US20110311805A1 - Cutting tool - Google Patents

Cutting tool Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110311805A1
US20110311805A1 US13/201,028 US201013201028A US2011311805A1 US 20110311805 A1 US20110311805 A1 US 20110311805A1 US 201013201028 A US201013201028 A US 201013201028A US 2011311805 A1 US2011311805 A1 US 2011311805A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
cutting tool
tool according
metal oxide
oxide layer
range
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US13/201,028
Other versions
US8691378B2 (en
Inventor
Veit Schier
Oliver Eibl
Wolfgang Engelhart
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Walter AG
Original Assignee
Walter AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Walter AG filed Critical Walter AG
Assigned to WALTER AG reassignment WALTER AG ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EIBL, OLIVER, ENGELHART, WOLFGANG, SCHIER, VEIT
Publication of US20110311805A1 publication Critical patent/US20110311805A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8691378B2 publication Critical patent/US8691378B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C14/00Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
    • C23C14/06Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material characterised by the coating material
    • C23C14/08Oxides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C14/00Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
    • C23C14/06Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material characterised by the coating material
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23BTURNING; BORING
    • B23B27/00Tools for turning or boring machines; Tools of a similar kind in general; Accessories therefor
    • B23B27/02Cutting tools with straight main part and cutting edge at an angle
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23BTURNING; BORING
    • B23B27/00Tools for turning or boring machines; Tools of a similar kind in general; Accessories therefor
    • B23B27/14Cutting tools of which the bits or tips or cutting inserts are of special material
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C14/00Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
    • C23C14/06Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material characterised by the coating material
    • C23C14/08Oxides
    • C23C14/081Oxides of aluminium, magnesium or beryllium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C14/00Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
    • C23C14/06Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material characterised by the coating material
    • C23C14/08Oxides
    • C23C14/083Oxides of refractory metals or yttrium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C16/00Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
    • C23C16/22Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the deposition of inorganic material, other than metallic material
    • C23C16/30Deposition of compounds, mixtures or solid solutions, e.g. borides, carbides, nitrides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C16/00Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
    • C23C16/22Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the deposition of inorganic material, other than metallic material
    • C23C16/30Deposition of compounds, mixtures or solid solutions, e.g. borides, carbides, nitrides
    • C23C16/40Oxides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C30/00Coating with metallic material characterised only by the composition of the metallic material, i.e. not characterised by the coating process
    • C23C30/005Coating with metallic material characterised only by the composition of the metallic material, i.e. not characterised by the coating process on hard metal substrates
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23BTURNING; BORING
    • B23B2228/00Properties of materials of tools or workpieces, materials of tools or workpieces applied in a specific manner
    • B23B2228/08Properties of materials of tools or workpieces, materials of tools or workpieces applied in a specific manner applied by physical vapour deposition [PVD]
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23BTURNING; BORING
    • B23B2228/00Properties of materials of tools or workpieces, materials of tools or workpieces applied in a specific manner
    • B23B2228/10Coatings
    • B23B2228/105Coatings with specified thickness
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/25Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component and including a second component containing structurally defined particles
    • Y10T428/256Heavy metal or aluminum or compound thereof
    • Y10T428/257Iron oxide or aluminum oxide
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/26Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component, the element or component having a specified physical dimension
    • Y10T428/263Coating layer not in excess of 5 mils thick or equivalent
    • Y10T428/264Up to 3 mils
    • Y10T428/2651 mil or less

Definitions

  • the invention concerns a cutting tool having a substrate main body and a single-layer or multi-layer coating applied thereto, wherein at least one layer of the coating is a metal oxide layer produced in the PVD process or in the CVD process.
  • Cutting tools comprise a main body made for example from carbide metal, cermet, steel or high-speed steel. Frequently a single-layer or multi-layer coating is applied to the main body to increase the service lives or also to improve the cutting properties. That coating includes for example metallic hard material layers, oxide layers or the like.
  • CVD processes chemical vapour deposition
  • PVD processes physical vapour deposition
  • a plurality of layers within a coating can be applied exclusively by means of CVD processes, exclusively by means of PVD processes or by a combination of those processes.
  • PVD magnetron sputtering
  • arc PVD arc vapour deposition
  • ion plating electron beam vapour deposition
  • laser ablation magnetron sputtering and arc vapour deposition count among the PVD processes most frequently used for coating tools.
  • modifications such as for example unpulsed or pulsed magnetron sputtering or unpulsed or pulsed arc vapour deposition.
  • the target in the PVD process can comprise a pure metal or a combination of two or more metals. If the target includes a plurality of metals then all those metals are simultaneously incorporated into the layer of a coating, which is built up in the PVD process.
  • the quantitative ratio of the metals relative to each other in the layer which is built up will depend on the quantitative ratio of the metals in the target, but also on the conditions in the PVD process as individual metals are dissolved out of the target in higher quantities under given conditions and/or are deposited on the substrate in higher quantities, than other metals.
  • the pure metals oxidic, nitridic, carbidic forms of the metals or mixtures thereof are also used in targets.
  • reactive gases are fed to the reaction chamber of the PVD process, for example nitrogen for producing nitrides, oxygen for producing oxides, carbon-bearing compounds for producing carbides, carbonitrides, oxycarbides etc. or mixtures of those gases to produce corresponding mixed compounds.
  • bias potential is generally applied to the substrates to be coated in order to achieve the surface energy necessary for the growth process, and thus atomic mobility.
  • the energy is necessary to achieve crystalline structures in a growing layer.
  • the effectively applied bias potential is reduced during the growth process with increasing layer thickness, because of the insulating properties of the layer material, and that worsens the growth conditions at the layer surface and in addition can ultimately lead to exclusively or primarily amorphous structures being grown.
  • the layers exhibit crystalline components of zirconium oxide, but only amorphous components of aluminium oxide.
  • Trinh D. H. et al., Radio frequency dual magnetron sputtering deposition and characterization of nanocomposite Al203 —ZrO2 thin films, J. Vac. Sc. Techn. A 24(2), March/April 2006, pages 309-316, describe the deposit of very thin zirconium oxide/aluminium oxide layers in the nanometer range by magnetron sputtering, which present crystalline components of tetragonal zirconium oxide but only amorphous components of aluminium oxide.
  • WO-A-2007/121954 describes the production of a hard substance layer on a substrate by means of magnetron sputtering, wherein the hard substance layer contains the metallic elements Al, Cr and Si as well as non-metallic elements from the group B, C, N and 0.
  • the atomic proportion of oxygen in the non-metallic elements is greater than 30%.
  • the hard substance layer preferably contains crystalline phases and/or mixed phases in the system Al—Cr—Si—O. Both cubic phases of the space group Fd3m and also hexagonal phases of the space group R-3C can be formed.
  • EP-A-1 029 105 and EP-A-1 253 215 describe coated cutting tools for metal machining with a carbide metal, cermet or ceramic body and a hard and wear-resistant and heat-resistant coating which is deposited using the DMS (dual magnetron sputtering)-PVD method, wherein at least one layer and preferably the outermost layer comprises Al 2 O 3 and further layers if at all present are produced between the tool body and the Al 2 O 3 layer from metal nitrides and/or carbides of the metallic elements Ti, Nb, Hf, V, Ta, Mo, Zr, Cr, W and/or Al.
  • the Al 2 O 3 layers comprise dense, fine-grain, crystalline ⁇ -Al 2 O 3 and can also include other phases from the ⁇ -series.
  • crystalline phases include binary systems or mixed crystals of known crystal systems.
  • X-ray and electron diffraction are used as methods of investigating metal oxide layers in order to determine the lattice plane spacings occurring in the crystal structure (d-values) and/or to demonstrate amorphous structures.
  • electron diffraction is more advantageous in relation to X-ray diffraction because of the lower wavelength for investigating disordered grains involving grain sizes of 10-50 nm.
  • the object of the present invention was that of providing coated cutting tools which are improved in comparison with the state of the art, in particular those which, in comparison with cutting tools involving a similar coating structure, have a higher level of hardness, improved wear properties and/or improved (reduced) thermal conductivity.
  • the object according to the invention is attained by a cutting tool having a substrate main body and a single-layer or multi-layer coating applied thereto,
  • At least one layer of the coating is a metal oxide layer produced in the PVD process or in the CVD process and
  • the preferred method of electron diffraction is transmission electron microscopy (TEM), but other methods of producing electron diffraction images are also known and suitable.
  • TEM transmission electron microscopy
  • the intensity distribution which is typical of amorphous structures is also to be referred to as diffuse. If reference is made herein to a plurality of the existing grains which have the structure according to the invention, that means a predominant number in relation to other grains in the same layer, preferably over 50%, particularly preferably over 70% and quite particularly preferably over 90%.
  • Electron diffraction images of the grain structure according to the invention in the metal oxide layer were evaluated in respect of the d-values (lattice plane spacings) and for the crystal structure according to the invention involving disorder in respect of the grains of the metal oxide layer it was found that point-shaped reflections occurred only up to a given d-value (d LIMIT ) while for greater lattice plane spacings d (lower scatter angles) above the d LIMIT no point-shaped reflections which were arranged on rings were now observed, but rather there was an intensity distribution in respect of the scattered electrons, as is to be found in amorphous structures.
  • d LIMIT d-value
  • FIG. 1 A diffraction image as is typical of such a crystal structure of a metal oxide layer according to the invention is shown in FIG. 1 for an aluminium oxide layer.
  • the d-value d LIMIT is plotted and shows that point-shaped reflections arranged on rings are observed only for d-values d ⁇ c. In the diffraction image the d-value rises towards the centre point of the rings or the disc-shaped reflections.
  • Table 1 hereinafter shows the experimentally determined d-values in comparison with the d-values expected for gamma aluminium oxide.
  • d LIMIT was 0.2 nm and all reflections with a lattice plane spacing>0.2 nm, which should occur for the crystal structure of gamma aluminium oxide, were not observed.
  • the limit value d LIMIT can be precisely determined from electron-microscopic diffraction images and thus makes it possible to quantify the disorder of the crystal structure in the metal oxide layer.
  • the metal oxide layer present in the coating of the tool according to the invention has a novel structure which can best be detected by electron diffraction, preferably transmission electron microscopy (TEM) but also in combination with X-ray diffraction (XRD). It is possible to see in the electron diffraction image that a structural disorder is present within the grains characteristic of the new structure, but nonetheless there must be a kind of long-range order or crystallinity. Alternatively the novel structure can also be demonstrated by a combination of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and hardness measurement. In XRD the novel structure exhibits few but wide reflections and a very high level of intensity of the background. It is of a markedly greater hardness than a purely amorphous structure of the same composition. In accordance with the claim however the novel structure is defined therein by way of the electron diffraction data.
  • TEM transmission electron microscopy
  • XRD X-ray diffraction
  • the definition specified herein of the metal oxide layer according to the invention with reference to the results of electron diffraction distinguishes grains of the metal oxide layer according to the invention from purely crystalline or polycrystalline structures, from amorphous structures or from structures with polycrystalline components in an amorphous matrix.
  • the electron diffraction images of the metal oxide layer according to the invention or the grain structures in that metal oxide layer do not correspond to one of the aforementioned structures, but most likely resemble structures with polycrystalline components in an amorphous matrix. It will be noted however that in the case of such structures there are crystalline components embedded in amorphous regions or beside amorphous regions.
  • the electron diffraction images of such structures differ from the electron diffraction images of the structures according to the invention in the characteristic features described herein so that a clear distinction is easily possible for the man skilled in the art.
  • the structures according to the invention involve at least two advantageous properties in respect of the coating of the substrate main body and thus the entire cutting tool. It was found that coatings with a metal oxide layer of the kind according to the invention can involve a considerably higher level of hardness (Vickers hardness) than crystalline metal oxide layers which have the same or similar composition and thickness but which do not have the characteristic structural disorder or afford the characteristic electron diffraction results.
  • the at least one metal oxide layer in comparison with a purely crystalline metal oxide layer of the same composition and thickness, has a Vickers hardness which is higher by 10%, preferably by 20%, further preferably by 40%, particularly preferably by 70%.
  • a Vickers hardness of 1700 HV was measured for a coarsely crystalline aluminium oxide layer deposited by means of CVD (3 pm thickness; not according to the invention).
  • an aluminium oxide layer of the same thickness (3 ⁇ m) of the kind according to the invention was deposited by means of a dual magnetron PVD process and a Vickers hardness of 2300 HV was measured.
  • a Vickers hardness of 3800 HV was measured.
  • the structures according to the invention and which can be clearly distinguished in the electron diffraction image from structures not according to the invention with otherwise the same chemical composition and layer thickness therefore exhibit a marked increase in hardness in comparison with the corresponding crystalline or coarsely crystalline structures.
  • the inventors explain the extraordinary increase in hardness of the layers according to the invention in comparison with crystalline layers or layers with crystals in an amorphous matrix in accordance with the state of the art, with a change in the relative slidability of the lattice planes relative to each other.
  • plastic deformation occurs by the crystalline lattice planes sliding against each other, wherein the lattice planes in the most densely packed structures are particularly preferred sliding planes. Disruptions in the lattice structures by severe disorder make it more difficult for the sliding movement of the lattice planes to occur and thus reduce the deformation capability and accordingly increase hardness.
  • the layers according to the invention exhibit a lower degree of thermal conductivity in comparison with purely crystalline systems, and that can afford considerable advantages for the service lives of the tools.
  • the inventors explain the reduction in thermal conductivity in comparison with corresponding purely crystalline systems in that the structural disorder in the grains leads to increased phonon scattering because of reduced free path lengths in the disturbed structures.
  • Measurements showed that an Al 2 O 3 layer according to the invention had a specific thermal conductivity lower by about 10% than a coarsely crystalline Al 2 O 3 layer which was deposited using the CVD process.
  • the at least one metal oxide layer therefore had a thermal conductivity which is lower by at least 5%, preferably by at least 10%, particularly preferably by at least 15%, in comparison with a purely crystalline metal oxide layer of the same composition and thickness.
  • the metal oxide layer contains grains of aluminium oxide, aluminium-chromium oxide, aluminium-chromium-silicon oxide, chromium oxide, silicon oxide, yttrium-zirconium oxide, yttrium-chromium oxide or mixed oxides of the metals Al, Cr, Y, V, W, Ni, Ta, Mo, Zr, Hf and/or Si or the metal oxide layer consists grains of said substances.
  • the metal oxide layer further includes inevitable impurities and/or manufacture-induced residues, preferably argon (Ar), nitrogen (N 2 ) and/or helium (He).
  • the grains in the metal oxide layer according to the invention have mean grain sizes in the range of 2 nm to 5000 nm, preferably 5 nm to 2000 nm, further preferably 10 nm to 1000 nm, particularly preferably 20 nm to 100 nm.
  • substrate temperature of 300 to 800° C., preferably 450 to 650° C., particularly preferably about 550° C.
  • substrate bias of ⁇ 300 to 0 V, preferably about ⁇ 150 V
  • the thickness of the at least one metal oxide layer is in the range of 0.2 to 20 ⁇ m, preferably in the range of 0.5 to 10 ⁇ m, particularly preferably in the range of 1 to 5 ⁇ m.
  • the at least one metal oxide layer according to the invention is preferably produced by means of PVD processes which are particularly preferably selected from high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HIPIMS), reactive magnetron sputtering (rMS), arc vapour deposition (arc PVD), ion plating, electron beam vapour deposition and laser ablation.
  • PVD processes which are particularly preferably selected from high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HIPIMS), reactive magnetron sputtering (rMS), arc vapour deposition (arc PVD), ion plating, electron beam vapour deposition and laser ablation.
  • the coating includes further layers selected from carbides, nitrides, oxides, carbonitrides, oxynitrides, oxycarbides, oxycarbonitrides, borides, boron nitrides, borocarbides, borocarbonitrides, borooxynitrides, borooxocarbides, borooxocarbonitrides and oxoboronitrides of the elements of groups IVa to VIIa of the periodic system and/or aluminium and/or silicon, including mixed-metallic phases and phase mixtures of the aforementioned compounds.
  • the substrate main body is made from carbide metal, cermet, steel or high-speed steel (HSS).
  • a sample 300 ⁇ m in thickness with the deposited layer was produced, parallel to the substrate surface, thinned to 100 ⁇ m, cut to shape with an ultrasound core hole borer and glued with the coating side on a grinding holder.
  • the sample was then thinned manually to 20 ⁇ m by grinding on a diamond film with various grain sizes (50 ⁇ m, 25 ⁇ m, 9 ⁇ m and 3 ⁇ m) from the substrate side.
  • An Al ring was then glued on and the sample was etched in the ion etching installation (Baltec RES 100) at 4 kV at 25 mA from the substrate side with argon ions and thinned until it is electron-transparent.
  • a sample with a residual thickness of 1 mm with the deposited coating is produced by separating off the substrate material parallel to the substrate surface. Two of the 1 mm thick residual portions are glued together at the surfaces (outsides of the coating; face to face), a small strip portion is sawn down from the sandwich and the strip portion is embedded in a small tube portion. The tube portion is sawn into discs, the discs are polished from both sides with diamond film and both sides are dimpled. Etching is effected from both sides with the ion etching installation PIPS with 4 kV at 25 mA.
  • the XRD measurements are performed in a microdiffractometer from Bruker using a radiation source with a cobalt cathode, an anode voltage of 30 KV; an anode current of 30 mA, a graphite primary monochromator (so that only the Co-K ⁇ radiation is used from the source).
  • the detector was a Bruker XAS D8-GADDS Discovery Detector.
  • the X-ray beam was focused to a diameter of 300 ⁇ m with a monocapillary.
  • a substrate having a coating is homogenously heated to a temperature of 81° C. on just one of the surfaces. The heating is then terminated and the substrate applied with the coated side to a large metal portion which is a good heat conductor.
  • the substrate serves as a heat reservoir in that measurement operation.
  • the large metal portion which is a good heat conductor serves as a heating bath at an approximately constant temperature which is below the substrate heating temperature, preferably at ambient temperature.
  • a heat flow flows through the coating from the heat reservoir to the heat bath, whereby the substrate cools down.
  • the measurement value is the substrate temperature on the substrate side remote from the coating, as a function of time.
  • the specific thermal conduction constant is determined from the cooling curve. The experiment is carried out under the same conditions for the various layers to be compared.
  • the novel coating of the present invention opens a broad spectrum of possible ways of improving and/or adapting the wear resistance, service lives and/or cutting properties of the cutting tools.
  • the resistance to wear, service life and cutting properties of a coating on a cutting tool depend on various factors such as for example the material of the main body of the cutting tool, the sequence, nature and composition of the layers in the coating, the thickness of the various layers and not least the nature of the cutting operation performed with the cutting tool.
  • Different levels of resistance to wear arise for one and the same cutting tool in dependence on the nature of the workpiece to be machined, the respective machining process and the further conditions during the machining operation such as for example the development of high temperatures or the use of corrosive cooling fluids.
  • An essential property of cutting tools, which is improved by the coating according to the invention in comparison with the state of the art with coatings of the same materials is the hardness of such a coating.
  • the markedly higher hardness of the coating according to the invention is attributed to the unique structural properties which are to be found with the coating according to the invention in accordance with TEM measurements.
  • the reduction in thermal conductivity of the metal oxide layer, and therewith usually also the overall layer, that is surprisingly achieved with coatings according to the invention, has a very positive effect in use of such cutting tools in the cutting machining of metals and composite materials.
  • the reduced thermal conductivity leads to improved resistance to thermoshock and thus increased resistance to comb cracking.
  • Carbide metal substrates were provided with a single-layer coating in a dual magnetron process in a PVD coating installation (Flexicoat; Hauzer Techno Coating BV, Venlo, Netherlands).
  • the substrate geometry was SEHW120408 or ADMT 160608-F56 (in accordance with DIN-ISO 1832).
  • the installation was evacuated to 1 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 5 mbars and the carbide metal surface cleaned by argon ion etching with a 170 V bias voltage.
  • Metal oxide Al 2 O 3 PVD process: dual magnetron target: Al rectangular target (81 cm ⁇ 16 cm) deposition: substrate temperature: 550° C. substrate bias voltage: ⁇ 150 volts (DC pulsed 100 kHz, 2 ⁇ s off-time) power: 20 kW oxygen flow: 150 sccm with 0.6 Pa Ar gas layer thickness: 2.1 ⁇ m
  • Metal oxide Al 2 O 3 PVD process: single magnetron target: Al rectangular target (81 cm ⁇ 16 cm) deposition: substrate temperature: 550° C. substrate bias voltage: ⁇ 120 volts power: 10 kW oxygen flow: 150 sccm with 0.6 Pa Ar gas layer thickness: 1.9 ⁇ m
  • Metal oxide (Al,Cr) 2 O 3 PVD process: dual magnetron target: Al/Cr— (70/30 atomic %) rectangular target (81 cm ⁇ 16 cm) deposition: substrate temperature: 550° C. substrate bias voltage: ⁇ 100 volts (DC pulsed 70 kHz, 4 ⁇ s off-time) power: 20 kW oxygen flow: 150 sccm with 0.2 Pa Ar gas layer thickness: 3.3 ⁇ m
  • Metal oxide (Al,Cr) 2 O 3 PVD process: arc vapour deposition target: Al/Cr— (70/30 atomic %) round source (16 cm diameter) deposition: substrate temperature: 550° C. vaporiser current: 2 ⁇ 160 A bias voltage: ⁇ 60 V (bipolar) oxygen flow: 500 sccm (no Ar gas) layer thickness: 2.5 ⁇ m
  • the thermal conductivity of the Al 2 O 3 coating in accordance with Example 1 was compared to a coarsely crystalline ⁇ -Al 2 O 3 coating (layer thickness: 5 ⁇ m) deposited in the CVD process.
  • the thermal conductivity of the Al 2 O 3 coating according to the invention, in accordance with Example 1, was about 10% less than that of the coating applied using the CVD process.
  • the wear was measured on the relief surface as a mean wear mark width VB in mm (at the main cutting edge) after milling distances of 800 mm, 1600 mm, 2400 mm, 3200 mm, 4000 mm and 4800 mm.
  • the following wear mark widths V Bmax were found (Table 3):

Abstract

The invention relates to a cutting tool having a substrate base body and a single or multi-layered coating attached thereupon, wherein at least one layer of the coating is a metal oxide layer produced in the PVD process or in the CVD process and the metal oxide layer has a grain structure wherein there is structural disorder within a plurality of the existing grains that are characterized in that in electron diffraction images of the grains, point-shaped reflections occur up to a maximum lattice spacing dGRENZ and for lattice spacing greater than dGRENZ no point-shaped reflections occur, but rather a diffuse intensity distribution typical for amorphous structures.

Description

    SUBJECT OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention concerns a cutting tool having a substrate main body and a single-layer or multi-layer coating applied thereto, wherein at least one layer of the coating is a metal oxide layer produced in the PVD process or in the CVD process.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Cutting tools comprise a main body made for example from carbide metal, cermet, steel or high-speed steel. Frequently a single-layer or multi-layer coating is applied to the main body to increase the service lives or also to improve the cutting properties. That coating includes for example metallic hard material layers, oxide layers or the like. CVD processes (chemical vapour deposition) and/or PVD processes (physical vapour deposition) are employed to apply the coating. A plurality of layers within a coating can be applied exclusively by means of CVD processes, exclusively by means of PVD processes or by a combination of those processes.
  • In regard to the PVD processes a distinction is drawn between various variants in such processes such as magnetron sputtering, arc vapour deposition (arc PVD), ion plating, electron beam vapour deposition and laser ablation. Magnetron sputtering and arc vapour deposition count among the PVD processes most frequently used for coating tools. Within individual PVD process variants there are in turn different modifications such as for example unpulsed or pulsed magnetron sputtering or unpulsed or pulsed arc vapour deposition.
  • The target in the PVD process can comprise a pure metal or a combination of two or more metals. If the target includes a plurality of metals then all those metals are simultaneously incorporated into the layer of a coating, which is built up in the PVD process.
  • The quantitative ratio of the metals relative to each other in the layer which is built up will depend on the quantitative ratio of the metals in the target, but also on the conditions in the PVD process as individual metals are dissolved out of the target in higher quantities under given conditions and/or are deposited on the substrate in higher quantities, than other metals. Besides the pure metals, oxidic, nitridic, carbidic forms of the metals or mixtures thereof are also used in targets.
  • To produce given metal compounds reactive gases are fed to the reaction chamber of the PVD process, for example nitrogen for producing nitrides, oxygen for producing oxides, carbon-bearing compounds for producing carbides, carbonitrides, oxycarbides etc. or mixtures of those gases to produce corresponding mixed compounds.
  • In the PVD process a so-called bias potential is generally applied to the substrates to be coated in order to achieve the surface energy necessary for the growth process, and thus atomic mobility. The energy is necessary to achieve crystalline structures in a growing layer. When applying insulating layers using the PVD process, which applies for example to a large number of metal oxide compounds, the effectively applied bias potential is reduced during the growth process with increasing layer thickness, because of the insulating properties of the layer material, and that worsens the growth conditions at the layer surface and in addition can ultimately lead to exclusively or primarily amorphous structures being grown.
  • Ramm, J. et al., Pulse enhanced electron emission (P3e™) arc evaporation and the synthesis of wear resistant Al—Cr—O coatings in corundum structure, Surface and Coatings Technology 202 (2007), pages 876-883, describe the deposit of aluminium oxide-chromium oxide layers by pulsed arc vapour deposition (arc PVD). The deposited layers firstly present a mixed crystal structure.
  • Teixeira, V. et al., Deposition of composite and nanolaminate ceramic coatings by sputtering, Vacuum 67 (2002), pages 477-483, describe the deposit of thin zirconium oxide/aluminium oxide layers in the nanometer range by magnetron sputtering. The layers exhibit crystalline components of zirconium oxide, but only amorphous components of aluminium oxide.
  • Trinh, D. H. et al., Radio frequency dual magnetron sputtering deposition and characterization of nanocomposite Al203 —ZrO2 thin films, J. Vac. Sc. Techn. A 24(2), March/April 2006, pages 309-316, describe the deposit of very thin zirconium oxide/aluminium oxide layers in the nanometer range by magnetron sputtering, which present crystalline components of tetragonal zirconium oxide but only amorphous components of aluminium oxide.
  • WO-A-2007/121954 describes the production of a hard substance layer on a substrate by means of magnetron sputtering, wherein the hard substance layer contains the metallic elements Al, Cr and Si as well as non-metallic elements from the group B, C, N and 0. The atomic proportion of oxygen in the non-metallic elements is greater than 30%. The hard substance layer preferably contains crystalline phases and/or mixed phases in the system Al—Cr—Si—O. Both cubic phases of the space group Fd3m and also hexagonal phases of the space group R-3C can be formed.
  • EP-A-1 029 105 and EP-A-1 253 215 describe coated cutting tools for metal machining with a carbide metal, cermet or ceramic body and a hard and wear-resistant and heat-resistant coating which is deposited using the DMS (dual magnetron sputtering)-PVD method, wherein at least one layer and preferably the outermost layer comprises Al2O3 and further layers if at all present are produced between the tool body and the Al2O3 layer from metal nitrides and/or carbides of the metallic elements Ti, Nb, Hf, V, Ta, Mo, Zr, Cr, W and/or Al. The Al2O3 layers comprise dense, fine-grain, crystalline γ-Al2O3 and can also include other phases from the γ-series.
  • Thus purely crystalline and purely amorphous systems as well as systems with crystalline grains in an amorphous matrix are known from the state of the art. The crystalline phases include binary systems or mixed crystals of known crystal systems.
  • X-ray and electron diffraction are used as methods of investigating metal oxide layers in order to determine the lattice plane spacings occurring in the crystal structure (d-values) and/or to demonstrate amorphous structures. In that respect electron diffraction is more advantageous in relation to X-ray diffraction because of the lower wavelength for investigating disordered grains involving grain sizes of 10-50 nm.
  • OBJECT
  • The object of the present invention was that of providing coated cutting tools which are improved in comparison with the state of the art, in particular those which, in comparison with cutting tools involving a similar coating structure, have a higher level of hardness, improved wear properties and/or improved (reduced) thermal conductivity.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The object according to the invention is attained by a cutting tool having a substrate main body and a single-layer or multi-layer coating applied thereto,
  • wherein at least one layer of the coating is a metal oxide layer produced in the PVD process or in the CVD process and
  • the metal oxide layer has a grain structure in which there are present within a plurality of the existing grains structural disorders which are characterised in that
  • point-shaped reflections occur in the electron diffraction images of the grains up to a maximum lattice plane spacing dLIMIT and for lattice plane spacings of greater than dLIMIT no point-shaped reflections occur, but an intensity distribution that is typical for amorphous structures.
  • The preferred method of electron diffraction is transmission electron microscopy (TEM), but other methods of producing electron diffraction images are also known and suitable.
  • The intensity distribution which is typical of amorphous structures is also to be referred to as diffuse. If reference is made herein to a plurality of the existing grains which have the structure according to the invention, that means a predominant number in relation to other grains in the same layer, preferably over 50%, particularly preferably over 70% and quite particularly preferably over 90%.
  • Electron diffraction images of the grain structure according to the invention in the metal oxide layer were evaluated in respect of the d-values (lattice plane spacings) and for the crystal structure according to the invention involving disorder in respect of the grains of the metal oxide layer it was found that point-shaped reflections occurred only up to a given d-value (dLIMIT) while for greater lattice plane spacings d (lower scatter angles) above the dLIMIT no point-shaped reflections which were arranged on rings were now observed, but rather there was an intensity distribution in respect of the scattered electrons, as is to be found in amorphous structures. Upon a comparison of the experimentally obtained d-values with the d-values to be expected (which are available in table form for the respective compound (for example ICSD Database)) it was established that reflections which should have a d-value of greater than dLIMIT were missing. With lattice plane spacings greater than dLIMIT at least one reflection which would be expected or found in the ordered structure of the same compound was missing in the diffraction image of the structure according to the invention.
  • A diffraction image as is typical of such a crystal structure of a metal oxide layer according to the invention is shown in FIG. 1 for an aluminium oxide layer. The d-value dLIMIT is plotted and shows that point-shaped reflections arranged on rings are observed only for d-values d<c. In the diffraction image the d-value rises towards the centre point of the rings or the disc-shaped reflections.
  • Table 1 hereinafter shows the experimentally determined d-values in comparison with the d-values expected for gamma aluminium oxide. In this case dLIMIT was 0.2 nm and all reflections with a lattice plane spacing>0.2 nm, which should occur for the crystal structure of gamma aluminium oxide, were not observed. The limit value dLIMIT can be precisely determined from electron-microscopic diffraction images and thus makes it possible to quantify the disorder of the crystal structure in the metal oxide layer. Proof that the grains in the metal oxide layer actually involve a structure with lacking long-range order is afforded in that point-shaped reflections arranged on rings occur in a region of the diffraction image (d<dLIMIT) and an intensity profile as is typical of amorphous structures occurs in the complementary image region (d>dLIMIT) and that a grain provides intensity distributions proportionately to its grain volume in both image regions of the diffraction image. The latter was demonstrated by way of the dark field images in the TEM.
  • TABLE 1
    tabled data experimentally
    hkl d-values [Å] determined d-values
    111 4.58
    220 2.81
    311 2.39
    222 2.29
    400 1.98 1.96
    422 1.62 1.51
    511 1.52 1.38
    440 1.40 1.18
    444 1.14 1.13
    0.99
    0.87
    0.80
  • The metal oxide layer present in the coating of the tool according to the invention has a novel structure which can best be detected by electron diffraction, preferably transmission electron microscopy (TEM) but also in combination with X-ray diffraction (XRD). It is possible to see in the electron diffraction image that a structural disorder is present within the grains characteristic of the new structure, but nonetheless there must be a kind of long-range order or crystallinity. Alternatively the novel structure can also be demonstrated by a combination of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and hardness measurement. In XRD the novel structure exhibits few but wide reflections and a very high level of intensity of the background. It is of a markedly greater hardness than a purely amorphous structure of the same composition. In accordance with the claim however the novel structure is defined therein by way of the electron diffraction data.
  • The definition specified herein of the metal oxide layer according to the invention with reference to the results of electron diffraction distinguishes grains of the metal oxide layer according to the invention from purely crystalline or polycrystalline structures, from amorphous structures or from structures with polycrystalline components in an amorphous matrix. The electron diffraction images of the metal oxide layer according to the invention or the grain structures in that metal oxide layer do not correspond to one of the aforementioned structures, but most likely resemble structures with polycrystalline components in an amorphous matrix. It will be noted however that in the case of such structures there are crystalline components embedded in amorphous regions or beside amorphous regions. The electron diffraction images of such structures differ from the electron diffraction images of the structures according to the invention in the characteristic features described herein so that a clear distinction is easily possible for the man skilled in the art.
  • Without the inventors hereby wishing to be tied down to a theory the particularity of the structure according to the invention, in accordance with the results of the electron diffraction images, is to be seen in the fact that individual grains exhibit both electron diffraction reflections which are typical of crystalline structures and also those which are typical of non-crystalline structures. That is interpreted and referred herein as “structural disorder” in a grain which otherwise appears crystalline.
  • Surprisingly, the structures according to the invention involve at least two advantageous properties in respect of the coating of the substrate main body and thus the entire cutting tool. It was found that coatings with a metal oxide layer of the kind according to the invention can involve a considerably higher level of hardness (Vickers hardness) than crystalline metal oxide layers which have the same or similar composition and thickness but which do not have the characteristic structural disorder or afford the characteristic electron diffraction results. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the at least one metal oxide layer, in comparison with a purely crystalline metal oxide layer of the same composition and thickness, has a Vickers hardness which is higher by 10%, preferably by 20%, further preferably by 40%, particularly preferably by 70%.
  • For example a Vickers hardness of 1700 HV was measured for a coarsely crystalline aluminium oxide layer deposited by means of CVD (3 pm thickness; not according to the invention). For comparison purposes an aluminium oxide layer of the same thickness (3 μm) of the kind according to the invention was deposited by means of a dual magnetron PVD process and a Vickers hardness of 2300 HV was measured. In the case of an aluminium-chromium oxide layer of the kind according to the invention, deposited by means of a dual magnetron PVD process with a mixed target (70 atomic % Al and 30 atomic % Cr) a Vickers hardness of 3800 HV was measured.
  • The structures according to the invention and which can be clearly distinguished in the electron diffraction image from structures not according to the invention with otherwise the same chemical composition and layer thickness therefore exhibit a marked increase in hardness in comparison with the corresponding crystalline or coarsely crystalline structures.
  • Without wishing to be bound down to a theory the inventors explain the extraordinary increase in hardness of the layers according to the invention in comparison with crystalline layers or layers with crystals in an amorphous matrix in accordance with the state of the art, with a change in the relative slidability of the lattice planes relative to each other. In crystalline systems of the kind according to the invention plastic deformation occurs by the crystalline lattice planes sliding against each other, wherein the lattice planes in the most densely packed structures are particularly preferred sliding planes. Disruptions in the lattice structures by severe disorder make it more difficult for the sliding movement of the lattice planes to occur and thus reduce the deformation capability and accordingly increase hardness.
  • Furthermore the layers according to the invention exhibit a lower degree of thermal conductivity in comparison with purely crystalline systems, and that can afford considerable advantages for the service lives of the tools. Having regard to the results of electron diffusion and the XRD measurements the inventors explain the reduction in thermal conductivity in comparison with corresponding purely crystalline systems in that the structural disorder in the grains leads to increased phonon scattering because of reduced free path lengths in the disturbed structures. Measurements showed that an Al2O3 layer according to the invention had a specific thermal conductivity lower by about 10% than a coarsely crystalline Al2O3 layer which was deposited using the CVD process. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the at least one metal oxide layer therefore had a thermal conductivity which is lower by at least 5%, preferably by at least 10%, particularly preferably by at least 15%, in comparison with a purely crystalline metal oxide layer of the same composition and thickness.
  • Further advantageous embodiments of the present invention are set forth hereinafter.
  • In an embodiment of the invention the metal oxide layer contains grains of aluminium oxide, aluminium-chromium oxide, aluminium-chromium-silicon oxide, chromium oxide, silicon oxide, yttrium-zirconium oxide, yttrium-chromium oxide or mixed oxides of the metals Al, Cr, Y, V, W, Ni, Ta, Mo, Zr, Hf and/or Si or the metal oxide layer consists grains of said substances.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention the metal oxide layer further includes inevitable impurities and/or manufacture-induced residues, preferably argon (Ar), nitrogen (N2) and/or helium (He).
  • Desirably the grains in the metal oxide layer according to the invention have mean grain sizes in the range of 2 nm to 5000 nm, preferably 5 nm to 2000 nm, further preferably 10 nm to 1000 nm, particularly preferably 20 nm to 100 nm.
  • Advantageously the at least one metal oxide layer according to the invention can be deposited by means of a dual magnetron PVD process with the following deposition parameters:
  • substrate temperature of 300 to 800° C., preferably 450 to 650° C., particularly preferably about 550° C.,
  • substrate bias of −300 to 0 V, preferably about −150 V,
  • power of 5 to 50 kW, preferably about 20 kW,
  • oxygen flow of 50 to 300 sccm, preferably 150 sccm, with 0.2 to 0.6 Pa Ar gas.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention the thickness of the at least one metal oxide layer is in the range of 0.2 to 20 μm, preferably in the range of 0.5 to 10 μm, particularly preferably in the range of 1 to 5 μm.
  • The at least one metal oxide layer according to the invention is preferably produced by means of PVD processes which are particularly preferably selected from high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HIPIMS), reactive magnetron sputtering (rMS), arc vapour deposition (arc PVD), ion plating, electron beam vapour deposition and laser ablation.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention besides the at least one metal oxide layer the coating includes further layers selected from carbides, nitrides, oxides, carbonitrides, oxynitrides, oxycarbides, oxycarbonitrides, borides, boron nitrides, borocarbides, borocarbonitrides, borooxynitrides, borooxocarbides, borooxocarbonitrides and oxoboronitrides of the elements of groups IVa to VIIa of the periodic system and/or aluminium and/or silicon, including mixed-metallic phases and phase mixtures of the aforementioned compounds.
  • In a further embodiment of the invention the substrate main body is made from carbide metal, cermet, steel or high-speed steel (HSS).
  • Measurement Methods
  • 1. Electron Diffraction (TEM)
  • When reference is made herein to electron diffraction experiments these are TEM measurements which were carried out with the following conditions, measurement parameters, devices and so forth.
  • Transmission Electron Microscope:
  • a) Zeiss 912 Omega
      • Source LaB6
      • Fine area aperture for electron diffraction: 750 nm or
  • b) Jeol 2000FXII
      • Source LaB6
      • Fine area aperture for electron diffraction: 200 nm
  • Sample Preparation: Surface Parallel
  • Taking a coated substrate body, a sample 300 μm in thickness with the deposited layer was produced, parallel to the substrate surface, thinned to 100 μm, cut to shape with an ultrasound core hole borer and glued with the coating side on a grinding holder. The sample was then thinned manually to 20 μm by grinding on a diamond film with various grain sizes (50 μm, 25 μm, 9 μm and 3 μm) from the substrate side. An Al ring was then glued on and the sample was etched in the ion etching installation (Baltec RES 100) at 4 kV at 25 mA from the substrate side with argon ions and thinned until it is electron-transparent.
  • Sample Preparation: Cross-Section
  • Taking a coated substrate body, a sample with a residual thickness of 1 mm with the deposited coating is produced by separating off the substrate material parallel to the substrate surface. Two of the 1 mm thick residual portions are glued together at the surfaces (outsides of the coating; face to face), a small strip portion is sawn down from the sandwich and the strip portion is embedded in a small tube portion. The tube portion is sawn into discs, the discs are polished from both sides with diamond film and both sides are dimpled. Etching is effected from both sides with the ion etching installation PIPS with 4 kV at 25 mA.
  • 2. XRD
  • When reference is made herein to XRD measurements they have been carried out with the following conditions, measurement parameters, devices and so forth.
  • The XRD measurements are performed in a microdiffractometer from Bruker using a radiation source with a cobalt cathode, an anode voltage of 30 KV; an anode current of 30 mA, a graphite primary monochromator (so that only the Co-Kα radiation is used from the source). The detector was a Bruker XAS D8-GADDS Discovery Detector. The X-ray beam was focused to a diameter of 300 μm with a monocapillary.
  • Measurement geometry: glancing incidence (angle of incidence constant, Bragg angle was varied).
  • 3. Determining the Vickers Hardness
  • When reference is made herein to Vickers hardness measurements they have been carried out with the following conditions, measurement parameters, devices and so forth.
  • Hardness measurements were carried out on a Fischerscope@H100 (Helmut Fischer GmbH, Sindelfingen, Germany) with a test load of 15 mN with a loading duration of 1 min (loading rate=15 mN/min). A Vickers pyramid was used as the testing tip. Resolution of the depth of penetration was ±2 nm and resolution of the load was ±0.04 mN. Prior to the measurement the sample was polished because of the surface roughness and demagnetised.
  • 4. Determining Thermal Conductivity
  • When reference is made herein to thermal conductivity measurements they have been carried out with the following conditions, measurement parameters, devices and so forth.
  • For measuring thermal conductivity a substrate having a coating is homogenously heated to a temperature of 81° C. on just one of the surfaces. The heating is then terminated and the substrate applied with the coated side to a large metal portion which is a good heat conductor. The substrate serves as a heat reservoir in that measurement operation. The large metal portion which is a good heat conductor serves as a heating bath at an approximately constant temperature which is below the substrate heating temperature, preferably at ambient temperature. A heat flow flows through the coating from the heat reservoir to the heat bath, whereby the substrate cools down. The measurement value is the substrate temperature on the substrate side remote from the coating, as a function of time. The specific thermal conduction constant is determined from the cooling curve. The experiment is carried out under the same conditions for the various layers to be compared.
  • The novel coating of the present invention opens a broad spectrum of possible ways of improving and/or adapting the wear resistance, service lives and/or cutting properties of the cutting tools.
  • The resistance to wear, service life and cutting properties of a coating on a cutting tool depend on various factors such as for example the material of the main body of the cutting tool, the sequence, nature and composition of the layers in the coating, the thickness of the various layers and not least the nature of the cutting operation performed with the cutting tool. Different levels of resistance to wear arise for one and the same cutting tool in dependence on the nature of the workpiece to be machined, the respective machining process and the further conditions during the machining operation such as for example the development of high temperatures or the use of corrosive cooling fluids. In addition a distinction is drawn between different kinds of wear which can influence the period of use of a tool, that is to say its service life, to a greater or lesser degree, depending on the machining operation. Therefore, further development in and improvement to cutting tools is always to be considered in relation to which tool properties are to be improved and are to be assessed under comparable conditions in relation to the state of the art.
  • An essential property of cutting tools, which is improved by the coating according to the invention in comparison with the state of the art with coatings of the same materials is the hardness of such a coating. The markedly higher hardness of the coating according to the invention is attributed to the unique structural properties which are to be found with the coating according to the invention in accordance with TEM measurements.
  • The reduction in thermal conductivity of the metal oxide layer, and therewith usually also the overall layer, that is surprisingly achieved with coatings according to the invention, has a very positive effect in use of such cutting tools in the cutting machining of metals and composite materials. The reduced thermal conductivity leads to improved resistance to thermoshock and thus increased resistance to comb cracking.
  • It will be self-evident that all individual features as are described herein for given embodiments according to the invention, insofar as this is technically meaningful and possible, can be combined with all other described features of embodiments according to the invention and such combinations are deemed to be disclosed within the context of this description. Therefore the individual identification of all possible combinations is dispensed with herein only for reasons of better readability.
  • Further advantages, features and embodiments of the present invention are described by means of the Examples hereinafter.
  • EXAMPLES
  • Carbide metal substrates were provided with a single-layer coating in a dual magnetron process in a PVD coating installation (Flexicoat; Hauzer Techno Coating BV, Venlo, Netherlands). The substrate geometry was SEHW120408 or ADMT 160608-F56 (in accordance with DIN-ISO 1832). Prior to deposition of the layers the installation was evacuated to 1×10−5 mbars and the carbide metal surface cleaned by argon ion etching with a 170 V bias voltage.
  • Example 1
  • Metal oxide: Al2O3
    PVD process: dual magnetron
    target: Al rectangular target (81 cm × 16 cm)
    deposition: substrate temperature:  550° C.
    substrate bias voltage: −150 volts (DC pulsed
      100 kHz, 2 μs off-time)
    power:    20 kW
    oxygen flow:   150 sccm with 0.6 Pa
    Ar gas
    layer thickness:   2.1 μm
  • Comparative Example 1
  • Metal oxide: Al2O3
    PVD process: single magnetron
    target: Al rectangular target (81 cm × 16 cm)
    deposition: substrate temperature:  550° C.
    substrate bias voltage: −120 volts
    power:    10 kW
    oxygen flow:   150 sccm with 0.6 Pa
    Ar gas
    layer thickness:   1.9 μm
  • Example 2
  • Metal oxide: (Al,Cr)2O3
    PVD process: dual magnetron
    target: Al/Cr— (70/30 atomic %) rectangular target (81 cm ×
    16 cm)
    deposition: substrate temperature:  550° C.
    substrate bias voltage: −100 volts (DC pulsed
       70 kHz, 4 μs off-time)
    power:    20 kW
    oxygen flow:   150 sccm with 0.2 Pa
    Ar gas
    layer thickness:   3.3 μm
  • Comparative Example 2
  • Metal oxide: (Al,Cr)2O3
    PVD process: arc vapour deposition
    target: Al/Cr— (70/30 atomic %) round source (16 cm
    diameter)
    deposition: substrate temperature: 550° C.
    vaporiser current: 2 × 160 A
    bias voltage:  −60 V (bipolar)
    oxygen flow:  500 sccm (no Ar gas)
    layer thickness:  2.5 μm
  • The results of the TEM measurements show that the Al2O3 and (Al, Cr)2O3 layers in accordance with Examples 1 and 2 have the structure according to the invention in which there is a structural disorder within a majority of the existing grains but nonetheless there is a kind of long-range order or crystallinity. In XRD the coatings exhibit few but broad reflections and a very high level of intensity in respect of the background.
  • In contrast thereto the results of the TEM and XRD measurements further showed that the Al2O3 layer in accordance with Comparative Example 1 was completely amorphous and the (Al, Cr)2O3 layer in accordance with Comparative Example 2 was crystalline.
  • Operations for determining the Vickers hardnesses of the layers in accordance with the Examples and the Comparative Examples showed that the structures according to the invention have a markedly higher level of hardness than amorphous structures of the same composition (see Table 2).
  • TABLE 2
    Determining the Vickers hardnesses
    Vickers hardness [HV]
    Example 1: 2720 HV
    Comparative Example 1: 1064 HV
    Example 2: 3800 HV
    Comparative Example 2: 2500 HV
  • Thermal Conductivity
  • In accordance with the above-described method, having regard to the layer thickness, the thermal conductivity of the Al2O3 coating in accordance with Example 1 was compared to a coarsely crystalline α-Al2O3 coating (layer thickness: 5 μm) deposited in the CVD process. The thermal conductivity of the Al2O3 coating according to the invention, in accordance with Example 1, was about 10% less than that of the coating applied using the CVD process.
  • Milling Tests
  • In milling tests on a workpiece comprising 42CrMoV4 steel (1.7226; strength: 850 MPa) the cutting tools from the Examples and Comparative Examples were investigated. In those tests milling was effected in the downcut mode without cooling lubricant at a cutting speed Vc=235 m/min, a tooth advance fz=0.2 mm/tooth and a cutting depth of 3 mm. The tool diameter was 125 mm, the cutting width was 98 mm, the overhang was 5 mm, the rake angle kappa was 45° and the front rake angle was 0°. The wear was measured on the relief surface as a mean wear mark width VB in mm (at the main cutting edge) after milling distances of 800 mm, 1600 mm, 2400 mm, 3200 mm, 4000 mm and 4800 mm. The following wear mark widths VBmax were found (Table 3):
  • TABLE 3
    Milling tests
    Wear mark widths VBmax [mm]
    Milling distance [mm] Example 1 Comparative Example 1
    800 0.02 0.03
    1600 0.03 0.05
    2400 0.03 0.06
    3200 0.04 0.09
    4000 0.06 0.12
    4800 0.08 0.13

Claims (24)

1. A cutting tool having a substrate main body and a single-layer or multi-layer coating applied thereto,
wherein at least one layer of the coating is a metal oxide layer produced in the PVD process or in the CVD process and
wherein the metal oxide layer has a grain structure in which there are present within a plurality of the existing grains structural disorders and
wherein point-shaped reflections occur in the electron diffraction images of the grains up to a maximum lattice plane spacing dLIMIT and for lattice plane spacings of greater than dLIMIT no point-shaped reflections occur, but an intensity distribution that is typical for amorphous structures.
2. A cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein the maximum lattice plane spacing dLIMIT up to which point-shaped reflections occur in the electron diffraction images of the grains is in the range of 0.1 nm to 00.6 nm.
3. A cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein at least one metal oxide layer has a thermal conductivity which is lower by at least 5%, in comparison with a purely crystalline metal oxide layer of the same composition and thickness.
4. A cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein at least one metal oxide layer has a Vickers hardness which is higher by 10%, in comparison with a purely crystalline metal oxide layer of the same composition and thickness.
5. A cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein the metal oxide layer contains grains of aluminium oxide, aluminium-chromium oxide, aluminium-chromium-silicon oxide, chromium oxide, silicon oxide, yttrium-zirconium oxide, yttrium-chromium oxide or mixed oxides of the metals Al, Cr, Y, V, W, Ni, Ta, Mo, Zr, Hf and/or Si or consists thereof.
6. A cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein the metal oxide layer further includes inevitable impurities and/or manufacture-induced residues, preferably argon (Ar), nitrogen (N2) and/or helium (He).
7. A cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein the grains in the metal oxide layer have mean grain sizes in the range of 2 nm to 5000 nm.
8. A cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein at least one metal oxide layer is deposited by means of a dual magnetron PVD process with the following deposition parameters:
substrate temperature of 450 to 650° C.,
substrate bias of −300 to 0 V,
sputter power of 5 to 50 kW,
oxygen flow of 50 to 300 sccm, with 0.2 to 0.6 Pa Ar gas.
9. A cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein the thickness of the at least one metal oxide layer is in the range of 0.2 to 20 μm, preferably in the range of 0.5 to 10 μm, particularly preferably in the range of 1 to 5 μm.
10. A cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein at least one metal oxide layer is produced by means of PVD processes selected from high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HIPIMS), reactive magnetron sputtering (rMS), arc vapour deposition (arc PVD), ion plating, electron beam vapour deposition and laser ablation.
11. A cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein besides at least one metal oxide layer the coating includes further layers selected from carbides, nitrides, oxides, carbonitrides, oxynitrides, oxycarbides, oxycarbonitrides, borides, boron nitrides, borocarbides, borocarbonitrides, borooxynitrides, borooxocarbides, borooxocarbonitrides and oxoboronitrides of the elements of groups IVa to VIIa of the periodic system and/or aluminium and/or silicon, including mixed-metallic phases and phase mixtures of the aforementioned compounds.
12. A cutting tool according to claim 1, wherein the substrate main body is made from carbide metal, cermet, steel or high-speed steel (HSS).
13. A cutting tool according to claim 2, wherein the maximum lattice plane spacing dLIMIT up to which point-shaped reflections occur in the electron diffraction images of the grains is in the range of 0.15 nm to 0.40 nm.
14. A cutting tool according to claim 3, wherein the thermal conductivity is lower by at least 10%.
15. A cutting tool according to claim 14, wherein the thermal conductivity is lower by at least 15%.
16. A cutting tool according to claim 4, wherein the Vickers hardness is higher by 20%.
17. A cutting tool according to claim 16, wherein the Vickers hardness is higher by 40%.
18. A cutting tool according to claim 17, wherein the Vickers hardness is higher by 70%.
19. A cutting tool according to claim 7, wherein the mean grain size is in the range of 5 nm to 2000 nm.
20. A cutting tool according to claim 19, wherein the mean grain size is in the range of 10 nm to 1000 nm.
21. A cutting tool according to claim 20, wherein the mean grain size is in the range of 20 nm to 100 nm.
22. A cutting tool according to claim 8, wherein the deposition parameters are one or more of:
substrate temperature of about 550° C.,
substrate bias of about −150 V,
sputter power of about 20 kW,
oxygen flow of 150 seem with 0.2 to 0.6 Pa Ar gas.
23. A cutting tool according to claim 9, wherein the thickness of the at least one metal oxide layer is in the range of 0.5 to 10 μm.
24. A cutting tool according to claim 23, wherein the thickness of the at least one metal oxide layer is in the range of 1 to 5 μm.
US13/201,028 2009-03-19 2010-03-18 Cutting tool Active 2030-08-05 US8691378B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102009001675 2009-03-19
DE102009001675A DE102009001675A1 (en) 2009-03-19 2009-03-19 cutting tool
DE102009001675.9 2009-03-19
PCT/EP2010/053551 WO2010106142A1 (en) 2009-03-19 2010-03-18 Cutting tool

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110311805A1 true US20110311805A1 (en) 2011-12-22
US8691378B2 US8691378B2 (en) 2014-04-08

Family

ID=42173916

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/201,028 Active 2030-08-05 US8691378B2 (en) 2009-03-19 2010-03-18 Cutting tool

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US8691378B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2408945B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5782019B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101563034B1 (en)
CN (1) CN102449186B (en)
DE (1) DE102009001675A1 (en)
ES (1) ES2681527T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2010106142A1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013193171A (en) * 2012-03-21 2013-09-30 Mitsubishi Materials Corp Surface-coated cutting tool exhibiting excellent lubricity, chipping resistance and wear resistance during high-speed intermittent cutting
US20140065368A1 (en) * 2012-08-28 2014-03-06 Ut-Battelle, Llc Superhydrophobic films and methods for making superhydrophobic films
US20150232982A1 (en) * 2012-09-10 2015-08-20 Oerlikon Surface Solutions Ag, Trübbach Method for manufacturing a metal-borocarbide layer on a substrate
RU2585565C1 (en) * 2014-12-01 2016-05-27 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования "Ульяновский государственный технический университет" Method for production of multi-layer coating for cutting tool
RU2622546C1 (en) * 2015-12-15 2017-06-16 федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Ульяновский государственный технический университет" Method of producing sandwiched coating for cutting tool
EP3722461A1 (en) 2019-04-12 2020-10-14 Walter Ag A coated cutting tool
US10844479B2 (en) 2014-02-21 2020-11-24 Ut-Battelle, Llc Transparent omniphobic thin film articles
KR20210079923A (en) 2019-12-20 2021-06-30 한국야금 주식회사 Hard film coated cutting tools
US11292919B2 (en) 2010-10-08 2022-04-05 Ut-Battelle, Llc Anti-fingerprint coatings
US11292288B2 (en) 2010-10-08 2022-04-05 Ut-Battelle, Llc Superhydrophobic transparent glass (STG) thin film articles

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5943713B2 (en) * 2012-05-31 2016-07-05 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool
JP5945162B2 (en) * 2012-05-31 2016-07-05 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool
DE102015210646A1 (en) 2015-06-10 2016-12-15 Mahle International Gmbh Cooling system of a motor vehicle
CN105441890B (en) * 2015-12-22 2018-04-17 西安交通大学 A kind of high temperature low-friction coefficient hard coat and preparation method thereof
JP2019507025A (en) * 2016-02-19 2019-03-14 ヴァルター アーゲー Cutting equipment
KR20190022471A (en) * 2016-06-29 2019-03-06 스미또모 덴꼬오 하드메탈 가부시끼가이샤 Cutting tool
EP3406751A1 (en) * 2017-05-24 2018-11-28 Walter Ag A coated cutting tool and a method for its production
CN113840948A (en) * 2019-05-21 2021-12-24 肯纳金属公司 Quantitatively textured polycrystalline coatings
KR102564876B1 (en) 2020-10-27 2023-08-10 세종대학교 산학협력단 Coated cutting tool comprising an oxide layer

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003025114A (en) * 2001-07-16 2003-01-29 Toshiba Tungaloy Co Ltd Aluminium oxide coated cutting tool
US20070178330A1 (en) * 2005-05-06 2007-08-02 Seco Tools Ab Thin wear resistent coating
US20100189978A1 (en) * 2007-07-02 2010-07-29 Walter Ag Tool with multi-layered metal oxide coating
US20100330360A1 (en) * 2008-02-27 2010-12-30 Kyocera Corporation Surface-Coated Member and Cutting Tool
US8025991B2 (en) * 2004-09-14 2011-09-27 Walter Ag Cutting tool with oxide coating
US8173278B2 (en) * 2006-04-21 2012-05-08 Cemecon Ag Coated body

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5928565A (en) * 1982-08-06 1984-02-15 Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd Coated hard alloy tool
DE59201616D1 (en) * 1991-03-27 1995-04-13 Krupp Widia Gmbh COMPOSITE BODY, USE OF THE COMPOSITE BODY AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF.
DE4209975A1 (en) * 1992-03-27 1993-09-30 Krupp Widia Gmbh Composite body and its use
SE520802C2 (en) 1997-11-06 2003-08-26 Sandvik Ab Cutting tool coated with alumina and process for its manufacture
SE519921C2 (en) * 1999-05-06 2003-04-29 Sandvik Ab PVD coated cutting tool and method for its manufacture
SE526337C2 (en) * 2002-07-16 2005-08-23 Seco Tools Ab PVD-coated cutting tool with at least one layer of (Ti, A1) (O, N) and method for making the same
JP2005262355A (en) * 2004-03-17 2005-09-29 Sumitomo Electric Hardmetal Corp Surface-coated cutting tool
JP4398287B2 (en) * 2004-03-17 2010-01-13 住友電工ハードメタル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool
JP2007119809A (en) * 2005-10-26 2007-05-17 Hitachi Tool Engineering Ltd Coated member
JP4917447B2 (en) 2006-05-25 2012-04-18 住友電工ハードメタル株式会社 Surface coated cutting tool
DE102008026358A1 (en) 2008-05-31 2009-12-03 Walter Ag Tool with metal oxide coating

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003025114A (en) * 2001-07-16 2003-01-29 Toshiba Tungaloy Co Ltd Aluminium oxide coated cutting tool
US8025991B2 (en) * 2004-09-14 2011-09-27 Walter Ag Cutting tool with oxide coating
US20070178330A1 (en) * 2005-05-06 2007-08-02 Seco Tools Ab Thin wear resistent coating
US8173278B2 (en) * 2006-04-21 2012-05-08 Cemecon Ag Coated body
US20100189978A1 (en) * 2007-07-02 2010-07-29 Walter Ag Tool with multi-layered metal oxide coating
US20100330360A1 (en) * 2008-02-27 2010-12-30 Kyocera Corporation Surface-Coated Member and Cutting Tool

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11292288B2 (en) 2010-10-08 2022-04-05 Ut-Battelle, Llc Superhydrophobic transparent glass (STG) thin film articles
US11292919B2 (en) 2010-10-08 2022-04-05 Ut-Battelle, Llc Anti-fingerprint coatings
JP2013193171A (en) * 2012-03-21 2013-09-30 Mitsubishi Materials Corp Surface-coated cutting tool exhibiting excellent lubricity, chipping resistance and wear resistance during high-speed intermittent cutting
US20140065368A1 (en) * 2012-08-28 2014-03-06 Ut-Battelle, Llc Superhydrophobic films and methods for making superhydrophobic films
US9771656B2 (en) * 2012-08-28 2017-09-26 Ut-Battelle, Llc Superhydrophobic films and methods for making superhydrophobic films
US20150232982A1 (en) * 2012-09-10 2015-08-20 Oerlikon Surface Solutions Ag, Trübbach Method for manufacturing a metal-borocarbide layer on a substrate
US9624571B2 (en) * 2012-09-10 2017-04-18 Oerlikon Surface Solutions Ag, Pfäffikon Method for manufacturing a metal-borocarbide layer on a substrate
US10844479B2 (en) 2014-02-21 2020-11-24 Ut-Battelle, Llc Transparent omniphobic thin film articles
RU2585565C1 (en) * 2014-12-01 2016-05-27 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования "Ульяновский государственный технический университет" Method for production of multi-layer coating for cutting tool
RU2622546C1 (en) * 2015-12-15 2017-06-16 федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Ульяновский государственный технический университет" Method of producing sandwiched coating for cutting tool
WO2020208062A1 (en) 2019-04-12 2020-10-15 Walter Ag A coated cutting tool
EP3722461A1 (en) 2019-04-12 2020-10-14 Walter Ag A coated cutting tool
KR20210079923A (en) 2019-12-20 2021-06-30 한국야금 주식회사 Hard film coated cutting tools

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN102449186B (en) 2015-03-18
CN102449186A (en) 2012-05-09
KR101563034B1 (en) 2015-10-23
US8691378B2 (en) 2014-04-08
KR20120000084A (en) 2012-01-03
EP2408945B1 (en) 2018-06-27
DE102009001675A1 (en) 2010-09-23
EP2408945A1 (en) 2012-01-25
ES2681527T3 (en) 2018-09-13
JP2012520938A (en) 2012-09-10
WO2010106142A8 (en) 2010-11-18
WO2010106142A1 (en) 2010-09-23
JP5782019B2 (en) 2015-09-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8691378B2 (en) Cutting tool
JP6858347B2 (en) Cover cutting tool
JP6268530B2 (en) Surface coated cutting tool with excellent chipping resistance due to hard coating layer
JP5321975B2 (en) Surface coated cutting tool
CN108472737B (en) Surface-coated cutting tool with hard coating layer exhibiting excellent chipping resistance, and method for manufacturing same
JP2015163423A (en) Surface coated cutting tool whose hard coating layer exerts excellent chipping resistance in high-speed intermittent cutting work
JP5416206B2 (en) Tool with metal oxide coating
US11052464B2 (en) Coated cutting tool
JP2020040175A (en) Coated cutting tool
EP3960341A1 (en) Cutting tool
EP3323909A1 (en) Coating
US20230028083A1 (en) Coated cutting tool
CN114945708B (en) PVD coated cemented carbide cutting tool with improved coating adhesion
EP3394312B1 (en) A coated cutting tool and method
JP7132548B2 (en) surface coated cutting tools
JP2006289586A (en) Surface-coated cermet cutting tool having hard coating layer exhibiting superior chipping resistance in high speed intermittent cutting work
CN114008245A (en) Coated cutting tool
JP5286931B2 (en) Surface-coated cutting tool that exhibits excellent chipping resistance and wear resistance with a hard coating layer in high-speed heavy cutting
JP2006289546A (en) Surface-coated cermet cutting tool having hard coating layer for exhibiting superior chipping resistance in high speed intermittent cutting work
JP2020199615A (en) Coated cutting tool
US20220402046A1 (en) Coated cutting tool
US20230405687A1 (en) Cutting tool
EP3722461A1 (en) A coated cutting tool
JP2023105884A (en) Surface-coated cutting tool
KR20210143274A (en) clad cutting tool

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: WALTER AG, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SCHIER, VEIT;EIBL, OLIVER;ENGELHART, WOLFGANG;SIGNING DATES FROM 20110708 TO 20110713;REEL/FRAME:026735/0737

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551)

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8