WO1995010184A1 - Pesticide composition and use thereof - Google Patents
Pesticide composition and use thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1995010184A1 WO1995010184A1 PCT/SI1994/000018 SI9400018W WO9510184A1 WO 1995010184 A1 WO1995010184 A1 WO 1995010184A1 SI 9400018 W SI9400018 W SI 9400018W WO 9510184 A1 WO9510184 A1 WO 9510184A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- pesticide
- action
- efficiency
- pesticide composition
- solution
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01M—CATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
- A01M1/00—Stationary means for catching or killing insects
- A01M1/14—Catching by adhesive surfaces
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01M—CATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
- A01M1/00—Stationary means for catching or killing insects
- A01M1/20—Poisoning, narcotising, or burning insects
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N25/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests
- A01N25/24—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests containing ingredients to enhance the sticking of the active ingredients
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N43/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds
- A01N43/02—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds having rings with one or more oxygen or sulfur atoms as the only ring hetero atoms
- A01N43/04—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds having rings with one or more oxygen or sulfur atoms as the only ring hetero atoms with one hetero atom
- A01N43/14—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds having rings with one or more oxygen or sulfur atoms as the only ring hetero atoms with one hetero atom six-membered rings
- A01N43/16—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds having rings with one or more oxygen or sulfur atoms as the only ring hetero atoms with one hetero atom six-membered rings with oxygen as the ring hetero atom
Definitions
- the present invention belongs to the field of plant protection and relates to a non- toxic biodegradable pesticide composition using specially prepared polysaccharides of homoglycane or heteroglycane type, especially modified starch polymers and/or derivatives thereof, which composition exhibits an insecticide, acancide and fungicide action.
- acaricides and fungicides are used. Chemical insecticides, acaricides and fungicides are the most well-known and widely used. They are advantageous due to a rapid and effective ac ⁇ tion. The long-term use thereof, however, is restricted due to the following negative effects:
- a long waiting time (a long period between the application of a pesticide and the permitted use of an agricultural product), which especially inhibits the production and eating of vegetables;
- Pests do not develop a resistence thereto, they are not generally phytotoxic and are quite non-toxic for humans and animals as a rule, which makes possible the use thereof in water reserve areas and in closed spaces (such as e.g. in greenhouses and for house plants) and there is no need for waiting time.
- the first object of the present invention is a non-toxic biodegradable pesticide composition
- a non-toxic biodegradable pesticide composition comprising
- modified starch having the reduction number be ⁇ tween 2 and 10, preferably between 4 and 7, which is the product of an acid/ thermic hydrolysis of natural starches, especially potato starch, under inter ⁇ rupting the hydrolysis by rapid cooling;
- Modified starches used as active substances in pesticide compositions according to the invention are water soluble substances as a rule.
- Modified starches having a lower reduction number are used in the preparation of foodstuffs, e.g. of custard additives.
- the value of reduction num ⁇ ber is not critical.
- Acid/thermic hydrolysis is a standard technological process. It is carried out with an inorganic acid at a temperature between 150 and 200 °C and is interrupted as soon as the desired reduction number is achieved.
- Suitable preservatives are copper salts, especially copper sulfate, and standard or ⁇ ganic preservatives such as sodium benzoate.
- concentration of preservatives especially depends upon the kind thereof and upon the end use of a pesticide.
- the purpose of adding a surfactant is especially the regulation of adhesion of sprayed drops onto biochemically different parts of pests and onto the cuticle of plants.
- a surfactant alkyl aryl polyglycol ether derivatives are especially suitable.
- the concentration also depends upon the kind thereof and upon the end use of a pesticide.
- the pesticide formulation for further use may be in the form of a dry substance or in the form of a real or of a colloidal (especially aqueous) solution.
- the stability of such a solution prepared according to the invention was tested and the results showed that after more then one year of storage at room temperature in closed plastic barrels no delamination and no settling down occurred.
- the preferable pesticide formulation for the end use is a real or colloidal aqueous solution, preferably a 2 to 30% solution, especially a 6 to 20% solution.
- the main application route of the pesticide is spraying.
- Such pesticide formulations are viscous and at spraying form fine droplets, which form a film on the surface of insects, which at drying makes the vital processes and activities of pests impossible.
- Insects so treated have their wings, antennae and legs stuck together, their move ⁇ ment and breathing are rendered impossible.
- After drying the film of modified starch polymers and/or derivatives thereof becomes brittle and peels off the cuticle of plants together with dead insects and/or mites.
- the peeling of dried spray is faster at the technique of watering from the upper side.
- the plant sprayed with the pesticide according to the present invention is not in ⁇ hibited in its growth and development and in some cases the pesticide application also had a positive effect on the plant development.
- Such a phenomenon was ob ⁇ served in vine plants in littoral climate where the grape crop had a higher acid con ⁇ tent and thus a higher quality.
- a possible cause for that phenomenon was a lower ab ⁇ sorption of light due to the pesticide film, which resulted in a changed ratio between sugars and acids in the crop.
- Pesticide formulations prepared according to the invention may also be used in the combination (a mixture or a solution) with small quantities (e.g. up to 0.5% with regard to the amount of the end form of the formulation to be applied) of standard (e.g. chemical) pesticides.
- standard (e.g. chemical) pesticides e.g., a definite synergistic action of both agents occurs, whereby the biodegradable pesticide according to the inven ⁇ tion still maintains its characteristic physical pesticide action.
- the effect of controlling pests is greater under an additional prolonged action to pests.
- Advantages of such applications are a smaller consumption of toxic pesticides per hectare and their less frequent applica ⁇ tion under simultaneous higher efficacy of plant protection.
- novel biodegradable non-toxic pesticide having an insecticide, acaricide and fungicide effect and its activity in combination with standard (e.g. chemical) pesticides was demonstrated in fruit trees, vine, vegetables and ornamental plants against different kinds of pests e.g.:
- mites e.g. Tetranychus urticae, Panonychus ulmi, Calepitrimerus vitis, Tar- sonemus palidus
- mites e.g. Tetranychus urticae, Panonychus ulmi, Calepitrimerus vitis, Tar- sonemus palidus
- different kinds of plant lice e.g. Tetranychus urticae, Panonychus ulmi, Calepitrimerus vitis, Tar- sonemus palidus
- Another object of the present invention is thus the use of a pesticide composition ac ⁇ cording to the invention as a physico-mechanical pesticide having an insecticide, acaricide and fungicide action for controlling different kinds of plant pests.
- a still further object of the present invention is a pesticide composition
- a pesticide composition comprising a basic pesticide composition as defined above in the combination with chemical insec ⁇ ticides, acaricides and fungicides, which composition provides for a synergistic and prolonged action.
- compositions according to the invention we succeeded in that any manipulation therewith was totally harmless to health while simultaneously excellent pesticide actions were achieved.
- the pesticide formulation according to the invention was prepared by blending the following ingredients in a stainless steel kettle at a temperature of about 35 °C:
- SANDOVT ⁇ Chromos, Zagreb
- surfactant 1 copper sulfate - preservative 0.005 water to 100
- Example 3 The procedure was the same as in Example 1 with the exception that 500 ppm of sodium benzoate were used as the preservative instead of copper sulfate. .Example 3
- aqueous pesticide solutions prepared from the pesticide formulation according to Example 1 were applied to adult plants of gladiolus (Gladiolus sp.) and Datura sp. infested with fruit mite (Panonychus ulmi).
- the efficiency of the application was measured according to Abbot's method. The testing showed a very high efficiency of application, i.e. a strong acaricide action of the pesticide.
- Table 1 shows the efficiency of the pesticide application on the fruit mite.
- Vine was grown in a commercial vineyard.
- the efficiency of the application of the pesticide was established by a comparison be ⁇ tween the length of internodes of test plants to which pesticide was applied, and con ⁇ trol plants. The measurement was carried out at four different times.
- the testing showed a great difference between the length of internodes of test plants and control plants, i.e. a very high efficiency of the application and a very strong acancide action of the pesticide.
- Table 2 shows the efficiency of the pesticide application on Calepitrimerus vitis.
- Example 5 There were used pesticide formulations as employed in Example 5, a 0.05% solution of the commercial chemical pesticide Actellic-50 (active substance pirimiphos- methyl, CA 29232-93-7) as well as a combination of a 10% pesticide solution accord ⁇ ing to the invention with the addition of 0.05% (with regard to the total amount of the test solution) of Actellic-50.
- the formulations were tested in greenhouses on adult plants of carnation (Dianthus sp..) and Calceolaria rugosa infested with plant lice (Aphis sp.).
- the efficiency of the pesticide application was calculated according to Henderson- Tilton's formula.
- Table 3 shows the efficiency of pesticide application to plant lice (non-winged forms).
- a 10% aqueous pesticide solution prepared from the pesticide for ⁇ mulation according to Example 1 a 0.3% solution of the commercial chemical pesti ⁇ cide Mitac-20 (active substance amitraz, CA 33089-61-1), a combination of a 10% solution of the pesticide according to the invention to which 0.3% of Mitac-20 was added, a 0.3% solution of the commercial chemical pesticide Basudin (active sub ⁇ stance diazinon, CA 10311-84-9) as weU as a 1.25% solution of the commercial chemical pesticide Ogriol.
- the formulations were tested on adult plants of apple tree (Malus domesticus) of the sort "Jonathan", age 25 years, infested with Quadras ⁇ pidiotus pemiciosus.
- the apple trees were grown in a test orchard of the Agricultural Institute of Slovenia.
- the efficiency of the appUcation (calculation of pesticide efficiency) was measured according to Abbot's method.
- the testing showed an efficiency of the pesticide appUcation (insecticide action) in comparison with commercial pesticides.
- Table 4 shows the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation to Quadraspidiotus per- rootssus.
- Example 5 The pesticide formulation disclosed in Example 5 was appUed to the adult plants of rubber plant (Ficus benjamina) infested with Pseudococcus sp.
- the rubber plants were grown in a greenhouse.
- the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation was measured according to Henderson- Tilton's formula.
- the testing showed a high efficiency of the pesticide appUcation (insecticide action).
- Table 5 shows the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation to .Pseudococcus sp..
- a 10% aqueous pesticide solution prepared from the pesticide for ⁇ mulation according to Example 1 a 0.3% solution of the commercial chemical pesti ⁇ cide Mitac-20 (active substance amitraz, CA 33089-61-1) as well as a combination of a 10% solution of the pesticide according to the invention to which 0.3% of Mitac-20 were added.
- the formulations were tested on adult plants of apple tree (Malus domesticus) of the sort "Jonathan", age 25 years, infested with Cydia pommonella. The apple trees were frwon in a test orchard of the Agricultural Institute of Slovenia.
- the efficiency of the appUcation was measured according to Abbot's method.
- the testing showed an efficiency of the pesticide appUcation (insecticide action) in comparison with commercial pesticides.
- Table 6 shows the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation to Cydia pommonella.
- the vine was grown in a commercial vineyard.
- the efficiency of the appUcation was measured according to Abbot's method.
- Table 7 shows the efficiency of the pesticide application to .Lobesia botrana, EupoecUlia ambigueUa.
- a 20% aqueous pesticide solution prepared from the pesticide formulation accord ⁇ ing to Example 1 was apphed to adult vine plants (Vitis vinifera) of the sort "Kraljevina” infested with Botrytis cinerea.
- the vine was grown in a commercial vineyard.
- the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation was measured according to Abbot's method.
- the testing showed an efficiency of the pesticide appUcation (fungicide action).
- Table 8 shows the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation to Botrytis cinerea.
- Example 5 There were used pesticide formulations disclosed in Example 5, a 0.25% solution of the commercial chemical pesticide Dithane M45 (active substance mancozeb, CA 8018-01-7) as weU as a combination of a 10% solution of the pesticide according to the invention to which 0.25% of Dithane M45 were added.
- the formulations were tested on vine (Vitis vinifera) infested with Plasmopara viticora.
- the vine was grown in a commercial vine nursery.
- the pesticide showed a very good fungicide action.
- Dithane M45 a definite synergistic action of both agents occured.
- Table 9 shows the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation to Plasmopara viticora.
- Example 5 There were used pesticide formulations disclosed in Example 5, a 0.038% solution of the commercial chemical pesticide Topas 100 EC (active substance penconazole, CA 66246-88-6), a combination of a 10% solution of the pesticide according to the inven ⁇ tion to which 0.038% of Topas 100 EC were added, a 0.5% solution of the commer ⁇ cial chemical pesticide Pepelin (active substance sulphur) as weU as a combination of 10% solution of the pesticide according to the invention to which 0.5% of Pepelin were added.
- the formulations were tested on adult vine plants (Vitis vinifera) of the sort "Chardonnay" infested with Uncinula necator.
- the vine was grown in a commercial vineyard.
- the pesticide showed a very good fungicide action.
- Topas 100 EC or with Pepelin a definite synergistic action of both agents occured.
- Table 10 shows the efficiency of pesticide appUcation to Uncinula necator.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Insects & Arthropods (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
A non-toxic biodegradable pesticide composition comprising as an active substance a modified starch having the reduction number between 2 and 10, preferably between 4 and 7, which is the product of an acid/thermic hydrolysis of natural starches, especially potato starch, with interruption of the hydrolysis by rapid cooling; a surfactant for regulating adhesion and a preservative is disclosed.
Description
Pesticide Composition and Use Thereof
Technical Field
The present invention belongs to the field of plant protection and relates to a non- toxic biodegradable pesticide composition using specially prepared polysaccharides of homoglycane or heteroglycane type, especially modified starch polymers and/or derivatives thereof, which composition exhibits an insecticide, acancide and fungicide action.
.Prior Art and Technical Problem
In the protection of plants against pests several groups of insecticides, acaricides and fungicides are used. Chemical insecticides, acaricides and fungicides are the most well-known and widely used. They are advantageous due to a rapid and effective ac¬ tion. The long-term use thereof, however, is restricted due to the following negative effects:
the phenomenon of the resistance of pests to chemical agents for plant protection and, consequently, the use of higher and higher concentrations of the available agents and a constant need for novel kinds of pesticides;
killing of useful predatory insects resulting in an additional destroying of ecological balance;
a long waiting time (a long period between the application of a pesticide and the permitted use of an agricultural product), which especially inhibits the production and eating of vegetables;
a high acute and chronic toxicity representing a risk for users of protective agents and for consumers of agricultural products;
environmental pollution, especially of water and soil.
Due to the above reasons a definite trend towards limiting the use of chemical pesti¬ cides is noticeable. It is to be expected that in the future chemical pesticides will be used only in very restricted concentrations and in specific cases. Chemical agents
having a physical action are also used, which agents, however, are potentially phytotoxic and represent substances harmful to the environment.
Technical Solution
It has been found in our investigations that polysaccharides, especially modified starch polymers and/or derivatives thereof, when prepared in a special way exhibit a special stickiness in aqueous solutions, which gave rise to the idea of using solutions thereof for controlling insects, mites and fungi. Experiments showed that such agents have a pesticide action, however, the action thereof is especially physical (mechanical), i.e. after application by spraying, a sticky film is formed on the surface of pests, which makes vital functions such as movement, breathing and propagation impossible. Pesticides so prepared are biologically degradable derivatives of natural compounds. Pests do not develop a resistence thereto, they are not generally phytotoxic and are quite non-toxic for humans and animals as a rule, which makes possible the use thereof in water reserve areas and in closed spaces (such as e.g. in greenhouses and for house plants) and there is no need for waiting time.
Thus the first object of the present invention is a non-toxic biodegradable pesticide composition comprising
as an active substance a modified starch having the reduction number be¬ tween 2 and 10, preferably between 4 and 7, which is the product of an acid/ thermic hydrolysis of natural starches, especially potato starch, under inter¬ rupting the hydrolysis by rapid cooling;
a surfactant for regulating adhesion and
- . a preservative.
Modified starches used as active substances in pesticide compositions according to the invention are water soluble substances as a rule.
Modified starches having a lower reduction number are used in the preparation of foodstuffs, e.g. of custard additives. For these products the value of reduction num¬ ber is not critical.
Acid/thermic hydrolysis is a standard technological process. It is carried out with an inorganic acid at a temperature between 150 and 200 °C and is interrupted as soon as the desired reduction number is achieved.
The addition of a preservative and a surfactant is useful for improving the properties of basic pesticide formulations.
Suitable preservatives are copper salts, especially copper sulfate, and standard or¬ ganic preservatives such as sodium benzoate. The concentration of preservatives especially depends upon the kind thereof and upon the end use of a pesticide.
The purpose of adding a surfactant is especially the regulation of adhesion of sprayed drops onto biochemically different parts of pests and onto the cuticle of plants. Among the surfactants, alkyl aryl polyglycol ether derivatives are especially suitable. The concentration also depends upon the kind thereof and upon the end use of a pesticide.
The pesticide formulation for further use may be in the form of a dry substance or in the form of a real or of a colloidal (especially aqueous) solution. The stability of such a solution prepared according to the invention was tested and the results showed that after more then one year of storage at room temperature in closed plastic barrels no delamination and no settling down occurred.
The preferable pesticide formulation for the end use is a real or colloidal aqueous solution, preferably a 2 to 30% solution, especially a 6 to 20% solution. The main application route of the pesticide is spraying.
Such pesticide formulations are viscous and at spraying form fine droplets, which form a film on the surface of insects, which at drying makes the vital processes and activities of pests impossible.
Insects so treated have their wings, antennae and legs stuck together, their move¬ ment and breathing are rendered impossible. After drying the film of modified starch polymers and/or derivatives thereof becomes brittle and peels off the cuticle of plants together with dead insects and/or mites. The peeling of dried spray is faster at the technique of watering from the upper side.
The plant sprayed with the pesticide according to the present invention is not in¬ hibited in its growth and development and in some cases the pesticide application also had a positive effect on the plant development. Such a phenomenon was ob¬ served in vine plants in littoral climate where the grape crop had a higher acid con¬ tent and thus a higher quality. A possible cause for that phenomenon was a lower ab¬ sorption of light due to the pesticide film, which resulted in a changed ratio between sugars and acids in the crop.
Pesticide formulations prepared according to the invention may also be used in the combination (a mixture or a solution) with small quantities (e.g. up to 0.5% with regard to the amount of the end form of the formulation to be applied) of standard (e.g. chemical) pesticides. In this application frequently a definite synergistic action of both agents occurs, whereby the biodegradable pesticide according to the inven¬ tion still maintains its characteristic physical pesticide action. At a substantially reduced concentration of the chemical agent, the effect of controlling pests is greater under an additional prolonged action to pests. Advantages of such applications are a smaller consumption of toxic pesticides per hectare and their less frequent applica¬ tion under simultaneous higher efficacy of plant protection.
The activity of the novel biodegradable non-toxic pesticide having an insecticide, acaricide and fungicide effect and its activity in combination with standard (e.g. chemical) pesticides was demonstrated in fruit trees, vine, vegetables and ornamental plants against different kinds of pests e.g.:
mites (e.g. Tetranychus urticae, Panonychus ulmi, Calepitrimerus vitis, Tar- sonemus palidus), different kinds of plant lice (Aphis sp. ),
Trialeurodes vaporariorum,
Pseudococcus sp.,
Coccus hesperidum, Quadraspidiotus pemiciosus,
Cydia pommonella,
Lobesia botrana, Eupoecillia ambiguella,
Botrytis cinerea,
Plasmopara viticora,
Uncinula necator.
Another object of the present invention is thus the use of a pesticide composition ac¬ cording to the invention as a physico-mechanical pesticide having an insecticide, acaricide and fungicide action for controlling different kinds of plant pests.
A still further object of the present invention is a pesticide composition comprising a basic pesticide composition as defined above in the combination with chemical insec¬ ticides, acaricides and fungicides, which composition provides for a synergistic and prolonged action.
With the compositions according to the invention we succeeded in that any manipulation therewith was totally harmless to health while simultaneously excellent pesticide actions were achieved.
The invention is illustrated by the following Examples.
Example 1
Preparation of a stable pesticide formulation
The pesticide formulation according to the invention was prepared by blending the following ingredients in a stainless steel kettle at a temperature of about 35 °C:
(%) a pesticide according to the invention 30 as defined in the description
SANDOVTΓ (Chromos, Zagreb) - surfactant 1 copper sulfate - preservative 0.005 water to 100
Example 2
Preparation of a stable pesticide formulation
The procedure was the same as in Example 1 with the exception that 500 ppm of sodium benzoate were used as the preservative instead of copper sulfate.
.Example 3
Preparation of a stable pesticide formulation
The procedure was the same as in Example 1 with the exception that RADOVIT (1%) (Radonja, Sisak, Croatia) was used as the surfactant instead of SANDOVIT.
Example 4
Preparation of a stable pesticide formulation
The procedure was the same as in Example 2 with the exception that RADOVTT (1%) (Radonja, Sisak, Croatia) was used as the surfactant instead of SANDOVIT.
Example 5
Application against fruit mite (Panonychus ulmi)
10% and 20% aqueous pesticide solutions prepared from the pesticide formulation according to Example 1 were applied to adult plants of gladiolus (Gladiolus sp.) and Datura sp. infested with fruit mite (Panonychus ulmi).
Both plants were grown in the greeenhouse of the Agricultural Institute of Slovenia. Gladioli were grown in beds and Datura sp. as pot plants.
The efficiency of the application (calculation of efficiency) was measured according to Abbot's method. The testing showed a very high efficiency of application, i.e. a strong acaricide action of the pesticide. Table 1 shows the efficiency of the pesticide application on the fruit mite.
TABLE 1
agent effect of pesticide on the fruit mite gladiolus Datura
20% pesticide 100.0% 100.0%
10% pesticide 100.0% 96.8%
Example 6
Application against Calepitrimerus vitis
A 20% aqueous pesticide solution prepared from the pesticide formulation accord¬ ing to Example 1, was applied to adult plants of vine (Vitis vinifera) of the sort "La_.ki Rising" infested with Calepitrimerus vitis.
Vine was grown in a commercial vineyard.
The efficiency of the application of the pesticide was established by a comparison be¬ tween the length of internodes of test plants to which pesticide was applied, and con¬ trol plants. The measurement was carried out at four different times.
The testing showed a great difference between the length of internodes of test plants and control plants, i.e. a very high efficiency of the application and a very strong acancide action of the pesticide.
Table 2 shows the efficiency of the pesticide application on Calepitrimerus vitis.
TABLE 2
length of internodes (cm)
plant -vine I II HI IV average
20% pesticide applied 3.97 4.17 3.85 3.15 3.79
control 2.66 2.67 2.23 2.00 2.39
.Example 7
Application against plant lice (Aphis sp.) without chemical pesticides and in com¬ bination therewith
There were used pesticide formulations as employed in Example 5, a 0.05% solution of the commercial chemical pesticide Actellic-50 (active substance pirimiphos- methyl, CA 29232-93-7) as well as a combination of a 10% pesticide solution accord¬ ing to the invention with the addition of 0.05% (with regard to the total amount of the test solution) of Actellic-50. The formulations were tested in greenhouses on adult plants of carnation (Dianthus sp..) and Calceolaria rugosa infested with plant lice (Aphis sp.).
The efficiency of the pesticide application was calculated according to Henderson- Tilton's formula.
The plants were infested with non-winged forms of plant lice. The pesticide showed a very good insecticide action. In previous testings still greater activity against winged forms had been observed. In the combination with Actellic-50 a definite synergistic action of both agents occcured.
Table 3 shows the efficiency of pesticide application to plant lice (non-winged forms).
TABLE 3
Pesticide action on plant lice
agent carnation Calceolari;
20% pesticide 54.9% 52.3%
10% pesticide 61.8% 45.1%
10% pesticide +
0.05% of Actellic-50 93.7% 52.5%
0.05% Actellic-50 82.6% 26.8%
.Example 8
Application against Quadraspidiotus pemiciosus without chemical pesticides and in combination therewith
There were used a 10% aqueous pesticide solution prepared from the pesticide for¬ mulation according to Example 1, a 0.3% solution of the commercial chemical pesti¬ cide Mitac-20 (active substance amitraz, CA 33089-61-1), a combination of a 10% solution of the pesticide according to the invention to which 0.3% of Mitac-20 was added, a 0.3% solution of the commercial chemical pesticide Basudin (active sub¬ stance diazinon, CA 10311-84-9) as weU as a 1.25% solution of the commercial chemical pesticide Ogriol. The formulations were tested on adult plants of apple tree (Malus domesticus) of the sort "Jonathan", age 25 years, infested with Quadras¬ pidiotus pemiciosus.
The apple trees were grown in a test orchard of the Agricultural Institute of Slovenia.
The efficiency of the appUcation (calculation of pesticide efficiency) was measured according to Abbot's method.
The testing showed an efficiency of the pesticide appUcation (insecticide action) in comparison with commercial pesticides.
Table 4 shows the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation to Quadraspidiotus per- niciosus.
TABLE 4
agent pesticide action on
Quadraspidiotus pemiciosus (%)
10% pesticide 54.9
10% pesticide + 0.3% of Mitac-20 56.7
0.3% Mitac-20 52.2
0.3% Basudin 69.5
1.25% Ogriol 50.5
Example 9
Application against Pseudococcus sp.
The pesticide formulation disclosed in Example 5 was appUed to the adult plants of rubber plant (Ficus benjamina) infested with Pseudococcus sp.
The rubber plants were grown in a greenhouse.
The efficiency of the pesticide appUcation was measured according to Henderson- Tilton's formula.
The testing showed a high efficiency of the pesticide appUcation (insecticide action).
Table 5 shows the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation to .Pseudococcus sp..
TABLE 5
agent pesticide action on
Pseudococcus sp. (%)
20% pesticide 77.5
10% pesticide 67.5
.Example 10
Application against Cydia pommonella without chemical pesticides and in combina¬ tion therewith
There were used a 10% aqueous pesticide solution prepared from the pesticide for¬ mulation according to Example 1, a 0.3% solution of the commercial chemical pesti¬ cide Mitac-20 (active substance amitraz, CA 33089-61-1) as well as a combination of a 10% solution of the pesticide according to the invention to which 0.3% of Mitac-20 were added. The formulations were tested on adult plants of apple tree (Malus domesticus) of the sort "Jonathan", age 25 years, infested with Cydia pommonella.
The apple trees were frwon in a test orchard of the Agricultural Institute of Slovenia.
The efficiency of the appUcation (calculation of efficiency) was measured according to Abbot's method.
The testing showed an efficiency of the pesticide appUcation (insecticide action) in comparison with commercial pesticides.
Table 6 shows the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation to Cydia pommonella.
TABLE 6
agent pesticide action on
Cydia pommonella (%)
10% pesticide 81.4
10% pesticide + 0.3% of Mitac-20 86.2
0.3% Mitac-20 82.5
Example 11
Application against Lobesia botrana, EupoecUlia ambigueUa
There were used a 15% aqueous pesticide solution prepared from the pesticide for¬ mulation according to Example 1 and a 0.3% solution of the commercial chemical pesticide Mitac-20 (active substance amitraz, CA 33089-61-1). The formulations were tested on adult vine plants (V is vinifera) of the sort "Kraljevina" infested with Lobesia botrana, EupoecUlia ambigueUa.
The vine was grown in a commercial vineyard.
The efficiency of the appUcation (calculation of efficiency) was measured according to Abbot's method.
The testing showed an efficiency of the pesticide application (insecticide action) in comparison with commercial pesticides.
Table 7 shows the efficiency of the pesticide application to .Lobesia botrana, EupoecUlia ambigueUa.
TABLE 7
agent pesticide action on
.Lobesia botrana, EupoecUlia ambigueUa (%)
15% pesticide 80.3
0.3% Mitac-20 89.5
.Example 12
Application against Botiytis cinerea
A 20% aqueous pesticide solution prepared from the pesticide formulation accord¬ ing to Example 1 was apphed to adult vine plants (Vitis vinifera) of the sort "Kraljevina" infested with Botrytis cinerea.
The vine was grown in a commercial vineyard.
The efficiency of the pesticide appUcation (calculation of efficiency) was measured according to Abbot's method.
The testing showed an efficiency of the pesticide appUcation (fungicide action).
Table 8 shows the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation to Botrytis cinerea.
TABLE 8
agent pesticide action on
Botrytis cinerea (%)
20% pesticide 54.4
Example 13
Application against Plasmopara viticora without chemical pesticides and in combina¬ tion therewith
There were used pesticide formulations disclosed in Example 5, a 0.25% solution of the commercial chemical pesticide Dithane M45 (active substance mancozeb, CA 8018-01-7) as weU as a combination of a 10% solution of the pesticide according to the invention to which 0.25% of Dithane M45 were added. The formulations were tested on vine (Vitis vinifera) infested with Plasmopara viticora.
The vine was grown in a commercial vine nursery.
The efficiency of the appUcation (pesticide efficiency calculation) was measured ac¬ cording to Abbot's method.
The pesticide showed a very good fungicide action. In the combination with Dithane M45 a definite synergistic action of both agents occured.
Table 9 shows the efficiency of the pesticide appUcation to Plasmopara viticora.
TABLE 9
agent pesticide action on
Plasmopara viticora (%)
20% pesticide 51.3
10% pesticide 25.7
0.25% Dithane M45 62.0
10% pesticide + 0.25% of Dithane M45 85.6
.Example 14
Application against Uncinula necator without chemical pesticides and in combina¬ tion therewith
There were used pesticide formulations disclosed in Example 5, a 0.038% solution of the commercial chemical pesticide Topas 100 EC (active substance penconazole, CA 66246-88-6), a combination of a 10% solution of the pesticide according to the inven¬ tion to which 0.038% of Topas 100 EC were added, a 0.5% solution of the commer¬ cial chemical pesticide Pepelin (active substance sulphur) as weU as a combination of 10% solution of the pesticide according to the invention to which 0.5% of Pepelin were added. The formulations were tested on adult vine plants (Vitis vinifera) of the sort "Chardonnay" infested with Uncinula necator.
The vine was grown in a commercial vineyard.
The efficiency of pesticide appUcation (efficiency calculation) was measured accord¬ ing to Abbot's method.
The pesticide showed a very good fungicide action. In the combination with Topas 100 EC or with Pepelin a definite synergistic action of both agents occured.
Table 10 shows the efficiency of pesticide appUcation to Uncinula necator.
TABLE 10
agent pesticide action on
Uncinula necator(%)
20% pesticide 58.3
10% pesticide 41.1
10% pesticide + 0.038% of Topas 100 EC 82.1
0.038% Topas 100 EC 76.1
10% pesticide + 0.5% of Pepelin 77.4
0.5% Pepelin 63.9
Claims
1. A non-toxic biodegradable pesticide composition comprising
as an active substance a modified starch having the reduction number be¬ tween 2 and 10, preferably between 4 and 7, which is the product of an acid/thermic hydrolysis of natural starches, especiaUy potato starch, under in¬ terrupting the hydrolysis by rapid cooling;
a surfactant for regulating adhesion and
a preservative.
2. The use of a pesticide composition according to claim 1 as a physico- mechanical pesticide having an insecticide, acaricide and fungicide action for control¬ ling different kinds of plant pests.
3. A pesticide composition comprising a pesticide composition according to claim 1 in combination with chemical insecticides, acaricides and fungicides, which composition provides for a synergistic and prolonged action.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU77137/94A AU7713794A (en) | 1993-10-07 | 1994-10-06 | Pesticide composition and use thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
SI9300529A SI9300529A (en) | 1993-10-07 | 1993-10-07 | Antitoxic and biodecomponsitional pesticides and use the same |
SIP-9300529 | 1993-10-07 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1995010184A1 true WO1995010184A1 (en) | 1995-04-20 |
Family
ID=20431257
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SI1994/000018 WO1995010184A1 (en) | 1993-10-07 | 1994-10-06 | Pesticide composition and use thereof |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU7713794A (en) |
SI (1) | SI9300529A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1995010184A1 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2336538A (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 1999-10-27 | Guenther Robert Norman Jones | Tree pest control |
EP1287739A1 (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2003-03-05 | National Starch and Chemical Investment Holding Corporation | Water dispersible starch based physical form modification of agricultural agents |
US6733802B1 (en) | 1997-12-17 | 2004-05-11 | Fortune Bio-Tech Limited | Natural azadirachtin composition |
WO2007081695A3 (en) * | 2006-01-10 | 2007-11-29 | Grain Processing Corp | Pest control agent, method for manufacture of pest control agent, and method for pest control |
US9670105B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2017-06-06 | Grain Processing Corporation | Method for drying spent filter media |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1990000351A1 (en) * | 1988-07-12 | 1990-01-25 | Aquaspersions Limited | Combating of undesired organisms |
US5089266A (en) * | 1989-10-10 | 1992-02-18 | Merlin Lee | Non-toxic insecticide composition and method for killing specific insects |
US5110804A (en) * | 1989-10-10 | 1992-05-05 | Agrisystemen Limited | Non-toxic insecticide composition and method for killing specific insects |
-
1993
- 1993-10-07 SI SI9300529A patent/SI9300529A/en unknown
-
1994
- 1994-10-06 WO PCT/SI1994/000018 patent/WO1995010184A1/en active Application Filing
- 1994-10-06 AU AU77137/94A patent/AU7713794A/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1990000351A1 (en) * | 1988-07-12 | 1990-01-25 | Aquaspersions Limited | Combating of undesired organisms |
US5089266A (en) * | 1989-10-10 | 1992-02-18 | Merlin Lee | Non-toxic insecticide composition and method for killing specific insects |
US5110804A (en) * | 1989-10-10 | 1992-05-05 | Agrisystemen Limited | Non-toxic insecticide composition and method for killing specific insects |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6733802B1 (en) | 1997-12-17 | 2004-05-11 | Fortune Bio-Tech Limited | Natural azadirachtin composition |
GB2336538A (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 1999-10-27 | Guenther Robert Norman Jones | Tree pest control |
GB2336538B (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2003-11-05 | Guenther Robert Norman Jones | Novel means of controlling woolly aphid (Eriosoma Lanigerum) and similar tree pests |
EP1287739A1 (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2003-03-05 | National Starch and Chemical Investment Holding Corporation | Water dispersible starch based physical form modification of agricultural agents |
US6667277B2 (en) | 2001-08-24 | 2003-12-23 | National Starch And Chemical Investment Holding Corporation | Water dispersible starch based physical form modification of agricultural agents |
SG105557A1 (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2004-08-27 | Nat Starch Chem Invest | Water dispensible starch based physical form modification of agricultural agents |
US9670105B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2017-06-06 | Grain Processing Corporation | Method for drying spent filter media |
WO2007081695A3 (en) * | 2006-01-10 | 2007-11-29 | Grain Processing Corp | Pest control agent, method for manufacture of pest control agent, and method for pest control |
US8025895B2 (en) | 2006-01-10 | 2011-09-27 | Grain Processing Corporation | Pest control agent, method for manufacture of pest control agent, and method for pest control |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU7713794A (en) | 1995-05-04 |
SI9300529A (en) | 1995-04-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4983390A (en) | Terrestrial delivery compositions and methods for controlling insect and habitat-associated pest populations in terrestrial environments | |
US4965070A (en) | Deer repellent formulation | |
US5496568A (en) | Fungal disease control in cultivated plants | |
EP1028628B1 (en) | Pesticide against plant-pathogenic microorganisms | |
US5368866A (en) | Deer repellent composition, process for making same, and a treatment method for applying the same | |
Hollingsworth et al. | Caffeine as a novel toxicant for slugs and snails | |
JP2007320844A (en) | Columnar article for plant growth or protection | |
EP0245970A1 (en) | Dithiocarbamate compostions having increased rain fastness | |
SK284549B6 (en) | Fungicidal two- or three-component composition based on metalaxyl, method of controlling and preventing Oomycetes infestation | |
WO1995010184A1 (en) | Pesticide composition and use thereof | |
BR112021009991A2 (en) | composition comprising a choline salt of a fatty acid and its use as a fungicide | |
MX2007005465A (en) | Agricultural or horticultural additive. | |
US20120039979A1 (en) | Insect control substance that can be applied to a surface | |
JP5701097B2 (en) | Terrestrial invertebrate repellent composition | |
JPH0579043B2 (en) | ||
WO1987000006A1 (en) | Plant microbiocidal compound and method | |
JP3095551B2 (en) | Pesticide-free cultivation method | |
AU749698B2 (en) | Use of at least one acid from the citric acid cycle combined with glycerine as a pesticide | |
KR100424860B1 (en) | A absorbtion increasing agent for the foiler uptake of dimethomorph | |
CA2113517A1 (en) | Fatty acid type herbicidal composition | |
CN108552212A (en) | A kind of solid repellent and preparation method thereof | |
Eichmann | Tartar emetic for thrips control on greenhouse carnations | |
WO1999046986A1 (en) | An ant repellent | |
JPH0441407A (en) | Antimicrobial agent for plant | |
WO1995012975A1 (en) | Method of controlling mildew in cultivated plants |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AU BG BR BY CA CN CZ HU JP KR NO NZ PL RO RU SK UA US |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): KE MW SD SZ AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: CA |