US20190072557A1 - Glycoprotein biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma and barrett's esophagus and uses thereof - Google Patents

Glycoprotein biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma and barrett's esophagus and uses thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20190072557A1
US20190072557A1 US15/527,701 US201515527701A US2019072557A1 US 20190072557 A1 US20190072557 A1 US 20190072557A1 US 201515527701 A US201515527701 A US 201515527701A US 2019072557 A1 US2019072557 A1 US 2019072557A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
complement
jac
glycospecies
gelsolin
epha
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/527,701
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Michelle Mei Chih HILL
Alok Shah
Kim-Ahn Lê CAO
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Queensland UQ
Original Assignee
University of Queensland UQ
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2014904616A external-priority patent/AU2014904616A0/en
Application filed by University of Queensland UQ filed Critical University of Queensland UQ
Assigned to THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND reassignment THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CAO, Kim-Ahn Lê, HILL, MICHELLE MEI CHIH, SHAH, Alok
Publication of US20190072557A1 publication Critical patent/US20190072557A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/574—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer
    • G01N33/57469—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer involving tumor associated glycolinkage, i.e. TAG
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/574—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer
    • G01N33/57484—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer involving compounds serving as markers for tumor, cancer, neoplasia, e.g. cellular determinants, receptors, heat shock/stress proteins, A-protein, oligosaccharides, metabolites
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/20—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
    • G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
    • G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
    • G16H50/30—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A90/00—Technologies having an indirect contribution to adaptation to climate change
    • Y02A90/10—Information and communication technologies [ICT] supporting adaptation to climate change, e.g. for weather forecasting or climate simulation

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to biomarkers for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma, and uses thereof, such as in methods for detecting the presence, and monitoring progression, of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.
  • the invention also relates to methods for treating and methods of monitoring the treatment of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma, as well as to kits and compositions for use in such methods.
  • Esophageal adenocarcinoma is now the leading esophageal cancer in industrialized countries, with an alarming increase in incidence of 3% per year over the past 30 years.
  • EAC Esophageal adenocarcinoma
  • EAC risk factors including, for example, accumulation of abdominal visceral fat, high dietary fat and cholesterol intake with low fruit and vegetable intake, acid reflux (gastroesophageal reflux disease), and smoking.
  • Barrett's esophagus also known as Barrett's metaplasia
  • Barrett's metaplasia a metaplastic change to the esophageal lining characterized by replacement of normal stratified squamous epithelium with metaplastic columnar epithelium, is a major risk factor for EAC and most EAC is thought to develop from BE.
  • Subjects with BE have 30-125 times greater risk of developing EAC than non-BE subjects, and it is estimated that 0.5% to 1% of subjects with BE develop EAC each year (Tischoff et al. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 2:653-63).
  • BE develops relatively slowly, generally over 5 to 10 years.
  • This development is thought to be in response to chronic gastroesophageal reflux disorder, which is a common condition in western populations.
  • the malignant progression to EAC follows a generally accepted series of stages, from metaplasia, to low-grade dysplasia (LGD), to high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and then to adenocarcinoma, with the involvement of genetic and epigenetic modifications.
  • EAC electrosenor
  • Current screening protocols for EAC generally involve endoscopic screening of patients with high risk chronic gastroesophageal reflux disorder to determine the degree of dysplasia in endoscopic biopsy samples. Those with HGD are candidates for endoscopic mucosal ablation or esophageal resection to slow or prevent disease progression.
  • these endoscopic screening programs have limitations associated with sampling error, variability in assessment of biopsies between practitioners, and tissue heterogeneity.
  • the present invention is predicated in part on the identification of serum glycoproteins that are differentially glycosylated in subjects with EAC, BE and in healthy subjects (i.e., subjects having a healthy condition (HC)).
  • subjects with EAC have a different serum glycosylation “signature” or “profile” than patients with BE and healthy patients
  • patients with BE have different a serum glycosylation signature or profile than healthy patients.
  • detecting the level of one or more of these different types of glycosylation in a biological sample, such as a blood, serum or plasma sample, from a subject can be used to determine the likelihood of presence of absence of either EAC or BE in the subject.
  • Monitoring the levels of one or more of the types of glycosylation identified herein can also be used to monitor the progress of EAC or BE, such as before, during and/or after treatment. Accordingly, in some aspects, monitoring the levels of one or more types of glycosylation identified herein can also be used to monitor the efficacy of treatment of EAC or BE.
  • the present invention thus represents a significant advance over current technologies for the management of EAC and BE. In certain advantageous embodiments, it relies upon measuring the level of at least one glycospecies.
  • the present invention also provides robust biomarkers for determining the likelihood of the presence or absence of EAC or BE.
  • the invention provides a method for determining the likelihood of the presence or absence of a condition selected from a HC, EAC and BE in a subject, the method comprising determining in a sample from the subject the level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between at least two of HC, EAC and BE, and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having the condition based on whether the level of the glycospecies is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence of the condition.
  • the methods determine the likelihood that EAC is present or absent in a subject, wherein the method comprises determining in a sample from the subject the level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between EAC and one or more other conditions (e.g., a HC and/or BE), and determining the likelihood of EAC being present or absent in the subject based on whether the level of the glycospecies is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of EAC.
  • the method comprises determining in a sample from the subject the level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between EAC and one or more other conditions (e.g., a HC and/or BE), and determining the likelihood of EAC being present or absent in the subject based on whether the level of the glycospecies is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of EAC.
  • the methods determine the likelihood that BE is present or absent in a subject, wherein the methods comprise determining in a sample from the subject the level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between BE and one or more other conditions (e.g., a HC and/or EAC), and determining a likelihood of BE being present or absent in the subject based on whether the level of the glycospecies is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of BE.
  • the methods comprise determining in a sample from the subject the level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between BE and one or more other conditions (e.g., a HC and/or EAC), and determining a likelihood of BE being present or absent in the subject based on whether the level of the glycospecies is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of BE.
  • the methods determine the likelihood of the subject having a HC in a subject, that is the absence of EAC and/or BE.
  • the methods comprise determining in a sample from the subject the level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between HC and one or more other conditions (e.g., BE and/or EAC), and determining the likelihood of the subject having or not having a HC based on whether the level of the glycospecies is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of a HC.
  • the invention provides methods for determining the likelihood of the presence or absence of a condition selected from a HC, EAC and BE in a subject, the method comprising determining in a sample from the subject the respective levels of a plurality of glycospecies of one or more glycoproteins, wherein individual glycospecies are differentially expressed between at least two of HC, EAC and BE, and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having the condition based on whether the respective levels of the individual glycospecies are above or below a corresponding predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of the condition.
  • the methods determine the likelihood of EAC being present or absent in a subject, wherein the methods comprise determining in a sample from the subject the respective levels of a plurality of glycospecies of one or more glycoproteins, wherein individual glycospecies are differentially expressed between EAC and one or more other conditions (e.g., a HC and/or BE), and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having EAC based on whether the respective levels of the individual glycospecies are above or below a corresponding predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of EAC.
  • the methods comprise determining in a sample from the subject the respective levels of a plurality of glycospecies of one or more glycoproteins, wherein individual glycospecies are differentially expressed between EAC and one or more other conditions (e.g., a HC and/or BE), and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having EAC based on whether the respective levels of the individual glycospecies are above or below a corresponding predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of EAC
  • the methods determine the likelihood of BE being present or absent in a subject, in which the methods comprise determining in a sample from the subject the respective levels of a plurality of glycospecies of one or more glycoproteins, wherein individual glycospecies are differentially expressed between BE and one or more other conditions (e.g., a HC and/or EAC), and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having BE based on whether the respective levels of the individual glycospecies are above or below a corresponding predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of BE.
  • the methods comprise determining in a sample from the subject the respective levels of a plurality of glycospecies of one or more glycoproteins, wherein individual glycospecies are differentially expressed between BE and one or more other conditions (e.g., a HC and/or EAC), and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having BE based on whether the respective levels of the individual glycospecies are above or below a corresponding predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of BE.
  • other conditions
  • the methods for determining the likelihood of the presence or absence of a HC in a subject comprise determining in a sample from the subject the respective levels of a plurality of glycospecies of one or more glycoproteins, wherein individual glycospecies are differentially expressed between HC and one or more other conditions (e.g., BE and/or EAC), and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having HC based on whether the respective levels of the individual glycospecies are above or below a corresponding predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of HC.
  • an individual glycoprotein comprises a first glycospecies and a second glycospecies wherein the first glycospecies is differentially expressed between a plurality of conditions and the second glycospecies is not so differentially expressed.
  • the glycoprotein is selected from the group comprising or consisting of: afamin, alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, alpha-1-antitrypsin, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1, alpha-1B-glycoprotein, alpha-2-antiplasmin, alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein, alpha-2-macroglobulin, alpha-2-antiplasmin, antithrombin-III, apolipoprotein B-100, beta-2-glycoprotein 1, C4b-binding protein alpha chain, ceruloplasmin, coagulation factor XII, complement C1q subcomponent subunit B, complement C5, complement component C7, complement component C9, complement factor B, ficolin-3, gelsolin, haptoglobin, hemopexin, plasma protease C1 inhibitor, serum paraoxonase/arylesterase 1, and serotransferrin.
  • afamin alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, alpha-1-anti
  • the level of an individual glycospecies is determined by contacting the sample with a glycan-binding molecule specific for the glycospecies, under conditions that permit binding of the glycan-binding molecule to the glycospecies.
  • the glycan-binding molecule is suitably selected from the group consisting of a lectin, a glycospecific antibody, a glycospecific aptamer, a glycospecific peptide, and a glycospecific small molecule.
  • Illustrative lectins suitable for this purpose include Aleuria aurantia lectin (AAL); erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin (EPHA); jacalin (JAC); Narcissus pseudonarcissus lectin (NPL); Pisum sativum agglutinin (PSA); wheat germ agglutinin (WGA); Bauhinia purpurea lectin (BPL); Erythrina cristagalli agglutinin (ECA); soybean agglutinin (SBA); Helix pomatia agglutinin (HPA); Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA); Datura stramonium lectin (DSA); Helix aspersa agglutinin (HAA); Solanum tuberosum lectin (STL); concanavalin A (ConA); Galanthus nivalis lectin (GNL); Ulex europeus agglutinin-I
  • glycospecies that are differentially expressed between subjects with EAC and healthy subjects are selected from the group comprising or consisting of: complement component AAL-binding complement component C9, EPHA-binding complement component C9, JAC-binding complement component C9, NPL-binding complement component C9, PSA-binding complement component C9, WGA-binding complement component C9, AAL-binding gelsolin, EPHA-binding gelsolin, JAC-binding gelsolin, PSA-binding gelsolin, EPHA-binding haptoglobin, NPL-binding haptoglobin, PSA-binding haptoglobin, WGA-binding haptoglobin, JAC-binding complement factor B, JAC-binding alpha- 1-antichymotrypsin, NPL-binding alpha-1 -antichymotrypsin, WGA-binding alpha-1 -antichymotrypsin, JAC-binding complement C5, JAC-binding hemopexin,
  • the glycospecies i.e., defined by the glycan-binding molecule (e.g., lectin) and the glycoprotein to which it binds
  • TABLE 1 the glycospecies (i.e., defined by the glycan-binding molecule (e.g., lectin) and the glycoprotein to which it binds) that are differentially expressed between EAC and HC are selected from TABLE 1:
  • glycospecies that are differentially expressed between EAC and HC are selected from TABLE 2:
  • glycospecies that are differentially expressed between EAC and HC are selected from the group comprising or consisting of those listed in TABLE 3:
  • the glycospecies that are differentially expressed between subjects with a HC and those with BE are selected from the group comprising or consisting of: EPHA-binding alpha-2-macroglobulin, JAC-binding apolipoprotein B-100, NPL-binding apolipoprotein B-100, AAL-binding ficolin-3, STL-binding ficolin-3, AAL-binding complement C1q subcomponent subunit C, EPHA-binding protein AMBP, EPHA-binding alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1, JAC-binding coagulation factor XII, NPL-binding antithrombin-III, SNA-binding alpha-2-antiplasmin, and STL-binding ceruloplasmin
  • the glycospecies i.e., defined by the glycan-binding molecule (e.g., lectin) and the glycoprotein to which it binds
  • TABLE 4 the glycospecies (i.e., defined by the glycan-binding molecule (e.g., lectin) and the glycoprotein to which it binds) that are differentially expressed between BE and a HC are selected from TABLE 4:
  • the glycospecies that are differentially expressed between EAC and HC are selected from JAC-binding apolipoprotein B-100 and NPL-binding apolipoprotein B-100.
  • the glycospecies that are differentially expressed between subjects with BE and those with a HC are selected from those listed in TABLE 5:
  • glycospecies that are differentially expressed between subjects with EAC and subjects with BE are selected from the group comprising or consisting of: AAL-binding complement component C9, EPHA-binding complement component C9, WGA-binding complement component C9, JAC-binding complement component C9, NPL-binding complement component C9, PSA-binding complement component C9, AAL-binding gelsolin, EPHA-binding gelsolin, JAC-binding gelsolin, PSA-binding gelsolin, NPL-binding gelsolin, WGA-binding gelsolin, AAL-binding haptoglobin, EPHA-binding haptoglobin, JAC-binding haptoglobin, PSA-binding haptoglobin, WGA-binding haptoglobin, JAC-binding complement factor B, EPHA-binding alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, PSA-binding alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, JAC-binding alpha-
  • the glycospecies i.e., defined by the glycan-binding molecule (e.g., lectin) and the glycoprotein to which it binds
  • TABLE 6 the glycospecies (i.e., defined by the glycan-binding molecule (e.g., lectin) and the glycoprotein to which it binds) that are differentially expressed between EAC and BE are selected from TABLE 6:
  • the glycospecies that are differentially expressed between EAC and BE are selected from AAL-binding complement component C9, EPHA-binding complement component C9, JAC-binding complement component C9, NPL-binding complement component C9, JAC-binding alpha- 1-antichymotrypsin, JAC-binding alpha-1B-glycoprotein; NPL-binding gelsolin; and EPHA-binding gelsolin.
  • glycospecies that are differentially expressed between EAC and BE are selected from those listed in TABLE 7:
  • the methods of the invention comprise determining the level of 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 or more than 20 glycospecies of one or more glycoproteins.
  • the one or more glycoproteins may optionally be selected from the group comprising: complement component 9, gelsolin, alpha-1B-glycoprotein, angiotensinogen, and alpha-2-macroglobulin.
  • the glycospecies may suitably comprise complement component 9 selected from the group comprising or consisting of: JAC-binding complement component 9, NPL-binding complement component 9 and WGA-binding complement component 9.
  • the glycospecies may also comprise gelsolin selected from the group comprising or consisting of EPHA-binding gelsolin and SNA-binding gelsolin.
  • the glycospecies may also be one or more of EPHA-binding alpha-1B-glycoprotein, WGA-binding angiotensinogen, and NPL-binding alpha-2-macroglobulin.
  • the predetermined threshold of the method described herein represents the level of a corresponding glycospecies in a sample from a control subject, or represents a value above or below the level of the glycospecies in a sample from a control subject, which level correlates with the presence of the selected condition.
  • the control subject may have EAC or BE.
  • the control subject is a healthy subject that does not have EAC or BE.
  • the invention provides a method for determining the likelihood of the presence or absence of a condition selected from a HC, EAC and BE in a subject, the method comprising determining in a sample from the subject the ratio of a level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein in the sample, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between at least two of HC, EAC and BE, and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having the condition based on whether the ratio of the glycospecies is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of the condition.
  • the methods determine the likelihood of EAC being present or absent in a subject, in which the method comprises determining in a sample from the subject the ratio of a level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein in the sample, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between EAC and one or more other conditions (e.g., a HC and/or BE), and determining a likelihood of EAC being present or absent in the subject based on whether the ratio is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of EAC.
  • the method comprises determining in a sample from the subject the ratio of a level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein in the sample, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between EAC and one or more other conditions (e.g., a HC and/or BE), and determining a likelihood of EAC being present or absent in the subject based on whether the ratio is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of EAC.
  • the methods determine the likelihood of BE being present or absent in a subject, wherein the methods comprise determining in a sample from the subject the ratio of a level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein in the sample, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between BE and one or more other condition (e.g., a HC and/or EAC), and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having BE based on whether the ratio is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of BE
  • the methods determining the likelihood of the subject having or not having a HC, the method comprising determining in a sample from the subject the ratio of a level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein in the sample, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between a HC and one or more other conditions (e.g., BE and/or EAC), and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having a HC based on whether the ratio is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of a HC.
  • a HC e.g., a HC and one or more other conditions
  • the determination is made based on the levels or ratios of a plurality of glycospecies of one or more glycoproteins.
  • the subject upon determining that the likelihood of EAC being present in the subject is above the predetermined threshold, the subject is suitably exposed to a treatment regimen for treating EAC.
  • the treatment regimens optionally comprise surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy. For example, surgery to remove all or part of the esophagus may be performed.
  • the determination method is performed by a person who also exposes the subject to the treatment regimen.
  • the sample from the subject can be provided to another person (e.g., a person in a laboratory) to perform the determination method before providing the results of the determination method to the person who exposes the subject to the treatment regimen.
  • the invention provides a method of monitoring the progression of EAC in a subject, comprising determining in a first sample from the subject the level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein, determining in a second sample from the subject the level of the glycospecies, wherein the second sample is taken at a later time than the first sample, and comparing the levels in the first and second sample, wherein an increase or decrease in the level of the glycospecies in the second sample compared to the first sample correlates with the progression or regression of EAC.
  • the invention also provides a method for monitoring the progression of EAC in a subject, comprising: determining in a first sample from the subject the respective levels of a plurality of glycospecies of one or more glycoproteins, determining in a second sample from the subject the respective levels of the plurality of glycospecies, wherein the second sample is taken at a later time than the first sample, and comparing the respective levels in the first and second sample, wherein an increase or decrease in the level of the glycospecies in the second sample compared to the first sample correlates with the progression or regression of EAC.
  • the invention provides a method for monitoring the progression of EAC in a subject, comprising determining in a first sample from the subject the respective ratios of the levels of a plurality of glycospecies of one or more glycoproteins to the total levels of the one or more glycoproteins, determining in a second sample from the subject the respective ratios of the levels of the plurality of glycospecies to the total levels of the glycoproteins, wherein the second sample is taken from the subject at a later time than the first sample, and comparing the respective ratios in the first and second sample, wherein an increase or decrease in the ratio of the glycospecies in the second sample compared to the first sample correlates with the progression or regression of EAC.
  • the present findings also enable methods of monitoring the efficacy of a treatment regimen for treating a condition selected from a HC, EAC and BE, and determining a subject's response to such treatment (e.g., whether it is a positive or negative response to such treatment).
  • a method for monitoring the efficacy of a particular treatment regimen in a subject towards a desired health state comprising: (1) providing a correlation of a reference glycospecies profile with the likelihood of having HC, wherein the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one glycospecies (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more glycospecies) of one or more glycoproteins, (2) obtaining a corresponding glycospecies profile of a subject having HC, EAC or BE after treatment with a treatment regimen, wherein a similarity of the subject's glycospecies profile after treatment to the reference glycospecies profile indicates the likelihood that the treatment regimen is effective for changing the health status of the subject to the desired health state.
  • a desired health state e.g., HC
  • Still another aspect of the present invention provides a method for correlating a reference glycospecies profile with an effective treatment regimen for a condition selected from HC, EAC and BE, wherein the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one glycospecies (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or more glycospecies), the method comprising: (a) determining a sample glycospecies profile from a subject with the condition prior to treatment, wherein the sample glycospecies profile evaluates for at least one glycospecies in the reference glycospecies profile a corresponding glycospecies, and correlating the sample glycospecies profile with a treatment regimen that is effective for treating the condition in the subject.
  • the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one glycospecies (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or more glycospecies)
  • the method comprising: (a) determining a sample glycospecies profile from a subject with the condition prior to treatment, wherein the sample glycospecies profile evaluates for at least one glycospecies in the reference glycospecies profile
  • the present invention provides a method for determining whether a treatment regimen is effective for treating a subject with a condition selected from HC, EAC and BE, the method comprising: (a) correlating a reference glycospecies profile prior to treatment with an effective treatment regimen for the condition, wherein the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one glycospecies (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or more glycospecies), and (b) obtaining a sample glycospecies profile from the subject after treatment, wherein the sample glycospecies profile evaluates for an individual glycospecies in the reference glycospecies profile a corresponding glycospecies, and wherein the sample glycospecies profile after treatment indicates whether the treatment regimen is effective for treating the condition in the subject.
  • the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one glycospecies (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or more glycospecies)
  • obtaining a sample glycospecies profile from the subject after treatment wherein the sample glycospecies profile evaluates for an individual glycospecies in the reference glycospecies profile
  • the present invention provides a method for correlating a glycospecies profile with a positive or negative response to a treatment regimen for a condition selected from HC, EAC and BE, the method comprising: (a) obtaining a glycospecies profile from a subject with the condition following commencement of the treatment regimen, wherein the glycospecies profile evaluates at least one glycospecies (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or more glycospecies), and (b) correlating the glycospecies profile from the subject with a positive or negative response to the treatment regimen.
  • a glycospecies profile e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or more glycospecies
  • Another aspect of the present invention provides a method for determining a positive or negative response to a treatment regimen by a subject with a condition selected from HC, EAC and BE, the method comprising: (a) correlating a reference glycospecies profile with a positive or negative response to the treatment regimen, wherein the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one glycospecies (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or more glycospecies), and (b) determining a sample glycospecies profile from the subject, wherein the subject's sample glycospecies profile evaluates for an individual glycospecies in the reference glycospecies profile a corresponding glycospecies and indicates whether the subject is responding to the treatment regimen.
  • the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one glycospecies (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or more glycospecies)
  • determining a sample glycospecies profile from the subject wherein the subject's sample glycospecies profile evaluates for an individual glycospecies in the reference glycospecies profile a corresponding glycospecies
  • the methods for determining a positive or negative response to a treatment regimen further comprise: determining a first sample glycospecies profile from the subject prior to commencing the treatment regimen, wherein the first sample glycospecies profile evaluates at least one glycospecies (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or more glycospecies), and comparing the first sample glycospecies profile with a second sample glycospecies profile from the subject after commencement of the treatment regimen, wherein the second sample glycospecies profile evaluates for an individual glycospecies in the first sample glycospecies profile a corresponding glycospecies.
  • the first sample glycospecies profile evaluates at least one glycospecies (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or more glycospecies)
  • the second sample glycospecies profile evaluates for an individual glycospecies in the first sample glycospecies profile a corresponding glycospecies.
  • Evaluation of glycospecies suitably includes determining the levels of individual glycospecies, which correlate with the presence of a condition, as broadly described above and elsewhere herein.
  • the present invention provides a method of monitoring or screening individuals characterized as being at an increased risk of developing BE and/or EAC for the likelihood of the subject having or not having EAC or BE.
  • Illustrative known risk factors for developing either or these conditions are known to be males over 40 years of age who are diagnosed as obese (i.e., identified as accumulating high levels of abdominal visceral fat, dietary fat), having a high cholesterol intake, suffering from acid reflux (gastroesophageal reflux disease), and smoking.
  • the present invention further provides a method of monitoring or screening a high risk subject for BE or EAC, the method comprising determining in a sample from the subject the level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between at least two of HC, EAC and BE, and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having the condition based on whether the level of the glycospecies is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence or absence of the condition.
  • a sample from the subject can be compared with a previous sample taken at an earlier date from the subject to determine the change in the levels of the glycospecies over time, and thus determine whether the likelihood of the subject developing BE or EAC is increasing.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic of the (A) lectin magnetic bead array (LeMBA), (B) biomarker discovery, and (C)-(D) biomarker verification processes.
  • Two approaches are shown in (B) for biomarker discovery.
  • the group binding difference method identifies candidates that are present in one group and absent in another group.
  • Sparse partial least squares-discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) combined with stability analyses generate a ranked list of candidates.
  • the analysis illustrated in (D) shows LeMBA coupled with western immunoblotting for protein level verification.
  • MS mass spectrometry
  • IB immunoblotting
  • HC healthy condition
  • DC disease condition
  • FIG. 2 demonstrates the outlier detection feature of GlycoSelector which allows the visualization of experimental errors or bias present in the data using four different graphical visualization tools.
  • a and E Principal component analysis
  • B and F hierarchical clustering
  • C and G boxplot graphical outputs (wherein “total intensity” is normalized and scaled)
  • D and H barplots of the coefficient of variation for BE/EAC biomarker discovery screen.
  • Unique numbers on the graph indicate the individual patient sample run. Run number 63 (arrow) in panel A to D was considered as an outlier based on the visualization tools. The sample was re-analyzed on the mass spectrometer and outlier detection was performed again (panel E to H).
  • FIG. 3 shows biomarker discovery and orthogonal verification. Serum samples from 29 patients (healthy-9, BE-10 and EAC-10) were screened using LeMBA-GlycoSelector pipeline.
  • A sPLS-DA clustering: The sPLS-DA sample representation is based on the top 100 lectin-protein candidates that differentiates EAC (left group on graph) from BE (right group on graph).
  • B Stability analysis: Amongst the top 100 sPLS-DA candidates, 82 candidates passed the stability criteria cut-off of 0.6 using 10-fold cross-validation analysis repeated 1000 times.
  • C Overlap between lectin-protein candidates that differentiates BE from healthy, EAC from BE and EAC from healthy phenotype.
  • AAL-HP AAL-P00738)
  • G and H Normalized intensity for AAL-HP and AAL-GSN using immunoblotting (H: healthy; B: BE; E: EAC; and C: control).
  • FIG. 4 shows LeMBA-MS data for Gelsolin as an example.
  • Y-axis shows relative abundance (note the log scale).
  • X-axis shows the binding to each of the 20 lectins, grouped into general reactivity groups. Boxed lectins show statistically significantly different binding between BE and EAC groups (*p ⁇ 0.05, Student's t-test). (Clear bars: HC; grey bars: BE; black bars: EAC).
  • FIG. 5 shows a reduction of fucosylated gelsolin in EAC.
  • A Immunoblot showing similar total serum gelsolin levels.
  • B Individual data for the two fucose-reactive lectins with reduced gelsolin binding in EAC. (Circle plots: HC; square plots: BE; triangle plots: EAC).
  • FIG. 6 provides proof-of concept data of exemplary glycospecies marker panels.
  • A ROC curve of multimarker panel for BE vs EAC
  • B ROC curve of multimarker panel for HC vs EAC
  • C ROC curve of multimarker panel for HC vs BE.
  • a glycospecies means one glycospecies or more than one glycospecies.
  • control subject may refer to a subject known to be affected with a disease condition (e.g., EAC or BE) (positive control), or to a subject known to be not affected or diagnosed with the disease condition (negative control), i.e., healthy.
  • a control subject that is known to be healthy, i.e., not suffering from the disease condition, may possibly suffer from another disease not tested/known.
  • control subjects and healthy controls include data obtained and used as a standard, i.e. it can be used over and over again for multiple different subjects.
  • the data from the control sample could have been obtained in a different set of experiments, for example, it could be an average obtained from a number of healthy subjects and not actually obtained at the time the data for the subject was obtained.
  • correlating generally refers to determining a relationship between one type of data with another or with a state.
  • correlating a glycospecies profile with the presence or absence of a condition comprises determining the presence, absence or amount of at least one glycospecies in a subject that suffers from that condition, or in persons known to be free of that condition.
  • a profile of glycospecies levels, absences or presences is correlated to a global probability or a particular outcome, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
  • ROC receiver operating characteristic
  • corresponding glycoprotein is meant a glycoprotein biomarker that is structurally and/or functionally similar to or the same as a glycospecies biomarker.
  • Representative corresponding glycoproteins include other glycospecies of the glycoprotein, and isoforms of the glycoprotein without any glycosylation.
  • differential expression of glycospecies means qualitative and/or quantitative differences in the temporal and/or local glycospecies expression patterns, e.g., between a biological sample taken from subjects with a condition as compared to a comparable sample taken from subjects lacking the condition.
  • a differentially expressed glycospecies may qualitatively have its expression altered, including an activation or inactivation in, for example, a biological sample from a subject with a disease condition (e.g., EAC) or disease susceptible condition (e.g., BE) versus a biological condition from a healthy subject.
  • a disease condition e.g., EAC
  • BE disease susceptible condition
  • the difference in glycospecies expression may also be quantitative, e.g., in that expression is modulated, i.e., either overexpressed, resulting in an increased amount of glycospecies, or underexpressed, resulting in a decreased amount of glycospecies.
  • the degree to which glycospecies expression differs need only be large enough to be quantified via standard quantification or characterization techniques.
  • a glycospecies is differentially expressed between the samples if the amount of the glycospecies in one sample is significantly different (i.e., p ⁇ 0.05) from the amount of the glycospecies in the other sample. It should be noted that if the glycospecies is detectable in one sample and not detectable in the other, then the glycospecies can be considered to be differentially present.
  • the term “likelihood” is used as a measure of whether subjects with a particular glycospecies profile actually have a condition (or not) based on a given mathematical model.
  • An increased likelihood for example may be relative or absolute and may be expressed qualitatively or quantitatively.
  • an increased risk may be expressed as simply determining the subject's level of a given glycospecies and placing the test subject in an “increased risk” category, based upon previous population studies.
  • a numerical expression of the test subject's increased risk may be determined based upon glycospecies level analysis.
  • glycopeptides Most naturally occurring secreted proteins (or peptides) comprise carbohydrate or saccharide moieties attached to the peptide via specific linkages to a select number of amino acids along the length of the primary peptide chain. Thus, many naturally occurring peptides are termed “glycopeptides” or “glycoproteins” or are referred to as “glycosylated” proteins or peptides.
  • glycoproteins The predominant sugars found on glycoproteins are glucose, galactose, mannose, fucose, N-acetylgalactosamine (“GalNAc”), N-acetylglucosamine (“GlcNAc”) and sialic acid (e.g., N-acetylneuraminic acid (“NANA” or “NeuAc”, where “Neu” is neuraminic acid) and “Ac” refers to “acetyl”).
  • NANA N-acetylneuraminic acid
  • Ac refers to “acetyl”.
  • the processing of the sugar groups occurs co-translationally in the lumen of the ER and continues in the Golgi apparatus for N-linked glycoproteins.
  • the oligosaccharide structure attached to the protein backbone is known as a “glycan” molecule.
  • the glycan structures found in naturally occurring glycopeptides are typically divided into two classes, “N-linked glycans” or N-linked oligosaccharides” and “O-linked glycans” or O-linked oligosaccharides
  • N-glycans are N-glycosylated at an amide nitrogen of an asparagine or an arginine residue in a protein via an N-acetylglucosamine residue.
  • N-linked glycosylation sites occur in the peptide primary structure containing, for example, the amino acid sequence asparagine-X-serine/threonine, where X is any amino acid residue except proline and aspartic acid.
  • a “glycan-binding molecule” refers to any molecule that is capable of binding to a glycan component of a glycoprotein.
  • the glycan-binding molecule is glycospecies-specific (or glycospecific) in that it selectively binds the glycan of one glycospecies of a glycoprotein but not another, such that it can be used to distinguish different glycospecies of the glycoprotein.
  • Glycan-binding molecules can be natural or synthetic, and include, for example, lectins, glycospecific antibodies, glycospecific aptamers (e.g. RNA aptamer, DNA aptamer, or peptide aptamer), glycospecific peptides, and glycospecific small molecule.
  • a “glycoprotein” refers to a protein having glycan structures associated with the polypeptide backbone. Glycoproteins can be associated with one or more types of glycosylation at a single or different sites. Glycoproteins that differ with respect to type of glycosylation generally have the same amino acid sequence or essentially the same amino acid sequence (e.g. isoforms, allelic variants and other variants are considered to have essentially the same amino acid sequence), while the glycan structures associated with a particular type of glycosylation differ by at least one glycan.
  • glycospecies refers to a glycoprotein with a distinct type of glycosylation.
  • the “type” or glycosylation is characterized by the glycans present in the glycosylations on the surface of the glycoprotein.
  • a glycosylation may comprise fucose-related glycans, mannose-related glycans, sialic acid glycans, etc.
  • a glycoprotein may be characterized as belonging to one, two, three, four, five or more than 5 different glycospecies (for example, a glycosylation may comprise both a fucose-related glycan, a mannose-related glycan and sialic acid-based glycan).
  • a “healthy” subject is a subject that does not have EAC or BE.
  • level with reference to a glycoprotein or glycospecies refers to the amount or concentration of the glycoprotein or glycospecies in a sample.
  • the amount or concentration may be absolute or may be relative, and can be determined using any method known in the art.
  • underexpressed and the like refer to a downward deviation in the level of expression of an EAC biomarker as compared to a baseline expression level of a corresponding EAC biomarker in a control sample.
  • overexpressed refers to an upward deviation in the level of glycospecies as compared to a baseline expression level of a corresponding glycospecies in a control sample.
  • predetermined threshold refers to a value, above or below which, indicates the presence of disease, such as EAC or BE or a healthy condition.
  • a predetermined threshold may represent the level of a particular glycospecies of a glycoprotein, or the ratio of the level of a particular glycospecies of a glycoprotein to the total glycoprotein level, in a sample from an appropriate control subject, such as a healthy subject or a subject with BE, or in pooled samples from multiple control subjects or medians or averages of multiple control subjects.
  • a level or ratio above or below the threshold indicates the presence of EAC or BE, as taught herein.
  • a predetermined threshold may represent a value larger or smaller than the level or ratio determined for a control subject so as to incorporate a further degree of confidence that a level or ratio above or below the predetermined threshold is indicative of the presence of disease, such as EAC or BE.
  • the predetermined threshold may represent the average or median level of a glycospecies in a group of control subjects, plus or minus 1, 2, 3 or more standard deviations. Those skilled in the art can readily determine an appropriate predetermined threshold based on analysis of biological samples from appropriate control subjects.
  • ROC curves means a graphical measure of sensitivity (y-axis) vs. 1—specificity (x-axis) for a clinical test.
  • AUC value area under the ROC curve value
  • ROC curve areas are typically between 0.5 and 1.0, but also ROC values below 0.5 can—according to information theory—be as good, if the result is interpreted inversely. Therefore, according to the present invention an AUC-value close to 1 (e.g., 0.95) represents the same good measure for a clinical test as an AUC-value close to 0 (e.g., 0.05).
  • sample biological sample
  • biological sample mean a material known or suspected of containing one or more glycospecies or other EAC/BE biomarkers.
  • a test sample can be used directly as obtained from the source or following a pretreatment to modify the character of the sample.
  • the sample is suitably derived from blood or plasma fractions, including cell fractions (e.g., comprising tumor cells) or lysates thereof, cell-free or cell-depleted fractions, and the like.
  • the sample can be treated prior to use, such as diluting viscous fluids, and the like.
  • Methods of treatment can involve filtration, distillation, extraction, concentration, inactivation of interfering components (e.g., inhibiting nucleases such as RNases and DNases), the addition of reagents, and the like
  • subject refers to any animal subject, particularly a mammalian subject, more particularly a human subject.
  • the subject presents with clinical signs of a condition as defined herein.
  • clinical sign or simply “sign”, refers to objective evidence of a disease present in a subject. Symptoms and/or signs associated with diseases referred to herein and the evaluation of such signs are routine and known in the art. Examples of signs of disease vary depending upon the disease. Signs of EAC may include tumorigenesis, metastasis, angiogenesis. Typically, whether a subject has a disease, and whether a subject is responding to treatment, may be determined by evaluation of signs associated with the disease.
  • the terms are also used herein to denote delaying the onset of, inhibiting (e.g., reducing or arresting the growth of), alleviating the effects of, or prolonging the life of a patient suffering from, cancer, in particular, EAC .
  • Those in need of treatment include those diagnosed with the disorder, those suspected of having the disorder, those predisposed to have the disorder as well as those in whom the disorder is to be prevented.
  • treatment refers to the eradication, removal, modification, or control of primary, regional, or metastatic cancer tissue that results from the administration of one or more therapeutic agents according to the methods of the invention.
  • such terms refer to the minimizing or delaying the spread of cancer resulting from the administration of one or more therapeutic agents to a subject with such a disease.
  • such terms refer to elimination of disease causing cells.
  • treatment refers to the act of treating.
  • treatment regimen refers to prophylactic and/or prophylactic regimen (i.e., before the onset of EAC, e.g., if the subject is affected with BE), or to a therapeutic regimen (i.e., after the onset of EAC).
  • treatment regimen encompasses natural substances and pharmaceutical agents (i.e., “drugs”) as well as any other treatment regimen including but not limited to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, proton therapy, immunotherapy, hormone therapy, phototherapy, cryotherapy, cryosurgery, toxin therapy or pro-apoptosis therapy, high intensity focused ultrasound, dietary treatments, physical therapy or exercise regimens, surgical interventions, and combinations thereof.
  • Glycosylation is a dynamic, post-translational modification that can be altered during the development and progression of a cancer, such as EAC, or a precancerous condition, such as BE.
  • a cancer such as EAC
  • a precancerous condition such as BE.
  • the same glycoprotein may be expressed both before and after oncogenic transformation, but the glycosylation of the glycoprotein before and after oncogenic transformation may be different.
  • Differences in the type of glycosylation include the removal of a glycan component, the addition of a glycan component, a change in the glycan component such as the substitution of one glycan component for another, the change in the branching of glycans, and the rearrangement of one or more glycan components on the glycoprotein, as where a glycan component is shifted from one position on the polypeptide sequence to another.
  • Differential glycosylation can be detected using any of method known in the art, including but not limited to, methods that detect binding of a particular type of glycosylation to a glycan-binding molecule, such as a lectin, glycospecific antibody or glycospecific aptamer, as further described herein, that is selective and/or specific for the particular type of glycosylation. Differences in glycosylation can also be detected spectroscopically. For example mass spectrometry can be used to characterize the glycan component and distinguish between different types of glycosylation.
  • the present invention is predicated in part on the identification of serum glycoproteins that are differentially glycosylated in subjects with EAC, BE and in healthy patients. Accordingly, as described herein, detection of the levels of one or more of these different types of glycosylation on particular glycoproteins (i.e., one or more glycospecies) in a biological sample, such as a blood, serum or plasma sample, from a subject can be used to determine whether the subject has EAC, BE or is healthy (i.e. has neither BE or EAC). The glycospecies can thus be considered biomarkers for BE and EAC.
  • the present invention provides a method comprising determining the ratio of a level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein in the sample, which glycospecies is differentially expressed between at least two of EAC, BE and HC, and determining a likelihood of the subject having or not having a HC based on whether the ratio is above or below a predetermined threshold that correlates with the presence of or absence of EAC or BE.
  • Monitoring the levels or ratios of one or more of the glycospecies identified herein can also be used to monitor the progress of disease, such as before, during and/or after treatment.
  • levels or ratios of a particular glycospecies identified herein as being increased or decreased in subjects with EAC compared to a healthy control subject or a control subject with BE can be monitored during or after treatment.
  • a change in the level or ratio of one or more glycospecies in the subject over time to be more similar to those levels or ratios observed in control subjects indicates that the disease has regressed.
  • a change over time in the level or ratio of one or more glycospecies in the subject to be less similar to those levels or ratios observed in control subjects indicates that the disease has progressed.
  • glycoproteins identified herein as being differentially glycosylated in subjects with EAC, BE and in healthy subjects are selected from: afamin, alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, alpha-1-antitrypsin, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 2, alpha-1B-glycoprotein, alpha-2-antiplasmin, alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein, alpha-2-macroglobulin, alpha-2-antiplasmin, angiotensinogen, antithrombin-III, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B-100, .apolipoprotein M, beta-2-glycoprotein 1, C4b-binding protein alpha chain, C4b-binding protein beta chain, cadherin-5, centriolin, ceruloplasmin, coagulation factor XII, complement C1q subcomponent subunit B, complement C1q subcomponent subunit C, complement C1s subcomponent, complement C5,
  • glycosylations associated with the above serum glycoproteins exhibit different lectin-binding properties resulting from the different glycan structures on the proteins.
  • These types of glycosylation include, for example, glycosylations that bind to lectins having a general reactivity with ⁇ / ⁇ - D -Galactose, including Bauhinia purpurea lectin (BPL, known to bind at least Gal ⁇ 1-3GalNAc), Erythrina cristagalli agglutinin (ECA, known to bind at least Gal ⁇ 1-4GlcNAc), and jacalin (JAC, known to bind at least Gal ⁇ 1-6GalNAc and Gal ⁇ 1-3GalNAc), lectins having a general reactivity with D -N-Acetylgalactosamine, including soybean agglutinin (SBA, known to bind to at least GalNAc ⁇ 1-3Gal), Helix pomatia agglutinin (HPA, known to
  • the lectin-binding properties of the glycoproteins provided herein indicate the type of glycosylation.
  • an AAL-binding glycoprotein such as an AAL-binding glycospecies of gelsolin
  • a fucosylated type possibly containing Fuc ⁇ l-2, -3, -6 linked oligosaccharides
  • a NPL-binding glycoprotein such as a NPL-binding glycospecies of gelsolin
  • Mannosylated possibly containing Man ⁇ 1-6Man oligosaccharides.
  • the identity of the glycans on the glycoprotein biomarkers described herein can be more precisely determined using standard methods well known in the art, such as, for example, mass spectrometry, high-pressure liquid chromatography, nuclear magnetic resonance, correlation spectroscopy, gas-liquid chromatography, or gas chromatography.
  • the levels of the various types of glycosylation present on a single glycoprotein in a sample such as a blood, serum or plasma sample, from subjects with
  • EAC is different to that of subjects with BE or healthy subjects.
  • the levels of several glycospecies of a single glycoprotein as listed above in the serum of subjects with BE is different to that of subjects with EAC or healthy subjects. Accordingly, the glycospecies provided herein are useful as biomarkers in methods for detecting and monitoring the progress of EAC and BE, and related methods and uses.
  • glycospecies that are present at different levels in subjects with EAC compared to healthy control subjects are glycospecies of complement component C9, gelsolin, haptoglobin, complement factor B, alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, complement C5, hemopexin, C4b-binding protein alpha chain, plasma protease C1 inhibitor, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1, ceruloplasmin, antithrombin-III, ficolin-3, and complement C1q subcomponent subunit B.
  • markers that are present at different levels in subjects with EAC compared to healthy control subjects are glycospecies of alpha-1-antitrypsin, alpha-1B-glycoprotein, complement C1s subcomponent, complement component C7, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 2, afamin, fibrinogen gamma chain, retinol-binding protein 4, gelsolin, vitamin K-dependent protein S, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein complex acid labile subunit, N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase, fibrogen gamma chain, serotransferrin, haemoglobin subunit beta, haptoglobin, complement factor B, alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein, cadherin-5, haemoglobin subunit beta, apolipoprotein A-I, fibrinogen beta chain, plasma kallikrein, kallistatin, cadherin-5, and centriolin.
  • a determination of the likelihood of whether a subject has EAC or is healthy and does not have EAC can be made by assessing the level of one or more of these glycospecies in a biological sample from the subject, such as a serum, plasma or blood sample, and comparing it to the level of the same glycoprotein of the same glycosylation type in a corresponding sample from a healthy control subject (i.e. a subject that is known to not have EAC) or samples from multiple healthy control subjects, wherein an increase or decrease indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the level of the glycospecies is compared to a predetermined level or threshold, wherein an increase or decrease in the level of the subject compared to the threshold indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the predetermined threshold may be calculated based on the level of the same glycospecies in a corresponding sample from a healthy control subject or from a group of healthy subjects, such that a level of the glycospecies above or below the predetermined level indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the ratio of the level of one or more glycospecies to the total level of the glycoprotein is also increased or decreased in a subject with BE compared to a healthy control subject or a group of healthy control subjects, and can thus also be used to determine the presence of EAC.
  • a separate ratio for each glycospecies can be determined.
  • a single ratio of the combined levels of the two or more types of glycosylation with a single glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein can be determined.
  • glycospecies that are present at different levels in subjects with EAC compared to healthy control subjects are glycospecies of complement component AAL-binding complement component C9, EPHA-binding complement component C9, JAC-binding complement component C9, NPL-binding complement component C9, PSA-binding complement component C9, WGA-binding complement component C9, AAL-binding gelsolin, EPHA-binding gelsolin, JAC-binding gelsolin, PSA-binding gelsolin, EPHA-binding haptoglobin, NPL-binding haptoglobin, PSA-binding haptoglobin, WGA-binding haptoglobin, JAC-binding complement factor B, JAC-binding alpha- 1-antichymotrypsin, NPL-binding alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, WGA-binding alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, JAC-binding complement C5, JAC-binding hemopexin, JAC-binding C4b-
  • the individual glycospecies that are differentially expressed between subjects with EAC and healthy subjects in a subject are selected from the glycospecies identified in TABLE 1.
  • the individual glycospecies that are differentially expressed between subjects with EAC and healthy subjects in a subject are selected from the glycospecies identified in TABLE 2.
  • a determination of the likelihood of whether a subject has EAC or is healthy can be made by assessing the level of one or more glycospecies in a biological sample from the subject, such as a serum, plasma or blood sample, and comparing it to the level of the same one or more glycospecies in a corresponding sample from a healthy control subject (i.e. a subject that is known to not have EAC) or samples from multiple healthy control subjects, wherein an increase or decrease indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the level of the one or more glycospecies is compared to a predetermined level or threshold, wherein an increase or decrease in the level of the subject compared to the threshold indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the predetermined threshold may be calculated based on the level of the same glycospecies in a corresponding sample from a healthy control subject or from a group of healthy subjects, such that a level of the glycospecies above or below the predetermined level indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the ratio of the level of a glycospecies to the total level of the corresponding glycoprotein is also increased or decreased in a subject with EAC compared to a healthy control subject or a group of healthy control subjects, and can thus also be used to determine the likelihood of the presence of
  • a separate ratio for each glycospecies can be determined.
  • a single ratio of the combined levels of the glycospecies of the single glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein can be determined.
  • Illustrative glycospecies that have increased levels in subjects with EAC compared to healthy subjects include, for example, those glycospecies identified in TABLE 1 as being overexpressed in subjects with EAC.
  • a determination that a subject has an increased level of one or more of these types of glycosylation compared to a healthy control subject or compared to a predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • a determination that a subject has an increased ratio of the level of a glycoprotein with one or more types of glycosylation to the total level of the glycoprotein compared to the ratio in a healthy control subject or compared to a predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • Illustrative glycospecies that have decreased levels in subjects with EAC compared to healthy subjects include, for example, those glycospecies identified as being underexpressed in subjects with EAC.
  • a determination that a subject has a decreased level of one or more of these glycospecies compared to a healthy control subject or compared to a predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • a determination that a subject has a decreased ratio of the level of one or more of these glycospecies to the total level of the glycoprotein compared to the ratio in a healthy control subject or compared to a predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the levels or ratios of the glycospecies identified above as being useful biomarkers for EAC can also be used to monitor the progress of disease in a subject that has
  • the progress of EAC can be assessed or monitored before, during or after treatment by assessing the level or ratio (i.e. the ratio of the level of a glycospecies to the total level of the glycoprotein) of one of more glycospecies in samples taken at various time points.
  • the efficacy of treatment can also be assessed by determining the level or ratio of one or more glycospecies in samples taken at various time points, wherein at least one of those time points is during or after treatment.
  • a decrease over time in the level or ratio of one or more of the glycospecies identified above as being decreased in subjects with EAC compared to healthy subjects indicates that the disease has progressed, while an increase in one or more of these glycospecies indicates that the disease has regressed.
  • progression of the disease may indicate that such treatment has not been effective, while regression of the disease may indicate that such treatment has been at least partially effective.
  • an increase over time in the level or ratio of one or more of the glycospecies identified in TABLE 1, TABLE 2, or TABLE 3 as being overexpressed in those subjects which are diagnosed with EAC indicates that the subject's EAC has progressed over time, while a decrease of any one or more of these glycospecies indicates that the subject's EAC has regressed.
  • a decrease over time in the level or ratio of one or more of the glycospecies identified in TABLE 1, TABLE 2, or TABLE 3 as being underexpressed in those subjects diagnosed with EAC indicates that the subject's EAC has progressed over time, while an increase of any one or more of these glycospecies indicates that the subject's EAC has regressed.
  • the level or ratio of more than one type of glycosylation with a single glycoprotein identified above is assessed to determine the presence or progression of EAC in a subject. For example, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20 or more types of glycosylation with a single glycoprotein may be assessed. Thus, a panel of more than one glycospecies may be assessed to determine a glycoprotein's glycosylation profile or signature for a subject.
  • this profile can be compared to a corresponding profile from a control subject or a group of control subjects to determine the presence or progression of EAC, wherein a change in the profile resulting from increases or decreases in the levels or ratios of the various types of glycosylation for a single glycoprotein, as described above, indicates the presence or progression of EAC.
  • glycospecies that are present at different levels in subjects with BE compared to healthy control subjects are glycospecies of alpha-2-macroglobulin, apolipoprotein B-100, ficolin-3, complement C1q subcomponent subunit C, protein AMBP, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1, coagulation factor XII, antithrombin-III, alpha-2-antiplasmin, and ceruloplasmin.
  • glycospecies that are present at different levels in subjects with BE compared to healthy control subjects are glycospecies of lumican, prothrombin, fibronectin, apolipoprotein M, angiotensinogen, apolipoprotein A-I, fibrinogen beta chain, plasma kallikrein, histidine-rich glycoprotein, vitamin K-dependent protein S, complement component C8 alpha chain, complement factor H, kallistatin, afamin, and hemoglobin subunit beta.
  • a determination of whether a subject has BE or is healthy and does not have BE can be made by assessing the level of one or more of these glycospecies in a biological sample from the subject, such as a serum, plasma or blood sample, and comparing it to the level of the same glycoprotein of the same glycosylation type in a corresponding sample from a healthy control subject (i.e. a subject that is known to not have BE) or samples from multiple healthy control subjects, wherein an increase or decrease indicates that the subject has BE.
  • the level of the glycospecies is compared to a predetermined level or threshold, wherein an increase or decrease in the level of the subject compared to the threshold indicates that the subject has BE.
  • the predetermined threshold may be calculated based on the level of the same glycospecies in a corresponding sample from a healthy control subject or from a group of healthy subjects, such that a level of the glycospecies above or below the predetermined level indicates that the subject has BE.
  • the ratio of the level of one or more glycospecies to the total level of the glycoprotein is also increased or decreased in a subject with BE compared to a healthy control subject or a group of healthy control subjects, and can thus also be used to determine the presence of BE.
  • a separate ratio for each glycospecies can be determined.
  • a single ratio of the combined levels of the two or more types of glycosylation with a single glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein can be determined.
  • the glycospecies that are differentially expressed between healthy subjects and those diagnosed with BE are selected from the group comprising or consisting of: EPHA-binding alpha-2-macroglobulin, JAC-binding apolipoprotein B-100, NPL-binding apolipoprotein B-100, AAL-binding ficolin-3, STL-binding ficolin-3, AAL-binding complement C1q subcomponent subunit C, EPHA-binding protein AMBP, EPHA-binding alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1, JAC-binding coagulation factor XII, NPL-binding antithrombin-III, SNA-binding alpha-2-antiplasmin, and STL-binding ceruloplasmin
  • the individual glycospecies i.e., defined by the glycan-binding molecule (e.g., lectin) and the glycoprotein to which it binds
  • TABLE 4 a determination that a subject has an increased level of one or more of those glycospecies identified in TABLE 4 or TABLE 5 as being overexpressed as compared to a healthy control subject or compared to a predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has BE.
  • a determination that a subject has an increased ratio of the level of one or more of these glycospecies to the total level of the corresponding glycoprotein compared to the ratio in a healthy control subject or compared to a predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has BE.
  • Illustrative glycospecies that have decreased levels in subjects with BE compared to healthy subjects include, for example, those glycospecies identified in TABLE 4 or TABLE 5 as being underexpressed in subjects diagnosed with BE.
  • a determination that a subject has a decreased level of one or more of these glycospecies compared to a healthy control subject or compared to a predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has BE.
  • a determination that a subject has a decreased ratio of the level of one or more of those glycospecies to the total level of the corresponding glycoprotein compared to the ratio in a healthy control subject or compared to a predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has
  • the levels or ratios of the glycospecies of one or more glycoproteins identified above as being useful biomarkers for BE can also be used to monitor the progress of disease in a subject that has BE.
  • the progress of BE can be assessed or monitored before, during or after treatment by assessing the level or ratio (i.e. the ratio of the level of a glycospecies to the total level of the glycoprotein) of one of more of the glycospecies in samples taken at various time points.
  • the efficacy of treatment can also be assessed by determining the level or ratio of one of more of the glycospecies in samples taken at various time points, wherein at least one of those time points is during or after treatment.
  • a decrease over time in the level or ratio of one or more of the glycospecies identified above as being decreased in subjects with BE compared to healthy subjects indicates that the disease has progressed, while an increase in one or more of these glycospecies indicates that the disease has regressed.
  • progression of the disease may indicate that such treatment has not been effective, while regression of the disease may indicate that such treatment has been at least partially effective.
  • an increase over time in the level or ratio of one or more of those glycospecies identified in TABLE 4 or TABLE 5 as being overexpressed in a subject diagnosed with BE indicates that the subject's BE has progressed over time, while a decrease of any one or more of these glycospecies indicates that the subject's BE has regressed.
  • a decrease over time in the level or ratio of alpha-2-macroglobulin in a subject with BE indicates that the subject's BE has progressed over time, while an increase of this glycospecies indicates that the subject's BE has regressed.
  • the level or ratio of more than one glycospecies identified above is assessed to determine the presence or progression of BE in a subject. For example, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20 or more glycospecies may be assessed. Thus, a panel of glycospecies may be assessed to determine a glycospecies profile or signature for a subject. In some embodiments, this profile can be compared to a corresponding profile from a control subject or a group of control subjects to determine the presence or progression of BE, wherein a change in the profile resulting from increases or decreases in the levels or ratios of the various glycospecies, as described above, indicates the presence or progression of BE.
  • glycospecies that are present at different levels in a biological sample from a subject with EAC compared to subjects with BE are glycospecies of haptoglobin, alpha- 1-antichymotrypsin, complement component C9, complement factor B, complement C5, hemopexin, C4b-binding protein alpha chain, plasma protease C1 inhibitor, gelsolin, alpha-2-macroglobulin, alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein, ficolin-3, complement C1q subcomponent subunit C, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1, ceruloplasmin, coagulation factor XII, and alpha-2-antiplasmin
  • Additional glycospecies that are present at different levels in a biological sample from a subject with EAC compared to subjects with BE are glycospecies of prothrombin, hemopexin, alpha-1B-glycoprotein, complement factor I, complement factor H, complement Cls subcomponent, C4b-binding protein beta chain, Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H
  • a determination of whether a subject has EAC can be made by assessing the level of one or more of these glycospecies in a biological sample, such as a serum, plasma or blood sample, from the subject, and comparing it to the level of the same glycospecies in a corresponding sample from a control subject with BE or from multiple control subjects, wherein an increase or decrease indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • a biological sample such as a serum, plasma or blood sample
  • the abundance or level of the glycospecies is compared to a predetermined threshold, wherein an increase or decrease indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the predetermined threshold is determined based on the level of the same glycospecies in a corresponding sample from a control subject with BE or from a group of control subjects with BE, such that a level of the glycospecies in the sample from the subject above or below the predetermined level indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the ratio of the level of one or more glycospecies of a glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein is also increased or decreased in a subject with EAC compared to a control subject with BE or a group of control subjects with BE. Where two or more glycospecies of the same glycoprotein are assessed, a separate ratio for each glycospecies can be determined. Alternatively, a single ratio of the combined levels of the two or more glycospecies of the glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein can be determined.
  • glycospecies that are present at different levels in subjects with EAC compared to subjects with BE are glycospecies of AAL-binding complement component C9, EPHA-binding complement component C9, WGA-binding complement component C9, JAC-binding complement component C9, NPL-binding complement component C9, PSA-binding complement component C9, AAL-binding gelsolin, EPHA-binding gelsolin, JAC-binding gelsolin, PSA-binding gelsolin, NPL-binding gelsolin, WGA-binding gelsolin, AAL-binding haptoglobin, EPHA-binding haptoglobin, JAC-binding haptoglobin, PSA-binding haptoglobin, WGA-binding haptoglobin, JAC-binding complement factor B, EPHA-binding alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, PSA-binding alpha-1 -antichymotrypsin, JAC-binding alpha-1-antichymotryp
  • the individual glycospecies i.e., defined by the glycan-binding molecule (e.g., lectin) and the glycoprotein to which it binds
  • the individual glycospecies that are differentially expressed between EAC and BE are selected from TABLE 6.
  • the individual glycospecies i.e., defined by the glycan-binding molecule (e.g., lectin) and the glycoprotein to which it binds
  • TABLE 7 the individual glycospecies (i.e., defined by the glycan-binding molecule (e.g., lectin) and the glycoprotein to which it binds) that are differentially expressed between EAC and BE are selected from TABLE 7.
  • a determination that a subject has a decreased level of one or more of these glycospecies compared to a control subject with BE or compared to a predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • a determination that a subject has a decreased ratio of the level of one or more of these glycospecies of a glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein compared to the ratio in a control subject with BE or compared to a predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the levels of different glycospecies of gelsolin are assessed to determine whether a subject has EAC.
  • the levels of multiple glycospecies of gelsolin are reduced in EAC subjects compared to BE subjects, as set out in TABLE 6 or TABLE 7.
  • These isoforms of gelsolin include AAL-binding gelsolin, JAC-binding gelsolin, and PSA-binding gelsolin, and comparing the level to the level of the same type of glycosylation of gelsolin in a control subject with BE or to a predetermined threshold, wherein a decrease indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the ratio of the level of one or more glycospecies of gelsolin to the total gelsolin level in a sample from a subject is assessed to determine whether the subject has EAC.
  • the methods of the present invention include determining the level of a gelsolin glycospecies selected from the group consisting of AAL-binding gelsolin, JAC-binding gelsolin and PSA-binding gelsolin, in a sample from a subject and also determining the total gelsolin levels in the same sample. A ratio of the level of the gelsolin with a single type of glycosylation to the total gelsolin level is then determined and compared to the same ratio as determined for a control subject with BE or is compared to a predetermined threshold.
  • a decrease in the ratio in the subject compared to the control subject or predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the level of two or more types of glycosylation of gelsolin such as two or more of AAL-binding gelsolin, JAC-binding gelsolin and PSA-binding gelsolin, are measured so as to determine a ratio of the combined level of the two or more types of glycosylation of gelsolin to the total level of gelsolin. This ratio is then compared to the same ratio as determined for a control subject with BE or is compared to a predetermined threshold, wherein a decrease in the ratio in the subject compared to the control subject or predetermined threshold indicates that the subject has EAC.
  • the levels or ratios of the glycospecies identified above as being useful biomarkers for EAC can also be used to monitor the progress of disease in a subject that has EAC.
  • the progress of EAC can be assessed or monitored before, during or after treatment by assessing the level or ratio (i.e. the ratio of the level of a glycospecies of a glycoprotein to the total level of the glycoprotein) of one of more of the glycospecies in samples taken at various time points.
  • the efficacy of treatment can also be assessed by determining the level or ratio of one of more of the glycospecies in samples taken at various time points, wherein at least one of those time points is during or after treatment.
  • An increase over time in the level or ratio of one or more of the glycospecies identified above as being increased in subjects with EAC compared to BE or a healthy sample indicates that the disease has progressed, while a decrease in one or more of these glycospecies indicates that the disease has regressed.
  • a decrease over time in the level or ratio of one or more of the glycospecies identified above as being decreased in subjects with EAC compared to BE or a healthy sample indicates that the disease has progressed, while an increase in one or more of these glycospecies indicates that the disease has regressed.
  • progression of the disease may indicate that such treatment has not been effective, while regression of the disease may indicate that such treatment has been at least partially effective.
  • an increase over time in the level or ratio of one or more of glycospecies of glycoprotein selected from those identified in TABLE 6 or TABLE 7 as being overexpressed in a subject with EAC compared with a subject with BE, in a subject diagnosed with EAC indicates that the subject's EAC has progressed over time, while a decrease of any one or more of these glycospecies indicates that the subject's EAC has regressed.
  • the level or ratio of more than one glycospecies identified above is assessed to determine the presence or progression of EAC in a subject. For example, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20 or more glycospecies may be assessed. Thus, a panel of glycospecies may be assessed to determine a “glycoprotein profile” for a subject. In some embodiments, this profile can be compared to a corresponding profile from a control subject or a group of control subjects to determine the presence or progression of EAC, wherein a change in the profile resulting from increases or decreases in the levels or ratios of the various glycospecies, as described above, indicates the presence or progression of EAC.
  • the levels of glycospecies identified herein as being useful biomarkers for detecting the likelihood of the presence or absence of, or monitoring the progress of, EAC and BE, can be assessed by any method known in the art. Such methods include, but are not limited to, methods that detect binding of a glycospecies to a glycan-binding molecule, such as a lectin, glycospecific antibody or glycospecific aptamer that is selective and/or specific for the glycospecies, such as western blots, ELISAs and microarray-based techniques. Spectroscopic methods also can be used to assess the level of a glycospecies in a sample.
  • the level of one or more glycospecies as described herein is assessed in a biological sample from a subject.
  • the biological sample is a blood, serum, plasma or blood fraction sample, although other types of samples are contemplated.
  • the sample may be obtained from the subject before or after diagnosis of BE or EAC.
  • the sample may be obtained from a subject before or after that subject has been diagnosed with having or having had BE or EAC.
  • the sample is obtained from the subject after they have been diagnosed with having or having had BE or EAC.
  • the subject has been diagnosed with BE or EAC, then been assessed as having cleared the disease before the sample is taken to assess the levels of one or more glycospecies.
  • the subject may have undergone or be undergoing treatment, such as surgical or medical treatment.
  • One or more samples can be taken from the subject at one or more time points. For example, to monitor the progress of disease, at least two samples are taken at two different time points, so as to compare the levels of one or more glycoproteins over time. In particular examples, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more samples are taken from the subject over a period of days, weeks, months or years.
  • the level of a glycospecies is assessed by detecting the binding of the glycospecies to an appropriate glycan-binding molecule.
  • the glycan-binding molecule is a lectin.
  • Lectins are proteins or glycoproteins that bind to all or part of a glycan structure.
  • a lectin may bind to a specific glycan moiety that is part of a glycoprotein or another glycan-containing molecule such as a glycolipid, glycophosphatidylinositol or glycosaminoglycan.
  • Lectins are capable of binding to specific glycans.
  • the high specificity of a lectin for a particular glycan moiety facilitates the precipitation, isolation and/or detection of glycoproteins with a particular single types of glycosylation from or in a biological sample by specifically binding to those types of glycosylation.
  • Lectins useful for binding glycospecies of glycoproteinare described herein so as to determine the levels of the glycospecies in a sample include Bauhinia purpurea lectin (BPL), Erythrina cristagalli agglutinin (ECA), jacalin (JAC), soybean agglutinin (SBA), Helix pomatia agglutinin (HPA), Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA), Datura stramonium lectin (DSA), Helix aspersa agglutinin (HAA), Solanum tuberosum lectin (STL), wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), concanavalin A (ConA), Galanthus nivalis lectin (GNL), Narcissus pseudonarcissus lectin (NPL), Aleuria aurantia lectin (AAL), Pisum sativum agglutinin (PSA), Ulex europeus agglutinin
  • AAL can be used to detect the levels of any AAL-binding glycoprotein, such as AAL-gelsolin and AAL-binding complement component C9.
  • PSA can be used to detect the levels of any PSA-binding glycoprotein, including, but not limited to, PSA-binding complement CS and PSA-binding retinol-binding protein 4.
  • Assays and techniques to detect binding of a glycospecies to a lectin are well known in the art, and any such assay or technique can be used in the methods of the present invention.
  • lectin-magnetic bead array-coupled mass spectrometry (LeMBA-MS), as described by Choi et al. (Electrophoresis (2011) 32, 3564-3575) and also below in Example 1, is used.
  • immunoassays that utilise lectin to capture the glycoprotein with a single glycosylation and a glycoprotein-specific antibody to detect and quantify the captured glycoprotein are used.
  • Such assays include, for example, western blots, ELISAs, lectin-AlphaLISA assays, and immunofluorescence.
  • lectin-based ELISAs or lectin-based immunosorbant assays (LIAs)
  • LIAs immunosorbant assays
  • the plate is coated with lectin and the biological sample is added to form lectin-glycoprotein complexes, which are then detected using antibodies specific for the polypeptide backbone of the glycoprotein.
  • lectin-glycoprotein complexes which are then detected using antibodies specific for the polypeptide backbone of the glycoprotein.
  • ⁇ TAS micro-total analysis systems
  • Electrochemical sensors include a biorecognition element, such as a lectin, coupled to an electrode transducer surface.
  • a biorecognition element such as a lectin
  • the specific interaction of a biological sample containing, for example, a glycospecies, to its corresponding lectin on the electrode surface is detected by electrical current or potential changes occurring at the transducer/biomolecule interface.
  • This type of technique is described by Shah, A. K., Electrochemical detection of glycan and protein epitopes of glycoproteins in serum, Analyst, 2014, 139(22): 5970-6, and is particularly suited to point of care applications.
  • the present invention is also directed to the use of lectins and compositions comprising lectins to detect the levels of one or more glycospecies in a biological sample, and thus uses of lectins to determine the likelihood of the presence or absence of, or monitor the progress of, EAC or BE in subject.
  • a lectin to determine the level of one or more glycospecies in a sample comprising contacting the sample with the lectin under conditions that permit binding of the glycospecies to the lectin, and detecting and determining the level of the glycospecies in the sample, wherein a level of the glycospecies above or below a predetermined threshold indicates the presence of EAC or BE, as described above in section 2.
  • lectins can be used to determine the ratio of the level of a glycospecies in a sample to the total level of the glycoprotein, as described above, wherein a ratio of the glycospecies above or below a predetermined threshold indicates the presence of EAC or BE, as described above in section 2.
  • a ratio of the level of a glycospecies to the total level of the glycoprotein (i.e. the combined level of all types or glycosylation of the glycoprotein) in a sample is determined.
  • the methods of the present invention may also require assessing the total level of a glycoprotein in a sample. Any method for determining the level of a glycoprotein, such as the concentration or amount of a glycoprotein, in a samples can be used, and such methods are widely known to those of skill in the art. Exemplary methods include, but are not limited to, immunoassays that utilise glycoprotein-specific antibodies to capture the glycoproteins and a secondary antibody to detect and quantify the captured glycoprotein.
  • Such assays include, for example, western blots, ELISAs and immunofluorescence.
  • the ⁇ TAS immunoassays described above are also suitable for detecting and quantifying levels of a glycoprotein, as are techniques involving the use of electrochemical sensors, as described above.
  • the detection and quantitation of the glycoprotein is performed simultaneously with, and using the same platform, as detection and quantitation of the glycospecies.
  • the levels of a particular glycospecies and the total levels of the glycoprotein can be simultaneously assessed using the ⁇ TAS immunoassays referred to above and described by Choi et al. (Clinica Chimica Acta (2012) 413:170-174) and Kagebayashi et al. (Anal Biochem (2009) 388:306-311).
  • a glycospecies may be determined to be a multivariate marker, i.e., differentially expressed in a variety of ways, for example, between subjects or group of subjects with different conditions if the presence or absence or mean or median level or concentration of the glycospecies in the different subjects or group of subjects is calculated to be statistically significant.
  • Common tests for statistical significance include, among others, t-test, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney and odds ratio.
  • kits may also optionally include appropriate reagents for detection of labels, positive and negative controls, washing solutions, blotting membranes, microtiter plates dilution buffers and the like.
  • a lectin-binding immunosorbent assay may include a lectin specific for the glycospecies of the glycoprotein to be detected, an antibody specific for the glycoprotein (i.e. specific for the polypeptide backbone of the glycosylation), and optionally a glycospecies, which may be used as a positive control.
  • kits can also feature various devices and reagents for performing one of the assays described herein, and/or printed instructions for using the kit to determine the level of a glycoprotein.
  • the present invention also extends to the management and treatment of subjects with BE or EAC.
  • the methods of the present invention are used to detect the presence of EAC or BE in a subject, the methods can further comprise treating the EAC or BE.
  • therapies for EAC and BE are well known in the art and an appropriate therapeutic regimen for a particular subject, based on the severity of the disease and other factors, such as age and general health of the subject, can be determined by a skilled practitioner and administered appropriately without undue experimentation.
  • Treatment for BE may include, for example, changes to diet and exercise, administration of therapeutic agents to reduce acid reflux, including proton pump inhibitors, antacids or H2 blockers, photodynamic therapy (PDT) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).
  • Treatment options for EAC can vary depending on the stage of the cancer, i.e. stage 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, and can include surgery to remove the part of their esophagus that contains the cancer (esophagectomy), chemotherapy, immunotherapies and/or radiation therapy.
  • Radiotherapies include radiation and waves that induce DNA damage for example, ⁇ -irradiation, X-rays, UV irradiation, microwaves, electronic emissions, radioisotopes, and the like. Therapy may be achieved by irradiating the localized tumor site with the above described forms of radiations. It is most likely that all of these factors effect a broad range of damage DNA, on the precursors of DNA, the replication and repair of DNA, and the assembly and maintenance of chromosomes.
  • Dosage ranges for X-rays range from daily doses of 50 to 200 roentgens for prolonged periods of time (3 to 4 weeks), to single doses of 2000 to 6000 roentgens.
  • Dosage ranges for radioisotopes vary widely, and depend on the half life of the isotope, the strength and type of radiation emitted, and the uptake by the neoplastic cells.
  • Non-limiting examples of radiotherapies include conformal external beam radiotherapy (50-100 Grey given as fractions over 4-8 weeks), either single shot or fractionated, high dose rate brachytherapy, permanent interstitial brachytherapy, systemic radio-isotopes (e.g., Strontium 89).
  • the radiotherapy may be administered in combination with a radiosensitizing agent.
  • radiosensitizing agents include but are not limited to efaproxiral, etanidazole, fluosol, misonidazole, nimorazole, temoporfin and tirapazamine.
  • Chemotherapeutic agents may be selected from any one or more of the following categories:
  • antiproliferative/antineoplastic drugs and combinations thereof, as used in medical oncology such as alkylating agents (for example cis-platin, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, nitrogen mustard, melphalan, chlorambucil, busulphan and nitrosoureas), antimetabolites (for example antifolates such as fluoropyridines like 5-fluorouracil and tegafur, raltitrexed, methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside and hydroxyurea, anti-tumor antibiotics (for example anthracyclines like adriamycin, bleomycin, doxorubicin, daunomycin, epirubicin, idarubicin, mitomycin-C, dactinomycin and mithramycin), antimitotic agents (for example vinca alkaloids like vincristine, vinblastine, vindesine and vinorelbine and taxoids like paclitaxe
  • cytostatic agents such as antiestrogens (for example tamoxifen, toremifene, raloxifene, droloxifene and idoxifene), oestrogen receptor down regulators (for example fulvestrant), antiandrogens (for example bicalutamide, flutamide, nilutamide and cyproterone acetate), UH antagonists or LHRH agonists (for example goserelin, leuprorelin and buserelin), progestogens (for example megestrol acetate), aromatase inhibitors (for example as anastrozole, letrozole, vorozole and exemestane) and inhibitors of 5 ⁇ -reductase such as finasteride;
  • antiestrogens for example tamoxifen, toremifene, raloxifene, droloxifene and idoxifene
  • agents which inhibit cancer cell invasion for example metalloproteinase inhibitors like marimastat and inhibitors of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor function;
  • inhibitors of growth factor function include growth factor antibodies, growth factor receptor antibodies (for example the anti-erbb2 antibody trastuzumab [HerceptinTM] and the anti-erbb1 antibody cetuximab [C225]), farnesyl transferase inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and serine/threonine kinase inhibitors, for example other inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor family (for example other EGFR family tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as N-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-7-methoxy-6-(3-morpholinopropoxy)quinazolin-4-amine (gefitinib, AZD1839), N-(3-ethynylphenyl)-6,7-bis(2-methoxyethoxy)quinazolin-4-amine (erlotinib, OSI-774) and 6-acrylamido
  • anti-angiogenic agents such as those which inhibit the effects of vascular endothelial growth factor, (for example the anti-vascular endothelial cell growth factor antibody bevacizumab [AvastinTM], compounds such as those disclosed in International Patent Applications WO 97/22596, WO 97/30035, WO 97/32856 and WO 98/13354) and compounds that work by other mechanisms (for example linomide, inhibitors of integrin ⁇ v ⁇ 33 function and angiostatin);
  • vascular endothelial growth factor for example the anti-vascular endothelial cell growth factor antibody bevacizumab [AvastinTM]
  • vastinTM anti-vascular endothelial cell growth factor antibody bevacizumab
  • compounds that work by other mechanisms for example linomide, inhibitors of integrin ⁇ v ⁇ 33 function and angiostatin
  • vascular damaging agents such as Combretastatin A4 and compounds disclosed in International Patent Applications WO 99/02166, W000/40529, WO 00/41669, W001/92224, W002/04434 and W002/08213;
  • antisense therapies for example those which are directed to the targets listed above, such as ISIS 2503, an anti-ras antisense, and
  • gene therapy approaches including for example approaches to replace aberrant genes such as aberrant p53 or aberrant GDEPT (gene-directed enzyme pro-drug therapy) approaches such as those using cytosine deaminase, thymidine kinase or a bacterial nitroreductase enzyme and approaches to increase patient tolerance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy such as multi-drug resistance gene therapy.
  • aberrant genes such as aberrant p53 or aberrant GDEPT (gene-directed enzyme pro-drug therapy) approaches
  • cytosine deaminase such as those using cytosine deaminase, thymidine kinase or a bacterial nitroreductase enzyme
  • approaches to increase patient tolerance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy such as multi-drug resistance gene therapy.
  • Immunotherapy approaches include for example ex-vivo and in-vivo approaches to increase the immunogenicity of patient tumor cells, such as transfection with cytokines such as interleukin 2, interleukin 4 or granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, approaches to decrease T-cell anergy, approaches using transfected immune cells such as cytokine-transfected dendritic cells, approaches using cytokine-transfected tumor cell lines and approaches using anti-idiotypic antibodies.
  • cytokines such as interleukin 2, interleukin 4 or granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor
  • transfected immune cells such as cytokine-transfected dendritic cells
  • approaches using cytokine-transfected tumor cell lines approaches using anti-idiotypic antibodies.
  • the immune effector may be, for example, an antibody specific for some marker on the surface of a malignant cell.
  • the antibody alone may serve as an effector of therapy or it may recruit other cells to actually facilitate cell killing.
  • the antibody also may be conjugated to a drug or toxin (chemotherapeutic, radionuclide, ricin A chain, cholera toxin, pertussis toxin, etc.) and serve merely as a targeting agent.
  • the effector may be a lymphocyte carrying a surface molecule that interacts, either directly or indirectly, with a malignant cell target.
  • Various effector cells include cytotoxic T cells and NK cells.
  • cancer therapies include phototherapy, cryotherapy, toxin therapy or pro-apoptosis therapy.
  • phototherapy includes phototherapy, cryotherapy, toxin therapy or pro-apoptosis therapy.
  • cryotherapy includes phototherapy, cryotherapy, toxin therapy or pro-apoptosis therapy.
  • pro-apoptosis therapy includes phototherapy, cryotherapy, toxin therapy or pro-apoptosis therapy.
  • treatment may also include administration of an anti-HER2 antibody, such as trastuzumab.
  • an anti-HER2 antibody such as trastuzumab.
  • the methods of the present invention may also include modifying or altering the treatment. For example, if the level or ratio of one or more glycospecies identified herein indicates that the disease has progressed and the current or previous treatment protocol has been ineffective, a skilled practitioner may devise a modified or altered treatment protocol. For example, if the subject has undergone surgery to remove part of the esophagus, and the level or ratio of one or more glycospecies identified herein indicates that the disease has progressed post-surgery, the subject may be administered chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
  • the methods of the present invention can also be used to determine the likelihood of a subject who has undergone a treatment regimen (e.g., surgery) having a relapse of EAC or BE.
  • the subject would be monitored at a time after the treatment regimen (e.g., after 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, 6 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months 6 months or more than 6 months) to determine the likelihood of the subject having a relapse of EAC or BE.
  • a time after the treatment regimen e.g., after 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, 6 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months 6 months or more than 6 months
  • therapeutic agents as described for example above will be administered in pharmaceutical compositions together with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and in an effective amount to achieve their intended purpose.
  • the dose of active compounds administered to a subject should be sufficient to achieve a beneficial response in the subject over time such as a reduction in, or relief from, the symptoms of EAC or BE.
  • the quantity of the pharmaceutically active compounds(s) to be administered may depend on the subject to be treated inclusive of the age, sex, weight and general health condition thereof. In this regard, precise amounts of the active compound(s) for administration will depend on the judgment of the practitioner.
  • the present invention can be practiced in the field of predictive medicine for the purposes of diagnosis or monitoring the presence or development of a condition selected from EAC or BE in a subject, and/or monitoring response to therapy efficacy.
  • the glycospecies profiles of the present invention further enable determination of endpoints in pharmacotranslational studies. For example, clinical trials can take many months or even years to establish the pharmacological parameters for a medicament to be used in treating or preventing EAC or BE. However, these parameters may be associated with a glycospecies profile associated with a health state (e.g., HC). Hence, the clinical trial can be expedited by selecting a treatment regimen (e.g., medicament and pharmaceutical parameters), which results in a glycospecies profile associated with the desired health state (e.g., HC).
  • a treatment regimen e.g., medicament and pharmaceutical parameters
  • This aspect of the present invention advantageously provides methods of monitoring the efficacy of a particular treatment regimen in a subject (for example, in the context of a clinical trial) already diagnosed with a condition selected from EAC or BE. These methods take advantage of glycospecies biomarkers that correlate with treatment efficacy, for example, to determine whether the glycospecies profile of a subject undergoing treatment partially or completely normalizes during the course of or following therapy or otherwise shows changes associated with responsiveness to the therapy.
  • the glycospecies profiles further enable stratification of patients prior to enrolment in pharmacotranslational studies.
  • a clinical trial can be expedited by selecting a priori patients with a particular glycospecies profile that would most benefit from a particular treatment regimen (e.g., medicament and pharmaceutical parameters).
  • a particular treatment regimen e.g., medicament and pharmaceutical parameters.
  • patient enrolment into a clinical trial testing the efficacy of a new EAC cancer therapeutic would best include patients with a glycospecies profile that indicated that they had EAC rather than BE, and as such the selected patients would most likely benefit from the new therapy.
  • the invention provides methods of correlating a reference glycospecies profile with an effective treatment regimen for a condition selected from EAC or BE, wherein the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, etc.)
  • glycospecies biomarker These methods generally comprise: (a) determining a sample glycospecies profile from a subject with the condition prior to treatment (i.e., baseline), wherein the sample glycospecies profile evaluates for an individual glycospecies biomarker in the reference glycospecies profile a corresponding glycospecies biomarker, and correlating the sample glycospecies profile with a treatment regimen that is effective for treating that condition.
  • the invention further provides methods of determining whether a treatment regimen is effective for treating a subject with a condition selected from EAC or BE. These methods generally comprise: (a) correlating a reference glycospecies profile prior to treatment (i.e., baseline) with an effective treatment regimen for the condition, wherein the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, etc.) glycospecies biomarker, and (b) obtaining a sample glycospecies profile from the subject after treatment, wherein the sample glycospecies profile evaluates for an individual glycospecies biomarker in the reference glycospecies profile a corresponding glycospecies biomarker, and wherein the sample glycospecies profile after treatment indicates whether the treatment regimen is effective for treating the condition in the subject.
  • a reference glycospecies profile prior to treatment i.e., baseline
  • the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, etc.) glycospecies biomarker
  • the invention can also be practiced to evaluate whether a subject is responder (i.e., a positive response) or non-responder (i.e., no response) to a treatment regimen.
  • This aspect of the invention provides methods of correlating a glycospecies profile with a positive and/or negative response to a treatment regimen. These methods generally comprise: (a) obtaining an glycospecies profile from a subject with a condition selected from EAC or BE following commencement of the treatment regimen, wherein the glycospecies profile evaluates at least one (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, etc.) glycospecies biomarker, and (b) correlating the glycospecies from the subject with a positive and/or negative response to the treatment regimen.
  • the invention also provides methods of determining a positive and/or negative response to a treatment regimen by a subject with a condition selected from EAC or BE. These methods generally comprise: (a) correlating a reference glycospecies profile with a positive and/or negative response to the treatment regimen, wherein the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, etc.) glycospecies biomarker, and (b) determining a sample glycospecies profile from the subject, wherein the subject's sample glycospecies profile evaluates for an individual glycospecies biomarker in the reference glycospecies profile a corresponding glycospecies biomarker and indicates whether the subject is responding to the treatment regimen.
  • the reference glycospecies profile evaluates at least one (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, etc.) glycospecies biomarker
  • determining a sample glycospecies profile from the subject wherein the subject's sample glycospecies profile evaluates for an individual glycospecies biomarker in the reference glycospecies
  • the methods further comprise determining a first sample glycospecies profile from the subject prior to commencing the treatment regimen (i.e., a baseline profile), wherein the first sample glycospecies profile evaluates at least one (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, etc.) glycospecies biomarker, and comparing the first sample glycospecies profile with a second sample glycospecies profile from the subject after commencement of the treatment regimen, wherein the second sample glycospecies profile evaluates for an individual glycospecies biomarker in the first sample glycospecies profile a corresponding glycospecies biomarker.
  • This aspect of the invention can be practiced to identify responders or non-responders relatively early in the treatment process, i.e., before clinical manifestations of efficacy.
  • a sample glycospecies profile is obtained within about 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 4 months, six months or longer of commencing therapy.
  • the serum samples were denatured by heating in denaturing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 1% w/v SDS, 5% v/v Triton X-100 and 20 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) at 60° C. for 30 minutes, followed by alkylation with 100 mM iodoacetamide for 1 hr at 37° C., maintaining a dark condition, prior to dilution for lectin pulldown.
  • denaturing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 1% w/v SDS, 5% v/v Triton X-100 and 20 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)
  • beads were washed three times with binding buffer, seven times with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate with three changes of plates during wash steps. 0.95 ⁇ g of sequencing grade trypsin in 20 ⁇ l of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate was added to each reaction mixture and incubated at 37° C. overnight for on-bead trypsin digest. On the following day, digested peptides were transferred to a new plate. Beads were washed with equivalent volume of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and supernatant was combined with digested peptides. Pooled peptide samples were dried under the vacuum and plates were stored at ⁇ 80° C. until further use. Bravo liquid handler (Agilent Technologies) was used to make the platform high-throughput.
  • the samples are resuspended in 20 ⁇ l of 0.1% v/v formic acids for LC-MS/MS.
  • optimal amount of tryptic peptides were subjected to LC-MS using Agilent 6520 QTOF coupled with a Chip Cube and 1200 HPLC (9 ⁇ l were loaded for HAA, HPA and UEA, 6 ⁇ l for NPL, STL, GNL, 5 ⁇ l for BPL, DSA, ECA, MAA, SBA, WFA and WGA, 4 ⁇ l for AAL, SNA, LPHA, PSA and JAC, 1 ⁇ l for EPHA and ConA).
  • the nano pump was set at 0.3 ⁇ l/min and the capillary pump at 4 ⁇ l/min
  • the HPLA-chip used contains 160 nl C18 trapping column, and 75 ⁇ m ⁇ 150 mm 300 ⁇ C18 analytical column (G4240-62010 Agilent Technologies).
  • Buffer A was 0.1% v/v formic acid and Buffer B was 90% v/v acetonitrile containing 0.1% v/v formic acid.
  • Peptides were eluted from the column using gradient from 6% B to 46% B at 45 minutes. Nano pump % B was increased to B at 45.5 min and maintained at the level till 55.5 min. It decreased to original 6% B at 58.5 minutes.
  • the mass spectrometry was operated in 2 GHz extended dynamic range and programmed to acquire 8 precursor MS1 spectra per second and 4 MS/MS spectra for each MS spectra. Dynamic exclusion was applied after 2 MS/MS within 0.25 minutes. Exclusion for lectin peptides was applied. The QTOF was tuned and calibrated prior to the analysis. One hundred femtomold/ ⁇ l of pre-digested bovine serum albumin peptides were used as quality control, before and after each plate. Levels of reference ions 299.2945 and 1221.9906 were maintained at minimum 5000 and 1000 counts respectively.
  • the multi-dimensional data from the LeMBA-MS were stored in the GlycoSelector database as lectin-protein pairs with the measured total MS1 intensity for the proteins, and the corresponding internal standard file for the sample. GlycoSelector was then used to perform sample outlier detection ( FIG. 2 ) and classification of the glycoproteins by pairwise comparison of the patient groups. Sparse partial least squares regression-discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA, Le Cao et al. (2011) BMC bioinformatics 12, 253) was used to select a ranked list of lectin-protein pairs that classified between 2 groups. As an example, the sPLS-DA plot in FIG. 3 a shows clear separation of BE and EAC using the top 100 lectin-protein pairs.
  • MRM-MS multiplexed MRM-MS was optimized for 41 target protein candidates and LeMBA was performed using 6 lectins (AAL, EPHA, JAC, NPL, PSA and WGA).
  • Linearity of the MRM method was determined by spiking range of dilutions of stable isotope standard (SIS) peptide, spanning 3125 fold dilution range into constant amount of LeMBA pull-down sample.
  • SIS stable isotope standard
  • the amount of SIS peptide spiked-in for each of four peptides was adjusted in such a manner that response from 1 ⁇ labeled peptide mix fall within 5-fold range of the cognate natural peptide.
  • the reproducibility of the dynamic MRM method was determined by running the same sample in triplicate for four consecutive days. Analysis showed that 86% of the peptides in MRM method showed % CV below 10% while 9% of peptides showed % CV between 10-20% and only 5% of the peptides were above 20%. Furthermore, % CV for the entire MRM-MS analysis for SIS as well as natural internal standard chicken ovalbumin peptide was below 20% suggesting robust performance of the LeMBA-MRM-MS method.
  • TABLE 10 shows the relative increase or decrease of exemplary differentially glycosylated proteins in the serum of patients with EAC compared to healthy patients, BE compared to healthy patients, and in the serum of patients with EAC compared to patients with BE, i.e. the relative abundance of the specific glycospecies.
  • eight proteins P00751: complement factor B, P01011: alpha-l-antichymotrypsin, P01031: complement C5,
  • P02748 complement component C9
  • P02790 hemopexin
  • P04003 C4b-binding protein alpha chain
  • P05155 plasma protease Cl inhibitor
  • P05546 heparin cofactor 2 having glycans that facilitated binding to JAC (i.e.
  • the JAC-binding glycospecies of complement factor B were increased in the serum of patients with EAC compared to healthy patients.
  • FIG. 4 shows the relative abundance of exemplary glycospecies that were demonstrated to be significantly increased or decreased in at least two of EAC, BE and healthy subjects, and which could thus be used to distinguish between healthy, pre-cancer (BE) patients and EAC patients, and therefore determine the likelihood of the presence or absence of EAC.
  • the AAL-binding gelsolin (P06396) and PSA-binding gelsolin glycospecies were present in the serum of EAC patients at significantly reduced levels compared to the serum of BE patients.
  • FIGS. 3 show the relative abundance of exemplary glycospecies that were demonstrated to have a statistically significant increase or decrease in amount (as assessed using an ANOVA-Tukey test) in the serum of BE patients compared to healthy patients, and which could thus be used to distinguish healthy patients from pre-cancer patients with EAC.
  • FIG. 4 shows LeMBA-MS data for gelsolin. Specifically, the Y-axis shows relative abundance (note the log scale), and the X-axis shows the binding to each of the 20 lectins, grouped into general reactivity groups. Boxed lectins show statistically significantly different binding between BE and EAC groups (*p ⁇ 0.05, Student's t-test).
  • the graph clearly shows that the gelsolin glycospecies that most clearly distinguish between BE and EAC based on their relative abundance, and in particular NPL-binding gelsolin, JAC-binding gelsolin, PSA-binding gelsolin and GNL-binding gelsolin, which are significantly reduced in the serum of EAC patients compared to BE patients, suggesting a reduction in multiple glycan structures on gelsolin in EAC patients.
  • gelsolin glycospecies were present at similar levels in the serum of healthy, BE and EAC patients (e.g. WGA-binding gelsolin), others were present at statistically different levels in the various groups. For example, glycospecies characterised as being in the serum of EAC patients at significantly reduced amounts compared to BE patients (statistical analysis using the Student's t-test), but were not present in significantly different amounts between healthy and BE patients.
  • glycospecies biomarkers can be reliably determine the likelihood of a subject having a relevant condition, a number of the biomarkers were selected for validation in a separate and distinct cohort of subjects.
  • TABLE 13 shows the relative increase or decrease of exemplary differentially glycosylated proteins in the serum of patients with EAC compared to healthy patients, BE compared to healthy patients, and in the serum of patients with EAC compared to patients with BE, i.e. the relative abundance of the specific glycospecies.
  • six proteins P00738: haptoglobin, P00751: complement factor B, P01011: alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, P02748: complement component C9, P09871: complement Cls subcomponent, and P10643: complement component C7) having glycans that facilitated binding to EPHA (i.e.
  • the EPHA-binding glycospecies of haptoglobin, the EPHA-binding glycospecies of complement factor B, the EPHA-binding glycospecies of alpha- 1-antichymotrypsin, the JAC-binding glycospecies of complement component C9, the EPHA-binding glycospecies complement Cls subcomponent, and the EPHA-binding glycospecies of complement component C7) were increased in the serum of patients with EAC compared to healthy patients
  • Serum samples were collected from consenting patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal at Ochsner Health Systems, New Jersey, USA. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of Ochsner Health Systems and the University of Queensland. Patient diagnosis was according to current practice, endoscopy with histology of biopsy samples, and classified as BE (Barrett's esophagus), EAC (esophageal adenocarcinoma) or healthy (i.e., non-BE/EAC). TABLEe 14 describes the clinical characteristics of patients. Samples were randomized prior to all experiments. The samples were stored at ⁇ 80° C. until use.
  • MyOneTM Tosyl activated Dynabeads were from Life Technologies. Lectins AAL, EPHA, JAC, and NPL were from Vector Laboratories. Modified sequencing grade trypsin was from Promega. Triton X-100 and sodium dodecyl sulfate solution were from Bio-rad. Tris base, glycine, and sodium chloride were from Amresco. Disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate, sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate, and calcium chloride dihydrate were from Ajax Finechem. Manganese chloride was from Univar. Acetonitrile CHROMASOLV® gradient grade was from Sigma. All other reagents including lectins not listed above were from Sigma unless otherwise specified.
  • Serum samples were screened using LeMBA-MRM-MS assay with four lectins (AAL, EPHA, JAC, and NPL) as reported previously in Shah et al. 2015 Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 3023-3039.
  • Lectin Magnetic Bead Array LeMBA
  • Lectins were conjugated with magnetic beads as described previously in Shah et al. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 3023-3039. (2, 3).
  • lectin-beads AAL, EPHA, JAC, and NPL
  • Serum samples (allowing 50 ⁇ g per pull-down as measured by BCA protein assay) were spiked with 10 pmol ovalbumin per reaction as an internal standard.
  • the serum protein mixture was denatured and reduced using denaturing buffer (20 mM Tris-HC1 pH 7.4, 1% w/v SDS, 5% v/v Triton X-100 and 20 mM Dithiothreitol) at 60° C.
  • Alkylated serum sample (50 ⁇ g per reaction) was incubated with lectin conjugated beads in 100 ⁇ l binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl 2 , 1 mM MnCl 2 , 0.05% w/v SDS, 1% v/v Triton X-100) at 4° C. for 1 hr on a plate shaker to allow glycoprotein-lectin binding.
  • 100 ⁇ l binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl 2 , 1 mM MnCl 2 , 0.05% w/v SDS, 1% v/v Triton X-100
  • Beads were then washed sequentially with (i) binding buffer 3 times and (ii) 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate seven times, including three plate changes in-between washes.
  • trypsin digest 0.95 ⁇ g of sequencing grade trypsin in 20 ⁇ l of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate was added to each reaction mixture and incubated at 37° C. overnight. The next day, digested peptides were transferred to a new plate. Beads were washed with an equivalent volume of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, and the supernatant was combined with digested peptides.
  • Peptide samples were vacuum-dried and the plates were stored at ⁇ 80° C. until further use. Bravo liquid handler (Agilent Technologies) was used to make the platform high throughput.
  • MRM-MS Multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry
  • the UHPLC system consisted of a reverse phase chromatographic column
  • Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% formic acid
  • mobile phase B consisted of 100% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid.
  • the UHPLC system was operated at 60° C., with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min
  • the gradient used for peptide separation was as follows: 3% B at 0 min; 35% B at 40 min; 95% B at 40.50 min; 95% B at 44.50 min; 3% B at 45 min; followed by conditioning of columns for 4 min at 3% B before injecting the next sample.
  • Agilent 6490 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode and controlled by Agilent's MassHunter Workstation software (version B.06.00 build 6.0.6025.4 SP4).
  • the MRM acquisition parameters were 150 V high pressure RF, 60 V low pressure RF, 4000 V capillary voltage, 300 V nozzle voltage, 11 L/min sheath gas flow at a temperature of 250° C., 15 L/min drying gas flow at a temperature of 250° C., 30 psi nebulizer gas flow, unit resolution (0.7 Da full width at half maximum in the first quadrupole (Q1) and the third quadrupole (Q3), and 200 V delta EMV (+).
  • Lectin-beads sufficient for biomarker qualification experiments were made in a single batch to minimize experimental variation. Serum samples were randomized for LeMBA-MRM-MS experiments. Peptide samples were spiked with SIS peptide mixture containing 50 femtomole of SPAFTDLHLR, AVEVLPK, and LTPLYELVK each, 100 femtomole of LSPIYNLVPVK, 200 femtomole of NLAVSQVVHK, 500 femtomole of VASMASEK,
  • ISQAVHAAHAEINEAGR and GSFEFPVGDAVSK each, and 1000 femtomole of VTSIQDWVQK, and LPPNVVEESAR each.
  • Raw data from MRM-MS experiment was processed using Skyline. All peaks were manually checked for correct integration, and peak area for each peptide (sum of all transitions) was exported for further analysis. Firstly, raw peptide intensity were normalized according to SIS peptide mixture. Followinged by the two step normalization described in Shah et al. 2015 Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 3023-3039. Univariate, multivariate and ROC curve analyses were performed using Shiny mixOmics (available on the world wide web at mixomics-projects.di.uq.edu.au/Shiny-dev/) as described in Shah et al. 2015 Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 3023-3039.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
  • Oncology (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
US15/527,701 2014-11-17 2015-11-17 Glycoprotein biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma and barrett's esophagus and uses thereof Abandoned US20190072557A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2014904616 2014-11-17
AU2014904616A AU2014904616A0 (en) 2014-11-17 Biomarkers and uses thereof
PCT/AU2015/050723 WO2016077881A1 (fr) 2014-11-17 2015-11-17 Biomarqueurs de glycoprotéines pour l'adénocarcinome de l'œsophage et l'œsophage de barrett et leurs utilisations

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AU2015/050723 A-371-Of-International WO2016077881A1 (fr) 2014-11-17 2015-11-17 Biomarqueurs de glycoprotéines pour l'adénocarcinome de l'œsophage et l'œsophage de barrett et leurs utilisations

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/165,803 Continuation US20220018843A1 (en) 2014-11-17 2021-02-02 Glycoprotein biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma and barrett's esophagus and uses thereof

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20190072557A1 true US20190072557A1 (en) 2019-03-07

Family

ID=56012961

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/527,701 Abandoned US20190072557A1 (en) 2014-11-17 2015-11-17 Glycoprotein biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma and barrett's esophagus and uses thereof
US17/165,803 Pending US20220018843A1 (en) 2014-11-17 2021-02-02 Glycoprotein biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma and barrett's esophagus and uses thereof

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/165,803 Pending US20220018843A1 (en) 2014-11-17 2021-02-02 Glycoprotein biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma and barrett's esophagus and uses thereof

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (2) US20190072557A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP3221701B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN107430126B (fr)
AU (2) AU2015349613B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2967869A1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2883628T3 (fr)
HK (1) HK1244877A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2016077881A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10837970B2 (en) 2017-09-01 2020-11-17 Venn Biosciences Corporation Identification and use of glycopeptides as biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment monitoring

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109342729B (zh) * 2018-10-30 2021-06-25 深圳格道糖生物技术有限公司 特定凝集素组合在基于唾液糖型鉴别食管癌方面的应用
CN110045125B (zh) * 2019-04-03 2022-08-09 中国医学科学院北京协和医院 一种用于诊断腹膜后纤维化的生物标志物及其用途
CN110846295B (zh) * 2019-11-13 2022-12-23 上海交通大学 一种基于功能性纳米磁珠富集马铃薯酯酰基水解酶的方法
JP2024529771A (ja) * 2021-08-26 2024-08-08 グリカノスティクス エス．アール．オー． がん診断のための糖タンパク質バイオマーカー

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9624482D0 (en) 1995-12-18 1997-01-15 Zeneca Phaema S A Chemical compounds
EP0880508B1 (fr) 1996-02-13 2003-04-16 AstraZeneca AB Derives de la quinazoline utilises comme inhibiteurs du vegf
IL125954A (en) 1996-03-05 2003-06-24 Zeneca Ltd Quinazoline derivatives, processes for their preparation, pharmaceutical compositions containing them and use thereof in the manufacture of medicaments having an antiangiogenic and/or vascular permeability reducing effect
GB9718972D0 (en) 1996-09-25 1997-11-12 Zeneca Ltd Chemical compounds
GB9714249D0 (en) 1997-07-08 1997-09-10 Angiogene Pharm Ltd Vascular damaging agents
GB9900334D0 (en) 1999-01-07 1999-02-24 Angiogene Pharm Ltd Tricylic vascular damaging agents
GB9900752D0 (en) 1999-01-15 1999-03-03 Angiogene Pharm Ltd Benzimidazole vascular damaging agents
JP2003535078A (ja) 2000-05-31 2003-11-25 アストラゼネカ アクチボラグ 血管損傷活性のあるインドール誘導体
WO2002008213A1 (fr) 2000-07-07 2002-01-31 Angiogene Pharmaceuticals Limited Derives de colchinol utiles comme inhibiteurs de l'angiogenese
BR0112224A (pt) 2000-07-07 2003-06-10 Angiogene Pharm Ltd Composto, composição farmacêutica, uso de um composto ou de um sal, solvato ou pró-droga farmaceuticamente aceitável do mesmo, e, processo para preparar um composto
CN1955737A (zh) * 2005-10-28 2007-05-02 中国医学科学院肿瘤医院肿瘤研究所 用于筛查食管癌癌前病变的蛋白质芯片
WO2007082057A2 (fr) * 2006-01-10 2007-07-19 The Regents Of The University Of California Jeux ordonnes d'echantillons de lectine et applications traductionnelles
WO2010115077A2 (fr) * 2009-04-02 2010-10-07 The Johns Hopkins University Ensembles de biomarqueurs pour l'oesophage de barrett et l'adénocarcinome de l'oesophage
CN101968440B (zh) * 2009-07-27 2011-11-09 熊慧 一种利用表面等离子谐振技术检测特定糖链蛋白、抗体或抗原的生物芯片
EP2470651A1 (fr) * 2009-08-24 2012-07-04 OncoTherapy Science, Inc. Gène adamts18 lié au cancer du poumon et au cancer de l' sophage
GB201208756D0 (en) * 2012-05-17 2012-07-04 Medical Res Council Methods
WO2013192242A2 (fr) * 2012-06-18 2013-12-27 University Of Southern California Marqueur de surface cellulaire et ses procédés d'utilisation

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10837970B2 (en) 2017-09-01 2020-11-17 Venn Biosciences Corporation Identification and use of glycopeptides as biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment monitoring
US11624750B2 (en) 2017-09-01 2023-04-11 Venn Biosciences Corporation Identification and use of glycopeptides as biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment monitoring

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN107430126B (zh) 2019-12-06
AU2021282520A1 (en) 2022-01-06
EP3221701B1 (fr) 2021-03-31
CA2967869A1 (fr) 2016-05-26
AU2015349613B2 (en) 2022-01-13
EP3221701A1 (fr) 2017-09-27
ES2883628T3 (es) 2021-12-09
CN107430126A (zh) 2017-12-01
WO2016077881A9 (fr) 2017-07-06
EP3221701A4 (fr) 2018-04-25
AU2015349613A1 (en) 2017-06-08
HK1244877A1 (zh) 2018-08-17
WO2016077881A1 (fr) 2016-05-26
US20220018843A1 (en) 2022-01-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20220018843A1 (en) Glycoprotein biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma and barrett's esophagus and uses thereof
EP2398918B1 (fr) Méthodes de diagnostic et de pronostic de cancer colorectal
Ricolleau et al. Surface‐enhanced laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry protein profiling identifies ubiquitin and ferritin light chain as prognostic biomarkers in node‐negative breast cancer tumors
Ahn et al. Integrated glycoproteomics demonstrates fucosylated serum paraoxonase 1 alterations in small cell lung cancer
EP2455389A1 (fr) Marqueur de chaîne de sucre comme mesure d'états de maladie de maladies hépatiques
Cheng et al. Proteomics analysis for finding serum markers of ovarian cancer
AU2017232226B2 (en) Method for the diagnosis of gaucher's disease
US20140274768A1 (en) Glycoforms of MUC5AC and Endorepellin and Biomarkers for Mucinous Pancreatic Cysts
Chen et al. Proteomics studies of pancreatic cancer
AU2012266768A1 (en) Method for the diagnosis of Gaucher's disease
EP3535587B1 (fr) Procédés utilisant la spectrométrie de masse pour la détection de la circulation d'histones h3 et h2b dans le plasma de patients atteint de choc septique ou de sepsie
Szabó et al. Proteomic and glycomic markers to differentiate lung adenocarcinoma from copd
EP3637106A1 (fr) Procédé de détection du cancer du poumon
KR101456096B1 (ko) 인간 혈청 당쇄 지도 및 이를 이용하여 혈청 시료를 검증하는 방법
US10627414B2 (en) Attractin and lumican biomarkers in idiopathic pneumonia syndrome
US20190339286A1 (en) Method to determine braf mutations and wild type braf protein by mass spectrometry
US20230375552A1 (en) Integrated proteomic biomarkers for the detection of aggressive prostate cancer
Wanyama et al. Glycomic-Based Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer: Advances and Challenges. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 643
Vareed et al. Metabolites of Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase (NP) in Serum Have the Potential to
Wong Application of Magnetic Bead-based Proteomic Fingerprinting Technology to the Detection of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HILL, MICHELLE MEI CHIH;SHAH, ALOK;CAO, KIM-AHN LE;SIGNING DATES FROM 20170719 TO 20170808;REEL/FRAME:043719/0428

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION