.
  • the information on the transmission quality is updated on the basis of the recognition.
  • a return to the first step 100 follows.
  • the desired test information symbol is thus a particular predetermined word which is recorded and stored in advance, and which can thus be repeatedly transmitted unchanged over the transmission path.
  • This particular word is continuously transmitted.
  • the interval between the words can be set as desired in such a manner that successive words can be distinguished from one another.
  • the words are received at the other end of the transmission path.
  • the signal On the transmission path, the signal has met with interference typical of the transmission path, which effect the quality of the signal.
  • a speech recognition which, on the basis of the word, gives a decision value indicating whether the word is recognized or not is performed to the received word. If desired, the received words can be stored in a memory for a later examination or check.
  • the storage can be performed by a predetermined criterion, in such a manner that only the unrecognized words are stored, for example.
  • the words are received over a predetermined period of time, and the quality estimate of transmission at the time is defined on the basis of the decisions made during the time.
  • a typical measurement time can be five seconds, for example.
  • the quality estimate is given on the known scale of one to five.
  • Speech recognition can be performed by known speech recognition methods and algorithms. A received word is evaluated in speech recognition, and as a result of the evaluation a binary decision whether the word was recognized or not is thus obtained. Since the solution of the invention only aims to recognize a word and not to estimate how near or far the received word is in view of the transmitted word, the solution of the invention is essentially easier to implement in practice than the previous methods.
  • Figure 2a illustrates a definition of the estimate of the transmission quality, in other words steps 104 and 106 of Figure 1.
  • a recognition test is thus performed to each word in step 200 by using a known speech recognition method. If the word was recognized, the quality estimate is upgraded in step 202. Next, the evaluation of the following word can be introduced in step 204. If the word was not recognized in step 200, the quality estimate is degraded in step 206. Next, the evaluation of the following word can also be introduced in step 204.
  • the update of quality information in steps 202 and 206 can be performed in such a manner that word recognitions performed over a particular determined period of time are taken into account when defining the grade.
  • the transmission quality can be defined on the basis of the words received during the last five seconds, for example, and when a new word arrives the recognition information of the oldest word is removed from the computation.
  • Figure 2b illustrates another embodiment of the definition of the estimate of the transmission quality. It is possible to predict the changes in the quality of the signal more accurately in this embodiment.
  • a recognition test is thus performed to each word in step 200. If the word was recognized, it is next checked in step 208 whether successive recognitions have occurred several times. If not, the quality estimate is upgraded by an increment ⁇ given in step 210. If several successive recognitions occur, the quality estimate is upgraded by an increment n* ⁇ given in step 212, which is thus greater than the increment used in step 210. Next, the evaluation of the following word can be introduced in step 204.
  • step 214 If the word was not recognized in step 200, it is next checked in step 214 whether successive failures in recognition have occurred several times. If not, the quality estimate is degraded by a decrement ⁇ given in step 216. If several successive failures in recognition occur, the quality estimate is degraded by a decrement n * ⁇ given in step 218, which is thus greater than the decrement used in step 216.
  • the evaluation of the following word can also be introduced in step 204. It is an aim of this method to make the quality estimation react quicker to great and abrupt changes. In a cellular radio system, for example, great changes can take place when a terminal enters or exits a tunnel. The quality of a signal can then suddenly change from good to bad, or vice versa. If several parallel decisions occur, they are detected in the above method, and thus the change unit of the quality information can be increased. The upgradation of the change unit and the number of the required successive similar decisions are system-dependent parameters.
  • sev- eral words that belong to different levels with respect to recognition can alternatively be used as a test information symbol.
  • the test word used at a particular time can be selected on the basis of the quality information. Let us assume, for example, that three words of different degrees of difficulty with respect to recognition are used. The test can be started with a word of medium degree of difficulty. If it is found that the quality information is continuously good, in other words the percentage of recognition of the word is high, the transmission of a more difficult word can be introduced. Similarly, if a word of a medium degree of difficulty is rarely recognized, in other words the percentage of recognition is low, an easier word can be introduced for testing the connection.
  • the recognition percentages for changing the test word are system- specific parameters and they can vary. This embodiment is illustrated in the flow diagram of Figure 3.
  • a recognition test is performed to a test word in step 300 and at once, the recognition percentage at the time is computed, in other words how many words from the transmitted ones are recognized. If the word was recognized, it is checked in step 302 whether the recognition percentage has reached the word upgradation threshold. If not, a transfer to the next word takes place in step 304. If the threshold is reached, the next most difficult word is selected as the test word in step 306. Next, a transfer to the following word takes place in step 304.
  • step 308 If the word was not recognized in step 300, it is checked in step 308 whether the recognition percentage has reached the word degradation threshold. If not, a transfer to the following word takes place in step 304. If the threshold is reached, the next easiest word is selected as the test word in step 310. Next, a transfer to the following word takes place in step 304.
  • the flow diagram only shows the word changing algorithm, not an update of the quality information, which is performed as shown in Figure 2a or 2b. The word can also be changed directly on the basis of the quality estimate, or on the basis of a parameter computed on the basis of another recognition test.
  • Figure 4a shows a transmitter 400 and a receiver 404.
  • the transmitter 400 transmits test information 404 to the receiver 402 in which the recognition and quality evaluation in accordance with the invention are performed.
  • Figure 4b shows a so-called loop-back solution, in which a first transceiver 406 transmits test information 404 to a second transceiver 408.
  • the second transceiver 408 transmits received test information 410 back to the first transceiver 406 which receives the signal and performs the recognition and quality evaluation in accordance with the invention.
  • An advantage of the latter solution is that trans- mission and reception can be performed physically in the same place.
  • a disadvantage is that the test information travels twice over the transmission path, which makes it impossible to define which transmission direction includes more interference.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of the structure of the arrangement in accordance with the invention.
  • the arrangement of the invention for defining the quality of transmission comprises memory means 500 in which previously known test information to be transmitted can be stored, in other words a number of words of different levels with respect to recognition in a preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • the arrangement further comprises control means 502 which read the test information from the memory means 500.
  • the arrangement comprises means 504 for continuously transmitting test information over a transmission channel 506, controlled by the control means 502.
  • the control means 502 are typically implemented by a processor and the transmission means 504, in turn, by means of a modem or a radio transmitter.
  • the arrangement of the invention further comprises means 508 for receiving test information from the transmission channel 506.
  • the reception means 508 typically comprise a radio receiver and a modem. From the modem, the test information is conveyed to processing means 510 which are arranged to perform an information measurement revealing whether the information is recognized or not to the received information by means of speech recognition software.
  • the arrangement further comprises processing means 510 for defining the transmission quality at the time on the basis of the measurements performed during a predetermined period of time.
  • the measurement results are stored in memory means 512. If desired, the received test information, in other words the received words, can be stored in the memory for a later examination or check in the memory means 512.
  • the storage can be performed by a predetermined criterion, for example in such a manner that only unrecognized words are stored.
  • the arrangement of the invention can be preferably implemented by a microcomputer apparatus which comprises a voice card and software capa- ble of producing voice information stored in a memory, and a modem via which the apparatus is connected to a transceiver in a cellular radio system, for example.
  • the recognition of information can preferably be performed by known speech recognition software.
  • the transmission and reception functions can both be preferably implemented by the same apparatus, or alternatively, two separate apparatuses can be used.
  • other measurements are also performed, such as field strength or bit error ratio measurements.
  • the results of the measurements performed at the same time are also stored.
  • the reception and measurement times are attached to the stored material, whereby results obtained by different methods can be compared with one another.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Monitoring And Testing Of Transmission In General (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Detection And Prevention Of Errors In Transmission (AREA)
  • Maintenance And Management Of Digital Transmission (AREA)

Abstract

Cette invention concerne un procédé et un dispositif qui permettent de définir la qualité de transmission dans un système de transmission. Ce dispositif comprend un système (504) qui va émettre des informations de test pouvant être reconnues sur un canal de transmission. Afin d'obtenir une estimée fiable de la qualité de transmission, le dispositif comprend un système (510) qui va effectuer une mesure des informations afin de révéler si elles sont reconnues ou non par rapport aux informations de test reçues. Ce dispositif comprend également un système (510) qui va mesurer la qualité de transmission à un moment donné en fonction des mesures effectuées sur une période prédéterminée.
PCT/FI1998/000652 1997-08-26 1998-08-25 Procede de definition de la qualite de transmission dans un systeme de transmission WO1999011014A2 (fr)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2000508161A JP2001514460A (ja) 1997-08-26 1998-08-25 伝送システムにおける伝送の質の定義
EP98940288A EP1010289A2 (fr) 1997-08-26 1998-08-25 Procede de definition de la qualite de transmission dans un systeme de transmission
CA002302469A CA2302469A1 (fr) 1997-08-26 1998-08-25 Procede de definition de la qualite de transmission dans un systeme de transmission
AU88656/98A AU733335B2 (en) 1997-08-26 1998-08-25 Defining quality of transmission in a transmission system
NO20000740A NO20000740L (no) 1997-08-26 2000-02-14 Definering av kvalitet pÕ transmisjon i et transmisjonssystem

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI973502 1997-08-26
FI973502A FI105735B (fi) 1997-08-26 1997-08-26 Menetelmä ja järjestely siirron laadun määrittämiseksi tiedonsiirtojärjestelmässä

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999011014A2 true WO1999011014A2 (fr) 1999-03-04
WO1999011014A3 WO1999011014A3 (fr) 1999-05-20

Family

ID=8549424

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/FI1998/000652 WO1999011014A2 (fr) 1997-08-26 1998-08-25 Procede de definition de la qualite de transmission dans un systeme de transmission

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1010289A2 (fr)
JP (1) JP2001514460A (fr)
CN (1) CN1268269A (fr)
AU (1) AU733335B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2302469A1 (fr)
FI (1) FI105735B (fr)
NO (1) NO20000740L (fr)
WO (1) WO1999011014A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN100391179C (zh) * 2003-11-04 2008-05-28 华为技术有限公司 网络线路误码检测系统及方法

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3708002A1 (de) * 1987-03-12 1988-09-22 Telefonbau & Normalzeit Gmbh Messverfahren zum beurteilen der guete von sprachcodierern und/oder uebertragungsstrecken
SE469007B (sv) * 1992-04-21 1993-04-26 Televerket Anordning vid mobila telesystem foer att moejliggoera jaemfoerelser av subjektiv samtalskvalite
WO1996006496A1 (fr) * 1994-08-18 1996-02-29 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Analyse de qualite audio
US5526366A (en) * 1994-01-24 1996-06-11 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. Speech code processing

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3708002A1 (de) * 1987-03-12 1988-09-22 Telefonbau & Normalzeit Gmbh Messverfahren zum beurteilen der guete von sprachcodierern und/oder uebertragungsstrecken
SE469007B (sv) * 1992-04-21 1993-04-26 Televerket Anordning vid mobila telesystem foer att moejliggoera jaemfoerelser av subjektiv samtalskvalite
US5526366A (en) * 1994-01-24 1996-06-11 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. Speech code processing
WO1996006496A1 (fr) * 1994-08-18 1996-02-29 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Analyse de qualite audio

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1010289A2 (fr) 2000-06-21
NO20000740D0 (no) 2000-02-14
AU8865698A (en) 1999-03-16
NO20000740L (no) 2000-04-13
FI973502A0 (fi) 1997-08-26
CN1268269A (zh) 2000-09-27
JP2001514460A (ja) 2001-09-11
FI973502A (fi) 1999-02-27
AU733335B2 (en) 2001-05-10
WO1999011014A3 (fr) 1999-05-20
CA2302469A1 (fr) 1999-03-04
FI105735B (fi) 2000-09-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0648032B1 (fr) Circuit et méthode de détection de la qualité de signaux pour récepteurs dans le système GSM
KR100201971B1 (ko) 적어도 두개의 수신분기를 구비하는 수신기
US5541956A (en) Adaptive equalizer and adaptive diversity equalizer
US5323422A (en) Adaptive receiver apparatus
US5802446A (en) Method and apparatus for testing a communication channel
US6029057A (en) Diversity method, a radio receiver and a radio system
JPH04502695A (ja) 変動する伝送特性を有するチャネルにビタビ・アルゴリズムを適用する方法及びその方法を実行する装置
CA2070834A1 (fr) Controleur de taux d'erreurs
CN100459485C (zh) 测定信号质量和从预定信号中挑选同步模式的方法
JP2008136234A (ja) 受信方法及び受信器
WO1998053630A1 (fr) Mesure de la qualite phonique dans les reseaux de telecommunications mobiles sur la base de parametres de liaison radio
EP0193332A2 (fr) Dispositif pour le traitement de signaux reçus
US20060078073A1 (en) Communication channel detector and channel detection method
JPH06318879A (ja) ディジタル通信装置
AU733335B2 (en) Defining quality of transmission in a transmission system
EP3902314B1 (fr) Procédé de formation d'un système d'essai pour essais de réseau mobile, système d'essai, ainsi que procédé d'essais mobiles
CN1228210A (zh) 分集组合方法以及接收机
US6983143B2 (en) Method of managing and monitoring performances in digital radio systems
US20040127261A1 (en) Method and monitoring means for monitoring the performance of an antenna device
CN111031609A (zh) 一种信道的选择方法及装置
WO2000072616A1 (fr) Procede robuste et efficace pour le lissage des resultats de mesures
US5633860A (en) Reliablity-controlled data reception in receivers for TDMA mobile radio systems
EP0683585B1 (fr) Dispositif de prise de décision par estimation de séquence à maximum de vraisemblance
CN1319293A (zh) 评估数字通信信号的传输质量的方法和装置
EP0916196B1 (fr) Procede pour determiner la qualite d'une connexion, et recepteur

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 98808547.X

Country of ref document: CN

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AU CA CN JP NO US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AU CA CN JP NO US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 88656/98

Country of ref document: AU

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2302469

Country of ref document: CA

Ref document number: 2302469

Country of ref document: CA

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 09486468

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998940288

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998940288

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 88656/98

Country of ref document: AU

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1998940288

Country of ref document: EP