Classifications

• • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
  • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
  • A23K—FODDER
  • A23K30/00—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs
  • A23K30/10—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder
• • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
  • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
  • A23K—FODDER
  • A23K30/00—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs
• • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
  • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
  • A23K—FODDER
  • A23K50/00—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
  • A23K50/10—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for ruminants
  • A23K50/15—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for ruminants containing substances which are metabolically converted to proteins, e.g. ammonium salts or urea

Definitions

• the invention concerns a process to preserve moist cellmass, such as straw, hay, fresh fodder, seeds, whale grain (straw and grain in one), grain hull waste, byproducts of potato industry, sugarbeet cuttings, products of the cellulose industry (cellulose, O-fibre), wood cells handled by various methods, softcells of energy forest production and bio mass in general, by adding urea and ureaphosphate in solid form, either in separate or common crystals, to the mass to be handled. Other minerals or additives, needed by animals, may be added in the crystals.
• ammonia has been known earlier as a material in handling straw feed. Its source has usually been liquid ammonia under pressure, sometimes 25 % solution of ammonia. Both materials have their own disadvantages, including toxidity and the transportation in high pressure vessels as for liquid ammonia.
• urea is known in feed preserv made of corn produce. Small quantities of urea are used primarily as stabilizers in preservative liquids.
• US-patent 3 063 839 relates to the use of urea in grass and to its drying afterwards.
• Fl-patent 54225 relates to a process in which green flour containing ureaphosphoric acid is made by adding phosphor acidic urea fluid to fresh grass and drying it in high temperature.
• the feed grain is harvested in the ripen ing phase with grain and straw into-the silo or is baled.
• the preservative can be added in connection with cutting or loading.
• the threshing of the grain and drying and milling following after that, which require lots of energy and invest ements, are left out.
• the hull of the grain becomes moreeasily digestable, which assists in the utilization of the heart of the grain.
• the process enables the industry refining the afore mentioned coarse feed to obtain faultless raw material. Large amounts of so called softcells, leaves and yearlings are generated in the production of the energy forest, the preserving and improving of the feed value of which is solved by the process described before.
• the period of use in industry connected with the agriculture is generally only a few months in a year.
• large amount s of cellmass byproduct which in general has to be dried immediately, needs to be handled.
• the capacity of the driers is to be measured to meet the production peaks, the investment costs form significant amounts.
• the moist cellmass can be stored at the same time as its feed value improves.
• the drying can be arranged to be done as for the resources at a more advantageous time.
• urea converts to ammonia and carbon dioxide. Both materials improve preserving, because they limit the breathing of the cells and function of certain microbes. Ammonia reacts with fibrous mass improving the digestibility of it. As gaseous material, ammonia and carbon dioxide evenly spread to the material to be treated. Ureaenzyme is always present in a biomass as a result of microbe function. A part of urea reacts with the component parts of the cell when slowly acting, very useful nitrogen combinations for animals are generated.
• the ambient temperature, moisture and degree of the acidity has an essential effect on the decomposition speed of the urea.
• the decomposition occurs very quickly. For preserving of the straw the beginning of reactions fast enough in damp mass is of an importance. The fact that the decomposition continues for a long time is advantageous.
• the general rule of chemical reactions is valid also to the decomposition of urea. Ten degrees (C°) rise in temperature doubles the reaction speed. So the warming up of the feed mass accelerates the disengagement of ammonia and carbon dioxide.
• Ureaphosphate is acidic in nature and decomposes in moist mainly to urea and phosphoric acid. It also has a mould growth preventing influence. Due to its acidity, it binds ammonia to the feedmass and promotes reactions between the fibrous materials of the feed and urea, thus improving tlie digestibility of the feed.
• urea-ureaphosphate composition "TR-granule" in accordance with the invention have been 3-30 % ureaphosphate and 97-70 % urea, although the ratio could be different.
• the quantity of use has varied from 3 % to 20 % of dry content of the feed in normal use.
• the maximum bonding capability of the cell mass has been utilized, in other words, the addition of the mixture corresponds to the amount of the dry content of the moist mass.
• urea was added- to moist straw in amount of 5 % of the weight of the straw.
• the dry contents of straw was 72 %.
• the 5 % addition of urea corresponds 3 % addition of ammonia nitrogen (NH 4 ).
• the ability of preserving and feed analysis corresponded the results obtained wit liquid ammonia.
• aired barley with its quick couch growth was harvested by a reel chaffer, portion of which was treated with ammonia and portion with ureaphosphat e-urea mixture.
• the -dry content of the harvested crop was about 30 %.
• Preserving was done in a normal way to a horizontal silo by packing with a tractor.
• Ammonia fodder was stocked to the rear end of the silo and was covered with a plastic cover. 40 kg liquid ammonia was used per one dry content ton of the fodder. Because the fodder was wet, closely spaced holes were made. In the pile having a surface area of 5 x 6 meters, 30 breathing holes were put in from above and each hole was prepared carefully by moving the breathing pipe vertically.
• Ureaphosphat e-urea fodder was prepared in the front end of the silo. The mixture was sown in the unloading section of the elevator in a self unloading trailer, whereby it was mixed up with the feed mass. The fodder was packed with a tractor, although it remained looser than the previous one. The pile was covered by a plastic cover similarly as in the ammonia treatment. The mixture constituants were 13 % ureaphosphate and 87 % urea. The total amount of ureaphosphate-urea mixture was 8,4 % from the dry material of the fodder.
• Table 2 shows that the greatest differences are in nitrogen values. Also filling value seems to be better with the ureaphosphate-urea mixture. In-vitro-digestibilities are 67.4 % with ammonia fodder and 71.9 % with mixture fodder.
• bale stacks were in a barn.
• a mixture proportion of 20 % of ureaphosphate and 80 % of urea was used.
• the dose quantity was 5 % mixture of the dry content of the fodder.
• the treatment was necessary to eliminate the mould already developed.
• the softening of the hull portion of the grain and the improvement of digestibility was observed. In practice this is of great importance, being so that the hull covers the digestible portion of the grain, when a part of the grain goes through the alimentary canal without braking up. Further the hull part of the oat for instance consists of almost one fourth of the weight of the grain.
• Potato pulp and sugarbeet cuttings the dry content of which was 20 % , was treated for the purpose of preserving and preparing the nitrogen gasket.
• the quantities of use in the latter case were 10-30 % of the wet weight of the cellmass.
• the untreated samples were quickly spoilt, other have been preserved well.
• Tables 3 and 4 show the effect of ammonia treatment and correspondingly ureaphosphate-urea treatment on the fodder value of the straw. The results show that with the method according to the invention clearly better results are accomplished as far as the filling and nitrogen values are concerned.
• Fodders prepared in accordance with the invention, have been fed both for meat and milk producing cattle. From the results can be drawn conclusions that it is no need to give special protein feed, but the animals can use the nitrogen combinations of the method for forming of the protein quite in a different manner than in a plain urea feeding for instance. A considerable part of the need of energy for animals becomes filled with the fodder prepared according to the invention.
• the health of the cattle has been good, the growth of the animals and the production and quality of milk has been normal.
• the gestation has been better than normal due to the phosphor of good quality received from feeding.
• ureaphosphate-urea to preserve cell mass and to improve its feed value, solves many problems. It gives better results than t-he treatment with urea and is easier to accomplish than the treatment with ureaphosphoric acid (both of which are new except the cases mentioned on page 1).
• the addition of ureaphosphate-urea mixture in solid form to the damp bio mass is safe, advantageous and efficient.
• Fodder to be treated barley with seeds and straw, plenty of quick couch growth Used amount: NH 3 4 % from dry material mixture 9 % from dry material, relation of mixture 1 ureaphosphate + 6.6. urea Treated amount: Nll 3 26760 kg wet material -360 kg NH 3 mixture 12860 kg wet material 50 kg UF 330 urea
• UF ureaphosphate Use amount: NH 3 3 % mixture ( 1 ureaphosphate + 2 urea) 6 %

Landscapes

• Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
• Animal Husbandry (AREA)
• Zoology (AREA)
• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Food Science & Technology (AREA)
• Birds (AREA)
• Fodder In General (AREA)
• Feed For Specific Animals (AREA)
• Fertilizers (AREA)
• Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)

Priority Applications (5)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=8513182

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (14)

Families Citing this family (1)

Citations (4)

Family Cites Families (1)

• 1980
  • 1980-01-14 FI FI800094A patent/FI60637C/fi not_active IP Right Cessation
• 1981
  • 1981-01-12 NL NL8120003A patent/NL8120003A/nl not_active Application Discontinuation
  • 1981-01-12 CH CH5933/81A patent/CH649897A5/de not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 1981-01-12 JP JP50036081A patent/JPS56501632A/ja active Pending
  • 1981-01-12 EP EP81900223A patent/EP0047249B1/en not_active Expired
  • 1981-01-12 WO PCT/FI1981/000001 patent/WO1981001944A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 1981-01-12 GB GB8202429A patent/GB2090116B/en not_active Expired
  • 1981-01-12 BR BR8108703A patent/BR8108703A/pt unknown
  • 1981-01-12 AU AU66487/81A patent/AU546946B2/en not_active Ceased
  • 1981-01-12 HU HU811447A patent/HU183446B/hu not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 1981-09-11 NO NO81813105A patent/NO154332C/no unknown
• 1982
  • 1982-02-12 RO RO82106615A patent/RO88675A/ro unknown
  • 1982-02-12 SE SE8200847A patent/SE424950B/sv unknown
  • 1982-02-13 SU SU823393300A patent/SU1175349A3/ru active

Patent Citations (4)

Non-Patent Citations (6)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events