US20090224770A1 - Screening of electrolytic capacitors - Google Patents

Screening of electrolytic capacitors Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090224770A1
US20090224770A1 US12/207,609 US20760908A US2009224770A1 US 20090224770 A1 US20090224770 A1 US 20090224770A1 US 20760908 A US20760908 A US 20760908A US 2009224770 A1 US2009224770 A1 US 2009224770A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
capacitors
screening
voltage
capacitor
bdv
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/207,609
Inventor
Yuri Freeman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kemet Electronics Corp
Original Assignee
Kemet Electronics Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kemet Electronics Corp filed Critical Kemet Electronics Corp
Priority to US12/207,609 priority Critical patent/US20090224770A1/en
Assigned to KEMET ELECTRONIC CORPORATION reassignment KEMET ELECTRONIC CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FREEMAN, YURI
Assigned to K FINANCING, LLC reassignment K FINANCING, LLC SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: KEMET CORPORATION
Publication of US20090224770A1 publication Critical patent/US20090224770A1/en
Priority to US12/751,107 priority patent/US8441265B2/en
Assigned to KEMET CORPORATION reassignment KEMET CORPORATION RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 022892/0795 Assignors: K FINANCING, LLC
Assigned to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AS AGENT reassignment BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AS AGENT SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KEMET ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Priority to US13/887,467 priority patent/US20130241591A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/01—Subjecting similar articles in turn to test, e.g. "go/no-go" tests in mass production; Testing objects at points as they pass through a testing station
    • G01R31/013—Testing passive components
    • G01R31/016—Testing of capacitors
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01G—CAPACITORS; CAPACITORS, RECTIFIERS, DETECTORS, SWITCHING DEVICES, LIGHT-SENSITIVE OR TEMPERATURE-SENSITIVE DEVICES OF THE ELECTROLYTIC TYPE
    • H01G13/00—Apparatus specially adapted for manufacturing capacitors; Processes specially adapted for manufacturing capacitors not provided for in groups H01G4/00 - H01G11/00
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01G—CAPACITORS; CAPACITORS, RECTIFIERS, DETECTORS, SWITCHING DEVICES, LIGHT-SENSITIVE OR TEMPERATURE-SENSITIVE DEVICES OF THE ELECTROLYTIC TYPE
    • H01G9/00—Electrolytic capacitors, rectifiers, detectors, switching devices, light-sensitive or temperature-sensitive devices; Processes of their manufacture

Definitions

  • the invention relates to screening of electrolytic capacitors. It can be used for screening out unreliable parts from the general population of the capacitors as well as for screening for most reliable capacitors for special applications such as medical and military applications. It can be also used for comparison of different materials and manufacturing techniques.
  • Accelerated ageing at elevated voltage and temperature, surge tests, re-flow test, etc. are incorporated in manufacturing of electrolytic capacitors to display hidden defects in the dielectric and to screen for non-reliable parts.
  • the problem with these techniques is that they cannot guarantee exclusion of all the non-reliable parts and, when intensified, can deteriorate performance and reliability of the general population of the capacitors as a result of the testing.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,882,719 issued Mar. 16, 1999 to R. Creasi is exemplary of the prior art.
  • This patent describes a test that provides reliability indication at early stages of the manufacturing of solid Ta capacitors. This test comprises testing in a wet cell Ta capacitors partially impregnated with solid electrolyte using static voltage exceeding working voltage (WV) or in gradually increased (sweep) voltage exceeding WV. In both cases the applied voltage results in electrical breakdown of the dielectric in poor capacitors, while good capacitors survive the test and continue through the manufacturing process.
  • WV working voltage
  • weep gradually increased
  • This test uses breakdown voltage (BDV) as an ultimate indicator of the quality of the dielectric in the electrolytic capacitors.
  • BDV breakdown voltage
  • this test can't be used for screening of finished encapsulated capacitors.
  • applied voltage which is sufficient for breaking the dielectric in a poor part, damages the dielectric in good parts. This damage can't be repaired in finished parts by re-formation of the dielectric in a wet cell as it was described in the prior art.
  • the screening according to this invention should be performed on parts either prior to or after conventional ageing and tests.
  • This screening is to imitate the BDV test and remove unreliable parts with poor dielectric without actual breaking of the dielectric or deteriorating quality of the tested capacitors.
  • dc voltage equal to or exceeding average breakdown voltage (BDV) is applied to the tested capacitor which is connected to a series resistor R s , wherein 0.1 Mohm ⁇ R s ⁇ 10 Mohm.
  • R s series resistor
  • the voltage increase on the capacitor (charge curve) is monitored, and the test is terminated either when voltage drop on the tested capacitor reaches average BDV or after time t, where 0.5 min ⁇ t ⁇ 5 min.
  • Final voltage drop on the capacitor indicates quality of the dielectric and is used for the screening purposes.
  • FIG. 1 shows a typical breakdown voltage distribution for a TA capacitor 15 ⁇ F-25V.
  • FIG. 2 shows typical current/voltage curves for D-case Ta polymer capacitors 15 ⁇ F-25V.
  • FIG. 3 shows typical charging curves for Ta polymer capacitors.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates typical final voltage drop distributions for 15 ⁇ F-25V Ta polymer capacitors
  • FIG. 5 shows dc leakage before and after screening using the inventive process.
  • FIG. 6 shows accelerated life test distribution data at 85° C. and 1.32 ⁇ rated voltage with and without the screening process.
  • Parameters of the screening should be determined on a small group of samples from given type of the capacitors prior to the screening process.
  • dc voltage is gradually increased on the capacitor connected to a fuse until rapid current increase in the circuit and/or a blown fuse indicate a breakdown.
  • FIG. 1 demonstrates typical distribution of the BDV in D-case polymer tantalum capacitors 15 uF-25V.
  • the left “tail” with low BDV represents unreliable capacitors with weak dielectric
  • right end of the distribution with high BDV represents highly reliable capacitors with robust dielectric.
  • this BDV test can not be used for screening purpose since all the tested capacitors are electrically broken to determine the endpoint of the test.
  • FIG. 2 shows typical I(V) characteristics of two D-case polymer tantalum capacitors 15 uF-25 V.
  • these two capacitors have practically equal currents at WV, which makes them look identical at conventional testing. However, their currents and, thereby, resistances are different when applied voltage approaches average BDV. High resistance in the vicinity of the average BDV correlates with high actual BDV and vice versa.
  • the R s is chosen as an average resistance of the capacitors in vicinity of the BDV. If the resistance of the capacitor in vicinity of the BVD is lower than R s (like in the part # 9 ), the larger part of the applied voltage will drop on the R s , making final voltage drop on the capacitor small as shown in FIG. 3 . If the resistance of the capacitor in vicinity of the BDV is higher that Rs (like in the part # 12 ), the most of the applied voltage will drop on the capacitor, making final voltage drop high ( FIG. 3 ).
  • the applied dc voltage is selected to be between the average breakdown voltage and 1.5 times the average breakdown voltage. If the applied dc voltage is below average BDV, it is impossible to achieve BDV during charging. If the applied dc voltage equals average BDV, the charging time is too long. If applied dc voltages is above 1.5 times average BDV, the increase in voltage is too rapid and hampers screening accuracy.
  • FIG. 3 demonstrates typical screening procedure (charge curves) for the two D-case polymer tantalum capacitors 15 uF-25 V.
  • the voltage drop on the first capacitor reached average BDV after 52 s. At that moment, voltage application was terminated. On the second capacitor, voltage drop reached its maximum at about 40 s and didn't change after that until voltage application was terminated after 1 min of the test. The final voltage drop on the second capacitor was below average BDV due to noticeable voltage drop on the R s . This indicates low resistance of the second capacitor in vicinity of the average BDV and, thereby, weaker dielectric in the capacitor vs. that in the first capacitor. A distribution of the final voltage drop on a population of the D-case Ta polymer capacitors 15 uF-25 V is shown on the FIG. 4 .
  • the lower left part of this distribution represents unreliable capacitors with weak dielectric that were removed from the population.
  • the central part of the population represents normal capacitors.
  • the high right part of the population represents exceptional quality capacitors suitable for special applications.
  • the dc leakage (DCL) at rated voltage was tested on these capacitors before and after the screening procedure ( FIG. 5 ).
  • FIG. 6 demonstrates results of the accelerated life test of the capacitors without and with this screening. During the screening, the capacitors with low final voltage drop were removed from the general population of the capacitors subjected to the accelerated test.
  • screening enables one to eliminate early failures. After selection by this screening, the failures start at a later time and with a much lower percentage of failed parts. This is the evidence that non-reliable capacitors with weak dielectric can be removed from the general population by this screening method. The distribution of the failures after the screening falls into a simple pattern, which indicates uniform degradation mechanism in the tested capacitors.
  • the method of this invention maybe used to remove potentially deflective capacitors before completion of the manufacturing process, thereby reducing manufacturing costs.
  • the enabled identification of higher quality units reduces returns and in-use failures.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Fixed Capacitors And Capacitor Manufacturing Machines (AREA)
  • Testing Electric Properties And Detecting Electric Faults (AREA)

Abstract

A method for screening electrolytic capacitors places a capacitor in series with a resistor in series with a resistor, applying a test voltage and following the charge curve for the capacitor. A high voltage drop indicates high reliability and a low voltage drop is used to reject the piece. The leakage current is not adversely affected during the test.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The invention relates to screening of electrolytic capacitors. It can be used for screening out unreliable parts from the general population of the capacitors as well as for screening for most reliable capacitors for special applications such as medical and military applications. It can be also used for comparison of different materials and manufacturing techniques.
  • 2. Background and Prior Art
  • Accelerated ageing at elevated voltage and temperature, surge tests, re-flow test, etc. are incorporated in manufacturing of electrolytic capacitors to display hidden defects in the dielectric and to screen for non-reliable parts. The problem with these techniques is that they cannot guarantee exclusion of all the non-reliable parts and, when intensified, can deteriorate performance and reliability of the general population of the capacitors as a result of the testing.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,882,719 issued Mar. 16, 1999 to R. Creasi is exemplary of the prior art. This patent describes a test that provides reliability indication at early stages of the manufacturing of solid Ta capacitors. This test comprises testing in a wet cell Ta capacitors partially impregnated with solid electrolyte using static voltage exceeding working voltage (WV) or in gradually increased (sweep) voltage exceeding WV. In both cases the applied voltage results in electrical breakdown of the dielectric in poor capacitors, while good capacitors survive the test and continue through the manufacturing process.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • This test, according to this invention, uses breakdown voltage (BDV) as an ultimate indicator of the quality of the dielectric in the electrolytic capacitors. At the same time, this test can't be used for screening of finished encapsulated capacitors. At that stage applied voltage which is sufficient for breaking the dielectric in a poor part, damages the dielectric in good parts. This damage can't be repaired in finished parts by re-formation of the dielectric in a wet cell as it was described in the prior art. The screening according to this invention should be performed on parts either prior to or after conventional ageing and tests.
  • The purpose of this screening is to imitate the BDV test and remove unreliable parts with poor dielectric without actual breaking of the dielectric or deteriorating quality of the tested capacitors. To accomplish this, dc voltage equal to or exceeding average breakdown voltage (BDV) is applied to the tested capacitor which is connected to a series resistor Rs, wherein 0.1 Mohm<Rs<10 Mohm. The voltage increase on the capacitor (charge curve) is monitored, and the test is terminated either when voltage drop on the tested capacitor reaches average BDV or after time t, where 0.5 min<t<5 min. Final voltage drop on the capacitor indicates quality of the dielectric and is used for the screening purposes.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a typical breakdown voltage distribution for a TA capacitor 15 μF-25V.
  • FIG. 2 shows typical current/voltage curves for D-case Ta polymer capacitors 15 μF-25V.
  • FIG. 3 shows typical charging curves for Ta polymer capacitors.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates typical final voltage drop distributions for 15 μF-25V Ta polymer capacitors
  • FIG. 5 shows dc leakage before and after screening using the inventive process.
  • FIG. 6 shows accelerated life test distribution data at 85° C. and 1.32× rated voltage with and without the screening process.
    •  DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Parameters of the screening, including average BDV and series resistance Rs, should be determined on a small group of samples from given type of the capacitors prior to the screening process. To determine the average BDV, dc voltage is gradually increased on the capacitor connected to a fuse until rapid current increase in the circuit and/or a blown fuse indicate a breakdown. As an example, FIG. 1 demonstrates typical distribution of the BDV in D-case polymer tantalum capacitors 15 uF-25V.
  • In the distribution shown, the left “tail” with low BDV represents unreliable capacitors with weak dielectric, while right end of the distribution with high BDV represents highly reliable capacitors with robust dielectric. At the same time, it is obvious that this BDV test can not be used for screening purpose since all the tested capacitors are electrically broken to determine the endpoint of the test.
  • To determine series resistance Rs, the current (I)—vs. voltage (V) characteristics should be investigated in the range of dc voltages from working voltage (WV) to the BDV. As an example, FIG. 2 shows typical I(V) characteristics of two D-case polymer tantalum capacitors 15 uF-25 V.
  • As one can see, these two capacitors have practically equal currents at WV, which makes them look identical at conventional testing. However, their currents and, thereby, resistances are different when applied voltage approaches average BDV. High resistance in the vicinity of the average BDV correlates with high actual BDV and vice versa. The Rs is chosen as an average resistance of the capacitors in vicinity of the BDV. If the resistance of the capacitor in vicinity of the BVD is lower than Rs (like in the part #9), the larger part of the applied voltage will drop on the Rs, making final voltage drop on the capacitor small as shown in FIG. 3. If the resistance of the capacitor in vicinity of the BDV is higher that Rs (like in the part #12), the most of the applied voltage will drop on the capacitor, making final voltage drop high (FIG. 3).
  • The applied dc voltage is selected to be between the average breakdown voltage and 1.5 times the average breakdown voltage. If the applied dc voltage is below average BDV, it is impossible to achieve BDV during charging. If the applied dc voltage equals average BDV, the charging time is too long. If applied dc voltages is above 1.5 times average BDV, the increase in voltage is too rapid and hampers screening accuracy.
  • With the average BDV and Rs determined on a small group of samples, screening can be performed on all of the population of the capacitors with given capacitance and rated voltage. As an example FIG. 3 demonstrates typical screening procedure (charge curves) for the two D-case polymer tantalum capacitors 15 uF-25 V. In this example, the parameters of screening were as follows: average BDV=48V, Rs=2 Mohm, and maximum screening time t=1 min.
  • According to the FIG. 3, the voltage drop on the first capacitor reached average BDV after 52 s. At that moment, voltage application was terminated. On the second capacitor, voltage drop reached its maximum at about 40 s and didn't change after that until voltage application was terminated after 1 min of the test. The final voltage drop on the second capacitor was below average BDV due to noticeable voltage drop on the Rs. This indicates low resistance of the second capacitor in vicinity of the average BDV and, thereby, weaker dielectric in the capacitor vs. that in the first capacitor. A distribution of the final voltage drop on a population of the D-case Ta polymer capacitors 15 uF-25 V is shown on the FIG. 4.
  • The lower left part of this distribution represents unreliable capacitors with weak dielectric that were removed from the population. The central part of the population represents normal capacitors. The high right part of the population represents exceptional quality capacitors suitable for special applications.
  • To guarantee that the capacitors are not damaged during the screening, the dc leakage (DCL) at rated voltage was tested on these capacitors before and after the screening procedure (FIG. 5).
  • As one can see, all the experimental points are either on the diagonal or below the diagonal, which indicates no change or improvement in quality of the dielectric as a result of screening. Lower DCL after the screening can be attributed to self-healing phenomena, when high voltage is applied briefly to the capacitor in the circuit with limited current.
  • FIG. 6 demonstrates results of the accelerated life test of the capacitors without and with this screening. During the screening, the capacitors with low final voltage drop were removed from the general population of the capacitors subjected to the accelerated test.
  • According to the FIG. 6, screening enables one to eliminate early failures. After selection by this screening, the failures start at a later time and with a much lower percentage of failed parts. This is the evidence that non-reliable capacitors with weak dielectric can be removed from the general population by this screening method. The distribution of the failures after the screening falls into a simple pattern, which indicates uniform degradation mechanism in the tested capacitors.
    • INDUSTRIAL UTILITY
  • The method of this invention maybe used to remove potentially deflective capacitors before completion of the manufacturing process, thereby reducing manufacturing costs. The enabled identification of higher quality units reduces returns and in-use failures.
  • The invention has been described in terms of representative examples which are not limitative of the scope of the invention. Modifications apparent to those with skill in the art are included within the scope of the invention.

Claims (2)

1-6. (canceled)
7. An apparatus for screening capacitors to remove unreliable parts from a large population comprising power supply with a volt meter, tested capacitor with separate volt meter, series resistor, and a circuit breaker or fuse.
US12/207,609 2006-12-18 2008-09-10 Screening of electrolytic capacitors Abandoned US20090224770A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/207,609 US20090224770A1 (en) 2006-12-18 2008-09-10 Screening of electrolytic capacitors
US12/751,107 US8441265B2 (en) 2006-12-18 2010-03-31 Apparatus and method for screening electrolytic capacitors
US13/887,467 US20130241591A1 (en) 2006-12-18 2013-05-06 Apparatus and Method for Screening Electrolytic Capacitors

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/641,928 US7671603B2 (en) 2006-12-18 2006-12-18 Screening of electrolytic capacitors
US12/207,609 US20090224770A1 (en) 2006-12-18 2008-09-10 Screening of electrolytic capacitors

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/641,928 Division US7671603B2 (en) 2006-12-18 2006-12-18 Screening of electrolytic capacitors

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/751,107 Continuation-In-Part US8441265B2 (en) 2006-12-18 2010-03-31 Apparatus and method for screening electrolytic capacitors

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090224770A1 true US20090224770A1 (en) 2009-09-10

Family

ID=39526348

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/641,928 Active 2027-06-20 US7671603B2 (en) 2006-12-18 2006-12-18 Screening of electrolytic capacitors
US12/207,609 Abandoned US20090224770A1 (en) 2006-12-18 2008-09-10 Screening of electrolytic capacitors

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/641,928 Active 2027-06-20 US7671603B2 (en) 2006-12-18 2006-12-18 Screening of electrolytic capacitors

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US7671603B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20140029290A (en) * 2012-08-31 2014-03-10 에이브이엑스 코포레이션 Screening method for electrolytic capacitors
CN109633383A (en) * 2018-11-15 2019-04-16 丰宾电子（深圳）有限公司 A kind of multiplication of voltage test method of alminium electrolytic condenser
US11448680B2 (en) 2020-03-31 2022-09-20 KYOCERA AVX Components Corporation Screening method for electrolytic capacitors that maintains individual capacitor unit identity

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8441265B2 (en) * 2006-12-18 2013-05-14 Kemet Electronics Corporation Apparatus and method for screening electrolytic capacitors
US9842628B2 (en) * 2008-07-10 2017-12-12 Agiga Tech Inc. Capacitor enablement voltage level adjustment method and apparatus
CN103675548A (en) * 2013-12-18 2014-03-26 长春维鸿东光电子器材有限公司 Pulse charging and discharging performance testing device for non-solid electrolyte tantalum capacitor
CN104535907B (en) * 2014-12-19 2017-11-07 深圳市众能达自动化设备有限公司 Electric capacity internal explosion detection means
US10006956B2 (en) * 2015-03-26 2018-06-26 Lenovo Enterprise Solutions (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Systems and methods for determining an operational condition of a capacitor package
JP2016217942A (en) * 2015-05-22 2016-12-22 株式会社東芝 Screening method
US10163573B1 (en) * 2015-11-06 2018-12-25 Presidio Components. Inc. Capacitor assemblies, energy storage modules and assemblies, and methods of making same
US10381166B2 (en) 2016-05-25 2019-08-13 Vishay Sprague, Inc. High performance and reliability solid electrolytic tantalum capacitors and screening method
CN110892278B (en) * 2018-11-14 2022-01-11 Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 Fault verification method and system of electronic equipment
CN115178501B (en) * 2022-07-12 2024-08-27 中国振华(集团)新云电子元器件有限责任公司(国营第四三二六厂) Screening method of high-reliability solid electrolyte tantalum capacitor

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4216424A (en) * 1978-10-30 1980-08-05 Vette Carl W Method and apparatus for testing electrolytic capacitors
US4425541A (en) * 1981-09-14 1984-01-10 Commonwealth Edison Co. Apparatus for identifying defective electric power distribution capacitors
US5882719A (en) * 1995-12-13 1999-03-16 H. C. Starck, Inc. Solid tantalum capacitor test
US5936409A (en) * 1997-01-20 1999-08-10 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Quality discrimination method for screening inspection of capacitors manufactured
US6280483B1 (en) * 1999-01-28 2001-08-28 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method of manufacturing solid electrolytic capacitors
US6448525B1 (en) * 1997-04-08 2002-09-10 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Capacitor characteristics measurement and packing apparatus
US20020140440A1 (en) * 2001-02-02 2002-10-03 Haase Wayne C. Digital measurement circuit and system using a grounded capacitive sensor
US6605946B1 (en) * 1999-08-25 2003-08-12 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Abnormality detection apparatus for power supply circuit
US7148697B2 (en) * 2004-06-04 2006-12-12 Doljack Frank A System and method for measuring electrical characteristics of a capacitor

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4419385A (en) * 1981-09-24 1983-12-06 Hughes Aircraft Company Low temperature process for depositing an oxide dielectric layer on a conductive surface and multilayer structures formed thereby
TW460701B (en) * 2000-01-20 2001-10-21 Winbond Electronics Corp Improved test circuit of TDDB
KR100400773B1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-10-08 주식회사 하이닉스반도체 Circuit for Testing Ferroelectric Capacitor in Ferroelectric Random Access Memy

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4216424A (en) * 1978-10-30 1980-08-05 Vette Carl W Method and apparatus for testing electrolytic capacitors
US4425541A (en) * 1981-09-14 1984-01-10 Commonwealth Edison Co. Apparatus for identifying defective electric power distribution capacitors
US5882719A (en) * 1995-12-13 1999-03-16 H. C. Starck, Inc. Solid tantalum capacitor test
US5936409A (en) * 1997-01-20 1999-08-10 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Quality discrimination method for screening inspection of capacitors manufactured
US6448525B1 (en) * 1997-04-08 2002-09-10 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Capacitor characteristics measurement and packing apparatus
US6280483B1 (en) * 1999-01-28 2001-08-28 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method of manufacturing solid electrolytic capacitors
US6605946B1 (en) * 1999-08-25 2003-08-12 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Abnormality detection apparatus for power supply circuit
US20020140440A1 (en) * 2001-02-02 2002-10-03 Haase Wayne C. Digital measurement circuit and system using a grounded capacitive sensor
US7148697B2 (en) * 2004-06-04 2006-12-12 Doljack Frank A System and method for measuring electrical characteristics of a capacitor

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20140029290A (en) * 2012-08-31 2014-03-10 에이브이엑스 코포레이션 Screening method for electrolytic capacitors
US9541607B2 (en) 2012-08-31 2017-01-10 Avx Corporation Screening method for electrolytic capacitors
US10591527B2 (en) 2012-08-31 2020-03-17 Avx Corporation Screening method for electrolytic capacitors
KR102141502B1 (en) * 2012-08-31 2020-08-06 에이브이엑스 코포레이션 Screening method for electrolytic capacitors
CN109633383A (en) * 2018-11-15 2019-04-16 丰宾电子（深圳）有限公司 A kind of multiplication of voltage test method of alminium electrolytic condenser
US11448680B2 (en) 2020-03-31 2022-09-20 KYOCERA AVX Components Corporation Screening method for electrolytic capacitors that maintains individual capacitor unit identity

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7671603B2 (en) 2010-03-02
US20080143342A1 (en) 2008-06-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7671603B2 (en) Screening of electrolytic capacitors
US8441265B2 (en) Apparatus and method for screening electrolytic capacitors
KR102009636B1 (en) Method for testing performance of cell
JP2007333529A (en) Insulation resistance measuring apparatus, leakage current measuring apparatus, insulation resistance measurement method and leakage current measurement method
CN115877210B (en) Pressure-maintaining adjustable capacitive load insulation detection method, device and equipment
JP4738703B2 (en) Electrolytic capacitor manufacturing method
JP2002313435A (en) Battery inspection method
CN115178501B (en) Screening method of high-reliability solid electrolyte tantalum capacitor
JP3156658B2 (en) How to charge a capacitor
JP3760373B2 (en) Screening method for ceramic electronic components
JPH10115651A (en) Inspection method for leak current characteristic of capacitor
JPH08227826A (en) Method for screening laminated ceramic capacitor
CN115792522B (en) Capacitive load insulation detection method, device and equipment
KR102266350B1 (en) Method for evaluating life cycle of aluminum polymer capacitor
JP5206493B2 (en) Ceramic capacitor sorting method and sorting apparatus
JP5151392B2 (en) Overvoltage protection element inspection method
DE102013002340A1 (en) Method for testing aging state of accumulator in lithium-ion battery system in electrical or hybrid vehicle, involves checking aging state of energy store using determined clamp resistors internal resistance sizes
DE19904608C2 (en) Device for testing an electrolytic capacitor and method for testing an electrolytic capacitor
JP7445884B2 (en) Inspection methods, management methods, production methods, and inspection systems
KR101988758B1 (en) Method for managing power cable using tanget delta
Bramoulle et al. Ultimate properties of the polypropylene film for energy storage capacitors
JP2000348990A (en) Inspection device for electrolytic capacitor and inspection method using the same
CN117330870A (en) Test method for rapidly verifying hydration-proof capacity of low-voltage aluminum electrolytic capacitor
JPH0714742A (en) Screening method for ceramic electronic component
DE102021122817A1 (en) Measuring and monitoring method for an isolation device and a vehicle

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: KEMET ELECTRONIC CORPORATION, SOUTH CAROLINA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FREEMAN, YURI;REEL/FRAME:021506/0764

Effective date: 20061214

AS Assignment

Owner name: K FINANCING, LLC,CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:KEMET CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022892/0795

Effective date: 20090630

Owner name: K FINANCING, LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:KEMET CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022892/0795

Effective date: 20090630

AS Assignment

Owner name: KEMET CORPORATION,SOUTH CAROLINA

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 022892/0795;ASSIGNOR:K FINANCING, LLC;REEL/FRAME:024397/0774

Effective date: 20100505

Owner name: KEMET CORPORATION, SOUTH CAROLINA

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 022892/0795;ASSIGNOR:K FINANCING, LLC;REEL/FRAME:024397/0774

Effective date: 20100505

AS Assignment

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AS AGENT, NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KEMET ELECTRONICS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:025150/0023

Effective date: 20100930

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION