US8973503B2 - Fragmentation bodies, warheads including fragmentation bodies, and related ordnance - Google Patents
Fragmentation bodies, warheads including fragmentation bodies, and related ordnance Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US8973503B2 US8973503B2 US13/550,705 US201213550705A US8973503B2 US 8973503 B2 US8973503 B2 US 8973503B2 US 201213550705 A US201213550705 A US 201213550705A US 8973503 B2 US8973503 B2 US 8973503B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- opposing
- indentations
- indentation
- array
- fragmentation body
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
- F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
- F42B12/20—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type
- F42B12/22—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type with fragmentation-hull construction
- F42B12/24—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type with fragmentation-hull construction with grooves, recesses or other wall weakenings
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
- B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
- B22F3/00—Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces
- B22F3/02—Compacting only
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
- B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
- B22F3/00—Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces
- B22F3/12—Both compacting and sintering
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
- B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
- B22F5/00—Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the special shape of the product
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
- B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
- B22F7/00—Manufacture of composite layers, workpieces, or articles, comprising metallic powder, by sintering the powder, with or without compacting wherein at least one part is obtained by sintering or compression
- B22F7/02—Manufacture of composite layers, workpieces, or articles, comprising metallic powder, by sintering the powder, with or without compacting wherein at least one part is obtained by sintering or compression of composite layers
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B15/00—Self-propelled projectiles or missiles, e.g. rockets; Guided missiles
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10T428/12—All metal or with adjacent metals
- Y10T428/12188—All metal or with adjacent metals having marginal feature for indexing or weakened portion for severing
Definitions
- the present disclosure in various embodiments, relates generally to fragmentation bodies, warheads including the fragmentation bodies, and related ordnance.
- Numerous conventional warheads such as a conventional SWITCHBLADETM warhead, include a containment (i.e., a warhead case), an explosive charge within the containment, a backer plate on the explosive charge, and discrete preformed fragments embedded in an adhesive material on the backer plate.
- a detonation which may also be characterized as an explosive “launch” of the explosive charge
- the discrete preformed fragments are propelled from the warhead such that least a portion of the discrete preformed fragments may act upon an intended target.
- Warhead efficacy is thus at least partially a factor of the quantity, size, shape, density, distribution, and velocity of the discrete preformed fragments.
- such conventional warhead configurations can provide limited efficiency.
- venting of explosive detonation-generated gases between the discrete preformed fragments, and substantially inevitable irregularities in the spacing and distribution of the discrete preformed fragments can impede the performance (e.g., velocity, trajectory, etc.) of the discrete preformed fragments upon explosive launch.
- adhesive material extruded through spaces between each of the discrete preformed fragments is difficult to remove and can interfere with the proper seating and effectiveness of the discrete preformed fragments in terms of velocity and direction of their respective trajectories.
- Embodiments described herein include fragmentation bodies, warheads including the fragmentation bodies, and related weapons.
- a fragmentation body comprises a substantially monolithic structure comprising a metal material and comprising a major surface having an indentation pattern therein, and an opposing major surface having an opposing indentation pattern therein, the opposing indentation pattern substantially aligned with the indentation pattern.
- a warhead comprises an explosive charge and at least one fragmentation body adjacent the explosive charge.
- the fragmentation body comprises a substantially monolithic structure comprising a metal material and comprising a major surface having an indentation pattern therein, and an opposing major surface having an opposing indentation pattern therein, the opposing indentation pattern substantially aligned with the indentation pattern.
- an article of ordnance comprises a rocket motor and a warhead.
- the warhead comprises an explosive charge and at least one fragmentation body adjacent the explosive charge.
- the fragmentation body comprises a substantially monolithic structure comprising a metal material and comprising a major surface having an indentation pattern therein, and an opposing major surface having an opposing indentation pattern therein, the opposing indentation pattern substantially aligned with the indentation pattern.
- FIG. 1A is a perspective view of a fragmentation body in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure
- FIG. 1B is a cross-sectional view taken along a portion of line C 1 -C 1 of FIG. 1A ;
- FIG. 2A is a perspective view of a fragmentation body in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 2B is a cross-sectional view taken along a portion of line C 2 -C 2 of FIG. 2A ;
- FIG. 3A is a bottom view of a fragmentation body in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 3B is a cross-sectional view taken along line C 3 -C 3 of FIG. 3A ;
- FIG. 4 is a top view of a fragmentation body in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 5A is a top view of a fragmentation body in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 5B is a cross-sectional view taken along line C 5 -C 5 of FIG. 5A ;
- FIG. 5C is a cross-sectional view taken along line D 5 -D 5 of FIG. 5A ;
- FIG. 6A is a cross-sectional view of a fragmentation body in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 6B is another cross-sectional view of the fragmentation body depicted in FIG. 6A ;
- FIG. 7A is a perspective view of a warhead in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 7B is a cross-sectional view taken along line C 7 -C 7 of FIG. 7A ;
- FIG. 8A is a side-elevation view of a warhead in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 8B is a cross-sectional view of the warhead depicted in FIG. 8A ;
- FIG. 8C is a bottom view of the warhead depicted in FIG. 8A ;
- FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a weapon in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 10A is a scanning electron micrograph showing a top-down view of a tungsten-based alloy, as described in Example 1;
- FIG. 10B is a scanning electron micrograph showing a polished cross-section of the tungsten-based alloy of FIG. 10A , as described in Example 1;
- FIG. 11A is a scanning electron micrograph showing a top-down view of another tungsten-based alloy, as described in Example 1;
- FIG. 11B is a scanning electron micrograph showing a polished cross-section of the another tungsten-based alloy of FIG. 11A , as described in Example 1;
- FIG. 12A is a photograph showing a top-down view of a fragmentation plate, as described in Example 2.
- FIG. 12B is a photograph showing a side elevation view of the fragmentation plate of FIG. 12A , as described in Example 2;
- FIG. 13A is a photograph showing a top-down view of another fragmentation plate, as described in Example 2.
- FIG. 13B is a photograph showing a side elevation view of the another fragmentation plate of FIG. 13A , as described in Example 2;
- FIG. 14A is a photograph showing a top-down view of yet another fragmentation plate, as described in Example 2.
- FIG. 14B is a photograph showing a perspective view of the yet another fragmentation plate of FIG. 14A , as described in Example 2;
- FIG. 14C is a photograph showing a side elevation view of the yet another fragmentation plate of FIG. 14A , as described in Example 2;
- FIG. 15 is a scanning electron micrograph showing a cross-sectional view of the indentation geometry of the fragmentation plate of FIG. 12A , as described in Example 2;
- FIGS. 16A-16I are each photographs showing a backlit witness panel following an explosive launch of a sample warhead, as described in Example 3;
- FIG. 17A is a photograph showing discrete fragments formed upon an explosive launch of a sample warhead, as described in Example 3.
- FIG. 17B is a photograph showing discrete fragments faulted upon an explosive launch of another sample warhead, as described in Example 3.
- Fragmentation bodies are disclosed, as are warheads including the fragmentation bodies, and related ordnance.
- fragmentation body means and includes a structure configured to substantially break up into fragments having at least one of a desired shape and a desired size upon the occurrence of a triggering event, such as a detonation or explosive launch of an explosive charge of a warhead incorporating the fragmentation body.
- the fragmentation bodies of the present disclosure may be used to increase warhead performance (e.g., fragment velocities and fragment trajectories) of and to reduce the manufacturing cost of a warhead.
- the terms “comprising,” “including,” “containing,” “characterized by,” and grammatical equivalents thereof are inclusive or open-ended terms that do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps, but also include the more restrictive terms “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” and grammatical equivalents thereof.
- the term “may” with respect to a material, structure, feature or method act indicates that such is contemplated for use in implementation of an embodiment of the disclosure and such term is used in preference to the more restrictive term “is” so as to avoid any implication that other, compatible materials, structures, features and methods usable in combination therewith should or must be, excluded.
- the term “monolithic” as applied to fragmentation bodies of embodiments of the disclosure means and includes bodies formed as, and comprising a single, unitary structure of a metal material.
- FIG. 1A illustrates a perspective view of a fragmentation body 100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the fragmentation body 100 may be a substantially monolithic structure including a major surface 110 , an opposing major surface 112 , and at least one major peripheral sidewall 120 .
- the at least one major peripheral sidewall 120 may run substantially perpendicular to each of the major surface 110 and the opposing major surface 112 .
- at least one of the at least one major peripheral sidewall 120 may run substantially non-perpendicular (i.e., at an angle other than about 90 degrees) to each of the major surface 110 and the opposite major surface 112 .
- the major surface 110 may include an indentation pattern 114 .
- the opposing major surface 112 may include an opposing indentation pattern 116 substantially aligned with the indentation pattern 114 .
- Such an arrangement may also be characterized as the two indentation patterns 114 and 116 comprising mirror image patterns.
- the opposing indentation pattern 116 may be provided more proximate an explosive charge of a warhead than the indentation pattern 114 , as described in further detail below.
- the indentation pattern 114 and the opposing indentation pattern 116 may cooperatively at least partially define interconnected fragments 118 , as described in further detail below.
- one of the indentation pattern 114 and the opposite indentation pattern 116 may be omitted.
- the fragmentation body 100 may be substantially planar, and may have a generally rectangular peripheral shape.
- the fragmentation body 100 may be substantially curved, and further embodiments may include at least one substantially curved portion and at least one substantially planar portion.
- the fragmentation body 100 may have other peripheral shapes including, but not limited to, circular, semicircular, crescent, ovular, annular, astroidal, deltoidal, ellipsoidal, triangular, tetragonal (e.g., square, rectangular, trapezium, trapezoidal, parallelogram, kite, rhomboidal, etc.), pentagonal, hexagonal, heptagonal, octagonal, enneagonal, decagonal, truncated versions thereof, or an irregular peripheral shape.
- the fragmentation body 100 may include at least one corner 122 having a substantially rounded configuration.
- the at least one corner 122 may have a different configuration, such as a substantially sharp configuration, or a combination of a rounded configuration and a sharp configuration.
- the fragmentation body 100 may have any desired dimensions, depending on at least one of a desired size and a desired quantity of the interconnected fragments 118 , as described in further detail below.
- Each of the indentation pattern 114 and the opposing indentation pattern 116 may include a plurality of indentations, such as one or more arrays of indentations.
- the indentation pattern 114 may include a first array of indentations 114 A extending in a first direction across the major surface 110 , and a second array of indentations 114 B extending in a second direction across the major surface 110 .
- the first array of indentations 114 A may at least partially intersect the second array of indentations 114 B.
- the opposing indentation pattern 116 may include a first opposing array of indentations 116 A extending across the opposing major surface 112 in the first direction and a second opposing array of indentations 116 B extending across the opposing major surface 112 in the second direction.
- the first opposing array of indentations 116 A may at least partially intersect with the second opposing array of indentations 116 B.
- the first array of indentations 114 A may be substantially aligned with the first opposing array of indentations 116 A
- the second array of indentations 114 B may be substantially aligned with the second opposing array of indentations 116 B. As depicted in FIG.
- each of the first array of indentations 114 A and the first opposing array of indentations 116 A may run substantially perpendicular (i.e., at a 90 degree angle) to each of the second array of indentations 114 B and the first opposing array of indentations 116 A.
- each of the first array of indentations 114 A and the first opposing array of indentations 116 A may run substantially non-perpendicular to each of the second array of indentations 114 B and the second opposing array of indentations 116 B.
- each of the indentation pattern 114 and the opposing indentation pattern 116 may include at least one other indentation, such as at least one other array of indentations.
- the indentation pattern 114 may include at least one additional array of indentations (not shown) extending across the major surface 110 in the first direction, the second direction, or in another direction. The at least one additional array of indentations may intersect with at least a portion of at least one of the first array of indentations 114 A and the second array of indentations 114 B.
- the opposing indentation pattern 116 may include at least one additional opposing array of indentations (not shown) extending across the opposing major surface 112 in the first direction, the second direction, or in the another direction.
- the at least one additional array of indentations may intersect with at least a portion of at least one of the first opposing array of indentations 116 A and the second opposing array of indentations 116 B.
- the at least one additional array of indentations may be substantially aligned with the at least one additional opposing array of indentations.
- the first array of indentations 114 A and the second array of indentations 114 B may extend in substantially linear paths across the major surface 110
- the first opposing array of indentations 116 A and the second opposing array of indentations 116 B may extend in substantially linear paths across the opposing major surface 112 .
- At least one of the first array of indentations 114 A and the second array of indentations 114 B may extend in substantially non-linear paths (e.g., v-shaped paths, u-shaped paths, angled paths, jagged paths, sinusoidal paths, curved paths, irregularly shaped paths, or a combination thereof) across at least a portion of the major surface 110 , and at least one of the first opposing array of indentations 116 A and the second opposing array of indentations 116 B may extend in non-linear paths across at least a portion of the opposing major surface 112 .
- the indentation pattern 114 and the opposing indentation pattern 116 each include at least one other indentation, the at least one other indentation may extend in a linear path or may extend in a non-linear path.
- each of the first array of indentations 114 A and the second array of indentations 114 B may be substantially continuous across the major surface 110
- each of the first opposing array of indentations 116 A and the second opposing array of indentations 116 B may be substantially continuous across the opposing major surface 112 .
- At least a portion of at least one of the first array of indentations 114 A and the second array of indentations 114 B may be substantially discontinuous across the major surface 110
- at least a portion of at least one of the first opposing array of indentations 116 A and the second opposing array of indentations 116 B may be substantially discontinuous across the opposing major surface 112 .
- each of the first array of indentations 114 A and the second array of indentations 114 B may terminate at one or more locations other than at the at least one major peripheral sidewall 120 of the fragmentation body 100
- at least a portion of each of the first opposing array of indentations 116 A and the second opposing array of indentations 116 B may terminate at one or more locations other than at the at least one major peripheral sidewall 120 of the fragmentation body 100
- the indentation pattern 114 and the opposing indentation pattern 116 each include at least one other indentation
- the at least one other indentation may be substantially continuous or may be substantially discontinuous.
- the indentation pattern 114 may be configured such that each indentation of the first array of indentations 114 A is set apart from an adjacent parallel indentation of the first array of indentations 114 A by a distance A 1 (i.e., the first array of indentations 114 A may be uniformly spaced), and such that each indentation of the second array of indentations 114 B is set apart from an adjacent parallel indentation of the second array of indentations 114 B by a distance B 1 (i.e., the second array of indentations 114 B may be uniformly spaced).
- the opposing indentation pattern 116 may be configured such that each indentation of the first opposing array of indentations 116 A is set apart from an adjacent parallel indentation of the first opposing array of indentations 116 A by the distance A 1 , and such that each indentation of the second opposing array of indentations 116 B is set apart from an adjacent parallel indentation of the second opposing array of indentations 116 B by the distance B 1 .
- a magnitude of each of the distance A 1 and the distance B 1 may depend upon a desired fragmentation efficiency of the fragmentation body 100 and a desired mass of each of the interconnected fragments 118 .
- a ratio between the distance A 1 and a height H 1 ( FIG.
- a ratio between the distance B 1 and the height H 1 ( FIG. 1B ) of the fragmentation body 100 may be within a range of from about 1:1 to about 3:1, such as from about 1.5:1 to about 2.5:1, or from about 1.8:1 to about 2.2:1.
- a ratio between the distance B 1 and the height H 1 ( FIG. 1B ) of the fragmentation body 100 may be within a range of from about 1:1 to about 3:1, such as from about 1.5:1 to about 2.5:1, or from about 1.8:1 to about 2.2:1.
- a ratio between the distance A 1 and the height H 1 ( FIG. 1B ) is about 2:1
- a ratio between the distance B 1 and the height H 1 ( FIG. 1B ) is about 2:1.
- the distance A 1 and the distance B 1 may be substantially equal or may be substantially different.
- the distance A 1 and the distance B 1 are substantially equal.
- the indentation pattern 114 may be configured such that at least one of the first array of indentations 114 A and the second array of indentations 114 B is non-uniformly spaced.
- the opposing indentation pattern 116 may be configured such that at least one of the first opposing array of indentations 116 A and the second opposing array of indentations 116 B is non-uniformly spaced.
- the first array of indentations 114 A and the first opposing array of indentations 116 A may each include at least one indentation set apart from an adjacent parallel indentation by a distance other than the distance A 1 .
- the second array of indentations 114 B and the second opposing array of indentations 116 B may each include at least one indentation set apart from an adjacent parallel indentation by a distance other than the distance B 1 .
- the at least one other array of indentations may be uniformly spaced or may be non-uniformly spaced.
- Each indentation of the indentation pattern 114 and each indentation of the opposing indentation pattern 116 may have a width, depth, and shape facilitating the break-up of the interconnected fragments 118 into substantially discrete fragments (not shown) of a substantially controlled shape and of a substantially controlled size upon the occurrence of a triggering event (e.g., an explosive launch).
- a triggering event e.g., an explosive launch
- each indentation of the indentation pattern 114 and each indentation of the opposing indentation pattern 116 may have a ratio of indentation width to indentation depth within a range of from about 1:1 to about 1:3, such as from about 1:1.5 to about 1:2.5, or from about 1:1.8 to about 1:2.2.
- each indentation of the indentation pattern 114 and each indentation of the opposing indentation pattern 116 has a ratio of indentation width to indentation depth of about 1:2.
- each indentation of the indentation pattern 114 and each indentation of the opposing indentation pattern 116 may independently have any desired shape including, but not limited to, a triangular shape, a tetragonal shape, (e.g., square, rectangular, trapezium, trapezoidal, parallelogram, etc.), a semicircular shape, an ovular shape, and an elliptical shape. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG.
- each indentation of the indentation pattern 114 has a substantially rectangular shape
- each indentation of the opposing indentation pattern 116 has a substantially triangular shape. It will be appreciated that other indentation configurations (i.e., indentation widths, depths, and shapes) are also possible.
- each of the interconnected fragments 118 may include a first region 118 A, a second region 118 B, and an intermediary region 118 C.
- Each of the first region 118 A and the second region 118 B may extend outwardly from the intermediary region 118 C, which may extend across the fragmentation body 100 and join together each of the interconnected fragments 118 .
- the indentation pattern 114 may at least partially define the shape of the first region 118 A of each of the interconnected fragments 118
- the opposing indentation pattern 116 may at least partially define the shape of the second region 118 B of each of the interconnected fragments 118 .
- the substantially rectangular shape of each indentation of the indentation pattern 114 may define the first region 118 A ( FIG. 1B ) of each of the interconnected fragments 118 as a substantially rectangular column.
- the substantially triangular shape of the opposing indentation pattern 116 may define the second region 118 B ( FIG. 1B ) of each of the interconnected fragments 118 as a substantially frusto-pyramid.
- first region 118 A ( FIG. 1B ) of each of the interconnected fragments 118 and the second region 118 B ( FIG. 1B ) of each of the interconnected fragments 118 may independently be of a different shape including, but not limited to, one of a parallel-piped column, a rectangular column, a cylindrical column, a dome, a pyramid, a frusto-pyramid, a cone, a frusto-cone, and an irregular shape.
- the indentation pattern 114 and the opposing indentation pattern 116 may be such that at least one of the interconnected fragments 118 is of a substantially different shape than at least one other of the interconnected fragments 118 .
- the indentation pattern 114 and the opposing indentation pattern 116 may at least partially define the size of each of the interconnected fragments 118 .
- each of first array of indentations 114 A and the second array of indentations 114 B may define the first region 118 A ( FIG. 1B ) of each of the interconnected fragments 118 to have a minimum width substantially equal to the distance A 1 and a minimum length substantially equal to the distance B 1 .
- each of first opposing array of indentations 116 A and the second opposing array of indentations 116 B may define the second region 118 B ( FIG.
- each of the interconnected fragments 118 may have a minimum width equal to the distance A 1 and a minimum length equal to the distance B 1 .
- a portion of at least one of the first region 118 A ( FIG. 1B ) and the second region 118 B ( FIG. 1B ) may have at least one of a length greater than the distance B 1 and a width greater than the distance A 1 .
- a portion of the second region 118 B of the interconnected fragments 118 may have a width greater than the distance B 1 (e.g., proximate an apex of each triangular shaped indentation of the second opposing array of indentations 114 B).
- the first region 118 A ( FIG. 1B ) of at least one of the interconnected fragments 118 may be of a different length and/or different width than the first region 118 A ( FIG. 1B ) of at least one other of the interconnected fragments 118 .
- the second region 118 B ( FIG. 1B ) of at least one of the interconnected fragments 118 may be of a different length and/or different width than the second region 118 B ( FIG. 1B ) of at least one other of the interconnected fragments 118 .
- the first region 118 A of each of the interconnected fragments 118 may be of substantially equal height, and the second region 118 B of the interconnected fragments 118 may be of substantially equal height.
- the first region 118 A of at least one of the interconnected fragments 118 may be of a different height than the first region 118 A of at least one other of interconnected fragments 118 .
- the second region 118 B of at least one of the interconnected fragments 118 may be of a different height than the second region 118 B of at least one other of interconnected fragments 118 .
- each of the interconnected fragments 118 may depend upon a desired mass for each of the interconnected fragments 118 .
- the dimensions of each of the interconnected fragments 118 may be such that each of the interconnected fragments 118 has a mass within a range of from about 1 grain to about 30 grains, such as from about 2 grains to about 15 grains, or from about 3 grains to about 8 grains.
- the dimensions of each of the interconnected fragments 118 may be such that each of the interconnected fragments 118 has substantially equal mass.
- the dimensions of at least one interconnected fragment of the interconnected fragments 118 may be such that the least one interconnected fragment is of a substantially different mass than at least one other interconnected fragment of the interconnected fragments 118 .
- each of the interconnected fragments 118 has a mass of about 8 grains.
- each of the interconnected fragments 118 has a mass of about 3 grains.
- the size of the fragmentation body 100 , the shape of the fragmentation body 100 , the properties of the indentation pattern 114 , and the properties of the opposing indentation pattern 116 may be such that the interconnected fragments 118 are arranged in a substantially organized manner.
- the interconnected fragments 118 may be arranged as a matrix of columns (not numbered) and rows (not numbered). Each of the columns may run substantially parallel to each other of the columns, and each of the rows may run substantially parallel to each other of the rows. Each of the columns may run substantially perpendicular to each of the rows.
- Each of the columns may be substantially similar (e.g., each of the columns may have substantially the same size and substantially the same shape), or at least one of the columns may be substantially different than at least one other of columns.
- each of the rows may be substantially similar (e.g., each of the rows may have substantially the same size and substantially the same shape), or at least one of the rows may be substantially different than at least one other of the rows.
- at least one row of the interconnected fragments 118 adjacent one of the at least one major peripheral sidewall 120 of the fragmentation body 100 may be substantially different than at least one row of the interconnected fragments 118 not adjacent one of the at least one major peripheral sidewall 120 of the fragmentation body 100 .
- At least one column of the interconnected fragments 118 adjacent one of the at least one major peripheral sidewall 120 of the fragmentation body 100 may be substantially different than at least one substantially parallel column of interconnected fragments 118 not adjacent one of the at least one major peripheral sidewall 120 of the fragmentation body 100 .
- at least one of the size of the fragmentation body 100 , the shape of the fragmentation body 100 , the properties of the indentation pattern 114 , and the properties of the opposing indentation pattern 116 may be such that at least a portion of the interconnected fragments 118 are arranged in a substantially disorganized manner.
- FIG. 2A illustrates a perspective view of a fragmentation body 200 in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the fragmentation body 200 includes a major surface 210 , an opposing major surface 212 , and at least one major peripheral sidewall 220 .
- the major surface 210 may include at least one elevated portion 210 B and a remaining portion 210 A.
- the opposing major surface 212 may include at least one opposing elevated portion (not shown) and an opposing remaining portion (not shown). If present, the opposing elevated portion may be substantially similar to the at least one elevated portion 210 B (e.g., in size and shape), or may be substantially different than the at least one elevated portion 210 B.
- the opposing elevated portion may be substantially aligned with the at least one elevated portion 210 B, or may be substantially unaligned with the at least one elevated portion 210 B.
- the at least one elevated portion 210 B may be absent from the major surface 210 (e.g., the at least one elevated portion 210 B shown in FIG. 2A may be coplanar with the remaining portion 210 shown in FIG. 2A ) and the at least one the opposing major surface 212 may include the at one opposing elevated portion.
- the at least one elevated portion 210 B may be located at a substantially central position along the major surface 210 .
- the at least one elevated portion 210 B may be located at one or more substantially non-central positions along the major surface 210 .
- the major surface 210 may include an indentation pattern 214
- the opposing major surface 212 may include an opposing indentation pattern 216 substantially aligned with the indentation pattern 214 .
- the indentation pattern 214 may include a first array of indentations 214 A, a second array of indentations 214 B, a third array of indentations 214 C, and a fourth array of indentations 214 D.
- Each of the third array of indentations 214 C and the fourth array of indentations 214 D may extend across the at least one elevated portion 210 B of the major surface 210 .
- Each of the first array of indentations 214 A and the second array of indentations 214 B may extend across the remaining portion 210 A of the major surface 210 .
- the opposing indentation pattern 216 may include a first opposing array of indentations 216 A, a second opposing array of indentations 214 B, a third opposing array of indentations (not shown), and a fourth opposing array of indentations (not shown).
- Each of the third opposing array of indentations and the fourth opposing array of indentations may extend across a portion of the opposing major surface 210 substantially aligned with the at least one elevated portion 210 B of the major surface 210 .
- Each of the first opposing array of indentations 216 A and the second opposing array of indentations 216 B may extend across another portion of the opposing major surface 210 substantially aligned with the remaining portion 210 A of the major surface 210 .
- each of the indentation pattern 214 and the opposing indentation pattern 216 may include at least one other indentation (not shown), such as at least one other array of indentations.
- one or more of the at least one elevated portion 210 B of the major surface 210 and the remaining portion 210 A of the major surface 210 may include at least one additional array of indentations (not shown).
- one or more of the portion of the opposing major surface 210 substantially aligned with the at least one elevated portion 210 B and the another portion of the opposing major surface 210 substantially aligned with the remaining portion 210 A may include at least one additional opposing array of indentations (not shown).
- Each of the first array of indentations 214 A, the second array of indentations 214 B, the third array of indentations 214 C, and the fourth array of indentations 214 D may extend in substantially linear paths across at least a portion the major surface 210 .
- each of the first opposing array of indentations 216 A, the second opposing array of indentations 214 B, the third opposing array of indentations (not shown), and the fourth opposing array of indentations 216 D may extend in substantially linear paths across at least a portion the opposing major surface 212 .
- At least one indentation of each of the indentation pattern 214 and the second indentation pattern may extend in a substantially non-linear path, in a manner similar to that described above with respect to the fragmentation body 100 .
- the at least one other indentation may extend in a linear path or may extend in a non-linear path.
- each of the first array of indentations 214 A, the second array of indentations 214 B, the third array of indentations 214 C, and the fourth array of indentations 214 D may be substantially discontinuous across the major surface 210 .
- at least a portion of each of the first array of indentations 214 A and the second array of indentations 214 B may terminate at the at least one elevated portion 210 B of the major surface 210
- each of the third array of indentations 214 C and the fourth array of indentations 214 D may terminate at the remaining portion 210 A of the major surface 210 .
- each of the first opposing array of indentations 216 A, the second opposing array of indentations 214 B, the third opposing array of indentations (not shown), and the fourth opposing array of indentations 216 D may be substantially discontinuous across the opposing major surface 212 .
- each of the first opposing array of indentations 216 A and the second opposing array of indentations 216 B may terminate at the portion of the opposing major surface 212 substantially aligned with the at least one elevated portion 210 B of the major surface 210
- each of the third opposing array of indentations (not shown) and the fourth opposing array of indentations (not shown) may terminate at the another portion of the opposing major surface 212 substantially aligned with the remaining portion 210 A of the major surface 210 .
- the indentation pattern 214 and the opposing indentation pattern 216 each include at least one other array of indentations, at least a portion of the at least one other array of indentations may be substantially discontinuous.
- the indentation pattern 214 may be configured such that each indentation of the first array of indentations 214 A is uniformly spaced by a distance A 2 , and such that each indentation of the second array of indentations 214 B is uniformly spaced by a distance B 2 .
- each indentation of the third array of indentations 214 C may be uniformly spaced by a distance A 3
- each indentation of the fourth array of indentations 214 D may be uniformly spaced by a distance B 3 .
- the distance A 3 and the distance B 3 may be greater than the distance A 2 and the distance B 2 , respectively.
- the opposing indentation pattern 216 may be configured such that each indentation of the first opposing array of indentations 216 A uniformly by the distance A 2 , and such that each indentation of the second opposing array of indentations 216 B is uniformly spaced by the distance B 2 .
- each indentation of the third opposing array of indentations (not shown) may be uniformly spaced by the distance A 3
- each indentation of the fourth opposing array of indentations 216 D ( FIG. 2B ) may be uniformly spaced by the distance B 3 .
- a length of each of the distance A 2 , the distance B 2 , the distance A 3 , and the distance B 3 may depend upon a desired fragmentation efficiency of the fragmentation body 200 and a desired mass of each of the interconnected fragments 218 .
- a ratio between the distance A 2 and a height H 2 ( FIG. 2B ) of a portion of the fragmentation body 200 may be within a range of from about 1:1 to about 3:1, such as from about 1.5:1 to about 2.5:1, or from about 1.8:1 to about 2.2:1.
- a ratio between the distance A 3 and a height H 3 FIG.
- a ratio between the distance B 2 and the height H 2 ( FIG. 1B ) of the portion the fragmentation body 100 may be within a range of from about 1:1 to about 3:1, such as from about 1.5:1 to about 2.5:1, or from about 1.8:1 to about 2.2:1.
- a ratio between the distance B 3 and a height H 3 ( FIG. 1B ) of another portion of the fragmentation body 200 may be within a range of from about 1:1 to about 3:1, such as from about 1.5:1 to about 2.5:1, or from about 1.8:1 to about 2.2:1.
- a ratio between the distance B 3 and a height H 3 FIG.
- each of the indentation pattern 214 and the opposing indentation pattern 216 may be configured such that at least one indentation is non-uniformly spaced, in a manner similar to that described above in relative to the fragmentation body 100 ( FIGS. 1A and 1B ).
- the at least one other array of indentations may be uniformly spaced or may be non-uniformly spaced.
- Each indentation of the indentation pattern 214 and each indentation of the opposing indentation pattern 216 may have a width, depth, and shape facilitating the break-up of the interconnected fragments 218 into substantially discrete fragments (not shown) of a substantially controlled shape and of a substantially controlled size upon the occurrence of a triggering event (e.g., an explosive launch).
- a triggering event e.g., an explosive launch.
- Each indentation of the indentation pattern 214 and each indentation of the opposing indentation pattern 216 may have a width, depth, and shape substantially similar to that described above in relation to the fragmentation body 100 .
- the indentation pattern 214 and the opposing indentation pattern 216 may at least partially define the shape and size of each of interconnected fragments 218 .
- the interconnected fragments 218 may include small interconnected fragments 218 ′ and large interconnected fragments 218 ′′.
- the shape of the interconnected fragments 218 may be substantially similar to the shape of the interconnected fragments 118 described above with respect to the fragmentation body 100 .
- the indentation pattern 214 and the opposing indentation pattern 216 may at least partially define a length and width of each of the interconnected fragments 218 . For example, as shown in FIG.
- each of the first array of indentations 214 A and the second array of indentations 214 B may at least partially define a first region 218 ′A ( FIG. 2B ) of each of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′ to have a minimum width substantially equal to the distance A 2 and a minimum length substantially equal to the distance B 2 .
- each of the third array of indentations 214 C and the fourth array of indentations 214 D may at least partially define a first region 218 ′′A ( FIG. 2B ) of each of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ to have a minimum width substantially equal to the distance A 3 and a minimum length substantially equal to the distance B 3 .
- each of first opposing array of indentations 216 A and the second opposing array of indentations 216 B may at least partially define a second region 218 ′B ( FIG. 2B ) of each of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′ to have a minimum width equal to the distance A 2 and a minimum length equal to the distance B 2 .
- each of the third opposing array of indentations (not shown) and the fourth opposing array of indentations 216 D ( FIG. 2B ) may at least partially define a second region 218 ′′B ( FIG. 2B ) of each of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ to have a minimum width equal to the distance A 3 and a minimum length equal to the distance B 3 .
- the small interconnected fragments 218 ′ and the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may be joined together by intermediary regions 218 ′C, 218 ′′C.
- the first region 218 ′A ( FIG. 2B ) of at least one of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′ may have at least one of a different length and a different width than the first region 218 ′A ( FIG. 2B ) of at least one other of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′.
- the first region 218 ′′A FIG.
- the second region 218 ′B ( FIG. 2B ) of at least one of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′ may have at least one of a different length and a different width than the second region 218 ′B ( FIG. 2B ) of at least one other of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′.
- the second region 218 ′′B ( FIG. 2B ) of at least one of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may have at least one of a different length and a different width than the second region 218 ′B ( FIG. 2B ) of at least one other of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′.
- the second region 218 ′′B FIG.
- the first region 218 ′A of each of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′ may be of substantially equal height
- the second region 218 ′B of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′ may be of substantially equal height
- the first region 218 ′′A of each of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may be of substantially equal height
- the second region 218 ′′B of each of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may be of substantially equal height.
- a height of the first region 218 ′′A of each of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may be greater than a height of the first region 218 ′A of each of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′, and a height of the second region 218 ′′B of each of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may be substantially equal to a height of the second region 218 ′B of each of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′.
- the height of the second region 218 ′′B of each of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may be greater than the height of the second region 218 ′B of each of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′, and the height of the first region 218 ′′A of each of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may be substantially equal to the height of the first region 218 ′A of each of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′.
- the first region 218 ′A of at least one of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′ may be of a different height than the first region 218 ′A of at least one other of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′.
- first region 218 ′′A of at least one of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may be of a different height than the first region 218 ′′A of at least one other of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′.
- second region 218 ′B of at least one of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′ may be of a different height than the second region 218 ′B of at least one other of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′.
- second region 218 ′′B of at least one of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may be of a different height than the second region 218 ′′B of at least one other of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′.
- each of the interconnected fragments 218 may depend upon a desired mass for each of the interconnected fragments 218 .
- the dimensions of each of the interconnected fragments 218 may be such that each of the of the interconnected fragments 218 has a mass within a range of from about 1 grain to about 30 grains, such as from about 2 grains to about 15 grains, or from about 3 grains to about 8 grains.
- the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may have a greater mass than the small interconnected fragments 218 ′.
- each of the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ has a mass of about 8 grains and each of the small interconnected fragments 218 ′ has a mass of about 3 grains.
- the interconnected fragments 218 may be arranged in a substantially organized manner.
- the small interconnected fragments 218 ′ may be arranged as a first matrix of columns (not numbered) and rows (not numbered)
- the large interconnected fragments 218 ′′ may be arranged as second matrix of other columns (not numbered) and other rows (not numbered).
- Each of the columns and each of the other columns may run substantially perpendicular to each of the rows and each of the other rows, respectively.
- Each of the columns may run in a substantially similar direction as each of the other columns, and each of the rows may run in a substantially similar direction as each of the other rows.
- each of the columns may run in a substantially different direction than each of the other columns, and each of the rows may run in a substantially different direction than each of the other columns.
- at least some of the columns may be substantially different (e.g., substantially different size, substantially different shape, etc.), and at least some of the rows may be substantially different.
- each of the other columns may be substantially similar, and each of the other rows may be substantially similar.
- at least one of the other columns may be substantially different, and at least one of the other rows may be substantially different.
- at least a portion of the interconnected fragments 218 may be arranged in a substantially disorganized manner.
- FIG. 3A illustrates a bottom view of a fragmentation body 300 in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the fragmentation body 300 includes a major surface 310 , an opposing major surface 312 , and at least one major peripheral sidewall 320 .
- the fragmentation body 300 has a generally semicircular peripheral shape.
- the major surface 310 may have a larger surface area than the opposing major surface 312 , enabling the at least one major peripheral sidewall 320 to run substantially non-perpendicular to each of the major surface 310 and the opposing major surface 312 .
- An indentation pattern 314 extending across the major surface 310 and an opposing indentation pattern 316 extending across the opposing major surface 312 may at least partially define interconnected fragments 318 , as previously described herein.
- the peripheral shape of the fragmentation body 300 may at least partially define one or more of the interconnected fragments 318 .
- the generally semicircular peripheral shape of the fragmentation body 300 may at least partially enable one or more of the interconnected fragments 318 (e.g., interconnected fragments 318 adjacent the at least one major peripheral sidewall 320 ) to be of a different size and a different shape than at least some other of the interconnected fragments 318 .
- FIG. 3B illustrates a cross-sectional view of the fragmentation body 300 taken about line C 3 -C 3 in FIG. 3A .
- FIG. 4 illustrates a top-down view of a fragmentation body 400 in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the fragmentation body 400 includes a major surface 410 , an opposing major surface (not shown), and at least one major peripheral sidewall 420 .
- the fragmentation body 400 has an irregular peripheral shape.
- An indentation pattern 414 extending across the major surface 410 and an opposing indentation pattern (not shown) extending across the opposing major surface 412 may at least partially define interconnected fragments 418 , as previously described herein.
- the peripheral shape of the fragmentation body 400 may at least partially define one or more of the interconnected fragments 418 . For example, as depicted in FIG.
- the irregular peripheral shape of the fragmentation body 400 may at least partially enable the interconnected fragments 418 of the fragmentation body 400 to be of substantially equal size (i.e., a mono-modal size distribution of the interconnected fragments 418 ).
- the irregular peripheral shape of the fragmentation body 400 may enable at least one of the interconnected fragments 418 (e.g., interconnected fragments 418 adjacent the at least one major peripheral sidewall 420 ) to be of a different size and a different shape than at least one other of the interconnected fragments 418 .
- FIG. 5A is a top-down view of a fragmentation body 500 in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the fragmentation body 500 has a generally semicircular shape and includes a major surface 510 , an opposing major surface 512 ( FIGS. 5B and 5C ), and at least one major peripheral sidewall 520 .
- the major surface may include at least one elevated portion 510 B and a remaining portion 510 A, substantially similar to the at least one elevated portion 210 B and the remaining portion 210 A described above with respect to the fragmentation body 200 .
- the major surface 510 may include each of an indentation pattern 514 and an opposing indentation pattern (not shown), which at least partially define interconnected fragments 518 (e.g., small interconnected fragments 518 ′ and large interconnected fragments 518 ′′) in a manner substantially similar to that described above with respect to the fragmentation body 200 .
- FIGS. 5B and 5C which show cross-sectional views of the fragmentation body 500 taken about line C 5 -C 5 of FIG. 2A and line D 5 -D 5 of FIG. 2A , respectively, the fragmentation body 500 may be substantially curved or arcuate. As shown in FIG.
- the major surface 510 may be substantially convex and the opposing major surface 512 may be substantially concave.
- the fragmentation body 500 may have any desired radius of curvature. The radius of curvature may be substantially constant or may vary across at least one of a length and a width of the fragmentation body 500 .
- FIG. 6A is a cross-sectional view of a fragmentation body 600 in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the fragmentation body 600 has a generally semicircular shape and includes a major surface 610 , an opposing major surface 612 , and at least one major peripheral sidewall 620 .
- the fragmentation body 600 may be substantially curved or arcuate.
- the fragmentation body 600 may be substantially similar to the fragmentation body 500 described above, with regard to FIGS. 5A and 5B , except that the opposing major surface 612 includes at least one opposing elevated portion 612 B and an opposing remaining portion 612 A.
- the major surface 610 does not include at least one elevated portion and a remaining portion.
- the major surface 610 may include at least one elevated portion and a remaining portion, substantially similar to the at least one elevated portion 510 B and a remaining portion 510 A described above with respect to the fragmentation body 500 .
- the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 of the present disclosure may be formed of and include a metal material.
- the metal material may impart fragments formed from the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 with at least one of a desired penetration efficiency and desired incendiary properties.
- the metal material may be substantially inert, or may be substantially reactive.
- the term “substantially inert” means and includes a material substantially incapable of producing a strong exothermic chemical reaction (e.g., an incendiary reaction).
- the term “substantially reactive” means and includes a material substantially capable of producing a strong exothermic chemical reaction.
- the metal material is substantially inert.
- the metal material may include at least one high-density metal.
- high-density metal means and includes a metal or semi-metal (i.e., metalloid) having a density greater than or equal to the density of magnesium (about 1.74 g/cm 3 ), such as greater than or equal to the density of titanium (about 4.5 g/cm 3 ), or greater than or equal to the density of zirconium (about 6.5 g/cm 3 ), or greater than or equal to the density of lead (about 11.3 g/cm 3 ), or greater than or equal to the density of hafnium (about 13.3 g/cm 3 ).
- Non-limiting examples of suitable high-density metals include magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), copper (Cu), silver (Ag), gold (Au), zirconium (Zr), titanium (Ti), zinc (Zn), boron (B), silicon (Si), cobalt (Co), manganese (Mn), tin (Sn), bismuth (Bi), lead (Pb), hafnium (Hf), tungsten (W), depleted uranium, tantalum (Ta), alloys thereof, carbides thereof, oxides thereof, or nitrides thereof.
- the at least one high-density metal is a tungsten-based alloy.
- tungsten-based alloy means and includes a metal alloy including greater than or equal to about 50 percent by weight of W, such as greater than or equal to about 75 percent by weight of W, or greater than or equal to about 90 percent by weight of W.
- the tungsten-based alloy may include at least one other metal, such as a lower melting point metal (e.g., a Group VIIIB metal, such as Fe, Co, Ni, Pd, or Pt; a Group IB metal, such as Cu, Ag, or Au; Zn; Al; Sn; Bi) that may interact with the W to form an alloy exhibiting at least one of a desired density, a desired strength, and a desired ductility.
- the at least one other metal includes Ni and at least one of Fe and Cu.
- the metal material may also include at least one oxidizing agent.
- the oxidizing agent may be a strong oxidizer, such that a strong exothermic reaction (e.g., an incendiary reaction) occurs when the fragments formed from the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 penetrate at least one target.
- suitable oxidizing agents include potassium perchlorate, ammonium perchlorate, ammonium nitrate, potassium nitrate, cesium nitrate, strontium nitrate, strontium peroxide, barium nitrate, barium peroxide, cupric oxide, and basic copper nitrate (BCN).
- embodiments of the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 may, optionally, be at least partially coated with at least one of a substantially inert material and a substantially reactive material.
- the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 of the present disclosure may be formed using a variety of methods or processes, such as a conventional injection molding and sintering process.
- at least one high-density metal, at least one lower melting point metal (e.g., a lower melting point than the at least one high-density metal), at least one binder material, and any other desired components (e.g., an oxidizing agent) may be combined to form a substantially homogeneous mixture having a desired consistency.
- At least each of the high-density metal and the lower melting point metal may be provided as powders having desired size, shape, and distribution properties.
- Particles of each of the powders of the substantially homogeneous mixture may be substantially monodisperse, wherein all of the particles are substantially the same size, or may be polydisperse, wherein the particles have a range of sizes and are averaged.
- particles of each of the powders of the substantially homogeneous mixture may independently be of any desired shape, such as spherical, granular, polyhedral, acicular, spindle, grain, flake, scale, or plate. Particles of each of the powders of the substantially homogeneous mixture may have substantially similar shapes, or may have substantially different shapes.
- the at least one binder material may be any conventional binder material, such as a low-melting point hydrocarbon-based material (e.g., waxes, such as carnauba wax, paraffin, etc.; polymers, such as polyethylene, polypropylene, etc.; plastics; or combinations thereof), which may facilitate the formation of a “green” fragmentation body of a desired geometric configuration and which may be removed prior to sintering, as described below.
- the at least one binder material may be provided in a liquid or other flowable state, or may be provided in a solid state and subjected to subsequent heating to transform the at least one binder material into a flowable state.
- the substantially homogeneous mixture may be injected into a mold cavity of a desired shape or geometric configuration. Upon cooling, the substantially homogeneous mixture may form a green fragmentation body having the shape of the mold cavity. While forming of the green fragmentation body using an injection molding process is described above, other processes may be used to form the green fragmentation body including, but not limited to, compacting, transfer molding, or extruding.
- the green fragmentation body may subsequently be subjected to conventional debinding operations to remove the at least one binder material and form a pre-sintered fragmentation body substantially free of the binder material.
- the debinding and pre-sintering operations may utilize at least one of heat, an inert gas, and a solvent to remove the at least one binder material.
- the green fragmentation body may be heated at a temperature below the melting point of each of the at least one high-density metal and the at least one lower melting point metal, but sufficient to volatilize or decompose the at least one binder material.
- the pre-sintered fragmentation body may be subjected to a sintering process to form a substantially fully sintered fragmentation body.
- the sintering process may be performed at a temperature above an incipient liquid phase sintering temperature of the pre-sintered fragmentation body.
- incipient liquid phase sintering temperature means and includes the minimum temperature effective for liquid phase sintering of a metal material.
- liquid phase sintering means and includes a sintering process for a metal material wherein a liquid phase is present during at least part of the sintering process.
- the sintering process may be performed at a temperature within a range of from about 1200° C.
- the pre-sintered fragmentation body shrinks in a predictable manner based on a density differential between the pre-sintered fragmentation body and the substantially fully sintered fragmentation body.
- the substantially fully sintered fragmentation body may be used as one of the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 described above, or the substantially fully sintered fragmentation body may be subjected to further treatment (e.g., etching or machining one or more indentations) to form one of the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 described above.
- the sintering process facilitates the strength, cohesiveness, hardness, ductility, and other significant properties of the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 .
- the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 may at least have sufficient strength to withstand subsequent handling operations (e.g., placement in a warhead containment) without substantially fragmenting or breaking apart in an unintended way.
- a plurality of separate green fragmentation bodies may be debound and pre-sintered to form a plurality of separate pre-sintered fragmentation bodies.
- the plurality of separate pre-sintered fragmentation bodies may then be arranged relative to each other in a desired configuration. In the desired configuration, each of the plurality of separate pre-sintered fragmentation bodies may contact or abut at least one other of the plurality of separate pre-sintered fragmentation bodies.
- the arranged plurality of separate pre-sintered fragmentation bodies may then be subjected to a sintering process substantially similar to that described above to form a substantially fully sintered fragmentation body, which may be used as one of the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 described above, or which may be subjected to further treatment (e.g., etching or machining one or more indentations) to form one of the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 described above.
- further treatment e.g., etching or machining one or more indentations
- FIG. 7A illustrates a perspective view of a warhead 750 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the warhead 750 may include a containment 752 , an explosive charge 754 , at least one barrier material 756 , and at least one fragmentation body 758 .
- the warhead 750 may also include an initiation mechanism (not shown), as is conventional. While the warhead 750 depicted in FIGS.
- the warhead 750 may have a different shape, such as a puck, a disc, a sphere, a plate, a prism, an annulus, a cone, a pyramid, or a complex shape.
- the warhead 750 may be configured to disperse or scatter a plurality of discrete fragments (not shown) formed by the controlled break-up of the fragmentation body 758 in one of a substantially omnidirectional pattern and a substantially focused directional pattern.
- the explosive charge 754 may be any suitable explosive known in art that may be cast, machined, or packed to fit within the containment 752 .
- the explosive charge 754 may be an explosive including 1,3,5,7-tetraaza-1,3,5,7-tetranitrocyclooctane (HMX), such as PBX-9011, PBX-9404-3, PBX-9501, LX-04-1, LX-07-2, LX-09-1, LX-10-0, LX-10-1, LX-11, LX-14, and Octol 75/25; an explosive including 1,3,5-triaza-1,3,5-trinitrocyclohexane (RDX), such as PBX-9007, PBX-9010, PBX-9205, PBX-9407, PBX-9604, HBX-1, HBX-3, Comp A-3, Comp A-5, Comp B, Comp B-3, Comp C-3, Comp C-4, XTX-8004, H-6, Cyclotol 75
- HMX
- the explosive is Comp C-4.
- Comp C-4 includes approximately 91 percent RDX along with waxes and oils.
- the at least one barrier material 756 may be located on the explosive charge 754 .
- the barrier material 756 serves as a buffer between the explosive charge 754 and the at least one fragmentation body 758 .
- the at least one barrier material 756 may be formed of and include a metallic material, such at least one of aluminum and steel.
- the at least one barrier material 756 is an aluminum plate.
- the at least one fragmentation body 758 may be provided on the at least one barrier material 756 and may be substantially similar to an embodiment of at least one of the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , and 600 described above.
- the at least one fragmentation body 758 may be bound or coupled to the at least one barrier material 756 using a suitable adhesive, such as at least one of an epoxy adhesive and a urethane adhesive.
- Suitable epoxy adhesives are commercially available from numerous sources, such as from Henkel Locktite Corp., (Rocky Hill, Conn.) under the LOCTITE-HYSOLTTM, E-20HPTM and E-30CLTM trade names, and from Royal Adhesives and Sealants (Bellville, N.J.) under the HARDMAN® trade name.
- Suitable urethane adhesives are also commercially available from numerous sources, such as from Resin Technology Group, LLC (South Easton, Mass.) under the Ura-Bond 24N trade name.
- the at least one barrier material 756 may be omitted, and the at least one fragmentation body 758 may be substantially unbuffered relative to the explosive charge 754 (e.g., the at least one fragmentation body 758 may be provided on the explosive charge 754 ).
- FIG. 8A illustrates a perspective view of a warhead 850 in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the warhead 850 may include a containment 852 , an explosive charge 854 , at least one barrier material 856 , a first fragmentation body 858 , a second fragmentation body 860 , and seals 862 .
- the warhead 850 may further include an initiation mechanism (not shown), as is conventional.
- the explosive charge 854 may be disposed within the containment 852 , the at least one barrier material 856 may be provided on the explosive charge 854 , the first fragmentation body 858 may be provided on the at least one barrier material 856 , and the second fragmentation body 860 may be provided on the first fragmentation body 858 .
- Each of the explosive charge 854 and the at least one barrier material 856 may be substantially similar to the explosive charge 754 and the at least one barrier material 754 described above with regard to FIG. 7B , respectively.
- the at least one barrier material 854 may be omitted.
- the first fragmentation body 858 and the second fragmentation body 860 may each independently be substantially similar to one of the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , and 600 described above.
- the warhead 850 may include at least one additional fragmentation body (not shown).
- one of the first fragmentation body 858 and the second fragmentation body 860 may be omitted.
- FIG. 8C illustrates a bottom view of the warhead 850 , more clearly showing each of the first fragmentation body 858 and the second fragmentation body 860 .
- the first fragmentation body 858 and the second fragmentation body 860 may be formed of and include the same material, or the first fragmentation body 858 may be formed of and include a different material than the second fragmentation body 860 .
- the first fragmentation body 858 may be formed of and include a substantially inert metal material
- the second fragmentation body 860 be formed of and include a different substantially inert metal material.
- one of first fragmentation body 858 and the second fragmentation body 860 may be formed of and include a substantially reactive metal material and while the other of the first fragmentation body 858 and the second fragmentation body 860 may be formed of and include a substantially inert metal material.
- first fragmentation body 858 may be formed of and include a substantially reactive metal material
- second fragmentation body 860 be formed of and include a different substantially reactive metal material
- each of the first fragmentation body 858 and the second fragmentation body 860 may be formed of and include the same substantially inert metal material, or may be formed of and include the same substantially reactive metal material.
- Each of the first fragmentation body 858 and the second fragmentation body 860 may be configured such that a first plurality of discrete fragments (not shown) formed from the controlled break-up of the first fragmentation body 858 exhibits one or more different properties than a second plurality of discrete fragments (not shown) formed from the controlled break-up of the second fragmentation body 860 .
- each of first fragmentation body 858 and the second fragmentation body 860 may be configured such that a velocity differential exists between the first plurality of discrete fragments and the second plurality of discrete fragments upon a detonation or explosive launch of the warhead 850 .
- At least a portion of one of the first plurality of discrete fragments and the second plurality of discrete fragments may travel at a slower velocity than at least a portion of the other of the first plurality of discrete fragments and the second plurality of discrete fragments.
- the velocity differential may enable faster moving fragments to reach at least one target first and prepare the at least one target for subsequent action by the slower moving fragments.
- Various factors may affect the velocity differential between the first plurality of discrete fragments and the second plurality of discrete fragments.
- the velocity differential may be influenced by one or more of the geometric configuration of each of the first fragmentation body 858 and the second fragmentation body 860 prior to explosive launch, the arrangement of the first fragmentation body 858 relative to the second fragmentation body 860 prior to explosive launch, at least one of the density and the surface roughness of the first fragmentation body 858 as compared to the second fragmentation body 860 , and at least one of sizes and shapes of the first plurality of discrete fragments relative to sizes and shapes of the second plurality of discrete fragments.
- One or more of the various factors above may also effectuate a velocity differential between at least one of different fragments of the first plurality of discrete fragments and different fragments of the second plurality of discrete fragments.
- FIG. 9 illustrates a perspective view of an ordnance 970 in accordance with embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the ordnance 970 may be configured as a rocket or missile and may include multiple sections or components.
- the ordnance 970 may include a rocket motor 972 that may contain a propellant (not shown), such as a liquid fuel or a solid fuel to propel the ordnance 970 .
- the rocket motor 972 may be configured to propel the ordnance using electric propulsion.
- the ordnance 970 may further include a tail section 974 including at least one nozzle (not shown) cooperatively configured with the rocket motor 972 to produce a desired thrust, as well as a wing or fin assembly 976 configured to assist in controlling the flight pattern of the ordnance 970 .
- the fin assembly 976 includes a plurality of adjustable fins 978 to selectively alter the course of flight of the ordnance 970 .
- the fin assembly 976 may extend beyond the tail section 974 of the ordnance 970 .
- at least one component associated with the rocket motor 972 e.g., the at least one nozzle
- a rolleron assembly (not shown) or other stabilizing structure may be associated, for example, with the fin assembly 976 , to stabilize the ordnance 970 during flight as will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art.
- the ordnance 970 may further include a forward or nose section 980 that may house a guidance/control system (not shown) configured to direct the ordnance 970 along a desired flight path, such as by controlling one or more of the fin assembly 976 and the at least one component associated with the rocket motor 972 (e.g., the at least one nozzle).
- the control system may include various sensors that may be used in detecting at least one target and, further may include communication equipment configured to transmit and receive information related to the flight or status of the ordnance 970 as well as information gathered relating to the at least one target.
- the ordnance 970 may include a warhead 982 configured to be detonated at a specific time in an effort to defeat the at least one target.
- the warhead 982 may be configured to detonate upon impact of the ordnance 970 with the at least one target, or it may be configured to be detonated at a desired time, such as when the ordnance 970 is located within a desired distance of the at least one target.
- the control system may include or be associated with appropriate detonating equipment to effect the desired detonation of the warhead 982 as will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art.
- the warhead 982 may be substantially similar to the warheads 750 , 850 of the present disclosure, and may, hence, include an embodiment of at least one of the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 described above.
- one or more components e.g., rocket motor 972 , fin assembly 976 , warhead 982 , etc.
- the ordnance 970 may be arranged in a different order or configuration depending on the intended use of the ordnance 970 .
- the ordnance 970 may guided to a location proximate the at least one target using the guidance/control system (not shown).
- the warhead 982 may experience an explosive launch effectuated by the detonation of an explosive charge (e.g., the explosive charges 754 , 854 described above) therein.
- the explosion of the explosive charge results in the fracturing, fragmentation, and comminution of at least one fragmentation body (e.g., one of fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 described above) of the warhead 982 to form a plurality of discrete fragments (not shown).
- the plurality of discrete fragments are propelled and scattered outwardly from the ordnance 970 , at least a portion of the plurality of discrete fragments being propelled and scattered toward the at least one target. Upon reaching the target, the at least a portion of the plurality of discrete fragments may damage or destroy the at least one target.
- Applications of the various embodiments of the present disclosure may include use in at least one of fragmentary warheads, rockets and missiles incorporating such warheads, fragmentary medium caliber munitions, unmanned vehicles, structural components in such unmanned vehicles, projectiles and bullets, and other types of weapons and munitions.
- the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 of the present disclosure may at least be used in SWITCHBLADETM warheads.
- Embodiments of the present disclosure provide improved fragmentation control and warhead performance as compared to many conventional warheads.
- Explosive gas venting properties of the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 in that the fragmentation body configurations temporarily constrain release of gases generated upon initiation of an adjacent explosive charge to increase forces acting upon the fragments and orient the fragments toward their intended trajectories enable relatively enhanced fragment velocities and more accurate fragment trajectories upon explosive launch.
- the fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 facilitate the consistent formation of discrete fragments of predetermined sizes and predetermined shapes.
- fragmentation bodies 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 , 600 are relatively easy to produce, to handle, and to place in a warhead assembly, and so facilitate improved warhead cost-efficiency and quality by removing variables introduced by manual fragment placement as well as greatly reducing labor time in warhead assembly.
- a first tungsten-based alloy (A1) and a second tungsten-based alloy (A2) were prepared.
- A1 included 90 wt % tungsten, 7 wt % nickel, and 3 wt % iron.
- A2 included 90 wt % tungsten, 6 wt % nickel, and 4 wt % copper. Larger tungsten particles were used in the preparation of A1 than were used in the preparation of A2.
- A1 was designed to have relatively higher strength and relatively lower ductility, and A2 was designed to have relatively lower strength and relatively higher ductility.
- FIG. 10A is a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) showing a top-down view of A1.
- FIG. 10B is an SEM showing a view of a polished cross-section of A1.
- FIG. 11A is an SEM showing a top-down view of A2.
- FIG. 11B is an SEM showing a view of a polished cross-section of A2.
- A1 and A2 of Example 1 were used to form three different fragmentation body configurations (C1, C2, and C3) each.
- the geometric configurations of each of the different fragmentation body configurations (C1A1, C1A2, C2A1, C2A2, C3A1, C3A2) are summarized in Table 1 below.
- M refers to middle
- S refers to side
- * designates values that could not be determined due damage incurred (e.g., a break) during the manufacture of the fragmentation body
- ** indicates that the listed height value corresponds to the non-elevated portion (i.e., “remainder” portion, as described above in reference to FIG. 2A ) of the fragmentation body.
- the elevated portions of C3A1 and C3A2 each had heights of 0.107 inch.
- interconnected fragments each had a mass of approximately 8 grains, and 4 of the interconnected fragments (i.e., the interconnected fragments located at the peripheral corners of each fragmentation body) each had a mass of approximately 2 grains.
- C2A1 and C2A2 each had 216 interconnected fragments, arranged as a matrix of 18 columns and 12 rows.
- 212 of the interconnected fragments each had a mass of approximate 3 grains, and 4 of the interconnected fragments (i.e., the interconnected fragments located at the peripheral corners of each fragmentation body) each had a mass of approximately 1 grain.
- C3A1 and C3A2 each had 174 interconnected fragments, with 28 of the interconnected fragments each having a mass of approximately 8 grains, 152 of the interconnected fragments each having a mass of approximately 3 grains, and 4 of the interconnected fragments (i.e., the interconnected fragments located at the peripheral corners of each fragmentation body) each having a mass of approximately 1 grain.
- FIGS. 12A and 12B are photographs showing a top-down view of C1A1 and a side elevation view of C1A1, respectively.
- C1A2 had a substantially similar structure.
- FIGS. 13A and 13B are photographs showing a top-down view of C2A2 and a side elevation view of C2A2, respectively.
- FIGS. 14A , 14 B, and 14 C are photographs showing a top-down view of C3A2, a perspective view of C3A2, and a side elevation view of C3A2, respectively.
- C3A1 had a substantially similar structure irrespective of the damage that occurred during the manufacture thereof.
- FIG. 15 is an SEM showing the indentation geometry of between two interconnected fragments of C1A1.
- C1A2, C2A1, C2A2, and the non-elevated portions of C3A1 and C3A2 i.e., the “remainder” portions, as described above in reference to FIG. 2A ) had substantially similar indentation geometries.
- Sample warheads were prepared and tested to determine fragment break-up, fragment dispersion, and fragment velocity.
- Each sample warhead included a containment, at least 88 grams of Comp C-4 explosive material, and an inner barrier material of aluminum.
- the inner barrier material was adhered into the containment using HARDMAN® Double Bubble epoxy.
- the Comp C-4 explosive material was hand-packed into the containment.
- One of the sample warheads had a baseline configuration including 122 discrete A1 fragments, arranged as a matrix of 14 columns and 9 rows, each of the discrete A1 fragments having a mass of approximately 8 grains.
- the 122 discrete A1 fragments were individually adhered to the inner barrier material of aluminum using HARDMAN® Double Bubble epoxy.
- sample warheads included at least one of the fragmentation body configurations of Example 2 above.
- a fragmentation body was adhered to the inner barrier material with HARDMAN® Double Bubble epoxy. Triangular indentations on the fragmentation body faced the inner barrier material.
- sample warheads included an additional fragmentation body adhered to the fragmentation body with HARDMAN® Double Bubble epoxy.
- Table 4 The configurations of each of the sample warheads is summarized in Table 4 below. In Table 4, “*” designates that the sample warhead included approximately 34 grams of additional Comp C-4 explosive material.
- Each of the sample warheads listed in Table 4 was tested.
- a 4 foot by 4 foot witness panel including 20-gauge steel was provided approximately 31 inches from a front of each of the sample warheads. The corresponding included angle was 75 degrees.
- a 0.5 inch diameter hole was drilled in the center of the witness panel such that flash from an initiation of the each of the sample warheads would be visible during high-speed photography and indicate time zero for velocity calculations.
- the equipment used to record and analyze an explosive launch of each of the sample warheads included a high-speed video camera that was capable of recording at 26,000 frames per second with a 10 microsecond exposure. Table 5 below summarizes the fragment velocity results for each of the sample warheads listed in Table 4.
- FIGS. 16A through 16I are photographs showing the backlit witness panel following the explosive launch of each of the sample warheads listed in Table 4, respectively (e.g., FIG. 16A corresponds to the sample warhead including the C1A2 configuration, FIG. 16B corresponds to the sample warhead including the C1A2 configuration, FIG. 16C corresponds to the sample warhead including the baseline configuration, FIG. 16D corresponds to the sample warhead including the C2A1 configuration, etc.).
- the baseline configuration ( FIG. 16C ) exhibited an included angle of approximately 65 degrees, and each of the C1A2 configuration and the C1A1 configuration exhibited an included angle of 75 degrees.
- the relatively increased included angle for each of the C1A2 configuration and the C1A1 configuration as compared to the baseline configuration is believe to be attributed to the outer rows and columns of the interconnected fragments being farther away from the sample warhead centerlines.
- the relatively increased distance from centerline results from the distance between the interconnected fragments (i.e., the indentation widths).
- Interconnected fragments located at farther distances from the warhead centerline are believed to be subjected to higher pressure gradients from shockwave curvature, causing larger gaps between the outer rows and outer columns of the interconnect fragments and facilitating greater venting of explosive gases.
- the venting gases are believed to impart a high radial force enabling interconnected fragments to be ejected at steeper angle upon being fractured along the indentations.
- the overall included angle for fragments originating from a center position in the each of the C1A2 configuration and the C1A1 configuration was also greater than that of fragments originating from a center position of the baseline configuration. As shown in FIGS.
- baseline configuration center fragments exhibit an included angle of approximately 15 degrees, as compared to included angle of approximately 22 degrees and 20 degrees for the C1A1 configuration and the C1A2 configuration, respectively.
- the relatively increased included angle of the C1A1 configuration and the C1A2 configuration is believed to be attributed to the increased distance of the interconnected fragments from the warhead centerline, as described above.
- each of the C1A1 configuration and the C1A2 configuration exhibited increased maximum velocity as compared to the baseline configuration. Without being bound to a particular theory, it is believed that the relatively increased maximum velocity was due to a delay in the venting of explosive gases because of the interconnected portions of the interconnected fragments.
- the delay in venting is believed to subject the interconnected fragments to pressure from the explosive gases for a longer period and facilitate increased transfer of energy. Substantially all of the interconnected fragments of each of the C1A2 configuration and the C1A1 configuration appeared to break-up.
- the C2A1 configuration exhibited an included angle of approximately 70 degrees for outer rows and columns of the interconnected fragments, and an included angle of approximately 25 degrees for a remainder of the interconnected fragments.
- the maximum velocity for the C2A1 configuration was 4079 feet per second, the highest velocity of all the sample warhead configurations tested.
- Micro-fragment perforations were also seen in the high-speed video with velocities between about 6200 feet per second and about 5962 feet per second. The relatively high velocities are believed to be attributed to the small fragment mass (e.g., approximately 3 grains) and a high charge-to-mass ratio. Substantially all of the interconnected fragments of the C2A1 configuration appeared to break-up.
- the C3A1 configuration exhibited an included angle of approximately 65 degrees for outer rows and columns of the interconnected fragments, and an included angle of approximately 25 degrees for a remainder of the interconnected fragments.
- the maximum velocity for the C3A1 configuration was about 3780 feet per second.
- the high-speed video showed that 3-grain fragments from the outer portions of the fragmentation body struck the witness panel before 8-grain fragments originating from the central portions of the fragmentation body.
- the 8-grain fragments were determined to have a velocity of approximately 3039 feet per second.
- the relatively lower velocity of the 8-grain fragments formed from the break-up of the C3A1 configuration as compared to the velocity of the 8-grain fragments formed from the break-up of each of the C1A1 configuration and the C1A2 configuration is believed to be attributed to a relative increase in explosive gas venting where the 3-grain interconnected fragments interconnected with the 8-grain interconnected fragments. Substantially all of the interconnected fragments of the C3A1 configuration appeared to break-up.
- the C2A2 double stack configuration (i.e., a fragmentation body having a C2A2 configuration on another fragmentation body having a C2A2 configuration) exhibited an included angle of approximately 60 degrees for outer rows and columns of the interconnected fragments, and an included angle of approximately 30 degrees for a remainder of the interconnected fragments.
- the C2A2 double stack configuration facilitated an increased breadth of fragment penetrations as compared to each of the single fragmentation body configurations depicted in FIGS. 16A through 16E .
- the outer rows and columns of interconnected fragments of the upper fragmentation body are not subjected to same high radial pressure forces as the lower fragmentation body (i.e., the fragmentation body closest to the explosive). Gases venting through fractured outer rows and columns of the interconnected fragments of the lower fragmentation body break-up or fracture the outer rows and columns of the interconnected fragments of the upper fragmentation body.
- the venting gases are believed to impart a relatively greater axial force (and a relatively lower radial force) on the outer rows and columns of the interconnected fragments thereof as compared to the axial force imparted on the outer rows and columns of the interconnected fragments of the lower fragmentation body.
- the maximum velocity for the C2A2 double stack configuration was about 2672 feet per second. A portion of the interconnected fragments of the C2A2 double stack configuration did not appear to substantially break-up.
- the C1A2 double stack configuration (i.e., a fragmentation body having a C1A2 configuration on another fragmentation body having a C1A2 configuration) exhibited an included angle of approximately 75 degrees along a horizontal axis and an included angle of approximately 65 degrees along a vertical axis. Similar to the C2A2 double stack configuration, the C1A2 double stack configuration exhibited an increased breadth of fragment penetrations as compared to the fragment penetrations of each of the single fragmentation body configurations depicted in FIGS. 16A through 16E . In addition, as shown in Table 5, the maximum velocity for the C1A2 double stack configuration was 1685 feet per second. The relatively lower maximum velocity is believed to be due to a low charge-to-mass ratio. A portion of the interconnected fragments of the C1A2 double stack configuration did not appear to substantially break-up.
- the C3A2 and C2A2 stack configuration i.e., a fragmentation body having a C3A2 configuration on another fragmentation body having a C2A2 configuration
- the maximum velocity for the C3A2 and C2A2 stack configuration was about 2385 feet per second.
- the high-speed video showed that 3-grain fragments struck the witness panel before 8-grain fragments.
- a portion of the interconnected fragments of the C3A2 and C2A2 stack configuration did not appear to substantially break-up.
- the C1A2 triple stack configuration (i.e., a fragmentation body having a C1A2 configuration on another fragmentation body having a C1A2 configuration, the another fragmentation body on yet another fragmentation body having a C1A2 configuration) exhibited an included angle of at least 75 degrees (i.e., the extent of the witness panel).
- the C1A2 triple stack configuration exhibited the largest breadth of fragment penetrations of the fragmentation body configurations tested.
- the maximum velocity for the C1A2 triple stack configuration was about 1845 feet per second. A portion of the interconnected fragments of the C1A2 triple stack configuration did not appear to substantially break-up.
- FIG. 17A is a photograph showing discrete fragments that were formed upon the break-up (by an explosive launch of the sample warhead) of the interconnected fragments of the C2A1 configuration. Each of the discrete fragments had a mass of up to approximately 3 grains.
- FIG. 17B shows discrete fragments that were formed upon the break-up (by explosive launch of the sample warhead) of the interconnected fragments of the C1A1 configuration. Each of the discrete fragments had a mass of approximately 8 grains.
Abstract
Description
TABLE 1 |
Dimensions of Multiple Fragmentation Body Configurations Using A1 and A2 |
Taper | Taper | Square | Square | ||||||||
Square | Square | Frag | Frag | Frag | Frag | ||||||
Taper Frag | Taper Frag | Frag | Frag | Groove | Groove | Groove | Groove | ||||
Inches | Length | Width | Height | Side | Middle | Side | Middle | S | M | S | M |
C1A1 | 2.024 | 1.337 | 0.107 | .122 × .124 | .121 × .125 | .133 × .134 | .132 × .135 | 0.024 | 0.025 | 0.015 | 0.015 |
C1A2 | 2.041 | 1.350 | 0.108 | .124 × .126 | .122 × .126 | .134 × .136 | .134 × .136 | 0.025 | 0.026 | 0.015 | 0.015 |
C2A1 | * | * | 0.073 | .098 × .095 | .097 × .096 | 0.099 × .096 | .099 × .097 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.016 | 0.015 |
C2A2 | 2.051 | 1.350 | 0.073 | .098 × .095 | .098 × .097 | .100 × .097 | .100 × .097 | 0.018 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.017 |
C3A1 | * | 1.338 | **0.073 | .093 × .089 | .139 × .149 | .100 × .097 | .146 × .155 | 0.021 | 0.020 | 0.014 | 0.015 |
C3A2 | 2.042 | 1.348 | **0.073 | .096 × .094 | .140 × .149 | .101 × .101 | .145 × .156 | 0.021 | 0.021 | 0.015 | 0.015 |
C1A1 and C1A2 each had 126 interconnected fragments, arranged as a matrix of 14 columns and 9 rows. 122 the interconnected fragments each had a mass of approximately 8 grains, and 4 of the interconnected fragments (i.e., the interconnected fragments located at the peripheral corners of each fragmentation body) each had a mass of approximately 2 grains. C2A1 and C2A2 each had 216 interconnected fragments, arranged as a matrix of 18 columns and 12 rows. 212 of the interconnected fragments each had a mass of approximate 3 grains, and 4 of the interconnected fragments (i.e., the interconnected fragments located at the peripheral corners of each fragmentation body) each had a mass of approximately 1 grain. C3A1 and C3A2 each had 174 interconnected fragments, with 28 of the interconnected fragments each having a mass of approximately 8 grains, 152 of the interconnected fragments each having a mass of approximately 3 grains, and 4 of the interconnected fragments (i.e., the interconnected fragments located at the peripheral corners of each fragmentation body) each having a mass of approximately 1 grain.
TABLE 2 |
C1A1 Microhardness |
C1A1 | Indent |
1 | |
Average | | HRC |
# |
1 | 54.4 | 53.8 | 54.1 | 317 | 31 | |
#3 | 52.0 | 52.1 | 52.1 | 343 | 35 | |
#5 | 51.8 | 51.8 | 51.8 | 346 | 35 | |
#7 | 51.8 | 52.7 | 52.3 | 339 | 34.5 | |
33.9 | ||||||
TABLE 3 |
C1A2 Microhardness |
C1A2 | Indent |
1 | |
Average | | HRC |
# |
1 | 53.2 | 53.4 | 53.3 | 326 | 33 | |
#3 | 54.3 | 54 | 54.2 | 318 | 32 | |
#5 | 55 | 55.2 | 55.1 | 305 | 30.5 | |
#7 | 54.3 | 52.8 | 53.6 | 323 | 32.5 | |
32.0 | ||||||
TABLE 4 |
Sample Warhead Configurations |
Explosive | Total Mass | ||
Test # | Test Configuration | Mass [gm] | [gm] |
1 | C1A2 | 88.26 | 186.1 |
2 | C1A1 | 89.49 | 188.15 |
3 | Baseline | 88.59 | 185.2 |
4 | C2A1 | 89.51 | 164.27 |
5 | C3A1 | 88.11 | 169.34 |
6 | C2A2 Double Stack | 90.3 | 211.13 |
7 | C1A2 Double Stack | 91.4 | 259.19 |
8 | C3A2&C2A2 | 89.66 | 216.97 |
(C2A2 closest to the explosive) | |||
9 | C1A2 Triple Stack* | 125.33 | 357.14 |
TABLE 5 |
Sample Warhead Velocity Results |
Minimum | |||
Maximum | Velocity | ||
Test # | Test Configuration | Velocity (ft/s) | (ft/s) |
1 | C1A2 | 3229 | 1861 |
2 | C1A1 | 3229 | 1993 |
3 | Baseline | 3100 | 2055 |
4 | C2A1 | 4079 | 2628 |
5 | C3A1 | 3780 | 2354 |
6 | C2A2 Double Stack | 2672 | 1704 |
7 | C1A2 Double Stack | 1685 | 1110 |
8 | C3A2&C2A2 | 2385 | 1529 |
(C2A2 closest to the explosive) | |||
9 | C1A2 Triple Stack* | 1845 | 900 |
Claims (30)
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/550,705 US8973503B2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2012-07-17 | Fragmentation bodies, warheads including fragmentation bodies, and related ordnance |
PCT/US2013/050653 WO2014014895A2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2013-07-16 | Fragmentation bodies, warheads including fragmentation bodies, and related ordnance |
US14/641,214 US9389054B2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2015-03-06 | Methods of forming fragmentation bodies, warheads, and ordnance |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/550,705 US8973503B2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2012-07-17 | Fragmentation bodies, warheads including fragmentation bodies, and related ordnance |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/641,214 Continuation US9389054B2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2015-03-06 | Methods of forming fragmentation bodies, warheads, and ordnance |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140182474A1 US20140182474A1 (en) | 2014-07-03 |
US8973503B2 true US8973503B2 (en) | 2015-03-10 |
Family
ID=48875788
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/550,705 Active 2033-01-29 US8973503B2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2012-07-17 | Fragmentation bodies, warheads including fragmentation bodies, and related ordnance |
US14/641,214 Active US9389054B2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2015-03-06 | Methods of forming fragmentation bodies, warheads, and ordnance |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/641,214 Active US9389054B2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2015-03-06 | Methods of forming fragmentation bodies, warheads, and ordnance |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8973503B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2014014895A2 (en) |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130255524A1 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2013-10-03 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Projectile Casing for an Explosive Projectile and Method for Handling a Projectile Casing |
US20150233688A1 (en) * | 2012-07-17 | 2015-08-20 | Orbital Atk, Inc. | Methods of forming fragmentation bodies, warheads, and ordnance |
US9738947B1 (en) | 2014-04-18 | 2017-08-22 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Fragmentation device with increased surface hardness and a method of producing the same |
US9784541B1 (en) | 2016-08-15 | 2017-10-10 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Increased lethality warhead for high acceleration environments |
US9964385B1 (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2018-05-08 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Shock mitigation body |
US20190033047A1 (en) * | 2016-01-15 | 2019-01-31 | Saab Bofors Dynamics Switzerland Ltd. | Warhead |
US10415939B2 (en) * | 2014-03-14 | 2019-09-17 | Hirtenberger Defence Europe GmbH | Projectile |
US10634472B1 (en) | 2016-03-22 | 2020-04-28 | Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. | Prefragmented warheads with enhanced performance |
US11105595B2 (en) * | 2019-04-29 | 2021-08-31 | Omnitek Partners Llc | High fragmentation mortar shells |
US11454480B1 (en) | 2019-06-12 | 2022-09-27 | Corvid Technologies LLC | Methods for forming munitions casings and casings and munitions formed thereby |
US11614311B1 (en) | 2016-03-22 | 2023-03-28 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Prefragmented warheads with enhanced performance |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IL222989A (en) * | 2012-11-12 | 2016-02-29 | Israel Aerospace Ind Ltd | Warhead |
US9946159B2 (en) * | 2016-03-29 | 2018-04-17 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Lithographic fragmentation technology |
WO2020131110A1 (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2020-06-25 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Momentum trap |
DE102019003479B4 (en) | 2019-05-15 | 2022-08-25 | TDW Gesellschaft für verteidigungstechnische Wirksysteme mbH | Process for optimizing the performance of an active system |
JP2022549167A (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2022-11-24 | マサチューセッツ インスティテュート オブ テクノロジー | Systems, compositions and methods for producing sharp edges |
DE102021104169A1 (en) | 2021-02-22 | 2022-03-17 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh | Ammunition including construction splinters |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2023158A (en) * | 1934-07-27 | 1935-12-03 | Trojan Powder Co | Hand grenade |
US3757693A (en) * | 1971-05-21 | 1973-09-11 | Avco Corp | Fragmentation wrap for explosive weapons |
US4824624A (en) * | 1984-12-17 | 1989-04-25 | Ceradyne, Inc. | Method of manufacturing boron carbide armor tiles |
US5157225A (en) | 1983-04-19 | 1992-10-20 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Controlled fragmentation warhead |
US6962634B2 (en) | 2002-03-28 | 2005-11-08 | Alliant Techsystems Inc. | Low temperature, extrudable, high density reactive materials |
US20080102303A1 (en) | 2006-06-20 | 2008-05-01 | Aerojet-General Corporation | Co-sintered multi-system tungsten alloy composite |
US7614348B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2009-11-10 | Alliant Techsystems Inc. | Weapons and weapon components incorporating reactive materials |
US8061275B1 (en) | 2010-01-08 | 2011-11-22 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Warhead selectively releasing fragments of varied sizes and shapes |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8973503B2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2015-03-10 | Alliant Techsystem Inc. | Fragmentation bodies, warheads including fragmentation bodies, and related ordnance |
-
2012
- 2012-07-17 US US13/550,705 patent/US8973503B2/en active Active
-
2013
- 2013-07-16 WO PCT/US2013/050653 patent/WO2014014895A2/en active Application Filing
-
2015
- 2015-03-06 US US14/641,214 patent/US9389054B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2023158A (en) * | 1934-07-27 | 1935-12-03 | Trojan Powder Co | Hand grenade |
US3757693A (en) * | 1971-05-21 | 1973-09-11 | Avco Corp | Fragmentation wrap for explosive weapons |
US5157225A (en) | 1983-04-19 | 1992-10-20 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Controlled fragmentation warhead |
US4824624A (en) * | 1984-12-17 | 1989-04-25 | Ceradyne, Inc. | Method of manufacturing boron carbide armor tiles |
US6962634B2 (en) | 2002-03-28 | 2005-11-08 | Alliant Techsystems Inc. | Low temperature, extrudable, high density reactive materials |
US20080102303A1 (en) | 2006-06-20 | 2008-05-01 | Aerojet-General Corporation | Co-sintered multi-system tungsten alloy composite |
US7614348B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2009-11-10 | Alliant Techsystems Inc. | Weapons and weapon components incorporating reactive materials |
US8061275B1 (en) | 2010-01-08 | 2011-11-22 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Warhead selectively releasing fragments of varied sizes and shapes |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/050653, mailed Feb. 18, 2014. |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9568291B2 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2017-02-14 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Projectile casing for an explosive projectile and method for handling a projectile casing |
US20130255524A1 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2013-10-03 | Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg | Projectile Casing for an Explosive Projectile and Method for Handling a Projectile Casing |
US20150233688A1 (en) * | 2012-07-17 | 2015-08-20 | Orbital Atk, Inc. | Methods of forming fragmentation bodies, warheads, and ordnance |
US9389054B2 (en) * | 2012-07-17 | 2016-07-12 | Orbital Atk, Inc. | Methods of forming fragmentation bodies, warheads, and ordnance |
US10415939B2 (en) * | 2014-03-14 | 2019-09-17 | Hirtenberger Defence Europe GmbH | Projectile |
US10648783B2 (en) | 2014-03-14 | 2020-05-12 | Hirtenberger Defence Europe GmbH | Projectile |
US9738947B1 (en) | 2014-04-18 | 2017-08-22 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Fragmentation device with increased surface hardness and a method of producing the same |
US20190033047A1 (en) * | 2016-01-15 | 2019-01-31 | Saab Bofors Dynamics Switzerland Ltd. | Warhead |
US10612899B2 (en) * | 2016-01-15 | 2020-04-07 | Saab Bofors Dynamics Switzerland Ltd. | Warhead |
US10634472B1 (en) | 2016-03-22 | 2020-04-28 | Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. | Prefragmented warheads with enhanced performance |
US11105596B1 (en) | 2016-03-22 | 2021-08-31 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Prefragmented warheads with enhanced performance |
US11614311B1 (en) | 2016-03-22 | 2023-03-28 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Prefragmented warheads with enhanced performance |
US9784541B1 (en) | 2016-08-15 | 2017-10-10 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Increased lethality warhead for high acceleration environments |
US9964385B1 (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2018-05-08 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Shock mitigation body |
US11105595B2 (en) * | 2019-04-29 | 2021-08-31 | Omnitek Partners Llc | High fragmentation mortar shells |
US11454480B1 (en) | 2019-06-12 | 2022-09-27 | Corvid Technologies LLC | Methods for forming munitions casings and casings and munitions formed thereby |
US11747122B1 (en) | 2019-06-12 | 2023-09-05 | Corvid Technologies LLC | Methods for forming munitions casings and casings and munitions formed thereby |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9389054B2 (en) | 2016-07-12 |
WO2014014895A2 (en) | 2014-01-23 |
US20140182474A1 (en) | 2014-07-03 |
WO2014014895A3 (en) | 2014-04-17 |
US20150233688A1 (en) | 2015-08-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9389054B2 (en) | Methods of forming fragmentation bodies, warheads, and ordnance | |
US7614348B2 (en) | Weapons and weapon components incorporating reactive materials | |
US20190285391A1 (en) | Auto-segmenting spherical projectile | |
US9683821B2 (en) | Reactive material enhanced projectiles, devices for generating reactive material enhanced projectiles and related methods | |
US4497253A (en) | Armor-piercing projectile | |
EP1516153B1 (en) | Projectile or warhead | |
US8857342B2 (en) | NANO-enhanced kinetic energy particles | |
EP1893935B1 (en) | Projectile or warhead | |
US20070056462A1 (en) | Oil well perforators | |
EP1864960A2 (en) | Metal matrix composite energetic structures | |
WO2015061662A1 (en) | Fragmenting projectile | |
EA001318B1 (en) | Projectile or warhead | |
WO1999010702A2 (en) | Projectile for ammunition cartridge | |
EP2281114A2 (en) | Rocket motor with pellet and bulk solid propellants | |
EP3387365B1 (en) | Multiple explosively formed projectiles liner fabricated by additive manufacturing | |
US6467416B1 (en) | Combined high-blast/anti-armor warheads | |
WO2018090025A1 (en) | Frangible bullet tip with fluted sides | |
USH2230H1 (en) | Ceramic and stacked penetrator against a hardened target | |
GB2595700A (en) | Enhanced energy shaped charge | |
US11614311B1 (en) | Prefragmented warheads with enhanced performance | |
EP3919854A1 (en) | Improved shaped charge device | |
JP3853598B2 (en) | Projectile and its manufacturing method | |
Powell | Precision blasting techniques for avalanche control |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC., VIRGINIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DUNAWAY, JAMES D.;BOTT, JOHN E.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20120412 TO 20120716;REEL/FRAME:028563/0545 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC.;CALIBER COMPANY;EAGLE INDUSTRIES UNLIMITED, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:031731/0281 Effective date: 20131101 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ORBITAL ATK, INC., VIRGINIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC.;REEL/FRAME:035383/0375 Effective date: 20150209 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, NORTH CAROLINA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ORBITAL ATK, INC.;ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:036732/0170 Effective date: 20150929 Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINIS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ORBITAL ATK, INC.;ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:036732/0170 Effective date: 20150929 |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
ERR | Erratum |
Free format text: IN THE NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION APPEARING IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF MARCH 8, 2016, DELETE ALL REFERENCE TO THE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION, ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 16, 2016, FOR PATENT NO. 8,973,503. THERE WAS NO PETITION UNDER 3.81(B) FILED AND GRANTED BY THE OFFICE OF PETITIONS. THE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION WHICH ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 16, 2016 WAS PUBLISHED IN ERROR AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ISSUED FOR THIS PATENT. |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC., MINNESOTA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:045998/0801 Effective date: 20180520 Owner name: ATK/PHYSICAL SCIENCES, INC., MINNESOTA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:045998/0801 Effective date: 20180520 Owner name: ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION, MINNESOTA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:045998/0801 Effective date: 20180520 Owner name: ORBITAL ATK, INC., MINNESOTA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:045998/0801 Effective date: 20180520 Owner name: ORBITAL ATK, INC., VIRGINIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:046477/0874 Effective date: 20180606 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NORTHROP GRUMMAN INNOVATION SYSTEMS, INC., MINNESOTA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ORBITAL ATK, INC.;REEL/FRAME:047400/0381 Effective date: 20180606 Owner name: NORTHROP GRUMMAN INNOVATION SYSTEMS, INC., MINNESO Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ORBITAL ATK, INC.;REEL/FRAME:047400/0381 Effective date: 20180606 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NORTHROP GRUMMAN INNOVATION SYSTEMS LLC, MINNESOTA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTHROP GRUMMAN INNOVATION SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:055223/0425 Effective date: 20200731 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION, MINNESOTA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTHROP GRUMMAN INNOVATION SYSTEMS LLC;REEL/FRAME:055256/0892 Effective date: 20210111 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |