US20090112267A1 - Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders - Google Patents
Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090112267A1 US20090112267A1 US11/841,670 US84167007A US2009112267A1 US 20090112267 A1 US20090112267 A1 US 20090112267A1 US 84167007 A US84167007 A US 84167007A US 2009112267 A1 US2009112267 A1 US 2009112267A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- distal end
- disc
- implanted device
- annulus
- elongate
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7001—Screws or hooks combined with longitudinal elements which do not contact vertebrae
- A61B17/7002—Longitudinal elements, e.g. rods
- A61B17/7019—Longitudinal elements having flexible parts, or parts connected together, such that after implantation the elements can move relative to each other
- A61B17/7025—Longitudinal elements having flexible parts, or parts connected together, such that after implantation the elements can move relative to each other with a sliding joint
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7001—Screws or hooks combined with longitudinal elements which do not contact vertebrae
- A61B17/7002—Longitudinal elements, e.g. rods
- A61B17/7019—Longitudinal elements having flexible parts, or parts connected together, such that after implantation the elements can move relative to each other
- A61B17/7026—Longitudinal elements having flexible parts, or parts connected together, such that after implantation the elements can move relative to each other with a part that is flexible due to its form
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7001—Screws or hooks combined with longitudinal elements which do not contact vertebrae
- A61B17/7002—Longitudinal elements, e.g. rods
- A61B17/7011—Longitudinal element being non-straight, e.g. curved, angled or branched
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00535—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets pneumatically or hydraulically operated
- A61B2017/00557—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets pneumatically or hydraulically operated inflatable
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/44—Joints for the spine, e.g. vertebrae, spinal discs
- A61F2/442—Intervertebral or spinal discs, e.g. resilient
- A61F2002/4435—Support means or repair of the natural disc wall, i.e. annulus, e.g. using plates, membranes or meshes
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to spinal implants. Specifically, the present invention relates to implantable devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders associated with the intervertebral disc.
- LBP lower back pain
- Some forms of back pain are not chronic and may be simply treated by rest, posture adjustments and painkillers.
- some forms of lower back pain (LBP) are very common and may be caused by unusual exertion or injury. Unusual exertion such has heavy lifting or strenuous exercise may result in back strain such as a pulled muscle, sprained muscle, sprained ligament, muscle spasm, or a combination thereof. An injury caused by falling down or a blow to the back may cause bruising.
- LBP lower back pain
- LBP lower back pain
- Unusual exertion such has heavy lifting or strenuous exercise may result in back strain such as a pulled muscle, sprained muscle, sprained ligament, muscle spasm, or a combination thereof.
- An injury caused by falling down or a blow to the back may cause bruising.
- These forms of back pain are typically non-chronic and may be self-treated and cured in a few days or weeks.
- non-chronic back pain may be treated by improvements in physical condition, posture and/or work conditions. For example, being pregnant, obese or otherwise significantly overweight may cause LBP. A mattress that does not provide adequate support may cause back pain in the morning. Working in an environment lacking good ergonomic design may also cause back pain. In these instances, the back pain may be cured by eliminating the culprit cause. Whether it is excess body weight, a bad mattress, or a bad office chair, these forms of back pain are readily treated.
- a prevalent clinical theory is that pain arises from physical impingement of the nerve roots or the spinal cord. Such nerve impingement may have of a number of different causes, but generally results from either a disc protrusion or from narrowing of the intervertebral foramina which surround the nerve roots.
- Another clinical theory is that damage to the disc, either from injury, degradation or otherwise, causes physical impingement of the disc nerves, which are primarily disposed about the periphery of the annulus, but may grow into fissures of a damaged disc.
- Disc protrusions may be caused by a physical injury to the disc or by natural degradation of the disc such as by degenerative disc disease (DDD).
- DDD degenerative disc disease
- Physical injury may cause damage to the annulus fibrosus which allows a portion of the disc, such as the nucleus pulposus, to protrude from the normal disc space.
- DDD may cause the entire disc to degenerate to such a degree that the annulus fibrosus bulges outward, delaminates or otherwise separates such that a portion of the disc protrudes from the normal disc space.
- the disc protrusion may impinge on a spinal nerve root causing severe pain.
- Impingement on the nerve root may also be caused by conditions unrelated to the disc such as by a spinal tumor or spinal stenosis (abnormal bone growth), but disc protrusions are the most common cause.
- the condition may be referred to as a disc stenosis, a disc bulge, a herniated disc, a slipped disc, a prolapsed disc or, if the protrusion separates from the disc, a sequestered disc.
- Nerve root impingement most often occurs in the lumbar region of the spinal column since the lumbar discs bear significant vertical loads relative to discs in other regions of the spine.
- disc protrusions in the lumbar region typically occur posteriorly because the annulus fibrosus is thinner on the posterior side than on the anterior side and because normal posture places more compression on the posterior side.
- Posterior protrusions are particularly problematic since the nerve roots are posteriorly positioned relative to the intervertebral discs. When a posterior disc protrusion presses against a nerve root, the pain is often severe and radiating, and may be aggravated by such subtle movements as coughing, bending over, or remaining in a sitting position for an extended period of time.
- discectomy is a procedure wherein the protruding portion of the disc is surgically removed.
- discectomy procedures have an inherent risk since the portion of the disc to be removed is immediately adjacent the nerve root and any damage to the nerve root is clearly undesirable.
- discectomy procedures are not always successful long term because scar tissue may form and/or additional disc material may subsequently protrude from the disc space as the disc deteriorates further.
- the recurrence of a disc protrusion may necessitate a repeat discectomy procedure, along with its inherent clinical risks and less than perfect long term success rate.
- a discectomy procedure at least as a stand-alone procedure, is clearly not an optimal solution.
- Discectomy is also not a viable solution for DDD when no disc protrusion is involved.
- DDD causes the entire disc to degenerate, narrowing of the intervertebral space, and shifting of the load to the facet joints. If the facet joints carry a substantial load, the joints may degrade over time and be a different cause of back pain.
- the narrowed disc space can result in the intervertebral foramina surrounding the nerve roots to directly impinge on one or more nerve roots. Such nerve impingement is very painful and cannot be corrected by a discectomy procedure.
- spinal fusion particularly with the assistance of interbody fusion cages, has become a preferred secondary procedure, and in some instances, a preferred primary procedure.
- Spinal fusion involves permanently fusing or fixing adjacent vertebrae.
- Hardware in the form of bars, plates, screws and cages may be utilized in combination with bone graft material to fuse adjacent vertebrae.
- Spinal fusion may be performed as a stand-alone procedure or may be performed in combination with a discectomy procedure.
- spinal fusion procedures are invasive to the disc, risk nerve damage and, depending on the procedural approach, either technically complicated (endoscopic anterior approach), invasive to the bowel (surgical anterior approach), or invasive to the musculature of the back (surgical posterior approach).
- Another procedure that has been less than clinically successful is total disc replacement with a prosthetic disc.
- This procedure is also very invasive to the disc and, depending on the procedural approach, either invasive to the bowel (surgical anterior approach) or invasive to the musculature of the back (surgical posterior approach).
- the procedure may actually complicate matters by creating instability in the spine, and the long term mechanical reliability of prosthetic discs has yet to be demonstrated.
- the present invention addresses this need by providing improved devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders.
- spinal disorder generally refers to a degradation in spinal condition as the result of injury, aging or the like, as opposed to a spinal deformity resulting from growth defects.
- the improved devices and methods of the present invention specifically address nerve impingement as the result of damage to the disc, particularly in the lumbar region, but may have other significant applications not specifically mentioned herein.
- the present invention is discussed in detail with reference to the treatment of damaged discs in the lumbar region of the adult human spinal column.
- the improved devices and methods of the present invention reduce if not eliminate back pain while maintaining near normal anatomical motion.
- the present invention provides dynamic bias devices and reinforcement devices, which may be used individually or in combination, to eliminate nerve impingement associated with a damaged disc, and/or to reinforce a damaged disc, while permitting relative movement of the vertebrae adjacent the damaged disc.
- the devices of the present invention are particularly well suited for minimally invasive methods of implantation.
- the dynamic bias devices of the present invention basically apply a bias force to adjacent vertebrae on either side of a damaged disc, while permitting relative movement of the vertebrae.
- disc height may be restored, thereby reducing nerve impingement.
- the dynamic bias devices of the present invention retract disc protrusions into the normal disc space thereby reducing nerve impingement by the protrusions; reduce the load carried by the facet joints thereby eliminating nerve impingement originating at the joint; restore intervertebral spacing thereby eliminating nerve impingement by the intervertebral foramina; and reduce pressure on portions of the annulus thereby alleviating nerve impingement in disc fissures.
- the reinforcement devices of the present invention basically reinforce a damaged disc, restore disc height and/or bear some or all of the load normally carried by a healthy disc, thereby reducing nerve impingement.
- Some embodiments of the reinforcement members of the present invention have a relatively small profile when implanted, but are very rigid, and thus serve to reinforce the disc, particularly the annulus. By reinforcing the disc, and particularly the annulus, disc protrusions may reduced or prevented, thereby eliminating nerve impingement by the protrusions.
- Other embodiments have a relatively large profile when implanted, and thus serve to increase disc height and/or to bear load. By increasing disc height, the advantages discussed previously may be obtained. By bearing some of the load normally carried by a healthy disc, the load may be redistributed as needed, such as when a dynamic bias device is used.
- FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate left lateral and posterior views, respectively, of a portion of the adult human vertebral (spinal) column;
- FIG. 2A illustrates a left lateral view of an intervertebral disc disposed between adjacent vertebrae, wherein the disc is partially protruding from the normal disc space and the disc height is reduced;
- FIG. 2B illustrates a left lateral view of an intervertebral disc disposed between adjacent vertebrae as in FIG. 2A , wherein dynamic bias devices and reinforcement devices of the present invention, which are illustrated schematically, restore normal disc height and eliminate the disc protrusion;
- FIGS. 3A-3C schematically illustrate a dynamic bias device 100 in accordance with the present invention
- FIGS. 4A-4B schematically illustrate left lateral and posterior views, respectively, of dynamic bias devices of the present invention mounted to adjacent vertebrae equidistant from the median plane;
- FIGS. 5A-5B schematically illustrate left lateral and posterior views, respectively, of a dynamic bias device of the present invention mounted to adjacent vertebrae in the median plane;
- FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 6C illustrates a posterior view of the bushing shown in FIGS. 6A-6B mounted to a spinous process
- FIG. 6D illustrates a posterior view of the spinous process shown in FIG. 6C , detailing the counter-bore
- FIGS. 7A-7B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention
- FIGS. 8A-8B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention
- FIGS. 9A-9B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 10A illustrates a side view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 10B illustrates a side view of the dynamic bias device shown in FIG. 10A subjected to a compression load
- FIG. 10C illustrates a cross-sectional view of the dynamic bias device shown in FIG. 1A ;
- FIG. 11A illustrates a cross-sectional view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 11B illustrates a cross-sectional view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention.
- FIGS. 12A-12B illustrate rear and side views, respectively, of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 12C illustrates the dynamic bias device shown in FIGS. 12A-12B subjected to a compression load
- FIG. 13A illustrates a side view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a fifth embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 13B illustrates a side or rear view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a sixth embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 13C illustrates a rear view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a seventh embodiment of the present invention
- FIGS. 14A-14D illustrate tools of the present invention for implanting the reinforcement members
- FIGS. 15A-15J illustrate steps for implanting a self-expanding reinforcement member
- FIGS. 15K-15L illustrate steps for implanting an inflatable reinforcement member
- FIGS. 15M-15R illustrate steps for implanting reinforcement bars
- FIG. 16 illustrates a bias force v. displacement curve for the dynamic bias device.
- FIGS. 1A and 1B the lower portion of an adult human vertebral column 10 is illustrated in left lateral and posterior views, respectively.
- the upper portion of the vertebral column 10 includes the thoracic region and the cervical region, which are not shown for purposes of simplified illustration only.
- the lower portion of the vertebral column 10 includes the lumbar region 12 , the sacrum 14 and the coccyx 16 .
- the sacrum 14 and the coccyx 16 are sometimes collectively referred to as the pelvic curvature.
- the vertebral column 10 includes an axis of curvature 60 which generally forms a double-S shape when viewed laterally.
- the vertebral column 10 also includes a median plane 70 which is a sagittal plane bisecting the vertebral column 10 into symmetrical left lateral and right lateral portions. In posterior views, the median plane 70 appears as a line.
- the lumbar region 12 of the vertebral column 10 includes five ( 5 ) vertebrae 20 (labeled L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , L 4 and L 5 ) separated by intervertebral discs 50 .
- the sacrum 14 which includes five (5) fused vertebrae 30 (superior vertebra 30 labeled S 1 ), is separated by a single disc 50 from the coccyx 16 , which includes four (4) fused vertebrae 40 .
- the intervertebral discs 50 may be referenced by their respective adjacent vertebrae.
- the disc 50 between the L 4 and L 5 lumbar vertebrae 20 may be referred to as the L 4 L 5 disc.
- the disc 50 between the L 5 lumbar vertebra 20 and the S 1 sacral vertebra 30 may be referred to as the L 5 S 1 disc.
- each vertebra 20 / 30 / 40 is a unique and irregular bone structure
- the vertebrae 20 of the lumbar region 12 (in addition to the thoracic and cervical regions) have common structures.
- Each vertebra 20 of the lumbar region 12 generally includes a body portion 21 and a vertebral arch portion 22 / 23 which encloses the vertebral foramen (not visible) in which the spinal cord is disposed.
- the vertebral arch 22 / 23 includes two pedicles 22 and two laminae 23 .
- a spinous process 24 extends posteriorly from the juncture of the two laminae 23
- two transverse processes 25 extend laterally from each lamina 23 .
- Four articular processes 26 / 27 extend inferiorly 26 and superiorly 27 from the laminae 23 .
- the inferior articular process 26 rests in the superior articular process 27 of the adjacent vertebra to form a facet joint 28 .
- the five (5) vertebrae 30 of the sacrum 14 are fused together to form a single rigid structure.
- the sacrum 14 includes a median sacral crest 31 which roughly corresponds to the spinous processes of the vertebrae 30 , and two intermediate sacral crests 32 which roughly correspond to the articular processes of the vertebrae 30 .
- the sacral laminae 33 are disposed between the median 31 and intermediate 32 sacral crests.
- Two lateral sacral crests 34 are disposed on either side of the sacral foraminae 35 .
- the sacrum 14 also includes a pair of sacral wings 36 which define auricular surfaces 39 .
- the superior (S 1 ) sacral vertebra 30 includes two superior articular processes 37 which engage the inferior articular processes 26 of the L 5 lumber vertebra 20 to form a facet joint, and the base 38 of the superior sacral vertebra S 1 is joined to the L 5 S 1 disc 50 .
- Each intervertebral disc 50 includes an annulus fibrosus 52 surrounding a nucleus pulposus 54 , which are more clearly visible in FIG. 15A .
- the posterior annulus 52 is generally thinner than the anterior annulus 52 , which may account for the higher incidence of posterior disc protrusions.
- a disc protrusion generically refers to any portion of the disc that protrudes from the normal disc space. Common clinical conditions that may be characterized as a disc protrusion include a disc stenosis, a disc bulge, a herniated or sequestered disc, a slipped disc, and a prolapsed disc. Generally, a disc protrusion results in a decrease in disc height proportional to the volume of the protrusion.
- a degenerative disc may sometimes only involve the loss of disc height, and may or may not involve any significant protrusion. However, both degenerative discs and a disc protrusions usually involve some loss in disc height.
- each intervertebral disc 50 forms one support point and the facet joints form two support points of what may be characterized as a three point support structure between adjacent vertebrae.
- the facet joints 28 are substantially vertical, leaving the disc 50 to carry the vast majority of the load.
- the nucleus 54 bears the majority of the load. This belief is based on the theory that the disc 50 behaves much like a balloon or tire, wherein the annulus 22 merely serves to contain the pressurized nucleus 54 , and the nucleus 54 bears all the load.
- annulus fibrosus 52 comprises 60% of the total disc 50 cross-section, and the nucleus pulposus 54 only comprises 40% of the total disc 50 cross-section.
- the annulus fibrosus 52 is made of 40-60% organized collagen in the form of a laminated structure, whereas the nucleus pulposus 54 is made of 18-30% collagen in the form of a relatively homogenous gel. It seems a more plausible theory is that the annulus fibrosus 52 is the primary load bearing portion of the disc 50 .
- FIG. 2A a left lateral view of an intervertebral disc 50 disposed between adjacent vertebrae 20 S (superior) and 20 I (inferior) is illustrated, wherein the disc 50 is partially protruding 56 from the normal disc space and the disc height is reduced.
- the disc 50 is shown to include a protrusion 56 , the reduction in disc height may or may not be accompanied with a protrusion 56 as discussed previously. For example, if the disc 50 is degenerated, the disc height may be reduced with or without a corresponding protrusion 56 .
- FIGS. 2A and 2B generically refer to any two adjacent vertebrae or any series of adjacent vertebrae, and that lumbar vertebrae 20 S and 20 I are specifically shown for purposes of illustration only. This generic method of illustrating vertebrae also applies to the remainder of the Figures.
- FIG. 2B a left lateral view of the intervertebral disc 50 disposed between adjacent vertebrae 20 S and 20 I is illustrated as in FIG. 2A .
- devices 100 and 200 of the present invention which are illustrated schematically, eliminate the disc protrusion 56 and restore normal disc height.
- one or more dynamic bias devices 100 and one or more reinforcement members 200 are utilized, either in combination or individually.
- the dynamic bias device 100 restores disc height and, by conservation of disc volume, retracts the protrusion into the normal disc space thereby reducing nerve impingement by the protrusion. Restoring disc height also reduces the load carried by the facet joints thereby eliminating nerve impingement originating at the joint, restores intervertebral spacing thereby eliminating nerve impingement by the intervertebral foramina, and reduces pressure on portions of the annulus thereby alleviating nerve impingement in disc fissures.
- the dynamic bias device 100 basically applies a bias force to the adjacent vertebrae 20 S and 20 I to which it is connected, but allows relative movement of the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I .
- the dynamic bias device 100 is conceptually similar to a spring attached to the adjacent vertebrae 20 S and 20 I .
- the dynamic bias device 100 applies a bias force (usually repulsive) between the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I when the disc height is normal or less than normal.
- the bias force is preferably set such that the disc height is normal with normal posture and loading, and increases with posterior flexure and/or added vertical load.
- the details of the design and use of the dynamic bias device 100 will be discussed in greater detail hereinafter, particularly with reference to FIGS. 3A-3C , 4 A- 4 B, 5 A- 5 B, 10 A- 10 C, 11 A- 11 B, 12 A- 12 C, and 13 A- 13 C.
- the dynamic bias device 100 is preferably mounted posterior to the axis of curvature 60 . Locating the dynamic bias device 100 posterior to the axis of curvature 60 shifts the load carried by the disc 50 from the posterior portion of the disc to the anterior portion of the disc 50 . Locating the dynamic bias device 100 posterior to the axis of curvature 60 also reduces the load carried by the facet joints. Preferably, the dynamic bias device 100 applies a substantially vertical bias force, with the direction independent of displacement.
- reinforcement members 200 may be placed in the anterior annulus 52 , to effectively bolster the anterior portion of the disc.
- the reinforcement members 200 may be used to reinforce the disc, restore disc height and/or bear the load normally carried by annulus.
- the reinforcement members 200 are relatively rigid and thus serve to reinforce the disc 50 where inserted.
- the reinforcement members 200 may have a relatively large profile when implanted and thus increase disc height.
- the reinforcement members 200 are particularly beneficial if the disc 50 is degenerated, or if the disc 50 will likely become degenerated with the change in load distribution. The details of the design and use of the reinforcement members 200 will be discussed in greater detail hereinafter, particularly with reference to FIGS. 14A-14D and 15 A- 15 R.
- one or more dynamic bias devices 100 and one or more reinforcement members 200 may be utilized, either alone or in combination. Specifically: one or more dynamic bias devices 100 may be used alone; one or more spacer devices 200 may be used alone; and one or more dynamic bias devices 100 and one or more reinforcement members 200 may be used in combination. If a combination of devices 100 / 200 is used, it is believed that the use of one or more posterior dynamic bias devices 100 in combination with one or more anterior reinforcement members 200 is most effective in treating posterior protrusions 56 , facet joint degradation, and nerve impingement by intervertebral foraminae, which are believed to be the most common culprits of chronic LBP.
- two or more dynamic bias devices 100 may be attached to the vertebrae on opposite sides of vertebrae 20 S and 20 I .
- one or more dynamic bias devices 100 is connected to vertebra 20 S and the vertebra immediately superior to vertebra 20 S
- one or more dynamic bias devices 100 is connected to vertebra 20 I and the vertebra immediately inferior to vertebra 201 .
- the dynamic bias devices 100 are primarily applying a traction force to effectively pull vertebrae 20 S and 20 I apart, thereby eliminating the disc protrusion 56 and restoring normal disc height.
- the dynamic bias device 100 is schematically illustrated under conditions of no-load, compression load (L C ), and traction load (L T ), respectively.
- the dynamic bias device 100 includes a pair of attachment members 102 , a bias member 104 , and a housing 106 .
- Attachment members 102 facilitate attachment of the dynamic bias device 100 to vertebrae 20 S and 20 I , as shown in FIG. 2B .
- Bias member 104 functions to apply a bias force between the attachment members 102 .
- Housing 106 functions to separate the moving portions of dynamic bias device 100 from the surrounding muscle, ligaments and other tissue when the dynamic bias device 100 is implanted.
- Attachment members 102 may comprise a wide variety of mechanical connection designs, and may incorporate into their design, or be used in combination with, other machine elements not specifically mentioned herein.
- the each attachment member 102 is shown as loop which may be connected to the vertebrae by fasteners and bushings, specific examples of which are described in detail with reference to FIGS. 6A-6D , 7 A- 7 B, 8 A- 8 B and 9 A- 9 B. These specific examples are provided by way of example, not limitation.
- the attachment members 102 may comprise or include screws, rivets, spikes, keys, pins, cotters, splines, couplings, bushings, washers, and the like, without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention.
- the primary function of the attachment members 102 is to fixedly secure the ends of the bias member 104 to the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I .
- the attachment members 102 are secured to the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I such that translational movement is minimized or eliminated, and such that rotational movement is permitted between each attachment member 102 and each vertebrae 20 S and 20 I .
- Providing attachment members 102 with these functional attributes permits the dynamic bias device 100 to effectively transmit a bias force to each vertebrae 20 S and 20 I , allow relative movement there between, and minimize stress on the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I at the attachment points.
- Bias member 104 functions to apply a bias force, either attraction or repulsion, between the attachment members 102 .
- the bias force generally increases or decreases with displacement of the ends of the bias member 104 , as with a conventional spring.
- the bias force may increase or decrease with the time derivative of displacement (i.e., velocity) of the ends of the bias member 104 , as with a conventional damper or shock absorber.
- the bias member 104 compresses in response to a compression load (L C ), thereby increasing or decreasing the bias force.
- L C compression load
- L T traction load
- the bias force of the bias member 104 increases in response to a compression load (L C ), and decreases in response to a traction load (L T ).
- the bias member 104 normally operates in compression.
- the bias force of the bias member 104 is adjusted such that the disc is restored to a more normal height when the dynamic bias device 100 is implanted. Because the disc height is usually initially less than normal, the dynamic bias device 100 is attached to the vertebrae with the bias member 104 preloaded in compression or with the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I in traction or otherwise spread apart. In this manner, for a given posture, the disc height will be larger following implantation of the dynamic bias device 100 than prior to implantation.
- the bias force of the bias member 104 decreases in response to a compression load (L C ), and increases in response to a traction load (L T ).
- the bias member 104 normally operates in tension.
- the bias member 104 may simply comprise a member that is rigid or semi-rigid in tension, such as a cable.
- the bias force of the bias member 104 is adjusted such that the disc is restored to a more normal height when the dynamic bias device 100 is implanted. Further with this arrangement, because the disc height is usually initially less than normal, the dynamic bias device 100 is attached to the vertebrae with the bias member 104 preloaded in tension or with the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I in traction or otherwise spread apart.
- the dynamic bias device 100 preferably operates with substantially linear displacement substantially parallel to the axis of curvature 60 .
- the amount of displacement will be evenly shared between the dynamic bias devices 100 in the traction embodiment, whereas the compression embodiment requires the full displacement to be assumed by each dynamic bias device 100 .
- the following ranges of displacement are given with reference to the compression embodiment.
- the dynamic bias device 100 may have a total (i.e., maximum) displacement preferably in the range of 1.0 to 3.0 cm to accommodate full posterior to anterior flexure in the L 5 -S 1 region, 0.5 to 1.5 cm to accommodate full posterior to anterior flexure in the L 4 -L 5 region, and 0.25 to 1.0 cm to accommodate full posterior to anterior flexure in the L 1 -L 4 region.
- bias member 104 operate within its elastic limit, as dictated by the chosen material and geometry of the bias member 104 .
- the bias member preferably should be able to withstand 1.0 to 10 million fatigue cycles, it is preferable that bias member 104 operate within its fatigue limit, as dictated by the chosen material and geometry, for the full range of displacement.
- the bias force may generally increase or decrease with displacement of the ends of the bias member 104 , as with a conventional spring.
- the bias force may increase or decrease with the time derivative of displacement (i.e., velocity) of the ends of the bias member 104 , as with a conventional damper or shock absorber.
- the bias force (F B ) is generally linearly proportional to the derivative of displacement ( ⁇ X/ ⁇ T) as dictated by the damper constant (P) of the bias member 104 .
- the bias force F B of the bias member 104 is adjusted such that the disc is restored to a more normal height when the dynamic bias device 100 is implanted.
- the bias force F B may be adjusted by selecting the spring constant (K) and/or damper constant (P) of the bias member 104 and by pre-loading (compressing) the bias member 104 an initial displacement ⁇ X i .
- the necessary bias force F B may be roughly calculated as a function of body weight (BW), the distance of the mounted dynamic bias device 100 from the axis of curvature 60 , and the mechanical properties of the surrounding tissues (muscle tissue, connective tissue, joints).
- BW body weight
- the normal net load carried by the lumbar region 12 is roughly 30% BW when laying down, 140% BW when standing, 185% BW when sitting, 215% BW when bending forward, and 250% BW when slouching.
- a bias force versus attachment point displacement curve for the dynamic bias device 100 is shown.
- the bias force is intended to be sufficiently high to spread the attachment points (e.g., processes of adjacent vertebrae) and restore normal disc height in all postures. For example, in normal standing posture, the bias force is sufficiently high to spread the attachment points as shown in FIG. 16 , such that more normal disc size and shape is obtained.
- the amount of force carried by the dynamic bias device 100 will change as a function of the spring properties, including the spring constant (K) and the compression length of the spring.
- the bias force is sufficient to shift the pre-implant (normal posture) distance to the post-implant (normal posture) distance.
- the bias force increase significantly as the attachment points come closer, as by extension, lifting and/or poor posture. This is facilitated by the natural increase in bias force of the spring as the distance decreases, and is aided by the damper pad and the compression limit (bottomed out) of the spring.
- the dynamic bias device is intended to limit excessive compression of the posterior disc, and not necessarily intended to limit flexion of the spine, it is also preferable that the bias force approach zero (spring fully extended) at a distance which is less than the extension limit of the dynamic bias device.
- the bias force may be in the range of 1% to 30% BW when laying down.
- the bias force may be in the range of 10% to 90% BW when standing.
- FIGS. 4A-4B and 5 A- 5 B left lateral and posterior views of dynamic bias devices 100 are schematically illustrated as being mounted to adjacent spinous processes 24 S and 24 I of adjacent vertebrae 20 S and 20 I .
- the dynamic bias devices 100 are preferably mounted substantially equidistant from the median plane 70 , or otherwise symmetric about the median plane 70 , in order to avoid causing lateral bias or curvature of the spine 10 .
- the dynamic bias devices 100 may be mounted substantially vertical as shown or at an angle to the median plane 70 and satisfy these criteria.
- the dynamic bias device 100 is preferably mounted in or near the median plane 70 for the same reason.
- the dynamic bias device(s) 100 near the median plane 70 , substantially equidistant from the median plane 70 , or otherwise symmetric about the median plane 70 , it is possible to have multiple dynamic bias devices 100 mounted asymmetrically while maintaining balanced bias forces about the median plane 70 .
- the objective is to avoid causing lateral bias or curvature of the spine 10 , which is a function of balancing bias forces and moments about the median plane 70 .
- the bias forces are vectors which have a magnitude governed by the properties of the bias member 104 , and a direction dictated by the mounting position of the dynamic bias device 100 .
- Each dynamic bias device 100 has two bias force vectors, one for each attachment member 102 at each attachment point.
- Each bias force vector has a moment arm equal to the distance from the attachment point to the median plane 70 .
- the product of the moment arm and the vertical component of the bias force vector is the moment or torque applied to the spine 10
- the horizontal component of the bias force vector is the shear applied to the spine 10 .
- all of the moments are balanced about the median plane 70 .
- the dynamic bias device(s) 100 is/are preferably mounted posterior to the axis of curvature 60 . This is advantageous because loss of disc height is most common in the posterior disc 50 , the largest amount of mechanical advantage about the anterior disc is obtained posterior to the axis of curvature 60 , and the posterior portions of the vertebrae are easiest to access less invasively.
- the dynamic bias device(s) 100 may be mounted at any position relative to the axis of curvature 60 depending on the location of the protrusion 56 , as long as the dynamic bias device(s) 100 is/are near the median plane 70 , substantially equidistant from the median plane 70 , or otherwise symmetric about the median plane 70 as discussed above.
- attachment points A-G refer to the lumbar vertebrae 20 (L 1 -L 5 ), and attachment points H-N refer to the sacral vertebrae 30 (particularly S 1 ).
- the attachment points A-G of the lumbar region 12 are equally applicable to the thoracic and cervical regions of the spine 10 , which are not illustrated for purposes of simplicity only.
- attachment points A and B refer to the left lateral and right lateral surfaces of the spinous process 24 ; attachment point C refers to the posterior surface of the spinous process 24 ; attachment points D and E refer to the posterior surfaces of the left and right laminae 23 ; and attachment points F and G refer to the distal ends of the left and right transverse processes 25 .
- attachment points H and I refer to the left lateral and right lateral surfaces of the superior median sacral crest 31 ; attachment points K and L refer to the posterior surfaces of the sacral laminae 33 between the median sacral crest 31 and the intermediate sacral crests 32 ; and attachment points M and N refer to posterior surface between the intermediate sacral crests 32 and the lateral sacral crests 34 .
- FIGS. 4B and 5B To illustrate the attachment point nomenclature, reference may be made to FIGS. 4B and 5B .
- a first dynamic bias device 100 is attached to the left lateral surface of the two spinous processes
- a second dynamic bias device 100 is attached to the right lateral surface of the two spinous processes.
- the set of attachment points for the arrangement of FIG. 4B is (AA, BB).
- FIG. 5B only one dynamic bias device 100 is attached to the posterior surface of the two spinous processes.
- the set of attachment points for the arrangement of FIG. 5B is (CC).
- the following sets of attachment points may be used to satisfy the above-referenced criteria with regard to balancing moments and forces about the median plane 70 .
- (CC); and (CJ) are preferred.
- (AA, BB); (DD, EE); (FF, GG); (AH, BI); (DK, EL); (FK, GL); (DM, EN); and (FM, GN) are preferred.
- double dynamic bias device 100 mounting (AD, BE); (AF, BG); (AK, BL); (AM, BN); (DH, El); (DF, EG); (FH, GI); (CA, CB); (CH, CI); (CD, CE); (CF, CG); (CK, CL); (CM, CN); (JA, JB); (JH, JI); (JD, JE); and (JF, JG) are possible.
- any combination of these sets may be used.
- the more posterior the attachment points the less invasive the procedure will be. Attachment points A, B, C, H and I are preferred for this reason.
- the dynamic bias device 140 is preferably disposed laterally or posteriorly of the spinous processes 24 , as opposed to under and between the spinous processes 24 .
- the dynamic bias device 100 may be attached to these points by conventional surgical techniques, except as described herein.
- the posterior musculature and connective tissues may be dissected to expose the desired attachment points.
- any disc protrusions 56 may be removed, in whole or in part, using a conventional discectomy procedure.
- any other abnormal spinal growths or protrusions may be removed.
- conventional traction or separation techniques may be employed to temporarily retract the protrusion 56 into the normal disc space until the dynamic bias devices are implanted.
- the spine may be placed in traction or conventional intervertebral separation tools may be used.
- the dynamic bias device 100 may be preloaded such that when the device is released after attachment, the bias force establishes the desired amount of separation.
- Pilot holes are drilled as needed, such as for the use of bushings 330 , 340 and/or 350 (described with reference to FIGS. 7A-7B , 8 A- 8 B and 9 A- 9 B hereinafter). If attachment points A, B, H and I are to be used, such as with the use of bushing 320 (described with reference to FIGS. 6A-6D hereinafter), a hole 90 and counter-bore 92 may be drilled into the spinous process 24 . The device(s) 100 are then attached to the desired attachment points in accordance with the hardware being used, and the site is subsequently surgically closed.
- bushings 320 , 330 , 340 , and 350 are illustrated.
- the attachment members 102 may comprise a wide variety of mechanical connection designs, and may incorporate into their design, or be used in combination with, other machine elements such as bushings 320 , 330 , 340 , and 350 .
- Bushings 320 , 330 , 340 , and 350 are adapted to mount one or two dynamic bias devices 100 .
- bushings 320 , 330 , 340 , and 350 are adapted to receive attachment members 102 in the form of loops or the like, but may be modified to receive other structures.
- a primary function of bushings 320 , 330 , 340 , and 350 is to isolate movement of the attachment members 102 from the vertebrae to which they are attached.
- the bushing to bone (vertebrae) interface is static, while the bushing to attachment member interface is dynamic. This reduces if not eliminates the abrasive degradation of the vertebrae due to the attachment of the dynamic bias device 100 .
- the orientation of the vertebral surface at the attachment points will determine the best bushing scheme.
- Bushing 320 is particularly suitable for attachment to the spinous process 24 as shown in FIG. 6C , or attachment points A, B, H and I as illustrated in FIG. 1A .
- Bushing 320 may be attached to the spinous process 24 utilizing a conventional fastener 300 , which includes bolt 302 , nut 304 and washers 306 and 308 .
- the fastener 300 is a lock fastener such that it will not have a tendency to unscrew with relative motion of the attachment members 102 .
- the nut 304 is not tightened so much as to inhibit rotational movement of the attachment members 102 .
- Fastener 300 may alternatively comprise a key and pin (e.g., cotter pin).
- a key and pin e.g., cotter pin.
- Bushing 320 includes a male fitting 321 which fits into a female fitting 324 .
- the male fitting 321 includes a shank portion 322 and a head portion 323 .
- the female fitting 324 includes a shank portion 325 and a head portion 326 .
- the female fitting 324 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the shank 322 of the male fitting 321
- the male fitting 321 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the bolt 302 of the fastener 300 .
- the outside surface of the shank 322 of the male fitting 321 and the inside surface of the shank 325 of the female fitting 324 may include mating threads.
- the size of the head 323 / 326 to bone interface is preferably maximized to minimize stress concentration and to distribute torsional loads over a large surface area.
- the size of the female shank 25 and the corresponding size of the hole 90 drilled through the spinous process 24 are chosen to minimize stress concentration and minimize the loss of bone integrity.
- a counter-bore 92 may be used to flatten and thereby maximize the contact surface area of the head 323 / 326 to bone interface, as illustrated in FIG. 6D .
- the materials of the fastener 300 and bushing 320 may comprise any suitable implantable material capable of withstanding high fatigue.
- all components could be comprised of 300 or 400 series stainless steel, titanium alloy 6-4, or MP35N alloy.
- all components would be made of the same or similar material to reduce galvanic corrosion.
- the surfaces of the fastener 300 and bushing 320 that engage the attachment members 102 of the dynamic bias device 100 are preferably smooth to reduce friction and wear.
- the surfaces of the bushing 320 that engage the vertebrae may have a roughened surface (e.g., knurled) to reduce the likelihood of relative movement there between.
- the surfaces of the bushing 320 that engage the vertebrae may have a porous sintered surface to facilitate solid bone growth, thereby further securing the bushing 320 .
- Coatings and surface treatments may be utilized to reduce or increase friction where desired, and biological response where tissue interface is likely.
- bushing 330 is substantially the same in design, function and use as bushing 320 .
- Bushing 330 is adapted to mount one or (preferably) two dynamic bias devices 100 .
- Bushing 330 is particularly suitable for attachment points C and J as illustrated in FIG. 1B .
- Bushing 330 may be attached to the vertebrae 20 / 30 utilizing a conventional bone screw 310 , which may be modified in diameter, length and thread type for the particular attachment site and condition.
- Bushing 330 includes two male fittings 331 which fit into a female fitting 334 .
- the male fittings 331 each include a shank portion 332 and a head portion 333 .
- the female fitting 334 includes two shank portions 335 and two head portions 336 .
- the female fitting 334 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the shanks 332 of the male fittings 331
- the male fittings 331 have an inside diameter sized to accommodate the bolt 302 of the fastener 300 .
- the outside surfaces of the shanks 332 of the male fittings 331 and the inside surfaces of the shanks 335 of the female fitting 334 may include mating threads.
- bushing 340 is substantially the same in design, function and use as bushing 330 .
- Bushing 340 is adapted to mount one dynamic bias device 100 .
- Bushing 340 is particularly suitable for attachment points C, D, E, F, G, J, K, L, M and N, but may also be used for attachment points A, B, H and I as illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B .
- Bushing 340 may be attached to the vertebrae 20 / 30 utilizing a conventional bone screw 310 , which may be modified in diameter, length and thread type for the particular attachment site and condition.
- Bushing 340 includes a male fitting 341 which fits into a female fitting 344 .
- the male fitting 341 includes a shank portion 342 and a head portion 343 .
- the female fitting 344 includes a shank portion 345 and a head portion 346 .
- the female fitting 344 also includes a flange 347 connecting the bone screw 310 to the bushing 340 .
- the female fitting 344 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the shank 342 of the male fitting 341
- the male fitting 341 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the bolt 302 of the fastener 300 .
- the outside surface of the shank 342 of the male fitting 341 and the inside surface of the shank 345 of the female fitting 344 may include mating threads.
- the attachment member 102 When fully assembled, the attachment member 102 is disposed around the shank 345 on the female fitting 344 and between the heads 343 / 346 of the fittings 341 / 344 . When mounted, the axis of the shank 345 of bushing 340 is oriented parallel to the mounting surface.
- bushing 350 is substantially the same in design, function and use as bushing 340 .
- Bushing 350 is adapted to mount one dynamic bias device 100 .
- Bushing 350 is particularly suitable for attachment points C, D, E, F, G, J, K, L, M and N, but may also be used for attachment points A, B, H and I as illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B .
- Bushing 350 may be attached to the vertebrae 20 / 30 utilizing a conventional bone screw 310 , which may be modified in diameter, length and thread type for the particular attachment site and condition.
- the fastener 300 is formed integrally with the bone screw 310 .
- Bushing 350 includes a male fitting 351 which fits into a female fitting 354 .
- the male fitting 351 includes a shank portion 352 and a head portion 353 .
- the female fitting 354 includes a shank portion 355 and a head portion 356 .
- the female fitting 354 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the shank 352 of the male fitting 351
- the male fitting 351 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the bolt 302 , which is integral with the bone screw 310 .
- the outside surface of the shank 352 of the male fitting 351 and the inside surface of the shank 355 of the female fitting 354 may include mating threads.
- the attachment member 102 When fully assembled, the attachment member 102 is disposed around the shank 355 on the female fitting 354 and between the heads 353 / 356 of the fittings 351 / 354 . When mounted, the axis of the shank 355 of bushing 350 is oriented perpendicular to the mounting surface.
- Dynamic bias device 110 includes a barrel 111 in which piston 112 is slidably disposed.
- a bias member in the form of a spring 113 is disposed in the barrel 111 . Longitudinal displacement of the barrel 111 relative to the piston 112 causes compression (or extension) of the spring 113 .
- the spring 113 provides a bias force which increases (or decreases) linearly with displacement as discussed previously.
- a flexible housing (not shown) may be placed about the dynamic bias device 110 to isolate the moving parts 111 / 112 from the surrounding tissue when implanted.
- An adjustable arm 114 may be connected to the piston 112 .
- the arm 114 and the barrel 111 include holes 115 or other suitable attachment members, which may be used in combination bushings 320 , 330 , 340 and 350 , to attach the dynamic bias device 110 to the vertebrae.
- the adjustable arm 114 and the piston 112 may include mating threads such that rotation of the arm 114 causes the arm 114 to effectively lengthen or shorten the piston 112 . This allows the distance between the holes 115 to be varied to accommodate different attachment locations and different anatomies. This also allows the dynamic bias device to be preloaded by extending the effective length of the piston 112 beyond the distance between attachment points.
- a collar 116 is provided to limit the extended length of the dynamic bias device 110 .
- the collar 116 may include threads that mate with threads inside the barrel 111 such that the collar 116 is adjustable, and thus the extended length is adjustable.
- the collar 116 may also include an elastomeric bumper pad to dampen impact between the piston 112 and the collar when the device 110 is filly extended.
- a elastomeric bumper pad 117 may be provided in the barrel 111 to dampen impact between the piston 112 and the barrel 111 when the device 110 is filly collapsed.
- Dynamic bias device 120 includes a barrel 121 in which piston 122 is slidably disposed.
- a bias member 123 in the form of a compressed or evacuated fluid (liquid or gas or a combination of both) is disposed in the barrel 121 and sealed relative to the piston 122 by piston ring 128 .
- the barrel 121 and piston 122 may define a closed volume or an exhaust reservoir 129 may be used as shown.
- the bias fluid 123 is in fluid communication with the exhaust reservoir 129 by way of an exhaust port through the wall of the barrel 121 .
- the exhaust reservoir 129 may comprise an expandable annular bag as shown, or other suitable structure. If a closed volume is used, longitudinal displacement of the barrel 121 relative to the piston 122 simply causes a change in pressure of the fluid 123 . If an exhaust reservoir 129 is used as shown, longitudinal displacement of the barrel 121 relative to the piston 122 causes a change in pressure of the fluid 123 and flow of fluid 123 into the exhaust reservoir 129 via the exhaust port. The pressure of the fluid 123 and the size of the exhaust hole dictates the bias force which increases (or decreases) with the time derivative of displacement as discussed previously.
- a flexible housing may be placed about the dynamic bias device 130 to isolate the moving parts 121 / 122 from the surrounding tissue when implanted.
- the housing may be used to define the exhaust reservoir 129 .
- An adjustable arm 124 may be connected to the piston 122 .
- the arm 124 and the barrel 121 include holes 125 or other suitable attachment members to attach the dynamic bias device 120 to the vertebrae.
- the adjustable arm 124 and the piston 122 may include mating threads to effectively lengthen or shorten the piston 122 .
- An adjustable collar 126 may be provided including mating threads such that the collar 126 is adjustable, and thus the extended length of the dynamic bias device 120 is adjustable.
- the collar 126 may include an elastomeric bumper pad (not shown) and an elastomeric bumper pad 127 may be provided in the barrel 121 to dampen impact between the piston 122 and the barrel 121 .
- dynamic bias device 130 is substantially the same in design, function and use as the combination of dynamic bias device 110 discussed with reference to FIGS. 10A-10C and dynamic bias device 120 described with reference to FIG. 11A .
- Dynamic bias device 130 includes a barrel 131 in which piston 132 is slidably disposed.
- a bias member is the form of a spring 133 A is disposed in the barrel 131 . Longitudinal displacement of the barrel 131 relative to the piston 132 causes compression (or extension) of the spring 133 .
- the spring 133 provides a bias force which increases (or decreases) linearly with displacement as discussed previously.
- a bias member 133 B in the form of a compressed or evacuated fluid (liquid or gas) is disposed in the barrel 131 and sealed relative to the piston 132 by piston ring 138 .
- the barrel 131 and piston 132 may define a closed volume or an exhaust reservoir 129 may be used as shown.
- the bias fluid 133 is in fluid communication with the exhaust reservoir 139 by way of an exhaust port through the wall of the barrel 131 .
- the exhaust reservoir 139 may comprise an expandable annular bag as shown, or other suitable structure. If a closed volume is used, longitudinal displacement of the barrel 131 relative to the piston 132 simply causes a change in pressure of the fluid 133 . If an exhaust reservoir 139 is used as shown, longitudinal displacement of the barrel 131 relative to the piston 132 causes a change in pressure of the fluid 133 and flow of fluid 133 into the exhaust reservoir 139 via the exhaust port.
- the pressure of the fluid 133 and the size of the exhaust hole dictates the bias force which increases (or decreases) with the time derivative of displacement as discussed previously.
- the bias members 133 A/ 133 B effectively act as a combined spring and damper.
- a flexible housing may be placed about the dynamic bias device 130 to isolate the moving parts 131 / 132 from the surrounding tissue when implanted.
- the housing may be used to define the exhaust reservoir 139 .
- An adjustable arm 134 may be connected to the piston 132 .
- the arm 134 and the barrel 131 include holes 135 or other suitable attachment members to attach the dynamic bias device 130 to the vertebrae.
- the adjustable arm 134 and the piston 132 may include mating threads to effectively lengthen or shorten the piston 132 .
- An adjustable collar 136 may be provided including mating threads such that the collar 136 is adjustable, and thus the extended length of the dynamic bias device 130 is adjustable.
- the collar 136 may include an elastomeric bumper pad (not shown) and an elastomeric bumper pad 137 may be provided in the barrel 131 to dampen impact between the piston 132 and the barrel 131 .
- FIG. 12C illustrates the dynamic bias device 140 subjected to a compression load. Except as described herein, dynamic bias device 140 is substantially the same in design, function and use as the generic device 100 described previously. Although movement of the dynamic bias device 140 in compression and extension is substantially linear and parallel to the axis of curvature 60 , as with dynamic bias device 100 , some lateral or posterior-anterior motion is present, but preferably minimized.
- Dynamic bias device 140 includes bias member 142 and loops 144 or other suitable attachment members, which may be used in combination bushings 320 , 330 , 340 and 350 , to attach the dynamic bias device 140 to the vertebrae.
- the bias member 142 is may be a semi-circular or semi-elliptical leaf spring, which may be a single plate as shown or a series of laminated plates. Relative longitudinal displacement of the attachment members 144 causes compression (or extension) of the leaf spring 142 .
- the leaf spring 142 provides a bias force which increases (or decreases) with displacement as discussed previously.
- the radius or axis of curvature of the leaf spring 142 is preferably maximized such that displacement of the attachment members 144 is substantially linear, but should not be so high as to result in buckling or inversion in compression.
- the radius or axis of curvature may range from half the distance between the attachment points to approximately 10 cm. Of course, half the distance between attachment points will vary depending on the location of each attachment point, but will likely be in the range of 1.0 to 3.0 cm for attachment points between adjacent processes.
- the displacement of the apex 143 is preferably of the leaf spring 142 minimized to minimize disturbance of and interference from surrounding tissue (bone, muscle, connective tissue, nerves, etc.).
- the apex 143 may face anteriorly, but preferably faces posteriorly or laterally to reduce interference with tissue close to the spinal column.
- the dynamic bias device 140 and particularly the leaf spring 142 , is preferably disposed laterally or posteriorly of the spinous processes 24 to avoid interference with movement of the vertebrae.
- dynamic bias devices 150 , 160 and 170 are illustrated in side and posterior views. Except as described herein, dynamic bias devices 150 , 160 and 170 are substantially the same in design, function and use as the dynamic bias device 140 discussed with reference to FIGS. 12A-12C .
- Dynamic bias device 150 as seen in FIG. 13A includes bias member 152 in the form of an articulated leaf spring, and attachment members 154 .
- Articulated leaf spring 152 reduces the horizontal range of movement by utilizing a plurality of articulations 153 having a smaller radius or axis of curvature.
- the reduced horizontal range of movement of the bias member 152 reduces the amount of disturbance and interference from surrounding tissue (bone, muscle, connective tissue, nerves, etc.).
- Dynamic bias device 160 as seen in FIG. 13B includes a plurality of bias members 162 in the form of leaf springs (shown) or articulated leaf springs (not shown), and attachment members 164 . Utilizing a plurality of leaf springs 162 increases stability of the dynamic bias device 160 and allows for greater net bias forces to be delivered to the attachment members 164 and the vertebrae attached thereto.
- Dynamic bias device 170 as seen in FIG. 13C includes a plurality of bias members 172 in the form of leaf springs (shown) or articulated leaf springs (not shown).
- the dynamic bias device 170 also includes attachment members 174 in the form of inverted semi-circular loops.
- the inverted semi-circular loops 174 permit the device 170 to be attached to the inferior and superior sides spinous processes of adjacent vertebrae, such that the attachment members 174 are disposed between adjacent spinous processes but the bias members 172 are disposed laterally of the spinous processes to avoid interference with movement of the vertebrae.
- Dynamic bias devices 110 , 120 , 130 , 140 , 150 , 160 and 170 may be used (i.e., implanted) substantially as described with reference to generic dynamic bias device 100 .
- one or more reinforcement members 200 may be used in combination with one or more dynamic bias devices 100 .
- the reinforcement members 200 may be used to reinforce the disc, restore disc height and/or bear some or all of the load normally carried by the annulus.
- the reinforcement members 200 are relatively rigid and thus serve to reinforce the disc 50 , and particularly the annulus 52 , where inserted.
- the reinforcement members 200 may have a relatively large profile when implanted and thus increase disc height.
- the reinforcing members 200 may be used singularly or in groups, depending on the increase in disc 50 height desired and/or the amount of reinforcement of the annulus 52 desired.
- the reinforcing members 200 may be stacked as illustrated in FIG. 2B or inserted side-by-side as illustrated in FIG. 15R .
- the reinforcing members 200 may be located in virtually any portion of the annulus 52 .
- the reinforcing members 200 are substantially symmetrically disposed about the median plane 70 to avoid causing curvature of the spine 10 .
- the reinforcing members 200 may be inserted, in part or in whole, into the nucleus 54 , it is preferable to insert them into the annulus 52 for purposes of stability and load carrying.
- the reinforcing members 200 are preferably placed in the annulus 52 to assume the load normally carried thereby, and reinforce the load bearing capacity of the annulus 52 , without hindering the normal mobility function of the disc 50 .
- the reinforcing members 200 may comprise expandable members such as self-expanding members 210 or inflatable members 220 .
- the reinforcing members 200 may comprise unexpandable members such as reinforcement bars 230 .
- space in the annulus 52 for the reinforcing members 200 is preferably established by dilation or the like, although some amount of tissue removal may be used.
- the expandable reinforcement members 210 / 220 are useful because they may be delivered in a low profile, unexpanded condition making it easier to traverse the very tough and fibrous collagen tissue of the annulus 52 .
- the reinforcement bars 230 are useful because they may have a small diameter and a sharpened tip.
- the self-expanding reinforcing member 210 may comprise a solid or semi-solid member that self-expands (e.g., by hydration) after insertion into the annulus.
- suitable materials for such solid or semi-solid members include solid fibrous collagen or other suitable hard hydrophilic biocompatible material. If the selected material is degradable, the material may induce the formation of fibrous scar tissue which is favorable. If non-degradable material is selected, the material must be rigid and bio-inert.
- the self-expanding reinforcing member 210 preferably has an initial diameter that is minimized, but may be in the range of 25% to 75% of the final expanded diameter, which may be in the range of 0.3 to 0.75 cm, or 10% to 75% of the nominal disc height.
- the length of the self-expanding member 210 may be in the range of 1.0 to 6.0 cm, and preferably in the range of 2.0 to 4.0 cm.
- the inflatable reinforcing member 220 may comprise an expandable hollow membrane capable of inflation after insertion into the annulus.
- An example of a suitable inflatable structure is detachable balloon membrane filled with a curable material.
- the membrane may consist of a biocompatible and bio-inert polymer material, such as polyurethane, silicone, or polycarbonate-polyurethane (e.g., Corethane).
- the curable filler material may consist of a curable silicone or polyurethane.
- the filler material may be curable by chemical reaction (e.g., moisture), photo-activation (e.g., UV light) or the like.
- the cure time is preferably sufficiently long to enable activation just prior to insertion (i.e., outside the body) and permit sufficient time for navigation and positioning of the member 220 in the disc. However, activation may also take place inside the body after implantation.
- the inflatable reinforcing member 220 preferably has an initial deflated diameter that is minimized, but may be in the range of 25% to 75% of the final inflated diameter, which may be in the range of 0.3 to 0.75 cm, or 10% to 75% of the nominal disc height.
- the length of the inflatable member 220 may be in the range of 1.0 to 6.0 cm, and preferably in the range of 2.0 to 4.0 cm.
- the reinforcement bars 230 may comprise a rigid, solid or hollow bar having a sharpened tip.
- the reinforcement bars 230 may comprises stainless steel mandrels, for example, having a diameter in the range of 0.005 to 0.100 inches, preferably in the range of 0.010 to 0.050 inches, and most preferably in the range of 0.020 to 0.040 inches, and a length in the range of 1.0 to 6.0 cm, and preferably in the range of 2.0 to 4.0 cm.
- the reinforcement bars 230 may be straight for linear insertion, or curved to gently wrap with the curvature of the annulus during insertion.
- the outer surface of the reinforcement bars 230 may have circular ridges or the like that the permit easy insertion into the annulus 52 but resist withdrawal and motion in the annulus following implantation.
- suitable materials for reinforcement bars 230 include titanium alloy 6-4, MP35N alloy, or super-elastic nickel-titanium alloy.
- the tools 410 , 420 and 430 may be used to implant the reinforcement devices 210 / 220 / 230 discussed above.
- the tools include a rigid, sharpened, hollow needle 410 , a semi-rigid, sharpened, hollow curved needle 420 , and a sharpened stylet 430 .
- the sharpened stylet 430 fits into the semi-rigid needle 420 which fits into the rigid needle 410 .
- the rigid hollow needle 410 includes a hollow shaft 412 and a grip or handle 414 .
- the shaft 412 includes a sharpened tip 413 to facilitate insertion into and pass through the surrounding tissue.
- the shaft 412 is preferably made of a rigid metal such as a stainless steel hypodermic tube.
- the grip 414 may comprise a polymer and may be formed by insert injection molding with the shaft 412 inserted into the mold.
- the semi-rigid curved needle 420 includes a hollow shaft 422 a hub 424 .
- the shaft 422 which includes a sharpened tip 423 , is longer than the rigid needle 410 and has an outside diameter sufficiently small to fit into the rigid needle 410 .
- the shaft 422 is preferably made of a semi-rigid polymer or composite.
- the shaft 422 includes a curved distal portion 426 that may be straightened (shown in phantom) upon insertion of the semi-rigid needle 420 into the lumen of the rigid needle 410 .
- the hub 424 may include a fitting 425 to facilitate connection to a fluid source or a pressure source (e.g., a syringe).
- the sharpened stylet 430 includes a flexible shaft 432 and a sharpened distal end 433 .
- the shaft 432 is longer than the both the rigid needle 410 and the semi-rigid needle 420 , and may have a length on the order of 10 to 60 cm.
- the shaft 432 also has an outside diameter sufficiently small to fit into the semi-rigid needle 420 .
- the shaft 422 preferably has a flexible but pushable construction incorporating a rigid metal such as stainless steel, or super-elastic nickel-titanium alloy.
- the sharpened stylet 430 is preferably highly elastic, to resist permanent set upon insertion into the curved portion 426 of the semi-rigid needle 420 .
- FIGS. 15A-15J With general reference to FIGS. 15A-15J , the steps for implanting a self-expanding reinforcement member 210 are illustrated. It should be understood that the procedure for implanting a single member 210 in the anterior annulus 52 is shown for purposes of illustration, not limitation. All of the variables with regard to quantity, location, orientation, etc. discussed previously may be implemented by varying the generic procedure described hereinafter.
- the sharpened stylet 430 , semi-rigid needle 420 and rigid needle 410 are assembled as shown in FIG. 14D .
- the distal portion of the assembly 410 / 420 / 430 is inserted into the disc 50 as in a conventional discogram procedure.
- the assembly 410 / 420 / 430 is advanced until the distal tip 413 of the rigid needle is proximate the anterior curvature of the annulus 52 , near the anterior side of the nucleus 54 , as seen in FIG. 15B .
- the semi-rigid needle 420 (alone or with stylet 430 ) is advanced relative to the rigid needle 410 until the curved portion 426 of the semi-rigid needle exits the distal tip 413 of the rigid needle 410 and the desired amount of curvature is established, as seen in FIG. 15C .
- the curved portion 426 may be advanced until the tip 423 is substantially parallel to the tangent of the anterior annulus 52 curvature.
- the sharpened stylet 430 is advanced relative to the semi-rigid needle 420 to the desired position within the anterior annulus 52 , as shown in FIG. 15D .
- the semi-rigid needle 420 and the rigid needle 410 are completely withdrawn from the stylet 430 , leaving the stylet in position as shown in FIG. 15E .
- a flexible dilator 440 is advanced over the stylet 430 to dilate the annulus 52 , as seen in FIG. 15F .
- the flexible dilator 440 is similar to semi-rigid needle 420 except that the dilator includes a blunt distal tip and is relatively more flexible, and has larger inner and outer diameters.
- one or more dilators 440 may be advanced co-axially about the stylet 430 until the annulus is sufficiently dilated to accept the self-expandable member 210 .
- the stylet 430 is then withdrawn from the flexible dilator 440 and the self-expandable member 210 is introduced into the lumen of the flexible dilator 440 using a push bar 450 , as shown in FIG. 15G .
- the dilator 440 may be removed in favor of a flexible hollow catheter with a large inner diameter to facilitate delivery of member 210 .
- the push bar 450 is similar to stylet 430 except that the distal tip of the push bar 450 is blunt.
- the push bar 450 may simply comprise the stylet 430 turned around, thus using the proximal blunt end of the stylet 430 as the push bar 450 .
- the push bar 450 is advanced until the member 210 is in the desired position, as seen in FIG. 15H .
- radiographic visualization may be used to visualize the distal end of the push bar 450 , which is formed of radiopaque material and may include radiopaque markers.
- the member may be loaded with a radiopaque material to facilitate radiographic visualization thereof.
- the flexible dilator 440 is retracted from the push bar 450 while maintaining position of the member 210 with the push bar.
- the push bar 450 is then removed leaving the member 210 in place. If necessary, the procedure may be repeated for additional member implants 210 .
- the member 210 is then allowed to expand over time, perhaps augmented by placing the spine 10 in traction. Alternatively, the spine 10 may be placed in traction prior to beginning the procedure as discussed with reference to the procedure for implanting dynamic bias device 100 .
- FIGS. 15K-15L the steps for implanting an inflatable reinforcement member 220 are illustrated.
- the steps outlined with reference to FIGS. 15A-15F are followed. Specifically, the same steps are followed up to and including the step of advancing the flexible dilator 440 over the stylet 430 to dilate the annulus 52 , and thereafter removing the stylet 430 from the flexible dilator 440 .
- the inflatable member 220 is introduced into the dilator 440 and advanced until the member 220 is in the desired position, as shown in FIG. 15K .
- the inflatable member 220 is connected to the distal end of the catheter 460 , which includes a flexible but pushable shaft 462 and an inflation port 464 .
- the flexible dilator 440 is retracted from the catheter 460 while maintaining position of the member 220 .
- the proximal inflation port 464 is connected to a syringe (not shown) or other suitable inflation apparatus for injection of the curable filler material.
- the filler material is then activated and the desired volume is injected into the catheter 460 via the inflation port 464 , as seen if FIG. 15L .
- the filler material is allowed to cure and the catheter 460 is gently torqued to break the catheter 460 from the solid member 220 . This break-away step may be facilitated by an area of weakness at the juncture between the distal end of the catheter 460 and the proximal end of the member 220 .
- the catheter 460 is then removed leaving the member 220 in place. If necessary, the procedure may be repeated for additional member implants 220 .
- the disc 50 includes a protrusion or bulge 56 , which is preferably, but not necessarily, reduced or eliminated before insertion of the reinforcement bar 230 . This may be done by separating the adjacent vertebrae 20 . In order to establish separation of the vertebrae 20 , the spine 10 may be placed in traction or conventional intervertebral separation tools may be used. After the bulge 56 is reduced or eliminated, similar steps are followed as outlined with reference to FIGS. 15A-15C .
- the distal portion of the assembly 410 / 420 / 450 is inserted into the disc 50 as in a conventional discogram procedure.
- the assembly 410 / 420 / 450 is advanced until the distal tip 413 of the rigid needle 410 just penetrates the posterior side of the annulus 52 , as seen in FIG. 15N .
- the semi-rigid needle 420 (alone or with bar 230 ) is advanced relative to the rigid needle 410 until the curved portion 426 of the semi-rigid needle 420 exits the distal tip 413 of the rigid needle 410 and the desired amount of curvature is established, as shown in FIG. 15N .
- the curved portion 426 may be advanced until the tip 423 is substantially parallel to the posterior annulus 52 .
- the reinforcement bar 230 with its sharpened tip is pushed into the annulus 52 as seen in FIG. 150 .
- the reinforcement bar 230 is advanced into the annulus 52 with the push bar 450 until the bar 230 is in the desired position, as seen in FIG. 15P , which may be confirmed using radiographic visualization as described above.
- the push bar 450 is then retracted, leaving the reinforcement bar 230 in place, as shown in FIG. 15P .
- the semi-rigid needle 420 and the rigid needle 410 are then removed, as shown in FIG. 15Q , or, if necessary, the procedure may be repeated for additional reinforcement bar implants 230 , as shown in FIG. 15R . Presence of the reinforcement bars 230 serves to keep the disc 50 , and particularly the bulge 56 , in a more normal condition, and to protect against continued bulging, thus easing nerve impingement.
- the present invention provides dynamic bias devices 100 , 110 , 120 , 130 , 140 , 150 , 160 , and 170 , in addition to reinforcement devices 210 , 220 , and 230 , which may be used individually or in combination, to eliminate nerve impingement associated with a damaged disc 50 , and/or to reinforce a damaged disc, while permitting relative movement of the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I adjacent the damaged disc.
- the present invention also provides minimally invasive methods of implanting such devices as described above.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Neurology (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Prostheses (AREA)
- Surgical Instruments (AREA)
Abstract
Devices and methods for treating a damaged intervertebral disc to reduce or eliminate associated back pain. Dynamic bias devices and reinforcement devices are disclosed, which may be used individually or in combination, to eliminate nerve impingement associated with the damaged disc, and/or to reinforce the damaged disc, while permitting relative movement of the vertebrae adjacent the damaged disc.
Description
- This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/967,042 filed Oct. 15, 2004, now pending, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/093,990 filed Mar. 7, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,835,205, issued Dec. 28, 2004, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/542,972 filed Apr. 4, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,402,750, issued Jun. 11, 2002, the entireties of all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- The present invention generally relates to spinal implants. Specifically, the present invention relates to implantable devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders associated with the intervertebral disc.
- Back pain is one of the most common and often debilitating conditions affecting millions of people in all walks of life. Today, it is estimated that over ten million people in the United States alone suffer from persistent back pain. Approximately half of those suffering from persistent back pain are afflicted with chronic disabling pain, which seriously compromises a person's quality of life and is the second most common cause of worker absenteeism. Further, the cost of treating chronic back pain is very high, even though the majority of sufferers do not receive treatment due to health risks, limited treatment options and inadequate therapeutic results. Thus, chronic back pain has a significantly adverse effect on a person's quality of life, on industrial productivity, and on heath care expenditures.
- Some forms of back pain are not chronic and may be simply treated by rest, posture adjustments and painkillers. For example, some forms of lower back pain (LBP) are very common and may be caused by unusual exertion or injury. Unusual exertion such has heavy lifting or strenuous exercise may result in back strain such as a pulled muscle, sprained muscle, sprained ligament, muscle spasm, or a combination thereof. An injury caused by falling down or a blow to the back may cause bruising. These forms of back pain are typically non-chronic and may be self-treated and cured in a few days or weeks.
- Other types of non-chronic back pain may be treated by improvements in physical condition, posture and/or work conditions. For example, being pregnant, obese or otherwise significantly overweight may cause LBP. A mattress that does not provide adequate support may cause back pain in the morning. Working in an environment lacking good ergonomic design may also cause back pain. In these instances, the back pain may be cured by eliminating the culprit cause. Whether it is excess body weight, a bad mattress, or a bad office chair, these forms of back pain are readily treated.
- However, some forms of back pain are chronic and are the result of spinal disorders which are not readily treated. Such spinal disorders may cause severe back pain, the origin of which may or may not be certain. A prevalent clinical theory is that pain arises from physical impingement of the nerve roots or the spinal cord. Such nerve impingement may have of a number of different causes, but generally results from either a disc protrusion or from narrowing of the intervertebral foramina which surround the nerve roots. Another clinical theory is that damage to the disc, either from injury, degradation or otherwise, causes physical impingement of the disc nerves, which are primarily disposed about the periphery of the annulus, but may grow into fissures of a damaged disc.
- Disc protrusions may be caused by a physical injury to the disc or by natural degradation of the disc such as by degenerative disc disease (DDD). Physical injury may cause damage to the annulus fibrosus which allows a portion of the disc, such as the nucleus pulposus, to protrude from the normal disc space. DDD may cause the entire disc to degenerate to such a degree that the annulus fibrosus bulges outward, delaminates or otherwise separates such that a portion of the disc protrudes from the normal disc space. In either case, the disc protrusion may impinge on a spinal nerve root causing severe pain. Impingement on the nerve root may also be caused by conditions unrelated to the disc such as by a spinal tumor or spinal stenosis (abnormal bone growth), but disc protrusions are the most common cause. Depending on the cause and nature of the disc protrusion, the condition may be referred to as a disc stenosis, a disc bulge, a herniated disc, a slipped disc, a prolapsed disc or, if the protrusion separates from the disc, a sequestered disc.
- Nerve root impingement most often occurs in the lumbar region of the spinal column since the lumbar discs bear significant vertical loads relative to discs in other regions of the spine. In addition, disc protrusions in the lumbar region typically occur posteriorly because the annulus fibrosus is thinner on the posterior side than on the anterior side and because normal posture places more compression on the posterior side. Posterior protrusions are particularly problematic since the nerve roots are posteriorly positioned relative to the intervertebral discs. When a posterior disc protrusion presses against a nerve root, the pain is often severe and radiating, and may be aggravated by such subtle movements as coughing, bending over, or remaining in a sitting position for an extended period of time.
- A common treatment for disc protrusion is discectomy, which is a procedure wherein the protruding portion of the disc is surgically removed. However, discectomy procedures have an inherent risk since the portion of the disc to be removed is immediately adjacent the nerve root and any damage to the nerve root is clearly undesirable. Furthermore, discectomy procedures are not always successful long term because scar tissue may form and/or additional disc material may subsequently protrude from the disc space as the disc deteriorates further. The recurrence of a disc protrusion may necessitate a repeat discectomy procedure, along with its inherent clinical risks and less than perfect long term success rate. Thus, a discectomy procedure, at least as a stand-alone procedure, is clearly not an optimal solution.
- Discectomy is also not a viable solution for DDD when no disc protrusion is involved. As mentioned above, DDD causes the entire disc to degenerate, narrowing of the intervertebral space, and shifting of the load to the facet joints. If the facet joints carry a substantial load, the joints may degrade over time and be a different cause of back pain. Furthermore, the narrowed disc space can result in the intervertebral foramina surrounding the nerve roots to directly impinge on one or more nerve roots. Such nerve impingement is very painful and cannot be corrected by a discectomy procedure.
- As a result, spinal fusion, particularly with the assistance of interbody fusion cages, has become a preferred secondary procedure, and in some instances, a preferred primary procedure. Spinal fusion involves permanently fusing or fixing adjacent vertebrae. Hardware in the form of bars, plates, screws and cages may be utilized in combination with bone graft material to fuse adjacent vertebrae. Spinal fusion may be performed as a stand-alone procedure or may be performed in combination with a discectomy procedure. By placing the adjacent vertebrae in their nominal position and fixing them in place, relative movement there between may be significantly reduced and the disc space may be restored to its normal condition. Thus, theoretically, aggravation caused by relative movement between adjacent vertebrae (and thus impingement on the nerve root by a disc protrusion and/or impingement from bone may be reduced if not eliminated.
- However, the success rate of spinal fusion procedures is certainly less than perfect for a number of different reasons, none of which are well understood. In addition, even if spinal fusion procedures are initially successful, they may cause accelerated degeneration of adjacent discs since the adjacent discs must accommodate a greater degree of motion. The degeneration of adjacent discs simply leads to the same problem at a different anatomical location, which is clearly not an optimal solution. Furthermore, spinal fusion procedures are invasive to the disc, risk nerve damage and, depending on the procedural approach, either technically complicated (endoscopic anterior approach), invasive to the bowel (surgical anterior approach), or invasive to the musculature of the back (surgical posterior approach).
- Another procedure that has been less than clinically successful is total disc replacement with a prosthetic disc. This procedure is also very invasive to the disc and, depending on the procedural approach, either invasive to the bowel (surgical anterior approach) or invasive to the musculature of the back (surgical posterior approach). In addition, the procedure may actually complicate matters by creating instability in the spine, and the long term mechanical reliability of prosthetic discs has yet to be demonstrated.
- Many other medical procedures have been proposed to solve the problems associated with disc protrusions. However, many of the proposed procedures have not been clinically proven and some of the allegedly beneficial procedures have controversial clinical data. From the foregoing, it should be apparent that there is a substantial need for improvements in the treatment of spinal disorders, particularly in the treatment of nerve impingement as the result of damage to the disc, whether by injury, degradation, or the like.
- The present invention addresses this need by providing improved devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders. As used herein, the term spinal disorder generally refers to a degradation in spinal condition as the result of injury, aging or the like, as opposed to a spinal deformity resulting from growth defects. The improved devices and methods of the present invention specifically address nerve impingement as the result of damage to the disc, particularly in the lumbar region, but may have other significant applications not specifically mentioned herein. For purposes of illustration only, and without limitation, the present invention is discussed in detail with reference to the treatment of damaged discs in the lumbar region of the adult human spinal column.
- As will become apparent from the following description, the improved devices and methods of the present invention reduce if not eliminate back pain while maintaining near normal anatomical motion. Specifically, the present invention provides dynamic bias devices and reinforcement devices, which may be used individually or in combination, to eliminate nerve impingement associated with a damaged disc, and/or to reinforce a damaged disc, while permitting relative movement of the vertebrae adjacent the damaged disc. The devices of the present invention are particularly well suited for minimally invasive methods of implantation.
- The dynamic bias devices of the present invention basically apply a bias force to adjacent vertebrae on either side of a damaged disc, while permitting relative movement of the vertebrae. By applying a bias force, disc height may be restored, thereby reducing nerve impingement. Specifically, by restoring disc height, the dynamic bias devices of the present invention: retract disc protrusions into the normal disc space thereby reducing nerve impingement by the protrusions; reduce the load carried by the facet joints thereby eliminating nerve impingement originating at the joint; restore intervertebral spacing thereby eliminating nerve impingement by the intervertebral foramina; and reduce pressure on portions of the annulus thereby alleviating nerve impingement in disc fissures.
- The reinforcement devices of the present invention basically reinforce a damaged disc, restore disc height and/or bear some or all of the load normally carried by a healthy disc, thereby reducing nerve impingement. Some embodiments of the reinforcement members of the present invention have a relatively small profile when implanted, but are very rigid, and thus serve to reinforce the disc, particularly the annulus. By reinforcing the disc, and particularly the annulus, disc protrusions may reduced or prevented, thereby eliminating nerve impingement by the protrusions. Other embodiments have a relatively large profile when implanted, and thus serve to increase disc height and/or to bear load. By increasing disc height, the advantages discussed previously may be obtained. By bearing some of the load normally carried by a healthy disc, the load may be redistributed as needed, such as when a dynamic bias device is used.
-
FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate left lateral and posterior views, respectively, of a portion of the adult human vertebral (spinal) column; -
FIG. 2A illustrates a left lateral view of an intervertebral disc disposed between adjacent vertebrae, wherein the disc is partially protruding from the normal disc space and the disc height is reduced; -
FIG. 2B illustrates a left lateral view of an intervertebral disc disposed between adjacent vertebrae as inFIG. 2A , wherein dynamic bias devices and reinforcement devices of the present invention, which are illustrated schematically, restore normal disc height and eliminate the disc protrusion; -
FIGS. 3A-3C schematically illustrate adynamic bias device 100 in accordance with the present invention; -
FIGS. 4A-4B schematically illustrate left lateral and posterior views, respectively, of dynamic bias devices of the present invention mounted to adjacent vertebrae equidistant from the median plane; -
FIGS. 5A-5B schematically illustrate left lateral and posterior views, respectively, of a dynamic bias device of the present invention mounted to adjacent vertebrae in the median plane; -
FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 6C illustrates a posterior view of the bushing shown inFIGS. 6A-6B mounted to a spinous process; -
FIG. 6D illustrates a posterior view of the spinous process shown inFIG. 6C , detailing the counter-bore; -
FIGS. 7A-7B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention; -
FIGS. 8A-8B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention; -
FIGS. 9A-9B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 10A illustrates a side view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 10B illustrates a side view of the dynamic bias device shown inFIG. 10A subjected to a compression load; -
FIG. 10C illustrates a cross-sectional view of the dynamic bias device shown inFIG. 1A ; -
FIG. 11A illustrates a cross-sectional view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 11B illustrates a cross-sectional view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention; -
FIGS. 12A-12B illustrate rear and side views, respectively, of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 12C illustrates the dynamic bias device shown inFIGS. 12A-12B subjected to a compression load; -
FIG. 13A illustrates a side view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a fifth embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 13B illustrates a side or rear view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a sixth embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 13C illustrates a rear view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a seventh embodiment of the present invention; -
FIGS. 14A-14D illustrate tools of the present invention for implanting the reinforcement members; -
FIGS. 15A-15J illustrate steps for implanting a self-expanding reinforcement member; -
FIGS. 15K-15L illustrate steps for implanting an inflatable reinforcement member; -
FIGS. 15M-15R illustrate steps for implanting reinforcement bars; and -
FIG. 16 illustrates a bias force v. displacement curve for the dynamic bias device. - The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings in which similar elements in different drawings are numbered the same. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict illustrative embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
- With reference to
FIGS. 1A and 1B , the lower portion of an adult human vertebral column 10 is illustrated in left lateral and posterior views, respectively. The upper portion of the vertebral column 10 includes the thoracic region and the cervical region, which are not shown for purposes of simplified illustration only. The lower portion of the vertebral column 10 includes thelumbar region 12, thesacrum 14 and thecoccyx 16. Thesacrum 14 and thecoccyx 16 are sometimes collectively referred to as the pelvic curvature. - The vertebral column 10 includes an axis of
curvature 60 which generally forms a double-S shape when viewed laterally. The vertebral column 10 also includes amedian plane 70 which is a sagittal plane bisecting the vertebral column 10 into symmetrical left lateral and right lateral portions. In posterior views, themedian plane 70 appears as a line. - The
lumbar region 12 of the vertebral column 10 includes five (5) vertebrae 20 (labeled L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5) separated byintervertebral discs 50. Thesacrum 14, which includes five (5) fused vertebrae 30 (superior vertebra 30 labeled S1), is separated by asingle disc 50 from thecoccyx 16, which includes four (4) fusedvertebrae 40. Although not labeled, theintervertebral discs 50 may be referenced by their respective adjacent vertebrae. For example, thedisc 50 between the L4 and L5lumbar vertebrae 20 may be referred to as the L4L5 disc. Similarly, thedisc 50 between the L5lumbar vertebra 20 and the S1 sacral vertebra 30 may be referred to as the L5S1 disc. - Although each
vertebra 20/30/40 is a unique and irregular bone structure, thevertebrae 20 of the lumbar region 12 (in addition to the thoracic and cervical regions) have common structures. Eachvertebra 20 of thelumbar region 12 generally includes abody portion 21 and a vertebralarch portion 22/23 which encloses the vertebral foramen (not visible) in which the spinal cord is disposed. Thevertebral arch 22/23 includes twopedicles 22 and twolaminae 23. Aspinous process 24 extends posteriorly from the juncture of the twolaminae 23, and twotransverse processes 25 extend laterally from eachlamina 23. Fourarticular processes 26/27 extend inferiorly 26 and superiorly 27 from thelaminae 23. The inferiorarticular process 26 rests in the superiorarticular process 27 of the adjacent vertebra to form a facet joint 28. - The five (5) vertebrae 30 of the
sacrum 14 are fused together to form a single rigid structure. Thesacrum 14 includes a mediansacral crest 31 which roughly corresponds to the spinous processes of the vertebrae 30, and two intermediate sacral crests 32 which roughly correspond to the articular processes of the vertebrae 30. Thesacral laminae 33 are disposed between the median 31 and intermediate 32 sacral crests. Two lateral sacral crests 34 are disposed on either side of thesacral foraminae 35. Thesacrum 14 also includes a pair ofsacral wings 36 which defineauricular surfaces 39. The superior (S1) sacral vertebra 30 includes two superiorarticular processes 37 which engage the inferior articular processes 26 of theL5 lumber vertebra 20 to form a facet joint, and thebase 38 of the superior sacral vertebra S1 is joined to theL5S1 disc 50. - Each
intervertebral disc 50 includes anannulus fibrosus 52 surrounding anucleus pulposus 54, which are more clearly visible inFIG. 15A . Theposterior annulus 52 is generally thinner than theanterior annulus 52, which may account for the higher incidence of posterior disc protrusions. As used herein, a disc protrusion generically refers to any portion of the disc that protrudes from the normal disc space. Common clinical conditions that may be characterized as a disc protrusion include a disc stenosis, a disc bulge, a herniated or sequestered disc, a slipped disc, and a prolapsed disc. Generally, a disc protrusion results in a decrease in disc height proportional to the volume of the protrusion. A degenerative disc may sometimes only involve the loss of disc height, and may or may not involve any significant protrusion. However, both degenerative discs and a disc protrusions usually involve some loss in disc height. - A common theory is that each
intervertebral disc 50 forms one support point and the facet joints form two support points of what may be characterized as a three point support structure between adjacent vertebrae. However, in thelumbar region 12, the facet joints 28 are substantially vertical, leaving thedisc 50 to carry the vast majority of the load. As between theannulus fibrosus 52 and the nucleus pulposus 54 of thedisc 50, it is commonly believed that thenucleus 54 bears the majority of the load. This belief is based on the theory that thedisc 50 behaves much like a balloon or tire, wherein theannulus 22 merely serves to contain thepressurized nucleus 54, and thenucleus 54 bears all the load. - However, this theory is questionable since the
annulus fibrosus 52 comprises 60% of thetotal disc 50 cross-section, and thenucleus pulposus 54 only comprises 40% of thetotal disc 50 cross-section. In addition, theannulus fibrosus 52 is made of 40-60% organized collagen in the form of a laminated structure, whereas thenucleus pulposus 54 is made of 18-30% collagen in the form of a relatively homogenous gel. It seems a more plausible theory is that theannulus fibrosus 52 is the primary load bearing portion of thedisc 50. - With reference to
FIG. 2A , a left lateral view of anintervertebral disc 50 disposed between adjacent vertebrae 20 S (superior) and 20 I (inferior) is illustrated, wherein thedisc 50 is partially protruding 56 from the normal disc space and the disc height is reduced. Although thedisc 50 is shown to include aprotrusion 56, the reduction in disc height may or may not be accompanied with aprotrusion 56 as discussed previously. For example, if thedisc 50 is degenerated, the disc height may be reduced with or without a correspondingprotrusion 56. - It should be understood that the vertebrae shown in
FIGS. 2A and 2B generically refer to any two adjacent vertebrae or any series of adjacent vertebrae, and thatlumbar vertebrae - With reference to
FIG. 2B , a left lateral view of theintervertebral disc 50 disposed betweenadjacent vertebrae FIG. 2A . However, in this Figure,devices disc protrusion 56 and restore normal disc height. Specifically, one or moredynamic bias devices 100 and one ormore reinforcement members 200 are utilized, either in combination or individually. - The
dynamic bias device 100 restores disc height and, by conservation of disc volume, retracts the protrusion into the normal disc space thereby reducing nerve impingement by the protrusion. Restoring disc height also reduces the load carried by the facet joints thereby eliminating nerve impingement originating at the joint, restores intervertebral spacing thereby eliminating nerve impingement by the intervertebral foramina, and reduces pressure on portions of the annulus thereby alleviating nerve impingement in disc fissures. - The
dynamic bias device 100 basically applies a bias force to theadjacent vertebrae vertebrae dynamic bias device 100 is conceptually similar to a spring attached to theadjacent vertebrae dynamic bias device 100 applies a bias force (usually repulsive) between thevertebrae dynamic bias device 100 will be discussed in greater detail hereinafter, particularly with reference toFIGS. 3A-3C , 4A-4B, 5A-5B, 10A-10C, 11A-11B, 12A-12C, and 13A-13C. - Because
most protrusions 56 are posterior, thedynamic bias device 100 is preferably mounted posterior to the axis ofcurvature 60. Locating thedynamic bias device 100 posterior to the axis ofcurvature 60 shifts the load carried by thedisc 50 from the posterior portion of the disc to the anterior portion of thedisc 50. Locating thedynamic bias device 100 posterior to the axis ofcurvature 60 also reduces the load carried by the facet joints. Preferably, thedynamic bias device 100 applies a substantially vertical bias force, with the direction independent of displacement. - Because more load will be shifted to the anterior portion of the
disc 50 with a posterior mounteddynamic bias device 100,reinforcement members 200 may be placed in theanterior annulus 52, to effectively bolster the anterior portion of the disc. Thereinforcement members 200 may be used to reinforce the disc, restore disc height and/or bear the load normally carried by annulus. Thereinforcement members 200 are relatively rigid and thus serve to reinforce thedisc 50 where inserted. In addition, thereinforcement members 200 may have a relatively large profile when implanted and thus increase disc height. Thereinforcement members 200 are particularly beneficial if thedisc 50 is degenerated, or if thedisc 50 will likely become degenerated with the change in load distribution. The details of the design and use of thereinforcement members 200 will be discussed in greater detail hereinafter, particularly with reference toFIGS. 14A-14D and 15A-15R. - As mentioned previously, one or more
dynamic bias devices 100 and one ormore reinforcement members 200 may be utilized, either alone or in combination. Specifically: one or moredynamic bias devices 100 may be used alone; one ormore spacer devices 200 may be used alone; and one or moredynamic bias devices 100 and one ormore reinforcement members 200 may be used in combination. If a combination ofdevices 100/200 is used, it is believed that the use of one or more posteriordynamic bias devices 100 in combination with one or moreanterior reinforcement members 200 is most effective in treatingposterior protrusions 56, facet joint degradation, and nerve impingement by intervertebral foraminae, which are believed to be the most common culprits of chronic LBP. - As an alternative to the arrangement shown in
FIG. 2B , two or moredynamic bias devices 100 may be attached to the vertebrae on opposite sides ofvertebrae dynamic bias devices 100 is connected tovertebra 20 S and the vertebra immediately superior tovertebra 20 S, and one or moredynamic bias devices 100 is connected tovertebra 20 I and the vertebra immediately inferior to vertebra 201. With this arrangement, thedynamic bias devices 100 are primarily applying a traction force to effectively pullvertebrae disc protrusion 56 and restoring normal disc height. - With reference to
FIGS. 3A-3C , thedynamic bias device 100 is schematically illustrated under conditions of no-load, compression load (LC), and traction load (LT), respectively. Thedynamic bias device 100 includes a pair ofattachment members 102, abias member 104, and ahousing 106.Attachment members 102 facilitate attachment of thedynamic bias device 100 tovertebrae FIG. 2B .Bias member 104 functions to apply a bias force between theattachment members 102.Housing 106 functions to separate the moving portions ofdynamic bias device 100 from the surrounding muscle, ligaments and other tissue when thedynamic bias device 100 is implanted. -
Attachment members 102 may comprise a wide variety of mechanical connection designs, and may incorporate into their design, or be used in combination with, other machine elements not specifically mentioned herein. For purposes of illustration only, the eachattachment member 102 is shown as loop which may be connected to the vertebrae by fasteners and bushings, specific examples of which are described in detail with reference toFIGS. 6A-6D , 7A-7B, 8A-8B and 9A-9B. These specific examples are provided by way of example, not limitation. Those skilled in the art will recognize that theattachment members 102 may comprise or include screws, rivets, spikes, keys, pins, cotters, splines, couplings, bushings, washers, and the like, without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention. - The primary function of the
attachment members 102 is to fixedly secure the ends of thebias member 104 to thevertebrae attachment members 102 are secured to thevertebrae attachment member 102 and eachvertebrae attachment members 102 with these functional attributes permits thedynamic bias device 100 to effectively transmit a bias force to eachvertebrae vertebrae -
Bias member 104 functions to apply a bias force, either attraction or repulsion, between theattachment members 102. The bias force generally increases or decreases with displacement of the ends of thebias member 104, as with a conventional spring. In addition, the bias force may increase or decrease with the time derivative of displacement (i.e., velocity) of the ends of thebias member 104, as with a conventional damper or shock absorber. As shown inFIG. 3B , thebias member 104 compresses in response to a compression load (LC), thereby increasing or decreasing the bias force. Similarly, as shown inFIG. 3C , thebias member 104 extends in response to a traction load (LT), thereby increasing or decreasing the bias force. - If the
dynamic bias devices 100 are attached tovertebrae 20 S and 20 I (compression embodiment), as shown inFIG. 2B , the bias force of thebias member 104 increases in response to a compression load (LC), and decreases in response to a traction load (LT). In addition, thebias member 104 normally operates in compression. Preferably, the bias force of thebias member 104 is adjusted such that the disc is restored to a more normal height when thedynamic bias device 100 is implanted. Because the disc height is usually initially less than normal, thedynamic bias device 100 is attached to the vertebrae with thebias member 104 preloaded in compression or with thevertebrae dynamic bias device 100 than prior to implantation. - If the
dynamic bias devices 100 are attached to the vertebrae on opposite sides ofvertebrae 20 S and 20 I (traction embodiment), as discussed as an alternative to the arrangement shown inFIG. 2B , the bias force of thebias member 104 decreases in response to a compression load (LC), and increases in response to a traction load (LT). With this latter arrangement, thebias member 104 normally operates in tension. Because thebias member 104 normally operates in tension with this arrangement, thebias member 104 may simply comprise a member that is rigid or semi-rigid in tension, such as a cable. Also with this arrangement, the bias force of thebias member 104 is adjusted such that the disc is restored to a more normal height when thedynamic bias device 100 is implanted. Further with this arrangement, because the disc height is usually initially less than normal, thedynamic bias device 100 is attached to the vertebrae with thebias member 104 preloaded in tension or with thevertebrae - With either arrangement, the
dynamic bias device 100 preferably operates with substantially linear displacement substantially parallel to the axis ofcurvature 60. However, the amount of displacement will be evenly shared between thedynamic bias devices 100 in the traction embodiment, whereas the compression embodiment requires the full displacement to be assumed by eachdynamic bias device 100. The following ranges of displacement are given with reference to the compression embodiment. When mounted near the posterior portion of adjacent spinous processes, thedynamic bias device 100 may have a total (i.e., maximum) displacement preferably in the range of 1.0 to 3.0 cm to accommodate full posterior to anterior flexure in the L5-S1 region, 0.5 to 1.5 cm to accommodate full posterior to anterior flexure in the L4-L5 region, and 0.25 to 1.0 cm to accommodate full posterior to anterior flexure in the L1-L4 region. - Within these ranges of displacement, it is preferable that
bias member 104 operate within its elastic limit, as dictated by the chosen material and geometry of thebias member 104. In addition, because the bias member preferably should be able to withstand 1.0 to 10 million fatigue cycles, it is preferable thatbias member 104 operate within its fatigue limit, as dictated by the chosen material and geometry, for the full range of displacement. - As mentioned previously, the bias force may generally increase or decrease with displacement of the ends of the
bias member 104, as with a conventional spring. In this situation, the bias force (FB) is generally governed by Hooke's Law where FB=KΔX, wherein FB is linearly proportional to the displacement (ΔX) as dictated by the spring constant (K) of thebias member 104. Also as mentioned previously, the bias force may increase or decrease with the time derivative of displacement (i.e., velocity) of the ends of thebias member 104, as with a conventional damper or shock absorber. In this situation, the bias force (FB) is generally linearly proportional to the derivative of displacement (ΔX/ΔT) as dictated by the damper constant (P) of thebias member 104. Preferably, the bias force FB of thebias member 104 is adjusted such that the disc is restored to a more normal height when thedynamic bias device 100 is implanted. The bias force FB may be adjusted by selecting the spring constant (K) and/or damper constant (P) of thebias member 104 and by pre-loading (compressing) thebias member 104 an initial displacement ΔXi. - The necessary bias force FB may be roughly calculated as a function of body weight (BW), the distance of the mounted
dynamic bias device 100 from the axis ofcurvature 60, and the mechanical properties of the surrounding tissues (muscle tissue, connective tissue, joints). The normal net load carried by thelumbar region 12 is roughly 30% BW when laying down, 140% BW when standing, 185% BW when sitting, 215% BW when bending forward, and 250% BW when slouching. - With reference to
FIG. 16 , a bias force versus attachment point displacement curve for thedynamic bias device 100 is shown. The bias force is intended to be sufficiently high to spread the attachment points (e.g., processes of adjacent vertebrae) and restore normal disc height in all postures. For example, in normal standing posture, the bias force is sufficiently high to spread the attachment points as shown inFIG. 16 , such that more normal disc size and shape is obtained. As the spine is placed in flexion and extension, the amount of force carried by thedynamic bias device 100 will change as a function of the spring properties, including the spring constant (K) and the compression length of the spring. - In a preferred embodiment, the bias force is sufficient to shift the pre-implant (normal posture) distance to the post-implant (normal posture) distance. To prevent excessive compression of the disc, particularly the posterior disc, it is also preferred that the bias force increase significantly as the attachment points come closer, as by extension, lifting and/or poor posture. This is facilitated by the natural increase in bias force of the spring as the distance decreases, and is aided by the damper pad and the compression limit (bottomed out) of the spring. In addition, because the dynamic bias device is intended to limit excessive compression of the posterior disc, and not necessarily intended to limit flexion of the spine, it is also preferable that the bias force approach zero (spring fully extended) at a distance which is less than the extension limit of the dynamic bias device.
- Thus, by way of example, not limitation, the bias force may be in the range of 1% to 30% BW when laying down. With other postures after implantation, the bias force may be estimated by subtracting the contribution of body weight from the load carried by
lumbar region 12, which is approximately 50% BW (head=5% BW; arms=9% BW; trunk=36% BW). As such, the bias force may be in the range of 10% to 90% BW when standing. - With reference to
FIGS. 4A-4B and 5A-5B, left lateral and posterior views ofdynamic bias devices 100 are schematically illustrated as being mounted to adjacentspinous processes adjacent vertebrae dynamic bias devices 100 are utilized per pair of vertebrae as shown inFIGS. 4A and 4B , thedynamic bias devices 100 are preferably mounted substantially equidistant from themedian plane 70, or otherwise symmetric about themedian plane 70, in order to avoid causing lateral bias or curvature of the spine 10. Note that thedynamic bias devices 100 may be mounted substantially vertical as shown or at an angle to themedian plane 70 and satisfy these criteria. When only onedynamic bias device 100 is utilized per pair of vertebrae as shown inFIGS. 5A and 5B , thedynamic bias device 100 is preferably mounted in or near themedian plane 70 for the same reason. - Although it is preferable to have the dynamic bias device(s) 100 near the
median plane 70, substantially equidistant from themedian plane 70, or otherwise symmetric about themedian plane 70, it is possible to have multipledynamic bias devices 100 mounted asymmetrically while maintaining balanced bias forces about themedian plane 70. The objective is to avoid causing lateral bias or curvature of the spine 10, which is a function of balancing bias forces and moments about themedian plane 70. - The bias forces are vectors which have a magnitude governed by the properties of the
bias member 104, and a direction dictated by the mounting position of thedynamic bias device 100. Eachdynamic bias device 100 has two bias force vectors, one for eachattachment member 102 at each attachment point. Each bias force vector has a moment arm equal to the distance from the attachment point to themedian plane 70. For each attachment point, the product of the moment arm and the vertical component of the bias force vector is the moment or torque applied to the spine 10, and the horizontal component of the bias force vector is the shear applied to the spine 10. Thus, in order to minimize curvature of the spine 10, all of the moments are balanced about themedian plane 70. In order to minimize lateral bias on the spine 10, all of the horizontal components of the bias force vectors are balanced about themedian plane 70. The easiest way to accomplish this result, of course, is to mount thedynamic bias devices 100 symmetrically about themedian plane 70. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that asymmetric mounting arrangements that substantially meet these criteria are also possible. - Further, because
most protrusions 56 are posterior, the dynamic bias device(s) 100 is/are preferably mounted posterior to the axis ofcurvature 60. This is advantageous because loss of disc height is most common in theposterior disc 50, the largest amount of mechanical advantage about the anterior disc is obtained posterior to the axis ofcurvature 60, and the posterior portions of the vertebrae are easiest to access less invasively. However, the dynamic bias device(s) 100 may be mounted at any position relative to the axis ofcurvature 60 depending on the location of theprotrusion 56, as long as the dynamic bias device(s) 100 is/are near themedian plane 70, substantially equidistant from themedian plane 70, or otherwise symmetric about themedian plane 70 as discussed above. - Given these criteria, there are many suitable mounting locations or attachment points for the
dynamic bias device 100. Some of the possible attachment points are labeled A-N inFIGS. 1A and 1B . Attachment points A-G refer to the lumbar vertebrae 20 (L1-L5), and attachment points H-N refer to the sacral vertebrae 30 (particularly S1). The attachment points A-G of thelumbar region 12 are equally applicable to the thoracic and cervical regions of the spine 10, which are not illustrated for purposes of simplicity only. - In the
lumbar region 12, attachment points A and B refer to the left lateral and right lateral surfaces of thespinous process 24; attachment point C refers to the posterior surface of thespinous process 24; attachment points D and E refer to the posterior surfaces of the left andright laminae 23; and attachment points F and G refer to the distal ends of the left and right transverse processes 25. - In the
sacrum 14, attachment points H and I refer to the left lateral and right lateral surfaces of the superior mediansacral crest 31; attachment points K and L refer to the posterior surfaces of thesacral laminae 33 between the mediansacral crest 31 and the intermediate sacral crests 32; and attachment points M and N refer to posterior surface between the intermediate sacral crests 32 and the lateral sacral crests 34. - A wide variety of sets of attachment points are possible, a non-exhaustive list of which is set forth herein. For single
dynamic bias device 100 mounting, the nomenclature is (X1Y1) where X1 is the attachment point on vertebra X, and Y1 is the attachment point on vertebra Y. For doubledynamic bias device 100 mounting, the nomenclature is (X1Y1, X2Y2) where X1 is the attachment point of the firstdynamic bias device 100 on vertebra X, Y1 is the attachment point of the firstdynamic bias device 100 on vertebra Y, X2 is the attachment point of the seconddynamic bias device 100 on vertebra X, and Y2 is the attachment point of the seconddynamic bias device 100 on vertebra Y. Vertebrae X and Y refer to any two different vertebrae, which are usually, but not necessarily, adjacent. In addition, vertebrae X and Y may be superior and inferior, respectively, or vice-versa. - To illustrate the attachment point nomenclature, reference may be made to
FIGS. 4B and 5B . InFIG. 4B , a firstdynamic bias device 100 is attached to the left lateral surface of the two spinous processes, and a seconddynamic bias device 100 is attached to the right lateral surface of the two spinous processes. Thus, the set of attachment points for the arrangement ofFIG. 4B is (AA, BB). InFIG. 5B , only onedynamic bias device 100 is attached to the posterior surface of the two spinous processes. Thus, the set of attachment points for the arrangement ofFIG. 5B is (CC). - By way of example, not limitation, the following sets of attachment points may be used to satisfy the above-referenced criteria with regard to balancing moments and forces about the
median plane 70. For singledynamic bias device 100 mounting: (CC); and (CJ) are preferred. For doubledynamic bias device 100 mounting: (AA, BB); (DD, EE); (FF, GG); (AH, BI); (DK, EL); (FK, GL); (DM, EN); and (FM, GN) are preferred. Also for doubledynamic bias device 100 mounting: (AD, BE); (AF, BG); (AK, BL); (AM, BN); (DH, El); (DF, EG); (FH, GI); (CA, CB); (CH, CI); (CD, CE); (CF, CG); (CK, CL); (CM, CN); (JA, JB); (JH, JI); (JD, JE); and (JF, JG) are possible. For more than double mounting, any combination of these sets may be used. Generally, the more posterior the attachment points, the less invasive the procedure will be. Attachment points A, B, C, H and I are preferred for this reason. In addition, to avoid interfering with the motion of the vertebrae, thedynamic bias device 140 is preferably disposed laterally or posteriorly of the spinous processes 24, as opposed to under and between the spinous processes 24. - The
dynamic bias device 100 may be attached to these points by conventional surgical techniques, except as described herein. The posterior musculature and connective tissues may be dissected to expose the desired attachment points. If desired, anydisc protrusions 56 may be removed, in whole or in part, using a conventional discectomy procedure. Also if desired, any other abnormal spinal growths or protrusions may be removed. However, formany disc protrusions 56, it is anticipated that conventional traction or separation techniques may be employed to temporarily retract theprotrusion 56 into the normal disc space until the dynamic bias devices are implanted. - In order to establish separation of the vertebrae, the spine may be placed in traction or conventional intervertebral separation tools may be used. Alternatively, the
dynamic bias device 100 may be preloaded such that when the device is released after attachment, the bias force establishes the desired amount of separation. - Pilot holes are drilled as needed, such as for the use of
bushings FIGS. 7A-7B , 8A-8B and 9A-9B hereinafter). If attachment points A, B, H and I are to be used, such as with the use of bushing 320 (described with reference toFIGS. 6A-6D hereinafter), ahole 90 and counter-bore 92 may be drilled into thespinous process 24. The device(s) 100 are then attached to the desired attachment points in accordance with the hardware being used, and the site is subsequently surgically closed. - With reference to
FIGS. 6A-6D , 7A-7B, 8A-8B and 9A-9B, various embodiments ofbushings attachment members 102 may comprise a wide variety of mechanical connection designs, and may incorporate into their design, or be used in combination with, other machine elements such asbushings Bushings dynamic bias devices 100. As illustrated,bushings attachment members 102 in the form of loops or the like, but may be modified to receive other structures. A primary function ofbushings attachment members 102 from the vertebrae to which they are attached. Thus, the bushing to bone (vertebrae) interface is static, while the bushing to attachment member interface is dynamic. This reduces if not eliminates the abrasive degradation of the vertebrae due to the attachment of thedynamic bias device 100. The orientation of the vertebral surface at the attachment points will determine the best bushing scheme. - With reference to
FIGS. 6A-6B , end and exploded views, respectively, of abushing 320 are illustrated.Bushing 320 is particularly suitable for attachment to thespinous process 24 as shown inFIG. 6C , or attachment points A, B, H and I as illustrated inFIG. 1A . Bushing 320 may be attached to thespinous process 24 utilizing aconventional fastener 300, which includesbolt 302,nut 304 andwashers fastener 300 is a lock fastener such that it will not have a tendency to unscrew with relative motion of theattachment members 102. However, thenut 304 is not tightened so much as to inhibit rotational movement of theattachment members 102.Fastener 300 may alternatively comprise a key and pin (e.g., cotter pin). When fully assembled, theattachment members 102 are disposed around the shaft of thebolt 302 on either side of thebushing 320 and between thewashers -
Bushing 320 includes amale fitting 321 which fits into afemale fitting 324. Themale fitting 321 includes ashank portion 322 and ahead portion 323. Similarly, thefemale fitting 324 includes ashank portion 325 and ahead portion 326. Thefemale fitting 324 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate theshank 322 of themale fitting 321, and themale fitting 321 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate thebolt 302 of thefastener 300. The outside surface of theshank 322 of themale fitting 321 and the inside surface of theshank 325 of thefemale fitting 324 may include mating threads. - The size of the
head 323/326 to bone interface is preferably maximized to minimize stress concentration and to distribute torsional loads over a large surface area. The size of thefemale shank 25 and the corresponding size of thehole 90 drilled through thespinous process 24 are chosen to minimize stress concentration and minimize the loss of bone integrity. A counter-bore 92 may be used to flatten and thereby maximize the contact surface area of thehead 323/326 to bone interface, as illustrated inFIG. 6D . - The materials of the
fastener 300 andbushing 320 may comprise any suitable implantable material capable of withstanding high fatigue. For example, all components could be comprised of 300 or 400 series stainless steel, titanium alloy 6-4, or MP35N alloy. Preferably, all components would be made of the same or similar material to reduce galvanic corrosion. The surfaces of thefastener 300 andbushing 320 that engage theattachment members 102 of thedynamic bias device 100 are preferably smooth to reduce friction and wear. The surfaces of thebushing 320 that engage the vertebrae may have a roughened surface (e.g., knurled) to reduce the likelihood of relative movement there between. In addition, the surfaces of thebushing 320 that engage the vertebrae may have a porous sintered surface to facilitate solid bone growth, thereby further securing thebushing 320. Coatings and surface treatments may be utilized to reduce or increase friction where desired, and biological response where tissue interface is likely. - With reference to
FIGS. 7A-7B , end and exploded views, respectively, of abushing 330 are illustrated. Except as described herein,bushing 330 is substantially the same in design, function and use asbushing 320.Bushing 330 is adapted to mount one or (preferably) twodynamic bias devices 100.Bushing 330 is particularly suitable for attachment points C and J as illustrated inFIG. 1B . Bushing 330 may be attached to thevertebrae 20/30 utilizing aconventional bone screw 310, which may be modified in diameter, length and thread type for the particular attachment site and condition. -
Bushing 330 includes twomale fittings 331 which fit into afemale fitting 334. Themale fittings 331 each include ashank portion 332 and ahead portion 333. Similarly, thefemale fitting 334 includes twoshank portions 335 and twohead portions 336. Thefemale fitting 334 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate theshanks 332 of themale fittings 331, and themale fittings 331 have an inside diameter sized to accommodate thebolt 302 of thefastener 300. The outside surfaces of theshanks 332 of themale fittings 331 and the inside surfaces of theshanks 335 of thefemale fitting 334 may include mating threads. When fully assembled, theattachment members 102 are disposed around theshanks 335 on either side ofheads 336 of thefemale fitting 334 and between theheads 333 of themale fittings 331. - With reference to
FIGS. 8A-8B , end and exploded views, respectively, of abushing 340 are illustrated. Except as described herein,bushing 340 is substantially the same in design, function and use asbushing 330.Bushing 340 is adapted to mount onedynamic bias device 100.Bushing 340 is particularly suitable for attachment points C, D, E, F, G, J, K, L, M and N, but may also be used for attachment points A, B, H and I as illustrated inFIGS. 1A and 1B . Bushing 340 may be attached to thevertebrae 20/30 utilizing aconventional bone screw 310, which may be modified in diameter, length and thread type for the particular attachment site and condition. -
Bushing 340 includes amale fitting 341 which fits into afemale fitting 344. Themale fitting 341 includes ashank portion 342 and ahead portion 343. Similarly, thefemale fitting 344 includes ashank portion 345 and ahead portion 346. Thefemale fitting 344 also includes aflange 347 connecting thebone screw 310 to thebushing 340. Thefemale fitting 344 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate theshank 342 of themale fitting 341, and themale fitting 341 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate thebolt 302 of thefastener 300. The outside surface of theshank 342 of themale fitting 341 and the inside surface of theshank 345 of thefemale fitting 344 may include mating threads. When fully assembled, theattachment member 102 is disposed around theshank 345 on thefemale fitting 344 and between theheads 343/346 of thefittings 341/344. When mounted, the axis of theshank 345 ofbushing 340 is oriented parallel to the mounting surface. - With reference to
FIGS. 9A-9B , end and exploded views, respectively, of abushing 350 are illustrated. Except as described herein,bushing 350 is substantially the same in design, function and use asbushing 340.Bushing 350 is adapted to mount onedynamic bias device 100.Bushing 350 is particularly suitable for attachment points C, D, E, F, G, J, K, L, M and N, but may also be used for attachment points A, B, H and I as illustrated inFIGS. 1A and 1B . Bushing 350 may be attached to thevertebrae 20/30 utilizing aconventional bone screw 310, which may be modified in diameter, length and thread type for the particular attachment site and condition. In this particular embodiment, thefastener 300 is formed integrally with thebone screw 310. -
Bushing 350 includes amale fitting 351 which fits into afemale fitting 354. Themale fitting 351 includes ashank portion 352 and ahead portion 353. Similarly, thefemale fitting 354 includes ashank portion 355 and ahead portion 356. Thefemale fitting 354 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate theshank 352 of themale fitting 351, and themale fitting 351 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate thebolt 302, which is integral with thebone screw 310. The outside surface of theshank 352 of themale fitting 351 and the inside surface of theshank 355 of thefemale fitting 354 may include mating threads. When fully assembled, theattachment member 102 is disposed around theshank 355 on thefemale fitting 354 and between theheads 353/356 of thefittings 351/354. When mounted, the axis of theshank 355 ofbushing 350 is oriented perpendicular to the mounting surface. - With reference to
FIGS. 10A-10C , side views of adynamic bias device 110 are illustrated in a no-load condition, in a compression load condition, and in cross-section, respectively. Except as described herein,dynamic bias device 110 is substantially the same in design, function and use as thegeneric device 100 described previously.Dynamic bias device 110 includes abarrel 111 in whichpiston 112 is slidably disposed. A bias member in the form of aspring 113 is disposed in thebarrel 111. Longitudinal displacement of thebarrel 111 relative to thepiston 112 causes compression (or extension) of thespring 113. Thespring 113 provides a bias force which increases (or decreases) linearly with displacement as discussed previously. A flexible housing (not shown) may be placed about thedynamic bias device 110 to isolate the movingparts 111/112 from the surrounding tissue when implanted. - An
adjustable arm 114 may be connected to thepiston 112. Thearm 114 and thebarrel 111 includeholes 115 or other suitable attachment members, which may be used incombination bushings dynamic bias device 110 to the vertebrae. Theadjustable arm 114 and thepiston 112 may include mating threads such that rotation of thearm 114 causes thearm 114 to effectively lengthen or shorten thepiston 112. This allows the distance between theholes 115 to be varied to accommodate different attachment locations and different anatomies. This also allows the dynamic bias device to be preloaded by extending the effective length of thepiston 112 beyond the distance between attachment points. - A
collar 116 is provided to limit the extended length of thedynamic bias device 110. Thecollar 116 may include threads that mate with threads inside thebarrel 111 such that thecollar 116 is adjustable, and thus the extended length is adjustable. Thecollar 116 may also include an elastomeric bumper pad to dampen impact between thepiston 112 and the collar when thedevice 110 is filly extended. Similarly, aelastomeric bumper pad 117 may be provided in thebarrel 111 to dampen impact between thepiston 112 and thebarrel 111 when thedevice 110 is filly collapsed. - With reference to
FIG. 11A , a cross-sectional view of adynamic bias device 120 is illustrated. Except as described herein,dynamic bias device 120 is substantially the same in design, function and use asdynamic bias device 110 discussed with reference toFIGS. 10A-10C .Dynamic bias device 120 includes abarrel 121 in whichpiston 122 is slidably disposed. Abias member 123 in the form of a compressed or evacuated fluid (liquid or gas or a combination of both) is disposed in thebarrel 121 and sealed relative to thepiston 122 bypiston ring 128. Thebarrel 121 andpiston 122 may define a closed volume or anexhaust reservoir 129 may be used as shown. Thebias fluid 123 is in fluid communication with theexhaust reservoir 129 by way of an exhaust port through the wall of thebarrel 121. Theexhaust reservoir 129 may comprise an expandable annular bag as shown, or other suitable structure. If a closed volume is used, longitudinal displacement of thebarrel 121 relative to thepiston 122 simply causes a change in pressure of thefluid 123. If anexhaust reservoir 129 is used as shown, longitudinal displacement of thebarrel 121 relative to thepiston 122 causes a change in pressure of the fluid 123 and flow offluid 123 into theexhaust reservoir 129 via the exhaust port. The pressure of the fluid 123 and the size of the exhaust hole dictates the bias force which increases (or decreases) with the time derivative of displacement as discussed previously. - A flexible housing (not shown) may be placed about the
dynamic bias device 130 to isolate the movingparts 121/122 from the surrounding tissue when implanted. The housing may be used to define theexhaust reservoir 129. Anadjustable arm 124 may be connected to thepiston 122. Thearm 124 and thebarrel 121 includeholes 125 or other suitable attachment members to attach thedynamic bias device 120 to the vertebrae. Theadjustable arm 124 and thepiston 122 may include mating threads to effectively lengthen or shorten thepiston 122. Anadjustable collar 126 may be provided including mating threads such that thecollar 126 is adjustable, and thus the extended length of thedynamic bias device 120 is adjustable. Thecollar 126 may include an elastomeric bumper pad (not shown) and anelastomeric bumper pad 127 may be provided in thebarrel 121 to dampen impact between thepiston 122 and thebarrel 121. - With reference to
FIG. 11B , a cross-sectional view of adynamic bias device 130 is illustrated. Except as described herein,dynamic bias device 130 is substantially the same in design, function and use as the combination ofdynamic bias device 110 discussed with reference toFIGS. 10A-10C anddynamic bias device 120 described with reference toFIG. 11A . -
Dynamic bias device 130 includes abarrel 131 in whichpiston 132 is slidably disposed. A bias member is the form of aspring 133A is disposed in thebarrel 131. Longitudinal displacement of thebarrel 131 relative to thepiston 132 causes compression (or extension) of the spring 133. The spring 133 provides a bias force which increases (or decreases) linearly with displacement as discussed previously. In addition, abias member 133B in the form of a compressed or evacuated fluid (liquid or gas) is disposed in thebarrel 131 and sealed relative to thepiston 132 bypiston ring 138. - The
barrel 131 andpiston 132 may define a closed volume or anexhaust reservoir 129 may be used as shown. The bias fluid 133 is in fluid communication with theexhaust reservoir 139 by way of an exhaust port through the wall of thebarrel 131. Theexhaust reservoir 139 may comprise an expandable annular bag as shown, or other suitable structure. If a closed volume is used, longitudinal displacement of thebarrel 131 relative to thepiston 132 simply causes a change in pressure of the fluid 133. If anexhaust reservoir 139 is used as shown, longitudinal displacement of thebarrel 131 relative to thepiston 132 causes a change in pressure of the fluid 133 and flow of fluid 133 into theexhaust reservoir 139 via the exhaust port. The pressure of the fluid 133 and the size of the exhaust hole dictates the bias force which increases (or decreases) with the time derivative of displacement as discussed previously. Thus, thebias members 133A/133B effectively act as a combined spring and damper. - A flexible housing (not shown) may be placed about the
dynamic bias device 130 to isolate the movingparts 131/132 from the surrounding tissue when implanted. The housing may be used to define theexhaust reservoir 139. Anadjustable arm 134 may be connected to thepiston 132. Thearm 134 and thebarrel 131 includeholes 135 or other suitable attachment members to attach thedynamic bias device 130 to the vertebrae. Theadjustable arm 134 and thepiston 132 may include mating threads to effectively lengthen or shorten thepiston 132. Anadjustable collar 136 may be provided including mating threads such that thecollar 136 is adjustable, and thus the extended length of thedynamic bias device 130 is adjustable. Thecollar 136 may include an elastomeric bumper pad (not shown) and anelastomeric bumper pad 137 may be provided in thebarrel 131 to dampen impact between thepiston 132 and thebarrel 131. - With reference to
FIGS. 12A-12B , rear and side views ofdynamic bias device 140 are illustrated in no-load condition.FIG. 12C illustrates thedynamic bias device 140 subjected to a compression load. Except as described herein,dynamic bias device 140 is substantially the same in design, function and use as thegeneric device 100 described previously. Although movement of thedynamic bias device 140 in compression and extension is substantially linear and parallel to the axis ofcurvature 60, as withdynamic bias device 100, some lateral or posterior-anterior motion is present, but preferably minimized.Dynamic bias device 140 includesbias member 142 andloops 144 or other suitable attachment members, which may be used incombination bushings dynamic bias device 140 to the vertebrae. Thebias member 142 is may be a semi-circular or semi-elliptical leaf spring, which may be a single plate as shown or a series of laminated plates. Relative longitudinal displacement of theattachment members 144 causes compression (or extension) of theleaf spring 142. Theleaf spring 142 provides a bias force which increases (or decreases) with displacement as discussed previously. - The radius or axis of curvature of the
leaf spring 142 is preferably maximized such that displacement of theattachment members 144 is substantially linear, but should not be so high as to result in buckling or inversion in compression. By way of example, not limitation, the radius or axis of curvature may range from half the distance between the attachment points to approximately 10 cm. Of course, half the distance between attachment points will vary depending on the location of each attachment point, but will likely be in the range of 1.0 to 3.0 cm for attachment points between adjacent processes. - The displacement of the apex 143 is preferably of the
leaf spring 142 minimized to minimize disturbance of and interference from surrounding tissue (bone, muscle, connective tissue, nerves, etc.). The apex 143 may face anteriorly, but preferably faces posteriorly or laterally to reduce interference with tissue close to the spinal column. Thedynamic bias device 140, and particularly theleaf spring 142, is preferably disposed laterally or posteriorly of thespinous processes 24 to avoid interference with movement of the vertebrae. - With reference to
FIGS. 13A-13C , various alternativedynamic bias devices dynamic bias devices dynamic bias device 140 discussed with reference toFIGS. 12A-12C . -
Dynamic bias device 150 as seen inFIG. 13A includesbias member 152 in the form of an articulated leaf spring, andattachment members 154. Articulatedleaf spring 152 reduces the horizontal range of movement by utilizing a plurality ofarticulations 153 having a smaller radius or axis of curvature. The reduced horizontal range of movement of thebias member 152 reduces the amount of disturbance and interference from surrounding tissue (bone, muscle, connective tissue, nerves, etc.). -
Dynamic bias device 160 as seen inFIG. 13B includes a plurality ofbias members 162 in the form of leaf springs (shown) or articulated leaf springs (not shown), andattachment members 164. Utilizing a plurality ofleaf springs 162 increases stability of thedynamic bias device 160 and allows for greater net bias forces to be delivered to theattachment members 164 and the vertebrae attached thereto. -
Dynamic bias device 170 as seen inFIG. 13C includes a plurality ofbias members 172 in the form of leaf springs (shown) or articulated leaf springs (not shown). Thedynamic bias device 170 also includesattachment members 174 in the form of inverted semi-circular loops. The invertedsemi-circular loops 174 permit thedevice 170 to be attached to the inferior and superior sides spinous processes of adjacent vertebrae, such that theattachment members 174 are disposed between adjacent spinous processes but thebias members 172 are disposed laterally of the spinous processes to avoid interference with movement of the vertebrae. -
Dynamic bias devices dynamic bias device 100. As mentioned previously, one ormore reinforcement members 200 may be used in combination with one or moredynamic bias devices 100. Thereinforcement members 200 may be used to reinforce the disc, restore disc height and/or bear some or all of the load normally carried by the annulus. Thereinforcement members 200 are relatively rigid and thus serve to reinforce thedisc 50, and particularly theannulus 52, where inserted. In addition, thereinforcement members 200 may have a relatively large profile when implanted and thus increase disc height. - The reinforcing
members 200 may be used singularly or in groups, depending on the increase indisc 50 height desired and/or the amount of reinforcement of theannulus 52 desired. For example, the reinforcingmembers 200 may be stacked as illustrated inFIG. 2B or inserted side-by-side as illustrated inFIG. 15R . In addition, the reinforcingmembers 200 may be located in virtually any portion of theannulus 52. Preferably, the reinforcingmembers 200 are substantially symmetrically disposed about themedian plane 70 to avoid causing curvature of the spine 10. Although the reinforcingmembers 200 may be inserted, in part or in whole, into thenucleus 54, it is preferable to insert them into theannulus 52 for purposes of stability and load carrying. Specifically, to provide stability, it is desirable to symmetrically locate the reinforcingmembers 200 as far as reasonably possible from themedian plane 70, or to span as great a distance as possible across themedian plane 70. In addition, because theannulus 52 of thedisc 50 is believed to carry the majority of the load, particularly in thelumbar region 12, the reinforcingmembers 200 are preferably placed in theannulus 52 to assume the load normally carried thereby, and reinforce the load bearing capacity of theannulus 52, without hindering the normal mobility function of thedisc 50. - The reinforcing
members 200 may comprise expandable members such as self-expandingmembers 210 orinflatable members 220. Alternatively, the reinforcingmembers 200 may comprise unexpandable members such as reinforcement bars 230. When implanting each type ofreinforcement member 210/220/230, it is preferable to maintain the integrity of theannulus 52. Accordingly, space in theannulus 52 for the reinforcingmembers 200 is preferably established by dilation or the like, although some amount of tissue removal may be used. - The
expandable reinforcement members 210/220 are useful because they may be delivered in a low profile, unexpanded condition making it easier to traverse the very tough and fibrous collagen tissue of theannulus 52. For similar reasons, the reinforcement bars 230 are useful because they may have a small diameter and a sharpened tip. Although it is possible to insert theexpandable reinforcing members 210/220 into theannulus 52 in their final expanded state, it is desirable to deliver theexpandable reinforcing members 210/220 into theannulus 52 in an unexpanded state and subsequently expand them in order to minimize invasiveness and resistance to insertion. - The self-expanding reinforcing
member 210 may comprise a solid or semi-solid member that self-expands (e.g., by hydration) after insertion into the annulus. Examples of suitable materials for such solid or semi-solid members include solid fibrous collagen or other suitable hard hydrophilic biocompatible material. If the selected material is degradable, the material may induce the formation of fibrous scar tissue which is favorable. If non-degradable material is selected, the material must be rigid and bio-inert. The self-expanding reinforcingmember 210 preferably has an initial diameter that is minimized, but may be in the range of 25% to 75% of the final expanded diameter, which may be in the range of 0.3 to 0.75 cm, or 10% to 75% of the nominal disc height. The length of the self-expandingmember 210 may be in the range of 1.0 to 6.0 cm, and preferably in the range of 2.0 to 4.0 cm. - The inflatable reinforcing
member 220 may comprise an expandable hollow membrane capable of inflation after insertion into the annulus. An example of a suitable inflatable structure is detachable balloon membrane filled with a curable material. The membrane may consist of a biocompatible and bio-inert polymer material, such as polyurethane, silicone, or polycarbonate-polyurethane (e.g., Corethane). The curable filler material may consist of a curable silicone or polyurethane. The filler material may be curable by chemical reaction (e.g., moisture), photo-activation (e.g., UV light) or the like. The cure time is preferably sufficiently long to enable activation just prior to insertion (i.e., outside the body) and permit sufficient time for navigation and positioning of themember 220 in the disc. However, activation may also take place inside the body after implantation. The inflatable reinforcingmember 220 preferably has an initial deflated diameter that is minimized, but may be in the range of 25% to 75% of the final inflated diameter, which may be in the range of 0.3 to 0.75 cm, or 10% to 75% of the nominal disc height. The length of theinflatable member 220 may be in the range of 1.0 to 6.0 cm, and preferably in the range of 2.0 to 4.0 cm. - The reinforcement bars 230 may comprise a rigid, solid or hollow bar having a sharpened tip. The reinforcement bars 230 may comprises stainless steel mandrels, for example, having a diameter in the range of 0.005 to 0.100 inches, preferably in the range of 0.010 to 0.050 inches, and most preferably in the range of 0.020 to 0.040 inches, and a length in the range of 1.0 to 6.0 cm, and preferably in the range of 2.0 to 4.0 cm. The reinforcement bars 230 may be straight for linear insertion, or curved to gently wrap with the curvature of the annulus during insertion. In addition, the outer surface of the reinforcement bars 230 may have circular ridges or the like that the permit easy insertion into the
annulus 52 but resist withdrawal and motion in the annulus following implantation. Other suitable materials for reinforcement bars 230 include titanium alloy 6-4, MP35N alloy, or super-elastic nickel-titanium alloy. - Referring now to
FIGS. 14A-14D ,various tools tools reinforcement devices 210/220/230 discussed above. The tools include a rigid, sharpened,hollow needle 410, a semi-rigid, sharpened, hollowcurved needle 420, and a sharpenedstylet 430. As seen inFIG. 14D , the sharpenedstylet 430 fits into thesemi-rigid needle 420 which fits into therigid needle 410. - With specific reference to
FIG. 14A , the rigidhollow needle 410 includes ahollow shaft 412 and a grip or handle 414. Theshaft 412 includes a sharpenedtip 413 to facilitate insertion into and pass through the surrounding tissue. Theshaft 412 is preferably made of a rigid metal such as a stainless steel hypodermic tube. Thegrip 414 may comprise a polymer and may be formed by insert injection molding with theshaft 412 inserted into the mold. - With specific reference to
FIG. 14B , the semi-rigidcurved needle 420 includes a hollow shaft 422 ahub 424. Theshaft 422, which includes a sharpenedtip 423, is longer than therigid needle 410 and has an outside diameter sufficiently small to fit into therigid needle 410. Theshaft 422 is preferably made of a semi-rigid polymer or composite. Theshaft 422 includes a curveddistal portion 426 that may be straightened (shown in phantom) upon insertion of thesemi-rigid needle 420 into the lumen of therigid needle 410. Thehub 424 may include a fitting 425 to facilitate connection to a fluid source or a pressure source (e.g., a syringe). - With specific reference to
FIG. 14C , the sharpenedstylet 430 includes aflexible shaft 432 and a sharpeneddistal end 433. Theshaft 432 is longer than the both therigid needle 410 and thesemi-rigid needle 420, and may have a length on the order of 10 to 60 cm. Theshaft 432 also has an outside diameter sufficiently small to fit into thesemi-rigid needle 420. Theshaft 422 preferably has a flexible but pushable construction incorporating a rigid metal such as stainless steel, or super-elastic nickel-titanium alloy. The sharpenedstylet 430 is preferably highly elastic, to resist permanent set upon insertion into thecurved portion 426 of thesemi-rigid needle 420. - With general reference to
FIGS. 15A-15J , the steps for implanting a self-expandingreinforcement member 210 are illustrated. It should be understood that the procedure for implanting asingle member 210 in theanterior annulus 52 is shown for purposes of illustration, not limitation. All of the variables with regard to quantity, location, orientation, etc. discussed previously may be implemented by varying the generic procedure described hereinafter. - Initially, the sharpened
stylet 430,semi-rigid needle 420 andrigid needle 410 are assembled as shown inFIG. 14D . As shown inFIG. 15A , the distal portion of theassembly 410/420/430 is inserted into thedisc 50 as in a conventional discogram procedure. Theassembly 410/420/430 is advanced until thedistal tip 413 of the rigid needle is proximate the anterior curvature of theannulus 52, near the anterior side of thenucleus 54, as seen inFIG. 15B . The semi-rigid needle 420 (alone or with stylet 430) is advanced relative to therigid needle 410 until thecurved portion 426 of the semi-rigid needle exits thedistal tip 413 of therigid needle 410 and the desired amount of curvature is established, as seen inFIG. 15C . Thecurved portion 426 may be advanced until thetip 423 is substantially parallel to the tangent of theanterior annulus 52 curvature. The sharpenedstylet 430 is advanced relative to thesemi-rigid needle 420 to the desired position within theanterior annulus 52, as shown inFIG. 15D . Thesemi-rigid needle 420 and therigid needle 410 are completely withdrawn from thestylet 430, leaving the stylet in position as shown inFIG. 15E . - A
flexible dilator 440 is advanced over thestylet 430 to dilate theannulus 52, as seen inFIG. 15F . Theflexible dilator 440 is similar tosemi-rigid needle 420 except that the dilator includes a blunt distal tip and is relatively more flexible, and has larger inner and outer diameters. Note that one ormore dilators 440 may be advanced co-axially about thestylet 430 until the annulus is sufficiently dilated to accept the self-expandable member 210. Thestylet 430 is then withdrawn from theflexible dilator 440 and the self-expandable member 210 is introduced into the lumen of theflexible dilator 440 using apush bar 450, as shown inFIG. 15G . Alternatively, thedilator 440 may be removed in favor of a flexible hollow catheter with a large inner diameter to facilitate delivery ofmember 210. Thepush bar 450 is similar tostylet 430 except that the distal tip of thepush bar 450 is blunt. Alternatively, thepush bar 450 may simply comprise thestylet 430 turned around, thus using the proximal blunt end of thestylet 430 as thepush bar 450. Thepush bar 450 is advanced until themember 210 is in the desired position, as seen inFIG. 15H . To facilitate positioning themember 210, radiographic visualization may be used to visualize the distal end of thepush bar 450, which is formed of radiopaque material and may include radiopaque markers. In addition, the member may be loaded with a radiopaque material to facilitate radiographic visualization thereof. - After the
member 210 is in the desired position, theflexible dilator 440 is retracted from thepush bar 450 while maintaining position of themember 210 with the push bar. Thepush bar 450 is then removed leaving themember 210 in place. If necessary, the procedure may be repeated foradditional member implants 210. Themember 210 is then allowed to expand over time, perhaps augmented by placing the spine 10 in traction. Alternatively, the spine 10 may be placed in traction prior to beginning the procedure as discussed with reference to the procedure for implantingdynamic bias device 100. - With reference to
FIGS. 15K-15L , the steps for implanting aninflatable reinforcement member 220 are illustrated. In this procedure, the steps outlined with reference toFIGS. 15A-15F are followed. Specifically, the same steps are followed up to and including the step of advancing theflexible dilator 440 over thestylet 430 to dilate theannulus 52, and thereafter removing thestylet 430 from theflexible dilator 440. Using acatheter 460, theinflatable member 220 is introduced into thedilator 440 and advanced until themember 220 is in the desired position, as shown inFIG. 15K . Theinflatable member 220 is connected to the distal end of thecatheter 460, which includes a flexible butpushable shaft 462 and aninflation port 464. Theflexible dilator 440 is retracted from thecatheter 460 while maintaining position of themember 220. - With the
member 220 in the desired position, which may be confirmed using radiographic visualization as described above, theproximal inflation port 464 is connected to a syringe (not shown) or other suitable inflation apparatus for injection of the curable filler material. The filler material is then activated and the desired volume is injected into thecatheter 460 via theinflation port 464, as seen ifFIG. 15L . The filler material is allowed to cure and thecatheter 460 is gently torqued to break thecatheter 460 from thesolid member 220. This break-away step may be facilitated by an area of weakness at the juncture between the distal end of thecatheter 460 and the proximal end of themember 220. Thecatheter 460 is then removed leaving themember 220 in place. If necessary, the procedure may be repeated foradditional member implants 220. - With reference to
FIGS. 15M-15R , the steps for implanting areinforcement bar 230 are illustrated. As seen inFIG. 15M , thedisc 50 includes a protrusion orbulge 56, which is preferably, but not necessarily, reduced or eliminated before insertion of thereinforcement bar 230. This may be done by separating theadjacent vertebrae 20. In order to establish separation of thevertebrae 20, the spine 10 may be placed in traction or conventional intervertebral separation tools may be used. After thebulge 56 is reduced or eliminated, similar steps are followed as outlined with reference toFIGS. 15A-15C . - Delivery of a
single reinforcement bar 230 into theposterior annulus 52 is illustrated. Specifically, the distal portion of theassembly 410/420/450 is inserted into thedisc 50 as in a conventional discogram procedure. Theassembly 410/420/450 is advanced until thedistal tip 413 of therigid needle 410 just penetrates the posterior side of theannulus 52, as seen inFIG. 15N . The semi-rigid needle 420 (alone or with bar 230) is advanced relative to therigid needle 410 until thecurved portion 426 of thesemi-rigid needle 420 exits thedistal tip 413 of therigid needle 410 and the desired amount of curvature is established, as shown inFIG. 15N . Thecurved portion 426 may be advanced until thetip 423 is substantially parallel to theposterior annulus 52. - Using the
push bar 450, thereinforcement bar 230 with its sharpened tip is pushed into theannulus 52 as seen inFIG. 150 . Thereinforcement bar 230 is advanced into theannulus 52 with thepush bar 450 until thebar 230 is in the desired position, as seen inFIG. 15P , which may be confirmed using radiographic visualization as described above. Thepush bar 450 is then retracted, leaving thereinforcement bar 230 in place, as shown inFIG. 15P . Thesemi-rigid needle 420 and therigid needle 410 are then removed, as shown inFIG. 15Q , or, if necessary, the procedure may be repeated for additionalreinforcement bar implants 230, as shown inFIG. 15R . Presence of the reinforcement bars 230 serves to keep thedisc 50, and particularly thebulge 56, in a more normal condition, and to protect against continued bulging, thus easing nerve impingement. - From the foregoing, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention provides
dynamic bias devices reinforcement devices disc 50, and/or to reinforce a damaged disc, while permitting relative movement of thevertebrae - Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention may be manifested in a variety of forms other than the specific embodiments described and contemplated herein. Accordingly, departures in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention as described in the appended claims.
Claims (70)
1. A method of treating an intervertebral disc having an annulus and a nucleus, comprising:
providing a first elongate tubular member having a proximal end, a tissue penetrating distal end and a lumen extending therethrough;
inserting the distal end of the first member into the disc;
providing a second elongate tubular member having a proximal end, a resiliently curved distal end and a lumen extending therethrough;
inserting the second member into the lumen of the first member such that the distal end of the second member extends distally of the distal end of the first elongate member; and
implanting a device in the disc via an insertion path defined at least in part by the first and second elongate members.
2. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the implanted device is implanted in the disc via the lumen of the second member.
3. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the implanted device is implanted in the annulus.
4. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the implanted device is expandable.
5. A method as in claim 4 , wherein the implanted device is delivered in an unexpanded state.
6. A method as in claim 5 , wherein the implanted device is inflatable.
7. A method as in claim 5 , wherein the implanted device is self-expandable.
8. A method as in claim 7 , wherein the implanted device expands by hydration.
9. A method as in claim 8 , wherein the implanted device comprises a hydrophilic material.
10. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the implanted device comprises a metallic material.
11. A method as in claim 10 , wherein the implanted device comprises stainless steel.
12. A method as in claim 10 , wherein the implanted device comprises a super-elastic alloy.
13. A method as in claim 10 , wherein the implanted device comprises a nickel titanium alloy.
14. A method as in claim 10 , wherein the implanted device comprises a MP35N alloy.
15. A method as in clam 1, wherein the second member is inserted into the lumen of the first member such that the distal end of the second member extends distally of the distal end of the first elongate member and points in a direction generally aligned with an anterior or posterior curvature of the annulus.
16. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the distal end of the second member is configured to penetrate tissue.
17. A method as in claim 16 , wherein the second member includes a shaft portion and a sharpened distal tip.
18. A method as in claim 17 , wherein the shaft potion of the second member comprises a polymer.
19. A method as in claim 17 , wherein the shaft portion of the second member comprises a composite.
20. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the second member is longer than the first member.
21. A method as in claim 1 , wherein the curved distal end of the second member straightens upon insertion into the first elongate member.
22. A method as in claim 21 , wherein the first member comprises a rigid material.
23. A method as in claim 22 , wherein the first member comprises a metal.
24. A method as in claim 22 , further comprising:
providing a third elongate member having a proximal end and a distal end; and inserting the third member into the second member.
25. A method as in claim 24 , wherein the distal end of the third member extends beyond the distal end of the second member.
26. A method as in claim 25 , wherein the distal end of the third member is configured to penetrate tissue, and wherein the tissue penetrating distal end of the third member extends into disc tissue.
27. A method as in claim 26 , wherein the third member includes a flexible shaft portion and a sharpened distal tip.
28. A method as in claim 24 , wherein the third member comprises a push rod.
29. A method as in claim 28 , wherein the implanted device is pushed out the distal end of the second member using the push rod.
30. A method of treating an intervertebral disc having an annulus and a nucleus, comprising:
providing a first elongate tubular member having a proximal end, a tissue penetrating distal end and a lumen extending therethrough;
inserting the distal end of the first member into the annulus;
providing a second elongate tubular member having a proximal end, a curved tissue penetrating distal end and a lumen extending therethrough;
inserting the second member into the lumen of the first member such that the distal end of the second member extends distally of the distal end of the first elongate member; and
implanting a device in the disc via an insertion path defined at least in part by the first and second elongate members.
31. A method as in claim 30 , wherein the implanted device is planted in the disc via the lumen of the second member.
32. A method as in claim 30 , wherein the implanted device is implanted in the annulus.
33. A method as in claim 30 , wherein the implanted device is expandable.
34. A method as in claim 33 , wherein the implanted device is delivered in an unexpanded state.
35. A method as in claim 34 , wherein the implanted device is inflatable.
36. A method as in claim 34 , wherein the implanted device is self-expandable.
37. A method as in claim 36 , wherein the implanted device expands by hydration.
38. A method as in claim 37 , wherein the implanted device comprises a hydrophilic material.
39. A method as in claim 30 , wherein the implanted device comprises a metallic material.
40. A method as in claim 39 , wherein the implanted device comprises stainless steel.
41. A method as in claim 39 , wherein the implanted device comprises a super-elastic alloy.
42. A method as in claim 39 , wherein the implanted device comprises a nickel titanium alloy.
43. A method as in claim 39 , wherein the implanted device comprises a MP35N alloy.
44. A method as in claim 30 , wherein the second member is inserted into the lumen of the first member such that the distal end of the second member extends distally of the distal end of the first elongate member and points in a direction generally aligned with an anterior or posterior curvature of the annulus.
45. A method as in claim 30 , wherein the curved distal end of the second member is resilient.
46. A method as in claim 45 , wherein the curved distal end of the second member straightens upon insertion into the first elongate member.
47. A method as in claim 46 , wherein the first member comprises a rigid material.
48. A method as in claim 47 , wherein the first member comprises a metal.
49. A method as in claim 30 , wherein the second member includes a shaft portion and a sharpened distal tip.
50. A method as in claim 49 , wherein the shaft portion of the second member comprises a polymer.
51. A method as in claim 49 , wherein the shaft portion of the second member comprises a composite.
52. A method as in claim 30 , wherein the second member is longer than the first member.
53. A method as in claim 30 , further comprising:
providing a third elongate member having a proximal end and a distal end; and inserting the third member into the second member.
54. A method as in claim 53 , wherein the distal end of the third member extends beyond the distal end of the second member.
55. A method as in claim 54 , wherein the distal end of the third member is configured to penetrate tissue, and wherein the tissue penetrating distal end of the third member extends into disc tissue.
56. A method as in claim 55 , wherein the third member includes a flexible shaft portion and a sharpened distal tip.
57. A method as in claim 53 , wherein the third member comprises a push rod.
58. A method as in claim 57 , wherein the implanted device is pushed out the distal end of the second member using the push rod.
59. A method as in claim 58 , wherein the implanted device is self-expanding.
60. A method of treating an intervertebral disc having an annulus and a nucleus, comprising:
providing a tubular member having a proximal end, a distal end and a lumen extending therethrough;
inserting the distal end of the tubular member into the disc;
providing an elongate stylet having a proximal end and a tissue penetrating distal end;
inserting the stylet through the tubular member and into the disc;
providing a device having a lumen configured to accommodate the stylet; and advancing the device over the stylet and into the disc.
61. A method as in claim 60 , wherein the distal end of the tubular member is curved.
62. A method as in claim 61 , wherein the curved distal end is resilient.
63. A method as in claim 60 , wherein the distal end of the tubular member is configured to penetrate tissue.
64. A method as in claim 63 , wherein the distal end of the tubular member includes a sharpened tip.
65. A method as in claim 60 , wherein the stylet includes a flexible shaft portion.
66. A method as in claim 65 , wherein the flexible shaft portion comprises a metallic material.
67. A method as in claim 66 , wherein the metallic material comprises stainless steel.
68. A method as in claim 66 , wherein the metallic material comprises a nickel titanium alloy.
69. A method as in claim 66 , wherein the metallic material comprises a MP35N alloy.
70. A method as in claim 60 , wherein the stylet has a length of about 10 cm to 60 cm.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/841,670 US20090112267A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2007-08-20 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/542,972 US6402750B1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2000-04-04 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US10/093,990 US6835205B2 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2002-03-07 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US10/967,042 US20050049708A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2004-10-15 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US11/841,670 US20090112267A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2007-08-20 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/967,042 Continuation US20050049708A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2004-10-15 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090112267A1 true US20090112267A1 (en) | 2009-04-30 |
Family
ID=24166065
Family Applications (7)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/542,972 Expired - Lifetime US6402750B1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2000-04-04 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US10/093,990 Expired - Lifetime US6835205B2 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2002-03-07 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US10/967,042 Abandoned US20050049708A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2004-10-15 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US11/285,257 Abandoned US20060084994A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2005-11-22 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US11/753,634 Abandoned US20070225814A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2007-05-25 | Devices and Methods for the Treatment of Spinal Disorders |
US11/753,649 Abandoned US20080255616A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2007-05-25 | Devices and Methods for the Treatment of Spinal Disorders |
US11/841,670 Abandoned US20090112267A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2007-08-20 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
Family Applications Before (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/542,972 Expired - Lifetime US6402750B1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2000-04-04 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US10/093,990 Expired - Lifetime US6835205B2 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2002-03-07 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US10/967,042 Abandoned US20050049708A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2004-10-15 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US11/285,257 Abandoned US20060084994A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2005-11-22 | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US11/753,634 Abandoned US20070225814A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2007-05-25 | Devices and Methods for the Treatment of Spinal Disorders |
US11/753,649 Abandoned US20080255616A1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2007-05-25 | Devices and Methods for the Treatment of Spinal Disorders |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (7) | US6402750B1 (en) |
Cited By (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090275983A1 (en) * | 2008-05-05 | 2009-11-05 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamic stabilization rod |
US8012177B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2011-09-06 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization assembly with frusto-conical connection |
US8066739B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2011-11-29 | Jackson Roger P | Tool system for dynamic spinal implants |
US8092500B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2012-01-10 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with floating core, compression spacer and over-mold |
US8100915B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2012-01-24 | Jackson Roger P | Orthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method |
US8105368B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2012-01-31 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with slitted core and outer sleeve |
US8152810B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2012-04-10 | Jackson Roger P | Spinal fixation tool set and method |
US8353932B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2013-01-15 | Jackson Roger P | Polyaxial bone anchor assembly with one-piece closure, pressure insert and plastic elongate member |
US8366745B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2013-02-05 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization assembly having pre-compressed spacers with differential displacements |
US8394133B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2013-03-12 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic fixation assemblies with inner core and outer coil-like member |
US8475498B2 (en) | 2007-01-18 | 2013-07-02 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with cord connection |
US8556938B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2013-10-15 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with non-pivotable retainer and pop-on shank, some with friction fit |
US8591560B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2013-11-26 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with elastic core and outer sleeve |
US8591515B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2013-11-26 | Roger P. Jackson | Spinal fixation tool set and method |
US8845649B2 (en) | 2004-09-24 | 2014-09-30 | Roger P. Jackson | Spinal fixation tool set and method for rod reduction and fastener insertion |
US8979904B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2015-03-17 | Roger P Jackson | Connecting member with tensioned cord, low profile rigid sleeve and spacer with torsion control |
US9050139B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2015-06-09 | Roger P. Jackson | Orthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method |
US9216041B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2015-12-22 | Roger P. Jackson | Spinal connecting members with tensioned cords and rigid sleeves for engaging compression inserts |
US9216039B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2015-12-22 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic spinal stabilization assemblies, tool set and method |
US9451989B2 (en) | 2007-01-18 | 2016-09-27 | Roger P Jackson | Dynamic stabilization members with elastic and inelastic sections |
US9743957B2 (en) | 2004-11-10 | 2017-08-29 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone screw with shank articulation pressure insert and method |
US10039578B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 | 2018-08-07 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Methods and devices for minimally invasive spinal fixation element placement |
US10258382B2 (en) | 2007-01-18 | 2019-04-16 | Roger P. Jackson | Rod-cord dynamic connection assemblies with slidable bone anchor attachment members along the cord |
US10299839B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 | 2019-05-28 | Medos International Sárl | Percutaneous access devices and bone anchor assemblies |
US10383660B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2019-08-20 | Roger P. Jackson | Soft stabilization assemblies with pretensioned cords |
US10729469B2 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2020-08-04 | Roger P. Jackson | Flexible spinal stabilization assembly with spacer having off-axis core member |
US11419642B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 | 2022-08-23 | Medos International Sarl | Percutaneous access devices and bone anchor assemblies |
Families Citing this family (735)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AU7178698A (en) | 1996-11-15 | 1998-06-03 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Biomaterial system for in situ tissue repair |
US8128661B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2012-03-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process distraction system and method with positionable wing and method |
US20080027552A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2008-01-31 | Zucherman James F | Spine distraction implant and method |
US7306628B2 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2007-12-11 | St. Francis Medical Technologies | Interspinous process apparatus and method with a selectably expandable spacer |
US5836948A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 1998-11-17 | Saint Francis Medical Technologies, Llc | Spine distraction implant and method |
US6068630A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2000-05-30 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US7201751B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2007-04-10 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device |
US20080071378A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2008-03-20 | Zucherman James F | Spine distraction implant and method |
US7959652B2 (en) * | 2005-04-18 | 2011-06-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant having deployable wings and method of implantation |
US20080039859A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2008-02-14 | Zucherman James F | Spine distraction implant and method |
US6695842B2 (en) * | 1997-10-27 | 2004-02-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Interspinous process distraction system and method with positionable wing and method |
US20080086212A1 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2008-04-10 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US7273497B2 (en) * | 1999-05-28 | 2007-09-25 | Anova Corp. | Methods for treating a defect in the annulus fibrosis |
US20070038231A1 (en) * | 1999-05-28 | 2007-02-15 | Ferree Bret A | Methods and apparatus for treating disc herniation and preventing the extrusion of interbody bone graft |
US20060247665A1 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2006-11-02 | Ferree Bret A | Methods and apparatus for treating disc herniation and preventing the extrusion of interbody bone graft |
FR2897259B1 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2008-05-09 | Ldr Medical Soc Par Actions Si | INTERSOMATIC TRANSFORAMINAL CAGE WITH INTERBREBAL FUSION GRAFT AND CAGE IMPLANTATION INSTRUMENT |
US7553329B2 (en) | 1999-08-18 | 2009-06-30 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Stabilized intervertebral disc barrier |
US7717961B2 (en) | 1999-08-18 | 2010-05-18 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Apparatus delivery in an intervertebral disc |
WO2009033100A1 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2009-03-12 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Bone anchoring systems |
US6883520B2 (en) | 1999-08-18 | 2005-04-26 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for dynamically stable spinal implant |
US7972337B2 (en) | 2005-12-28 | 2011-07-05 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Devices and methods for bone anchoring |
US7998213B2 (en) | 1999-08-18 | 2011-08-16 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Intervertebral disc herniation repair |
US6508839B1 (en) | 1999-08-18 | 2003-01-21 | Intrinsic Orthopedics, Inc. | Devices and methods of vertebral disc augmentation |
US8323341B2 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2012-12-04 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Impaction grafting for vertebral fusion |
US7507243B2 (en) * | 1999-08-18 | 2009-03-24 | Gregory Lambrecht | Devices and method for augmenting a vertebral disc |
US6821276B2 (en) | 1999-08-18 | 2004-11-23 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Intervertebral diagnostic and manipulation device |
WO2004100841A1 (en) | 1999-08-18 | 2004-11-25 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Devices and method for augmenting a vertebral disc nucleus |
US7258700B2 (en) * | 1999-08-18 | 2007-08-21 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Devices and method for nucleus pulposus augmentation and retention |
US6964674B1 (en) * | 1999-09-20 | 2005-11-15 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Annulotomy closure device |
US20040172019A1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2004-09-02 | Ferree Bret A. | Reinforcers for artificial disc replacement methods and apparatus |
US7615076B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2009-11-10 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus |
US7052516B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2006-05-30 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and deformable spinal disc annulus stent |
US7951201B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2011-05-31 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus |
US6592625B2 (en) * | 1999-10-20 | 2003-07-15 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and spinal disc annulus stent |
US8632590B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2014-01-21 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for the treatment of the intervertebral disc |
US7935147B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2011-05-03 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for enhanced delivery of treatment device to the intervertebral disc annulus |
US8128698B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2012-03-06 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus |
US7004970B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2006-02-28 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Methods and devices for spinal disc annulus reconstruction and repair |
US6830570B1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2004-12-14 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Devices and techniques for a posterior lateral disc space approach |
ATE336952T1 (en) * | 1999-12-01 | 2006-09-15 | Henry Graf | DEVICE FOR INTERVERBEL STABILIZATION |
US7641657B2 (en) | 2003-06-10 | 2010-01-05 | Trans1, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing posterior or anterior trans-sacral access to spinal vertebrae |
ES2308014T5 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2012-03-16 | Trans1, Inc. | Apparatus for distraction and spinal fusion |
US6899716B2 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2005-05-31 | Trans1, Inc. | Method and apparatus for spinal augmentation |
US6790210B1 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2004-09-14 | Trans1, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for forming curved axial bores through spinal vertebrae |
US7744599B2 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2010-06-29 | Trans1 Inc. | Articulating spinal implant |
US6558390B2 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2003-05-06 | Axiamed, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for performing therapeutic procedures in the spine |
US6575979B1 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2003-06-10 | Axiamed, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing posterior or anterior trans-sacral access to spinal vertebrae |
US6558386B1 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2003-05-06 | Trans1 Inc. | Axial spinal implant and method and apparatus for implanting an axial spinal implant within the vertebrae of the spine |
US6740093B2 (en) | 2000-02-28 | 2004-05-25 | Stephen Hochschuler | Method and apparatus for treating a vertebral body |
US6579291B1 (en) | 2000-10-10 | 2003-06-17 | Spinalabs, Llc | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US6805695B2 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2004-10-19 | Spinalabs, Llc | Devices and methods for annular repair of intervertebral discs |
FR2808995B1 (en) | 2000-05-18 | 2003-02-21 | Aesculap Sa | INTERSOMATIC CAGE WITH UNIFIED GRAFT |
US7833250B2 (en) | 2004-11-10 | 2010-11-16 | Jackson Roger P | Polyaxial bone screw with helically wound capture connection |
US7166107B2 (en) * | 2000-09-11 | 2007-01-23 | D. Greg Anderson | Percutaneous technique and implant for expanding the spinal canal |
US6358254B1 (en) | 2000-09-11 | 2002-03-19 | D. Greg Anderson | Method and implant for expanding a spinal canal |
US6579319B2 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2003-06-17 | Medicinelodge, Inc. | Facet joint replacement |
US20050080486A1 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2005-04-14 | Fallin T. Wade | Facet joint replacement |
US6419703B1 (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2002-07-16 | T. Wade Fallin | Prosthesis for the replacement of a posterior element of a vertebra |
US6969610B2 (en) * | 2001-01-12 | 2005-11-29 | University Of Rochester | Methods of modifying cell structure and remodeling tissue |
US7090698B2 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2006-08-15 | Facet Solutions | Method and apparatus for spine joint replacement |
US6595998B2 (en) * | 2001-03-08 | 2003-07-22 | Spinewave, Inc. | Tissue distraction device |
GB0107708D0 (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2001-05-16 | Imp College Innovations Ltd | Bone fixated,articulated joint load control device |
US6511481B2 (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2003-01-28 | Triage Medical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for fixation of proximal femoral fractures |
US6887243B2 (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2005-05-03 | Triage Medical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for bone fixation with secondary compression |
US6632235B2 (en) | 2001-04-19 | 2003-10-14 | Synthes (U.S.A.) | Inflatable device and method for reducing fractures in bone and in treating the spine |
FR2824261B1 (en) * | 2001-05-04 | 2004-05-28 | Ldr Medical | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS AND IMPLEMENTATION METHOD AND TOOLS |
FR2827156B1 (en) * | 2001-07-13 | 2003-11-14 | Ldr Medical | VERTEBRAL CAGE DEVICE WITH MODULAR FASTENING |
FR2827498B1 (en) | 2001-07-18 | 2004-05-14 | Frederic Fortin | FLEXIBLE VERTEBRAL CONNECTION DEVICE CONSISTING OF PALLIANT ELEMENTS OF THE RACHIS |
FR2828398B1 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2003-09-19 | Jean Taylor | VERTEBRA STABILIZATION ASSEMBLY |
US6736815B2 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2004-05-18 | Core Medical, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for treating spinal discs |
AU2002336694A1 (en) * | 2001-11-01 | 2003-05-12 | Lawrence M. Boyd | Devices and methods for the restoration of a spinal disc |
AU2002350026A1 (en) * | 2001-11-01 | 2003-05-12 | Lawrence M. Boyd | System and method for the pretreatment of the endplates of an intervertebral disc |
WO2003047441A1 (en) * | 2001-12-07 | 2003-06-12 | Mathys Medizinaltechnik Ag | Damping element |
US9480503B2 (en) * | 2002-01-03 | 2016-11-01 | Rohit Khanna | Universal laminoplasty implant |
EP1482841B1 (en) | 2002-03-14 | 2005-12-07 | Yeung, Jeffery E. | Suture anchor and approximating device |
US6824278B2 (en) * | 2002-03-15 | 2004-11-30 | Memx, Inc. | Self-shadowing MEM structures |
US20100168751A1 (en) * | 2002-03-19 | 2010-07-01 | Anderson D Greg | Method, Implant & Instruments for Percutaneous Expansion of the Spinal Canal |
US7682375B2 (en) | 2002-05-08 | 2010-03-23 | Stephen Ritland | Dynamic fixation device and method of use |
US20030220643A1 (en) * | 2002-05-24 | 2003-11-27 | Ferree Bret A. | Devices to prevent spinal extension |
US6793678B2 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2004-09-21 | Depuy Acromed, Inc. | Prosthetic intervertebral motion disc having dampening |
EP2100565A1 (en) | 2002-07-19 | 2009-09-16 | Interventional Spine, Inc. | Apparatus for spinal fixation |
FR2843538B1 (en) * | 2002-08-13 | 2005-08-12 | Frederic Fortin | DEVICE FOR DISTRACTING AND DAMPING ADJUSTABLE TO THE GROWTH OF THE RACHIS |
US7052497B2 (en) * | 2002-08-14 | 2006-05-30 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Techniques for spinal surgery and attaching constructs to vertebral elements |
US20040143264A1 (en) * | 2002-08-23 | 2004-07-22 | Mcafee Paul C. | Metal-backed UHMWPE rod sleeve system preserving spinal motion |
US8876868B2 (en) | 2002-09-06 | 2014-11-04 | Roger P. Jackson | Helical guide and advancement flange with radially loaded lip |
FR2844179B1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2004-12-03 | Jean Taylor | POSTERIOR VERTEBRAL SUPPORT KIT |
FR2844180B1 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2005-08-05 | Spinevision | CONNECTING ELEMENT FOR THE DYNAMIC STABILIZATION OF A SPINAL FIXING SYSTEM AND SPINAL FASTENING SYSTEM COMPRISING SUCH A MEMBER |
EP1585457B1 (en) * | 2002-09-24 | 2010-03-31 | Bogomir Gorensek | Stabilizing device for intervertebral disc, and methods thereof |
FR2845587B1 (en) * | 2002-10-14 | 2005-01-21 | Scient X | DYNAMIC DEVICE FOR INTERVERTEBRAL CONNECTION WITH MULTIDIRECTIONALLY CONTROLLED DEBATMENT |
US20050075634A1 (en) * | 2002-10-29 | 2005-04-07 | Zucherman James F. | Interspinous process implant with radiolucent spacer and lead-in tissue expander |
US20060064165A1 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2006-03-23 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation |
US8048117B2 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2011-11-01 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant and method of implantation |
US7749252B2 (en) * | 2005-03-21 | 2010-07-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant having deployable wing and method of implantation |
US7909853B2 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2011-03-22 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation |
US8070778B2 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2011-12-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant with slide-in distraction piece and method of implantation |
US8147548B2 (en) * | 2005-03-21 | 2012-04-03 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant having a thread-shaped wing and method of implantation |
US7833246B2 (en) * | 2002-10-29 | 2010-11-16 | Kyphon SÀRL | Interspinous process and sacrum implant and method |
US7549999B2 (en) * | 2003-05-22 | 2009-06-23 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process distraction implant and method of implantation |
US20080021468A1 (en) * | 2002-10-29 | 2008-01-24 | Zucherman James F | Interspinous process implants and methods of use |
US20060264939A1 (en) * | 2003-05-22 | 2006-11-23 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Interspinous process implant with slide-in distraction piece and method of implantation |
FR2846550B1 (en) | 2002-11-05 | 2006-01-13 | Ldr Medical | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS |
US7776042B2 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2010-08-17 | Trans1 Inc. | Methods and apparatus for provision of therapy to adjacent motion segments |
GB0301085D0 (en) * | 2003-01-17 | 2003-02-19 | Krishna Manoj | Articulating spinal disc prosthesis |
US7335203B2 (en) | 2003-02-12 | 2008-02-26 | Kyphon Inc. | System and method for immobilizing adjacent spinous processes |
CA2515862A1 (en) | 2003-02-14 | 2004-09-02 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | In-situ formed intervertebral fusion device |
US8540753B2 (en) | 2003-04-09 | 2013-09-24 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone screw with uploaded threaded shank and method of assembly and use |
US8652175B2 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2014-02-18 | Rachiotek, Llc | Surgical implant devices and systems including a sheath member |
BRPI0410697A (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2006-06-20 | Univ Yale | dynamic spine stabilizer and method |
US20050171543A1 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2005-08-04 | Timm Jens P. | Spine stabilization systems and associated devices, assemblies and methods |
US7615068B2 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2009-11-10 | Applied Spine Technologies, Inc. | Mounting mechanisms for pedicle screws and related assemblies |
US20050182401A1 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2005-08-18 | Timm Jens P. | Systems and methods for spine stabilization including a dynamic junction |
US7713287B2 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2010-05-11 | Applied Spine Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic spine stabilizer |
US7635379B2 (en) | 2003-05-02 | 2009-12-22 | Applied Spine Technologies, Inc. | Pedicle screw assembly with bearing surfaces |
US20050177164A1 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2005-08-11 | Carmen Walters | Pedicle screw devices, systems and methods having a preloaded set screw |
WO2004103208A2 (en) | 2003-05-15 | 2004-12-02 | Biomerix Corporation | Manufacture and use of implantable reticulated elastomeric matrices |
US6997929B2 (en) * | 2003-05-16 | 2006-02-14 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Tissue distraction device |
US7377923B2 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2008-05-27 | Alphatec Spine, Inc. | Variable angle spinal screw assembly |
DE10323566B4 (en) * | 2003-05-26 | 2006-03-23 | Fehling Ag | Instrument for unipolar ablation of cardiac tissue |
US8926670B2 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2015-01-06 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone screw assembly |
US7967850B2 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2011-06-28 | Jackson Roger P | Polyaxial bone anchor with helical capture connection, insert and dual locking assembly |
US8366753B2 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2013-02-05 | Jackson Roger P | Polyaxial bone screw assembly with fixed retaining structure |
KR100828144B1 (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2008-05-14 | 인트린식 쎄라퓨틱스 인코포레이티드 | Implant for intervertebral disc annular defect |
US20050043796A1 (en) * | 2003-07-01 | 2005-02-24 | Grant Richard L. | Spinal disc nucleus implant |
US8052723B2 (en) | 2003-08-05 | 2011-11-08 | Flexuspine Inc. | Dynamic posterior stabilization systems and methods of use |
US7753958B2 (en) | 2003-08-05 | 2010-07-13 | Gordon Charles R | Expandable intervertebral implant |
US7909869B2 (en) | 2003-08-05 | 2011-03-22 | Flexuspine, Inc. | Artificial spinal unit assemblies |
US7708766B2 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2010-05-04 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Distraction screw |
US20050065516A1 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2005-03-24 | Tae-Ahn Jahng | Method and apparatus for flexible fixation of a spine |
US7763052B2 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2010-07-27 | N Spine, Inc. | Method and apparatus for flexible fixation of a spine |
US20050203513A1 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2005-09-15 | Tae-Ahn Jahng | Spinal stabilization device |
US8979900B2 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2015-03-17 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Spinal stabilization device |
US7815665B2 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2010-10-19 | N Spine, Inc. | Adjustable spinal stabilization system |
US7632294B2 (en) * | 2003-09-29 | 2009-12-15 | Promethean Surgical Devices, Llc | Devices and methods for spine repair |
BR0318485A (en) * | 2003-09-29 | 2006-09-12 | Synthes Gmbh | dynamic damping element for two bones |
US7255714B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2007-08-14 | Michel H. Malek | Vertically adjustable intervertebral disc prosthesis |
WO2005039454A2 (en) * | 2003-10-17 | 2005-05-06 | Biedermann Motech Gmbh | Flexible implant |
DE102004021861A1 (en) * | 2004-05-04 | 2005-11-24 | Biedermann Motech Gmbh | Implant for temporary or permanent replacement of vertebra or intervertebral disk, comprising solid central element and outer elements with openings |
DE10348329B3 (en) * | 2003-10-17 | 2005-02-17 | Biedermann Motech Gmbh | Rod-shaped element used in spinal column and accident surgery for connecting two bone-anchoring elements comprises a rigid section and an elastic section that are made in one piece |
EP2305155A3 (en) | 2003-10-23 | 2015-01-14 | TRANS1, Inc. | Tools and tool kits for performing minimally invasive procedures on the spine |
WO2005041793A2 (en) * | 2003-10-23 | 2005-05-12 | Trans1, Inc. | Spinal mobility preservation apparatus and method |
US8632570B2 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2014-01-21 | Biedermann Technologies Gmbh & Co. Kg | Stabilization device for bones comprising a spring element and manufacturing method for said spring element |
US7862586B2 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2011-01-04 | Life Spine, Inc. | Spinal stabilization systems |
US7553320B2 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2009-06-30 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for replacing the function of facet joints |
US7753937B2 (en) | 2003-12-10 | 2010-07-13 | Facet Solutions Inc. | Linked bilateral spinal facet implants and methods of use |
US7763077B2 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2010-07-27 | Biomerix Corporation | Repair of spinal annular defects and annulo-nucleoplasty regeneration |
US7806914B2 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2010-10-05 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Dynamic spinal stabilization system |
EP1729672A2 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2006-12-13 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Apparatus and method for injecting fluent material at a distracted tissue site |
US7901459B2 (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2011-03-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Split spinal device and method |
US7550010B2 (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2009-06-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinal arthroplasty device and method |
US7771479B2 (en) | 2004-01-09 | 2010-08-10 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dual articulating spinal device and method |
US20050171610A1 (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2005-08-04 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Mobile bearing spinal device and method |
US7556651B2 (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2009-07-07 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Posterior spinal device and method |
US7875077B2 (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2011-01-25 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Support structure device and method |
US20050187631A1 (en) * | 2004-01-27 | 2005-08-25 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Prosthetic device |
US20050165486A1 (en) * | 2004-01-27 | 2005-07-28 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Prosthetic device and method |
US7297146B2 (en) | 2004-01-30 | 2007-11-20 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Orthopedic distraction implants and techniques |
US8029548B2 (en) * | 2008-05-05 | 2011-10-04 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Flexible spinal stabilization element and system |
FR2865629B1 (en) | 2004-02-04 | 2007-01-26 | Ldr Medical | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS |
EP2113227B1 (en) | 2004-02-04 | 2015-07-29 | LDR Medical | Intervertebral disc prosthesis |
US8562649B2 (en) | 2004-02-17 | 2013-10-22 | Gmedelaware 2 Llc | System and method for multiple level facet joint arthroplasty and fusion |
US8333789B2 (en) | 2007-01-10 | 2012-12-18 | Gmedelaware 2 Llc | Facet joint replacement |
US7993373B2 (en) | 2005-02-22 | 2011-08-09 | Hoy Robert W | Polyaxial orthopedic fastening apparatus |
US11241261B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2022-02-08 | Roger P Jackson | Apparatus and method for soft spinal stabilization using a tensionable cord and releasable end structure |
US7458981B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2008-12-02 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Spinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion |
US20220338905A1 (en) * | 2004-03-09 | 2022-10-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment |
US7763073B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2010-07-27 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior process dynamic spacer |
US8523904B2 (en) * | 2004-03-09 | 2013-09-03 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment |
US8029511B2 (en) * | 2004-03-22 | 2011-10-04 | Disc Dynamics, Inc. | Multi-stage biomaterial injection system for spinal implants |
US20060135959A1 (en) * | 2004-03-22 | 2006-06-22 | Disc Dynamics, Inc. | Nuclectomy method and apparatus |
US7645294B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2010-01-12 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Head-to-head connector spinal fixation system |
US7717939B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2010-05-18 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Rod attachment for head to head cross connector |
US7282065B2 (en) * | 2004-04-09 | 2007-10-16 | X-Spine Systems, Inc. | Disk augmentation system and method |
US7824390B2 (en) | 2004-04-16 | 2010-11-02 | Kyphon SÀRL | Spinal diagnostic methods and apparatus |
US7452351B2 (en) | 2004-04-16 | 2008-11-18 | Kyphon Sarl | Spinal diagnostic methods and apparatus |
FR2869528B1 (en) | 2004-04-28 | 2007-02-02 | Ldr Medical | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS |
US20050251175A1 (en) * | 2004-05-07 | 2005-11-10 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Anchors for use in attachment of bladder tissues to pelvic floor tissues following a prostatectomy |
US7585316B2 (en) | 2004-05-21 | 2009-09-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US7758581B2 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2010-07-20 | Facet Solutions, Inc. | Polyaxial reaming apparatus and method |
US7588578B2 (en) | 2004-06-02 | 2009-09-15 | Facet Solutions, Inc | Surgical measurement systems and methods |
US8764801B2 (en) | 2005-03-28 | 2014-07-01 | Gmedelaware 2 Llc | Facet joint implant crosslinking apparatus and method |
US7935136B2 (en) * | 2004-06-17 | 2011-05-03 | Alamin Todd F | Facet joint fusion devices and methods |
WO2006002359A2 (en) | 2004-06-23 | 2006-01-05 | Applied Spine Technologies, Inc. | Spinal stabilization devices and systems |
US7722579B2 (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2010-05-25 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Devices for injecting a curable biomaterial into a intervertebral space |
JP2008508980A (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2008-03-27 | トランス1,インク. | Nucleus nucleus prosthesis device and method |
US7854752B2 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2010-12-21 | Theken Spine, Llc | System and method for dynamic skeletal stabilization |
CA2574277A1 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2006-02-23 | Innovative Spinal Technologies, Inc. | System and method for dynamic skeletal stabilization |
US20060036241A1 (en) * | 2004-08-11 | 2006-02-16 | Tzony Siegal | Spinal surgery system and method |
US7931688B2 (en) | 2004-08-25 | 2011-04-26 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Expandable interbody fusion device |
US7717938B2 (en) | 2004-08-27 | 2010-05-18 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Dual rod cross connectors and inserter tools |
US7887566B2 (en) * | 2004-09-16 | 2011-02-15 | Hynes Richard A | Intervertebral support device with bias adjustment and related methods |
WO2006034436A2 (en) | 2004-09-21 | 2006-03-30 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Expandable support device and method of use |
US20060224219A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | Sherwood Services Ag | Method of using neural stimulation during nucleoplasty procedures |
US20100145424A1 (en) * | 2004-09-21 | 2010-06-10 | Covidien Ag | Method for Treatment of an Intervertebral Disc |
US20060064145A1 (en) * | 2004-09-21 | 2006-03-23 | Podhajsky Ronald J | Method for treatment of an intervertebral disc |
US8012209B2 (en) | 2004-09-23 | 2011-09-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder, binder aligner and method of implantation |
US8092496B2 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2012-01-10 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Methods and devices for posterior stabilization |
US7896906B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2011-03-01 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Artificial facet joint |
US7766940B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2010-08-03 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior stabilization system |
US20060084976A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2006-04-20 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior stabilization systems and methods |
WO2006042206A2 (en) * | 2004-10-06 | 2006-04-20 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Systems and methods for direct restoration of foraminal volume |
DE102004048938B4 (en) * | 2004-10-07 | 2015-04-02 | Synthes Gmbh | Device for the dynamic stabilization of vertebral bodies |
US20060085076A1 (en) * | 2004-10-15 | 2006-04-20 | Manoj Krishna | Posterior spinal arthroplasty-development of a new posteriorly inserted artificial disc and an artificial facet joint |
US8128662B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-03-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Minimally invasive tooling for delivery of interspinous spacer |
US8152837B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-04-10 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8226690B2 (en) | 2005-07-22 | 2012-07-24 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for stabilization of bone structures |
US8945183B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-02-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer instrument system with deployment indicator |
US20090030465A1 (en) * | 2004-10-20 | 2009-01-29 | Moti Altarac | Dynamic rod |
US8317864B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-11-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8267969B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-09-18 | Exactech, Inc. | Screw systems and methods for use in stabilization of bone structures |
US8012207B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2011-09-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8409282B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-04-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8123782B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US7935134B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2011-05-03 | Exactech, Inc. | Systems and methods for stabilization of bone structures |
US20090228045A1 (en) * | 2004-10-20 | 2009-09-10 | Stanley Kyle Hayes | Dynamic rod |
US8123807B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8613747B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-12-24 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US9161783B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-10-20 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US7763074B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2010-07-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9119680B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-09-01 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8277488B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-10-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9023084B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-05-05 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
WO2009042489A2 (en) * | 2004-10-20 | 2009-04-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Dynamic rod |
US8273108B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-09-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8162985B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-04-24 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8025680B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2011-09-27 | Exactech, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8167944B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-05-01 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US20070239159A1 (en) * | 2005-07-22 | 2007-10-11 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for stabilization of bone structures |
US8425559B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-04-23 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US20060265074A1 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2006-11-23 | Manoj Krishna | Posterior spinal arthroplasty-development of a new posteriorly inserted artificial disc, a new anteriorly inserted artifical disc and an artificial facet joint |
US9055981B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2015-06-16 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinal implants and methods |
CA2614133A1 (en) * | 2004-10-25 | 2006-05-04 | Lanx, Llc | Interspinous distraction devices and associated methods of insertion |
US8241330B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2012-08-14 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinous process implants and associated methods |
CA2585504A1 (en) * | 2004-10-28 | 2006-05-11 | Axial Biotech, Inc. | Apparatus and method for concave scoliosis expansion |
US8926672B2 (en) | 2004-11-10 | 2015-01-06 | Roger P. Jackson | Splay control closure for open bone anchor |
JP2008519656A (en) | 2004-11-10 | 2008-06-12 | ロジャー・ピー・ジャクソン | Helical guide and forward flange with break extension |
US8444681B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2013-05-21 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with pop-on shank, friction fit retainer and winged insert |
US9980753B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2018-05-29 | Roger P Jackson | pivotal anchor with snap-in-place insert having rotation blocking extensions |
US9918745B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2018-03-20 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with pop-on shank and winged insert with friction fit compressive collet |
US9168069B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2015-10-27 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with pop-on shank and winged insert with lower skirt for engaging a friction fit retainer |
WO2006057837A1 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2006-06-01 | Jackson Roger P | Spinal fixation tool attachment structure |
EP1814474B1 (en) | 2004-11-24 | 2011-09-14 | Samy Abdou | Devices for inter-vertebral orthopedic device placement |
CA2701050A1 (en) | 2004-12-06 | 2009-07-09 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US7857832B2 (en) | 2004-12-08 | 2010-12-28 | Interventional Spine, Inc. | Method and apparatus for spinal stabilization |
US7648523B2 (en) | 2004-12-08 | 2010-01-19 | Interventional Spine, Inc. | Method and apparatus for spinal stabilization |
US20090264939A9 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2009-10-22 | Martz Erik O | Instrument set and method for performing spinal nuclectomy |
FR2879436B1 (en) | 2004-12-22 | 2007-03-09 | Ldr Medical | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS |
US20060229613A1 (en) * | 2004-12-31 | 2006-10-12 | Timm Jens P | Sheath assembly for spinal stabilization device |
US20060189985A1 (en) * | 2005-02-09 | 2006-08-24 | Lewis David W | Device for providing a combination of flexibility and variable force to the spinal column for the treatment of scoliosis |
US8092459B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-10 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US7927354B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-04-19 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8043335B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-10-25 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8034080B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-10-11 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US7993342B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-09 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US7998208B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-16 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8096994B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20060184248A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2006-08-17 | Edidin Avram A | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20070276372A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2007-11-29 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods |
US8096995B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20070276493A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2007-11-29 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8007521B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-30 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20070055237A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2007-03-08 | Edidin Avram A | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8157841B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-04-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20080039944A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2008-02-14 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods |
US8057513B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-11-15 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US7998174B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-16 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US7988709B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-02 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8038698B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-10-18 | Kphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8100943B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-24 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8029567B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-10-04 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20080288078A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2008-11-20 | Kohm Andrew C | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20070276373A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2007-11-29 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods |
US8097018B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US7294129B2 (en) * | 2005-02-18 | 2007-11-13 | Ebi, L.P. | Spinal fixation device and associated method |
US7901437B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2011-03-08 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization member with molded connection |
US7604654B2 (en) * | 2005-02-22 | 2009-10-20 | Stryker Spine | Apparatus and method for dynamic vertebral stabilization |
US10076361B2 (en) | 2005-02-22 | 2018-09-18 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone screw with spherical capture, compression and alignment and retention structures |
US7556639B2 (en) * | 2005-03-03 | 2009-07-07 | Accelerated Innovation, Llc | Methods and apparatus for vertebral stabilization using sleeved springs |
US20060212033A1 (en) * | 2005-03-03 | 2006-09-21 | Accin Corporation | Vertebral stabilization using flexible rods |
JP2006253316A (en) * | 2005-03-09 | 2006-09-21 | Sony Corp | Solid-state image sensing device |
US7722647B1 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2010-05-25 | Facet Solutions, Inc. | Apparatus and method for posterior vertebral stabilization |
US20060229607A1 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2006-10-12 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Systems, kits and methods for treatment of the spinal column using elongate support members |
US20060241757A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-26 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of manufacturing same |
US8066742B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2011-11-29 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
EP1871253B1 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2015-09-16 | Paradigm Spine, LLC | Interspinous vertebral and lumbosacral stabilization devices |
US7862590B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2011-01-04 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer |
US20060241566A1 (en) * | 2005-04-11 | 2006-10-26 | Orthox, Llc | Nucleus Extraction from Spine Intervertebral Disc |
US8034079B2 (en) * | 2005-04-12 | 2011-10-11 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment |
US7780709B2 (en) * | 2005-04-12 | 2010-08-24 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants and methods for inter-transverse process dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment |
US7789898B2 (en) * | 2005-04-15 | 2010-09-07 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Transverse process/laminar spacer |
US7674296B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2010-03-09 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Expandable vertebral prosthesis |
WO2006116119A2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-11-02 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Dynamic stabilization system for the spine |
US7632313B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2009-12-15 | Jmea Corporation | Disc repair system |
US7608108B2 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2009-10-27 | Jmea Corporation | Tissue repair system |
US7727233B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2010-06-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinous process stabilization devices and methods |
US8702718B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2014-04-22 | Jmea Corporation | Implantation system for tissue repair |
US20060247776A1 (en) * | 2005-05-02 | 2006-11-02 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for augmenting intervertebral discs |
US20060253198A1 (en) * | 2005-05-03 | 2006-11-09 | Disc Dynamics, Inc. | Multi-lumen mold for intervertebral prosthesis and method of using same |
US8795364B2 (en) | 2005-05-06 | 2014-08-05 | Kensey Nash Corporation | System and devices for the repair of a vertebral disc defect |
US20060254599A1 (en) * | 2005-05-10 | 2006-11-16 | Levin Bruce H | Intervention techniques for post-laminectomy syndrome and other spinal disorders |
US20060271048A1 (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-30 | Jeffery Thramann | Pedicle screw based vertebral body stabilization apparatus |
US8668705B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2014-03-11 | Neotract, Inc. | Latching anchor device |
US9149266B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2015-10-06 | Neotract, Inc. | Deforming anchor device |
US8529584B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2013-09-10 | Neotract, Inc. | Median lobe band implant apparatus and method |
US8333776B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2012-12-18 | Neotract, Inc. | Anchor delivery system |
US10195014B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2019-02-05 | Neotract, Inc. | Devices, systems and methods for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and other conditions |
US8491606B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2013-07-23 | Neotract, Inc. | Median lobe retraction apparatus and method |
US7758594B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2010-07-20 | Neotract, Inc. | Devices, systems and methods for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and other conditions |
US7896891B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2011-03-01 | Neotract, Inc. | Apparatus and method for manipulating or retracting tissue and anatomical structure |
US8157815B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2012-04-17 | Neotract, Inc. | Integrated handle assembly for anchor delivery system |
US10925587B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2021-02-23 | Neotract, Inc. | Anchor delivery system |
US8628542B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2014-01-14 | Neotract, Inc. | Median lobe destruction apparatus and method |
US9504461B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2016-11-29 | Neotract, Inc. | Anchor delivery system |
US8945152B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2015-02-03 | Neotract, Inc. | Multi-actuating trigger anchor delivery system |
US8834492B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2014-09-16 | Neotract, Inc. | Continuous indentation lateral lobe apparatus and method |
US7909836B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2011-03-22 | Neotract, Inc. | Multi-actuating trigger anchor delivery system |
US8425535B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2013-04-23 | Neotract, Inc. | Multi-actuating trigger anchor delivery system |
US8603106B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2013-12-10 | Neotract, Inc. | Integrated handle assembly for anchor delivery system |
US9364212B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2016-06-14 | Neotract, Inc. | Suture anchoring devices and methods for use |
US9549739B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2017-01-24 | Neotract, Inc. | Devices, systems and methods for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia and other conditions |
US7645286B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2010-01-12 | Neotract, Inc. | Devices, systems and methods for retracting, lifting, compressing, supporting or repositioning tissues or anatomical structures |
US8394113B2 (en) | 2005-05-20 | 2013-03-12 | Neotract, Inc. | Coiled anchor device |
WO2006135555A2 (en) * | 2005-06-08 | 2006-12-21 | Accelerated Innovation, Llc | Vertebral facet stabilizer |
US7601172B2 (en) | 2005-06-15 | 2009-10-13 | Ouroboros Medical, Inc. | Mechanical apparatus and method for artificial disc replacement |
US8021426B2 (en) * | 2005-06-15 | 2011-09-20 | Ouroboros Medical, Inc. | Mechanical apparatus and method for artificial disc replacement |
US7442210B2 (en) | 2005-06-15 | 2008-10-28 | Jerome Segal | Mechanical apparatus and method for artificial disc replacement |
US20070162135A1 (en) * | 2005-06-15 | 2007-07-12 | Jerome Segal | Mechanical apparatus and method for artificial disc replacement |
US7547319B2 (en) | 2005-06-15 | 2009-06-16 | Ouroboros Medical | Mechanical apparatus and method for artificial disc replacement |
US7828825B2 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2010-11-09 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Multi-level multi-functional spinal stabilization systems and methods |
DE102005028887A1 (en) * | 2005-06-22 | 2007-01-04 | Tutogen Medical Gmbh | Implant for correction of position of vertebral canal, comprises upper and lower part and made of bone substance |
FR2887434B1 (en) | 2005-06-28 | 2008-03-28 | Jean Taylor | SURGICAL TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OF TWO VERTEBRATES |
FR2887762B1 (en) * | 2005-06-29 | 2007-10-12 | Ldr Medical Soc Par Actions Si | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS INSERTION INSTRUMENTATION BETWEEN VERTEBRATES |
US20070005140A1 (en) * | 2005-06-29 | 2007-01-04 | Kim Daniel H | Fabrication and use of biocompatible materials for treating and repairing herniated spinal discs |
US20070010846A1 (en) * | 2005-07-07 | 2007-01-11 | Leung Andrea Y | Method of manufacturing an expandable member with substantially uniform profile |
EP1903949A2 (en) | 2005-07-14 | 2008-04-02 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Expandable support device and method of use |
US8523865B2 (en) * | 2005-07-22 | 2013-09-03 | Exactech, Inc. | Tissue splitter |
US7824414B2 (en) * | 2005-07-22 | 2010-11-02 | Kensey Nash Corporation | System and devices for the repair of a vertebral disc defect |
US7811309B2 (en) * | 2005-07-26 | 2010-10-12 | Applied Spine Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic spine stabilization device with travel-limiting functionality |
US8221462B2 (en) * | 2005-08-01 | 2012-07-17 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Interspinous internal fixation/distraction device |
US20070055379A1 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2007-03-08 | Stone Corbett W | Annular access devices |
US7713288B2 (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2010-05-11 | Applied Spine Technologies, Inc. | Spring junction and assembly methods for spinal device |
US7699875B2 (en) * | 2006-04-17 | 2010-04-20 | Applied Spine Technologies, Inc. | Spinal stabilization device with weld cap |
US8366773B2 (en) | 2005-08-16 | 2013-02-05 | Benvenue Medical, Inc. | Apparatus and method for treating bone |
US8591583B2 (en) | 2005-08-16 | 2013-11-26 | Benvenue Medical, Inc. | Devices for treating the spine |
EP2705809B1 (en) | 2005-08-16 | 2016-03-23 | Benvenue Medical, Inc. | Spinal tissue distraction devices |
US20070073397A1 (en) * | 2005-09-15 | 2007-03-29 | Mckinley Laurence M | Disc nucleus prosthesis and its method of insertion and revision |
FR2891135B1 (en) | 2005-09-23 | 2008-09-12 | Ldr Medical Sarl | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS |
TWI423782B (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2014-01-21 | Paradigm Spine Llc | Interspinous vertebral stabilization devices |
US7879074B2 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2011-02-01 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior dynamic stabilization systems and methods |
US8167915B2 (en) | 2005-09-28 | 2012-05-01 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for treating spinal stenosis |
FR2891727B1 (en) * | 2005-10-06 | 2008-09-26 | Frederic Fortin | PERFECTED AUTOBLOCATION DEVICE FOR COSTAL DISTRACTION DEVICE |
WO2007044740A2 (en) * | 2005-10-10 | 2007-04-19 | Donna Jean Carver | Artificial spinal disc replacement system and method |
US20070093814A1 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2007-04-26 | Callahan Ronald Ii | Dynamic spinal stabilization systems |
US20070093815A1 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2007-04-26 | Callahan Ronald Ii | Dynamic spinal stabilizer |
US20070093813A1 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2007-04-26 | Callahan Ronald Ii | Dynamic spinal stabilizer |
US8357181B2 (en) * | 2005-10-27 | 2013-01-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
US8137385B2 (en) | 2005-10-31 | 2012-03-20 | Stryker Spine | System and method for dynamic vertebral stabilization |
US7862591B2 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2011-01-04 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
FR2893838B1 (en) | 2005-11-30 | 2008-08-08 | Ldr Medical Soc Par Actions Si | PROSTHESIS OF INTERVERTEBRAL DISC AND INSTRUMENTATION OF INSERTION OF THE PROSTHESIS BETWEEN VERTEBRATES |
US7704271B2 (en) | 2005-12-19 | 2010-04-27 | Abdou M Samy | Devices and methods for inter-vertebral orthopedic device placement |
WO2007075843A2 (en) * | 2005-12-19 | 2007-07-05 | Abdou M S | Devices for inter- vertebral orthopedic device placement |
US7988695B2 (en) * | 2005-12-21 | 2011-08-02 | Theken Spine, Llc | Articulated delivery instrument |
US7922745B2 (en) * | 2006-01-09 | 2011-04-12 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US20070168038A1 (en) * | 2006-01-13 | 2007-07-19 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Materials, devices and methods for treating multiple spinal regions including the interbody region |
US20070173820A1 (en) * | 2006-01-13 | 2007-07-26 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Materials, devices, and methods for treating multiple spinal regions including the anterior region |
US20070173823A1 (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2007-07-26 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
US8083795B2 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2011-12-27 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of manufacturing same |
US20070191838A1 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2007-08-16 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Interspinous devices and methods of use |
US7578849B2 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2009-08-25 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intervertebral implants and methods of use |
US7691130B2 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2010-04-06 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinal implants including a sensor and methods of use |
US7837711B2 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2010-11-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Artificial spinous process for the sacrum and methods of use |
US7815663B2 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2010-10-19 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Vertebral rods and methods of use |
US7682376B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2010-03-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous devices and methods of use |
US7635389B2 (en) | 2006-01-30 | 2009-12-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Posterior joint replacement device |
US7811326B2 (en) | 2006-01-30 | 2010-10-12 | Warsaw Orthopedic Inc. | Posterior joint replacement device |
US7776075B2 (en) * | 2006-01-31 | 2010-08-17 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable spinal rods and methods of use |
US8029545B2 (en) * | 2006-02-07 | 2011-10-04 | Warsaw Orthopedic Inc. | Articulating connecting member and anchor systems for spinal stabilization |
CN100534398C (en) * | 2006-02-09 | 2009-09-02 | 邹德威 | Coupling full intervertebral joints system |
WO2007098423A2 (en) | 2006-02-17 | 2007-08-30 | Paradigm Spine, L.L.C. | Method and system for performing interspinous space preparation for receiving an implant |
US20070233068A1 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2007-10-04 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic assembly for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
US20070233252A1 (en) * | 2006-02-23 | 2007-10-04 | Kim Daniel H | Devices, systems and methods for treating intervertebral discs |
US7918889B2 (en) * | 2006-02-27 | 2011-04-05 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable spinal prosthetic devices and associated methods |
US8118869B2 (en) * | 2006-03-08 | 2012-02-21 | Flexuspine, Inc. | Dynamic interbody device |
US8262698B2 (en) | 2006-03-16 | 2012-09-11 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same |
US7976549B2 (en) | 2006-03-23 | 2011-07-12 | Theken Spine, Llc | Instruments for delivering spinal implants |
US20070225810A1 (en) * | 2006-03-23 | 2007-09-27 | Dennis Colleran | Flexible cage spinal implant |
US8025681B2 (en) | 2006-03-29 | 2011-09-27 | Theken Spine, Llc | Dynamic motion spinal stabilization system |
US7985246B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2011-07-26 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Methods and instruments for delivering interspinous process spacers |
US20070233245A1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2007-10-04 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Methods and instruments for delivering intervertebral devices |
FR2899788B1 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2008-07-04 | Jean Taylor | TREATMENT EQUIPMENT FOR VERTEBRATES, COMPRISING AN INTEREPINOUS IMPLANT |
US20070270959A1 (en) * | 2006-04-18 | 2007-11-22 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Arthroplasty device |
US7942905B2 (en) * | 2006-04-20 | 2011-05-17 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Vertebral stabilizer |
US20070288012A1 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2007-12-13 | Dennis Colleran | Dynamic motion spinal stabilization system and device |
US8118844B2 (en) | 2006-04-24 | 2012-02-21 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same |
US20070255406A1 (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2007-11-01 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Devices, apparatus, and methods for bilateral approach to disc augmentation |
US20070255286A1 (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2007-11-01 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Devices, apparatus, and methods for improved disc augmentation |
US8133279B2 (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2012-03-13 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Methods for treating an annulus defect of an intervertebral disc |
DE102007018860B4 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2023-01-05 | Paradigm Spine L.L.C. | Instrument system for use with an interspinous implant |
US7846185B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2010-12-07 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable interspinous process implant and method of installing same |
US8048118B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2011-11-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Adjustable interspinous process brace |
US8348978B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2013-01-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interosteotic implant |
US8252031B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-08-28 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Molding device for an expandable interspinous process implant |
US20070270823A1 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-22 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Multi-chamber expandable interspinous process brace |
US20070270821A1 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-22 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Vertebral stabilizer |
US20070270824A1 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process brace |
US8105357B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-01-31 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process brace |
EP2023864B1 (en) | 2006-05-01 | 2019-07-10 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Expandable support device |
US8062337B2 (en) * | 2006-05-04 | 2011-11-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same |
US20070270838A1 (en) * | 2006-05-08 | 2007-11-22 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Dynamic spinal stabilization device with dampener |
US7785350B2 (en) * | 2006-05-08 | 2010-08-31 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Load bearing flexible spinal connecting element |
US8012179B2 (en) * | 2006-05-08 | 2011-09-06 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamic spinal stabilization members and methods |
US8529626B2 (en) * | 2006-05-09 | 2013-09-10 | Centinel Spine, Inc. | Systems and methods for stabilizing a functional spinal unit |
US20070265633A1 (en) * | 2006-05-11 | 2007-11-15 | Moon Jon K | Implement and method to extract nucleus from spine intervertebral disc |
US8147517B2 (en) * | 2006-05-23 | 2012-04-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Systems and methods for adjusting properties of a spinal implant |
US20070276496A1 (en) * | 2006-05-23 | 2007-11-29 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Surgical spacer with shape control |
US8092536B2 (en) * | 2006-05-24 | 2012-01-10 | Disc Dynamics, Inc. | Retention structure for in situ formation of an intervertebral prosthesis |
US20070276491A1 (en) * | 2006-05-24 | 2007-11-29 | Disc Dynamics, Inc. | Mold assembly for intervertebral prosthesis |
US20070276369A1 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2007-11-29 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | In vivo-customizable implant |
US8858600B2 (en) * | 2006-06-08 | 2014-10-14 | Spinadyne, Inc. | Dynamic spinal stabilization device |
US20070288009A1 (en) * | 2006-06-08 | 2007-12-13 | Steven Brown | Dynamic spinal stabilization device |
US7905906B2 (en) * | 2006-06-08 | 2011-03-15 | Disc Motion Technologies, Inc. | System and method for lumbar arthroplasty |
US8764835B2 (en) * | 2006-06-13 | 2014-07-01 | Bret A. Ferree | Intervertebral disc treatment methods and apparatus |
US9232938B2 (en) | 2006-06-13 | 2016-01-12 | Anova Corp. | Method and apparatus for closing fissures in the annulus fibrosus |
US8821549B2 (en) | 2006-06-13 | 2014-09-02 | Anova Corporation | Methods and apparatus for anulus repair |
US8834496B2 (en) | 2006-06-13 | 2014-09-16 | Bret A. Ferree | Soft tissue repair methods and apparatus |
US20070299442A1 (en) * | 2006-06-26 | 2007-12-27 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Vertebral stabilizer |
US8449576B2 (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2013-05-28 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Dynamic fixation system |
US7927356B2 (en) * | 2006-07-07 | 2011-04-19 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamic constructs for spinal stabilization |
US8048119B2 (en) | 2006-07-20 | 2011-11-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Apparatus for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same |
WO2008013960A2 (en) * | 2006-07-27 | 2008-01-31 | Abdou Samy M | Devices and methods for the minimally invasive treatment of spinal stenosis |
WO2008014337A2 (en) * | 2006-07-28 | 2008-01-31 | Mmsn Limited Partnership | Bone anchor device |
US8834526B2 (en) | 2006-08-09 | 2014-09-16 | Rolando Garcia | Methods and apparatus for treating spinal stenosis |
US20080039847A1 (en) * | 2006-08-09 | 2008-02-14 | Mark Piper | Implant and system for stabilization of the spine |
FR2907329B1 (en) * | 2006-10-20 | 2009-02-27 | Jean Taylor | INTEREPINEAL VERTEBRAL PROSTHESIS |
US20080086115A1 (en) * | 2006-09-07 | 2008-04-10 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intercostal spacer device and method for use in correcting a spinal deformity |
US8506636B2 (en) * | 2006-09-08 | 2013-08-13 | Theken Spine, Llc | Offset radius lordosis |
US8425601B2 (en) * | 2006-09-11 | 2013-04-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinal stabilization devices and methods of use |
US9017388B2 (en) * | 2006-09-14 | 2015-04-28 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Methods for correcting spinal deformities |
US20080077150A1 (en) * | 2006-09-22 | 2008-03-27 | Linh Nguyen | Steerable rasp/trial member inserter and method of use |
US8092533B2 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2012-01-10 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamic devices and methods for stabilizing vertebral members |
US20080161920A1 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2008-07-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamizing Interbody Implant and Methods for Stabilizing Vertebral Members |
US8845726B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2014-09-30 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Dilator |
US8029541B2 (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2011-10-04 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US8162982B2 (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2012-04-24 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments |
EP2083701A4 (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2013-06-12 | Simpirica Spine Inc | Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments |
US20080262549A1 (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2008-10-23 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for deploying spinous process constraints |
US8187307B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2012-05-29 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
US20080177298A1 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2008-07-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Tensioner Tool and Method for Implanting an Interspinous Process Implant Including a Binder |
US8097019B2 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2012-01-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Systems and methods for in situ assembly of an interspinous process distraction implant |
US20080177333A1 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2008-07-24 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Adjustable jacking implant |
US20090082775A1 (en) * | 2006-10-25 | 2009-03-26 | Moti Altarac | Spondylolisthesis reduction system and method |
US8096996B2 (en) * | 2007-03-20 | 2012-01-17 | Exactech, Inc. | Rod reducer |
US8361117B2 (en) | 2006-11-08 | 2013-01-29 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Spinal cross connectors |
FR2908035B1 (en) | 2006-11-08 | 2009-05-01 | Jean Taylor | INTEREPINE IMPLANT |
US7879104B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2011-02-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinal implant system |
US20080114455A1 (en) * | 2006-11-15 | 2008-05-15 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Rotating Interspinous Process Devices and Methods of Use |
US20080114357A1 (en) * | 2006-11-15 | 2008-05-15 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Inter-transverse process spacer device and method for use in correcting a spinal deformity |
AR064013A1 (en) * | 2006-11-30 | 2009-03-04 | Paradigm Spine Llc | VERTEBRAL, INTERLAMINAR, INTERESPINOUS STABILIZATION SYSTEM |
WO2008070863A2 (en) | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-12 | Interventional Spine, Inc. | Intervertebral implant |
US7955392B2 (en) | 2006-12-14 | 2011-06-07 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process devices and methods |
WO2008080145A2 (en) * | 2006-12-22 | 2008-07-03 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Implant retention device and method |
CA2675037A1 (en) | 2007-01-10 | 2008-07-17 | Facet Solutions, Inc. | Taper-locking fixation system |
US9265532B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2016-02-23 | Lanx, Inc. | Interspinous implants and methods |
US8075596B2 (en) * | 2007-01-12 | 2011-12-13 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinal prosthesis systems |
US8377098B2 (en) | 2007-01-19 | 2013-02-19 | Flexuspine, Inc. | Artificial functional spinal unit system and method for use |
US8034081B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2011-10-11 | CollabComl, LLC | Interspinous dynamic stabilization implant and method of implanting |
US8465546B2 (en) | 2007-02-16 | 2013-06-18 | Ldr Medical | Intervertebral disc prosthesis insertion assemblies |
WO2008103832A2 (en) | 2007-02-21 | 2008-08-28 | Benvenue Medical, Inc. | Devices for treating the spine |
EP2155121B1 (en) | 2007-04-16 | 2015-06-17 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US7799058B2 (en) * | 2007-04-19 | 2010-09-21 | Zimmer Gmbh | Interspinous spacer |
US8241362B2 (en) | 2007-04-26 | 2012-08-14 | Voorhies Rand M | Lumbar disc replacement implant for posterior implantation with dynamic spinal stabilization device and method |
US20110245928A1 (en) | 2010-04-06 | 2011-10-06 | Moximed, Inc. | Femoral and Tibial Bases |
US20080275567A1 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2008-11-06 | Exploramed Nc4, Inc. | Extra-Articular Implantable Mechanical Energy Absorbing Systems |
US10022154B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2018-07-17 | Moximed, Inc. | Femoral and tibial base components |
US8709090B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2014-04-29 | Moximed, Inc. | Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device |
US7655041B2 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2010-02-02 | Moximed, Inc. | Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing systems and implantation method |
US8142479B2 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2012-03-27 | Spinal Simplicity Llc | Interspinous process implants having deployable engagement arms |
US8075593B2 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2011-12-13 | Spinal Simplicity Llc | Interspinous implants and methods for implanting same |
JP5226066B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2013-07-03 | スパイナル シンプリシティ エルエルシー | Interspinous implant and method of embedding it |
US9907645B2 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2018-03-06 | Moximed, Inc. | Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device |
US8123805B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2012-02-28 | Moximed, Inc. | Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device |
US20100137996A1 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2010-06-03 | Moximed, Inc. | Femoral and tibial base components |
US8100967B2 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2012-01-24 | Moximed, Inc. | Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device |
US8894714B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2014-11-25 | Moximed, Inc. | Unlinked implantable knee unloading device |
US20080275504A1 (en) * | 2007-05-02 | 2008-11-06 | Bonin Henry K | Constructs for dynamic spinal stabilization |
US20080281361A1 (en) * | 2007-05-10 | 2008-11-13 | Shannon Marlece Vittur | Posterior stabilization and spinous process systems and methods |
US8840646B2 (en) | 2007-05-10 | 2014-09-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinous process implants and methods |
US8273124B2 (en) * | 2007-05-17 | 2012-09-25 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Self-distracting cage |
EP1994900A1 (en) * | 2007-05-22 | 2008-11-26 | Flexismed SA | Interspinous vertebral implant |
US20080294199A1 (en) * | 2007-05-25 | 2008-11-27 | Andrew Kohm | Spinous process implants and methods of using the same |
CA2721898A1 (en) * | 2007-05-25 | 2009-12-18 | Exactech, Inc. | Dynamic rod |
AU2008263148C1 (en) | 2007-05-31 | 2012-05-24 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with pre-tensioned solid core |
US7967867B2 (en) | 2007-05-31 | 2011-06-28 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Expandable interbody fusion device |
US8864832B2 (en) | 2007-06-20 | 2014-10-21 | Hh Spinal Llc | Posterior total joint replacement |
US7998176B2 (en) | 2007-06-08 | 2011-08-16 | Interventional Spine, Inc. | Method and apparatus for spinal stabilization |
FR2916956B1 (en) | 2007-06-08 | 2012-12-14 | Ldr Medical | INTERSOMATIC CAGE, INTERVERTEBRAL PROSTHESIS, ANCHORING DEVICE AND IMPLANTATION INSTRUMENTATION |
US8313515B2 (en) | 2007-06-15 | 2012-11-20 | Rachiotek, Llc | Multi-level spinal stabilization system |
US10821003B2 (en) | 2007-06-20 | 2020-11-03 | 3Spline Sezc | Spinal osteotomy |
US20110172708A1 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2011-07-14 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for increasing the bending stiffness of a spinal segment with elongation limit |
US20100036424A1 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2010-02-11 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for increasing the bending stiffness and constraining the spreading of a spinal segment |
US8403961B2 (en) | 2007-06-22 | 2013-03-26 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and devices for controlled flexion restriction of spinal segments |
US8900307B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2014-12-02 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Highly lordosed fusion cage |
US8758366B2 (en) * | 2007-07-09 | 2014-06-24 | Neotract, Inc. | Multi-actuating trigger anchor delivery system |
US20090105760A1 (en) * | 2007-07-13 | 2009-04-23 | George Frey | Systems and methods for spinal stabilization |
US10758283B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2020-09-01 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Fixation devices having fenestrations and methods for using the same |
US20150119939A1 (en) * | 2007-07-13 | 2015-04-30 | George Frey | Systems and Methods for Spinal Stabilization |
JP2010535593A (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2010-11-25 | ジンテス ゲゼルシャフト ミット ベシュレンクテル ハフツング | Dynamic cable system |
CN101790355B (en) * | 2007-08-09 | 2012-07-25 | 非线性技术有限公司 | Device and method for vertebrae spinous process traction |
US8080038B2 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2011-12-20 | Jmea Corporation | Dynamic stabilization device for spine |
US8348976B2 (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2013-01-08 | Kyphon Sarl | Spinous-process implants and methods of using the same |
US20090062852A1 (en) * | 2007-08-29 | 2009-03-05 | Marino James F | Annular repair device and methods |
US20090088782A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Missoum Moumene | Flexible Spinal Rod With Elastomeric Jacket |
WO2009046399A1 (en) * | 2007-10-05 | 2009-04-09 | Hynes Richard A | Spinal stabilization treatment methods for maintaining axial spine height and sagital plane spine balance |
US8523912B2 (en) | 2007-10-22 | 2013-09-03 | Flexuspine, Inc. | Posterior stabilization systems with shared, dual dampener systems |
US8187330B2 (en) | 2007-10-22 | 2012-05-29 | Flexuspine, Inc. | Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a variable length elongated member |
US8157844B2 (en) | 2007-10-22 | 2012-04-17 | Flexuspine, Inc. | Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a variable length elongated member |
US8267965B2 (en) | 2007-10-22 | 2012-09-18 | Flexuspine, Inc. | Spinal stabilization systems with dynamic interbody devices |
US8162994B2 (en) | 2007-10-22 | 2012-04-24 | Flexuspine, Inc. | Posterior stabilization system with isolated, dual dampener systems |
US8182514B2 (en) | 2007-10-22 | 2012-05-22 | Flexuspine, Inc. | Dampener system for a posterior stabilization system with a fixed length elongated member |
US8911477B2 (en) | 2007-10-23 | 2014-12-16 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic stabilization member with end plate support and cable core extension |
US20090118833A1 (en) * | 2007-11-05 | 2009-05-07 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | In-situ curable interspinous process spacer |
US20090125032A1 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2009-05-14 | Gutierrez Robert C | Rod removal instrument |
US20100318130A1 (en) * | 2007-12-15 | 2010-12-16 | Parlato Brian D | Flexible rod assembly for spinal fixation |
US9232968B2 (en) | 2007-12-19 | 2016-01-12 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Polymeric pedicle rods and methods of manufacturing |
US8252028B2 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2012-08-28 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior dynamic stabilization device |
US8617214B2 (en) | 2008-01-07 | 2013-12-31 | Mmsn Limited Partnership | Spinal tension band |
WO2009091811A1 (en) | 2008-01-14 | 2009-07-23 | Brenzel Michael P | Apparatus and methods for fracture repair |
CA2711955C (en) | 2008-01-15 | 2016-05-17 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
CA2710142A1 (en) | 2008-01-17 | 2009-07-23 | Beat Lechmann | An expandable intervertebral implant and associated method of manufacturing the same |
US20090198338A1 (en) | 2008-02-04 | 2009-08-06 | Phan Christopher U | Medical implants and methods |
US20090198245A1 (en) * | 2008-02-04 | 2009-08-06 | Phan Christopher U | Tools and methods for insertion and removal of medical implants |
US7935133B2 (en) | 2008-02-08 | 2011-05-03 | Mmsn Limited Partnership | Interlaminar hook |
US8252029B2 (en) * | 2008-02-21 | 2012-08-28 | Zimmer Gmbh | Expandable interspinous process spacer with lateral support and method for implantation |
US8267939B2 (en) | 2008-02-28 | 2012-09-18 | Stryker Spine | Tool for implanting expandable intervertebral implant |
US20090222096A1 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2009-09-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Multi-compartment expandable devices and methods for intervertebral disc expansion and augmentation |
US8114136B2 (en) | 2008-03-18 | 2012-02-14 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants and methods for inter-spinous process dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment |
US7909857B2 (en) * | 2008-03-26 | 2011-03-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Devices and methods for correcting spinal deformities |
BRPI0910325A8 (en) | 2008-04-05 | 2019-01-29 | Synthes Gmbh | expandable intervertebral implant |
US8211149B2 (en) * | 2008-05-12 | 2012-07-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic | Elongated members with expansion chambers for treating bony members |
CA2725091A1 (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2009-12-03 | Synthes Usa, Llc | Balloon-assisted annulus repair |
WO2009149399A1 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for deploying spinous process constraints |
EP2326267B1 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2018-04-25 | Empirical Spine, Inc. | Apparatus for locking an implantable band |
WO2009149407A1 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for locking a band |
US8043340B1 (en) * | 2008-06-09 | 2011-10-25 | Melvin Law | Dynamic spinal stabilization system |
US8784453B1 (en) | 2008-06-09 | 2014-07-22 | Melvin Law | Dynamic spinal stabilization system |
US20090326583A1 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2009-12-31 | Missoum Moumene | Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System With Flexible Ligament |
US20090326584A1 (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2009-12-31 | Michael Andrew Slivka | Spinal Dynamic Stabilization Rods Having Interior Bumpers |
EP2344048B1 (en) | 2008-07-30 | 2016-09-07 | Neotract, Inc. | Slotted anchor device |
EP2345373B1 (en) | 2008-07-30 | 2020-04-29 | Neotract, Inc. | Anchor delivery system with replaceable cartridge |
US20100030549A1 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2010-02-04 | Lee Michael M | Mobile device having human language translation capability with positional feedback |
WO2010147639A1 (en) | 2008-08-01 | 2010-12-23 | Jackson Roger P | Longitudinal connecting member with sleeved tensioned cords |
EP2349115A1 (en) | 2008-08-05 | 2011-08-03 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Facet augmentation |
EP2320815A2 (en) * | 2008-08-14 | 2011-05-18 | Exactech Inc. | Dynamic rod |
ES2523801T3 (en) | 2008-09-03 | 2014-12-01 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Apparatus for coupling a prosthesis to a segment of the spine |
ES2394670T3 (en) * | 2008-10-08 | 2013-02-04 | Biedermann Technologies Gmbh & Co. Kg | Elongated implant device and vertebral stabilization device |
US20100094344A1 (en) * | 2008-10-14 | 2010-04-15 | Kyphon Sarl | Pedicle-Based Posterior Stabilization Members and Methods of Use |
US8163022B2 (en) | 2008-10-14 | 2012-04-24 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus |
US20100106252A1 (en) * | 2008-10-29 | 2010-04-29 | Kohm Andrew C | Spinal implants having multiple movable members |
US8114131B2 (en) | 2008-11-05 | 2012-02-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Extension limiting devices and methods of use for the spine |
US8187304B2 (en) * | 2008-11-10 | 2012-05-29 | Malek Michel H | Facet fusion system |
US20100211176A1 (en) | 2008-11-12 | 2010-08-19 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Fixation device and method |
JP2012508597A (en) * | 2008-11-12 | 2012-04-12 | シンピライカ スパイン, インコーポレイテッド | Adjusted restraint device and method of use |
US20100204795A1 (en) | 2008-11-12 | 2010-08-12 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Fixation device and method |
EP2373236B1 (en) | 2008-12-17 | 2014-05-21 | Synthes GmbH | Posterior spine dynamic stabilizer |
US9492214B2 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2016-11-15 | Michel H. Malek | Flexible spinal stabilization system |
US8721723B2 (en) | 2009-01-12 | 2014-05-13 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Expandable vertebral prosthesis |
US8114135B2 (en) * | 2009-01-16 | 2012-02-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Adjustable surgical cables and methods for treating spinal stenosis |
WO2010088621A1 (en) | 2009-02-02 | 2010-08-05 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Sacral tether anchor and methods of use |
US8641734B2 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2014-02-04 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Dual spring posterior dynamic stabilization device with elongation limiting elastomers |
US8118840B2 (en) | 2009-02-27 | 2012-02-21 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Vertebral rod and related method of manufacture |
EP2405839A4 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2013-12-11 | Simpirica Spine Inc | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
EP2405840B1 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2024-02-21 | Empirical Spine, Inc. | Surgical tether apparatus |
WO2010104975A1 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2010-09-16 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
US9861399B2 (en) | 2009-03-13 | 2018-01-09 | Spinal Simplicity, Llc | Interspinous process implant having a body with a removable end portion |
US8945184B2 (en) * | 2009-03-13 | 2015-02-03 | Spinal Simplicity Llc. | Interspinous process implant and fusion cage spacer |
US9757164B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2017-09-12 | Spinal Simplicity Llc | Interspinous process implant having deployable anchor blades |
US8535327B2 (en) | 2009-03-17 | 2013-09-17 | Benvenue Medical, Inc. | Delivery apparatus for use with implantable medical devices |
US9526620B2 (en) | 2009-03-30 | 2016-12-27 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Zero profile spinal fusion cage |
WO2010114853A1 (en) | 2009-03-30 | 2010-10-07 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for improving shear loading capacity of a spinal segment |
JP2012522588A (en) | 2009-03-31 | 2012-09-27 | ランクス インコーポレイテッド | Spinous process implants and related methods |
US8292927B2 (en) * | 2009-04-24 | 2012-10-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Flexible articulating spinal rod |
US9050194B2 (en) | 2009-05-06 | 2015-06-09 | Stryker Spine | Expandable spinal implant apparatus and method of use |
US20100286701A1 (en) * | 2009-05-08 | 2010-11-11 | Kyphon Sarl | Distraction tool for distracting an interspinous space |
US20110040331A1 (en) * | 2009-05-20 | 2011-02-17 | Jose Fernandez | Posterior stabilizer |
US8372117B2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2013-02-12 | Kyphon Sarl | Multi-level interspinous implants and methods of use |
US8157842B2 (en) | 2009-06-12 | 2012-04-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous implant and methods of use |
US9668771B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2017-06-06 | Roger P Jackson | Soft stabilization assemblies with off-set connector |
US11229457B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2022-01-25 | Roger P. Jackson | Pivotal bone anchor assembly with insert tool deployment |
US8998959B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2015-04-07 | Roger P Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchors with pop-on shank, fully constrained friction fit retainer and lock and release insert |
US9320543B2 (en) | 2009-06-25 | 2016-04-26 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Posterior dynamic stabilization device having a mobile anchor |
WO2011017712A2 (en) * | 2009-08-07 | 2011-02-10 | Exatech, Inc. | Systems and methods for stabilization of bone structures, including thorocolumbar stabilization systems and methods |
US8747472B2 (en) * | 2009-08-14 | 2014-06-10 | Baxano Surgical, Inc. | Spinal therapy device with fixated distraction distance |
US9861408B2 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2018-01-09 | The Foundry, Llc | Method and apparatus for treating canine cruciate ligament disease |
US9278004B2 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2016-03-08 | Cotera, Inc. | Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the articular joints |
CN105615966B (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2019-08-23 | 科特拉有限公司 | Equipment for treating joint to carry out power distribution in the joint |
US10349980B2 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2019-07-16 | The Foundry, Llc | Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the shoulder |
US9668868B2 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2017-06-06 | Cotera, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for treatment of patellofemoral conditions |
US8617245B2 (en) | 2009-09-17 | 2013-12-31 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Intervertebral implant having extendable bone fixation members |
US8211126B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2012-07-03 | Jmea Corporation | Tissue repair system |
US9011494B2 (en) * | 2009-09-24 | 2015-04-21 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Composite vertebral rod system and methods of use |
US20110077686A1 (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2011-03-31 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant having a compliant spacer |
FR2951365A1 (en) * | 2009-10-20 | 2011-04-22 | Henry Graf | Extra-discal intervertebral stabilization assembly for arthrodesis, has spring plate for connecting rings of connection unit, where plate is bent for offering controlled resistance to connection, during connection of adjacent screws |
US8523948B2 (en) * | 2009-10-20 | 2013-09-03 | Moximed, Inc. | Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing assemblies having a tension member, and methods |
US8771317B2 (en) | 2009-10-28 | 2014-07-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process implant and method of implantation |
US9078761B2 (en) | 2009-11-12 | 2015-07-14 | Anchor Orthopedics Xt Inc. | Devices and methods for treating tissue defects |
US8764806B2 (en) | 2009-12-07 | 2014-07-01 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for minimally invasive spinal stabilization and instrumentation |
US9393129B2 (en) | 2009-12-10 | 2016-07-19 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Bellows-like expandable interbody fusion cage |
WO2011084477A2 (en) | 2009-12-15 | 2011-07-14 | Vertifex, Inc. | Spinal spacer for cervical and other vertebra, and associated systems and methods |
RU2573945C2 (en) | 2009-12-31 | 2016-01-27 | Лдр Медикал | Fastening device, intervertebral implant and device for implantation |
US8460319B2 (en) | 2010-01-11 | 2013-06-11 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Intervertebral disc annulus repair system and method |
US8317831B2 (en) * | 2010-01-13 | 2012-11-27 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process spacer diagnostic balloon catheter and methods of use |
US8114132B2 (en) | 2010-01-13 | 2012-02-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Dynamic interspinous process device |
US20110172720A1 (en) * | 2010-01-13 | 2011-07-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Articulating interspinous process clamp |
US8147526B2 (en) | 2010-02-26 | 2012-04-03 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process spacer diagnostic parallel balloon catheter and methods of use |
US9445844B2 (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2016-09-20 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Composite material posterior dynamic stabilization spring rod |
WO2011126825A2 (en) * | 2010-03-29 | 2011-10-13 | Anderson D Greg | Device and method for expanding the spinal canal with spinal column stabilization and spinal deformity correction |
US8282683B2 (en) | 2010-04-12 | 2012-10-09 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Expandable vertebral implant |
US9301850B2 (en) | 2010-04-12 | 2016-04-05 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Expandable vertebral implant |
US8591585B2 (en) | 2010-04-12 | 2013-11-26 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Expandable vertebral implant |
US8870880B2 (en) | 2010-04-12 | 2014-10-28 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Angling inserter tool for expandable vertebral implant |
WO2011137403A2 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2011-11-03 | The Johns Hopkins University | Intersegmental motion preservation system for use in the spine and methods for use thereof |
US20120109202A1 (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2012-05-03 | Neuraxis Llc | Intersegmental motion preservation system for use in the spine and methods for use thereof |
US8535380B2 (en) | 2010-05-13 | 2013-09-17 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Fixation device and method |
US9282979B2 (en) | 2010-06-24 | 2016-03-15 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Instruments and methods for non-parallel disc space preparation |
US8979860B2 (en) | 2010-06-24 | 2015-03-17 | DePuy Synthes Products. LLC | Enhanced cage insertion device |
WO2012003175A1 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2012-01-05 | Synthes Usa, Llc | Distractible intervertebral implant |
US9044334B2 (en) | 2010-07-21 | 2015-06-02 | Nlt Spine Ltd. | Spinal surgery implants and delivery system |
US8814908B2 (en) | 2010-07-26 | 2014-08-26 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Injectable flexible interspinous process device system |
EP2608747A4 (en) | 2010-08-24 | 2015-02-11 | Flexmedex Llc | Support device and method for use |
US9301787B2 (en) | 2010-09-27 | 2016-04-05 | Mmsn Limited Partnership | Medical apparatus and method for spinal surgery |
US8696710B2 (en) | 2010-10-06 | 2014-04-15 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Device and accessories for limiting flexion |
US9402732B2 (en) | 2010-10-11 | 2016-08-02 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Expandable interspinous process spacer implant |
AU2011324058A1 (en) | 2010-11-02 | 2013-06-20 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with pop-on shank and pivotable retainer |
US9149286B1 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2015-10-06 | Flexmedex, LLC | Guidance tool and method for use |
US8496689B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2013-07-30 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fusion cage and fixation plates and method of implanting |
US8562650B2 (en) | 2011-03-01 | 2013-10-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Percutaneous spinous process fusion plate assembly and method |
US8425560B2 (en) | 2011-03-09 | 2013-04-23 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fixation plates and lag screws and method of implanting |
US9700425B1 (en) | 2011-03-20 | 2017-07-11 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Vertebral body replacement and insertion methods |
WO2012128825A1 (en) | 2011-03-24 | 2012-09-27 | Jackson Roger P | Polyaxial bone anchor with compound articulation and pop-on shank |
US8388687B2 (en) | 2011-03-25 | 2013-03-05 | Flexuspine, Inc. | Interbody device insertion systems and methods |
US9044270B2 (en) | 2011-03-29 | 2015-06-02 | Moximed, Inc. | Apparatus for controlling a load on a hip joint |
US8591548B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2013-11-26 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinous process fusion plate assembly |
US8591549B2 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2013-11-26 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Variable durometer lumbar-sacral implant |
US9161749B2 (en) | 2011-04-14 | 2015-10-20 | Neotract, Inc. | Method and apparatus for treating sexual dysfunction |
WO2012178018A2 (en) | 2011-06-24 | 2012-12-27 | Benvenue Medical, Inc. | Devices and methods for treating bone tissue |
AU2012296522B2 (en) | 2011-08-16 | 2016-12-22 | Stryker European Holdings I, Llc | Expandable implant |
CA2856346C (en) | 2011-08-18 | 2022-08-30 | Anchor Orthopedics Xt Inc. | Suture passing instrumentation and methods of use thereof |
CN103930058A (en) | 2011-08-23 | 2014-07-16 | 弗雷科斯米德克斯有限公司 | Tissue removal device and method |
US8845728B1 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2014-09-30 | Samy Abdou | Spinal fixation devices and methods of use |
US11812923B2 (en) | 2011-10-07 | 2023-11-14 | Alan Villavicencio | Spinal fixation device |
US9526627B2 (en) | 2011-11-17 | 2016-12-27 | Exactech, Inc. | Expandable interbody device system and method |
WO2013106217A1 (en) | 2012-01-10 | 2013-07-18 | Jackson, Roger, P. | Multi-start closures for open implants |
US20130226240A1 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2013-08-29 | Samy Abdou | Spinous process fixation devices and methods of use |
FR2987256B1 (en) | 2012-02-24 | 2014-08-08 | Ldr Medical | ANCHORING DEVICE FOR INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT, INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT AND IMPLANTATION INSTRUMENTATION |
US10292801B2 (en) | 2012-03-29 | 2019-05-21 | Neotract, Inc. | System for delivering anchors for treating incontinence |
EP2854715A1 (en) | 2012-05-29 | 2015-04-08 | NLT Spine Ltd. | Laterally deflectable implant |
US10130353B2 (en) | 2012-06-29 | 2018-11-20 | Neotract, Inc. | Flexible system for delivering an anchor |
WO2014018098A1 (en) | 2012-07-26 | 2014-01-30 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Expandable implant |
US9468466B1 (en) | 2012-08-24 | 2016-10-18 | Cotera, Inc. | Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the spine |
US9198767B2 (en) | 2012-08-28 | 2015-12-01 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for spinal stabilization and instrumentation |
US20140067069A1 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2014-03-06 | Interventional Spine, Inc. | Artificial disc |
US9320617B2 (en) | 2012-10-22 | 2016-04-26 | Cogent Spine, LLC | Devices and methods for spinal stabilization and instrumentation |
US9433404B2 (en) | 2012-10-31 | 2016-09-06 | Suture Concepts Inc. | Method and apparatus for closing fissures in the annulus fibrosus |
US10786235B2 (en) | 2012-10-31 | 2020-09-29 | Anchor Innovation Medical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for closing a fissure in the annulus of an intervertebral disc, and/or for effecting other anatomical repairs and/or fixations |
US8911478B2 (en) | 2012-11-21 | 2014-12-16 | Roger P. Jackson | Splay control closure for open bone anchor |
US8715351B1 (en) | 2012-11-29 | 2014-05-06 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Expandable interbody fusion device with graft chambers |
US9011493B2 (en) * | 2012-12-31 | 2015-04-21 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Spinous process fixation system and methods thereof |
US10058354B2 (en) | 2013-01-28 | 2018-08-28 | Roger P. Jackson | Pivotal bone anchor assembly with frictional shank head seating surfaces |
WO2014117107A1 (en) | 2013-01-28 | 2014-07-31 | Cartiva, Inc. | Systems and methods for orthopedic repair |
US9737294B2 (en) | 2013-01-28 | 2017-08-22 | Cartiva, Inc. | Method and system for orthopedic repair |
US8852239B2 (en) | 2013-02-15 | 2014-10-07 | Roger P Jackson | Sagittal angle screw with integral shank and receiver |
US9492288B2 (en) | 2013-02-20 | 2016-11-15 | Flexuspine, Inc. | Expandable fusion device for positioning between adjacent vertebral bodies |
US9717601B2 (en) | 2013-02-28 | 2017-08-01 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Expandable intervertebral implant, system, kit and method |
US9522070B2 (en) | 2013-03-07 | 2016-12-20 | Interventional Spine, Inc. | Intervertebral implant |
US10342675B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2019-07-09 | Stryker European Holdings I, Llc | Expandable implant |
AU2014229500B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2018-05-31 | Embark Enterprises, Inc. | Quadruped stifle stabilization system |
US8900312B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2014-12-02 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Expandable interbody fusion device with graft chambers |
US9282996B2 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2016-03-15 | Moximed, Inc. | Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing assemblies |
US8828019B1 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2014-09-09 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Inserter for expanding an expandable interbody fusion device |
US10085783B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-10-02 | Izi Medical Products, Llc | Devices and methods for treating bone tissue |
US9913728B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-03-13 | Quandary Medical, Llc | Spinal implants and implantation system |
US20140277467A1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2014-09-18 | Spinal Stabilization Technologies, Llc | Prosthetic Spinal Disk Nucleus |
WO2014150786A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-25 | Moximed, Inc. | Implantation approach and instrumentality for an energy absorbing system |
US9675303B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-06-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Visualization systems, instruments and methods of using the same in spinal decompression procedures |
US9522028B2 (en) | 2013-07-03 | 2016-12-20 | Interventional Spine, Inc. | Method and apparatus for sacroiliac joint fixation |
WO2015024013A2 (en) | 2013-08-16 | 2015-02-19 | Suture Concepts Inc. | Method and apparatus for closing a fissure in the annulus of an intervertebral disc, and/or for effecting other anatomical repairs and/or fixations |
US11779380B2 (en) * | 2013-09-20 | 2023-10-10 | Fred F Naraghi | Methods, systems, and devices for the treatment of stenosis |
US9566092B2 (en) | 2013-10-29 | 2017-02-14 | Roger P. Jackson | Cervical bone anchor with collet retainer and outer locking sleeve |
US9717533B2 (en) | 2013-12-12 | 2017-08-01 | Roger P. Jackson | Bone anchor closure pivot-splay control flange form guide and advancement structure |
US9451993B2 (en) | 2014-01-09 | 2016-09-27 | Roger P. Jackson | Bi-radial pop-on cervical bone anchor |
US9114026B1 (en) | 2014-03-06 | 2015-08-25 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Inserter for an expandable spinal interbody fusion device |
US9445921B2 (en) | 2014-03-06 | 2016-09-20 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Device for expanding and supporting body tissue |
US11065132B2 (en) | 2014-03-06 | 2021-07-20 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Method of expanding a space between opposing tissue surfaces |
US9439783B2 (en) | 2014-03-06 | 2016-09-13 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Inserter for expanding body tissue |
US9265623B2 (en) | 2014-03-06 | 2016-02-23 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Method of expanding a spinal interbody fusion device |
US10398565B2 (en) | 2014-04-24 | 2019-09-03 | Choice Spine, Llc | Limited profile intervertebral implant with incorporated fastening and locking mechanism |
US9517144B2 (en) | 2014-04-24 | 2016-12-13 | Exactech, Inc. | Limited profile intervertebral implant with incorporated fastening mechanism |
US10758274B1 (en) | 2014-05-02 | 2020-09-01 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Spinal fixation constructs and related methods |
EP3139848A4 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2018-06-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal nerve decompression systems, dilation systems, and methods of using the same |
US10064658B2 (en) | 2014-06-04 | 2018-09-04 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with insert guides |
US9597119B2 (en) | 2014-06-04 | 2017-03-21 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with polymer sleeve |
PL3215067T3 (en) | 2014-11-04 | 2020-11-02 | Spinal Stabilization Technologies Llc | Percutaneous implantable nuclear prosthesis |
EP3215069B1 (en) | 2014-11-04 | 2023-03-08 | Spinal Stabilization Technologies LLC | Percutaneous implantable nuclear prosthesis |
EP3226787A4 (en) | 2014-12-02 | 2018-08-15 | Activortho, Inc. | Active compression devices, methods of assembly and methods of use |
EP3258868B1 (en) * | 2015-02-16 | 2019-08-21 | Akros Medical, Inc. | Devices and systems for semi-rigid bone fixation |
US11426290B2 (en) | 2015-03-06 | 2022-08-30 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Expandable intervertebral implant, system, kit and method |
CN105310758B (en) * | 2015-03-18 | 2017-08-01 | 周军 | A kind of intervertebral disk stabilizer and its application method |
US9913727B2 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2018-03-13 | Medos International Sarl | Expandable implant |
KR20170022740A (en) | 2015-08-21 | 2017-03-02 | (주)나노테크 | Apparatus for collecting waste heat |
CA2997117A1 (en) | 2015-09-01 | 2017-03-09 | Spinal Stabilization Technologies Llc | Implantable nuclear prosthesis |
US10857003B1 (en) | 2015-10-14 | 2020-12-08 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for vertebral stabilization |
US9486323B1 (en) | 2015-11-06 | 2016-11-08 | Spinal Stabilization Technologies Llc | Nuclear implant apparatus and method following partial nuclectomy |
US11224467B2 (en) | 2016-02-26 | 2022-01-18 | Activortho, Inc. | Active compression apparatus, methods of assembly and methods of use |
IL261289B2 (en) | 2016-02-26 | 2023-04-01 | Activortho Inc | Active compression apparatus, methods of assembly and methods of use |
JP7019616B2 (en) | 2016-06-28 | 2022-02-15 | イーアイティー・エマージング・インプラント・テクノロジーズ・ゲーエムベーハー | Expandable and angle adjustable intervertebral cage with range of motion joints |
US11510788B2 (en) | 2016-06-28 | 2022-11-29 | Eit Emerging Implant Technologies Gmbh | Expandable, angularly adjustable intervertebral cages |
US10743890B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2020-08-18 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Drill apparatus and surgical fixation devices and methods for using the same |
US12016573B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2024-06-25 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Drill apparatus and surgical fixation devices and methods for using the same |
US10973648B1 (en) | 2016-10-25 | 2021-04-13 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for vertebral bone realignment |
US10744000B1 (en) | 2016-10-25 | 2020-08-18 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for vertebral bone realignment |
US10537436B2 (en) | 2016-11-01 | 2020-01-21 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Curved expandable cage |
US10888433B2 (en) | 2016-12-14 | 2021-01-12 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implant inserter and related methods |
US10398563B2 (en) | 2017-05-08 | 2019-09-03 | Medos International Sarl | Expandable cage |
US11344424B2 (en) | 2017-06-14 | 2022-05-31 | Medos International Sarl | Expandable intervertebral implant and related methods |
WO2019010252A2 (en) | 2017-07-04 | 2019-01-10 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for treatment of a bone |
US10940016B2 (en) | 2017-07-05 | 2021-03-09 | Medos International Sarl | Expandable intervertebral fusion cage |
EP3727171B1 (en) | 2017-12-23 | 2023-06-07 | Teleflex Life Sciences Limited | Expandable tissue engagement apparatus |
JP7457712B2 (en) | 2018-09-04 | 2024-03-28 | スパイナル スタビライゼーション テクノロジーズ リミテッド ライアビリティ カンパニー | Implantable nucleus pulposus prostheses, kits, and related methods |
US11179248B2 (en) | 2018-10-02 | 2021-11-23 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for spinal implantation |
US11446156B2 (en) | 2018-10-25 | 2022-09-20 | Medos International Sarl | Expandable intervertebral implant, inserter instrument, and related methods |
US11723691B2 (en) * | 2019-12-25 | 2023-08-15 | Apifix Ltd | Biasing device for spinal device |
US11426286B2 (en) | 2020-03-06 | 2022-08-30 | Eit Emerging Implant Technologies Gmbh | Expandable intervertebral implant |
AU2021320088B2 (en) | 2020-08-03 | 2022-06-23 | Teleflex Life Sciences Llc | Handle and cartridge system for medical interventions |
US11850160B2 (en) | 2021-03-26 | 2023-12-26 | Medos International Sarl | Expandable lordotic intervertebral fusion cage |
US11752009B2 (en) | 2021-04-06 | 2023-09-12 | Medos International Sarl | Expandable intervertebral fusion cage |
US20240023999A1 (en) * | 2022-07-19 | 2024-01-25 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Implantable distraction device and method of installation thereof |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5716416A (en) * | 1996-09-10 | 1998-02-10 | Lin; Chih-I | Artificial intervertebral disk and method for implanting the same |
US5755797A (en) * | 1993-04-21 | 1998-05-26 | Sulzer Medizinaltechnik Ag | Intervertebral prosthesis and a process for implanting such a prosthesis |
US6126682A (en) * | 1996-08-13 | 2000-10-03 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Method for treating annular fissures in intervertebral discs |
US6558386B1 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2003-05-06 | Trans1 Inc. | Axial spinal implant and method and apparatus for implanting an axial spinal implant within the vertebrae of the spine |
Family Cites Families (159)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3426364A (en) * | 1966-08-25 | 1969-02-11 | Colorado State Univ Research F | Prosthetic appliance for replacing one or more natural vertebrae |
US3648691A (en) * | 1970-02-24 | 1972-03-14 | Univ Colorado State Res Found | Method of applying vertebral appliance |
SE391122B (en) * | 1971-01-25 | 1977-02-07 | Cutter Lab | PROTESTS IN THE FORM OF A SPINE BONIC DISC AND PROCEDURES FOR MANUFACTURE THEREOF |
US3875595A (en) * | 1974-04-15 | 1975-04-08 | Edward C Froning | Intervertebral disc prosthesis and instruments for locating same |
US4013078A (en) * | 1974-11-25 | 1977-03-22 | Feild James Rodney | Intervertebral protector means |
US4006747A (en) * | 1975-04-23 | 1977-02-08 | Ethicon, Inc. | Surgical method |
US4141365A (en) * | 1977-02-24 | 1979-02-27 | The Johns Hopkins University | Epidural lead electrode and insertion needle |
US4369788A (en) * | 1980-01-31 | 1983-01-25 | Goald Harold J | Reversed forceps for microdisc surgery |
US4494261A (en) * | 1980-12-22 | 1985-01-22 | Spinal Dynamics, Inc. | Head and neck cushion |
US4501261A (en) * | 1982-06-28 | 1985-02-26 | Toto Limited | Instantaneous gas water heater |
US4490139A (en) * | 1983-01-28 | 1984-12-25 | Eli Lilly And Company | Implant needle and method |
US4580563A (en) * | 1983-10-24 | 1986-04-08 | Gross R Michael | Arthroscopic surgical instrument and method |
US4743260A (en) | 1985-06-10 | 1988-05-10 | Burton Charles V | Method for a flexible stabilization system for a vertebral column |
US4890612A (en) * | 1987-02-17 | 1990-01-02 | Kensey Nash Corporation | Device for sealing percutaneous puncture in a vessel |
ES2086291T3 (en) * | 1987-05-26 | 1996-07-01 | Sumitomo Pharma | DEVICE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF SOLID PREPARATIONS. |
US4772287A (en) * | 1987-08-20 | 1988-09-20 | Cedar Surgical, Inc. | Prosthetic disc and method of implanting |
US5282856A (en) * | 1987-12-22 | 1994-02-01 | Ledergerber Walter J | Implantable prosthetic device |
US4936827A (en) * | 1988-04-11 | 1990-06-26 | Ivy Laboratories, Inc. | Implanter applicator |
DE8807485U1 (en) * | 1988-06-06 | 1989-08-10 | Mecron Medizinische Produkte Gmbh, 1000 Berlin | Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis |
US4911718A (en) * | 1988-06-10 | 1990-03-27 | University Of Medicine & Dentistry Of N.J. | Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer |
FR2642645B1 (en) | 1989-02-03 | 1992-08-14 | Breard Francis | FLEXIBLE INTERVERTEBRAL STABILIZER AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING ITS VOLTAGE BEFORE PLACEMENT ON THE RACHIS |
US5100422A (en) * | 1989-05-26 | 1992-03-31 | Impra, Inc. | Blood vessel patch |
US5201729A (en) | 1990-01-12 | 1993-04-13 | Laserscope | Method for performing percutaneous diskectomy using a laser |
GB2240718A (en) * | 1990-02-09 | 1991-08-14 | Hundon Forge Ltd | Implanting device with needle cover |
US5492697A (en) * | 1990-03-05 | 1996-02-20 | Board Of Regents, Univ. Of Texas System | Biodegradable implant for fracture nonunions |
DE59100448D1 (en) * | 1990-04-20 | 1993-11-11 | Sulzer Ag | Implant, in particular intervertebral prosthesis. |
FR2666981B1 (en) | 1990-09-21 | 1993-06-25 | Commarmond Jacques | SYNTHETIC LIGAMENT VERTEBRAL. |
CA2096651A1 (en) * | 1990-11-20 | 1992-05-21 | Robert S. Behl | Tension guide and dilator |
US5047055A (en) * | 1990-12-21 | 1991-09-10 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Hydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus |
US5192326A (en) * | 1990-12-21 | 1993-03-09 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Hydrogel bead intervertebral disc nucleus |
US5390683A (en) * | 1991-02-22 | 1995-02-21 | Pisharodi; Madhavan | Spinal implantation methods utilizing a middle expandable implant |
CA2075080A1 (en) * | 1991-08-02 | 1993-02-03 | Ralph A. Dematteis | Method and apparatus for laparoscopic repair of hernias |
DE4128332A1 (en) | 1991-08-27 | 1993-03-04 | Man Ceramics Gmbh | SPINE BONE REPLACEMENT |
NL9101489A (en) * | 1991-09-03 | 1993-04-01 | Texas Instruments Holland | INJECTOR FOR IMMEDIATELY IMPLANTING AN OBJECT IN A LIVING BEING. |
US5195541A (en) * | 1991-10-18 | 1993-03-23 | Obenchain Theodore G | Method of performing laparoscopic lumbar discectomy |
US5282827A (en) * | 1991-11-08 | 1994-02-01 | Kensey Nash Corporation | Hemostatic puncture closure system and method of use |
DK168419B1 (en) * | 1991-11-25 | 1994-03-28 | Cook Inc A Cook Group Company | Abdominal wall support device and apparatus for insertion thereof |
US5439467A (en) * | 1991-12-03 | 1995-08-08 | Vesica Medical, Inc. | Suture passer |
US5176692A (en) * | 1991-12-09 | 1993-01-05 | Wilk Peter J | Method and surgical instrument for repairing hernia |
US5171279A (en) | 1992-03-17 | 1992-12-15 | Danek Medical | Method for subcutaneous suprafascial pedicular internal fixation |
FR2692952B1 (en) | 1992-06-25 | 1996-04-05 | Psi | IMPROVED SHOCK ABSORBER WITH MOVEMENT LIMIT. |
GB9217578D0 (en) * | 1992-08-19 | 1992-09-30 | Surgicarft Ltd | Surgical implants,etc |
US5279555A (en) * | 1992-08-24 | 1994-01-18 | Merck & Co., Inc. | Device for injecting implants |
CA2100532C (en) * | 1992-09-21 | 2004-04-20 | David T. Green | Device for applying a meniscal staple |
US5383905A (en) * | 1992-10-09 | 1995-01-24 | United States Surgical Corporation | Suture loop locking device |
US5383926A (en) * | 1992-11-23 | 1995-01-24 | Children's Medical Center Corporation | Re-expandable endoprosthesis |
US5417699A (en) * | 1992-12-10 | 1995-05-23 | Perclose Incorporated | Device and method for the percutaneous suturing of a vascular puncture site |
US5496318A (en) | 1993-01-08 | 1996-03-05 | Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. | Interspinous segmental spine fixation device |
US5725577A (en) * | 1993-01-13 | 1998-03-10 | Saxon; Allen | Prosthesis for the repair of soft tissue defects |
AU683243B2 (en) * | 1993-02-10 | 1997-11-06 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Spinal stabilization surgical tool set |
FR2701650B1 (en) | 1993-02-17 | 1995-05-24 | Psi | Double shock absorber for intervertebral stabilization. |
US5439464A (en) * | 1993-03-09 | 1995-08-08 | Shapiro Partners Limited | Method and instruments for performing arthroscopic spinal surgery |
US5415661A (en) | 1993-03-24 | 1995-05-16 | University Of Miami | Implantable spinal assist device |
US5398861A (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 1995-03-21 | United States Surgical Corporation | Device for driving surgical fasteners |
US5534028A (en) * | 1993-04-20 | 1996-07-09 | Howmedica, Inc. | Hydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus with diminished lateral bulging |
US5500000A (en) * | 1993-07-01 | 1996-03-19 | United States Surgical Corporation | Soft tissue repair system and method |
US5423816A (en) * | 1993-07-29 | 1995-06-13 | Lin; Chih I. | Intervertebral locking device |
FR2709247B1 (en) * | 1993-08-27 | 1995-09-29 | Martin Jean Raymond | Device for anchoring spinal instrumentation on a vertebra. |
FR2709246B1 (en) | 1993-08-27 | 1995-09-29 | Martin Jean Raymond | Dynamic implanted spinal orthosis. |
US5397332A (en) * | 1993-09-02 | 1995-03-14 | Ethicon, Inc. | Surgical mesh applicator |
US5433739A (en) | 1993-11-02 | 1995-07-18 | Sluijter; Menno E. | Method and apparatus for heating an intervertebral disc for relief of back pain |
FR2712481B1 (en) | 1993-11-18 | 1996-01-12 | Graf Henry | Improvements to flexible inter-vertebral stabilizers. |
US5458642A (en) * | 1994-01-18 | 1995-10-17 | Beer; John C. | Synthetic intervertebral disc |
CA2144211C (en) * | 1994-03-16 | 2005-05-24 | David T. Green | Surgical instruments useful for endoscopic spinal procedures |
US5571189A (en) * | 1994-05-20 | 1996-11-05 | Kuslich; Stephen D. | Expandable fabric implant for stabilizing the spinal motion segment |
US6187048B1 (en) * | 1994-05-24 | 2001-02-13 | Surgical Dynamics, Inc. | Intervertebral disc implant |
US5725552A (en) * | 1994-07-08 | 1998-03-10 | Aga Medical Corporation | Percutaneous catheter directed intravascular occlusion devices |
FR2722980B1 (en) | 1994-07-26 | 1996-09-27 | Samani Jacques | INTERTEPINOUS VERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
ATE203885T1 (en) * | 1994-09-08 | 2001-08-15 | Stryker Technologies Corp | HYDROGEL DISC CORE |
US5730744A (en) * | 1994-09-27 | 1998-03-24 | Justin; Daniel F. | Soft tissue screw, delivery device, and method |
US6171318B1 (en) * | 1994-09-29 | 2001-01-09 | Bard Asdi Inc. | Hernia mesh patch with stiffening layer |
US5785705A (en) | 1994-10-11 | 1998-07-28 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | RF method for controlled depth ablation of soft tissue |
US5824093A (en) * | 1994-10-17 | 1998-10-20 | Raymedica, Inc. | Prosthetic spinal disc nucleus |
US5674296A (en) * | 1994-11-14 | 1997-10-07 | Spinal Dynamics Corporation | Human spinal disc prosthesis |
US6171329B1 (en) * | 1994-12-19 | 2001-01-09 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | Self-expanding defect closure device and method of making and using |
US5716413A (en) * | 1995-10-11 | 1998-02-10 | Osteobiologics, Inc. | Moldable, hand-shapable biodegradable implant material |
US6007570A (en) | 1996-08-13 | 1999-12-28 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Apparatus with functional element for performing function upon intervertebral discs |
US6122549A (en) | 1996-08-13 | 2000-09-19 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Apparatus for treating intervertebral discs with resistive energy |
DE59511075D1 (en) | 1995-11-08 | 2007-02-08 | Zimmer Gmbh | Device for introducing an implant, in particular an intervertebral prosthesis |
US5645597A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 1997-07-08 | Krapiva; Pavel I. | Disc replacement method and apparatus |
US5865845A (en) * | 1996-03-05 | 1999-02-02 | Thalgott; John S. | Prosthetic intervertebral disc |
US5823994A (en) | 1996-03-15 | 1998-10-20 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Method and apparatus for soft tissue fixation |
EP0828458B1 (en) | 1996-03-27 | 2003-12-17 | Lubos Rehak | The device for the correction of spinal deformities |
US5716408A (en) * | 1996-05-31 | 1998-02-10 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | Prosthesis for hernia repair and soft tissue reconstruction |
US5728150A (en) * | 1996-07-29 | 1998-03-17 | Cardiovascular Dynamics, Inc. | Expandable microporous prosthesis |
US6068628A (en) | 1996-08-20 | 2000-05-30 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Apparatus for treating chondromalacia |
US5716409A (en) * | 1996-10-16 | 1998-02-10 | Debbas; Elie | Reinforcement sheet for use in surgical repair |
US6019793A (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 2000-02-01 | Synthes | Surgical prosthetic device |
FR2755844B1 (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 1999-01-29 | Stryker France Sa | OSTEOSYNTHESIS SYSTEM WITH ELASTIC DEFORMATION FOR SPINE |
US5860977A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 1999-01-19 | Saint Francis Medical Technologies, Llc | Spine distraction implant and method |
AU6326298A (en) | 1997-02-12 | 1998-08-26 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Electrode for electrosurgical ablation of tissue and method of manufacturing thesame |
WO1998034558A2 (en) | 1997-02-12 | 1998-08-13 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Concave probe for arthroscopic surgery |
US5954716A (en) | 1997-02-19 | 1999-09-21 | Oratec Interventions, Inc | Method for modifying the length of a ligament |
US6022376A (en) * | 1997-06-06 | 2000-02-08 | Raymedica, Inc. | Percutaneous prosthetic spinal disc nucleus and method of manufacture |
US5984925A (en) | 1997-07-30 | 1999-11-16 | Cross Medical Products, Inc. | Longitudinally adjustable bone plates and method for use thereof |
US6511958B1 (en) * | 1997-08-14 | 2003-01-28 | Sulzer Biologics, Inc. | Compositions for regeneration and repair of cartilage lesions |
US6004320A (en) | 1997-09-19 | 1999-12-21 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Clip on electrocauterizing sheath for orthopedic shave devices |
US6007533A (en) | 1997-09-19 | 1999-12-28 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Electrocauterizing tip for orthopedic shave devices |
US6309420B1 (en) * | 1997-10-14 | 2001-10-30 | Parallax Medical, Inc. | Enhanced visibility materials for implantation in hard tissue |
US6146380A (en) * | 1998-01-09 | 2000-11-14 | Radionics, Inc. | Bent tip electrical surgical probe |
JP2002502626A (en) * | 1998-02-10 | 2002-01-29 | アーテミス・メディカル・インコーポレイテッド | Supplementary device and method of using the same |
US5989291A (en) | 1998-02-26 | 1999-11-23 | Third Millennium Engineering, Llc | Intervertebral spacer device |
JP2002506672A (en) * | 1998-03-19 | 2002-03-05 | オーレイテック インターヴェンションズ インコーポレイテッド | Catheter for delivering energy to the surgical site |
JP2002512079A (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2002-04-23 | コーゼン リサーチ グループ インク. | Articulated spinal implant |
US6019792A (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2000-02-01 | Cauthen Research Group, Inc. | Articulating spinal implant |
US6224630B1 (en) | 1998-05-29 | 2001-05-01 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Implantable tissue repair device |
DE69942858D1 (en) * | 1998-06-01 | 2010-11-25 | Kyphon S A R L | DEFINABLE, PREFORMED STRUCTURES FOR ESTABLISHMENT IN REGIONS INSIDE THE BODY |
US6132465A (en) * | 1998-06-04 | 2000-10-17 | Raymedica, Inc. | Tapered prosthetic spinal disc nucleus |
US6045561A (en) * | 1998-06-23 | 2000-04-04 | Orthopaedic Biosystems Ltd., Inc. | Surgical knot manipulator |
WO2000040159A1 (en) * | 1998-12-31 | 2000-07-13 | Yeung Teresa T | Tissue fastening devices and delivery means |
US6146422A (en) * | 1999-01-25 | 2000-11-14 | Lawson; Kevin Jon | Prosthetic nucleus replacement for surgical reconstruction of intervertebral discs and treatment method |
US6183518B1 (en) * | 1999-02-22 | 2001-02-06 | Anthony C. Ross | Method of replacing nucleus pulposus and repairing the intervertebral disk |
US6110210A (en) * | 1999-04-08 | 2000-08-29 | Raymedica, Inc. | Prosthetic spinal disc nucleus having selectively coupled bodies |
AU4348400A (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2000-11-02 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Systems for securing facet joints together |
US6428576B1 (en) | 1999-04-16 | 2002-08-06 | Endospine, Ltd. | System for repairing inter-vertebral discs |
US6162217A (en) | 1999-04-21 | 2000-12-19 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling a temperature-controlled probe |
US6296643B1 (en) * | 1999-04-23 | 2001-10-02 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Device for the correction of spinal deformities through vertebral body tethering without fusion |
US6245107B1 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2001-06-12 | Bret A. Ferree | Methods and apparatus for treating disc herniation |
US6371990B1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2002-04-16 | Bret A. Ferree | Annulus fibrosis augmentation methods and apparatus |
US6340369B1 (en) * | 1999-08-13 | 2002-01-22 | Bret A. Ferree | Treating degenerative disc disease with harvested disc cells and analogues of the extracellular matrix |
US6685695B2 (en) * | 1999-08-13 | 2004-02-03 | Bret A. Ferree | Method and apparatus for providing nutrition to intervertebral disc tissue |
US6344058B1 (en) * | 1999-08-13 | 2002-02-05 | Bret A. Ferree | Treating degenerative disc disease through transplantation of allograft disc and vertebral endplates |
US7717961B2 (en) * | 1999-08-18 | 2010-05-18 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Apparatus delivery in an intervertebral disc |
US7507243B2 (en) * | 1999-08-18 | 2009-03-24 | Gregory Lambrecht | Devices and method for augmenting a vertebral disc |
US6883520B2 (en) * | 1999-08-18 | 2005-04-26 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for dynamically stable spinal implant |
US7258700B2 (en) * | 1999-08-18 | 2007-08-21 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Devices and method for nucleus pulposus augmentation and retention |
US6425919B1 (en) | 1999-08-18 | 2002-07-30 | Intrinsic Orthopedics, Inc. | Devices and methods of vertebral disc augmentation |
US6508839B1 (en) * | 1999-08-18 | 2003-01-21 | Intrinsic Orthopedics, Inc. | Devices and methods of vertebral disc augmentation |
US6429013B1 (en) * | 1999-08-19 | 2002-08-06 | Artecel Science, Inc. | Use of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells for chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage repair |
US6171317B1 (en) * | 1999-09-14 | 2001-01-09 | Perclose, Inc. | Knot tying device and method |
US6264695B1 (en) * | 1999-09-30 | 2001-07-24 | Replication Medical, Inc. | Spinal nucleus implant |
US6878167B2 (en) * | 2002-04-24 | 2005-04-12 | Bret A. Ferree | Methods and apparatus for placing intradiscal devices |
US20030040796A1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2003-02-27 | Ferree Bret A. | Devices used to treat disc herniation and attachment mechanisms therefore |
US20030026788A1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2003-02-06 | Ferree Bret A. | Use of extracellular matrix tissue to preserve cultured cell phenotype |
US20030004574A1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2003-01-02 | Ferree Bret A. | Disc and annulus augmentation using biologic tissue |
WO2001028464A1 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2001-04-26 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and spinal disc annulus stent |
US7153312B1 (en) * | 1999-12-02 | 2006-12-26 | Smith & Nephew Inc. | Closure device and method for tissue repair |
US6684886B1 (en) * | 2000-01-21 | 2004-02-03 | Prospine, Inc. | Intervertebral disc repair methods and apparatus |
US6558390B2 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2003-05-06 | Axiamed, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for performing therapeutic procedures in the spine |
US7014633B2 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2006-03-21 | Trans1, Inc. | Methods of performing procedures in the spine |
US6514255B1 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2003-02-04 | Bret Ferree | Sublaminar spinal fixation apparatus |
US6336930B1 (en) * | 2000-03-07 | 2002-01-08 | Zimmer, Inc. | Polymer filled bone plate |
US6689125B1 (en) * | 2000-04-04 | 2004-02-10 | Spinalabs, Llc | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US6610093B1 (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2003-08-26 | Perumala Corporation | Method and apparatus for stabilizing adjacent vertebrae |
US20020026244A1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2002-02-28 | Trieu Hai H. | Intervertebral disc nucleus implants and methods |
US6620196B1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2003-09-16 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral disc nucleus implants and methods |
CA2419991C (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2011-10-04 | Sherwood Services Ag | Apparatus for and treatment of the intervertebral disc |
US6648893B2 (en) * | 2000-10-27 | 2003-11-18 | Blackstone Medical, Inc. | Facet fixation devices |
US7445634B2 (en) * | 2000-10-27 | 2008-11-04 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Annulus repair systems and methods |
US6508828B1 (en) * | 2000-11-03 | 2003-01-21 | Radi Medical Systems Ab | Sealing device and wound closure device |
US20040024463A1 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2004-02-05 | Thomas James C. | Expandable implant for partial disc replacement and reinforcement of a disc partially removed in a discectomy and for reduction and maintenance of alignment of cancellous bone fractures and methods and apparatuses for same |
IL162419A0 (en) * | 2001-12-10 | 2005-11-20 | Colbar Lifescience Ltd | Methods, devices, and preparations for intervertebral disc treatment |
US20040010315A1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2004-01-15 | Song John K. | Self-expanding intervertebral device |
WO2003095026A1 (en) * | 2002-05-13 | 2003-11-20 | Pflueger D Russell | Spinal disc therapy system |
US6945933B2 (en) * | 2002-06-26 | 2005-09-20 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Instruments and methods for minimally invasive tissue retraction and surgery |
US7033393B2 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2006-04-25 | Raymedica, Inc. | Self-transitioning spinal disc anulus occulsion device and method of use |
US20040002763A1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-01 | Raymedica, Inc. | Spinal disc anulus occlusion device and method of use |
US6723097B2 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2004-04-20 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Surgical trial implant |
US6958078B2 (en) * | 2002-08-19 | 2005-10-25 | The University Of Toledo | Bioartificial intervertebral disc |
-
2000
- 2000-04-04 US US09/542,972 patent/US6402750B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-03-07 US US10/093,990 patent/US6835205B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2004
- 2004-10-15 US US10/967,042 patent/US20050049708A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2005
- 2005-11-22 US US11/285,257 patent/US20060084994A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2007
- 2007-05-25 US US11/753,634 patent/US20070225814A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2007-05-25 US US11/753,649 patent/US20080255616A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2007-08-20 US US11/841,670 patent/US20090112267A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5755797A (en) * | 1993-04-21 | 1998-05-26 | Sulzer Medizinaltechnik Ag | Intervertebral prosthesis and a process for implanting such a prosthesis |
US6126682A (en) * | 1996-08-13 | 2000-10-03 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Method for treating annular fissures in intervertebral discs |
US5716416A (en) * | 1996-09-10 | 1998-02-10 | Lin; Chih-I | Artificial intervertebral disk and method for implanting the same |
US6558386B1 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2003-05-06 | Trans1 Inc. | Axial spinal implant and method and apparatus for implanting an axial spinal implant within the vertebrae of the spine |
Cited By (43)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10299839B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 | 2019-05-28 | Medos International Sárl | Percutaneous access devices and bone anchor assemblies |
US11426216B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 | 2022-08-30 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Methods and devices for minimally invasive spinal fixation element placement |
US10039578B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 | 2018-08-07 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Methods and devices for minimally invasive spinal fixation element placement |
US11419642B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 | 2022-08-23 | Medos International Sarl | Percutaneous access devices and bone anchor assemblies |
US9216039B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2015-12-22 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic spinal stabilization assemblies, tool set and method |
US8394133B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2013-03-12 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic fixation assemblies with inner core and outer coil-like member |
US8894657B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2014-11-25 | Roger P. Jackson | Tool system for dynamic spinal implants |
US8162948B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2012-04-24 | Jackson Roger P | Orthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method |
US9055978B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2015-06-16 | Roger P. Jackson | Orthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method |
US8292892B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2012-10-23 | Jackson Roger P | Orthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method |
US8100915B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2012-01-24 | Jackson Roger P | Orthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method |
US8066739B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2011-11-29 | Jackson Roger P | Tool system for dynamic spinal implants |
US8377067B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2013-02-19 | Roger P. Jackson | Orthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method |
US9050139B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2015-06-09 | Roger P. Jackson | Orthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method |
US9918751B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2018-03-20 | Roger P. Jackson | Tool system for dynamic spinal implants |
US8845649B2 (en) | 2004-09-24 | 2014-09-30 | Roger P. Jackson | Spinal fixation tool set and method for rod reduction and fastener insertion |
US9743957B2 (en) | 2004-11-10 | 2017-08-29 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone screw with shank articulation pressure insert and method |
US10039577B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2018-08-07 | Roger P Jackson | Bone anchor receiver with horizontal radiused tool attachment structures and parallel planar outer surfaces |
US9629669B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2017-04-25 | Roger P. Jackson | Spinal fixation tool set and method |
US11389214B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2022-07-19 | Roger P. Jackson | Spinal fixation tool set and method |
US8591515B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2013-11-26 | Roger P. Jackson | Spinal fixation tool set and method |
US9211150B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2015-12-15 | Roger P. Jackson | Spinal fixation tool set and method |
US8273089B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2012-09-25 | Jackson Roger P | Spinal fixation tool set and method |
US8152810B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2012-04-10 | Jackson Roger P | Spinal fixation tool set and method |
US8613760B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2013-12-24 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with slitted core and outer sleeve |
US8353932B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2013-01-15 | Jackson Roger P | Polyaxial bone anchor assembly with one-piece closure, pressure insert and plastic elongate member |
US8696711B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2014-04-15 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor assembly with one-piece closure, pressure insert and plastic elongate member |
US8105368B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2012-01-31 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with slitted core and outer sleeve |
US8591560B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2013-11-26 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with elastic core and outer sleeve |
US10729469B2 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2020-08-04 | Roger P. Jackson | Flexible spinal stabilization assembly with spacer having off-axis core member |
US10258382B2 (en) | 2007-01-18 | 2019-04-16 | Roger P. Jackson | Rod-cord dynamic connection assemblies with slidable bone anchor attachment members along the cord |
US9451989B2 (en) | 2007-01-18 | 2016-09-27 | Roger P Jackson | Dynamic stabilization members with elastic and inelastic sections |
US8475498B2 (en) | 2007-01-18 | 2013-07-02 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with cord connection |
US8012177B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2011-09-06 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization assembly with frusto-conical connection |
US8506599B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2013-08-13 | Roger P. Jackson | Dynamic stabilization assembly with frusto-conical connection |
US8366745B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2013-02-05 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization assembly having pre-compressed spacers with differential displacements |
US8979904B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2015-03-17 | Roger P Jackson | Connecting member with tensioned cord, low profile rigid sleeve and spacer with torsion control |
US10383660B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2019-08-20 | Roger P. Jackson | Soft stabilization assemblies with pretensioned cords |
US8092500B2 (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2012-01-10 | Jackson Roger P | Dynamic stabilization connecting member with floating core, compression spacer and over-mold |
US8430912B2 (en) * | 2008-05-05 | 2013-04-30 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamic stabilization rod |
US20090275983A1 (en) * | 2008-05-05 | 2009-11-05 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamic stabilization rod |
US9216041B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2015-12-22 | Roger P. Jackson | Spinal connecting members with tensioned cords and rigid sleeves for engaging compression inserts |
US8556938B2 (en) | 2009-06-15 | 2013-10-15 | Roger P. Jackson | Polyaxial bone anchor with non-pivotable retainer and pop-on shank, some with friction fit |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6402750B1 (en) | 2002-06-11 |
US20080255616A1 (en) | 2008-10-16 |
US20070225814A1 (en) | 2007-09-27 |
US20020095154A1 (en) | 2002-07-18 |
US20050049708A1 (en) | 2005-03-03 |
US6835205B2 (en) | 2004-12-28 |
US20060084994A1 (en) | 2006-04-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6835205B2 (en) | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders | |
US6579291B1 (en) | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders | |
US7780733B2 (en) | Artificial spinal disc replacement system and method | |
AU2017214484B2 (en) | Systems and methods for patient-specific total disc replacement | |
US7744631B2 (en) | Method for vertebral disc annular fibrosis tensioning and lengthening | |
US7601171B2 (en) | Spinal motion preservation assemblies | |
US7896904B2 (en) | Vertebral disc tensioning device | |
US9314346B2 (en) | Spinal implant | |
JP2008517672A (en) | Spinal motion retention assembly | |
US20080249627A1 (en) | Prosthetic Disc Device and Method for Intervertebral Disc Replacement | |
CN102512232B (en) | Interspinal universal dynamic stabilizer | |
WO2006047541A2 (en) | Spinal motion preservation assemblies | |
WO2008060401A2 (en) | Artificial spinal disc replacement system and method | |
WO2008083153A9 (en) | Vertebral disc annular fibrosis tensioning and lengthening device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |