US20150267218A1 - Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants - Google Patents

Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150267218A1
US20150267218A1 US14/423,793 US201314423793A US2015267218A1 US 20150267218 A1 US20150267218 A1 US 20150267218A1 US 201314423793 A US201314423793 A US 201314423793A US 2015267218 A1 US2015267218 A1 US 2015267218A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
plant
increased
yield
fiber
plants
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/423,793
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Inbal Nurith Dangoor
Hagai Karchi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Evogene Ltd
Original Assignee
Evogene Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Evogene Ltd filed Critical Evogene Ltd
Priority to US14/423,793 priority Critical patent/US20150267218A1/en
Assigned to EVOGENE LTD. reassignment EVOGENE LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KARCHI, HAGAI, DANGOOR, Inbal Nurith
Publication of US20150267218A1 publication Critical patent/US20150267218A1/en
Priority to US17/083,557 priority patent/US11485982B1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • C07K14/415—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from plants
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8242—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits
    • C12N15/8243—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits involving biosynthetic or metabolic pathways, i.e. metabolic engineering, e.g. nicotine, caffeine
    • C12N15/8247—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits involving biosynthetic or metabolic pathways, i.e. metabolic engineering, e.g. nicotine, caffeine involving modified lipid metabolism, e.g. seed oil composition
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8242—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits
    • C12N15/8243—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits involving biosynthetic or metabolic pathways, i.e. metabolic engineering, e.g. nicotine, caffeine
    • C12N15/8255—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits involving biosynthetic or metabolic pathways, i.e. metabolic engineering, e.g. nicotine, caffeine involving lignin biosynthesis
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C12N15/8273—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for drought, cold, salt resistance
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A40/00—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production
    • Y02A40/10—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production in agriculture
    • Y02A40/146—Genetically Modified [GMO] plants, e.g. transgenic plants

Definitions

  • the present invention in some embodiments thereof, relates to isolated polypeptides and polynucleotides, nucleic acid constructs comprising same, transgenic plants expressing same and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance (ABST), water use efficiency (WUE), yield (e.g., grain quantity and/or quality), fiber yield, fiber quality, biomass, oil content, growth rate, vigor, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and/or fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) of a plant.
  • ABSST abiotic stress tolerance
  • WUE water use efficiency
  • yield e.g., grain quantity and/or quality
  • fiber yield e.g., fiber quality, fiber quality, biomass, oil content, growth rate, vigor, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and/or fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) of a plant.
  • NUE nitrogen use efficiency
  • FUE fertilizer use efficiency
  • ABS Abiotic stress
  • environment stress such as salinity, drought, flood, suboptimal temperature and toxic chemical pollution
  • Most plants have evolved strategies to protect themselves against these conditions.
  • the severity and duration of the stress conditions are too great, the effects on plant development, growth and yield of most crop plants are profound.
  • most of the crop plants are highly susceptible to abiotic stress and thus necessitate optimal growth conditions for commercial crop yields.
  • Continuous exposure to stress causes major alterations in the plant metabolism which ultimately leads to cell death and consequently yield losses.
  • Drought is a gradual phenomenon, which involves periods of abnormally dry weather that persists long enough to produce serious hydrologic imbalances such as crop damage, water supply shortage and increased susceptibility to various diseases.
  • drought can last many years and results in devastating effects on agriculture and water supplies.
  • drought is associated with increase susceptibility to various diseases.
  • Salinity high salt levels, affects one in five hectares of irrigated land. None of the top five food crops, i.e., wheat, corn, rice, potatoes, and soybean, can tolerate excessive salt. Detrimental effects of salt on plants result from both water deficit, which leads to osmotic stress (similar to drought stress), and the effect of excess sodium ions on critical biochemical processes. As with freezing and drought, high salt causes water deficit; and the presence of high salt makes it difficult for plant roots to extract water from their environment. Soil salinity is thus one of the more important variables that determine whether a plant may thrive. In many parts of the world, sizable land areas are uncultivable due to naturally high soil salinity.
  • Salt and drought stress signal transduction consist of ionic and osmotic homeostasis signaling pathways.
  • the ionic aspect of salt stress is signaled via the SOS pathway where a calcium-responsive SOS3-SOS2 protein kinase complex controls the expression and activity of ion transporters such as SOS1.
  • the osmotic component of salt stress involves complex plant reactions that overlap with drought and/or cold stress responses.
  • Suboptimal temperatures affect plant growth and development through the whole plant life cycle. Thus, low temperatures reduce germination rate and high temperatures result in leaf necrosis.
  • Heat shock may arise in various organs, including leaves and particularly fruit, when transpiration is insufficient to overcome heat stress. Heat also damages cellular structures, including organelles and cytoskeleton, and impairs membrane function. Heat shock may produce a decrease in overall protein synthesis, accompanied by expression of heat shock proteins, e.g., chaperones, which are involved in refolding proteins denatured by heat.
  • Heat shock proteins e.g., chaperones
  • Excessive chilling conditions e.g., low, but above freezing, temperatures affect crops of tropical origins, such as soybean, rice, maize, and cotton.
  • Typical chilling damage includes wilting, necrosis, chlorosis or leakage of ions from cell membranes.
  • the underlying mechanisms of chilling sensitivity are not completely understood yet, but probably involve the level of membrane saturation and other physiological deficiencies.
  • Excessive light conditions which occur under clear atmospheric conditions subsequent to cold late summer/autumn nights, can lead to photoinhibition of photosynthesis (disruption of photosynthesis). In addition, chilling may lead to yield losses and lower product quality through the delayed ripening of maize.
  • Abscisic acid biosynthesis is regulated by osmotic stress at multiple steps. Both ABA-dependent and -independent osmotic stress signaling first modify constitutively expressed transcription factors, leading to the expression of early response transcriptional activators, which then activate downstream stress tolerance effector genes.
  • genes which increase tolerance to cold or salt stress can also improve drought stress protection, these include for example, the transcription factor AtCBF/DREB1, OsCDPK7 (Saijo et al. 2000, Plant J. 23: 319-327) or AVP1 (a vacuolar pyrophosphatase-proton pump, Gaxiola et al. 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 11444-11449).
  • Nutrient deficiencies cause adaptations of the root architecture, particularly notably for example is the root proliferation within nutrient rich patches to increase nutrient uptake. Nutrient deficiencies cause also the activation of plant metabolic pathways which maximize the absorption, assimilation and distribution processes such as by activating architectural changes. Engineering the expression of the triggered genes may cause the plant to exhibit the architectural changes and enhanced metabolism also under other conditions.
  • fertilizers are the fuel behind the “green revolution”, directly responsible for the exceptional increase in crop yields during the last 40 years, and are considered the number one overhead expense in agriculture.
  • inorganic nitrogenous fertilizers such as ammonium nitrate, potassium nitrate, or urea, typically accounts for 40% of the costs associated with crops such as corn and wheat.
  • main fertilizers Nitrogen (N), Phosphate (P) and Potassium (K)
  • nitrogen is often the rate-limiting element in plant growth and all field crops have a fundamental dependence on inorganic nitrogenous fertilizer.
  • Nitrogen is responsible for biosynthesis of amino and nucleic acids, prosthetic groups, plant hormones, plant chemical defenses, etc. and usually needs to be replenished every year, particularly for cereals, which comprise more than half of the cultivated areas worldwide.
  • nitrogen is translocated to the shoot, where it is stored in the leaves and stalk during the rapid step of plant development and up until flowering.
  • plants accumulate the bulk of their organic nitrogen during the period of grain germination, and until flowering. Once fertilization of the plant has occurred, grains begin to form and become the main sink of plant nitrogen. The stored nitrogen can be then redistributed from the leaves and stalk that served as storage compartments until grain formation.
  • NUE nitrogen use efficiency
  • fertilizers are major factors responsible for environmental problems such as eutrophication of groundwater, lakes, rivers and seas, nitrate pollution in drinking water which can cause methemoglobinemia, phosphate pollution, atmospheric pollution and the like.
  • the use of fertilizers is expected to increase in order to support food and fiber production for rapid population growth on limited land resources. For example, it has been estimated that by 2050, more than 150 million tons of nitrogenous fertilizer will be used worldwide annually.
  • FUE fertilizer use efficiency
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,084,153 to Good et al. discloses the use of a stress responsive promoter to control the expression of Alanine Amine Transferase (AlaAT) and transgenic canola plants with improved drought and nitrogen deficiency tolerance when compared to control plants.
  • AlAT Alanine Amine Transferase
  • Yield is affected by various factors, such as, the number and size of the plant organs, plant architecture (for example, the number of branches), grains set length, number of filled grains, vigor (e.g. seedling), growth rate, root development, utilization of water, nutrients (e.g., nitrogen) and fertilizers, and stress tolerance.
  • Crops such as, corn, rice, wheat, canola and soybean account for over half of total human caloric intake, whether through direct consumption of the seeds themselves or through consumption of meat products raised on processed seeds or forage. Seeds are also a source of sugars, proteins and oils and metabolites used in industrial processes.
  • Vegetable or seed oils are the major source of energy and nutrition in human and animal diet. They are also used for the production of industrial products, such as paints, inks and lubricants.
  • plant oils represent renewable sources of long-chain hydrocarbons which can be used as fuel. Since the currently used fossil fuels are finite resources and are gradually being depleted, fast growing biomass crops may be used as alternative fuels or for energy feedstocks and may reduce the dependence on fossil energy supplies.
  • the major bottleneck for increasing consumption of plant oils as bio-fuel is the oil price, which is still higher than fossil fuel.
  • the production rate of plant oil is limited by the availability of agricultural land and water. Thus, increasing plant oil yields from the same growing area can effectively overcome the shortage in production space and can decrease vegetable oil prices at the same time.
  • Genes known to be involved in increasing plant oil yields include those participating in fatty acid synthesis or sequestering such as desaturase [e.g., DELTA6, DELTA12 or acyl-ACP (Ssi2; Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR; Hypertext Transfer Protocol://World Wide Web (dot) arabidopsis (dot) org/), TAIR No. AT2G43710)], OleosinA (TAIR No. AT3G01570) or FAD3 (TAIR No.
  • desaturase e.g., DELTA6, DELTA12 or acyl-ACP (Ssi2; Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR; Hypertext Transfer Protocol://World Wide Web (dot) arabidopsis (dot) org/), TAIR No. AT2G43710)
  • OleosinA TAIR No. AT3G01570
  • FAD3 TAIR No.
  • AT2G29980 various transcription factors and activators such as Led 1 [TAIR No. AT1G21970, Lotan et al. 1998. Cell. 26;93(7):1195-205], Lec2 [TAIR No. AT1G28300, Santos Mendoza et al. 2005, FEBS Lett. 579(21):4666-70], Fus3 (TAIR No. AT3G26790), ABI3 [TAIR No. AT3G24650, Lara et al. 2003. J Biol Chem. 278(23): 21003-11] and Wri1 [TAIR No. AT3G54320, Cernac and Benning, 2004. Plant J. 40(4): 575-85].
  • Led 1 TAIR No. AT1G21970, Lotan et al. 1998. Cell. 26;93(7):1195-205
  • Lec2 TAIR No. AT1G28300, Santos Mendoza et al. 2005, FEBS Lett. 579
  • 20070169219, 20070006345, 20070006346 and 20060195943 disclose transgenic plants with improved nitrogen use efficiency which can be used for the conversion into fuel or chemical feedstocks
  • WO2008/122980 polynucleotides for increasing oil content, growth rate, biomass, yield and/or vigor of a plant.
  • Cotton and cotton by-products provide raw materials that are used to produce a wealth of consumer-based products in addition to textiles including cotton foodstuffs, livestock feed, fertilizer and paper.
  • the production, marketing, consumption and trade of cotton-based products generate an excess of $100 billion annually in the U.S. alone, making cotton the number one value-added crop.
  • Cotton fibers may be characterized according to a variety of properties, some of which are considered highly desirable within the textile industry for the production of increasingly high quality products and optimal exploitation of modem spinning technologies. Commercially desirable properties include length, length uniformity, fineness, maturity ratio, decreased fuzz fiber production, micronaire, bundle strength, and single fiber strength. Much effort has been put into the improvement of the characteristics of cotton fibers mainly focusing on fiber length and fiber fineness. In particular, there is a great demand for cotton fibers of specific lengths.
  • a cotton fiber is composed of a single cell that has differentiated from an epidermal cell of the seed coat, developing through four stages, i.e., initiation, elongation, secondary cell wall thickening and maturation stages. More specifically, the elongation of a cotton fiber commences in the epidermal cell of the ovule immediately following flowering, after which the cotton fiber rapidly elongates for approximately 21 days. Fiber elongation is then terminated, and a secondary cell wall is formed and grown through maturation to become a mature cotton fiber.
  • WO publication No. 2004/104162 discloses methods of increasing abiotic stress tolerance and/or biomass in plants and plants generated thereby.
  • WO publication No. 2004/111183 discloses nucleotide sequences for regulating gene expression in plant trichomes and constructs and methods utilizing same.
  • WO publication No. 2004/081173 discloses novel plant derived regulatory sequences and constructs and methods of using such sequences for directing expression of exogenous polynucleotide sequences in plants.
  • WO publication No. 2005/121364 discloses polynucleotides and polypeptides involved in plant fiber development and methods of using same for improving fiber quality, yield and/or biomass of a fiber producing plant.
  • WO publication No. 2007/049275 discloses isolated polypeptides, polynucleotides encoding same, transgenic plants expressing same and methods of using same for increasing fertilizer use efficiency, plant abiotic stress tolerance and biomass.
  • WO publication No. 2007/020638 discloses methods of increasing abiotic stress tolerance and/or biomass in plants and plants generated thereby.
  • WO publication No. 2008/122980 discloses genes constructs and methods for increasing oil content, growth rate and biomass of plants.
  • WO publication No. 2008/075364 discloses polynucleotides involved in plant fiber development and methods of using same.
  • WO publication No. 2009/083958 discloses methods of increasing water use efficiency, fertilizer use efficiency, biotic/abiotic stress tolerance, yield and biomass in plant and plants generated thereby.
  • WO publication No. 2009/141824 discloses isolated polynucleotides and methods using same for increasing plant utility.
  • WO publication No. 2009/013750 discloses genes, constructs and methods of increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and/or yield in plants generated thereby.
  • WO publication No. 2010/020941 discloses methods of increasing nitrogen use efficiency, abiotic stress tolerance, yield and biomass in plants and plants generated thereby.
  • WO publication No. 2010/076756 discloses isolated polynucleotides for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, yield, biomass, growth rate, vigor, oil content, fiber yield, fiber quality, and/or nitrogen use efficiency of a plant.
  • WO2010/100595 publication discloses isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics.
  • WO publication No. 2010/049897 discloses isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing plant yield, biomass, growth rate, vigor, oil content, abiotic stress tolerance of plants and nitrogen use efficiency.
  • WO2010/143138 publication discloses isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing nitrogen use efficiency, fertilizer use efficiency, yield, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, abiotic stress tolerance and/or water use efficiency
  • WO publication No. 2011/080674 discloses isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing plant yield, biomass, growth rate, vigor, oil content, abiotic stress tolerance of plants and nitrogen use efficiency.
  • WO2011/015985 publication discloses polynucleotides and polypeptides for increasing desirable plant qualities.
  • WO2011/135527 publication discloses isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics.
  • WO2012/028993 publication discloses isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing nitrogen use efficiency, yield, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, and/or abiotic stress tolerance.
  • WO2012/085862 publication discloses isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for improving plant properties.
  • WO2012/150598 publication discloses isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing plant yield, biomass, growth rate, vigor, oil content, abiotic stress tolerance of plants and nitrogen use efficiency.
  • WO2013/027223 publication discloses isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics.
  • WO2013/080203 publication discloses isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing nitrogen use efficiency, yield, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, and/or abiotic stress tolerance.
  • WO2013/098819 publication discloses isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing yield of plants.
  • a method of increasing yield, growth rate, biomass, vigor, oil content, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance of a plant comprising expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO: 475-770, 6179-9796, 9798-10420 or 10421, thereby increasing the yield, growth rate, biomass, vigor, oil content, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance of the plant.
  • a method of increasing yield, growth rate, biomass, vigor, oil content, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance of a plant comprising expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770 and 6179-10421, thereby increasing the yield, growth rate, biomass, vigor, oil content, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance of the plant.
  • a method of producing a crop comprising growing a crop plant transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide at least 80% homologous to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770, 6179-9796, and 9798-10421, wherein the crop plant is derived from plants selected for increased yield, increased growth rate, increased biomass, increased vigor, increased oil content, increased seed yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, increased photosynthetic capacity, increased nitrogen use efficiency, and/or increased abiotic stress tolerance as compared to a wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions, and the crop plant having the increased yield, increased growth rate, increased biomass, increased vigor, increased oil content, increased seed yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, increased photosynthetic capacity, increased nitrogen use efficiency, and/or increased abiotic stress tolerance
  • a method of increasing yield, growth rate, biomass, vigor, oil content, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance of a plant comprising expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO: 1-474, 771-6177 or 6178, thereby increasing the yield, growth rate, biomass, vigor, oil content, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance of the plant.
  • a method of increasing yield, growth rate, biomass, vigor, oil content, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance of a plant comprising expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide comprising the nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-474 and 771-6178, thereby increasing the yield, growth rate, biomass, vigor, oil content, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance of the plant.
  • a method of producing a crop comprising growing a crop plant transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide which comprises a nucleic acid sequence which is at least 80% identical to the nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-474 and 771-6178, wherein the crop plant is derived from plants selected for increased yield, increased growth rate, increased biomass, increased vigor, increased oil content, increased seed yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, increased photosynthetic capacity, increased nitrogen use efficiency, and/or increased abiotic stress tolerance as compared to a wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions, and the crop plant having the increased yield, increased growth rate, increased biomass, increased vigor, increased oil content, increased seed yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, increased photosynthetic capacity, increased nitrogen use efficiency, and/or increased abiotic stress tolerance, thereby producing the crop.
  • an isolated polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide which comprises an amino acid sequence at least 80% homologous to the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:475-770, 6179-9796, 9798-10420 or 10421, wherein said amino acid sequence is capable of increasing yield, growth rate, biomass, vigor, oil content, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance of a plant.
  • an isolated polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide which comprises the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770 and 6179-10421.
  • an isolated polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NOs: 1-474 and 771-6178, wherein said nucleic acid sequence is capable of increasing yield, growth rate, biomass, vigor, oil content, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance of a plant.
  • an isolated polynucleotide comprising the nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1-474 and 771-6178.
  • nucleic acid construct comprising the isolated polynucleotide of some embodiments of the invention, and a promoter for directing transcription of said nucleic acid sequence in a host cell.
  • an isolated polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence at least 80% homologous to SEQ ID NO: 475-770, 6179-9796, 9798-10420 or 10421, wherein said amino acid sequence is capable of increasing yield, growth rate, biomass, vigor, oil content, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance of a plant.
  • an isolated polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 475-770 and 6179-10421.
  • a plant cell exogenously expressing the polynucleotide of some embodiments of the invention, or the nucleic acid construct of some embodiments of the invention.
  • a plant cell exogenously expressing the polypeptide of some embodiments of the invention.
  • the nucleic acid sequence encodes an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 475-770 and 6179-10421.
  • the nucleic acid sequence is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1-474 and 771-6178.
  • the polynucleotide consists of the nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1-474 and 771-6178.
  • the nucleic acid sequence encodes the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 475-770 and 6179-10421.
  • the plant cell forms part of a plant.
  • the method further comprising growing the plant expressing said exogenous polynucleotide under the abiotic stress.
  • the abiotic stress is selected from the group consisting of salinity, drought, osmotic stress, water deprivation, flood, low temperature, high temperature, heavy metal toxicity, anaerobiosis, nutrient deficiency, nitrogen deficiency, nutrient excess, atmospheric pollution and UV irradiation.
  • the yield comprises seed yield or oil yield.
  • transgenic plant comprising the nucleic acid construct of some embodiments of the invention or the plant cell of some embodiments of the invention.
  • the method further comprising growing the plant expressing said exogenous polynucleotide under nitrogen-limiting conditions.
  • the promoter is heterologous to said isolated polynucleotide and/or to said host cell.
  • a method of growing a crop comprising seeding seeds and/or planting plantlets of a plant transformed with the isolated polynucleotide of some embodiments of the invention, or with the nucleic acid construct of some embodiments of the invention, wherein the plant is derived from plants selected for at least one trait selected from the group consisting of: increased nitrogen use efficiency, increased photosynthetic capacity, increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased biomass, increased growth rate, increased vigor, increased yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, and increased oil content as compared to a non-transformed plant, thereby growing the crop.
  • the non-transformed plant is a wild type plant of identical genetic background.
  • the non-transformed plant is a wild type plant of the same species.
  • the non-transformed plant is grown under identical growth conditions.
  • a method of producing a crop comprising growing a crop of a plant transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide at least 80% homologous to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770, 6179-9796, 9798-10420 or 10421, wherein the crop plant is derived from plants selected for increased yield, increased growth rate, increased biomass, increased vigor, increased oil content, increased seed yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, increased photosynthetic capacity, increased nitrogen use efficiency, and/or increased abiotic stress tolerance as compared to a wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions, and the crop plant having the increased yield, increased growth rate, increased biomass, increased vigor, increased oil content, increased seed yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, increased photosynthetic capacity, increased nitrogen use efficiency, and/or increased abiotic stress tolerance, thereby producing
  • a method of producing a crop comprising growing a crop of a plant transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide encoding the polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770 and 6179-10421, wherein the crop plant is derived from plants selected for increased yield, increased growth rate, increased biomass, increased vigor, increased oil content, increased seed yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, increased photosynthetic capacity, increased nitrogen use efficiency, and/or increased abiotic stress tolerance as compared to a wild type plant of the same species which is grown under the same growth conditions, and the crop plant having the increased yield, increased growth rate, increased biomass, increased vigor, increased oil content, increased seed yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, increased photosynthetic capacity, increased nitrogen use efficiency, and/or increased abiotic stress tolerance, thereby producing the crop.
  • a method of growing a crop comprising seeding seeds and/or planting plantlets of a plant transformed with the isolated polynucleotide of some embodiments of the invention, or the nucleic acid construct of some embodiments of the invention, wherein the plant is derived from plants selected for at least one trait selected from the group consisting of: increased nitrogen use efficiency, increased photosynthetic capacity, increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased biomass, increased growth rate, increased vigor, increased yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, and increased oil content as compared to a non-transformed plant, thereby growing the crop.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of the modified pGI binary plasmid containing the new At6669 promoter (SEQ ID NO: 10446) and the GUSintron (pQYN 6669) used for expressing the isolated polynucleotide sequences of the invention.
  • RB T-DNA right border
  • LB T-DNA left border
  • MCS Multiple cloning site
  • RE any restriction enzyme
  • NOS pro nopaline synthase promoter
  • NPT-II neomycin phosphotransferase gene
  • NOS ter nopaline synthase terminator
  • Poly-A signal polyadenylation signal
  • GUSintron the GUS reporter gene (coding sequence and intron).
  • the isolated polynucleotide sequences of the invention were cloned into the vector while replacing the GUSintron reporter gene.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of the modified pGI binary plasmid containing the new At6669 promoter (SEQ ID NO: 10446) (pQFN or pQFNc) used for expressing the isolated polynucleotide sequences of the invention.
  • RB T-DNA right border
  • LB T-DNA left border
  • MCS Multiple cloning site
  • RE any restriction enzyme
  • NOS pro nopaline synthase promoter (SEQ ID NO:10457)
  • NPT-II neomycin phosphotransferase gene
  • NOS ter nopaline synthase terminator
  • Poly-A signal polyadenylation signal
  • FIGS. 3A-F are images depicting visualization of root development of transgenic plants exogenously expressing the polynucleotide of some embodiments of the invention when grown in transparent agar plates under normal ( FIGS. 3A-B ), osmotic stress (15% PEG; FIGS. 3C-D ) or nitrogen-limiting ( FIGS. 3E-F ) conditions.
  • the different transgenes were grown in transparent agar plates for 17 days (7 days nursery and 10 days after transplanting). The plates were photographed every 3-4 days starting at day 1 after transplanting.
  • FIG. 3 A An image of a photograph of plants taken following 10 after transplanting days on agar plates when grown under normal (standard) conditions.
  • FIG. 3 B An image of root analysis of the plants shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 3A in which the lengths of the roots measured are represented by arrows.
  • FIG. 3 C An image of a photograph of plants taken following 10 days after transplanting on agar plates, grown under high osmotic (PEG 15%) conditions.
  • FIG. 3 D An image of root analysis of the plants shown in FIG. 3C in which the lengths of the roots measured are represented by arrows.
  • FIG. 3 E An image of a photograph of plants taken following 10 days after transplanting on agar plates, grown under low nitrogen conditions.
  • FIG. 3 F An image of root analysis of the plants shown in FIG. 3E in which the lengths of the roots measured are represented by arrows.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of the modified pGI binary plasmid containing the Root Promoter (pQNa RP) used for expressing the isolated polynucleotide sequences of the invention.
  • RB T-DNA right border
  • LB T-DNA left border
  • NOS pro nopaline synthase promoter
  • NPT-II neomycin phosphotransferase gene
  • NOS ter nopaline synthase terminator
  • Poly-A signal polyadenylation signal
  • the isolated polynucleotide sequences according to some embodiments of the invention were cloned into the MCS (Multiple cloning site) of the vector.
  • MCS Multiple cloning site
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of the pQYN plasmid.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of the pQFN plasmid.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of the pQFYN plasmid.
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of the modified pGI binary plasmid (pQXNc) used for expressing the isolated polynucleotide sequences of some embodiments of the invention.
  • RB T-DNA right border
  • LB T-DNA left border
  • NOS pro nopaline synthase promoter
  • NPT-II neomycin phosphotransferase gene
  • NOS ter nopaline synthase terminator
  • RE any restriction enzyme
  • Poly-A signal polyadenylation signal
  • 35S the 35S promoter (pQFNC; SEQ ID NO: 10442).
  • the isolated polynucleotide sequences of some embodiments of the invention were cloned into the MCS (Multiple cloning site) of the vector.
  • the present invention in some embodiments thereof, relates to isolated polypeptides and polynucleotides, nucleic acid constructs comprising the isolated polypeptides, transgenic plants expressing same and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance (ABST), water use efficiency (WUE), yield (e.g., grain quantity and/or quality), fiber yield, fiber quality, biomass, oil content, growth rate, photosynthetic capacity, vigor, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and/or fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) of a plant.
  • ABSST abiotic stress tolerance
  • WUE water use efficiency
  • yield e.g., grain quantity and/or quality
  • fiber yield e.g., fiber yield, fiber quality, biomass, oil content, growth rate, photosynthetic capacity, vigor
  • NUE nitrogen use efficiency
  • FUE fertilizer use efficiency
  • the present inventors have identified novel polypeptides and polynucleotides which can be used to generate nucleic acid constructs and transgenic plants and to increase abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, yield (e.g., seed yield), growth rate, photosynthetic capacity, vigor, biomass, oil content, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or fertilizer use efficiency of a plant.
  • yield e.g., seed yield
  • growth rate e.g., photosynthetic capacity
  • vigor vigor
  • biomass oil content
  • fiber yield fiber quality
  • fiber length fiber length
  • nitrogen use efficiency e.g., nitrogen use efficiency, and/or fertilizer use efficiency of a plant.
  • bioinformatics tools to identify polynucleotides and polypeptides which enhance abiotic stress tolerance, yield (e.g., seed yield, oil yield, oil content), photosynthetic capacity, growth rate, biomass, vigor, fiber quality and yield and/or fertilizer (e.g., nitrogen) use efficiency of a plant.
  • homologous polypeptides and polynucleotides having the same function were also identified (SEQ ID NOs: 6179-10421 for polypeptides, and SEQ ID NOs: 771-6178 for polynucleotides; Table 152, Example 19 in the Examples section which follows).
  • Transgenic plants over-expressing the identified polynucleotides and polypeptides were generated (Examples 20-22 in the Examples section which follows) and were found to exhibit increased tolerance to abiotic stress conditions (e.g., drought stress, salinity stress, osmotic stress), increased yield (e.g., seed yield, weight of 1000 seeds, harvest index), increased biomass (e.g., fresh and dry weight, rosette area), increased vigor and growth rate (e.g., relative growth rate), increased photosynthetic capacity (e.g., leaf area, leaves number), drought avoidance (e.g., early flowering and inflorescence emergence), and increased nitrogen use efficiency (Tables 154-181, Examples 23-25 in the Examples section which follows) as compared to control plants grown under the same growth conditions.
  • abiotic stress conditions e.g., drought stress, salinity stress, osmotic stress
  • increased yield e.g., seed yield, weight of 1000 seeds, harvest index
  • biomass e.g., fresh
  • abiotic stress tolerance e.g., water use efficiency, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, yield, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, and/or fertilizer use efficiency (e.g., nitrogen use efficiency) of a plant
  • fertilizer use efficiency e.g., nitrogen use efficiency
  • a plant comprising expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or more say 100% homologous to the amino acid sequence
  • plant yield refers to the amount (e.g., as determined by weight or size) or quantity (numbers) of tissues or organs produced per plant or per growing season. Hence increased yield could affect the economic benefit one can obtain from the plant in a certain growing area and/or growing time.
  • a plant yield can be affected by various parameters including, but not limited to, plant biomass; plant vigor; growth rate; seed yield; seed or grain quantity; seed or grain quality; oil yield; content of oil, starch and/or protein in harvested organs (e.g., seeds or vegetative parts of the plant); number of flowers (florets) per panicle (expressed as a ratio of number of filled seeds over number of primary panicles); harvest index; number of plants grown per area; number and size of harvested organs per plant and per area; number of plants per growing area (density); number of harvested organs in field; total leaf area; carbon assimilation and carbon partitioning (the distribution/allocation of carbon within the plant); resistance to shade; number of harvestable organs (e.g. seeds), seeds per pod, weight per seed; and modified architecture [such as increase stalk diameter, thickness or improvement of physical properties (e.g. elasticity)].
  • seed yield refers to the number or weight of the seeds per plant, seeds per pod, or per growing area or to the weight of a single seed, or to the oil extracted per seed.
  • seed yield can be affected by seed dimensions (e.g., length, width, perimeter, area and/or volume), number of (filled) seeds and seed filling rate and by seed oil content.
  • increase seed yield per plant could affect the economic benefit one can obtain from the plant in a certain growing area and/or growing time; and increase seed yield per growing area could be achieved by increasing seed yield per plant, and/or by increasing number of plants grown on the same given area.
  • seed also referred to as “grain” or “kernel” as used herein refers to a small embryonic plant enclosed in a covering called the seed coat (usually with some stored food), the product of the ripened ovule of gymnosperm and angiosperm plants which occurs after fertilization and some growth within the mother plant.
  • oil content refers to the amount of lipids in a given plant organ, either the seeds (seed oil content) or the vegetative portion of the plant (vegetative oil content) and is typically expressed as percentage of dry weight (10% humidity of seeds) or wet weight (for vegetative portion).
  • oil content is affected by intrinsic oil production of a tissue (e.g., seed, vegetative portion), as well as the mass or size of the oil-producing tissue per plant or per growth period.
  • increase in oil content of the plant can be achieved by increasing the size/mass of a plant's tissue(s) which comprise oil per growth period.
  • increased oil content of a plant can be achieved by increasing the yield, growth rate, biomass and vigor of the plant.
  • plant biomass refers to the amount (e.g., measured in grams of air-dry tissue) of a tissue produced from the plant in a growing season, which could also determine or affect the plant yield or the yield per growing area.
  • An increase in plant biomass can be in the whole plant or in parts thereof such as aboveground (harvestable) parts, vegetative biomass, roots and seeds.
  • growth rate refers to the increase in plant organ/tissue size per time (can be measured in cm 2 per day or cm/day).
  • photosynthetic capacity refers to a measure of the maximum rate at which leaves are able to fix carbon during photosynthesis. It is typically measured as the amount of carbon dioxide that is fixed per square meter per second, for example as ⁇ mol m ⁇ 2 sec ⁇ 1 . Plants are able to increase their photosynthetic capacity by several modes of action, such as by increasing the total leaves area (e.g., by increase of leaves area, increase in the number of leaves, and increase in plant's vigor, e.g., the ability of the plant to grow new leaves along time in course) as well as by increasing the ability of the plant to efficiently execute carbon fixation in the leaves. Hence, the increase in total leaves area can be used as a reliable measurement parameter for photosynthetic capacity increment.
  • plant vigor refers to the amount (measured by weight) of tissue produced by the plant in a given time. Hence increased vigor could determine or affect the plant yield or the yield per growing time or growing area. In addition, early vigor (seed and/or seedling) results in improved field stand.
  • a plant yield can be determined under stress (e.g., abiotic stress, nitrogen-limiting conditions) and/or non-stress (normal) conditions.
  • stress e.g., abiotic stress, nitrogen-limiting conditions
  • non-stress normal
  • non-stress conditions refers to the growth conditions (e.g., water, temperature, light-dark cycles, humidity, salt concentration, fertilizer concentration in soil, nutrient supply such as nitrogen, phosphorous and/or potassium), that do not significantly go beyond the everyday climatic and other abiotic conditions that plants may encounter, and which allow optimal growth, metabolism, reproduction and/or viability of a plant at any stage in its life cycle (e.g., in a crop plant from seed to a mature plant and back to seed again).
  • Persons skilled in the art are aware of normal soil conditions and climatic conditions for a given plant in a given geographic location. It should be noted that while the non-stress conditions may include some mild variations from the optimal conditions (which vary from one type/species of a plant to another), such variations do not cause the plant to cease growing without the capacity to resume growth.
  • abiotic stress refers to any adverse effect on metabolism, growth, reproduction and/or viability of a plant. Accordingly, abiotic stress can be induced by suboptimal environmental growth conditions such as, for example, salinity, osmotic stress, water deprivation, drought, flooding, freezing, low or high temperature, heavy metal toxicity, anaerobiosis, nutrient deficiency (e.g., nitrogen deficiency or limited nitrogen), atmospheric pollution or UV irradiation.
  • suboptimal environmental growth conditions such as, for example, salinity, osmotic stress, water deprivation, drought, flooding, freezing, low or high temperature, heavy metal toxicity, anaerobiosis, nutrient deficiency (e.g., nitrogen deficiency or limited nitrogen), atmospheric pollution or UV irradiation.
  • abiotic stress tolerance refers to the ability of a plant to endure an abiotic stress without suffering a substantial alteration in metabolism, growth, productivity and/or viability.
  • Plants are subject to a range of environmental challenges. Several of these, including salt stress, general osmotic stress, drought stress and freezing stress, have the ability to impact whole plant and cellular water availability. Not surprisingly, then, plant responses to this collection of stresses are related. Zhu (2002) Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 53: 247-273 et al. note that “most studies on water stress signaling have focused on salt stress primarily because plant responses to salt and drought are closely related and the mechanisms overlap”. Many examples of similar responses and pathways to this set of stresses have been documented. For example, the CBF transcription factors have been shown to condition resistance to salt, freezing and drought (Kasuga et al. (1999) Nature Biotech. 17: 287-291).
  • the Arabidopsis rd29B gene is induced in response to both salt and dehydration stress, a process that is mediated largely through an ABA signal transduction process (Uno et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11632-11637), resulting in altered activity of transcription factors that bind to an upstream element within the rd29B promoter.
  • McCDPK1 calcium-dependent protein kinase
  • the stress-induced kinase was also shown to phosphorylate a transcription factor, presumably altering its activity, although transcript levels of the target transcription factor are not altered in response to salt or drought stress.
  • Saijo et al. demonstrated that a rice salt/drought-induced calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (OsCDPK7) conferred increased salt and drought tolerance to rice when overexpressed (Saijo et al. (2000) Plant J. 23: 319-327).
  • Exposure to dehydration invokes similar survival strategies in plants as does freezing stress (see, for example, Yelenosky (1989) Plant Physiol 89: 444-451) and drought stress induces freezing tolerance (see, for example, Siminovitch et al. (1982) Plant Physiol 69: 250-255; and Guy et al. (1992) Planta 188: 265-270).
  • strategies that allow plants to survive in low water conditions may include, for example, reduced surface area, or surface oil or wax production.
  • increased solute content of the plant prevents evaporation and water loss due to heat, drought, salinity, osmoticum, and the like therefore providing a better plant tolerance to the above stresses.
  • water use efficiency refers to the level of organic matter produced per unit of water consumed by the plant, i.e., the dry weight of a plant in relation to the plant's water use, e.g., the biomass produced per unit transpiration.
  • fertilizer use efficiency refers to the metabolic process(es) which lead to an increase in the plant's yield, biomass, vigor, and growth rate per fertilizer unit applied.
  • the metabolic process can be the uptake, spread, absorbent, accumulation, relocation (within the plant) and use of one or more of the minerals and organic moieties absorbed by the plant, such as nitrogen, phosphates and/or potassium.
  • fertilizer-limiting conditions refers to growth conditions which include a level (e.g., concentration) of a fertilizer applied which is below the level needed for normal plant metabolism, growth, reproduction and/or viability.
  • NUE nitrogen use efficiency
  • nitrogen-limiting conditions refers to growth conditions which include a level (e.g., concentration) of nitrogen (e.g., ammonium or nitrate) applied which is below the level needed for normal plant metabolism, growth, reproduction and/or viability.
  • a level e.g., concentration
  • nitrogen e.g., ammonium or nitrate
  • Improved plant NUE and FUE is translated in the field into either harvesting similar quantities of yield, while implementing less fertilizers, or increased yields gained by implementing the same levels of fertilizers.
  • improved NUE or FUE has a direct effect on plant yield in the field.
  • the polynucleotides and polypeptides of some embodiments of the invention positively affect plant yield, seed yield, and plant biomass.
  • the benefit of improved plant NUE will certainly improve crop quality and biochemical constituents of the seed such as protein yield and oil yield.
  • improved AB ST will confer plants with improved vigor also under non-stress conditions, resulting in crops having improved biomass and/or yield e.g., elongated fibers for the cotton industry, higher oil content.
  • fiber is usually inclusive of thick-walled conducting cells such as vessels and tracheids and to fibrillar aggregates of many individual fiber cells.
  • the term “fiber” refers to (a) thick-walled conducting and non-conducting cells of the xylem; (b) fibers of extraxylary origin, including those from phloem, bark, ground tissue, and epidermis; and (c) fibers from stems, leaves, roots, seeds, and flowers or inflorescences (such as those of Sorghum vulgare used in the manufacture of brushes and brooms).
  • Example of fiber producing plants include, but are not limited to, agricultural crops such as cotton, silk cotton tree (Kapok, Ceiba pentandra ), desert willow, creosote bush, winterfat, balsa, kenaf, roselle, jute, sisal abaca, flax, corn, sugar cane, hemp, ramie, kapok, coir, bamboo, Spanish moss and Agave spp. (e.g. sisal).
  • agricultural crops such as cotton, silk cotton tree (Kapok, Ceiba pentandra ), desert willow, creosote bush, winterfat, balsa, kenaf, roselle, jute, sisal abaca, flax, corn, sugar cane, hemp, ramie, kapok, coir, bamboo, Spanish moss and Agave spp. (e.g. sisal).
  • fiber quality refers to at least one fiber parameter which is agriculturally desired, or required in the fiber industry (further described hereinbelow).
  • fiber parameters include but are not limited to, fiber length, fiber strength, fiber fitness, fiber weight per unit length, maturity ratio and uniformity (further described hereinbelow).
  • Cotton fiber (lint) quality is typically measured according to fiber length, strength and fineness. Accordingly, the lint quality is considered higher when the fiber is longer, stronger and finer.
  • fiber yield refers to the amount or quantity of fibers produced from the fiber producing plant.
  • the term “increasing” refers to at least about 2%, at least about 3%, at least about 4%, at least about 5%, at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, increase in abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, yield (e.g., seed yield), growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, nitrogen use efficiency, and/or fertilizer use efficiency of a plant as compared to a native plant or a wild type plant [i.e., a plant not modified with the biomolecules (polynucleotide or polypeptides) of the invention, e.g., a non-transformed plant of the same species which is grown under the same (e.g., identical) growth conditions].
  • yield e.g., seed yield
  • growth rate vigor
  • biomass oil content
  • phrases “expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide” as used herein refers to upregulating the expression level of an exogenous polynucleotide within the plant by introducing the exogenous polynucleotide into a plant cell or plant and expressing by recombinant means, as further described herein below.
  • expressing refers to expression at the mRNA and optionally polypeptide level.
  • exogenous polynucleotide refers to a heterologous nucleic acid sequence which may not be naturally expressed within the plant (e.g., a nucleic acid sequence from a different species) or which overexpression in the plant is desired.
  • the exogenous polynucleotide may be introduced into the plant in a stable or transient manner, so as to produce a ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecule and/or a polypeptide molecule.
  • RNA ribonucleic acid
  • the exogenous polynucleotide may comprise a nucleic acid sequence which is identical or partially homologous to an endogenous nucleic acid sequence of the plant.
  • endogenous refers to any polynucleotide or polypeptide which is present and/or naturally expressed within a plant or a cell thereof.
  • the exogenous polynucleotide of the invention comprises a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or more say 100% homologous to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:475-770 and 6179-10421.
  • Homologous sequences include both orthologous and paralogous sequences.
  • paralogous relates to gene-duplications within the genome of a species leading to paralogous genes.
  • orthologous relates to homologous genes in different organisms due to ancestral relationship.
  • orthologs are evolutionary counterparts derived from a single ancestral gene in the last common ancestor of given two species (Koonin E V and Galperin M Y (Sequence—Evolution—Function: Computational Approaches in Comparative Genomics. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 2003. Chapter 2, Evolutionary Concept in Genetics and Genomics. Available from: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20255) and therefore have great likelihood of having the same function.
  • One option to identify orthologues in monocot plant species is by performing a reciprocal blast search. This may be done by a first blast involving blasting the sequence-of-interest against any sequence database, such as the publicly available NCBI database which may be found at: ncbi (dot) nlm (dot) nih (dot) gov. If orthologues in rice were sought, the sequence-of-interest would be blasted against, for example, the 28,469 full-length cDNA clones from Oryza sativa Nipponbare available at NCBI. The blast results may be filtered.
  • the ClustalW program may be used [Hypertext Transfer Protocol://World Wide Web (dot) ebi (dot) ac (dot) uk/Tools/clustalw2/index (dot) html], followed by a neighbor joining tree (Hypertext Transfer Protocol://en (dot) wikipedia (dot) org/wiki/Neighbor-joining) which helps visualizing the clustering.
  • Homology e.g., percent homology, identity+similarity
  • homology comparison software computing a pairwise sequence alignment
  • Identity e.g., percent homology
  • NCBI National Center of Biotechnology Information
  • the identity is a global identity, i.e., an identity over the entire amino acid or nucleic acid sequences of the invention and not over portions thereof.
  • the term “homology” or “homologous” refers to identity of two or more nucleic acid sequences; or identity of two or more amino acid sequences; or the identity of an amino acid sequence to one or more nucleic acid sequence.
  • the homology is a global homology, i.e., an homology over the entire amino acid or nucleic acid sequences of the invention and not over portions thereof.
  • the degree of homology or identity between two or more sequences can be determined using various known sequence comparison tools. Following is a non-limiting description of such tools which can be used along with some embodiments of the invention.
  • Pairwise global alignment was defined by S. B. Needleman and C. D. Wunsch, “A general method applicable to the search of similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins” Journal of Molecular Biology, 1970, pages 443-53, volume 48).
  • the EMBOSS-6.0.1 Needleman-Wunsch algorithm (available from emboss(dot)sourceforge(dot)net/apps/cvs/emboss/apps/needle(dot)html) can be used to find the optimum alignment (including gaps) of two sequences along their entire length—a “Global alignment”.
  • the threshold used to determine homology using the EMBOSS-6.0.1 Needleman-Wunsch algorithm is 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100%.
  • the threshold used to determine homology using the OneModel FramePlus algorithm is 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100%.
  • the threshold used to determine homology using the EMBOSS-6.0.1 Needleman-Wunsch algorithm for comparison of polynucleotides with polynucleotides is 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100%.
  • determination of the degree of homology further requires employing the Smith-Waterman algorithm (for protein-protein comparison or nucleotide-nucleotide comparison).
  • the threshold used to determine homology using the Smith-Waterman algorithm is 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100%.
  • the global homology is performed on sequences which are pre-selected by local homology to the polypeptide or polynucleotide of interest (e.g., 60% identity over 60% of the sequence length), prior to performing the global homology to the polypeptide or polynucleotide of interest (e.g., 80% global homology on the entire sequence).
  • homologous sequences are selected using the BLAST software with the Blastp and tBlastn algorithms as filters for the first stage, and the needle (EMBOSS package) or Frame+ algorithm alignment for the second stage.
  • Blast alignments is defined with a very permissive cutoff—60% Identity on a span of 60% of the sequences lengths because it is used only as a filter for the global alignment stage. In this specific embodiment (when the local identity is used), the default filtering of the Blast package is not utilized (by setting the parameter “-F F”).
  • homologs are defined based on a global identity of at least 80% to the core gene polypeptide sequence.
  • the gap open penalty is the score taken away when a gap is created. The best value depends on the choice of comparison matrix. The default value assumes you are using the EBLOSUM62 matrix for protein sequences, and the EDNAFULL matrix for nucleotide sequences. (Floating point number from 1.0 to 100.0) -gapextend float [0.5 for any sequence].
  • the gap extension, penalty is added to the standard gap penalty for each base or residue in the gap. This is how long gaps are penalized.
  • the gap extension penalty should be lower than the gap penalty.
  • An exception is where one or both sequences are single reads with possible sequencing errors in which case you would expect many single base gaps. You can get this result by setting the gap open penalty to zero (or very low) and using the gap extension penalty to control gap scoring. (Floating point number from 0.0 to 10.0)
  • “-asequence” associated qualifiers -sbegin1 integer Start of the sequence to be used -send1 integer End of the sequence to be used -sreverse1 boolean Reverse (if DNA) -sask1 boolean Ask for begin/end/reverse -snucleotide1 boolean Sequence is nucleotide -sprotein1 boolean Sequence is protein -slower1 boolean Make lower case -supper1 boolean Make upper case -sformat1 string Input sequence format -sdbname1 string Database name -sid1 string Entryname -ufo1 string UFO features -fformat1 string Features format -fopenfile1 string Features file name “-bsequence” associated qualifiers -sbegin2 integer Start of each sequence to be used -send2 integer End of each sequence to be used -sreverse2 boolean Reverse (if DNA) -sask2
  • -dtrans Performs a translated search, relevant for a protein query against a DNA database. Each database entry is translated to six reading frames and a result is given for each frame.
  • -trans ⁇ transtab_name> Translation table. The default location for the table is $ CGNROOT/tables/trans. -onestrand Restricts the search to just the top strand of the query/database nucleic sequence.
  • -list ⁇ n> The maximum size of the output hit list. The default is 50.
  • -docalign ⁇ n> The number of documentation lines preceding each alignment. The default is 10.
  • -thr_score ⁇ score_name> The score that places limits on the display of results. Scores that are smaller than -thr_min value or larger than -thr_max value are not shown. Valid options are: quality.
  • the homology is a local homology or a local identity.
  • Local alignments tools include, but are not limited to the BlastP, BlastN, BlastX or TBLASTN software of the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI), FASTA, and the Smith-Waterman algorithm
  • a tblastn search allows the comparison between a protein sequence to the six-frame translations of a nucleotide database. It can be a very productive way of finding homologous protein coding regions in unannotated nucleotide sequences such as expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and draft genome records (HTG), located in the BLAST databases est and htgs, respectively.
  • ESTs expressed sequence tags
  • HOG draft genome records
  • Default parameters for blastp include: Max target sequences: 100; Expected threshold: e ⁇ 5 ; Word size: 3; Max matches in a query range: 0; Scoring parameters: Matrix—BLOSUM62; filters and masking: Filter—low complexity regions.
  • Local alignments tools which can be used include, but are not limited to, the tBLASTX algorithm, which compares the six-frame conceptual translation products of a nucleotide query sequence (both strands) against a protein sequence database.
  • Default parameters include: Max target sequences: 100; Expected threshold: 10; Word size: 3; Max matches in a query range: 0; Scoring parameters: Matrix—BLOSUM62; filters and masking: Filter—low complexity regions.
  • the exogenous polynucleotide of the invention encodes a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or more say 100% identical to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770 and 6179-10421.
  • the method of increasing abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, yield, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, and/or fertilizer use efficiency (e.g., nitrogen use efficiency) of a plant is effected by expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide at least at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or more say 100% identical to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID
  • the exogenous polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth by SEQ ID NO: 475-770, 6179-10420 or 10421.
  • the method of increasing abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, yield, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, and/or fertilizer use efficiency (e.g., nitrogen use efficiency) of a plant is effected by expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770 and 6179-10421, thereby increasing the abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, yield, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, and/or fertilizer use efficiency (e.g., nitrogen use efficiency) of the plant.
  • an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770 and
  • a method of increasing abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, yield, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, and/or fertilizer use efficiency (e.g., nitrogen use efficiency) of a plant comprising expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770 and 6179-10421, thereby increasing the abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, yield, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, and/or fertilizer use efficiency (e.g., nitrogen use efficiency) of the plant.
  • the exogenous polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide consisting of the amino acid sequence set forth by SEQ ID NO: 475-770 and 6179-10421.
  • the exogenous polynucleotide comprises a nucleic acid sequence which is at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, e.g., 100% identical to the nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1-474 and 771-6178.
  • a method of increasing abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, yield, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, and/or fertilizer use efficiency (e.g., nitrogen use efficiency) of a plant comprising expressing within the plant an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, e.g., 100% identical to the nucleic acid sequence selected from the group
  • the exogenous polynucleotide is at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, e.g., 100% identical to the polynucleotide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1-474 and 771-6178.
  • the exogenous polynucleotide is set forth by SEQ ID NO: 1-474, 771-6177 or 6178.
  • polynucleotide refers to a single or double stranded nucleic acid sequence which is isolated and provided in the form of an RNA sequence, a complementary polynucleotide sequence (cDNA), a genomic polynucleotide sequence and/or a composite polynucleotide sequences (e.g., a combination of the above).
  • isolated refers to at least partially separated from the natural environment e.g., from a plant cell.
  • complementary polynucleotide sequence refers to a sequence, which results from reverse transcription of messenger RNA using a reverse transcriptase or any other RNA dependent DNA polymerase. Such a sequence can be subsequently amplified in vivo or in vitro using a DNA dependent DNA polymerase.
  • genomic polynucleotide sequence refers to a sequence derived (isolated) from a chromosome and thus it represents a contiguous portion of a chromosome.
  • composite polynucleotide sequence refers to a sequence, which is at least partially complementary and at least partially genomic.
  • a composite sequence can include some exonal sequences required to encode the polypeptide of the present invention, as well as some intronic sequences interposing therebetween.
  • the intronic sequences can be of any source, including of other genes, and typically will include conserved splicing signal sequences. Such intronic sequences may further include cis acting expression regulatory elements.
  • Nucleic acid sequences encoding the polypeptides of the present invention may be optimized for expression. Examples of such sequence modifications include, but are not limited to, an altered G/C content to more closely approach that typically found in the plant species of interest, and the removal of codons atypically found in the plant species commonly referred to as codon optimization.
  • an optimized gene or nucleic acid sequence refers to a gene in which the nucleotide sequence of a native or naturally occurring gene has been modified in order to utilize statistically-preferred or statistically-favored codons within the plant.
  • the nucleotide sequence typically is examined at the DNA level and the coding region optimized for expression in the plant species determined using any suitable procedure, for example as described in Sardana et al. (1996, Plant Cell Reports 15:677-681).
  • the standard deviation of codon usage may be calculated by first finding the squared proportional deviation of usage of each codon of the native gene relative to that of highly expressed plant genes, followed by a calculation of the average squared deviation.
  • a Table of codon usage from highly expressed genes of dicotyledonous plants is compiled using the data of Murray et al. (1989, Nuc Acids Res. 17:477-498).
  • Codon Usage Database contains codon usage tables for a number of different species, with each codon usage Table having been statistically determined based on the data present in Genbank.
  • a naturally-occurring nucleotide sequence encoding a protein of interest can be codon optimized for that particular plant species. This is effected by replacing codons that may have a low statistical incidence in the particular species genome with corresponding codons, in regard to an amino acid, that are statistically more favored.
  • one or more less-favored codons may be selected to delete existing restriction sites, to create new ones at potentially useful junctions (5′ and 3′ ends to add signal peptide or termination cassettes, internal sites that might be used to cut and splice segments together to produce a correct full-length sequence), or to eliminate nucleotide sequences that may negatively effect mRNA stability or expression.
  • codon optimization of the native nucleotide sequence may comprise determining which codons, within the native nucleotide sequence, are not statistically-favored with regards to a particular plant, and modifying these codons in accordance with a codon usage table of the particular plant to produce a codon optimized derivative.
  • a modified nucleotide sequence may be fully or partially optimized for plant codon usage provided that the protein encoded by the modified nucleotide sequence is produced at a level higher than the protein encoded by the corresponding naturally occurring or native gene. Construction of synthetic genes by altering the codon usage is described in for example WO publication 93/07278 (Koziel M., et al.).
  • the exogenous polynucleotide is a non-coding RNA.
  • non-coding RNA refers to an RNA molecule which does not encode an amino acid sequence (a polypeptide).
  • non-coding RNA molecules include, but are not limited to, an antisense RNA, a pre-miRNA (precursor of a microRNA), or a precursor of a Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA).
  • Non-limiting examples of non-coding RNA polynucleotides are provided in SEQ ID NOs: 217, 218, 261, 262, 473, 474, 2066, 2827, 2886, 3165, 3166, 3167, 3168, 3180, 3181, 3213, 3215, 5247, 6108, 6163.
  • the invention encompasses nucleic acid sequences described hereinabove; fragments thereof, sequences hybridizable therewith, sequences homologous thereto, sequences encoding similar polypeptides with different codon usage, altered sequences characterized by mutations, such as deletion, insertion or substitution of one or more nucleotides, either naturally occurring or man induced, either randomly or in a targeted fashion.
  • the invention provides an isolated polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, e.g., 100% identical to the polynucleotide selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1-474 and 771-6178.
  • the nucleic acid sequence is capable of increasing abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, yield, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, and/or fertilizer use efficiency (e.g., nitrogen use efficiency) of a plant.
  • the isolated polynucleotide comprising the nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1-474 and 771-6178.
  • the isolated polynucleotide is set forth by SEQ ID NO: 1-474, 771-6177 or 6178.
  • the invention provides an isolated polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide which comprises an amino acid sequence at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or more say 100% homologous to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 475-770, 6179-10420 or 10421.
  • the amino acid sequence is capable of increasing abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, yield, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, and/or fertilizer use efficiency (e.g., nitrogen use efficiency) of a plant.
  • the invention provides an isolated polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide which comprises the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770 and 6179-10421.
  • nucleic acid construct comprising the isolated polynucleotide of the invention, and a promoter for directing transcription of the nucleic acid sequence in a host cell.
  • the invention provides an isolated polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or more say 100% homologous to an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 475-770 and 6179-10421.
  • the polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos: 475-770 and 6179-10421.
  • the polypeptide is set forth by SEQ ID NO: 475-770 and 6179-10421.
  • the invention also encompasses fragments of the above described polypeptides and polypeptides having mutations, such as deletions, insertions or substitutions of one or more amino acids, either naturally occurring or man induced, either randomly or in a targeted fashion.
  • plant encompasses whole plants, ancestors and progeny of the plants and plant parts, including seeds, shoots, stems, roots (including tubers), and plant cells, tissues and organs.
  • the plant may be in any form including suspension cultures, embryos, meristematic regions, callus tissue, leaves, gametophytes, sporophytes, pollen, and microspores.
  • Plants that are particularly useful in the methods of the invention include all plants which belong to the superfamily Viridiplantae, in particular monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants including a fodder or forage legume, ornamental plant, food crop, tree, or shrub selected from the list comprising Acacia spp., Acer spp., Actinidia spp., Aesculus spp., Agathis australis, Albizia amara, Alsophila tricolor, Andropogon spp., Arachis spp, Areca catechu, Astelia fragrans, Astragalus cicer, Baikiaea plurijuga, Betula spp., Brassica spp., Bruguiera gymnorrhiza , Burkea africana, Butea frondosa, Cadaba farinosa, Calliandra spp, Camellia sinensis, Canna indica, Capsicum spp., Cassia spp., Centro
  • the plant used by the method of the invention is a crop plant such as rice, maize, wheat, barley, peanut, potato, sesame, olive tree, palm oil, banana, soybean, sunflower, canola, sugarcane, alfalfa, millet, leguminosae (bean, pea), flax, lupinus , rapeseed, tobacco, poplar and cotton.
  • a crop plant such as rice, maize, wheat, barley, peanut, potato, sesame, olive tree, palm oil, banana, soybean, sunflower, canola, sugarcane, alfalfa, millet, leguminosae (bean, pea), flax, lupinus , rapeseed, tobacco, poplar and cotton.
  • the plant is a dicotyledonous plant.
  • the plant is a monocotyledonous plant.
  • a plant cell exogenously expressing the polynucleotide of some embodiments of the invention, the nucleic acid construct of some embodiments of the invention and/or the polypeptide of some embodiments of the invention.
  • expressing the exogenous polynucleotide of the invention within the plant is effected by transforming one or more cells of the plant with the exogenous polynucleotide, followed by generating a mature plant from the transformed cells and cultivating the mature plant under conditions suitable for expressing the exogenous polynucleotide within the mature plant.
  • the transformation is effected by introducing to the plant cell a nucleic acid construct which includes the exogenous polynucleotide of some embodiments of the invention and at least one promoter for directing transcription of the exogenous polynucleotide in a host cell (a plant cell). Further details of suitable transformation approaches are provided hereinbelow.
  • nucleic acid construct according to some embodiments of the invention comprises a promoter sequence and the isolated polynucleotide of the some embodiments of invention.
  • the isolated polynucleotide is operably linked to the promoter sequence.
  • a coding nucleic acid sequence is “operably linked” to a regulatory sequence (e.g., promoter) if the regulatory sequence is capable of exerting a regulatory effect on the coding sequence linked thereto.
  • a regulatory sequence e.g., promoter
  • promoter refers to a region of DNA which lies upstream of the transcriptional initiation site of a gene to which RNA polymerase binds to initiate transcription of RNA.
  • the promoter controls where (e.g., which portion of a plant) and/or when (e.g., at which stage or condition in the lifetime of an organism) the gene is expressed.
  • the promoter is heterologous to the isolated polynucleotide and/or to the host cell.
  • heterologous promoter refers to a promoter from a different species or from the same species but from a different gene locus as of the isolated polynucleotide sequence.
  • any suitable promoter sequence can be used by the nucleic acid construct of the present invention.
  • the promoter is a constitutive promoter, a tissue-specific, or an abiotic stress-inducible promoter.
  • the promoter is a plant promoter, which is suitable for expression of the exogenous polynucleotide in a plant cell.
  • Suitable promoters for expression in wheat include, but are not limited to, Wheat SPA promoter (SEQ ID NO: 10422; Albanietal, Plant Cell, 9: 171-184, 1997, which is fully incorporated herein by reference), wheat LMW (SEQ ID NO: 10423 (longer LMW promoter), and SEQ ID NO: 10424 (LMW promoter) and HMW glutenin-1 (SEQ ID NO: 10425 (Wheat HMW glutenin-1 longer promoter); and SEQ ID NO: 10426 (Wheat HMW glutenin-1 Promoter); Thomas and Flavell, The Plant Cell 2:1171-1180; Furtado et al., 2009 Plant Biotechnology Journal 7:240-253, each of which is fully incorporated herein by reference), wheat alpha, beta and gamma gliadins [e.g., SEQ ID NO: 10427 (wheat alpha gliadin, B genome promoter); SEQ ID NO: 10428 (wheat gamma gli
  • ExpansinB promoters e.g., rice ExpB5 [SEQ ID NO:10437 (rice ExpB5 longer promoter) and SEQ ID NO: 10438 (rice ExpB5 promoter)] and Barley ExpB1 [SEQ ID NO: 10439 (barley ExpB1 Promoter), Won et al. Mol Cells. 2010; 30:369-76, which is fully incorporated herein by reference], barley SS2 (sucrose synthase 2) [(SEQ ID NO: 10440), Guerin and Carbonero, Plant Physiology May 1997 vol. 114 no.
  • Suitable constitutive promoters include, for example, CaMV 35S promoter [SEQ ID NO: 10442 (CaMV 35S (QFNC) Promoter); SEQ ID NO: 10443 (PJJ 35S from Brachypodium); SEQ ID NO: 10444 (CaMV 35S (OLD) Promoter) (Odell et al., Nature 313:810-812, 1985)], Arabidopsis At6669 promoter (SEQ ID NO: 10445 ( Arabidopsis At6669 (OLD) Promoter); see PCT Publication No.
  • W004081173A2 or the new At6669 promoter (SEQ ID NO: 10446 ( Arabidopsis At6669 (NEW) Promoter)); maize Ub1 Promoter [cultivar Nongda 105 (SEQ ID NO:10431); GenBank: DQ141598.1; Taylor et al., Plant Cell Rep 1993 12: 491-495, which is fully incorporated herein by reference; and cultivar B73 (SEQ ID NO:10432); Christensen, A H, et al. Plant Mol. Biol.
  • tissue-specific promoters include, but not limited to, leaf-specific promoters [e.g., AT5G06690 (Thioredoxin) (high expression, SEQ ID NO: 10448), AT5G61520 (AtSTP3) (low expression, SEQ ID NO: 10449) described in Buttner et al 2000 Plant, Cell and Environment 23, 175-184, or the promoters described in Yamamoto et al., Plant J. 12:255-265, 1997; Kwon et al., Plant Physiol. 105:357-67, 1994; Yamamoto et al., Plant Cell Physiol. 35:773-778, 1994; Gotor et al., Plant J.
  • leaf-specific promoters e.g., AT5G06690 (Thioredoxin) (high expression, SEQ ID NO: 10448), AT5G61520 (AtSTP3) (low expression, SEQ ID NO: 10449) described in Buttner et al 2000
  • endosperm specific promoters e.g., wheat LMW (SEQ ID NO: 10423 (Wheat LMW Longer Promoter), and SEQ ID NO: 10424 (Wheat LMW Promoter) and HMW glutenin-1 [(SEQ ID NO: 10425 (Wheat HMW glutenin-1 longer Promoter)); and SEQ ID NO: 10426 (Wheat HMW glutenin-1 Promoter), Thomas and Flavell, The Plant Cell 2:1171-1180, 1990; Mol Gen Genet 216:81-90, 1989; NAR 17:461-2), wheat alpha, beta and gamma gliadins (SEQ ID NO: 10427 (wheat alpha gliadin (B genome) promoter); SEQ ID NO: 10428 (wheat gamma gliadin promoter); EMBO 3:1409-15, 1984), Barley ltrl promoter, barley Bl, C, D hordein (Theor Appl
  • Arabidopsis APETALA 1 (AT1G69120, AP1) (SEQ ID NO: 10454 ( Arabidopsis (AT1G69120) APETALA 1)) (Hempel et al., Development 124:3845-3853, 1997)]
  • root promoters e.g., the ROOTP promoter [SEQ ID NO: 10455]; rice ExpB5 (SEQ ID NO:10438 (rice ExpB5 Promoter); or SEQ ID NO: 10437 (rice ExpB5 longer Promoter)) and barley ExpB1 promoters (SEQ ID NO:10439) (Won et al. Mol.
  • Suitable abiotic stress-inducible promoters include, but not limited to, salt-inducible promoters such as RD29A (Yamaguchi-Shinozalei et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 236:331-340, 1993); drought-inducible promoters such as maize rabl7 gene promoter (Pla et. al., Plant Mol. Biol. 21:259-266, 1993), maize rab28 gene promoter (Busk et. al., Plant J. 11:1285-1295, 1997) and maize Ivr2 gene promoter (Pelleschi et. al., Plant Mol. Biol. 39:373-380, 1999); heat-inducible promoters such as heat tomato hsp80-promoter from tomato (U.S. Pat. No. 5,187,267).
  • salt-inducible promoters such as RD29A (Yamaguchi-Shinozalei et al., Mol. Gen. Gene
  • the nucleic acid construct of some embodiments of the invention can further include an appropriate selectable marker and/or an origin of replication.
  • the nucleic acid construct utilized is a shuttle vector, which can propagate both in E. coli (wherein the construct comprises an appropriate selectable marker and origin of replication) and be compatible with propagation in cells.
  • the construct according to the present invention can be, for example, a plasmid, a bacmid, a phagemid, a cosmid, a phage, a virus or an artificial chromosome.
  • the nucleic acid construct of some embodiments of the invention can be utilized to stably or transiently transform plant cells.
  • stable transformation the exogenous polynucleotide is integrated into the plant genome and as such it represents a stable and inherited trait.
  • transient transformation the exogenous polynucleotide is expressed by the cell transformed but it is not integrated into the genome and as such it represents a transient trait.
  • the Agrobacterium system includes the use of plasmid vectors that contain defined DNA segments that integrate into the plant genomic DNA. Methods of inoculation of the plant tissue vary depending upon the plant species and the Agrobacterium delivery system. A widely used approach is the leaf disc procedure which can be performed with any tissue explant that provides a good source for initiation of whole plant differentiation. See, e.g., Horsch et al. in Plant Molecular Biology Manual A5, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1988) p. 1-9. A supplementary approach employs the Agrobacterium delivery system in combination with vacuum infiltration. The Agrobacterium system is especially viable in the creation of transgenic dicotyledonous plants.
  • DNA transfer into plant cells There are various methods of direct DNA transfer into plant cells.
  • electroporation the protoplasts are briefly exposed to a strong electric field.
  • microinjection the DNA is mechanically injected directly into the cells using very small micropipettes.
  • microparticle bombardment the DNA is adsorbed on microprojectiles such as magnesium sulfate crystals or tungsten particles, and the microprojectiles are physically accelerated into cells or plant tissues.
  • Micropropagation is a process of growing new generation plants from a single piece of tissue that has been excised from a selected parent plant or cultivar. This process permits the mass reproduction of plants having the preferred tissue expressing the fusion protein.
  • the new generation plants which are produced are genetically identical to, and have all of the characteristics of, the original plant.
  • Micropropagation allows mass production of quality plant material in a short period of time and offers a rapid multiplication of selected cultivars in the preservation of the characteristics of the original transgenic or transformed plant.
  • the advantages of cloning plants are the speed of plant multiplication and the quality and uniformity of plants produced.
  • Micropropagation is a multi-stage procedure that requires alteration of culture medium or growth conditions between stages.
  • the micropropagation process involves four basic stages: Stage one, initial tissue culturing; stage two, tissue culture multiplication; stage three, differentiation and plant formation; and stage four, greenhouse culturing and hardening.
  • stage one initial tissue culturing
  • stage two tissue culture multiplication
  • stage three differentiation and plant formation
  • stage four greenhouse culturing and hardening.
  • stage one initial tissue culturing
  • the tissue culture is established and certified contaminant-free.
  • stage two the initial tissue culture is multiplied until a sufficient number of tissue samples are produced from the seedlings to meet production goals.
  • stage three the tissue samples grown in stage two are divided and grown into individual plantlets.
  • the transformed plantlets are transferred to a greenhouse for hardening where the plants' tolerance to light is gradually increased so that it can be grown in the natural environment.
  • the transgenic plants are generated by transient transformation of leaf cells, meristematic cells or the whole plant.
  • Transient transformation can be effected by any of the direct DNA transfer methods described above or by viral infection using modified plant viruses.
  • Viruses that have been shown to be useful for the transformation of plant hosts include CaMV, Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), brome mosaic virus (BMV) and Bean Common Mosaic Virus (BV or BCMV). Transformation of plants using plant viruses is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,855,237 (bean golden mosaic virus; BGV), EP-A 67,553 (TMV), Japanese Published Application No. 63-14693 (TMV), EPA 194,809 (BV), EPA 278,667 (BV); and Gluzman, Y. et al., Communications in Molecular Biology: Viral Vectors, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, pp. 172-189 (1988). Pseudovirus particles for use in expressing foreign DNA in many hosts, including plants are described in WO 87/06261.
  • the virus used for transient transformations is avirulent and thus is incapable of causing severe symptoms such as reduced growth rate, mosaic, ring spots, leaf roll, yellowing, streaking, pox formation, tumor formation and pitting.
  • a suitable avirulent virus may be a naturally occurring avirulent virus or an artificially attenuated virus.
  • Virus attenuation may be effected by using methods well known in the art including, but not limited to, sub-lethal heating, chemical treatment or by directed mutagenesis techniques such as described, for example, by Kurihara and Watanabe (Molecular Plant Pathology 4:259-269, 2003), Gal-on et al. (1992), Atreya et al. (1992) and Huet et al. (1994).
  • Suitable virus strains can be obtained from available sources such as, for example, the American Type culture Collection (ATCC) or by isolation from infected plants. Isolation of viruses from infected plant tissues can be effected by techniques well known in the art such as described, for example by Foster and Taylor, Eds. “Plant Virology Protocols: From Virus Isolation to Transgenic Resistance (Methods in Molecular Biology (Humana Pr), Vol 81)”, Humana Press, 1998. Briefly, tissues of an infected plant believed to contain a high concentration of a suitable virus, preferably young leaves and flower petals, are ground in a buffer solution (e.g., phosphate buffer solution) to produce a virus infected sap which can be used in subsequent inoculations.
  • a buffer solution e.g., phosphate buffer solution
  • the virus When the virus is a DNA virus, suitable modifications can be made to the virus itself. Alternatively, the virus can first be cloned into a bacterial plasmid for ease of constructing the desired viral vector with the foreign DNA. The virus can then be excised from the plasmid. If the virus is a DNA virus, a bacterial origin of replication can be attached to the viral DNA, which is then replicated by the bacteria. Transcription and translation of this DNA will produce the coat protein which will encapsidate the viral DNA. If the virus is an RNA virus, the virus is generally cloned as a cDNA and inserted into a plasmid. The plasmid is then used to make all of the constructions. The RNA virus is then produced by transcribing the viral sequence of the plasmid and translation of the viral genes to produce the coat protein(s) which encapsidate the viral RNA.
  • a plant viral polynucleotide in which the native coat protein coding sequence has been deleted from a viral polynucleotide, a non-native plant viral coat protein coding sequence and a non-native promoter, preferably the subgenomic promoter of the non-native coat protein coding sequence, capable of expression in the plant host, packaging of the recombinant plant viral polynucleotide, and ensuring a systemic infection of the host by the recombinant plant viral polynucleotide, has been inserted.
  • the coat protein gene may be inactivated by insertion of the non-native polynucleotide sequence within it, such that a protein is produced.
  • the recombinant plant viral polynucleotide may contain one or more additional non-native subgenomic promoters.
  • Each non-native subgenomic promoter is capable of transcribing or expressing adjacent genes or polynucleotide sequences in the plant host and incapable of recombination with each other and with native subgenomic promoters.
  • Non-native (foreign) polynucleotide sequences may be inserted adjacent the native plant viral subgenomic promoter or the native and a non-native plant viral subgenomic promoters if more than one polynucleotide sequence is included.
  • the non-native polynucleotide sequences are transcribed or expressed in the host plant under control of the subgenomic promoter to produce the desired products.
  • a recombinant plant viral polynucleotide is provided as in the first embodiment except that the native coat protein coding sequence is placed adjacent one of the non-native coat protein subgenomic promoters instead of a non-native coat protein coding sequence.
  • a recombinant plant viral polynucleotide in which the native coat protein gene is adjacent its subgenomic promoter and one or more non-native subgenomic promoters have been inserted into the viral polynucleotide.
  • the inserted non-native subgenomic promoters are capable of transcribing or expressing adjacent genes in a plant host and are incapable of recombination with each other and with native subgenomic promoters.
  • Non-native polynucleotide sequences may be inserted adjacent the non-native subgenomic plant viral promoters such that the sequences are transcribed or expressed in the host plant under control of the subgenomic promoters to produce the desired product.
  • a recombinant plant viral polynucleotide is provided as in the third embodiment except that the native coat protein coding sequence is replaced by a non-native coat protein coding sequence.
  • the viral vectors are encapsidated by the coat proteins encoded by the recombinant plant viral polynucleotide to produce a recombinant plant virus.
  • the recombinant plant viral polynucleotide or recombinant plant virus is used to infect appropriate host plants.
  • the recombinant plant viral polynucleotide is capable of replication in the host, systemic spread in the host, and transcription or expression of foreign gene(s) (exogenous polynucleotide) in the host to produce the desired protein.
  • polynucleotide of the present invention can also be introduced into a chloroplast genome thereby enabling chloroplast expression.
  • a technique for introducing exogenous polynucleotide sequences to the genome of the chloroplasts involves the following procedures. First, plant cells are chemically treated so as to reduce the number of chloroplasts per cell to about one. Then, the exogenous polynucleotide is introduced via particle bombardment into the cells with the aim of introducing at least one exogenous polynucleotide molecule into the chloroplasts.
  • the exogenous polynucleotides selected such that it is integratable into the chloroplast's genome via homologous recombination which is readily effected by enzymes inherent to the chloroplast.
  • the exogenous polynucleotide includes, in addition to a gene of interest, at least one polynucleotide stretch which is derived from the chloroplast's genome.
  • the exogenous polynucleotide includes a selectable marker, which serves by sequential selection procedures to ascertain that all or substantially all of the copies of the chloroplast genomes following such selection will include the exogenous polynucleotide. Further details relating to this technique are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,945,050; and 5,693,507 which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • a polypeptide can thus be produced by the protein expression system of the chloroplast and become integrated into the chloroplast's inner membrane.
  • the present invention also envisages expressing a plurality of exogenous polynucleotides in a single host plant to thereby achieve superior effect on nitrogen use efficiency, fertilizer use efficiency, oil content, yield, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, growth rate, photosynthetic capacity, biomass, vigor, water use efficiency, and/or abiotic stress tolerance.
  • Expressing a plurality of exogenous polynucleotides in a single host plant can be effected by co-introducing multiple nucleic acid constructs, each including a different exogenous polynucleotide, into a single plant cell.
  • the transformed cell can then be regenerated into a mature plant using the methods described hereinabove.
  • expressing a plurality of exogenous polynucleotides in a single host plant can be effected by co-introducing into a single plant-cell a single nucleic-acid construct including a plurality of different exogenous polynucleotides.
  • a construct can be designed with a single promoter sequence which can transcribe a polycistronic messenger RNA including all the different exogenous polynucleotide sequences.
  • the polynucleotide sequences can be inter-linked via an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) sequence which facilitates translation of polynucleotide sequences positioned downstream of the IRES sequence.
  • IRES internal ribosome entry site
  • a transcribed polycistronic RNA molecule encoding the different polypeptides described above will be translated from both the capped 5′ end and the two internal IRES sequences of the polycistronic RNA molecule to thereby produce in the cell all different polypeptides.
  • the construct can include several promoter sequences each linked to a different exogenous polynucleotide sequence.
  • the plant cell transformed with the construct including a plurality of different exogenous polynucleotides can be regenerated into a mature plant, using the methods described hereinabove.
  • expressing a plurality of exogenous polynucleotides in a single host plant can be effected by introducing different nucleic acid constructs, including different exogenous polynucleotides, into a plurality of plants.
  • the regenerated transformed plants can then be cross-bred and resultant progeny selected for superior abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, fertilizer use efficiency, growth, biomass, yield and/or vigor traits, using conventional plant breeding techniques.
  • the method further comprising growing the plant expressing the exogenous polynucleotide under the abiotic stress.
  • Non-limiting examples of abiotic stress conditions include, salinity, osmotic stress, drought, water deprivation, excess of water (e.g., flood, waterlogging), low temperature (e.g., cold stress), high temperature, heavy metal toxicity, anaerobiosis, nutrient deficiency (e.g., nitrogen deficiency or nitrogen limitation), nutrient excess, atmospheric pollution and UV irradiation.
  • abiotic stress conditions include, salinity, osmotic stress, drought, water deprivation, excess of water (e.g., flood, waterlogging), low temperature (e.g., cold stress), high temperature, heavy metal toxicity, anaerobiosis, nutrient deficiency (e.g., nitrogen deficiency or nitrogen limitation), nutrient excess, atmospheric pollution and UV irradiation.
  • the method further comprising growing the plant expressing the exogenous polynucleotide under fertilizer limiting conditions (e.g., nitrogen-limiting conditions).
  • fertilizer limiting conditions e.g., nitrogen-limiting conditions
  • Non-limiting examples include growing the plant on soils with low nitrogen content (40-50% Nitrogen of the content present under normal or optimal conditions), or even under sever nitrogen deficiency (0-10% Nitrogen of the content present under normal or optimal conditions).
  • the invention encompasses plants exogenously expressing the polynucleotide(s), the nucleic acid constructs and/or polypeptide(s) of the invention.
  • the level of the polypeptide encoded by the exogenous polynucleotide can be determined by methods well known in the art such as, activity assays, Western blots using antibodies capable of specifically binding the polypeptide, Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA), radio-immuno-assays (RIA), immunohistochemistry, immunocytochemistry, immunofluorescence and the like.
  • activity assays Western blots using antibodies capable of specifically binding the polypeptide
  • ELISA Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay
  • RIA radio-immuno-assays
  • immunohistochemistry immunocytochemistry
  • immunofluorescence immunofluorescence and the like.
  • RNA-in situ hybridization Methods of determining the level in the plant of the RNA transcribed from the exogenous polynucleotide are well known in the art and include, for example, Northern blot analysis, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis (including quantitative, semi-quantitative or real-time RT-PCR) and RNA-in situ hybridization.
  • RT-PCR reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
  • sub-sequence data of those polynucleotides described above can be used as markers for marker assisted selection (MAS), in which a marker is used for indirect selection of a genetic determinant or determinants of a trait of interest [e.g., abiotic stress tolerance, water use efficiency, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, yield, seed yield, fiber yield, fiber quality, fiber length, photosynthetic capacity, and/or fertilizer use efficiency (e.g., nitrogen use efficiency)].
  • MAS marker assisted selection
  • Nucleic acid data of the present teachings may contain or be linked to polymorphic sites or genetic markers on the genome such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), microsatellites and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), DNA fingerprinting (DFP), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), expression level polymorphism, polymorphism of the encoded polypeptide and any other polymorphism at the DNA or RNA sequence.
  • RFLP restriction fragment length polymorphism
  • SNP single nucleotide polymorphism
  • DFP DNA fingerprinting
  • AFLP amplified fragment length polymorphism
  • expression level polymorphism polymorphism of the encoded polypeptide and any other polymorphism at the DNA or RNA sequence.
  • marker assisted selections include, but are not limited to, selection for a morphological trait (e.g., a gene that affects form, coloration, male sterility or resistance such as the presence or absence of awn, leaf sheath coloration, height, grain color, aroma of rice); selection for a biochemical trait (e.g., a gene that encodes a protein that can be extracted and observed; for example, isozymes and storage proteins); selection for a biological trait (e.g., pathogen races or insect biotypes based on host pathogen or host parasite interaction can be used as a marker since the genetic constitution of an organism can affect its susceptibility to pathogens or parasites).
  • a morphological trait e.g., a gene that affects form, coloration, male sterility or resistance such as the presence or absence of awn, leaf sheath coloration, height, grain color, aroma of rice
  • selection for a biochemical trait e.g., a gene that encodes a protein that
  • polynucleotides and polypeptides described hereinabove can be used in a wide range of economical plants, in a safe and cost effective manner.
  • Plant lines exogenously expressing the polynucleotide or the polypeptide of the invention are screened to identify those that show the greatest increase of the desired plant trait.
  • a method of evaluating a trait of a plant comprising: (a) expressing in a plant or a portion thereof the nucleic acid construct of some embodiments of the invention; and (b) evaluating a trait of a plant as compared to a wild type plant of the same type (e.g., a plant not transformed with the claimed biomolecules); thereby evaluating the trait of the plant.
  • a method of producing a crop comprising growing a crop of a plant expressing an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or more say 100% homologous to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770 and 6179-10421, wherein said plant is derived from a plant selected for increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased water use efficiency, increased growth rate, increased vigor, increased biomass, increased oil
  • a method of producing a crop comprising growing a crop plant transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide at least 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or more say 100% homologous to the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 475-770 and 6179-10421, wherein the crop plant is derived from plants selected for increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased water use efficiency, increased growth rate, increased vigor, increased biomass, increased oil content, increased yield, increased seed yield, increased fiber yield,
  • a method of producing a crop comprising growing a crop of a plant expressing an exogenous polynucleotide which comprises a nucleic acid sequence which is at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, e.g., 100% identical to the nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1-474 and 771-6178, wherein said plant is derived from a plant selected for increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased water use efficiency, increased growth rate, increased vigor, increased biomass,
  • a method of producing a crop comprising growing a crop plant transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide at least 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or more say 100% identical to the nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 1-474 and 771-6178, wherein the crop plant is derived from plants selected for increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased water use efficiency, increased growth rate, increased vigor, increased biomass, increased oil content, increased yield, increased seed yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, increased
  • a method of growing a crop comprising seeding seeds and/or planting plantlets of a plant transformed with the exogenous polynucleotide of the invention, e.g., the polynucleotide which encodes the polypeptide of some embodiments of the invention, wherein the plant is derived from plants selected for at least one trait selected from the group consisting of increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased water use efficiency, increased growth rate, increased vigor, increased biomass, increased oil content, increased yield, increased seed yield, increased fiber yield, increased fiber quality, increased fiber length, increased photosynthetic capacity, and/or increased fertilizer use efficiency (e.g., increased nitrogen use efficiency) as compared to a non-transformed plant.
  • the exogenous polynucleotide of the invention e.g., the polynucleotide which encodes the polypeptide of some embodiments of the invention
  • the plant is derived from plants selected for at least one trait selected from the group consisting of increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased water use efficiency,
  • the method of growing a crop comprising seeding seeds and/or planting plantlets of a plant transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, e.g., 100% identical to the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 475-770 and 6179-10421, wherein the plant is derived from plants selected for at least one trait selected from the group consisting of increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased water use efficiency, increased growth rate
  • the method of growing a crop comprising seeding seeds and/or planting plantlets of a plant transformed with an exogenous polynucleotide comprising the nucleic acid sequence at least about 80%, at least about 81%, at least about 82%, at least about 83%, at least about 84%, at least about 85%, at least about 86%, at least about 87%, at least about 88%, at least about 89%, at least about 90%, at least about 91%, at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at least about 93%, at least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, e.g., 100% identical to the nucleic acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1-474 and 771-6178, wherein the plant is derived from plants selected for at least one trait selected from the group consisting of increased abiotic stress tolerance, increased water use efficiency, increased growth rate, increased vigor, increased biomass, increased
  • transgene the exogenous polynucleotide encoding the polypeptide
  • abiotic stress tolerance can be determined using known methods such as detailed below and in the Examples section which follows.
  • Abiotic stress tolerance Transformed (i.e., expressing the transgene) and non-transformed (wild type) plants are exposed to an abiotic stress condition, such as water deprivation, suboptimal temperature (low temperature, high temperature), nutrient deficiency, nutrient excess, a salt stress condition, osmotic stress, heavy metal toxicity, anaerobiosis, atmospheric pollution and UV irradiation.
  • an abiotic stress condition such as water deprivation, suboptimal temperature (low temperature, high temperature), nutrient deficiency, nutrient excess, a salt stress condition, osmotic stress, heavy metal toxicity, anaerobiosis, atmospheric pollution and UV irradiation.
  • Salinity tolerance assay Transgenic plants with tolerance to high salt concentrations are expected to exhibit better germination, seedling vigor or growth in high salt.
  • Salt stress can be effected in many ways such as, for example, by irrigating the plants with a hyperosmotic solution, by cultivating the plants hydroponically in a hyperosmotic growth solution (e.g., Hoagland solution), or by culturing the plants in a hyperosmotic growth medium [e.g., 50% Murashige-Skoog medium (MS medium)].
  • a hyperosmotic growth medium e.g. 50% Murashige-Skoog medium (MS medium)
  • the salt concentration in the irrigation water, growth solution, or growth medium can be adjusted according to the specific characteristics of the specific plant cultivar or variety, so as to inflict a mild or moderate effect on the physiology and/or morphology of the plants (for guidelines as to appropriate concentration see, Bernstein and Kafkafi, Root Growth Under Salinity Stress In: Plant Roots, The Hidden Half 3rd ed. Waisel Y, Eshel A and Kafkafi U. (editors) Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 2002, and reference therein).
  • a salinity tolerance test can be performed by irrigating plants at different developmental stages with increasing concentrations of sodium chloride (for example 50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM, 400 mM NaCl) applied from the bottom and from above to ensure even dispersal of salt. Following exposure to the stress condition the plants are frequently monitored until substantial physiological and/or morphological effects appear in wild type plants. Thus, the external phenotypic appearance, degree of wilting and overall success to reach maturity and yield progeny are compared between control and transgenic plants.
  • sodium chloride for example 50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM, 400 mM NaCl
  • Quantitative parameters of tolerance measured include, but are not limited to, the average wet and dry weight, growth rate, leaf size, leaf coverage (overall leaf area), the weight of the seeds yielded, the average seed size and the number of seeds produced per plant. Transformed plants not exhibiting substantial physiological and/or morphological effects, or exhibiting higher biomass than wild-type plants, are identified as abiotic stress tolerant plants.
  • Osmotic tolerance test Osmotic stress assays (including sodium chloride and mannitol assays) are conducted to determine if an osmotic stress phenotype was sodium chloride-specific or if it was a general osmotic stress related phenotype. Plants which are tolerant to osmotic stress may have more tolerance to drought and/or freezing. For salt and osmotic stress germination experiments, the medium is supplemented for example with 50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM NaCl or 100 mM, 200 mM NaCl, 400 mM mannitol.
  • Drought tolerance assay/Osmoticum assay Tolerance to drought is performed to identify the genes conferring better plant survival after acute water deprivation. To analyze whether the transgenic plants are more tolerant to drought, an osmotic stress produced by the non-ionic osmolyte sorbitol in the medium can be performed. Control and transgenic plants are germinated and grown in plant-agar plates for 4 days, after which they are transferred to plates containing 500 mM sorbitol. The treatment causes growth retardation, then both control and transgenic plants are compared, by measuring plant weight (wet and dry), yield, and by growth rates measured as time to flowering.
  • soil-based drought screens are performed with plants overexpressing the polynucleotides detailed above. Seeds from control Arabidopsis plants, or other transgenic plants overexpressing the polypeptide of the invention are germinated and transferred to pots. Drought stress is obtained after irrigation is ceased accompanied by placing the pots on absorbent paper to enhance the soil-drying rate. Transgenic and control plants are compared to each other when the majority of the control plants develop severe wilting. Plants are re-watered after obtaining a significant fraction of the control plants displaying a severe wilting. Plants are ranked comparing to controls for each of two criteria: tolerance to the drought conditions and recovery (survival) following re-watering.
  • the maintenance of a phenotype under drought condition as compared to normal conditions can be determined as the “RATIO Drought/Normal”, which represents ratio for the specified parameter of Drought condition results (measured parameter under Drought) divided by measured parameter under Normal conditions.
  • Cold stress tolerance To analyze cold stress, mature (25 day old) plants are transferred to 4° C. chambers for 1 or 2 weeks, with constitutive light. Later on plants are moved back to greenhouse. Two weeks later damages from chilling period, resulting in growth retardation and other phenotypes, are compared between both control and transgenic plants, by measuring plant weight (wet and dry), and by comparing growth rates measured as time to flowering, plant size, yield, and the like.
  • Heat stress tolerance is achieved by exposing the plants to temperatures above 34° C. for a certain period. Plant tolerance is examined after transferring the plants back to 22° C. for recovery and evaluation after 5 days relative to internal controls (non-transgenic plants) or plants not exposed to neither cold or heat stress.
  • Water use efficiency can be determined as the biomass produced per unit transpiration. To analyze WUE, leaf relative water content can be measured in control and transgenic plants. Fresh weight (FW) is immediately recorded; then leaves are soaked for 8 hours in distilled water at room temperature in the dark, and the turgid weight (TW) is recorded. Total dry weight (DW) is recorded after drying the leaves at 60° C. to a constant weight. Relative water content (RWC) is calculated according to the following Formula I:
  • Fertilizer use efficiency To analyze whether the transgenic plants are more responsive to fertilizers, plants are grown in agar plates or pots with a limited amount of fertilizer, as described, for example, in Yanagisawa et al (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101:7833-8). The plants are analyzed for their overall size, time to flowering, yield, protein content of shoot and/or grain. The parameters checked are the overall size of the mature plant, its wet and dry weight, the weight of the seeds yielded, the average seed size and the number of seeds produced per plant.
  • NUE nitrogen use efficiency
  • PUE phosphate use efficiency
  • KUE potassium use efficiency
  • Nitrogen use efficiency To analyze whether the transgenic plants (e.g., Arabidopsis plants) are more responsive to nitrogen, plant are grown in 0.75-3 mM (nitrogen deficient conditions) or 6-10 mM (optimal nitrogen concentration). Plants are allowed to grow for additional 25 days or until seed production. The plants are then analyzed for their overall size, time to flowering, yield, protein content of shoot and/or grain/seed production. The parameters checked can be the overall size of the plant, wet and dry weight, the weight of the seeds yielded, the average seed size and the number of seeds produced per plant.
  • Nitrogen Use efficiency assay using plantlets The assay is done according to Yanagisawa-S. et al. with minor modifications (“Metabolic engineering with Dof1 transcription factor in plants: Improved nitrogen assimilation and growth under low-nitrogen conditions” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 7833-7838). Briefly, transgenic plants which are grown for 7-10 days in 0.5 ⁇ MS [Murashige-Skoog] supplemented with a selection agent are transferred to two nitrogen-limiting conditions: MS media in which the combined nitrogen concentration (NH 4 NO 3 and KNO 3 ) was 0.75 mM (nitrogen deficient conditions) or 6-15 mM (optimal nitrogen concentration).
  • Plants are allowed to grow for additional 30-40 days and then photographed, individually removed from the Agar (the shoot without the roots) and immediately weighed (fresh weight) for later statistical analysis. Constructs for which only T1 seeds are available are sown on selective media and at least 20 seedlings (each one representing an independent transformation event) are carefully transferred to the nitrogen-limiting media. For constructs for which T2 seeds are available, different transformation events are analyzed. Usually, 20 randomly selected plants from each event are transferred to the nitrogen-limiting media allowed to grow for 3-4 additional weeks and individually weighed at the end of that period. Transgenic plants are compared to control plants grown in parallel under the same conditions. Mock-transgenic plants expressing the uidA reporter gene (GUS) under the same promoter or transgenic plants carrying the same promoter but lacking a reporter gene are used as control.
  • GUS uidA reporter gene
  • N (nitrogen) concentration determination in the structural parts of the plants involves the potassium persulfate digestion method to convert organic N to NO 3 ⁇ (Purcell and King 1996 Argon. J. 88:111-113, the modified Cd ⁇ mediated reduction of NO 3 ⁇ to NO 2 ⁇ (Vodovotz 1996 Biotechniques 20:390-394) and the measurement of nitrite by the Griess assay (Vodovotz 1996, supra). The absorbance values are measured at 550 nm against a standard curve of NaNO 2 . The procedure is described in details in Samonte et al. 2006 Agron. J. 98:168-176.
  • Germination tests compare the percentage of seeds from transgenic plants that could complete the germination process to the percentage of seeds from control plants that are treated in the same manner Normal conditions are considered for example, incubations at 22° C. under 22-hour light 2-hour dark daily cycles. Evaluation of germination and seedling vigor is conducted between 4 and 14 days after planting. The basal media is 50% MS medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962 Plant Physiology 15, 473-497).
  • Germination is checked also at unfavorable conditions such as cold (incubating at temperatures lower than 10° C. instead of 22° C.) or using seed inhibition solutions that contain high concentrations of an osmolyte such as sorbitol (at concentrations of 50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM, 300 mM, 500 mM, and up to 1000 mM) or applying increasing concentrations of salt (of 50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM, 300 mM, 500 mM NaCl).
  • an osmolyte such as sorbitol
  • salt of 50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM, 300 mM, 500 mM NaCl
  • the effect of the transgene on plant's vigor, growth rate, biomass, yield and/or oil content can be determined using known methods.
  • Plant vigor The plant vigor can be calculated by the increase in growth parameters such as leaf area, fiber length, rosette diameter, plant fresh weight and the like per time.
  • the growth rate can be measured using digital analysis of growing plants. For example, images of plants growing in greenhouse on plot basis can be captured every 3 days and the rosette area can be calculated by digital analysis. Rosette area growth is calculated using the difference of rosette area between days of sampling divided by the difference in days between samples.
  • Evaluation of growth rate can be done by measuring plant biomass produced, rosette area, leaf size or root length per time (can be measured in cm 2 per day of leaf area).
  • Relative growth area (RGR) can be calculated using Formula II.
  • Relative growth rate area Regression coefficient of area along time course Formula II:
  • the relative growth area rate is in units of area units (e g, mm 2 /day or cm 2 /day) and the length growth rate is in units of length units (e.g., cm/day or mm/day).
  • RGR can be determined for plant height (Formula IX), SPAD (Formula XIII), Number of tillers (Formula XIV), root length (Formula XVII), vegetative growth (Formula XVII), leaf number (Formula XXI), rosette area (Formula XXII), rosette diameter (Formula XXIII), plot coverage (Formula XXIV), leaf blade area (Formula XX), and leaf area (Formula XXVI).
  • Relative growth rate of Plant height Regression coefficient of Plant height along time course (measured in cm/day).
  • Relative growth rate of SPAD Regression coefficient of SPAD Formula XIII: measurements along time course.
  • Relative growth rate of Number of tillers Regression coefficient of Number of tillers along time course (measured in units of “number of tillers/day”).
  • Relative growth rate of root length Regression coefficient of root length along time course (measured in cm per day).
  • Vegetative growth rate analysis was calculated according to Formula XVII below.
  • Relative growth rate of vegetative growth Regression coefficient of leaf area along time course (measured in cm 2 per day).
  • Relative growth rate of leaf number Regression coefficient of leaf number along time course (measured in number per day).
  • Relative growth rate of rosette diameter Regression coefficient of rosette diameter along time course (measured in cm per day).
  • Relative growth rate of leaf blade area Regression coefficient of leaf area along time course (measured in cm 2 per day).
  • Seed yield Evaluation of the seed yield per plant can be done by measuring the amount (weight or size) or quantity (i.e., number) of dry seeds produced and harvested from 8-16 plants and divided by the number of plants.
  • the total seeds from 8-16 plants can be collected, weighted using e.g., an analytical balance and the total weight can be divided by the number of plants.
  • Seed yield per growing area can be calculated in the same manner while taking into account the growing area given to a single plant. Increase seed yield per growing area could be achieved by increasing seed yield per plant, and/or by increasing number of plants capable of growing in a given area.
  • seed yield can be determined via the weight of 1000 seeds.
  • the weight of 1000 seeds can be determined as follows: seeds are scattered on a glass tray and a picture is taken. Each sample is weighted and then using the digital analysis, the number of seeds in each sample is calculated.
  • the 1000 seeds weight can be calculated using formula III:
  • Seed Weight number of seed in sample/sample weight ⁇ 1000 Formula III:
  • the Harvest Index can be calculated using Formulas IV, V, VIII and XI below.
  • Harvest Index (seed) Average seed yield per plant/Average dry weight Formula IV:
  • Harvest Index (for barley)—The harvest index is calculated using Formula XI.
  • Root/Shoot Ratio total weight of the root at harvest/total weight of the vegetative portion above ground at harvest.
  • Ratio of the number of pods per node on main stem at pod set Total number of pods on main stem/Total number of nodes on main stem, average of three plants per plot.
  • Ratio of total number of seeds in main stem to number of seeds on lateral branches Total number of seeds on main stem at pod set/Total number of seeds on lateral branches at pod set.
  • Grain protein concentration Grain protein content (g grain protein m ⁇ 2 ) is estimated as the product of the mass of grain N (g grain N m ⁇ 2 ) multiplied by the N/protein conversion ratio of k-5.13 (Mosse 1990, supra). The grain protein concentration is estimated as the ratio of grain protein content per unit mass of the grain (g grain protein kg ⁇ 1 grain).
  • Fiber length can be measured using fibrograph.
  • the fibrograph system was used to compute length in terms of “Upper Half Mean” length.
  • the upper half mean (UHM) is the average length of longer half of the fiber distribution.
  • increased yield of corn may be manifested as one or more of the following: increase in the number of plants per growing area, increase in the number of ears per plant, increase in the number of rows per ear, number of kernels per ear row, kernel weight, thousand kernel weight (1000-weight), ear length/diameter, increase oil content per kernel and increase starch content per kernel.
  • increased yield of rice can be manifested by an increase in one or more of the following: number of plants per growing area, number of panicles per plant, number of spikelets per panicle, number of flowers per panicle, increase in the seed filling rate, increase in thousand kernel weight (1000-weight), increase oil content per seed, increase starch content per seed, among others.
  • An increase in yield may also result in modified architecture, or may occur because of modified architecture.
  • increased yield of soybean may be manifested by an increase in one or more of the following: number of plants per growing area, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, increase in the seed filling rate, increase in thousand seed weight (1000-weight), reduce pod shattering, increase oil content per seed, increase protein content per seed, among others.
  • An increase in yield may also result in modified architecture, or may occur because of modified architecture.
  • Increased yield of canola may be manifested by an increase in one or more of the following: number of plants per growing area, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, increase in the seed filling rate, increase in thousand seed weight (1000-weight), reduce pod shattering, increase oil content per seed, among others.
  • An increase in yield may also result in modified architecture, or may occur because of modified architecture.
  • Increased yield of cotton may be manifested by an increase in one or more of the following: number of plants per growing area, number of bolls per plant, number of seeds per boll, increase in the seed filling rate, increase in thousand seed weight (1000-weight), increase oil content per seed, improve fiber length, fiber strength, among others.
  • An increase in yield may also result in modified architecture, or may occur because of modified architecture.
  • Oil content The oil content of a plant can be determined by extraction of the oil from the seed or the vegetative portion of the plant. Briefly, lipids (oil) can be removed from the plant (e.g., seed) by grinding the plant tissue in the presence of specific solvents (e.g., hexane or petroleum ether) and extracting the oil in a continuous extractor. Indirect oil content analysis can be carried out using various known methods such as Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy, which measures the resonance energy absorbed by hydrogen atoms in the liquid state of the sample [See for example, Conway T F.
  • NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
  • NI Near Infrared
  • Seed Oil yield can be calculated as follows: Seed yield per plant (gr.)*Oil % in seed.
  • the present invention is of high agricultural value for promoting the yield of commercially desired crops (e.g., biomass of vegetative organ such as poplar wood, or reproductive organ such as number of seeds or seed biomass).
  • crops e.g., biomass of vegetative organ such as poplar wood, or reproductive organ such as number of seeds or seed biomass.
  • transgenic plants described hereinabove or parts thereof may be processed to produce a feed, meal, protein or oil preparation, such as for ruminant animals.
  • transgenic plants described hereinabove which exhibit an increased oil content can be used to produce plant oil (by extracting the oil from the plant).
  • the plant oil (including the seed oil and/or the vegetative portion oil) produced according to the method of the invention may be combined with a variety of other ingredients.
  • the specific ingredients included in a product are determined according to the intended use.
  • Exemplary products include animal feed, raw material for chemical modification, biodegradable plastic, blended food product, edible oil, biofuel, cooking oil, lubricant, biodiesel, snack food, cosmetics, and fermentation process raw material.
  • Exemplary products to be incorporated to the plant oil include animal feeds, human food products such as extruded snack foods, breads, as a food binding agent, aquaculture feeds, fermentable mixtures, food supplements, sport drinks, nutritional food bars, multi-vitamin supplements, diet drinks, and cereal foods.
  • the oil comprises a seed oil.
  • the oil comprises a vegetative portion oil (oil of the vegetative portion of the plant).
  • the plant cell forms a part of a plant.
  • a food or feed comprising the plants or a portion thereof of the present invention.
  • compositions, method or structure may include additional ingredients, steps and/or parts, but only if the additional ingredients, steps and/or parts do not materially alter the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed composition, method or structure.
  • a compound or “at least one compound” may include a plurality of compounds, including mixtures thereof.
  • range format is merely for convenience and brevity and should not be construed as an inflexible limitation on the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the description of a range should be considered to have specifically disclosed all the possible subranges as well as individual numerical values within that range. For example, description of a range such as from 1 to 6 should be considered to have specifically disclosed subranges such as from 1 to 3, from 1 to 4, from 1 to 5, from 2 to 4, from 2 to 6, from 3 to 6 etc., as well as individual numbers within that range, for example, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. This applies regardless of the breadth of the range.
  • a numerical range is indicated herein, it is meant to include any cited numeral (fractional or integral) within the indicated range.
  • the phrases “ranging/ranges between” a first indicate number and a second indicate number and “ranging/ranges from” a first indicate number “to” a second indicate number are used herein interchangeably and are meant to include the first and second indicated numbers and all the fractional and integral numerals therebetween.
  • method refers to manners, means, techniques and procedures for accomplishing a given task including, but not limited to, those manners, means, techniques and procedures either known to, or readily developed from known manners, means, techniques and procedures by practitioners of the chemical, pharmacological, biological, biochemical and medical arts.
  • sequences that substantially correspond to its complementary sequence as including minor sequence variations, resulting from, e.g., sequencing errors, cloning errors, or other alterations resulting in base substitution, base deletion or base addition, provided that the frequency of such variations is less than 1 in 50 nucleotides, alternatively, less than 1 in 100 nucleotides, alternatively, less than 1 in 200 nucleotides, alternatively, less than 1 in 500 nucleotides, alternatively, less than 1 in 1000 nucleotides, alternatively, less than 1 in 5,000 nucleotides, alternatively, less than 1 in 10,000 nucleotides.
  • Correlation analysis was performed for selected genes according to some embodiments of the invention, in which the characterized parameters (measured parameters according to the correlation IDs) were used as “x axis” for correlation with the tissue transcriptom which was used as the “Y axis”. For each gene and measured parameter a correlation coefficient “R” was calculated (using Pearson correlation) along with a p-value for the significance of the correlation.
  • the present inventors have identified polynucleotides which upregulation of expression thereof can increase abiotic stress tolerance (AB ST), water use efficiency (WUE), yield, oil content, growth rate, vigor, biomass, fiber yield and quality, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) of a plant.
  • AB ST abiotic stress tolerance
  • WUE water use efficiency
  • NUE nitrogen use efficiency
  • FUE fertilizer use efficiency
  • nucleotide sequence datasets used here were originated from publicly available databases or from performing sequencing using the Solexa technology (e.g. Barley and Sorghum). Sequence data from 100 different plant species was introduced into a single, comprehensive database. Other information on gene expression, protein annotation, enzymes and pathways were also incorporated. Major databases used include:
  • Database assembly was performed to build a wide, rich, reliable annotated and easy to analyze database comprised of publicly available genomic mRNA, ESTs DNA sequences, data from various crops as well as gene expression, protein annotation and pathway data QTLs, and other relevant information.
  • Database assembly is comprised of a toolbox of gene refining, structuring, annotation and analysis tools enabling to construct a tailored database for each gene discovery project.
  • Gene refining and structuring tools enable to reliably detect splice variants and antisense transcripts, generating understanding of various potential phenotypic outcomes of a single gene.
  • the capabilities of the “LEADS” platform of Compugen LTD for analyzing human genome have been confirmed and accepted by the scientific community [see e.g., “Widespread Antisense Transcription”, Yelin, et al. (2003) Nature Biotechnology 21, 379-85; “Splicing of Alu Sequences”, Lev-Maor, et al. (2003) Science 300 (5623), 1288-91; “Computational analysis of alternative splicing using EST tissue information”, Xie H et al. Genomics 2002], and have been proven most efficient in plant genomics as well.
  • EST clustering and gene assembly For gene clustering and assembly of organisms with available genome sequence data ( arabidopsis , rice, castorbean, grape, brachypodium, poplar, soybean, sorghum) the genomic LEADS version (GANG) was employed. This tool allows most accurate clustering of ESTs and mRNA sequences on genome, and predicts gene structure as well as alternative splicing events and anti-sense transcription.
  • Gene expression profiling Several data sources were exploited for gene expression profiling, namely microarray data and digital expression profile (see below). According to gene expression profile, a correlation analysis was performed to identify genes which are co-regulated under different development stages and environmental conditions and associated with different phenotypes.
  • Expression profiling is one of the most important resource data for identifying genes important for ABST, increased yield, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, WUE, NUE and FUE of a plant.
  • a digital expression profile summary was compiled for each cluster according to all keywords included in the sequence records comprising the cluster.
  • Digital expression also known as electronic Northern Blot, is a tool that displays virtual expression profile based on the EST sequences forming the gene cluster.
  • the tool provides the expression profile of a cluster in terms of plant anatomy (e.g., the tissue/organ in which the gene is expressed), developmental stage (the developmental stages at which a gene can be found) and profile of treatment (provides the physiological conditions under which a gene is expressed such as drought, cold, pathogen infection, etc).
  • the digital expression Given a random distribution of ESTs in the different clusters, the digital expression provides a probability value that describes the probability of a cluster having a total of N ESTs to contain X ESTs from a certain collection of libraries.
  • GS FLX pyrosequencing (Roche/454 Life Sciences) of non-normalized and purified cDNA samples yielded 1,150,657 expressed sequence tags, that assembled into 67,477 unigenes (32,357 singletons and 35,120 contigs).
  • Analysis of the data obtained against the Cucurbit Genomics Database [Hypertext Transfer Protocol://World Wide Web (dot) icugi (dot) org/] confirmed the accuracy of the sequencing and assembly. Expression patterns of selected genes fitted well their qRT-PCR data.
  • the array oligonucleotide represents about 44,000 sorghum genes and transcripts.
  • various plant characteristics of 17 different sorghum hybrids were analyzed.
  • RNA expression analysis 10 hybrids encompassing the observed variance were selected for RNA expression analysis.
  • sorghum plants were grown in the field using commercial fertilization and irrigation protocols, which include 370 m 3 water per dunam (1000 m 2 ) per entire growth period and fertilization of 14 units of URAN® 21% (Nitrogen Fertilizer Solution; PCS Sales, Northbrook, Ill., USA) (normal growth conditions).
  • Drought conditions sorghum seeds were sown in soil and grown under normal condition until around 35 days from sowing, around stage V8 (eight green leaves are fully expanded, booting not started yet). At this point, irrigation was stopped, and severe drought stress was developed.
  • Analyzed Sorghum tissues All 10 selected Sorghum hybrids were sample per each treatment. Tissues [Flag leaf, Flower meristem and Flower] from plants growing under normal conditions, severe drought stress and low nitrogen conditions were sampled and RNA was extracted as described above. Each micro-array expression information tissue type has received a Set ID as summarized in Table 1 below.
  • Average grain area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the Plant ‘Head’. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The grain area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Head average area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period 5 ‘Heads’ were photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The ‘Head’ area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of ‘Heads’.
  • Head average length (cm)—At the end of the growing period 5 ‘Heads’ were photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The ‘Head’ length (longest axis) was measured from those images and was divided by the number of ‘Heads’.
  • Head average width (cm)—At the end of the growing period 5 ‘Heads’ were photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The ‘Head’ width was measured from those images and was divided by the number of ‘Heads’.
  • Head average perimeter (cm)—At the end of the growing period 5 ‘Heads’ were photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The ‘Head’ perimeter was measured from those images and was divided by the number of ‘Heads’.
  • An image processing system was used, which consists of a personal desktop computer (Intel P4 3.0 GHz processor) and a public domain program—ImageJ 1.37, Java based image processing software, which was developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and is freely available on the internet at Hypertext Transfer Protocol://rsbweb (dot) nih (dot) gov/. Images were captured in resolution of 10 Mega Pixels (3888 ⁇ 2592 pixels) and stored in a low compression JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group standard) format. Next, image processing output data for seed area and seed length was saved to text files and analyzed using the JMP statistical analysis software (SAS institute).
  • SAS institute JMP statistical analysis software
  • Total seed weight per head (Grain yield) (gr.)—At the end of the experiment (plant ‘Heads’) heads from plots within blocks A-C were collected. 5 heads were separately threshed and grains were weighted, all additional heads were threshed together and weighted as well. The average grain weight per head was calculated by dividing the total grain weight by number of total heads per plot (based on plot). In case of 5 heads, the total grains weight of 5 heads was divided by 5.
  • FW (fresh weight) head per plant (gr.)—At the end of the experiment (when heads were harvested) total heads and 5 selected heads per plots within blocks A-C were collected separately. The heads (total and 5) were weighted (gr.) separately, and the average fresh weight per plant was calculated for total (FW Head/Plant gr. based on plot) and for 5 heads (FW Head/Plant gr. based on 5 plants).
  • Plant height Plants were characterized for height during growing period at 5 time points. In each measure, plants were measured for their height using a measuring tape. Height was measured from ground level to top of the longest leaf.
  • Plant leaf number Plants were characterized for leaf number during growing period at 5 time points. In each measure, plants were measured for their leaf number by counting all the leaves of 3 selected plants per plot.
  • SPAD Chlorophyll content was determined using a Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter and measurement was performed 64 days post sowing. SPAD meter readings were done on young fully developed leaves. Three measurements per leaf were taken per plot.
  • Vegetative fresh weight and Heads At the end of the experiment (when inflorescence were dry) all inflorescence and vegetative material from plots within blocks A-C were collected. The biomass and heads weight of each plot was separated, measured and divided by the number of heads.
  • Plant biomass (Fresh weight)—At the end of the experiment (when inflorescence were dry) the vegetative material from plots within blocks A-C were collected. The plants biomass without the inflorescence were measured and divided by the number of plants.
  • Dry weight total weight of the vegetative portion above ground (excluding roots) after drying at 70° C. in oven for 48 hours;
  • the array oligonucleotide represents about 65,000 sorghum genes and transcripts.
  • various plant characteristics of 12 different sorghum hybrids were analyzed.
  • RNA expression analysis 8 hybrids encompassing the observed variance were selected for RNA expression analysis.
  • sorghum plants were grown in the field using commercial fertilization and irrigation protocols, which include 452 m 3 water per dunam (1000 square meters) per entire growth period and fertilization of 14 units of URAN® 21% (Nitrogen Fertilizer Solution; PCS Sales, Northbrook, Ill., USA) (normal growth conditions).
  • Drought conditions sorghum seeds were sown in soil and grown under normal condition until flowering stage (59 days from sowing), drought treatment was imposed by irrigating plants with 50% water relative to the normal treatment from this stage [309 m 3 water per dunam (1000 square meters) per entire growth period].
  • Analyzed Sorghum tissues All 12 selected Sorghum hybrids were sample per each treatment. Tissues [Flag leaf, upper stem, lower stem, flower, grain] representing different plant characteristics, from plants growing under normal conditions and drought stress conditions were sampled and RNA was extracted as described above. Each micro-array expression information tissue type has received a Set ID as summarized in Table 10 below.
  • Average grain area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the Plant ‘Head’. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The grain area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Average grain width (cm)—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the Plant ‘Head’. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The sum of grain width (longest axis) was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Average grain perimeter (cm)—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the Plant ‘Head’. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The sum of grain perimeter was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Grain circularity At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the Plant ‘Head’. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The circularity of the grains was calculated based on Formula VI.
  • Head average area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period 8 ‘Heads’ were photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The ‘Head’ area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of ‘Heads’.
  • Head average length (cm)—At the end of the growing period 8 ‘Heads’ were photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The ‘Head’ length (longest axis) was measured from those images and was divided by the number of ‘Heads’.
  • Head average width (cm)—At the end of the growing period 8 ‘Heads’ were photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The ‘Head’ width (longest axis) was measured from those images and was divided by the number of ‘Heads’.
  • An image processing system was used, which consists of a personal desktop computer (Intel P4 3.0 GHz processor) and a public domain program—ImageJ 1.37, Java based image processing software, which was developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and is freely available on the internet at Hypertext Transfer Protocol://rsbweb (dot) nih (dot) gov/. Images were captured in resolution of 10 Mega Pixels (3888 ⁇ 2592 pixels) and stored in a low compression JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group standard) format. Next, image processing output data for seed area and seed length was saved to text files and analyzed using the JMP statistical analysis software (SAS institute).
  • SAS institute JMP statistical analysis software
  • Head dry weight at grain filling (gr.)—5 heads per plot were collected at the grain filling stage (R2-R3) and weighted after oven dry (dry weight).
  • Head dry weights at harvest (gr.)—At the end of the growing period heads were collected (harvest stage), either from 8 plants per plot or from the rest of the plants in the plot. Heads were weighted after oven dry (dry weight), and average head weight per plant or per plot were calculated.
  • Total seed yield (gr.)—At the end of the growing period heads were collected (harvest stage). 8 heads were separately threshed and grains were weighted. The average grain weight per plant was calculated by dividing the total grain weight by the number of plants.
  • Grain number (num.)—was calculated by dividing seed yield by 1000 seed weight.
  • Plant height (cm.)—Plants were characterized for height during growing period at 6 time points (including at harvest). In each measure, plants were measured for their height using a measuring tape. Height was measured from ground level to top of the longest leaf.
  • SPAD Chlorophyll content was determined using a Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter and measurement was performed at early grain filling (SPAD_earlyGF) and late grain filling (SPAD_lateGF). SPAD meter readings were done on fully developed leaf. Three measurements per leaf were taken per plant.
  • Vegetative fresh and dry weight per plant (gr.)—At the end of the growing period all vegetative material (excluding roots) from plots were collected and weighted before (fresh weight) and after (dry weight) oven dry. The biomass per plant was calculated by dividing total biomass by the number of plants.
  • Relative water content (R WC, %)—at grain filling stage, leaves were collected from 5 plants per plot. Measurements of relative water content was done as follows: fresh weight (FW) was recorded immediately after leaf sampling; then leaves were soaked for 8 hours in distilled water at room temperature in the dark, and the turgid weight (TW) was recorded. Total dry weight (DW) was recorded after drying the leaves at 60° C. to a constant weight. Relative water content (RWC) is calculated according to Formula I (above).
  • SLA Specific leaf area
  • Stomatal conductance (F) GF (mmol m ⁇ 2 s ⁇ 1 )—plants were evaluated for their stomata conductance using SC-1 Leaf Porometer (Decagon devices) at flowering (F) and at grain filling (GF) stages. Stomata conductance readings were done on fully developed leaf, for 2 leaves and 2 plants per plot.
  • Lower internode fresh and dry density (F) and (H) (gr/cm 3 )—These parameters were measured at two time points during the course of the experiment: at flowering (F) and at harvest (H). Lower internodes from at least 5 plants per plot were separated from the plant and weighted (fresh and dry weight). To obtain stem density, stem weight (either fresh or dry) was divided by the stem volume (see above).
  • Number of days to heading [num]—Calculated as the number of days from sowing till 50% of the plot arrives heading.
  • Number of days to maturity (num]—Calculated as the number of days from sowing till 50% of the plot arrives seed maturation.
  • Full Hoagland solution consists of: KNO 3 —0.808 grams/liter, MgSO 4 —0.12 grams/liter, KH 2 PO 4 —0.172 grams/liter and 0.01% (volume/volume) of ‘Super coratin’ micro elements (Iron-EDDHA [ethylenediamine-N,N′-bis(2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid)]—40.5 grams/liter; Mn—20.2 grams/liter; Zn 10.1 grams/liter; Co 1.5 grams/liter; and Mo 1.1 grams/liter), solution's pH should be 6.5-6.8].
  • KNO 3 0.808 grams/liter
  • MgSO 4 0.12 grams/liter
  • KH 2 PO 4 0.172 grams/liter
  • 0.01% (volume/volume) of ‘Super coratin’ micro elements Iron-EDDHA [ethylenediamine-N,N′-bis(2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid)]—40.5 grams/liter; Mn—20.2 grams/liter; Zn 10.1 grams/liter; Co 1.5 grams/
  • Analyzed Sorghum tissues All 10 selected Sorghum hybrids were sampled per each treatment. Three tissues [leaves, meristems and roots] growing at 100 mM NaCl, low temperature (10 ⁇ 2° C.), low Nitrogen (1.2 mM Nitrogen) or under Normal conditions were sampled and RNA was extracted as described above. Each micro-array expression information tissue type has received a Set ID as summarized in Table 21 below.
  • Total biomass [gr] total biomass including roots and shoots.
  • RGR Leaf Num calculated relative growth rate (RGR) of leaf number.
  • NUE per total biomass nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of total biomass.
  • NUE per root biomass nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of total biomass.
  • NUE per shoot biomass nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of total biomass.
  • Percent of reduction of root biomass compared to normal the difference (reduction in percent) between root biomass under normal and under low nitrogen conditions.
  • Percent of reduction of shoot biomass compared to normal the difference (reduction in percent) between shoot biomass under normal and under low nitrogen conditions.
  • Percent of reduction of total biomass compared to normal the difference (reduction in percent) between total biomass (shoot and root) under normal and under low nitrogen conditions.
  • Plant height Plants were characterized for height during growing period at 5 time points. In each measure, plants were measured for their height using a measuring tape. Height was measured from ground level to top of the longest leaf.
  • SPAD Chlorophyll content was determined using a Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter and measurement was performed 64 days post sowing. SPAD meter readings were done on young fully developed leaf. Three measurements per leaf were taken per plot.
  • Chlorophyll content was determined using a Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter and measurement was performed at time of flowering. SPAD meter readings were done on young fully developed leaf. Three measurements per leaf were taken per plot.
  • TP1, TP2 and TP3 refer to time points 1, 2 (TP1 + 8 days) and 3 (TP2 + 7 days), respectively.
  • the array oligonucleotide represents about 60,000 sorghum genes and transcripts.
  • various plant characteristics of 10 different sorghum hybrids were analyzed. The correlation between the RNA levels and the characterized parameters was analyzed using Pearson correlation test [Hypertext Transfer Protocol://World Wide Web (dot) davidmlane (dot) com/hyperstat/A34739 (dot) html].
  • Analyzed Sorghum tissues All 10 selected Sorghum hybrids were sampled per each condition.
  • Leaf tissue growing under 30° C. and low light (100 ⁇ E m- 2 sec- 1 ), 14° C. and low light (100 ⁇ E m- 2 sec- 1 ), 30° C. and high light (250 ⁇ m- 2 sec- 1 ), 14° C. and high light (250 ⁇ E m- 2 sec- 1 ) were sampled at vegetative stage of four-five leaves and RNA was extracted as described above.
  • Each micro-array expression information tissue type has received a Set ID as summarized in Table 32 below.
  • RGR Relative Growth Rate
  • Leaves number [num]—Plants were characterized for leaf number during growing period. In each measure, plants were measured for their leaf number by counting all the leaves of selected plants per plot.
  • Leaves temperature [° C.]—leaf temperature was measured using Fluke IR thermometer 568 device. Measurements were done on opened leaves.
  • Table 33 describes the Sorghum correlated parameters.
  • the average for each of the measured parameters was calculated using the JMP software and values are summarized in Tables 34-37 below. Subsequent correlation analysis between the various transcriptom sets and the average parameters (Table 38) was conducted. Under, results were integrated to the database.
  • the array oligonucleotide represents about 60,000 maize genes and transcripts.
  • RNA expression analysis Twelve Maize hybrids were grown in 3 repetitive plots, in field. Maize seeds were planted and plants were grown in the field using commercial fertilization and irrigation protocols, which included 485 m 3 water per dunam (1000 square meters) per entire growth period and fertilization of 30 units of URAN® 21% fertilization per dunam per entire growth period (normal conditions).
  • the 12 different maize hybrids were analyzed. Among them, 11 hybrids encompassing the observed variance were selected for RNA expression analysis. The correlation between the RNA levels and the characterized parameters was analyzed using Pearson correlation test [Hypertext Transfer Protocol://World Wide Web (dot) davidmlane (dot) com/hyperstat/A34739 (dot) html].
  • Grain Area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the ear. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The grain area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Grain Length and Grain width (cm)—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the ear. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The sum of grain lengths/or width (longest axis) was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Ear Area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period 5 ears were photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The Ear area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of Ears.
  • the image processing system was used, which consists of a personal desktop computer (Intel P4 3.0 GHz processor) and a public domain program—ImageJ 1.37, Java based image processing software, which was developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and is freely available on the internet at Hypertext Transfer Protocol://rsbweb (dot) nih (dot) gov/. Images were captured in resolution of 10 Mega Pixels (3888 ⁇ 2592 pixels) and stored in a low compression JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group standard) format. Next, image processing output data for seed area and seed length was saved to text files and analyzed using the JMP statistical analysis software (SAS institute).
  • SAS institute JMP statistical analysis software
  • Normalized Grain Weight per plant (kg)—At the end of the experiment all ears from plots within blocks A-C were collected. Six ears were separately threshed and grains were weighted, all additional ears were threshed together and weighted as well. The average grain weight per ear was calculated by dividing the total grain weight by number of total ears per plot (based on plot). In case of 6 ears, the total grains weight of 6 ears was divided by 6.
  • Ear FW (kg)—At the end of the experiment (when ears were harvested) total and 6 selected ears per plots within blocks A-C were collected separately. The plants with (total and 6) were weighted (gr.) separately and the average ear per plant was calculated for total (Ear FW per plot) and for 6 (Ear FW per plant).
  • Leaf number per plant [num]—Plants were characterized for leaf number during growing period at 5 time points. In each measure, plants were measured for their leaf number by counting all the leaves of 3 selected plants per plot.
  • SPAD Chlorophyll content was determined using a Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter and measurement was performed at early stages of grain filling (R1-R2) and late stage of grain filling (R3-R4). SPAD meter readings were done on young fully developed leaf. Three measurements per leaf were taken per plot. Data were taken after 46 and 54 days after sowing (DPS).
  • Dry weight total weight of the vegetative portion above ground (excluding roots) after drying at 70° C. in oven for 48 hours.
  • Percent Filled Ear [%] was calculated as the percentage of the Ear area with grains out of the total ear.
  • Cob diameter [mm] The diameter of the cob without grains was measured using a ruler.
  • Kernel Row Number per Ear [num] The number of rows in each ear was counted.
  • Table 41 describes the Maize correlated parameters. The average for each of the measured parameter was calculated using the JMP software (Tables 42-47) and a subsequent correlation analysis was performed (Table 48-49). Results were then integrated to the database.
  • Corr. ID correlation set ID according to the correlated parameters Table above.
  • Exp. Set Expression set.
  • R Pearson correlation coefficient;
  • P p value.
  • the array oligonucleotide represents about 44,000 maize genes and transcripts.
  • RNA expression analysis The correlation between the RNA levels and the characterized
  • TP2 V6-V8
  • TP5 R1-R2
  • Grain Area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the ear. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The grain area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Grain Length and Grain width (cm)—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the ear. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The sum of grain lengths/or width (longest axis) was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Ear Area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period 5 ears were, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The Ear area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of Ears.
  • Ear Length and Ear Width (cm)—At the end of the growing period 5 ears were, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The Ear length and width (longest axis) was measured from those images and was divided by the number of ears.
  • the image processing system was used, which consists of a personal desktop computer (Intel P4 3.0 GHz processor) and a public domain program—ImageJ 1.37, Java based image processing software, which was developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and is freely available on the internet at Hypertext Transfer Protocol://rsbweb (dot) nih (dot) gov/. Images were captured in resolution of 10 Mega Pixels (3888 ⁇ 2592 pixels) and stored in a low compression JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group standard) format. Next, image processing output data for seed area and seed length was saved to text files and analyzed using the JMP statistical analysis software (SAS institute).
  • SAS institute JMP statistical analysis software
  • Normalized Grain Weight per plant (gr.)—At the end of the experiment all ears from plots within blocks A-C were collected. Six ears were separately threshed and grains were weighted, all additional ears were threshed together and weighted as well. The average grain weight per ear was calculated by dividing the total grain weight by number of total ears per plot (based on plot). In case of 6 ears, the total grains weight of 6 ears was divided by 6.
  • Ear FW (gr.)—At the end of the experiment (when ears were harvested) total and 6 selected ears per plots within blocks A-C were collected separately. The plants with (total and 6) were weighted (gr.) separately and the average ear per plant was calculated for total (Ear FW per plot) and for 6 (Ear FW per plant).
  • Leaf number per plant [num]—Plants were characterized for leaf number during growing period at 5 time points. In each measure, plants were measured for their leaf number by counting all the leaves of 3 selected plants per plot.
  • SPAD Chlorophyll content was determined using a Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter and measurement was performed 64 days post sowing. SPAD meter readings were done on young fully developed leaf. Three measurements per leaf were taken per plot. Data were taken after 46 and 54 days after sowing (DPS).
  • Dry weight total weight of the vegetative portion above ground (excluding roots) after drying at 70° C. in oven for 48 hours.
  • Percent Filled Ear [%] was calculated as the percentage of the Ear area with grains out of the total ear.
  • Cob diameter [mm] The diameter of the cob without grains was measured using a ruler.
  • Kernel Row Number per Ear [num] The number of rows in each ear was counted.
  • Full Hoagland solution consists of: KNO 3 —0.808 grams/liter, MgSO 4 —0.12 grams/liter, KH 2 PO 4 —0.136 grams/liter and 0.01% (volume/volume) of ‘Super coratin’ micro elements (Iron-EDDHA [ethylenediamine-N,N′-bis(2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid)]—40.5 grams/liter; Mn—20.2 grams/liter; Zn 10.1 grams/liter; Co 1.5 grams/liter; and Mo 1.1 grams/liter), solution's pH should be 6.5-6.8.
  • Iron-EDDHA ethylenediamine-N,N′-bis(2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid)
  • Analyzed Maize tissues Twelve selected Maize hybrids were sampled per each treatment. Two tissues [leaves and root tip] representing different plant characteristics were sampled. Plants were sampled from all 4 treatments applied: salinity (100 mM NaCl), low temperature (10 ⁇ 2° C.), low Nitrogen (1.6 mM N) and Normal conditions. Sampling was done at the vegetative stage (V4-5) and RNA was extracted as described above. Each micro-array expression information tissue type has received a Set ID as summarized in Table 54-57 below.
  • Root dry weight (DW)—root dry weight per plant, all vegetative tissue above ground (average of four plants);
  • SPAD Chlorophyll content was determined using a Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter and measurement was performed 30 days post sowing. SPAD meter readings were done on young fully developed leaf. Three measurements per leaf were taken per plot.
  • Plant height growth the relative growth rate (RGR) of Plant Height was calculated using Formula IX:
  • Relative growth rate of Plant height Regression coefficient of Plant height along time course (measured in cm/day).
  • Root length the length of the root was measured at V4 developmental stage.
  • Tables 58-59 describes the maize correlated parameters. The average for each of the measured parameter was calculated using the JMP software and values are summarized in Tables 60-63 below. Subsequent correlation analysis between the various transcriptom sets and the average parameters (Tables 64-67) was conducted. Under, results were integrated to the database.
  • the array oligonucleotide represents about 60K Maize genes and transcripts designed based on data from Public databases (Example 1).
  • biomass components or vigor related parameters various plant characteristics of 13 different Maize hybrids were analyzed under normal and defoliation conditions. Same hybrids were subjected to RNA expression analysis. The correlation between the RNA levels and the characterized parameters was analyzed using Pearson correlation test [Hypertext Transfer Protocol://World Wide Web (dot) davidmlane (dot) com/hyperstat/A34739 (dot) html].
  • the image processing system was used, which consists of a personal desktop computer (Intel P4 3.0 GHz processor) and a public domain program—ImageJ 1.37, Java based image processing software, which was developed at the U.S. National
  • Ear Area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period Sears were, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The Ear area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of ears.
  • Ear Length and Ear Width (cm)—At the end of the growing period 6 ears were, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The Ear length and width (longest axis) was measured from those images and was divided by the number of ears.
  • Grain Area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the ear. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weight, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The grain area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Grain Length and Grain width (cm)—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the ear. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weight, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The sum of grain lengths/or width (longest axis) was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Grain Perimeter (cm)—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the ear. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains were weight, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The sum of grain perimeter was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Ear filled grain area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period 5 ears were photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The Ear area filled with kernels was measured from those images and was divided by the number of Ears.
  • Filled per Whole Ear was calculated as the length of the ear with grains out of the total ear.
  • Cob width [mm] The diameter of the cob without grains was measured using a ruler.
  • Ear average (avr.) weight [gr.]—At the end of the experiment (when ears were harvested) total and 6 selected ears per plots were collected. The ears were weighted and the average ear per plant was calculated. The ear weight was normalized using the relative humidity to be 0%.
  • Ear row number (num)—The number of rows per ear was counted.
  • Ear fresh weight per plant GF—During the grain filling period (GF) and total and 6 selected ears per plot were collected separately. The ears were weighted and the average ear weight per plant was calculated.
  • Ears dry weight (Kg)—At the end of the experiment (when ears were harvested) total and 6 selected ears per plots were collected and weighted. The ear weight was normalized using the relative humidity to be 0%.
  • Ears fresh weight (Kg)—At the end of the experiment (when ears were harvested) total and 6 selected ears per plots were collected and weighted.
  • Ears per plant (num)—the number of ears per plant was counted.
  • Grains yield (Kg.)—At the end of the experiment all ears were collected. Ears from 6 plants from each plot were separately threshed and grains were weighted.
  • Grains dry yield (Kg.)—At the end of the experiment all ears were collected. Ears from 6 plants from each plot were separately threshed and grains were weighted. The grain weight was normalized using the relative humidity to be 0%.
  • Grain yield per ear (Kg.)—At the end of the experiment all ears were collected. 5 ears from each plot were separately threshed and grains were weighted. The average grain weight per ear was calculated by dividing the total grain weight by the number of ears.
  • Leaves area cm 2 ) per plant (GF, and HD) [LAI] Total leaf area of 6 plants in a plot. This parameter was measured using a Leaf area-meter at two time points during the course of the experiment: at heading (HD) and during the grain filling period (GF).
  • Leaves fresh weight (gr.) (GF, and HD)—This parameter was measured at two time points during the course of the experiment: at heading (HD) and during the grain filling period (GF). Leaves used for measurement of the LAI were weighted.
  • Lower stem fresh weight (gr.) (GF, HD, and H)—This parameter was measured at three time points during the course of the experiment: at heading (HD), during the grain filling period (GF) and at harvest (H). Lower internodes from at least 4 plants per plot were separated from the plant and weighted. The average internode weight per plant was calculated by dividing the total grain weight by the number of plants.
  • Lower stem length (cm) (GF, HD, and H)—This parameter was measured at three time points during the course of the experiment: at heading (HD), during the grain filling period (GF) and at harvest (H). Lower internodes from at least 4 plants per plot were separated from the plant and their length was measured using a ruler. The average internode length per plant was calculated by dividing the total grain weight by the number of plants.
  • Lower stem width (mm) (GF, HD, and H)—This parameter was measured at three time points during the course of the experiment: at heading (HD), during the grain filling period (GF) and at harvest (H). Lower internodes from at least 4 plants per plot were separated from the plant and their diameter was measured using a caliber. The average internode width per plant was calculated by dividing the total grain weight by the number of plants.
  • Plant height growth the relative growth rate (RGR) of Plant Height was calculated using Formula IX above, by Regression coefficient of Plant height along time course, measured in cm/day).
  • SPAD Chlorophyll content was determined using a Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter and measurement was performed 64 days post sowing. SPAD meter readings were done on young fully developed leaf. Three measurements per leaf were taken per plot. Data were taken after 46 and 54 days after sowing (DPS).
  • Stem fresh weight (gr.) (GF and HD)—This parameter was measured at two time points during the course of the experiment: at heading (HD) and during the grain filling period (GF). Stems of the plants used for measurement of the LAI were weighted.
  • Total dry matter (kg) Total dry matter was calculated as follows:
  • Upper stem fresh weight (gr.) (GF, HD and H)—This parameter was measured at three time points during the course of the experiment: at heading (HD), during the grain filling period (GF) and at harvest (H). Upper internodes from at least 4 plants per plot were separated from the plant and weighted. The average internode weight per plant was calculated by dividing the total grain weight by the number of plants.
  • Upper stem length (cm) (GF, HD and H)—This parameter was measured at three time points during the course of the experiment: at heading (HD), during the grain filling period (GF) and at harvest (H). Upper internodes from at least 4 plants per plot were separated from the plant and their length was measured using a ruler.
  • Upper stem width (mm) (GF, HD and H)—This parameter was measured at three time points during the course of the experiment: at heading (HD), during the grain filling period (GF) and at harvest (H). Upper internodes from at least 4 plants per plot were separated from the plant and their diameter was measured using a caliber.
  • Vegetative dry weight total weight of the vegetative portion of 6 plants (above ground excluding roots) after drying at 70° C. in oven for 48 hours divided by the number of plants.
  • Vegetative fresh weight total weight of the vegetative portion of 6 plants (above ground excluding roots).
  • Node number nodes on the stem were counted at the heading stage of plant development.
  • Tables 75 and 76 hereinbelow provide the correlations (R) between the expression levels yield improving genes and their homologs in various tissues [Expression (Exp) sets] and the phenotypic performance [yield, biomass, growth rate and/or vigor components (Correlation vector (Cor))] under normal and defoliation conditions across maize varieties.
  • R correlations between the expression levels yield improving genes and their homologs in various tissues [Expression (Exp) sets] and the phenotypic performance [yield, biomass, growth rate and/or vigor components (Correlation vector (Cor))] under normal and defoliation conditions across maize varieties.
  • P p value.
  • the array oligonucleotide represents about 60K foxtail millet genes and transcripts.
  • various plant characteristics of 14 different foxtail millet accessions were analyzed.
  • RNA expression analysis 11 accessions encompassing the observed variance were selected for RNA expression analysis.
  • Drought conditions foxtail millet seeds were sown in soil and grown under normal condition until the heading stage (22 days from sowing), and then drought treatment was imposed by irrigating plants with 50% water relative to the normal treatment (171 m 3 water per dunam per entire growth period).
  • foxtail millet lines were sample per each treatment.
  • Each micro-array expression information tissue type has received a Set ID as summarized in Tables 77-78 below.
  • the image analysis system included a personal desktop computer (Intel P4 3.0 GHz processor) and a public domain program—ImageJ 1.37 (Java based image processing program, which was developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and freely available on the internet [Hypertext Transfer Protocol://rsbweb (dot) nih (dot) gov/]. Next, analyzed data was saved to text files and processed using the JMP statistical analysis software (SAS institute).
  • SAS institute JMP statistical analysis software
  • Average Grain Area (cm 2 )—A sample of ⁇ 200 grains was weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The grain area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Average Grain Length and width (cm)—A sample of ⁇ 200 grains was weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The sum of grain lengths and width (longest axis) were measured from those images and were divided by the number of grains.
  • Head Average Area (cm 2 )—The ‘Head’ area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of ‘Heads’.
  • Head Average Length and width (cm)—The ‘Head’ length and width (longest axis) were measured from those images and were divided by the number of ‘Heads’.
  • the image processing system was used, which consists of a personal desktop computer (Intel P4 3.0 GHz processor) and a public domain program—ImageJ 1.37, Java based image processing software, which was developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and is freely available on the internet at Hypertext Transfer Protocol://rsbweb (dot) nih (dot) gov/. Images were captured in resolution of 10 Mega Pixels (3888 ⁇ 2592 pixels) and stored in a low compression JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group standard) format. Next, image processing output data for seed area and seed length was saved to text files and analyzed using the JMP statistical analysis software (SAS institute).
  • SAS institute JMP statistical analysis software
  • Head weight (Kg.) and head number (num.)—At the end of the experiment, heads were harvested from each plot and were counted and weighted.
  • Total Grain Yield (gr.)—At the end of the experiment (plant ‘Heads’) heads from plots were collected, the heads were threshed and grains were weighted. In addition, the average grain weight per head was calculated by dividing the total grain weight by number of total heads per plot (based on plot).
  • Number (num) of days to anthesis Calculated as the number of days from sowing till 50% of the plot arrives anthesis.
  • . . etc. refer to those described in Table 79 above [Foxtail millet correlated parameters (vectors)]. Provided are the values of each of the parameters (as described above) measured in Foxtail millet accessions (line) for maintenance of performance under drought (calculated as % of change under drought vs normal growth conditions). Growth conditions are specified in the experimental procedure section.
  • . . etc. refer to those described in Table 79 above [Foxtail millet correlated parameters (vectors)]. Provided are the values of each of the parameters (as described above) measured in Foxtail millet accessions (line) for maintenance of performance under drought (calculated as % of change under drought vs normal growth conditions). Growth conditions are specified in the experimental procedure section.
  • the array oligonucleotide represents about 44,000 Barley genes and transcripts.
  • various plant characteristics of 25 different Barley accessions were analyzed. Among them, 13 accessions encompassing the observed variance were selected for RNA expression analysis. The correlation between the RNA levels and the characterized parameters was analyzed using Pearson correlation test [Hypertext Transfer Protocol://World Wide Web (dot) davidmlane (dot) com/hyperstat/A34739 (dot) html].
  • Barley transcriptom expression sets Expression Set Set ID booting spike 1 flowering spike 2 meristem 3 Stem 4 Table 89. Provided are the Barley transcriptom expression sets.
  • Barley yield components and vigor related parameters assessment 25 Barley accessions in 4 repetitive blocks (named A, B, C, and D), each containing 4 plants per plot were grown at net house. Plants were phenotyped on a daily basis following the standard descriptor of barley (Table 90, below). Harvest was conducted while 50% of the spikes were dry to avoid spontaneous release of the seeds. Plants were separated to the vegetative part and spikes, of them, 5 spikes were threshed (grains were separated from the glumes) for additional grain analysis such as size measurement, grain count per spike and grain yield per spike. All material was oven dried and the seeds were threshed manually from the spikes prior to measurement of the seed characteristics (weight and size) using scanning and image analysis.
  • the image analysis system included a personal desktop computer (Intel P4 3.0 GHz processor) and a public domain program—ImageJ 1.37 [Java based image processing program, which was developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and freely available on the internet [Hypertext Transfer Protocol://rsbweb (dot) nih (dot) gov/]. Next, analyzed data was saved to text files and processed using the JMP statistical analysis software (SAS institute).
  • SAS institute JMP statistical analysis software
  • Grains per spike At the end of the experiment (50% of the spikes were dry) all spikes from plots within blocks A-D were collected. The total number of grains from 5 spikes that were manually threshed was counted. The average grain per spike is calculated by dividing the total grain number by the number of spikes.
  • Grain average size (cm)—At the end of the experiment (50% of the spikes were dry) all spikes from plots within blocks A-D were collected. The total grains from 5 spikes that were manually threshed were scanned and images were analyzed using the digital imaging system. Grain scanning was done using Brother scanner (model DCP-135), at the 200 dpi resolution and analyzed with Image J software. The average grain size was calculated by dividing the total grain size by the total grain number.
  • Grain yield per spike (gr.)—At the end of the experiment (50% of the spikes were dry) all spikes from plots within blocks A-D were collected. The total grains from 5 spikes that were manually threshed were weight. The grain yield was calculated by dividing the total weight by the spike number.
  • Spike length analysis At the end of the experiment (50% of the spikes were dry) all spikes from plots within blocks A-D were collected. The five chosen spikes per plant were measured using measuring tape excluding the awns.
  • Plant height At the harvest stage (50% of spikes were dry) each of the plants was measured for its height using measuring tape. Height was measured from ground level to top of the longest spike excluding awns.
  • Days to flowering Each of the plants was monitored for flowering date. Days of flowering was calculated from sowing date till flowering date.
  • Stem pigmentation At the growth stage 10 (booting), each of the plants was scored for its stem color. The scale that was used was 1 for green till 5 for full purple.
  • Dry weight total weight of the vegetative portion above ground (excluding roots) after drying at 70° C. in oven for 48 hours.
  • Spike yield per plant total spike weight per plant (gr.) after drying at 30° C. in oven for 48 hours.
  • Harvest Index (for barley)—The harvest index is calculated using Formula XI.
  • the array oligonucleotide represents about 60K Barley genes and transcripts.
  • various plant characteristics of 15 different Barley accessions were analyzed. Among them, 10 accessions encompassing the observed variance were selected for RNA expression analysis. The correlation between the RNA levels and the characterized parameters was analyzed using Pearson correlation test [Hypertext Transfer Protocol://World Wide Web (dot) davidmlane (dot) com/hyperstat/A34739 (dot) html].
  • Barley transcriptom expression sets under drought and recovery conditions Expression Set Set ID Booting spike under drought conditions 1 Leaf at reproductive stage under drought conditions 2 Leaf at vegetative stage under drought conditions 3 Meristem at vegetative stage under drought conditions 4 Root tip at vegetative stage under drought conditions 5 Root tip at vegetative stage under recovery from drought 6 conditions Table 94. Provided are the barley transcriptome expression sets under drought and recovery conditions.
  • Barley yield components and vigor related parameters assessment 15 Barley accessions in 5 repetitive blocks, each containing 5 plants per pot were grown at net house. Three different treatments were applied: plants were regularly fertilized and watered during plant growth until harvesting (as recommended for commercial growth, normal growth conditions which included irrigation 2-3 times a week, and fertilization given in the first 1.5 months of the growth period); under low Nitrogen (80% percent less Nitrogen); or under drought stress (cycles of drought and re-irrigating were conducted throughout the whole experiment, overall 40% less water were given in the drought treatment). Plants were phenotyped on a daily basis following the parameters listed in Tables 97-100 below. Harvest was conducted while all the spikes were dry.
  • the image analysis system included a personal desktop computer (Intel P4 3.0 GHz processor) and a public domain program—ImageJ 1.37 (Java based image processing program, which was developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and freely available on the internet [Hypertext Transfer Protocol://rsbweb (dot) nih (dot) gov/]. Next, analyzed data was saved to text files and processed using the JMP statistical analysis software (SAS institute).
  • SAS institute JMP statistical analysis software
  • Grain yield (gr.)—At the end of the experiment all spikes of the pots were collected. The total grains from all spikes that were manually threshed were weighted. The grain yield was calculated by per plot or per plant.
  • Spike length and width analysis At the end of the experiment the length and width of five chosen spikes per plant were measured using measuring tape excluding the awns.
  • Spike number analysis The spikes per plant were counted.
  • Plant height Each of the plants was measured for its height using measuring tape. Height was measured from ground level to top of the longest spike excluding awns at two time points at the Vegetative growth (30 days after sowing) and at harvest.
  • Spike weight The biomass and spikes weight of each plot was separated, measured and divided by the number of plants.
  • Dry weight total weight of the vegetative portion above ground (excluding roots) after drying at 70° C. in oven for 48 hours at two time points at the Vegetative growth (30 days after sowing) and at harvest.
  • Spikelet per spike number of spikelets per spike was counted.
  • Root/Shoot Ratio The Root/Shoot Ratio is calculated using Formula XII.
  • Root/Shoot Ratio total weight of the root at harvest/total weight of the vegetative portion above ground at harvest.
  • Percent of reproductive tillers the number of reproductive tillers barring a spike at harvest was divided by the total numbers o tillers.
  • SPAD Chlorophyll content was determined using a Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter and measurement was performed at time of flowering. SPAD meter readings were done on young fully developed leaf. Three measurements per leaf were taken per plot.
  • Root FW (gr.), root length (cm) and No. of lateral roots—3 plants per plot were selected for measurement of root weight, root length and for counting the number of lateral roots formed.
  • Average Grain Area (cm 2 )—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the spike. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains was weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The grain area was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Average Grain Length and width (cm)—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the spike. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains was weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The sum of grain lengths or width (longest axis) was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains
  • Average Grain perimeter (cm)—At the end of the growing period the grains were separated from the spike. A sample of ⁇ 200 grains was weighted, photographed and images were processed using the below described image processing system. The sum of grain perimeter was measured from those images and was divided by the number of grains.
  • Heading date the day in which booting stage was observed was recorded and number of days from sowing to heading was calculated.
  • Relative water content Fresh weight (FW) of three leaves from three plants each from different seed ID was immediately recorded; then leaves were soaked for 8 hours in distilled water at room temperature in the dark, and the turgid weight (TW) was recorded. Total dry weight (DW) was recorded after drying the leaves at 60° C. to a constant weight.
  • Relative water content (RWC) is calculated according to Formula I above.
  • Harvest Index (for barley)—The harvest index is calculated using Formula XI above.
  • Relative growth rate the relative growth rate (RGR) of Plant Height (Formula IX above), SPAD (Formula XIII below) and number of tillers (Formula XIII) are calculated as follows:
  • Relative growth rate of Number of tillers Regression coefficient of Number of tillers along time course (measured in units of “number of tillers/day”).
  • RATIO Drought/Normal Represent ratio for the specified parameter of Drought condition results divided by Normal conditions results (maintenance of phenotype under drought in comparison to normal conditions).
  • Tables 97-100 describes the Barley correlated parameters. The average for each of the measured parameters was calculated using the JMP software and values are summarized in Tables 101-109 below. Subsequent correlation analysis between the various transcriptom sets and the average parameters (Tables 110-113) was conducted. Under, results were integrated to the database.
  • the array oligonucleotide represents about 44,000 Tomato genes and transcripts.
  • NUE yield components or vigor related parameters various plant characteristics of 18 different Tomato varieties were analyzed. Among them, 10 varieties encompassing the observed variance were selected for RNA expression analysis. The correlation between the RNA levels and the characterized parameters was analyzed using Pearson correlation test [Hypertext Transfer Protocol://World Wide Web (dot) davidmlane (dot) com/hyperstat/A34739 (dot) html].
  • Tomato varieties were grown in 3 repetitive blocks, each containing 6 plants per plot, at net house. Briefly, the growing protocol was as follows:
  • Tomato varieties were grown under normal conditions: 4-6 Liters/m 2 of water per day and fertilized with NPK (nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium at a ratio 6:6:6, respectively) as recommended in protocols for commercial tomato production.
  • NPK nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium at a ratio 6:6:6, respectively
  • Drought stress Tomato varieties were grown under normal conditions (4-6 Liters/m 2 per day with fertilizers) until flowering. At this time, irrigation was reduced to 50% compared to normal conditions.
  • Plants were phenotyped on a daily basis following the standard descriptor of tomato (Table 115). Harvest was conducted while 50% of the fruits were red (mature). Plants were separated to the vegetative part and fruits, of them, 2 nodes were analyzed for additional inflorescent parameters such as size, number of flowers, and inflorescent weight. Fresh weight of all vegetative material was measured. Fruits were separated to colors (red vs. green) and in accordance with the fruit size (small, medium and large). Next, analyzed data was saved to text files and processed using the JMP statistical analysis software (SAS institute).
  • SAS institute JMP statistical analysis software
  • Tomato transcriptom expression sets Expression Set Set IDs Leaf, normal conditions 1 Flower, normal conditions 2 Leaf, low nitrogen conditions 3 Flower, low nitrogen conditions 4 Leaf, drought conditions 5 Flower, drought conditions 6 Leaf, drought conditions 7 Flower, drought conditions 8 Leaf, low nitrogen conditions 9 Flower, low nitrogen conditions 10 Leaf, normal conditions 11 Flower, normal conditions 12 Table 114: Provided are the tomato transcriptome expression sets.
  • Fruit Yield (grams)—At the end of the experiment [when 50% of the fruit were ripe (red)] all fruits from plots within blocks A-C were collected. The total fruits were counted and weighted. The average fruits weight was calculated by dividing the total fruit weight by the number of fruits.
  • Plant Fresh Weight (grams)—At the end of the experiment [when 50% of the fruit were ripe (red)] all plants from plots within blocks A-C were collected. Fresh weight was measured (grams).
  • Inflorescence Weight (grams)—At the end of the experiment [when 50% of the fruits were ripe (red)] two inflorescence from plots within blocks A-C were collected. The inflorescence weight (gr.) and number of flowers per inflorescence were counted.
  • SPAD Chlorophyll content was determined using a Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter and measurement was performed at time of flowering. SPAD meter readings were done on young fully developed leaf. Three measurements per leaf were taken per plot.
  • WUE Water use efficiency
  • Leaf relative water content was measured in control and transgenic plants. Fresh weight (FW) was immediately recorded; then leaves were soaked for 8 hours in distilled water at room temperature in the dark, and the turgid weight (TW) was recorded. Total dry weight (DW) was recorded after drying the leaves at 60° C. to a constant weight.
  • Relative water content (RWC) was calculated according to the following Formula I [(FW ⁇ DW/TW ⁇ DW) ⁇ 100] as described above.
  • Plants that maintain high relative water content (RWC) compared to control lines were considered more tolerant to drought than those exhibiting reduced relative water content
  • Tomato hybrids were grown in 3 repetitive plots, each containing 17 plants, at a net house under semi-hydroponics conditions. Briefly, the growing protocol was as follows: Tomato seeds were sown in trays filled with a mix of vermiculite and peat in a 1:1 ratio.
  • the trays were transferred to the high salinity solution (300 mM NaCl in addition to the Full Hoagland solution), low nitrogen solution (the amount of total nitrogen was reduced in a 90% from the full Hoagland solution, final amount of 0.8 mM N), or at Normal growth solution (Full Hoagland containing 8 mM N solution, at 28 ⁇ 2° C.). Plants were grown at 28 ⁇ 2° C.
  • Full Hoagland solution consists of: KNO 3 —0.808 grams/liter, MgSO 4 —0.12 grams/liter, KH 2 PO 4 —0.172 grams/liter and 0.01% (volume/volume) of ‘Super coratin’ micro elements (Iron-EDDHA [ethylenediamine-N,N′-bis(2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid)]—40.5 grams/liter; Mn—20.2 grams/liter; Zn 10.1 grams/liter; Co 1.5 grams/liter; and Mo 1.1 grams/liter), solution's pH should be 6.5-6.8.
  • Iron-EDDHA ethylenediamine-N,N′-bis(2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid)
  • Tomato transcriptom expression sets Expression Set Set IDs Leaf - normal conditions 1 + 10 Root - normal conditions 2 + 9 Leaf - low nitrogen conditions 3 + 8 Root - low nitrogen conditions 4 + 7 Leaf - salinity conditions 5 + 12 Root - salinity conditions 6 + 11 Table 124. Provided are the tomato transcriptom experimental sets.
  • Tomato vigor related parameters following 5 weeks of growing, plant were harvested and analyzed for leaf number, plant height, chlorophyll levels (SPAD units), different indices of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and plant biomass. Next, analyzed data was saved to text files and processed using the JMP statistical analysis software (SAS institute). Data parameters collected are summarized in Table 125, herein below.
  • Leaf number number of opened leaves.
  • RGR Leaf Num calculated relative growth rate (RGR) of leaf number.
  • NUE root biomass nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of root growth calculated as root biomass divided by nitrogen concentration
  • NUE shoot biomass nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of shoot growth calculated as shoot biomass divided by nitrogen concentration. Percent of reduction of root biomass compared to normal—the difference (reduction in percent) between root biomass under normal and under low nitrogen conditions.
  • Percent of reduction of shoot biomass compared to normal the difference (reduction in percent) between shoot biomass under normal and under low nitrogen conditions.
  • Percent of reduction of total biomass compared to normal the difference (reduction in percent) between total biomass (shoot and root) under normal and under low nitrogen conditions.
  • Plant height Plants were characterized for height during growing period at 5 time points. In each measure, plants were measured for their height using a measuring tape. Height was measured from ground level to top of the longest leaf.
  • SPAD Chlorophyll content was determined using a Minolta SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter and measurement was performed 64 days post sowing. SPAD meter readings were done on young fully developed leaf. Three measurements per leaf were taken per plot.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Nutrition Science (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
  • Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
US14/423,793 2012-08-27 2013-08-26 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants Abandoned US20150267218A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/423,793 US20150267218A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2013-08-26 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US17/083,557 US11485982B1 (en) 2012-08-27 2020-10-29 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261693392P 2012-08-27 2012-08-27
US201361754587P 2013-01-20 2013-01-20
PCT/IL2013/050725 WO2014033714A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2013-08-26 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US14/423,793 US20150267218A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2013-08-26 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IL2013/050725 A-371-Of-International WO2014033714A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2013-08-26 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/847,948 Division US10858665B2 (en) 2012-08-27 2017-12-20 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150267218A1 true US20150267218A1 (en) 2015-09-24

Family

ID=50182608

Family Applications (7)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/423,793 Abandoned US20150267218A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2013-08-26 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US15/847,948 Active US10858665B2 (en) 2012-08-27 2017-12-20 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US17/083,557 Active US11485982B1 (en) 2012-08-27 2020-10-29 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US17/083,539 Active US11512323B2 (en) 2012-08-27 2020-10-29 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US17/083,578 Abandoned US20210254088A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2020-10-29 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US17/973,568 Abandoned US20230140118A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2022-10-26 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US17/979,839 Abandoned US20230109864A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2022-11-03 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants

Family Applications After (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/847,948 Active US10858665B2 (en) 2012-08-27 2017-12-20 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US17/083,557 Active US11485982B1 (en) 2012-08-27 2020-10-29 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US17/083,539 Active US11512323B2 (en) 2012-08-27 2020-10-29 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US17/083,578 Abandoned US20210254088A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2020-10-29 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US17/973,568 Abandoned US20230140118A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2022-10-26 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US17/979,839 Abandoned US20230109864A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2022-11-03 Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (7) US20150267218A1 (pt)
AR (1) AR092866A1 (pt)
AU (3) AU2013310979B2 (pt)
BR (10) BR122019028122B1 (pt)
CA (4) CA2881623C (pt)
MX (2) MX356151B (pt)
WO (1) WO2014033714A1 (pt)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10858665B2 (en) 2012-08-27 2020-12-08 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US11926833B2 (en) 2022-01-25 2024-03-12 Living Carbon PBC Compositions and methods for enhancing biomass productivity in plants

Families Citing this family (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7554007B2 (en) 2003-05-22 2009-06-30 Evogene Ltd. Methods of increasing abiotic stress tolerance and/or biomass in plants
AU2005234725B2 (en) 2003-05-22 2012-02-23 Evogene Ltd. Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby
WO2007049275A2 (en) 2005-10-24 2007-05-03 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polypeptides, polynucleotides encoding same, transgenic plants expressing same and methods of using same
EP2336330B1 (en) 2004-06-14 2018-01-10 Evogene Ltd. Polynucleotides and polypeptides involved in plant fiber development and methods of using same
MX349479B (es) 2006-12-20 2017-07-31 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos y polipeptidos involucrados en el desarrollo de fibra vegetal y metodos de uso.
BR122020016899B1 (pt) 2007-04-09 2021-06-22 Evogene Ltd Método para aumentar o teor de óleo, taxa de crescimento, biomassa, vigor e/ou rendimento de uma planta, e, construção de ácido nucleico isolado
CA3133548A1 (en) 2007-07-24 2009-01-29 Evogene Ltd. Polynucleotides, polypeptides encoded thereby, and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance and/or biomass and/or yield in plants expressing same
MX357387B (es) 2007-12-27 2018-07-06 Evogene Ltd Polipeptidos, polinucleotidos aislados utiles para modificar la eficacia en el uso de agua, eficacia en el uso del fertilizante, la tolerancia al estres biotico/abiotico, el rendimiento y biomasa en plantas.
BRPI0908666B1 (pt) 2008-05-22 2021-06-15 Evogene Ltd Método de aumento do teor do óleo, do rendimento de sementes, da taxa de crescimento e/ou da biomassa de uma planta quando comparada a uma planta nativa, e, construção de ácido nucleico isolado
AR073076A1 (es) 2008-08-18 2010-10-13 Evogene Ltd Polipeptidos y polinucleotidos aislados utiles para mejorar la eficacia en el uso de nitrogeno, tolerancia al estres abiotico, rendimiento y biomasa en plantas.
BRPI0914522B1 (pt) 2008-10-30 2019-04-02 Evogene Ltd Método para aumentar o rendimento, a biomassa, a taxa de crescimento, o vigor, oteor de óleo, e/ou a eficiência da utilização do nitrogênio de uma planta
EP2373792B1 (en) 2008-12-29 2016-11-02 Evogene Ltd. Polynucleotides, polypeptides encoded thereby, and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and/or yield in plants expressing same
EP3460062B1 (en) 2009-03-02 2021-05-05 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
MX339869B (es) 2009-06-10 2016-06-15 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos y polipeptidos aislados, y metodos para utilizarlos para mejorar la eficacia en el uso de nitrogeno, rendimiento, tasa de crecimiento, vigor, biomasa, contenido de aceite y/o tolerancia al estres abiotico.
MX2012001508A (es) 2009-08-04 2013-05-30 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos y polipeptidos aislados, y metodos para utilizarlos para mejorar la tolerancia al estres abiotico, rendimiento, tasa de crecimiento, vigor, biomasa, contenido de aceite y/o eficacia en el uso de nitrogeno de las plantas.
AU2010337936B2 (en) 2009-12-28 2016-06-23 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing plant yield, biomass, growth rate, vigor, oil content, abiotic stress tolerance of plants and nitrogen use efficiency
BR122021002353B1 (pt) 2010-04-28 2022-08-16 Evogene Ltd Método de aumento de produção, biomassa, taxa de crescimento, vigor, tolerância ao estresse abiótico e/ou eficiência de uso de nitrogênio de uma planta, e, construto de ácido nucleico isolado
AR082530A1 (es) 2010-08-30 2012-12-12 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos y polipeptidos aislados, y metodos para utilizarlos para aumentar la eficacia en el uso de nitrogeno, rendimiento, tasa de crecimiento, vigor, biomasa, contenido de aceite y/o tolerancia al estres abiotico
BR122020018456B1 (pt) 2010-12-22 2021-10-19 Evogene Ltd. Método para aumentar a tolerância ao estresse abiótico, rendimento, biomassa, taxa de crescimento, vigor, e/ou eficiência de uso de nitrogênio de uma planta, e, construto de ácido nucleico isolado
WO2012150598A2 (en) 2011-05-03 2012-11-08 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing plant yield, biomass, growth rate, vigor, oil content, abiotic stress tolerance of plants and nitrogen use efficiency
WO2013027223A2 (en) 2011-08-23 2013-02-28 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
CA3119279A1 (en) 2011-11-21 2013-05-30 Evogene Ltd. Compositions and methods for increasing nematode resistance in plants
BR122019023075B1 (pt) 2011-11-28 2021-06-22 Evogene Ltd Método para aumento da eficiência no uso de nitrogênio, produção, biomassa, taxa de crescimento, vigor, e/ou tolerância ao estresse abiótico de uma planta e construto de ácido nucleico isolado
CA2859950A1 (en) 2011-12-28 2013-07-04 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing yield of plants
BR122019028229B1 (pt) 2012-02-29 2022-04-26 Evogene Ltd Método para aumentar o rendimento, a taxa de crescimento, a biomassa, e/ou o rendimento das sementes de uma planta em comparação com uma planta controle da mesma espécie que é cultivada nas mesmas condições de crescimento, e, construção de ácido nucleico
BR122021002108B1 (pt) 2012-05-28 2022-08-16 Evogene Ltd Método para aumentar a produção, taxa de crescimento, biomassa, vigor, produção de sementes, eficiência no uso de nitrogênio, e/ou tolerância ao estresse abiótico de uma planta, e, construção de ácido nucleico isolado
WO2014102773A1 (en) 2012-12-25 2014-07-03 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing nitrogen use efficiency of plants
WO2014102774A1 (en) 2012-12-26 2014-07-03 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, construct and plants comprising same and methods of using same for increasing nitrogen use efficiency of plants
AU2014269927B9 (en) 2013-05-22 2020-04-16 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
AU2014313753B2 (en) 2013-08-27 2020-03-12 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
WO2015164918A1 (en) * 2014-05-01 2015-11-05 Australian Centre For Plant Functional Genomics Pty Ltd Wheat boron transporters
MX2016015571A (es) 2014-05-28 2017-02-23 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos aislados, polipeptidos y metodos para utilizarlos para aumentar la tolerancia al stress abiotico, la biomasa y el rendimiento de plantas.
MX2017002281A (es) 2014-08-27 2017-05-02 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos y polipeptidos aislados y metodos para utilizarlos para aumentar el rendimiento de las plantas y/o sus caracteristicas agricolas.
AU2016381496B2 (en) 2015-12-28 2022-11-24 Evogene Ltd. Plant traits conferred by isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides
WO2018025202A1 (en) * 2016-08-03 2018-02-08 National Research Council Of Canada Agents and methods for altering wax production in plants
CN109284718B (zh) * 2018-09-26 2021-09-24 大连航佳机器人科技有限公司 面向巡检机器人的变视角多仪表同时识别方法
CN116716314A (zh) * 2023-07-03 2023-09-08 河南农业大学 番茄SlFolB基因在提高植物产量中的应用

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070277269A1 (en) * 2006-04-17 2007-11-29 Ceres, Inc. Nucleotide sequences and polypeptides encoded thereby useful for modifying plant characteristics

Family Cites Families (64)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7262055B2 (en) 1998-08-25 2007-08-28 Gendaq Limited Regulated gene expression in plants
US6084153A (en) 1996-02-14 2000-07-04 The Governors Of The University Of Alberta Plants having enhanced nitrogen assimilation/metabolism
US20090093620A1 (en) 2000-09-05 2009-04-09 David Kovalic Annotated Plant Genes
US20110214206A1 (en) 1999-05-06 2011-09-01 La Rosa Thomas J Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants
US20090087878A9 (en) * 1999-05-06 2009-04-02 La Rosa Thomas J Nucleic acid molecules associated with plants
US20110277178A1 (en) 1999-05-06 2011-11-10 Jingdong Liu Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants and uses thereof for plant improvement
US20070011783A1 (en) 1999-05-06 2007-01-11 Jingdong Liu Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants and uses thereof for plant improvement
US20100293669A2 (en) 1999-05-06 2010-11-18 Jingdong Liu Nucleic Acid Molecules and Other Molecules Associated with Plants and Uses Thereof for Plant Improvement
US8106174B2 (en) 2000-05-08 2012-01-31 Monsanto Technology Llc Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants and uses thereof for plant improvement
US20110179531A1 (en) 2000-05-09 2011-07-21 Kovalic David K Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants and uses thereof for plant improvement
US20070067865A1 (en) 2000-09-05 2007-03-22 Kovalic David K Annotated plant genes
US7214786B2 (en) * 2000-12-14 2007-05-08 Kovalic David K Nucleic acid molecules and other molecules associated with plants and uses thereof for plant improvement
US20050108791A1 (en) 2001-12-04 2005-05-19 Edgerton Michael D. Transgenic plants with improved phenotypes
JP2005185101A (ja) * 2002-05-30 2005-07-14 National Institute Of Agrobiological Sciences 植物の全長ｃＤＮＡおよびその利用
WO2004081173A2 (en) 2003-03-12 2004-09-23 Evogene Ltd. Nucleotide sequences regulating gene expression and constructs and methods utilizing same
BRPI0411182B1 (pt) 2003-05-22 2019-08-20 Evogene Ltd. Método para aumentar a tolerância de uma planta ao estresse salino e construto deácido nucleico
AU2005234725B2 (en) 2003-05-22 2012-02-23 Evogene Ltd. Methods of Increasing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and/or Biomass in Plants and Plants Generated Thereby
EP1636333A4 (en) 2003-06-19 2007-10-24 Evogene Ltd NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES FOR REGULATING GENE EXPRESSION IN VEGETABLE TRICHROMES, AND HYBRID GENES AND METHODS IN WHICH THEY INTERVENE
US7569389B2 (en) * 2004-09-30 2009-08-04 Ceres, Inc. Nucleotide sequences and polypeptides encoded thereby useful for modifying plant characteristics
US20060150283A1 (en) 2004-02-13 2006-07-06 Nickolai Alexandrov Sequence-determined DNA fragments and corresponding polypeptides encoded thereby
US20120159672A1 (en) 2004-02-06 2012-06-21 Nickolai Alexandrov Sequence-determined DNA fragments and corresponding polypeptides encoded thereby
WO2007049275A2 (en) 2005-10-24 2007-05-03 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polypeptides, polynucleotides encoding same, transgenic plants expressing same and methods of using same
EP2336330B1 (en) 2004-06-14 2018-01-10 Evogene Ltd. Polynucleotides and polypeptides involved in plant fiber development and methods of using same
US20060141495A1 (en) 2004-09-01 2006-06-29 Kunsheng Wu Polymorphic markers and methods of genotyping corn
US7750207B2 (en) * 2004-09-01 2010-07-06 Monsanto Technology Llc Zea mays ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activase promoter
AU2005286428B2 (en) 2004-09-24 2012-08-23 Basf Plant Science Gmbh Nucleic acid sequences encoding proteins associated with abiotic stress response and plant cells and plants with increased tolerance to environmental stress
SI1827078T1 (sl) 2004-12-21 2014-05-30 Monsanto Technology Llc Transgene rastline z izboljšanimi agronomskimi lastnostmi
US20080148432A1 (en) * 2005-12-21 2008-06-19 Mark Scott Abad Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
MX349479B (es) 2006-12-20 2017-07-31 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos y polipeptidos involucrados en el desarrollo de fibra vegetal y metodos de uso.
BR122020016899B1 (pt) 2007-04-09 2021-06-22 Evogene Ltd Método para aumentar o teor de óleo, taxa de crescimento, biomassa, vigor e/ou rendimento de uma planta, e, construção de ácido nucleico isolado
US8299318B2 (en) * 2007-07-05 2012-10-30 Ceres, Inc. Nucleotide sequences and corresponding polypeptides conferring modulated plant characteristics
CA3133548A1 (en) 2007-07-24 2009-01-29 Evogene Ltd. Polynucleotides, polypeptides encoded thereby, and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance and/or biomass and/or yield in plants expressing same
CN103695459A (zh) 2007-09-18 2014-04-02 巴斯夫植物科学有限公司 产量提高的植物
US8362325B2 (en) * 2007-10-03 2013-01-29 Ceres, Inc. Nucleotide sequences and corresponding polypeptides conferring modulated plant characteristics
MX357387B (es) 2007-12-27 2018-07-06 Evogene Ltd Polipeptidos, polinucleotidos aislados utiles para modificar la eficacia en el uso de agua, eficacia en el uso del fertilizante, la tolerancia al estres biotico/abiotico, el rendimiento y biomasa en plantas.
BRPI0908666B1 (pt) 2008-05-22 2021-06-15 Evogene Ltd Método de aumento do teor do óleo, do rendimento de sementes, da taxa de crescimento e/ou da biomassa de uma planta quando comparada a uma planta nativa, e, construção de ácido nucleico isolado
AR073076A1 (es) 2008-08-18 2010-10-13 Evogene Ltd Polipeptidos y polinucleotidos aislados utiles para mejorar la eficacia en el uso de nitrogeno, tolerancia al estres abiotico, rendimiento y biomasa en plantas.
CN102264907A (zh) 2008-10-23 2011-11-30 巴斯夫植物科学有限公司 产量增加的植物(nue)
BRPI0914522B1 (pt) 2008-10-30 2019-04-02 Evogene Ltd Método para aumentar o rendimento, a biomassa, a taxa de crescimento, o vigor, oteor de óleo, e/ou a eficiência da utilização do nitrogênio de uma planta
EP2373792B1 (en) 2008-12-29 2016-11-02 Evogene Ltd. Polynucleotides, polypeptides encoded thereby, and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and/or yield in plants expressing same
EP3460062B1 (en) 2009-03-02 2021-05-05 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
MX339869B (es) 2009-06-10 2016-06-15 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos y polipeptidos aislados, y metodos para utilizarlos para mejorar la eficacia en el uso de nitrogeno, rendimiento, tasa de crecimiento, vigor, biomasa, contenido de aceite y/o tolerancia al estres abiotico.
MX2012001508A (es) 2009-08-04 2013-05-30 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos y polipeptidos aislados, y metodos para utilizarlos para mejorar la tolerancia al estres abiotico, rendimiento, tasa de crecimiento, vigor, biomasa, contenido de aceite y/o eficacia en el uso de nitrogeno de las plantas.
AU2010337936B2 (en) 2009-12-28 2016-06-23 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing plant yield, biomass, growth rate, vigor, oil content, abiotic stress tolerance of plants and nitrogen use efficiency
US20110173745A1 (en) 2010-01-21 2011-07-21 Chao Jung Hung Separable paperless bidet toilet seat
US20110214205A1 (en) 2010-02-26 2011-09-01 Monsanto Technology Llc. Isolated Novel Nucleic Acid and Protein Molecules from Foxtail Millet and Methods of Using Those Molecules to Generate Transgenic Plants with Enhanced Agronomic Traits
BR122021002353B1 (pt) 2010-04-28 2022-08-16 Evogene Ltd Método de aumento de produção, biomassa, taxa de crescimento, vigor, tolerância ao estresse abiótico e/ou eficiência de uso de nitrogênio de uma planta, e, construto de ácido nucleico isolado
AR082530A1 (es) 2010-08-30 2012-12-12 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos y polipeptidos aislados, y metodos para utilizarlos para aumentar la eficacia en el uso de nitrogeno, rendimiento, tasa de crecimiento, vigor, biomasa, contenido de aceite y/o tolerancia al estres abiotico
BR122020018456B1 (pt) 2010-12-22 2021-10-19 Evogene Ltd. Método para aumentar a tolerância ao estresse abiótico, rendimento, biomassa, taxa de crescimento, vigor, e/ou eficiência de uso de nitrogênio de uma planta, e, construto de ácido nucleico isolado
WO2012150598A2 (en) 2011-05-03 2012-11-08 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing plant yield, biomass, growth rate, vigor, oil content, abiotic stress tolerance of plants and nitrogen use efficiency
WO2013027223A2 (en) 2011-08-23 2013-02-28 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
CA3119279A1 (en) 2011-11-21 2013-05-30 Evogene Ltd. Compositions and methods for increasing nematode resistance in plants
BR122019023075B1 (pt) 2011-11-28 2021-06-22 Evogene Ltd Método para aumento da eficiência no uso de nitrogênio, produção, biomassa, taxa de crescimento, vigor, e/ou tolerância ao estresse abiótico de uma planta e construto de ácido nucleico isolado
CA2859950A1 (en) 2011-12-28 2013-07-04 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing yield of plants
BR122019028229B1 (pt) 2012-02-29 2022-04-26 Evogene Ltd Método para aumentar o rendimento, a taxa de crescimento, a biomassa, e/ou o rendimento das sementes de uma planta em comparação com uma planta controle da mesma espécie que é cultivada nas mesmas condições de crescimento, e, construção de ácido nucleico
BR122021002108B1 (pt) 2012-05-28 2022-08-16 Evogene Ltd Método para aumentar a produção, taxa de crescimento, biomassa, vigor, produção de sementes, eficiência no uso de nitrogênio, e/ou tolerância ao estresse abiótico de uma planta, e, construção de ácido nucleico isolado
CA2881623C (en) 2012-08-27 2023-01-24 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
WO2014102773A1 (en) 2012-12-25 2014-07-03 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing nitrogen use efficiency of plants
WO2014102774A1 (en) 2012-12-26 2014-07-03 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, construct and plants comprising same and methods of using same for increasing nitrogen use efficiency of plants
AU2014269927B9 (en) 2013-05-22 2020-04-16 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
AU2014313753B2 (en) 2013-08-27 2020-03-12 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
MX2016015571A (es) 2014-05-28 2017-02-23 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos aislados, polipeptidos y metodos para utilizarlos para aumentar la tolerancia al stress abiotico, la biomasa y el rendimiento de plantas.
MX2017002281A (es) 2014-08-27 2017-05-02 Evogene Ltd Polinucleotidos y polipeptidos aislados y metodos para utilizarlos para aumentar el rendimiento de las plantas y/o sus caracteristicas agricolas.
AU2016381496B2 (en) 2015-12-28 2022-11-24 Evogene Ltd. Plant traits conferred by isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070277269A1 (en) * 2006-04-17 2007-11-29 Ceres, Inc. Nucleotide sequences and polypeptides encoded thereby useful for modifying plant characteristics

Non-Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Guo et al., 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101: 9205-9210. *
Keskin et al., 2004, Protein Science 13: 1043-1055. *
Setaria italica At2g33490-like protein (LOC101778068), GenBank accession number XM_004957248.3 *
Showalter et al., 2010, Plant Physiology 153: 485-513. *
Showalter et al., 2016, BMC Plant Biology 16: 229, pp 1-34. *
Tester and Bacic, 2005, Plant Physiology 137: 791-793. *
Thornton et al., 2000, Nature Structural Biology, structural genomic supplement, November 2000: 991-994. *
Velasquez et al., 2011, Science 332: 1401-1403. *
Zea mays HRGP sequence, GenBank accession number FJ940679.1, published 30 July 2010. *
Zhang et al., 2012, Nature Biotechnology 30: 549-554, with online methods. *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10858665B2 (en) 2012-08-27 2020-12-08 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US11485982B1 (en) 2012-08-27 2022-11-01 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US11512323B2 (en) 2012-08-27 2022-11-29 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants
US11926833B2 (en) 2022-01-25 2024-03-12 Living Carbon PBC Compositions and methods for enhancing biomass productivity in plants

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA3177778A1 (en) 2014-03-06
MX356151B (es) 2018-05-15
BR122020018663B1 (pt) 2022-08-09
WO2014033714A1 (en) 2014-03-06
AU2019201587A1 (en) 2019-04-04
US20230109864A1 (en) 2023-04-13
BR122019028124B1 (pt) 2022-08-09
BR122019028113B1 (pt) 2022-08-30
US11512323B2 (en) 2022-11-29
CA3177786A1 (en) 2014-03-06
CA2881623C (en) 2023-01-24
AR092866A1 (es) 2015-05-06
US20210254088A1 (en) 2021-08-19
AU2021218142A1 (en) 2021-09-16
MX2015002423A (es) 2015-06-05
BR112015004552A2 (pt) 2017-07-04
BR112015004552A8 (pt) 2021-07-06
CA3177769A1 (en) 2014-03-06
US20180105830A1 (en) 2018-04-19
AU2019201587B2 (en) 2021-05-20
BR122020018667B1 (pt) 2022-06-14
CA2881623A1 (en) 2014-03-06
US11485982B1 (en) 2022-11-01
US10858665B2 (en) 2020-12-08
BR122019028110B1 (pt) 2022-07-12
BR122020018671B1 (pt) 2022-04-12
BR122019028122B1 (pt) 2022-10-25
BR122019028105B1 (pt) 2022-05-10
AU2013310979B2 (en) 2018-12-13
US20220348947A1 (en) 2022-11-03
US20230140118A1 (en) 2023-05-04
AU2013310979A1 (en) 2015-03-05
MX2018005769A (es) 2022-01-25
BR122020018668B1 (pt) 2022-05-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11525141B2 (en) Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
US11472853B1 (en) Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
US20210189413A1 (en) Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
US11293032B2 (en) Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing plant yield and/or agricultural characteristics
US20230313218A1 (en) Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, construct and plants comprising same and methods of using same for increasing nitrogen use efficiency of plants
US11078492B2 (en) Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for increasing nitrogen use efficiency, yield, growth rate, vigor, biomass, oil content, and/or abiotic stress tolerance
US10457952B2 (en) Isolated polynucleotides and polypeptides, and methods of using same for improving plant properties
AU2013310979B2 (en) Isolated polynucleotides, polypeptides and methods of using same for increasing abiotic stress tolerance, biomass and yield of plants

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: EVOGENE LTD., ISRAEL

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DANGOOR, INBAL NURITH;KARCHI, HAGAI;SIGNING DATES FROM 20130424 TO 20130501;REEL/FRAME:035176/0479

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION