US3697322A

US3697322A - Magnesium oxide coatings

Info

Publication number: US3697322A
Application number: US64644A
Authority: US
Inventors: Leonard S Lee; Yoshio Uyeda; Leo F Heneghan
Original assignee: Merck and Co Inc
Current assignee: MARINE MAGNESIUM COMPANY A PARTNERSHIP OF PA
Priority date: 1970-08-17
Filing date: 1970-08-17
Publication date: 1972-10-10
Anticipated expiration: 1989-10-10
Also published as: BE786123A

Abstract

LITHIUM ADDITIVES IN MAGNESIUM OXIDE/MAGNESIUM HYDROXIDE COATINGS FOR SILICON STEEL AND THE MATERIAL COATED BY SUCH PROCESS.

Description

United States Patent cc Patented Oct. 10, 1972 3,697,322 MAGNESIUM OXIDE COATINGS Leonard S. Lee, Daly City, and Yoshio Uyeda and Leo F. Heneghan, San Mateo, Calif, assignors to Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ. No Drawing. Continuation-impart of application Ser. No. 40,479, May 22, 1970. This application Aug. 17, 1970,

Ser. No. 64,644

Int. Cl. H01f N04 US. Cl. 117-234 5 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Lithium additives in magnesium oxide/magnesium hydroxide coatings for silicon steel and the material coated by such process.

This application is a continuation-in-part of US. application Ser. No. 40,479, filed May 22, 1970, and now abandoned.

This invention relates to coatings for ferrous material and, more particularly, an improved magnesium oxide/ magnesium hydroxide coating for grain oriented silicon steel, and the material coated by such process.

In many fields of use and, in particular, in the electrical industry, it is necessary to provide a coating on ferproperties. It has been found necessary to provide a coating on the ferrous material prior to the final high temperature grain growth anneal. This coating will perform three separate functions. The first function of the coating is to provide separation of the various turns or layers of the coiled material to prevent their sticking or welding together during high temperature anneals. A second function is that of aiding in the chemical purification of the ferrous material to develop the desired optimum magnetic characteristics of such material. The third function of the coating is to form on the surface of the ferrous material a refractory type coating which will provide electrical insulation of one layer of ferrous material from the next, for example, during its use as a core in a transformer.

In the present state of the electrical apparatus arr, me most widely used coating for the ferrous material which is used as the magnetic core of the electrical apparatus is a coating of magnesium oxide and/or magnesium hydroxide. These coatings are, in general, applied to the ferrous material in the form of a suspension of magnesium oxide and/or magnesium hydroxide in water. The suspension comprises a quantity of magnesium oxide in water and is mixed sufficiently for the desired application, the magnesium oxide being hydrated to an extent dependent on the character of the oxide used, the duration of mixing and the temperature of the suspension. Therefore, the term magnesium oxide coating is with reference to a coating of magnesium hydroxide which may include magnesium oxide which has not been hydrated.

As set forth in US. Pat. No. 2,385,332, in the names of Victor W. Carpenter et al., portions of an annealing separator of magnesium oxide can, during a heat treatment at suitable temperatures, be caused to react with silica particles on or near the surfaces of previously oxidized silicon-iron sheet stock to form a glass-like coating, which coating is useful as an interlaminary insulator in the use of silicon-iron in electrical apparatus, e.g. m the cores of transformers.

In the production of silicon steel for the magnetic cores of transformers, the steel is generally annealed to provide optimum grain growth and grain orientation which develops the magnetic properties of the silicon steel. This anneal is usually carried out in a hydrogen atmosphere at temperatures ranging from approximately 950 to 1500 C. from about 2 to about 50 hours. This anneal also aids in purifying the steel, aided by the coating placed on the steel. During this anneal a portion of the magnesium oxide coating reacts with the silica on the surface of the silicon steel to form a glass-like coating of magnesium silicate. This glass-like coating provides electrical insulation during the use of the silicon steel in electrical apparatus, e.g., in the cores of transformers.

A number of additives have been proposed in the past to be added to the magnesium hydroxide and/or magnesium oxide in order to improve the MgOSiO reaction. For example, US. Pat. 2,809,137 (Robinson) involves the use of silica to be combined with the MgO and/or Mg(OH) for the purpose of improving the insulating properties of the glass-like film obtained after high temperature annealing. US. Pat. 2,394,047 (Elsey et al.) relates to the use of additives to produce oxidized surface metal and to enhance glass film formation.

This invention relates to an improved MgO/Mg(OH) coating which forms a superior insulating glass film when applied to silicon steel surfaces which have been previously oxidized. For example, one such method of oxidation which may be employed is taught in US. Pat. 2,385,332, discussed above. More particularly the invention concerns coatings containing magnesium oxide/magnesium hydroxide and organic or inorganic lithium bearing compounds which when applied to silicon sheet steel imparts unexpected and improved insulation qualities to the silicon steel after the final high temperature anneal.

Representative members of the class of organic and inorganic lithium bearing compounds includes the followmg:

lithium acetate lithium borate, such as lithium metaborate, lithium metaborate hydrate, lithium pentaborate, lithium tetraborate and lithium borohydrate lithium chromate lithium fluoride lithium hydroxide lithium lactate lithium nitrate lithium phosphate lithium silicate lithium sulfate lithium zirconate lithium zirconium silicate lithium hydroxide monohydrate lithium carbonate lithium acetylsalicylate lithium metaaluminate lithium aluminum hydride lithium amide lithium antimonide lithium orthoarsenate lithium azide lithium benzoate lithium bromide lithium bromide, dihydrate lithium carbide lithium bicarbonate lithium chlorate lithium chlorate hydrate lithium perchlorate lithium perchlorate .trihydrate lithium chloride lithium chloride monohydrate lithium chloroplatinate lithium bichromate dihydrate lithium dichromate lithium citrate lithium fluosilicate lithium fluosulfonate lithium formate monohydrate lithium gallium hydride lithium gallium nitride lithium metagermanate lithium hydride lithium iodate lithium iodine lithium iodide, trihydrate lithium laurate lithium permanganate lithium molybdate lithium myristate lithium nitrate trihydrate lithium nitridev lithium nitrite lithium oxalate lithium acid oxalate lithium oxide lithium palmitate lithium metaphosphate lithium orthophosphate lithium orthophosphate hydrate lithium dihydrogen phosphate lithium salicylate lithium selenide lithium metasilicate lithium orthosilicate lithium silicide lithium stearate lithium sulfate lithium hydrogen sulfate lithium sulfate monohydrate lithium sulfide lithium" hydrosulfide lithium sulfite monohydrate lithium tartrate lithium thallium dl-tartrate lithium dithionate lithium. thiocyanate lithium tungstate lithium. titanate lithium manganite I lithium vanadate lithium cobaltite and the like.

It will be appreciatedthat lithium compounds which have a relatively high weight percent of lithium are preferred for use in the instant invention since the anion portion of the lithium compound (assuming it to be a salt) would ordinarily serve no purpose. Itshould be emphasized, however, that any lithium compound (or mixtures of such compounds) may be utilized to obtain the advantageous function here involved since the key to this function is the presence of the lithium atom or ion. Analysis of the composition of the glass film formed according to the practice of this invention reveals a novel film containing predominately well crystallized MgO, magnesium silicate and lithium.

The concentration of the lithium bearing compound calculated as Li with. respect to the amount of the MgO employed in the coating is not critical and may vary from about 0.1 to about 30 weight percent of the magnesium oxide. A satisfactory concentration for most 4 practical purposes (calculated as Li O) has been found to be from about 0.2 .to 12.5 weight percent of MgO. It should be noted that the particular grade of MgO to be utilized is not critical and any commercially available MgO may be employed in the practice of the invention.

The lithium-MgO/Mg(OH) coatings of the invention a may be applied to the grain-oriented silicon steel using techniques conventionally employed in the coating of these materials. Among the well known procedures that are presently employed in applying the MgO/Mg(-OH) coatings, a continuous strip of the ferrous material is passed through a bath containing the MgO/Mg(OH) suspension and then through a drying furnace. In addition to employing conventional coating techniques, the

amount of MgO/Mg(OH) (exclusive of lithium additive) that is applied to the silicon steel in the practice of this invention is similar to those amounts that heretofore had been employed in MgO/Mg(OI-I) coatings and in general will vary from about 0.020 to 0.060 ounce of MgO per square foot of steel surface.

The manner and time at which the lithium compounds are combined with the magnesium oxide is not critical. As described by the various examples set forth below, these procedures include adding the lithium compound to a magnesium material, such as magnesium basic carbonate or Mg(OH) prior to their conversion to the magnesium oxide; blending the lithium material with the MgO or Mg(OH) adding the lithium compound separately during coating slurry make-up; or mixing the lithium material in the water used for coating slurry make-up prior to the addition of the MgO powder.

The annealing of the silicon steel that has previously been coated with the coating composition of the invention may be carried out in a reducing atmosphere at temperatures ranging from approximately 950 to 1500 C. for from about 2 to. 50 hours using techniques well known to the art.

The unobvious and unexpected properties of the instant invention are clearly revealed by the following examples:

EXAMPLE 1 A slurry containing about 1 lb. MgO/gal. concentration was made up by mixing 60 g. of a commercial grade MgO with 6 g. of a reagent grade lithium caarbonate, and then addingSOO ml. of deionized water in a Waring blendor for one minute. The resulting slurry was coated on strips of silicon steel (size 3 mm. x 30.5 mm.) at a coating weight of 0.038 oz./ft. dried at 250-275 C., and

annealed in hydrogen atmosphere at 1200 C. for about 30' hours. For comparative purposes, identical silicon strips were coated with an identical MgO slurry at the same concentration but without the lithium compound. After annealing and cooling, the excess magnesium oxide coating was scrubbed off all samples with a nylon brush and a cloth. These strips were tested for resistance on both" surfaces vvith a Franklin tester (ASTM-A344-60T). The results are:

Additive (MgO basis): Resistance 0% 3.7 ohms-cmfi.

10% Li CO (4.0% as Li O) Infinity (complete insulation).

EXAMPLE 2 A slurry containing about 0.5 lb. MgO/gallon concentration was made up by mixing 30 g. of a commercial grade MgO with 0.3 g. of a reagent grade lithium carbonate. and then adding 500 ml. of deionized water in a Waring blendor for one minute. The slurry Was coated on silicon steel strips and tested in the same manner as described in Example 1. Franklin test results show:

Additive (MgO basis): Resistance, ohms-cm. 0% 3.9 1% Li CO (0.4% as Li O) 11.0

EXAMPLE 3 60 g. of a commercial grade magnesium oxide was added to a Waring blendor containing 500 ml. of deionized water. 4.8 g. of a reagent grade lithium hydroxide was then added and mixed thoroughly for one minute. The slurry was coated on silicon steel strips and tested in the same manner as described in Example 1. Franklin test results showed:

Additive (MgO basis): Resistance 1.8 ohms-cm 8% LiOH (5.0% as Li O) Infinity (complete insulation) EXAMPLE 4 60 g. of a commercial grade magnesium oxide and 12 g. of a reagent grade lithium hydroxide monohydrate were mixed thoroughly before adding to 500 ml. of deionized water in a Waring blendor. The resulting slurry was coated onto silicon strips and tested in the same manner as described in Example 1. Franklin test results show:

Additive (MgO basis): Resistance 0% 1.8 ohms-cm. 20% LiOH-H O (7.1% as Infinity (complete Li O) insulation) EXAMPLE 5 Additive (MgO basis): Resistance, ohms-cm? 0% 3.4 0.5% LiF (0.3% as Li O) 6.7

EXAMPLE 6 60 g. of a commercial magnesium-oxide, 3 g. of lithium metaborate and 500 ml. of deionized water were added simultaneously into a Waring blendor and mixed to form a smooth coating slurry. This slurry was coated on silicon steel strips and tested in the same manner as described in Example 1. Franklin test results show:

Additive (MgO basis): Resistance 0% 2.6 ohms-emf. 5% HBO; (1.5% as Li O) Infinity (complete insulation).

EXAMPLE 7 60 g. of a commercial magnesium oxide and 6 g. of lithium acetate (LiC H O -2H O) were thoroughly mixed and added to 500 ml. of deionized water in a Waring blendor. The resulting slurry was coated on strips of silicon steel and tested in the same manner as described in Example 1. Franklin tests on the surfaces show:

Additive (MgO basis): Resistance, ohms-cm. 0% 2.6 LiC H O -2H O (1.5% as Li O) 38.3

EXAMPLE 8 60 g. of a commercial magnesium oxide, 0.6 g. of lithium sulfate and 500 ml. of deionized water were mixed in a Waring blender. The slurry was coated onto strips of silicon steel in the same manner as described in Example 1. Franklin tests show:

Additive (MgO basis) 0% 1% 'Li SO .H O (0.2% as Li O) 8.8

Resistance, ohms-cm.

6 EXAMPLE 9 Additive (MgO basis): Resistance, ohms-cm.

1% LiNO (0.2% as Li O) 7.4

EXAMPLE 10 According to the procedure set forth in Example 1 and using identical silicon steel strips the following results were obtained:

Level (MgO As Resistivbasis) percent;

Additive percent LizO ohmsem 2 Control 1. 8 1 0. 15 6. 9 Lithium lactate (Li C H O 5 0. 73 15. 0 l0 1. 46 38. 3 Lithium tetraborate "i 8: 6,? (Ll2B407.5H20) 10 1. 15 2g?) Lithium phosphate (2LiaPO .1/2H 0)-{ g 7 Lithium silicate (LizSiOa) 6;; Lithium zirconate (Li2Zl03) m Lithium zirconium silicate 1 0. 14 12. 9 (2Li O .Z1O2.Sl02). 6 0. 70 11. 8 1 0. 12 3. 8 Lithium diehromate (LiZCrZO'l-HZO) 5 0.60 12. 4 10 1. 20

1 Infinity (complete insulation).

Accordingly, these experiments demonstrate that magnesium oxides currently employed to coat grain-oriented silicon steel give relatively low resistance whereas the same MgO coating containing a lithium compound results in the production of a film having a considerably higher resistance including values of infinity (complete insulation) depending upon the silicon steel strip employed in the study and on the amount and type of lithium compound utilized. Comparable results to that indicated above are achieved employing other representative lithium compounds encompassed within the scope of the invention. One skilled in the art will appreciate that subsequent treatments of the coated steel such as described in U.S. Pat. 2,501,846 may be utilized in the production of ferrous material which finds use in the electrical apparatus industry.

Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein, it is not intended to limit the invention solely thereto but to include all of the obvious variations and modifications within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

What is claimed is:

1. A method of producing an electrical insulating film on magnetic silicon steel which comprises applying a coating composition consisting essentially of a material selected from the group consisting of MgO, Mg(OH) and mixtures thereof and at least one lithium compound to surface oxidized silicon steel and annealing said silicon steel at an elevated temperature, said lithium compound being present at from about 0.1 to about 30 weight percent of magnesium oxide calculated as U 0.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the annealing occurs at about 9501500 C. for from about 2 to 50 hours.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the lithium compound is selected from the group consisting of lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium fluoride, lithium borate, lithium acetate, lithium sulfate, lithium oxide, lithium lactate, lithium phosphate, lithium silicate, lithium zirconate, lithium zirconium silicate, lithium dichromate, and lithium nitrate.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the lithium compoundis lithium borate.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the lithium borate is lithium metaborate.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS Nelson 117-53 X ,Deringer 11753 X Martin 148113 McBride 117--234 Morrill 117234 X Carpenter 117-53 UX Taylor 148-113 X 8 10/1970 Foster et a1. 148--113 12/1948 Carpenter l 148-6 1/1949 Elsey et a1. l 148 6 4/1957 Robinson l 1486 FOREIGN PATENTS 7/ 1964 France.

WILLIAM D. MARTIN, Primary Examiner 10 B. D. PIANALTO, Assistant Examiner U.S. Cl. X.R.