WO1997040120A1 - Selective hydrodesulfurization catalyst and process - Google Patents

Selective hydrodesulfurization catalyst and process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1997040120A1
WO1997040120A1 PCT/US1997/001594 US9701594W WO9740120A1 WO 1997040120 A1 WO1997040120 A1 WO 1997040120A1 US 9701594 W US9701594 W US 9701594W WO 9740120 A1 WO9740120 A1 WO 9740120A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
catalyst
feedstock
naphtha
coo
catalysts
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1997/001594
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Mark P. Lapinski
Kenneth L. Riley
Thomas R. Halbert
William Lasko
Jeffrey L. Kaufman
Clyde L. Aldridge
Michele S. Touvelle
Original Assignee
Exxon Research And Engineering Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US08/583,725 external-priority patent/US6126814A/en
Application filed by Exxon Research And Engineering Company filed Critical Exxon Research And Engineering Company
Priority to AU22527/97A priority Critical patent/AU2252797A/en
Priority to JP53295197A priority patent/JP3955096B2/en
Priority to EP97905697A priority patent/EP0883663A4/en
Priority to CA002244374A priority patent/CA2244374C/en
Publication of WO1997040120A1 publication Critical patent/WO1997040120A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/76—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
    • B01J23/84—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36 with arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/85—Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
    • B01J23/88—Molybdenum
    • B01J23/882—Molybdenum and cobalt
    • B01J35/40—
    • B01J35/50—
    • B01J35/615—
    • B01J35/635—
    • B01J35/647—
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G45/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
    • C10G45/02—Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing
    • C10G45/04—Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G45/06—Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used containing nickel or cobalt metal, or compounds thereof
    • C10G45/08—Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used containing nickel or cobalt metal, or compounds thereof in combination with chromium, molybdenum, or tungsten metals, or compounds thereof

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a catalyst and process for hydrodesulfurizing naphtha feedstreams wherein the reactor inlet temperature is below the dew point of the feedstock and at the reactor inlet that the naphtha will completely vaporize within the catalyst bed.
  • the catalyst is comprised of about 1 to about 10 wt.% Mo0 3 , about 0.1 to about 5 wt.% CoO supported on a suitable support material.
  • They are also characterized as having an average medium pore diameter from about 6 ⁇ A to 20 ⁇ A, a Co/Mo atomic ratio of about 0.1 to about 1.0, a M0O 3 surface concentration of about 0.5 x 10 " to about 3.0 x 10 " g Mo0 3 /m " , and an average particle size of less than about 2.0 mm in diameter.
  • Naphtha streams are primary products in any petroleum refinery in the United States. These streams are blended to makeup what is referred to in the industry as the "gasoline poof'.
  • One problem associated with such streams, especially those naphtha streams which are products of a cracking process, such as fluidized catalytic cracking and coking, is that they contain relatively high levels of undesirable sulfur. They also contain valuable olefins which contribute to the octane number of the resulting gasoline pool, and thus it is highly desirable not to saturate them to lower octane paraffins during processing.
  • a catalyst suitable for hydrodesulfurizing a naphtha feedstream with minimum olefins saturation which catalyst comprises:
  • the catalyst has a metals sulfide edge plane area from about 800 to 2800 ⁇ mol oxygen/g Mo0 3 as measured by oxygen chemisorption.
  • the process conditions of hydrodesulfurization are such that the inlet temperature of the feedstock to the reaction unit is below the dew point of the feedstock and 100% of the feedstock becomes vaporized in the catalyst bed.
  • the M0O 3 surface concentration in g MoO ? /m 2 is about 0.75 x 10 "4 to 2.5 x 10 "4 ; the Co/Mo atomic ratio is from about 0.20 to 0.85; and the mean pore diameter is from about 75A to about 175 A.
  • the sole figure hereof shows a plot of the hydrodesulfurization (HDS) relative activity versus the metal sulfide edge plane area for the catalysts described in Table VII hereof.
  • HDS hydrodesulfurization
  • Naphtha feedstocks suitable for use in the present invention can comprise any one or more refinery streams boiling in the range from about 50°F to about 450°F. at atmospheric pressure.
  • the naphtha feedstock generally contains cracked naphtha which usually comprises fluid catalytic cracking unit naphtha (FCC catalytic naphtha), coker naphtha, hydrocracker naphtha, resid hydrotreater naphtha, debutanized natural gasoline (DNG), and gasoline blending components from other sources wherein a naphtha boiling range stream can be produced.
  • FCC catalytic naphtha and coker naphtha are generally more olefinic naphthas since they are products of catalytic and/or thermal cracking reactions, and are the more preferred streams for use in the present invention.
  • the naphtha feedstock preferably a cracked naphtha feedstock
  • the naphtha feedstock generally contains not only paraffins, naphthenes. and aromatics. but also unsaturates, such as open-chain and cyclic olefins, dienes. and cyclic hydrocarbons with olefinic side chains.
  • the cracked naphtha feedstock generally comprises an overall olefins concentration ranging as high as about 60 wt.%, more typically as high as about 50 wt.%, and most typically from about 5 wt.% to about 40 wt.%.
  • the cracked naphtha feedstock can comprise a diene concentration of as much as 15 wt.%, but more typically ranges from about 0.02 wt.% to about 5 wt.% of the feedstock. High diene concentrations can result in a gasoline product with poor stability and color.
  • the cracked naphtha feedstock sulfur content will generally range from about 0.05 wt.% to about 0.7 wt.% and more typically from about 0.07 wt.% to about 0.5 wt.% based on the total weight of the feedstock.
  • Nitrogen content will generally range from about 5 wppm to about 500 wppm. and more typically from about 20 wppm to about 200 wppm.
  • hydrodesulfurization catalysts in the prior art that are similar to those of the instant invention, but none can be characterized as having all of the unique properties, and thus the level of activity for hydrodesulfurization in combination with the relatively low olefin saturation, as those of the instant invention.
  • some conventional hydrodesulfurization catalysts typically contain M0O 3 and CoO levels within the range of those instantly claimed.
  • Other hydrodesulfurization catalysts have surface areas and pore diameters in the range of the instant catalysts. Only when all of the properties of the instant catalysts are present can such a high degree of hydrodesulfurization in combination with such low olefin saturation be met.
  • the properties which are critical to the catalysts of the present invention include: (a) a Mo0 3 concentration of about 1 to 10 wt.%, preferably about 2 to 8 wt.%, and more preferably about 4 to 6 wt.%, based on the total weight of the catalyst; (b) a CoO concentration of about 0.1 to 5 wt.%, preferably about 0.5 to 4 wt.%. and more preferably about 1 to 3 wt.%. also based on the total weight of the catalyst; (c) a Co/Mo atomic ratio of about 0.1 to about 1.0. preferably from about 0.20 to about 0.80.
  • the most preferred catalysts will also have a high degree of metal sulfide edge plane area as measured by the Oxygen Chemisorption Test described in "Structure and Properties of Molybdenum Sulfide: Correlation of 0 2 Chemisorption with Hydrodesulfurization Activity * '. S.J. Tauster et al.. Journal of Catalysis 63. pp 515-519 ( 1980). which is inco ⁇ orated herein by reference.
  • the Oxygen Chemisorption Test involves edge-plane area measurements made wherein pulses of oxygen are added to a carrier gas stream and thus rapidly traverse the catalyst bed.
  • the oxygen chemisorption will be from about 800 to 2.800, preferably from about 1.000 to 2.200. and more preferably from about 1.200 to 2,000 ⁇ mol oxygen/gram M0O 3 .
  • hydrotreating and hydrodesulfurization are sometimes used interchangably in this document.
  • the catalysts of the present invention are supported catalysts.
  • Any suitable inorganic oxide support material may be used for the catalyst of the present invention.
  • suitable support materials include: alumina, silica, titania, calcium oxide, strontium oxide, barium oxide, carbons, zirconia. diatomaceous earth, lanthanide oxides including cerium oxide, lanthanum oxide, neodynium oxide, yttrium oxide, and praesodynium oxide; chromia, thorium oxide, urania, niobia, tantala. tin oxide, zince oxide, and aluminum phosphate.
  • Preferred are alumina, silica, and silica-alumina. More preferred is alumina.
  • magnesia can also be used.
  • the support material can contain small amount of contaminants, such as Fe. sulfates. silica, and various metal oxides which can be present during the preparation of the support material. These contaminants are present in the raw materials used to prepare the support and will preferably be present in amounts less than about 1 wt.%. based on the total weight of the support. It is more preferred that the support material be substantially free of such contaminants. It is an embodiment of the present invention that about 0 to 5 wt.%, preferably from about 0.5 to 4 wt.%, and more preferably from about 1 to 3 wt.%. of an additive be present in the support, which additive is selected from the group consisting of phosphorus and metals or metal oxides from Group I A (alkali metals) of the Periodic Table of the Elements.
  • the hydrodesulfurization process using the catalysts of the present invention typically begins with a cracked naphtha feedstock preheating step.
  • the chargestock is preheated in feed/effluent heat exchangers prior to entering a furnace for final preheating to a targeted reaction zone inlet temperature.
  • the feedstock can be contacted with a hydrogen-containing stream prior to. during, and/or after preheating.
  • the hydrogen-containing stream can also be added in the hydrodesulfurization reaction zone.
  • the hydrogen stream can be pure hydrogen or can be in admixture with other components found in refinery hydrogen streams. It is preferred that the hydrogen-containing stream have little. if any, hydrogen sulfide.
  • the hydrogen stream purity should be at least about 50% by volume hydrogen, preferably at least about 65% by volume hydrogen, and more preferably at least about 75% by volume hydrogen for best results.
  • the reaction zone can consist of one or more fixed bed reactors each of which can comprise a plurality of catalyst beds. Since some olefin saturation will take place, and olefin saturation and the desulfurization reaction are generally exothermic, consequently interstage cooling between fixed bed reactors, or between catalyst beds in the same reactor shell, can be employed. A portion of the heat generated from the hydrodesulfurization process can be recovered and where this heat recovery option is not available, cooling may be performed through cooling utilities such as cooling water or air. or through use of a hydrogen quench stream. In this manner, optimum reaction temperatures can be more easily maintained.
  • the process of the present invention generally operates at a liquid hourly space velocity of from about 0.5 hr "1 to about 15 hr ' . preferably from about 0.5 hr " ' to about 10 hr ' 1 , and most preferably from about 1 hr " to about 5 hr "1 .
  • the most preferred mode of performing the hydrodesulfurization process with the catalysts of the present invention is to use a reactor inlet temperature below the dew point of the feedstock so that the naphtha fraction will not be completely vaporized at the reactor inlet.
  • a reactor inlet temperature below the dew point of the feedstock so that the naphtha fraction will not be completely vaporized at the reactor inlet.
  • the degree of vaporization is defined by the ratio of the inlet dew point temperature (T D p, R) of the naphtha feedstock to the reactor inlet temperature (T IN R), where R is the absolute temperature in degrees Rankine.
  • the dew point temperatures can be calculated by computer software programs, such as Pro/II, available from Simulation Sciences Inc.
  • the T DP /T IN ratio should be greater than or equal to 0.990, but less than the ratio at which dry point operation is not achieved within the catalyst bed. That is, the ratio extends up to the point at which the operation stays all mixed phase in the reactor.
  • the ratio limit may vary somewhat depending on selected operating conditions.
  • the 0.990 ratio is specified to account for uncertainties in the measurement of the inlet temperature including variance in the location of the temperature measurement and uncertainties in the calculation of the actual dew point; however, the naphtha feedstock should not be completely vaporized at the reactor inlet.
  • the metals of the catalyst of the present invention can be deposited or incorporated upon the support by any suitable conventional means, such as by impregnation employing heat-decomposable salts of the Group VIB and VIII metals or other methods known to those skilled in the art such as ion-exchange, with impregnation methods being preferred.
  • suitable aqueous impregnation solutions include, but are not limited to cobalt nitrate, ammonium molybdate, nickel nitrate, and ammonium meta-tungstate.
  • Impregnation of the hydrogenation metals on the catalyst support using the above aqueous impregnation solutions can be performed using incipient wetness techniques.
  • the catalyst support is precalcined and the amount of water to be added to just wet all of the support is determined.
  • the aqueous impregnation solutions are added such that the aqueous solution contains the total amount of hydrogenation component metal(s) to be deposited on the given mass of support.
  • Impregnation can be performed for each metal separately, including an intervening drying step between impregnations, or as a single co- impregnation step.
  • the saturated support can then be separated, drained, and dried in preparation for calcination. Calcination generally is performed at a temperature of from about 480°F to about 1,200°F, or more preferably from about 800°F to about 1, 100°F.
  • Hydrodesulfurization of the naphtha feedstocks of the present invention may be performed under the following conditions:
  • reaction pressures and hydrogen circulation rates below these ranges can result in higher catalyst deactivation rates resulting in less effective selective hydrotreating. Excessively high reaction pressures increase energy and equipment costs and provide diminishing marginal benefits.
  • a solution was prepared by dissolving 8.590 g. of citric acid in 15 ml of deionized water to which 2.840 g. of cobalt carbonate was added. The resulting solution was heated to a boil then held there until the solution was clear. The heated solution was then cooled to about room temperature and 6.533 g. of ammonium heptamolybdate was added. After the solution became clear, the solution was diluted to 73.3 ml with deionized water. 1 18.2 g. of a transitional alumina extrudate which contained 84.6 wt.% solids and the remainder adsorbed water was added to the solution and agitated for several minutes to wet all of the particles.
  • the transitional alumina extrudate was in cylindrical form with an average diameter of 1/16 inch, a median pore diameter as measured by mercury intrusion of 87 A, a surface area of about 270 m7g. and a pore volume of about 0.60 cm J /g. After the particles were wetted, the solution was air dried under a hood overnight in an evaporation dish after which it was dried at about 49°C for four hours and then calcined at 460°C for two hours in air. The resulting catalyst is Catalyst A. which is used in Example 3 below.
  • the M0O 3 surface concentrations for these catalysts were between 1.0 and 2.0xl0 '4 g Mo ⁇ 3/m2, the average panicle diameters were 1/32 inch, and the median pore diameters were 75-76 A as measured by mercury intrusion on the fresh catalysts in oxidized form.
  • Each catalyst was sulfided in situ with a 10% FbS/H2 gas blend at 370-400°C for 8 hr and cooled to 250°C before the introduction of the naphtha feedstock.
  • the reactor conditions were 275°C, 1000 SCF/B, 100% hydrogen treat gas, 200 psig total inlet pressure and constant space velocity.
  • Table I below lists the selectivity factors (xlO) and the Co/Mo atomic mole ratios. The selectivity factor has been described previously in US Patent 4, 149,965 and is defined as the ratio of the hydrodesulfurization rate constant to the olefin hydrogenation rate constant:
  • Isothermal, upflow, all-vapor phase pilot plant runs were made on an ICN feedstock (71-163°C, 775 wppm total sulfur, 49.2 bromine number) at 274°C. 200 psig total inlet pressure, treat gas to oil of 2000 SCF/B, 100% hydrogen treat gas and constant LHSV.
  • Catalyst A which was prepared according to Example 1 herein, is a 5.2 wt% M0O3 and 1.5 wt% CoO on an alumina support with a 87 A median pore diameter and 1/16 inch particle diameter (of this invention);
  • Catalyst B which is a 8.2 wt% M0O3 and 2.4 wt% CoO on an alumina support with a 85 A median pore diameter and 1/16 inch particle diameter
  • Catalyst C which is a commercial RT-2 catalyst that contained about 12 wt% M0O3 and 4 wt%
  • CoO (67 A median pore diameter and 1/16 inch particle diameter). The Co/Mo mole ratios for all three catalysts ranged from 0.55 to 0.63. A fourth catalyst. Catalyst D, was also tested but the catalyst was first run with a heavy cat naphtha feed ( 1757 wppm total sulfur and 29.7 bromine number) for a period of 24 days before switching to the above ICN feedstock and conditions. Catalyst D was a commercial KF-742 catalyst with about 15 wt% M0O3, 4 wt% CoO. 72 A median pore diameter and 1.3 mm particle diameter. All catalysts were sulfided in situ with a 10% H2S/H?
  • Catalyst A which is a catalyst of this invention, shows a clear enhancement in selectivity when the M0O3 surface concentration is less than 2.9x10"4 g
  • Catalyst A shows a clear enhancement in selectivity when the M0O3 surface concentration
  • the temperature response of three low-metal catalysts was investigated with an ICN feedstock (71-167°C, 922 wppm total sulfur. 58 bromine number) at 200 psig total inlet pressure, 1000 SCF/B treat gas to oil ratio, 100% hydrogen and 260-288°C.
  • the runs were done in isothermal, upflow reactors in all-vapor phase operation.
  • the catalysts were prepared in the laboratory with M0O3 contents ranging from 3.2-5.2 wt% and CoO contents ranging from 0.9- 1.5 wt%.
  • Three different alumina supports were used that varied significantly in the median pore diameters. The supports will be referred to as Support X which had a 58 A median pore diameter (MPD), Support Y which had a 87 A MPD.
  • the average particle diameters of the catalysts were all less than 1/16 inch so as to isolate the effect of pore diameter with temperature.
  • Each catalyst was sulfided in situ with a 10% H 2 S/H 2 gas blend at 370°C for 15 hr and cooled to 93°F before the introduction of the ICN feedstock.
  • the catalysts and the hydrodesulfurization (HDS) results as a function of temperature are reported in Table III.
  • catalysts of the present invention must have median pore diameters greater than 58 A at moderate operating temperatures.
  • the catalysts were first allowed to line-out for 10 days at the base condition of 296°C. 800 SCF/B and 325 psig total inlet pressure. After this period, the temperature was increased to 338°C and the space velocity was increased by a factor of 2 for each catalyst. Data was taken after one day on oil (Case I). After 8 days, the conditions were switched back to the base conditions. After 4 days, the conditions were changed to3540°C and 300 SCF/B; again data was taken after one day on oil (Case II). Table IV shows the %HDS results for the three catalysts.
  • RT-2 was a 1/16 inch extrudate with 67 A median pore diameter and about 12 wt% MoO 3 and 4 wt% CoO.
  • the KF-742 commercial catalyst was a 1.3 mm quadrilobe with a 72 A median pore diameter and about 15 wt% Mo0 3 and 4 wt% CoO.
  • Each catalyst was sulfided in situ with a 10% H 2 S/H 2 gas blend at 370°C for 15 hr and cooled to 93°C before the introduction of the naphtha feedstock.
  • the reactor conditions were 302°C, 1000 SCF/B. 80% hydrogen/20% methane treat gas and 325 psig total inlet pressure.
  • Table V summarizes the HDS and olefin hydrogenation (OH) levels along with the calculated selectivity factors.
  • the selectivity factors show that the low-metal catalysts are the most selective for HDS.
  • Both catalysts were sulfided in situ with a 10% H 2 S/H 2 gas blend at 370°C for 15 hr and cooled to 93°C before the introduction of the HCN feedstock.
  • a comparison at constant conditions shows that the low-metal catalyst can achieve a sulfur removal level close to 90% while providing significantly less olefin hydrogenation (see Table VI).
  • Catalyst Support ⁇ vt% wt% wt% Ratio meter. A 2 MoO-j/m- Size. A ⁇ mol (xl O)
  • Figure 1 hereof shows a plot of the FIDS relative activity versus the metal sulfide edge plane area for the catalysts described in Table VII above.
  • the relative HDS activity was calculated for each catalyst based on a weight M0O 3 basis using 1.33 order kinetics and then normalized to the value for the commercial Catalyst E (which was given the value of 100). Since the selectivity factors in Table VII are approximately constant, it is apparent that obtaining metals dispersions higher than about 800 and lower than about 2800 ⁇ mol 0 2 /g Mo0 3 results in catalysts that have higher HDS activity per weight of MoO ? than the base Catalyst E yet retain the same high selectivity.
  • the HDS activity per weight of M0O 3 appears to be maximized between about 1200 and 2000 ⁇ mol 0 2 /g Mo0 3 .
  • a HCN feedstock 100-232°C. 2200 wppm sulfur. 21.1 bromine number
  • a commercial hydrotreating unit with a fixed bed of a new commercial catalyst of this invention ( 1.3 mm asymmetric quadrilobe, 4.2 wt% M0O 3 . 1.2 wt% CoO. alumina support with 87 A median pore diameter).
  • the catalyst was sulfided prior to hydrotreating the HCN feedstock according to a standard commercial practice.
  • Table VIII summarizes two conditions; Condition A is a case in which the reactor inlet temperature was greater than the calculated inlet dew point temperature whereas Condition B is a case where the reactor inlet temperature was lower than the calculated dew point.
  • Table VIII shows that the HDS levels for the two conditions were close while the olefin hydrogenation was significantly different (83% for Condition A versus 33% for Condition B). This corresponds to a factor of 2.7 increase in the selectivity factor for Condition B versus Condition A.
  • the large olefin hydrogenation reduction resulted in significant octane savings of 3.5 RON and 1.6 MON while the HDS level was maintained at greater than 90%.
  • Significant hydrogen consumption savings were also realized from the lower olefin hydrogenation level.
  • a HCN feedstock 100-232°C. 2200 wppm sulfur, 21. 1 bromine number
  • a commercial hydrotreating unit with a fixed bed of a new commercial catalyst of this invention ( 1.3 mm asymmetric quadrilobe. 4.2 wt% M0O3. 1.2 wt% CoO. alumina support with 87 A median pore diameter).
  • the catalyst was sulfided prior to hydrotreating the HCN feedstock according to a standard commercial practice.
  • Table IX summarizes ten conditions that were run over two months in the commercial unit. The total reactor pressure during this time was 280-350 psig while the LHSV varied by a factor of 2.85 over a base level. Table IX also lists the %HDS and %OH which are values that were averaged over the period at each condition.
  • Conditions 1-3 above are at TQp/Tyjsf ratios below 0.990 and show low selectivity values of 1.5 or less.
  • Conditions 4- 10 are at Top/TFN ratios of 0.990 and greater and show selectivity values of 1.8 to 3.2. These data show that for a variety of commercial unit conditions using a catalyst of this invention, high selectivity values are obtained as long as the T[)p/TiN ratio is greater than or equal to 0.990.

Abstract

A catalyst and process for hydrodesulfurizing naphtha feedstreams wherein the reactor inlet temperature is below the dew point of the feedstock at the reactor inlet so that the naphtha will completely vaporize within the catalyst bed. The catalyst is comprised of about 1 to about 10 wt.% MoO3, about 0.1 to about 5 wt.% CoO supported on a suitable support material. They are also characterized as having an average medium pore diameter from about 60 Å to 200 Å, a Co/Mo atomic ratio of about 0.1 to about 1.0, a MoO3 surface concentration of about 0.5 x 10-4 to about 3.0 x 10-4 g MoO¿3/m?2, and an average particle size of less than about 2.0 mm in diameter.

Description

SELECTIVE HYnRODESULFϋRIZATIQN CATALYST AND PROCESS
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a catalyst and process for hydrodesulfurizing naphtha feedstreams wherein the reactor inlet temperature is below the dew point of the feedstock and at the reactor inlet that the naphtha will completely vaporize within the catalyst bed. The catalyst is comprised of about 1 to about 10 wt.% Mo03, about 0.1 to about 5 wt.% CoO supported on a suitable support material. They are also characterized as having an average medium pore diameter from about 6θA to 20θA, a Co/Mo atomic ratio of about 0.1 to about 1.0, a M0O3 surface concentration of about 0.5 x 10" to about 3.0 x 10" g Mo03/m", and an average particle size of less than about 2.0 mm in diameter.
Background of the Invention
Naphtha streams are primary products in any petroleum refinery in the United States. These streams are blended to makeup what is referred to in the industry as the "gasoline poof'. One problem associated with such streams, especially those naphtha streams which are products of a cracking process, such as fluidized catalytic cracking and coking, is that they contain relatively high levels of undesirable sulfur. They also contain valuable olefins which contribute to the octane number of the resulting gasoline pool, and thus it is highly desirable not to saturate them to lower octane paraffins during processing. There is a continuing need for catalysts having ever improved properties with respect to the desulfurization of naphtha streams so that the sulfur level of such streams can be brought to the ever lower levels required by ever stricter governmental regulations. Research over the last couple of decades has resulted in a great many hydrodesulfurization catalysts and processes for desulfurizing naphtha feed streams, while attempting to keep olefin saturation at a minimum. While there are commercially successful naphtha hydrodesulflirization catalysts in use today, there is a continuing need for improved catalysts that are capable of combining optimum hydrodesulfurization with minimum hydrogenation of olefin.
Summary of the Invention
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a catalyst suitable for hydrodesulfurizing a naphtha feedstream with minimum olefins saturation, which catalyst comprises:
(a) an inorganic refractory support material;
(b) about 1 to 10 wt.% MoO3; and
(c) about 0.1 to 5 wt.% CoO; and
(d) a Co/Mo atomic ratio of about 0.1 to 1.0; and
(e) a median pore diameter of about 6θA to 20θA; and
(f) a Mo03 surface concentration in g Mo03/m" of about 0.5 x 10" to 3 x 10"4; and
(g) an average particle size diameter of less than about 2.0 mm.
Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a process for hydrodesulfurizing a naphtha feedstock by passing the feedstock to a hydrodesulfurization process unit containing a bed of catalyst wherein the feedstock passes through the bed of the above defined catalyst at hydrodesulfurization conditions. - J
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the catalyst has a metals sulfide edge plane area from about 800 to 2800 μmol oxygen/g Mo03 as measured by oxygen chemisorption.
In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the process conditions of hydrodesulfurization are such that the inlet temperature of the feedstock to the reaction unit is below the dew point of the feedstock and 100% of the feedstock becomes vaporized in the catalyst bed.
In other preferred embodiments of the present invention, the M0O3 surface concentration in g MoO?/m2 is about 0.75 x 10"4 to 2.5 x 10"4; the Co/Mo atomic ratio is from about 0.20 to 0.85; and the mean pore diameter is from about 75A to about 175 A.
Brief Description of the Figure
The sole figure hereof shows a plot of the hydrodesulfurization (HDS) relative activity versus the metal sulfide edge plane area for the catalysts described in Table VII hereof.
Detailed Description of the Invention
Naphtha feedstocks suitable for use in the present invention can comprise any one or more refinery streams boiling in the range from about 50°F to about 450°F. at atmospheric pressure. The naphtha feedstock generally contains cracked naphtha which usually comprises fluid catalytic cracking unit naphtha (FCC catalytic naphtha), coker naphtha, hydrocracker naphtha, resid hydrotreater naphtha, debutanized natural gasoline (DNG), and gasoline blending components from other sources wherein a naphtha boiling range stream can be produced. FCC catalytic naphtha and coker naphtha are generally more olefinic naphthas since they are products of catalytic and/or thermal cracking reactions, and are the more preferred streams for use in the present invention.
The naphtha feedstock, preferably a cracked naphtha feedstock, generally contains not only paraffins, naphthenes. and aromatics. but also unsaturates, such as open-chain and cyclic olefins, dienes. and cyclic hydrocarbons with olefinic side chains. The cracked naphtha feedstock generally comprises an overall olefins concentration ranging as high as about 60 wt.%, more typically as high as about 50 wt.%, and most typically from about 5 wt.% to about 40 wt.%. The cracked naphtha feedstock can comprise a diene concentration of as much as 15 wt.%, but more typically ranges from about 0.02 wt.% to about 5 wt.% of the feedstock. High diene concentrations can result in a gasoline product with poor stability and color. The cracked naphtha feedstock sulfur content will generally range from about 0.05 wt.% to about 0.7 wt.% and more typically from about 0.07 wt.% to about 0.5 wt.% based on the total weight of the feedstock. Nitrogen content will generally range from about 5 wppm to about 500 wppm. and more typically from about 20 wppm to about 200 wppm.
There are many hydrodesulfurization catalysts in the prior art that are similar to those of the instant invention, but none can be characterized as having all of the unique properties, and thus the level of activity for hydrodesulfurization in combination with the relatively low olefin saturation, as those of the instant invention. For example, some conventional hydrodesulfurization catalysts typically contain M0O3 and CoO levels within the range of those instantly claimed. Other hydrodesulfurization catalysts have surface areas and pore diameters in the range of the instant catalysts. Only when all of the properties of the instant catalysts are present can such a high degree of hydrodesulfurization in combination with such low olefin saturation be met. The properties which are critical to the catalysts of the present invention include: (a) a Mo03 concentration of about 1 to 10 wt.%, preferably about 2 to 8 wt.%, and more preferably about 4 to 6 wt.%, based on the total weight of the catalyst; (b) a CoO concentration of about 0.1 to 5 wt.%, preferably about 0.5 to 4 wt.%. and more preferably about 1 to 3 wt.%. also based on the total weight of the catalyst; (c) a Co/Mo atomic ratio of about 0.1 to about 1.0. preferably from about 0.20 to about 0.80. more preferably from about 0.25 to about 0.72; (d) a median pore diameter of about 6θA to about 200 A, preferably from about 75 A to about 175 A, and more preferably from about 8θA to about 15θA; (e) a M0O3 surface concentration of about 0.5 x 10" to about 3 x 10" g. Mo03/m~, preferably about 0.75 x I O" to about 2.5 x 10" . more preferably from about 1 x 10' to about 2 x 10" : and (f) an average particle size diameter of less than 2.0 mm. preferably less than about 1.6 mm. more preferably less than about 1.4 mm. and most preferably as small as practical for a commercial hydrodesulfurization process unit. The most preferred catalysts will also have a high degree of metal sulfide edge plane area as measured by the Oxygen Chemisorption Test described in "Structure and Properties of Molybdenum Sulfide: Correlation of 02 Chemisorption with Hydrodesulfurization Activity*'. S.J. Tauster et al.. Journal of Catalysis 63. pp 515-519 ( 1980). which is incoφorated herein by reference. The Oxygen Chemisorption Test involves edge-plane area measurements made wherein pulses of oxygen are added to a carrier gas stream and thus rapidly traverse the catalyst bed. For example, the oxygen chemisorption will be from about 800 to 2.800, preferably from about 1.000 to 2.200. and more preferably from about 1.200 to 2,000 μmol oxygen/gram M0O3. The terms hydrotreating and hydrodesulfurization are sometimes used interchangably in this document.
The catalysts of the present invention are supported catalysts. Any suitable inorganic oxide support material may be used for the catalyst of the present invention. Non-limiting examples of suitable support materials include: alumina, silica, titania, calcium oxide, strontium oxide, barium oxide, carbons, zirconia. diatomaceous earth, lanthanide oxides including cerium oxide, lanthanum oxide, neodynium oxide, yttrium oxide, and praesodynium oxide; chromia, thorium oxide, urania, niobia, tantala. tin oxide, zince oxide, and aluminum phosphate. Preferred are alumina, silica, and silica-alumina. More preferred is alumina. For the catalysts with a high degree of metal sulfide edge plane area of the present invention, magnesia can also be used. It is to be understood that the support material can contain small amount of contaminants, such as Fe. sulfates. silica, and various metal oxides which can be present during the preparation of the support material. These contaminants are present in the raw materials used to prepare the support and will preferably be present in amounts less than about 1 wt.%. based on the total weight of the support. It is more preferred that the support material be substantially free of such contaminants. It is an embodiment of the present invention that about 0 to 5 wt.%, preferably from about 0.5 to 4 wt.%, and more preferably from about 1 to 3 wt.%. of an additive be present in the support, which additive is selected from the group consisting of phosphorus and metals or metal oxides from Group I A (alkali metals) of the Periodic Table of the Elements.
The hydrodesulfurization process using the catalysts of the present invention typically begins with a cracked naphtha feedstock preheating step. The chargestock is preheated in feed/effluent heat exchangers prior to entering a furnace for final preheating to a targeted reaction zone inlet temperature. The feedstock can be contacted with a hydrogen-containing stream prior to. during, and/or after preheating. The hydrogen-containing stream can also be added in the hydrodesulfurization reaction zone. The hydrogen stream can be pure hydrogen or can be in admixture with other components found in refinery hydrogen streams. It is preferred that the hydrogen-containing stream have little. if any, hydrogen sulfide. The hydrogen stream purity should be at least about 50% by volume hydrogen, preferably at least about 65% by volume hydrogen, and more preferably at least about 75% by volume hydrogen for best results.
The reaction zone can consist of one or more fixed bed reactors each of which can comprise a plurality of catalyst beds. Since some olefin saturation will take place, and olefin saturation and the desulfurization reaction are generally exothermic, consequently interstage cooling between fixed bed reactors, or between catalyst beds in the same reactor shell, can be employed. A portion of the heat generated from the hydrodesulfurization process can be recovered and where this heat recovery option is not available, cooling may be performed through cooling utilities such as cooling water or air. or through use of a hydrogen quench stream. In this manner, optimum reaction temperatures can be more easily maintained.
The process of the present invention generally operates at a liquid hourly space velocity of from about 0.5 hr"1 to about 15 hr' . preferably from about 0.5 hr"' to about 10 hr' 1, and most preferably from about 1 hr" to about 5 hr"1 .
The most preferred mode of performing the hydrodesulfurization process with the catalysts of the present invention is to use a reactor inlet temperature below the dew point of the feedstock so that the naphtha fraction will not be completely vaporized at the reactor inlet. As the hydrodesulfurization reaction begins when the naphtha feed contacts the catalyst, some of the exothermic heat of reaction is absorbed by the endothermic heat of vaporization, thus achieving 100% vaporization within the bed (dry point operation). By transferring some of the heat of reaction to vaporization, the overall temperature rise across the reactor is moderated, thus reducing the overall extent of olefin hydrogenation with only small reductions in hydrodesulfurization. The degree of vaporization is defined by the ratio of the inlet dew point temperature (TDp, R) of the naphtha feedstock to the reactor inlet temperature (TIN R), where R is the absolute temperature in degrees Rankine. The dew point temperatures can be calculated by computer software programs, such as Pro/II, available from Simulation Sciences Inc. In the present configuration, the TDP/TIN ratio should be greater than or equal to 0.990, but less than the ratio at which dry point operation is not achieved within the catalyst bed. That is, the ratio extends up to the point at which the operation stays all mixed phase in the reactor. The ratio limit may vary somewhat depending on selected operating conditions. The 0.990 ratio is specified to account for uncertainties in the measurement of the inlet temperature including variance in the location of the temperature measurement and uncertainties in the calculation of the actual dew point; however, the naphtha feedstock should not be completely vaporized at the reactor inlet.
The metals of the catalyst of the present invention can be deposited or incorporated upon the support by any suitable conventional means, such as by impregnation employing heat-decomposable salts of the Group VIB and VIII metals or other methods known to those skilled in the art such as ion-exchange, with impregnation methods being preferred. Suitable aqueous impregnation solutions include, but are not limited to cobalt nitrate, ammonium molybdate, nickel nitrate, and ammonium meta-tungstate.
Impregnation of the hydrogenation metals on the catalyst support using the above aqueous impregnation solutions can be performed using incipient wetness techniques. The catalyst support is precalcined and the amount of water to be added to just wet all of the support is determined. The aqueous impregnation solutions are added such that the aqueous solution contains the total amount of hydrogenation component metal(s) to be deposited on the given mass of support. Impregnation can be performed for each metal separately, including an intervening drying step between impregnations, or as a single co- impregnation step. The saturated support can then be separated, drained, and dried in preparation for calcination. Calcination generally is performed at a temperature of from about 480°F to about 1,200°F, or more preferably from about 800°F to about 1, 100°F.
Hydrodesulfurization of the naphtha feedstocks of the present invention may be performed under the following conditions:
Conditions Broad Preferred
Temp (°F) 450-700 500-670
Total Press (psig) 200-800 200-500
H2 Feed Rate SCF/B1 200-5000 200-2500
H: Purity v% 50-100 65-100
LHSV2 0.5-15 0.5-10
Standard Cubic Feed per Barrel
" Liquid Hourly Space Velocity
Reaction pressures and hydrogen circulation rates below these ranges can result in higher catalyst deactivation rates resulting in less effective selective hydrotreating. Excessively high reaction pressures increase energy and equipment costs and provide diminishing marginal benefits.
The following examples are presented to illustrate the invention and should not be considered limiting in any way.
Example 1 :
A solution was prepared by dissolving 8.590 g. of citric acid in 15 ml of deionized water to which 2.840 g. of cobalt carbonate was added. The resulting solution was heated to a boil then held there until the solution was clear. The heated solution was then cooled to about room temperature and 6.533 g. of ammonium heptamolybdate was added. After the solution became clear, the solution was diluted to 73.3 ml with deionized water. 1 18.2 g. of a transitional alumina extrudate which contained 84.6 wt.% solids and the remainder adsorbed water was added to the solution and agitated for several minutes to wet all of the particles. The transitional alumina extrudate was in cylindrical form with an average diameter of 1/16 inch, a median pore diameter as measured by mercury intrusion of 87 A, a surface area of about 270 m7g. and a pore volume of about 0.60 cmJ/g. After the particles were wetted, the solution was air dried under a hood overnight in an evaporation dish after which it was dried at about 49°C for four hours and then calcined at 460°C for two hours in air. The resulting catalyst is Catalyst A. which is used in Example 3 below.
Example 2:
Isothermal, upflow. all-vapor phase runs were made using a small fixed-bed unit with an intermediate cat naphtha (ICN) feedstock. The naphtha vvas found to have a 80-156°C boiling range (5% and 95% distillation boiling points), 740 wppm total sulfur, and 46 bromine number. The olefin saturation in this and all examples herein was determined by using the bromine number test (ASTM 1 159). A series of 5 wt% MoO3 catalysts supported on alumina were prepared such that the atomic mole ratio of cobalt to molybdenum varied from 0.0 to 0.86 (0.0-2.4 wt% CoO was added). The M0O3 surface concentrations for these catalysts were between 1.0 and 2.0xl0'4g Moθ3/m2, the average panicle diameters were 1/32 inch, and the median pore diameters were 75-76 A as measured by mercury intrusion on the fresh catalysts in oxidized form. Each catalyst was sulfided in situ with a 10% FbS/H2 gas blend at 370-400°C for 8 hr and cooled to 250°C before the introduction of the naphtha feedstock. For the tests, the reactor conditions were 275°C, 1000 SCF/B, 100% hydrogen treat gas, 200 psig total inlet pressure and constant space velocity. Table I below lists the selectivity factors (xlO) and the Co/Mo atomic mole ratios. The selectivity factor has been described previously in US Patent 4, 149,965 and is defined as the ratio of the hydrodesulfurization rate constant to the olefin hydrogenation rate constant:
Selectivity
Figure imgf000013_0001
where Sf, S« are the feed and product sulfur levels, respectively and Brf and Brp are the feed and product bromine number levels, respectively. Table I shows that there is a maximum in selectivity when the Co/Mo mole ratio is greater than 0.0 and less than 0.86.
Table I:
Co/Mo Mole Ratio Selectivity Factor (xlO)
0.00 2.8
0.20 5.5
0.43 6.2
0.86 4.8
Example 3:
Isothermal, upflow, all-vapor phase pilot plant runs were made on an ICN feedstock (71-163°C, 775 wppm total sulfur, 49.2 bromine number) at 274°C. 200 psig total inlet pressure, treat gas to oil of 2000 SCF/B, 100% hydrogen treat gas and constant LHSV. Three catalysts were tested under these conditions: (1) Catalyst A, which was prepared according to Example 1 herein, is a 5.2 wt% M0O3 and 1.5 wt% CoO on an alumina support with a 87 A median pore diameter and 1/16 inch particle diameter (of this invention); (2) Catalyst B which is a 8.2 wt% M0O3 and 2.4 wt% CoO on an alumina support with a 85 A median pore diameter and 1/16 inch particle diameter; and (3) Catalyst C which is a commercial RT-2 catalyst that contained about 12 wt% M0O3 and 4 wt%
CoO (67 A median pore diameter and 1/16 inch particle diameter). The Co/Mo mole ratios for all three catalysts ranged from 0.55 to 0.63. A fourth catalyst. Catalyst D, was also tested but the catalyst was first run with a heavy cat naphtha feed ( 1757 wppm total sulfur and 29.7 bromine number) for a period of 24 days before switching to the above ICN feedstock and conditions. Catalyst D was a commercial KF-742 catalyst with about 15 wt% M0O3, 4 wt% CoO. 72 A median pore diameter and 1.3 mm particle diameter. All catalysts were sulfided in situ with a 10% H2S/H? gas blend at 370°C for 15 hr and cooled to 93°C before the introduction of the initial naphtha feedstock. After the introduction of the ICN feedstock, the catalysts were given 4-1 1 days to line-out. Table II shows the selectivity factor (xlO) as a function of the M0O3 surface concentration. Catalyst A, which is a catalyst of this invention, shows a clear enhancement in selectivity when the M0O3 surface concentration is less than 2.9x10"4 g
Moθ3/m2. For the same catalysts, the treat gas to oil ratio was changed to 1000
SCF/B after the completion of the balances at 2000 SCF/B. Again. Catalyst A shows a clear enhancement in selectivity when the M0O3 surface concentration
is less than 2.9x10~4 g Moθ3/m2. Table II:
Treat Gas Ratio Total Days Surface Selectivity
Catalyst SCF/B on Oil Concentration Factor (xlO)
Figure imgf000015_0001
A 2000 1 1 1.9 x lO"4 6.2
B 2000 1 1 2.9 x lO"4 4.6
C 2000 1 1 4.0 x 10"4 4.5
D 2000 28 5.5 x IO'4 3.9
A 1000 25 1.9 x lO'4 5.2
B 1000 25 2.9 x lO"4 4.3
L 1U00 23 4.0 x IO"4 4.5
D 1000 40 5.5 x IO"4 4.5
Example 4:
The temperature response of three low-metal catalysts was investigated with an ICN feedstock (71-167°C, 922 wppm total sulfur. 58 bromine number) at 200 psig total inlet pressure, 1000 SCF/B treat gas to oil ratio, 100% hydrogen and 260-288°C. The runs were done in isothermal, upflow reactors in all-vapor phase operation. The catalysts were prepared in the laboratory with M0O3 contents ranging from 3.2-5.2 wt% and CoO contents ranging from 0.9- 1.5 wt%. Three different alumina supports were used that varied significantly in the median pore diameters. The supports will be referred to as Support X which had a 58 A median pore diameter (MPD), Support Y which had a 87 A MPD. and Support Z which had a 131 A MPD. The average particle diameters of the catalysts were all less than 1/16 inch so as to isolate the effect of pore diameter with temperature. Each catalyst was sulfided in situ with a 10% H2S/H2 gas blend at 370°C for 15 hr and cooled to 93°F before the introduction of the ICN feedstock. The catalysts and the hydrodesulfurization (HDS) results as a function of temperature are reported in Table III.
Table III:
Median
Catalyst Wt% Wt% Support PPaarrttiiccllee PPoorree RReellaattiivvee TTeemmpp..00 %HDS
Number MoO CoO Dia., inch Diameter, LHSV C
A
4.9 1.4 X 1/20 58 1 260 74.0
1 274 90.0
1 288 91.8
5.2 1.5 Y 1/32 87 1.75 260 75.7
1.75 274 86.2
1.75 288 95.8
3.2 0.9 Z 1/20 131 1 260 72.6
1 274 87.6
1 288 96.0
For both Catalysts 2 and 3, the %HDS increased in an uniform trend from 260 to 288°C. However, for Catalyst 1, only a small increase was observed from 274 to 288°C indicating a HDS diffusion limitation due to the small average pore size of 58A. Therefore, catalysts of the present invention must have median pore diameters greater than 58 A at moderate operating temperatures.
Example 5:
Isothermal, upflow, all-vapor phase pilot plant runs were made on a heavy cat naphtha (HCN) feedstock (71-228°C, 2075 wppm total sulfur. 33.9 bromine number) using the three catalysts listed in Table IV below. The two low-metal CoMo catalysts were made with aluminas that had median pore diameters of 87 A (Support Y) and 131 A (Support Z) as measured by mercury intrusion on the fresh catalysts in the oxidized form. The third catalyst used was a high-activity, commercial catalyst (KF-752) with a median pore diameter of 77 A. In order to monitor the performance of the high-activity catalyst at levels similar to the low-metals catalysts, less volume of the high-activity catalyst was loaded into its reactor (by a factor of 4.7). This resulted in the very high space velocities used for this catalyst. Each catalyst was sulfided in situ with a 10% H2S/H2 gas blend at 370°C for 15 hr and cooled to 93°C before the introduction of the HCN feedstock.
The catalysts were first allowed to line-out for 10 days at the base condition of 296°C. 800 SCF/B and 325 psig total inlet pressure. After this period, the temperature was increased to 338°C and the space velocity was increased by a factor of 2 for each catalyst. Data was taken after one day on oil (Case I). After 8 days, the conditions were switched back to the base conditions. After 4 days, the conditions were changed to3540°C and 300 SCF/B; again data was taken after one day on oil (Case II). Table IV shows the %HDS results for the three catalysts.
Table IV:
Commercial Low-Metal Low- Metal
High Catalyst on Catalyst on
Description Activity Catalyst Support Y Support Z
Figure imgf000018_0001
Wt% CoO 4.9 1.5 0.9
Median Pore Diameter, A 77 87 131
Base LHSV* 4.7 1 1
Base Temperature, °F 565 565 565
Base %HDS 89.2% 97.6% 89.4%
Case I LHSV* 9.3 2 2
Case I Temperature. °F 640 640 640
Case I %HDS 89.9% 99.7% 97.0%
Case II LHSV* 4.7 1 1
Case II Temperature. °F 670 670 670
Case II %HDS 63.8% 97.5% 89.9%
Space velocities on a relative basis
A comparison of the Base Case to Case I shows that the high- activity catalyst had the smallest increase in HDS level. Comparing the Base Case with Case II shows that there was a dramatic decrease in HDS level for the high-activity catalyst whereas the HDS levels for each low-metal catalyst remained approximately constant. Both Cases I and II indicate that there is a significant HDS diffusion limitation for the high-activity catalyst with the HCN feedstock at temperatures greater than 338°C. Therefore, the median pore diameter should be greater than about 77 A for higher temperature operations. Example 6:
Isothermal, upflow, all-vapor phase pilot plant runs were made using two very similar HCN feedstocks with 71-228°C boiling range, 1760 (Feed L) to 2075 (Feed H) wppm total sulfur, and 29.7 (Feed L) to 33.2 (Feed H) bromine number. A laboratory-prepared low-metal catalyst and a commercially- produced low-metal, catalyst were compared to the commercial catalysts RT-2 and KF-742. The low-metal catalysts were 1.3 mm asymmetric quadrilobes with 84-87 A median pore diameters and consisted of 4.2 wt% Mo03 and 1.2- 1.3 wt% CoO on alumina. Commercial RT-2 was a 1/16 inch extrudate with 67 A median pore diameter and about 12 wt% MoO3 and 4 wt% CoO. The KF-742 commercial catalyst was a 1.3 mm quadrilobe with a 72 A median pore diameter and about 15 wt% Mo03 and 4 wt% CoO. Each catalyst was sulfided in situ with a 10% H2S/H2 gas blend at 370°C for 15 hr and cooled to 93°C before the introduction of the naphtha feedstock. For the tests, the reactor conditions were 302°C, 1000 SCF/B. 80% hydrogen/20% methane treat gas and 325 psig total inlet pressure. The space velocities were adjusted such that HDS levels between 96 and 99% were obtained. Table V below summarizes the HDS and olefin hydrogenation (OH) levels along with the calculated selectivity factors. The selectivity factors show that the low-metal catalysts are the most selective for HDS.
Table V:
HCN LHSV Selectivity
Catalyst Feed (relative) %HDS %OH Factor (x 10)
Commercial RT-2 L 2.8 96.8 45.6 2.93
Commercial KF-742 L 6.4 97.8 48.9 3.17
Lab Low-Metal Catalyst H 1 99.2 58.5 3.54
CommercialLow-Metal Catalyst H 1 99.1 57.0 3.57 Example 7:
Isothermal, upflow, all-vapor phase pilot plant runs were made on a HCN feedstock (85-237°F. 1760 wppm sulfur, 29.7 bromine number) at 288°C. 325 psig total inlet pressure, treat gas to oil of 1000 SCF/B. 80% hydrogen/20% methane treat gas and constant LHSV. A laboratory-prepared catalyst containing 5.2 wt% Mo03 and 1.5 wt% CoO on an alumina support with a 87 A median pore diameter was compared to a high-activity commercial C0M0 catalyst. KF- 742. Both catalysts were sulfided in situ with a 10% H2S/H2 gas blend at 370°C for 15 hr and cooled to 93°C before the introduction of the HCN feedstock. A comparison at constant conditions shows that the low-metal catalyst can achieve a sulfur removal level close to 90% while providing significantly less olefin hydrogenation (see Table VI).
Table VI:
Wt% Wt% % Olefm
Catalyst Mo03 CoO %HDS Hydrogenation
Low-Metal Catalyst 5.2 1.5 87.7 28.9
Commercial KF-742 15 4 99.6 85.4
Example 8:
Isothermal, upflow. all-vapor phase pilot plant runs were made on an ICN feedstock (71- 166°C. 978 wppm total sulfur, 49.7 bromine number. 49.1 API, 29 wppm total nitrogen) at 274°C, 200 psig total inlet pressure, 1000 SCF/B, 100% hydrogen treat gas and constant LHSV. Table VII shows a summary of the catalysts that were tested. Both Supports a and b were alumina. Each catalyst was sulfided in situ with a 10% H2S/H2 gas blend at 370°C for 15 hr and cooled to 93 °C before the introduction of the ICN feedstock. After the introduction of the ICN feedstock, the catalysts were given 10-1 1 days to line- out.
Table VII:
Edge
Co/Mo Median Surface Plane Selectivity vloo3 CoO P Atomic Pore Dia¬ Concentration Particle Area Factor
Catalyst Support \vt% wt% wt% Ratio meter. A 2 MoO-j/m- Size. A μmol (xl O)
Oy g
M0O3
E a 4.2 1 .2 - 0.55 87 1.49 x l O"4 1 -3 mm 761 5. 1
F a 6. 1 1 .5 - 0.47 87 1.99 x IO"4 1.3 mm 1 885 5.0
G b 5.0 1 .5 - 0.57 84 1.74 x l O"4 1 / 1 6 in 2560 5.2
H b 5.0 1 .7 0.53 0.64 84 1 .78 x l O"4 1 / 1 6 in 1348 5.3
Figure 1 hereof shows a plot of the FIDS relative activity versus the metal sulfide edge plane area for the catalysts described in Table VII above. The relative HDS activity was calculated for each catalyst based on a weight M0O3 basis using 1.33 order kinetics and then normalized to the value for the commercial Catalyst E (which was given the value of 100). Since the selectivity factors in Table VII are approximately constant, it is apparent that obtaining metals dispersions higher than about 800 and lower than about 2800 μmol 02/g Mo03 results in catalysts that have higher HDS activity per weight of MoO? than the base Catalyst E yet retain the same high selectivity. The HDS activity per weight of M0O3 appears to be maximized between about 1200 and 2000 μmol 02/g Mo03 .
Example 9:
A HCN feedstock ( 100-232°C. 2200 wppm sulfur. 21.1 bromine number) was processed in a commercial hydrotreating unit with a fixed bed of a new commercial catalyst of this invention ( 1.3 mm asymmetric quadrilobe, 4.2 wt% M0O3. 1.2 wt% CoO. alumina support with 87 A median pore diameter). The catalyst was sulfided prior to hydrotreating the HCN feedstock according to a standard commercial practice. Table VIII below summarizes two conditions; Condition A is a case in which the reactor inlet temperature was greater than the calculated inlet dew point temperature whereas Condition B is a case where the reactor inlet temperature was lower than the calculated dew point. From Conditions A to B, the dew point at the inlet changed as a result of increasing the space velocity by a factor of 2.3 and increasing the reactor pressure 45 psig with the hydrogen flowrate approximately constant. The temperature rise for Condition B shows that the product at the reactor outlet was completely vaporized, i.e.. the operation went through the dry point in the reactor bed.
Table VIII:
Condi¬ Gas to inlet Inlet Reactor TDP'T| %H %01efi Selectivit RO MO tion # Oil ratio Temp., Dew ΔTemp, N DS n Hydro y Factor N N
SCF/B °C Point, °C (R/R) (xl O) Loss Loss
°C
A 2000 274 250 64 0.954 97 83 1.0 4.5 1.9
B 950 277 285 25 1.015 93 33 2.7 1.0 0.3
Table VIII shows that the HDS levels for the two conditions were close while the olefin hydrogenation was significantly different (83% for Condition A versus 33% for Condition B). This corresponds to a factor of 2.7 increase in the selectivity factor for Condition B versus Condition A. The large olefin hydrogenation reduction resulted in significant octane savings of 3.5 RON and 1.6 MON while the HDS level was maintained at greater than 90%. Note that the road octane loss, (ΔRON+ΔMON)/2. was only 0.65 at 93% HDS. Significant hydrogen consumption savings were also realized from the lower olefin hydrogenation level.
Example 10:
A HCN feedstock ( 100-232°C. 2200 wppm sulfur, 21. 1 bromine number) was processed in a commercial hydrotreating unit with a fixed bed of a new commercial catalyst of this invention ( 1.3 mm asymmetric quadrilobe. 4.2 wt% M0O3. 1.2 wt% CoO. alumina support with 87 A median pore diameter).
The catalyst was sulfided prior to hydrotreating the HCN feedstock according to a standard commercial practice. Table IX below summarizes ten conditions that were run over two months in the commercial unit. The total reactor pressure during this time was 280-350 psig while the LHSV varied by a factor of 2.85 over a base level. Table IX also lists the %HDS and %OH which are values that were averaged over the period at each condition.
Table IX:
Inlet Dew-
Condition Gas to Oil Inlet Temp. Point Temp. TDP/TIN Selectivity
Number Ratio. SCF/B °c (TιN) °C (TDP) (R/R) %HDS %OH Factor (x 10)
1 2000 263 250 0.974 94 75 0.9
2 2000 274 250 0.954 97 83 1.0
3 1500 274 263 0.980 97 68 1.5
4 1500 270 264 0.990 97 58 2.0
5 1450 266 268 1.005 93 42 2.0
6 1000 274 282 1.015 93 45 1.8
7 820 288 296 1.015 93 46 1.8
8 950 277 285 1.015 93 2.7
9 760 291 293 1.005 95 38 2.8
10 890 280 288 1.015 95 34 3.2 Conditions 1-3 above are at TQp/Tyjsf ratios below 0.990 and show low selectivity values of 1.5 or less. Conditions 4- 10 are at Top/TFN ratios of 0.990 and greater and show selectivity values of 1.8 to 3.2. These data show that for a variety of commercial unit conditions using a catalyst of this invention, high selectivity values are obtained as long as the T[)p/TiN ratio is greater than or equal to 0.990.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A catalyst suitable for hydrodesulfurizing naphtha feedstreams without excessive olefin saturation, which catalyst comprises:
(a) an inorganic refractory support material; and
(b) about 1 to 10 wt.% Mo03; and
(c) about 0.1 to 5 wt.% CoO; and
(d) a Co/Mo atomic ratio of about 0.1 to 1.0: and
(e) a median pore diameter of about 60A to 200A: and
(f) a Moϋ3 surface concentration in g Mo03/m of about 0.5 x 10' to 3 x 10"4: and
(g) an average particle size diameter of less than about 2.0 mm.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the amount of M0O3 is from about 2 to 8 wt.%; and the amount of CoO is from about 0.5 to 4 wt.%; and the inorganic support material is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica, and silica-alumina; and the Co/Mo atomic ratio is from about 0.20 to about 0.80: and the process of claim 3 wherein the median pore diameter is from about 75 A to about 175A.
3. The process of claim 2 wherein the Mo03 surface concentration is from about 0.75 x IO'4 to about 2.5 x IO'4.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst has a metal sulfide edge plane area of from about 800 to 2800 μmol oxygen/g M0O3 as measured by oxygen chemisorption.
5. The process of claim 3 wherein the catalyst has a metal sulfide edge plane area of from about 800 to 2800 μmol oxygen/g Mo03 as measured by oxygen chemisorption.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein the process unit is operated such that the inlet temperature of the feedstock to the reaction unit is below the dew point of the feedstock and 100% of the feedstock becomes vaporized in the catalyst bed.
7. A process for hydrodesulfurizing naphtha feedstreams without excessive olefin saturation, which process comprises:
feeding a naphtha feedstream to a hydrodesulfurization process unit containing a bed of hydrodesulfurization catalyst, which catalyst is comprised of:
(a) an inorganic refractory support material; and
(b) about 2 to 8 wt.% Mo03; and
(c) about 0.5 to 4 wt.% CoO: and
(d) a Co/Mo atomic ratio of about 0.20 to 0.80; and
(e) a median pore diameter of about 75 A to 175 A; and
(f) a Mo03 surface concentration in g Mo03/ιrf of about 0.75 x 10" to 2.5 x 10"4; and
(g) an average particle size diameter of less than about 1.6 mm; and herein the process unit is operated such that the inlet temperature of the feedstock to the reaction unit is below the dew point of the feedstock and 100% of the feedstock becomes vaporized in the catalyst bed.
8. The process of claim 7 wherein the amount of Mo03 is from about 2 to 8 wt.%: and the amount of CoO is from about 0.5 to 4 wt.%; and the inorganic support material is selected from the group consisting of alumina, silica, and silica-alumina: and the Co/Mo atomic ratio is from about 0.20 to about 0.80; and the process of claim 3 wherein the median pore diameter is from about 75 A to about 175 A.
9. The process of claim 8 wherein the M0O3 surface concentration is from about 0.75 x I O'4 to about 2.5 x IO"4.
10. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst has a metal sulfide edge plane area of from about 800 to 2800 μmol oxygen/g Mo03 as measured by oxygen chemisorption.
PCT/US1997/001594 1996-02-02 1997-01-30 Selective hydrodesulfurization catalyst and process WO1997040120A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU22527/97A AU2252797A (en) 1996-02-02 1997-01-30 Selective hydrodesulfurization catalyst and process
JP53295197A JP3955096B2 (en) 1996-02-02 1997-01-30 Selective hydrodesulfurization catalyst and method
EP97905697A EP0883663A4 (en) 1996-02-02 1997-01-30 Selective hydrodesulfurization catalyst and process
CA002244374A CA2244374C (en) 1996-02-02 1997-01-30 Selective hydrodesulfurization catalyst and process

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US60127496A 1996-02-02 1996-02-02
US08/601,274 1996-02-02
US08/583,725 1996-02-02
US08/583,725 US6126814A (en) 1996-02-02 1996-02-02 Selective hydrodesulfurization process (HEN-9601)

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1997040120A1 true WO1997040120A1 (en) 1997-10-30

Family

ID=27078881

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1997/001594 WO1997040120A1 (en) 1996-02-02 1997-01-30 Selective hydrodesulfurization catalyst and process

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0883663A4 (en)
JP (1) JP3955096B2 (en)
AU (1) AU2252797A (en)
CA (1) CA2244374C (en)
WO (1) WO1997040120A1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1097109A1 (en) * 1998-06-18 2001-05-09 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Two stage hydrodesulfurization process
US6413413B1 (en) 1998-12-31 2002-07-02 Catalytic Distillation Technologies Hydrogenation process
US6673237B2 (en) 2001-11-28 2004-01-06 Corning Incorporated High performance monolith treater for gasoline upgrade
US6867338B2 (en) 2002-03-15 2005-03-15 Catalytic Distillation Technologies Selective hydrogenation of acetylenes and dienes in a hydrocarbon stream
EP1702045A1 (en) * 2003-12-23 2006-09-20 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation A process for reducing sulfur and olefin contents in gasoline
US7288182B1 (en) * 1997-07-15 2007-10-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk Group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
US7513989B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2009-04-07 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydrocracking process using bulk group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
CN101152631B (en) * 2006-09-29 2011-04-20 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Selective hydrogenation desulfurizing catalyzer and method of producing the same
US8303805B2 (en) 2007-10-12 2012-11-06 Nippon Oil Corporation Process for producing gasoline base and gasoline

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6596157B2 (en) * 2000-04-04 2003-07-22 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Staged hydrotreating method for naphtha desulfurization
US7220352B2 (en) * 2002-04-02 2007-05-22 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Selective hydrodesulfurization of naphtha streams
JP4486330B2 (en) * 2003-07-14 2010-06-23 財団法人石油産業活性化センター Hydrodesulfurization catalyst and hydrodesulfurization method for gasoline fraction
US7776784B2 (en) 2003-07-14 2010-08-17 Nippon Oil Corporation Hydrodesulfurization catalyst and hydrodesulfurization process for gasoline fractions
JP4486329B2 (en) * 2003-07-14 2010-06-23 財団法人石油産業活性化センター Hydrodesulfurization catalyst and hydrodesulfurization method for gasoline fraction
JP2007501104A (en) * 2003-08-01 2007-01-25 エクソンモービル　リサーチ　アンド　エンジニアリング　カンパニー Catalyst system and its use in producing low sulfur fuel
US7629289B2 (en) * 2004-06-23 2009-12-08 Uop Llc Selective naphtha desulfurization process and catalyst
JP5330056B2 (en) * 2009-03-30 2013-10-30 一般財団法人石油エネルギー技術センター Method for producing monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
JP4929311B2 (en) * 2009-04-27 2012-05-09 一般財団法人石油エネルギー技術センター Hydrodesulfurization catalyst and hydrodesulfurization method for gasoline fraction

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4600703A (en) * 1983-12-19 1986-07-15 Intevep, S.A. Catalyst for the hydrocracking of heavy vacuum gas oils, method of preparation of catalyst and process for use thereof in the mild hydrocracking of heavy vacuum gas oils
US5169822A (en) * 1991-06-17 1992-12-08 Texaco Inc. Catalysts for removal of impurities by the hydroprocessing of hydrocarbons
US5275994A (en) * 1991-06-17 1994-01-04 Texaco Inc. Process for preparing a catalyst for removal of hydroprocessing impurities

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4016108A (en) * 1976-01-05 1977-04-05 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Preparation of catalysts of predetermined pore size distribution and pore volume
US4013547A (en) * 1976-01-22 1977-03-22 Union Oil Company Of California Desulfurization of residual petroleum oils with a catalyst calcined at higher temperatures
US4132632A (en) * 1978-03-31 1979-01-02 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Selective hydrodesulfurization of cracked naphtha
US4328127A (en) * 1980-09-16 1982-05-04 Mobil Oil Corporation Residua demetalation/desulfurization catalyst
US4717705A (en) * 1986-10-28 1988-01-05 Shell Oil Company Hydrotreating catalysts prepared from hydrogels
US4886582A (en) * 1988-06-29 1989-12-12 Union Oil Company Of California Resid hydroprocessing catalyst and method of preparation
US5266188A (en) * 1991-04-22 1993-11-30 Amoco Corporation Selective hydrotreating

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4600703A (en) * 1983-12-19 1986-07-15 Intevep, S.A. Catalyst for the hydrocracking of heavy vacuum gas oils, method of preparation of catalyst and process for use thereof in the mild hydrocracking of heavy vacuum gas oils
US5169822A (en) * 1991-06-17 1992-12-08 Texaco Inc. Catalysts for removal of impurities by the hydroprocessing of hydrocarbons
US5275994A (en) * 1991-06-17 1994-01-04 Texaco Inc. Process for preparing a catalyst for removal of hydroprocessing impurities

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP0883663A4 *

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7288182B1 (en) * 1997-07-15 2007-10-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk Group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
US7513989B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2009-04-07 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydrocracking process using bulk group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
EP1097109A1 (en) * 1998-06-18 2001-05-09 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Two stage hydrodesulfurization process
EP1097109A4 (en) * 1998-06-18 2001-12-12 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co Two stage hydrodesulfurization process
US6413413B1 (en) 1998-12-31 2002-07-02 Catalytic Distillation Technologies Hydrogenation process
US6673237B2 (en) 2001-11-28 2004-01-06 Corning Incorporated High performance monolith treater for gasoline upgrade
US6867338B2 (en) 2002-03-15 2005-03-15 Catalytic Distillation Technologies Selective hydrogenation of acetylenes and dienes in a hydrocarbon stream
US7368617B2 (en) 2002-03-15 2008-05-06 Catalytic Distillation Technologies Selective hydrogenation of acetylenes and dienes in a hydrocarbon stream
EP1702045A1 (en) * 2003-12-23 2006-09-20 China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation A process for reducing sulfur and olefin contents in gasoline
EP1702045A4 (en) * 2003-12-23 2011-08-17 China Petroleum & Chemical A process for reducing sulfur and olefin contents in gasoline
CN101152631B (en) * 2006-09-29 2011-04-20 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Selective hydrogenation desulfurizing catalyzer and method of producing the same
US8303805B2 (en) 2007-10-12 2012-11-06 Nippon Oil Corporation Process for producing gasoline base and gasoline

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3955096B2 (en) 2007-08-08
JP2000505358A (en) 2000-05-09
CA2244374C (en) 2005-04-12
AU2252797A (en) 1997-11-12
EP0883663A4 (en) 1999-12-29
CA2244374A1 (en) 1997-10-30
EP0883663A1 (en) 1998-12-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6126814A (en) Selective hydrodesulfurization process (HEN-9601)
US6013598A (en) Selective hydrodesulfurization catalyst
US5985136A (en) Two stage hydrodesulfurization process
CA2244374C (en) Selective hydrodesulfurization catalyst and process
US4132632A (en) Selective hydrodesulfurization of cracked naphtha
CA2392003C (en) Two stage deep naphtha desulfurization with reduced mercaptan formation
US4140626A (en) Process for the selective desulfurization of cracked naphthas with magnesia-containing catalyst
US4131537A (en) Naphtha hydrofining process
AU771597B2 (en) Naphtha desulfurization with reduced mercaptan formation
CA2403999C (en) Staged hydrotreating method for naphtha desulfurization
AU2001249836A1 (en) Staged hydrotreating method for naphtha desulfurization
EP1246891A1 (en) High temperature naphtha desulfurization using a low metal and partially deactivated catalyst
EP1506270B1 (en) Multi-stage hydrodesulfurization of cracked naphtha streams with a stacked bed reactor
CA2480168C (en) Selective hydrodesulfurization of naphtha streams
CA1102729A (en) Process for the hydrotreating of heavy hydrocarbon streams
WO2004062796A1 (en) Catalyst activation in the presence of olefinic hydrocarbon for selective cat naphtha hydrodesulfurization
CS235073B2 (en) Method of heavy hydrocarbons fraction hydrogenation treatment containing metals,asphaltenes,sulphur and nitrogen compounds
AU2001241734A1 (en) Hydroprocessing fcc naphthas

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AU BA BB BG BR CA CN CU CZ EE GE HU IL IS JP KP KR LC LK LR LT MG MK MN MX NO NZ PL RO SG SI SK TR TT UA UZ VN AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): KE LS MW SD SZ UG AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2244374

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2244374

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1997905697

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1997905697

Country of ref document: EP