US3785488A - Flotation process for recovering molybdenum - Google Patents
Flotation process for recovering molybdenum Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3785488A US3785488A US00248317A US3785488DA US3785488A US 3785488 A US3785488 A US 3785488A US 00248317 A US00248317 A US 00248317A US 3785488D A US3785488D A US 3785488DA US 3785488 A US3785488 A US 3785488A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- molybdenite
- flotation
- concentrate
- sulfide
- recovering
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D1/00—Flotation
- B03D1/02—Froth-flotation processes
- B03D1/06—Froth-flotation processes differential
Definitions
- ABSTRACT A process for recovering molybdenite from a metallurgical concentrate comprising a major proportion of copper sulfide and other sulfides'and a minor portion of molybdenum sulfide is provided, in which the copper and other sulfides are selectively depressed by employing a mixed thiol-alcohol thereby enabling the molybdenite to be recovered by flotation.
- the subject matter of the present invention relates to an improved flotation process for recoveringmolybdenite. More particularly, this invention relates to a process wherein molybdenum sulfide is separated from other sulfides with which it occurs by use of a novel selective depressant.
- any one of three approaches may be used to separate molybdenite from other sulfides.
- molybdenite can be depressed by suitable reagents and the copper recovered by reflotation.
- a heat treatment step involving low temperature roasting of the molybdenite bearing flotation tailings is required in order to reactivate the molybdenite for up-grading by reflotation in several stages.
- This approach is not particularly desirable because it requires floating the major portion (usually more than 99 percent) of the metallurgical concentrate initially obtained and requires costly heat treatment as an added step.
- a second approach involves depressing copper minerals by means of steaming or low temperature roasting to remove the original copper mineral collectors, followed byflotation of molybdenite from the heat treated concentrate with or without the use of auxiliary copper depressants. This approach is not particularly desirable because of the added costly heat treatment steps required.
- a third approach is that of depressing copper sulfide with selective reagents and recovering molybdenite by selective flotation and repeated cleaning, as necessary.
- This approach is highly desirable since it requires floating only a small fraction of the total weight of metallurgical concentrate (usually less than -I percent) and it does not require the added costly, heat treating steps.
- the major problem associated with this third approach is providing selective and effective depressants for sulfides otherv than molybdenite.
- a selective depressant employed was the material obtained by reaction of sodium hydroxide with phosphorus pentasulfide commonly referred to as Nokes Reagent. This reaction may erupt with great violence liberating substantial amounts of hydrogen sulfide, a hazardous and toxic pollutant. The reaction is spasmodic in character, giving rise to violent bursts of activity and gas liberation at unpredictable intervals. The unpredictable nature of the reaction recently was responsible for the deaths of several workers.
- this third approach as a method of recovering molybdenite from other sulfides is highly desirable from a processing viewpoint, the lack of safe and effective depressants necessitates the use of alternative recovery procedures.
- sodium sulfide and sodium cyanide among others.
- sodium sulfide requires the use of large quantities, as well as constituting a safety hazard in that it will liberate hydrogen sulfide under certain conditions.
- the sodium cyanide also presents a potential safety hazard because of the inherent nature of cyanide compounds.
- the present invention represents the culmination of a long series of investigations directed to providing a safe and effective process for recovering molybdenite from the metallurgical concentrates obtained by the flotation treatment of raw copper sulfide ores.
- An additional object of the invention is to provide a safe and effective process for recovering molybdenite' It is yet another object of the invention to provide a relatively cheap process for recovering molybdenite.
- the present invention provides a process for recovering molybdenite from a metallurgical concentrate of sulfide minerals in which the molybdenite constitutes a minor amount which comprises depressing minerals other than molybdenite with from about 0.1 to 10 pounds per ton of concentrate of a thioalcohol having the formula:
- R is an alkyl group of from I to 4 carbon atoms
- R, R" and R' are individually selected from hydrogen, hydroxyl, sulfhydryl and an alkanol group of from I to 4 carbon atoms
- X is'selected from hydrogen, sodium, potassium and ammonium; selectively froth floating molybdenite from the depressed sulfides and recovering the flotation concentrate thus obtained.
- Thioglycerol, HSCH CH(OI-l)CH Ol-l is preferred as a selective depressant for the sulfide minerals, other than molybdenite, which have been previously activated by flotation collectors such as xanthates, dithiophosphates, dithiocarbamates and their derivatives.
- the novel depressants selectively depress sulfide minerals other than molybdenite enabling much cleaner froth flotation concentrates to be obtained than was formerly possible.
- the present process avoids costly added heat treatment steps and enables the desired recovery to be effected while froth floating only a minor portion of the metallurgical concentrate initially employed.
- the reagents are safe to use and present no significant threat to health and the environment. Still further, the present process enables more efficient recovery of molybdenite to be achieved than was previously possible.
- the reagents used in this invention may function generally as depressants for many sulfide minerals and could be useful for example for depressing pyrite in' coal flotation, to give low sulfur coal, a commodity much in demand for ecological reasons. It is'also possible that they may serve to depress undesirable sulfides during non-metallic mineral flotation, for example, in the recovery of fluorspar, barite, silica, feldspar, etc., from their ores.
- hydrophilic polycarboxylic acids or sulfonates to depress minerals which are normally promoted by fatty acids or petroleum sulfonates'.
- Hydrophilic polyamines may be used as depressants for minerals which are promoted by fatty amines.
- ore in which the metal occurs as a sulfide is first processed in accordance with conventional procedures to separate the valuable minerals from the gangue materials. Generally, such separation is effected by grinding the ore to a suitable sizefor flotation and effecting flotation using a collector such as a xanthate, dithiophosphate, dithiocarbamate, or a derivative thereof.
- a collector such as a xanthate, dithiophosphate, dithiocarbamate, or a derivative thereof.
- the concentrate thus collected is suitable for use directly in the process of the present invention.
- the particular method by which the metallurgical concentrate is obtained is not critical and forms no part of the present invention.
- the metallurgical concentrate- is prepared as a -40 percent aqueous slurry in a flotation cell and conditioned with from about 0.1 to about 10 pounds per ton of solids with a novel depressant of the present invention. The most effective amount can be readily determined by testing. Conditioning is continued until copper sulfide is no longer floated to the surface by a stream of air.
- a hydrocarbon oil in sufficient amount to aid in the flotation of the molybdenum sulfide to the surface where it can be collected is also possible. Hydrocarbon oils such as kerosene, fuel oil, and the like are normally used for such purpose and are effective in the present process.
- the floated molybdenium sulfide concentrate is then recovered and, if necessary, subjected to cleaning. ln many instances the concentrate obtained is of sufficient purity to be processed without the need for additional cleaning. When cleaning is contemplated, a reflotation of the concentrate using a novel depressant of the present invention is beneficial.
- EXAMPLE l A 600 gm. sample of mixed copper-molybdenum sulfides containing -O.55 percent molybdenum was refloated in a laboratory flotation cell at -28 percent solids with 0.1 lb./ton of sodium ethyl xanthate for 5 minutes. The froth product was returned to the cell, conditioned for 2 minutes with 2.00 lbs./ton of thioglycerol, HSCH CH(OH )CH OH, and 0.5 lb./ton of fuel oil.
- the froth was collected for 4 minutes, returned to a cleaner cell, conditioned for 2 minutes with 0.5 lb./ton of thioglycerol and 0.2 lb./ton fuel oil and the froth collected for 4 minutes more.
- the cleaned concentrate contained 9.2 percent of the total sample weight, while the rougher tailing contained 71.8 percent and the cleaner tailing 19.0 percent. Microscopic examination showed that percent of the molybdenum had been recovered'in the rougher flotation step.
- EXAMPLE n A copper concentrate was processed in the laboratory using thioglycerol to depress the copper minerals while recovering the contained molybdenum minerals by froth flotation.
- the following operating procedure EXAMPLE lll Comparison of current plant operating practice with Nokes Reagent relative to thioglycerol for copper depression during rougher molybdenum flotation is as follows: 9CTA Concen trzition9CTL Percent 9CTA Example Reagent lbs./t0n9CTL Copper9C TA 9CTL depression9CTA l-a --9CTL 21.39CTA l-b Noke's rgt. 29CTL 46.09CTA l c Nokes rgt. 49CTL 75.09CTA l-d Thioglycerol 19CTL 87.89CTA l-e Thioglycerol 49CTL 94.6
- the reagents of this invention are extremely effective at depressing the copper sulfide minerals, while allowing the molybdenum sulfide to float and be concentrated.
- a process for recovering molybdenite from a metallurgical concentrate which comprises depressing sulfide minerals other than molybdenite with from about 0.1 to 10 pounds per ton of concentrate solids of thioglycerol, selectively froth-floating molybdenite from the sulfides and recovering the flotation concentrate 3.
- a process according to claim 1 wherein a hydrothus obtained.
Landscapes
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
Abstract
A process for recovering molybdenite from a metallurgical concentrate comprising a major proportion of copper sulfide and other sulfides and a minor portion of molybdenum sulfide is provided, in which the copper and other sulfides are selectively depressed by employing a mixed thiol-alcohol thereby enabling the molybdenite to be recovered by flotation.
Description
United States Patent 1 Werneke FLOTATIDN PROCESS FOR RECOVERING MOLYBDENUM [75] Inventor: Michael Francis Wernelre, Milford,
Conn.
[73] Assignee: American Cyanarnid Company,
Stamford, Conn.
[22] Filed: Apr. 27, 1972 [21] Appl. No.: 248,317
[ 1 .Ian. 15, 1974 2,125,337 8/1938 Gaudin 209/166 2,316,743 4/1943 Marsh 3,405,581 8/1946 Keller 209/166 FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS 114,078 10/1941 Australia 209/166 Primary Examiner-Robert Halper Att0rneyJ0hn M. Miele [57] ABSTRACT A process for recovering molybdenite from a metallurgical concentrate comprising a major proportion of copper sulfide and other sulfides'and a minor portion of molybdenum sulfide is provided, in which the copper and other sulfides are selectively depressed by employing a mixed thiol-alcohol thereby enabling the molybdenite to be recovered by flotation.
3 Claims, No Drawings FLOTATION PROCESS FOR RECOVERING MOILYBDENUM Generally stated, the subject matter of the present invention relates to an improved flotation process for recoveringmolybdenite. More particularly, this invention relates to a process wherein molybdenum sulfide is separated from other sulfides with which it occurs by use of a novel selective depressant.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In the treatment of copper sulfide ores containing minor quantities of molybdenite (M the molybdenite normally accompanies the copper sulfide in the metallurgical concentrates obtained by flotation treatment of the raw ores. It is then necessary to separate molybdenite from the copper sulfide and any other sulfides, notably iron sulfide, in the concentrates thus obtained'.
Normally, any one of three approaches may be used to separate molybdenite from other sulfides. In a first approach, molybdenite can be depressed by suitable reagents and the copper recovered by reflotation. A heat treatment step involving low temperature roasting of the molybdenite bearing flotation tailings is required in order to reactivate the molybdenite for up-grading by reflotation in several stages. This approach is not particularly desirable because it requires floating the major portion (usually more than 99 percent) of the metallurgical concentrate initially obtained and requires costly heat treatment as an added step.
. A second approach involves depressing copper minerals by means of steaming or low temperature roasting to remove the original copper mineral collectors, followed byflotation of molybdenite from the heat treated concentrate with or without the use of auxiliary copper depressants. This approach is not particularly desirable because of the added costly heat treatment steps required. 1
A third approach is that of depressing copper sulfide with selective reagents and recovering molybdenite by selective flotation and repeated cleaning, as necessary. This approach is highly desirable since it requires floating only a small fraction of the total weight of metallurgical concentrate (usually less than -I percent) and it does not require the added costly, heat treating steps. The major problem associated with this third approach is providing selective and effective depressants for sulfides otherv than molybdenite.
In the past, a selective depressant employed was the material obtained by reaction of sodium hydroxide with phosphorus pentasulfide commonly referred to as Nokes Reagent. This reaction may erupt with great violence liberating substantial amounts of hydrogen sulfide, a hazardous and toxic pollutant. The reaction is spasmodic in character, giving rise to violent bursts of activity and gas liberation at unpredictable intervals. The unpredictable nature of the reaction recently was responsible for the deaths of several workers. Thus, although this third approach as a method of recovering molybdenite from other sulfides is highly desirable from a processing viewpoint, the lack of safe and effective depressants necessitates the use of alternative recovery procedures. Other depressants which have been used are sodium sulfide and sodium cyanide among others. However, the sodium sulfide requires the use of large quantities, as well as constituting a safety hazard in that it will liberate hydrogen sulfide under certain conditions. The sodium cyanide also presents a potential safety hazard because of the inherent nature of cyanide compounds.
The present invention represents the culmination of a long series of investigations directed to providing a safe and effective process for recovering molybdenite from the metallurgical concentrates obtained by the flotation treatment of raw copper sulfide ores.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a process for recovering molybdenite from the metallurgical concentrates in which it occurs.
An additional object of the invention is to provide a safe and effective process for recovering molybdenite' It is yet another object of the invention to provide a relatively cheap process for recovering molybdenite.
Additional objects and advantages will be set forth in part in the description which follows and in part will be obvious from the description or 'may be learned by the practice of the invention, the objects and advantages being realized and attained bymeans of the processes and improvements, particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
THE INVENTION To achieve the foregoing objects and in accordance with its purposes as embodied and broadly described, the present invention provides a process for recovering molybdenite from a metallurgical concentrate of sulfide minerals in which the molybdenite constitutes a minor amount which comprises depressing minerals other than molybdenite with from about 0.1 to 10 pounds per ton of concentrate of a thioalcohol having the formula:
wherein R is an alkyl group of from I to 4 carbon atoms, R, R" and R' are individually selected from hydrogen, hydroxyl, sulfhydryl and an alkanol group of from I to 4 carbon atoms and X is'selected from hydrogen, sodium, potassium and ammonium; selectively froth floating molybdenite from the depressed sulfides and recovering the flotation concentrate thus obtained.
Thioglycerol, HSCH CH(OI-l)CH Ol-l, is preferred as a selective depressant for the sulfide minerals, other than molybdenite, which have been previously activated by flotation collectors such as xanthates, dithiophosphates, dithiocarbamates and their derivatives.
-The invention consists of the novel methods, processes, steps and improvements herein shown and described. 1
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are not restrictive of the invention.
In accordance with the present invention, the novel depressants selectively depress sulfide minerals other than molybdenite enabling much cleaner froth flotation concentrates to be obtained than was formerly possible. In addition, the present process avoids costly added heat treatment steps and enables the desired recovery to be effected while froth floating only a minor portion of the metallurgical concentrate initially employed. In addition, the reagents are safe to use and present no significant threat to health and the environment. Still further, the present process enables more efficient recovery of molybdenite to be achieved than was previously possible.
While it is not considered to limit the invention herein disclosed and claimed, it is believed that the mechanism of action involves the choice of a selective reactive moiety which has an affinity for the mineral to be depressed and attaching a hydrophilic group to such reactive moiety. Therefore, on flotation the surface of the depressed mineral has been made hydrophilic and is rendered unfloatable.
It is conceivable that the reagents used in this invention may function generally as depressants for many sulfide minerals and could be useful for example for depressing pyrite in' coal flotation, to give low sulfur coal, a commodity much in demand for ecological reasons. It is'also possible that they may serve to depress undesirable sulfides during non-metallic mineral flotation, for example, in the recovery of fluorspar, barite, silica, feldspar, etc., from their ores.
Applications of other materials as depressants could include the use of hydrophilic polycarboxylic acids or sulfonates to depress minerals which are normally promoted by fatty acids or petroleum sulfonates'. Hydrophilic polyamines may be used as depressants for minerals which are promoted by fatty amines.
ln carrying out the process of the present invention,
'a copper. ore in which the metal occurs as a sulfide is first processed in accordance with conventional procedures to separate the valuable minerals from the gangue materials. Generally, such separation is effected by grinding the ore to a suitable sizefor flotation and effecting flotation using a collector such as a xanthate, dithiophosphate, dithiocarbamate, or a derivative thereof. The concentrate thus collected is suitable for use directly in the process of the present invention. The particular method by which the metallurgical concentrate is obtained is not critical and forms no part of the present invention.
The metallurgical concentrate-is prepared as a -40 percent aqueous slurry in a flotation cell and conditioned with from about 0.1 to about 10 pounds per ton of solids with a novel depressant of the present invention. The most effective amount can be readily determined by testing. Conditioning is continued until copper sulfide is no longer floated to the surface by a stream of air. The use ofa hydrocarbon oil in sufficient amount to aid in the flotation of the molybdenum sulfide to the surface where it can be collected is also possible. Hydrocarbon oils such as kerosene, fuel oil, and the like are normally used for such purpose and are effective in the present process.
The floated molybdenium sulfide concentrate is then recovered and, if necessary, subjected to cleaning. ln many instances the concentrate obtained is of sufficient purity to be processed without the need for additional cleaning. When cleaning is contemplated, a reflotation of the concentrate using a novel depressant of the present invention is beneficial.
The following examples are provided for illustrative purposes and may include particular features of the invention. However, the examples should not be construed as limiting the invention, many variations of which are possible without departing from the spirit or scope thereof.
EXAMPLE l A 600 gm. sample of mixed copper-molybdenum sulfides containing -O.55 percent molybdenum was refloated in a laboratory flotation cell at -28 percent solids with 0.1 lb./ton of sodium ethyl xanthate for 5 minutes. The froth product was returned to the cell, conditioned for 2 minutes with 2.00 lbs./ton of thioglycerol, HSCH CH(OH )CH OH, and 0.5 lb./ton of fuel oil. The froth was collected for 4 minutes, returned to a cleaner cell, conditioned for 2 minutes with 0.5 lb./ton of thioglycerol and 0.2 lb./ton fuel oil and the froth collected for 4 minutes more. The cleaned concentrate contained 9.2 percent of the total sample weight, while the rougher tailing contained 71.8 percent and the cleaner tailing 19.0 percent. Microscopic examination showed that percent of the molybdenum had been recovered'in the rougher flotation step.
EXAMPLE n A copper concentrate was processed in the laboratory using thioglycerol to depress the copper minerals while recovering the contained molybdenum minerals by froth flotation. The following operating procedure EXAMPLE lll Comparison of current plant operating practice with Nokes Reagent relative to thioglycerol for copper depression during rougher molybdenum flotation is as follows: 9CTA Concen trzition9CTL Percent 9CTA Example Reagent lbs./t0n9CTL Copper9C TA 9CTL depression9CTA l-a --9CTL 21.39CTA l-b Noke's rgt. 29CTL 46.09CTA l c Nokes rgt. 49CTL 75.09CTA l-d Thioglycerol 19CTL 87.89CTA l-e Thioglycerol 49CTL 94.6
It can be readily observed from the examples that the reagents of this invention are extremely effective at depressing the copper sulfide minerals, while allowing the molybdenum sulfide to float and be concentrated.
I claim:
1. A process for recovering molybdenite from a metallurgical concentrate which comprises depressing sulfide minerals other than molybdenite with from about 0.1 to 10 pounds per ton of concentrate solids of thioglycerol, selectively froth-floating molybdenite from the sulfides and recovering the flotation concentrate 3. A process according to claim 1 wherein a hydrothus obtained.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the concentration of the thioglycerol is from about 1 to 4 of the molybdemtepounds per ton. 5 =l= carbon oil is used to aid in the flotation and recovery
Claims (3)
1. A process for recovering molybdenite from a metallurgical concentrate which comprises depressing sulfide minerals other than molybdenite with from about 0.1 to 10 pounds per ton of concentrate solids of thioglycerol, selectively froth-floating molybdenite from the sulfides and recovering the flotation concentrate thus obtained.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the concentration of the thioglycerol is from about 1 to 4 pounds per ton.
3. A process according to claim 1 wherein a hydrocarbon oil is used to aid in the flotation and recovery of the molybdenite.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US24831772A | 1972-04-27 | 1972-04-27 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US3785488A true US3785488A (en) | 1974-01-15 |
Family
ID=22938582
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US00248317A Expired - Lifetime US3785488A (en) | 1972-04-27 | 1972-04-27 | Flotation process for recovering molybdenum |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US3785488A (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4316797A (en) * | 1980-09-10 | 1982-02-23 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Flotation agent and process |
| US4329223A (en) * | 1980-01-11 | 1982-05-11 | United States Borax & Chemical Corporation | Flotation of molybdenite |
| US4416770A (en) * | 1982-05-28 | 1983-11-22 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Selective mineral recovery |
| US4532031A (en) * | 1982-06-21 | 1985-07-30 | American Cyanamid Company | Froth flotation process |
| US4643823A (en) * | 1982-09-10 | 1987-02-17 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Recovering metal sulfides by flotation using mercaptoalcohols |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1839155A (en) * | 1927-12-13 | 1931-12-29 | Du Pont | Process of concentrating ores by flotation |
| US1904460A (en) * | 1927-02-15 | 1933-04-18 | Barrett Co | Concentration of ores by flotation |
| US2125337A (en) * | 1929-12-24 | 1938-08-02 | Antoine M Gaudin | Flotation reagents and method of use |
| US2316743A (en) * | 1939-11-09 | 1943-04-13 | American Cyanamid Co | Flotation of molybdenite |
| US3405581A (en) * | 1966-10-24 | 1968-10-15 | Houdaille Industries Inc | Heavy duty punching machine with carriage means to support and move tool holder transversely of machine |
-
1972
- 1972-04-27 US US00248317A patent/US3785488A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1904460A (en) * | 1927-02-15 | 1933-04-18 | Barrett Co | Concentration of ores by flotation |
| US1839155A (en) * | 1927-12-13 | 1931-12-29 | Du Pont | Process of concentrating ores by flotation |
| US2125337A (en) * | 1929-12-24 | 1938-08-02 | Antoine M Gaudin | Flotation reagents and method of use |
| US2316743A (en) * | 1939-11-09 | 1943-04-13 | American Cyanamid Co | Flotation of molybdenite |
| US3405581A (en) * | 1966-10-24 | 1968-10-15 | Houdaille Industries Inc | Heavy duty punching machine with carriage means to support and move tool holder transversely of machine |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4329223A (en) * | 1980-01-11 | 1982-05-11 | United States Borax & Chemical Corporation | Flotation of molybdenite |
| US4316797A (en) * | 1980-09-10 | 1982-02-23 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Flotation agent and process |
| US4416770A (en) * | 1982-05-28 | 1983-11-22 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Selective mineral recovery |
| US4532031A (en) * | 1982-06-21 | 1985-07-30 | American Cyanamid Company | Froth flotation process |
| US4643823A (en) * | 1982-09-10 | 1987-02-17 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Recovering metal sulfides by flotation using mercaptoalcohols |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US3595390A (en) | Ore flotation process with poly(ethylene-propylene)glycol frothers | |
| Bulatovic | Flotation behaviour of gold during processing of porphyry copper-gold ores and refractory gold-bearing sulphides | |
| ES8800077A1 (en) | Novel collectors for the selective froth flotation of sulfide minerals | |
| AU2013293041B2 (en) | Monothiophosphate containing collectors and methods | |
| US6149013A (en) | Enhanced flotation reagents for beneficiation of phosphate ores | |
| US5124028A (en) | Froth flotation of silica or siliceous gangue | |
| Bulatovic et al. | Selection and evaluation of different depressants systems for flotation of complex sulphide ores | |
| US4324653A (en) | Process for the treatment of phosphate ores with silico-carbonate gangue | |
| US3480143A (en) | Flotation of siliceous ores | |
| US3590999A (en) | Flotation of sulfide ores | |
| US3788467A (en) | Flotation process for recovering molybdenum | |
| US3785488A (en) | Flotation process for recovering molybdenum | |
| US4220525A (en) | Beneficiation of metallic ores by froth flotation using polyhydroxy amine depressants | |
| US4790932A (en) | N-alkyl and N-alkenyl aspartic acids as co-collectors for the flotation of non-sulfidic ores | |
| Prasad et al. | Reverse flotation of sedimentary calcareous/dolomitic rock phosphate ore—an overview | |
| CA1141488A (en) | Flotation of molybdenite | |
| US3590998A (en) | Flotation of sulfide ores | |
| US4968415A (en) | Process for selective flotation of phosphorus minerals | |
| US3078997A (en) | Flotation process for concentration of phenacite and bertrandite | |
| US4159943A (en) | Froth flotation of ores using hydrocarbyl bicarbonates | |
| US3278028A (en) | Flotation of mica | |
| US3361257A (en) | Phosphate flotation | |
| US3844412A (en) | Depressing reagent for mineral flotation and method for its employment | |
| US4597857A (en) | Process for producing an upgraded sulfide mineral concentrate from an ore containing sulfide mineral and silicate clay | |
| US5295584A (en) | Process for selective flotation of phosphorus minerals |