USPP9684P - Chrysanthemum plant named `White Miami` - Google Patents
Chrysanthemum plant named `White Miami` Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USPP9684P USPP9684P US08/547,219 US54721995V US9684P US PP9684 P USPP9684 P US PP9684P US 54721995 V US54721995 V US 54721995V US 9684 P US9684 P US 9684P
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- miami
- white
- laterals
- days
- capitulum
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 241000723353 Chrysanthemum Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 abstract description 8
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 abstract description 8
- 241000131317 Capitulum Species 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000017260 vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 235000005633 Chrysanthemum balsamita Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 4
- 239000003630 growth substance Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 241001466077 Salina Species 0.000 description 6
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 235000007516 Chrysanthemum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 241001573881 Corolla Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000011681 asexual reproduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013465 asexual reproduction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000009604 Chrysanthemum X morifolium Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000189548 Chrysanthemum x morifolium Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000218922 Magnoliophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000350 mutagenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001850 reproductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
- A01H6/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their botanic taxonomy
- A01H6/14—Asteraceae or Compositae, e.g. safflower, sunflower, artichoke or lettuce
- A01H6/1424—Chrysanthemum
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T83/00—Cutting
- Y10T83/647—With means to convey work relative to tool station
- Y10T83/664—Roller
- Y10T83/6648—Continuous conveying during, cutting; e.g., straw cutting
Definitions
- the present invention comprises a new and distinct cultivar of Chrysanthemum, botanically known as Dendranthema grandiflora, and referred to by the cultivar name White Miami.
- the new cultivar was discovered and selected by inventor Cornelis P. VandenBerg on Dec. 10, 1993 in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif. as one flowering plant within a flowering block established as rooted cuttings from stock plants which had been exposed as unrooted cuttings to an X-ray source of 1750 rads in Fort Myers, Fla. on May 13, 1993.
- the irradiated parent cultivar was the cultivar Miami, described as a daisy spray cut mum with a very light pink ray floret color with many small flowers.
- the ray floret color of the parent cultivar Miami was considered to be too light for commercial introduction, and was never introduced nor patented in North America.
- the irradiation program resulting in White Miami had as its primary objective the expansion of color ranges of the parent cultivar Miami.
- the irradiation program comprised irradiation of cuttings of the parent cultivar at irradiation levels of 1500, 1750 and 2000 rads.
- a total of 2,145 cuttings harvested from a total of 225 irradiated plants were planted on Oct. 4, 1993.
- 13 initial selections were made, which selections were then revegetated and reflowered in Honselersdijk, The netherlands. This flowering resulted in discarding 11 of the original 13 selections on Aug. 29, 1994.
- the remaining wo selections were maintained as PIs (Possible Introductions) and further trialed in Salinas, Calif. and Honselersdijk, The Netherlands, ultimately resulting in the decision to introduce the 2 remaining selections as White Miami and Pink Miami. Pink Miami is disclosed in co-pending application Ser. No. 08/547397.
- the phenotype may vary significantly with variations in environment such as temperature, light intensity and daylength, without, however, any variance in genotype.
- Plant height is 79 to 86 cm when grown with b 17 to 18 long days prior to start of short days.
- Peduncle length of both the first and the fourth lateral at flowering after removing the apical bud without growth regulator applications is 5 to 8 cm.
- White Miami Of the commercial culivars known to the inventor, the most similar in comparison to White Miami is the parent cultivar Miami. All traits of White Miami are similar to those of Miami, except for the ray floret color. The ray floret color of White Miami is White, while the ray florer color of Miami is a very light pink. When compared with the sister cultivar Pink miami, disclosed in co-pending application Ser. No. 08/547,397, White Miami has a 3 to 5 cm shorter plant height than Pink Miami, while the ray floret color of white Miami is white, compared to the light purple ray floret color of Pink Miami.
- Gynoecium --Present on both ray and disc florets.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
A chrysanthemum plant named White Miami particularly characterized by its flat capitulum form; daisy capitulum type; white ray floret color; small flowers, with a diameter across face of capitulum of 38 to 41 mm when fully opened, when grown as a single stem spray cut mum; flowering response is 51 to 60 days after start of short days; plant height is 79 to 86 cm when grown with 17 to 18 long days prior to start of short days; peduncle length of both the first and the fourth lateral at flowering after removing the apical bud without growth regulator applications is 5 to 8 cm; high production of flowers per stem, with 14 to 17 laterals developing; top laterals produe one terminal flower, lower laterals produce one terminal flower and 2 to 4 secondary flowers; and recommended as spray cut mum.
Description
The present invention comprises a new and distinct cultivar of Chrysanthemum, botanically known as Dendranthema grandiflora, and referred to by the cultivar name White Miami.
White Miami, identified as 3661 (90-571B01), is a product of a mutation induction program. The new cultivar was discovered and selected by inventor Cornelis P. VandenBerg on Dec. 10, 1993 in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif. as one flowering plant within a flowering block established as rooted cuttings from stock plants which had been exposed as unrooted cuttings to an X-ray source of 1750 rads in Fort Myers, Fla. on May 13, 1993. The irradiated parent cultivar was the cultivar Miami, described as a daisy spray cut mum with a very light pink ray floret color with many small flowers. The ray floret color of the parent cultivar Miami was considered to be too light for commercial introduction, and was never introduced nor patented in North America.
The irradiation program resulting in White Miami had as its primary objective the expansion of color ranges of the parent cultivar Miami. The irradiation program comprised irradiation of cuttings of the parent cultivar at irradiation levels of 1500, 1750 and 2000 rads. A total of 2,145 cuttings harvested from a total of 225 irradiated plants were planted on Oct. 4, 1993. Of these, 13 initial selections were made, which selections were then revegetated and reflowered in Honselersdijk, The netherlands. This flowering resulted in discarding 11 of the original 13 selections on Aug. 29, 1994. The remaining wo selections were maintained as PIs (Possible Introductions) and further trialed in Salinas, Calif. and Honselersdijk, The Netherlands, ultimately resulting in the decision to introduce the 2 remaining selections as White Miami and Pink Miami. Pink Miami is disclosed in co-pending application Ser. No. 08/547397.
The first act of asexual reproduction of White Miami was accomplished when vegetative cuttings were taken from the initial selection in February of 1994 in a controlled environment in Salinas, Calif., by technicians working under supervision of Cornelis P. VandenBerg.
Horticultural examination of controlled flowerings of successive plantings has shown that the unique combination of characteristics as herein disclosed for White Miami are firmly fixed and are retained through successive generations of asexual reproduction.
White Miami has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The phenotype may vary significantly with variations in environment such as temperature, light intensity and daylength, without, however, any variance in genotype.
The following observations, measurements and comparisons described plants grown in Salinas, Calif., under greenhouse conditions which approximate those generally used in commercial greenhouse practice.
The following traits have been repeatedly observed and are determined to be basic characteristics of White Miami, which, in combination, distinguish this Chrysanthemum as a new and distinct cultivar:
1. Flat capitulum form.
2. Daisy capitulum type.
3. White ray floret color.
4. Small flowers, with a diameter across face of capitulum of 38 to 41 mm when fully opened, when grown as a single stem spray cut mum.
5. Flowering response is 51 to 60 days after start of short days.
6. Plant height is 79 to 86 cm when grown with b 17 to 18 long days prior to start of short days.
7. Peduncle length of both the first and the fourth lateral at flowering after removing the apical bud without growth regulator applications is 5 to 8 cm.
8. High production of flowers per stem, with 14 to 17 laterals developing. Top laterals produce one terminal flower, lower laterals produce one terminal flower and 2 to 4 secondary flowers.
9. Recommended as spray cut mum.
The accompanying photographic drawing is a side view of a single stem cut spray mum of White Miami, with the colors being as nearly true as possible with illustrations of this type.
Of the commercial culivars known to the inventor, the most similar in comparison to White Miami is the parent cultivar Miami. All traits of White Miami are similar to those of Miami, except for the ray floret color. The ray floret color of White Miami is White, while the ray florer color of Miami is a very light pink. When compared with the sister cultivar Pink miami, disclosed in co-pending application Ser. No. 08/547,397, White Miami has a 3 to 5 cm shorter plant height than Pink Miami, while the ray floret color of white Miami is white, compared to the light purple ray floret color of Pink Miami.
In the following description color references are made to the Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart. The color values were determined on plant material grown as a single stem spray cut mum grown in Salinas, Calif. on Jul. 7, 1995.
Classification:
Botanical.--Dendranthema grandiflora cv White Miami.
Commercial.--Flat daisy spray cut mum.
A. Capitulum:
Form.--Flat.
Type.--Daisy.
Diameter across face.--38 to 41 mm when fully opened.
B. Corolla of ray florets:
Color (general tonality from a distance of three meters).--White.
Color (upper surface):--155B.
Color (Under surface):--155B.
Shape.--Longitudinal straight, cross section concave.
C. Corolla of disc florets:
Color (mature):--b 15A.
Color (immature).--15 A. overlaid with 144B.
D. Reproductive Organs:
Androecium.--Present on disc florets only; no pollen.
Gynoecium.--Present on both ray and disc florets.
A. General Appearance:
Height.--79 to 86 cm when grown in Salinas with 17 to 18 long days prior to start of short days.
B. Foliage:
Color (upper surface).--147A.
Color (under surface).--147B.
Shape.--Deeply lobed, strongly serrated.
Claims (1)
1. A new and distinct Chrysanthemum plant named White Miami, as described and illustrated.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/547,219 USPP9684P (en) | 1995-10-24 | 1995-10-24 | Chrysanthemum plant named `White Miami` |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/547,219 USPP9684P (en) | 1995-10-24 | 1995-10-24 | Chrysanthemum plant named `White Miami` |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| USPP9684P true USPP9684P (en) | 1996-11-05 |
Family
ID=24183810
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/547,219 Expired - Lifetime USPP9684P (en) | 1995-10-24 | 1995-10-24 | Chrysanthemum plant named `White Miami` |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | USPP9684P (en) |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4616099A (en) * | 1982-07-19 | 1986-10-07 | Sparkes A Graham | Family group of successive radiation induced chrysanthemum mutants named snapper |
-
1995
- 1995-10-24 US US08/547,219 patent/USPP9684P/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4616099A (en) * | 1982-07-19 | 1986-10-07 | Sparkes A Graham | Family group of successive radiation induced chrysanthemum mutants named snapper |
Non-Patent Citations (14)
| Title |
|---|
| Broertjes, 1966, "Mutation breeding of Chrysanthemums", Euphytica, 15:156-162. |
| Broertjes, 1966, Mutation breeding of Chrysanthemums , Euphytica, 15:156 162. * |
| Broertjes, et al., 1978, "Application of Mutation Breeding Methods in the Improvement of Vegetatively Propagated Crops", Elsevier Sci. Pub. Co., New York, pp. 162-175. |
| Broertjes, et al., 1978, Application of Mutation Breeding Methods in the Improvement of Vegetatively Propagated Crops , Elsevier Sci. Pub. Co., New York, pp. 162 175. * |
| Broertjes, et al., 1980, "A mutant of a mutant of a . . . Irradiation of progressive radiation-induced mutants in a mutation breeding programme with Chrysanthemum morifolium", Euphytica, 29:525-530. |
| Broertjes, et al., 1980, A mutant of a mutant of a . . . Irradiation of progressive radiation induced mutants in a mutation breeding programme with Chrysanthemum morifolium , Euphytica, 29:525 530. * |
| Chan, 1966, "Chrysanthemum and rose mutations induced by X-rays", Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc., pp. 613-620. |
| Chan, 1966, Chrysanthemum and rose mutations induced by X rays , Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc., pp. 613 620. * |
| Dowrick, et al., 1966, "The induction of mutations in chrysanthemum using X-and gamma radiation", Euphytica, 15:204-210. |
| Dowrick, et al., 1966, The induction of mutations in chrysanthemum using X and gamma radiation , Euphytica, 15:204 210. * |
| Gosling, ed., 1979, "The Chrysanthemum Manual-6th edition", The National Chrysanthemum Society, London, Essex Telegraph Press, Ltd., pp. 329-336. |
| Gosling, ed., 1979, The Chrysanthemum Manual 6th edition , The National Chrysanthemum Society, London, Essex Telegraph Press, Ltd., pp. 329 336. * |
| Searle, et al., 1968, "Chrysanthemums the Year Round", Blanford Press, London, pp. 27-29, 320-327. |
| Searle, et al., 1968, Chrysanthemums the Year Round , Blanford Press, London, pp. 27 29, 320 327. * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| USPP8759P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Sandy | |
| USPP8808P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Blue Volare | |
| USPP8829P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Light Volare | |
| USPP9684P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `White Miami` | |
| USPP9683P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Pink Miami` | |
| USPP8610P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Chantal | |
| USPP9455P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Blush | |
| USPP8224P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Light Brioso | |
| USPP8223P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Dark Brioso | |
| USPP9830P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Sunny Fargo` | |
| USPP8794P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Peach Cantata | |
| USPP9423P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Soft Volare` | |
| USPP10680P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Plum Akron` | |
| USPP9844P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `White Cinderella` | |
| USPP9760P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Peach Cinderella` | |
| USPP8809P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Cherry Conga | |
| USPP8611P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Cream Chantal | |
| USPP9853P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Golden Kent` | |
| USPP9700P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Golden Cinderella` | |
| USPP8665P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Yellow Tayrona | |
| USPP9701P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Pink Cinderella` | |
| USPP9441P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `White Blush` | |
| USPP9702P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named `Bronze Cherie` | |
| USPP7594P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named White Oreo | |
| USPP8711P (en) | Chrysanthemum plant named Red Cumbia |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: YODER BROTHERS, INC., OHIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VANDENBERG, CORNELIS P.;REEL/FRAME:007781/0413 Effective date: 19951005 |