US20180001380A1 - Casting simulation method - Google Patents
Casting simulation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20180001380A1 US20180001380A1 US15/544,595 US201615544595A US2018001380A1 US 20180001380 A1 US20180001380 A1 US 20180001380A1 US 201615544595 A US201615544595 A US 201615544595A US 2018001380 A1 US2018001380 A1 US 2018001380A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- inelastic
- strain
- effective
- stress
- equivalent
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 238000005482 strain hardening Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 51
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000009864 tensile test Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000012669 compression test Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 53
- 230000008646 thermal stress Effects 0.000 description 9
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004512 die casting Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910000838 Al alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 3
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 0 C*C(CCC(C)=*)N Chemical compound C*C(CCC(C)=*)N 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013213 extrapolation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- NRNCYVBFPDDJNE-UHFFFAOYSA-N pemoline Chemical compound O1C(N)=NC(=O)C1C1=CC=CC=C1 NRNCYVBFPDDJNE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910001018 Cast iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000011089 carbon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
- B22D—CASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
- B22D46/00—Controlling, supervising, not restricted to casting covered by a single main group, e.g. for safety reasons
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D11/00—Process control or regulation for heat treatments
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N3/08—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady tensile or compressive forces
- G01N3/18—Performing tests at high or low temperatures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/23—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2113/00—Details relating to the application field
- G06F2113/22—Moulding
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
- G06F2119/08—Thermal analysis or thermal optimisation
Definitions
- This disclosure relates to a casting simulation method using thermal stress and deformation analysis.
- JP2007330977A PTL 1
- Dong Shuxin Yasushi Iwata, Toshio Sugiyama, and Hiroaki Iwahori, “ Cold Crack Criterion for ADC 12 Aluminum Alloy Die Casting”, Casting Engineering, 81(5), 2009, pp. 226-231, ADC12 (NPL 1) are reference examples of Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc.
- the amount of equivalent inelastic strain (including the amount of plastic strain and the amount of viscoplastic strain) is used as a measure of hardening, and inelastic strain that occurs at such a high temperature at which recovery occurs simultaneously with deformation is also treated as contributing to work hardening as much as inelastic strain produced at room temperature. This causes an unrealistic increase in yield stress at room temperature, causing problems in the accuracy of thermal stress analysis.
- NPL 2 Hallvard et al. proposes a constitutive equation that is expressed as Constitutive Eq. (I) below representing the relationship between stress and inelastic strain as described below, and that considers inelastic strain produced at or above a certain temperature as not contributing to hardening, while the other produced below that temperature as contributing to work hardening. From a metallurgical viewpoint, however, it is clear that recovery does not happen suddenly at a certain temperature. Therefore, this constitutive equation has a problem.
- Van Haaften et al. proposes a constitutive equation that is expressed as Constitutive Eq. (II) below between stress and inelastic strain, a function a which is 0 at high temperature and 1 at low temperature is used to smoothly consider the contributions of inelastic strain produced at different temperatures to work hardening.
- Alankar et al. proposes a constitutive equation that is expressed as Constitutive Eq. (III) below representing the relationship between stress and inelastic strain.
- Constitutive Eq. (III) representing the relationship between stress and inelastic strain.
- recovery occurs more frequently as the ratio of a work hardening index at high temperature n (T) to a work hardening index at room temperature n RT decreases.
- n (T) /n RT determines the ratio between plastic strain contributing to work hardening and creep strain not contributing to work hardening (strain making no contribution to work hardening).
- K (T) , n (T) , and m (T) in the following equation cannot be determined accurately.
- the present disclosure has been developed in view of the above circumstances, and provides a casting simulation method using thermal stress and deformation analysis, in which an amount of equivalent inelastic strain effective for work hardening is determined by multiplying an equivalent inelastic strain rate calculated in the analysis by an effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ representing a proportion of inelastic strain contributing to work hardening to obtain an effective inelastic strain rate, and integrating it over a time from 0 second in analysis, and the amount of equivalent inelastic strain thus obtained is used as a measure of work hardening in a constitutive equation.
- the present disclosure also provides a method of experimentally determining an effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T) which represents the contributions of inelastic strain produced at different temperatures to work hardening.
- T denotes a temperature with inelastic strain
- h (T) denotes an increment of yield strength at room temperature with respect to an amount of inelastic strain at the temperature with inelastic strain
- h (RT) denotes an increment of yield strength at room temperature with respect to an amount of inelastic strain applied at room temperature
- h (T) /h (RT) denotes an effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T)
- ⁇ inelastic / ⁇ t denotes an equivalent inelastic strain rate
- t denotes a time from 0 second in analysis.
- the effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T) is obtained by: applying different inelastic pre-strains to a test piece at different temperatures; cooling the test piece to room temperature; performing a tensile test or a compression test on the test piece at room temperature; and measuring influence of amounts of the inelastic pre-strains applied at the different temperatures on the increase in yield stress.
- FIG. 1 a graph conceptually illustrating the temperature history of a test piece in a test for determining an effective inelastic strain coefficient
- FIG. 2 is a graph conceptually illustrating the influence of amounts of inelastic pre-strains at different temperatures on yield stress rise at room temperature;
- FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating a temperature history of JIS ADC12 used in tests for determining an effective inelastic strain coefficient in examples
- FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the experimental results obtained in examples of examining the influence of inelastic pre-strains at different temperatures on the 0.2% offset yield stress of JIS ADC12 at room temperature;
- FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating material constants K, m, n, and ⁇ obtained for JIS ADC12 in examples
- FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the results obtained in examples of comparing experimental values with calculated values according to the present disclosure in stress-strain curves for JIS ADC12 at room temperature;
- FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating the results obtained in examples of comparing experimental values with calculated values according to the present disclosure in stress-strain curves for JIS ADC12 at 200° C.;
- FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating the results obtained in examples of comparing experimental values and calculated values according to the present disclosure in stress-strain curves for JIS ADC12 at 250° C.;
- FIG. 9 is a graph illustrating the results obtained in examples of comparing experimental values and calculated values according to the present disclosure in stress-strain curves for JIS ADC12 at 300° C.;
- FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the results obtained in examples of comparing experimental values and calculated values according to the present disclosure in stress-strain curves for JIS ADC12 at 350° C.;
- FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating the results obtained in examples of comparing experimental values and calculated values according to the present disclosure in stress-strain curves for JIS ADC12 at 400° C.;
- FIG. 12 is a graph illustrating the results obtained in examples of comparing experimental values and calculated values according to the present disclosure in stress-strain curves for JIS ADC12 at 450° C.;
- FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating “the influence of inelastic pre-strains at room temperature and at 450° C. on the increase in yield stress at room temperature” calculated in examples using the conventional extended Ludwik's law;
- FIG. 14 is a graph illustrating “the influence of inelastic pre-strains applied at different temperatures on increase in yield stress at room temperature” calculated in examples according to the present disclosure
- FIG. 15 is a graph illustrating the results obtained in examples of comparing experimental values and calculated values according to the present disclosure to examine the influence of inelastic pre-strains applied at different temperatures on the increase in 0.2% offset yield stress at room temperature;
- FIG. 16 is a graph illustrating experimental results in examples of examining the influence of inelastic pre-strains applied at different temperatures on the 0.2% offset yield stress of FCD400 at room temperature.
- an equivalent inelastic strain rate calculated by thermal stress analysis is multiplied by an “effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T) indicative of temperature dependency”, which is preferably experimentally determined, and the result is used as an effective inelastic strain rate.
- the effective inelastic strain rate is then integrated over a time from 0 second in analysis to determine the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain, which in turn is, in place of the amount of equivalent inelastic strain, used as a measure of hardening in a constitutive equation.
- the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain is applicable to any constitutive equation, whether an elasto-plastic constitutive equation or an elasto-viscoplastic constitutive equation, as long as it is a constitutive equation using the amount of equivalent inelastic strain conventionally as a measure of work hardening as described in paragraph 0008.
- the determination of the effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T) is carried out by applying inelastic pre-strains of different magnitudes at the corresponding temperatures at which ⁇ (T) is to be obtained, then cooling to room temperature, conducting a tensile test or a compression test, and measuring the increase in yield stress.
- a tensile test piece is heated in a way as presented in the temperature history in FIG. 1 .
- T 3 be the temperature at which ⁇ (T) is to be determined
- a single inelastic pre-strain is applied at T 3 in T 1 , T 2 , T 3 , . . . , T n per test.
- the test piece is cooled to room temperature and subjected to a tensile test or a compression test at room temperature.
- measurement is made of the increase in yield stress.
- This procedure is repeated for inelastic pre-strains at different temperatures and at different magnitudes. In this way, the influence of the amounts of the inelastic pre-strains applied at the different temperatures on the increase in yield stress at room temperature is measured.
- the same temperature history is set for all test conditions.
- the reason for this is to eliminate the influence of the temperature history of the test piece on the measured values.
- the above-described test is not limited to a particular test, and may be a tensile test or a compression test as long as it can provide a stress-strain curve and enables measurement of yield stress.
- a tensile test in this disclosure for example, a publicly-known and widely-used tensile test may be used, such as JIS Z 2241:2011.
- a publicly-known and widely-used compression test may be used, such as JIS K 7181:2011.
- FIG. 2 illustrates the influence of inelastic pre-strains applied at different temperatures on the increase in yield stress at room temperature.
- h a gradient of yield stress with respect to the amount of inelastic pre-strains applied at room temperature
- T h
- the value of h (T) /h (RT) is used as an effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T), which is indicative of how much the inelastic strain produced at the temperature T contribute to work hardening at room temperature with respect to the inelastic strain produced at room temperature at which all the inelastic strains produced contribute to work hardening.
- an effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T) is experimentally determined to be 0 or a negative value, i.e., in which inelastic strain applied at the temperature T should not contribute to work hardening at room temperature
- a constitutive equation to which the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain is introduced involves no effective inelastic strain, and thus is not able to express work hardening in principle.
- the stress-strain curve displays elasto-perfectly plastic behavior or elasto-perfectly viscoplastic behavior. In that case, the reproducibility of the stress-strain curve deteriorates, resulting in lower accuracy of predictions on thermal stress and deformation.
- An effective inelastic strain is produced as long as the effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T) is not 0, making it possible to express work hardening in the stress-inelastic strain curve at the temperature T. Accordingly, even in a temperature range with the inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T) being 0 or a negative value, if a positive small value, rather than 0 or a negative value, is corrected appropriately for use as an effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T), it is possible to express work hardening in a stress-equivalent inelastic strain curve with a slight ineffective inelastic strain.
- ⁇ (T) at the time of correction is in a range of 0 ⁇ 0.5, and desirably 0 ⁇ 0.1, although it depends on the alloy type.
- ⁇ (T) is corrected by the following linear interpolation using an effective inelastic strain coefficient at maximum temperature ⁇ min in a temperature range in which ⁇ (T) is experimentally determined to be non-zero and a maximum temperature T max (which may alternatively be a solidus temperature) in a temperature range in which ⁇ is experimentally determined to be 0:
- ⁇ extrapolation (T) denotes a value of a as corrected in a temperature range in which ⁇ is experimentally determined to be 0;
- T max denotes the maximum temperature (which may alternatively be a solidus temperature) in a temperature range where a is experimentally determined to be 0,
- T min denotes a maximum temperature in a temperature range in which ⁇ is experimentally determined to be non-zero
- ⁇ min denotes a value of ⁇ in T min ;
- T denotes a temperature above T min
- material constants in a constitutive equation to which the amount of effective inelastic strain is introduced are determined as explained below in the case of introducing the amount of effective inelastic strain to the constants (K(T), n(T), and m(T)) of the extended Ludwik's law.
- ⁇ 0 is a constant necessary for calculation and usually a small value of 1 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 6 .
- the term with an index n (T) representing the degree of work hardening includes the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain as a variable.
- the term with an index m (T) representing the strain rate dependence of the stress-strain curve includes an equivalent inelastic strain rate as a variable. Since the equation as a whole includes the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain, for each temperature, by substituting the inelastic strain rate into the term with m (T) , K (T) , n (T) , and m (T) are determined by numerical optimization to fit the stress-effective equivalent inelastic strain curve.
- the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain ⁇ effective inelastic is determined.
- the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain is used to simulate the influence of inelastic strain applied at the temperature in question on work hardening at room temperature.
- ⁇ ij ⁇ e ij + ⁇ p ij
- T is the temperature
- ⁇ ij is the stress
- ⁇ eff. is the equivalent stress
- ⁇ ij is the total strain
- ⁇ e ij is the elastic strain
- ⁇ p ij is the plastic strain
- f is the yield function
- D ijkl is the fourth-order constitutive tensor.
- an exemplary elasto-viscoplastic constitutive equation is:
- ⁇ ij ⁇ e ij + ⁇ vp ij
- ⁇ eff. F ( ⁇ eff. vp , ⁇ dot over ( ⁇ ) ⁇ eff. vp ,T )
- ⁇ eff. is the equivalent stress
- ⁇ eff. vp is the equivalent viscoplastic strain
- ⁇ dot over ( ⁇ ) ⁇ eff. vp is the equivalent viscoplastic strain rate
- the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain ⁇ effective inelastic defined by Eq. (1) instead of the amount of equivalent inelastic strain conventionally used, may be introduced or substituted.
- material constants in a constitutive equation are determined in step (II) using an equivalent stress-effective equivalent inelastic strain curve, and are input to a constitutive equation to which the amount of effective inelastic strain is introduced. Then, in the thermal stress analysis step (IV), the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain is calculated, and the result, instead of the amount of equivalent inelastic strain conventionally used, is used as a parameter representing the amount of work hardening to calculate thermal stress.
- JIS ADC12 a typical aluminum die-casting alloy, JIS ADC12, is analyzed for an effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T) and material constants (K(T), n(T), and m(T)) at each temperature according to the procedures described in paragraphs 0026 to 0033.
- tensile tests were performed to obtain stress-equivalent inelastic strain curves required to determine material constants K(T), n(T), and m(T).
- Stress-inelastic strain curves were obtained under a set of conditions including: experimental strain rates of 10 ⁇ 3 /s and 10 ⁇ 4 /s and test temperatures of RT, 200° C., 250° C., 300° C., 350° C., 400° C., and 450° C.
- Each test pieces was obtained by casting JIS ADC12 in a copper mold and processing it into the shape of a tensile test piece.
- test pieces were heated from room temperature to 450° C., then subjected to heat treatment at 450° C. for 1 hour to cause precipitates to be re-dissolved, and cooled to the test temperature as soon as possible so that the mechanical properties at the time of cooling can be examined accurately. As soon as the test temperature was reached, the tensile test was carried out.
- each test piece was cooled to room temperature and quenched with dry ice to eliminate the effect of the increase in yield stress caused by natural aging. Then, the 0.2% offset yield stress was determined by conducting a tensile test on each test piece at room temperature. The results are presented in FIG. 4 .
- the 0.2% offset yield stress was 106 MPa. Based on the results presented in the figure, determinations of an effective inelastic strain coefficient ⁇ (T) were made of the rate of increase in 0.2% offset yield stress with respect to the increase in inelastic pre-strain at each temperature, that is, h (T) , and of the value of h (T) at room temperature.
- the effective inelastic strain coefficient is 0 by definition, yet any inelastic strain produced contributes to work hardening at room temperature, although not depending on the quantity, and exhibits work hardening even in a stress-equivalent inelastic strain curve.
- the effective inelastic strain coefficient becomes 0 and any inelastic strain produced does not contribute to work hardening at room temperature.
- ⁇ was set to 0.000185 at 350° C., 0.0000927 at 400° C., and 0 at 450° C., while correcting the effective inelastic strain coefficient at 350° C. and 400° C. from 0 to a very small positive value, so that work hardening could be expressed in the stress-inelastic strain curve in the temperature range of 350° C. to 400° C. and almost no effective inelastic strain would be produced.
- the stress-equivalent inelastic strain curve obtained in paragraph 0040 was transformed into a stress-effective equivalent inelastic strain curve, and the values of K (T) , m (T) , and n (T) were obtained as described in paragraphs 0032 and 0033.
- the values of K (T) , m (T) , and n (T) are presented in FIG. 5 .
- FIGS. 6 to 12 each illustrate stress-inelastic strain curves to compare experimental values with calculated values according to the extended Ludwik equation to which the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain determined by Eq. (1) is introduced.
- tensile tests were performed at strain rates of 10 ⁇ 3 /s and 10 ⁇ 4 /s at RT, 200° C., 250° C., 300° C., 350° C., 400° C., and 450° C.
- all the constitutive equations incorporating the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain accurately reproduced the strain rate dependence and the shape of the corresponding stress-inelastic strain curve. In this case, we faithfully followed the data obtained in the limited experimental temperature range and considered 450° C.
- inelastic strains produced in different temperature ranges are all considered as equivalent to one another and included as a measure of hardening. Accordingly, as is clear from FIG. 13 , inelastic strains produced at 450° C. as well as those produced at room temperature contributed to an increase in yield stress, and thus to an unrealistic increase in yield stress. It is noted here that inelastic strains applied at other temperatures also have the same results as at 450° C. with overlapping plots, and thus they are omitted in the figure.
- the analysis program incorporating the amount of effective equivalent inelastic strain could reproduce the behavior at 300° C. or higher at which an increase in yield stress is independent of the amount of inelastic pre-strain.
- this program could accurately reproduce the behavior even at 300° C. or lower at which an increase in yield stress depends on the amount of inelastic pre-strain.
- FIG. 16 depicts the influence of experimentally obtained inelastic strain at high temperature on the 0.2% offset yield stress of a typical cast iron, JIS FCD400, at room temperature.
- pre-strain applied at 700° C. does not contribute to work hardening at room temperature.
- inelastic strain applied at 350° C. contributes to work hardening at room temperature and the amount of work hardening is proportional to the amount of inelastic strain applied. This behavior is identical to that observed in ADC12, and from this follows that the present disclosure is also applicable to FCD400.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2015009707A JP6455880B2 (ja) | 2015-01-21 | 2015-01-21 | 鋳造シミュレーション方法 |
JP2015-009707 | 2015-01-21 | ||
PCT/JP2016/000311 WO2016117345A1 (ja) | 2015-01-21 | 2016-01-21 | 鋳造シミュレーション方法 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20180001380A1 true US20180001380A1 (en) | 2018-01-04 |
Family
ID=56416895
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/544,595 Abandoned US20180001380A1 (en) | 2015-01-21 | 2016-01-21 | Casting simulation method |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20180001380A1 (ja) |
EP (1) | EP3248712B1 (ja) |
JP (1) | JP6455880B2 (ja) |
WO (1) | WO2016117345A1 (ja) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110135026A (zh) * | 2019-04-29 | 2019-08-16 | 西北工业大学 | 多尺度物理本构模型嵌入abaqus的方法 |
CN111272552A (zh) * | 2020-02-28 | 2020-06-12 | 鞍钢股份有限公司 | 一种变速率拉伸曲线评价方法 |
CN114115165A (zh) * | 2022-01-28 | 2022-03-01 | 深圳市北工实业有限公司 | 一种铸锻一体成型机的生产控制方法及系统 |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108254250B (zh) * | 2017-12-30 | 2020-05-08 | 北京工业大学 | 一种考虑动态应变时效的热机多轴应力应变关系确定方法 |
CN112270070B (zh) * | 2020-09-30 | 2024-05-28 | 江苏沙钢集团有限公司 | 一种渐进式修正薄带连铸结晶辊辊型的方法 |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6233500B1 (en) * | 1997-06-19 | 2001-05-15 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force | Optimization and control of microstructure development during hot metal working |
JP4670542B2 (ja) * | 2005-08-11 | 2011-04-13 | 日本電気株式会社 | 材料定数算出装置および方法 |
US8214182B2 (en) * | 2009-05-12 | 2012-07-03 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Methods of predicting residual stresses and distortion in quenched aluminum castings |
JP6268584B2 (ja) * | 2014-01-14 | 2018-01-31 | 日産自動車株式会社 | 熱変形解析方法、熱変形解析プログラム、および熱変形解析装置 |
-
2015
- 2015-01-21 JP JP2015009707A patent/JP6455880B2/ja active Active
-
2016
- 2016-01-21 EP EP16739953.4A patent/EP3248712B1/en active Active
- 2016-01-21 WO PCT/JP2016/000311 patent/WO2016117345A1/ja active Application Filing
- 2016-01-21 US US15/544,595 patent/US20180001380A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110135026A (zh) * | 2019-04-29 | 2019-08-16 | 西北工业大学 | 多尺度物理本构模型嵌入abaqus的方法 |
CN111272552A (zh) * | 2020-02-28 | 2020-06-12 | 鞍钢股份有限公司 | 一种变速率拉伸曲线评价方法 |
CN114115165A (zh) * | 2022-01-28 | 2022-03-01 | 深圳市北工实业有限公司 | 一种铸锻一体成型机的生产控制方法及系统 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2016117345A1 (ja) | 2016-07-28 |
EP3248712A1 (en) | 2017-11-29 |
JP2016132027A (ja) | 2016-07-25 |
EP3248712B1 (en) | 2020-12-09 |
JP6455880B2 (ja) | 2019-01-23 |
EP3248712A4 (en) | 2018-07-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Lin et al. | A unified constitutive model based on dislocation density for an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy at time-variant hot deformation conditions | |
Changizian et al. | The high temperature flow behavior modeling of AZ81 magnesium alloy considering strain effects | |
EP3248712B1 (en) | Casting simulation method | |
Lin et al. | New constitutive model for high-temperature deformation behavior of inconel 718 superalloy | |
Chen et al. | Modelling of constitutive relationship, dynamic recrystallization and grain size of 40Cr steel during hot deformation process | |
Tan et al. | A modified Johnson–Cook model for tensile flow behaviors of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy at high strain rates | |
Lin et al. | Effect of temperature and strain rate on the compressive deformation behavior of 42CrMo steel | |
Cai et al. | Constitutive equations for elevated temperature flow stress of Ti–6Al–4V alloy considering the effect of strain | |
Lin et al. | A new phenomenological constitutive model for hot tensile deformation behaviors of a typical Al–Cu–Mg alloy | |
Noroozi et al. | Prediction of fatigue crack growth under constant amplitude loading and a single overload based on elasto-plastic crack tip stresses and strains | |
US20160299046A1 (en) | A method of measurement and determination on fracture toughness of structural materials at high temperature | |
Wei et al. | Constitutive modeling of Mg–9Li–3Al–2Sr–2Y at elevated temperatures | |
Khamei et al. | Modeling the hot-deformation behavior of Ni60 wt%–Ti40 wt% intermetallic alloy | |
Piao et al. | Characterization of flow stress at ultra-high strain rates by proper extrapolation with Taylor impact tests | |
Huffman et al. | A non-linear damage accumulation fatigue model for predicting strain life at variable amplitude loadings based on constant amplitude fatigue data | |
Farrahi et al. | A new energy‐based isothermal and thermo‐mechanical fatigue lifetime prediction model for aluminium–silicon–magnesium alloy | |
JP6601762B2 (ja) | 鋼の熱処理シミュレーション方法および鋼の熱処理シミュレーションプログラム | |
Lin et al. | New constitutive model for hot deformation behaviors of Ni-based superalloy considering the effects of initial δ phase | |
Xu et al. | Comparison of constitutive models for FCC metals over wide temperature and strain rate ranges with application to pure copper | |
Toros et al. | Modeling uniaxial, temperature and strain rate dependent behavior of Al–Mg alloys | |
Mohanty et al. | Prediction of fatigue crack growth and residual life using an exponential model: Part II (mode-I overload induced retardation) | |
Ou et al. | Strain compensation of the constitutive equation for high temperature flow stress of a Al-Cu-Li alloy | |
Gerstgrasser et al. | Analysis of two parameter identification methods for original and modified Johnson-Cook fracture strains, including numerical comparison and validation of a new blue-brittle dependent fracture model for free-cutting steel 50SiB8 | |
Moćko et al. | An influence of cyclic loading on the form of constitutive relationship for DP500 steel | |
Nourian-Avval et al. | A new model for fatigue life prediction under multiaxial loadings based on energy dissipation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WASEDA UNIVERSITY, JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YOSHIDA, MAKOTO;MOTOYAMA, YUICHI;OKANE, TOSHIMITSU;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20170530 TO 20170703;REEL/FRAME:043041/0540 Owner name: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:YOSHIDA, MAKOTO;MOTOYAMA, YUICHI;OKANE, TOSHIMITSU;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20170530 TO 20170703;REEL/FRAME:043041/0540 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WASEDA UNIVERSITY;NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;SIGNING DATES FROM 20170530 TO 20170605;REEL/FRAME:043061/0157 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |