US2424552A - Froth flotation of nonmetallic minerals - Google Patents

Froth flotation of nonmetallic minerals Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2424552A
US2424552A US591293A US59129345A US2424552A US 2424552 A US2424552 A US 2424552A US 591293 A US591293 A US 591293A US 59129345 A US59129345 A US 59129345A US 2424552 A US2424552 A US 2424552A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
flotation
silica
pulp
nonmetallic
phosphate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US591293A
Inventor
Clemmer Julius Bruce
Rampacek Carl
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US591293A priority Critical patent/US2424552A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2424552A publication Critical patent/US2424552A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/001Flotation agents
    • B03D1/002Inorganic compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2201/00Specified effects produced by the flotation agents
    • B03D2201/02Collectors
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2203/00Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; specified applications
    • B03D2203/02Ores
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2203/00Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; specified applications
    • B03D2203/02Ores
    • B03D2203/04Non-sulfide ores
    • B03D2203/06Phosphate ores
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S209/00Classifying, separating, and assorting solids
    • Y10S209/902Froth flotation; phosphate

Definitions

  • This invention relates to an improved process for the concentration of nonmetallic minerals from ores containing them in association with siliceous gangue; more particularly it relates to a froth flotation process employing anionic collecting agents to effect flotation of activated siliceous gangue constituents from nonmetallic ores.
  • nonmetallic is used herein to designate those minerals which are used commercially for purposes other than as a source of metal which they contain.
  • nonmetallic minerals include phosphates, calcite, barite, strontianite, and witherite.
  • the present invention herein described relates to the froth flotation of activated siliceous gangue constituents from all five of these minerals.
  • An object of the invention is to provide an improved process for the concentration of nonmetallic minerals in pulps containing them in the presence of siliceous gangue.
  • a further object is to provide a flotation process which will have greater selectivity in separating siliceous materials from nonmetallic ores and thereby effect greater operating economies.
  • a still further object is to provide a frothflotation process for siliceous gangue materials wherein inexpensive anionic collecting agents are employed to float the siliceous gangue.
  • a conventional flotation method well known to the art is to float the economic nonmetallic minerals from the siliceous gangue materials employing oleic acid, sodium oleate, or similar anionic collecting agents in conjunction with various addition agents in acid, neutral, or moderately aklaline pulps to facilitate flotation of the desired nonmetallic mineral from the retarded silica.
  • An alternative method for concentrating nonmetallic minerals by flotation is to reverse the customary separation and float the siliceous gangue constituents from the nonmetallic carbonate, sulfate, or phosphate minerals employing cationic collecting agents such as laurylamine hydrochloride, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, or similar compounds which ionize in the aqueous pulps to yield a large active cation.
  • Collectors of the cationic type have been used and found advantageous for the flotation of siliceous gangue from many nonmetallic ores.
  • Tartaron describes a method for the cationic flotation of silica from phosphates, calcite, barite, and fluorspar in U. S.
  • Patent 2,222,728 and Breerwood and Williams in U. S. Patent 2,161,010 made use of cationic collectors for floating siliceous constituents from cement rock.
  • cationic collectors have many limitations. They are more expensive than collectors of the anionic type, and, moreover, they are not particularly selective.
  • Cationic collectors are ineffective silica collectors in the presence of slime and desliming of the ore pulp is generally necessary before satisfactory flotation separation can be achieved.
  • a caustic alkaline pulp with a pH at least as high as 10, and preferably in the pH range 10 to 12, is preferable in our method of flotation to facilitate effective retardation of the economic nonmetallic minerals by the metaor poly-phosphate depressants during flotation of the silica.
  • caustic alkalies such as sodium or potassium hydroxides, or their equivalents, to establish the desired pH for flotation.
  • Moderate quantities of other alkaline reagents, such as sodium sulfide, sodium carbonate, and sodium silicate, may be used in conjunction with the caustic alkalies if desired.
  • a combination of hydrated lime and soda ash has been successfully employed in the flotation of many nonmetallic ores and served the dual purpose of activating the siliceous materials to anionic flotation and establishing the desired caustic alkalinity for flotation by formation of caustic soda within the pulp.
  • the optimum pH for anionic flotation of the activated siliceous constituents and retardation of the desired nonmetallic mineral to be recovered varies slightly for diflerent ores but generally falls within the range 10 to 12, and the proper pH for any particular case is'best determined by experimentation.
  • siliceous gangue constituents in the nonmetallic ore be activated and rendered floatable.
  • the siliceous gangue materials in certain nonmetallic ores such as the cement rocks containing quartz associated with calcite or limestone, are naturally activated to soap flotation, presumedly due to soluble calcium salts in the ore.
  • Other nonmetallic ores however, seldom conmaterials and the successful operation of our process requires that the silica in such ores be activated for anionic flotation.
  • Extended research of a variety isdewashing the pulp with of nonmetallic Ores demonstrated that on method of flotation lends itself readily to the us of silica activating agents. Many alkaline-cart!
  • metal salt activating agents differs for difl'erent ores and the proper quantity for any particular case is best determined by experimentation.
  • a proper quantity of metal salt activating agent, collector, and phosphate depressant in a caustic alkaline pulp with a pH of 10 to 12 enables rapid and substantially complete flotation of silica form calcium phosphate. calcite, barite, strontianite, or witherite.
  • hydrated lime as the silica activating agent in the practice of our invention, and from the standpoint of cost, hydrated lime is particularly attractive. Grinding or blunging the ore with suiflcient hydrated lime to establish a pulp pH of about 11 effects substantially complete activation of the silica.
  • the usual quantity of hydrated lime required to activate the silica varies from 1 to 4 pounds per ton of ore, but some ores containing acidic salts may require 8 pounds or more of lime perton. Excessive quantitle of dissolved hydrated lime in the conditioned pulp should be removed before flotation as they increase collector and phosphate requirements.
  • the pulp for flotation be substantially free of dissolved hydrated lime.
  • the lime salts in the conditioned pulp may be removed by settling and fresh water, or by addition of suflicient soda ash to the pulp to precipitate the disolved lime as insoluble calcium carbonate.
  • the combination of hydrated lime and soda ash was particularly advantageous on many ores; conditioning the ore pulp with hydrated lime to give a pH of about 11 sufllced for activation of the silica and subsequent addition of soda ash to precipitate the dissolved hydrated lime remaining in solution gave a pulp of the desired caustic alkalinity for flotation. Additional caustic soda may be added to the pulp if desired.
  • a soft water free of lime or magnesia salts is not obligatory in the practice of this invention.
  • a water moderately hard with lime salts, for example: is permisible and, in fact, has been found advantageous as the lime salts aid in the activation of the siliceous materials.
  • the anionic collecting agents which we have found suitable for flotation of activated siliceous gangue materials from nonmetallic ores include oieic acid, red oil (crude oleic acid), crude and purified sodium oleate, fish oil fatty acids, fish oil soaps, and various crude or purified tallols and sulfate soaps recovered from sulfate paper mill black liquors.
  • the tallols which are mixture of fatty and resin acids, are relatively inexpensive and are particularly attractive collectors on many nonmetallic ores.
  • the various phosphates which we have employed andfound suitable for retarding flotation of nonmetallic minerals in the practice of our invention include sodium metaphosphate, sodium hexametaphosphate, and sodium tetra-phosphate.
  • the potassium salts may also be employed if desired, but they are more expensive than the sodium salts.
  • the alkali-metal salts of the orthoand pyro-phosphates lack the specific depressing properties of the metaand poly-phosphates, but have been employed as auxiliary reagents in the practice of our invention to aid pulp dispersion and improve the flotation separation.
  • flotation pulp be deslimed. Desliming of the pulp should be practiced whenever permissible as subsequent flotation of the activated silica is more rapid and complete, and less reagents are required in flotation.
  • Example I A sample of deslimed phosphate feed was obtained from an operating washer near Brewster, Florida, in the land-pebble phosphate district. The sample consisted mainly of so-called bone phosphate of lime (tricalcium phosphate) associated with quartz and some indurated clay. A head analysis gave 59.3 percent Caa(P0'4) 2, hereinafter referred to as B. P. L. for convenience, and 19.6 percent SiOz. The sample as received was substantially finer than 20 mesh and was used for the following flotation procedures.
  • a 250-gram portion of the phosphate sample was wet ground to pass 65 mesh in a laboratory pebble mill.
  • the ground charge was diluted to a volume of 2.5 liters with additional tap water to give a pulp containing about 10 percent solids.
  • the pulp was dispersed using caustic soda and sodium hexametaphosphate equivalent to 1.0 and 0.5 pound per ton of ore, respectively. 'llhe dispersed pulp was fractionated by sedimentation and decantation to remove the bulk of the slime finer than 20 microns.
  • the deslimed granular portion of the ore was repulped with additional tap water and transferred to a small mechanical agitation flotation cell of standard design.
  • the substantially deslimed pulp was first conditioned with the caustic soda (commercial lye) and sodium hexametaphosphate to retard the calcium phosphate and establish the desired caustic alkalinity for activation and flotation of the silica.
  • the pulp was then conditioned with calcium chloride and talloi to activate and float the silica. Air was then allowed to enter the cell and resulted in immediate formation of a compact, heavily mineralized froth of the si liceous gangue materials. The froth was collected for 3.0 minutes whereupon flotation of the collecting the resulting froth for plete.
  • the rougherandscavenger froths werecombined activate and float the remaining silica in a and cleaned twice by refloating in the same cell scavenger froth.
  • the rougher and scavenger using ta water for dilution and the quantities froths were combined and cleaned twice by reof reagents as indicated.
  • the flnal silica rejects, floating in the same cell.
  • Tap water was used the combined phosphate concentrates from the for dilution together with the quantities of recleaning steps (middlings), the rougher phosagentsasindicated.
  • Therougher and composited phate concentrate (tailing), and the untreated cleaner phosphate concentrates, and the flnal slime were dried, weighed, and analyzed.
  • the silica rejects were dried, weighed, and analyzed. results of the test are as follows. The results of the test are as follows:
  • Anionic flotation oi the lime-activated silica flotation reject" which WM rejected 81.5 percent of the silica in the feed with for percent of the night of the feed a loss of only 8.3 percent of the B. P. L. Flotat pgoent of the silica and only tion of the silica from the slime-bearing pulp was con 0 the The untreated and readily achieved. It is therefore apparent that the cleaner phosphate concentrates were our method of flotation is applicable to slimeciently free of 811168 to D considered finished bearing as we" as desnmed pulps' grade.
  • the composited phosphate accounted for a recovery of 98.8 percent or the Example Phosphate in the sample and P Another portion of the Florida phosphate samcent L and Percent ple was ground to pass 65 mesh, deslimed, and s rahtze s ssaz i isu use ea ra e was emp oye 0 Another zso'gmm portion of the activate the silica to anionic flotation. The reo was wet ground in laboratory Mm. agent charge employed in the test was as follows: mill to pass 65 mesh in the presence of hydrated lime equivalent to 12.0 pounds per ton of ore.
  • V Hydrated lime and various soluble alkaline-earth and heavy-metal salts such-as calcium chloride, magnesium sulfate, barium chlorid strontium nitrate, or lead nitrate, were employed and found suitable for activating the quartz and granular silicate minerals to anionic flotation.
  • Tallol, sulfate soap, oleic acid, sodium oleate, flsh oil soap, flsh oil fatty acids, and similar anionic collecting agents were employed in'various tests for flotation of the activated silica and gave good results.
  • the proper quantity of caustic a1- kali, phosphate depressant, activating agent, and collector diflers slightly for different ores and the optimum quantities are best determined by trial for each particular case.
  • Example IV A synthetic cement rock was prepared by mixing approximately equal quantities of calcite and quartz. The mixture was ground to pass'65 mesh in a laboratory pebble mill and transferred to a laboratory mechanical flotation cell. Tap water was added to the cell to give a pulp containing about 25 percent solids. Flotation of the quartz from the calcite was efl'ected by the following reagents expressed in conventional pounds per ton of flotation teed:
  • Example V Another portion of the synthetic cement rock was ground to pass 65 mesh and floated by the procedure described in Example IV, but in this instance lead nitrate and tallol were employed to activate and float the quartz from the calcite.
  • the silica. rougher froth was cleaned twice by 10 reflecting in the same cell using tap water for dilution.
  • the reagent charge employed in the test was as follows:
  • calcite concentrate rougher tailing
  • silica rejects cleaner froth
  • CaCO S10: CaCOa SiOi Calcite Concentrate... 76. 1 90.3. 9. 7 98.1 24. 7 Silica Rejects 23. 9 5. 7 94. 3 1. 9 75. 3
  • Example VII In another test on the aforementioned synthetic cement rock wherein lead nitrate equivalent to 1.0 pound per ton of flotation feed was employed to activate the quartz, the calcite concentrates assayed 98.9 percent CaCO: and 1.1 percent 810:, and the silica reiects assayed 21.2 per cent CaCO-a and 78.8 percent 810:.
  • Example VIII In still another test on the synthetic cement rock,'hydrated lime equivalent to 12 pounds per ton of flotation feed was added to the grinding operation. The ground pulp was washed with fresh tapwater to reject the iiine remaining in 'solution employingthe procedure described. in
  • Example II The washed pulp was floated to reject the quartz using 1.0, 0.8, 1.0, and 0.4 pound per ton, respectively, of caustic soda, sodium hexametaphosphate, sodium oleate, and oieate acid.
  • the rougher calcite concentrate assayed 99.0 per cent CaCO: and 1.0 per cent 810:. and accounted for a recovery of 94.1' percent of the calcium carbonate in the feed.
  • the rougher silica froth assayed 13.0 per cent CaCO: and 87.0 percent 810:, and contained 97.6 per cent of the silica in the feed.
  • Example IX A mixture composed of approximately 8 parts Anionic flotation of the calcium-activated quartz rejected 95.5 percent of the silica in the feed with a loss of 10.8 percent of the barium carbonate (witherite).
  • the calcium chloride used to actiate the quartz to anionic flotation was added to the pulp before the alkali and phosphate. While we have found that such practice is permissible on many nonmetallic ores, we generally prefer to add the silica-activating agent to the caustic alkaline and phosphate conditioned pulp.
  • the soluble alkaline-earth or heavy-metal salt to activate the silica may be added before, with, or after of witherit'e and 4 parts of quartz was ground to pass 85 mesh and subjected to flotation in a manner similar to that described in Example IV. Activation and flotation of the quartz from the witherite was efl'ected by the following reagents expressed in pounds per ton of flotation feed:
  • Example X A mixture composed of approximately equal quantities of barite and quartz was ground to pass mesh and subjected to flotation in a manner similar to that described in Example IV.
  • the quantities of reagents, expressed in pounds per ton .of flotation feed, employed for flotation of the quartz from the barite were as follows:
  • Conditioner Cleaner are as follows: R0
  • Example XII A sample of barite table concentrates was obtained from operating plant near Cartersville,
  • the table concentrates containing barite associated with iron oxides and quartz together with minor quantities of feldspar and other silicate gangue minerals were being ground and treated by flotation to reject silica and to recover an enriched barite-iron product.
  • a head analysis of the sample gave 62.6 percent BaSO4, 29.8 percent SiOz, and 5.4 percent FezOs.
  • a 250-gram portion of the sample was wet ground in a laboratory rod-mill to pass 65 mesh.
  • the ground pulp was transferred to a mechanical flotation cell and diluted with tap water to give a pulp containing about percent solids.
  • Activation and flotation oi the siliceous gangue constituents from the retarded barite and iron oxides was effected by-the following quantities of reagents expressed in conventional pounds per ton of flotation feed:
  • a process for beneflciating ores of nonmetallic minerals of the class consisting of calcite, barite, strontianite, witherlte, and tricalcium phosphate containing siliceous gangue materials which comprises blunging an aqueous pulp of the comminuted are in the presence of hydrated lime to establish a pH of at least about 11, then adding thereto soda ash to precipitate the lime remainafter subjecting said pulp to agitation and aeration in the presence of an alkali-soluble inorganic phosphate selected from the group consisting of metphosphates and polyphosphates, together with an anion-active collecting agent selected from the class consisting of fatty acids and resin acids and mixtures of fatty.v and resin acids and soaps thereof, whereby siliceous gangue is floated and beneilciated nonmetallic mineral is depressed and recovered.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)

Description

Patented July 29, 1941 OFFICE ,FROTH FLOTATION F NONMETALLIC MINERALS Julius Bruce Clennner and Carl Bampacek, Tuscaloosa, Ala.
No Drawing. Application May 1, 1945, Serial No. 591,293
8 Claims. (Cl. 209-166) (Granted under the amended April 30, 1928;
The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States for governmental purposes without the payment to us of any royalty thereon in accordance with the provisions of the act of April 30, 1928 (Ch. 460, 45 Stat. L 467).
This invention relates to an improved process for the concentration of nonmetallic minerals from ores containing them in association with siliceous gangue; more particularly it relates to a froth flotation process employing anionic collecting agents to effect flotation of activated siliceous gangue constituents from nonmetallic ores. The term nonmetallic is used herein to designate those minerals which are used commercially for purposes other than as a source of metal which they contain. Among the so designated nonmetallic minerals are included phosphates, calcite, barite, strontianite, and witherite. The present invention herein described relates to the froth flotation of activated siliceous gangue constituents from all five of these minerals.
An object of the invention is to provide an improved process for the concentration of nonmetallic minerals in pulps containing them in the presence of siliceous gangue. A further object is to provide a flotation process which will have greater selectivity in separating siliceous materials from nonmetallic ores and thereby effect greater operating economies. A still further object is to provide a frothflotation process for siliceous gangue materials wherein inexpensive anionic collecting agents are employed to float the siliceous gangue. Other objects, purposes, and advantages of the invention will hereinafter more fully appear or will be understood from the detailed description of its practice.
We are aware that various froth flotation methods have been proposed for the concentration of nonmetallic ores for the purpose of rejecting siliceous gangue constituents and recovering an enriched product of the economic nonmetallic minerals. A conventional flotation method well known to the art is to float the economic nonmetallic minerals from the siliceous gangue materials employing oleic acid, sodium oleate, or similar anionic collecting agents in conjunction with various addition agents in acid, neutral, or moderately aklaline pulps to facilitate flotation of the desired nonmetallic mineral from the retarded silica. The technical and patent literature abounds with examples of practice of the methods for the flotation of such nonmetallic minerals as rock phosphate, calcite, barite, and fluorspar from quartz, feldspar, and other siliceous gangue materials. Among others, for example, Crago describes a method for the anionic flotation of act of March 3, 1883, as
fluorspar or phosphate rock from siliceous gangue in U. S. Patent 2,105,807. Tartaron in U. S. Patent 2,105,826 makes use of the short chain fatty acid collectors and various metal salts to effect flotation of phosphate rock, calcite, barite, or fluorspar from siliceous gangue in substantially neutral or acid pulps. Rose and MacDonald'in U. S. Patent 2,040,187 describes the flotation of carbonates, sulfates, fluorides, tungstates, and oxides from each other and from siliceous gangue by the use of fatty acid collecting agents in conjunction with various metallic salts in the presence of a metaphosphate or similar addition agent. These and numerous other investigators have made use of various anionic collectors in conjunction with a variety of inorganic and organic addition agents to enable flotation of nonsulfide metallic and nonmetallic minerals from each other and from siliceous gangue in particular.
An alternative method for concentrating nonmetallic minerals by flotation is to reverse the customary separation and float the siliceous gangue constituents from the nonmetallic carbonate, sulfate, or phosphate minerals employing cationic collecting agents such as laurylamine hydrochloride, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, or similar compounds which ionize in the aqueous pulps to yield a large active cation. Collectors of the cationic type have been used and found advantageous for the flotation of siliceous gangue from many nonmetallic ores. Among others, for example, Tartaron describes a method for the cationic flotation of silica from phosphates, calcite, barite, and fluorspar in U. S. Patent 2,222,728 and Breerwood and Williams in U. S. Patent 2,161,010 made use of cationic collectors for floating siliceous constituents from cement rock. Despite their widespread adoption for the flotation of silica and silicates from non-sulfide and nonmetallic ores and mineral products, cationic collectors have many limitations. They are more expensive than collectors of the anionic type, and, moreover, they are not particularly selective. Cationic collectors are ineffective silica collectors in the presence of slime and desliming of the ore pulp is generally necessary before satisfactory flotation separation can be achieved.
As a result of extended research and experimentation, we have discovered a method of concentrating nonmetallic ores by froth flotation wherein anionic collecting agents are employed to float activated siliceous gangue constituents from caustic alkaline ore pulps with a pH of at least 10 while retarding flotation of the economic nonmetallic mineral with a soluble inorganic metaphosphate or polyphosphate. A moderate quanssame assignee as the present application,
.tain naturally activated siliceous tity of a metaor poly-phosphate in a strongly caustic alkaline pulp of the non-metallic ore effectively retards flotation of such nonmetallic minerals as calcium phosphate in phosphate rock, calcite in cement rock, and barite, strontianite. or witherite without adversely affecting anionic flotation of the activated silica.
In a co-pending application, assigned to tLie 7 Julius Bruce Clemmer and Ballard H. Clemmo Serial No. 473,162, flied January 22, 1943, scribed a process for beneiiciating iron ores and products from themilling of iron ores containing calcareous and/or siliceous gangue materials wherein anionic collecting agents are employed to float the activated siliceous constituents from caustic alkaline iron ore pulps with a pH of at least 10 while retarding flotation of the iron oxides with a metaphosphate or polyphosphate. Choice of the quantity of phosphate and collector employed in flotation of the calcareous iron ores enables flotation of the calcareous constituents with the activated silica or retardation of the,
calcareous materials with the iron oxides. The present application is an outgrowth of the aforementioned invention with particular reference to the concentration of nonmetallic ores and mineral products.
A caustic alkaline pulp with a pH at least as high as 10, and preferably in the pH range 10 to 12, is preferable in our method of flotation to facilitate effective retardation of the economic nonmetallic minerals by the metaor poly-phosphate depressants during flotation of the silica. We prefer to employ caustic alkalies, such as sodium or potassium hydroxides, or their equivalents, to establish the desired pH for flotation. Moderate quantities of other alkaline reagents, such as sodium sulfide, sodium carbonate, and sodium silicate, may be used in conjunction with the caustic alkalies if desired. A combination of hydrated lime and soda ash has been successfully employed in the flotation of many nonmetallic ores and served the dual purpose of activating the siliceous materials to anionic flotation and establishing the desired caustic alkalinity for flotation by formation of caustic soda within the pulp. The optimum pH for anionic flotation of the activated siliceous constituents and retardation of the desired nonmetallic mineral to be recovered varies slightly for diflerent ores but generally falls within the range 10 to 12, and the proper pH for any particular case is'best determined by experimentation. Poor flotation of the silica and incomplete retardation of the nonmetallic invariably results if the pH of the pulp is much less than 10; a pulp pH greater than 12 is not particularly objectionable in our method of flotation, but the froth is inclined to be voluminous and flotation of the silica is sluggish. We, therefore, prefer in our flotation method to keep the pH in the range of 10 to 12.
It is essential in the practice of this invention that the siliceous gangue constituents in the nonmetallic ore be activated and rendered floatable. The siliceous gangue materials in certain nonmetallic ores, such as the cement rocks containing quartz associated with calcite or limestone, are naturally activated to soap flotation, presumedly due to soluble calcium salts in the ore. Other nonmetallic ores, however, seldom conmaterials and the successful operation of our process requires that the silica in such ores be activated for anionic flotation. Extended research of a variety isdewashing the pulp with of nonmetallic Ores demonstrated that on method of flotation lends itself readily to the us of silica activating agents. Many alkaline-cart! and heavy metal salts exhibit the property of acti vatingquartz and various silicate minerals ti soap flotation when a proper quantity is employer at an optimum pH. We have found that condi tioning of the caustic alkaline ore pulp with 5 moderate quantity of an activator selected iron the group consisting of soluble calcium, magnesium, barium, strontium, and lead salts sufllce: to activate the siliceous gangue constituents in many nonmetallic ores to anionic flotation by the higher fatty acids. resin acids, or their derived soaps, without adversely aii'ecting retardation oi the economic nonmetallic mineral by the phosphate depressants. The effectiveness of the metal salt activating agents differs for difl'erent ores and the proper quantity for any particular case is best determined by experimentation. A proper quantity of metal salt activating agent, collector, and phosphate depressant in a caustic alkaline pulp with a pH of 10 to 12 enables rapid and substantially complete flotation of silica form calcium phosphate. calcite, barite, strontianite, or witherite.
We may also employ hydrated lime as the silica activating agent in the practice of our invention, and from the standpoint of cost, hydrated lime is particularly attractive. Grinding or blunging the ore with suiflcient hydrated lime to establish a pulp pH of about 11 effects substantially complete activation of the silica. The usual quantity of hydrated lime required to activate the silica varies from 1 to 4 pounds per ton of ore, but some ores containing acidic salts may require 8 pounds or more of lime perton. Excessive quantitle of dissolved hydrated lime in the conditioned pulp should be removed before flotation as they increase collector and phosphate requirements. Although we have achieved by the practice of our invention good flotation of silica from .nonmetallic ore pulps containing as much as parts per million of hydrated lime in solution, equivalent in our tests to about 0.8 pound of hydrated lime per ton of solids, we prefer that the pulp for flotation be substantially free of dissolved hydrated lime. The lime salts in the conditioned pulp may be removed by settling and fresh water, or by addition of suflicient soda ash to the pulp to precipitate the disolved lime as insoluble calcium carbonate. The combination of hydrated lime and soda ash was particularly advantageous on many ores; conditioning the ore pulp with hydrated lime to give a pH of about 11 sufllced for activation of the silica and subsequent addition of soda ash to precipitate the dissolved hydrated lime remaining in solution gave a pulp of the desired caustic alkalinity for flotation. Additional caustic soda may be added to the pulp if desired. Should an excess of hydrated lime be inadvertently added to the pulp to activate the silica, as evidenced by a pH of about 12.3 which is the pH of a saturated solution of hydrated lime, the excess is best removed by settling and washing the pulp one or more times with fresh water to reduce the pH to about 11, whereupon soda ash may be added to precipitate the dissolved lime remaining in the pulp before proceeding with flotation. If desired. however, the washing may be carried further to give a flnal pulp for flotation practically free of dissolved hydrated lime and having a pH of 9 to 10. Subsequent addition of a caustic alkali to the lime conditioned and washed pulp to establish the desired pH for flotation together with a higher fatty acid, resin acid, or soap collecting agent in conjunction with a metaphosphate or polyphosphate enables flotation of the calciumactivated silica and retardation of the economic nonmetallic mineral.
The use of a soft water free of lime or magnesia salts is not obligatory in the practice of this invention. A water moderately hard with lime salts, for example: is permisible and, in fact, has been found advantageous as the lime salts aid in the activation of the siliceous materials.
The anionic collecting agents which we have found suitable for flotation of activated siliceous gangue materials from nonmetallic ores include oieic acid, red oil (crude oleic acid), crude and purified sodium oleate, fish oil fatty acids, fish oil soaps, and various crude or purified tallols and sulfate soaps recovered from sulfate paper mill black liquors. The tallols, which are mixture of fatty and resin acids, are relatively inexpensive and are particularly attractive collectors on many nonmetallic ores.
The various phosphates which we have employed andfound suitable for retarding flotation of nonmetallic minerals in the practice of our invention include sodium metaphosphate, sodium hexametaphosphate, and sodium tetra-phosphate. The potassium salts may also be employed if desired, but they are more expensive than the sodium salts. The alkali-metal salts of the orthoand pyro-phosphates lack the specific depressing properties of the metaand poly-phosphates, but have been employed as auxiliary reagents in the practice of our invention to aid pulp dispersion and improve the flotation separation.
While we have achieved satisfactory flotation of activated silica from nonmetallic ore pulps containing substantial quantities of slime by the practice of our invention, we prefer that the flotation pulp be deslimed. Desliming of the pulp should be practiced whenever permissible as subsequent flotation of the activated silica is more rapid and complete, and less reagents are required in flotation.
The proportions of the various reagents employed in the practice of our flotation method are subject to considerable variation, and the optimum quantities are best determined by experimentation for any particular case. Purity of the separated products is a. reliable guide for reagent adjustment. An excess of collecting agent promotes flotation of a portion of the economic nonmetallic mineral with the activated siliceous gangue, whereas a deficiency of collector results in incomplete flotation of the silica. Conversely, an excess of metaphosphate or polyphosphate results in retardation of a portion of the siliceous gangue, whereas a deficiency permits flotation of the economic nonmetallic mineral with the silica. Control of the collector and phosphate depressant is not critical, however, and reasonable variations in the quantities employed is permissible without adversely affecting the separation.
Conventional flotation terminology designates the floated product from roughing and cleaning operations as concentrates, and the pulp residues as tailings and middlings, respectively. This terminology is in keeping with the general practice of floating the valuable mineral from the worthless gangue. When the separation is reversed and the gangue is floated from the economic mineral, the terminology may become con fused. To avoid possible confusion in describing the results of our flotation tests, we shall hereinafter designate the enriched pulps of the economic nonmetallic mineral from the roughing and cleaning steps as concentrates, rougher and concentrates, cleaner, respectively. The floated silica products from the roughing and cleaning steps will be designated as ,rougher froth" and "silica rejects, respectively. In describing the results of our flotation tests we shell for simplicity hereinafter consider and report the enriched pulps from the cleaning steps (middlings) as finished concentrates. It will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the middlings may be retreated by conventional methods to yield an even higher grade concentrate without departing from the spirit of the invention.
The invention will be further illustrated, but is not intended to be limited by the following examples of practice:'
Example I A sample of deslimed phosphate feed was obtained from an operating washer near Brewster, Florida, in the land-pebble phosphate district. The sample consisted mainly of so-called bone phosphate of lime (tricalcium phosphate) associated with quartz and some indurated clay. A head analysis gave 59.3 percent Caa(P0'4) 2, hereinafter referred to as B. P. L. for convenience, and 19.6 percent SiOz. The sample as received was substantially finer than 20 mesh and was used for the following flotation procedures.
A 250-gram portion of the phosphate sample was wet ground to pass 65 mesh in a laboratory pebble mill. The ground charge was diluted to a volume of 2.5 liters with additional tap water to give a pulp containing about 10 percent solids. The pulp was dispersed using caustic soda and sodium hexametaphosphate equivalent to 1.0 and 0.5 pound per ton of ore, respectively. 'llhe dispersed pulp was fractionated by sedimentation and decantation to remove the bulk of the slime finer than 20 microns. The deslimed granular portion of the ore was repulped with additional tap water and transferred to a small mechanical agitation flotation cell of standard design. Additional tap water was added to the cell to give a pulp for flotation containing about 20 percent solids. Flotation of the siliceous gangue from the calicum phosphate was achieved by employing the following reagent charge expressed in conventional pounds per ton of ore:
Conditioner R h S Cleaner oug cav- Reagent er enger No. 1 No. 2 N0. 1 No. 2
Caustic soda 1.5 0.5 0.5 Sodium hexametaphosphate 1.0 0. 04 'Ialiol 0. 6 0. 4 0. 4 0. 2 l. 0 0. 2 2. 5 3.0 3.0 3. 0 2. 5 10.6 10. 4 10.0 10. 2 l0. 2
The substantially deslimed pulp was first conditioned with the caustic soda (commercial lye) and sodium hexametaphosphate to retard the calcium phosphate and establish the desired caustic alkalinity for activation and flotation of the silica. The pulp was then conditioned with calcium chloride and talloi to activate and float the silica. Air was then allowed to enter the cell and resulted in immediate formation of a compact, heavily mineralized froth of the si liceous gangue materials. The froth was collected for 3.0 minutes whereupon flotation of the collecting the resulting froth for plete. Additional tallol was then added to the pulp and a scavenger product was obtained by The rougherandscavenger frothswerecombined activate and float the remaining silica in a and cleaned twice by refloating in the same cell scavenger froth. The rougher and scavenger using ta water for dilution and the quantities froths were combined and cleaned twice by reof reagents as indicated. The flnal silica rejects, floating in the same cell. Tap water was used the combined phosphate concentrates from the for dilution together with the quantities of recleaning steps (middlings), the rougher phosagentsasindicated. Therougher and composited phate concentrate (tailing), and the untreated cleaner phosphate concentrates, and the flnal slime were dried, weighed, and analyzed. The silica rejects were dried, weighed, and analyzed. results of the test are as follows. The results of the test are as follows:
Product weight Assay, percent Dish, per cent mm wow, Assay,percent Dist... per cent percent DUN! B. P. L. 010, B. P. L. 010, B. P. L. s10, B. P. L. 010,
Phosphate Concen- Phosphate Concentrates: tratss:
Rougher 03.2 01.0 a2 72.1 20.0 Rougher 40.2 00.0 0.0 00.0 140 01081161 13.2 04.0 12.0 143 0.3 cm 33.4 711 2.1 40.0 45 Slime (untreated) 11.0 64.0 11.9 11.9 6.8
Composite 76.6 70.5 4.9 91.7 18.5 Composite 01.4 00.3 0.2 oaa 42.0 Silica lects n4 21.0 70.5 as 01.5 Bilica Rejects 12.0 7.0 00.0 1.7 00.0
CompositeFeed. 1000 00.0 000 100.0 1000 Composite Feed 100.0 00.4 10.1 1000 100.0
Anionic flotation oi the lime-activated silica flotation reject" which WM rejected 81.5 percent of the silica in the feed with for percent of the night of the feed a loss of only 8.3 percent of the B. P. L. Flotat pgoent of the silica and only tion of the silica from the slime-bearing pulp was con 0 the The untreated and readily achieved. It is therefore apparent that the cleaner phosphate concentrates were our method of flotation is applicable to slimeciently free of 811168 to D considered finished bearing as we" as desnmed pulps' grade. The composited phosphate accounted for a recovery of 98.8 percent or the Example Phosphate in the sample and P Another portion of the Florida phosphate samcent L and Percent ple was ground to pass 65 mesh, deslimed, and s rahtze s ssaz i isu use ea ra e was emp oye 0 Another zso'gmm portion of the activate the silica to anionic flotation. The reo was wet ground in laboratory Mm. agent charge employed in the test was as follows: mill to pass 65 mesh in the presence of hydrated lime equivalent to 12.0 pounds per ton of ore. 1 The ground charge, which had a pH of 11.2 due cmdmme' Rough Bow Clean to presence of hydrated lime, was flocculated er enger and settled readily. The clear, supernatant 1 grind water was carefully decanted from the settled material to avoid loss of solids. The settled material was repulped with 5 liters of fresh tap water and again allowed to stand until the solids had settled. The clear, supernatant water was decanted from the solids and the washing operation was again repeated. The twicewashed pulp had a pH of 9.8 and was substantiall free of hydrated lime. The washed pulp 3.0 minutes- 8 the pulp again briefly conditioned. Air was admitted to the flotation cell and the rouaher froth was removed. Additional tallol and a small quantity of lead nitrate were added to the pulp to The results of the test are as follows:
was then transferred to a laboratory flotation Assay, per cent Dlst., percent cell and enough tap water was added to give a. Product 33 I pulp for flotation containing about 20 percent B. P. L. $10. aP. L. s10. solids. Flotation of the lime-activated silica from the calcium phosphate was effected by the Pho pha c onfollowing rzggents expressed in conventional 00 "gmfig 33 {3,2 :3 pounds per n of Slime (zifit'ritelifl 1010 0412 111s 1110 010 0 its 88.7 05.0 10.4 00.8 41.0 R m Conditioner Rough Scav- Cleaner Silica 11.3 0.0 90.0 1.2 52.4
eage
er enge' N04 55 CompoaiteFeed. 100.0 00.1 10.4 100.0 100.0
g g f g ggg 2 The results of the previously recorded flotation hos ate 1.5 0.04 tests are typical of those we have obtained on 'fiig 8-: samples of deslimed feed from several washers op- Time, min: I 55 2:5 BKY 3. 0 sio ""56 crating in the Florida phosphate district. Flotam6 mo tion of total or deslimed charges of the washer feeds ground in a pebble mill, iron ball-mill, or iron rod-mill to pass 65, 100, or 200 mesh gave results similar to those indicated. A moderate quantity of a metaphoephate or polyphosphate,
such as sodium metaphosphate, sodium hexametaphosphate, or sodium tetraphosphate, in a caustic alkaline pulp having a pH of at least 10, and preferably 11 to 12, adequately retarded the calcium phosphate during flotation of the activated silica. V Hydrated lime and various soluble alkaline-earth and heavy-metal salts, such-as calcium chloride, magnesium sulfate, barium chlorid strontium nitrate, or lead nitrate, were employed and found suitable for activating the quartz and granular silicate minerals to anionic flotation. Tallol, sulfate soap, oleic acid, sodium oleate, flsh oil soap, flsh oil fatty acids, and similar anionic collecting agents were employed in'various tests for flotation of the activated silica and gave good results. The proper quantity of caustic a1- kali, phosphate depressant, activating agent, and collector diflers slightly for different ores and the optimum quantities are best determined by trial for each particular case.
Example IV A synthetic cement rock was prepared by mixing approximately equal quantities of calcite and quartz. The mixture was ground to pass'65 mesh in a laboratory pebble mill and transferred to a laboratory mechanical flotation cell. Tap water was added to the cell to give a pulp containing about 25 percent solids. Flotation of the quartz from the calcite was efl'ected by the following reagents expressed in conventional pounds per ton of flotation teed:
Conditioner Reagent Rougher No. 1 No. 2
Caustic soda Sodium hexametaphospbate Calcium Chloride. Sodium pleate.
Assay percent Dist. percent Weight,
Product per cent CaCOr SiO: C800: SiO:
Calcite concentrate,
rougher 89. 3 l0. 7 Silica rougher froth Composite Feed.
Rougher flotation of the quartz rejected 88.9 percent of the silica with a loss of only 7.0 percent of the calcium carbonate.
Example V Another portion of the synthetic cement rock was ground to pass 65 mesh and floated by the procedure described in Example IV, but in this instance lead nitrate and tallol were employed to activate and float the quartz from the calcite. The silica. rougher froth was cleaned twice by 10 reflecting in the same cell using tap water for dilution. The reagent charge employed in the test was as follows:
Conditioner Cleaner Reagent Rougber N0. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2
Caustic soda. 0.7 Sodium henmetao 4 0 4 The results of the test follow:
Assay, per cent Dist., per cent Weight Product pet C1100: Hi0: 0e00: 8101 Calcite eonoentrate...- 35. 8 09.3 0.7 70. 3 0. 5 Middlings 33.2 39.8 00.2 26.1 40.5 Silica Rejects 31. 0 5. 9 94. 1 3. 6 69. 0
Composite Feed- 100.0 60.6 49.4 100.0 100.0
The calcite concentrate (rougher tailing) and silica rejects (cleaner froth) from the test were of acceptable grade, but the middlings would require retreatment to yield final concentrates and tailings.
Example VI Conditioner Reagent Rougher Scavenger No 1 No.2
Causticsoda-.-.. 1.0 v Sodium hexametaphosphate. 1.0 Sodium oleate 1. 0.4 0.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 11. 2 11. 1 ll. 0
The rougher and scavenger iroths in the tests were sufliciently free of calcite to be rejected without cleaning. Analysis of the calcite concentrate and the combined rougher and scavenger silica froths gave the following results:
W ht Assay, per cent Dist., per cent 61g Product per cent;
CaCO: S10: CaCOa SiOi Calcite Concentrate... 76. 1 90.3. 9. 7 98.1 24. 7 Silica Rejects 23. 9 5. 7 94. 3 1. 9 75. 3
Composite Feed. 100. 0 70. l 29. 9 100. 0 100. 0
centrates.
Example VII In another test on the aforementioned synthetic cement rock wherein lead nitrate equivalent to 1.0 pound per ton of flotation feed was employed to activate the quartz, the calcite concentrates assayed 98.9 percent CaCO: and 1.1 percent 810:, and the silica reiects assayed 21.2 per cent CaCO-a and 78.8 percent 810:.
Example VIII In still another test on the synthetic cement rock,'hydrated lime equivalent to 12 pounds per ton of flotation feed was added to the grinding operation. The ground pulp was washed with fresh tapwater to reject the iiine remaining in 'solution employingthe procedure described. in
Example II. The washed pulp was floated to reject the quartz using 1.0, 0.8, 1.0, and 0.4 pound per ton, respectively, of caustic soda, sodium hexametaphosphate, sodium oleate, and oieate acid. The rougher calcite concentrate assayed 99.0 per cent CaCO: and 1.0 per cent 810:. and accounted for a recovery of 94.1' percent of the calcium carbonate in the feed. The rougher silica froth assayed 13.0 per cent CaCO: and 87.0 percent 810:, and contained 97.6 per cent of the silica in the feed.
Example IX A mixture composed of approximately 8 parts Anionic flotation of the calcium-activated quartz rejected 95.5 percent of the silica in the feed with a loss of 10.8 percent of the barium carbonate (witherite).
In this test. the calcium chloride used to actiate the quartz to anionic flotation was added to the pulp before the alkali and phosphate. While we have found that such practice is permissible on many nonmetallic ores, we generally prefer to add the silica-activating agent to the caustic alkaline and phosphate conditioned pulp. The soluble alkaline-earth or heavy-metal salt to activate the silica may be added before, with, or after of witherit'e and 4 parts of quartz was ground to pass 85 mesh and subjected to flotation in a manner similar to that described in Example IV. Activation and flotation of the quartz from the witherite was efl'ected by the following reagents expressed in pounds per ton of flotation feed:
Conditioner Raget Riggla Scav- No. 1 No. 2 No. 3
Calcium chioride.. l. 0
Caustic soda. l. 0 0. 4 Sodium hexameta- 1 0 o o p flodil oleate. 1. 0 0.10 Oieic mi 0. 4 Time,min 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 Pulp pH? l1. 2 ll. 2 10. 1 l0. 7 l0. 8
The rougher and scavenger silica i'roths were combined and cleaned once in the same cell using tap water for dilution with caustic soda to maintain alkalinity, sodium hexametaphosphate to retard the witherite, and sodium oleate to insure flotation of the quartz. The results of the test the anionic collecting agent without departing from the spirit of our invention.
Example X Conditioner Reapnt Rougher Cleaner No. 1 No. 2
cm soda. i g g. 4 Calcium chloride I I I 1. o Sodium ole-tn 2. 0 0. l Oleic acid 0. 4 Time, min 2. 6 2. 5 2. ii 2. 5 Pulp pH 11. 2 11. 2 ll. 0 10.9
The results of the test follow:
Assay per cent Dist. cent Weight, Product per cent SICO: 8101 8:001 8102 Btrontianite Concentratee:
Rougher 36. 0 97. 6 2. 4 57. 4 2. l Cleaner 16. 5 88. 8 11. 2 24. 6 4. 5
Composite 61. 5 94. 8 5. 2 82. 0 6. 6 Silica Rejects 48. c 22. l 77. 9 18.0 93. 4
Composite Feed. 1(1). 0 50. 5 40. 5 100. 0 100. 0
Example X! A mixture composed of approximately equal quantities of barite and quartz was ground to pass mesh and subiected to flotation in a manner similar to that described in Example IV. The quantities of reagents, expressed in pounds per ton .of flotation feed, employed for flotation of the quartz from the barite were as follows:
Conditioner Cleaner are as follows: R0
ugh Scav- Reagent er engor A t D t No. 1 No. 2 No. 1 No. 2
ssay per can is rcent Product weight p6 percent Causticsoda 0.7 0.4 0.4
Bacon 8101 BaCO; SiO, Sodium hexametaw L 2.0 0.05 0.10 Witherite Concontrates:
Rougher 45.1 90.0 1.0 70.6 1.1 Cleaner as 840 10.0 12.7 3.4
S' ggmposite 53.9 00.0 3.4 89.2 4.5
m m8 The rougher and scavenger silica froths were CompositeFeed. 100.0 58.4 41.6 100.0 100.0 combined and cleaned twice by refloating in the same cell using tap water for dilution with the reagents as indicated. The results of the test are as follows:
w ht Assay, per cent Dist., per cent erg Product per BaSOl SiOi 3:180; 810,
Barite Concentrates:
ougher 47. 6 93. 9 6. l 94. 2 5. 6 Cleaner 1. 9 65. 4 34. 6 2. 6 l. 2
Composite 49. 92.8 7. 2 96. 8 6. 8 Silica j Rejeets 50. 5 3.0 97. 0 3. 2 93. 2 Composite Feed. 100. 0 47. 4 52. 6 100. 0 100. 0
Example XII A sample of barite table concentrates was obtained from operating plant near Cartersville,
Georgia. The table concentrates containing barite associated with iron oxides and quartz together with minor quantities of feldspar and other silicate gangue minerals were being ground and treated by flotation to reject silica and to recover an enriched barite-iron product. A head analysis of the sample gave 62.6 percent BaSO4, 29.8 percent SiOz, and 5.4 percent FezOs.
A 250-gram portion of the sample was wet ground in a laboratory rod-mill to pass 65 mesh. The ground pulp was transferred to a mechanical flotation cell and diluted with tap water to give a pulp containing about percent solids. Activation and flotation oi the siliceous gangue constituents from the retarded barite and iron oxides was effected by-the following quantities of reagents expressed in conventional pounds per ton of flotation feed:
Conditioner Cleaner Reagent Rougher No.1 No.2 No.1 No.2
Caustic soda Sodium hexameta- The results of the test are as follows:
Assay, per cent Dist per. cent Product gfi ggg B9804 S10: F810: BaS04 SiOa F010:
Barite Concentrstes:
Rougher 62. 3 83. 7 5. 6 7. 9 83. 3 11. 7 91. 9 Cleaner 6.8 56.5 37.3 3.9 6.1 8.5 4.9 Composite... 69. i 81.0 8.7 .7. 5 89. 4 20. 2 96. 8 Silica Relects 30. 9 21. 3 77. 0 0. 6 l0. 6 79. 8 3. 2
Composite Feed 100.0 02.0 29.8 5.4 100 0 100.0 100.0
- ing in solution as calcium carbonate, and therein solution, until said pulp contains not more than 100 parts per million of soluble lime, and then subjecting said pulp to agitation and aeration in the presence of a quantity of caustic alkali to establish a pulp pH at least as alkaline as pH 10, and an alkali-soluble inorganic phosphate selected from the group consistingof metaphosphates and polyphosphates, together with an anion-active collecting agent selected from the class consisting of fatty acids and resin acids and mixtures of fatty and resin acids-and soaps thereof, whereby siliceous gangue is floated and beneflciated nonmetallic mineral is depressed and recovered.
2. A process for beneflciating ores of nonmetallic minerals of the class consisting of calcite, barite, strontianite, witherlte, and tricalcium phosphate containing siliceous gangue materials which comprises blunging an aqueous pulp of the comminuted are in the presence of hydrated lime to establish a pH of at least about 11, then adding thereto soda ash to precipitate the lime remainafter subjecting said pulp to agitation and aeration in the presence of an alkali-soluble inorganic phosphate selected from the group consisting of metphosphates and polyphosphates, together with an anion-active collecting agent selected from the class consisting of fatty acids and resin acids and mixtures of fatty.v and resin acids and soaps thereof, whereby siliceous gangue is floated and beneilciated nonmetallic mineral is depressed and recovered.
employed as the collecting agent.
5 The process of claim 1 wherein oleic acid is employed as the collecting agent.
6. The process of claim 2 wherein sodium hexametaphosphate is employed as the alkali-soluble inorganic phosphate.
7. The process of claim 2 wherin talloi is employed as the collecting agent.
8. The process of claim 2 wherein oleic acid is employed as the collecting agent.
. JULIUS BRUCE CLEMMER.
CARL RAMPACEK.
REFERENCES CITED The following referencesnareeof record in the the of this patent:
UNITED STATES PATENTS Number Name Date 2,363,029 Weinig Nov. 21, 1944 1,780,022 Littleford Oct. 28, 1930 1,914,694 Lange June 20, 1933 1,914,695 Lange June 20, 1933 2,289,741 Tartarton July 14, 1942 2,383,467 Clemmer and Clemmons -L..- Aug. 28, 1945
US591293A 1945-05-01 1945-05-01 Froth flotation of nonmetallic minerals Expired - Lifetime US2424552A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US591293A US2424552A (en) 1945-05-01 1945-05-01 Froth flotation of nonmetallic minerals

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US591293A US2424552A (en) 1945-05-01 1945-05-01 Froth flotation of nonmetallic minerals

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2424552A true US2424552A (en) 1947-07-29

Family

ID=24365898

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US591293A Expired - Lifetime US2424552A (en) 1945-05-01 1945-05-01 Froth flotation of nonmetallic minerals

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2424552A (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2784468A (en) * 1952-03-11 1957-03-12 American Cyanamid Co Clarification of black foundry waste waters
US3032190A (en) * 1958-11-17 1962-05-01 Int Minerals & Chem Corp Beneficiation of phosphate ores
US3078997A (en) * 1961-02-24 1963-02-26 Havens Richard Flotation process for concentration of phenacite and bertrandite
US3361257A (en) * 1964-10-14 1968-01-02 Armour Agricult Chem Phosphate flotation
US3454159A (en) * 1966-04-21 1969-07-08 Borden Inc Phosphate flotation
US3830366A (en) * 1972-03-24 1974-08-20 American Cyanamid Co Mineral flotation with sulfosuccinamate and depressent
US4122950A (en) * 1975-11-24 1978-10-31 Occidental Petroleum Corporation Flotation separation of glass from a mixture of comminuted inorganic materials using hydrocarbon sulfonates
WO2019007714A1 (en) 2017-07-04 2019-01-10 Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V. Process to treat siliceous non-sulfidic ores and collector composition therefor
WO2019007712A1 (en) 2017-07-04 2019-01-10 Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V. Process to treat carbonatitic non-sulfidic ores and collector composition therefor

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1780022A (en) * 1928-07-03 1930-10-28 Minerals Separation North Us Flotation concentration of phosphatic material
US1914694A (en) * 1931-02-04 1933-06-20 Gen Engineering Co Concentration of phosphate-bearing material
US1914695A (en) * 1931-02-04 1933-06-20 Gen Engineering Co Concentration of phosphate-bearing material
US2289741A (en) * 1941-04-09 1942-07-14 Phosphate Recovery Corp Concentration of kyanite
US2363029A (en) * 1942-02-12 1944-11-21 Basic Magnesium Inc Treatment of magnesite ores
US2383467A (en) * 1943-01-22 1945-08-28 Clemmer Julius Bruce Flotation of iron ores

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1780022A (en) * 1928-07-03 1930-10-28 Minerals Separation North Us Flotation concentration of phosphatic material
US1914694A (en) * 1931-02-04 1933-06-20 Gen Engineering Co Concentration of phosphate-bearing material
US1914695A (en) * 1931-02-04 1933-06-20 Gen Engineering Co Concentration of phosphate-bearing material
US2289741A (en) * 1941-04-09 1942-07-14 Phosphate Recovery Corp Concentration of kyanite
US2363029A (en) * 1942-02-12 1944-11-21 Basic Magnesium Inc Treatment of magnesite ores
US2383467A (en) * 1943-01-22 1945-08-28 Clemmer Julius Bruce Flotation of iron ores

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2784468A (en) * 1952-03-11 1957-03-12 American Cyanamid Co Clarification of black foundry waste waters
US3032190A (en) * 1958-11-17 1962-05-01 Int Minerals & Chem Corp Beneficiation of phosphate ores
US3078997A (en) * 1961-02-24 1963-02-26 Havens Richard Flotation process for concentration of phenacite and bertrandite
US3361257A (en) * 1964-10-14 1968-01-02 Armour Agricult Chem Phosphate flotation
US3454159A (en) * 1966-04-21 1969-07-08 Borden Inc Phosphate flotation
US3830366A (en) * 1972-03-24 1974-08-20 American Cyanamid Co Mineral flotation with sulfosuccinamate and depressent
US4122950A (en) * 1975-11-24 1978-10-31 Occidental Petroleum Corporation Flotation separation of glass from a mixture of comminuted inorganic materials using hydrocarbon sulfonates
WO2019007714A1 (en) 2017-07-04 2019-01-10 Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V. Process to treat siliceous non-sulfidic ores and collector composition therefor
WO2019007712A1 (en) 2017-07-04 2019-01-10 Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V. Process to treat carbonatitic non-sulfidic ores and collector composition therefor
RU2735681C1 (en) * 2017-07-04 2020-11-05 Норион Кемикалз Интернэшнл Б.В. Method of processing carbonate non-sulphide ores and corresponding composition of collectors

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4081363A (en) Mineral beneficiation by froth flotation: use of alcohol ethoxylate partial esters of polycarboxylic acids
US3259242A (en) Beneficiation of apatite-calcite ores
US2424552A (en) Froth flotation of nonmetallic minerals
US2373688A (en) Flotation of ores
US2407651A (en) Concentrating fluorspar by froth flotation
US4139481A (en) Combinations of alkylamidoalkyl monoesters of sulfosuccinic acid and fatty acids as collectors for non-sulfide ores
US2383467A (en) Flotation of iron ores
US4207178A (en) Process for beneficiation of phosphate and iron ores
US2669355A (en) Flotation method and reagent
US2303962A (en) Concentration of mica
US4192739A (en) Process for beneficiation of non-sulfide ores
US3893915A (en) Fluorspar ore flotation
US4330398A (en) Flotation of phosphate ores with anionic agents
US3469693A (en) Beneficiation of ores by froth flotation using sulfosuccinamates
US3278028A (en) Flotation of mica
US2238439A (en) Froth flotation process
US1986817A (en) Flotation reagent
US2168762A (en) cacos
US2403481A (en) Method of concentrating iron ore
US2419945A (en) Froth flotation of silica from iron ore
US3454159A (en) Phosphate flotation
US2300827A (en) Flotation of nonmetallic minerals
US4122950A (en) Flotation separation of glass from a mixture of comminuted inorganic materials using hydrocarbon sulfonates
US2701057A (en) Concentration of iron ores by froth flotation
US2811254A (en) Method for the beneficiation of phosphate ores