US9637792B2 - Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation - Google Patents

Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US9637792B2
US9637792B2 US13/364,978 US201213364978A US9637792B2 US 9637792 B2 US9637792 B2 US 9637792B2 US 201213364978 A US201213364978 A US 201213364978A US 9637792 B2 US9637792 B2 US 9637792B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
keshet
nature genetics
methylation
www
loci
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US13/364,978
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20120196756A1 (en
Inventor
David A. Ahlquist
William R. Taylor
Hongzhi Zou
Graham P. Lidgard
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
Exact Sciences Corp
Original Assignee
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
Exact Sciences Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US13/364,978 priority Critical patent/US9637792B2/en
Application filed by Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Exact Sciences Corp filed Critical Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
Assigned to EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION reassignment EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LIDGARD, GRAHAM P., ZOU, HONGHZI
Assigned to MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH reassignment MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AHLQUIST, DAVID A., TAYLOR, WILLIAM R.
Publication of US20120196756A1 publication Critical patent/US20120196756A1/en
Priority to US15/278,697 priority patent/US10519510B2/en
Publication of US9637792B2 publication Critical patent/US9637792B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Assigned to EXACT SCIENCES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC reassignment EXACT SCIENCES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION
Priority to US16/665,738 priority patent/US10870893B2/en
Priority to US17/101,904 priority patent/US11952633B2/en
Assigned to EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION reassignment EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EXACT SCIENCES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC
Priority to US18/628,011 priority patent/US20240368702A1/en
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
    • C12Q1/6883—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material
    • C12Q1/6886—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material for cancer
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6813—Hybridisation assays
    • C12Q1/6827—Hybridisation assays for detection of mutation or polymorphism
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6844—Nucleic acid amplification reactions
    • C12Q1/6858—Allele-specific amplification
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2521/00—Reaction characterised by the enzymatic activity
    • C12Q2521/30—Phosphoric diester hydrolysing, i.e. nuclease
    • C12Q2521/331—Methylation site specific nuclease
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2523/00—Reactions characterised by treatment of reaction samples
    • C12Q2523/10—Characterised by chemical treatment
    • C12Q2523/125—Bisulfite(s)
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2563/00—Nucleic acid detection characterized by the use of physical, structural and functional properties
    • C12Q2563/159—Microreactors, e.g. emulsion PCR or sequencing, droplet PCR, microcapsules, i.e. non-liquid containers with a range of different permeability's for different reaction components
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/154—Methylation markers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods and compositions for determination of and uses of specific methylation patterns indicative of adenoma and carcinoma.
  • the invention relates to analysis of defined CpG loci that are coordinately methylated in DNAs from cancer and adenoma samples, methods for identifying coordinately methylated loci, and methods of using analysis of coordinately methylated loci in one or more marker regions in the design of assays for adenoma and cancer having improved sensitivity and specificity.
  • DNA may be methylated at cytosines located 5′ to guanosine in CpG dinucleotides. This modification has important regulatory effects on gene expression, especially when involving CpG rich areas, known as CpG islands, often found in the promoter regions of genes. While approximately 75% of the CpG sites throughout the human genome are methylated, CpG sites within CpG islands are normally unmethylated, and aberrant methylation of CpG islands has been associated with certain diseases, including cancers. For example, CpG island hypermethylation is associated with transcriptional inactivation of defined tumor suppressor genes in human cancers, e.g., colorectal cancer. Therefore, detection of hypermethylated nucleic acid could indicate susceptibility or onset of various forms of cancers.
  • CIMP CpG island methylator phenotype
  • Issa states that “methylation events (alone) may not provide the ideal universal cancer marker they were once thought to be because CIMP target genes will not be useful to screen for all colorectal cancers (many false negatives are predicted), and non-CIMP target genes will likely yield a high rate of false-positives because they are also methylated in normal appearing mucosa of older individuals without tumors” (Issa, et al., supra).
  • methylation analyses in cancer detection is to look at multiple marker genes. For example, Zou, et al., examined the methylation status of BMP3, EYA2, ALX4, and vimentin in cancer samples. While methylation levels were significantly higher in both cancer and adenoma than in normal epithelium, for each of the four genes, the sensitivity as determined by receiver operating curves was not significantly improved by combining any or all markers compared with the best single marker. (Zou, et al., Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prey 2007; 16(12):2686).
  • Zou also looked at neoplasims showing methylation in more than one of the marker genes and found that co-methylation was frequent, with 72% of the cancers and 84% of the adenomas tested showing hypermethylation in two or more of the genes.
  • Zou reported that methylation of one or more of four (at least one), two or more of four, three or more of four, or four of four of these marker genes was noted in 88%, 72%, 53%, and 41% of 74 cancers and 98%, 84%, 60%, and 39% of 62 adenomas, compared with 24%, 7%, 3%, and 0% of 70 normal epithelia, respectively, demonstrating that although the assay gets progressively more specific as when more genes are included in the comethylation set, the sensitivity declines precipitously.
  • the present invention relates to the methods of identifying regions of specific genes and specific regions of genomic nucleic acid useful in the detection of methylation associated with colorectal cancer.
  • Methods comprise, e.g., detecting methylated sequences in, for example, tissue biopsy, stool extract, or other body fluids with improved sensitivity and specificity.
  • the present invention provides methods of methylation analysis comprising identifying methylation loci showing advantageous methylation ratios when methylation in non-normal cells, e.g., cancer or adenoma cells is compared to background methylation in normal cells.
  • the present invention relates to methods of analyzing methylation at each of several loci in a set of possible methylation sites within a marker sequence, wherein the presence of methylation at all of the loci within the defined set of sites occurs more frequently in cancer and adenoma cells than in normal cells, such that a finding of methylation at all of the loci in the defined subset of loci in a sample is indicative of adenoma or cancer.
  • the present invention provides a method of identifying a set of methylated CpG loci in a marker nucleic acid wherein methylation is indicative of adenoma, comprising:
  • the percentage of individual copies of said marker nucleic acid from said plurality of normal samples that are methylated at all of said CpG loci in said defined subset is less than the percentage of individual copies of said marker nucleic acid from said plurality of non-normal samples that are methylated at all of said CpG loci in said defined subset, and wherein methylation at all of said CpG loci in said defined subset in said marker nucleic acid is indicative of a non-normal state, e.g., adenoma and/or cancer.
  • the mean percentage of individual copies of the marker nucleic acid methylated at all loci in said defined set of CpG loci in said plurality of non-normal samples is greater than the mean percentage of individual copies of the marker nucleic acid methylated at all loci in said defined set of CpG loci in the plurality of normal samples.
  • the mean percentage of individual copies of the marker nucleic acid methylated at all loci in said defined set of CpG loci in the plurality of non-normal samples is at least one standard deviation, preferably two standard deviations, more preferably three standard deviations greater than the mean percentage of individual copies of said marker nucleic acid methylated at all loci in said defined set of CpG loci in said plurality of normal samples.
  • the defined subset of CpG loci consists of the same loci in the defined set of CpG loci.
  • Determination of the methylation status of the set of CpG loci may be accomplished by any method known to those of skill in the art.
  • the method comprises treating DNA from the samples with bisulfite. Bisulfite modification treatment is described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,704, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • determining the methylation status of the defined set of CpG loci comprises digital analysis of each of a plurality of CpG loci in a plurality of individual copies of a marker nucleic acid.
  • digital analysis comprise digital sequencing, and/or digital PCR.
  • non-normal sample comprises an adenoma sample, and in particular preferred embodiments, comprises a colorectal adenoma sample.
  • a non-normal sampled comprises a cancer sample, and in certain preferred embodiments, comprises a colorectal cancer sample.
  • the present invention provides methods of detecting cancer or adenoma in a sample, e.g., from a subject.
  • the present invention provides methods comprising determining the methylation status of each CpG locus in a defined subset of CpG loci in at least one cancer or adenoma marker nucleic acid molecule, wherein methylation at each of the CpG loci in the defined subset of CpG loci in the cancer or adenoma marker nucleic acid molecule is indicative of cancer or adenoma in the sample.
  • the defined subset comprises at least three CpG loci, while in some preferred embodiments, the defined subset comprises at least four CpG loci or at least five CpG loci.
  • the determining comprises analysis of the CpG loci in a nucleic acid detection assay configured to determine the methylation status of each of the loci in a single nucleic acid detection assay. In some preferred embodiments, the determining comprises analysis of the CpG loci in a nucleic acid detection assay configured to determine the methylation status of each of said loci in a single reaction mixture. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid detection assay comprises a primer extension assay.
  • the nucleic acid detection assay may comprise one or more of a nucleic acid amplification assay, a nucleic acid sequencing assay, a structure-specific cleavage assay, a 5′ nuclease cleavage assay, an invasive cleavage assay and/or a ligation assay.
  • the methods of the present invention are not limited to the analysis of a single cancer or adenoma marker nucleic acid.
  • the methylation status of each CpG locus in a defined subset of CpG loci in at least one cancer or adenoma marker nucleic acid molecule comprises analysis of nucleic acid molecules from a plurality of cancer or adenoma markers.
  • the plurality of cancer or adenoma markers comprises at least three cancer or adenoma markers, while in some embodiments, the plurality comprises at least four cancer or adenoma markers.
  • the cancer or adenoma markers and nucleic acid molecules are selected from the group comprising Vimentin, BMP3, Septin 9, TFPI2, 2 regions of LRAT, and EYA4 markers and nucleic acid molecules.
  • the assay methods of the present invention are combined with the analysis of one or more other cancer markers, such as fecal occult blood markers (e.g., hemoglobin, alpha-defensin, calprotectin, ⁇ 1-antitrypsin, albumin, MCM2, transferrin, lactoferrin, and lysozyme).
  • fecal occult blood markers e.g., hemoglobin, alpha-defensin, calprotectin, ⁇ 1-antitrypsin, albumin, MCM2, transferrin, lactoferrin, and lysozyme.
  • a cancer or adenoma marker nucleic acid molecule comprises a vimentin nucleic acid molecule, and in some particularly preferred embodiments, the defined subset of CpG loci in the vimentin nucleic acid molecule comprises loci 37, 40, and 45.
  • a cancer or adenoma marker nucleic acid molecule comprises a BMP3 nucleic acid molecule, and in some particularly preferred embodiments, the defined subset of CpG loci in the BMP3 nucleic acid molecule comprises loci 34, 53, and 61.
  • a cancer or adenoma marker nucleic acid molecule comprises a Septin9 nucleic acid molecule, and in some particularly preferred embodiments, the defined subset of CpG loci in said Septin9 nucleic acid molecule comprises loci 59, 61, 68, and 70.
  • a cancer or adenoma marker nucleic acid molecule comprises a TFPI2 nucleic acid molecule and in some particularly preferred embodiments, the defined subset of CpG loci in said TFPI2 nucleic acid molecule comprises loci 55, 59, 63, and 67.
  • a cancer or adenoma marker nucleic acid molecule comprises an EYA4 nucleic acid molecule, and in some particularly preferred embodiments, the defined subset of CpG loci in said EYA4 nucleic acid molecule comprises loci 31, 34, 37, and 44.
  • the at least one cancer or adenoma marker or nucleic acid molecule comprises a plurality markers or nucleic acid molecules comprising Vimentin, BMP3, Septin9, and TFPI2 markers or nucleic acid molecules.
  • the present invention further provides methods of selecting a defined set of CpG loci in a marker nucleic acid wherein methylation is indicative of non-normal status, e.g., adenoma or cancer, comprising a) determining the methylation status of a plurality of CpG loci in each of a plurality of individual copies of a marker nucleic acid from a plurality of normal samples; b) determining the methylation status of the plurality of CpG loci in each of a plurality of individual copies of said marker nucleic acid from a plurality of non-normal (e.g., adenoma or cancer) samples; c) determining methylation ratios for each locus in the plurality of said CpG loci in the marker nucleic acid; and d) selecting a defined set of CpG loci in the marker nucleic acid, wherein the defined set of CpG loci comprises a plurality of CpG loci having advantageous methylation ratios correlating with non
  • determining the methylation ratios comprises determining the ratio between the mean methylation at each of the plurality of CpG loci in the normal samples to the mean methylation at each corresponding CpG locus in said plurality of CpG loci in the non-normal samples.
  • the plurality of individual copies of a marker nucleic acid analyzed in the normal and non-normal (e.g., adenoma or cancer) samples comprises at least 10, preferably at least 100, more preferably at least 1000, still more preferably at least 10,000 and still more preferably at least 100,000 copies.
  • the number of copies analyzed is not limited to these whole numbers, but may be any integer above about 10. The number of copies from different sample types, e.g., normal and non-normal need not be equal.
  • the plurality of normal and non-normal (e.g., adenoma or cancer) samples compared comprises at least 10, preferably at least 25, still more preferably at least 100 samples.
  • the defined set of CpG loci comprises at least three CpG loci, preferably at least four CpG loci, more preferably at least five CpG loci.
  • Determination of the methylation status of the plurality of CpG loci may be accomplished by any method known to those of skill in the art, including those described in more detail, below.
  • the method comprises treating DNA from the samples with bisulfite.
  • determining the methylation status of the defined set of CpG loci comprises digital analysis of each of a plurality of CpG loci in a plurality of individual copies of a marker nucleic acid.
  • digital analysis comprises digital sequencing, and/or digital PCR.
  • the terms “digital sequencing” and “single molecule sequencing” are used interchangeably and refer to determining the nucleotide sequence of individual nucleic acid molecules.
  • Systems for individual molecule sequencing include but are not limited to the 454 FLXTM or 454 TITANIUMTM (Roche), the SOLEXATM/Illumina Genome Analyzer (Illumina), the HELISCOPETM Single Molecule Sequencer (Helicos Biosciences), and the SOLIDTM DNA Sequencer (Life Technologies/Applied Biosystems) instruments), as well as other platforms still under development by companies such as Intelligent Biosystems and Pacific Biosystems.
  • background refers to methylation observed in a normal cell or sample at a nucleic acid locus or region that is generally unmethylated in normal cells.
  • CpG islands are generally considered unmethylated in normal human cells but methylation is not completely absent in the CpG islands of normal cells.
  • methylation or “methylated,” as used in reference to the methylation status of a cytosine, e.g., in a CpG locus, generally refers to the presence or absence of a methyl group at position 5 of the cytosine residue (i.e., whether a particular cytosine is 5-methylcytosine). Methylation may be determined directly, e.g., as evidenced by routine methods for analysis of methylation status of cytosines, e.g., by determining the sensitivity (or lack thereof) of a particular C-residue to conversion to uracil by treatment with bisulfite.
  • a cytosine residue in a sample that is not converted to uracil when the sample is treated with bisulfite in a manner that would be expected to convert that residue if non-methylated may generally be deemed “methylated”.
  • the terms “digital PCR”, “single molecule PCR” and “single molecule amplification” refer to PCR and other nucleic acid amplification methods that are configured to provide amplification product or signal from a single starting molecule.
  • samples are divided, e.g., by serial dilution or by partition into small enough portions (e.g., in microchambers or in emulsions) such that each portion or dilution has, on average, no more than a single copy of the target nucleic acid.
  • Methods of single molecule PCR are described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No.
  • sensitivity refers to clinical sensitivity—the proportion of positive samples that give a positive result using a diagnostic assay. Sensitivity is generally calculated as the number of true positives identified by the assay, divided by the sum of the number of true positives and the number of false negatives determined by the assay on known positive samples. Similarly, the term “specificity” refers to the proportion or number of true negatives determined by the assay divided by the sum of the number of true negatives and the number of false positives determined by the assay on known negative sample(s).
  • the term “complementary” refers to different assays that, when used together, provide a more sensitive and/or specific result than can be provided by any one of the different assays used alone.
  • the term “informative” or “informativeness” refers to a quality of a marker or panel of markers, and specifically to the likelihood of finding a marker (or panel of markers) in a positive sample.
  • sample as used herein is used in its broadest sense.
  • a sample suspected of containing a human gene or chromosome or sequences associated with a human chromosome may comprise a cell, chromosomes isolated from a cell (e.g., a spread of metaphase chromosomes), genomic DNA (in solution or bound to a solid support such as for Southern blot analysis), RNA (in solution or bound to a solid support such as for Northern blot analysis), cDNA (in solution or bound to a solid support) and the like.
  • CpG island refers to a genomic DNA region that contains a high percentage of CpG sites relative to the average genomic CpG incidence (per same species, per same individual, or per subpopulation (e.g., strain, ethnic subpopulation, or the like).
  • CpG islands are defined as having a GC percentage that is greater than 50% and with an observed/expected CpG ratio that is greater than 60% (Gardiner-Garden et al. (1987) J Mol. Biol. 196:261-282; Baylin et al. (2006) Nat. Rev. Cancer 6:107-116; Irizarry et al. (2009) Nat.
  • CpG islands may have a GC content >55% and observed CpG/expected CpG of 0.65 (Takai et al. (2007) PNAS 99:3740-3745; herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
  • Various parameters also exist regarding the length of CpG islands. As used herein, CpG islands may be less than 100 bp; 100-200 bp, 200-300 bp, 300-500 bp, 500-750 bp; 750-1000 bp; 1000 or more by in length.
  • CpG islands show altered methylation patterns relative to controls (e.g., altered methylation in cancer subjects relative to subjects without cancer; tissue-specific altered methylation patterns; altered methylation in stool from subjects with colorectal neoplasia (e.g., colorectal cancer, colorectal adenoma) relative to subjects without colorectal neoplasia).
  • altered methylation involves hypermethylation.
  • altered methylation involves hypomethylation.
  • CpG shore or “CpG island shore” refers to a genomic region external to a CpG island that is or that has potential to have altered methylation patterns (see, e.g., Irizarry et al. (2009) Nat. Genetics 41:178-186; herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
  • CpG island shores may show altered methylation patterns relative to controls (e.g., altered methylation in cancer subjects relative to subjects without cancer; tissue-specific altered methylation patterns; altered methylation in stool from subjects with colorectal neoplasia (e.g., colorectal cancer, colorectal adenoma) relative to subjects without colorectal neoplasia).
  • CpG island shores may be located in various regions relative to CpG islands (see, e.g., Irizarry et al. (2009) Nat. Genetics 41; 178-186; herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). Accordingly, in some embodiments, CpG island shores are located less than 100 bp; 100-250 bp; 250-500 bp; 500-1000 bp; 1000-1500 bp; 1500-2000 bp; 2000-3000 bp; 3000 bp or more away from a CpG island.
  • target when used in reference to a nucleic acid detection or analysis method, refers to a nucleic acid having a particular sequence of nucleotides to be detected or analyzed, e.g., in a sample suspected of containing the target nucleic acid.
  • a target is a nucleic acid having a particular sequence for which it is desirable to determine a methylation status.
  • target When used in reference to the polymerase chain reaction, “target” generally refers to the region of nucleic acid bounded by the primers used for polymerase chain reaction. Thus, the “target” is sought to be sorted out from other nucleic acid sequences that may be present in a sample.
  • a “segment” is defined as a region of nucleic acid within the target sequence.
  • sample template refers to nucleic acid originating from a sample that is analyzed for the presence of a target.
  • locus refers to a particular position, e.g., of a mutation, polymorphism, or a C residue in a CpG dinucleotide, within a defined region or segment of nucleic acid, such as a gene or any other characterized sequence on a chromosome or RNA molecule.
  • a locus is not limited to any particular size or length, and may refer to a portion of a chromosome, a gene, functional genetic element, or a single nucleotide or basepair.
  • a locus refers to the C residue in the CpG dinucleotide.
  • methylation ratio refers to the amount or degree of methylation observed for particular methylation region or locus (e.g., a CpG locus in a marker gene or region) in a plurality of non-normal cells (e.g., cells in a particular disease state, such as cancerous or pre-cancerous cells) compared to the amount or degree of methylation observed for the same region or locus in a plurality of normal cells (e.g., cells that are not in the particular disease state of interest).
  • non-normal cells e.g., cells in a particular disease state, such as cancerous or pre-cancerous cells
  • a methylation ratio may be expressed as the ratio of the means determined for normal cells:adenoma cells, or 0.11348.
  • a methylation ratio need not be expressed in any particular manner or by any particular calculation.
  • the methylation ratio above may alternatively be expressed, e.g., as 8.39889:74.0771; 8.39889/74.0771; 74.0771:8.39889; as a calculated “fold methylation over background” 8.81987, etc.
  • the term “advantageous methylation ratio” refers to a methylation ratio for a locus at which methylation correlates with a cellular status, e.g., a particular disease state (for example, normal, precancerous, cancerous) that, when compared to other methylation loci correlated with the same disease state, displays a higher percentage methylation in a population of non-normal cells compared to background levels of methylation at the same locus in a population of normal cells.
  • certain CpG loci e.g., within a methylation marker sequence, display a much greater signal-to-noise, i.e., degree in methylation compared to background than other loci in the same marker sequence.
  • certain disease-associated marker genes or regions display advantageous methylation ratios at some or all loci compared to the methylation ratios observed for some or all loci within another marker sequence.
  • methylation loci e.g., CpG loci in a marker sequence
  • a particular pattern of methylation that correlates with a cellular status, e.g., a particular disease state (for example, normal, precancerous, cancerous).
  • methylation loci that are all methylated in a manner correlated with a disease state may be deemed to be coordinately methylated in cells having that disease state.
  • Coordinat methylation is not limited to situations in which all of the coordinated loci are methylated.
  • Any pattern of methylation among a particular set of loci that correlates with a cellular status including patterns in which all of the coordinate loci are methylated, patterns in which the loci exhibit a reproducible pattern of methylation and non-methylation, and patterns in which none of the loci within the set are methylated are all included within the meaning of “coordinately methylated.”
  • coordinate methylation analysis is used interchangeably with “multimethylation analysis” and refers to an assay in which the methylation statuses of a plurality of individual methylation loci in a marker sequence, e.g., CpG loci, are determined together.
  • coordinate methylation analysis is performed using a digital/single copy method (e.g., digital sequencing) or an assay method configured to interrogate all of the selected CpG loci on each molecule tested, such that the methylation pattern in each single molecule tested is revealed.
  • defined set of CpG loci refers to the set of CpG loci in a marker gene or region selected for methylation analysis.
  • a defined set of CpG loci in a marker gene or region may comprise all CpG loci in the gene or region, or it may comprise fewer than all of the loci in that gene or region.
  • defined subset of CpG loci refers to a subset of the defined set of CpG loci in a marker gene or region, the methylation of which has been determined to be indicative of a non-normal state, e.g., adenoma or cancer.
  • a non-normal state e.g., adenoma or cancer.
  • the methylation status of a defined subset of CpG loci in at least one cancer marker nucleic acid molecule is determined, with simultaneous methylation at all of said CpG loci in the defined subset being indicative of cancer in the sample.
  • a defined subset of CpG loci in a marker gene or region may comprise all CpG loci in the defined set, or it may comprise fewer than all of the loci in the defined set of loci in that gene or region.
  • colonal cancer is meant to include the well-accepted medical definition that defines colorectal cancer as a medical condition characterized by cancer of cells of the intestinal tract below the small intestine (e.g., the large intestine (colon), including the cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, and sigmoid colon, and rectum). Additionally, as used herein, the term “colorectal cancer” is meant to further include medical conditions which are characterized by cancer of cells of the duodenum and small intestine (jejunum and ileum).
  • Metastasis is meant to refer to the process in which cancer cells originating in one organ or part of the body relocate to another part of the body and continue to replicate. Metastasized cells subsequently form tumors which may further metastasize. Metastasis thus refers to the spread of cancer from the part of the body where it originally occurs to other parts of the body.
  • colorectal cancer cells are meant to refer to colorectal cancer cells which have metastasized; colorectal cancer cells localized in a part of the body other than the duodenum, small intestine (jejunum and ileum), large intestine (colon), including the cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, and sigmoid colon, and rectum.
  • an individual is suspected of being susceptible to metastasized colorectal cancer is meant to refer to an individual who is at an above-average risk of developing metastasized colorectal cancer.
  • individuals at a particular risk of developing metastasized colorectal cancer are those whose family medical history indicates above average incidence of colorectal cancer among family members and/or those who have already developed colorectal cancer and have been effectively treated who therefore face a risk of relapse and recurrence.
  • Other factors which may contribute to an above-average risk of developing metastasized colorectal cancer which would thereby lead to the classification of an individual as being suspected of being susceptible to metastasized colorectal cancer may be based upon an individual's specific genetic, medical and/or behavioral background and characteristics.
  • neoplasm refers to any new and abnormal growth of tissue.
  • a neoplasm can be a premalignant neoplasm or a malignant neoplasm.
  • nucleic acid-specific marker refers to any biological material that can be used to indicate the presence of a neoplasm.
  • biological materials include, without limitation, nucleic acids, polypeptides, carbohydrates, fatty acids, cellular components (e.g., cell membranes and mitochondria), and whole cells.
  • markers are particular nucleic acid regions, e.g., genes, intragenic regions, etc. Regions of nucleic acid that are markers may be referred to, e.g., as “marker genes,” “marker regions,” “marker sequences,” etc.
  • colonal neoplasm-specific marker refers to any biological material that can be used to indicate the presence of a colorectal neoplasm (e.g., a premalignant colorectal neoplasm; a malignant colorectal neoplasm).
  • colorectal neoplasm-specific markers include, but are not limited to, exfoliated epithelial markers (e.g., bmp-3, bmp-4, SFRP2, vimentin, septin9, ALX4, EYA4, TFPI2, NDRG4, FOXE1, long DNA, BAT-26, K-ras, APC, melanoma antigen gene, p53, BRAF, and PIK3CA) and fecal occult blood markers (e.g., hemoglobin, alpha-defensin, calprotectin, ⁇ 1-antitrypsin, albumin, MCM2, transferrin, lactoferrin, and lysozyme). See also U.S.
  • exfoliated epithelial markers e.g., bmp-3, bmp-4, SFRP2, vimentin, septin9, ALX4, EYA4, TFPI2, NDRG4, FOXE1, long DNA, BAT-26, K
  • Additional markers include but are not limited those in Table 1, below:
  • adenoma refers to a benign tumor of glandular origin. Although these growths are benign, over time they may progress to become malignant.
  • colonal adenoma refers to a benign colorectal tumor in which the cells form recognizable glandular structures or in which the cells are clearly derived from glandular epithelium.
  • amplifying or “amplification” in the context of nucleic acids refers to the production of multiple copies of a polynucleotide, or a portion of the polynucleotide, typically starting from a small amount of the polynucleotide (e.g., a single polynucleotide molecule), where the amplification products or amplicons are generally detectable.
  • Amplification of polynucleotides encompasses a variety of chemical and enzymatic processes. The generation of multiple DNA copies from one or a few copies of a target or template DNA molecule during a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or a ligase chain reaction (LCR; see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No.
  • PCR polymerase chain reaction
  • the mixture is denatured and the primers then annealed to their complementary sequences within the target molecule.
  • the primers are extended with a polymerase so as to form a new pair of complementary strands.
  • the steps of denaturation, primer annealing, and polymerase extension can be repeated many times (i.e., denaturation, annealing and extension constitute one “cycle”; there can be numerous “cycles”) to obtain a high concentration of an amplified segment of the desired target sequence.
  • the length of the amplified segment of the desired target sequence is determined by the relative positions of the primers with respect to each other, and therefore, this length is a controllable parameter.
  • PCR polymerase chain reaction
  • nucleic acid detection assay refers to any method of determining the nucleotide composition of a nucleic acid of interest.
  • Nucleic acid detection assay include but are not limited to, DNA sequencing methods, probe hybridization methods, structure specific cleavage assays (e.g., the INVADER assay, (Hologic, Inc.) and are described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,846,717, 5,985,557, 5,994,069, 6,001,567, 6,090,543, and 6,872,816; Lyamichev et al., Nat.
  • NASBA e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,409,818, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety
  • molecular beacon technology e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,150,097, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety
  • E-sensor technology e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,248,229, 6,221,583, 6,013,170, and 6,063,573, herein incorporated by reference in their entireties
  • cycling probe technology e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos.
  • the terms “complementary” or “complementarity” used in reference to polynucleotides refers to polynucleotides related by the base-pairing rules. For example, the sequence “5′-A-G-T-3′,” is complementary to the sequence “3′-T-C-A-5′.”
  • Complementarity may be “partial,” in which only some of the nucleic acids' bases are matched according to the base pairing rules. Or, there may be “complete” or “total” complementarity between the nucleic acids. The degree of complementarity between nucleic acid strands has significant effects on the efficiency and strength of hybridization between nucleic acid strands. This is of particular importance in amplification reactions, as well as detection methods that depend upon binding between nucleic acids.
  • the term “primer” refers to an oligonucleotide, whether occurring naturally, as in a purified restriction digest, or produced synthetically, that is capable of acting as a point of initiation of synthesis when placed under conditions in which synthesis of a primer extension product that is complementary to a nucleic acid strand is induced (e.g., in the presence of nucleotides and an inducing agent such as a biocatalyst (e.g., a DNA polymerase or the like).
  • the primer is typically single stranded for maximum efficiency in amplification, but may alternatively be partially or completely double stranded.
  • the portion of the primer that hybridizes to a template nucleic acid is sufficiently long to prime the synthesis of extension products in the presence of the inducing agent.
  • the exact lengths of the primers will depend on many factors, including temperature, source of primer and the use of the method. Primers may comprise labels, tags, capture moieties, etc.
  • nucleic acid molecule refers to any nucleic acid containing molecule, including but not limited to, DNA or RNA.
  • the term encompasses sequences that include any of the known base analogs of DNA and RNA including, but not limited to, 4 acetylcytosine, 8-hydroxy-N6-methyladenosine, aziridinylcytosine, pseudoisocytosine, 5-(carboxyhydroxyl-methyl)uracil, 5-fluorouracil, 5-bromouracil, 5-carboxymethylaminomethyl-2-thiouracil, 5-carboxymethyl-aminomethyluracil, dihydrouracil, inosine, N6-isopentenyladenine, 1-methyladenine, 1-methylpseudo-uracil, 1-methylguanine, 1-methylinosine, 2,2-dimethyl-guanine, 2-methyladenine, 2-methylguanine, 3-methyl-cytosine, 5-methylcytosine, N6
  • nucleobase is synonymous with other terms in use in the art including “nucleotide,” “deoxynucleotide,” “nucleotide residue,” “deoxynucleotide residue,” “nucleotide triphosphate (NTP),” or deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP).
  • oligonucleotide refers to a nucleic acid that includes at least two nucleic acid monomer units (e.g., nucleotides), typically more than three monomer units, and more typically greater than ten monomer units.
  • the exact size of an oligonucleotide generally depends on various factors, including the ultimate function or use of the oligonucleotide. To further illustrate, oligonucleotides are typically less than 200 residues long (e.g., between 15 and 100), however, as used herein, the term is also intended to encompass longer polynucleotide chains. Oligonucleotides are often referred to by their length.
  • oligonucleotide For example a 24 residue oligonucleotide is referred to as a “24-mer”.
  • the nucleoside monomers are linked by phosphodiester bonds or analogs thereof, including phosphorothioate, phosphorodithioate, phosphoroselenoate, phosphorodiselenoate, phosphoroanilothioate, phosphoranilidate, phosphoramidate, and the like, including associated counterions, e.g., H + , NH 4 + , Na + , and the like, if such counterions are present.
  • oligonucleotides are typically single-stranded.
  • Oligonucleotides are optionally prepared by any suitable method, including, but not limited to, isolation of an existing or natural sequence, DNA replication or amplification, reverse transcription, cloning and restriction digestion of appropriate sequences, or direct chemical synthesis by a method such as the phosphotriester method of Narang et al. (1979) Meth Enzymol. 68: 90-99; the phosphodiester method of Brown et al. (1979) Meth Enzymol. 68: 109-151; the diethylphosphoramidite method of Beaucage et al. (1981) Tetrahedron Lett. 22: 1859-1862; the triester method of Matteucci et al. (1981) J Am Chem Soc.
  • a “sequence” of a biopolymer refers to the order and identity of monomer units (e.g., nucleotides, amino acids, etc.) in the biopolymer.
  • the sequence (e.g., base sequence) of a nucleic acid is typically read in the 5′ to 3′ direction.
  • wild-type refers to a gene or gene product that has the characteristics of that gene or gene product when isolated from a naturally occurring source.
  • a wild-type gene is that which is most frequently observed in a population and is thus arbitrarily designed the “normal” or “wild-type” form of the gene.
  • modified refers to a gene or gene product that displays modifications in sequence and or functional properties (i.e., altered characteristics) when compared to the wild-type gene or gene product. It is noted that naturally occurring mutants can be isolated; these are identified by the fact that they have altered characteristics when compared to the wild-type gene or gene product.
  • the term “gene” refers to a nucleic acid (e.g., DNA) sequence that comprises coding sequences necessary for the production of a polypeptide, precursor, or RNA (e.g., rRNA, tRNA).
  • the polypeptide can be encoded by a full length coding sequence or by any portion of the coding sequence so long as the desired activity or functional properties (e.g., enzymatic activity, ligand binding, signal transduction, immunogenicity, etc.) of the full-length or fragment polypeptide are retained.
  • the term also encompasses the coding region of a structural gene and the sequences located adjacent to the coding region on both the 5′ and 3′ ends for a distance of about 1 kb or more on either end such that the gene corresponds to the length of the full-length mRNA. Sequences located 5′ of the coding region and present on the mRNA are referred to as 5′ non-translated sequences. Sequences located 3′ or downstream of the coding region and present on the mRNA are referred to as 3′ non-translated sequences.
  • the term “gene” encompasses both cDNA and genomic forms of a gene.
  • a genomic form or clone of a gene contains the coding region interrupted with non-coding sequences termed “introns” or “intervening regions” or “intervening sequences.”
  • Introns are segments of a gene that are transcribed into nuclear RNA (e.g., hnRNA); introns may contain regulatory elements (e.g., enhancers). Introns are removed or “spliced out” from the nuclear or primary transcript; introns therefore are absent in the messenger RNA (mRNA) transcript.
  • mRNA messenger RNA
  • genomic forms of a gene may also include sequences located on both the 5′ and 3′ end of the sequences that are present on the RNA transcript. These sequences are referred to as “flanking” sequences or regions (these flanking sequences are located 5′ or 3′ to the non-translated sequences present on the mRNA transcript).
  • the 5′ flanking region may contain regulatory sequences such as promoters and enhancers that control or influence the transcription of the gene.
  • the 3′ flanking region may contain sequences that direct the termination of transcription, post-transcriptional cleavage and polyadenylation.
  • multimethylation As used herein, the terms “multimethylation,” “series methylation” and “specific methylation” are used interchangeably to refer to defined combinations of CpG sites or loci in a marker sequence must be methylated to call that sequence methylated in a coordinate or multimethylation assay.
  • a specific methylation assay of the CpG sites for BMP3 might require that the CpG positions at 23, 34, 53, 61, 70, and 74, numbered by reference to FIGS. 1A and 1B , all be methylated in order for a sample to be classified as methylated at the BMP3 marker.
  • Specific methylation of BMP3 is not limited to this set of particular loci, but may include more, fewer, or a different collection of CpG loci.
  • the CpG loci selected for co-analysis in a multimethylation assay are preferably selected. e.g., by analysis of normal (non-adenoma, non-cancer) samples to identify CpG methylation combinations that are less frequently represented in normal samples.
  • combinations of methylation sites are selected to produce good signal-to-noise in cancer and adenoma samples (i.e., the mean multimethylation at a particular combination of loci in cancer samples divided by the mean multimethylation in at those loci in normal samples is high).
  • the terms “individual” and “average” methylation are used interchangeably to refer to analyses in which each CpG locus is analyzed individually, such that all molecules in which that base is methylated are included in a count, regardless of the methylation status of other loci, e.g., in the same marker. Generally, the methylation percentages of all the loci in a marker/region are then averaged, to produce a percent methylation figure for that marker.
  • kits refers to any delivery system for delivering materials.
  • delivery systems include systems that allow for the storage, transport, or delivery of reaction reagents (e.g., oligonucleotides, enzymes, etc. in the appropriate containers) and/or supporting materials (e.g., buffers, written instructions for performing the assay etc.) from one location to another.
  • reaction reagents e.g., oligonucleotides, enzymes, etc. in the appropriate containers
  • supporting materials e.g., buffers, written instructions for performing the assay etc.
  • kits include one or more enclosures (e.g., boxes) containing the relevant reaction reagents and/or supporting materials.
  • fragment kit refers to a delivery systems comprising two or more separate containers that each contain a subportion of the total kit components. The containers may be delivered to the intended recipient together or separately.
  • a first container may contain an enzyme for use in an assay, while a second container contains oligonucleotides.
  • fragment kit is intended to encompass kits containing Analyte specific reagents (ASR's) regulated under section 520(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, but are not limited thereto. Indeed, any delivery system comprising two or more separate containers that each contains a subportion of the total kit components are included in the term “fragmented kit.”
  • a “combined kit” refers to a delivery system containing all of the components of a reaction assay in a single container (e.g., in a single box housing each of the desired components).
  • kit includes both fragmented and combined kits.
  • the term “information” refers to any collection of facts or data. In reference to information stored or processed using a computer system(s), including but not limited to internets, the term refers to any data stored in any format (e.g., analog, digital, optical, etc.).
  • the term “information related to a subject” refers to facts or data pertaining to a subject (e.g., a human, plant, or animal).
  • the term “genomic information” refers to information pertaining to a genome including, but not limited to, nucleic acid sequences, genes, allele frequencies, RNA expression levels, protein expression, phenotypes correlating to genotypes, etc.
  • Allele frequency information refers to facts or data pertaining to allele frequencies, including, but not limited to, allele identities, statistical correlations between the presence of an allele and a characteristic of a subject (e.g., a human subject), the presence or absence of an allele in an individual or population, the percentage likelihood of an allele being present in an individual having one or more particular characteristics, etc.
  • FIGS. 1A and 1B provide sequence and CpG information for exemplary marker regions used in the present analysis.
  • the native sequence of the region is shown in the top line.
  • Unmethylated C-residues that would be converted by bisulfite and amplification to Ts are shown as T residues.
  • Candidate methylation positions are shown boxed. Reference numbering for base and CpG positions is shown above each native sequence. Primer locations for amplification are shown as a row of underlined base positions.
  • FIGS. 2 A-J provide tables showing analyses of normal, adenoma, and cancer samples in which the average methylation was determined at each of the indicated CpG positions, in the indicated marker regions.
  • the numbered CpG positions are as indicated by the reference numbers in FIGS. 1A and 1B .
  • the Mean methylation at each specific locus is shown at the bottom of each column for normal, adenoma, and cancer samples.
  • the ratio of normal/mutant methylation for each locus (a methylation ratio at each locus) is shown at the bottom of each column of the Adenoma and Cancer sample data.
  • the Mean columns on the right of each table indicate the average of methylation across all indicated CpG loci for each of the samples.
  • the Mean and SD values across all normal samples at all loci are as indicated below each table of values from normal samples.
  • FIGS. 3 A-I provide tables showing the analyses of normal, adenoma, and cancer samples in which average methylation across all of the CpG loci indicated in FIGS. 2A-J were calculated for each marker in each sample.
  • the average, standard deviation and the mean plus 2 or 3 standard deviations for each marker are indicated.
  • shaded cells in FIGS. 3B and 3C indicate a positive result, reflected as an average methylation value for that marker that is greater than the mean methylation+3 standard deviations determined for that marker in the normal samples.
  • FIGS. 3D and 3E show the calculated effect of a 20-fold dilution of adenoma and cancer DNA into normal DNA
  • FIGS. 3F and 3G show a calculated 10-fold dilution
  • FIGS. 3H and 3I show a calculated 5-fold dilution.
  • the average methylation for a marker is divided by the 20, 10, or 5, added to the mean methylation of the normal DNA for that marker.
  • Shaded cells in FIGS. 3D-3I indicate an average methylation value for that marker that is greater than the mean methylation+2 standard deviations (specificity of 97.5%) determined for that marker in the normal samples.
  • FIGS. 4A and 4B provide sequence and CpG information for exemplary genes used in the present analysis.
  • the CpG loci in each marker gene included in the defined subsets of CpG loci for coordinate methylation analysis in colorectal adenoma and cancer samples are shown with a black background and in white typeface.
  • FIGS. 5 A-I provide tables showing the analyses of normal, adenoma, and cancer samples in which methylation was determined at each of the indicated CpG positions in the indicated marker regions (i.e., samples were assayed for the percentage of DNA copies that displayed methylation at all of the CpG loci in the defined subset).
  • Each marker was tested at each of the CpG loci in the defined subsets indicated in FIGS. 4A and 4B and the percentage methylation data reflects the percentage of marker copies having methylation at all of the tested CpG loci (coordinate methylation or “multimethylation” analysis).
  • the mean multimethylation, standard deviation and the mean plus 2 or 3 standard deviations for each marker are indicated.
  • shaded cells in FIGS. 5B and 5C indicate a positive result, reflected as multimethylation value for that marker that is greater than the mean multimethylation+3 standard deviations determined for that marker in the normal samples.
  • FIGS. 5D and 5E show the calculated effect of a 20-fold dilution of adenoma and cancer DNA into normal DNA
  • FIGS. 5F and 5G show a calculated 10-fold dilution
  • 5 H and 5 I show a calculated 5-fold dilution.
  • the average multimethylation for a marker is divide by the 20, 10, or 5, added to the mean multimethylation of the normal DNA for that marker.
  • Shaded cells in FIGS. 5D-5I indicate an average multimethylation value for that marker that is greater than the mean multimethylation+2 standard deviations (specificity of 97.5%) determined for that marker in the normal samples.
  • FIG. 6 shows a table and graph comparing the percent positive values calculated for each marker in adenoma and cancer samples, as indicated, using either individual/average methylation or multimethylation analysis methods to test each of the indicated markers, at each of the indicated calculated dilutions.
  • FIG. 7 shows a table and graph comparing the percent positive values determined in adenoma and cancer samples, determined using the four markers with the lowest mean background in these samples (vimentin, BMP3, Septin9, TFPI2), using either the individual/average methylation or the multimethylation analysis method, at each of the indicated calculated dilutions into normal DNA.
  • the present invention relates to methods and compositions for determination of, and uses of, specific methylation patterns indicative of adenoma and carcinoma.
  • the invention relates to analysis of defined subsets of CpG loci that are coordinately methylated in DNAs from cancer and adenoma samples, methods for identifying coordinately methylated loci, and methods of using analysis of coordinately methylated loci in one or more markers or regions in the design of assays for adenoma and cancer having improved sensitivity and specificity.
  • the present invention relates to the observation that, within marker nucleic acids for which methylation status is indicative of cellular status, e.g., cancerous, pre-cancerous, normal, etc., a subset of the individual methylation loci, e.g., CpG loci, in non-normal cells generally displays a greater degree of methylation relative to the background levels of methylation observed at corresponding loci in normal cells, while other methylation loci in the non-normal cells may exhibit levels of methylation that are closer to background levels.
  • the degree of methylation observed for a particular locus in plurality of cancerous or pre-cancerous cells relative to normal cells is expressed as a methylation ratio.
  • Some embodiments of the present invention relate to screening known or suspected marker genes to identify specific methylation loci that exhibit greater ratios of disease-associated methylation relative to background methylation, as compared to other marker genes or other loci in the same marker gene.
  • the present invention relates to coordinate methylation analysis, to measure the degree to which a marker molecule or a sample exhibits methylation at all of a plurality of selected loci.
  • the present invention relates to analyzing methylation statuses of a defined set of individual CpG loci in methylation markers (or target regions within such markers) in a significant enough number of individual DNA molecules in adenoma samples or cancer samples to identify defined subsets of CpG loci that have advantageous methylation ratios compared to other loci in the same adenoma or cancer samples.
  • a defined subset of CpG loci that have advantageous methylation ratios in a sample may comprise the entirety of a set of CpG loci in a particular marker or target region of a marker, or it may be fewer than all of the CpG loci in the characterized region of the marker.
  • amplification of a marker nucleic acid from a sample generally produces a mixture of amplicons coming from many copies of a target molecule. If the amplification conditions are not selective for a gene variant, the amplicon product contains a mixture of the variant and the normal or wildtype DNA. Even if primers are specific for a mutation or for a particular methylation site, when DNA is amplified from many copies of target DNA derived from many cells, there can be heterogeneity in other base positions in the resulting amplicon.
  • An aspect of the present invention is based on the observation that collecting methylation ratio information from a very large number of individual molecules in both normal and non-normal samples reveals that some methylation loci in marker regions or sequences exhibit a greater degree of methylation in non-normal cells compared to background (methylation at the same loci in normal cells) than do other individual loci in the same marker region or gene.
  • These loci in non-normal sequences that have a greater level of methylation compared to background can be viewed as being particularly advantageous in that they are easier to identify over the background level of methylation observed in normal cells.
  • One aspect of this advantage is that analysis of these particular loci permits identification of cancer-associated methylation with more sensitivity, and in a greater background of normal cells.
  • the present invention also relates to the observation that coordinated analysis of multiple loci provides a significantly enhanced level of sensitivity in the identification of cancerous or precancerous cells, especially in samples that may also comprise a significant number of normal cells.
  • FIG. 6 compares the sensitivity of detecting adenoma and cancer cells.
  • the methylation was either determined as an average across the marker region (e.g., the mean methylation in the vimentin marker across all of loci 26, 37, 40, 45, 52, 54, 59, 63, and 74; see FIGS.
  • FIG. 3A-I indicated as “Individual” average methylation, or as a percentage of molecules displaying methylation at all of a subset of selected loci (e.g., methylation in the vimentin marker at all three of loci 37, 40 and 45; see FIGS. 5A-I ), i.e., coordinate methylation analysis of multiple individual loci, indicated as “multi”.
  • the sensitivities for the same samples are also shown in calculated 5, 10 or 20-fold dilutions into normal DNA.
  • the present invention provides a method for designing a methylation assay to identify a disease state, comprising I) selecting at least one sequence for analysis; II) determining the methylation status of a plurality of loci in the sequence in a population of normal cells and a population of non-normal cells to determine an average rate of methylation for each of the plurality of loci each both normal and non-normal cells; and III) identifying at least two loci in said plurality of loci having advantageous methylation ratios.
  • the present invention provides use of a nucleic acid detection assay to coordinately analyze a plurality of the advantageous loci in a sample, thereby determining the disease state of cells in sample.
  • methods of clonally amplifying individual copies of nucleic acids can be used in the rapid analysis of large numbers of individual markers from normal and non-normal samples.
  • Single-molecule amplification methods may comprise use of microchambers, emulsion reactions, “bridge PCR” on solid supports, or any of a number of established methods of segregating the amplification products arising from individual target molecules. Following single molecule amplification, amplicons can be sequenced.
  • Platforms for individual molecule sequencing include the 454 FLXTM or 454 TITANIUMTM (Roche), the SOLEXATM/Illumina Genome Analyzer (Illumina), the HELISCOPETM Single Molecule Sequencer (Helicos Biosciences), the Ion Personal Genome Machine (Ion Torrent), and the SOLIDTM DNA Sequencer (Life Technologies/Applied Biosystems) instruments, as well as other platforms still under development by companies such as Intelligent Biosystems and Pacific Biosystems.
  • sequence information is generated varies for the different next-generation sequencing platforms, all of them share the common feature of generating sequence data from a very large number of individual sequencing templates, in sequencing reactions that are run simultaneously. Data from the reactions are collected using, e.g., a flow cell, a chemical or optical sensor, and/or scanner, and sequences are assembled and analyzed using bioinformatics software.
  • the present invention provides methods of analysis of methylation markers using digital sequencing to identify neoplasm-associated methylation loci that have methylation ratios that are statistically significantly advantageous compared to other loci in the same markers.
  • digital sequencing is done in a highly or massively parallel fashion, providing higher precision in identifying CpG methylation sites having advantageous methylation ratios.
  • each molecule is analyzed for methylation at each CpG locus, so the percentage of DNA copies having methylation at any combination of the CpG loci can be analyzed after the experimental run.
  • each particular marker sequence e.g., each target nucleic acid molecule, or clonal amplicon may be interrogated many, many times, e.g., at least 100 times, sometimes over 1000 times, and in some instances over 100,000 times, or as many as 500,000 times.
  • patterns of coordinate methylation indicative of cancer or adenoma that would be undetectable in analysis of a handful of individual target molecules may be revealed.
  • determining the methylation status of a set of CpG loci in a large number of copies marker DNA from both normal samples and non-normal samples reveals that certain CpG loci in marker genes or regions may tend to be coordinately methylated.
  • design of nucleic acid detection assays to interrogate a plurality of CpG loci for which coordinate methylation is indicative of adenoma or cancer in a sample can provide an assay that has improved signal-to-noise compared to assays that survey average percent methylation across entire marker genes.
  • selecting a subset of CpG loci comprises selecting loci that have been determined to be coordinately methylated by use, e.g., of digital analysis methods. Another aspect comprises selecting CpG loci determined to have advantageous methylation ratios when normal DNA is compared to adenoma or cancer DNA. Assay designs may, but need not, make use of a CpG locus having the most advantageous methylation ratio compared to other loci in the same marker. In some embodiments, selection of a plurality of CpG loci as a subset comprises selecting the plurality of loci having the most advantageous methylation ratios.
  • selection of a plurality of CpG loci as a subset comprises selecting the locus having the most advantageous methylation ratio, then selecting at least additional CpG loci that are conveniently situated with respect to the first selected locus for the configuration of a particular nucleic acid detection assay (e.g., the selection of CpG loci having particular proximity to each other for configuring an invasive cleavage assay, ligation assay, amplification assay, etc.) in order to interrogate all of the selected CpG loci on copies of the target DNA in a single assay.
  • a candidate subset of CpG loci is further analyzed to determine the percentage of copies of marker DNA from non-normal samples that are coordinately methylated at those candidate loci, and that have little or no coordinated methylation in normal samples.
  • methylation analysis typically analyze in a non-digital fashion, e.g., analyzing a mixture of co-amplified molecules derived from a mixture of DNA target nucleic acids, so that analysis of the amplified products provides sequence information that reflects that aggregate or average methylation status in the amplicon population, but does not provide information on the percentage of starting molecules having coordinated methylation at all of a plurality of CpG loci.
  • the reduction in number of DNA copies in normal DNA displaying methylation at all of the selected sites drops to a greater degree than it does in the DNA from cancer and/or adenoma sample, resulting in an significantly enhanced ratio of specific signal to background noise.
  • the background from normal DNA is dramatically reduced by using multimethylation (coordinate methylation) analysis, while no equivalent reduction in signal from cancer and adenoma DNA is seen.
  • the background in normal samples is less reduced and/or the signal from cancer DNA also decreases with multimethylation analysis, such that there is less or no net improvement in the signal-to-noise and the advantages of using a multimethylation analysis approached are less.
  • Genes having favorable signal to noise in multimethylation analyses are readily determined empirically.
  • DNA extracted from frozen tissue samples was treated with an EPITECT bisulfite conversion kit (Qiagen) to convert non-methylated cytosines to uracil. Methylated cytosines remain unconverted. Primers for each gene region were designed for each sequence such that the composition of the amplification products remained the same as the original target sequences and methylated and non methylated sequences were amplified with equal efficiencies. Amplification of the dU-containing converted DNA produced amplicons having T-residues in place of the dU residues. The amplicons were then prepared for sequencing on the Illumina instrument. For each tissue sample, the amplification reaction for each target was prepared from the same sample of bisulfite-treated DNA.
  • Qiagen EPITECT bisulfite conversion kit
  • the Illumina procedure comprises a) preparation of a library from sample DNA by attachment of known sequence tags that permit indexing, flow cell attachment, amplification, and sequencing; b) attachment of the library to a flow cell surface; c) bridge amplification to produce clusters of DNA fragments derived from single molecules, and d) sequencing in using iterative primer extension reactions using labeled reversible terminators to determine the nucleotide sequence of each cluster of amplicons.
  • a flow cell is composed of 8 lanes, one of which is dedicated to a phiX quality control.
  • Tissue-extracted DNA from patients was bisulfite-treated and a 2-step amplification using approximately 10,000 genome copies of initial material was carried out.
  • the first round used tailed (T1) (Illumina) primers specific for marker sequences. These tails were Illumina-derived sequences needed for round two.
  • T2 (Illumina) PCR uses primers specific for the Illmuna tails added in T1, and incorporates the index, sequencing primer, and flow cell attachment sequences.
  • T1 tailed primers specific for marker sequences.
  • T2 Illumina
  • non-CpG cytosines Forward and reverse primers specific for regions with converted, non-CpG cytosines are designed (using, e.g., MethPrimer software) to amplify each of the specific biomarker sites in a non-methylation specific manner.
  • C/T degenerate mixtures
  • G/A degenerate mixtures
  • additional primers may be designed. If CpGs in the target sequence cannot be avoided, the primers may incorporate degenerate bases at CpG sites (BiSearch software).
  • Primers for second round PCR comprise sequences for Illumina flow cell attachment (bridge amplification sites), sequencing primer sites (for the sample read), index sites, and sequencing primers sites (for the indexing read).
  • Each of the primer sets (x) has 12 different index tags, for a total of 12x sets.
  • the control DNAs are amplified, purified (e.g, using AMPURE treatment (Agencourt)), and run on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer to assess the size and quantity of the amplified nucleic acids.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
  • Oncology (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
US13/364,978 2011-02-02 2012-02-02 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation Active 2033-01-24 US9637792B2 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/364,978 US9637792B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2012-02-02 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
US15/278,697 US10519510B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2016-09-28 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
US16/665,738 US10870893B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2019-10-28 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
US17/101,904 US11952633B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2020-11-23 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
US18/628,011 US20240368702A1 (en) 2011-02-02 2024-04-05 Digital sequence analysis of dna methylation

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161438649P 2011-02-02 2011-02-02
US13/364,978 US9637792B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2012-02-02 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/278,697 Division US10519510B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2016-09-28 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120196756A1 US20120196756A1 (en) 2012-08-02
US9637792B2 true US9637792B2 (en) 2017-05-02

Family

ID=46577813

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/364,978 Active 2033-01-24 US9637792B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2012-02-02 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
US15/278,697 Active 2032-11-12 US10519510B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2016-09-28 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
US16/665,738 Active US10870893B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2019-10-28 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
US17/101,904 Active 2034-01-10 US11952633B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2020-11-23 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
US18/628,011 Pending US20240368702A1 (en) 2011-02-02 2024-04-05 Digital sequence analysis of dna methylation

Family Applications After (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/278,697 Active 2032-11-12 US10519510B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2016-09-28 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
US16/665,738 Active US10870893B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2019-10-28 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
US17/101,904 Active 2034-01-10 US11952633B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2020-11-23 Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
US18/628,011 Pending US20240368702A1 (en) 2011-02-02 2024-04-05 Digital sequence analysis of dna methylation

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (5) US9637792B2 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
EP (3) EP2670893B1 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
JP (1) JP2014519310A (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
CN (2) CN110129436A (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
AU (1) AU2012212127B2 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
CA (1) CA2826696C (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
ES (2) ES2829198T3 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)
WO (1) WO2012106525A2 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11674168B2 (en) 2015-10-30 2023-06-13 Exact Sciences Corporation Isolation and detection of DNA from plasma
US12049671B2 (en) 2017-01-27 2024-07-30 Exact Sciences Corporation Detection of colon neoplasia by analysis of methylated DNA
US12173362B2 (en) 2017-12-13 2024-12-24 Exact Sciences Corporation Multiplex amplification detection assay II
US12188093B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2025-01-07 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research Detecting cholangiocarcinoma
US12319969B2 (en) 2015-03-27 2025-06-03 Exact Sciences Corporation Detecting esophageal disorders
US12391978B2 (en) 2010-11-15 2025-08-19 Exact Sciences Corporation Real time cleavage assay

Families Citing this family (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8673555B2 (en) 2008-02-15 2014-03-18 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research Detecting neoplasm
US9637792B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2017-05-02 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
KR20150067151A (ko) * 2012-08-31 2015-06-17 내셔널 디펜스 메디컬 센터 암을 스크리닝하는 방법
WO2014046197A1 (ja) * 2012-09-19 2014-03-27 シスメックス株式会社 大腸癌に関する情報の取得方法、ならびに大腸癌に関する情報を取得するためのマーカーおよびキット
JP6325667B2 (ja) * 2013-10-21 2018-05-16 キム・ソンチョン オリゴヌクレオチドを用いた生体分子分析方法及び装置
US10253358B2 (en) 2013-11-04 2019-04-09 Exact Sciences Development Company, Llc Multiple-control calibrators for DNA quantitation
WO2015095689A1 (en) 2013-12-19 2015-06-25 Exact Sciences Corporation Synthetic nucleic acid control molecules
EP3126529B1 (en) 2014-03-31 2020-05-27 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research Detecting colorectal neoplasm
CN105603061A (zh) * 2015-12-11 2016-05-25 宁云山 一种基于数字PCR技术检测人Septin 9基因甲基化的方法及所用探针与引物及其试剂盒
DE102015226843B3 (de) * 2015-12-30 2017-04-27 Technische Universität Dresden Verfahren und Mittel zur Diagnostik von Tumoren
WO2017201400A1 (en) * 2016-05-19 2017-11-23 The Regents Of The University Of California Determination of cell types in mixtures using targeted bisulfite sequencing
US11965157B2 (en) 2017-04-19 2024-04-23 Singlera Genomics, Inc. Compositions and methods for library construction and sequence analysis
KR20250117473A (ko) 2017-11-30 2025-08-04 메이오 파운데이션 포 메디칼 에쥬케이션 앤드 리써치 유방암 검출방법
CN111989407B (zh) 2018-03-13 2024-10-29 格里尔公司 异常的片段检测及分类
CN108676878B (zh) * 2018-05-23 2019-12-17 杭州诺辉健康科技有限公司 检测ndrg4基因甲基化位点的产品在制备结直肠癌早期检测的产品的用途
EP3899953A1 (en) 2018-12-21 2021-10-27 Grail, Inc. Source of origin deconvolution based on methylation fragments in cell-free-dna samples
CN112195243A (zh) * 2020-09-22 2021-01-08 北京华大吉比爱生物技术有限公司 一种检测多基因甲基化的试剂盒及其应用
CN114561464A (zh) * 2021-12-20 2022-05-31 上海锐翌生物科技有限公司 用于进展期腺瘤诊断、检测或筛查的引物探针组及试剂盒
CN114317775B (zh) * 2022-01-12 2023-06-30 中国人民解放军军事科学院军事医学研究院 一种NCOA4的RNA m6A修饰作为γ射线辐射标志物的应用

Citations (59)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4458066A (en) 1980-02-29 1984-07-03 University Patents, Inc. Process for preparing polynucleotides
US4683195A (en) 1986-01-30 1987-07-28 Cetus Corporation Process for amplifying, detecting, and/or-cloning nucleic acid sequences
US4683202A (en) 1985-03-28 1987-07-28 Cetus Corporation Process for amplifying nucleic acid sequences
US4965188A (en) 1986-08-22 1990-10-23 Cetus Corporation Process for amplifying, detecting, and/or cloning nucleic acid sequences using a thermostable enzyme
US5011769A (en) 1985-12-05 1991-04-30 Meiogenics U.S. Limited Partnership Methods for detecting nucleic acid sequences
US5124246A (en) 1987-10-15 1992-06-23 Chiron Corporation Nucleic acid multimers and amplified nucleic acid hybridization assays using same
US5288609A (en) 1984-04-27 1994-02-22 Enzo Diagnostics, Inc. Capture sandwich hybridization method and composition
US5338671A (en) 1992-10-07 1994-08-16 Eastman Kodak Company DNA amplification with thermostable DNA polymerase and polymerase inhibiting antibody
US5352775A (en) 1991-01-16 1994-10-04 The Johns Hopkins Univ. APC gene and nucleic acid probes derived therefrom
US5403711A (en) 1987-11-30 1995-04-04 University Of Iowa Research Foundation Nucleic acid hybridization and amplification method for detection of specific sequences in which a complementary labeled nucleic acid probe is cleaved
US5409818A (en) 1988-02-24 1995-04-25 Cangene Corporation Nucleic acid amplification process
US5494810A (en) 1990-05-03 1996-02-27 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Thermostable ligase-mediated DNA amplifications system for the detection of genetic disease
US5508169A (en) 1990-04-06 1996-04-16 Queen's University At Kingston Indexing linkers
US5527676A (en) 1989-03-29 1996-06-18 The Johns Hopkins University Detection of loss of the wild-type P53 gene and kits therefor
US5624802A (en) 1987-10-15 1997-04-29 Chiron Corporation Nucleic acid multimers and amplified nucleic acid hybridization assays using same
US5639611A (en) 1988-12-12 1997-06-17 City Of Hope Allele specific polymerase chain reaction
US5660988A (en) 1993-11-17 1997-08-26 Id Biomedical Corporation Cycling probe cleavage detection of nucleic acid sequences
US5710264A (en) 1990-07-27 1998-01-20 Chiron Corporation Large comb type branched polynucleotides
US5741650A (en) 1996-01-30 1998-04-21 Exact Laboratories, Inc. Methods for detecting colon cancer from stool samples
US5773258A (en) 1995-08-25 1998-06-30 Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Nucleic acid amplification using a reversibly inactivated thermostable enzyme
US5792614A (en) 1994-12-23 1998-08-11 Dade Behring Marburg Gmbh Detection of nucleic acids by target-catalyzed product formation
US5846717A (en) 1996-01-24 1998-12-08 Third Wave Technologies, Inc. Detection of nucleic acid sequences by invader-directed cleavage
US5882867A (en) 1995-06-07 1999-03-16 Dade Behring Marburg Gmbh Detection of nucleic acids by formation of template-dependent product
US5914230A (en) 1995-12-22 1999-06-22 Dade Behring Inc. Homogeneous amplification and detection of nucleic acids
US5952178A (en) 1996-08-14 1999-09-14 Exact Laboratories Methods for disease diagnosis from stool samples
US5955263A (en) 1991-06-14 1999-09-21 Johns Hopkins University Sequence specific DNA binding by p53
US5965408A (en) 1996-07-09 1999-10-12 Diversa Corporation Method of DNA reassembly by interrupting synthesis
US5985557A (en) 1996-01-24 1999-11-16 Third Wave Technologies, Inc. Invasive cleavage of nucleic acids
US5994069A (en) 1996-01-24 1999-11-30 Third Wave Technologies, Inc. Detection of nucleic acids by multiple sequential invasive cleavages
US6013170A (en) 1997-06-12 2000-01-11 Clinical Micro Sensors, Inc. Detection of analytes using reorganization energy
US6063573A (en) 1998-01-27 2000-05-16 Clinical Micro Sensors, Inc. Cycling probe technology using electron transfer detection
US6143496A (en) 1997-04-17 2000-11-07 Cytonix Corporation Method of sampling, amplifying and quantifying segment of nucleic acid, polymerase chain reaction assembly having nanoliter-sized sample chambers, and method of filling assembly
US6150097A (en) 1996-04-12 2000-11-21 The Public Health Research Institute Of The City Of New York, Inc. Nucleic acid detection probes having non-FRET fluorescence quenching and kits and assays including such probes
US6183960B1 (en) 1995-11-21 2001-02-06 Yale University Rolling circle replication reporter systems
US6221583B1 (en) 1996-11-05 2001-04-24 Clinical Micro Sensors, Inc. Methods of detecting nucleic acids using electrodes
US6235502B1 (en) 1998-09-18 2001-05-22 Molecular Staging Inc. Methods for selectively isolating DNA using rolling circle amplification
US6268136B1 (en) 1997-06-16 2001-07-31 Exact Science Corporation Methods for stool sample preparation
US6440706B1 (en) 1999-08-02 2002-08-27 Johns Hopkins University Digital amplification
WO2003044232A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2003-05-30 The Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine Method of detection of prostate cancer
WO2003064701A2 (en) 2002-01-30 2003-08-07 Epigenomics Ag Method for the analysis of cytosine methylation patterns
US6677312B1 (en) 1989-03-29 2004-01-13 The Johns Hopkins University Methods for restoring wild-type p53 gene function
US20040132048A1 (en) 2002-06-26 2004-07-08 Robert Martienssen Methods and compositions for determining methylation profiles
US6800617B1 (en) 1989-03-29 2004-10-05 The Johns Hopkins University Methods for restoring wild-type p53 gene function
US20050003463A1 (en) 2002-02-27 2005-01-06 Peter Adorjan Method and nucleic acids for the analysis of colorectal cell proliferative disorders
WO2005023091A2 (en) 2003-09-05 2005-03-17 The Trustees Of Boston University Method for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
US6872816B1 (en) 1996-01-24 2005-03-29 Third Wave Technologies, Inc. Nucleic acid detection kits
US7005266B2 (en) 2000-02-04 2006-02-28 Qiagen Gmbh Nucleic acid isolation from stool samples and other inhibitor-rich biological materials
US20070059753A1 (en) * 2005-09-15 2007-03-15 Tatiana Vener Detecting gene methylation
US20070202525A1 (en) 2006-02-02 2007-08-30 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Non-invasive fetal genetic screening by digital analysis
US7432050B2 (en) 2001-10-05 2008-10-07 Case Western Reserve University Methods and compositions for detecting colon cancers
US20080254474A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2008-10-16 University Of Southern California Dna methylation analysis by digital bisulfite genomic sequencing and digital methylight
US7485420B2 (en) 2003-08-14 2009-02-03 Case Western Reserve University Methods and compositions for detecting colon cancers
US20090253142A1 (en) 2008-03-15 2009-10-08 Hologic, Inc. Compositions and methods for analysis of nucleic acid molecules during amplification reactions
US7611869B2 (en) 2000-02-07 2009-11-03 Illumina, Inc. Multiplexed methylation detection methods
US7662594B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2010-02-16 New England Biolabs, Inc. Helicase-dependent amplification of RNA
US20100092981A1 (en) 2006-04-03 2010-04-15 Genzyme Corporation Methods of detecting hypermethylation
US20100144867A1 (en) 2006-12-19 2010-06-10 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Use of lecithin:retinol acyl transferase gene promoter methylation in evaluating the cancer state of subject
WO2010118016A2 (en) 2009-04-06 2010-10-14 The Johns Hopkins University Digital quantification of dna methylation
US20100273164A1 (en) 2009-03-24 2010-10-28 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Targeted and Whole-Genome Technologies to Profile DNA Cytosine Methylation

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US563961A (en) 1896-07-14 Alfred john keys
US5851770A (en) 1994-04-25 1998-12-22 Variagenics, Inc. Detection of mismatches by resolvase cleavage using a magnetic bead support
ATE248224T1 (de) 1994-04-25 2003-09-15 Avitech Diagnostics Inc Die bestimmung von mutationen durch spaltung mit resolvase
US6017704A (en) 1996-06-03 2000-01-25 The Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine Method of detection of methylated nucleic acid using agents which modify unmethylated cytosine and distinguishing modified methylated and non-methylated nucleic acids
US5786146A (en) 1996-06-03 1998-07-28 The Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine Method of detection of methylated nucleic acid using agents which modify unmethylated cytosine and distinguishing modified methylated and non-methylated nucleic acids
EP1053352B1 (en) 1998-02-04 2002-09-18 Variagenics, Inc. Mismatch detection techniques
GB0700374D0 (en) * 2007-01-09 2007-02-14 Oncomethylome Sciences S A NDRG family methylation markers
US8609327B2 (en) * 2008-07-10 2013-12-17 International Business Machines Corporation Forming sub-lithographic patterns using double exposure
US20100124747A1 (en) 2008-11-03 2010-05-20 University Of Southern California Compositions and methods for diagnosis or prognosis of testicular cancer
US8916344B2 (en) * 2010-11-15 2014-12-23 Exact Sciences Corporation Methylation assay
US9637792B2 (en) 2011-02-02 2017-05-02 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation

Patent Citations (78)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4458066A (en) 1980-02-29 1984-07-03 University Patents, Inc. Process for preparing polynucleotides
US5288609A (en) 1984-04-27 1994-02-22 Enzo Diagnostics, Inc. Capture sandwich hybridization method and composition
US4683202B1 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow) 1985-03-28 1990-11-27 Cetus Corp
US4683202A (en) 1985-03-28 1987-07-28 Cetus Corporation Process for amplifying nucleic acid sequences
US5011769A (en) 1985-12-05 1991-04-30 Meiogenics U.S. Limited Partnership Methods for detecting nucleic acid sequences
US4683195B1 (enrdf_load_stackoverflow) 1986-01-30 1990-11-27 Cetus Corp
US4683195A (en) 1986-01-30 1987-07-28 Cetus Corporation Process for amplifying, detecting, and/or-cloning nucleic acid sequences
US4965188A (en) 1986-08-22 1990-10-23 Cetus Corporation Process for amplifying, detecting, and/or cloning nucleic acid sequences using a thermostable enzyme
US5624802A (en) 1987-10-15 1997-04-29 Chiron Corporation Nucleic acid multimers and amplified nucleic acid hybridization assays using same
US5124246A (en) 1987-10-15 1992-06-23 Chiron Corporation Nucleic acid multimers and amplified nucleic acid hybridization assays using same
US5403711A (en) 1987-11-30 1995-04-04 University Of Iowa Research Foundation Nucleic acid hybridization and amplification method for detection of specific sequences in which a complementary labeled nucleic acid probe is cleaved
US5409818A (en) 1988-02-24 1995-04-25 Cangene Corporation Nucleic acid amplification process
US5639611A (en) 1988-12-12 1997-06-17 City Of Hope Allele specific polymerase chain reaction
US7267955B2 (en) 1989-03-29 2007-09-11 The Johns Hopkins University Method for detecting loss of wild-type p53
US5527676A (en) 1989-03-29 1996-06-18 The Johns Hopkins University Detection of loss of the wild-type P53 gene and kits therefor
US6090566A (en) 1989-03-29 2000-07-18 Johns Hopkins University Diagnostic method detecting loss of wild-type p53
US6800617B1 (en) 1989-03-29 2004-10-05 The Johns Hopkins University Methods for restoring wild-type p53 gene function
US6677312B1 (en) 1989-03-29 2004-01-13 The Johns Hopkins University Methods for restoring wild-type p53 gene function
US5508169A (en) 1990-04-06 1996-04-16 Queen's University At Kingston Indexing linkers
US5494810A (en) 1990-05-03 1996-02-27 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Thermostable ligase-mediated DNA amplifications system for the detection of genetic disease
US5849481A (en) 1990-07-27 1998-12-15 Chiron Corporation Nucleic acid hybridization assays employing large comb-type branched polynucleotides
US5710264A (en) 1990-07-27 1998-01-20 Chiron Corporation Large comb type branched polynucleotides
US5352775A (en) 1991-01-16 1994-10-04 The Johns Hopkins Univ. APC gene and nucleic acid probes derived therefrom
US5648212A (en) 1991-01-16 1997-07-15 The John Hopkins University Detection of inherited and somatic mutations of APC gene in colorectal cancer of humans
USRE36713E (en) 1991-01-16 2000-05-23 The Johns Hopkins University APC gene and nucleic acid probes derived therefrom
US7087583B2 (en) 1991-06-14 2006-08-08 Johns Hopkins University Sequence specific DNA binding by p53
US6245515B1 (en) 1991-06-14 2001-06-12 The Johns Hopkins University Sequence specific DNA binding p53
US5955263A (en) 1991-06-14 1999-09-21 Johns Hopkins University Sequence specific DNA binding by p53
US5338671A (en) 1992-10-07 1994-08-16 Eastman Kodak Company DNA amplification with thermostable DNA polymerase and polymerase inhibiting antibody
US5660988A (en) 1993-11-17 1997-08-26 Id Biomedical Corporation Cycling probe cleavage detection of nucleic acid sequences
US6110677A (en) 1994-12-23 2000-08-29 Dade Behring Marburg Gmbh Oligonucleotide modification, signal amplification, and nucleic acid detection by target-catalyzed product formation
US5792614A (en) 1994-12-23 1998-08-11 Dade Behring Marburg Gmbh Detection of nucleic acids by target-catalyzed product formation
US6121001A (en) 1994-12-23 2000-09-19 Dade Behring Marburg Gmbh Detection of nucleic acids by target-catalyzed product formation
US5882867A (en) 1995-06-07 1999-03-16 Dade Behring Marburg Gmbh Detection of nucleic acids by formation of template-dependent product
US5773258A (en) 1995-08-25 1998-06-30 Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Nucleic acid amplification using a reversibly inactivated thermostable enzyme
US6210884B1 (en) 1995-11-21 2001-04-03 Yale University Rolling circle replication reporter systems
US6183960B1 (en) 1995-11-21 2001-02-06 Yale University Rolling circle replication reporter systems
US5914230A (en) 1995-12-22 1999-06-22 Dade Behring Inc. Homogeneous amplification and detection of nucleic acids
US6001567A (en) 1996-01-24 1999-12-14 Third Wave Technologies, Inc. Detection of nucleic acid sequences by invader-directed cleavage
US5994069A (en) 1996-01-24 1999-11-30 Third Wave Technologies, Inc. Detection of nucleic acids by multiple sequential invasive cleavages
US5846717A (en) 1996-01-24 1998-12-08 Third Wave Technologies, Inc. Detection of nucleic acid sequences by invader-directed cleavage
US5985557A (en) 1996-01-24 1999-11-16 Third Wave Technologies, Inc. Invasive cleavage of nucleic acids
US6872816B1 (en) 1996-01-24 2005-03-29 Third Wave Technologies, Inc. Nucleic acid detection kits
US6090543A (en) 1996-01-24 2000-07-18 Third Wave Technologies, Inc. Cleavage of nucleic acids
US5741650A (en) 1996-01-30 1998-04-21 Exact Laboratories, Inc. Methods for detecting colon cancer from stool samples
US6150097A (en) 1996-04-12 2000-11-21 The Public Health Research Institute Of The City Of New York, Inc. Nucleic acid detection probes having non-FRET fluorescence quenching and kits and assays including such probes
US5965408A (en) 1996-07-09 1999-10-12 Diversa Corporation Method of DNA reassembly by interrupting synthesis
US5952178A (en) 1996-08-14 1999-09-14 Exact Laboratories Methods for disease diagnosis from stool samples
US6303304B1 (en) 1996-08-14 2001-10-16 Exact Laboratories, Inc. Methods for disease diagnosis from stool samples
US6221583B1 (en) 1996-11-05 2001-04-24 Clinical Micro Sensors, Inc. Methods of detecting nucleic acids using electrodes
US6143496A (en) 1997-04-17 2000-11-07 Cytonix Corporation Method of sampling, amplifying and quantifying segment of nucleic acid, polymerase chain reaction assembly having nanoliter-sized sample chambers, and method of filling assembly
US7459315B2 (en) 1997-04-17 2008-12-02 Cytonix Corporation Miniaturized assembly and method of filling assembly
US6391559B1 (en) 1997-04-17 2002-05-21 Cytonix Corporation Method of sampling, amplifying and quantifying segment of nucleic acid, polymerase chain reaction assembly having nanoliter-sized sample chambers, and method of filling assembly
US6013170A (en) 1997-06-12 2000-01-11 Clinical Micro Sensors, Inc. Detection of analytes using reorganization energy
US6248229B1 (en) 1997-06-12 2001-06-19 Clinical Micro Sensors, Inc. Detection of analytes using reorganization energy
US6268136B1 (en) 1997-06-16 2001-07-31 Exact Science Corporation Methods for stool sample preparation
US6063573A (en) 1998-01-27 2000-05-16 Clinical Micro Sensors, Inc. Cycling probe technology using electron transfer detection
US6235502B1 (en) 1998-09-18 2001-05-22 Molecular Staging Inc. Methods for selectively isolating DNA using rolling circle amplification
US6440706B1 (en) 1999-08-02 2002-08-27 Johns Hopkins University Digital amplification
US6753147B2 (en) 1999-08-02 2004-06-22 The Johns Hopkins University Digital amplification
US7005266B2 (en) 2000-02-04 2006-02-28 Qiagen Gmbh Nucleic acid isolation from stool samples and other inhibitor-rich biological materials
US7611869B2 (en) 2000-02-07 2009-11-03 Illumina, Inc. Multiplexed methylation detection methods
US7432050B2 (en) 2001-10-05 2008-10-07 Case Western Reserve University Methods and compositions for detecting colon cancers
WO2003044232A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2003-05-30 The Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine Method of detection of prostate cancer
WO2003064701A2 (en) 2002-01-30 2003-08-07 Epigenomics Ag Method for the analysis of cytosine methylation patterns
US20050003463A1 (en) 2002-02-27 2005-01-06 Peter Adorjan Method and nucleic acids for the analysis of colorectal cell proliferative disorders
US20040132048A1 (en) 2002-06-26 2004-07-08 Robert Martienssen Methods and compositions for determining methylation profiles
US7662594B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2010-02-16 New England Biolabs, Inc. Helicase-dependent amplification of RNA
US7485420B2 (en) 2003-08-14 2009-02-03 Case Western Reserve University Methods and compositions for detecting colon cancers
WO2005023091A2 (en) 2003-09-05 2005-03-17 The Trustees Of Boston University Method for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
US20070059753A1 (en) * 2005-09-15 2007-03-15 Tatiana Vener Detecting gene methylation
US20070202525A1 (en) 2006-02-02 2007-08-30 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Non-invasive fetal genetic screening by digital analysis
US20100092981A1 (en) 2006-04-03 2010-04-15 Genzyme Corporation Methods of detecting hypermethylation
US20100144867A1 (en) 2006-12-19 2010-06-10 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Use of lecithin:retinol acyl transferase gene promoter methylation in evaluating the cancer state of subject
US20080254474A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2008-10-16 University Of Southern California Dna methylation analysis by digital bisulfite genomic sequencing and digital methylight
US20090253142A1 (en) 2008-03-15 2009-10-08 Hologic, Inc. Compositions and methods for analysis of nucleic acid molecules during amplification reactions
US20100273164A1 (en) 2009-03-24 2010-10-28 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Targeted and Whole-Genome Technologies to Profile DNA Cytosine Methylation
WO2010118016A2 (en) 2009-04-06 2010-10-14 The Johns Hopkins University Digital quantification of dna methylation

Non-Patent Citations (61)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Abe et al., "CpG island methylator phenotype is a strong determinant of poor prognosis in neuroblastomas," Cancer Res, 2005, 65:828-834.
Ahlquist, Molecular detection of colorectal neoplasia, Gastroenterology, 2010, 138:2127-2139.
Ballabio, et al., "Screening for steroid sulfatase (STS) gene deletions by multiplex DNA amplification," Human Genetics, 1990, 84(6) 571-573.
Barnay, "Genetic disease detection and DNA amplification using cloned thermostable ligase," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA, 1991, 88, 189-93.
Baylin et al., "Alterations in DNA methylation: a fundamental aspect of neoplasia," Adv Cancer Res 1998;72:141-19.
Baylin et al., "Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer-a mechanism for early oncogenic pathway addiction?" Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2006, 6:107-116.
Baylin et al., "Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer—a mechanism for early oncogenic pathway addiction?" Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2006, 6:107-116.
Beaucage et al., "Deoxynucleoside phosphoramidites-A new class of key intermediates for deoxypolynucleotide synthesis," Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, 22: 1859-1862.
Beaucage et al., "Deoxynucleoside phosphoramidites—A new class of key intermediates for deoxypolynucleotide synthesis," Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, 22: 1859-1862.
Bentley et al, "Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry," Nature, 2008, 456:53-59.
Brown et al., "Chemical synthesis and cloning of a tyrosine tRNA gene," Meth Enzymol., 1979, 68:109-151.
Bustin, "Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays," J. Molecular Endocrinology, 2000, 25:169-193.
Chamerlain et al., "Deletion screening of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus via multiplex DNA amplification," Nucleic Acids Research, 1988, 16(23):11141-11156.
Craig et al., "Identification of genetic variants using bar-coded multiplexed sequencing," Nat. Methods Nat Methods., 2008, 5(10):887-93.
DNA Methylation and Cancer Therapy, Landes Bioscience, 2005, ed. Moshe Szyf (TOC only).
Don et al., "'Touchdown' PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification," Nucleic Acids Research, 1991, 19(14):4008.
Don et al., "‘Touchdown’ PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification," Nucleic Acids Research, 1991, 19(14):4008.
Eads et al., "Epigenetic patterns in the progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma," Cancer Res, 2001, 61:3410-3418.
Estellar et al., "Hypermethylation-associated inactivation of p14(ARF) is independent of p16(INK4a) methylation and p53 mutational status," Cancer Res, 2000, 60:129-133.
Extended European Search Report for EP12742758.1, issued Oct. 8, 2015, 8 pages.
Garcia-Manero et al., "DNA methylation of multiple promoter-associated CpG islands in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia," Clin Cancer Res, 2002, 8:2217-2224.
Gardiner-Garden et al., "CpG islands in vertebrate genomes," J Mol. Biol., 1987, 196:261-282.
Glockner et al., "Methylation of TFPI2 in Stool DNA: A Potentional Novel Biomarker for the Detection of Colorectal Cancer," Cancer Res, 2009. 69:4691-4699.
Grutzmann et al., Sensitive Detection of Colorectal Cancer in Peripheral Blood by Septin 9 DNA Methylation Assay PLoS ONE, 2008, 3(11):e3759.
Guilfoyle et al., "Ligation-mediated PCR amplification of specific fragments from a class-II restriction endonuclease total digest," Nucleic Acids Research, 1997, 25:1854-1858.
Hall et al., "Sensitive detection of DNA polymorphisms by the serial invasive signal amplification reaction," PNAS, 2000, 97:8272.
Hecker et al., "High and low annealing temperatures increase both specificity and yield in touchdown and stepdown PCR," Biotechniques, 1996, 20(3):478-485.
Herman et al., "Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands," PNAS, 1996, 93(13):9821-9826.
Higuchi et al., "A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions," Nucleic Acids Research, 1988, 16(15):7351-7367.
Higuchi et al., "Kinetic PCR analysis: real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions," Biotechnology, 1993, 11:1026-1030.
Higuchi et al., "Simultaneous amplification and detection of specific DNA sequences," Biotechnology, 1992, 10:413-417.
International Search Report for International Patent Application PCT/US2012/023646, mailed Feb. 2, 2012, 13 pages.
Irizarry et al., "The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores," Nat. Genetics, 2009, 41:178-186.
Issa et al., "CIMP, at Last," Gastroenterology, 2005 129(3):1121-1124.
Jones et al., "The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer," Nat Rev Genet, 2002, 3:415-428.
Kalinina et al., "Nanoliter scale PCR with TaqMan detection," Nucleic Acids Research, 1997, 25:1999-2004.
Keshet et al., "Evidence for an instructive mechanism of de novo methylation in cancer cells," Nature Genetics, 2006, 38:149-153.
Lyamichev et al., "Polymorphism identification and quantitative detection of genomic DNA by invasive cleavage of oligonucleotide probes," Nat. Biotech., 1999, 17:292-296.
Matteucci et al., "Synthesis of deoxyoligonucleotides on a polymer support," J Am Chem Soc., 1981, 103:3185-3191.
Narang et al., "Improved phosphotriester method for the synthesis of gene fragments," Meth Enzymol., 1979, 68: 90-98.
Pfeifer et al., "Methylated-CpG island recovery assay-assisted microarrays for cancer diagnosis," Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics, 2007, 1(1):99-108.
Roux, "Using mismatched primer-template pairs in touchdown PCR," Biotechniques, 1994, 16(5):812-814.
Schouten et al., "Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification," Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, 30(12): e57.
Shen et al., "DNA methylation and environmental exposures in human hepatocellular carcinoma," J Natl Cancer Inst, 2002, 94:755-761.
Strathdee et al., "Primary ovarian carcinomas display multiple methylator phenotypes involving known tumor suppressor genes," Am J Pathol, 2001, 158:1121-1127.
Takai et al., "Comprehensive analysis of CpG islands in human chromosomes 21 and 22," PNAS, 2007, 99:3740-3745.
Tena-Tomas et al., ""A globally occurring indel polymorphism in the promoter of theIFNA2 gene is not associated with severity of malaria but with the positivity rate of HCV," BMC Genetics, 2008, 9:80".
Toyota et al., "Aberrant methylation in gastric cancer associated with the CpG island methylator phenotype," Cancer Res, 1999, 59:5438-5442.
Toyota et al., "CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer," PNAS, 1999, 96:8681-8686.
Toyota et al., "Methylation profiling in acute myeloid leukemia," Blood, 2001, 97:2823-2829.
Triglia et al., "A procedure for in vitro amplification of DNA segments that lie outside the boundaries of known sequences," Nucleic Acids Res., 1999, 16:8186.
Ueki et al., "Hypermethylation of multiple genes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma," Cancer Res, 2000, 60:1835-1839.
Van Rijnsoever et al., "Characterisation of colorectal cancers showing hypermethylation at multiple CpG islands," Gut, 2002, 51:797-802.
Vogelstein et al., "Digital PCR," PNAS, 1999, 96: 9236-41.
Weber et al., "Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells," Nature Genetics, 2005, 37(8):853-862.
Weisenberger et al., DNA methylation analysis by digital bisulfite genomic sequencing and digital MethyLight, Nucleic Acids Res, 2008, 36:4689-98.
Whitehall et al., "Morphological and molecular heterogeneity within nonmicrosatellite instability-high colorectal cancer," Cancer Res, 2002, 62:6011-6014.
Whitehall et al., "Morphological and molecular heterogeneity within nonmicrosatellite instability—high colorectal cancer," Cancer Res, 2002, 62:6011-6014.
Yamashita et al., "Genetics supersedes epigenetics in colon cancer phenotype," Cancer Cell, 2003, 4:121-131.
Zou et al., "Highly Methylated Genes in Colorectal Neoplasia: Implications for Screening Cancer," Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2007, 16:2686-2696.
Zou et al., Sensitive Quantification of Vimentin Methylation with a Novel Methylation Specific qInvader Technology, AACC Annual Meeting Jul. 28, 2010, Abstract No. D-144, 1 page.

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US12391978B2 (en) 2010-11-15 2025-08-19 Exact Sciences Corporation Real time cleavage assay
US12188093B2 (en) 2014-09-26 2025-01-07 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research Detecting cholangiocarcinoma
US12319969B2 (en) 2015-03-27 2025-06-03 Exact Sciences Corporation Detecting esophageal disorders
US11674168B2 (en) 2015-10-30 2023-06-13 Exact Sciences Corporation Isolation and detection of DNA from plasma
US12049671B2 (en) 2017-01-27 2024-07-30 Exact Sciences Corporation Detection of colon neoplasia by analysis of methylated DNA
US12173362B2 (en) 2017-12-13 2024-12-24 Exact Sciences Corporation Multiplex amplification detection assay II

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20210095350A1 (en) 2021-04-01
EP2670893A4 (en) 2015-11-11
WO2012106525A2 (en) 2012-08-09
EP3795699A1 (en) 2021-03-24
US20200048720A1 (en) 2020-02-13
CN110129436A (zh) 2019-08-16
CA2826696C (en) 2019-12-03
EP3441479B1 (en) 2020-09-02
US20240368702A1 (en) 2024-11-07
CA2826696A1 (en) 2012-08-09
EP3441479A1 (en) 2019-02-13
EP2670893A2 (en) 2013-12-11
ES2686309T3 (es) 2018-10-17
AU2012212127A1 (en) 2013-08-22
ES2829198T3 (es) 2021-05-31
EP3795699B1 (en) 2023-12-20
JP2014519310A (ja) 2014-08-14
AU2012212127B2 (en) 2016-06-02
EP2670893B1 (en) 2018-06-27
US11952633B2 (en) 2024-04-09
US10519510B2 (en) 2019-12-31
US20120196756A1 (en) 2012-08-02
WO2012106525A3 (en) 2014-02-20
US20170073771A1 (en) 2017-03-16
CN103703173A (zh) 2014-04-02
US10870893B2 (en) 2020-12-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11952633B2 (en) Digital sequence analysis of DNA methylation
JP7704792B2 (ja) 肝細胞癌の検出
US11384401B2 (en) Detecting gastrointestinal neoplasms
CN107847515B (zh) 实体瘤甲基化标志物及其用途
CN102686744B (zh) 用于检测结肠直肠癌的sdc2甲基化
WO2018087129A1 (en) Colorectal cancer methylation markers
KR102223014B1 (ko) 전암병변의 검출방법
EP1340818A1 (en) Method and nucleic acids for the analysis of a colon cell proliferative disorder
EP2699695A2 (en) Prostate cancer markers
JP2022552400A (ja) 特定の遺伝子のｃｐｇメチル化変化を利用した肝癌診断用組成物およびその使用
JP7383051B2 (ja) メチル化修飾に基づく腫瘍マーカーｓｔａｍｐ－ｅｐ８及びその応用
HK40050531A (en) Digital sequence analysis of dna methylation
JP7381606B2 (ja) メチル化修飾に基づく腫瘍マーカーｓｔａｍｐ－ｅｐ９及びその応用
JP7383727B2 (ja) メチル化修飾に基づく腫瘍マーカーｓｔａｍｐ－ｅｐ７及びその応用
CN111020034A (zh) 新型的诊断肿瘤的标志物及其应用
HK40056939A (en) Solid tumor methylation markers and uses thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION, WISCONSIN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZOU, HONGHZI;LIDGARD, GRAHAM P.;REEL/FRAME:027837/0942

Effective date: 20120209

Owner name: MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AHLQUIST, DAVID A.;TAYLOR, WILLIAM R.;REEL/FRAME:027837/0947

Effective date: 20120221

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
AS Assignment

Owner name: EXACT SCIENCES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, WISCONSIN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:044119/0001

Effective date: 20171001

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION, WISCONSIN

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:EXACT SCIENCES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC;REEL/FRAME:058738/0465

Effective date: 20220101

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

AS Assignment

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ILLINOIS

Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:EXACT SCIENCES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:069898/0249

Effective date: 20250113