US2701057A - Concentration of iron ores by froth flotation - Google Patents
Concentration of iron ores by froth flotation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US2701057A US2701057A US290843A US29084352A US2701057A US 2701057 A US2701057 A US 2701057A US 290843 A US290843 A US 290843A US 29084352 A US29084352 A US 29084352A US 2701057 A US2701057 A US 2701057A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- iron
- ore
- flotation
- calcareous
- pulp
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims description 123
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims description 52
- 238000009291 froth flotation Methods 0.000 title claims description 6
- UQSXHKLRYXJYBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron oxide Inorganic materials [Fe]=O UQSXHKLRYXJYBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 41
- 238000005188 flotation Methods 0.000 claims description 39
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 29
- 235000013980 iron oxide Nutrition 0.000 claims description 26
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 claims description 16
- 150000004760 silicates Chemical class 0.000 claims description 14
- NTHWMYGWWRZVTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium silicate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-][Si]([O-])=O NTHWMYGWWRZVTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000004115 Sodium Silicate Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 claims description 13
- 229910052911 sodium silicate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000011347 resin Chemical class 0.000 claims description 11
- 229920005989 resin Chemical class 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000344 soap Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- 235000014113 dietary fatty acids Nutrition 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000194 fatty acid Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 229930195729 fatty acid Natural products 0.000 claims description 9
- 150000004665 fatty acids Chemical class 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000000881 depressing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000000979 retarding effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910021532 Calcite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 37
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 28
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 21
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 18
- BPQQTUXANYXVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Orthosilicate Chemical compound [O-][Si]([O-])([O-])[O-] BPQQTUXANYXVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 16
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 16
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 16
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 15
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 11
- 235000010755 mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 11
- CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Carbonate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]C([O-])=O CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 10
- VBMVTYDPPZVILR-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(2+);oxygen(2-) Chemical class [O-2].[Fe+2] VBMVTYDPPZVILR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 8
- 125000000129 anionic group Chemical group 0.000 description 7
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 7
- 235000019198 oils Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 6
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000005273 aeration Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 239000003518 caustics Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 235000017550 sodium carbonate Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 229910000029 sodium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 235000011121 sodium hydroxide Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229910052910 alkali metal silicate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000994 depressogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- LIKBJVNGSGBSGK-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(3+);oxygen(2-) Chemical compound [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Fe+3].[Fe+3] LIKBJVNGSGBSGK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000003085 diluting agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000021323 fish oil Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 229910052595 hematite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000011019 hematite Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- WRIDQFICGBMAFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N (E)-8-Octadecenoic acid Natural products CCCCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCC(O)=O WRIDQFICGBMAFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LQJBNNIYVWPHFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 20:1omega9c fatty acid Natural products CCCCCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCCC(O)=O LQJBNNIYVWPHFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- QSBYPNXLFMSGKH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 9-Heptadecensaeure Natural products CCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCCC(O)=O QSBYPNXLFMSGKH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004375 Dextrin Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920001353 Dextrin Polymers 0.000 description 2
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrochloric acid Chemical compound Cl VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 229920001732 Lignosulfonate Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000005642 Oleic acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- ZQPPMHVWECSIRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Oleic acid Natural products CCCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCCC(O)=O ZQPPMHVWECSIRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sulfate Chemical compound [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000019425 dextrin Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000007667 floating Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910001608 iron mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- QXJSBBXBKPUZAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N isooleic acid Natural products CCCCCCCC=CCCCCCCCCC(O)=O QXJSBBXBKPUZAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- ZQPPMHVWECSIRJ-KTKRTIGZSA-N oleic acid Chemical compound CCCCCCCC\C=C/CCCCCCCC(O)=O ZQPPMHVWECSIRJ-KTKRTIGZSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000010665 pine oil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000010453 quartz Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910052979 sodium sulfide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- GRVFOGOEDUUMBP-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium sulfide (anhydrous) Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[S-2] GRVFOGOEDUUMBP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000003784 tall oil Substances 0.000 description 2
- QTWJRLJHJPIABL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-methylphenol;3-methylphenol;4-methylphenol Chemical compound CC1=CC=C(O)C=C1.CC1=CC=CC(O)=C1.CC1=CC=CC=C1O QTWJRLJHJPIABL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VHUUQVKOLVNVRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonium hydroxide Chemical compound [NH4+].[OH-] VHUUQVKOLVNVRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000008733 Citrus aurantifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000406799 Deto Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000795633 Olea <sea slug> Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000008331 Pinus X rigitaeda Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000011613 Pinus brutia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000018646 Pinus brutia Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000011941 Tilia x europaea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000001298 alcohols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000003513 alkali Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000008044 alkali metal hydroxides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000000908 ammonium hydroxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012752 auxiliary agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002585 base Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- AXCZMVOFGPJBDE-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium dihydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[Ca+2] AXCZMVOFGPJBDE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 239000000920 calcium hydroxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000011116 calcium hydroxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910001861 calcium hydroxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002939 deleterious effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002270 dispersing agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000514 dolomite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010459 dolomite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012812 general test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002198 insoluble material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920005610 lignin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004571 lime Substances 0.000 description 1
- 159000000003 magnesium salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005456 ore beneficiation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010979 pH adjustment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003209 petroleum derivative Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019353 potassium silicate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052604 silicate mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052814 silicon oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000008234 soft water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000003871 sulfonates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D1/00—Flotation
- B03D1/001—Flotation agents
- B03D1/004—Organic compounds
- B03D1/016—Macromolecular compounds
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D1/00—Flotation
- B03D1/001—Flotation agents
- B03D1/002—Inorganic compounds
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D1/00—Flotation
- B03D1/001—Flotation agents
- B03D1/004—Organic compounds
- B03D1/008—Organic compounds containing oxygen
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D2201/00—Specified effects produced by the flotation agents
- B03D2201/005—Dispersants
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D2201/00—Specified effects produced by the flotation agents
- B03D2201/02—Collectors
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D2203/00—Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; Specified applications
- B03D2203/02—Ores
- B03D2203/04—Non-sulfide ores
Definitions
- This invention relates to the beneficiation of oxidized iron ores and more particularly to the beneficiation of oxidized calcareous iron ores by froth flotation of calcareous diluents from an alkaline pulp of the ore.
- This invention has as an object the development of an improved process for the isolation of calcium-containing minerals from oxidized iron minerals.
- a further object is the development of a flotation process for obtaining calcium-containing concentrates of high purity from calcareous oxidized iron ores.
- a still further object is the isolation by flotation of the calcium-containing minerals present in certain iron ores, with a minimum loss of iron from the resulting concentrated iron product.
- Another object is the isolation by flotation of the calcium-containing minerals from oxidized iron ores while retarding the flotation of the iron oxides and insoluble materials.
- the invention accordingly comprises a method of isolating the calcareous constituents of various iron ores by employing anionic-collecting agents to float the calcareous material from caustic alkaline iron ore pulps having a pH at least as high as about 9.3, while retarding flotation of the iron oxides with water-soluble silicates.
- anionic-collecting agents to float the calcareous material from caustic alkaline iron ore pulps having a pH at least as high as about 9.3, while retarding flotation of the iron oxides with water-soluble silicates.
- Proper control of pulp pH is of considerable importance.
- Dextrin, soda ash, lignin sulfonate, or mixtures of these materials in moderation may be used as supplementary reagents in conjunction with the various water-soluble silicates, if desired, but are not obligatory in the practice of this invention.
- soluble silicates are so well-known in industry that any discussion of their nature seems largely unnecessary. However, concisely, soluble silicates are manufactured by fusing finely divided silica (SiOz) and an alkaline material such as soda ash. The fused product resembles glass but may be dissolved, by special processes, in water. A number of different grades may be produced by varying the proportions of the ingredients, or by special processes which produce specific properties, but the ratio of alkali to silica normally lies between 123.2 and 1:3.86.
- the soluble silicates are very largely marketed as water solutions or as readily soluble hydrated powders.
- desliming is neither necessary nor especially desirable, particularly when a maximum rejection of calcareous material is desired.
- Flotataion of deslimed charges may be accomplished without difiiculty, but the reagent combination readily enables filming and flotation of slime calcite as well as granular calcite.
- Froths are compact, heavily mineral- 2,701,057 Patented Feb. 1, 1955 ized, and clean readily to yield concentrates of high quality.
- caustic alkaline pulps with a pH of approximately 10 are preferred in the practice of this invention, acceptable results have been obtained throughout the range of about pH 9.3 to about 12.0. Iron slimes are most eifectively retarded at a pH value above 9.5, and concurrently, anionic collector efficiencies are increased above this pH value. In practice, the indicated pH range of operation is of considerable importance. Tests have been made in which visually well-dispersed pulps have been obtained at pH values ranging down to 8.0. Nevertheless, optimum conditions for calcite flotation from iron ores were not established below a pH of 9.3 and only partial flotation of calcite in relatively barren or lightly mineralized froths was obtained.
- Moderate quantities of alkaline reagents other than caustic such as other alkali metal hydroxides, ammonium hydroxide, sodium sulfide, sodium carbonate, or mixtures of these materials, may be used to augment the natural alkaline reaction of the silicates in pH adjustment.
- Reasonable quantities of hydrated lime may also be used as an alkalizer in the separation, although such a use in one sense defeats the purpose of isolating moderately pure calcite for subsequent controlled blending with the final iron products, as the lime activates fine silica to anionic flotation so that a part of the mineral, if present in the ore being treated, reports in the calcite concentrate.
- a moderate amount of calcium and magnesium salts may be present in the water used in the process without deleterious effect.
- soft water is not a prerequisite of the separation.
- the anion-active collecting agents suitable for the selective flotation of calcite from iron oxides and silica include the higher fatty acids, exemplified by red oil or oleic acid, purified or crude soaps of these acids, fishoil soaps, fish-oil fatty acids, paper-mill sulfate soaps, and tall oils. Sulfonated petroleum products also may be used to replace part of the red oil.
- Frothing agents such as the higher alcohols, pine oil, cresylic acid, etc., may be used to advantage in the cleaning operations.
- a critical study of the results of numerous batch flotation tests indicates that the relatively large optimum quantity of silicate used in batch work may be considerably reduced in continuous operation, as it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the large quantities of calcite reporting in the middlings whenever silicate concentrations are somewhat reduced in batch work in all probability would in part report in the finished concentrates when middlings were retreated by con ventional continuous operation flotation methods.
- the higher than normal pH must be maintained to obtain continued selectivity.
- the cleaner tailings or middlings from the two cleaning or refloating operations being enriched in iron, will be calculated in a composite iron product composed of flotation tailings and middlings (cleaner tailings).
- grade of the middlings and hence the Fe product would be improved by recirculation in plant operations.
- the invention will be further illustrated, but is not intended to be limited by the following examples of tional sodium silicate to retard the remaining iron oxides.
- the pine oil improved the froth condition of the second cleaner.
- the final calcite rejects, the combined iron concentrates practice, 5 (cleaner tailings) from the cleaning steps, and the rougher Example 1 iron concentrates were drled, we1ghed, and assayed.
- a l p The results of the test were as follows: of relanvely 9 grade hlghly carequb Assay, percent Distribution, percent l1mon1t1c 1ron ore was obtained from an operatmg mlne P d in the Longwy area of eastern France.
- the ore was To not 5: Fe (38,0 [H501 Fe 0 ,0 IHSOL typical of the area and was largely comprised of oolitic limonite associated with calcite, an iron silicate mineral, Calcite product 3&3 44.1 L8 10.0 92,1 a small lim0illt4 of quartz 0A heiad6 ;1nalys1s give F (lfim cgtratcsz 1 3 3 7 68 3 percent e, percent a an percent y- 8 arm 47.6 drochloric acid insoluble (hereinafter referred to as Cleaner 2L9 insol.).
- the iron ore or product to be treated is first The calcite fraction isolated accounted for 36.3 per ground to a suitable size for flotation (if not already of t 0f th Weight f the feed, Contained Percent such size) by standard or conventional methods.
- the 20 of the CaO present in the ore, and only 10.0 percent of fineness of grind may vary from 35 to 200 mesh or finer, the Fe and 9.8 percent of the insol.
- the grade of the depending on the size required for substantially complete iron product was raised from 32.9 percent to 46.4 percent liberation of the ferruginous minerals from the diluents or Fe with a 90 percent recovery of the iron values. gangue minerals. Although overgrinding is to be avoided, These results were about average of those obtained on good liberation is essential for a satisfactory flotation charges of this calcareous limonite ore ground in various separation. On the present ore, grinding to pass 100 mesh types of mills to pass 65, 100, and 200 mesh, respectively. yielded acceptable results.
- the calcite was rejected without dificulty in the tests by A 250-gram portion of minus 20 mesh rolls crushed 1151115 Pounds P ton f the Various anlofllc ore was ground with 400 cc. water to pass 100 mesh in a q g g m helfltofore Inentjonfid, together With laboratory rod mill containing 25 pounds of /z-inch steel ficlent alkallllflg agents to Provide 3 P from t0 rods. The ground charge was then transferred to a small Example 2 mechanical flotationpeu of standard.
- Froth product Iron product (middlings-i-tailing) Soluble Test silicate Assay, percent 090 Assay, percent Recovery, percent lb./t. ore Weight 1'ec., Weight percent perpercent Fe CaO Insol. cent Fe 020 Insol. Fe 0210 Insol.
- Example 4 The importance of maintenance of a proper pulp pH in the practice of my invention, as previously mentioned, cannot be overemphasized. This factor is of prime importance not only with regard to optimum iron oxide retardation, but also with reference to essentially complete removal of calcite from the pulp.
- the combination of reagents used in the practice of my invention with pulps within the proper pH range results in both good collector etficiency and high selectivity. There is no sacrifice of selectivity in order to obtain high collector efliciency, as might be expected by those versed in this art.
- Anionic or soap flotation of minerals from pulps having a pH above 9.5 results in considerably increased collector efficiency.
- Example l Several 250-gram charges of the limonitic ore of Example l Were ground through 100 mesh and floated (without being deslimed) in the manner previously described.
- the feed contained 32.6 percent iron (largely as limonite), 17.6 percent CaO, and 6.3 percent acid insoluble matter.
- the rougher froth product was cleaned or refioated twice to yield a cleaner reject or final calcite product.
- the two cleaner tailings or middlings were combined by calculation with the rougher tailing or machine discharge to yield a composite iron concentrate. In continuous operation, of course, the middlings would be recirculated and it may be anticipated that the over-all grade of finished product would be slightly better than is indicated in the present batch work.
- test B filming efliciency increased progressively (tests B, C, D) until it was possible in test E to reduce the collector to a third the quantity previously used. Relatively little change in the character or grade of the finished product was noted, although in the extremely high pH range (test D) a part of the ferruginous minerals again showed a tendency to film and float. However, this factor is considered of secondary importance as operation probably would best be undertaken in the 9.5 to 11.0 pH range from both an economic and equipment corrosion standpoint.
- Example 5 The flotation tests heretofore reported were all made on a typical calcareous hydrated iron oxide or limonite ore. I shall now consider the application of my method of flotation to a typical calcareous iron ore in which the iron values are present in the form of an earthy type of hematite. In the particular ore to be considered at this time, there is also present a considerable amount of acid insoluble matter. As my method of flotation retards this material as Well as the iron oxide, the insoluble matter content of the iron product is greater than that of the feed. In the aforementioned copending application, Serial No.
- a 25 O-gram charge of the calcareous iron ore was ground to pass mesh in the manner described in Example 1.
- the ground charge, including slime was transferred to a small mechanical flotation cell of standard design and sufficient tap water added to give a pulp for flotation containing about 22 percent solids.
- Flotation of the calcite from the slime-bearing pulp was effected by the following reagents expressed in conventional terms ton of flotation feed:
- the flotation process resulted in the isolation of 86 percent of the calcite with a loss of only 11.4 percent of the Fe.
- the composite Fe product though still containing siliceous material, was nevertheless increased in grade from 36 to 44.3 percent Fe.
- subsequent treatment by the method of my copending application, to reject silica produced an over-all 85 percent Fe recovery in a final iron product having an assay of 54.7 percent Fe, 2.3 percent CaO, and 12.5 percent insol.
- the practice of my invention aifords a means of positively controlling, in the case of calcareous iron ores, the quantity of calcite remaining in the ore from which a part of the insoluble matter has been, or is to be, removed.
- positive means of assuring the proper acid-base relationships are provided.
- the high-grade calcite isolated by my process may readily be recombined with the iron product, once siliceous gangue has been removed by any of several possible methods.
- the process also affords a positive rejection of the maximum quantity of calcite that might be desired in the event the ores or products are transported for considerable distances to the blast furnaces.
- Transportation charges in some instances are sufliciently great to warrant isolation and rejection of the material at the mine and to supply fluxing material from calcite or dolomite deposits more immediatelv adjacent to the furnaces.
- a process for selectively isolating the calcareous constituents of calcareous iron ores comprising subjecting an alkaline pulp of the iron ore having a pH at least as high as about 9.3 to froth flotation with an anionic-collecting agent selected from the class consisting of higher fatty acids, resin acids, mixtures of fatty and resin acids, and soaps thereof, and retarding flotation of the iron oxides with water-soluble silicates in an amount providing an iron oxide depressing action equivalent to that of from 2 to 12 pounds of sodium silicate solution of 63 per cent water content per ton of ore.
- an anionic-collecting agent selected from the class consisting of higher fatty acids, resin acids, mixtures of fatty and resin acids, and soaps thereof
- a process for beneficiating calcareous iron ores which comprises conditioning an aqueous pulp of the comminuted ore with a quantity of alkali metal silicate sufficient to establish a pulp pH at least as alkaline as pH 9.3, adding to the alkaline pulp an anion-active collecting agent selected from the class consisting of higher fatty acids, resin acids, and mixtures of fatty and resin acids, and soaps thereof, and then subjecting said pulp to agitation and aeration whereby calcareous diluents are floated and beneficiated iron ore is depressed and recovered.
- a process for beneficiating calcareous iron ore comprising forming an aqueous pulp of the comminuted ore, adding alkali metal silicate and a dispersing agent to the pulp in an amount providing an iron oxide depressing action equivalent to that of from 2 to 12 pounds of sodium silicate solution of 63 per cent water content per ton of ore, adjusting the pH of the pulp to at least as high as about pH 9.3, adding an anion-active collecting agent selected from the class consisting of higher fatty acids, resin acids, mixtures of fatty and resin acids, and soaps thereof, to the alkaline pulp, and then subjecting said pulp to agitation and aeration, floating the calcareous material from the iron oxides and insolubles, and separately recovering beneficiated iron oxide and material high in CaO content.
- a process for beneficiating calcareous iron ore comprising forming an alkaline pulp of the comminuted ore having a pH in the range of from about 9.3 to about 11.0, including a quantity of alkali-metal silicate in said alkaline pulp in an amount providing an iron oxide depressing action equivalent to that of from 2 to 12 pounds of sodium silicate solution of 63 per cent water content per ton of ore, adding an active anion-collecting agent selected from the class consisting of higher fatty acids, resin acids, mixtures of fatty and resin acids, and soaps thereof, to the alkaline pulp, and then subjecting said pulp to agitation and aeration, floating off the calcareous material from the depressed iron oxides, and recovering the beneficiated iron ore.
- a process for beneficiating calcareous iron ore comprising forming a pulp of the comminuted ore, adding to the pulp a quantity of alkaline materials including alkalimetal silicates in an amount providing an iron oxide depressing action equivalent to that of from 2 to 12 pounds of sodium silicate solution of 63 per cent water content per ton of ore, to raise the pH of the pulp to at least about 9.3, adding an anion-active collecting agent to the alkaline pulp, and then subjecting said pulp to agitation and aeration whereby calcareous dilutents are floated and beneficiated iron ore is depressed, and recovering the beneficiated iron ore.
- a process for beneficiating calcareous iron ore comprising, forming an aqueous pulp of the comminuted ore, adding sodium silicate solution containing about 63 percent Water to the pulp in an amount of about 8 to 12 pounds of the reagent solution per ton of ore, adjusting the alkalinity of the pulp to a pH of about 10.0, conditioning the pulp for flotation by the addition of an anionic collecting agent selected from the class consisting of higher fatty acids, resin acids, mixtures of fatty and resin acids, and soaps thereof, subjecting the conditioned pulp to agitation and aeration whereby calcareous material is floated and beneficiated iron ore is depressed, and separately recovering the beneficiated iron oxide and calcareous material.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
Description
United States Patent CONCENTRATION OF [IRON ORES BY FROTH FLOTATION Ballard H. Clemmons, Tuscaloosa, Ala.
No Drawing. Application May 29, 1952, Serial No. 290,843
6 Claims. (Cl. 209-166) (Granted under Title 35, U. S. Code (1952), sec. 266) The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States for governmental purposes without the payment to me of any royalty thereon in accordance with the provisions of the act of April 30, 1928 (ch. 460, 45 Stat. L. 467).
This invention relates to the beneficiation of oxidized iron ores and more particularly to the beneficiation of oxidized calcareous iron ores by froth flotation of calcareous diluents from an alkaline pulp of the ore.
Conventional iron-ore beneficiation processes take little or no cognizance of the calcite contained in certain ores, but are concerned primarily with rejection of the maximum amount of insoluble matter possible.
This invention has as an object the development of an improved process for the isolation of calcium-containing minerals from oxidized iron minerals.
A further object is the development of a flotation process for obtaining calcium-containing concentrates of high purity from calcareous oxidized iron ores.
A still further object is the isolation by flotation of the calcium-containing minerals present in certain iron ores, with a minimum loss of iron from the resulting concentrated iron product.
Another object is the isolation by flotation of the calcium-containing minerals from oxidized iron ores while retarding the flotation of the iron oxides and insoluble materials.
Other objects, purposes, and desirable features of the invention will appear hereinafter or will be understood from the subsequent description of its practice.
The invention accordingly comprises a method of isolating the calcareous constituents of various iron ores by employing anionic-collecting agents to float the calcareous material from caustic alkaline iron ore pulps having a pH at least as high as about 9.3, while retarding flotation of the iron oxides with water-soluble silicates. Proper control of pulp pH is of considerable importance. Dextrin, soda ash, lignin sulfonate, or mixtures of these materials in moderation may be used as supplementary reagents in conjunction with the various water-soluble silicates, if desired, but are not obligatory in the practice of this invention.
My experiments show that any of the soluble silicates (ortho-, meta-, or sesqui-silicates) can be used in the practice of this invention upon proper adjustment of reagent quantities. I prefer, however, to use the least expensive form commonly known as water glass.
The soluble silicates are so well-known in industry that any discussion of their nature seems largely unnecessary. However, concisely, soluble silicates are manufactured by fusing finely divided silica (SiOz) and an alkaline material such as soda ash. The fused product resembles glass but may be dissolved, by special processes, in water. A number of different grades may be produced by varying the proportions of the ingredients, or by special processes which produce specific properties, but the ratio of alkali to silica normally lies between 123.2 and 1:3.86. The soluble silicates are very largely marketed as water solutions or as readily soluble hydrated powders.
In the practice of this invention, desliming is neither necessary nor especially desirable, particularly when a maximum rejection of calcareous material is desired. Flotataion of deslimed charges may be accomplished without difiiculty, but the reagent combination readily enables filming and flotation of slime calcite as well as granular calcite. Froths are compact, heavily mineral- 2,701,057 Patented Feb. 1, 1955 ized, and clean readily to yield concentrates of high quality.
Although caustic alkaline pulps with a pH of approximately 10 are preferred in the practice of this invention, acceptable results have been obtained throughout the range of about pH 9.3 to about 12.0. Iron slimes are most eifectively retarded at a pH value above 9.5, and concurrently, anionic collector efficiencies are increased above this pH value. In practice, the indicated pH range of operation is of considerable importance. Tests have been made in which visually well-dispersed pulps have been obtained at pH values ranging down to 8.0. Nevertheless, optimum conditions for calcite flotation from iron ores were not established below a pH of 9.3 and only partial flotation of calcite in relatively barren or lightly mineralized froths was obtained. Moderate quantities of alkaline reagents other than caustic, such as other alkali metal hydroxides, ammonium hydroxide, sodium sulfide, sodium carbonate, or mixtures of these materials, may be used to augment the natural alkaline reaction of the silicates in pH adjustment. Reasonable quantities of hydrated lime may also be used as an alkalizer in the separation, although such a use in one sense defeats the purpose of isolating moderately pure calcite for subsequent controlled blending with the final iron products, as the lime activates fine silica to anionic flotation so that a part of the mineral, if present in the ore being treated, reports in the calcite concentrate.
A moderate amount of calcium and magnesium salts may be present in the water used in the process without deleterious effect. Thus, soft water is not a prerequisite of the separation.
The anion-active collecting agents suitable for the selective flotation of calcite from iron oxides and silica include the higher fatty acids, exemplified by red oil or oleic acid, purified or crude soaps of these acids, fishoil soaps, fish-oil fatty acids, paper-mill sulfate soaps, and tall oils. Sulfonated petroleum products also may be used to replace part of the red oil.
The quantities of the various reagents utilized in the practice of this invention are subject to considerable variation, and optimum quantities are best determined by experimentation for any particular ore or product treated. Purity and yield of separated products are reliable guides for reagent adjustment. A large excess of collecting agent, under the conditions of trial, tends to float additional iron minerals in the roughing operation, but the latter are retarded without dilficulty in subsequent cleaners. A deficiency of collector results in incomplete flotation of the calcite. Large excesses of soluble silicate tend to retard calcite, whereas a deficiency results in little more than partial collection of the calcite and decrease in selectivity as regards iron oxides. Frothing agents such as the higher alcohols, pine oil, cresylic acid, etc., may be used to advantage in the cleaning operations. A critical study of the results of numerous batch flotation tests indicates that the relatively large optimum quantity of silicate used in batch work may be considerably reduced in continuous operation, as it will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the large quantities of calcite reporting in the middlings whenever silicate concentrations are somewhat reduced in batch work in all probability would in part report in the finished concentrates when middlings were retreated by con ventional continuous operation flotation methods. However, the higher than normal pH must be maintained to obtain continued selectivity.
In describing the results of tests made on various iron ores, for simplicity and convenience, the cleaner tailings or middlings from the two cleaning or refloating operations, being enriched in iron, will be calculated in a composite iron product composed of flotation tailings and middlings (cleaner tailings). As stated above, it will be apparent that the grade of the middlings and hence the Fe product would be improved by recirculation in plant operations.
It will also be noted that the removal of calcite of necessity results in an increase in the insoluble matter content of the ores. In a copending application Serial No. 290,842, filed May 29, 1952, in which I am a joint inventor there is described a two-stage process for selectively removing calcite and silica from oxidized iron ores as individual concentrates.
The invention will be further illustrated, but is not intended to be limited by the following examples of tional sodium silicate to retard the remaining iron oxides. The pine oil improved the froth condition of the second cleaner.
The final calcite rejects, the combined iron concentrates practice, 5 (cleaner tailings) from the cleaning steps, and the rougher Example 1 iron concentrates were drled, we1ghed, and assayed. A l p The results of the test were as follows: of relanvely 9 grade hlghly carequb Assay, percent Distribution, percent l1mon1t1c 1ron ore was obtained from an operatmg mlne P d in the Longwy area of eastern France. The ore was To not 5: Fe (38,0 [H501 Fe 0 ,0 IHSOL typical of the area and was largely comprised of oolitic limonite associated with calcite, an iron silicate mineral, Calcite product 3&3 44.1 L8 10.0 92,1 a small lim0illt4 of quartz 0A heiad6 ;1nalys1s give F (lfim cgtratcsz 1 3 3 7 68 3 percent e, percent a an percent y- 8 arm 47.6 drochloric acid insoluble (hereinafter referred to as Cleaner 2L9 insol.). Composite 03.7 46.4 2.2 9.4 90.0 7.9 90.2 In carrying out the flotation process according to this QE 100-0 100-0 100-0 invention, the iron ore or product to be treated is first The calcite fraction isolated accounted for 36.3 per ground to a suitable size for flotation (if not already of t 0f th Weight f the feed, Contained Percent such size) by standard or conventional methods. The 20 of the CaO present in the ore, and only 10.0 percent of fineness of grind may vary from 35 to 200 mesh or finer, the Fe and 9.8 percent of the insol. The grade of the depending on the size required for substantially complete iron product was raised from 32.9 percent to 46.4 percent liberation of the ferruginous minerals from the diluents or Fe with a 90 percent recovery of the iron values. gangue minerals. Although overgrinding is to be avoided, These results were about average of those obtained on good liberation is essential for a satisfactory flotation charges of this calcareous limonite ore ground in various separation. On the present ore, grinding to pass 100 mesh types of mills to pass 65, 100, and 200 mesh, respectively. yielded acceptable results. The calcite was rejected without dificulty in the tests by A 250-gram portion of minus 20 mesh rolls crushed 1151115 Pounds P ton f the Various anlofllc ore was ground with 400 cc. water to pass 100 mesh in a q g g m helfltofore Inentjonfid, together With laboratory rod mill containing 25 pounds of /z-inch steel ficlent alkallllflg agents to Provide 3 P from t0 rods. The ground charge was then transferred to a small Example 2 mechanical flotationpeu of standard. i and suficcient The eflect of variations in the quantity of soluble silitaRWateT added to glve a Pulp contammg about 25 Percent cate retardant is shown in the following example. Sevsohdseral individual 250-gram charges of the calcareous limo- Flotat1on Of the calcareous constltuent Of the ore 13S nitic French re were ground to pass mesh in the then achleved m f P P of manner of Example 1. These charges, including slime, m ff Ted 011 i 0161c acld) as conecfor were individually subjected to identical flotation condi- Pf N Bfand sodlum F (a Commerclal 809mm tions (similar to those of Example 1, using 1.12 pounds lllcate havlflg a NaZO-SIOZ Tatlo of comaln' red oil per ton of ore) other than for variations in the 8 appl'oxlmately 63 Percent Water; slllcate reagent 40 quantity of sodium silicate used as iron and insol recharges Show" in these examples are based on the Watel' tardant and small adjustments in the quantity of caustic, solution as received") as the silica and iron oxide deto maintain a constant pulp pH of 10.0. Results are pressant. The reagent charge used expressed in the consummarized in the following table:
Froth product Iron product (middlings-i-tailing) Soluble Test silicate Assay, percent 090 Assay, percent Recovery, percent lb./t. ore Weight 1'ec., Weight percent perpercent Fe CaO Insol. cent Fe 020 Insol. Fe 0210 Insol.
ventional terms of pounds of reagent per ton of ore was It is readily apparent from a study of the table that, as follows: although moderately high calcite rejections were obtained when quantities of silicate of 2 pounds and above Conditioner Cleaner per ton of ore were used (provided a pulp pH above 9.3 Reagent Rougher was obtained), optimum results were not obtained until No.1 No.2 No. 1 No.2 the concentration of reagent reached 8-12 pounds per ton of ore treated. Furthermore, froth characteristics sodium silicate, were progressively better as this concentration was in- Brand 120 1. creased. Higher quantities (test G) tended to retard R94 the calcite. Pine 0il 0.08 E l 3 T11ne,1n1n 2.5 2.5 2.5 1+2 1+2 P 6 Pulp P In the preceding examples of practice, soluble silicates alone were employed to retard the iron oxides during The pulp, including approximately 30 percent by weight anionic flotation of the calcareous constituents of the ore. of slimed ore finer than 20 microns in size, was condi- I shall now describe the results of flotation tests wherein tioned for flotation in two stages. In the first conditioner auxiliary addition agents are employed to supplement the the sodium silicate established the desired alkalinity and 76 soluble silicates in the practice of my invention. A numretarded the iron oxides and siliceous material. In the her of variations, employing smaller concentrations of second conditioner the ore was conditioned with the red silicate in conjunction with various supplementary disoil, as indicated. This filmed and prepared the calcareous persants, such as lignin sulfonates, dextrins, soda ash, etc., constituents for flotation. Air was then allowed to enter were tried. It was found that certain of these reagents the cell and resulted in the immediate formation of a 30 could be utilized advantageously to reduce the quantity compact, heavily mineralized froth of the calcareous maof silicate required, though uniformly best results from terials. The froth was collected for 2.5 minutes wherethe standpoint of froth characteristics were obtained when upon flotation was complete. This rougher froth was the silicate was used alone. In all instances, adjustment cleaned by refloating, as indicated, in the same cell using of pulp pH to at least 9.3 was a basic requirement. By tap water for makeup, and using a small amount of addimeans of some of the reagent combinations, thoroughly dispersed pulps were obtained in the pH range of 8-9, but under the conditions of trial, a satisfactory calctie rejection was not eifected.
Employing minus 100-mesh charges of the same ore, as well as the general test procedure used in Example 1, the following composited iron products were obtained by use of auxiliary agents supplementing the iron oxide retarding effect of the soluble silicates. In all instances w 1 his t Fe 'l' e g percen COIDPOSI e Condltmner calcite'product assay, per Percent Percent Test cent Fe re- OaO recovery jection Reagents pH Rougher Cleaner Fe 0410 N21200: 0.8 A SllicateN-- 0.5 9.15 15.5 0.0
Red Oil 1. 2s Silicate N 12.
11 5 5 7 5 52. 4 .0 46. 2.4 77.1 9 .0 Red Oil 1. 12 3 Silicate N-- 12.0 E NaOH 4.0 10.9 49.5 35.9 44.1 4.2 87.5 84.1
Red 011 0. 32
NaOH, as needed, was used to adjust the pulp pH to Likewise, it will be noted that collector efficiency was about 10.0. low in test A and that none of the calcite carried through Pounds Percent Percent Deprcssant used per Assay percent Fe re- Q20 reton Fe Cao Insol covered ected N Brand Sodium Silicate 1. 0 43. 2 4. 0 8. 8 90. 8 84.1 Yellow Corn Dextrin. 1. 0 N Brand Sodium Silicate 1.0 44. 5 4. 2 8. 3 89. 7 84. 6 Lignin Sullonate.... 1.0 N" Brand Sodium cate 1. 0 44. 7 3. 9 8. 6 89. 0 85. 7 Soda Ash 1.0 Composite, Feed (all tests) 32.6 17.6 6 3 100.0 100.0
It will be seen that the grade of the products produced in this fashion compare favorably with those obtained in tests utilizing silicate alone as retardant. Best froth characteristics, however, were obtained in the normal high silicate tests.
Example 4 The importance of maintenance of a proper pulp pH in the practice of my invention, as previously mentioned, cannot be overemphasized. This factor is of prime importance not only with regard to optimum iron oxide retardation, but also with reference to essentially complete removal of calcite from the pulp. The combination of reagents used in the practice of my invention with pulps within the proper pH range results in both good collector etficiency and high selectivity. There is no sacrifice of selectivity in order to obtain high collector efliciency, as might be expected by those versed in this art. Anionic or soap flotation of minerals from pulps having a pH above 9.5 results in considerably increased collector efficiency. Optimum selectivity with reference to the retardation of iron oxide minerals and flotation of calcite is achieved in accordance with the present invention in the pH range above 9.3-9.5. Below that point, in those instances where flotation can be achieved by means of anionic collecting agents, both iron oxide and calcareous minerals tend to float in a non-selective manner. The foregoing observations are illustrated as follows:
Several 250-gram charges of the limonitic ore of Example l Were ground through 100 mesh and floated (without being deslimed) in the manner previously described. The feed contained 32.6 percent iron (largely as limonite), 17.6 percent CaO, and 6.3 percent acid insoluble matter. In each test the rougher froth product was cleaned or refioated twice to yield a cleaner reject or final calcite product. Similarly, in each test, the two cleaner tailings or middlings were combined by calculation with the rougher tailing or machine discharge to yield a composite iron concentrate. In continuous operation, of course, the middlings would be recirculated and it may be anticipated that the over-all grade of finished product would be slightly better than is indicated in the present batch work.
the cleaning operation. In the higher pH range, filming efliciency increased progressively (tests B, C, D) until it was possible in test E to reduce the collector to a third the quantity previously used. Relatively little change in the character or grade of the finished product was noted, although in the extremely high pH range (test D) a part of the ferruginous minerals again showed a tendency to film and float. However, this factor is considered of secondary importance as operation probably would best be undertaken in the 9.5 to 11.0 pH range from both an economic and equipment corrosion standpoint.
Example 5 The flotation tests heretofore reported were all made on a typical calcareous hydrated iron oxide or limonite ore. I shall now consider the application of my method of flotation to a typical calcareous iron ore in which the iron values are present in the form of an earthy type of hematite. In the particular ore to be considered at this time, there is also present a considerable amount of acid insoluble matter. As my method of flotation retards this material as Well as the iron oxide, the insoluble matter content of the iron product is greater than that of the feed. In the aforementioned copending application, Serial No. 290,842, filed.May 29, 1952, in which I am a joint inventor, there is described a process for beneficiating iron ores by froth flotation wherein a two-stage procedure of selectively beneficiating such ores is employed. Complete treatment of ores containing both calcareous and siliceous constituents would require use of a procedure of this nature whenever the two gangue minerals were to be isolated as individual products. I am presently concerned, however, with only the first stage of this. selective flotation procedure-namely, the isolation, under controlled conditions, of a major part of the calcite present in the ore. The following example of practice must, therefore, be evaluated only from this standpoint.
A sample of calcareous and siliceous hematite ore, locally known as Big Seam Red Ore, was obtained from the Birmingham, Alabama, district. The ore was typical of the district and contained hematite associated with a gangue composed predominantly of quartz and calcite. Minor quantities of shale and ferruginous clays also were present. A head analysis gave 36.4 percent Fe, 12.0 percent CaO, and 22.4 percent hydrochloric acid insoluble.
A 25 O-gram charge of the calcareous iron ore was ground to pass mesh in the manner described in Example 1. The ground charge, including slime, was transferred to a small mechanical flotation cell of standard design and sufficient tap water added to give a pulp for flotation containing about 22 percent solids. Flotation of the calcite from the slime-bearing pulp was effected by the following reagents expressed in conventional terms ton of flotation feed:
of pounds per Conditioner Rougher Cleaner Reagent 5 No. 1 No. 2 1 No. 2
NaOH NazCOa Sodr m Silicate N 'u Red 011 Time, minutes Pulp pH The slime-bearing pulp was conditioned with caustic, soda ash, to replace part of the silicate, and sodium silicate N (a 40 percent aqueous solution, added on an as received basis). Red oil was then added as filming agent, and the pulp again conditioned briefly as indicated. The rougher froth was cleaned by refloating in the same cell, using tap water for dilution together with additional caustic soda and silicate. The froth (calcite product) and composited Fe product (middlings plus tailings) were dried, weighed, and analyzed.
The results of the test are as follows:
The flotation process resulted in the isolation of 86 percent of the calcite with a loss of only 11.4 percent of the Fe. The composite Fe product, though still containing siliceous material, was nevertheless increased in grade from 36 to 44.3 percent Fe. For illustration purposes, subsequent treatment by the method of my copending application, to reject silica, produced an over-all 85 percent Fe recovery in a final iron product having an assay of 54.7 percent Fe, 2.3 percent CaO, and 12.5 percent insol.
The results of the previously described flotation tests are typical of those obtained on a variety of calcareous ores, using various silicates and combinations of silicates with other iron oxide depressants as retardants while float- 0 ing calcite from iron ore pulps made alkaline to a pH above 9.3 by means of caustic soda, sodium sulfide, or by the natural alkalinity derived from a relatively high concentration of silicate. Oleic acid,-or red oil, is the preferred collecting agent or calcite promoter, in the practice of my invention, but sodium olea te, tall oil, sulfate soap, petroleum sulfonates, fish oil fatty acids, or similar anionic collecting agents or combinations thereof, have also been successfully used for this purpose.
The practice of my invention aifords a means of positively controlling, in the case of calcareous iron ores, the quantity of calcite remaining in the ore from which a part of the insoluble matter has been, or is to be, removed. In the event an essentially self-fluxing product is desired from the beneficiation processes, positive means of assuring the proper acid-base relationships are provided. The high-grade calcite isolated by my process may readily be recombined with the iron product, once siliceous gangue has been removed by any of several possible methods.
The process also affords a positive rejection of the maximum quantity of calcite that might be desired in the event the ores or products are transported for considerable distances to the blast furnaces. Transportation charges in some instances are sufliciently great to warrant isolation and rejection of the material at the mine and to supply fluxing material from calcite or dolomite deposits more immediatelv adjacent to the furnaces.
Since many widely differing embodiments of the invention will occur to one skilled in the art, the invention is not limited to the specific details illustrated and described, and various changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.
What is claimed is:
1. A process for selectively isolating the calcareous constituents of calcareous iron ores comprising subjecting an alkaline pulp of the iron ore having a pH at least as high as about 9.3 to froth flotation with an anionic-collecting agent selected from the class consisting of higher fatty acids, resin acids, mixtures of fatty and resin acids, and soaps thereof, and retarding flotation of the iron oxides with water-soluble silicates in an amount providing an iron oxide depressing action equivalent to that of from 2 to 12 pounds of sodium silicate solution of 63 per cent water content per ton of ore.
2. A process for beneficiating calcareous iron ores which comprises conditioning an aqueous pulp of the comminuted ore with a quantity of alkali metal silicate sufficient to establish a pulp pH at least as alkaline as pH 9.3, adding to the alkaline pulp an anion-active collecting agent selected from the class consisting of higher fatty acids, resin acids, and mixtures of fatty and resin acids, and soaps thereof, and then subjecting said pulp to agitation and aeration whereby calcareous diluents are floated and beneficiated iron ore is depressed and recovered.
3. A process for beneficiating calcareous iron ore comprising forming an aqueous pulp of the comminuted ore, adding alkali metal silicate and a dispersing agent to the pulp in an amount providing an iron oxide depressing action equivalent to that of from 2 to 12 pounds of sodium silicate solution of 63 per cent water content per ton of ore, adjusting the pH of the pulp to at least as high as about pH 9.3, adding an anion-active collecting agent selected from the class consisting of higher fatty acids, resin acids, mixtures of fatty and resin acids, and soaps thereof, to the alkaline pulp, and then subjecting said pulp to agitation and aeration, floating the calcareous material from the iron oxides and insolubles, and separately recovering beneficiated iron oxide and material high in CaO content.
4. A process for beneficiating calcareous iron ore comprising forming an alkaline pulp of the comminuted ore having a pH in the range of from about 9.3 to about 11.0, including a quantity of alkali-metal silicate in said alkaline pulp in an amount providing an iron oxide depressing action equivalent to that of from 2 to 12 pounds of sodium silicate solution of 63 per cent water content per ton of ore, adding an active anion-collecting agent selected from the class consisting of higher fatty acids, resin acids, mixtures of fatty and resin acids, and soaps thereof, to the alkaline pulp, and then subjecting said pulp to agitation and aeration, floating off the calcareous material from the depressed iron oxides, and recovering the beneficiated iron ore.
5. A process for beneficiating calcareous iron ore comprising forming a pulp of the comminuted ore, adding to the pulp a quantity of alkaline materials including alkalimetal silicates in an amount providing an iron oxide depressing action equivalent to that of from 2 to 12 pounds of sodium silicate solution of 63 per cent water content per ton of ore, to raise the pH of the pulp to at least about 9.3, adding an anion-active collecting agent to the alkaline pulp, and then subjecting said pulp to agitation and aeration whereby calcareous dilutents are floated and beneficiated iron ore is depressed, and recovering the beneficiated iron ore.
6. A process for beneficiating calcareous iron ore comprising, forming an aqueous pulp of the comminuted ore, adding sodium silicate solution containing about 63 percent Water to the pulp in an amount of about 8 to 12 pounds of the reagent solution per ton of ore, adjusting the alkalinity of the pulp to a pH of about 10.0, conditioning the pulp for flotation by the addition of an anionic collecting agent selected from the class consisting of higher fatty acids, resin acids, mixtures of fatty and resin acids, and soaps thereof, subjecting the conditioned pulp to agitation and aeration whereby calcareous material is floated and beneficiated iron ore is depressed, and separately recovering the beneficiated iron oxide and calcareous material.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,939,119 Holt Dec. 12, 1933 2,383,467 Clemmer et al. Aug. 28, 1945 2,403,481 Clemmer et al. July 9, 1946 2,415,416 Clemmer et al. Feb. 11, 1947 2,507,012 Heilmann May 9, 1950 FOREIGN PATENTS 621,985 Great Britain Apr. 25, 1949
Claims (1)
1. A PROCESS FOR SELECTIVELY ISOLATING THE CALCAREOUS CONSTITUENTS OF CALCAREOUS IRON ORES COMPRISING SUBJECTING AN ALKALINE PULP OF THE IRON ORE HAVING A PH AT LEAST AS HIGH AS ABOUT 9.3 TO FROTH FLOTATION WITH AN ANIONIC-COLLECTING AGENT SELECTED FROM THE CLASS CONSISTING OF HIGHER FATTY ACIDS, RESIN ACIDS, MIXTURES OF FATTY AND RESIN ACIDS, AND SOAPS THEREOF, AND RETARDING FLOTATION OF THE IRON OXIDES WITH WATER-SOLUBLE SILICATES IN AN AMOUNT PROVIDING AN IRON OXIDE DEPRESSING ACTION EQUIVALENT TO THAT OF FROM 2 TO 12 POUNDS OF SODIUM SILICATE SOLUTION OF 63 PER CENT WATER CONTENT PER TON OF ORE.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US290843A US2701057A (en) | 1952-05-29 | 1952-05-29 | Concentration of iron ores by froth flotation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US290843A US2701057A (en) | 1952-05-29 | 1952-05-29 | Concentration of iron ores by froth flotation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US2701057A true US2701057A (en) | 1955-02-01 |
Family
ID=23117779
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US290843A Expired - Lifetime US2701057A (en) | 1952-05-29 | 1952-05-29 | Concentration of iron ores by froth flotation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US2701057A (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2857051A (en) * | 1956-04-26 | 1958-10-21 | Harvey L Noblitt | Method of recovering white mica |
US3430762A (en) * | 1966-11-28 | 1969-03-04 | David Weston | Simultaneous flotation of silica phosphates and carbonate minerals |
US3534854A (en) * | 1967-11-20 | 1970-10-20 | Int Minerals & Chem Corp | Beneficiation of calcite-apatite-quartz ores |
US3779380A (en) * | 1971-10-12 | 1973-12-18 | Hercules Inc | Collector composition for ore flotation |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1939119A (en) * | 1930-05-21 | 1933-12-12 | Grover J Holt | Ore conditioning process |
US2383467A (en) * | 1943-01-22 | 1945-08-28 | Clemmer Julius Bruce | Flotation of iron ores |
US2403481A (en) * | 1945-02-09 | 1946-07-09 | Nasa | Method of concentrating iron ore |
US2415416A (en) * | 1945-02-09 | 1947-02-11 | Nasa | Froth flotation of silica from iron ore with anionic collector |
GB621985A (en) * | 1946-02-27 | 1949-04-25 | Smidth & Co As F L | Improvements relating to the treatment of limestone |
US2507012A (en) * | 1946-02-27 | 1950-05-09 | Separation Process Company | Froth flotation beneficiating material containing dolomite or magnesite |
-
1952
- 1952-05-29 US US290843A patent/US2701057A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1939119A (en) * | 1930-05-21 | 1933-12-12 | Grover J Holt | Ore conditioning process |
US2383467A (en) * | 1943-01-22 | 1945-08-28 | Clemmer Julius Bruce | Flotation of iron ores |
US2403481A (en) * | 1945-02-09 | 1946-07-09 | Nasa | Method of concentrating iron ore |
US2415416A (en) * | 1945-02-09 | 1947-02-11 | Nasa | Froth flotation of silica from iron ore with anionic collector |
GB621985A (en) * | 1946-02-27 | 1949-04-25 | Smidth & Co As F L | Improvements relating to the treatment of limestone |
US2507012A (en) * | 1946-02-27 | 1950-05-09 | Separation Process Company | Froth flotation beneficiating material containing dolomite or magnesite |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2857051A (en) * | 1956-04-26 | 1958-10-21 | Harvey L Noblitt | Method of recovering white mica |
US3430762A (en) * | 1966-11-28 | 1969-03-04 | David Weston | Simultaneous flotation of silica phosphates and carbonate minerals |
US3534854A (en) * | 1967-11-20 | 1970-10-20 | Int Minerals & Chem Corp | Beneficiation of calcite-apatite-quartz ores |
US3779380A (en) * | 1971-10-12 | 1973-12-18 | Hercules Inc | Collector composition for ore flotation |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4098687A (en) | Beneficiation of lithium ores by froth flotation | |
US3915391A (en) | Recovery of scheelite from ores by flotation | |
US2442455A (en) | Concentration of nonmicaceous, water-insoluble alkaline-earth metal salt minerals | |
US2373688A (en) | Flotation of ores | |
US3314537A (en) | Treatment of phosphate rock slimes | |
US2407651A (en) | Concentrating fluorspar by froth flotation | |
US4132635A (en) | Beneficiation of iron ores by froth flotation | |
US3430765A (en) | Beneficiation of fluorspar ores | |
US3302785A (en) | Phosphate matrix beneficiation process | |
US2383467A (en) | Flotation of iron ores | |
US2959281A (en) | Flotation of niobium-bearing minerals | |
US2701057A (en) | Concentration of iron ores by froth flotation | |
US2424552A (en) | Froth flotation of nonmetallic minerals | |
US2669355A (en) | Flotation method and reagent | |
US3278028A (en) | Flotation of mica | |
US2838369A (en) | Process for the concentration of ores containing gold and uranium | |
US3207304A (en) | Method of concentrating fluorspar ores | |
US2525146A (en) | Selective separation by flotation of phosphatic titanium-oxide mixtures | |
US3032189A (en) | Beneficiation of phosphatic ores | |
US2570120A (en) | Process for recovery of pitchblende and similar uranium minerals from ores of same by special flotation practice | |
US2162525A (en) | Flotation of fine oxide ore minerals | |
US2450720A (en) | Froth flotation of silicious gangue from an alkaline magnetic iron ore pulp with an amine | |
US2470150A (en) | Froth flotation of oxide iron ore | |
US2403481A (en) | Method of concentrating iron ore | |
US2423022A (en) | Froth flotation of silica from iron ore by anionic collectors |