US20080255564A1 - Bone cutting device - Google Patents
Bone cutting device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080255564A1 US20080255564A1 US12/012,437 US1243708A US2008255564A1 US 20080255564 A1 US20080255564 A1 US 20080255564A1 US 1243708 A US1243708 A US 1243708A US 2008255564 A1 US2008255564 A1 US 2008255564A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- bone
- cutting device
- cutting
- vertebral bodies
- adjacent vertebral
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/02—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for holding wounds open; Tractors
- A61B17/025—Joint distractors
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
- A61B17/1655—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans for tapping
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
- A61B17/1662—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans for particular parts of the body
- A61B17/1671—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans for particular parts of the body for the spine
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/32—Surgical cutting instruments
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/34—Trocars; Puncturing needles
- A61B17/3468—Trocars; Puncturing needles for implanting or removing devices, e.g. prostheses, implants, seeds, wires
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/88—Osteosynthesis instruments; Methods or means for implanting or extracting internal or external fixation devices
- A61B17/8875—Screwdrivers, spanners or wrenches
- A61B17/8877—Screwdrivers, spanners or wrenches characterised by the cross-section of the driver bit
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/88—Osteosynthesis instruments; Methods or means for implanting or extracting internal or external fixation devices
- A61B17/8875—Screwdrivers, spanners or wrenches
- A61B17/8886—Screwdrivers, spanners or wrenches holding the screw head
- A61B17/8888—Screwdrivers, spanners or wrenches holding the screw head at its central region
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/44—Joints for the spine, e.g. vertebrae, spinal discs
- A61F2/4455—Joints for the spine, e.g. vertebrae, spinal discs for the fusion of spinal bodies, e.g. intervertebral fusion of adjacent spinal bodies, e.g. fusion cages
- A61F2/446—Joints for the spine, e.g. vertebrae, spinal discs for the fusion of spinal bodies, e.g. intervertebral fusion of adjacent spinal bodies, e.g. fusion cages having a circular or elliptical cross-section substantially parallel to the axis of the spine, e.g. cylinders or frustocones
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/46—Special tools or methods for implanting or extracting artificial joints, accessories, bone grafts or substitutes, or particular adaptations therefor
- A61F2/4603—Special tools or methods for implanting or extracting artificial joints, accessories, bone grafts or substitutes, or particular adaptations therefor for insertion or extraction of endoprosthetic joints or of accessories thereof
- A61F2/4611—Special tools or methods for implanting or extracting artificial joints, accessories, bone grafts or substitutes, or particular adaptations therefor for insertion or extraction of endoprosthetic joints or of accessories thereof of spinal prostheses
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/16—Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
- A61B17/17—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires
- A61B17/1739—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body
- A61B17/1757—Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body for the spine
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/02—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for holding wounds open; Tractors
- A61B17/025—Joint distractors
- A61B2017/0256—Joint distractors for the spine
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S623/00—Prosthesis, i.e. artificial body members, parts thereof, or aids and accessories therefor
- Y10S623/902—Method of implanting
- Y10S623/908—Bone
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T407/00—Cutters, for shaping
- Y10T407/19—Rotary cutting tool
- Y10T407/1952—Having peripherally spaced teeth
- Y10T407/1962—Specified tooth shape or spacing
- Y10T407/1964—Arcuate cutting edge
Definitions
- the present invention relates to artificial fusion implants to be placed into the intervertebral space left remaining after the removal of a damaged spinal disc and specifically to the apparatus for and method of, inserting the implants.
- a fusion (the joining together of two or more bones via a continuous bridge of incorporated bone) may be performed.
- the interbody fusion wherein the disc is partially excised and bone placed within that space previously occupied by that disc material (between adjacent vertebrae) for the purpose of restoring a more normal spatial relationship, and to provide for stability; short term by mechanical support, and long term by the permanent cross bonding of bone from vertebra to vertebra.
- the endplates For fusion to occur within the disc space, it is necessary to prepare the vertebrae to be fused by breaking through, or cutting into, the hardened outside plates of bone (the endplates) to allow the interposed bone graft to come into direct contact with the more vascular cancellous (spongy) bone, and to thereby trick the body into attempting to heal this induced, but controlled, “fracturing” by both bone production and the healing of the grafts to both opposed vertebral surfaces such that they become one continuous segment of bone.
- the purpose of the present invention is to provide an implant, and the apparatus and method of inserting the implant within the intervertebral space left after the removal of the disc material and permanently eliminate all motion at that location.
- the device of the present invention is space occupying within the disc interspace, rigid, self-stabilizing to resist dislodgement, stabilizing to the adjacent spinal vertebrae to eliminate local motion, and able to intrinsically participate in a vertebra to vertebra bony fusion so as to assure the permanency of the result.
- these devices resemble the present invention only in that they are placed within the intervertebral space following the removal of a damaged disc. In that they seek to is preserve spinal motion, they are diametrically different from the present invention which seeks to permanently eliminate all motion at that spinal segment.
- a second related area of prior art includes those devices utilized to replace essentially wholly removed vertebrae. Such removal is generally necessitated by extensive vertebral fractures, or tumors, and is not associated with the treatment of disc disease. While the present invention is to be placed within the disc space, these other vertebral devices cannot be placed within the disc space as at least one vertebra has already been removed such that there no longer remains a “disc space”. Furthermore, these devices are limited in that they seek to perform as temporary structural members mechanically replacing the removed vertebrae (not a removed disc), and do not intrinsically participate in supplying osteogenic material to achieve cross vertebrae bony fusion.
- This group of devices must be accompanied by a further surgery consisting of a bone fusion procedure utilizing conventional technique.
- This group consisting of vertebral struts rather than disc replacements would include the following:
- this second group of devices differs from the present invention in that they are vertebral replacements struts, do not intrinsically participate in the bony fusion, can only be inserted in the limited circumstances where an entire vertebra has been removed from the anterior approach, and are not designed for, or intended to be used for the treatment of disc disease.
- a third area of prior art related to the present invention includes all devices designed to be applied to one of the surfaces of the spine.
- Such devices include all types of plates, struts, and rods which are attached by hooks, wires and screws. These devices differ significantly from the present invention in that they are not inserted within the disc space and furthermore do not intrinsically participate in supplying osteogenic material for the fusion.
- none of these devices are designed to be nor can be used within the disc space. Moreover, these devices do not replace a damaged disc, and do not intrinsically participate in the generation of a bony fusion.
- Another area of related prior art to be considered is that of devices designed to be placed within the vertebral interspace following the removal of a damaged disc, and seeking to eliminate further motion at that location.
- the present invention provides for a system of completely guarded instrumentation so that all contiguous vital structures (e.g. large blood vessels, neural structures) are absolutely protected.
- the instrumentation of the present invention also makes overpenetration by the drill impossible.
- overpenetration in the cervical spine for example, would result in the total paralysis or death of the patient.
- the result In the thoracic spine, the result would be complete paraplegia.
- the result In the lumbar spine, the result would be paraplegia or a life-threatening perforation of the aorta, vena cava, or iliac vessels.
- the present invention is atraumatically screwed into place while the BAGBY device, in contradistinction, is pounded into position.
- BAGBY describes that its implant is significantly larger in size than the hole drilled and must be pounded in. This is extremely dangerous and the pounding occurs directly over the spinal cord which is precariously vulnerable to percussive injury.
- the BAGBY device must always be pounded directly towards the spinal cord.
- the BAGBY device is pounded into a smooth hole under great resistance, and lacking any specific design features to secure it, the device is highly susceptible to forceful ejection which would result in great danger to the patient and clinical failure.
- the present invention in contradistinction, is securely screwed into place, and possesses highly specialized locking threads to make accidental dislodgement impossible. Because of the proximity of the spinal cord, spinal nerves, and blood vessels, any implant dislodgement as might occur with the BAGBY device might have catastrophic consequences.
- the BAGBY device can only be inserted from the front of the vertebral column, however, in contrast, the present invention can be utilized in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, and can be inserted from behind (posteriorly) in the lumbar spine. This is of great importance in that the purpose of these devices is in the treatment of disc disease and probably greater than 99 percent of all lumbar operations for the treatment of disc disease are performed from behind where the present invention can easily be utilized, but the BAGBY device, as per BAGBY'S description, cannot.
- Disc removal requires the complete removal of the disc prior to the drilling step, whereas the present invention eliminates the laborious separate process of disc removal and efficiently removes the disc and prepares the vertebral end plates in a single step.
- the present invention saves time over the BAGBY invention since time is not wasted laboring to remove the disc prior to initiating the fusion. Also, with the present invention the procedure is performed through a system of guarded instrumentation, time is not wasted constantly placing and replacing various soft tissue retractors throughout the procedure.
- Implant stability Dislodgement of the implant would be a major source of device failure (an unsuccessful clinical result), and might result in patient paralysis or even death.
- the BAGBY device lacks any specific means of achieving stability and since it is pounded in against resistance to achieve vertebral distraction, and is susceptible to forceful dislodgement by the tendency of the two distracted vertebrae, to return to their original positions squeezing out the device.
- the present invention is screwed into place. As there is no unscrewing force present between the vertebrae, compression alone cannot dislodge the implant.
- the implant is inherently stable by its design.
- the threads of the present invention are highly specialized in that they are periodically interrupted so that the tail ends of each of the tabs so formed are blunted and twisted so as to resist accidental unscrewing.
- the removal of an implant with such “locking threads” requires the use of a special extractor included within the instrumentation.
- the stability of the present invention is still further enhanced, again in contradistinction to the BAGBY device, by the presence of a “bone ingrowth” surface texturing, which both increases the friction of the fit and allows for the direct growth of the vertebral bone into the casing of the implant itself.
- the present invention is not only self-stabilizing, it also provides stability to the adjacent vertebrae in at least three ways that the BAGBY device cannot.
- the BAGBY device is placed transversely across the joint in the center, leaving both vertebrae free to rock back and forth over this round barrel shaped axis, much like a board over a barrel, being used for a seesaw.
- the BAGBY device may actually behave as a third body allowing the translation of the vertebrae relative to the device and to each other.
- any device can only provide stability if it remains properly, seated.
- the present invention is inherently stable, and therefore assures that it will stabilize the adjacent vertebrae, rather than, as with the BAGBY, the instability of the spine to be treated may cause a dislocation of the BAGBY implant, is with further loss of spinal stability.
- the present invention offers considerably greater surface area to distribute the load.
- the BAGBY device is placed centrally, the present device is placed bilaterally where the bone tends to be more cortical and much stronger out towards the rim.
- the present invention supports the load achieving an “I” beam effect, whereas the BAGBY implant does not.
- it is not pressure alone that causes the collapse of the bone adjacent to the implant, but also bony erosion that is caused by the motion under pressure of the implant against the bone.
- the present invention alone is highly resistant to such motion, again diminishing the likelihood of erosion and interspace collapse.
- the present invention has a surface treatment of known and conventional technology to induce the growth of bone from the vertebrae directly into the casing material of the implant itself.
- the BAGBY device has no similar feature.
- the BAGBY invention calls for removing the disc and then drilling a hole between the adjacent vertebrae. The bony debris so generated is then put into the device.
- the present invention takes a core of pure bone producing marrow from the iliac crest, and then by use of a special press, forcibly injects the implant device with an extremely dense compressed core of that osteogenic material until the material itself virtually extrudes from every cell of the implant.
- the probability of achieving fusion The probability of achieving fusion—The fusion rate within the spine is known to be related directly to the amount of exposed vascular bone bed area, the quality and quantity of the fusion mass available, and the extent of the stabilization obtained with all other factors being half constant. It would then be anticipated, that the fusion rate would be superior with the present invention as compared to the RAGBY device, because of optimal implant stability (#5), optimal spinal stability (#6), bone ingrowth surface treatment (#8), superior fusion mass (#9), and the greater exposed vertebral bony surface area (#7).
- the implant of the present invention would utilize bone ingrowth technology, it would do so with conventional technology.
- Cloward's method of instrumentation was designed for, and limited to, use on the anterior aspect and in the region of the cervical spine only. The hole was midline, which would preclude its use posteriorly where the spinal cord would be in the way.
- Cloward's method As the bone graft to be inserted in Cloward's method was necessarily larger in diameter than the hole drilled, the graft could not be inserted through the drill guide. This mandated the removal of the drill guide and left the graft insertion phase completely unprotected. Thus Cloward's method and instrumentation was inappropriate for posterior application.
- Cloward's method inappropriate for posterior application.
- the drill guide described by Cloward could not be placed posteriorly within the spinal canal, as the foot plate would crush the nerves. Modifying Cloward's drill guide by removing the foot plate completely, would still leave the instrument unworkable as it would then lack stability, and would not be controllable for depth of seating.
- Wilterberger (Wilterberger, B. R., Abbott, K. H., “Dowel Intervertebral Fusion as Used in Lumbar Disc Surgery,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Volume 39A, pg. 234-292, 1957) described the unprotected drilling of a hole from the posterior into the lumbar spine between the nerve roots and across the disc space, and then inserting a stack of button-like dowels into that space. While Wilterberger had taken the Cloward concept of circular drilling and dowel fusion and applied it to the lumbar spine from a posterior approach, he had not provided for an improved method, nor had he advanced the instrumentation so as to make that procedure sufficiently safe, and it rapidly fell into disrepute.
- Crock Crock, H. V., “Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion—Indications for its Use and notes on Surgical Technique,” Clinical Orthopedics, Volume 165, pg. 157-163, 1981) described his technique and instrumentation for Anterior Interbody Fusion of the lumbar spine, wherein he drilled two large holes side by side across the disc space from anterior to posterior essentially unprotected and then pounded in two at least partially cylindrical grafts larger than the holes prepared.
- the present invention comprises a series of artificial implants, the purpose of which is to participate in, and directly cause bone fusion across an intervertebral space following the excision of a damaged disc.
- implants are structurally load bearing devices, stronger than bone, capable of withstanding the substantial forces generated within the spinal interspace.
- the devices of the present invention have a plurality of macro sized cells and openings, which can be loaded with fusion promoting materials, such as autogenous bone, for the purpose of materially influencing the adjacent vertebrae to perform a bony bond to the implants and to each other.
- the implant casing may be surface textured or otherwise treated by any of a number of known technologies to achieve a “bone ingrowth surface” to further enhance the stability of the implant and to expedite the fusion.
- the devices of the present invention are configured and designed so as to promote their own stability within the vertebral interspace and to resist being dislodged, and furthermore, to stabilize the adjacent spinal segments.
- the apparatus and method of the present invention for preparing the vertebrae for insertion of the implant allows for the rapid and safe removal of the disc, preparation of the vertebrae, performance of the fusion, and internal stabilization of the spinal segment.
- the present invention is a method for Interbody Spinal Fusion utilizing novel instrumentation, whereby a protective tubular member is placed prior to the drilling part of the procedure and is left in place until the graft is fully seated.
- two distractors are used to separate two adjacent vertebrae to a preferred distance.
- a hollow Outer Sleeve having teeth at one end is driven into the adjacent vertebrae on one side to hold the vertebrae in position when the distractor is removed, a diameter reducing hollow Inner Sleeve is introduced into the Outer Sleeve, a drill having a drill stop is passed through the hollow Inner Sleeve to drill a hole to a desired depth, and an implant is inserted in the hole. The method is repeated on the other side of the disc.
- the present invention provides for a single surgery providing for an integrated discectomy, fusion, and interbody internal spinal fixation.
- the present invention is safer by providing protection of the surrounding tissues.
- An Outer Sleeve places all of the delicate soft tissue structures, nerves, blood vessels, and organs outside of the path of the various sharp surgical instruments and the implant. Further, it is an improvement upon hand held retractors in that it occupies the least possible amount of area, avoids the stretching associated with manual retraction, provides for the retraction and shielding of the surrounding tissues in all directions circumferentially and simultaneously, and it does so exclusively with smooth, curved surfaces.
- the present invention is safer by providing protection against the danger of instrument or implant overpenetration.
- the present invention is safer as the surgical site and wound are protected from the debris generated during the procedure.
- the present invention is safer because the method provides for absolute protection to the soft tissues directly and from indirect injury by overpenetration. It makes safe the use of power instrumentation which is both more effective and efficient.
- the present invention maintains the vertebrae to be fused rigid throughout the procedure.
- the present invention holds the vertebrae to be fused aligned throughout the procedure.
- the present invention holds the vertebrae to be fused distracted throughout the procedure.
- the present invention assures that all instruments introduced through the Outer Sleeve are coaxial and equally centered through the disc space and parallel the endplates.
- the present invention facilitates the implant insertion by countering the high compressive forces tending to collapse the interspace, which if left unchecked would resist the introduction and advancement of the implant and make stripping more likely.
- the present invention extends the range and use of the procedure and similarly the interbody spinal implant itself by making the procedure safe throughout the spine.
- the present invention increases the ability to use a specifically sized implant.
- the design and use of a second or Inner Sleeve in the present invention allows for the difference in size between the inside diameter of the Outer Sleeve, and the outside diameter of the drill itself. This difference being necessary to accommodate the sum of the distraction to be produced, and the depth of the circumferential threading present of the implant.
- a specially designed drill bit with a central shaft recess allows for the safe collection of the drilling products, which can then be removed without disturbing the Outer Sleeve by removing the drill bit and Inner Sleeve as a single unit.
- a specially designed trephine for removing a core of bone slightly smaller in diameter than the internal diameter of the implant cavity itself, however of a greater length.
- a specially designed press for forcefully compressing and injecting the long core of autogenous bone into the implant, such that it extrudes through the implant itself.
- a specially designed driver extractor which attaches to the implant and allows the implant to be either inserted or removed without itself dissociating from the implant, except by the deliberate disengagement of the operator.
- predistraction increases the working space.
- the Distractor in the present invention is self-orienting acting as a directional finder.
- the Distractor in the present invention is self-centralizing between the opposed vertebral surfaces acting as a centering post for the subsequent bone removal.
- predistraction assures the equal removal of bone from the adjacent vertebral surfaces.
- predistraction assures the exact congruence between the hole drilled-and the device.
- predistraction assures that the drilling is parallel to the vertebral endplates.
- predistraction allows for the determination of the optimal distraction prior to drilling.
- predistraction allows for the verification of the correct prosthesis size prior to drilling.
- predistraction facilitates device insertion by relieving the compressive loads across the interspace which would resist implantation.
- predistraction decreases the likelihood of stripping the bone during insertion.
- predistraction provides for the side by side positioning, spacing, and parallelism required prior to the irrevocable event of drilling.
- predistraction provides for the rigid stabilization of the vertebrae opposed to the disc space throughout the surgical procedure.
- predistraction provides for an implant easier to insert as the compressive loads of the opposed vertebrae are held in check so that the device itself need not drive the vertebrae apart to be inserted.
- predistraction allows for the insertion of a more effective implant as more of the implant can be dedicated to its intended purpose and be full diameter, whereas without the benefit of predistraction and the ability to maintain the same, a significant portion of the forward end of the implant would need to be dedicated to the purpose of separating the opposing vertebrae.
- the present invention allows for the use of an implant with a sharper thread or surface projections as there is no danger to the surrounding tissues.
- the present invention allows for the implant to be fully preloaded as provided to the surgeon, or for the surgeon to load it with the material of his choice at the time of surgery.
- the present invention allows for the loading of a spinal implant outside of the spinal canal and prior to implantation.
- FIG. 1 is a side view of the Long Distractor, of the present invention inserted into the intervertebral space.
- FIG. 2 is a side view of a Convertible Distractor assembly in relation to the spine.
- FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a high retention Short Distractor of FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 3A is a side view of the high retention Short Distractor of FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 3B is a side view of an alternative Short Distractor with circumferential forward facing ratcheting.
- FIG. 3C is a top view of the alternative Short Distractor of FIG. 3B .
- FIG. 3D is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of a Short Distractor.
- FIG. 3E is a top view of the alternative distractor of FIG. 3D .
- FIG. 3F is a side view of a further alternative rectangularized Short Distractor with knurled surfaces.
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a spinal segment (two vertebrae and an interposed disc) with a Short Distractor in place, with a portion of the upper vertebrae and disc cut away to show the Short Distractor on one side of the spine and the Long Distractor about to be placed contralaterally.
- FIG. 5 shows a side view of the Outer Sleeve in place over the Long Distractor, and about to receive the Driver Cap in preparation for being seated.
- FIG. 6 shows the Long Distractor, Outer Sleeve, and Driver Cap following the proper seating of the Outer Sleeve into the two adjacent vertebrae.
- FIG. 7A is a side view of the cervical Outer Sleeve being placed over a Long Distractor which is in place within the disc space anteriorly.
- FIG. 7B is a bottom view of the single Outer Sleeve of FIG. 7A .
- FIG. 7C is a bottom view of a Dual Outer Sleeve.
- FIG. 7D is an enlarged side view of the proximal portion of FIG. 7C .
- FIG. 7E is a bottom view of a Dual Driver Cap for driving two distractors.
- FIG. 7F is a side sectional view showing the Dual Outer Sleeve of FIGS. 7C and 7D , Distractors and Dual Cap of FIG. 7E seated.
- FIG. 8 is a side view of the Outer Sleeve of FIG. 7A centered on the Long Distractor and fully seated on the anterior aspect of the cervical spine.
- FIG. 9 is a perspective view of the Distractor Puller.
- FIG. 10 is a cutaway partial side view of the Proximal Puller engaging the extraction ring of the Long Distractor over the end of the Outer Sleeve.
- FIG. 10A is a side view of the Puller coupled to the Long Distractor just prior to its extraction.
- FIG. 10B is a posterior view of the proximal Outer Sleeve and a Short Distractor in place in regard to the vertebrae, disc and nerves.
- FIG. 11A is a side sectional view of the Drill and Inner Sleeve within the Outer Sleeve and drilling across the intervertebral space and cutting partially cylindrical arcs from the adjacent vertebrae.
- FIG. 11B is a sectional side view of preparation of the intervertebral space by the alternative “Trephine Method” showing the Distractor, Trephine, Inner Sleeve, and Outer Sleeve in place.
- FIG. 11C is a sectional side view as in FIG. 11A , but showing the use of an alternative drilling conformation wherein the extended proximal portion is both distracting and self-centering.
- FIG. 11D is a side view of an instrument for removing arcs of bone from vertebrae following drilling.
- FIG. 12 is a perspective view of the surgical Tap.
- FIG. 13 is a side view of the Outer Sleeve and the surgical Tap fully threaded within the interspace.
- FIG. 14A is a side view of the bone harvesting Trephine and motor adapter.
- FIG. 14B is a perspective view of the implant Bone Loading Device.
- FIG. 14C is a perspective view of the Corkscrew.bone freeing and extracting instrument.
- FIG. 15 is a partial perspective view of the Bone Loading Device in operation.
- FIG. 16 is a perspective view of the Implant Driver about to engage the spinal implant.
- FIG. 17 is a side view of the spinal implant being fully seated within the intervertebral space by means of the Driver apparatus in place within the Outer Sleeve.
- FIG. 18 is a side view of the lumbar spine showing the end result of the device implantation via the posterior route.
- the method of the present invention involves the following steps.
- the patient is placed on a spinal surgery frame, which allows for the distraction and alignment of the disc space to be fused.
- a bilateral posterior exposure of the interspace, with or without partial discectomy is then performed.
- Utilizing distractors the disc space is distracted, and a hollow Outer Sleeve is fitted over one of the distractors.
- the end of the Outer Sleeve has teeth for engaging the two adjacent vertebrae.
- the Outer Sleeve is driven into the vertebrae and the distractor is then removed.
- a hollow Inner Sleeve is then inserted into the Outer Sleeve and a stopped Drill is utilized to prepare the opposed vertebral surfaces.
- the Drill and the Inner Sleeve are removed as a single unit.
- the space is tapped if so required.
- the prepared spinal implant is then inserted via the Outer Sleeve utilizing a stopped inserter.
- the instruments are then removed and the procedure repeated on the contralateral side of the spine.
- Step 1a Prior to surgery, translucent implant templates appropriately adjusted for scale are superimposed on AP, lateral, and axial images of the interspace to be fused, for the purpose of selecting the optimal implant size and to determine the desired distraction.
- Step 1b The patient is preferably placed onto a spinal surgery frame capable of inducing both distraction and vertebral alignment.
- Step 2 a standard bilateral (partial) discectomy is performed and any posterior lipping of the vertebral bodies adjacent the interspace is removed. Alternatively, no disc material need be removed.
- the interspace is exposed by performing bilateral paired semihemilaminotomies and resecting the inner aspects of the facet joints adjacent the spinal canal while preserving the supra and interspinous ligaments.
- Step 3 Beginning on the first side, the dural sac and traversing nerve root at that level are retracted medially and a Long Distractor then inserted and impacted flush to the posterior vertebral bodies adjacent that interspace. Long Distractors with working ends of increasing diameter are then sequentially inserted until the optimal distraction is obtained.
- This optimal distraction not only restores the normal height of the interspace, but further achieves a balance wherein the tendency for the space to collapse is resisted, which in urging the vertebral bodies apart is being equally resisted by the powerful soft tissue structures about the spinal segment including the outer casing of the disc (the annulus fibrosus), various ligaments, capsular structures, as well as the muscles and other soft-tissue structures.
- This balanced distraction not only provides for the spatial restoration of the height of the interspace, but for considerable stability as the space now resists further distraction or collapse.
- the use of the solid bodied Long Distractors is terminated and a disassemblable Convertible Distractor is placed with tactile and/or radiographic confirmation of ideal distraction.
- the Convertible Distractor is then disassembled such that the Short Distractor portion is left in place and the ultra-low profile head portion being positioned adjacent to the canal floor and safely away from the neural structures.
- various embodiments of the Short Distractor are available with varying degrees of resistance to dislodgment. In the preferred embodiment of the procedure, attention is then directed to the contralateral side of the spine.
- Step 4 On the contralateral side of the same interspace the Long Distractor having at its working end the diameter matching the Short Distractor already in place, is then inserted. If however, due to an asymmetrical collapse of the interspace it is then determined that greater distraction is required on the second side to achieve the optimal stability, then the appropriate Short Distractor would be placed on the second side. Then the Short Distractor would be removed from the first side and replaced with a larger Long Distractor so as to bring the interspace into balance.
- the entire procedure is performed on the one side of the spine utilizing only the Long Distractor prior to repeating the procedure on the contralateral side of the spine. While this method can be performed in accordance with the remaining steps as described in the preferred embodiment, when utilized it is best performed using a Trephine which allows the Long Distractor to remain in place, thereby allowing for interspace distraction otherwise provided in the first method by the Short Distractor.
- This alternative method then requires the use of a Trephine over the Long Distractor in lieu of a reamer and is therefore called the “Trephine Method”, which will be discussed in detail later.
- Step 5 With the Short Distractor in place on the first side of the spine, and the matching Long Distractor in place on the second side of the spine, and with the dural sac and traversing nerve root safely retracted, the Outer Sleeve is placed over the Long Distractor and firmly impacted to its optimal depth using the Impaction Cap and a mallet. The Long Distractor is then removed.
- Step 6 An Inner Sleeve is then placed within the Outer Sleeve, and the interspace is then prepared on that side by utilizing a Drill, Endmill, Reamer, or Trephine to drill, ream, or cut out the bone to be removed to either side, as well as any remaining interposed discal material.
- a Drill, Endmill, Reamer, or Trephine to drill, ream, or cut out the bone to be removed to either side, as well as any remaining interposed discal material.
- it and the Inner Sleeve are removed as a unit, safely carrying away the bone and disc debris trapped within them from the spinal canal.
- Step 7 If required, a thread forming Tap with penetration limiting means to control the depth of insertion, is then inserted through the Outer Sleeve.
- Step 8 The prepared implant is then inserted utilizing the specialized Driver unit.
- the implant may be coated with, made of, and/or loaded with substances consistent with bony fusion.
- the implant is treated with bone promoting and inducing substances, but is loaded with materials suitable for participating in a fusion.
- a hollow Trephine is utilized to harvest a core of bone from the posterior superior aspect of the iliac crest adjacent the sacroiliac joint.
- This core of bone is at its outside diameter, slightly smaller than the inside diameter of the spinal implant to be loaded, but longer than the spinal implant.
- the core of bone is then injected from within the Trephine into the central cavity of the implant causing a superabundance of the bone material within the implant such that the bone material tends to press out through the openings communicating with the outside surface of the implant.
- Step 9 Using the Driver Extractor instrument, the prepared implant is threaded into the prepared interspace. The instrumentation is removed from that side of the spine and attention is then redirected to the first side of the spine. A small retractor is utilized to move the dural sac and traversing nerve root medially and to protect them and allowing the direct visualization of the retained Short Distractor unit. Without removing the Short Distractor, it is reassembled to its shaft portion, essentially reconstituting itself into a Long Distractor. With the inserted implant now acting as the distractor on the opposite side, the Long Distractor is utilized to guide the Outer Sleeve down where it is impacted as described in Step 5 .
- Steps 6 & 7 are then repeated, completing the procedure at that level.
- the wound is then irrigated and closed in the routine manner.
- the correct implant diameter and length are accurately assessed, as well as the correct amount of distraction needed to restore the interspace to its premorbid height.
- the patient is then properly positioned and a bilateral partial discectomy performed via paired semihemilaminotomies.
- the Convertible Distractor would then be disassembled, the barrel and head portion removed, and the Short Distractor portion left deeply embedded and with its flanged head flat against the canal floor and deep to the neural structures. It would then be safe to allow the dural sac and nerve root to return to their normal positions, which would be superficial to the flanged portion of the Short Distractor.
- the dural sac and nerve root would then be retracted medially on this second side, and a Long Distractor with an 18 mm diameter barrel portion and a 11 mm working portion would then be inserted into the interspace and driven flush to the bone if necessary, such impaction imploding any osteophytes not already removed, and assuring that the shoulder portion of the barrel comes to lie flat against the posterior aspects of the adjacent bodies.
- the Outer Sleeve would then be placed over the Long Distractor and utilizing the Driver Cap and a mallet, seated to the optimal depth.
- the Long Distractor is then removed and the Inner Sleeve is inserted into the Outer Sleeve. Since the purpose of the Inner Sleeve is to support the drill and allow for the increased size of the implant over the size of the drill, thus making it possible for the insertion of the implant to occur through the Outer Sleeve, the Inner Sleeve therefore measures 18 mm in its outside diameter, and 16.6 mm in its inside diameter. This allows it to fit within the Outer Sleeve, the diameter of which is 18.1 mm and to admit the drill bit which is 16.5 mm in diameter.
- the Drill and Inner Sleeve are removed as a single unit with the trapped interposed cartilaginous and bony debris.
- the depth of drill penetration is preset and limited by the fixed rigid column of the Outer Sleeve. In this example, the space will be prepared to a depth of 28 mm in anticipation of countersinking a 26 mm long implant at least 2 mm. If a Tap were to be utilized, it would be inserted at this time and be appropriate to the minor and major diameters of the implant to be inserted and as with the Drill, controlled for its depth of penetration.
- the spinal implant would then be prepared for implantation by utilizing a Trephine to harvest a core of posterior iliac bone greater than 30 mm long and approximately 14.5 mm in diameter.
- this core of bone would be forcefully injected into the internal chamber of the spinal implant which would then be capped. Cap end forward, the fully loaded implant would then be attached to the Insertion Driver, down the Outer Sleeve and screwed into place with the depth of penetration limited by the Insertion instrument. The Insertion Driver is then unscrewed from the implant and removed from the Outer Sleeve. With the dural sac and nerve root retracted and protected, the Outer Sleeve would then be removed. This would complete the fusion procedure on that side, and then as described, the procedure would be repeated on the other (first) side of the same interspace.
- Trephine Method An alternative and extremely useful method is the “Trephine Method”. Its advantages include that it may be used in conjunction with the preferred embodiment substituting the use of a hollow, tubular cutter, called a Trephine for the use of the Drill in Step 5 of the preferred embodiment. Additionally, it may be utilized so as to obviate the need for the placement of the Short Distractor and to allow the procedure to be effectively performed from start to finish on one side prior to initiating the procedure on the opposite side, and while nevertheless maintaining distraction at the site of the bone removal.
- the dural sac and nerve root are retracted.
- the Outer Sleeve has an inner diameter only slightly greater than the implant to be inserted. Therefore, at this time, a first Inner Sleeve is inserted into the Outer Sleeve to make up the difference between the outside diameter of the Long Distractor and the inside diameter of the Outer Sleeve. With the Outer Sleeve and first Inner Sleeve thus assembled, they are placed over the Long Distractor and the Outer Sleeve is optimally seated using the Impaction Cap. The Cap and first Inner Sleeve are removed, but the Long Distractor and Outer Sleeve are left in place.
- a hollow, tubular cutter known as a Trephine is then inserted over the Long Distractor and its barrel portion and within the Outer Sleeve.
- the Trephine which is stopped out to the appropriate depth, can then be utilized to cut equal arcs of bone from the opposed vertebral endplates.
- a second Inner Sleeve may be placed within the Outer Sleeve prior to placing the Trephine over the Long Distractor and within that second sleeve.
- This second Inner Sleeve would be just greater in its internal diameter than the Long Distractor and just smaller in its outside diameter than the inner diameter of the Outer Sleeve. While it would provide enhanced stability to the Trephine, provision would then need to be made in is the way of large flutes passing longitudinally or obliquely along the outer surface of the Distractor to its barrel portion to accommodate the bony and cartilaginous debris generated during the cutting procedure.
- the Trephine, the Long Distractor, and the second Inner Sleeve, if utilized, are all removed. Since the Trephine cuts two arcs of bone but does not ream them out, a shafted instrument with a perpendicular cutting portion at its working end is then inserted parallel to the disc space and then rotated through an arc of motion cutting the bases of the two longitudinally cut arcs, thus freeing them for removal through the Outer Sleeve. The space may then be tapped if required, and the implant is inserted as per the preferred method. As already mentioned, the “Trephine Method” can be used with or without the use of the Short Distractor on the contralateral side.
- the following method is the preferred embodiment for performing anterior interbody fusion in the thoracic and lumbar spines. It is also appropriate in the cervical spine when the width of the spine anteriorly is sufficient so that it is possible to place two implants side by side and such that each intrudes at least several millimeters into the substance of the opposed vertebrae and for the length of the implants.
- the interspace to be fused is adequately exposed and the soft tissues and vital structures retracted and protected to either side. Visualization of the broad width of the interspace anteriorly is made possible by the absence of the neurological structures in relation to this aspect of the spine.
- the center line of the anterior aspect of the interspace is noted and marked.
- the disc is removed using first a knife and then curettes and rongeurs as needed. Alternatively, the disc may be left intact to be removed during the drilling stage of the procedure.
- the Dual Outer Sleeve with its common Foot Plate and Retention Prongs is then inserted over either a singly placed Long Distractor and then the second Distractor placed, or is placed over both Distractors if already placed.
- the Dual Outer Sleeve is then seated firmly against the anterior aspect of the spine. Any spurs which would interfere with the flush seating of the Foot Plate to the anterior aspect of the spine should be removed prior to inserting the Long Distractors.
- an Inner Sleeve and drill bit Once the Outer Sleeve has been optimally seated, one of the Long Distractors is removed and in its place is inserted an Inner Sleeve and drill bit.
- the drill bit has as its outside diameter the minor diameter of the implant to be inserted.
- the Inner Sleeve is essentially equal in thickness to the difference between the minor and major diameters of the threaded implant.
- a Stopped Drill is then utilized to prepare the opposed vertebral surfaces and to remove any remaining disc material interposed. If required, a Stopped Tap may be inserted through the Outer Sleeve and into the interspace to create a thread form. The properly prepared implant is then affixed to the Insertion Driver and passed through the Outer Sleeve down into the interspace and inserted until its depth of penetration is limited by the stop on the Insertion Driver. With the implant itself now in a position to act as a distractor, the Long Distractor is then removed from the contralateral side and the procedure repeated. When both implants are firmly in place, the outer sleeve may then be removed. The amount of countersinking of the implants may then be adjusted under direct vision.
- the disc (D) between adjacent vertebrae (V) is approached via bilateral paired semihemilaminotomies of the adjacent vertebrae.
- the supraspinous ligament, the interspinous ligament, the spinous process, portions of the lamina, and most of the facet joints are preserved.
- these structures may be removed.
- a bilateral partial nuclear discectomy is then performed through bilateral openings created through the posterior aspect of the annulus fibrosus. While considered less desirable, disc excision can be delayed and performed simultaneously with the vertebral bone resection during the drilling procedure.
- a dural nerve root retractor is placed such that the dural sac and lower nerve root are retracted medially allowing exposure to one side of a portion of two adjacent vertebral bodies and the interposed disc posteriorly.
- a Long Distractor 100 is inserted under direct vision into the intervertebral space.
- the disc penetrating portion 102 is essentially cylindrical with a bullet-shaped front end 103 and a shoulder portion 104 where the penetrating portion 102 extends from barrel 106 .
- the penetrating portion 102 urges the vertebral bodies apart, facilitating the introduction of the instruments.
- Long Distractors with sequentially increasing diameter penetrating portions 102 are then introduced. As the optimal diameter of penetrating portion 102 is achieved, the vertebral bodies to either side are forced into full congruence and thus become parallel, not only to the penetrating portion 102 , but to each other.
- any remaining excrescences of bone of the posterior vertebral bodies adjacent the posterior disc which have not already been removed are flattened flush to the vertebral body by the forced impaction, such as by hitting with a hammer flat surface 109 of crown 110 , driving the shoulder 104 against the lipped portions of vertebrae V.
- unit 100 Because of the forced opposition of the vertebral endplates to portion 102 with optimal distraction, unit 100 will then come to lie absolutely perpendicular to the plane of the posterior bodies and absolutely parallel to the vertebral endplates, allowing optimal alignment for the procedure to be performed.
- Penetrating portion 102 is available in various diameters, but all are of a constant length, which is less than the known depth of the interspace. This combined with the circumferential shoulder 104 , which is too large to fit within the interspace, protects against the danger of overpenetration. Barrel 106 is of the same diameter as the external diameter of the device to be implanted. A recessed portion 108 below the crown 110 allows for the Long Distractor 100 to be engaged by an extractor unit shown in FIG. 9 .
- a Convertible Long Distractor 113 is used on the first side of the spine. As shown in FIG. 2 , the Convertible Long Distractor 113 has a barrel portion 152 separable from the Short Distractor portion 120 . While the initial distraction may be performed with a solid Long Distractor, as the optimal distraction is approached the appropriate Convertible Long Distractor is utilized.
- the Convertible Long Distractor 113 consists of a Short Distractor portion 120 and a barrel 152 having a rectangular projection 134 at one end.
- the Short Distractor 120 has an increased diameter head 128 , a rectangular slot 118 and an internal threaded opening 114 .
- the barrel 152 is hollow and has an internal shaft 111 terminating in a large diameter hexagonal crown 115 at one end and a reduced diameter portion 112 .
- the crown has a detent portion 117 in its flat surface.
- the other end of the shaft 111 has a threaded small member 116 that corresponds to threaded opening 114 .
- the shaft 111 is prevented from removal from the barrel 152 by set pin 119 passing through the wall of barrel 152 in a convenient manner.
- the Short Distractor portion 120 is removably attached to the barrel portion 152 via the mating of female rectangular slot 118 and the male mating member 134 .
- the mating held together by utilizing is knob 136 to drive the crown 110 connected to interior shaft 111 having a threaded working end screw 116 that threads into the female aperture 118 of the Short Distractor portion 120 .
- Cap 136 has an open socket 138 for fitting around crown 115 and engages the reduced diameter hexagonal portion 112 so as to permit the rotation of shaft- 111 and threaded male member 116 .
- a detent ball 150 in the inside of the socket 138 engages detent 117 in the crown 115 , holding them together.
- the Short Distractor portion 120 of FIGS. 2 , 3 , and 3 A- 3 F are designed to provide for high stability when temporarily situated so as to resist inadvertent migration while the surgeon is working on the second side.
- the embodiment of the Short Distractor 120 shown in FIGS. 3 and 3A has a pair of sharp pegs 126 , to embed into the opposing vertebral bodies and forward facing ratchetings 124 , that further resist backward movement.
- FIGS. 3B and 3C which show the preferred embodiment, are side and top views of an alternative embodiment of the distractor portion such that the distractor portion to be interposed between the vertebrae is essentially cylindrical, but with circumferential forward facing ratchetings 124 .
- FIGS. 3D and 3E A further alternative embodiment is shown in FIGS. 3D and 3E .
- This is a more rectangularized design, with forward facing ratchetings, without the sharp prongs 126 of FIG. 3 .
- FIG. 3F is a side view of a further embodiment of the Short Distractor 120 shown with knurling, to increase the interference with the bone surface so as to add stability to the unit and to resist dislodgment.
- the working ends of both the Long and Short Distractors can have a variety of configurations consistent with their purpose, and that surface irregularities as well as the shape of the ends themselves, with or without prongs 126 , may be utilized to make the Short Distractor 120 more resistant to migration.
- the Convertible Distractor is dissociated, leaving Short Distractor 120 in place with its rounded external end 128 , safely on the canal floor and deep to the dural sac and nerve root.
- the surgeon then moves to the other side of the spine at the same disc (D) level, and retracts the dural sac and nerve root medially, exposing the disc on that side.
- Long Distractors 100 are then sequentially inserted into the disc space until the diameter of the distractor on the second side is at least as big as that on the first side. If because of some asymmetry of the interspace a larger diameter distractor is required on the second side to achieve the ideal distraction as compared to the first side, then the second side is fitted with a Short Distractor of the larger diameter, and the surgeon would then return back to the first side.
- the first side Short Distractor would then be removed and the Long Distractor 100 corresponding to the increased diameter of the already placed Short Distractor 120 would then be inserted. In either event, the operation is continued by working on the one side where the Long Distractor is in place.
- a device as the Michelson Spinal Surgery Frame, it may be possible to obtain adequate distraction preoperatively such that the surgeon is either disinclined to use a distractor, or to simply place the correct Long Distractor on the first side and then proceed with the surgical procedure on that side before moving to the opposite side.
- the Long Distractor now serves as both a centering post and an alignment rod for the hollow Outer Sleeve 140 shown in FIG. 5 which is fitted over the Long Distractor 100 , shown by phantom lines 101 in FIG. 5 .
- the Outer Sleeve 140 is metal and has a sharp toothed front end 142 that is capable of penetrating into and holding fast the two adjacent vertebrae (V). Interrupting the circumferential sharp teeth of 142 are flat, planar areas 152 which serve to resist the further insertion of the sharp teeth into the vertebral bodies.
- the toothed front end 142 of the Outer Sleeve 140 is a continuation of the tubular shaft 144 , which in turn is connected to circumferentially enlarged tubular back end 146 having a knurled outer surface 148 for easier manipulation.
- An alternative embodiment of an Outer Sleeve incorporates an expansile key hole and slot configuration 154 to either side of shaft 144 along the mid-plane of the interspace and parallel to it such that the end 142 resists the collapse of the vertebrae (V) to either side of the disc (D), but may nevertheless allow for their further distraction, in the event the only diameter or the root diameter of the implant is larger than the hole drilled.
- a Driver Cap 160 in-the form of an impaction cap has at its far end a flat, closed-back surface 162 and at its other end a broad, circular opening.
- the Driver Cap 160 fits over both the Outer Sleeve 140 and the Long Distractor 100 .
- interior surface 170 circumferentially engages portion 146 of the Outer Sleeve until the back end 172 engages the internal shoulder 164 .
- mallet blows are applied to surface 162 , that force is transmitted via the internal shoulder 164 to the Outer Sleeve 140 via its far end 172 , seating teeth 142 into the vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space D and to the depth of the teeth 142 to the flat portions 152 .
- the Cap 160 is then removed and the Distractor Puller 200 of FIG. 9 utilized to remove the Long Distractor 100 from the spine leaving the Outer Sleeve 140 in place.
- the Distractor Puller 200 has front portion 202 , a mid portion 204 , and a back handle portion 206 .
- a socket 208 is connected to one end of shaft 210 which at its far end is connected to back handle portion 206 .
- the socket 208 has defined within it a cavity 212 that is open at its front end and funnelized on the interior aspect of its sides.
- the cavity 212 is constructed so that the head of the Distractor Puller 200 and the partially circumferential flange 218 engages the circumferential recess 108 of the Distractor 100 .
- the entrance to cavity 212 is slightly funnelized, and the leading edges of flange 218 slightly rounded to facilitate the engagement of recess 108 and head 110 of Distractor 100 , which is further facilitated in that the Driver Cap 160 leaves portion 108 of Distractor 100 precisely flush with the back surface 172 of the Outer Sleeve 140 .
- This provides a large, flat surface 172 to precisely guide surface 230 of socket 208 , and open portion 212 around head 110 while flange 218 engages recess 108 .
- the springloaded detent ball 228 engages hemispherical depression 112 in the crown 110 , shown in FIG. 2 .
- This springloaded detent 228 in engagement with complimentary indent 218 protects against the inadvertent dissociation of the Long Distractor from the Puller 200 after the Distractor has been removed from within the Outer Sleeve 140 and prior to its removal from the wound.
- the two instruments are easily disassociated by freeing the crown portion 110 from cavity 212 by a manual force applied perpendicular to their relative long axes at this location.
- a cylindrical and free removable weight 216 is fitted around shaft 210 between the front portion 202 and the rear handle portion 206 . Gently, but repeatedly sliding the weight 216 along shaft 210 and driven rearwardly against flat surface 228 , transmits a rearward vector to proximal end 202 and thereby to the Long Distractor 100 to which it is engaged.
- Paired extended handle 224 and 226 allow the surgeon to resist any excessive rearward motion as the instrument is used to liberate the Long Distractor 100 .
- Paired handles 224 and 226 are also useful in that they allow a rotational directing of portion 208 , via the shaft 210 . This allows the surgeon to control and manipulate rotationally the orientation of the opening of cavity 212 to facilitate its application, to the head 110 of the distractor 100 .
- the Distractor Puller 200 is a significant improvement over the alternatives of striking a remover instrument with an independent hammer over the exposed surgical wound, or manually extracting the distractor by forcefully pulling.
- the use of a free hammer over the open wound is dangerous because the neural structures can be impacted on the back swing which is made even more likely by the effects of gravity on the mallet head.
- Manual extraction by pulling is dangerous because of the significant interference fit of portion 102 within the spine such that significant force would be required to remove the Distractor 100 , and if force were not coaxial then the Outer Sleeve might be dislodged or misaligned. Further, once the flat portion 102 became free of the interspace, all resistance to withdrawal would be lost and in the face of the considerable force necessary to free it, the Distractor 100 might easily become projectile imparting injury to the patient and/or the surgeon.
- the toothed end 142 of the Outer Sleeve 140 working in conjunction with the Short Distractor 120 on the contralateral side rigidly maintains the relative position of the adjacent vertebrae V. Further, since the remainder of the procedure on that side of the spine occurs entirely through the protective Outer Sleeve 140 , and as the nerves and dural sac are external to that Outer Sleeve and superficial to the toothed end 142 of the Outer Sleeve 140 , which is firmly embedded into the adjacent vertebrae V, the Outer Sleeve 140 serves to insure the safety of these delicate neural structures.
- the Outer Sleeve 140 is of a fixed length and rigid, its flat rearward surface 172 may be used as a stop to the advancement of all instruments placed through the Outer Sleeve 140 , thus protecting against accidental overpenetration. Further, the Outer Sleeve 140 assures that the further procedure to be performed will occur coaxial to the disc space D and further, be symmetrical in regard to each of the opposed vertebral surfaces.
- FIG. 10B is a posterior view of the spine at this stage of the procedure, showing a Short Distractor 120 in place on one side of the spine and the bottom portion of Outer Sleeve 140 in place on the opposite side of the spine.
- an Inner Sleeve 242 is inserted from the rear within the Outer Sleeve 140 .
- This Inner Sleeve has a collar portion 244 of a known thickness which seats against the top edge surface 172 of Outer Sleeve 140 .
- the cylindrical barrel portion of Inner Sleeve 242 comes to approximate the posterior aspect of the vertebral bodies interior the Outer Sleeve when fully seated.
- a Drill 240 having a known selected length is then introduced through the rearward aperture of the Inner Sleeve 242 and utilized to ream out the arcs of bone which it engages from the opposed vertebral endplates as well as any discal material within its path down to its predetermined and limited depth.
- the Drill 240 has a narrow engagement portion 246 , which allows it to be affixed to a drill mechanism which may be either a manual or a power unit.
- a circumferential collar 248 of an increased diameter serves to limit the depth of penetration of the drill 240 and may be fixed, or lockably adjustable.
- Such mechanisms include, but are not limited to, the use of collets, threaded shafts with lock nuts, and flanges engaging grooves forced therein by either a cap pulled over the flanges or screwed down upon them.
- the forward cutting edge 252 of Drill 240 is a modification of a large fluted drill design such that the end resembles an end cutting mill which may contain any workable number of cutting surfaces, but preferably four or more, and such cutting surfaces being relatively shallow such that the advancement of the instrument occurs more slowly.
- the outside diameter of the Drill 240 corresponds to the minor diameter of the threaded spinal implant.
- the Inner Sleeve 242 has an inner diameter slightly greater than that dimension and its outer diameter is slightly smaller than the inside diameter of the Outer Sleeve 140 which has the same outer diameter as the major diameter of the threaded implant.
- the drill shaft of drill 240 comprises an upper portion 243 , a central recessed portion 256 of a smaller diameter and a lower cutting drill portion 250 .
- the upper portion 243 and lower portion 256 of the drill 240 have the same outside diameter.
- the Inner Sleeve 242 serves many functions. First, it provides a more intimate drill guide for drill 240 in the event a smaller diameter hole is to be drilled than that of the inside diameter of the Outer Sleeve 140 . Second, since it now guides the Drill, it allows for the Outer Sleeve 140 to have an internal diameter large enough to admit the threaded spinal implant, which is indeed considerably larger in diameter than the Drill 240 itself.
- the Drill 240 would be free to wander within the confines of that greater space and would not reliably make parallel cuts removing equal portions of bone from the adjacent vertebrae V. Further, the bone removal not only needs to be equal, but must be correctly oriented in three dimensions. That is, the path of the Drill 240 must be equally centered within the disc space, parallel the endplates, and parallel to the sagittal axis dissecting the interspace.
- a further purpose of the Inner Sleeve 242 is that it may be removed simultaneously with the Drill 240 , thereby trapping the debris, both cartilaginous and bony generated during the drilling procedure, which are guided rearward by the large flutes 251 of Drill portion 250 , where they are collected around recessed portion 256 between the recessed portion 256 and the inner wall of the Inner Sleeve 242 are there contained therein.
- the Drill 240 in conjunction with the Inner Sleeve 242 , all of the debris generated by the reaming procedure is safely removed from the spinal canal and wound area.
- the disc tissue in the area to be reamed has been removed previously, as per the preferred method, then the patient's own bone of good quality and useful within the operation will then be contained between the Inner Sleeve 242 and the shaft portion 256 . Once away from the surgical wound, this material may be used to load the spinal implant or placed deep within the interspace to participate in the fusion.
- Drill end 250 has a forward projecting nipple 260 , which itself is bullet-shaped in its leading aspect so as to ease its entrance into the disc space and to urge the vertebrae apart.
- Nipple 260 is distracting, stabilizing as it resists any tendency of the vertebrae to move together, is self-centering to the Drill portion 250 when working in conjunction with Sleeves 140 and 242 , and virtually assures the symmetrical resection of bone from the opposed vertebral surfaces.
- FIG. 11B The alternative “Trephine Method” referred to earlier in this application, is shown in FIG. 11B .
- a Long Distractor 100 is left in place after the Outer Sleeve 140 is seated.
- the Long Distractor 100 in this case differs from the Long Distractor of the preferred embodiment in that its outside diameter of the barrel 106 is of a smaller diameter than in the prior version. This is made necessary because regardless of the method, the hole to be formed corresponds to the minor diameter of the spinal implant.
- Trephine 270 a hollow, tubular member with sharp cutting teeth 251 at its proximal end, has a wall thickness and since the outside diameter of that trephine 270 must correspond to the root diameter of the implant, then the wall thickness of the trephine 270 must be allowed for by a corresponding reduction in the diameter of the Long Distractor 100 .
- a further modification of the Long Distractor 100 to the “Trephine Method” would use longitudinal grooves (not shown) along the barrel surface 106 for the purpose of transmitting any debris generated during the cutting procedure, rearward. Since the cutting element is both centered and aligned by the Long Distractor, the use of the Inner Sleeve 242 is not mandatory, but may once again be useful in controlling the path of the debris. To that end, little debris is generated in the “Trephine Method” as the bony arcs are not so much being reamed out and removed as they are simply being cut into the bone where these arcs of bone are left connected at their far ends.
- Instrument 272 consisting of a shaft 276 attached off center to the lower surface 273 handle 274 .
- the shaft 274 terminates in a cutting arm 278 .
- the instrument 272 is inserted through Outer Sleeve 140 where the lower surface 273 of handle 274 abuts the top 172 of the Outer Sleeve 140 , both stopping downward motion of instrument 272 and precisely placing the perpendicularly cutting arm 278 of instrument 272 so that as handle portion 274 is rotated, the cutting arm 278 is also rotated, cutting the arcs of bone and liberating them from their last attachments. These portions of bone are then removed utilizing this instrument or a long forceps, and then placed within the implants or otherwise used to participate in the fusion.
- the spinal implant 1 While in the preferred embodiment of the present invention the spinal implant 1 , is essentially self-tapping, if the bone is unusually hard it may be desirable to form the thread pattern within the interspace prior to the insertion of the implant I.
- Tap 280 has a thread-cutting portion 282 connected by a shaft 286 to a handle portion 292 , which has been designed to give mechanical advantage to the rotation of the instrument for the purpose of cutting threads.
- the lower portion of handle 290 has a forward facing flat surface 288 too large to fit through the opening of Outer Sleeve 140 which thus safely limits the depth of penetration of the cutting element 282 .
- This tap 280 is further made safe by blunt end 294 which will engage the uncut portions of the vertebral bone just prior to the engagement of shoulder 288 against surface 172 .
- This feature allows the surgeon to appreciate a less harsh resistance as the blunt nose 294 encounters the remaining unresected bone for the drill hole and prior to the sudden increase in resistance caused by the seating of shoulder 288 against top edge 172 , which first resistance serves as a warning to the surgeon to discontinue the tapping procedure.
- the surgeon has both visual (as shoulder 288 approaches top edge 172 ) and tactile warnings to avoid stripping the thread form.
- Tap end 282 is highly specialized for its specific purpose.
- a truncated bullet-shaped area 298 which ramps up to the constant diameter intermediate the cutting ridges 296 .
- Ramp portion 298 urges the opposed vertebral bodies apart, which motion is resisted by Outer Sleeve 140 , thus progressively driving the sharp leading edges of thread forms 296 into the vertebral bodies.
- the periodic longitudinal grooves 284 interrupting the thread forms which may number 1 to 8, but preferably 4, function to accumulate the bony material which is removed during the thread cutting process. In that regard, in the ideal embodiment, the thread cutting form is designed to compress the bone to be formed rather than to trough through it.
- the major and minor diameters of the Tap 280 may be varied, in the preferred embodiment, the minor diameter corresponds to the minor diameter of the implant I, but the major diameter is slightly less than the major diameter of the implant.
- the surgical site is now fully prepared to receive the spinal implant I.
- the implant has been enhanced by the use of, application to, and filling with fusion promoting, enhancing, and participating substances and factors.
- the implant may be fully prepared for insertion as provided to the operating surgeon.
- human bone is most commonly used as the graft material of choice, with the patient's own bone being considered the best source.
- FIG. 14 a shows a trephine 300 with an exceedingly sharp front cutting edge 302 for quickly and cleanly coring into the patient's posterior iliac crest, or any other bony tissue, and for the purpose of producing a core of bone then contained within the hollow 304 of the trephine 300 .
- Trephine 300 has a rear portion 306 with a pair of diametrically opposed slots 310 , and disposed clockwise from their longitudinally oriented rearward facing openings so as to engage diametrically and opposing members 312 of Drive unit 308 , by which trephine 300 may be attached to either a hand or power drill. It can be appreciated that engagement mechanism 312 is stable during the clockwise cutting procedure, and yet allows for the rapid disconnection of the two components once the cutting is completed.
- a corkscrew 408 shown in FIG. 14C is introduced though the central opening of rear portion 306 and threaded down and through the core of bone within 304 and to the depth of teeth 302 .
- the tip 318 of the corkscrew 408 which extends substantially on line with the outer envelope of the corkscrew, then cuts radially through the base of the bone core.
- Trephine 300 has a barrel portion 304 continuous with sharp toothed portion 302 having an inner diameter just less than the inner diameter of the spinal implant I to be loaded.
- the Trephine 300 with its core of harvested bone is then placed as shown in FIG. 14B , through opening 340 of Implant Bone Loading device 320 , where the barrel portion 304 then passes through and is stopped by circular flange 344 .
- the plunger shaft 326 of instrument 320 is then prepared for attachment by rotating knob 332 counterclockwise such that the plunger 372 is pulled via the long threaded shaft portion 328 back to the base of collar 330 at its proximal end. In this position, knob 332 is considerably extended rearward from collar 330 .
- the plunger head 372 is inserted into the central hollow of portion 306 of Trephine 300 as the proximal cylindrical portion of collar 330 then follows it, such that the plunger 372 then occupies the rearward portion of barrel 304 and the proximal cylindrical portion of collar 330 occupies the central hollow of portion 306 .
- a pair of diametrically opposed radially projecting arms 346 on collar 330 are then advanced longitudinally into diametrically opposed paired L slots 340 and then rotated clockwise to complete this assembly.
- a spinal implant I is engaged through its female rectangular slot 364 by a rectangular protruding bar extending from rearward facing surface of end plug 324 , (not shown) and secured there by knob 334 which extends as a rod through a central aperture within end plug 324 to extend at the far end as a small bolt which threads to a female aperture centered within the female slot 364 of the spinal implant.
- end plug 324 With the spinal implant I secured to end plug 324 and the opposite end of the implant I presenting as a hollow, tubular opening, end plug 324 is advanced into device 320 where it is secured by rotationally engaging diametrically opposed L- shaped slots 321 . With device 320 fully assembled, end 302 of trephine 300 lies coaxial and opposed to the open end of implant I.
- the plunger 372 proximal the threaded shaft 328 is then forcibly, but controllably driven forward down the barrel 304 ejecting the bone graft directly into the spinal implant I.
- the bone graft is greater in length than the interior of the spinal implant, with further compression the bone is forced into the radially disposed apertures through the wall of the device communicating from the central cavity to the exterior.
- End plug 324 is then removed from apparatus 320 .
- end plug 324 as a handle, end cap 374 shown in FIG. 16 is secured to the open end of the spinal implant I.
- the implant is then disassociated from end plug 324 by rotating knob 334 counterclockwise.
- FIG. 16 shows an Implant Driver instrument which may be used to either insert or to remove said implant 1 .
- Driver 350 has at its far end 362 , a rectangular protrusion 398 , which protrusion intimately engages the complimentary rectangular slot 364 of implant I.
- Threaded portion 353 Protruding from slot 398 of end 362 is threaded portion 353 , which extends as a rod through hollow shaft 358 and hollow hand barrel 360 to knob 354 where it can be rotationally controlled.
- Threaded portion 353 screws into a female aperture central slot 364 , urging 353 into 364 , and binding them together such that instrument 350 can be rotated via paired and diametrically opposed extending arms 366 and in either direction while maintaining contact with the implant.
- the implant is then introduced through the Outer Sleeve 140 and screwed into the interspace opposed between the two prepared vertebrae V until such time as the leading edge of the Implant Cap 374 reaches the depth of the prepared hole at which time its forward motion is impeded by the bone lying before it which had not been drilled out. This allows for a progressive feel to the surgeon as the implant is screwed home.
- this terminal resistance to further seating provides significant tactile feedback to the surgeon.
- visual monitoring of the depth of insertion of the implant is provided to the surgeon by observing the progressive approximation of the forward surface 370 , of barrel portion 360 , as it approaches the rearward facing-surface 172 of Outer-Sleeve 140 . Nevertheless, a final safety mechanism, when the full depth of insertion has been achieved, surface 370 of instrument 350 will abut surface 172 of the Outer Sleeve 140 , prohibiting any further installation of the spinal implant.
- the Driver 350 is dissociated from the implant by turning knob 354 in a counterclockwise direction.
- the Driver 350 is then withdrawn from the outer sheath, then the Outer Sleeve 140 is removed. This leaves the implant fully installed and inset to the determined depth as shown in FIG. 18 .
- a dural nerve root retractor is used to retract the neural structures medially, bringing into full view the head 128 of the Short Distractor 120 , lying flush on the canal floor.
- extended screw portion 116 is inserted into the female threaded portion 114 of the Short Distractor 120 as the extended rectangular portion 134 of apparatus 152 is engaged to the female rectangular portion 118 of the Short Distractor 120 .
- the Long Distractor configuration is restored.
- the Outer Sleeve 140 is slipped over the reconstituted Long Distractor and seated using the Driver Cap 162 .
- the entire sequence of events as described for the implantation of the spinal implant I as already placed, is then repeated such that both spinal implants come to lie side by side within the interspace.
- circlage or other internal fixation of the levels to be fused may additionally be performed, and then the wound is closed in the routine manner.
- implants are placed side by side from anterior to posterior parallel to the interspace and extending through into the adjacent vertebral bodies. Where the transverse width of the disc space is insufficient to allow for the use of two implants, each of which would be large enough to protrude to the required depth into the adjacent vertebrae, then a singular and significantly larger implant may be placed centrally.
- the interspace to be fused is exposed anteriorly.
- the soft tissues are withdrawn and protected to either side, and if necessary, above and below as well. It is then possible to visualize the entire width of the vertebrae anteriorly adjacent that interspace.
- the surgeon has already templated the appropriate patient radiographs to determine the requisite distraction and optimal implant size.
- the surgeon then broadly excises the great bulk of the nuclear disc portion. (Alternatively, the disc can be left to be removed via the drill later.)
- the surgeon then notes and marks a point midway from side to side anteriorly. He then inserts Long Distractor 100 centering it on a point midway between the point just noted and the lateral extent of the intervertebral space visualized anteriorly.
- the outer barrel portion 106 of the Distractor 100 utilized will correspond to the outside diameter of the implants to be installed.
- the Distractor tips 102 inserted are sequentially larger in diameter until the optimal distraction is achieved.
- This optimal distraction although suggested by the initial templating, may be visually and tactilely confirmed as performed.
- the vertebral endplates will come into full congruence and parallel to the forward shaft portion 102 of the Distractor 100 , causing an alteration in the alignment of the vertebrae and a significant increase in the interference fit and pressurization at the tip, such that the instrument becomes exceedingly stable.
- a Dual Outer Sleeve 340 consisting of a pair of hollow tubes is then introduced over the side by side Long Distractors protruding anteriorly from the spine.
- the Dual Outer Sleeve 340 is comprised of two hollow tubular members identical in size displaced from each other ideally the sum of the difference between the minor and major diameters of both implants combined, but not less than that difference for one implant, as it is possible to have the threads of one implant nest interposed to the threads of the other, such that they both occupy a common area between them.
- the preferred embodiment is slightly greater than two times the difference between the major and minor diameters of the implant (the sum of both) the distance may be considerably greater.
- tubular portions 348 of instrument 340 are parallel, when the area between them 350 , is sufficiently great, these elements may be inclined or declined relative to each other such that they either converge or diverge at their proximal ends.
- Paired tubular structures 348 may be bridged in part or wholly throughout their length, but are rigidly fixed by Foot Plate 344 .
- a top view shows the Foot Plate to be essentially rectangular, but without sharp corners.
- Foot Plate 344 is contoured so as to approximate the shape of the vertebrae anteriorly. Extending forward from Foot Plate 344 are multiple sharp prongs 342 sufficiently long to affix them to the vertebrae. The prongs 342 are limited in length so as to not penetrate too far posteriorly and number from 2 to 10 , but preferably 6 . As the Dual Outer Sleeve 340 is driven forward utilizing Dual Driver Cap 420 , of FIG.
- the Dual Driver Cap 420 is of the same design as Single Driver Cap 160 , in that there is a recess 354 as per 168 , allowing the Outer Sleeve to be fully seated without impeding the rearward projection of the Long Distractor unit.
- area 354 is more relieved as it is unnecessary for the Dual Cap 420 to contact the Long Distractor through portion 110 to inhibit its forward motion, as the Foot Plate 344 functions to that effect.
- the Dual Cap 420 for the Dual Outer Sleeve 340 is correspondingly dual itself and engages the rearward facing dual tubular portion 352 .
- the vertebrae adjacent the interspace to be fused are rigidly held via Foot Plate 344 and the prongs 342 .
- the key element in the anterior method is the use of the predistraction principle, where such distraction is maintained by the Outer Sleeve with or without the Long Distractor. Therefore, once the preparation of the interspace has been completed, while not the preferred embodiment, it is nevertheless within the scope of this invention that one could remove the Outer Sleeve as there are no neural structures requiring protection, and insert the implants directly rather than through the Outer Sleeve.
- FIGS. 16-18 a cylindrical embodiment of the spinal implant I of the present invention is shown.
- the implant I is shown attached to the insertion device 350 .
- the implant I is shown installed in the disc space D, between the adjacent vertebrae.
- the cylindrical implant I comprises a hollow tubular member which in the preferred embodiment is made of an ASTM surgically implantable material, preferably Titanium.
- the cylindrical implant I is closed at one end and open at the other end covered by a cap 394 .
- the cylindrical implant I has a series of macro-sized openings 390 through the side walls of the cylindrical implant I.
- a series of external threads 392 are formed on the circumference of the cylindrical implant I. Any variety of threads may be used on the implant.
- the cap 374 has a hexagonal is opening 394 for tightening the cap 374 .
- While the present invention has been described in association with the implant of a threaded spinal implant, it is recognized that other forms of implants may be used with the present method.
- implants made from bone or artificial materials, knurled or irregularly shaped cylinders or spheres, or any other shaped implants that can be introduced through the outer sleeve may be used. Being able to perform the procedure through the outer sleeve permits the procedure to be performed safely and quickly, and more accurately.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Transplantation (AREA)
- Neurology (AREA)
- Cardiology (AREA)
- Vascular Medicine (AREA)
- Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Prostheses (AREA)
- Surgical Instruments (AREA)
- Electrotherapy Devices (AREA)
- Thermotherapy And Cooling Therapy Devices (AREA)
- Saccharide Compounds (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Acyclic And Carbocyclic Compounds In Medicinal Compositions (AREA)
- Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/223,916, filed Aug. 20, 2002; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/586,950, filed Jan. 16, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,436,098; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/074,781, filed Jun. 10, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,437; all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to artificial fusion implants to be placed into the intervertebral space left remaining after the removal of a damaged spinal disc and specifically to the apparatus for and method of, inserting the implants.
- 2. Description of the Prior Art
- For the purpose of achieving long term stability to a segment of injured spine, a fusion (the joining together of two or more bones via a continuous bridge of incorporated bone) may be performed. Well-known to those skilled in such art is the interbody fusion wherein the disc is partially excised and bone placed within that space previously occupied by that disc material (between adjacent vertebrae) for the purpose of restoring a more normal spatial relationship, and to provide for stability; short term by mechanical support, and long term by the permanent cross bonding of bone from vertebra to vertebra. For fusion to occur within the disc space, it is necessary to prepare the vertebrae to be fused by breaking through, or cutting into, the hardened outside plates of bone (the endplates) to allow the interposed bone graft to come into direct contact with the more vascular cancellous (spongy) bone, and to thereby trick the body into attempting to heal this induced, but controlled, “fracturing” by both bone production and the healing of the grafts to both opposed vertebral surfaces such that they become one continuous segment of bone.
- The purpose of the present invention is to provide an implant, and the apparatus and method of inserting the implant within the intervertebral space left after the removal of the disc material and permanently eliminate all motion at that location. To do so, the device of the present invention is space occupying within the disc interspace, rigid, self-stabilizing to resist dislodgement, stabilizing to the adjacent spinal vertebrae to eliminate local motion, and able to intrinsically participate in a vertebra to vertebra bony fusion so as to assure the permanency of the result.
- At present, following the removal of a damaged disc, either bone or nothing is placed into the remaining space. Placing nothing into this space allows the space to collapse which may result in damage to the nerves; or the space may fill with scar tissue and eventually lead to a reherniation. The use of bone to fill the space is less than optimal in that bone obtained from the patient requires additional surgery and is of limited availability in its most useful form, and if obtained elsewhere, lacks living bone cells, carries a significant risk of infection, and is also limited in supply as it is usually obtained from accident victims. Furthermore, regardless of the source of the bone, it is only marginal structurally and lacks a means to either stabilize itself against dislodgement, or to stabilize the adjacent vertebrae.
- a. Prior Art Implants
- There have been an extensive number of attempts to develop an acceptable disc prosthesis (an artificial disc). Such devices by design would be used to replace a damaged disc and seek to restore the height of the interspace and to restore the normal motion of that spinal joint. No such device has been found that is medically acceptable. This group of prosthetic or artificial disc replacements, seeking to preserve spinal motion and so are different from the present invention, would include:
- U.S. Pat. No. 3,867,728 to STUBSTAD—describing a flexible disc implant.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,349,921 to KUNTZ—describing a flexible disc replacement with file-like surface projections to discourage device dislocation.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,309,777 to PATIL—describing a motion preserving implant with spiked outer surfaces to resist dislocation and containing a series of springs to urge the vertebrae away from each other.
- U.S. Pat. No. 3,875,595 to FRONING—describing a motion preserving bladder-like disc replacement with two opposed stud-like projections to resist dislocation.
- U.S. Pat. No. 2,372,622 to FASSIO (France)—describing a motion preserving implant comprising complimentary opposed convex and concave surfaces.
- In summary, these devices resemble the present invention only in that they are placed within the intervertebral space following the removal of a damaged disc. In that they seek to is preserve spinal motion, they are diametrically different from the present invention which seeks to permanently eliminate all motion at that spinal segment.
- A second related area of prior art includes those devices utilized to replace essentially wholly removed vertebrae. Such removal is generally necessitated by extensive vertebral fractures, or tumors, and is not associated with the treatment of disc disease. While the present invention is to be placed within the disc space, these other vertebral devices cannot be placed within the disc space as at least one vertebra has already been removed such that there no longer remains a “disc space”. Furthermore, these devices are limited in that they seek to perform as temporary structural members mechanically replacing the removed vertebrae (not a removed disc), and do not intrinsically participate in supplying osteogenic material to achieve cross vertebrae bony fusion. Therefore, unlike the present invention which provides for a source of osteogenesis, use of this group of devices must be accompanied by a further surgery consisting of a bone fusion procedure utilizing conventional technique. This group consisting of vertebral struts rather than disc replacements would include the following:
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,553,273 to WU—describing a turnbuckle-like vertebral strut.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,401,112 to REZAIAN—describing a turnbuckle—like vertebral strut with the addition of a long stabilizing staple that spans the missing vertebral body.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,554,914 to KAPP—describing a large distractible spike that elongates with a screw mechanism to span the gap left by the removal of an entire vertebra and to serve as an anchor for acrylic cement which is then used to replace the missing bone (vertebrae).
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,217 to OGILVIE—describing a vertebral strut mechanism that can be implanted after at least one vertebrae has been removed and consists of a mechanism for causing the engagement of screws into the vertebrae above and the vertebrae below the one removed.
- In summary, this second group of devices differs from the present invention in that they are vertebral replacements struts, do not intrinsically participate in the bony fusion, can only be inserted in the limited circumstances where an entire vertebra has been removed from the anterior approach, and are not designed for, or intended to be used for the treatment of disc disease.
- A third area of prior art related to the present invention includes all devices designed to be applied to one of the surfaces of the spine. Such devices include all types of plates, struts, and rods which are attached by hooks, wires and screws. These devices differ significantly from the present invention in that they are not inserted within the disc space and furthermore do not intrinsically participate in supplying osteogenic material for the fusion.
- Therefore, where permanent spinal immobilization is desired, an additional surgery, consisting of a spinal fusion performed by conventional means or the use of supplemental methylmethacrylate cement is required. Such devices applied to the spine, but not within the disc space, would include the following:
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,604,995 to STEPHENS—describing a “U” shaped metal rod attached to the posterior elements of the spine with wires to stabilize the spine over a large number of segments.
- U.S. Pat. No. 2,677,369 to KNOWLES—describing a metal column device to be placed posteriorly along the lumbar spine to be held in position by its shape alone and to block pressure across the posterior portions of the spinal column by locking the spine in full flexion thereby shifting the maximum weight back onto the patient's own disc.
- Other devices are simply variations on the use of rods (e.g. Harrington, Luque, Cotrel-Dubosset, Zielke), wires or cables (Dwyer), plates and screws (Steffee), or struts (Dunn, Knowles).
- In summary, none of these devices are designed to be nor can be used within the disc space. Moreover, these devices do not replace a damaged disc, and do not intrinsically participate in the generation of a bony fusion.
- Another area of related prior art to be considered is that of devices designed to be placed within the vertebral interspace following the removal of a damaged disc, and seeking to eliminate further motion at that location.
- Such a device is contained in U.S. Pat. No. 4,501,269 issued to BAGBY which describes an implantable device and limited instrumentation. The method employed is as follows: a hole is bored transversely across the joint and a hollow metal basket of larger diameter than the hole is then pounded into the hole and then the hollow metal basket is filled with the bone debris generated by the drilling.
- While the present invention (device, instrumentation, and method) may appear to bear some superficial resemblance to the BAGBY invention, it is minimal, while the differences are many fold and highly significant. These differences include the following:
- 1. Safety—The present invention provides for a system of completely guarded instrumentation so that all contiguous vital structures (e.g. large blood vessels, neural structures) are absolutely protected. The instrumentation of the present invention also makes overpenetration by the drill impossible. Such overpenetration in the cervical spine, for example, would result in the total paralysis or death of the patient. In the thoracic spine, the result would be complete paraplegia. In the lumbar spine, the result would be paraplegia or a life-threatening perforation of the aorta, vena cava, or iliac vessels.
- The present invention is atraumatically screwed into place while the BAGBY device, in contradistinction, is pounded into position. BAGBY describes that its implant is significantly larger in size than the hole drilled and must be pounded in. This is extremely dangerous and the pounding occurs directly over the spinal cord which is precariously vulnerable to percussive injury. Furthermore, while it is possible, for example in the lumbar spine, to insert the present invention away from the spinal cord and nerves, the BAGBY device must always be pounded directly towards the spinal cord.
- Furthermore, since the BAGBY device is pounded into a smooth hole under great resistance, and lacking any specific design features to secure it, the device is highly susceptible to forceful ejection which would result in great danger to the patient and clinical failure. The present invention, in contradistinction, is securely screwed into place, and possesses highly specialized locking threads to make accidental dislodgement impossible. Because of the proximity of the spinal cord, spinal nerves, and blood vessels, any implant dislodgement as might occur with the BAGBY device might have catastrophic consequences.
- 2. Broad applicability—The BAGBY device can only be inserted from the front of the vertebral column, however, in contrast, the present invention can be utilized in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, and can be inserted from behind (posteriorly) in the lumbar spine. This is of great importance in that the purpose of these devices is in the treatment of disc disease and probably greater than 99 percent of all lumbar operations for the treatment of disc disease are performed from behind where the present invention can easily be utilized, but the BAGBY device, as per BAGBY'S description, cannot.
- 3. Disc removal—The BAGBY invention requires the complete removal of the disc prior to the drilling step, whereas the present invention eliminates the laborious separate process of disc removal and efficiently removes the disc and prepares the vertebral end plates in a single step.
- 4. Time required—The present invention saves time over the BAGBY invention since time is not wasted laboring to remove the disc prior to initiating the fusion. Also, with the present invention the procedure is performed through a system of guarded instrumentation, time is not wasted constantly placing and replacing various soft tissue retractors throughout the procedure.
- 5. Implant stability—Dislodgement of the implant would be a major source of device failure (an unsuccessful clinical result), and might result in patient paralysis or even death. As discussed, the BAGBY device lacks any specific means of achieving stability and since it is pounded in against resistance to achieve vertebral distraction, and is susceptible to forceful dislodgement by the tendency of the two distracted vertebrae, to return to their original positions squeezing out the device. The present invention, however, is screwed into place. As there is no unscrewing force present between the vertebrae, compression alone cannot dislodge the implant. The implant is inherently stable by its design. Furthermore, the threads of the present invention are highly specialized in that they are periodically interrupted so that the tail ends of each of the tabs so formed are blunted and twisted so as to resist accidental unscrewing. The removal of an implant with such “locking threads” requires the use of a special extractor included within the instrumentation. The stability of the present invention is still further enhanced, again in contradistinction to the BAGBY device, by the presence of a “bone ingrowth” surface texturing, which both increases the friction of the fit and allows for the direct growth of the vertebral bone into the casing of the implant itself.
- 6. Spinal stability—The present invention is not only self-stabilizing, it also provides stability to the adjacent vertebrae in at least three ways that the BAGBY device cannot. First, the BAGBY device is placed transversely across the joint in the center, leaving both vertebrae free to rock back and forth over this round barrel shaped axis, much like a board over a barrel, being used for a seesaw.
- Secondly, as the BAGBY device lacks any specific design features to resist sliding, it may actually behave as a third body allowing the translation of the vertebrae relative to the device and to each other.
- Thirdly, any device can only provide stability if it remains properly, seated. The present invention is inherently stable, and therefore assures that it will stabilize the adjacent vertebrae, rather than, as with the BAGBY, the instability of the spine to be treated may cause a dislocation of the BAGBY implant, is with further loss of spinal stability.
- 7. The collapse of the interspace—While both the present invention and the BAGBY device can be fabricated to withstand the compression forces within the interspace, the interspace may nevertheless collapse under the superincumbent body weight as the implant settles into the vertebral bone. This is related to the load per unit area. Again the present invention is superior to the BAGBY device in at least four ways.
- First, the present invention offers considerably greater surface area to distribute the load. Secondly, while the BAGBY device is placed centrally, the present device is placed bilaterally where the bone tends to be more cortical and much stronger out towards the rim. Thirdly, the present invention supports the load achieving an “I” beam effect, whereas the BAGBY implant does not. Fourthly, it is not pressure alone that causes the collapse of the bone adjacent to the implant, but also bony erosion that is caused by the motion under pressure of the implant against the bone. As discussed in item 6 above, the present invention alone is highly resistant to such motion, again diminishing the likelihood of erosion and interspace collapse.
- 8. Bone ingrowth surface texturing—The present invention has a surface treatment of known and conventional technology to induce the growth of bone from the vertebrae directly into the casing material of the implant itself. The BAGBY device has no similar feature.
- 9. Fusion mass—The BAGBY invention calls for removing the disc and then drilling a hole between the adjacent vertebrae. The bony debris so generated is then put into the device. The present invention takes a core of pure bone producing marrow from the iliac crest, and then by use of a special press, forcibly injects the implant device with an extremely dense compressed core of that osteogenic material until the material itself virtually extrudes from every cell of the implant.
- 10. The probability of achieving fusion—The fusion rate within the spine is known to be related directly to the amount of exposed vascular bone bed area, the quality and quantity of the fusion mass available, and the extent of the stabilization obtained with all other factors being half constant. It would then be anticipated, that the fusion rate would be superior with the present invention as compared to the RAGBY device, because of optimal implant stability (#5), optimal spinal stability (#6), bone ingrowth surface treatment (#8), superior fusion mass (#9), and the greater exposed vertebral bony surface area (#7).
- The last area of prior art possibly related to the present invention and therefore, to be considered related to “bony ingrowth”, are patents that either describe methods of producing materials and or materials or devices to achieve the same. Such patents would include:
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,526 (DORMAN), No. 4,634,720 (DORMAN), No. 4,542,539 (ROWE), No. 4,405,319 (COSENTINO), No. 4,439,152 (SMALL), No. 4,168,326 (BROEMER), No. 4,535,485 (ASHMAN), No. 3,987,499 (SCHARBACH), No. 3,605,123 (HAHN), No. 4,655,777 (DUNN), No. 4,645,503 (LIN), No. 4,547,390 (ASHMAN), No. 4,608,052 (VAN KAPEN), No. 4,698,375 (DORMAN), No. 4,661,536 (DORMAN), No, 3,952,334 (BOKROS), No. 3,905,047 (LONG), No. 4,693,721 (DUCHEYNE), No. 4,070,514 (ENTHERLY).
- However, while the implant of the present invention would utilize bone ingrowth technology, it would do so with conventional technology.
- b. Prior Art Instrumentations And Methods
- The following is a history of the prior art apparatus and methods of inserting spinal implants:
- In 1956, Ralph Cloward developed a method and instruments which he later described for preparing the anterior aspect (front) of the cervical spine, and then fusing it. Cloward surgically removed the disc to be fused across and then placed a rigid drill guide with a large foot plate and prongs down over an aligner rod and embedded said prongs into the adjacent vertebrae to maintain the alignment so as to facilitate the reaming out of the bone adjacent the disc spaces. As the large foot plate sat against the front of the spine, it also served as a fixed reference point to control the depth of drilling. The reaming left two opposed resected arcs, one each, from the opposed vertebral surfaces. The tubular drill guide, which was placed only preliminary to the drilling, was thereafter completely removed. A cylindrical bony dowel, significantly larger in diameter than the hole formed, was then pounded into the hole already drilled. Cloward's method of instrumentation was designed for, and limited to, use on the anterior aspect and in the region of the cervical spine only. The hole was midline, which would preclude its use posteriorly where the spinal cord would be in the way.
- As the bone graft to be inserted in Cloward's method was necessarily larger in diameter than the hole drilled, the graft could not be inserted through the drill guide. This mandated the removal of the drill guide and left the graft insertion phase completely unprotected. Thus Cloward's method and instrumentation was inappropriate for posterior application.
- In addition, the failure to provide continuous protection to the delicate neural structures from the instruments, as well as the bony and cartilaginous debris generated during the procedure, made Cloward's method inappropriate for posterior application. Also, the drill guide described by Cloward could not be placed posteriorly within the spinal canal, as the foot plate would crush the nerves. Modifying Cloward's drill guide by removing the foot plate completely, would still leave the instrument unworkable as it would then lack stability, and would not be controllable for depth of seating.
- Nevertheless, Wilterberger, (Wilterberger, B. R., Abbott, K. H., “Dowel Intervertebral Fusion as Used in Lumbar Disc Surgery,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Volume 39A, pg. 234-292, 1957) described the unprotected drilling of a hole from the posterior into the lumbar spine between the nerve roots and across the disc space, and then inserting a stack of button-like dowels into that space. While Wilterberger had taken the Cloward concept of circular drilling and dowel fusion and applied it to the lumbar spine from a posterior approach, he had not provided for an improved method, nor had he advanced the instrumentation so as to make that procedure sufficiently safe, and it rapidly fell into disrepute.
- Crock (Crock, H. V., “Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion—Indications for its Use and notes on Surgical Technique,” Clinical Orthopedics, Volume 165, pg. 157-163, 1981) described his technique and instrumentation for Anterior Interbody Fusion of the lumbar spine, wherein he drilled two large holes side by side across the disc space from anterior to posterior essentially unprotected and then pounded in two at least partially cylindrical grafts larger than the holes prepared.
- A review of the prior art is instructive as to a number of significant deficiencies in regard to the method and instrumentation for the performance of Interbody Spinal Fusion utilizing drilling to prepare the endplates.
- As the great majority of spinal surgery is performed in the lumbar spine and from posteriorly, a review of the prior art reveals a number of deficiencies in regard to the spine in general, and to the posterior approach to the lumbar spine specifically. These deficiencies include the:
- 1. Failure to protect the surrounding tissues throughout the procedure, specifically, prior to drilling and until after the insertion of the graft;
- 2. Failure to contain the debris, bony and cartilaginous, generated during the procedure;
- 3. Failure to optimize the contact of the cylindrical drill hole and bone graft, the mismatch in their diameters resulting in incongruence of fit;
- 4. Failure to determine the optimal drill size prior to drilling;
- 5. Failure to determine the optimal amount of distraction prior to drilling;
- 6. Inability to optimize the amount of distraction so as to restore the-normal spatial relationships between adjacent vertebrae;
- 7. Inability to create sufficient working space within the spinal canal (between the nerve roots and the dural sac) to make the procedure safe;
- 8. Absent a foot plate on the drill guide, as necessitated by the close tolerances posteriorly, the inability to reliably insure that the drilling is parallel to the vertebral endplates;
- 9. The inability to insure equal bone removal from the opposed vertebral surfaces; and
- 10. The inability to determine within the spinal canal, the proper side by side positioning for dual drill holes.
- The present invention comprises a series of artificial implants, the purpose of which is to participate in, and directly cause bone fusion across an intervertebral space following the excision of a damaged disc. Such implants are structurally load bearing devices, stronger than bone, capable of withstanding the substantial forces generated within the spinal interspace. The devices of the present invention have a plurality of macro sized cells and openings, which can be loaded with fusion promoting materials, such as autogenous bone, for the purpose of materially influencing the adjacent vertebrae to perform a bony bond to the implants and to each other. The implant casing may be surface textured or otherwise treated by any of a number of known technologies to achieve a “bone ingrowth surface” to further enhance the stability of the implant and to expedite the fusion.
- The devices of the present invention are configured and designed so as to promote their own stability within the vertebral interspace and to resist being dislodged, and furthermore, to stabilize the adjacent spinal segments.
- The apparatus and method of the present invention for preparing the vertebrae for insertion of the implant allows for the rapid and safe removal of the disc, preparation of the vertebrae, performance of the fusion, and internal stabilization of the spinal segment.
- The present invention is a method for Interbody Spinal Fusion utilizing novel instrumentation, whereby a protective tubular member is placed prior to the drilling part of the procedure and is left in place until the graft is fully seated.
- In the preferred embodiment two distractors are used to separate two adjacent vertebrae to a preferred distance. A hollow Outer Sleeve having teeth at one end is driven into the adjacent vertebrae on one side to hold the vertebrae in position when the distractor is removed, a diameter reducing hollow Inner Sleeve is introduced into the Outer Sleeve, a drill having a drill stop is passed through the hollow Inner Sleeve to drill a hole to a desired depth, and an implant is inserted in the hole. The method is repeated on the other side of the disc.
- In summary then, the present invention, instrumentation, and method, provides for a single surgery providing for an integrated discectomy, fusion, and interbody internal spinal fixation.
- The apparatus and method of the present invention provide the following advantages:
- 1. The present invention is safer by providing protection of the surrounding tissues. An Outer Sleeve places all of the delicate soft tissue structures, nerves, blood vessels, and organs outside of the path of the various sharp surgical instruments and the implant. Further, it is an improvement upon hand held retractors in that it occupies the least possible amount of area, avoids the stretching associated with manual retraction, provides for the retraction and shielding of the surrounding tissues in all directions circumferentially and simultaneously, and it does so exclusively with smooth, curved surfaces.
- 2. The present invention is safer by providing protection against the danger of instrument or implant overpenetration.
- 3. The present invention is safer as the surgical site and wound are protected from the debris generated during the procedure.
- 4. The present invention is safer because the method provides for absolute protection to the soft tissues directly and from indirect injury by overpenetration. It makes safe the use of power instrumentation which is both more effective and efficient.
- 5. The present invention maintains the vertebrae to be fused rigid throughout the procedure.
- 6. The present invention holds the vertebrae to be fused aligned throughout the procedure.
- 7. The present invention holds the vertebrae to be fused distracted throughout the procedure.
- 8. The present invention assures that all instruments introduced through the Outer Sleeve are coaxial and equally centered through the disc space and parallel the endplates.
- 9. The present invention facilitates the implant insertion by countering the high compressive forces tending to collapse the interspace, which if left unchecked would resist the introduction and advancement of the implant and make stripping more likely.
- 10. The present invention extends the range and use of the procedure and similarly the interbody spinal implant itself by making the procedure safe throughout the spine.
- 11. The present invention increases the ability to use a specifically sized implant.
- 12. In the present invention the end of all the penetrating instrumentation is blunt faced.
- 13. In the present invention all of the instruments have been stopped at a predetermined depth to avoid overpenetration.
- 14. The design of the Outer Sleeve in the present invention conforms to the spacial limitations of the specific surgical site.
- 15. The design and use of a second or Inner Sleeve in the present invention allows for the difference in size between the inside diameter of the Outer Sleeve, and the outside diameter of the drill itself. This difference being necessary to accommodate the sum of the distraction to be produced, and the depth of the circumferential threading present of the implant.
- 16. In the present invention a specially designed drill bit with a central shaft recess allows for the safe collection of the drilling products, which can then be removed without disturbing the Outer Sleeve by removing the drill bit and Inner Sleeve as a single unit.
- 17. In the present invention a specially designed trephine for removing a core of bone slightly smaller in diameter than the internal diameter of the implant cavity itself, however of a greater length.
- 18. In the present invention a specially designed press for forcefully compressing and injecting the long core of autogenous bone into the implant, such that it extrudes through the implant itself.
- 19. In the present invention a specially designed driver extractor, which attaches to the implant and allows the implant to be either inserted or removed without itself dissociating from the implant, except by the deliberate disengagement of the operator.
- 20. In the present invention predistraction increases the working space.
- 21. The Distractor in the present invention is self-orienting acting as a directional finder.
- 22. The Distractor in the present invention is self-centralizing between the opposed vertebral surfaces acting as a centering post for the subsequent bone removal.
- 23. In the present invention predistraction assures the equal removal of bone from the adjacent vertebral surfaces.
- 24. In the present invention predistraction assures the exact congruence between the hole drilled-and the device.
- 25. In the present invention predistraction assures that the drilling is parallel to the vertebral endplates.
- 26. In the present invention predistraction allows for the determination of the optimal distraction prior to drilling.
- 27. In the present invention predistraction allows for the verification of the correct prosthesis size prior to drilling.
- 28. In the present invention predistraction facilitates device insertion by relieving the compressive loads across the interspace which would resist implantation.
- 29. In the present invention predistraction decreases the likelihood of stripping the bone during insertion.
- 30. In the present invention predistraction provides for the side by side positioning, spacing, and parallelism required prior to the irrevocable event of drilling.
- 31. In the present invention predistraction provides for the rigid stabilization of the vertebrae opposed to the disc space throughout the surgical procedure.
- 32. In the present invention predistraction provides for an implant easier to insert as the compressive loads of the opposed vertebrae are held in check so that the device itself need not drive the vertebrae apart to be inserted.
- 33. In the present invention predistraction allows for the insertion of a more effective implant as more of the implant can be dedicated to its intended purpose and be full diameter, whereas without the benefit of predistraction and the ability to maintain the same, a significant portion of the forward end of the implant would need to be dedicated to the purpose of separating the opposing vertebrae.
- 34. The present invention allows for the use of an implant with a sharper thread or surface projections as there is no danger to the surrounding tissues.
- 35. The present invention allows for the implant to be fully preloaded as provided to the surgeon, or for the surgeon to load it with the material of his choice at the time of surgery.
- 36. The present invention allows for the loading of a spinal implant outside of the spinal canal and prior to implantation.
- It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method of performing a discectomy, a fusion, and an internal stabilization of the spine, and specifically, all three of the above simultaneously and as a single procedure.
- It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved method of performing a discectomy, a fusion, and an internal stabilization of the spine, which is both quicker and safer than is possible by previous methods.
- It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved method of performing a discectomy, a fusion and an internal stabilization of the spine, to provide for improved surgical spinal implants.
- It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved method of performing a discectomy, a fusion, and an internal stabilization of the spine, which provides for an improved system of surgical instrumentation to facilitate the performance of the combined discectomy, fusion, and internal spinal stabilization.
- It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved method of performing a discectomy, a fusion, and an internal stabilization of the spine procedures.
- It is an object of the present invention to provide instrumentation and a method of spinal interbody arthrodesis that is faster, safer, and more efficacious than prior methods, and can effectively be performed in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine anteriorly, as well as in the lower lumbar spine posteriorly.
- It is a further object of the present invention to provide a means for inserting a spinal implant between adjacent vertebrae while maintaining their optimal spacing, positioning, and alignment.
- These and other objects of the present invention will be apparent from review of the following specification and the accompanying drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a side view of the Long Distractor, of the present invention inserted into the intervertebral space. -
FIG. 2 is a side view of a Convertible Distractor assembly in relation to the spine. -
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a high retention Short Distractor ofFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 3A is a side view of the high retention Short Distractor ofFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 3B is a side view of an alternative Short Distractor with circumferential forward facing ratcheting. -
FIG. 3C is a top view of the alternative Short Distractor ofFIG. 3B . -
FIG. 3D is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of a Short Distractor. -
FIG. 3E is a top view of the alternative distractor ofFIG. 3D . -
FIG. 3F is a side view of a further alternative rectangularized Short Distractor with knurled surfaces. -
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a spinal segment (two vertebrae and an interposed disc) with a Short Distractor in place, with a portion of the upper vertebrae and disc cut away to show the Short Distractor on one side of the spine and the Long Distractor about to be placed contralaterally. -
FIG. 5 shows a side view of the Outer Sleeve in place over the Long Distractor, and about to receive the Driver Cap in preparation for being seated. -
FIG. 6 shows the Long Distractor, Outer Sleeve, and Driver Cap following the proper seating of the Outer Sleeve into the two adjacent vertebrae. -
FIG. 7A is a side view of the cervical Outer Sleeve being placed over a Long Distractor which is in place within the disc space anteriorly. -
FIG. 7B is a bottom view of the single Outer Sleeve ofFIG. 7A . -
FIG. 7C is a bottom view of a Dual Outer Sleeve. -
FIG. 7D is an enlarged side view of the proximal portion ofFIG. 7C . -
FIG. 7E is a bottom view of a Dual Driver Cap for driving two distractors. -
FIG. 7F is a side sectional view showing the Dual Outer Sleeve ofFIGS. 7C and 7D , Distractors and Dual Cap ofFIG. 7E seated. -
FIG. 8 is a side view of the Outer Sleeve ofFIG. 7A centered on the Long Distractor and fully seated on the anterior aspect of the cervical spine. -
FIG. 9 is a perspective view of the Distractor Puller. -
FIG. 10 is a cutaway partial side view of the Proximal Puller engaging the extraction ring of the Long Distractor over the end of the Outer Sleeve. -
FIG. 10A is a side view of the Puller coupled to the Long Distractor just prior to its extraction. -
FIG. 10B is a posterior view of the proximal Outer Sleeve and a Short Distractor in place in regard to the vertebrae, disc and nerves. -
FIG. 11A is a side sectional view of the Drill and Inner Sleeve within the Outer Sleeve and drilling across the intervertebral space and cutting partially cylindrical arcs from the adjacent vertebrae. -
FIG. 11B is a sectional side view of preparation of the intervertebral space by the alternative “Trephine Method” showing the Distractor, Trephine, Inner Sleeve, and Outer Sleeve in place. -
FIG. 11C is a sectional side view as inFIG. 11A , but showing the use of an alternative drilling conformation wherein the extended proximal portion is both distracting and self-centering. -
FIG. 11D is a side view of an instrument for removing arcs of bone from vertebrae following drilling. -
FIG. 12 is a perspective view of the surgical Tap. -
FIG. 13 is a side view of the Outer Sleeve and the surgical Tap fully threaded within the interspace. -
FIG. 14A is a side view of the bone harvesting Trephine and motor adapter. -
FIG. 14B is a perspective view of the implant Bone Loading Device. -
FIG. 14C is a perspective view of the Corkscrew.bone freeing and extracting instrument. -
FIG. 15 is a partial perspective view of the Bone Loading Device in operation. -
FIG. 16 is a perspective view of the Implant Driver about to engage the spinal implant. -
FIG. 17 is a side view of the spinal implant being fully seated within the intervertebral space by means of the Driver apparatus in place within the Outer Sleeve. -
FIG. 18 is a side view of the lumbar spine showing the end result of the device implantation via the posterior route. - The following discussion will be in regard to application in the lumbar spine via the posterior approach. In its simplest form, the method of the present invention involves the following steps. The patient is placed on a spinal surgery frame, which allows for the distraction and alignment of the disc space to be fused. A bilateral posterior exposure of the interspace, with or without partial discectomy is then performed. Utilizing distractors the disc space is distracted, and a hollow Outer Sleeve is fitted over one of the distractors. The end of the Outer Sleeve has teeth for engaging the two adjacent vertebrae. The Outer Sleeve is driven into the vertebrae and the distractor is then removed. A hollow Inner Sleeve is then inserted into the Outer Sleeve and a stopped Drill is utilized to prepare the opposed vertebral surfaces. The Drill and the Inner Sleeve are removed as a single unit. The space is tapped if so required. The prepared spinal implant is then inserted via the Outer Sleeve utilizing a stopped inserter. The instruments are then removed and the procedure repeated on the contralateral side of the spine.
- Step 1a. Prior to surgery, translucent implant templates appropriately adjusted for scale are superimposed on AP, lateral, and axial images of the interspace to be fused, for the purpose of selecting the optimal implant size and to determine the desired distraction.
- Step 1b. The patient is preferably placed onto a spinal surgery frame capable of inducing both distraction and vertebral alignment.
- Step 2. In the preferred embodiment, a standard bilateral (partial) discectomy is performed and any posterior lipping of the vertebral bodies adjacent the interspace is removed. Alternatively, no disc material need be removed. In the preferred embodiment, the interspace is exposed by performing bilateral paired semihemilaminotomies and resecting the inner aspects of the facet joints adjacent the spinal canal while preserving the supra and interspinous ligaments.
- Step 3. Beginning on the first side, the dural sac and traversing nerve root at that level are retracted medially and a Long Distractor then inserted and impacted flush to the posterior vertebral bodies adjacent that interspace. Long Distractors with working ends of increasing diameter are then sequentially inserted until the optimal distraction is obtained. This optimal distraction not only restores the normal height of the interspace, but further achieves a balance wherein the tendency for the space to collapse is resisted, which in urging the vertebral bodies apart is being equally resisted by the powerful soft tissue structures about the spinal segment including the outer casing of the disc (the annulus fibrosus), various ligaments, capsular structures, as well as the muscles and other soft-tissue structures. This balanced distraction not only provides for the spatial restoration of the height of the interspace, but for considerable stability as the space now resists further distraction or collapse.
- In the preferred embodiment, as the desired distraction is approached, the use of the solid bodied Long Distractors is terminated and a disassemblable Convertible Distractor is placed with tactile and/or radiographic confirmation of ideal distraction. The Convertible Distractor is then disassembled such that the Short Distractor portion is left in place and the ultra-low profile head portion being positioned adjacent to the canal floor and safely away from the neural structures. To insure that the Short Distractor remains in place until its removal is desired, various embodiments of the Short Distractor are available with varying degrees of resistance to dislodgment. In the preferred embodiment of the procedure, attention is then directed to the contralateral side of the spine.
- Step 4. On the contralateral side of the same interspace the Long Distractor having at its working end the diameter matching the Short Distractor already in place, is then inserted. If however, due to an asymmetrical collapse of the interspace it is then determined that greater distraction is required on the second side to achieve the optimal stability, then the appropriate Short Distractor would be placed on the second side. Then the Short Distractor would be removed from the first side and replaced with a larger Long Distractor so as to bring the interspace into balance.
- In an alternative embodiment, the entire procedure is performed on the one side of the spine utilizing only the Long Distractor prior to repeating the procedure on the contralateral side of the spine. While this method can be performed in accordance with the remaining steps as described in the preferred embodiment, when utilized it is best performed using a Trephine which allows the Long Distractor to remain in place, thereby allowing for interspace distraction otherwise provided in the first method by the Short Distractor. This alternative method then requires the use of a Trephine over the Long Distractor in lieu of a reamer and is therefore called the “Trephine Method”, which will be discussed in detail later.
- Step 5. With the Short Distractor in place on the first side of the spine, and the matching Long Distractor in place on the second side of the spine, and with the dural sac and traversing nerve root safely retracted, the Outer Sleeve is placed over the Long Distractor and firmly impacted to its optimal depth using the Impaction Cap and a mallet. The Long Distractor is then removed.
- Step 6. An Inner Sleeve is then placed within the Outer Sleeve, and the interspace is then prepared on that side by utilizing a Drill, Endmill, Reamer, or Trephine to drill, ream, or cut out the bone to be removed to either side, as well as any remaining interposed discal material. In the preferred method, utilizing a specially designed Endmill-Drill, it and the Inner Sleeve are removed as a unit, safely carrying away the bone and disc debris trapped within them from the spinal canal.
- Step 7. If required, a thread forming Tap with penetration limiting means to control the depth of insertion, is then inserted through the Outer Sleeve.
- Step 8. The prepared implant is then inserted utilizing the specialized Driver unit. It should be noted that the implant may be coated with, made of, and/or loaded with substances consistent with bony fusion. However, in the preferred embodiment, the implant is treated with bone promoting and inducing substances, but is loaded with materials suitable for participating in a fusion.
- While substances both natural and artificial are covered by the present invention, the preferred embodiment is in regard to the use of the patient's own bone by the following method. A hollow Trephine is utilized to harvest a core of bone from the posterior superior aspect of the iliac crest adjacent the sacroiliac joint. This core of bone is at its outside diameter, slightly smaller than the inside diameter of the spinal implant to be loaded, but longer than the spinal implant. Utilizing an instrument designed for that purpose, the core of bone is then injected from within the Trephine into the central cavity of the implant causing a superabundance of the bone material within the implant such that the bone material tends to press out through the openings communicating with the outside surface of the implant.
- Step 9. Using the Driver Extractor instrument, the prepared implant is threaded into the prepared interspace. The instrumentation is removed from that side of the spine and attention is then redirected to the first side of the spine. A small retractor is utilized to move the dural sac and traversing nerve root medially and to protect them and allowing the direct visualization of the retained Short Distractor unit. Without removing the Short Distractor, it is reassembled to its shaft portion, essentially reconstituting itself into a Long Distractor. With the inserted implant now acting as the distractor on the opposite side, the Long Distractor is utilized to guide the Outer Sleeve down where it is impacted as described in Step 5.
- Steps 6 & 7 are then repeated, completing the procedure at that level. The wound is then irrigated and closed in the routine manner.
- Through preoperative templating of the patient's anterior posterior, lateral, and axially imaged MRI scan in conjunction with translucent overlays of the various sized implants, the correct implant diameter and length are accurately assessed, as well as the correct amount of distraction needed to restore the interspace to its premorbid height. The patient is then properly positioned and a bilateral partial discectomy performed via paired semihemilaminotomies.
- For the purpose of this example, it will be assumed that by preoperative assessment it was determined that the correct implant would have an external diameter of 18 mm and be 26 mm long. Further, the distraction necessary to restore the height of the interspace would be approximately 10 mm. The dural sac and traversing nerve root would then be retracted medially and protected, while a Long Distractor having an outside diameter to the barrel portion corresponding to the implant to be inserted, that is 18 mm, and having a diameter at the working end of perhaps 8 mm, would be inserted. This then being found to be slightly smaller than optimal by direct observation, a Convertible Distractor having in its barrel portion an 18 mm outside diameter, but having in its working portion a 10 mm diameter would then be inserted. Direct observation and/or x-ray then confirming the ideal distraction, the Convertible Distractor would then be disassembled, the barrel and head portion removed, and the Short Distractor portion left deeply embedded and with its flanged head flat against the canal floor and deep to the neural structures. It would then be safe to allow the dural sac and nerve root to return to their normal positions, which would be superficial to the flanged portion of the Short Distractor.
- Attention would then be directed to the contralateral side. The dural sac and nerve root would then be retracted medially on this second side, and a Long Distractor with an 18 mm diameter barrel portion and a 11 mm working portion would then be inserted into the interspace and driven flush to the bone if necessary, such impaction imploding any osteophytes not already removed, and assuring that the shoulder portion of the barrel comes to lie flat against the posterior aspects of the adjacent bodies. With the dural sac and nerve root still safely retracted, the Outer Sleeve would then be placed over the Long Distractor and utilizing the Driver Cap and a mallet, seated to the optimal depth.
- In the preferred embodiment, the Long Distractor is then removed and the Inner Sleeve is inserted into the Outer Sleeve. Since the purpose of the Inner Sleeve is to support the drill and allow for the increased size of the implant over the size of the drill, thus making it possible for the insertion of the implant to occur through the Outer Sleeve, the Inner Sleeve therefore measures 18 mm in its outside diameter, and 16.6 mm in its inside diameter. This allows it to fit within the Outer Sleeve, the diameter of which is 18.1 mm and to admit the drill bit which is 16.5 mm in diameter.
- Following the drilling procedure, the Drill and Inner Sleeve are removed as a single unit with the trapped interposed cartilaginous and bony debris. The depth of drill penetration is preset and limited by the fixed rigid column of the Outer Sleeve. In this example, the space will be prepared to a depth of 28 mm in anticipation of countersinking a 26 mm long implant at least 2 mm. If a Tap were to be utilized, it would be inserted at this time and be appropriate to the minor and major diameters of the implant to be inserted and as with the Drill, controlled for its depth of penetration. The spinal implant would then be prepared for implantation by utilizing a Trephine to harvest a core of posterior iliac bone greater than 30 mm long and approximately 14.5 mm in diameter.
- Using the Bone Loading Device, this core of bone would be forcefully injected into the internal chamber of the spinal implant which would then be capped. Cap end forward, the fully loaded implant would then be attached to the Insertion Driver, down the Outer Sleeve and screwed into place with the depth of penetration limited by the Insertion instrument. The Insertion Driver is then unscrewed from the implant and removed from the Outer Sleeve. With the dural sac and nerve root retracted and protected, the Outer Sleeve would then be removed. This would complete the fusion procedure on that side, and then as described, the procedure would be repeated on the other (first) side of the same interspace.
- An alternative and extremely useful method is the “Trephine Method”. Its advantages include that it may be used in conjunction with the preferred embodiment substituting the use of a hollow, tubular cutter, called a Trephine for the use of the Drill in Step 5 of the preferred embodiment. Additionally, it may be utilized so as to obviate the need for the placement of the Short Distractor and to allow the procedure to be effectively performed from start to finish on one side prior to initiating the procedure on the opposite side, and while nevertheless maintaining distraction at the site of the bone removal.
- The following is a description of the “Trephine Method”. Having completed the exposure of the interspace on at least one side, the dural sac and nerve root are retracted. A Long Distractor differing from the Long Solid Bodied Distractor of the preferred embodiment only in that the barrel portion is of a precisely lesser diameter than the spinal implant. As in the preferred embodiment, the Outer Sleeve has an inner diameter only slightly greater than the implant to be inserted. Therefore, at this time, a first Inner Sleeve is inserted into the Outer Sleeve to make up the difference between the outside diameter of the Long Distractor and the inside diameter of the Outer Sleeve. With the Outer Sleeve and first Inner Sleeve thus assembled, they are placed over the Long Distractor and the Outer Sleeve is optimally seated using the Impaction Cap. The Cap and first Inner Sleeve are removed, but the Long Distractor and Outer Sleeve are left in place.
- With the Long Distractor maintaining optimal distraction and with the Outer Sleeve locking the vertebrae together so as to resist any movement of the vertebrae, a hollow, tubular cutter known as a Trephine is then inserted over the Long Distractor and its barrel portion and within the Outer Sleeve. The Trephine, which is stopped out to the appropriate depth, can then be utilized to cut equal arcs of bone from the opposed vertebral endplates.
- Alternatively, a second Inner Sleeve may be placed within the Outer Sleeve prior to placing the Trephine over the Long Distractor and within that second sleeve. This second Inner Sleeve would be just greater in its internal diameter than the Long Distractor and just smaller in its outside diameter than the inner diameter of the Outer Sleeve. While it would provide enhanced stability to the Trephine, provision would then need to be made in is the way of large flutes passing longitudinally or obliquely along the outer surface of the Distractor to its barrel portion to accommodate the bony and cartilaginous debris generated during the cutting procedure.
- Following the use of the Trephine to the appropriate depth by either of these methods, the Trephine, the Long Distractor, and the second Inner Sleeve, if utilized, are all removed. Since the Trephine cuts two arcs of bone but does not ream them out, a shafted instrument with a perpendicular cutting portion at its working end is then inserted parallel to the disc space and then rotated through an arc of motion cutting the bases of the two longitudinally cut arcs, thus freeing them for removal through the Outer Sleeve. The space may then be tapped if required, and the implant is inserted as per the preferred method. As already mentioned, the “Trephine Method” can be used with or without the use of the Short Distractor on the contralateral side.
- The following method is the preferred embodiment for performing anterior interbody fusion in the thoracic and lumbar spines. It is also appropriate in the cervical spine when the width of the spine anteriorly is sufficient so that it is possible to place two implants side by side and such that each intrudes at least several millimeters into the substance of the opposed vertebrae and for the length of the implants.
- The interspace to be fused is adequately exposed and the soft tissues and vital structures retracted and protected to either side. Visualization of the broad width of the interspace anteriorly is made possible by the absence of the neurological structures in relation to this aspect of the spine. The center line of the anterior aspect of the interspace is noted and marked. The disc is removed using first a knife and then curettes and rongeurs as needed. Alternatively, the disc may be left intact to be removed during the drilling stage of the procedure. However, as per the preferred embodiment of the procedure, having removed the great mass of the nucleus and the greater portion of the annulus anteriorly, Long Distractors with progressively increasing diameters to their working ends are inserted into the interspace at a point midway between the central marking line and the lateral extent of the anterior aspect of the spine as visualized.
- The Dual Outer Sleeve with its common Foot Plate and Retention Prongs is then inserted over either a singly placed Long Distractor and then the second Distractor placed, or is placed over both Distractors if already placed. The Dual Outer Sleeve is then seated firmly against the anterior aspect of the spine. Any spurs which would interfere with the flush seating of the Foot Plate to the anterior aspect of the spine should be removed prior to inserting the Long Distractors. Once the Outer Sleeve has been optimally seated, one of the Long Distractors is removed and in its place is inserted an Inner Sleeve and drill bit. The drill bit has as its outside diameter the minor diameter of the implant to be inserted. The Inner Sleeve is essentially equal in thickness to the difference between the minor and major diameters of the threaded implant.
- A Stopped Drill is then utilized to prepare the opposed vertebral surfaces and to remove any remaining disc material interposed. If required, a Stopped Tap may be inserted through the Outer Sleeve and into the interspace to create a thread form. The properly prepared implant is then affixed to the Insertion Driver and passed through the Outer Sleeve down into the interspace and inserted until its depth of penetration is limited by the stop on the Insertion Driver. With the implant itself now in a position to act as a distractor, the Long Distractor is then removed from the contralateral side and the procedure repeated. When both implants are firmly in place, the outer sleeve may then be removed. The amount of countersinking of the implants may then be adjusted under direct vision.
- In the preferred embodiment, the disc (D) between adjacent vertebrae (V) is approached via bilateral paired semihemilaminotomies of the adjacent vertebrae. In the preferred embodiment the supraspinous ligament, the interspinous ligament, the spinous process, portions of the lamina, and most of the facet joints are preserved. However, while less desirable, these structures may be removed.
- In the preferred method, a bilateral partial nuclear discectomy is then performed through bilateral openings created through the posterior aspect of the annulus fibrosus. While considered less desirable, disc excision can be delayed and performed simultaneously with the vertebral bone resection during the drilling procedure. Starting on the first side a dural nerve root retractor is placed such that the dural sac and lower nerve root are retracted medially allowing exposure to one side of a portion of two adjacent vertebral bodies and the interposed disc posteriorly.
- Referring now to
FIG. 1 , preferably after removing some portion of nuclear disc material, aLong Distractor 100 is inserted under direct vision into the intervertebral space. Thedisc penetrating portion 102 is essentially cylindrical with a bullet-shapedfront end 103 and ashoulder portion 104 where the penetratingportion 102 extends frombarrel 106. The penetratingportion 102 urges the vertebral bodies apart, facilitating the introduction of the instruments. Long Distractors with sequentially increasingdiameter penetrating portions 102 are then introduced. As the optimal diameter of penetratingportion 102 is achieved, the vertebral bodies to either side are forced into full congruence and thus become parallel, not only to the penetratingportion 102, but to each other. At this time, any remaining excrescences of bone of the posterior vertebral bodies adjacent the posterior disc which have not already been removed are flattened flush to the vertebral body by the forced impaction, such as by hitting with a hammerflat surface 109 ofcrown 110, driving theshoulder 104 against the lipped portions of vertebrae V. Because of the forced opposition of the vertebral endplates toportion 102 with optimal distraction,unit 100 will then come to lie absolutely perpendicular to the plane of the posterior bodies and absolutely parallel to the vertebral endplates, allowing optimal alignment for the procedure to be performed. -
Penetrating portion 102 is available in various diameters, but all are of a constant length, which is less than the known depth of the interspace. This combined with thecircumferential shoulder 104, which is too large to fit within the interspace, protects against the danger of overpenetration.Barrel 106 is of the same diameter as the external diameter of the device to be implanted. A recessedportion 108 below thecrown 110 allows for theLong Distractor 100 to be engaged by an extractor unit shown inFIG. 9 . - In the preferred embodiment, a
Convertible Long Distractor 113 is used on the first side of the spine. As shown inFIG. 2 , theConvertible Long Distractor 113 has abarrel portion 152 separable from theShort Distractor portion 120. While the initial distraction may be performed with a solid Long Distractor, as the optimal distraction is approached the appropriate Convertible Long Distractor is utilized. TheConvertible Long Distractor 113 consists of aShort Distractor portion 120 and abarrel 152 having arectangular projection 134 at one end. TheShort Distractor 120 has an increaseddiameter head 128, arectangular slot 118 and an internal threadedopening 114. Thebarrel 152 is hollow and has an internal shaft 111 terminating in a large diameterhexagonal crown 115 at one end and a reduceddiameter portion 112. The crown has adetent portion 117 in its flat surface. The other end of the shaft 111 has a threadedsmall member 116 that corresponds to threadedopening 114. The shaft 111 is prevented from removal from thebarrel 152 byset pin 119 passing through the wall ofbarrel 152 in a convenient manner. TheShort Distractor portion 120 is removably attached to thebarrel portion 152 via the mating of femalerectangular slot 118 and themale mating member 134. The mating held together by utilizing is knob 136 to drive thecrown 110 connected to interior shaft 111 having a threaded workingend screw 116 that threads into thefemale aperture 118 of theShort Distractor portion 120. - Cap 136 has an
open socket 138 for fitting aroundcrown 115 and engages the reduced diameterhexagonal portion 112 so as to permit the rotation of shaft-111 and threadedmale member 116. Adetent ball 150 in the inside of thesocket 138 engagesdetent 117 in thecrown 115, holding them together. - The
Short Distractor portion 120 ofFIGS. 2 , 3, and 3A-3F are designed to provide for high stability when temporarily situated so as to resist inadvertent migration while the surgeon is working on the second side. To that end, the embodiment of theShort Distractor 120 shown inFIGS. 3 and 3A has a pair ofsharp pegs 126, to embed into the opposing vertebral bodies and forward facingratchetings 124, that further resist backward movement.FIGS. 3B and 3C , which show the preferred embodiment, are side and top views of an alternative embodiment of the distractor portion such that the distractor portion to be interposed between the vertebrae is essentially cylindrical, but with circumferentialforward facing ratchetings 124. - A further alternative embodiment is shown in
FIGS. 3D and 3E . This is a more rectangularized design, with forward facing ratchetings, without thesharp prongs 126 ofFIG. 3 .FIG. 3F is a side view of a further embodiment of theShort Distractor 120 shown with knurling, to increase the interference with the bone surface so as to add stability to the unit and to resist dislodgment. To this end, it is apparent that the working ends of both the Long and Short Distractors can have a variety of configurations consistent with their purpose, and that surface irregularities as well as the shape of the ends themselves, with or withoutprongs 126, may be utilized to make theShort Distractor 120 more resistant to migration. - Once the ideal distraction has been achieved on the first side of the spine, the Convertible Distractor is dissociated, leaving
Short Distractor 120 in place with its roundedexternal end 128, safely on the canal floor and deep to the dural sac and nerve root. - As shown in
FIG. 4 , the surgeon then moves to the other side of the spine at the same disc (D) level, and retracts the dural sac and nerve root medially, exposing the disc on that side.Long Distractors 100 are then sequentially inserted into the disc space until the diameter of the distractor on the second side is at least as big as that on the first side. If because of some asymmetry of the interspace a larger diameter distractor is required on the second side to achieve the ideal distraction as compared to the first side, then the second side is fitted with a Short Distractor of the larger diameter, and the surgeon would then return back to the first side. In that event, the first side Short Distractor would then be removed and theLong Distractor 100 corresponding to the increased diameter of the already placedShort Distractor 120 would then be inserted. In either event, the operation is continued by working on the one side where the Long Distractor is in place. In this regard, it should be noted, that by the use of such a device as the Michelson Spinal Surgery Frame, it may be possible to obtain adequate distraction preoperatively such that the surgeon is either disinclined to use a distractor, or to simply place the correct Long Distractor on the first side and then proceed with the surgical procedure on that side before moving to the opposite side. These variations are within the scope of the present invention. - The Long Distractor now serves as both a centering post and an alignment rod for the
hollow Outer Sleeve 140 shown inFIG. 5 which is fitted over theLong Distractor 100, shown byphantom lines 101 inFIG. 5 . TheOuter Sleeve 140 is metal and has a sharp toothedfront end 142 that is capable of penetrating into and holding fast the two adjacent vertebrae (V). Interrupting the circumferential sharp teeth of 142 are flat,planar areas 152 which serve to resist the further insertion of the sharp teeth into the vertebral bodies. The toothedfront end 142 of theOuter Sleeve 140 is a continuation of thetubular shaft 144, which in turn is connected to circumferentially enlarged tubularback end 146 having a knurledouter surface 148 for easier manipulation. An alternative embodiment of an Outer Sleeve incorporates an expansile key hole andslot configuration 154 to either side ofshaft 144 along the mid-plane of the interspace and parallel to it such that theend 142 resists the collapse of the vertebrae (V) to either side of the disc (D), but may nevertheless allow for their further distraction, in the event the only diameter or the root diameter of the implant is larger than the hole drilled. - A
Driver Cap 160 in-the form of an impaction cap has at its far end a flat, closed-back surface 162 and at its other end a broad, circular opening. TheDriver Cap 160 fits over both theOuter Sleeve 140 and theLong Distractor 100. As theDriver Cap 160 is seated,interior surface 170 circumferentially engagesportion 146 of the Outer Sleeve until theback end 172 engages theinternal shoulder 164. As mallet blows are applied tosurface 162, that force is transmitted via theinternal shoulder 164 to theOuter Sleeve 140 via itsfar end 172, seatingteeth 142 into the vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space D and to the depth of theteeth 142 to theflat portions 152. As theOuter Sleeve 140 is advanced forward,crown portion 110 of the Long Distractor is allowed to protrude within theDriver Cap 160 unobstructed until it contacts the interiorflat surface 168. Oncecrown 110 comes into contact with the flatinterior surface 168, then further taps of the mallet will not advance the Outer Sleeve, any further motion being resisted by theflat shoulder portion 104 of the Long Distractor abutting the hard surfaces of the posterior vertebral bodies. In this way, theOuter Sleeve 140 is safely and assuredly inserted to its optimal depth and rigidly securing the two opposed vertebrae as shown inFIG. 6 . - The
Cap 160 is then removed and theDistractor Puller 200 ofFIG. 9 utilized to remove theLong Distractor 100 from the spine leaving theOuter Sleeve 140 in place. TheDistractor Puller 200 hasfront portion 202, amid portion 204, and aback handle portion 206. At thefront portion 202 of theDistractor Puller 200, asocket 208 is connected to one end ofshaft 210 which at its far end is connected to backhandle portion 206. Thesocket 208 has defined within it acavity 212 that is open at its front end and funnelized on the interior aspect of its sides. Thecavity 212 is constructed so that the head of theDistractor Puller 200 and the partiallycircumferential flange 218 engages thecircumferential recess 108 of theDistractor 100. The entrance tocavity 212 is slightly funnelized, and the leading edges offlange 218 slightly rounded to facilitate the engagement ofrecess 108 andhead 110 ofDistractor 100, which is further facilitated in that theDriver Cap 160 leavesportion 108 ofDistractor 100 precisely flush with theback surface 172 of theOuter Sleeve 140. This provides a large,flat surface 172 to precisely guidesurface 230 ofsocket 208, andopen portion 212 aroundhead 110 whileflange 218 engagesrecess 108. Thespringloaded detent ball 228 engageshemispherical depression 112 in thecrown 110, shown inFIG. 2 . Thisspringloaded detent 228 in engagement withcomplimentary indent 218 protects against the inadvertent dissociation of the Long Distractor from thePuller 200 after the Distractor has been removed from within theOuter Sleeve 140 and prior to its removal from the wound. Once out of the body, the two instruments are easily disassociated by freeing thecrown portion 110 fromcavity 212 by a manual force applied perpendicular to their relative long axes at this location. - A cylindrical and free
removable weight 216 is fitted aroundshaft 210 between thefront portion 202 and therear handle portion 206. Gently, but repeatedly sliding theweight 216 alongshaft 210 and driven rearwardly againstflat surface 228, transmits a rearward vector toproximal end 202 and thereby to theLong Distractor 100 to which it is engaged. - Paired
extended handle Long Distractor 100. Paired handles 224 and 226 are also useful in that they allow a rotational directing ofportion 208, via theshaft 210. This allows the surgeon to control and manipulate rotationally the orientation of the opening ofcavity 212 to facilitate its application, to thehead 110 of thedistractor 100. - The
Distractor Puller 200 is a significant improvement over the alternatives of striking a remover instrument with an independent hammer over the exposed surgical wound, or manually extracting the distractor by forcefully pulling. The use of a free hammer over the open wound is dangerous because the neural structures can be impacted on the back swing which is made even more likely by the effects of gravity on the mallet head. Manual extraction by pulling is dangerous because of the significant interference fit ofportion 102 within the spine such that significant force would be required to remove theDistractor 100, and if force were not coaxial then the Outer Sleeve might be dislodged or misaligned. Further, once theflat portion 102 became free of the interspace, all resistance to withdrawal would be lost and in the face of the considerable force necessary to free it, theDistractor 100 might easily become projectile imparting injury to the patient and/or the surgeon. - Once the
Long Distractor 100 has been fully removed from theOuter Sleeve 140, thetoothed end 142 of theOuter Sleeve 140, working in conjunction with theShort Distractor 120 on the contralateral side rigidly maintains the relative position of the adjacent vertebrae V. Further, since the remainder of the procedure on that side of the spine occurs entirely through theprotective Outer Sleeve 140, and as the nerves and dural sac are external to that Outer Sleeve and superficial to thetoothed end 142 of theOuter Sleeve 140, which is firmly embedded into the adjacent vertebrae V, theOuter Sleeve 140 serves to insure the safety of these delicate neural structures. Further, since theOuter Sleeve 140 is of a fixed length and rigid, its flatrearward surface 172 may be used as a stop to the advancement of all instruments placed through theOuter Sleeve 140, thus protecting against accidental overpenetration. Further, theOuter Sleeve 140 assures that the further procedure to be performed will occur coaxial to the disc space D and further, be symmetrical in regard to each of the opposed vertebral surfaces. -
FIG. 10B is a posterior view of the spine at this stage of the procedure, showing aShort Distractor 120 in place on one side of the spine and the bottom portion ofOuter Sleeve 140 in place on the opposite side of the spine. - Referring to
FIG. 11A , anInner Sleeve 242 is inserted from the rear within theOuter Sleeve 140. This Inner Sleeve has acollar portion 244 of a known thickness which seats against thetop edge surface 172 ofOuter Sleeve 140. The cylindrical barrel portion ofInner Sleeve 242 comes to approximate the posterior aspect of the vertebral bodies interior the Outer Sleeve when fully seated. ADrill 240, having a known selected length is then introduced through the rearward aperture of theInner Sleeve 242 and utilized to ream out the arcs of bone which it engages from the opposed vertebral endplates as well as any discal material within its path down to its predetermined and limited depth. TheDrill 240, has anarrow engagement portion 246, which allows it to be affixed to a drill mechanism which may be either a manual or a power unit. Acircumferential collar 248 of an increased diameter serves to limit the depth of penetration of thedrill 240 and may be fixed, or lockably adjustable. - Not shown here, but well known to those skilled in the art, are various mechanisms to lockably adjust such instruments as drills. Such mechanisms include, but are not limited to, the use of collets, threaded shafts with lock nuts, and flanges engaging grooves forced therein by either a cap pulled over the flanges or screwed down upon them.
- In the preferred embodiment, the
forward cutting edge 252 ofDrill 240 is a modification of a large fluted drill design such that the end resembles an end cutting mill which may contain any workable number of cutting surfaces, but preferably four or more, and such cutting surfaces being relatively shallow such that the advancement of the instrument occurs more slowly. The outside diameter of theDrill 240 corresponds to the minor diameter of the threaded spinal implant. TheInner Sleeve 242 has an inner diameter slightly greater than that dimension and its outer diameter is slightly smaller than the inside diameter of theOuter Sleeve 140 which has the same outer diameter as the major diameter of the threaded implant. - The drill shaft of
drill 240 comprises anupper portion 243, a central recessedportion 256 of a smaller diameter and a lowercutting drill portion 250. Theupper portion 243 andlower portion 256 of thedrill 240 have the same outside diameter. - The
Inner Sleeve 242 serves many functions. First, it provides a more intimate drill guide fordrill 240 in the event a smaller diameter hole is to be drilled than that of the inside diameter of theOuter Sleeve 140. Second, since it now guides the Drill, it allows for theOuter Sleeve 140 to have an internal diameter large enough to admit the threaded spinal implant, which is indeed considerably larger in diameter than theDrill 240 itself. - If a
larger Outer Sleeve 140 were utilized absent theInner Sleeve 242, then theDrill 240 would be free to wander within the confines of that greater space and would not reliably make parallel cuts removing equal portions of bone from the adjacent vertebrae V. Further, the bone removal not only needs to be equal, but must be correctly oriented in three dimensions. That is, the path of theDrill 240 must be equally centered within the disc space, parallel the endplates, and parallel to the sagittal axis dissecting the interspace. - A further purpose of the
Inner Sleeve 242 is that it may be removed simultaneously with theDrill 240, thereby trapping the debris, both cartilaginous and bony generated during the drilling procedure, which are guided rearward by thelarge flutes 251 ofDrill portion 250, where they are collected around recessedportion 256 between the recessedportion 256 and the inner wall of theInner Sleeve 242 are there contained therein. Thus, by removing theDrill 240 in conjunction with theInner Sleeve 242, all of the debris generated by the reaming procedure is safely removed from the spinal canal and wound area. - Further, if the disc tissue in the area to be reamed has been removed previously, as per the preferred method, then the patient's own bone of good quality and useful within the operation will then be contained between the
Inner Sleeve 242 and theshaft portion 256. Once away from the surgical wound, this material may be used to load the spinal implant or placed deep within the interspace to participate in the fusion. - The method of actually producing the surgical hole within the spine is variable. As shown in
FIG. 1C , in an alternativeembodiment Drill end 250 has a forward projectingnipple 260, which itself is bullet-shaped in its leading aspect so as to ease its entrance into the disc space and to urge the vertebrae apart.Nipple 260 is distracting, stabilizing as it resists any tendency of the vertebrae to move together, is self-centering to theDrill portion 250 when working in conjunction withSleeves - The alternative “Trephine Method” referred to earlier in this application, is shown in
FIG. 11B . In this alternative, aLong Distractor 100 is left in place after theOuter Sleeve 140 is seated. TheLong Distractor 100 in this case differs from the Long Distractor of the preferred embodiment in that its outside diameter of thebarrel 106 is of a smaller diameter than in the prior version. This is made necessary because regardless of the method, the hole to be formed corresponds to the minor diameter of the spinal implant.Trephine 270, a hollow, tubular member with sharp cuttingteeth 251 at its proximal end, has a wall thickness and since the outside diameter of thattrephine 270 must correspond to the root diameter of the implant, then the wall thickness of thetrephine 270 must be allowed for by a corresponding reduction in the diameter of theLong Distractor 100. - A further modification of the
Long Distractor 100 to the “Trephine Method” would use longitudinal grooves (not shown) along thebarrel surface 106 for the purpose of transmitting any debris generated during the cutting procedure, rearward. Since the cutting element is both centered and aligned by the Long Distractor, the use of theInner Sleeve 242 is not mandatory, but may once again be useful in controlling the path of the debris. To that end, little debris is generated in the “Trephine Method” as the bony arcs are not so much being reamed out and removed as they are simply being cut into the bone where these arcs of bone are left connected at their far ends. Thus, when the Trephining Method has been completed and theTrephine 270 andInner Sleeve 242 removed, unlike in the preferred embodiment where the hole is drilled out, it remains necessary to remove both the two arcs of bone, and any interposed material. Nevertheless, this is very easily performed by various means, one of which is depicted inFIG. 11D . -
Instrument 272 consisting of ashaft 276 attached off center to thelower surface 273handle 274. Theshaft 274 terminates in acutting arm 278. Theinstrument 272 is inserted throughOuter Sleeve 140 where thelower surface 273 ofhandle 274 abuts the top 172 of theOuter Sleeve 140, both stopping downward motion ofinstrument 272 and precisely placing theperpendicularly cutting arm 278 ofinstrument 272 so that ashandle portion 274 is rotated, the cuttingarm 278 is also rotated, cutting the arcs of bone and liberating them from their last attachments. These portions of bone are then removed utilizing this instrument or a long forceps, and then placed within the implants or otherwise used to participate in the fusion. - While in the preferred embodiment of the present invention the spinal implant 1, is essentially self-tapping, if the bone is unusually hard it may be desirable to form the thread pattern within the interspace prior to the insertion of the implant I. To that end, as shown in
FIG. 12 ,Tap 280 has a thread-cuttingportion 282 connected by ashaft 286 to ahandle portion 292, which has been designed to give mechanical advantage to the rotation of the instrument for the purpose of cutting threads. The lower portion ofhandle 290 has a forward facingflat surface 288 too large to fit through the opening ofOuter Sleeve 140 which thus safely limits the depth of penetration of the cuttingelement 282. Thistap 280 is further made safe byblunt end 294 which will engage the uncut portions of the vertebral bone just prior to the engagement ofshoulder 288 againstsurface 172. This feature allows the surgeon to appreciate a less harsh resistance as theblunt nose 294 encounters the remaining unresected bone for the drill hole and prior to the sudden increase in resistance caused by the seating ofshoulder 288 againsttop edge 172, which first resistance serves as a warning to the surgeon to discontinue the tapping procedure. Thus, the surgeon has both visual (asshoulder 288 approaches top edge 172) and tactile warnings to avoid stripping the thread form.Tap end 282 is highly specialized for its specific purpose. Rearward to the specializedblunt tip 294 is a truncated bullet-shapedarea 298 which ramps up to the constant diameter intermediate the cuttingridges 296.Ramp portion 298 urges the opposed vertebral bodies apart, which motion is resisted byOuter Sleeve 140, thus progressively driving the sharp leading edges ofthread forms 296 into the vertebral bodies. The periodiclongitudinal grooves 284 interrupting the thread forms, which may number 1 to 8, but preferably 4, function to accumulate the bony material which is removed during the thread cutting process. In that regard, in the ideal embodiment, the thread cutting form is designed to compress the bone to be formed rather than to trough through it. Further, while both the major and minor diameters of theTap 280 may be varied, in the preferred embodiment, the minor diameter corresponds to the minor diameter of the implant I, but the major diameter is slightly less than the major diameter of the implant. - With
Tap 280 now removed, andSleeve 140 still in place, the surgical site is now fully prepared to receive the spinal implant I. In the preferred embodiment of the spinal implant, the implant has been enhanced by the use of, application to, and filling with fusion promoting, enhancing, and participating substances and factors. Thus, the implant may be fully prepared for insertion as provided to the operating surgeon. However, at the present time, human bone is most commonly used as the graft material of choice, with the patient's own bone being considered the best source. -
FIG. 14 a shows atrephine 300 with an exceedingly sharpfront cutting edge 302 for quickly and cleanly coring into the patient's posterior iliac crest, or any other bony tissue, and for the purpose of producing a core of bone then contained within the hollow 304 of thetrephine 300.Trephine 300 has arear portion 306 with a pair of diametricallyopposed slots 310, and disposed clockwise from their longitudinally oriented rearward facing openings so as to engage diametrically and opposingmembers 312 ofDrive unit 308, by which trephine 300 may be attached to either a hand or power drill. It can be appreciated thatengagement mechanism 312 is stable during the clockwise cutting procedure, and yet allows for the rapid disconnection of the two components once the cutting is completed. - Because of the high interference between the graft and the inner wall of
hollow portion 304, and the relative weakness of the cancellous bone being harvested, it is possible to remove theTrephine 300 while still drilling, and to have it extract the core of bone with it. However, in the highly unlikely event that the core of bone would remain fixed at its base, then with thedrive mechanism 308 removed, acorkscrew 408 shown inFIG. 14C is introduced though the central opening ofrear portion 306 and threaded down and through the core of bone within 304 and to the depth ofteeth 302. Thetip 318 of thecorkscrew 408, which extends substantially on line with the outer envelope of the corkscrew, then cuts radially through the base of the bone core. As thehandle portion 314 of thecorkscrew 408 abuts the flat, rearward surface ofportion 306 and it can no longer advance. Ascorkscrew 408 is continued to be turned further, it will cause the core of bone to be pulled rearward, as in removing a cork from a wine bottle.Trephine 300 has abarrel portion 304 continuous with sharptoothed portion 302 having an inner diameter just less than the inner diameter of the spinal implant I to be loaded. - The
Trephine 300 with its core of harvested bone is then placed as shown inFIG. 14B , through opening 340 of ImplantBone Loading device 320, where thebarrel portion 304 then passes through and is stopped bycircular flange 344. Theplunger shaft 326 ofinstrument 320 is then prepared for attachment by rotatingknob 332 counterclockwise such that theplunger 372 is pulled via the long threaded shaft portion 328 back to the base ofcollar 330 at its proximal end. In this position,knob 332 is considerably extended rearward fromcollar 330. Withplunger shaft 326 in this position, theplunger head 372 is inserted into the central hollow ofportion 306 ofTrephine 300 as the proximal cylindrical portion ofcollar 330 then follows it, such that theplunger 372 then occupies the rearward portion ofbarrel 304 and the proximal cylindrical portion ofcollar 330 occupies the central hollow ofportion 306. A pair of diametrically opposed radially projectingarms 346 oncollar 330 are then advanced longitudinally into diametrically opposed pairedL slots 340 and then rotated clockwise to complete this assembly. - At the other end of
instrument 320, a spinal implant I is engaged through its femalerectangular slot 364 by a rectangular protruding bar extending from rearward facing surface ofend plug 324, (not shown) and secured there byknob 334 which extends as a rod through a central aperture withinend plug 324 to extend at the far end as a small bolt which threads to a female aperture centered within thefemale slot 364 of the spinal implant. With the spinal implant I secured to endplug 324 and the opposite end of the implant I presenting as a hollow, tubular opening,end plug 324 is advanced intodevice 320 where it is secured by rotationally engaging diametrically opposed L- shapedslots 321. Withdevice 320 fully assembled, end 302 oftrephine 300 lies coaxial and opposed to the open end of implant I. - As shown in
FIG. 15 , asknob 332 is then rotated clockwise, theplunger 372 proximal the threaded shaft 328 is then forcibly, but controllably driven forward down thebarrel 304 ejecting the bone graft directly into the spinal implant I. As the bone graft is greater in length than the interior of the spinal implant, with further compression the bone is forced into the radially disposed apertures through the wall of the device communicating from the central cavity to the exterior. -
End plug 324 is then removed fromapparatus 320. Usingend plug 324 as a handle,end cap 374 shown inFIG. 16 is secured to the open end of the spinal implant I. The implant is then disassociated fromend plug 324 by rotatingknob 334 counterclockwise. -
FIG. 16 shows an Implant Driver instrument which may be used to either insert or to remove said implant 1.Driver 350 has at itsfar end 362, arectangular protrusion 398, which protrusion intimately engages the complimentaryrectangular slot 364 of implant I. Protruding fromslot 398 ofend 362 is threadedportion 353, which extends as a rod throughhollow shaft 358 andhollow hand barrel 360 toknob 354 where it can be rotationally controlled. Threadedportion 353 screws into a female aperturecentral slot 364, urging 353 into 364, and binding them together such thatinstrument 350 can be rotated via paired and diametrically opposed extendingarms 366 and in either direction while maintaining contact with the implant. - Affixed to the
Driver 350, the implant is then introduced through theOuter Sleeve 140 and screwed into the interspace opposed between the two prepared vertebrae V until such time as the leading edge of theImplant Cap 374 reaches the depth of the prepared hole at which time its forward motion is impeded by the bone lying before it which had not been drilled out. This allows for a progressive feel to the surgeon as the implant is screwed home. - As described previously, with the use of the
Tap 280, this terminal resistance to further seating provides significant tactile feedback to the surgeon. Again, as with theTap 280, visual monitoring of the depth of insertion of the implant is provided to the surgeon by observing the progressive approximation of the forward surface 370, ofbarrel portion 360, as it approaches the rearward facing-surface 172 of Outer-Sleeve 140. Nevertheless, a final safety mechanism, when the full depth of insertion has been achieved, surface 370 ofinstrument 350 will abut surface 172 of theOuter Sleeve 140, prohibiting any further installation of the spinal implant. - Once the implant has been fully installed, the
Driver 350 is dissociated from the implant by turningknob 354 in a counterclockwise direction. TheDriver 350 is then withdrawn from the outer sheath, then theOuter Sleeve 140 is removed. This leaves the implant fully installed and inset to the determined depth as shown inFIG. 18 . - Attention is then redirected to the other, or first, side of the spine. A dural nerve root retractor is used to retract the neural structures medially, bringing into full view the
head 128 of theShort Distractor 120, lying flush on the canal floor. Utilizingapparatus 152,extended screw portion 116 is inserted into the female threadedportion 114 of theShort Distractor 120 as the extendedrectangular portion 134 ofapparatus 152 is engaged to the femalerectangular portion 118 of theShort Distractor 120. Then turning rearward facingportions FIG. 2 , the Long Distractor configuration is restored. - With the dural sac and nerve roots still retracted and protected, the
Outer Sleeve 140 is slipped over the reconstituted Long Distractor and seated using theDriver Cap 162. The entire sequence of events as described for the implantation of the spinal implant I as already placed, is then repeated such that both spinal implants come to lie side by side within the interspace. Though not necessary, circlage or other internal fixation of the levels to be fused may additionally be performed, and then the wound is closed in the routine manner. - Because of the absence of the spinal cord and nerve roots, it is generally possible to visualize in one instance the entire width of the disc space from side to side throughout the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine. In the preferred embodiment of the anterior interbody fusion, implants are placed side by side from anterior to posterior parallel to the interspace and extending through into the adjacent vertebral bodies. Where the transverse width of the disc space is insufficient to allow for the use of two implants, each of which would be large enough to protrude to the required depth into the adjacent vertebrae, then a singular and significantly larger implant may be placed centrally. With this in mind, and in light of the very detailed description of the technique and instrumentation already provided in regard to the method of posterior lumbar interbody fusion, a brief discussion of anterior spinal interbody fusion with dual implant installation will suffice, and the method for installation of a large, singular midline graft will become obvious.
- The interspace to be fused is exposed anteriorly. The soft tissues are withdrawn and protected to either side, and if necessary, above and below as well. It is then possible to visualize the entire width of the vertebrae anteriorly adjacent that interspace. As discussed above, the surgeon has already templated the appropriate patient radiographs to determine the requisite distraction and optimal implant size. In the preferred method, the surgeon then broadly excises the great bulk of the nuclear disc portion. (Alternatively, the disc can be left to be removed via the drill later.) The surgeon then notes and marks a point midway from side to side anteriorly. He then inserts
Long Distractor 100 centering it on a point midway between the point just noted and the lateral extent of the intervertebral space visualized anteriorly. Theouter barrel portion 106 of theDistractor 100 utilized, will correspond to the outside diameter of the implants to be installed. TheDistractor tips 102 inserted are sequentially larger in diameter until the optimal distraction is achieved. This optimal distraction, although suggested by the initial templating, may be visually and tactilely confirmed as performed. When the optimal distraction is achieved, the vertebral endplates will come into full congruence and parallel to theforward shaft portion 102 of theDistractor 100, causing an alteration in the alignment of the vertebrae and a significant increase in the interference fit and pressurization at the tip, such that the instrument becomes exceedingly stable. - There is a sensation imparted to the surgeon of the tissues having moved through their elastic range to the point where the two adjacent vertebrae V begin to feel and move as if a single solid. These changes are easily appreciated visually as the vertebrae realign to become congruent to tip 102, and can also easily be appreciated via lateral Roentgenography. However, should the surgeon fail to appreciate that optimal distraction has been achieved and attempt to further distract the interspace, he would find that extremely difficult to do because of the increased resistance as the tissues are moved beyond their range of elastic deformation. Further, there would be no elasticity left to allow the vertebrae to move further apart and the sensation to the surgeon should he attempt to gently tap the oversized Distractor forward with a mallet, would be one of great brittleness.
- Returning now to the procedure, when the
correct intercorporeal Distractor 100 producing the ideal interspace distraction having itsbarrel portion 106 corresponding to the implant to be installed has been inserted, then its exact duplicate is inserted anteriorly equidistant to the other side of the spine. As thebarrel portion 106 ofLong Distractor 100 is exactly of the same major diameter as the spinal implant I looking coaxially on end, the surgeon can then assess the anticipated side by side relationship of the dual implants when implanted. - As shown in
FIGS. 7C and 7D , aDual Outer Sleeve 340 consisting of a pair of hollow tubes is then introduced over the side by side Long Distractors protruding anteriorly from the spine. TheDual Outer Sleeve 340 is comprised of two hollow tubular members identical in size displaced from each other ideally the sum of the difference between the minor and major diameters of both implants combined, but not less than that difference for one implant, as it is possible to have the threads of one implant nest interposed to the threads of the other, such that they both occupy a common area between them. However, while the preferred embodiment is slightly greater than two times the difference between the major and minor diameters of the implant (the sum of both) the distance may be considerably greater. Whereas in the preferred embodiment extendingtubular portions 348 ofinstrument 340 are parallel, when the area between them 350, is sufficiently great, these elements may be inclined or declined relative to each other such that they either converge or diverge at their proximal ends. Pairedtubular structures 348, may be bridged in part or wholly throughout their length, but are rigidly fixed byFoot Plate 344. In its preferred embodiment, a top view shows the Foot Plate to be essentially rectangular, but without sharp corners. - Other shapes can be utilized. In side view 7D it can be appreciated, that
Foot Plate 344 is contoured so as to approximate the shape of the vertebrae anteriorly. Extending forward fromFoot Plate 344 are multiplesharp prongs 342 sufficiently long to affix them to the vertebrae. Theprongs 342 are limited in length so as to not penetrate too far posteriorly and number from 2 to 10, but preferably 6. As theDual Outer Sleeve 340 is driven forward utilizingDual Driver Cap 420, ofFIG. 7E , engaging therearward end 352, theprongs 342 extending fromFoot Plate 344 are embedded into the opposed vertebral bodies until their forward motion is inhibited by thecurved Foot Plate 344 becoming congruent to and being stopped by, the anterior aspect of the vertebral bodies. - As already taught in
FIG. 5 , theDual Driver Cap 420 is of the same design asSingle Driver Cap 160, in that there is arecess 354 as per 168, allowing the Outer Sleeve to be fully seated without impeding the rearward projection of the Long Distractor unit. However, unlike inCap 160,area 354 is more relieved as it is unnecessary for theDual Cap 420 to contact the Long Distractor throughportion 110 to inhibit its forward motion, as theFoot Plate 344 functions to that effect. Further, theDual Cap 420 for theDual Outer Sleeve 340 is correspondingly dual itself and engages the rearward facing dualtubular portion 352. Once the Dual Outer Sleeve has been fully seated, the vertebrae adjacent the interspace to be fused are rigidly held viaFoot Plate 344 and theprongs 342. Thus, it is possible to remove either one, or if desired, both of the Long Distractor rods utilizingLong Distractor puller 200, as per the method already described. It is then the surgeon's choice to work on one or both sides of the spine. As per previous discussion, the surgeon may drill the interspace utilizing theInner Sleeve 242 or leave the Long Distractors in place as per the “Trephine Method”. - Tapping, if necessary, and the insertion of the implants then occurs through the
protective Outer Sleeve 340. Once the implants have been fully inserted, the Outer Sleeve is removed. - Having utilized the Drill method, or “Trephine Method”, with or without an Inner Sleeve to prepare the fusion site, it is the preferred embodiment to leave the
Outer Sleeve 340 in place as it provides for the ideal placement and alignment of theTap 280 and implant I. - It is anticipated that the surgeon wishing to work deep within the interspace, or preferring the ability to directly visualize the tap being used, or the implant being inserted, may choose to remove the Outer Sleeve after the insertion of the first prosthesis to maintain stability, or prior to that, which while not the preferred embodiments, are nevertheless within the scope of the present invention.
- As previously described for the posterior lumbar spine, alternatively, one can employ the “Trephine Method” as has been described in detail.
- As a further alternative, it should be noted that the key element in the anterior method is the use of the predistraction principle, where such distraction is maintained by the Outer Sleeve with or without the Long Distractor. Therefore, once the preparation of the interspace has been completed, while not the preferred embodiment, it is nevertheless within the scope of this invention that one could remove the Outer Sleeve as there are no neural structures requiring protection, and insert the implants directly rather than through the Outer Sleeve.
- As yet a further alternative of this method, where the height of the distracted interspace is such that the diameter of the implant required to span that height and to embed with sufficient depth into the opposed vertebral bodies is such that it is not possible to place two such implants side by side, then only a single implant which may be of significantly increased diameter, is used and placed centrally within the interspace rather than to either side. The placement of a singular central graft via the present invention method and instrumentation is in keeping with the methods already described and can be performed using either a drill or the “Trephine Method”.
- Referring to
FIGS. 16-18 , a cylindrical embodiment of the spinal implant I of the present invention is shown. InFIG. 16 the implant I is shown attached to theinsertion device 350. InFIGS. 17 and 18 the implant I is shown installed in the disc space D, between the adjacent vertebrae. - The cylindrical implant I comprises a hollow tubular member which in the preferred embodiment is made of an ASTM surgically implantable material, preferably Titanium. The cylindrical implant I is closed at one end and open at the other end covered by a
cap 394. The cylindrical implant I has a series ofmacro-sized openings 390 through the side walls of the cylindrical implant I. A series ofexternal threads 392 are formed on the circumference of the cylindrical implant I. Any variety of threads may be used on the implant. Thecap 374 has a hexagonal is opening 394 for tightening thecap 374. - While the present invention has been described in association with the implant of a threaded spinal implant, it is recognized that other forms of implants may be used with the present method. For example, dowels, made from bone or artificial materials, knurled or irregularly shaped cylinders or spheres, or any other shaped implants that can be introduced through the outer sleeve may be used. Being able to perform the procedure through the outer sleeve permits the procedure to be performed safely and quickly, and more accurately.
Claims (29)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/012,437 US20080255564A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2008-02-01 | Bone cutting device |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/074,781 US5484437A (en) | 1988-06-13 | 1993-06-10 | Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants |
US08/586,950 US6436098B1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 1996-01-16 | Method for inserting spinal implants and for securing a guard to the spine |
US10/223,916 US7399303B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2002-08-20 | Bone cutting device and method for use thereof |
US12/012,437 US20080255564A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2008-02-01 | Bone cutting device |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/223,916 Division US7399303B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2002-08-20 | Bone cutting device and method for use thereof |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080255564A1 true US20080255564A1 (en) | 2008-10-16 |
Family
ID=22121653
Family Applications (12)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/586,950 Expired - Fee Related US6436098B1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 1996-01-16 | Method for inserting spinal implants and for securing a guard to the spine |
US09/626,636 Expired - Fee Related US7993347B1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2000-07-27 | Guard for use in performing human interbody spinal surgery |
US10/223,916 Expired - Fee Related US7399303B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2002-08-20 | Bone cutting device and method for use thereof |
US10/371,476 Expired - Fee Related US6875213B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2003-02-21 | Method of inserting spinal implants with the use of imaging |
US10/638,023 Expired - Fee Related US7326214B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2003-08-09 | Bone cutting device having a cutting edge with a non-extending center |
US10/664,498 Abandoned US20040073217A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2003-09-19 | Osteogenic packing device and method |
US10/692,545 Expired - Fee Related US7264622B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2003-10-24 | System for radial bone displacement |
US11/252,082 Abandoned US20060036247A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2005-10-17 | Distractor for use in spinal surgery |
US11/252,048 Abandoned US20060058793A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2005-10-17 | Distractor for use in spinal surgery |
US11/356,868 Expired - Fee Related US7887565B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2006-02-18 | Apparatus and method for sequential distraction |
US12/012,437 Abandoned US20080255564A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2008-02-01 | Bone cutting device |
US12/218,856 Abandoned US20080287955A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2008-07-18 | Distractor for use in spinal surgery and method of use thereof |
Family Applications Before (10)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/586,950 Expired - Fee Related US6436098B1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 1996-01-16 | Method for inserting spinal implants and for securing a guard to the spine |
US09/626,636 Expired - Fee Related US7993347B1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2000-07-27 | Guard for use in performing human interbody spinal surgery |
US10/223,916 Expired - Fee Related US7399303B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2002-08-20 | Bone cutting device and method for use thereof |
US10/371,476 Expired - Fee Related US6875213B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2003-02-21 | Method of inserting spinal implants with the use of imaging |
US10/638,023 Expired - Fee Related US7326214B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2003-08-09 | Bone cutting device having a cutting edge with a non-extending center |
US10/664,498 Abandoned US20040073217A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2003-09-19 | Osteogenic packing device and method |
US10/692,545 Expired - Fee Related US7264622B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2003-10-24 | System for radial bone displacement |
US11/252,082 Abandoned US20060036247A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2005-10-17 | Distractor for use in spinal surgery |
US11/252,048 Abandoned US20060058793A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2005-10-17 | Distractor for use in spinal surgery |
US11/356,868 Expired - Fee Related US7887565B2 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2006-02-18 | Apparatus and method for sequential distraction |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/218,856 Abandoned US20080287955A1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2008-07-18 | Distractor for use in spinal surgery and method of use thereof |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (12) | US6436098B1 (en) |
EP (3) | EP1508307A1 (en) |
JP (2) | JP4000134B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR100318703B1 (en) |
AT (3) | ATE263511T1 (en) |
CA (3) | CA2357536C (en) |
DE (3) | DE69433702T2 (en) |
DK (3) | DK1093760T3 (en) |
ES (3) | ES2206468T3 (en) |
PT (3) | PT703757E (en) |
Cited By (63)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7824431B2 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2010-11-02 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction method |
US20110098705A1 (en) * | 2009-10-23 | 2011-04-28 | Chappuis James L | Devices and Methods for Temporarily Retaining Spinal Rootlets within Dural Sac |
US7993347B1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2011-08-09 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Guard for use in performing human interbody spinal surgery |
US8088163B1 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2012-01-03 | Kleiner Jeffrey B | Tools and methods for spinal fusion |
USD656610S1 (en) | 2009-02-06 | 2012-03-27 | Kleiner Jeffrey B | Spinal distraction instrument |
WO2012040152A1 (en) | 2010-09-20 | 2012-03-29 | Jeffrey Kleiner | Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system |
US8267966B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2012-09-18 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Facet joint implants and delivery tools |
WO2012145048A1 (en) | 2011-04-20 | 2012-10-26 | Spinewindow Llc | Method and apparatus for performing retro peritoneal dissection |
WO2012162600A2 (en) | 2011-05-26 | 2012-11-29 | Strauch Eric | Surgical drape with separable elements |
US8361152B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2013-01-29 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Facet joint implants and delivery tools |
US8366748B2 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2013-02-05 | Kleiner Jeffrey | Apparatus and method of spinal implant and fusion |
US8512347B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2013-08-20 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction/implant delivery device |
US8685031B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2014-04-01 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery system |
US8828082B2 (en) | 2009-07-09 | 2014-09-09 | R Tree Innovations, Llc | Inter-body implant |
US8906028B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2014-12-09 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery device and method of using the same |
USD723682S1 (en) | 2013-05-03 | 2015-03-03 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery tool |
US9005288B2 (en) | 2008-01-09 | 2015-04-14 | Providence Medical Techonlogy, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for accessing and treating the facet joint |
USD732667S1 (en) | 2012-10-23 | 2015-06-23 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cage spinal implant |
US9060877B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2015-06-23 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system |
US9173694B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2015-11-03 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system |
US9186193B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2015-11-17 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system |
USD745156S1 (en) | 2012-10-23 | 2015-12-08 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal implant |
WO2015187397A1 (en) | 2013-06-07 | 2015-12-10 | George Frey | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
US9247943B1 (en) | 2009-02-06 | 2016-02-02 | Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc | Devices and methods for preparing an intervertebral workspace |
USD750249S1 (en) | 2014-10-20 | 2016-02-23 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Expandable fusion cage |
US9333086B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2016-05-10 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal facet cage implant |
US9381049B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2016-07-05 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Composite spinal facet implant with textured surfaces |
US9629729B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2017-04-25 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Biological delivery system with adaptable fusion cage interface |
US9717403B2 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2017-08-01 | Jeffrey B. Kleiner | Method and apparatus for performing retro peritoneal dissection |
USD797290S1 (en) | 2015-10-19 | 2017-09-12 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery tool |
US9987024B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2018-06-05 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
EP3357459A1 (en) | 2017-02-03 | 2018-08-08 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, LLC | Bone graft delivery device with positioning handle |
US10201375B2 (en) | 2014-05-28 | 2019-02-12 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Lateral mass fixation system |
USD841165S1 (en) | 2015-10-13 | 2019-02-19 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical cage |
US10245159B1 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2019-04-02 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery system and method for using same |
USD853560S1 (en) | 2008-10-09 | 2019-07-09 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Spinal implant insertion device |
US10363108B2 (en) | 2010-06-07 | 2019-07-30 | Creative Surgical Solutions, Llc | Surgical drape with separable elements |
USD857893S1 (en) | 2017-10-26 | 2019-08-27 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Cortical surgical guide |
USD858765S1 (en) | 2017-10-26 | 2019-09-03 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Cortical surgical guide |
US10653454B2 (en) | 2007-07-13 | 2020-05-19 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Spinal fixation systems |
USD887552S1 (en) | 2016-07-01 | 2020-06-16 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical cage |
US10682243B2 (en) | 2015-10-13 | 2020-06-16 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal joint implant delivery device and system |
US10743890B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2020-08-18 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Drill apparatus and surgical fixation devices and methods for using the same |
USD895111S1 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2020-09-01 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Sacro-iliac guide |
USD911525S1 (en) | 2019-06-21 | 2021-02-23 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal cage |
US10973656B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2021-04-13 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Inc. | Bone graft delivery system and method for using same |
US11039889B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2021-06-22 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
US11065039B2 (en) | 2016-06-28 | 2021-07-20 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal implant and methods of using the same |
USD933230S1 (en) | 2019-04-15 | 2021-10-12 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical cage |
US11185382B2 (en) | 2017-08-31 | 2021-11-30 | Creative Surgical Solutions, Llc | Separable sterile drape with z-shaped folds |
US11224521B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2022-01-18 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction/implant delivery device |
USD945621S1 (en) | 2020-02-27 | 2022-03-08 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal cage |
US11272964B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2022-03-15 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
USD948717S1 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2022-04-12 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Sacro-iliac guide |
US11376073B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2022-07-05 | Mighty Oak Medical Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
US11633254B2 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2023-04-25 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus for use in augmented reality assisted surgical procedures and methods for using the same |
US11648128B2 (en) | 2018-01-04 | 2023-05-16 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Facet screw and delivery device |
US11666455B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2023-06-06 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Inc., A Nevada Corporation | Bone graft delivery devices, systems and kits |
US11806197B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2023-11-07 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus for use in spine related surgical procedures and methods for using the same |
US11813034B2 (en) | 2010-06-07 | 2023-11-14 | Creative Surgical Solutions, Llc | Surgical drape with separable elements |
US11871968B2 (en) | 2017-05-19 | 2024-01-16 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal fixation access and delivery system |
US12004781B2 (en) | 2014-05-27 | 2024-06-11 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Lateral mass fixation implant |
US12016573B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2024-06-25 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Drill apparatus and surgical fixation devices and methods for using the same |
Families Citing this family (314)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050027004A1 (en) * | 1993-06-09 | 2005-02-03 | Martek Biosciences Corporation | Methods of treating senile dementia and Alzheimer's diseases using docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid compositions |
US6206922B1 (en) * | 1995-03-27 | 2001-03-27 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Methods and instruments for interbody fusion |
JP2002505592A (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 2002-02-19 | アドバンスト バイオ サーフェイシズ,インコーポレイティド | Biomaterial systems used to repair tissue in situ |
DE19720241B4 (en) * | 1997-05-15 | 2005-12-29 | Eska Implants Gmbh & Co. | Interbody fusion implant |
US6440138B1 (en) * | 1998-04-06 | 2002-08-27 | Kyphon Inc. | Structures and methods for creating cavities in interior body regions |
US6428541B1 (en) * | 1998-04-09 | 2002-08-06 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Method and instrumentation for vertebral interbody fusion |
US7776046B2 (en) | 1998-04-09 | 2010-08-17 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Method and instrumentation for vertebral interbody fusion |
US6371986B1 (en) * | 1998-10-27 | 2002-04-16 | George W. Bagby | Spinal fusion device, bone joining implant, and vertebral fusion implant |
DE29911422U1 (en) | 1999-07-02 | 1999-08-12 | Aesculap Ag & Co Kg | Intervertebral implant |
WO2001019295A1 (en) * | 1999-09-14 | 2001-03-22 | Spine Solutions Inc. | Instrument for inserting intervertebral implants |
US7935147B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2011-05-03 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for enhanced delivery of treatment device to the intervertebral disc annulus |
US7004970B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2006-02-28 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Methods and devices for spinal disc annulus reconstruction and repair |
US8632590B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2014-01-21 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for the treatment of the intervertebral disc |
US7052516B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2006-05-30 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and deformable spinal disc annulus stent |
US7951201B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2011-05-31 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus |
US8128698B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2012-03-06 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus |
US6592625B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2003-07-15 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and spinal disc annulus stent |
US7615076B2 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2009-11-10 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus |
US7641657B2 (en) | 2003-06-10 | 2010-01-05 | Trans1, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing posterior or anterior trans-sacral access to spinal vertebrae |
US7547324B2 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2009-06-16 | Trans1, Inc. | Spinal mobility preservation apparatus having an expandable membrane |
US6575979B1 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2003-06-10 | Axiamed, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing posterior or anterior trans-sacral access to spinal vertebrae |
US7727263B2 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2010-06-01 | Trans1, Inc. | Articulating spinal implant |
US6558390B2 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2003-05-06 | Axiamed, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for performing therapeutic procedures in the spine |
US6790210B1 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2004-09-14 | Trans1, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for forming curved axial bores through spinal vertebrae |
ES2308014T5 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2012-03-16 | Trans1, Inc. | Apparatus for distraction and spinal fusion |
ATE390100T1 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2008-04-15 | Warsaw Orthopedic Inc | SPINAL IMPLANT AND INTRODUCTION DEVICE |
ATE270848T1 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2004-07-15 | Sdgi Holdings Inc | CUTLERY FOR PREPARING THE INTERVERBEL SPACE |
US6805695B2 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2004-10-19 | Spinalabs, Llc | Devices and methods for annular repair of intervertebral discs |
US6676706B1 (en) | 2000-04-26 | 2004-01-13 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing a minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty |
US6991656B2 (en) * | 2000-04-26 | 2006-01-31 | Dana Mears | Method and apparatus for performing a minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty |
US20050043810A1 (en) * | 2000-04-26 | 2005-02-24 | Dana Mears | Method and apparatus for performing a minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty |
US6478800B1 (en) | 2000-05-08 | 2002-11-12 | Depuy Acromed, Inc. | Medical installation tool |
WO2002033164A2 (en) * | 2000-10-17 | 2002-04-25 | James Hardie Research Pty Limited | Method for reducing impurities in cellulose fibers for manufacture of fiber reinforced cement composite materials |
US6666891B2 (en) | 2000-11-13 | 2003-12-23 | Frank H. Boehm, Jr. | Device and method for lumbar interbody fusion |
WO2002038062A2 (en) | 2000-11-13 | 2002-05-16 | Boehm Frank H Jr | Device and method for lumbar interbody fusion |
US6673113B2 (en) | 2001-10-18 | 2004-01-06 | Spinecore, Inc. | Intervertebral spacer device having arch shaped spring elements |
US7169182B2 (en) * | 2001-07-16 | 2007-01-30 | Spinecore, Inc. | Implanting an artificial intervertebral disc |
US7713302B2 (en) | 2001-10-01 | 2010-05-11 | Spinecore, Inc. | Intervertebral spacer device utilizing a spirally slotted belleville washer having radially spaced concentric grooves |
US7771477B2 (en) | 2001-10-01 | 2010-08-10 | Spinecore, Inc. | Intervertebral spacer device utilizing a belleville washer having radially spaced concentric grooves |
US7485134B2 (en) * | 2001-12-07 | 2009-02-03 | Simonson Rush E | Vertebral implants adapted for posterior insertion |
AU2003209287A1 (en) | 2002-01-15 | 2003-07-30 | The Regents Of The University Of California | System and method providing directional ultrasound therapy to skeletal joints |
US7819826B2 (en) | 2002-01-23 | 2010-10-26 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Implantable thermal treatment method and apparatus |
EP1482877B1 (en) * | 2002-03-11 | 2007-05-30 | Spinal Concepts Inc. | Instrumentation for implanting spinal implant devices |
US20080027548A9 (en) | 2002-04-12 | 2008-01-31 | Ferree Bret A | Spacerless artificial disc replacements |
US8038713B2 (en) | 2002-04-23 | 2011-10-18 | Spinecore, Inc. | Two-component artificial disc replacements |
US7001433B2 (en) | 2002-05-23 | 2006-02-21 | Pioneer Laboratories, Inc. | Artificial intervertebral disc device |
US8388684B2 (en) | 2002-05-23 | 2013-03-05 | Pioneer Signal Technology, Inc. | Artificial disc device |
US6736821B2 (en) * | 2002-06-18 | 2004-05-18 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | System and method of mating implants and vertebral bodies |
WO2004026187A1 (en) * | 2002-09-19 | 2004-04-01 | Malan De Villiers | Intervertebral prosthesis |
US7625378B2 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2009-12-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Devices and methods for securing a bone plate to a bony segment |
US8361067B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2013-01-29 | Relievant Medsystems, Inc. | Methods of therapeutically heating a vertebral body to treat back pain |
US6907884B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2005-06-21 | Depay Acromed, Inc. | Method of straddling an intraosseous nerve |
US7258690B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2007-08-21 | Relievant Medsystems, Inc. | Windowed thermal ablation probe |
AU2003230740B2 (en) * | 2002-11-08 | 2008-10-09 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Transpedicular intervertebral disk access methods and devices |
US7828804B2 (en) * | 2002-11-08 | 2010-11-09 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Transpedicular intervertebral disk access methods and devices |
US7204852B2 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2007-04-17 | Spine Solutions, Inc. | Intervertebral implant, insertion tool and method of inserting same |
GB0301085D0 (en) * | 2003-01-17 | 2003-02-19 | Krishna Manoj | Articulating spinal disc prosthesis |
ZA200506026B (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2006-11-29 | Spinalmotion Inc | Intervertebral prosthesis placement instrument |
EP1587437B1 (en) * | 2003-01-31 | 2013-02-27 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Spinal midline indicator |
AU2004220634B2 (en) * | 2003-03-06 | 2009-09-17 | Spinecore, Inc. | Instrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device |
US6908484B2 (en) * | 2003-03-06 | 2005-06-21 | Spinecore, Inc. | Cervical disc replacement |
US7648509B2 (en) | 2003-03-10 | 2010-01-19 | Ilion Medical Llc | Sacroiliac joint immobilization |
ES2545328T3 (en) | 2003-03-14 | 2015-09-10 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Bone cement hydraulic injection device in percutaneous vertebroplasty |
US20040186483A1 (en) * | 2003-03-22 | 2004-09-23 | Bagby George W. | Implant driver apparatus and bone joining device |
WO2004084742A1 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2004-10-07 | Theken Surgical Llc | Spinal implant adjustment device |
US8066713B2 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2011-11-29 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Remotely-activated vertebroplasty injection device |
US7491204B2 (en) * | 2003-04-28 | 2009-02-17 | Spine Solutions, Inc. | Instruments and method for preparing an intervertebral space for receiving an artificial disc implant |
US20090076614A1 (en) * | 2007-09-17 | 2009-03-19 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Intervertebral Prosthetic Disc with Shock Absorption Core |
US10052211B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2018-08-21 | Simplify Medical Pty Ltd. | Prosthetic disc for intervertebral insertion |
US7575599B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2009-08-18 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic disc with metallic core |
US7753956B2 (en) | 2003-05-27 | 2010-07-13 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Prosthetic disc for intervertebral insertion |
AU2004245015A1 (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2004-12-16 | Frank Nguyen | Methods and devices for transpedicular discectomy |
US8415407B2 (en) | 2004-03-21 | 2013-04-09 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Methods, materials, and apparatus for treating bone and other tissue |
US7803162B2 (en) * | 2003-07-21 | 2010-09-28 | Spine Solutions, Inc. | Instruments and method for inserting an intervertebral implant |
EP1648351B1 (en) | 2003-07-22 | 2009-02-25 | Synthes GmbH | Intervertebral implant comprising temporary blocking means |
FR2858546B1 (en) * | 2003-08-04 | 2006-04-28 | Spine Next Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS |
WO2005030034A2 (en) | 2003-09-26 | 2005-04-07 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Device for delivering viscous material |
US8052613B2 (en) | 2003-10-23 | 2011-11-08 | Trans1 Inc. | Spinal nucleus extraction tool |
US7320707B2 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2008-01-22 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Method of laterally inserting an artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with crossbar spacer |
US7670377B2 (en) | 2003-11-21 | 2010-03-02 | Kyphon Sarl | Laterally insertable artifical vertebral disk replacement implant with curved spacer |
DE602005023583D1 (en) * | 2004-02-09 | 2010-10-28 | Depuy Spine Inc | SYSTEMS FOR SPINE SURGERY SURGERY |
US7963981B2 (en) * | 2004-04-19 | 2011-06-21 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Bone fixation plate |
US8236034B2 (en) | 2004-04-19 | 2012-08-07 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Bone fixation plate |
US20050251175A1 (en) * | 2004-05-07 | 2005-11-10 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Anchors for use in attachment of bladder tissues to pelvic floor tissues following a prostatectomy |
US7033363B2 (en) | 2004-05-19 | 2006-04-25 | Sean Powell | Snap-lock for drill sleeve |
DE102004028429B3 (en) * | 2004-06-03 | 2005-11-03 | Karl Storz Gmbh & Co. Kg | Device for punching out tissue areas on bones |
FR2871366A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-16 | Ceravic Soc Par Actions Simpli | PROSTHETIC EXPANSIBLE BONE IMPLANT |
US7625380B2 (en) | 2004-07-21 | 2009-12-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dual distractor inserter |
US7862617B2 (en) * | 2004-07-27 | 2011-01-04 | Lamprich Medical, Llc | Spinal disc prosthesis apparatus and placement method |
US7172628B2 (en) | 2004-07-27 | 2007-02-06 | Lonnie Jay Lamprich | Spinal disc prosthesis and methods |
CN106963464B (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2019-11-05 | 德普伊新特斯产品有限责任公司 | Surgical set |
US20070299525A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2007-12-27 | Biomedica S.R.L. | Bone Spacer |
US7585326B2 (en) | 2004-08-06 | 2009-09-08 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for intervertebral disc prosthesis insertion |
US20060036251A1 (en) | 2004-08-09 | 2006-02-16 | Reiley Mark A | Systems and methods for the fixation or fusion of bone |
US9662158B2 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2017-05-30 | Si-Bone Inc. | Systems and methods for the fixation or fusion of bone at or near a sacroiliac joint |
US8388667B2 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2013-03-05 | Si-Bone, Inc. | Systems and methods for the fixation or fusion of bone using compressive implants |
US8444693B2 (en) | 2004-08-09 | 2013-05-21 | Si-Bone Inc. | Apparatus, systems, and methods for achieving lumbar facet fusion |
US20070156241A1 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2007-07-05 | Reiley Mark A | Systems and methods for the fixation or fusion of bone |
US8425570B2 (en) | 2004-08-09 | 2013-04-23 | Si-Bone Inc. | Apparatus, systems, and methods for achieving anterior lumbar interbody fusion |
US8470004B2 (en) | 2004-08-09 | 2013-06-25 | Si-Bone Inc. | Apparatus, systems, and methods for stabilizing a spondylolisthesis |
US8414648B2 (en) | 2004-08-09 | 2013-04-09 | Si-Bone Inc. | Apparatus, systems, and methods for achieving trans-iliac lumbar fusion |
US9949843B2 (en) | 2004-08-09 | 2018-04-24 | Si-Bone Inc. | Apparatus, systems, and methods for the fixation or fusion of bone |
US20180228621A1 (en) | 2004-08-09 | 2018-08-16 | Mark A. Reiley | Apparatus, systems, and methods for the fixation or fusion of bone |
US20060036261A1 (en) * | 2004-08-13 | 2006-02-16 | Stryker Spine | Insertion guide for a spinal implant |
US20060054171A1 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2006-03-16 | Bruce Dall | Method and apparatus of approaching a joint |
WO2006034436A2 (en) | 2004-09-21 | 2006-03-30 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Expandable support device and method of use |
US7666189B2 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2010-02-23 | Synthes Usa, Llc | Less invasive surgical system and methods |
US20060085076A1 (en) * | 2004-10-15 | 2006-04-20 | Manoj Krishna | Posterior spinal arthroplasty-development of a new posteriorly inserted artificial disc and an artificial facet joint |
US20060265074A1 (en) | 2004-10-21 | 2006-11-23 | Manoj Krishna | Posterior spinal arthroplasty-development of a new posteriorly inserted artificial disc, a new anteriorly inserted artifical disc and an artificial facet joint |
US20060111779A1 (en) * | 2004-11-22 | 2006-05-25 | Orthopedic Development Corporation, A Florida Corporation | Minimally invasive facet joint fusion |
US8021392B2 (en) | 2004-11-22 | 2011-09-20 | Minsurg International, Inc. | Methods and surgical kits for minimally-invasive facet joint fusion |
US7887589B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2011-02-15 | Glenn Bradley J | Minimally invasive spinal disc stabilizer and insertion tool |
US20060142858A1 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2006-06-29 | Dennis Colleran | Expandable implants for spinal disc replacement |
WO2006069089A2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2006-06-29 | Packaging Service Corporation Of Kentucky | Cervical plate system |
US8083797B2 (en) | 2005-02-04 | 2011-12-27 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic disc with shock absorption |
US20060235520A1 (en) * | 2005-04-19 | 2006-10-19 | Pannu Yashdip S | Spinal implant apparatus, method and system |
US20060253198A1 (en) * | 2005-05-03 | 2006-11-09 | Disc Dynamics, Inc. | Multi-lumen mold for intervertebral prosthesis and method of using same |
US20060253199A1 (en) * | 2005-05-03 | 2006-11-09 | Disc Dynamics, Inc. | Lordosis creating nucleus replacement method and apparatus |
US20060264932A1 (en) * | 2005-05-06 | 2006-11-23 | Bert Jeffrey K | Attachment to bone |
US8152809B1 (en) * | 2005-06-15 | 2012-04-10 | Vanderbilt University | Flat cut bit for cranial perforator |
US20070010815A1 (en) * | 2005-06-30 | 2007-01-11 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Fixation systems with modulated stiffness |
JP5081822B2 (en) | 2005-07-14 | 2012-11-28 | スタウト メディカル グループ,エル.ピー. | Expandable support device and system |
US9381024B2 (en) | 2005-07-31 | 2016-07-05 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Marked tools |
US9918767B2 (en) * | 2005-08-01 | 2018-03-20 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Temperature control system |
US20070050028A1 (en) * | 2005-08-26 | 2007-03-01 | Conner E S | Spinal implants and methods of providing dynamic stability to the spine |
US20070244562A1 (en) * | 2005-08-26 | 2007-10-18 | Magellan Spine Technologies, Inc. | Spinal implants and methods of providing dynamic stability to the spine |
US8998923B2 (en) | 2005-08-31 | 2015-04-07 | Spinealign Medical, Inc. | Threaded bone filling material plunger |
US20070067034A1 (en) * | 2005-08-31 | 2007-03-22 | Chirico Paul E | Implantable devices and methods for treating micro-architecture deterioration of bone tissue |
US7533672B2 (en) * | 2005-09-06 | 2009-05-19 | Synthes Usa, Llc | Methods and apparatus for vascular protection in spinal surgery |
US8105331B2 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2012-01-31 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Spinal surgery distractor with an integrated retractor |
US20070106316A1 (en) * | 2005-10-10 | 2007-05-10 | University Of South Florida | Dural Knife with Foot Plate |
US20070123904A1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2007-05-31 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Distraction instrument and method for distracting an intervertebral site |
US7867237B2 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2011-01-11 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Arthroplasty revision device and method |
US8360629B2 (en) | 2005-11-22 | 2013-01-29 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Mixing apparatus having central and planetary mixing elements |
US7988695B2 (en) | 2005-12-21 | 2011-08-02 | Theken Spine, Llc | Articulated delivery instrument |
US8377072B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2013-02-19 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Medical device installation tool |
US7842072B2 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2010-11-30 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Spinal fixation device with variable stiffness |
US7976549B2 (en) | 2006-03-23 | 2011-07-12 | Theken Spine, Llc | Instruments for delivering spinal implants |
US8221423B2 (en) * | 2006-03-28 | 2012-07-17 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Osteochondral plug graft harvesting instrument and kit |
WO2007121320A2 (en) | 2006-04-12 | 2007-10-25 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Posterior spinal device and method |
EP2007295A4 (en) * | 2006-04-14 | 2012-05-16 | Blackstone Medical Inc | Percutaneous facet fusion system and method |
EP2023864B1 (en) | 2006-05-01 | 2019-07-10 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Expandable support device |
US8672889B2 (en) * | 2006-05-05 | 2014-03-18 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Soft tissue tunneling device |
US8092536B2 (en) * | 2006-05-24 | 2012-01-10 | Disc Dynamics, Inc. | Retention structure for in situ formation of an intervertebral prosthesis |
US20070276491A1 (en) * | 2006-05-24 | 2007-11-29 | Disc Dynamics, Inc. | Mold assembly for intervertebral prosthesis |
US8303601B2 (en) | 2006-06-07 | 2012-11-06 | Stryker Spine | Collet-activated distraction wedge inserter |
US20070288009A1 (en) * | 2006-06-08 | 2007-12-13 | Steven Brown | Dynamic spinal stabilization device |
US8858600B2 (en) * | 2006-06-08 | 2014-10-14 | Spinadyne, Inc. | Dynamic spinal stabilization device |
US7905906B2 (en) * | 2006-06-08 | 2011-03-15 | Disc Motion Technologies, Inc. | System and method for lumbar arthroplasty |
ES2547854T3 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2015-10-09 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Integrated bone biopsy and therapy device |
EP2043563B1 (en) | 2006-07-24 | 2019-07-17 | Centinel Spine Schweiz GmbH | Intervertebral implant with keel |
US8337500B2 (en) | 2006-07-31 | 2012-12-25 | Synthes Usa, Llc | Drilling/milling guide and keel cut preparation system |
US7992878B2 (en) * | 2006-07-31 | 2011-08-09 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Helical lead for a drive shaft collet |
US8506636B2 (en) | 2006-09-08 | 2013-08-13 | Theken Spine, Llc | Offset radius lordosis |
CA2663447A1 (en) | 2006-09-14 | 2008-03-20 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Polymeric bone cement and methods of use thereof |
US8715350B2 (en) | 2006-09-15 | 2014-05-06 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Systems and methods for securing an implant in intervertebral space |
EP2063817A4 (en) | 2006-09-15 | 2012-04-18 | Pioneer Surgical Technology Inc | Joint arthroplasty devices having articulating members |
US20080077241A1 (en) * | 2006-09-22 | 2008-03-27 | Linh Nguyen | Removable rasp/trial member insert, kit and method of use |
US20080161817A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-07-03 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Intervertebral distraction device |
CA2747850C (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2013-05-14 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Fluid delivery system |
US8974496B2 (en) | 2007-08-30 | 2015-03-10 | Jeffrey Chun Wang | Interspinous implant, tools and methods of implanting |
US8480675B2 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2013-07-09 | Vertech, Inc. | Betts osteotome |
US8480715B2 (en) | 2007-05-22 | 2013-07-09 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Spinal implant system and method |
EP2155124A4 (en) * | 2007-05-22 | 2013-04-03 | Vg Innovations Llc | Method and apparatus for spinal facet fusion |
US8864829B1 (en) | 2007-07-02 | 2014-10-21 | Theken Spine, Llc | Spinal cage having deployable member |
US10342674B2 (en) | 2007-07-02 | 2019-07-09 | Theken Spine, Llc | Spinal cage having deployable member |
US8142508B1 (en) | 2007-07-02 | 2012-03-27 | Theken Spine, Llc | Spinal cage having deployable member which is removable |
US8545562B1 (en) | 2007-07-02 | 2013-10-01 | Theken Spine, Llc | Deployable member for use with an intervertebral cage |
US8292958B1 (en) | 2007-07-02 | 2012-10-23 | Theken Spine, Llc | Spinal cage having deployable member |
US20090024174A1 (en) | 2007-07-17 | 2009-01-22 | Stark John G | Bone screws and particular applications to sacroiliac joint fusion |
CA2694734A1 (en) | 2007-07-27 | 2009-02-05 | R Tree Innovations, Llc | Inter-body implantation system and method |
WO2009021144A2 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2009-02-12 | Transcorp, Inc. | Device for variably adjusting intervertebral distraction and lordosis |
US8709054B2 (en) | 2007-08-07 | 2014-04-29 | Transcorp, Inc. | Implantable vertebral frame systems and related methods for spinal repair |
US7867263B2 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2011-01-11 | Transcorp, Inc. | Implantable bone plate system and related method for spinal repair |
US20090043391A1 (en) | 2007-08-09 | 2009-02-12 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Customized Intervertebral Prosthetic Disc with Shock Absorption |
US8808380B2 (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2014-08-19 | William Casey Fox | Method and apparatus for an osteotomy fixation or arthrodesis cage |
EP2194890A1 (en) * | 2007-09-13 | 2010-06-16 | Transcorp, Inc. | Transcorporeal spinal decompression and repair system and related method |
US8430882B2 (en) | 2007-09-13 | 2013-04-30 | Transcorp, Inc. | Transcorporeal spinal decompression and repair systems and related methods |
US20090076516A1 (en) * | 2007-09-13 | 2009-03-19 | David Lowry | Device and method for tissue retraction in spinal surgery |
WO2009045912A2 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-09 | Transcorp, Inc. | Vertebrally-mounted tissue retractor and method for use in spinal surgery |
US20090105833A1 (en) | 2007-10-22 | 2009-04-23 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Method and Spacer Device for Spanning a Space Formed upon Removal of an Intervertebral Disc |
US8267997B2 (en) | 2007-11-12 | 2012-09-18 | Theken Spine, Llc | Vertebral interbody compression implant |
WO2009067568A1 (en) * | 2007-11-19 | 2009-05-28 | Magellan Spine Technologies, Inc. | Spinal implants and methods |
EP2227181A1 (en) | 2007-11-27 | 2010-09-15 | Transcorp, Inc. | Methods and systems for repairing an intervertebral disc using a transcorporal approach |
WO2009082497A1 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2009-07-02 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Multiple portal guide |
US9826992B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2017-11-28 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Multiple portal guide |
EP2224870B1 (en) | 2007-12-28 | 2013-05-22 | Synthes GmbH | A tack or drive screw for securing a prosthesis to bone and associated instrumentation |
ES2751997T3 (en) | 2008-01-14 | 2020-04-02 | Conventus Orthopaedics Inc | Fracture repair apparatus |
US8740912B2 (en) | 2008-02-27 | 2014-06-03 | Ilion Medical Llc | Tools for performing less invasive orthopedic joint procedures |
US8764833B2 (en) | 2008-03-11 | 2014-07-01 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Artificial intervertebral disc with lower height |
US8202299B2 (en) | 2008-03-19 | 2012-06-19 | Collabcom II, LLC | Interspinous implant, tools and methods of implanting |
US8313528B1 (en) | 2008-03-27 | 2012-11-20 | Spinelogik, Inc. | Intervertebral fusion device and method of use |
US8333804B1 (en) | 2008-03-27 | 2012-12-18 | Spinelogik, Inc. | Intervertebral fusion device and method of use |
WO2009125243A1 (en) * | 2008-04-08 | 2009-10-15 | Vexim | Guide sleeve for accessing a vertebral body and related methods of use |
WO2009125242A1 (en) | 2008-04-08 | 2009-10-15 | Vexim | Apparatus for restoration of the spine and methods of use thereof |
US9034038B2 (en) | 2008-04-11 | 2015-05-19 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Motion limiting insert for an artificial intervertebral disc |
WO2009137514A1 (en) | 2008-05-05 | 2009-11-12 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Polyaryletherketone artificial intervertebral disc |
US9220603B2 (en) | 2008-07-02 | 2015-12-29 | Simplify Medical, Inc. | Limited motion prosthetic intervertebral disc |
WO2010009151A2 (en) | 2008-07-17 | 2010-01-21 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Artificial intervertebral disc placement system |
WO2010009153A1 (en) | 2008-07-18 | 2010-01-21 | Spinalmotion, Inc. | Posterior prosthetic intervertebral disc |
US8337498B2 (en) * | 2008-08-13 | 2012-12-25 | Rasmussen G Lynn | Systems and methods for providing a bone milling device |
US8808294B2 (en) | 2008-09-09 | 2014-08-19 | William Casey Fox | Method and apparatus for a multiple transition temperature implant |
US10028753B2 (en) | 2008-09-26 | 2018-07-24 | Relievant Medsystems, Inc. | Spine treatment kits |
JP5688022B2 (en) | 2008-09-26 | 2015-03-25 | リリーバント メドシステムズ、インコーポレイテッド | System and method for guiding an instrument through the interior of a bone |
US8147554B2 (en) | 2008-10-13 | 2012-04-03 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Intervertebral spacer |
US8545566B2 (en) | 2008-10-13 | 2013-10-01 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Articulating spacer |
US8163022B2 (en) | 2008-10-14 | 2012-04-24 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus |
US8425573B2 (en) * | 2008-10-24 | 2013-04-23 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Method and system for attaching a plate to a bone |
US20100211176A1 (en) | 2008-11-12 | 2010-08-19 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Fixation device and method |
US20100204795A1 (en) | 2008-11-12 | 2010-08-12 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Fixation device and method |
US8425603B2 (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2013-04-23 | Synthes Usa, Llc | Orthopedic implant with flexible keel |
US20100262245A1 (en) * | 2009-02-18 | 2010-10-14 | Alfaro Arthur A | Intervertebral spacer |
US8292962B2 (en) * | 2009-03-04 | 2012-10-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinal nucleus replacement implants |
US20110196208A1 (en) * | 2009-03-06 | 2011-08-11 | Lanx, Inc. | Asymetrical surgical retractor |
US20100228095A1 (en) * | 2009-03-06 | 2010-09-09 | Lanx, Inc. | Surgical retractor |
AU2009341783B2 (en) | 2009-03-12 | 2014-11-13 | Stryker European Operations Limited | Apparatus for bone restoration of the spine and methods of use |
US9050194B2 (en) | 2009-05-06 | 2015-06-09 | Stryker Spine | Expandable spinal implant apparatus and method of use |
US20110040331A1 (en) * | 2009-05-20 | 2011-02-17 | Jose Fernandez | Posterior stabilizer |
US8234023B2 (en) * | 2009-06-12 | 2012-07-31 | General Electric Company | System and method for regulating speed, power or position of a powered vehicle |
EP2488112B1 (en) | 2009-10-15 | 2017-08-30 | Synthes GmbH | Protection sleeve retention device |
WO2011050140A1 (en) | 2009-10-22 | 2011-04-28 | Blue Fury Consulting, L.L.C. | Posterior cervical fusion system and techniques |
US10098674B2 (en) | 2009-10-22 | 2018-10-16 | Nuvasive, Inc. | System and method for posterior cervical fusion |
US9028553B2 (en) | 2009-11-05 | 2015-05-12 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Self-pivoting spinal implant and associated instrumentation |
US8617167B2 (en) * | 2009-12-04 | 2013-12-31 | Pivot Medical, Inc. | Methods and devices for accessing and retracting a capsule of a joint |
US9480511B2 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2016-11-01 | Engage Medical Holdings, Llc | Blade fixation for ankle fusion and arthroplasty |
US8652153B2 (en) | 2010-01-11 | 2014-02-18 | Anulex Technologies, Inc. | Intervertebral disc annulus repair system and bone anchor delivery tool |
EP2523614A4 (en) | 2010-01-15 | 2017-02-15 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Rotary-rigid orthopaedic rod |
WO2011091052A1 (en) | 2010-01-20 | 2011-07-28 | Kyle Taylor | Apparatus and methods for bone access and cavity preparation |
US9427324B1 (en) | 2010-02-22 | 2016-08-30 | Spinelogik, Inc. | Intervertebral fusion device and method of use |
JP2013521880A (en) | 2010-03-08 | 2013-06-13 | コンベンタス オーソピディックス, インコーポレイテッド | Apparatus and method for securing a bone implant |
US8926665B2 (en) * | 2010-03-18 | 2015-01-06 | Facsecure, Llc | Cortical, anti-migration, facet dowel for fusion of facet joints in the spine and devices for setting the same in place |
US8535380B2 (en) | 2010-05-13 | 2013-09-17 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Fixation device and method |
US8425569B2 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2013-04-23 | Transcorp, Inc. | Implantable vertebral frame systems and related methods for spinal repair |
FR2960764B1 (en) * | 2010-06-04 | 2012-06-08 | Spineart Sa | INSTRUMENTS FOR MINI-INVASIVE SPINAL SURGERY AND THEIR APPLICATIONS |
US8827902B2 (en) | 2010-08-16 | 2014-09-09 | Donald David DIETZE, Jr. | Surgical instrument system and method for providing retraction and vertebral distraction |
WO2012027490A2 (en) | 2010-08-24 | 2012-03-01 | Stout Medical Group, L.P. | Support device and method for use |
BR112013008694A2 (en) | 2010-09-27 | 2016-06-21 | Smith & Nephew Inc | device and methods for use during arthroscopic surgery |
WO2012061639A1 (en) | 2010-11-03 | 2012-05-10 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Drill guide |
US8409257B2 (en) | 2010-11-10 | 2013-04-02 | Warsaw Othopedic, Inc. | Systems and methods for facet joint stabilization |
US9149286B1 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2015-10-06 | Flexmedex, LLC | Guidance tool and method for use |
WO2012083205A1 (en) | 2010-12-16 | 2012-06-21 | Medicinelodge, Inc. Dba Imds Co-Innovation | Arthroplasty systems and methods |
CA2830153C (en) | 2011-04-07 | 2017-11-07 | Vexim S.A. | Expandable orthopedic device |
EP2706931B1 (en) | 2011-05-12 | 2015-04-15 | NLT Spine Ltd. | Tissue disruption device |
US9295501B2 (en) * | 2011-08-02 | 2016-03-29 | Blackstone Medical, Inc. | Bayonet counter-torque wrench |
US9119639B2 (en) | 2011-08-09 | 2015-09-01 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Articulated cavity creator |
CN103930058A (en) | 2011-08-23 | 2014-07-16 | 弗雷科斯米德克斯有限公司 | Tissue removal device and method |
US8790352B2 (en) * | 2011-10-03 | 2014-07-29 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Ovoid tunnel guide and method of ACL reconstruction |
US9254130B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2016-02-09 | Hyun Bae | Blade anchor systems for bone fusion |
US9198769B2 (en) | 2011-12-23 | 2015-12-01 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Bone anchor assembly, bone plate system, and method |
AU2012362524B2 (en) | 2011-12-30 | 2018-12-13 | Relievant Medsystems, Inc. | Systems and methods for treating back pain |
WO2013106726A1 (en) | 2012-01-12 | 2013-07-18 | Wyatt Drake Geist | Access assembly for anterior and lateral spinal procedures |
US8778026B2 (en) | 2012-03-09 | 2014-07-15 | Si-Bone Inc. | Artificial SI joint |
JP6091529B2 (en) | 2012-03-09 | 2017-03-08 | エスアイ−ボーン・インコーポレイテッドSi−Bone, Inc. | Integrated implant |
US10363140B2 (en) | 2012-03-09 | 2019-07-30 | Si-Bone Inc. | Systems, device, and methods for joint fusion |
US10238382B2 (en) | 2012-03-26 | 2019-03-26 | Engage Medical Holdings, Llc | Blade anchor for foot and ankle |
BR112014027319A2 (en) | 2012-05-04 | 2017-06-27 | Si Bone Inc | fenestrated implant |
US9572589B2 (en) | 2012-07-10 | 2017-02-21 | Stryker European Holdings I, Llc | Drill guide |
US9011450B2 (en) | 2012-08-08 | 2015-04-21 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Surgical instrument |
US10588691B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2020-03-17 | Relievant Medsystems, Inc. | Radiofrequency ablation of tissue within a vertebral body |
WO2014071161A1 (en) | 2012-11-05 | 2014-05-08 | Relievant Medsystems, Inc. | System and methods for creating curved paths through bone and modulating nerves within the bone |
WO2014078737A1 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2014-05-22 | Lanx, Inc. | Oblique expanding fusion cage device and method |
KR101302453B1 (en) * | 2012-12-11 | 2013-09-02 | 박경우 | Percutaneous extraforaminotomy with foraminal ligament resection and instrument tools being used for the same |
US10022245B2 (en) | 2012-12-17 | 2018-07-17 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Polyaxial articulating instrument |
WO2014117107A1 (en) | 2013-01-28 | 2014-07-31 | Cartiva, Inc. | Systems and methods for orthopedic repair |
US9737294B2 (en) | 2013-01-28 | 2017-08-22 | Cartiva, Inc. | Method and system for orthopedic repair |
US9439693B2 (en) | 2013-02-01 | 2016-09-13 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Steerable needle assembly for use in vertebral body augmentation |
US9913728B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-03-13 | Quandary Medical, Llc | Spinal implants and implantation system |
US9675303B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2017-06-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Visualization systems, instruments and methods of using the same in spinal decompression procedures |
WO2014144696A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Lanx, Inc. | Expandable fusion cage system |
US9119732B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-09-01 | Orthocision, Inc. | Method and implant system for sacroiliac joint fixation and fusion |
WO2014145902A1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Si-Bone Inc. | Implants for spinal fixation or fusion |
US9724151B2 (en) | 2013-08-08 | 2017-08-08 | Relievant Medsystems, Inc. | Modulating nerves within bone using bone fasteners |
US9526529B2 (en) | 2013-09-25 | 2016-12-27 | Blackstone Medical, Inc. | Bone screw systems with pressure caps having biasing members |
US11147688B2 (en) | 2013-10-15 | 2021-10-19 | Si-Bone Inc. | Implant placement |
US9839448B2 (en) | 2013-10-15 | 2017-12-12 | Si-Bone Inc. | Implant placement |
US9480501B2 (en) | 2013-10-21 | 2016-11-01 | Blackstone Medical, Inc. | Modular pedicle screw |
US9980758B2 (en) | 2013-11-27 | 2018-05-29 | Blackstone Medical, Inc. | Minimally invasive counter-torque wrench system |
US10022132B2 (en) | 2013-12-12 | 2018-07-17 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Tissue displacement tools and methods |
FR3015221B1 (en) | 2013-12-23 | 2017-09-01 | Vexim | EXPANSIBLE INTRAVERTEBRAL IMPLANT SYSTEM WITH POSTERIOR PEDICULAR FIXATION |
US10045803B2 (en) | 2014-07-03 | 2018-08-14 | Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research | Sacroiliac joint fusion screw and method |
EP3164080A4 (en) | 2014-07-06 | 2018-06-27 | Garcia-Bengochea, Javier | Methods and devices for surgical access |
US10166033B2 (en) | 2014-09-18 | 2019-01-01 | Si-Bone Inc. | Implants for bone fixation or fusion |
US9662157B2 (en) | 2014-09-18 | 2017-05-30 | Si-Bone Inc. | Matrix implant |
US10376206B2 (en) | 2015-04-01 | 2019-08-13 | Si-Bone Inc. | Neuromonitoring systems and methods for bone fixation or fusion procedures |
US10687830B2 (en) | 2015-07-06 | 2020-06-23 | Javier Garcia-Bengochea | Methods and devices for surgical access |
US10058350B2 (en) | 2015-09-24 | 2018-08-28 | Integrity Implants, Inc. | Access assembly for anterior and lateral spinal procedures |
US10143490B2 (en) * | 2016-02-10 | 2018-12-04 | Daniel Walzman | Dural knife |
US9833321B2 (en) | 2016-04-25 | 2017-12-05 | Imds Llc | Joint fusion instrumentation and methods |
US10413332B2 (en) | 2016-04-25 | 2019-09-17 | Imds Llc | Joint fusion implant and methods |
US20170367839A1 (en) | 2016-06-23 | 2017-12-28 | VGI Medical, LLC | Method and apparatus for spinal facet fusion |
US10390955B2 (en) | 2016-09-22 | 2019-08-27 | Engage Medical Holdings, Llc | Bone implants |
US10456272B2 (en) | 2017-03-03 | 2019-10-29 | Engage Uni Llc | Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty |
US11540928B2 (en) | 2017-03-03 | 2023-01-03 | Engage Uni Llc | Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty |
US10631881B2 (en) | 2017-03-09 | 2020-04-28 | Flower Orthopedics Corporation | Plating depth gauge and countersink instrument |
US10918426B2 (en) | 2017-07-04 | 2021-02-16 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for treatment of a bone |
US10966843B2 (en) | 2017-07-18 | 2021-04-06 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Implant inserters and related methods |
US11045331B2 (en) | 2017-08-14 | 2021-06-29 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implant inserters and related methods |
CA3074834A1 (en) | 2017-09-08 | 2019-03-14 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implants, instruments, and methods |
WO2019067584A1 (en) | 2017-09-26 | 2019-04-04 | Si-Bone Inc. | Systems and methods for decorticating the sacroiliac joint |
USD907771S1 (en) | 2017-10-09 | 2021-01-12 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implant |
WO2020168269A1 (en) | 2019-02-14 | 2020-08-20 | Si-Bone Inc. | Implants for spinal fixation and or fusion |
US11369419B2 (en) | 2019-02-14 | 2022-06-28 | Si-Bone Inc. | Implants for spinal fixation and or fusion |
AU2020346827A1 (en) | 2019-09-12 | 2022-03-31 | Relievant Medsystems, Inc. | Systems and methods for tissue modulation |
US11666460B2 (en) | 2019-09-24 | 2023-06-06 | Simplify Medical Pty Ltd. | Surgical cutter instrument with trial |
US11058550B2 (en) | 2019-10-04 | 2021-07-13 | Pain TEQ, LLC | Allograft implant for fusing a sacroiliac joint |
US11154402B1 (en) | 2019-10-04 | 2021-10-26 | Pain TEQ, LLC | Instrumentation for fusing a sacroiliac joint |
CA3156501A1 (en) | 2019-10-04 | 2021-04-08 | Pain TEQ, LLC | Multimodal abrading device for fusing a sacroiliac joint |
WO2021108590A1 (en) | 2019-11-27 | 2021-06-03 | Si-Bone, Inc. | Bone stabilizing implants and methods of placement across si joints |
WO2021119126A1 (en) | 2019-12-09 | 2021-06-17 | Si-Bone Inc. | Sacro-iliac joint stabilizing implants and methods of implantation |
US12082876B1 (en) | 2020-09-28 | 2024-09-10 | Relievant Medsystems, Inc. | Introducer drill |
EP4259015A4 (en) | 2020-12-09 | 2024-09-11 | Si Bone Inc | Sacro-iliac joint stabilizing implants and methods of implantation |
JP2024505335A (en) | 2020-12-22 | 2024-02-06 | リリーバント メドシステムズ、インコーポレイテッド | Prediction of spinal neuromodulation candidates |
US11931053B2 (en) | 2022-08-04 | 2024-03-19 | PTL Opco, LLC | Single-use joint decorticator apparatus |
US20240285290A1 (en) * | 2023-02-27 | 2024-08-29 | Allosource | Method and apparatus for effecting osteochondral restoration |
Citations (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US669764A (en) * | 1900-11-27 | 1901-03-12 | Morgan Potter | Guiding appliance for drills. |
US1705049A (en) * | 1926-02-18 | 1929-03-12 | Harry W Howland | Boring instrument |
US2179029A (en) * | 1938-11-02 | 1939-11-07 | Barnes Ernest | Boring tool |
US2444099A (en) * | 1945-06-26 | 1948-06-29 | Camloc Fastener Corp | Hole-cutting saw |
US3559513A (en) * | 1968-05-06 | 1971-02-02 | Everett D Hougen | Hole saw |
US3719186A (en) * | 1971-04-22 | 1973-03-06 | Univ Alabama In Birmingham | Surgical instrument for placement of bone pins and holes therefor |
US3848601A (en) * | 1972-06-14 | 1974-11-19 | G Ma | Method for interbody fusion of the spine |
US4090804A (en) * | 1977-02-04 | 1978-05-23 | Haley Ernest K | Circular drill with centering device |
US4203692A (en) * | 1978-12-20 | 1980-05-20 | Jensen Roger S | Self-centering hole saw adapter |
US4235595A (en) * | 1977-05-31 | 1980-11-25 | Arnegger Richard E | Handpiece with continuous shaft and bell rotor |
US4352610A (en) * | 1980-07-07 | 1982-10-05 | The Boeing Company | Method and tool for generating holes in composite materials |
US4362161A (en) * | 1980-10-27 | 1982-12-07 | Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. | Cranial drill |
US4414962A (en) * | 1977-06-15 | 1983-11-15 | Carson Robert W | Operating arthroscope |
US4438769A (en) * | 1982-04-15 | 1984-03-27 | Pratt Clyde R | Medical staple device |
US4545374A (en) * | 1982-09-03 | 1985-10-08 | Jacobson Robert E | Method and instruments for performing a percutaneous lumbar diskectomy |
US4696308A (en) * | 1986-04-09 | 1987-09-29 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Core sampling apparatus |
US4710075A (en) * | 1986-10-01 | 1987-12-01 | Boehringer Mannheim Corporation | Adjustable drill gauge |
US4793363A (en) * | 1986-09-11 | 1988-12-27 | Sherwood Medical Company | Biopsy needle |
US5015255A (en) * | 1989-05-10 | 1991-05-14 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Spinal stabilization method |
US5047032A (en) * | 1987-10-21 | 1991-09-10 | Richards Medical Company | Method and apparatus for cutting joint surfaces |
US5049150A (en) * | 1990-12-27 | 1991-09-17 | Zimmer, Inc. | Tool for gripping a bone fragment |
US5098435A (en) * | 1990-11-21 | 1992-03-24 | Alphatec Manufacturing Inc. | Cannula |
US5108395A (en) * | 1989-09-18 | 1992-04-28 | Societe De Fabrication De Materiel Orthopedique - Sofamor | Implant for anterior dorsolumbar spinal osteosynthesis, intended for the correction of kyphoses |
US5171111A (en) * | 1991-07-05 | 1992-12-15 | Kansai Kogu Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Drilling tool |
US5192293A (en) * | 1992-07-06 | 1993-03-09 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Drill guide for orbital implant |
US5197971A (en) * | 1990-03-02 | 1993-03-30 | Bonutti Peter M | Arthroscopic retractor and method of using the same |
US5313962A (en) * | 1991-10-18 | 1994-05-24 | Obenchain Theodore G | Method of performing laparoscopic lumbar discectomy |
US5357983A (en) * | 1992-03-17 | 1994-10-25 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Method for subcutaneous suprafascial pedicular internal fixation |
US5484437A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1996-01-16 | Michelson; Gary K. | Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants |
US5632747A (en) * | 1995-03-15 | 1997-05-27 | Osteotech, Inc. | Bone dowel cutter |
US5797909A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1998-08-25 | Michelson; Gary Karlin | Apparatus for inserting spinal implants |
US6152661A (en) * | 1999-08-17 | 2000-11-28 | Thrasher; Charles M. | Wood coring bit |
US6436098B1 (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 2002-08-20 | Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc. | Method for inserting spinal implants and for securing a guard to the spine |
US6966912B2 (en) * | 1998-06-09 | 2005-11-22 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Device and method for preparing a space between adjacent vertebrae to receive an insert |
Family Cites Families (279)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US31865A (en) * | 1861-04-02 | Improvement in harrow-frames | ||
US62123A (en) | 1867-02-19 | Improved drift | ||
US430977A (en) * | 1890-06-24 | tellebing- | ||
US350420A (en) | 1886-10-05 | Staple-driving implement | ||
US493730A (en) * | 1893-03-21 | Trephine | ||
US640108A (en) * | 1899-06-17 | 1899-12-26 | Henry M Dalzell | Tubular crown-saw. |
US1137585A (en) | 1915-02-05 | 1915-04-27 | Thornton Craig Jr | Dental appliance. |
US2065659A (en) | 1934-08-04 | 1936-12-29 | Arthur V Cullen | Fastening method and means |
US2243718A (en) | 1938-11-05 | 1941-05-27 | Moreira Francisco Elias Godoy | Surgical drill |
US2181746A (en) | 1939-02-04 | 1939-11-28 | John R Siebrandt | Combination bone clamp and adjustable drill guide |
GB564591A (en) | 1943-01-28 | 1944-10-04 | Courtaulds Ltd | Improvements in the manufacture and production of artificial threads, filaments and the like |
US2543780A (en) | 1946-12-09 | 1951-03-06 | Herbert E Hipps | Bone graft apparatus |
US2537070A (en) | 1948-12-27 | 1951-01-09 | Puy Mfg Company Inc De | Surgical appliance and method for fixation of bone fragments |
US2514665A (en) | 1949-01-11 | 1950-07-11 | Myller Ernest | Medical instrument |
US2677369A (en) | 1952-03-26 | 1954-05-04 | Fred L Knowles | Apparatus for treatment of the spinal column |
US2774350A (en) | 1952-09-08 | 1956-12-18 | Jr Carl S Cleveland | Spinal clamp or splint |
US2789558A (en) | 1953-09-17 | 1957-04-23 | Leslie V Rush | Medullary in driver and extractor |
US2832343A (en) | 1955-04-12 | 1958-04-29 | Mose Clara Emilie Marie | Dilators |
US2849002A (en) | 1956-03-12 | 1958-08-26 | Vincent J Oddo | Haemostatic catheter |
US2842131A (en) | 1957-05-27 | 1958-07-08 | George W Smith | Automatic drill |
US2878809A (en) | 1958-01-23 | 1959-03-24 | Richards Mfg Company | Surgical drill attachment |
US3128768A (en) | 1961-11-24 | 1964-04-14 | Rosemount Eng Co Ltd | Surgical drill |
US3181533A (en) | 1962-01-15 | 1965-05-04 | William C Heath | Surgical snare |
FR1338873A (en) | 1962-06-04 | 1963-10-04 | Comite Central De Fabricants D | Furnace for the thermal treatment of agglomerated fuels or classified coal |
US3298372A (en) | 1963-12-17 | 1967-01-17 | Feinberg Maurice | Surgical hydrocephalus shunt sleeve for placement in a vertebra |
US3426364A (en) | 1966-08-25 | 1969-02-11 | Colorado State Univ Research F | Prosthetic appliance for replacing one or more natural vertebrae |
US3486505A (en) * | 1967-05-22 | 1969-12-30 | Gordon M Morrison | Orthopedic surgical instrument |
SE332486B (en) | 1968-12-09 | 1971-02-08 | Aga Ab | |
US3618611A (en) | 1969-03-05 | 1971-11-09 | Julius C Urban | Vacuum rotary dissector |
US3604487A (en) | 1969-03-10 | 1971-09-14 | Richard S Gilbert | Orthopedic screw driving means |
US3948262A (en) | 1969-04-01 | 1976-04-06 | Alza Corporation | Novel drug delivery device |
US3605123A (en) | 1969-04-29 | 1971-09-20 | Melpar Inc | Bone implant |
US3682177A (en) | 1970-03-18 | 1972-08-08 | Acme Eng Co Inc | Cranial drilling instrument |
CA962806A (en) | 1970-06-04 | 1975-02-18 | Ontario Research Foundation | Surgical prosthetic device |
US3720959A (en) | 1970-08-26 | 1973-03-20 | G Hahn | Mandibular prosthetic apparatus |
US3709219A (en) | 1970-11-27 | 1973-01-09 | W Halloran | Bone compression device |
CA992255A (en) | 1971-01-25 | 1976-07-06 | Cutter Laboratories | Prosthesis for spinal repair |
US3750652A (en) | 1971-03-05 | 1973-08-07 | J Sherwin | Knee retractor |
US3867950A (en) | 1971-06-18 | 1975-02-25 | Univ Johns Hopkins | Fixed rate rechargeable cardiac pacemaker |
US3877020A (en) * | 1972-06-27 | 1975-04-08 | Allen W Brunsting | Paired transition rebalancing pulse for voltage to frequency converters |
US3888260A (en) | 1972-06-28 | 1975-06-10 | Univ Johns Hopkins | Rechargeable demand inhibited cardiac pacer and tissue stimulator |
JPS5312588Y2 (en) * | 1972-09-21 | 1978-04-05 | ||
US3828790A (en) | 1973-02-28 | 1974-08-13 | American Cystoscope Makers Inc | Surgical snare |
DE2311817C2 (en) | 1973-03-09 | 1984-06-07 | Werner Dipl.-Ing. 8000 München Kraus | Stimulation current device to promote the healing of bone damage |
DE2314573C2 (en) | 1973-03-23 | 1986-12-18 | Werner Dipl.-Ing. 8000 München Kraus | Device for promoting healing processes |
US4070514A (en) | 1973-06-05 | 1978-01-24 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Method of fabricating graphite for use as a skeletal prosthesis and product thereof |
US3905047A (en) | 1973-06-27 | 1975-09-16 | Posta Jr John J | Implantable ceramic bone prosthesis |
DE2340546A1 (en) | 1973-08-10 | 1975-02-27 | Pfaudler Werke Ag | METALLIC IMPLANT AND PROCEDURE FOR ITS MANUFACTURING |
US3892232A (en) * | 1973-09-24 | 1975-07-01 | Alonzo J Neufeld | Method and apparatus for performing percutaneous bone surgery |
US3942535A (en) | 1973-09-27 | 1976-03-09 | G. D. Searle & Co. | Rechargeable tissue stimulating system |
JPS5060085A (en) | 1973-09-27 | 1975-05-23 | ||
US3867932A (en) | 1974-01-18 | 1975-02-25 | Donald R Huene | Assembly for inserting rigid shafts into fractured bones |
US4051905A (en) | 1974-03-28 | 1977-10-04 | Gerbruder Heller | Drill for percussion drilling machines |
JPS5239596B2 (en) | 1974-04-04 | 1977-10-06 | ||
US3875595A (en) | 1974-04-15 | 1975-04-08 | Edward C Froning | Intervertebral disc prosthesis and instruments for locating same |
US3916907A (en) | 1974-06-21 | 1975-11-04 | Wendell C Peterson | Spreader instrument for use in performing a spinal fusion |
JPS5223514B2 (en) | 1974-09-25 | 1977-06-24 | ||
US3952334A (en) | 1974-11-29 | 1976-04-27 | General Atomic Company | Biocompatible carbon prosthetic devices |
FR2295729A1 (en) | 1974-12-27 | 1976-07-23 | Mahay Et Cie | TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS |
DE2615116A1 (en) | 1975-04-07 | 1976-10-28 | Kyoto Ceramic | IMPLANTABLE DEVICE |
USD257511S (en) | 1975-09-08 | 1980-11-11 | Olin Corporation | Drill tool or the like |
DE2546824C2 (en) | 1975-10-18 | 1986-05-07 | Ernst Leitz Wetzlar Gmbh, 6330 Wetzlar | Coated endoprosthesis and process for their manufacture |
USD245259S (en) | 1976-01-29 | 1977-08-02 | Zimmer U.S.A. Inc. | Tibial prosthesis |
GB1574825A (en) | 1976-03-31 | 1980-09-10 | Rubery Owen Fasteners Ltd | Screw threaded members and their manufacture |
US4027392A (en) | 1976-05-10 | 1977-06-07 | Interface Biomedical Laboratories Corporation | Endosteal bionic tooth and implantation method |
DE2659916A1 (en) | 1976-05-14 | 1977-11-24 | Pfaudler Werke Ag | Surgical prosthetic fixing with self cutting screw threads - having abrasive coating to facilitate insertion and improve screw grip |
DE2621383A1 (en) | 1976-05-14 | 1977-12-01 | Gardner Denver Gmbh | METHOD OF PLACING IMPLANTS INTO BONE AND APPARATUS |
US4082097A (en) | 1976-05-20 | 1978-04-04 | Pacesetter Systems Inc. | Multimode recharging system for living tissue stimulators |
US4059115A (en) * | 1976-06-14 | 1977-11-22 | Georgy Stepanovich Jumashev | Surgical instrument for operation of anterior fenestrated spondylodessis in vertebral osteochondrosis |
US4142517A (en) | 1976-07-23 | 1979-03-06 | Contreras Guerrero De Stavropo | Apparatus for extracting bone marrow specimens |
GB1550010A (en) | 1976-12-15 | 1979-08-08 | Ontario Research Foundation | Surgical prosthetic device or implant having pure metal porous coating |
US4232679A (en) | 1977-01-26 | 1980-11-11 | Pacesetter Systems, Inc. | Programmable human tissue stimulator |
GB1565178A (en) | 1977-02-24 | 1980-04-16 | Interfix Ltd | Bone screw |
US4259072A (en) | 1977-04-04 | 1981-03-31 | Kyoto Ceramic Co., Ltd. | Ceramic endosseous implant |
JPS53144194A (en) | 1977-05-20 | 1978-12-15 | Kureha Chemical Ind Co Ltd | Compound implanted material and making method thereof |
EP0000383B1 (en) * | 1977-07-08 | 1982-10-13 | The Wellcome Foundation Limited | Pyrimido (4,5-c) pyridazines, their use in pharmaceutical preparations, and process for their preparation |
US4258716A (en) | 1978-02-06 | 1981-03-31 | The University Of Melbourne | Microsurgical instruments |
US4181457A (en) | 1978-02-10 | 1980-01-01 | Holmes Horace D | Tapping tool for making vibration resistant prevailing torque fastener |
US4323071A (en) | 1978-04-24 | 1982-04-06 | Advanced Catheter Systems, Inc. | Vascular guiding catheter assembly and vascular dilating catheter assembly and a combination thereof and methods of making the same |
FR2429009A1 (en) | 1978-06-21 | 1980-01-18 | Roux Christiane | PROSTHESIS FOR ARTICULATION, PARTICULARLY COXO-FEMORAL, ARTIFICIAL |
GB2029702B (en) | 1978-07-20 | 1982-12-15 | Secr Social Service Brit | Fracture fixation aooaratus |
AT358715B (en) | 1978-09-04 | 1980-09-25 | Plansee Metallwerk | BUTCHING AND REJECTING DEVICE FOR BONE MARKING NAIL |
US4197850A (en) | 1978-11-03 | 1980-04-15 | Pacesetter Systems, Inc. | Implantable human tissue stimulator with memory protect means |
USD260525S (en) | 1978-12-04 | 1981-09-01 | Lassiter Will M | Channel drill and bolt combination |
US4341206A (en) * | 1978-12-19 | 1982-07-27 | Synthes Ag | Device for producing a hole in a bone |
FR2460657A1 (en) | 1979-07-12 | 1981-01-30 | Anvar | BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT FOR USE AS A BONE PROSTHESIS PIECE |
US4333469A (en) | 1979-07-20 | 1982-06-08 | Telectronics Pty. Ltd. | Bone growth stimulator |
US4492226A (en) | 1979-10-10 | 1985-01-08 | Vsesojuzny Nauchno-Issledovatelsky I Ispytatelny Institut Meditsinskoi Tekhniki | Device for uniting bone fragments |
US4450834A (en) * | 1979-10-18 | 1984-05-29 | Ace Orthopedic Manufacturing, Inc. | External fixation device |
US4327736A (en) | 1979-11-20 | 1982-05-04 | Kanji Inoue | Balloon catheter |
CH642251A5 (en) | 1979-12-22 | 1984-04-13 | Straumann Inst Ag | BALL JOINT PROSTHESIS WITH A CAP. |
CH642840A5 (en) | 1980-02-08 | 1984-05-15 | Allo Pro Ag | SURGICAL IMPLANT, IN PARTICULAR HIP JOINT. |
US4293962A (en) | 1980-02-14 | 1981-10-13 | Zimmer Usa, Inc. | Bone plug inserting system |
SU1124960A1 (en) | 1980-02-19 | 1984-11-23 | Bokov Nikolaj F | Puncture instrument |
US4289123A (en) | 1980-03-31 | 1981-09-15 | Dunn Harold K | Orthopedic appliance |
US4405319A (en) | 1980-04-08 | 1983-09-20 | Renal Systems, Inc. | Porous titanium coating for blood access device |
CH648197A5 (en) | 1980-05-28 | 1985-03-15 | Synthes Ag | IMPLANT AND SCREW FASTENING ON ITS BONE. |
GB2076657A (en) | 1980-05-31 | 1981-12-09 | Atkins Brian Norman | Apparatus for external fixation of part of the human or animal skeletal structure |
CA1146301A (en) | 1980-06-13 | 1983-05-17 | J. David Kuntz | Intervertebral disc prosthesis |
DE3031905A1 (en) | 1980-08-23 | 1982-03-04 | L. & C. Steinmüller GmbH, 5270 Gummersbach | BURNER SYSTEM |
GB2083754B (en) | 1980-09-15 | 1984-04-26 | Rezaian Seyed Mahmoud | Spinal fixator |
US4309777A (en) | 1980-11-13 | 1982-01-12 | Patil Arun A | Artificial intervertebral disc |
CH646857A5 (en) | 1980-11-18 | 1984-12-28 | Sulzer Ag | SPONDYLODESIS STABILIZER. |
US4414979A (en) | 1981-02-23 | 1983-11-15 | Telectronics Pty. Ltd. | Monitorable bone growth stimulator |
JPS57163309A (en) | 1981-04-01 | 1982-10-07 | Olympus Optical Co Ltd | Capsule apparatus for medical use |
US4488549A (en) | 1981-08-25 | 1984-12-18 | University Of Exeter | Pressurization of cement in bones |
EP0077159A1 (en) * | 1981-10-14 | 1983-04-20 | Brian Norman Atkins | Vertebrae spreader |
BR8107560A (en) | 1981-11-19 | 1983-07-05 | Luiz Romariz Duarte | ULTRASONIC STIMULATION OF BONE FRACTURE CONSOLIDATION |
US4501269A (en) | 1981-12-11 | 1985-02-26 | Washington State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Process for fusing bone joints |
US4439152A (en) | 1982-03-04 | 1984-03-27 | Small Irwin A | Method of jawbone abutment implant for dental prostheses and implant device |
US4535485A (en) | 1982-03-12 | 1985-08-20 | Medical Biological Sciences, Inc. | Polymeric acrylic prothesis |
US4547390A (en) | 1982-03-12 | 1985-10-15 | Medical Biological Sciences, Inc. | Process of making implantable prosthesis material of modified polymeric acrylic (PMMA) beads coated with PHEMA and barium sulfate |
US4542539A (en) | 1982-03-12 | 1985-09-24 | Artech Corp. | Surgical implant having a graded porous coating |
SU1063397A1 (en) | 1982-03-25 | 1983-12-30 | 1-Й Московский Ордена Ленина И Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Медицинский Институт Им.И.М.Сеченова | Method of setting dislocations of cervical vertebra and reponator for its realization |
JPS591403A (en) * | 1982-04-13 | 1984-01-06 | Pola Chem Ind Inc | Polyglycerol compound and cosmetic containing the same |
EP0097879B1 (en) | 1982-06-29 | 1990-10-17 | Gelsen, Karl-Heinz | Drilling machine |
US4549547A (en) | 1982-07-27 | 1985-10-29 | Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Implantable bone growth stimulator |
GB2126094A (en) | 1982-08-26 | 1984-03-21 | Brian Norman Atkins | Device for holding the bones of the wrist and forearm after setting or during arthrodesis of the wrist |
US4600000A (en) | 1982-09-16 | 1986-07-15 | Edwards Charles C | External fixation system |
US4552200A (en) | 1982-09-30 | 1985-11-12 | Southwire Company | Control in continuous casting to enhance feeding |
WO1984001298A1 (en) | 1982-10-01 | 1984-04-12 | Keith William Jeffcoat | Electric healing device |
US4535374A (en) | 1982-11-04 | 1985-08-13 | Amcodyne Incorporated | Whitney-type head loading/unloading apparatus |
US4497320A (en) | 1983-02-14 | 1985-02-05 | Rudolph Beaver, Inc. | Surgical blade unit |
US4997434A (en) | 1983-02-16 | 1991-03-05 | Seedhom Bahaa B | Prosthetic ligaments and instruments for use in the surgical replacement of ligaments |
US4777939A (en) * | 1983-03-09 | 1988-10-18 | George Kees Research & Development Co., Inc. | Retractor structure |
SU1107854A1 (en) | 1983-03-30 | 1984-08-15 | Харьковский Научно-Исследовательский Институт Ортопедии И Травматологии Им.Проф.М.И.Ситенко | Spine fixative |
US4570623A (en) | 1983-06-02 | 1986-02-18 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group Inc. | Arched bridge staple |
US4490421A (en) | 1983-07-05 | 1984-12-25 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Balloon and manufacture thereof |
USD281814S (en) | 1983-07-13 | 1985-12-17 | Techmedica, Inc. | Osteotomy staple |
JPS6031706A (en) | 1983-07-30 | 1985-02-18 | 池田物産株式会社 | Headrest apparatus |
US4570624A (en) | 1983-08-10 | 1986-02-18 | Henry Ford Hospital | Universal guide for inserting parallel pins |
JPS6043984A (en) | 1983-08-20 | 1985-03-08 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Video tape recorder |
IL69888A0 (en) | 1983-10-03 | 1984-01-31 | Avmedica Ltd | Unilateral external fixation system for small bones |
US4554914A (en) | 1983-10-04 | 1985-11-26 | Kapp John P | Prosthetic vertebral body |
SU1222254A1 (en) | 1983-11-09 | 1986-04-07 | Bogosyan Aleksandr B | Needle for intraosseous injection |
US4553273A (en) | 1983-11-23 | 1985-11-19 | Henry Ford Hospital | Vertebral body prosthesis and spine stabilizing method |
US4696290A (en) | 1983-12-16 | 1987-09-29 | Acromed Corporation | Apparatus for straightening spinal columns |
US4611581A (en) | 1983-12-16 | 1986-09-16 | Acromed Corporation | Apparatus for straightening spinal columns |
US4655777A (en) | 1983-12-19 | 1987-04-07 | Southern Research Institute | Method of producing biodegradable prosthesis and products therefrom |
SU1217374A1 (en) | 1984-02-03 | 1986-03-15 | Институт Сейсмологии | Endoscopic knife |
US4604995A (en) | 1984-03-30 | 1986-08-12 | Stephens David C | Spinal stabilizer |
US4653486A (en) | 1984-04-12 | 1987-03-31 | Coker Tom P | Fastener, particularly suited for orthopedic use |
DE3414514A1 (en) | 1984-04-13 | 1985-10-24 | Biotronik Meß- und Therapiegeräte GmbH & Co Ingenieurbüro Berlin, 1000 Berlin | SCREW-IN PAN FOR AN ARTIFICIAL HIP JOINT |
US4566466A (en) | 1984-04-16 | 1986-01-28 | Ripple Dale B | Surgical instrument |
US4608052A (en) | 1984-04-25 | 1986-08-26 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Implant with attachment surface |
US4619264A (en) | 1984-06-14 | 1986-10-28 | Singh Om P | Method and apparatus for treatment of fresh fractures, delayed unions and non-unions of living bone |
US4736738A (en) | 1984-07-09 | 1988-04-12 | Matej Lipovsek | Instrument kit and procedure for performing posterior lumbar interbody fusion |
EP0176728B1 (en) | 1984-09-04 | 1989-07-26 | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin | Intervertebral-disc prosthesis |
GB2164277A (en) | 1984-09-12 | 1986-03-19 | Univ Manchester | A bone drill |
US4602638A (en) | 1984-10-03 | 1986-07-29 | Eddie Adams | Apparatus and method for invasive electrical stimulation of bone fractures |
CA1264674A (en) | 1984-10-17 | 1990-01-23 | Paul Ducheyne | Porous flexible metal fiber material for surgical implantation |
US4665920A (en) | 1984-11-28 | 1987-05-19 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Skeletal tissue stimulator and a low voltage oscillator circuit for use therein |
ES283078Y (en) | 1984-11-30 | 1985-12-16 | Otero Vich Jose M. | BONE INSERT FOR CERVICAL INTERSOMATIC ARTHRODESIS |
US4877020A (en) | 1984-11-30 | 1989-10-31 | Vich Jose M O | Apparatus for bone graft |
DE3445738A1 (en) | 1984-12-14 | 1986-06-19 | Draenert Klaus | IMPLANT FOR BONE REINFORCEMENT AND ANCHORING OF BONE SCREWS, IMPLANTS OR IMPLANT PARTS |
US4721103A (en) | 1985-01-31 | 1988-01-26 | Yosef Freedland | Orthopedic device |
FR2576779B1 (en) | 1985-02-07 | 1988-10-07 | Tornier Sa | ASSEMBLY DEVICE BETWEEN A BONE IMPLANT AND THE TOOL FOR ITS PLACEMENT |
US4636526A (en) | 1985-02-19 | 1987-01-13 | The Dow Chemical Company | Composites of unsintered calcium phosphates and synthetic biodegradable polymers useful as hard tissue prosthetics |
US4698375A (en) | 1985-02-19 | 1987-10-06 | The Dow Chemical Company | Composites of unsintered calcium phosphates and synthetic biodegradable polymers useful as hard tissue prosthetics |
US4661536A (en) | 1985-02-19 | 1987-04-28 | The Dow Chemical Company | Process for the preparation of hard tissue prosthetics |
US4634720A (en) | 1985-02-19 | 1987-01-06 | The Dow Chemical Company | Process for the preparation of hard tissue prosthetics |
US4592346A (en) | 1985-04-08 | 1986-06-03 | Jurgutis John A | Orthopedic staple |
US4636217A (en) | 1985-04-23 | 1987-01-13 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Anterior spinal implant |
FR2581336B1 (en) | 1985-05-02 | 1989-05-05 | Collomb Jean | WRENCH FOR SCREWING A PART WITH A HEAD WITH A SIZE AND A THREADED BORE |
US4599086A (en) | 1985-06-07 | 1986-07-08 | Doty James R | Spine stabilization device and method |
US4743260A (en) | 1985-06-10 | 1988-05-10 | Burton Charles V | Method for a flexible stabilization system for a vertebral column |
US4653509A (en) | 1985-07-03 | 1987-03-31 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force | Guided trephine samples for skeletal bone studies |
US4645503A (en) | 1985-08-27 | 1987-02-24 | Orthomatrix Inc. | Moldable bone-implant material |
CH663558A5 (en) | 1985-09-13 | 1987-12-31 | Stellram Sa | MILLING MACHINE FOR MACHINING T-GROOVES |
US4743256A (en) * | 1985-10-04 | 1988-05-10 | Brantigan John W | Surgical prosthetic implant facilitating vertebral interbody fusion and method |
JPH0655213B2 (en) | 1985-12-27 | 1994-07-27 | 京セラ株式会社 | Lumbar spine block |
US4664567A (en) | 1986-02-06 | 1987-05-12 | Bijur Lubricating Corp. | Drill bit |
US4903882A (en) | 1986-03-10 | 1990-02-27 | Long Gregory T | Driving tool for an electrical staple |
DE3608163A1 (en) | 1986-03-12 | 1987-09-24 | Walter A Dr Med Laabs | Device for dynamically/rigidly locking the distal and proximal parts of fractured bones |
US4913143A (en) * | 1986-05-28 | 1990-04-03 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force | Trephine assembly |
US4677883A (en) | 1986-06-09 | 1987-07-07 | Lee Wen Hsin | Cork screw |
GB8620937D0 (en) | 1986-08-29 | 1986-10-08 | Shepperd J A N | Spinal implant |
US4769881A (en) | 1986-09-02 | 1988-09-13 | Pedigo Irby R | High precision tens apparatus and method of use |
US4713004A (en) | 1986-09-04 | 1987-12-15 | Vent Plant Corporation | Submergible screw-type dental implant and method of utilization |
DE3637314A1 (en) | 1986-11-03 | 1988-05-11 | Lutz Biedermann | SPACE HOLDER IMPLANT |
US4805602A (en) | 1986-11-03 | 1989-02-21 | Danninger Medical Technology | Transpedicular screw and rod system |
US4834757A (en) | 1987-01-22 | 1989-05-30 | Brantigan John W | Prosthetic implant |
US5116304A (en) | 1987-01-28 | 1992-05-26 | Cadwell Industries, Inc. | Magnetic stimulator with skullcap-shaped coil |
CA1283501C (en) | 1987-02-12 | 1991-04-30 | Thomas P. Hedman | Artificial spinal disc |
US4714469A (en) | 1987-02-26 | 1987-12-22 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Spinal implant |
US4790303A (en) | 1987-03-11 | 1988-12-13 | Acromed Corporation | Apparatus and method for securing bone graft |
DE8704901U1 (en) | 1987-04-02 | 1987-07-23 | Kluger, Patrick, Dr.med., 3590 Bad Wildungen | Device for setting up a spine with damaged vertebral bodies |
US4781591A (en) | 1987-04-06 | 1988-11-01 | Allen James P | Endosteal implant and method for performing implantation thereof |
US4958634A (en) | 1987-05-06 | 1990-09-25 | Jang G David | Limacon geometry balloon angioplasty catheter systems and method of making same |
US5071406A (en) | 1987-05-06 | 1991-12-10 | Jang G David | Limacon geometry balloon angioplasty catheter systems |
US4863477A (en) | 1987-05-12 | 1989-09-05 | Monson Gary L | Synthetic intervertebral disc prosthesis |
CH672588A5 (en) | 1987-07-09 | 1989-12-15 | Sulzer Ag | |
EP0374160A1 (en) * | 1987-07-21 | 1990-06-27 | STAUBLI, Jurg Gottfried | Chisel |
GB8718627D0 (en) | 1987-08-06 | 1987-09-09 | Showell A W Sugicraft Ltd | Spinal implants |
US4779012A (en) | 1987-08-12 | 1988-10-18 | Honeywell Inc. | Track-and-hold amplifier |
US4772287A (en) | 1987-08-20 | 1988-09-20 | Cedar Surgical, Inc. | Prosthetic disc and method of implanting |
US4874001A (en) | 1987-11-02 | 1989-10-17 | Konsepts Beauty Supply, Inc. | Manicurist's bit |
USD318629S (en) | 1987-11-16 | 1991-07-30 | Michelson Gary K | Lumbar interbody gauge |
FR2624719B1 (en) | 1987-12-18 | 1990-05-11 | Zimmer Sa | DRILLING PROBE, PARTICULARLY FOR POSITIONING AND FIXING A MEDULAR NAIL |
US5282856A (en) | 1987-12-22 | 1994-02-01 | Ledergerber Walter J | Implantable prosthetic device |
US4830000A (en) | 1987-12-31 | 1989-05-16 | Aspen Laboratories, Inc. | Surgical drill |
US4851008A (en) | 1988-02-01 | 1989-07-25 | Orthomet, Inc. | Bone implant prosthesis with substantially stress-free outer surface |
US4865603A (en) | 1988-02-04 | 1989-09-12 | Joint Medical Products Corporation | Metallic prosthetic devices having micro-textured outer surfaces |
DE3809793A1 (en) | 1988-03-23 | 1989-10-05 | Link Waldemar Gmbh Co | SURGICAL INSTRUMENT SET |
US5423842A (en) | 1988-05-16 | 1995-06-13 | Michelson; Gary K. | Spinal microknife |
US4848327A (en) | 1988-05-23 | 1989-07-18 | Perdue Kevin D | Apparatus and procedure for blind alignment of fasteners extended through transverse holes in an orthopedic locking nail |
US4911718A (en) | 1988-06-10 | 1990-03-27 | University Of Medicine & Dentistry Of N.J. | Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer |
US5015247A (en) | 1988-06-13 | 1991-05-14 | Michelson Gary K | Threaded spinal implant |
IT215084Z2 (en) | 1988-08-03 | 1990-07-30 | Torino A | VARIABLE EXCURSION CAMBRA |
US4960420A (en) | 1988-08-23 | 1990-10-02 | Marlowe Goble E | Channel ligament clamp and system |
DE3829603A1 (en) | 1988-09-01 | 1990-03-15 | Kontron Holding Ag | ULTRASONIC DOSCOPE DEVICE |
US4912144A (en) * | 1988-10-11 | 1990-03-27 | Arco Chemical Technology, Inc. | Ductile, blow-moldable composition containing a styrene-methylmethacrylate copolymer having pendant carboxy ester groups |
US4961740B1 (en) | 1988-10-17 | 1997-01-14 | Surgical Dynamics Inc | V-thread fusion cage and method of fusing a bone joint |
DE3844661C2 (en) | 1988-12-10 | 1994-05-11 | Imz Fertigung Vertrieb | Implantable fastener for extraoral applications |
US4968316A (en) | 1988-12-12 | 1990-11-06 | Hergenroeder Patrick T | Arthroscopic ankle joint distraction method |
US4955885A (en) | 1988-12-21 | 1990-09-11 | Zimmer, Inc. | Surgical slider instrument and method of using instrument |
US4969888A (en) | 1989-02-09 | 1990-11-13 | Arie Scholten | Surgical protocol for fixation of osteoporotic bone using inflatable device |
CA1318469C (en) | 1989-02-15 | 1993-06-01 | Acromed Corporation | Artificial disc |
US5030236A (en) | 1989-06-19 | 1991-07-09 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Apparatus for enhancing biointegration of bony and endoprosthesis structures |
US5458638A (en) | 1989-07-06 | 1995-10-17 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Non-threaded spinal implant |
DE8910673U1 (en) * | 1989-09-07 | 1989-12-07 | Fa. Robert Schröder, 5600 Wuppertal | Operating handle for screwdriver |
US4936848A (en) | 1989-09-22 | 1990-06-26 | Bagby George W | Implant for vertebrae |
DE8912648U1 (en) * | 1989-10-23 | 1990-11-22 | Mecron Medizinische Produkte Gmbh, 1000 Berlin | Vertebral body implant |
US5055104A (en) * | 1989-11-06 | 1991-10-08 | Surgical Dynamics, Inc. | Surgically implanting threaded fusion cages between adjacent low-back vertebrae by an anterior approach |
AU3591093A (en) | 1989-11-17 | 1993-09-01 | Thomas L. Sheridan | Continuously engaged tangential driving tool |
US5059193A (en) | 1989-11-20 | 1991-10-22 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Expandable spinal implant and surgical method |
JP2917357B2 (en) * | 1990-02-07 | 1999-07-12 | ミノルタ株式会社 | Magnetic powder containing members for copying machines |
US4987904A (en) | 1990-03-22 | 1991-01-29 | Wilson James T | Method and apparatus for bone size gauging |
US5029573A (en) | 1990-03-30 | 1991-07-09 | Chow James C | System for endoscopic surgery |
US5181457A (en) * | 1990-09-25 | 1993-01-26 | Iizuka Toshiyuki | Seed peeling apparatus |
AR246020A1 (en) | 1990-10-03 | 1994-03-30 | Hector Daniel Barone Juan Carl | A ball device for implanting an intraluminous aortic prosthesis, for repairing aneurysms. |
US5108422A (en) | 1990-10-22 | 1992-04-28 | United States Surgical Corporation | Skin fastener |
DE4036804A1 (en) | 1990-11-19 | 1992-05-21 | Univ Halle Wittenberg | Instruments for decompression of cervical narrow spinal channel - act to remove dorsal edge points of vertebrae and ventral bridge building of damaged segments |
DE4104359A1 (en) | 1991-02-13 | 1992-08-20 | Implex Gmbh | CHARGING SYSTEM FOR IMPLANTABLE HOERHILFEN AND TINNITUS MASKERS |
US5217479A (en) | 1991-02-14 | 1993-06-08 | Linvatec Corporation | Surgical cutting instrument |
US5171278A (en) | 1991-02-22 | 1992-12-15 | Madhavan Pisharodi | Middle expandable intervertebral disk implants |
US5123926A (en) | 1991-02-22 | 1992-06-23 | Madhavan Pisharodi | Artificial spinal prosthesis |
EP0571555B1 (en) | 1991-02-22 | 1996-03-27 | PISHARODI, Madhavan | Middle expandable intervertebral disk implant |
US5192327A (en) | 1991-03-22 | 1993-03-09 | Brantigan John W | Surgical prosthetic implant for vertebrae |
US5112336A (en) | 1991-05-14 | 1992-05-12 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Drill guide and template for prosthetic devices |
US5306307A (en) | 1991-07-22 | 1994-04-26 | Calcitek, Inc. | Spinal disk implant |
US5242443A (en) | 1991-08-15 | 1993-09-07 | Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc. | Percutaneous fixation of vertebrae |
US5146933A (en) | 1991-09-20 | 1992-09-15 | Dow Corning Wright Corporation | Implantable prosthetic device and tethered inflation valve for volume |
US5395317A (en) | 1991-10-30 | 1995-03-07 | Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc. | Unilateral biportal percutaneous surgical procedure |
US5263953A (en) | 1991-12-31 | 1993-11-23 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Apparatus and system for fusing bone joints |
GB9200214D0 (en) | 1992-01-06 | 1992-02-26 | Zimmer Limited | Apparatus for use in fusion of adjacent bodies |
US5258031A (en) | 1992-01-06 | 1993-11-02 | Danek Medical | Intervertebral disk arthroplasty |
US5183471A (en) | 1992-01-24 | 1993-02-02 | Wilk Peter J | Laparoscopic cannula |
US5269772A (en) | 1992-01-24 | 1993-12-14 | Wilk Peter J | Laparoscopic cannula assembly and associated method |
DE69228531T2 (en) | 1992-02-20 | 1999-07-29 | Neomedics, Inc., Budd Lake, N.J. | Implantable bone growth stimulator |
US5396880A (en) | 1992-04-08 | 1995-03-14 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Endoscope for direct visualization of the spine and epidural space |
ATE141149T1 (en) | 1992-04-21 | 1996-08-15 | Sulzer Medizinaltechnik Ag | ARTIFICIAL DISC BODY |
US5324295A (en) | 1992-04-24 | 1994-06-28 | Shapiro Michael R | Drill guide for surgical pins |
US5306309A (en) | 1992-05-04 | 1994-04-26 | Calcitek, Inc. | Spinal disk implant and implantation kit |
DE4220215C2 (en) | 1992-06-20 | 1994-09-22 | S & G Implants Gmbh | Implant to fix adjacent vertebrae |
US5246458A (en) | 1992-10-07 | 1993-09-21 | Graham Donald V | Artificial disk |
US5314427A (en) | 1992-10-13 | 1994-05-24 | Marlowe Goble E | Channel ligament clamp |
DE4236553A1 (en) * | 1992-10-29 | 1994-05-05 | Hawera Probst Kg Hartmetall | Rock drill |
US5408422A (en) * | 1992-12-08 | 1995-04-18 | Yozan Inc. | Multiplication circuit capable of directly multiplying digital data with analog data |
US5292252A (en) | 1992-12-14 | 1994-03-08 | Impla-Med, Inc. | Stimulator healing cap |
US5364399A (en) | 1993-02-05 | 1994-11-15 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Anterior cervical plating system |
AU683243B2 (en) | 1993-02-10 | 1997-11-06 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Spinal stabilization surgical tool set |
FR2703580B1 (en) | 1993-03-03 | 1997-10-17 | Gilles Robert | Cervical interbody fusion cage. |
US5352229A (en) | 1993-05-12 | 1994-10-04 | Marlowe Goble E | Arbor press staple and washer and method for its use |
DE4318700C1 (en) | 1993-06-04 | 1994-11-17 | S & G Implants Gmbh | Implant to stiffen neighboring vertebrae |
US5314432A (en) * | 1993-08-05 | 1994-05-24 | Paul Kamaljit S | Lumbar spinal disc trocar placement device |
US5425772A (en) | 1993-09-20 | 1995-06-20 | Brantigan; John W. | Prosthetic implant for intervertebral spinal fusion |
US5443514A (en) | 1993-10-01 | 1995-08-22 | Acromed Corporation | Method for using spinal implants |
US5397364A (en) | 1993-10-12 | 1995-03-14 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Anterior interbody fusion device |
US5484737A (en) * | 1994-12-13 | 1996-01-16 | Electronics & Telecommunications Research Institute | Method for fabricating bipolar transistor |
US5989289A (en) * | 1995-10-16 | 1999-11-23 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Bone grafts |
EP0955961B1 (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 2004-03-31 | SDGI Holdings, Inc. | Spinal spacer |
US5867728A (en) * | 1996-12-17 | 1999-02-02 | Compaq Computer Corp. | Preventing corruption in a multiple processor computer system during a peripheral device configuration cycle |
FR2767675B1 (en) * | 1997-08-26 | 1999-12-03 | Materiel Orthopedique En Abreg | INTERSOMATIC IMPLANT AND ANCILLARY OF PREPARATION SUITABLE FOR ALLOWING ITS POSITION |
US6074423A (en) * | 1998-11-02 | 2000-06-13 | Lawson; Kevin Jon | Safer more X-ray transparent spinal implant |
US6283966B1 (en) * | 1999-07-07 | 2001-09-04 | Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc. | Spinal surgery tools and positioning method |
US6641582B1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2003-11-04 | Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc. | Bone preparation instruments and methods |
US6840941B2 (en) * | 2001-10-31 | 2005-01-11 | Depuy Acromed, Inc. | Vertebral endplate chisel |
AU2003253906A1 (en) * | 2002-07-19 | 2004-02-09 | Osteotech, Inc. | Chisels and procedure for insertion of spinal implant in a spinal disc space |
-
1994
- 1994-06-09 DE DE69433702T patent/DE69433702T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-06-09 CA CA002357536A patent/CA2357536C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1994-06-09 KR KR1019950705673A patent/KR100318703B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1994-06-09 EP EP04027215A patent/EP1508307A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1994-06-09 EP EP00204831A patent/EP1093760B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-06-09 ES ES94920704T patent/ES2206468T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-06-09 ES ES00204831T patent/ES2231110T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-06-09 CA CA002521196A patent/CA2521196C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1994-06-09 AT AT00204830T patent/ATE263511T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1994-06-09 PT PT94920704T patent/PT703757E/en unknown
- 1994-06-09 EP EP00204830A patent/EP1092395B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-06-09 AT AT94920704T patent/ATE247928T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1994-06-09 DE DE69434145T patent/DE69434145T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-06-09 CA CA002164859A patent/CA2164859C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1994-06-09 AT AT00204831T patent/ATE282366T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1994-06-09 DK DK00204831T patent/DK1093760T3/en active
- 1994-06-09 PT PT00204830T patent/PT1092395E/en unknown
- 1994-06-09 DE DE69433088T patent/DE69433088T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-06-09 DK DK94920704T patent/DK0703757T3/en active
- 1994-06-09 ES ES00204830T patent/ES2216817T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-06-09 PT PT00204831T patent/PT1093760E/en unknown
- 1994-06-09 DK DK00204830T patent/DK1092395T3/en active
-
1996
- 1996-01-16 US US08/586,950 patent/US6436098B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2000
- 2000-07-27 US US09/626,636 patent/US7993347B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2002
- 2002-08-20 US US10/223,916 patent/US7399303B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2003
- 2003-02-21 US US10/371,476 patent/US6875213B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-08-09 US US10/638,023 patent/US7326214B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-09-19 US US10/664,498 patent/US20040073217A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-10-24 US US10/692,545 patent/US7264622B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2004
- 2004-07-21 JP JP2004212571A patent/JP4000134B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2005
- 2005-10-17 US US11/252,082 patent/US20060036247A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-10-17 US US11/252,048 patent/US20060058793A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2006
- 2006-02-18 US US11/356,868 patent/US7887565B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2007
- 2007-06-22 JP JP2007165520A patent/JP4134248B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2008
- 2008-02-01 US US12/012,437 patent/US20080255564A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2008-07-18 US US12/218,856 patent/US20080287955A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (45)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US669764A (en) * | 1900-11-27 | 1901-03-12 | Morgan Potter | Guiding appliance for drills. |
US1705049A (en) * | 1926-02-18 | 1929-03-12 | Harry W Howland | Boring instrument |
US2179029A (en) * | 1938-11-02 | 1939-11-07 | Barnes Ernest | Boring tool |
US2444099A (en) * | 1945-06-26 | 1948-06-29 | Camloc Fastener Corp | Hole-cutting saw |
US3559513A (en) * | 1968-05-06 | 1971-02-02 | Everett D Hougen | Hole saw |
US3719186A (en) * | 1971-04-22 | 1973-03-06 | Univ Alabama In Birmingham | Surgical instrument for placement of bone pins and holes therefor |
US3848601A (en) * | 1972-06-14 | 1974-11-19 | G Ma | Method for interbody fusion of the spine |
US4090804A (en) * | 1977-02-04 | 1978-05-23 | Haley Ernest K | Circular drill with centering device |
US4235595A (en) * | 1977-05-31 | 1980-11-25 | Arnegger Richard E | Handpiece with continuous shaft and bell rotor |
US4414962A (en) * | 1977-06-15 | 1983-11-15 | Carson Robert W | Operating arthroscope |
US4203692A (en) * | 1978-12-20 | 1980-05-20 | Jensen Roger S | Self-centering hole saw adapter |
US4352610A (en) * | 1980-07-07 | 1982-10-05 | The Boeing Company | Method and tool for generating holes in composite materials |
US4362161A (en) * | 1980-10-27 | 1982-12-07 | Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. | Cranial drill |
US4438769A (en) * | 1982-04-15 | 1984-03-27 | Pratt Clyde R | Medical staple device |
US4545374A (en) * | 1982-09-03 | 1985-10-08 | Jacobson Robert E | Method and instruments for performing a percutaneous lumbar diskectomy |
US4696308A (en) * | 1986-04-09 | 1987-09-29 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Core sampling apparatus |
US4793363A (en) * | 1986-09-11 | 1988-12-27 | Sherwood Medical Company | Biopsy needle |
US4710075A (en) * | 1986-10-01 | 1987-12-01 | Boehringer Mannheim Corporation | Adjustable drill gauge |
US5047032A (en) * | 1987-10-21 | 1991-09-10 | Richards Medical Company | Method and apparatus for cutting joint surfaces |
US6096038A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 2000-08-01 | Michelson; Gary Karlin | Apparatus for inserting spinal implants |
US5797909A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1998-08-25 | Michelson; Gary Karlin | Apparatus for inserting spinal implants |
US5484437A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1996-01-16 | Michelson; Gary K. | Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants |
US5505732A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1996-04-09 | Michelson; Gary K. | Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants |
US5015255A (en) * | 1989-05-10 | 1991-05-14 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Spinal stabilization method |
US5108395A (en) * | 1989-09-18 | 1992-04-28 | Societe De Fabrication De Materiel Orthopedique - Sofamor | Implant for anterior dorsolumbar spinal osteosynthesis, intended for the correction of kyphoses |
US5197971A (en) * | 1990-03-02 | 1993-03-30 | Bonutti Peter M | Arthroscopic retractor and method of using the same |
US5098435A (en) * | 1990-11-21 | 1992-03-24 | Alphatec Manufacturing Inc. | Cannula |
US5049150A (en) * | 1990-12-27 | 1991-09-17 | Zimmer, Inc. | Tool for gripping a bone fragment |
US5171111A (en) * | 1991-07-05 | 1992-12-15 | Kansai Kogu Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Drilling tool |
US5313962A (en) * | 1991-10-18 | 1994-05-24 | Obenchain Theodore G | Method of performing laparoscopic lumbar discectomy |
US5357983A (en) * | 1992-03-17 | 1994-10-25 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Method for subcutaneous suprafascial pedicular internal fixation |
US5192293A (en) * | 1992-07-06 | 1993-03-09 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Drill guide for orbital implant |
US7264622B2 (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 2007-09-04 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | System for radial bone displacement |
US6436098B1 (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 2002-08-20 | Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc. | Method for inserting spinal implants and for securing a guard to the spine |
US20040073217A1 (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 2004-04-15 | Karlin Technology, Inc. | Osteogenic packing device and method |
US6875213B2 (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 2005-04-05 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Method of inserting spinal implants with the use of imaging |
US20060036247A1 (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 2006-02-16 | Karlin Technology, Inc. | Distractor for use in spinal surgery |
US20060058793A1 (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 2006-03-16 | Karlin Technology, Inc. | Distractor for use in spinal surgery |
US7326214B2 (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 2008-02-05 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Bone cutting device having a cutting edge with a non-extending center |
US7399303B2 (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 2008-07-15 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Bone cutting device and method for use thereof |
US20080287955A1 (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 2008-11-20 | Karlin Technology, Inc. | Distractor for use in spinal surgery and method of use thereof |
US7887565B2 (en) * | 1993-06-10 | 2011-02-15 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Apparatus and method for sequential distraction |
US5632747A (en) * | 1995-03-15 | 1997-05-27 | Osteotech, Inc. | Bone dowel cutter |
US6966912B2 (en) * | 1998-06-09 | 2005-11-22 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Device and method for preparing a space between adjacent vertebrae to receive an insert |
US6152661A (en) * | 1999-08-17 | 2000-11-28 | Thrasher; Charles M. | Wood coring bit |
Cited By (131)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7993347B1 (en) | 1993-06-10 | 2011-08-09 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Guard for use in performing human interbody spinal surgery |
US10219910B2 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2019-03-05 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction method |
US8348979B2 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2013-01-08 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction method |
US9622873B2 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2017-04-18 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction method |
US8834530B2 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2014-09-16 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction method |
US11285010B2 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2022-03-29 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction method |
US7824431B2 (en) | 2006-12-29 | 2010-11-02 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction method |
US10653454B2 (en) | 2007-07-13 | 2020-05-19 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Spinal fixation systems |
US11559408B2 (en) | 2008-01-09 | 2023-01-24 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for accessing and treating the facet joint |
US9005288B2 (en) | 2008-01-09 | 2015-04-14 | Providence Medical Techonlogy, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for accessing and treating the facet joint |
US10179054B2 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2019-01-15 | Jeffrey B. Kleiner | Spinal fusion cage system with inserter |
USD700322S1 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2014-02-25 | Jeffrey B. Kleiner | Intervertebral surgical tool |
US8088163B1 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2012-01-03 | Kleiner Jeffrey B | Tools and methods for spinal fusion |
US8277510B2 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2012-10-02 | Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc | Tools and methods for spinal fusion |
US9439782B2 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2016-09-13 | Jeffrey B. Kleiner | Spinal fusion cage system with inserter |
US8808305B2 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2014-08-19 | Jeffrey B. Kleiner | Spinal fusion cage system with inserter |
US8292960B2 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2012-10-23 | Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc | Spinal fusion cage with removable planar elements |
USD696399S1 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2013-12-24 | Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc | Spinal distraction instrument |
US8715355B2 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2014-05-06 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Spinal fusion cage with removable planar elements |
US11129730B2 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2021-09-28 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Inc., a Nevada corpora | Spinal fusion cage system with inserter |
US8753347B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2014-06-17 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US10172721B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2019-01-08 | Providence Technology, Inc. | Spinal facet cage implant |
US8623054B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2014-01-07 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US8512347B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2013-08-20 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction/implant delivery device |
US9622874B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2017-04-18 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction/implant delivery device |
US8753377B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2014-06-17 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US8753345B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2014-06-17 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US8425558B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2013-04-23 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US8828062B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2014-09-09 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US10588672B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2020-03-17 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US8834472B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2014-09-16 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US11141144B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2021-10-12 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Facet joint implants and delivery tools |
US10568666B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2020-02-25 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US8361152B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2013-01-29 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Facet joint implants and delivery tools |
US10456175B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2019-10-29 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US11890038B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2024-02-06 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US10238501B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2019-03-26 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction/implant delivery device |
US11224521B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2022-01-18 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical distraction/implant delivery device |
US9011492B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2015-04-21 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Facet joint implants and delivery tools |
US10226285B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2019-03-12 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US11272964B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2022-03-15 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US8267966B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2012-09-18 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Facet joint implants and delivery tools |
US11058553B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2021-07-13 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal facet cage implant |
US10149673B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2018-12-11 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Facet joint implants and delivery tools |
US10039649B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2018-08-07 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Composite spinal facet implant with textured surfaces |
US9629665B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2017-04-25 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US11344339B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2022-05-31 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
US9333086B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2016-05-10 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal facet cage implant |
US9381049B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2016-07-05 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Composite spinal facet implant with textured surfaces |
US9622791B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2017-04-18 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools |
USD853560S1 (en) | 2008-10-09 | 2019-07-09 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Spinal implant insertion device |
US8870882B2 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2014-10-28 | Jeffrey KLEINER | Apparatus and method of spinal implant and fusion |
US9427264B2 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2016-08-30 | Jeffrey KLEINER | Apparatus and method of spinal implant and fusion |
US9717403B2 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2017-08-01 | Jeffrey B. Kleiner | Method and apparatus for performing retro peritoneal dissection |
US10617293B2 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2020-04-14 | Jeffrey B. Kleiner | Method and apparatus for performing retro peritoneal dissection |
US9861496B2 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2018-01-09 | Jeffrey B. Kleiner | Apparatus and method of spinal implant and fusion |
US8366748B2 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2013-02-05 | Kleiner Jeffrey | Apparatus and method of spinal implant and fusion |
USD656610S1 (en) | 2009-02-06 | 2012-03-27 | Kleiner Jeffrey B | Spinal distraction instrument |
US9247943B1 (en) | 2009-02-06 | 2016-02-02 | Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc | Devices and methods for preparing an intervertebral workspace |
USD667542S1 (en) | 2009-02-06 | 2012-09-18 | Kleiner Jeffrey B | Spinal distraction instrument |
US10201355B2 (en) | 2009-02-06 | 2019-02-12 | Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc | Angled surgical tool for removing tissue from within an intervertebral space |
US9826988B2 (en) | 2009-02-06 | 2017-11-28 | Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc | Devices and methods for preparing an intervertebral workspace |
US9814599B2 (en) | 2009-07-09 | 2017-11-14 | R Tree Innovations, Llc | Inter-body implantation system and method |
US10806594B2 (en) | 2009-07-09 | 2020-10-20 | R Tree Innovations, Llc | Inter-body implant |
US9877844B2 (en) | 2009-07-09 | 2018-01-30 | R Tree Innovations, Llc | Inter-body implant |
US8828082B2 (en) | 2009-07-09 | 2014-09-09 | R Tree Innovations, Llc | Inter-body implant |
US10835386B2 (en) | 2009-07-09 | 2020-11-17 | R Tree Innovations, Llc | Inter-body implantation system and method |
US9186193B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2015-11-17 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system |
US10973656B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2021-04-13 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Inc. | Bone graft delivery system and method for using same |
US11660208B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2023-05-30 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Inc. | Bone graft delivery system and method for using same |
US9173694B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2015-11-03 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system |
US11666455B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2023-06-06 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Inc., A Nevada Corporation | Bone graft delivery devices, systems and kits |
US9060877B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2015-06-23 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system |
US8685031B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2014-04-01 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery system |
US8906028B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2014-12-09 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery device and method of using the same |
US10245159B1 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2019-04-02 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery system and method for using same |
US8709088B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2014-04-29 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system |
US10195053B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2019-02-05 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery system and method for using same |
US12053393B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2024-08-06 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Inc. | Bone graft delivery system and method for use |
US9629729B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2017-04-25 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Biological delivery system with adaptable fusion cage interface |
US20110098705A1 (en) * | 2009-10-23 | 2011-04-28 | Chappuis James L | Devices and Methods for Temporarily Retaining Spinal Rootlets within Dural Sac |
US8979748B2 (en) * | 2009-10-23 | 2015-03-17 | James L. Chappuis | Devices and methods for temporarily retaining spinal rootlets within dural sac |
US8864654B2 (en) | 2010-04-20 | 2014-10-21 | Jeffrey B. Kleiner | Method and apparatus for performing retro peritoneal dissection |
US10363108B2 (en) | 2010-06-07 | 2019-07-30 | Creative Surgical Solutions, Llc | Surgical drape with separable elements |
US8726907B2 (en) | 2010-06-07 | 2014-05-20 | Eric Strauch | Surgical drape with separable elements |
US10363110B2 (en) | 2010-06-07 | 2019-07-30 | Creative Surgical Solutions, Llc | Surgical drape with separable elements |
US11185381B2 (en) | 2010-06-07 | 2021-11-30 | Creative Surgical Solutions, Llc | Surgical drape with separable elements |
US11813034B2 (en) | 2010-06-07 | 2023-11-14 | Creative Surgical Solutions, Llc | Surgical drape with separable elements |
US11376073B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2022-07-05 | Mighty Oak Medical Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
US11806197B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2023-11-07 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus for use in spine related surgical procedures and methods for using the same |
US11039889B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2021-06-22 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
US9987024B2 (en) | 2010-06-29 | 2018-06-05 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
WO2012040152A1 (en) | 2010-09-20 | 2012-03-29 | Jeffrey Kleiner | Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system |
WO2012145048A1 (en) | 2011-04-20 | 2012-10-26 | Spinewindow Llc | Method and apparatus for performing retro peritoneal dissection |
WO2012162600A2 (en) | 2011-05-26 | 2012-11-29 | Strauch Eric | Surgical drape with separable elements |
USRE48501E1 (en) | 2012-10-23 | 2021-04-06 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cage spinal implant |
USD745156S1 (en) | 2012-10-23 | 2015-12-08 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal implant |
USD732667S1 (en) | 2012-10-23 | 2015-06-23 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cage spinal implant |
USD723682S1 (en) | 2013-05-03 | 2015-03-03 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery tool |
EP3797716A1 (en) | 2013-06-07 | 2021-03-31 | Frey, George | Patient-matched apparatus |
WO2015187397A1 (en) | 2013-06-07 | 2015-12-10 | George Frey | Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures |
US12004781B2 (en) | 2014-05-27 | 2024-06-11 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Lateral mass fixation implant |
US11058466B2 (en) | 2014-05-28 | 2021-07-13 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Lateral mass fixation system |
US10201375B2 (en) | 2014-05-28 | 2019-02-12 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Lateral mass fixation system |
USD750249S1 (en) | 2014-10-20 | 2016-02-23 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Expandable fusion cage |
US10682243B2 (en) | 2015-10-13 | 2020-06-16 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal joint implant delivery device and system |
USD884895S1 (en) | 2015-10-13 | 2020-05-19 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical cage |
USD841165S1 (en) | 2015-10-13 | 2019-02-19 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical cage |
USD797290S1 (en) | 2015-10-19 | 2017-09-12 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc | Bone graft delivery tool |
US11065039B2 (en) | 2016-06-28 | 2021-07-20 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal implant and methods of using the same |
USD887552S1 (en) | 2016-07-01 | 2020-06-16 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical cage |
US12016573B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2024-06-25 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Drill apparatus and surgical fixation devices and methods for using the same |
US10743890B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2020-08-18 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Drill apparatus and surgical fixation devices and methods for using the same |
US11925400B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2024-03-12 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Fixation devices having fenestrations and methods for using the same |
US11376049B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2022-07-05 | Mighty Oak Medical Inc. | Fixation devices having fenestrations and methods for using the same |
USD895837S1 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2020-09-08 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Surgical guide tray |
US10758283B2 (en) | 2016-08-11 | 2020-09-01 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Fixation devices having fenestrations and methods for using the same |
EP3357459A1 (en) | 2017-02-03 | 2018-08-08 | Spinal Surgical Strategies, LLC | Bone graft delivery device with positioning handle |
US11871968B2 (en) | 2017-05-19 | 2024-01-16 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal fixation access and delivery system |
US11185382B2 (en) | 2017-08-31 | 2021-11-30 | Creative Surgical Solutions, Llc | Separable sterile drape with z-shaped folds |
US11672623B2 (en) | 2017-08-31 | 2023-06-13 | Creative Surgical Solutions, Llc | Separable sterile drape with z-shaped folds |
USD857893S1 (en) | 2017-10-26 | 2019-08-27 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Cortical surgical guide |
USD858765S1 (en) | 2017-10-26 | 2019-09-03 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Cortical surgical guide |
US11813172B2 (en) | 2018-01-04 | 2023-11-14 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Facet screw and delivery device |
US11648128B2 (en) | 2018-01-04 | 2023-05-16 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Facet screw and delivery device |
US11633254B2 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2023-04-25 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Patient-matched apparatus for use in augmented reality assisted surgical procedures and methods for using the same |
USD895111S1 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2020-09-01 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Sacro-iliac guide |
USD948717S1 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2022-04-12 | Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. | Sacro-iliac guide |
USD933230S1 (en) | 2019-04-15 | 2021-10-12 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Cervical cage |
USD911525S1 (en) | 2019-06-21 | 2021-02-23 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal cage |
USD945621S1 (en) | 2020-02-27 | 2022-03-08 | Providence Medical Technology, Inc. | Spinal cage |
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7399303B2 (en) | Bone cutting device and method for use thereof | |
US5484437A (en) | Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants | |
US7686805B2 (en) | Methods for distraction of a disc space | |
US5797909A (en) | Apparatus for inserting spinal implants | |
US7431722B1 (en) | Apparatus including a guard member having a passage with a non-circular cross section for providing protected access to the spine | |
AU749542B2 (en) | Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KARLIN TECHNOLOGY, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICHELSON, GARY KARLIN;REEL/FRAME:020517/0024 Effective date: 19930610 Owner name: SOFAMOR DANEK HOLDINGS, INC., TENNESSEE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KARLIN TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020516/0604 Effective date: 19981007 Owner name: SDGI HOLDINGS, INC., DELAWARE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SOFAMOR DANEK HOLDINGS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020516/0602 Effective date: 20040429 Owner name: WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC., INDIANA Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:SDGI HOLDINGS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020519/0227 Effective date: 20060428 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |