US20080287955A1 - Distractor for use in spinal surgery and method of use thereof - Google Patents

Distractor for use in spinal surgery and method of use thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080287955A1
US20080287955A1 US12218856 US21885608A US2008287955A1 US 20080287955 A1 US20080287955 A1 US 20080287955A1 US 12218856 US12218856 US 12218856 US 21885608 A US21885608 A US 21885608A US 2008287955 A1 US2008287955 A1 US 2008287955A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
distractor
implant
distraction
bone
outer sleeve
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12218856
Inventor
Gary Karlin Michelson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Warsaw Orthopedic Inc
Original Assignee
SDGI Holdings Inc
Warsaw Orthopedic Inc
Karlin Tech Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/02Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for holding wounds open; Tractors
    • A61B17/025Joint distractors
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/16Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
    • A61B17/1662Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans for particular parts of the body
    • A61B17/1671Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans for particular parts of the body for the spine
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/16Bone cutting, breaking or removal means other than saws, e.g. Osteoclasts; Drills or chisels for bones; Trepans
    • A61B17/17Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires
    • A61B17/1739Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body
    • A61B17/1757Guides or aligning means for drills, mills, pins or wires specially adapted for particular parts of the body for the spine
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/02Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for holding wounds open; Tractors
    • A61B17/025Joint distractors
    • A61B2017/0256Joint distractors for the spine
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S623/00Prosthesis, i.e. artificial body members, parts thereof, or aids and accessories therefor
    • Y10S623/902Method of implanting
    • Y10S623/908Bone
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T407/00Cutters, for shaping
    • Y10T407/19Rotary cutting tool
    • Y10T407/1952Having peripherally spaced teeth
    • Y10T407/1962Specified tooth shape or spacing
    • Y10T407/1964Arcuate cutting edge

Abstract

Apparatus and a method of inserting spinal implants is disclosed in which an intervertebral space is first distracted, a hollow sleeve having teeth at one end is then driven into the vertebrae adjacent that disc space. A drill is then passed through the hollow sleeve removing disc and bone in preparation for receiving the spinal implant which is then inserted through the sleeve.

Description

  • This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 11/252,082, filed Oct. 17, 2005; which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/692,545, filed Oct. 24, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,264,622; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/626,636, filed Jul. 27, 2000; which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/484,927, filed Jun. 7, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,096,038; which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/074,781, filed Jun. 10, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,437; all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to artificial fusion implants to be placed into the intervertebral space left remaining after the removal of a damaged spinal disc and specifically to the apparatus for and method of, inserting the implants.
  • 2. Description of the Prior Art
  • For the purpose of achieving long term stability to a segment of injured spine, a fusion (the joining together of two or more bones via a continuous bridge of incorporated bone) may be performed. Well-known to those skilled in such art is the interbody fusion wherein the disc is partially excised and bone placed within that space previously occupied by that disc material (between adjacent vertebrae) for the purpose of restoring a more normal spatial relationship, and to provide for stability; short term by mechanical support, and long term by the permanent cross bonding of bone from vertebra to vertebra. For fusion to occur within the disc space, it is necessary to prepare the vertebrae to be fused by breaking through, or cutting into, the hardened outside plates of bone (the endplates) to allow the interposed bone graft to come into direct contact with the more vascular cancellous (spongy) bone, and to thereby trick the body into attempting to heal this induced, but controlled, “fracturing” by both bone production and the healing of the grafts to both opposed vertebral surfaces such that they become one continuous segment of bone.
  • The purpose of the present invention is to provide an implant, and the apparatus and method of inserting the implant within the intervertebral space left after the removal of the disc material and permanently eliminate all motion at that location. To do so, the device of the present invention is space occupying within the disc interspace, rigid, self-stabilizing to resist dislodgement, stabilizing to the adjacent spinal vertebrae to eliminate local motion, and able to intrinsically participate in a vertebra to vertebra bony fusion so as to assure the permanency of the result.
  • At present, following the removal of a damaged disc, either bone or nothing is placed into the remaining space. Placing nothing into this space allows the space to collapse which may result in damage to the nerves; or the space may fill with scar tissue and eventually lead to a reherniation. The use of bone to fill the space is less than optimal in that bone obtained from the patient requires additional surgery and is of limited availability in its most useful form, and if obtained elsewhere, lacks living bone cells, carries a significant risk of infection, and is also limited in supply as it is usually obtained from accident victims. Furthermore, regardless of the source of the bone, it is only marginal structurally and lacks a means to either stabilize itself against dislodgement, or to stabilize the adjacent vertebrae.
  • a. Prior Art Implants
  • There have been an extensive number of attempts to develop an acceptable disc prosthesis (an artificial disc). Such devices by design would be used to replace a damaged disc and seek to restore the height of the interspace and to restore the normal motion of that spinal joint. No such device has been found that is medically acceptable. This group of prosthetic or artificial disc replacements, seeking to preserve spinal motion and so are different from the present invention, would include:
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,867,728 to STUBSTAD—describing a flexible disc implant.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,349,921 to KUNTZ—describing a flexible disc replacement with file-like surface projections to discourage device dislocation.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,309,777 to PATIL—describing a motion preserving implant with spiked outer surfaces to resist dislocation and containing a series of springs to urge the vertebrae away from each other.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,875,595 to FRONING—describing a motion preserving bladder-like disc replacement with two opposed stud-like projections to resist dislocation.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 2,372,622 to FASSIO (France)—describing a motion preserving implant comprising complimentary opposed convex and concave surfaces.
  • In summary, these devices resemble the present invention only in that they are placed within the intervertebral space following the removal of a damaged disc. In that they seek to is preserve spinal motion, they are diametrically different from the present invention which seeks to permanently eliminate all motion at that spinal segment.
  • A second related area of prior art includes those devices utilized to replace essentially wholly removed vertebrae. Such removal is generally necessitated by extensive vertebral fractures, or tumors, and is not associated with the treatment of disc disease. While the present invention is to be placed within the disc space, these other vertebral devices cannot be placed within the disc space as at least one vertebra has already been removed such that there no longer remains a “disc space”. Furthermore, these devices are limited in that they seek to perform as temporary structural members mechanically replacing the removed vertebrae (not a removed disc), and do not intrinsically participate in supplying osteogenic material to achieve cross vertebrae bony fusion. Therefore, unlike the present invention which provides for a source of osteogenesis, use of this group of devices must be accompanied by a further surgery consisting of a bone fusion procedure utilizing conventional technique. This group consisting of vertebral struts rather than disc replacements would include the following:
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,553,273 to WU—describing a turnbuckle-like vertebral strut.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,401,112 to REZAIAN—describing a turnbuckle—like vertebral strut with the addition of a long stabilizing staple that spans the missing vertebral body.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,554,914 to KAPP—describing a large distractible spike that elongates with a screw mechanism to span the gap left by the removal of an entire vertebra and to serve as an anchor for acrylic cement which is then used to replace the missing bone (vertebrae).
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,217 to OGILVIE—describing a vertebral strut mechanism that can be implanted after at least one vertebrae has been removed and consists of a mechanism for causing the engagement of screws into the vertebrae above and the vertebrae below the one removed.
  • In summary, this second group of devices differs from the present invention in that they are vertebral replacements struts, do not intrinsically participate in the bony fusion, can only be inserted in the limited circumstances where an entire vertebra has been removed from the anterior approach, and are not designed for, or intended to be used for the treatment of disc disease.
  • A third area of prior art related to the present invention includes all devices designed to be applied to one of the surfaces of the spine. Such devices include all types of plates, struts, and rods which are attached by hooks, wires and screws. These devices differ significantly from the present invention in that they are not inserted within the disc space and furthermore do not intrinsically participate in supplying osteogenic material for the fusion.
  • Therefore, where permanent spinal immobilization is desired, an additional surgery, consisting of a spinal fusion performed by conventional means or the use of supplemental methylmethacrylate cement is required. Such devices applied to the spine, but not within the disc space, would include the following:
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,604,995 to STEPHENS—describing a “U” shaped metal rod attached to the posterior elements of the spine with wires to stabilize the spine over a large number of segments.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 2,677,369 to KNOWLES—describing a metal column device to be placed posteriorly along the lumbar spine to be held in position by its shape alone and to block pressure across the posterior portions of the spinal column by locking the spine in full flexion thereby shifting the maximum weight back onto the patient's own disc.
  • Other devices are simply variations on the use of rods (e.g. Harrington, Luque, Cotrel-Dubosset, Zielke), wires or cables (Dwyer), plates and screws (Steffee), or struts (Dunn, Knowles).
  • In summary, none of these devices are designed to be nor can be used within the disc space. Moreover, these devices do not replace a damaged disc, and do not intrinsically participate in the generation of a bony fusion.
  • Another area of related prior art to be considered is that of devices designed to be placed within the vertebral interspace following the removal of a damaged disc, and seeking to eliminate further motion at that location.
  • Such a device is contained in U.S. Pat. No. 4,501,269 issued to BAGBY which describes an implantable device and limited instrumentation. The method employed is as follows: a hole is bored transversely across the joint and a hollow metal basket of larger diameter than the hole is then pounded into the hole and then the hollow metal basket is filled with the bone debris generated by the drilling.
  • While the present invention (device, instrumentation, and method) may appear to bear some superficial resemblance to the BAGBY invention, it is minimal, while the differences are many fold and highly significant. These differences include the following:
  • 1. Safety—The present invention provides for a system of completely guarded instrumentation so that all contiguous vital structures (e.g. large blood vessels, neural structures) are absolutely protected. The instrumentation of the present invention also makes overpenetration by the drill impossible. Such overpenetration in the cervical spine, for example, would result in the total paralysis or death of the patient. In the thoracic spine, the result would be complete paraplegia. In the lumbar spine, the result would be paraplegia or a life-threatening perforation of the aorta, vena cava, or iliac vessels.
  • The present invention is atraumatically screwed into place while the BAGBY device, in contradistinction, is pounded into position. BAGBY describes that its implant is significantly larger in size than the hole drilled and must be pounded in. This is extremely dangerous and the pounding occurs directly over the spinal cord which is precariously vulnerable to percussive injury. Furthermore, while it is possible, for example in the lumbar spine, to insert the present invention away from the spinal cord and nerves, the BAGBY device must always be pounded directly towards the spinal cord.
  • Furthermore, since the BAGBY device is pounded into a smooth hole under great resistance, and lacking any specific design features to secure it, the device is highly susceptible to forceful ejection which would result in great danger to the patient and clinical failure. The present invention, in contradistinction, is securely screwed into place, and possesses highly specialized locking threads to make accidental dislodgement impossible. Because of the proximity of the spinal cord, spinal nerves, and blood vessels, any implant dislodgement as might occur with the BAGBY device might have catastrophic consequences.
  • 2. Broad applicability—The BAGBY device can only be inserted from the front of the vertebral column, however, in contrast, the present invention can be utilized in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, and can be inserted from behind (posteriorly) in the lumbar spine. This is of great importance in that the purpose of these devices is in the treatment of disc disease and probably greater than 99 percent of all lumbar operations for the treatment of disc disease are performed from behind where the present invention can easily be utilized, but the BAGBY device, as per BAGBY'S description, cannot.
  • 3. Disc removal—The BAGBY invention requires the complete removal of the disc prior to the drilling step, whereas the present invention eliminates the laborious separate process of disc removal and efficiently removes the disc and prepares the vertebral end plates in a single step.
  • 4. Time required—The present invention saves time over the BAGBY invention since time is not wasted laboring to remove the disc prior to initiating the fusion. Also, with the present invention the procedure is performed through a system of guarded instrumentation, time is not wasted constantly placing and replacing various soft tissue retractors throughout the procedure.
  • 5. Implant stability—Dislodgement of the implant would be a major source of device failure (an unsuccessful clinical result), and might result in patient paralysis or even death. As discussed, the BAGBY device lacks any specific means of achieving stability and since it is pounded in against resistance to achieve vertebral distraction, and is susceptible to forceful dislodgement by the tendency of the two distracted vertebrae, to return to their original positions squeezing out the device. The present invention, however, is screwed into place. As there is no unscrewing force present between the vertebrae, compression alone cannot dislodge the implant. The implant is inherently stable by its design. Furthermore, the threads of the present invention are highly specialized in that they are periodically interrupted so that the tail ends of each of the tabs so formed are blunted and twisted so as to resist accidental unscrewing. The removal of an implant with such “locking threads” requires the use of a special extractor included within the instrumentation. The stability of the present invention is still further enhanced, again in contradistinction to the BAGBY device, by the presence of a “bone ingrowth” surface texturing, which both increases the friction of the fit and allows for the direct growth of the vertebral bone into the casing of the implant itself.
  • 6. Spinal stability—The present invention is not only self-stabilizing, it also provides stability to the adjacent vertebrae in at least three ways that the BAGBY device cannot. First, the BAGBY device is placed transversely across the joint in the center, leaving both vertebrae free to rock back and forth over this round barrel shaped axis, much like a board over a barrel, being used for a seesaw.
  • Secondly, as the BAGBY device lacks any specific design features to resist sliding, it may actually behave as a third body allowing the translation of the vertebrae relative to the device and to each other.
  • Thirdly, any device can only provide stability if it remains properly, seated. The present invention is inherently stable, and therefore assures that it will stabilize the adjacent vertebrae, rather than, as with the BAGBY, the instability of the spine to be treated may cause a dislocation of the BAGBY implant, is with further loss of spinal stability.
  • 7. The collapse of the interspace—While both the present invention and the BAGBY device can be fabricated to withstand the compression forces within the interspace, the interspace may nevertheless collapse under the superincumbent body weight as the implant settles into the vertebral bone. This is related to the load per unit area. Again the present invention is superior to the BAGBY device in at least four ways.
  • First, the present invention offers considerably greater surface area to distribute the load. Secondly, while the BAGBY device is placed centrally, the present device is placed bilaterally where the bone tends to be more cortical and much stronger out towards the rim. Thirdly, the present invention supports the load achieving an “I” beam effect, whereas the BAGBY implant does not. Fourthly, it is not pressure alone that causes the collapse of the bone adjacent to the implant, but also bony erosion that is caused by the motion under pressure of the implant against the bone. As discussed in item 6 above, the present invention alone is highly resistant to such motion, again diminishing the likelihood of erosion and interspace collapse.
  • 8. Bone ingrowth surface texturing—The present invention has a surface treatment of known and conventional technology to induce the growth of bone from the vertebrae directly into the casing material of the implant itself. The BAGBY device has no similar feature.
  • 9. Fusion mass—The BAGBY invention calls for removing the disc and then drilling a hole between the adjacent vertebrae. The bony debris so generated is then put into the device. The present invention takes a core of pure bone producing marrow from the iliac crest, and then by use of a special press, forcibly injects the implant device with an extremely dense compressed core of that osteogenic material until the material itself virtually extrudes from every cell of the implant.
  • 10. The probability of achieving fusion—The fusion rate within the spine is known to be related directly to the amount of exposed vascular bone bed area, the quality and quantity of the fusion mass available, and the extent of the stabilization obtained with all other factors being half constant. It would then be anticipated, that the fusion rate would be superior with the present invention as compared to the BAGBY device, because of optimal implant stability (#5), optimal spinal stability (#6), bone ingrowth surface treatment (#8), superior fusion mass (#9), and the greater exposed vertebral bony surface area (#7).
  • The last area of prior art possibly related to the present invention and therefore, to be considered related to “bony ingrowth”, are patents that either describe methods of producing materials and or materials or devices to achieve the same. Such patents would include:
      • U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,526 (DORMAN), No. 4,634,720 (DORMAN), No. 4,542,539 (ROWE), No. 4,405,319 (COSENTINO), No. 4,439,152 (SMALL), No. 4,168,326 (BROEMER), No. 4,535,485 (ASHMAN), No. 3,987,499 (SCHARBACH), No. 3,605,123 (HAHN), No. 4,655,777 (DUNN), No. 4,645,503 (LIN), No. 4,547,390 (ASHMAN), No. 4,608,052 (VAN KAPEN), No. 4,698,375 (DORMAN), No. 4,661,536 (DORMAN), No. 3,952,334 (BOKROS), No. 3,905,047 (LONG), No. 4,693,721 (DUCHEYNE), No. 4,070,514 (ENTHERLY).
  • However, while the implant of the present invention would utilize bone ingrowth technology, it would do so with conventional technology.
  • b. Prior Art Instrumentations and Methods
  • The following is a history of the prior art apparatus and methods of inserting spinal implants:
  • In 1956, Ralph Cloward developed a method and instruments which he later described for preparing the anterior aspect (front) of the cervical spine, and then fusing it. Cloward surgically removed the disc to be fused across and then placed a rigid drill guide with a large foot plate and prongs down over an aligner rod and embedded said prongs into the adjacent vertebrae to maintain the alignment so as to facilitate the reaming out of the bone adjacent the disc spaces. As the large foot plate sat against the front of the spine, it also served as a fixed reference point to control the depth of drilling. The reaming left two opposed resected arcs, one each, from the opposed vertebral surfaces. The tubular drill guide, which was placed only preliminary to the drilling, was thereafter completely removed. A cylindrical bony dowel, significantly larger in diameter than the hole formed, was then pounded into the hole already drilled. Cloward's method of instrumentation was designed for, and limited to, use on the anterior aspect and in the region of the cervical spine only. The hole was midline, which would preclude its use posteriorly where the spinal cord would be in the way.
  • As the bone graft to be inserted in Cloward's method was necessarily larger in diameter than the hole drilled, the graft could not be inserted through the drill guide. This mandated the removal of the drill guide and left the graft insertion phase completely unprotected. Thus Cloward's method and instrumentation was inappropriate for posterior application.
  • In addition, the failure to provide continuous protection to the delicate neural structures from the instruments, as well as the bony and cartilaginous debris generated during the procedure, made Cloward's method inappropriate for posterior application. Also, the drill guide described by Cloward could not be placed posteriorly within the spinal canal, as the foot plate would crush the nerves. Modifying Cloward's drill guide by removing the foot plate completely, would still leave the instrument unworkable as it would then lack stability, and would not be controllable for depth of seating.
  • Nevertheless, Wilterberger, (Wilterberger, B. R., Abbott, K. H., “Dowel Intervertebral Fusion as Used in Lumbar Disc Surgery,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Volume 39A, pg. 234-292, 1957) described the unprotected drilling of a hole from the posterior into the lumbar spine between the nerve roots and across the disc space, and then inserting a stack of button-like dowels into that space. While Wilterberger had taken the Cloward concept of circular drilling and dowel fusion and applied it to the lumbar spine from a posterior approach, he had not provided for an improved method, nor had he advanced the instrumentation so as to make that procedure sufficiently safe, and it rapidly fell into disrepute.
  • Crock (Crock, H. V., “Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion—Indications for its Use and notes on Surgical Technique,” Clinical Orthopedics, Volume 165, pg. 157-163, 1981) described his technique and instrumentation for Anterior Interbody Fusion of the lumbar spine, wherein he drilled two large holes side by side across the disc space from anterior to posterior essentially unprotected and then pounded in two at least partially cylindrical grafts larger than the holes prepared.
  • A review of the prior art is instructive as to a number of significant deficiencies in regard to the method and instrumentation for the performance of Interbody Spinal Fusion utilizing drilling to prepare the endplates.
  • As the great majority of spinal surgery is performed in the lumbar spine and from posteriorly, a review of the prior art reveals a number of deficiencies in regard to the spine in general, and to the posterior approach to the lumbar spine specifically. These deficiencies include the:
  • 1. Failure to protect the surrounding tissues throughout the procedure, specifically, prior to drilling and until after the insertion of the graft;
  • 2. Failure to contain the debris, bony and cartilaginous, generated during the procedure;
  • 3. Failure to optimize the contact of the cylindrical drill hole and bone graft, the mismatch in their diameters resulting in incongruence of fit;
  • 4. Failure to determine the optimal drill size prior to drilling;
  • 5. Failure to determine the optimal amount of distraction prior to drilling;
  • 6. Inability to optimize the amount of distraction so as to restore the normal spatial relationships between adjacent vertebrae;
  • 7. Inability to create sufficient working space within the spinal canal (between the nerve roots and the dural sac) to make the procedure safe;
  • 8. Absent a foot plate on the drill guide, as necessitated by the close tolerances posteriorly, the inability to reliably insure that the drilling is parallel to the vertebral endplates;
  • 9. The inability to insure equal bone removal from the opposed vertebral surfaces; and
  • 10. The inability to determine within the spinal canal, the proper side by side positioning for dual drill holes.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention comprises a series of artificial implants, the purpose of which is to participate in, and directly cause bone fusion across an intervertebral space following the excision of a damaged disc. Such implants are structurally load bearing devices, stronger than bone, capable of withstanding the substantial forces generated within the spinal interspace. The devices of the present invention have a plurality of macro sized cells and openings, which can be loaded with fusion promoting materials, such as autogenous bone, for the purpose of materially influencing the adjacent vertebrae to perform a bony bond to the implants and to each other. The implant casing may be surface textured or otherwise treated by any of a number of known technologies to achieve a “bone ingrowth surface” to further enhance the stability of the implant and to expedite the fusion.
  • The devices of the present invention are configured and designed so as to promote their own stability within the vertebral interspace and to resist being dislodged, and furthermore, to stabilize the adjacent spinal segments.
  • The apparatus and method of the present invention for preparing the vertebrae for insertion of the implant allows for the rapid and safe removal of the disc, preparation of the vertebrae, performance of the fusion, and internal stabilization of the spinal segment.
  • The present invention is a method for Interbody Spinal Fusion utilizing novel instrumentation, whereby a protective tubular member is placed prior to the drilling part of the procedure and is left in place until the graft is fully seated.
  • In the preferred embodiment two distractors are used to separate two adjacent vertebrae to a preferred distance. A hollow Outer Sleeve having teeth at one end is driven into the adjacent vertebrae on one side to hold the vertebrae in position when the distractor is removed, a diameter reducing hollow Inner Sleeve is introduced into the Outer Sleeve, a drill having a drill stop is passed through the hollow Inner Sleeve to drill a hole to a desired depth, and an implant is inserted in the hole. The method is repeated on the other side of the disc.
  • In summary then, the present invention, instrumentation, and method, provides for a single surgery providing for an integrated discectomy, fusion, and interbody internal spinal fixation.
  • DISCUSSION OF THE INSTRUMENTATION
  • The apparatus and method of the present invention provide the following advantages:
  • 1. The present invention is safer by providing protection of the surrounding tissues. An Outer Sleeve places all of the delicate soft tissue structures, nerves, blood vessels, and organs outside of the path of the various sharp surgical instruments and the implant. Further, it is an improvement upon hand held retractors in that it occupies the least possible amount of area, avoids the stretching associated with manual retraction, provides for the retraction and shielding of the surrounding tissues in all directions circumferentially and simultaneously, and it does so exclusively with smooth, curved surfaces.
  • 2. The present invention is safer by providing protection against the danger of instrument or implant overpenetration.
  • 3. The present invention is safer as the surgical site and wound are protected from the debris generated during the procedure.
  • 4. The present invention is safer because the method provides for absolute protection to the soft tissues directly and from indirect injury by overpenetration. It makes safe the use of power instrumentation which is both more effective and efficient.
  • 5. The present invention maintains the vertebrae to be fused rigid throughout the procedure.
  • 6. The present invention holds the vertebrae to be fused aligned throughout the procedure.
  • 7. The present invention holds the vertebrae to be fused distracted throughout the procedure.
  • 8. The present invention assures that all instruments introduced through the Outer Sleeve are coaxial and equally centered through the disc space and parallel the endplates.
  • 9. The present invention facilitates the implant insertion by countering the high compressive forces tending to collapse the interspace, which if left unchecked would resist the introduction and advancement of the implant and make stripping more likely.
  • 10. The present invention extends the range and use of the procedure and similarly the interbody spinal implant itself by making the procedure safe throughout the spine.
  • 11. The present invention increases the ability to use a specifically sized implant.
  • 12. In the present invention the end of all the penetrating instrumentation is blunt faced.
  • 13. In the present invention all of the instruments have been stopped at a predetermined depth to avoid overpenetration.
  • 14. The design of the Outer Sleeve in the present invention conforms to the spacial limitations of the specific surgical site.
  • 15. The design and use of a second or Inner Sleeve in the present invention allows for the difference in size between the inside diameter of the Outer Sleeve, and the outside diameter of the drill itself. This difference being necessary to accommodate the sum of the distraction to be produced, and the depth of the circumferential threading present of the implant.
  • 16. In the present invention a specially designed drill bit with a central shaft recess allows for the safe collection of the drilling products, which can then be removed without disturbing the Outer Sleeve by removing the drill bit and Inner Sleeve as a single unit.
  • 17. In the present invention a specially designed trephine for removing a core of bone slightly smaller in diameter than the internal diameter of the implant cavity itself, however of a greater length.
  • 18. In the present invention a specially designed press for forcefully compressing and injecting the long core of autogenous bone into the implant, such that it extrudes through the implant itself.
  • 19. In the present invention a specially designed driver extractor, which attaches to the implant and allows the implant to be either inserted or removed without itself dissociating from the implant, except by the deliberate disengagement of the operator.
  • 20. In the present invention predistraction increases the working space.
  • 21. The Distractor in the present invention is self-orienting acting as a directional finder.
  • 22. The Distractor in the present invention is self-centralizing between the opposed vertebral surfaces acting as a centering post for the subsequent bone removal.
  • 23. In the present invention predistraction assures the equal removal of bone from the adjacent vertebral surfaces.
  • 24. In the present invention predistraction assures the exact congruence between the hole drilled and the device.
  • 25. In the present invention predistraction assures that the drilling is parallel to the vertebral endplates.
  • 26. In the present invention predistraction allows for the determination of the optimal distraction prior to drilling.
  • 27. In the present invention predistraction allows for the verification of the correct prosthesis size prior to drilling.
  • 28. In the present invention predistraction facilitates device insertion by relieving the compressive loads across the interspace which would resist implantation.
  • 29. In the present invention predistraction decreases the likelihood of stripping the bone during insertion.
  • 30. In the present invention predistraction provides for the side by side positioning, spacing, and parallelism required prior to the irrevocable event of drilling.
  • 31. In the present invention predistraction provides for the rigid stabilization of the vertebrae opposed to the disc space throughout the surgical procedure.
  • 32. In the present invention predistraction provides for an implant easier to insert as the compressive loads of the opposed vertebrae are held in check so that the device itself need not drive the vertebrae apart to be inserted.
  • 33. In the present invention predistraction allows for the insertion of a more effective implant as more of the implant can be dedicated to its intended purpose and be full diameter, whereas without the benefit of predistraction and the ability to maintain the same, a significant portion of the forward end of the implant would need to be dedicated to the purpose of separating the opposing vertebrae.
  • 34. The present invention allows for the use of an implant with a sharper thread or surface projections as there is no danger to the surrounding tissues.
  • 35. The present invention allows for the implant to be fully preloaded as provided to the surgeon, or for the surgeon to load it with the material of his choice at the time of surgery.
  • 36. The present invention allows for the loading of a spinal implant outside of the spinal canal and prior to implantation.
  • OBJECTS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method of performing a discectomy, a fusion, and an internal stabilization of the spine, and specifically, all three of the above simultaneously and as a single procedure.
  • It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved method of performing a discectomy, a fusion, and an internal stabilization of the spine, which is both quicker and safer than is possible by previous methods.
  • It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved method of performing a discectomy, a fusion and an internal stabilization of the spine, to provide for improved surgical spinal implants.
  • It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved method of performing a discectomy, a fusion, and an internal stabilization of the spine, which provides for an improved system of surgical instrumentation to facilitate the performance of the combined discectomy, fusion, and internal spinal stabilization.
  • It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved method of performing a discectomy, a fusion, and an internal stabilization of the spine procedures.
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide instrumentation and a method of spinal interbody arthrodesis that is faster, safer, and more efficacious than prior methods, and can effectively be performed in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine anteriorly, as well as in the lower lumbar spine posteriorly.
  • It is a further object of the present invention to provide a means for inserting a spinal implant between adjacent vertebrae while maintaining their optimal spacing, positioning, and alignment.
  • These and other objects of the present invention will be apparent from review of the following specification and the accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a side view of the Long Distractor, of the present invention inserted into the intervertebral space.
  • FIG. 2 is a side view of a Convertible Distractor assembly in relation to the spine.
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a high retention Short Distractor of FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 3A is a side view of the high retention Short Distractor of FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 3B is a side view of an alternative Short Distractor with circumferential forward facing ratcheting.
  • FIG. 3C is a top view of the alternative Short Distractor of FIG. 3B.
  • FIG. 3D is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of a Short Distractor.
  • FIG. 3E is a top view of the alternative distractor of FIG. 3D.
  • FIG. 3F is a side view of a further alternative rectangularized Short Distractor with knurled surfaces.
  • FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a spinal segment (two vertebrae and an interposed disc) with a Short Distractor in place, with a portion of the upper vertebrae and disc cut away to show the Short Distractor on one side of the spine and the Long Distractor about to be placed contralaterally.
  • FIG. 5 shows a side view of the Outer Sleeve in place over the Long Distractor, and about to receive the Driver Cap in preparation for being seated.
  • FIG. 6 shows the Long Distractor, Outer Sleeve, and Driver Cap following the proper seating of the Outer Sleeve into the two adjacent vertebrae.
  • FIG. 7A is a side view of the cervical Outer Sleeve being placed over a Long Distractor which is in place within the disc space anteriorly.
  • FIG. 7B is a bottom view of the single Outer Sleeve of FIG. 7A.
  • FIG. 7C is a bottom view of a Dual Outer Sleeve.
  • FIG. 7D is an enlarged side view of the proximal portion of FIG. 7C.
  • FIG. 7E is a bottom view of a Dual Driver Cap for driving two distractors.
  • FIG. 7F is a side sectional view showing the Dual Outer Sleeve of FIGS. 7C and 7D, Distractors and Dual Cap of FIG. 7E seated.
  • FIG. 8 is a side view of the Outer Sleeve of FIG. 7A centered on the Long Distractor and fully seated on the anterior aspect of the cervical spine.
  • FIG. 9 is a perspective view of the Distractor Puller.
  • FIG. 10 is a cutaway partial side view of the Proximal Puller engaging the extraction ring of the Long Distractor over the end of the Outer Sleeve.
  • FIG. 10A is a side view of the Puller coupled to the Long Distractor just prior to its extraction.
  • FIG. 10B is a posterior view of the proximal Outer Sleeve and a Short Distractor in place in regard to the vertebrae, disc and nerves.
  • FIG. 11A is a side sectional view of the Drill and Inner Sleeve within the Outer Sleeve and drilling across the intervertebral space and cutting partially cylindrical arcs from the adjacent vertebrae.
  • FIG. 11B is a sectional side view of preparation of the intervertebral space by the alternative “Trephine Method” showing the Distractor, Trephine, Inner Sleeve, and Outer Sleeve in place.
  • FIG. 11C is a sectional side view as in FIG. 11A, but showing the use of an alternative drilling conformation wherein the extended proximal portion is both distracting and self-centering.
  • FIG. 11D is a side view of an instrument for removing arcs of bone from vertebrae following drilling.
  • FIG. 12 is a perspective view of the surgical Tap.
  • FIG. 13 is a side view of the Outer Sleeve and the surgical Tap fully threaded within the interspace.
  • FIG. 14A is a side view of the bone harvesting Trephine and motor adapter.
  • FIG. 14B is a perspective view of the implant Bone Loading Device.
  • FIG. 14C is a perspective view of the Corkscrew bone freeing and extracting instrument.
  • FIG. 15 is a partial perspective view of the Bone Loading Device in operation.
  • FIG. 16 is a perspective view of the Implant Driver about to engage the spinal implant.
  • FIG. 17 is a side view of the spinal implant being fully seated within the intervertebral space by means of the Driver apparatus in place within the Outer Sleeve.
  • FIG. 18 is a side view of the lumbar spine showing the end result of the device implantation via the posterior route.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The following discussion will be in regard to application in the lumbar spine via the posterior approach. In its simplest form, the method of the present invention involves the following steps. The patient is placed on a spinal surgery frame, which allows for the distraction and alignment of the disc space to be fused. A bilateral posterior exposure of the interspace, with or without partial discectomy is then performed. Utilizing distractors the disc space is distracted, and a hollow Outer Sleeve is fitted over one of the distractors. The end of the Outer Sleeve has teeth for engaging the two adjacent vertebrae. The Outer Sleeve is driven into the vertebrae and the distractor is then removed. A hollow Inner Sleeve is then inserted into the Outer Sleeve and a stopped Drill is utilized to prepare the opposed vertebral surfaces. The Drill and the Inner Sleeve are removed as a single unit. The space is tapped if so required. The prepared spinal implant is then inserted via the Outer Sleeve utilizing a stopped inserter. The instruments are then removed and the procedure repeated on the contralateral side of the spine.
  • Step 1a. Prior to surgery, translucent implant templates appropriately adjusted for scale are superimposed on AP, lateral, and axial images of the interspace to be fused, for the purpose of selecting the optimal implant size and to determine the desired distraction.
  • Step 1b. The patient is preferably placed onto a spinal surgery frame capable of inducing both distraction and vertebral alignment.
  • Step 2. In the preferred embodiment, a standard bilateral (partial) discectomy is performed and any posterior lipping of the vertebral bodies adjacent the interspace is removed. Alternatively, no disc material need be removed. In the preferred embodiment, the interspace is exposed by performing bilateral paired semihemilaminotomies and resecting the inner aspects of the facet joints adjacent the spinal canal while preserving the supra and interspinous ligaments.
  • Step 3. Beginning on the first side, the dural sac and traversing nerve root at that level are retracted medially and a Long Distractor then inserted and impacted flush to the posterior vertebral bodies adjacent that interspace. Long Distractors with working ends of increasing diameter are then sequentially inserted until the optimal distraction is obtained. This optimal distraction not only restores the normal height of the interspace, but further achieves a balance wherein the tendency for the space to collapse is resisted, which in urging the vertebral bodies apart is being equally resisted by the powerful soft tissue structures about the spinal segment including the outer casing of the disc (the annulus fibrosus), various ligaments, capsular structures, as well as the muscles and other soft-tissue structures. This balanced distraction not only provides for the spatial restoration of the height of the interspace, but for considerable stability as the space now resists further distraction or collapse.
  • In the preferred embodiment, as the desired distraction is approached, the use of the solid bodied Long Distractors is terminated and a disassemblable Convertible Distractor is placed with tactile and/or radiographic confirmation of ideal distraction. The Convertible Distractor is then disassembled such that the Short Distractor portion is left in place and the ultra-low profile head portion being positioned adjacent to the canal floor and safely away from the neural structures. To insure that the Short Distractor remains in place until its removal is desired, various embodiments of the Short Distractor are available with varying degrees of resistance to dislodgment. In the preferred embodiment of the procedure, attention is then directed to the contralateral side of the spine.
  • Step 4. On the contralateral side of the same interspace the Long Distractor having at its working end the diameter matching the Short Distractor already in place, is then inserted. If however, due to an asymmetrical collapse of the interspace it is then determined that greater distraction is required on the second side to achieve the optimal stability, then the appropriate Short Distractor would be placed on the second side. Then the Short Distractor would be removed from the first side and replaced with a larger Long Distractor so as to bring the interspace into balance.
  • In an alternative embodiment, the entire procedure is performed on the one side of the spine utilizing only the Long Distractor prior to repeating the procedure on the contralateral side of the spine. While this method can be performed in accordance with the remaining steps as described in the preferred embodiment, when utilized it is best performed using a Trephine which allows the Long Distractor to remain in place, thereby allowing for interspace distraction otherwise provided in the first method by the Short Distractor. This alternative method then requires the use of a Trephine over the Long Distractor in lieu of a reamer and is therefore called the “Trephine Method”, which will be discussed in detail later.
  • Step 5. With the Short Distractor in place on the first side of the spine, and the matching Long Distractor in place on the second side of the spine, and with the dural sac and traversing nerve root safely retracted, the Outer Sleeve is placed over the Long Distractor and firmly impacted to its optimal depth using the Impaction Cap and a mallet. The Long Distractor is then removed.
  • Step 6. An Inner Sleeve is then placed within the Outer Sleeve, and the interspace is then prepared on that side by utilizing a Drill, Endmill, Reamer, or Trephine to drill, ream, or cut out the bone to be removed to either side, as well as any remaining interposed discal material. In the preferred method, utilizing a specially designed Endmill-Drill, it and the Inner Sleeve are removed as a unit, safely carrying away the bone and disc debris trapped within them from the spinal canal.
  • Step 7. If required, a thread forming Tap with penetration limiting means to control the depth of insertion, is then inserted through the Outer Sleeve.
  • Step 8. The prepared implant is then inserted utilizing the specialized Driver unit. It should be noted that the implant may be coated with, made of, and/or loaded with substances consistent with bony fusion. However, in the preferred embodiment, the implant is treated with bone promoting and inducing substances, but is loaded with materials suitable for participating in a fusion.
  • While substances both natural and artificial are covered by the present invention, the preferred embodiment is in regard to the use of the patient's own bone by the following method. A hollow Trephine is utilized to harvest a core of bone from the posterior superior aspect of the iliac crest adjacent the sacroiliac joint. This core of bone is at its outside diameter, slightly smaller than the inside diameter of the spinal implant to be loaded, but longer than the spinal implant. Utilizing an instrument designed for that purpose, the core of bone is then injected from within the Trephine into the central cavity of the implant causing a superabundance of the bone material within the implant such that the bone material tends to press out through the openings communicating with the outside surface of the implant.
  • Step 9. Using the Driver Extractor instrument, the prepared implant is threaded into the prepared interspace. The instrumentation is removed from that side of the spine and attention is then redirected to the first side of the spine. A small retractor is utilized to move the dural sac and traversing nerve root medially and to protect them and allowing the direct visualization of the retained Short Distractor unit. Without removing the Short Distractor, it is reassembled to its shaft portion, essentially reconstituting itself into a Long Distractor. With the inserted implant now acting as the distractor on the opposite side, the Long Distractor is utilized to guide the Outer Sleeve down where it is impacted as described in Step 5.
  • Steps 6 & 7 are then repeated, completing the procedure at that level. The wound is then irrigated and closed in the routine manner.
  • Representative Example of the Preferred Method
  • Through preoperative templating of the patient's anterior posterior, lateral, and axially imaged MRI scan in conjunction with translucent overlays of the various sized implants, the correct implant diameter and length are accurately assessed, as well as the correct amount of distraction needed to restore the interspace to its premorbid height. The patient is then properly positioned and a bilateral partial discectomy performed via paired semihemilaminotomies.
  • For the purpose of this example, it will be assumed that by preoperative assessment it was determined that the correct implant would have an external diameter of 18 mm and be 26 mm long. Further, the distraction necessary to restore the height of the interspace would be approximately 10 mm. The dural sac and traversing nerve root would then be retracted medially and protected, while a Long Distractor having an outside diameter to the barrel portion corresponding to the implant to be inserted, that is 18 mm, and having a diameter at the working end of perhaps 8 mm, would be inserted. This then being found to be slightly smaller than optimal by direct observation, a Convertible Distractor having in its barrel portion an 18 mm outside diameter, but having in its working portion a 10 mm diameter would then be inserted. Direct observation and/or x-ray then confirming the ideal distraction, the Convertible Distractor would then be disassembled, the barrel and head portion removed, and the Short Distractor portion left deeply embedded and with its flanged head flat against the canal floor and deep to the neural structures. It would then be safe to allow the dural sac and nerve root to return to their normal positions, which would be superficial to the flanged portion of the Short Distractor.
  • Attention would then be directed to the contralateral side. The dural sac and nerve root would then be retracted medially on this second side, and a Long Distractor with an 18 mm diameter barrel portion and a 11 mm working portion would then be inserted into the interspace and driven flush to the bone if necessary, such impaction imploding any osteophytes not already removed, and assuring that the shoulder portion of the barrel comes to lie flat against the posterior aspects of the adjacent bodies. With the dural sac and nerve root still safely retracted, the Outer Sleeve would then be placed over the Long Distractor and utilizing the Driver Cap and a mallet, seated to the optimal depth.
  • In the preferred embodiment, the Long Distractor is then removed and the Inner Sleeve is inserted into the Outer Sleeve. Since the purpose of the Inner Sleeve is to support the drill and allow for the increased size of the implant over the size of the drill, thus making it possible for the insertion of the implant to occur through the Outer Sleeve, the Inner Sleeve therefore measures 18 mm in its outside diameter, and 16.6 mm in its inside diameter. This allows it to fit within the Outer Sleeve, the diameter of which is 18.1 mm and to admit the drill bit which is 16.5 mm in diameter.
  • Following the drilling procedure, the Drill and Inner Sleeve are removed as a single unit with the trapped interposed cartilaginous and bony debris. The depth of drill penetration is preset and limited by the fixed rigid column of the Outer Sleeve. In this example, the space will be prepared to a depth of 28 mm in anticipation of countersinking a 26 mm long implant at least 2 mm. If a Tap were to be utilized, it would be inserted at this time and be appropriate to the minor and major diameters of the implant to be inserted and as with the Drill, controlled for its depth of penetration. The spinal implant would then be prepared for implantation by utilizing a Trephine to harvest a core of posterior iliac bone greater than 30 mm long and approximately 14.5 mm in diameter.
  • Using the Bone Loading Device, this core of bone would be forcefully injected into the internal chamber of the spinal implant which would then be capped. Cap end forward, the fully loaded implant would then be attached to the Insertion Driver, down the Outer Sleeve and screwed into place with the depth of penetration limited by the Insertion instrument. The Insertion Driver is then unscrewed from the implant and removed from the Outer Sleeve. With the dural sac and nerve root retracted and protected, the Outer Sleeve would then be removed. This would complete the fusion procedure on that side, and then as described, the procedure would be repeated on the other (first) side of the same interspace.
  • Alternative Methods
  • An alternative and extremely useful method is the “Trephine Method”. Its advantages include that it may be used in conjunction with the preferred embodiment substituting the use of a hollow, tubular cutter, called a Trephine for the use of the Drill in Step 5 of the preferred embodiment. Additionally, it may be utilized so as to obviate the need for the placement of the Short Distractor and to allow the procedure to be effectively performed from start to finish on one side prior to initiating the procedure on the opposite side, and while nevertheless maintaining distraction at the site of the bone removal.
  • The following is a description of the “Trephine Method”. Having completed the exposure of the interspace on at least one side, the dural sac and nerve root are retracted. A Long Distractor differing from the Long Solid Bodied Distractor of the preferred embodiment only in that the barrel portion is of a precisely lesser diameter than the spinal implant. As in the preferred embodiment, the Outer Sleeve has an inner diameter only slightly greater than the implant to be inserted. Therefore, at this time, a first Inner Sleeve is inserted into the Outer Sleeve to make up the difference between the outside diameter of the Long Distractor and the inside diameter of the Outer Sleeve. With the Outer Sleeve and first Inner Sleeve thus assembled, they are placed over the Long Distractor and the Outer Sleeve is optimally seated using the Impaction Cap. The Cap and first Inner Sleeve are removed, but the Long Distractor and Outer Sleeve are left in place.
  • With the Long Distractor maintaining optimal distraction and with the Outer Sleeve locking the vertebrae together so as to resist any movement of the vertebrae, a hollow, tubular cutter known as a Trephine is then inserted over the Long Distractor and its barrel portion and within the Outer Sleeve. The Trephine, which is stopped out to the appropriate depth, can then be utilized to cut equal arcs of bone from the opposed vertebral endplates.
  • Alternatively, a second Inner Sleeve may be placed within the Outer Sleeve prior to placing the Trephine over the Long Distractor and within that second sleeve. This second Inner Sleeve would be just greater in its internal diameter than the Long Distractor and just smaller in its outside diameter than the inner diameter of the Outer Sleeve. While it would provide enhanced stability to the Trephine, provision would then need to be made in is the way of large flutes passing longitudinally or obliquely along the outer surface of the Distractor to its barrel portion to accommodate the bony and cartilaginous debris generated during the cutting procedure.
  • Following the use of the Trephine to the appropriate depth by either of these methods, the Trephine, the Long Distractor, and the second Inner Sleeve, if utilized, are all removed. Since the Trephine cuts two arcs of bone but does not ream them out, a shafted instrument with a perpendicular cutting portion at its working end is then inserted parallel to the disc space and then rotated through an arc of motion cutting the bases of the two longitudinally cut arcs, thus freeing them for removal through the Outer Sleeve. The space may then be tapped if required, and the implant is inserted as per the preferred method. As already mentioned, the “Trephine Method” can be used with or without the use of the Short Distractor on the contralateral side.
  • Applications of Method in Other Areas of the Spine
  • The following method is the preferred embodiment for performing anterior interbody fusion in the thoracic and lumbar spines. It is also appropriate in the cervical spine when the width of the spine anteriorly is sufficient so that it is possible to place two implants side by side and such that each intrudes at least several millimeters into the substance of the opposed vertebrae and for the length of the implants.
  • The interspace to be fused is adequately exposed and the soft tissues and vital structures retracted and protected to either side. Visualization of the broad width of the interspace anteriorly is made possible by the absence of the neurological structures in relation to this aspect of the spine. The center line of the anterior aspect of the interspace is noted and marked. The disc is removed using first a knife and then curettes and rongeurs as needed. Alternatively, the disc may be left intact to be removed during the drilling stage of the procedure. However, as per the preferred embodiment of the procedure, having removed the great mass of the nucleus and the greater portion of the annulus anteriorly, Long Distractors with progressively increasing diameters to their working ends are inserted into the interspace at a point midway between the central marking line and the lateral extent of the anterior aspect of the spine as visualized.
  • The Dual Outer Sleeve with its common Foot Plate and Retention Prongs is then inserted over either a singly placed Long Distractor and then the second Distractor placed, or is placed over both Distractors if already placed. The Dual Outer Sleeve is then seated firmly against the anterior aspect of the spine. Any spurs which would interfere with the flush seating of the Foot Plate to the anterior aspect of the spine should be removed prior to inserting the Long Distractors. Once the Outer Sleeve has been optimally seated, one of the Long Distractors is removed and in its place is inserted an Inner Sleeve and drill bit. The drill bit has as its outside diameter the minor diameter of the implant to be inserted. The Inner Sleeve is essentially equal in thickness to the difference between the minor and major diameters of the threaded implant.
  • A Stopped Drill is then utilized to prepare the opposed vertebral surfaces and to remove any remaining disc material interposed. If required, a Stopped Tap may be inserted through the Outer Sleeve and into the interspace to create a thread form. The properly prepared implant is then affixed to the Insertion Driver and passed through the Outer Sleeve down into the interspace and inserted until its depth of penetration is limited by the stop on the Insertion Driver. With the implant itself now in a position to act as a distractor, the Long Distractor is then removed from the contralateral side and the procedure repeated. When both implants are firmly in place, the outer sleeve may then be removed. The amount of countersinking of the implants may then be adjusted under direct vision.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT METHOD AND INSTRUMENTATION
  • In the preferred embodiment, the disc (D) between adjacent vertebrae (V) is approached via bilateral paired semihemilaminotomies of the adjacent vertebrae. In the preferred embodiment the supraspinous ligament, the interspinous ligament, the spinous process, portions of the lamina, and most of the facet joints are preserved. However, while less desirable, these structures may be removed.
  • In the preferred method, a bilateral partial nuclear discectomy is then performed through bilateral openings created through the posterior aspect of the annulus fibrosus. While considered less desirable, disc excision can be delayed and performed simultaneously with the vertebral bone resection during the drilling procedure. Starting on the first side a dural nerve root retractor is placed such that the dural sac and lower nerve root are retracted medially allowing exposure to one side of a portion of two adjacent vertebral bodies and the interposed disc posteriorly.
  • Referring now to FIG. 1, preferably after removing some portion of nuclear disc material, a Long Distractor 100 is inserted under direct vision into the intervertebral space. The disc penetrating portion 102 is essentially cylindrical with a bullet-shaped front end 103 and a shoulder portion 104 where the penetrating portion 102 extends from barrel 106. The penetrating portion 102 urges the vertebral bodies apart, facilitating the introduction of the instruments. Long Distractors with sequentially increasing diameter penetrating portions 102 are then introduced. As the optimal diameter of penetrating portion 102 is achieved, the vertebral bodies to either side are forced into full congruence and thus become parallel, not only to the penetrating portion 102, but to each other. At this time, any remaining excrescences of bone of the posterior vertebral bodies adjacent the posterior disc which have not already been removed are flattened flush to the vertebral body by the forced impaction, such as by hitting with a hammer flat surface 109 of crown 110, driving the shoulder 104 against the lipped portions of vertebrae V. Because of the forced opposition of the vertebral endplates to portion 102 with optimal distraction, unit 100 will then come to lie absolutely perpendicular to the plane of the posterior bodies and absolutely parallel to the vertebral endplates, allowing optimal alignment for the procedure to be performed.
  • Penetrating portion 102 is available in various diameters, but all are of a constant length, which is less than the known depth of the interspace. This combined with the circumferential shoulder 104, which is too large to fit within the interspace, protects against the danger of overpenetration. Barrel 106 is of the same diameter as the external diameter of the device to be implanted. A recessed portion 108 below the crown 110 allows for the Long Distractor 100 to be engaged by an extractor unit shown in FIG. 9.
  • In the preferred embodiment, a Convertible Long Distractor 113 is used on the first side of the spine. As shown in FIG. 2, the Convertible Long Distractor 113 has a barrel portion 152 separable from the Short Distractor portion 120. While the initial distraction may be performed with a solid Long Distractor, as the optimal distraction is approached the appropriate Convertible Long Distractor is utilized. The Convertible Long Distractor 113 consists of a Short Distractor portion 120 and a barrel 152 having a rectangular projection 134 at one end. The Short Distractor 120 has an increased diameter head 128, a rectangular slot 118 and an internal threaded opening 114. The barrel 152 is hollow and has an internal shaft 111 terminating in a large diameter hexagonal crown 115 at one end and a reduced diameter portion 112. The crown has a detent portion 117 in its flat surface. The other end of the shaft 111 has a threaded small member 116 that corresponds to threaded opening 114. The shaft 111 is prevented from removal from the barrel 152 by set pin 119 passing through the wall of barrel 152 in a convenient manner. The Short Distractor portion 120 is removably attached to the barrel portion 152 via the mating of female rectangular slot 118 and the male mating member 134. The mating held together by utilizing is knob 136 to drive the crown 110 connected to interior shaft 111 having a threaded working end screw 116 that threads into the female aperture 118 of the Short Distractor portion 120.
  • Cap 136 has an open socket 138 for fitting around crown 115 and engages the reduced diameter hexagonal portion 112 so as to permit the rotation of shaft-111 and threaded male member 116. A detent ball 150 in the inside of the socket 138 engages detent 117 in the crown 115, holding them together.
  • The Short Distractor portion 120 of FIGS. 2, 3, and 3A-3F are designed to provide for high stability when temporarily situated so as to resist inadvertent migration while the surgeon is working on the second side. To that end, the embodiment of the Short Distractor 120 shown in FIGS. 3 and 3A has a pair of sharp pegs 126, to embed into the opposing vertebral bodies and forward facing ratchetings 124, that further resist backward movement. FIGS. 3B and 3C, which show the preferred embodiment, are side and top views of an alternative embodiment of the distractor portion such that the distractor portion to be interposed between the vertebrae is essentially cylindrical, but with circumferential forward facing ratchetings 124.
  • A further alternative embodiment is shown in FIGS. 3D and 3E. This is a more rectangularized design, with forward facing ratchetings, without the sharp prongs 126 of FIG. 3. FIG. 3F is a side view of a further embodiment of the Short Distractor 120 shown with knurling, to increase the interference with the bone surface so as to add stability to the unit and to resist dislodgment. To this end, it is apparent that the working ends of both the Long and Short Distractors can have a variety of configurations consistent with their purpose, and that surface irregularities as well as the shape of the ends themselves, with or without prongs 126, may be utilized to make the Short Distractor 120 more resistant to migration.
  • Once the ideal distraction has been achieved on the first side of the spine, the Convertible Distractor is dissociated, leaving Short Distractor 120 in place with its rounded external end 128, safely on the canal floor and deep to the dural sac and nerve root.
  • As shown in FIG. 4, the surgeon then moves to the other side of the spine at the same disc (D) level, and retracts the dural sac and nerve root medially, exposing the disc on that side. Long Distractors 100 are then sequentially inserted into the disc space until the diameter of the distractor on the second side is at least as big as that on the first side. If because of some asymmetry of the interspace a larger diameter distractor is required on the second side to achieve the ideal distraction as compared to the first side, then the second side is fitted with a Short Distractor of the larger diameter, and the surgeon would then return back to the first side. In that event, the first side Short Distractor would then be removed and the Long Distractor 100 corresponding to the increased diameter of the already placed Short Distractor 120 would then be inserted. In either event, the operation is continued by working on the one side where the Long Distractor is in place. In this regard, it should be noted, that by the use of such a device as the Michelson Spinal Surgery Frame, it may be possible to obtain adequate distraction preoperatively such that the surgeon is either disinclined to use a distractor, or to simply place the correct Long Distractor on the first side and then proceed with the surgical procedure on that side before moving to the opposite side. These variations are within the scope of the present invention.
  • The Long Distractor now serves as both a centering post and an alignment rod for the hollow Outer Sleeve 140 shown in FIG. 5 which is fitted over the Long Distractor 100, shown by phantom lines 101 in FIG. 5. The Outer Sleeve 140 is metal and has a sharp toothed front end 142 that is capable of penetrating into and holding fast the two adjacent vertebrae (V). Interrupting the circumferential sharp teeth of 142 are flat, planar areas 152 which serve to resist the further insertion of the sharp teeth into the vertebral bodies. The toothed front end 142 of the Outer Sleeve 140 is a continuation of the tubular shaft 144, which in turn is connected to circumferentially enlarged tubular back end 146 having a knurled outer surface 148 for easier manipulation. An alternative embodiment of an Outer Sleeve incorporates an expansile key hole and slot configuration 154 to either side of shaft 144 along the mid-plane of the interspace and parallel to it such that the end 142 resists the collapse of the vertebrae (V) to either side of the disc (D), but may nevertheless allow for their further distraction, in the event the only diameter or the root diameter of the implant is larger than the hole drilled.
  • A Driver Cap 160 in the form of an impaction cap has at its far end a flat, closed-back surface 162 and at its other end a broad, circular opening. The Driver Cap 160 fits over both the Outer Sleeve 140 and the Long Distractor 100. As the Driver Cap 160 is seated, interior surface 170 circumferentially engages portion 146 of the Outer Sleeve until the back end 172 engages the internal shoulder 164. As mallet blows are applied to surface 162, that force is transmitted via the internal shoulder 164 to the Outer Sleeve 140 via its far end 172, seating teeth 142 into the vertebral bodies adjacent the disc space D and to the depth of the teeth 142 to the flat portions 152. As the Outer Sleeve 140 is advanced forward, crown portion 110 of the Long Distractor is allowed to protrude within the Driver Cap 160 unobstructed until it contacts the interior flat surface 168. Once crown 110 comes into contact with the flat interior surface 168, then further taps of the mallet will not advance the Outer Sleeve, any further motion being resisted by the flat shoulder portion 104 of the Long Distractor abutting the hard surfaces of the posterior vertebral bodies. In this way, the Outer Sleeve 140 is safely and assuredly inserted to its optimal depth and rigidly securing the two opposed vertebrae as shown in FIG. 6.
  • The Cap 160 is then removed and the Distractor Puller 200 of FIG. 9 utilized to remove the Long Distractor 100 from the spine leaving the Outer Sleeve 140 in place. The Distractor Puller 200 has front portion 202, a mid portion 204, and a back handle portion 206. At the front portion 202 of the Distractor Puller 200, a socket 208 is connected to one end of shaft 210 which at its far end is connected to back handle portion 206. The socket 208 has defined within it a cavity 212 that is open at its front end and funnelized on the interior aspect of its sides. The cavity 212 is constructed so that the head of the Distractor Puller 200 and the partially circumferential flange 218 engages the circumferential recess 108 of the Distractor 100. The entrance to cavity 212 is slightly funnelized, and the leading edges of flange 218 slightly rounded to facilitate the engagement of recess 108 and head 110 of Distractor 100, which is further facilitated in that the Driver Cap 160 leaves portion 108 of Distractor 100 precisely flush with the back surface 172 of the Outer Sleeve 140. This provides a large, flat surface 172 to precisely guide surface 230 of socket 208, and open portion 212 around head 110 while flange 218 engages recess 108. The springloaded detent ball 228 engages hemispherical depression 112 in the crown 110, shown in FIG. 2. This springloaded detent 228 in engagement with complimentary indent 218 protects against the inadvertent dissociation of the Long Distractor from the Puller 200 after the Distractor has been removed from within the Outer Sleeve 140 and prior to its removal from the wound. Once out of the body, the two instruments are easily disassociated by freeing the crown portion 110 from cavity 212 by a manual force applied perpendicular to their relative long axes at this location.
  • A cylindrical and free removable weight 216 is fitted around shaft 210 between the front portion 202 and the rear handle portion 206. Gently, but repeatedly sliding the weight 216 along shaft 210 and driven rearwardly against flat surface 228, transmits a rearward vector to proximal end 202 and thereby to the Long Distractor 100 to which it is engaged.
  • Paired extended handle 224 and 226, allow the surgeon to resist any excessive rearward motion as the instrument is used to liberate the Long Distractor 100. Paired handles 224 and 226 are also useful in that they allow a rotational directing of portion 208, via the shaft 210. This allows the surgeon to control and manipulate rotationally the orientation of the opening of cavity 212 to facilitate its application, to the head 110 of the distractor 100.
  • The Distractor Puller 200 is a significant improvement over the alternatives of striking a remover instrument with an independent hammer over the exposed surgical wound, or manually extracting the distractor by forcefully pulling. The use of a free hammer over the open wound is dangerous because the neural structures can be impacted on the back swing which is made even more likely by the effects of gravity on the mallet head. Manual extraction by pulling is dangerous because of the significant interference fit of portion 102 within the spine such that significant force would be required to remove the Distractor 100, and if force were not coaxial then the Outer Sleeve might be dislodged or misaligned. Further, once the flat portion 102 became free of the interspace, all resistance to withdrawal would be lost and in the face of the considerable force necessary to free it, the Distractor 100 might easily become projectile imparting injury to the patient and/or the surgeon.
  • Once the Long Distractor 100 has been fully removed from the Outer Sleeve 140, the toothed end 142 of the Outer Sleeve 140, working in conjunction with the Short Distractor 120 on the contralateral side rigidly maintains the relative position of the adjacent vertebrae V. Further, since the remainder of the procedure on that side of the spine occurs entirely through the protective Outer Sleeve 140, and as the nerves and dural sac are external to that Outer Sleeve and superficial to the toothed end 142 of the Outer Sleeve 140, which is firmly embedded into the adjacent vertebrae V, the Outer Sleeve 140 serves to insure the safety of these delicate neural structures. Further, since the Outer Sleeve 140 is of a fixed length and rigid, its flat rearward surface 172 may be used as a stop to the advancement of all instruments placed through the Outer Sleeve 140, thus protecting against accidental overpenetration. Further, the Outer Sleeve 140 assures that the further procedure to be performed will occur coaxial to the disc space D and further, be symmetrical in regard to each of the opposed vertebral surfaces.
  • FIG. 10B is a posterior view of the spine at this stage of the procedure, showing a Short Distractor 120 in place on one side of the spine and the bottom portion of Outer Sleeve 140 in place on the opposite side of the spine.
  • Referring to FIG. 11A, an Inner Sleeve 242 is inserted from the rear within the Outer Sleeve 140. This Inner Sleeve has a collar portion 244 of a known thickness which seats against the top edge surface 172 of Outer Sleeve 140. The cylindrical barrel portion of Inner Sleeve 242 comes to approximate the posterior aspect of the vertebral bodies interior the Outer Sleeve when fully seated. A Drill 240, having a known selected length is then introduced through the rearward aperture of the Inner Sleeve 242 and utilized to ream out the arcs of bone which it engages from the opposed vertebral endplates as well as any discal material within its path down to its predetermined and limited depth. The Drill 240, has a narrow engagement portion 246, which allows it to be affixed to a drill mechanism which may be either a manual or a power unit. A circumferential collar 248 of an increased diameter serves to limit the depth of penetration of the drill 240 and may be fixed, or lockably adjustable.
  • Not shown here, but well known to those skilled in the art, are various mechanisms to lockably adjust such instruments as drills. Such mechanisms include, but are not limited to, the use of collets, threaded shafts with lock nuts, and flanges engaging grooves forced therein by either a cap pulled over the flanges or screwed down upon them.
  • In the preferred embodiment, the forward cutting edge 252 of Drill 240 is a modification of a large fluted drill design such that the end resembles an end cutting mill which may contain any workable number of cutting surfaces, but preferably four or more, and such cutting surfaces being relatively shallow such that the advancement of the instrument occurs more slowly. The outside diameter of the Drill 240 corresponds to the minor diameter of the threaded spinal implant. The Inner Sleeve 242 has an inner diameter slightly greater than that dimension and its outer diameter is slightly smaller than the inside diameter of the Outer Sleeve 140 which has the same outer diameter as the major diameter of the threaded implant.
  • The drill shaft of drill 240 comprises an upper portion 243, a central recessed portion 256 of a smaller diameter and a lower cutting drill portion 250. The upper portion 243 and lower portion 256 of the drill 240 have the same outside diameter.
  • The Inner Sleeve 242 serves many functions. First, it provides a more intimate drill guide for drill 240 in the event a smaller diameter hole is to be drilled than that of the inside diameter of the Outer Sleeve 140. Second, since it now guides the Drill, it allows for the Outer Sleeve 140 to have an internal diameter large enough to admit the threaded spinal implant, which is indeed considerably larger in diameter than the Drill 240 itself.
  • If a larger Outer Sleeve 140 were utilized absent the Inner Sleeve 242, then the Drill 240 would be free to wander within the confines of that greater space and would not reliably make parallel cuts removing equal portions of bone from the adjacent vertebrae V. Further, the bone removal not only needs to be equal, but must be correctly oriented in three dimensions. That is, the path of the Drill 240 must be equally centered within the disc space, parallel the endplates, and parallel to the sagittal axis dissecting the interspace.
  • A further purpose of the Inner Sleeve 242 is that it may be removed simultaneously with the Drill 240, thereby trapping the debris, both cartilaginous and bony generated during the drilling procedure, which are guided rearward by the large flutes 251 of Drill portion 250, where they are collected around recessed portion 256 between the recessed portion 256 and the inner wall of the Inner Sleeve 242 are there contained therein. Thus, by removing the Drill 240 in conjunction with the Inner Sleeve 242, all of the debris generated by the reaming procedure is safely removed from the spinal canal and wound area.
  • Further, if the disc tissue in the area to be reamed has been removed previously, as per the preferred method, then the patient's own bone of good quality and useful within the operation will then be contained between the Inner Sleeve 242 and the shaft portion 256: Once away from the surgical wound, this material may be used to load the spinal implant or placed deep within the interspace to participate in the fusion.
  • The method of actually producing the surgical hole within the spine is variable. As shown in FIG. 1C, in an alternative embodiment Drill end 250 has a forward projecting nipple 260, which itself is bullet-shaped in its leading aspect so as to ease its entrance into the disc space and to urge the vertebrae apart. Nipple 260 is distracting, stabilizing as it resists any tendency of the vertebrae to move together, is self-centering to the Drill portion 250 when working in conjunction with Sleeves 140 and 242, and virtually assures the symmetrical resection of bone from the opposed vertebral surfaces.
  • The alternative “Trephine Method” referred to earlier in this application, is shown in FIG. 11B. In this alternative, a Long Distractor 100 is left in place after the Outer Sleeve 140 is seated. The Long Distractor 100 in this case differs from the Long Distractor of the preferred embodiment in that its outside diameter of the barrel 106 is of a smaller diameter than in the prior version. This is made necessary because regardless of the method, the hole to be formed corresponds to the minor diameter of the spinal implant. Trephine 270, a hollow, tubular member with sharp cutting teeth 251 at its proximal end, has a wall thickness and since the outside diameter of that trephine 270 must correspond to the root diameter of the implant, then the wall thickness of the trephine 270 must be allowed for by a corresponding reduction in the diameter of the Long Distractor 100.
  • A further modification of the Long Distractor 100 to the “Trephine Method” would use longitudinal grooves (not shown) along the barrel surface 106 for the purpose of transmitting any debris generated during the cutting procedure, rearward. Since the cutting element is both centered and aligned by the Long Distractor, the use of the Inner Sleeve 242 is not mandatory, but may once again be useful in controlling the path of the debris. To that end, little debris is generated in the “Trephine Method” as the bony arcs are not so much being reamed out and removed as they are simply being cut into the bone where these arcs of bone are left connected at their far ends. Thus, when the Trephining Method has been completed and the Trephine 270 and Inner Sleeve 242 removed, unlike in the preferred embodiment where the hole is drilled out, it remains necessary to remove both the two arcs of bone, and any interposed material. Nevertheless, this is very easily performed by various means, one of which is depicted in FIG. 11D.
  • Instrument 272 consisting of a shaft 276 attached off center to the lower surface 273 handle 274. The shaft 274 terminates in a cutting arm 278. The instrument 272 is inserted through Outer Sleeve 140 where the lower surface 273 of handle 274 abuts the top 172 of the Outer Sleeve 140, both stopping downward motion of instrument 272 and precisely placing the perpendicularly cutting arm 278 of instrument 272 so that as handle portion 274 is rotated, the cutting arm 278 is also rotated, cutting the arcs of bone and liberating them from their last attachments. These portions of bone are then removed utilizing this instrument or a long forceps, and then placed within the implants or otherwise used to participate in the fusion.
  • While in the preferred embodiment of the present invention the spinal implant I, is essentially self-tapping, if the bone is unusually hard it may be desirable to form the thread pattern within the interspace prior to the insertion of the implant I. To that end, as shown in FIG. 12, Tap 280 has a thread-cutting portion 282 connected by a shaft 286 to a handle portion 292, which has been designed to give mechanical advantage to the rotation of the instrument for the purpose of cutting threads. The lower portion of handle 290 has a forward facing flat surface 288 too large to fit through the opening of Outer Sleeve 140 which thus safely limits the depth of penetration of the cutting element 282. This tap 280 is further made safe by blunt end 294 which will engage the uncut portions of the vertebral bone just prior to the engagement of shoulder 288 against surface 172. This feature allows the surgeon to appreciate a less harsh resistance as the blunt nose 294 encounters the remaining unresected bone for the drill hole and prior to the sudden increase in resistance caused by the seating of shoulder 288 against top edge 172, which first resistance serves as a warning to the surgeon to discontinue the tapping procedure. Thus, the surgeon has both visual (as shoulder 288 approaches top edge 172) and tactile warnings to avoid stripping the thread form. Tap end 282 is highly specialized for its specific purpose. Rearward to the specialized blunt tip 294 is a truncated bullet-shaped area 298 which ramps up to the constant diameter intermediate the cutting ridges 296. Ramp portion 298 urges the opposed vertebral bodies apart, which motion is resisted by Outer Sleeve 140, thus progressively driving the sharp leading edges of thread forms 296 into the vertebral bodies. The periodic longitudinal grooves 284 interrupting the thread forms, which may number 1 to 8, but preferably 4, function to accumulate the bony material which is removed during the thread cutting process. In that regard, in the ideal embodiment, the thread cutting form is designed to compress the bone to be formed rather than to trough through it. Further, while both the major and minor diameters of the Tap 280 may be varied, in the preferred embodiment, the minor diameter corresponds to the minor diameter of the implant I, but the major diameter is slightly less than the major diameter of the implant.
  • With Tap 280 now removed, and Sleeve 140 still in place, the surgical site is now fully prepared to receive the spinal implant I. In the preferred embodiment of the spinal implant, the implant has been enhanced by the use of, application to, and filling with fusion promoting, enhancing, and participating substances and factors. Thus, the implant may be fully prepared for insertion as provided to the operating surgeon. However, at the present time, human bone is most commonly used as the graft material of choice, with the patient's own bone being considered the best source.
  • FIG. 14 a shows a trephine 300 with an exceedingly sharp front cutting edge 302 for quickly and cleanly coring into the patient's posterior iliac crest, or any other bony tissue, and for the purpose of producing a core of bone then contained within the hollow 304 of the trephine 300. Trephine 300 has a rear portion 306 with a pair of diametrically opposed slots 310, and disposed clockwise from their longitudinally oriented rearward facing openings so as to engage diametrically and opposing members 312 of Drive unit 308, by which trephine 300 may be attached to either a hand or power drill. It can be appreciated that engagement mechanism 312 is stable during the clockwise cutting procedure, and yet allows for the rapid disconnection of the two components once the cutting is completed.
  • Because of the high interference between the graft and the inner wall of hollow portion 304, and the relative weakness of the cancellous bone being harvested, it is possible to remove the Trephine 300 while still drilling, and to have it extract the core of bone with it. However, in the highly unlikely event that the core of bone would remain fixed at its base, then with the drive mechanism 308 removed, a corkscrew 408 shown in FIG. 14C is introduced though the central opening of rear portion 306 and threaded down and through the core of bone within 304 and to the depth of teeth 302. The tip 318 of the corkscrew 408, which extends substantially on line with the outer envelope of the corkscrew, then cuts radially through the base of the bone core. As the handle portion 314 of the corkscrew 408 abuts the flat, rearward surface of portion 306 and it can no longer advance. As corkscrew 408 is continued to be turned further, it will cause the core of bone to be pulled rearward, as in removing a cork from a wine bottle. Trephine 300 has a barrel portion 304 continuous with sharp toothed portion 302 having an inner diameter just less than the inner diameter of the spinal implant I to be loaded.
  • The Trephine 300 with its core of harvested bone is then placed as shown in FIG. 14B, through opening 340 of Implant Bone Loading device 320, where the barrel portion 304 then passes through and is stopped by circular flange 344. The plunger shaft 326 of instrument 320 is then prepared for attachment by rotating knob 332 counterclockwise such that the plunger 372 is pulled via the long threaded shaft portion 328 back to the base of collar 330 at its proximal end. In this position, knob 332 is considerably extended rearward from collar 330. With plunger shaft 326 in this position, the plunger head 372 is inserted into the central hollow of portion 306 of Trephine 300 as the proximal cylindrical portion of collar 330 then follows it, such that the plunger 372 then occupies the rearward portion of barrel 304 and the proximal cylindrical portion of collar 330 occupies the central hollow of portion 306. A pair of diametrically opposed radially projecting arms 346 on collar 330 are then advanced longitudinally into diametrically opposed paired L slots 340 and then rotated clockwise to complete this assembly.
  • At the other end of instrument 320, a spinal implant I is engaged through its female rectangular slot 364 by a rectangular protruding bar extending from rearward facing surface of end plug 324, (not shown) and secured there by knob 334 which extends as a rod through a central aperture within end plug 324 to extend at the far end as a small bolt which threads to a female aperture centered within the female slot 364 of the spinal implant. With the spinal implant I secured to end plug 324 and the opposite end of the implant I presenting as a hollow, tubular opening, end plug 324 is advanced into device 320 where it is secured by rotationally engaging diametrically opposed L-shaped slots 321. With device 320 fully assembled, end 302 of trephine 300 lies coaxial and opposed to the open end of implant I.
  • As shown in FIG. 15, as knob 332 is then rotated clockwise, the plunger 372 proximal the threaded shaft 328 is then forcibly, but controllably driven forward down the barrel 304 ejecting the bone graft directly into the spinal implant I. As the bone graft is greater in length than the interior of the spinal implant, with further compression the bone is forced into the radially disposed apertures through the wall of the device communicating from the central cavity to the exterior.
  • End plug 324 is then removed from apparatus 320. Using end plug 324 as a handle, end cap 374 shown in FIG. 16 is secured to the open end of the spinal implant I. The implant is then disassociated from end plug 324 by rotating knob 334 counterclockwise.
  • FIG. 16 shows an Implant Driver instrument which may be used to either insert or to remove said implant I. Driver 350 has at its far end 362, a rectangular protrusion 398, which protrusion intimately engages the complimentary rectangular slot 364 of implant I. Protruding from slot 398 of end 362 is threaded portion 353, which extends as a rod through hollow shaft 358 and hollow hand barrel 360 to knob 354 where it can be rotationally controlled. Threaded portion 353 screws into a female aperture central slot 364, urging 353 into 364, and binding them together such that instrument 350 can be rotated via paired and diametrically opposed extending arms 366 and in either direction while maintaining contact with the implant.
  • Affixed to the Driver 350, the implant is then introduced through the Outer Sleeve 140 and screwed into the interspace opposed between the two prepared vertebrae V until such time as the leading edge of the Implant Cap 374 reaches the depth of the prepared hole at which time its forward motion is impeded by the bone lying before it which had not been drilled out. This allows for a progressive feel to the surgeon as the implant is screwed home.
  • As described previously, with the use of the Tap 280, this terminal resistance to further seating provides significant tactile feedback to the surgeon. Again, as with the Tap 280, visual monitoring of the depth of insertion of the implant is provided to the surgeon by observing the progressive approximation of the forward surface 370, of barrel portion 360, as it approaches the rearward facing surface 172 of Outer-Sleeve 140. Nevertheless, a final safety mechanism, when the full depth of insertion has been achieved, surface 370 of instrument 350 will abut surface 172 of the Outer Sleeve 140, prohibiting any further installation of the spinal implant.
  • Once the implant has been fully installed, the Driver 350 is dissociated from the implant by turning knob 354 in a counterclockwise direction. The Driver 350 is then withdrawn from the outer sheath, then the Outer Sleeve 140 is removed. This leaves the implant fully installed and inset to the determined depth as shown in FIG. 18.
  • Attention is then redirected to the other, or first, side of the spine. A dural nerve root retractor is used to retract the neural structures medially, bringing into full view the head 128 of the Short Distractor 120, lying flush on the canal floor. Utilizing apparatus 152, extended screw portion 116 is inserted into the female threaded portion 114 of the Short Distractor 120 as the extended rectangular portion 134 of apparatus 152 is engaged to the female rectangular portion 118 of the Short Distractor 120. Then turning rearward facing portions 108 and 110, utilizing the knob 136 of FIG. 2, the Long Distractor configuration is restored.
  • With the dural sac and nerve roots still retracted and protected, the Outer Sleeve 140 is slipped over the reconstituted Long Distractor and seated using the Driver Cap 162. The entire sequence of events as described for the implantation of the spinal implant I as already placed, is then repeated such that both spinal implants come to lie side by side within the interspace. Though not necessary, circlage or other internal fixation of the levels to be fused may additionally be performed, and then the wound is closed in the routine manner.
  • Brief Discussion with Reference to the Drawings of the Preferred Method and Instrumentation for Anterior Interbody Fusion Incorporating Intercorporeal Predistraction and Utilizing a Guarded Sleeve System is Disclosed
  • Because of the absence of the spinal cord and nerve roots, it is generally possible to visualize in one instance the entire width of the disc space from side to side throughout the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine. In the preferred embodiment of the anterior interbody fusion, implants are placed side by side from anterior to posterior parallel to the interspace and extending through into the adjacent vertebral bodies. Where the transverse width of the disc space is insufficient to allow for the use of two implants, each of which would be large enough to protrude to the required depth into the adjacent vertebrae, then a singular and significantly larger implant may be placed centrally. With this in mind, and in light of the very detailed description of the technique and instrumentation already provided in regard to the method of posterior lumbar interbody fusion, a brief discussion of anterior spinal interbody fusion with dual implant installation will suffice, and the method for installation of a large, singular midline graft will become obvious.
  • The interspace to be fused is exposed anteriorly. The soft tissues are withdrawn and protected to either side, and if necessary, above and below as well. It is then possible to visualize the entire width of the vertebrae anteriorly adjacent that interspace. As discussed above, the surgeon has already templated the appropriate patient radiographs to determine the requisite distraction and optimal implant size. In the preferred method, the surgeon then broadly excises the great bulk of the nuclear disc portion. (Alternatively, the disc can be left to be removed via the drill later.) The surgeon then notes and marks a point midway from side to side anteriorly. He then inserts Long Distractor 100 centering it on a point midway between the point just noted and the lateral extent of the intervertebral space visualized anteriorly. The outer barrel portion 106 of the Distractor 100 utilized, will correspond to the outside diameter of the implants to be installed. The Distractor tips 102 inserted are sequentially larger in diameter until the optimal distraction is achieved. This optimal distraction, although suggested by the initial templating, may be visually and tactilely confirmed as performed. When the optimal distraction is achieved, the vertebral endplates will come into full congruence and parallel to the forward shaft portion 102 of the Distractor 100, causing an alteration in the alignment of the vertebrae and a significant increase in the interference fit and pressurization at the tip, such that the instrument becomes exceedingly stable.
  • There is a sensation imparted to the surgeon of the tissues having moved through their elastic range to the point where the two adjacent vertebrae V begin to feel and move as if a single solid. These changes are easily appreciated visually as the vertebrae realign to become congruent to tip 102, and can also easily be appreciated via lateral Roentgenography. However, should the surgeon fail to appreciate that optimal distraction has been achieved and attempt to further distract the interspace, he would find that extremely difficult to do because of the increased resistance as the tissues are moved beyond their range of elastic deformation. Further, there would be no elasticity left to allow the vertebrae to move further apart and the sensation to the surgeon should he attempt to gently tap the oversized Distractor forward with a mallet, would be one of great brittleness.
  • Returning now to the procedure, when the correct intercorporeal Distractor 100 producing the ideal interspace distraction having its barrel portion 106 corresponding to the implant to be installed has been inserted, then its exact duplicate is inserted anteriorly equidistant to the other side of the spine. As the barrel portion 106 of Long Distractor 100 is exactly of the same major diameter as the spinal implant I looking coaxially on end, the surgeon can then assess the anticipated side by side relationship of the dual implants when implanted.
  • As shown in FIGS. 7C and 7D, a Dual Outer Sleeve 340 consisting of a pair of hollow tubes is then introduced over the side by side Long Distractors protruding anteriorly from the spine. The Dual Outer Sleeve 340 is comprised of two hollow tubular members identical in size displaced from each other ideally the sum of the difference between the minor and major diameters of both implants combined, but not less than that difference for one implant, as it is possible to have the threads of one implant nest interposed to the threads of the other, such that they both occupy a common area between them. However, while the preferred embodiment is slightly greater than two times the difference between the major and minor diameters of the implant (the sum of both) the distance may be considerably greater. Whereas in the preferred embodiment extending tubular portions 348 of instrument 340 are parallel, when the area between them 350, is sufficiently great, these elements may be inclined or declined relative to each other such that they either converge or diverge at their proximal ends. Paired tubular structures 348, may be bridged in part or wholly throughout their length, but are rigidly fixed by Foot Plate 344. In its preferred embodiment, a top view shows the Foot Plate to be essentially rectangular, but without sharp corners.
  • Other shapes can be utilized. In side view 7D it can be appreciated, that Foot Plate 344 is contoured so as to approximate the shape of the vertebrae anteriorly. Extending forward from Foot Plate 344 are multiple sharp prongs 342 sufficiently long to affix them to the vertebrae. The prongs 342 are limited in length so as to not penetrate too far posteriorly and number from 2 to 10, but preferably 6. As the Dual Outer Sleeve 340 is driven forward utilizing Dual Driver Cap 420, of FIG. 7E, engaging the rearward end 352, the prongs 342 extending from Foot Plate 344 are embedded into the opposed vertebral bodies until their forward motion is inhibited by the curved Foot Plate 344 becoming congruent to and being stopped by, the anterior aspect of the vertebral bodies.
  • As already taught in FIG. 5, the Dual Driver Cap 420 is of the same design as Single Driver Cap 160, in that there is a recess 354 as per 168, allowing the Outer Sleeve to be fully seated without impeding the rearward projection of the Long Distractor unit. However, unlike in Cap 160, area 354 is more relieved as it is unnecessary for the Dual Cap 420 to contact the Long Distractor through portion 110 to inhibit its forward motion, as the Foot Plate 344 functions to that effect. Further, the Dual Cap 420 for the Dual Outer Sleeve 340 is correspondingly dual itself and engages the rearward facing dual tubular portion 352. Once the Dual Outer Sleeve has been fully seated, the vertebrae adjacent the interspace to be fused are rigidly held via Foot Plate 344 and the prongs 342. Thus, it is possible to remove either one, or if desired, both of the Long Distractor rods utilizing Long Distractor puller 200, as per the method already described. It is then the surgeon's choice to work on one or both sides of the spine. As per previous discussion, the surgeon may drill the interspace utilizing the Inner Sleeve 242 or leave the Long Distractors in place as per the “Trephine Method”.
  • Tapping, if necessary, and the insertion of the implants then occurs through the protective Outer Sleeve 340. Once the implants have been fully inserted, the Outer Sleeve is removed.
  • Having utilized the Drill method, or “Trephine Method”, with or without an Inner Sleeve to prepare the fusion site, it is the preferred embodiment to leave the Outer Sleeve 340 in place as it provides for the ideal placement and alignment of the Tap 280 and implant I.
  • It is anticipated that the surgeon wishing to work deep within the interspace, or preferring the ability to directly visualize the tap being used, or the implant being inserted, may choose to remove the Outer Sleeve after the insertion of the first prosthesis to maintain stability, or prior to that, which while not the preferred embodiments, are nevertheless within the scope of the present invention.
  • Alternative Methods to the Preferred Embodiment for Method of Anterior Interbody Fusion
  • As previously described for the posterior lumbar spine, alternatively, one can employ the “Trephine Method” as has been described in detail.
  • As a further alternative, it should be noted that the key element in the anterior method is the use of the predistraction principle, where such distraction is maintained by the Outer Sleeve with or without the Long Distractor. Therefore, once the preparation of the interspace has been completed, while not the preferred embodiment, it is nevertheless within the scope of this invention that one could remove the Outer Sleeve as there are no neural structures requiring protection, and insert the implants directly rather than through the Outer Sleeve.
  • As yet a further alternative of this method, where the height of the distracted interspace is such that the diameter of the implant required to span that height and to embed with sufficient depth into the opposed vertebral bodies is such that it is not possible to place two such implants side by side, then only a single implant which may be of significantly increased diameter, is used and placed centrally within the interspace rather than to either side. The placement of a singular central graft via the present invention method and instrumentation is in keeping with the methods already described and can be performed using either a drill or the “Trephine Method”.
  • Referring to FIGS. 16-18, a cylindrical embodiment of the spinal implant I of the present invention is shown. In FIG. 16 the implant I is shown attached to the insertion device 350. In FIGS. 17 and 18 the implant I is shown installed in the disc space D, between the adjacent vertebrae.
  • The cylindrical implant I comprises a hollow tubular member which in the preferred embodiment is made of an ASTM surgically implantable material, preferably Titanium. The cylindrical implant I is closed at one end and open at the other end covered by a cap 394. The cylindrical implant I has a series of macro-sized openings 390 through the side walls of the cylindrical implant I. A series of external threads 392 are formed on the circumference of the cylindrical implant I. Any variety of threads may be used on the implant. The cap 374 has a hexagonal is opening 394 for tightening the cap 374.
  • While the present invention has been described in association with the implant of a threaded spinal implant, it is recognized that other forms of implants may be used with the present method. For example, dowels, made from bone or artificial materials, knurled or irregularly shaped cylinders or spheres, or any other shaped implants that can be introduced through the outer sleeve may be used. Being able to perform the procedure through the outer sleeve permits the procedure to be performed safely and quickly, and more accurately.

Claims (7)

  1. 1. A distractor, comprising: a distraction head having a longitudinal axis and a first pair of opposed surfaces extending substantially along said longitudinal axis and defining a first working distraction height approximating a normal disc space height and a second pair of opposed surfaces extending substantially along said longitudinal axis and defining a second working distraction height approximating a second normal disc space height, said distraction head rotatable between said first distraction height and said second distraction height by rotating the distraction head about said longitudinal axis.
  2. 2. The distractor of claim 1, wherein said first pair of opposing surfaces are planar surfaces extending in a parallel alignment along said longitudinal axis.
  3. 3. The distractor of claim 2, wherein said distractor head includes:
    a distractor tip having a rounded leading edge to permit insertion of said distractor head to directly achieve said second working distraction height; and
    a pair of inclined surfaces extending from said leading edge to said first pair of opposing surfaces.
  4. 4. The distractor of claim 1, wherein said distractor head includes rounded surfaces adapted to engage and urge bone apart to said second distraction height during rotation.
  5. 5. The distractor of claim 1, further comprising a shaft joined with said distractor head.
  6. 6. The distractor of claim 5, wherein said shaft is integrally joined to said distractor head.
  7. 7. A distraction device for distracting the disc space between adjacent vertebrae, comprising:
    an elongated stem having a height corresponding to a desired height of distraction for the disc space, said stem having a first end and a second end defining a longitudinal axis therebetween and a length along said axis that is sized to be maintained within the disc space when said elongated stem is driven into the disc space; and
    a flange at said first end projecting outward from said longitudinal axis of said stem, said flange having a bone contacting face for contacting at least one of the vertebrae when said stem is driven into the disc space and for transmitting a reduction force to the vertebra upon application of an external force to the distraction device.
US12218856 1988-06-13 2008-07-18 Distractor for use in spinal surgery and method of use thereof Abandoned US20080287955A1 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08074781 US5484437A (en) 1988-06-13 1993-06-10 Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants
US08484927 US6096038A (en) 1988-06-13 1995-06-07 Apparatus for inserting spinal implants
US09626636 US7993347B1 (en) 1993-06-10 2000-07-27 Guard for use in performing human interbody spinal surgery
US10692545 US7264622B2 (en) 1993-06-10 2003-10-24 System for radial bone displacement
US11252082 US20060036247A1 (en) 1993-06-10 2005-10-17 Distractor for use in spinal surgery
US12218856 US20080287955A1 (en) 1993-06-10 2008-07-18 Distractor for use in spinal surgery and method of use thereof

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12218856 US20080287955A1 (en) 1993-06-10 2008-07-18 Distractor for use in spinal surgery and method of use thereof

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11252082 Division US20060036247A1 (en) 1988-06-13 2005-10-17 Distractor for use in spinal surgery

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080287955A1 true true US20080287955A1 (en) 2008-11-20

Family

ID=22121653

Family Applications (12)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08586950 Expired - Fee Related US6436098B1 (en) 1988-06-13 1996-01-16 Method for inserting spinal implants and for securing a guard to the spine
US09626636 Expired - Lifetime US7993347B1 (en) 1988-06-13 2000-07-27 Guard for use in performing human interbody spinal surgery
US10223916 Expired - Fee Related US7399303B2 (en) 1988-06-13 2002-08-20 Bone cutting device and method for use thereof
US10371476 Expired - Fee Related US6875213B2 (en) 1988-06-13 2003-02-21 Method of inserting spinal implants with the use of imaging
US10638023 Expired - Lifetime US7326214B2 (en) 1988-06-13 2003-08-09 Bone cutting device having a cutting edge with a non-extending center
US10664498 Abandoned US20040073217A1 (en) 1988-06-13 2003-09-19 Osteogenic packing device and method
US10692545 Expired - Fee Related US7264622B2 (en) 1988-06-13 2003-10-24 System for radial bone displacement
US11252082 Abandoned US20060036247A1 (en) 1988-06-13 2005-10-17 Distractor for use in spinal surgery
US11252048 Abandoned US20060058793A1 (en) 1988-06-13 2005-10-17 Distractor for use in spinal surgery
US11356868 Expired - Lifetime US7887565B2 (en) 1988-06-13 2006-02-18 Apparatus and method for sequential distraction
US12012437 Abandoned US20080255564A1 (en) 1988-06-13 2008-02-01 Bone cutting device
US12218856 Abandoned US20080287955A1 (en) 1988-06-13 2008-07-18 Distractor for use in spinal surgery and method of use thereof

Family Applications Before (11)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08586950 Expired - Fee Related US6436098B1 (en) 1988-06-13 1996-01-16 Method for inserting spinal implants and for securing a guard to the spine
US09626636 Expired - Lifetime US7993347B1 (en) 1988-06-13 2000-07-27 Guard for use in performing human interbody spinal surgery
US10223916 Expired - Fee Related US7399303B2 (en) 1988-06-13 2002-08-20 Bone cutting device and method for use thereof
US10371476 Expired - Fee Related US6875213B2 (en) 1988-06-13 2003-02-21 Method of inserting spinal implants with the use of imaging
US10638023 Expired - Lifetime US7326214B2 (en) 1988-06-13 2003-08-09 Bone cutting device having a cutting edge with a non-extending center
US10664498 Abandoned US20040073217A1 (en) 1988-06-13 2003-09-19 Osteogenic packing device and method
US10692545 Expired - Fee Related US7264622B2 (en) 1988-06-13 2003-10-24 System for radial bone displacement
US11252082 Abandoned US20060036247A1 (en) 1988-06-13 2005-10-17 Distractor for use in spinal surgery
US11252048 Abandoned US20060058793A1 (en) 1988-06-13 2005-10-17 Distractor for use in spinal surgery
US11356868 Expired - Lifetime US7887565B2 (en) 1988-06-13 2006-02-18 Apparatus and method for sequential distraction
US12012437 Abandoned US20080255564A1 (en) 1988-06-13 2008-02-01 Bone cutting device

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (12) US6436098B1 (en)
EP (3) EP1093760B1 (en)
JP (2) JP4000134B2 (en)
CA (3) CA2164859C (en)
DE (6) DE69433702D1 (en)
DK (3) DK0703757T3 (en)
ES (3) ES2206468T3 (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080255564A1 (en) * 1993-06-10 2008-10-16 Karlin Technology, Inc. Bone cutting device
US20100228350A1 (en) * 2009-03-04 2010-09-09 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal nucleus replacement implants
US7824431B2 (en) 2006-12-29 2010-11-02 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Cervical distraction method
US20110098705A1 (en) * 2009-10-23 2011-04-28 Chappuis James L Devices and Methods for Temporarily Retaining Spinal Rootlets within Dural Sac
US8267966B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2012-09-18 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Facet joint implants and delivery tools
US8361152B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2013-01-29 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Facet joint implants and delivery tools
US8512347B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2013-08-20 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Cervical distraction/implant delivery device
US8828082B2 (en) 2009-07-09 2014-09-09 R Tree Innovations, Llc Inter-body implant
US9005288B2 (en) 2008-01-09 2015-04-14 Providence Medical Techonlogy, Inc. Methods and apparatus for accessing and treating the facet joint
USD732667S1 (en) 2012-10-23 2015-06-23 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Cage spinal implant
USD745156S1 (en) 2012-10-23 2015-12-08 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Spinal implant
US9333086B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2016-05-10 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Spinal facet cage implant
US9381049B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2016-07-05 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Composite spinal facet implant with textured surfaces

Families Citing this family (270)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050027004A1 (en) * 1993-06-09 2005-02-03 Martek Biosciences Corporation Methods of treating senile dementia and Alzheimer's diseases using docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid compositions
US6206922B1 (en) * 1995-03-27 2001-03-27 Sdgi Holdings, Inc. Methods and instruments for interbody fusion
WO1998020939A3 (en) 1996-11-15 1998-09-03 Advanced Bio Surfaces Inc Biomaterial system for in situ tissue repair
DE19720241B4 (en) * 1997-05-15 2005-12-29 Eska Implants Gmbh & Co. Interbody fusion implant
US6440138B1 (en) * 1998-04-06 2002-08-27 Kyphon Inc. Structures and methods for creating cavities in interior body regions
US6428541B1 (en) * 1998-04-09 2002-08-06 Sdgi Holdings, Inc. Method and instrumentation for vertebral interbody fusion
US7776046B2 (en) 1998-04-09 2010-08-17 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Method and instrumentation for vertebral interbody fusion
US6371986B1 (en) * 1998-10-27 2002-04-16 George W. Bagby Spinal fusion device, bone joining implant, and vertebral fusion implant
EP1194088B1 (en) 1999-07-02 2008-03-12 Spine Solutions Inc. Intervertebral implant
US7052516B2 (en) 1999-10-20 2006-05-30 Anulex Technologies, Inc. Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and deformable spinal disc annulus stent
US7004970B2 (en) 1999-10-20 2006-02-28 Anulex Technologies, Inc. Methods and devices for spinal disc annulus reconstruction and repair
US6592625B2 (en) 1999-10-20 2003-07-15 Anulex Technologies, Inc. Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and spinal disc annulus stent
US7935147B2 (en) 1999-10-20 2011-05-03 Anulex Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for enhanced delivery of treatment device to the intervertebral disc annulus
US7951201B2 (en) 1999-10-20 2011-05-31 Anulex Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus
US8163022B2 (en) 2008-10-14 2012-04-24 Anulex Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus
US7615076B2 (en) 1999-10-20 2009-11-10 Anulex Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus
US8128698B2 (en) 1999-10-20 2012-03-06 Anulex Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus
US8632590B2 (en) 1999-10-20 2014-01-21 Anulex Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and methods for the treatment of the intervertebral disc
US6558390B2 (en) 2000-02-16 2003-05-06 Axiamed, Inc. Methods and apparatus for performing therapeutic procedures in the spine
US6575979B1 (en) * 2000-02-16 2003-06-10 Axiamed, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing posterior or anterior trans-sacral access to spinal vertebrae
US7641657B2 (en) 2003-06-10 2010-01-05 Trans1, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing posterior or anterior trans-sacral access to spinal vertebrae
US7727263B2 (en) 2000-02-16 2010-06-01 Trans1, Inc. Articulating spinal implant
US6740090B1 (en) 2000-02-16 2004-05-25 Trans1 Inc. Methods and apparatus for forming shaped axial bores through spinal vertebrae
ES2308014T5 (en) 2000-02-16 2012-03-16 Trans1, Inc. Apparatus for distraction and spinal fusion
JP4255234B2 (en) * 2000-02-22 2009-04-15 ウォーソー・オーソペディック・インコーポレーテッド Front insertion type bone graft and driver instrument
US6805695B2 (en) 2000-04-04 2004-10-19 Spinalabs, Llc Devices and methods for annular repair of intervertebral discs
US6676706B1 (en) * 2000-04-26 2004-01-13 Zimmer Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for performing a minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty
US6991656B2 (en) * 2000-04-26 2006-01-31 Dana Mears Method and apparatus for performing a minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty
US20050043810A1 (en) * 2000-04-26 2005-02-24 Dana Mears Method and apparatus for performing a minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty
USRE45639E1 (en) 2000-05-08 2015-08-04 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Medical installation tool
USRE43317E1 (en) 2000-05-08 2012-04-17 Depuy Spine, Inc. Medical installation tool
US6666891B2 (en) 2000-11-13 2003-12-23 Frank H. Boehm, Jr. Device and method for lumbar interbody fusion
US7713302B2 (en) 2001-10-01 2010-05-11 Spinecore, Inc. Intervertebral spacer device utilizing a spirally slotted belleville washer having radially spaced concentric grooves
US7771477B2 (en) 2001-10-01 2010-08-10 Spinecore, Inc. Intervertebral spacer device utilizing a belleville washer having radially spaced concentric grooves
US7169182B2 (en) * 2001-07-16 2007-01-30 Spinecore, Inc. Implanting an artificial intervertebral disc
US6673113B2 (en) 2001-10-18 2004-01-06 Spinecore, Inc. Intervertebral spacer device having arch shaped spring elements
US7485134B2 (en) * 2001-12-07 2009-02-03 Simonson Rush E Vertebral implants adapted for posterior insertion
US7211055B2 (en) 2002-01-15 2007-05-01 The Regents Of The University Of California System and method providing directional ultrasound therapy to skeletal joints
WO2003061756A3 (en) 2002-01-23 2003-10-16 Univ California Implantable thermal treatment method and apparatus
CA2702131A1 (en) * 2002-03-11 2003-09-25 Zimmer Spine, Inc. Instrumentation and procedure for implanting spinal implant devices
US20080027548A9 (en) 2002-04-12 2008-01-31 Ferree Bret A Spacerless artificial disc replacements
US8038713B2 (en) 2002-04-23 2011-10-18 Spinecore, Inc. Two-component artificial disc replacements
US8388684B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2013-03-05 Pioneer Signal Technology, Inc. Artificial disc device
US7001433B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2006-02-21 Pioneer Laboratories, Inc. Artificial intervertebral disc device
US6736821B2 (en) * 2002-06-18 2004-05-18 Sdgi Holdings, Inc. System and method of mating implants and vertebral bodies
JP4429909B2 (en) 2002-09-19 2010-03-10 ビリアーズ, マラン デ Intervertebral prosthesis
US7625378B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2009-12-01 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Devices and methods for securing a bone plate to a bony segment
WO2004043271A1 (en) * 2002-11-08 2004-05-27 Sdgi Holdings, Inc. Transpedicular intervertebral disk access methods and devices
US7828804B2 (en) * 2002-11-08 2010-11-09 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Transpedicular intervertebral disk access methods and devices
US7204852B2 (en) 2002-12-13 2007-04-17 Spine Solutions, Inc. Intervertebral implant, insertion tool and method of inserting same
GB0301085D0 (en) * 2003-01-17 2003-02-19 Krishna Manoj Articulating spinal disc prosthesis
EP1587437B1 (en) 2003-01-31 2013-02-27 Spinalmotion, Inc. Spinal midline indicator
JP4275699B2 (en) 2003-01-31 2009-06-10 スパイナルモーション, インコーポレイテッド Intervertebral prosthesis deployment instrument
WO2004080333A3 (en) * 2003-03-06 2005-04-14 Spinecore Inc Instrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US6908484B2 (en) * 2003-03-06 2005-06-21 Spinecore, Inc. Cervical disc replacement
US7648509B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2010-01-19 Ilion Medical Llc Sacroiliac joint immobilization
ES2545328T3 (en) 2003-03-14 2015-09-10 Depuy Spine, Inc. Hydraulic injection device in percutaneous vertebroplasty bone cement
US20040186483A1 (en) * 2003-03-22 2004-09-23 Bagby George W. Implant driver apparatus and bone joining device
WO2004084742A1 (en) * 2003-03-24 2004-10-07 Theken Surgical Llc Spinal implant adjustment device
US8066713B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2011-11-29 Depuy Spine, Inc. Remotely-activated vertebroplasty injection device
US7491204B2 (en) * 2003-04-28 2009-02-17 Spine Solutions, Inc. Instruments and method for preparing an intervertebral space for receiving an artificial disc implant
US10052211B2 (en) 2003-05-27 2018-08-21 Simplify Medical Pty Ltd. Prosthetic disc for intervertebral insertion
WO2004105638A3 (en) 2003-05-27 2005-01-13 Spinalmotion Inc Prosthetic disc for intervertebral insertion
WO2004107955A3 (en) * 2003-05-30 2008-01-17 Frank Nguyen Methods and devices for transpedicular discectomy
US9918767B2 (en) * 2005-08-01 2018-03-20 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Temperature control system
US9381024B2 (en) 2005-07-31 2016-07-05 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Marked tools
US8415407B2 (en) 2004-03-21 2013-04-09 Depuy Spine, Inc. Methods, materials, and apparatus for treating bone and other tissue
US7803162B2 (en) * 2003-07-21 2010-09-28 Spine Solutions, Inc. Instruments and method for inserting an intervertebral implant
FR2858546B1 (en) * 2003-08-04 2006-04-28 Spine Next Sa Prothese of intervertebral disc
WO2005041793A3 (en) 2003-10-23 2005-11-10 Steven D Ainsworth Spinal mobility preservation apparatus and method
EP1691848B1 (en) 2003-10-23 2012-08-22 TRANS1, Inc. Tools and tool kits for performing minimally invasive procedures on the spine
US7520899B2 (en) * 2003-11-05 2009-04-21 Kyphon Sarl Laterally insertable artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with crossbar spacer
US7691146B2 (en) 2003-11-21 2010-04-06 Kyphon Sarl Method of laterally inserting an artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with curved spacer
ES2350584T3 (en) * 2004-02-09 2011-01-25 Depuy Spine, Inc. Spinal surgery systems.
US8360629B2 (en) 2005-11-22 2013-01-29 Depuy Spine, Inc. Mixing apparatus having central and planetary mixing elements
US7963981B2 (en) * 2004-04-19 2011-06-21 Globus Medical, Inc. Bone fixation plate
US8236034B2 (en) 2004-04-19 2012-08-07 Globus Medical, Inc. Bone fixation plate
US7553317B2 (en) * 2004-05-07 2009-06-30 Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. Instrument for effecting anastomosis of respective tissues defining two body lumens
US7033363B2 (en) 2004-05-19 2006-04-25 Sean Powell Snap-lock for drill sleeve
DE102004028429B3 (en) * 2004-06-03 2005-11-03 Karl Storz Gmbh & Co. Kg Device for punching out tissue areas of bone
FR2871366A1 (en) 2004-06-09 2005-12-16 Ceravic Soc Par Actions Simpli expandable prosthetic bone implant
CN101065080A (en) 2004-07-30 2007-10-31 光碟-O-特克医学科技有限公司 Methods, materials and apparatus for treating bone and other tissue
US7625380B2 (en) 2004-07-21 2009-12-01 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Dual distractor inserter
US7172628B2 (en) 2004-07-27 2007-02-06 Lonnie Jay Lamprich Spinal disc prosthesis and methods
US7862617B2 (en) 2004-07-27 2011-01-04 Lamprich Medical, Llc Spinal disc prosthesis apparatus and placement method
US7575599B2 (en) 2004-07-30 2009-08-18 Spinalmotion, Inc. Intervertebral prosthetic disc with metallic core
US20070299525A1 (en) * 2004-08-05 2007-12-27 Biomedica S.R.L. Bone Spacer
US7585326B2 (en) 2004-08-06 2009-09-08 Spinalmotion, Inc. Methods and apparatus for intervertebral disc prosthesis insertion
US8414648B2 (en) 2004-08-09 2013-04-09 Si-Bone Inc. Apparatus, systems, and methods for achieving trans-iliac lumbar fusion
US20070156241A1 (en) 2004-08-09 2007-07-05 Reiley Mark A Systems and methods for the fixation or fusion of bone
US9949843B2 (en) 2004-08-09 2018-04-24 Si-Bone Inc. Apparatus, systems, and methods for the fixation or fusion of bone
US8470004B2 (en) 2004-08-09 2013-06-25 Si-Bone Inc. Apparatus, systems, and methods for stabilizing a spondylolisthesis
US8986348B2 (en) 2004-08-09 2015-03-24 Si-Bone Inc. Systems and methods for the fusion of the sacral-iliac joint
US8425570B2 (en) 2004-08-09 2013-04-23 Si-Bone Inc. Apparatus, systems, and methods for achieving anterior lumbar interbody fusion
US20060036251A1 (en) 2004-08-09 2006-02-16 Reiley Mark A Systems and methods for the fixation or fusion of bone
US8444693B2 (en) * 2004-08-09 2013-05-21 Si-Bone Inc. Apparatus, systems, and methods for achieving lumbar facet fusion
US9662158B2 (en) 2004-08-09 2017-05-30 Si-Bone Inc. Systems and methods for the fixation or fusion of bone at or near a sacroiliac joint
US20060036261A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2006-02-16 Stryker Spine Insertion guide for a spinal implant
US20060054171A1 (en) * 2004-09-15 2006-03-16 Bruce Dall Method and apparatus of approaching a joint
WO2006034436A3 (en) 2004-09-21 2006-10-19 Stout Medical Group Lp Expandable support device and method of use
US7666189B2 (en) * 2004-09-29 2010-02-23 Synthes Usa, Llc Less invasive surgical system and methods
US20060085076A1 (en) * 2004-10-15 2006-04-20 Manoj Krishna Posterior spinal arthroplasty-development of a new posteriorly inserted artificial disc and an artificial facet joint
US20060265074A1 (en) * 2004-10-21 2006-11-23 Manoj Krishna Posterior spinal arthroplasty-development of a new posteriorly inserted artificial disc, a new anteriorly inserted artifical disc and an artificial facet joint
US20060111779A1 (en) * 2004-11-22 2006-05-25 Orthopedic Development Corporation, A Florida Corporation Minimally invasive facet joint fusion
US8021392B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2011-09-20 Minsurg International, Inc. Methods and surgical kits for minimally-invasive facet joint fusion
US7887589B2 (en) 2004-11-23 2011-02-15 Glenn Bradley J Minimally invasive spinal disc stabilizer and insertion tool
WO2006066228A3 (en) * 2004-12-16 2006-08-24 Dennis Colleran Expandable implants for spinal disc replacement
US7736380B2 (en) 2004-12-21 2010-06-15 Rhausler, Inc. Cervical plate system
US8083797B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2011-12-27 Spinalmotion, Inc. Intervertebral prosthetic disc with shock absorption
US20060235520A1 (en) * 2005-04-19 2006-10-19 Pannu Yashdip S Spinal implant apparatus, method and system
US20060253198A1 (en) * 2005-05-03 2006-11-09 Disc Dynamics, Inc. Multi-lumen mold for intervertebral prosthesis and method of using same
US20060253199A1 (en) * 2005-05-03 2006-11-09 Disc Dynamics, Inc. Lordosis creating nucleus replacement method and apparatus
US20060264932A1 (en) * 2005-05-06 2006-11-23 Bert Jeffrey K Attachment to bone
US8152809B1 (en) * 2005-06-15 2012-04-10 Vanderbilt University Flat cut bit for cranial perforator
US8864829B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2014-10-21 Theken Spine, Llc Spinal cage having deployable member
US20070010815A1 (en) * 2005-06-30 2007-01-11 Sdgi Holdings, Inc. Fixation systems with modulated stiffness
WO2007009107A3 (en) 2005-07-14 2008-08-07 Scott E Greenhalgh Expandable support device and method of use
US20070050028A1 (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-03-01 Conner E S Spinal implants and methods of providing dynamic stability to the spine
US20070244562A1 (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-10-18 Magellan Spine Technologies, Inc. Spinal implants and methods of providing dynamic stability to the spine
US8998923B2 (en) 2005-08-31 2015-04-07 Spinealign Medical, Inc. Threaded bone filling material plunger
US20070067034A1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2007-03-22 Chirico Paul E Implantable devices and methods for treating micro-architecture deterioration of bone tissue
US7533672B2 (en) * 2005-09-06 2009-05-19 Synthes Usa, Llc Methods and apparatus for vascular protection in spinal surgery
US8105331B2 (en) * 2005-10-03 2012-01-31 Globus Medical, Inc. Spinal surgery distractor with an integrated retractor
US20070106316A1 (en) * 2005-10-10 2007-05-10 University Of South Florida Dural Knife with Foot Plate
US20070123904A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-31 Depuy Spine, Inc. Distraction instrument and method for distracting an intervertebral site
US7867237B2 (en) * 2005-10-31 2011-01-11 Depuy Spine, Inc. Arthroplasty revision device and method
US7988695B2 (en) 2005-12-21 2011-08-02 Theken Spine, Llc Articulated delivery instrument
US8377072B2 (en) 2006-02-06 2013-02-19 Depuy Spine, Inc. Medical device installation tool
US7842072B2 (en) * 2006-03-16 2010-11-30 Zimmer Spine, Inc. Spinal fixation device with variable stiffness
US7976549B2 (en) 2006-03-23 2011-07-12 Theken Spine, Llc Instruments for delivering spinal implants
US8221423B2 (en) * 2006-03-28 2012-07-17 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Osteochondral plug graft harvesting instrument and kit
KR20090007418A (en) 2006-04-12 2009-01-16 스피날모우션, 인코포레이티드 Posterior spinal device and method
WO2007120903A3 (en) * 2006-04-14 2008-08-21 Blackstone Medical Inc Percutaneous facet fusion system and method
US8672889B2 (en) * 2006-05-05 2014-03-18 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Soft tissue tunneling device
US8092536B2 (en) * 2006-05-24 2012-01-10 Disc Dynamics, Inc. Retention structure for in situ formation of an intervertebral prosthesis
US20070276491A1 (en) * 2006-05-24 2007-11-29 Disc Dynamics, Inc. Mold assembly for intervertebral prosthesis
US8303601B2 (en) 2006-06-07 2012-11-06 Stryker Spine Collet-activated distraction wedge inserter
US8858600B2 (en) * 2006-06-08 2014-10-14 Spinadyne, Inc. Dynamic spinal stabilization device
US20070288009A1 (en) * 2006-06-08 2007-12-13 Steven Brown Dynamic spinal stabilization device
US7905906B2 (en) * 2006-06-08 2011-03-15 Disc Motion Technologies, Inc. System and method for lumbar arthroplasty
WO2008001385A3 (en) * 2006-06-29 2009-04-30 Mordechay Beyar Integrated bone biopsy and therapy apparatus
EP2043563A4 (en) 2006-07-24 2013-03-27 Spine Solutions Inc Intervertebral implant with keel
US7992878B2 (en) * 2006-07-31 2011-08-09 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc Helical lead for a drive shaft collet
CA2659024A1 (en) 2006-07-31 2008-02-07 Synthes (Usa) Drilling/milling guide and keel cut preparation system
US8506636B2 (en) 2006-09-08 2013-08-13 Theken Spine, Llc Offset radius lordosis
CA2663447A1 (en) 2006-09-14 2008-03-20 Depuy Spine, Inc. Polymeric bone cement and methods of use thereof
US8715350B2 (en) 2006-09-15 2014-05-06 Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. Systems and methods for securing an implant in intervertebral space
WO2008034135A3 (en) 2006-09-15 2008-07-24 Pioneer Surgical Tech Inc Joint arthroplasty devices having articulating members
US20080077150A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-03-27 Linh Nguyen Steerable rasp/trial member inserter and method of use
US20080161817A1 (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-07-03 Depuy Spine, Inc. Intervertebral distraction device
EP2091818B1 (en) * 2006-10-19 2016-06-08 DePuy Spine, Inc. Fluid delivery system and related method
US8480675B2 (en) * 2007-03-07 2013-07-09 Vertech, Inc. Betts osteotome
US8480715B2 (en) 2007-05-22 2013-07-09 Zimmer Spine, Inc. Spinal implant system and method
US8162981B2 (en) * 2007-05-22 2012-04-24 Vg Innovations, Llc Method and apparatus for spinal facet fusion
US8545562B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2013-10-01 Theken Spine, Llc Deployable member for use with an intervertebral cage
US8292958B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2012-10-23 Theken Spine, Llc Spinal cage having deployable member
US8142508B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2012-03-27 Theken Spine, Llc Spinal cage having deployable member which is removable
US20090024174A1 (en) 2007-07-17 2009-01-22 Stark John G Bone screws and particular applications to sacroiliac joint fusion
CA2694734A1 (en) 2007-07-27 2009-02-05 R Tree Innovations, Llc Inter-body implantation system and method
US7867263B2 (en) * 2007-08-07 2011-01-11 Transcorp, Inc. Implantable bone plate system and related method for spinal repair
WO2009021144A3 (en) * 2007-08-07 2009-04-23 David Lowry Device for variably adjusting intervertebral distraction and lordosis
US8709054B2 (en) * 2007-08-07 2014-04-29 Transcorp, Inc. Implantable vertebral frame systems and related methods for spinal repair
US20090043391A1 (en) 2007-08-09 2009-02-12 Spinalmotion, Inc. Customized Intervertebral Prosthetic Disc with Shock Absorption
US8808380B2 (en) * 2007-08-27 2014-08-19 William Casey Fox Method and apparatus for an osteotomy fixation or arthrodesis cage
US8974496B2 (en) 2007-08-30 2015-03-10 Jeffrey Chun Wang Interspinous implant, tools and methods of implanting
US20090076516A1 (en) * 2007-09-13 2009-03-19 David Lowry Device and method for tissue retraction in spinal surgery
WO2009036367A1 (en) * 2007-09-13 2009-03-19 Transcorp, Inc. Transcorporeal spinal decompression and repair system and related method
US8430882B2 (en) 2007-09-13 2013-04-30 Transcorp, Inc. Transcorporeal spinal decompression and repair systems and related methods
US20090076614A1 (en) * 2007-09-17 2009-03-19 Spinalmotion, Inc. Intervertebral Prosthetic Disc with Shock Absorption Core
WO2009045912A3 (en) * 2007-09-28 2010-09-16 Transcorp, Inc. Vertebrally-mounted tissue retractor and method for use in spinal surgery
US8758441B2 (en) 2007-10-22 2014-06-24 Spinalmotion, Inc. Vertebral body replacement and method for spanning a space formed upon removal of a vertebral body
US8267997B2 (en) 2007-11-12 2012-09-18 Theken Spine, Llc Vertebral interbody compression implant
US20090138084A1 (en) * 2007-11-19 2009-05-28 Magellan Spine Technologies, Inc. Spinal implants and methods
WO2009070607A1 (en) 2007-11-27 2009-06-04 Transcorp, Inc. Methods and systems for repairing an intervertebral disc using a transcorporal approach
EP2231035A1 (en) 2007-12-21 2010-09-29 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Multiple portal guide
US9826992B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2017-11-28 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Multiple portal guide
CA2711028C (en) 2007-12-28 2015-10-06 Synthes Usa, Llc A tack or drive screw for securing a prosthesis to bone and associated instrumentation and method
WO2009091811A1 (en) 2008-01-14 2009-07-23 Brenzel Michael P Apparatus and methods for fracture repair
US8088163B1 (en) 2008-02-06 2012-01-03 Kleiner Jeffrey B Tools and methods for spinal fusion
US9247943B1 (en) 2009-02-06 2016-02-02 Kleiner Intellectual Property, Llc Devices and methods for preparing an intervertebral workspace
USD656610S1 (en) 2009-02-06 2012-03-27 Kleiner Jeffrey B Spinal distraction instrument
US8740912B2 (en) 2008-02-27 2014-06-03 Ilion Medical Llc Tools for performing less invasive orthopedic joint procedures
US8764833B2 (en) 2008-03-11 2014-07-01 Spinalmotion, Inc. Artificial intervertebral disc with lower height
US8202299B2 (en) 2008-03-19 2012-06-19 Collabcom II, LLC Interspinous implant, tools and methods of implanting
US8333804B1 (en) 2008-03-27 2012-12-18 Spinelogik, Inc. Intervertebral fusion device and method of use
US8313528B1 (en) 2008-03-27 2012-11-20 Spinelogik, Inc. Intervertebral fusion device and method of use
WO2009125242A1 (en) 2008-04-08 2009-10-15 Vexim Apparatus for restoration of the spine and methods of use thereof
WO2009125243A1 (en) * 2008-04-08 2009-10-15 Vexim Guide sleeve for accessing a vertebral body and related methods of use
US9034038B2 (en) 2008-04-11 2015-05-19 Spinalmotion, Inc. Motion limiting insert for an artificial intervertebral disc
US9220603B2 (en) 2008-07-02 2015-12-29 Simplify Medical, Inc. Limited motion prosthetic intervertebral disc
WO2010009151A3 (en) 2008-07-17 2010-05-06 Spinalmotion, Inc. Artificial intervertebral disc placement system
EP2299941A1 (en) 2008-07-18 2011-03-30 Spinalmotion Inc. Posterior prosthetic intervertebral disc
US8337498B2 (en) * 2008-08-13 2012-12-25 Rasmussen G Lynn Systems and methods for providing a bone milling device
US8808294B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2014-08-19 William Casey Fox Method and apparatus for a multiple transition temperature implant
US8545566B2 (en) 2008-10-13 2013-10-01 Globus Medical, Inc. Articulating spacer
US8147554B2 (en) 2008-10-13 2012-04-03 Globus Medical, Inc. Intervertebral spacer
US8425573B2 (en) * 2008-10-24 2013-04-23 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Method and system for attaching a plate to a bone
US9717403B2 (en) 2008-12-05 2017-08-01 Jeffrey B. Kleiner Method and apparatus for performing retro peritoneal dissection
US8366748B2 (en) 2008-12-05 2013-02-05 Kleiner Jeffrey Apparatus and method of spinal implant and fusion
US8425603B2 (en) * 2008-12-22 2013-04-23 Synthes Usa, Llc Orthopedic implant with flexible keel
US9480511B2 (en) 2009-12-17 2016-11-01 Engage Medical Holdings, Llc Blade fixation for ankle fusion and arthroplasty
US20100262245A1 (en) * 2009-02-18 2010-10-14 Alfaro Arthur A Intervertebral spacer
US20110196208A1 (en) * 2009-03-06 2011-08-11 Lanx, Inc. Asymetrical surgical retractor
US20100228095A1 (en) * 2009-03-06 2010-09-09 Lanx, Inc. Surgical retractor
ES2659719T3 (en) 2009-03-12 2018-03-19 Vexim Apparatus for bone restoration of the spine
WO2010129697A1 (en) 2009-05-06 2010-11-11 Thibodeau Lee L Expandable spinal implant apparatus and method of use
US20110040331A1 (en) * 2009-05-20 2011-02-17 Jose Fernandez Posterior stabilizer
US8234023B2 (en) * 2009-06-12 2012-07-31 General Electric Company System and method for regulating speed, power or position of a powered vehicle
US8906028B2 (en) 2009-09-18 2014-12-09 Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc Bone graft delivery device and method of using the same
US9629729B2 (en) 2009-09-18 2017-04-25 Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc Biological delivery system with adaptable fusion cage interface
US9173694B2 (en) 2009-09-18 2015-11-03 Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system
US9186193B2 (en) 2009-09-18 2015-11-17 Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system
EP2618753B1 (en) 2010-09-20 2018-05-30 Jeffrey Kleiner Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system
US8685031B2 (en) 2009-09-18 2014-04-01 Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc Bone graft delivery system
US9060877B2 (en) 2009-09-18 2015-06-23 Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc Fusion cage with combined biological delivery system
CA2775602A1 (en) 2009-10-15 2011-04-21 Synthes Usa, Llc Protection sleeve retention device
US10098674B2 (en) 2009-10-22 2018-10-16 Nuvasive, Inc. System and method for posterior cervical fusion
WO2011050140A1 (en) 2009-10-22 2011-04-28 Blue Fury Consulting, L.L.C. Posterior cervical fusion system and techniques
US9028553B2 (en) 2009-11-05 2015-05-12 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Self-pivoting spinal implant and associated instrumentation
US8652153B2 (en) 2010-01-11 2014-02-18 Anulex Technologies, Inc. Intervertebral disc annulus repair system and bone anchor delivery tool
US20110178520A1 (en) 2010-01-15 2011-07-21 Kyle Taylor Rotary-rigid orthopaedic rod
CA2823873A1 (en) 2010-01-20 2011-07-28 Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. Apparatus and methods for bone access and cavity preparation
US9427324B1 (en) 2010-02-22 2016-08-30 Spinelogik, Inc. Intervertebral fusion device and method of use
JP2013521880A (en) 2010-03-08 2013-06-13 コンベンタス オーソピディックス, インコーポレイテッド Apparatus and method for securing a bone implant
US8926665B2 (en) * 2010-03-18 2015-01-06 Facsecure, Llc Cortical, anti-migration, facet dowel for fusion of facet joints in the spine and devices for setting the same in place
US8864654B2 (en) 2010-04-20 2014-10-21 Jeffrey B. Kleiner Method and apparatus for performing retro peritoneal dissection
US8535380B2 (en) 2010-05-13 2013-09-17 Stout Medical Group, L.P. Fixation device and method
US8425569B2 (en) 2010-05-19 2013-04-23 Transcorp, Inc. Implantable vertebral frame systems and related methods for spinal repair
FR2960764B1 (en) * 2010-06-04 2012-06-08 Spineart Sa Instruments for minimally invasive spinal surgery and their applications
US8726907B2 (en) 2010-06-07 2014-05-20 Eric Strauch Surgical drape with separable elements
WO2017066518A1 (en) 2010-06-29 2017-04-20 Mighty Oak Medical, Inc. Patient-matched apparatus and methods for performing surgical procedures
US8827902B2 (en) 2010-08-16 2014-09-09 Donald David DIETZE, Jr. Surgical instrument system and method for providing retraction and vertebral distraction
EP2608747A4 (en) 2010-08-24 2015-02-11 Flexmedex Llc Support device and method for use
CN103429178A (en) 2010-09-27 2013-12-04 史密夫和内修有限公司 Device and methods for use during arthroscopic surgery
US8409257B2 (en) 2010-11-10 2013-04-02 Warsaw Othopedic, Inc. Systems and methods for facet joint stabilization
US9149286B1 (en) 2010-11-12 2015-10-06 Flexmedex, LLC Guidance tool and method for use
US9925051B2 (en) 2010-12-16 2018-03-27 Engage Medical Holdings, Llc Arthroplasty systems and methods
US8845638B2 (en) 2011-05-12 2014-09-30 Nlt Spine Ltd. Tissue disruption device and corresponding methods
US9295501B2 (en) * 2011-08-02 2016-03-29 Blackstone Medical, Inc. Bayonet counter-torque wrench
US9119639B2 (en) 2011-08-09 2015-09-01 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Articulated cavity creator
EP2747682A4 (en) 2011-08-23 2015-01-21 Flexmedex Llc Tissue removal device and method
US8790352B2 (en) * 2011-10-03 2014-07-29 Smith & Nephew, Inc. Ovoid tunnel guide and method of ACL reconstruction
US9254130B2 (en) 2011-11-01 2016-02-09 Hyun Bae Blade anchor systems for bone fusion
US9198769B2 (en) 2011-12-23 2015-12-01 Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. Bone anchor assembly, bone plate system, and method
WO2013106726A1 (en) 2012-01-12 2013-07-18 Wyatt Drake Geist Access assembly for anterior and lateral spinal procedures
EP2822490A4 (en) 2012-03-09 2016-03-02 Si Bone Inc Integrated implant
US8778026B2 (en) 2012-03-09 2014-07-15 Si-Bone Inc. Artificial SI joint
US9572589B2 (en) 2012-07-10 2017-02-21 Stryker European Holdings I, Llc Drill guide
US9011450B2 (en) 2012-08-08 2015-04-21 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Surgical instrument
EP2919718A4 (en) 2012-11-16 2016-09-07 Lanx Inc Oblique expanding fusion cage device and method
US10022245B2 (en) 2012-12-17 2018-07-17 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Polyaxial articulating instrument
US9737294B2 (en) 2013-01-28 2017-08-22 Cartiva, Inc. Method and system for orthopedic repair
US9439693B2 (en) 2013-02-01 2016-09-13 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Steerable needle assembly for use in vertebral body augmentation
WO2014159225A3 (en) 2013-03-14 2014-11-27 Baxano Surgical, Inc. Spinal implants and implantation system
US9119732B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-09-01 Orthocision, Inc. Method and implant system for sacroiliac joint fixation and fusion
WO2014144696A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Lanx, Inc. Expandable fusion cage system
WO2014145902A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Si-Bone Inc. Implants for spinal fixation or fusion
US9675303B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2017-06-13 Vertiflex, Inc. Visualization systems, instruments and methods of using the same in spinal decompression procedures
USD723682S1 (en) 2013-05-03 2015-03-03 Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc Bone graft delivery tool
US9526529B2 (en) 2013-09-25 2016-12-27 Blackstone Medical, Inc. Bone screw systems with pressure caps having biasing members
US9839448B2 (en) 2013-10-15 2017-12-12 Si-Bone Inc. Implant placement
US9480501B2 (en) 2013-10-21 2016-11-01 Blackstone Medical, Inc. Modular pedicle screw
US9980758B2 (en) 2013-11-27 2018-05-29 Blackstone Medical, Inc. Minimally invasive counter-torque wrench system
US10045803B2 (en) 2014-07-03 2018-08-14 Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research Sacroiliac joint fusion screw and method
US10045768B2 (en) 2014-07-06 2018-08-14 Javier Garcia-Bengochea Methods and devices for surgical access
US9662157B2 (en) 2014-09-18 2017-05-30 Si-Bone Inc. Matrix implant
USD750249S1 (en) 2014-10-20 2016-02-23 Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc Expandable fusion cage
US10058350B2 (en) 2015-09-24 2018-08-28 Integrity Implants, Inc. Access assembly for anterior and lateral spinal procedures
USD797290S1 (en) 2015-10-19 2017-09-12 Spinal Surgical Strategies, Llc Bone graft delivery tool
US20170303938A1 (en) 2016-04-25 2017-10-26 Imds Llc Joint fusion instrumentation and methods

Citations (97)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US62123A (en) * 1867-02-19 Improved drift
US493730A (en) * 1893-03-21 Trephine
US1137585A (en) * 1915-02-05 1915-04-27 Thornton Craig Jr Dental appliance.
US2243718A (en) * 1938-11-05 1941-05-27 Moreira Francisco Elias Godoy Surgical drill
US2372622A (en) * 1943-01-28 1945-03-27 Courtaulds Ltd Manufacture and production of artificial threads, filaments, and the like
US2537070A (en) * 1948-12-27 1951-01-09 Puy Mfg Company Inc De Surgical appliance and method for fixation of bone fragments
US2543780A (en) * 1946-12-09 1951-03-06 Herbert E Hipps Bone graft apparatus
US2677369A (en) * 1952-03-26 1954-05-04 Fred L Knowles Apparatus for treatment of the spinal column
US2789558A (en) * 1953-09-17 1957-04-23 Leslie V Rush Medullary in driver and extractor
US2832343A (en) * 1955-04-12 1958-04-29 Mose Clara Emilie Marie Dilators
US2878809A (en) * 1958-01-23 1959-03-24 Richards Mfg Company Surgical drill attachment
US3128768A (en) * 1961-11-24 1964-04-14 Rosemount Eng Co Ltd Surgical drill
US3298372A (en) * 1963-12-17 1967-01-17 Feinberg Maurice Surgical hydrocephalus shunt sleeve for placement in a vertebra
US3426364A (en) * 1966-08-25 1969-02-11 Colorado State Univ Research F Prosthetic appliance for replacing one or more natural vertebrae
US3709219A (en) * 1970-11-27 1973-01-09 W Halloran Bone compression device
US3719186A (en) * 1971-04-22 1973-03-06 Univ Alabama In Birmingham Surgical instrument for placement of bone pins and holes therefor
US3720959A (en) * 1970-08-26 1973-03-20 G Hahn Mandibular prosthetic apparatus
US3867932A (en) * 1974-01-18 1975-02-25 Donald R Huene Assembly for inserting rigid shafts into fractured bones
US3867950A (en) * 1971-06-18 1975-02-25 Univ Johns Hopkins Fixed rate rechargeable cardiac pacemaker
US3867728A (en) * 1971-12-30 1975-02-25 Cutter Lab Prosthesis for spinal repair
US3875595A (en) * 1974-04-15 1975-04-08 Edward C Froning Intervertebral disc prosthesis and instruments for locating same
US3942535A (en) * 1973-09-27 1976-03-09 G. D. Searle & Co. Rechargeable tissue stimulating system
US3948262A (en) * 1969-04-01 1976-04-06 Alza Corporation Novel drug delivery device
US3952334A (en) * 1974-11-29 1976-04-27 General Atomic Company Biocompatible carbon prosthetic devices
US4016651A (en) * 1974-09-25 1977-04-12 Kyoto Ceramic Co., Ltd. Device for implanting an artificial endosseous element of ceramics and an implant method for use of the device
US4070514A (en) * 1973-06-05 1978-01-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Method of fabricating graphite for use as a skeletal prosthesis and product thereof
US4082097A (en) * 1976-05-20 1978-04-04 Pacesetter Systems Inc. Multimode recharging system for living tissue stimulators
US4086701A (en) * 1975-04-07 1978-05-02 Kyoto Ceramic Kabushiki Kaisha Device for implanting an artificial endosseous element of ceramics and an implant method for use of the same
US4142517A (en) * 1976-07-23 1979-03-06 Contreras Guerrero De Stavropo Apparatus for extracting bone marrow specimens
US4181457A (en) * 1978-02-10 1980-01-01 Holmes Horace D Tapping tool for making vibration resistant prevailing torque fastener
US4197850A (en) * 1978-11-03 1980-04-15 Pacesetter Systems, Inc. Implantable human tissue stimulator with memory protect means
US4258716A (en) * 1978-02-06 1981-03-31 The University Of Melbourne Microsurgical instruments
US4259072A (en) * 1977-04-04 1981-03-31 Kyoto Ceramic Co., Ltd. Ceramic endosseous implant
US4262369A (en) * 1978-06-21 1981-04-21 Christiane Roux Artificial joints, in particular coxo-femoral joints
US4309777A (en) * 1980-11-13 1982-01-12 Patil Arun A Artificial intervertebral disc
US4328593A (en) * 1979-12-22 1982-05-11 Institut Straumann Ag Universal joint prosthesis with cap
US4423721A (en) * 1978-09-04 1984-01-03 Schwarzkopf Development Corporation Device for insertion and extraction of medullary nails
US4439152A (en) * 1982-03-04 1984-03-27 Small Irwin A Method of jawbone abutment implant for dental prostheses and implant device
US4450834A (en) * 1979-10-18 1984-05-29 Ace Orthopedic Manufacturing, Inc. External fixation device
US4492226A (en) * 1979-10-10 1985-01-08 Vsesojuzny Nauchno-Issledovatelsky I Ispytatelny Institut Meditsinskoi Tekhniki Device for uniting bone fragments
US4497320A (en) * 1983-02-14 1985-02-05 Rudolph Beaver, Inc. Surgical blade unit
US4501269A (en) * 1981-12-11 1985-02-26 Washington State University Research Foundation, Inc. Process for fusing bone joints
US4507115A (en) * 1981-04-01 1985-03-26 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Medical capsule device
US4566466A (en) * 1984-04-16 1986-01-28 Ripple Dale B Surgical instrument
US4570624A (en) * 1983-08-10 1986-02-18 Henry Ford Hospital Universal guide for inserting parallel pins
US4570623A (en) * 1983-06-02 1986-02-18 Pfizer Hospital Products Group Inc. Arched bridge staple
US4634720A (en) * 1985-02-19 1987-01-06 The Dow Chemical Company Process for the preparation of hard tissue prosthetics
US4636526A (en) * 1985-02-19 1987-01-13 The Dow Chemical Company Composites of unsintered calcium phosphates and synthetic biodegradable polymers useful as hard tissue prosthetics
US4636217A (en) * 1985-04-23 1987-01-13 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Anterior spinal implant
US4645503A (en) * 1985-08-27 1987-02-24 Orthomatrix Inc. Moldable bone-implant material
US4653509A (en) * 1985-07-03 1987-03-31 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Guided trephine samples for skeletal bone studies
US4653486A (en) * 1984-04-12 1987-03-31 Coker Tom P Fastener, particularly suited for orthopedic use
US4655777A (en) * 1983-12-19 1987-04-07 Southern Research Institute Method of producing biodegradable prosthesis and products therefrom
US4661536A (en) * 1985-02-19 1987-04-28 The Dow Chemical Company Process for the preparation of hard tissue prosthetics
US4664567A (en) * 1986-02-06 1987-05-12 Bijur Lubricating Corp. Drill bit
US4665920A (en) * 1984-11-28 1987-05-19 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Skeletal tissue stimulator and a low voltage oscillator circuit for use therein
US4721103A (en) * 1985-01-31 1988-01-26 Yosef Freedland Orthopedic device
US4733995A (en) * 1985-09-13 1988-03-29 Stellram S.A. Milling cutter for machining T-shaped grooves
US4736738A (en) * 1984-07-09 1988-04-12 Matej Lipovsek Instrument kit and procedure for performing posterior lumbar interbody fusion
US4743256A (en) * 1985-10-04 1988-05-10 Brantigan John W Surgical prosthetic implant facilitating vertebral interbody fusion and method
US4743260A (en) * 1985-06-10 1988-05-10 Burton Charles V Method for a flexible stabilization system for a vertebral column
US4805602A (en) * 1986-11-03 1989-02-21 Danninger Medical Technology Transpedicular screw and rod system
US4820305A (en) * 1986-11-03 1989-04-11 Harms Juergen Place holder, in particular for a vertebra body
US4830000A (en) * 1987-12-31 1989-05-16 Aspen Laboratories, Inc. Surgical drill
US4834757A (en) * 1987-01-22 1989-05-30 Brantigan John W Prosthetic implant
US4904260A (en) * 1987-08-20 1990-02-27 Cedar Surgical, Inc. Prosthetic disc containing therapeutic material
US4903882A (en) * 1986-03-10 1990-02-27 Long Gregory T Driving tool for an electrical staple
US4904261A (en) * 1987-08-06 1990-02-27 A. W. Showell (Surgicraft) Limited Spinal implants
US4911718A (en) * 1988-06-10 1990-03-27 University Of Medicine & Dentistry Of N.J. Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer
US4913143A (en) * 1986-05-28 1990-04-03 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Trephine assembly
US4913144A (en) * 1988-08-03 1990-04-03 D.A.O. S.R.L. Adjustable staple
US4987904A (en) * 1990-03-22 1991-01-29 Wilson James T Method and apparatus for bone size gauging
US4997434A (en) * 1983-02-16 1991-03-05 Seedhom Bahaa B Prosthetic ligaments and instruments for use in the surgical replacement of ligaments
US5015247A (en) * 1988-06-13 1991-05-14 Michelson Gary K Threaded spinal implant
US5015255A (en) * 1989-05-10 1991-05-14 Spine-Tech, Inc. Spinal stabilization method
US5084050A (en) * 1984-12-14 1992-01-28 Klaus Draenert Implant for bone reinforcement and for anchoring bone screws, implants and implant parts
US5102414A (en) * 1988-12-10 1992-04-07 Imz Fertigungs-Und Vertriebsgesellschaft Fur Dentale Technologie Mbh Implantable fixing device for extraoral applications
US5105819A (en) * 1988-09-01 1992-04-21 Kon-Tron Elektronik AG Ultrasound endoscope device
US5108395A (en) * 1989-09-18 1992-04-28 Societe De Fabrication De Materiel Orthopedique - Sofamor Implant for anterior dorsolumbar spinal osteosynthesis, intended for the correction of kyphoses
US5112336A (en) * 1991-05-14 1992-05-12 Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. Drill guide and template for prosthetic devices
US5183471A (en) * 1992-01-24 1993-02-02 Wilk Peter J Laparoscopic cannula
US5192327A (en) * 1991-03-22 1993-03-09 Brantigan John W Surgical prosthetic implant for vertebrae
US5192293A (en) * 1992-07-06 1993-03-09 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Drill guide for orbital implant
US5197971A (en) * 1990-03-02 1993-03-30 Bonutti Peter M Arthroscopic retractor and method of using the same
US5279292A (en) * 1991-02-13 1994-01-18 Implex Gmbh Charging system for implantable hearing aids and tinnitus maskers
US5282856A (en) * 1987-12-22 1994-02-01 Ledergerber Walter J Implantable prosthetic device
US5292252A (en) * 1992-12-14 1994-03-08 Impla-Med, Inc. Stimulator healing cap
US5304132A (en) * 1987-05-06 1994-04-19 Jang G David Limacon geometry balloon angioplasty catheter systems and method of making same
US5306309A (en) * 1992-05-04 1994-04-26 Calcitek, Inc. Spinal disk implant and implantation kit
US5393036A (en) * 1989-11-17 1995-02-28 Sheridan; Thomas L. Continuously engaged tangential driving tool
US5395317A (en) * 1991-10-30 1995-03-07 Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc. Unilateral biportal percutaneous surgical procedure
US5397364A (en) * 1993-10-12 1995-03-14 Danek Medical, Inc. Anterior interbody fusion device
US5396880A (en) * 1992-04-08 1995-03-14 Danek Medical, Inc. Endoscope for direct visualization of the spine and epidural space
US5408422A (en) * 1992-12-08 1995-04-18 Yozan Inc. Multiplication circuit capable of directly multiplying digital data with analog data
US5484437A (en) * 1988-06-13 1996-01-16 Michelson; Gary K. Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants
US5489307A (en) * 1993-02-10 1996-02-06 Spine-Tech, Inc. Spinal stabilization surgical method
US5489308A (en) * 1989-07-06 1996-02-06 Spine-Tech, Inc. Spinal implant

Family Cites Families (194)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US31865A (en) * 1861-04-02 Improvement in harrow-frames
US430977A (en) * 1890-06-24 tellebing-
US350420A (en) 1886-10-05 Staple-driving implement
US640108A (en) * 1899-06-17 1899-12-26 Henry M Dalzell Tubular crown-saw.
US669764A (en) * 1900-11-27 1901-03-12 Morgan Potter Guiding appliance for drills.
US1705049A (en) * 1926-02-18 1929-03-12 Harry W Howland Boring instrument
US2065659A (en) 1934-08-04 1936-12-29 Arthur V Cullen Fastening method and means
US2179029A (en) * 1938-11-02 1939-11-07 Barnes Ernest Boring tool
US2181746A (en) 1939-02-04 1939-11-28 John R Siebrandt Combination bone clamp and adjustable drill guide
US2444099A (en) * 1945-06-26 1948-06-29 Camloc Fastener Corp Hole-cutting saw
US2514665A (en) 1949-01-11 1950-07-11 Myller Ernest Medical instrument
US2774350A (en) 1952-09-08 1956-12-18 Jr Carl S Cleveland Spinal clamp or splint
US2849002A (en) 1956-03-12 1958-08-26 Vincent J Oddo Haemostatic catheter
US2842131A (en) 1957-05-27 1958-07-08 George W Smith Automatic drill
US3181533A (en) 1962-01-15 1965-05-04 William C Heath Surgical snare
FR1338873A (en) 1962-06-04 1963-10-04 Comite Central De Fabricants D Oven for heat treatment of classified agglomerates fuels or coal
US3486505A (en) * 1967-05-22 1969-12-30 Gordon M Morrison Orthopedic surgical instrument
US3559513A (en) * 1968-05-06 1971-02-02 Everett D Hougen Hole saw
US3618611A (en) 1969-03-05 1971-11-09 Julius C Urban Vacuum rotary dissector
US3604487A (en) 1969-03-10 1971-09-14 Richard S Gilbert Orthopedic screw driving means
US3605123A (en) 1969-04-29 1971-09-20 Melpar Inc Bone implant
US3682177A (en) 1970-03-18 1972-08-08 Acme Eng Co Inc Cranial drilling instrument
CA962806A (en) 1970-06-04 1975-02-18 Ontario Research Foundation Surgical prosthetic device
US3750652A (en) 1971-03-05 1973-08-07 J Sherwin Knee retractor
US3848601A (en) * 1972-06-14 1974-11-19 G Ma Method for interbody fusion of the spine
US3877020A (en) * 1972-06-27 1975-04-08 Allen W Brunsting Paired transition rebalancing pulse for voltage to frequency converters
US3888260A (en) 1972-06-28 1975-06-10 Univ Johns Hopkins Rechargeable demand inhibited cardiac pacer and tissue stimulator
JPS5312588Y2 (en) * 1972-09-21 1978-04-05
US3828790A (en) 1973-02-28 1974-08-13 American Cystoscope Makers Inc Surgical snare
DE2311817C2 (en) 1973-03-09 1984-06-07 Werner Dipl.-Ing. 8000 Muenchen De Kraus
DE2314573C2 (en) 1973-03-23 1986-12-18 Werner Dipl.-Ing. 8000 Muenchen De Kraus
US3905047A (en) 1973-06-27 1975-09-16 Posta Jr John J Implantable ceramic bone prosthesis
DE2340546A1 (en) 1973-08-10 1975-02-27 Pfaudler Werke Ag Metallic implant and process for its manufacture
US3892232A (en) * 1973-09-24 1975-07-01 Alonzo J Neufeld Method and apparatus for performing percutaneous bone surgery
JPS5060085A (en) 1973-09-27 1975-05-23
US4051905A (en) 1974-03-28 1977-10-04 Gerbruder Heller Drill for percussion drilling machines
JPS5239596B2 (en) 1974-04-04 1977-10-06
US3916907A (en) 1974-06-21 1975-11-04 Wendell C Peterson Spreader instrument for use in performing a spinal fusion
FR2295729B1 (en) 1974-12-27 1979-04-06 Mahay Et Cie
DE2546824C2 (en) 1975-10-18 1986-05-07 Ernst Leitz Wetzlar Gmbh, 6330 Wetzlar, De
GB1574825A (en) 1976-03-31 1980-09-10 Rubery Owen Fasteners Ltd Screw threaded members and their manufacture
US4027392A (en) 1976-05-10 1977-06-07 Interface Biomedical Laboratories Corporation Endosteal bionic tooth and implantation method
DE2621383A1 (en) 1976-05-14 1977-12-01 Gardner Denver Gmbh A method for insertion of implants in bone and apparatus therefor
DE2659916A1 (en) 1976-05-14 1977-11-24 Pfaudler Werke Ag Surgical prosthetic fixing with self cutting screw threads - having abrasive coating to facilitate insertion and improve screw grip
US4059115A (en) * 1976-06-14 1977-11-22 Georgy Stepanovich Jumashev Surgical instrument for operation of anterior fenestrated spondylodessis in vertebral osteochondrosis
GB1550010A (en) 1976-12-15 1979-08-08 Ontario Research Foundation Surgical prosthetic device or implant having pure metal porous coating
US4232679B1 (en) 1977-01-26 1988-05-31
US4090804A (en) * 1977-02-04 1978-05-23 Haley Ernest K Circular drill with centering device
GB1565178A (en) 1977-02-24 1980-04-16 Interfix Ltd Bone screw
JPS616660B2 (en) 1977-05-20 1986-02-28 Kureha Chemical Ind Co Ltd
US4414962A (en) * 1977-06-15 1983-11-15 Carson Robert W Operating arthroscope
EP0000383B1 (en) * 1977-07-08 1982-10-13 The Wellcome Foundation Limited Pyrimido (4,5-c) pyridazines, their use in pharmaceutical preparations, and process for their preparation
US4323071B1 (en) 1978-04-24 1990-05-29 Advanced Cardiovascular System
GB2029702B (en) 1978-07-20 1982-12-15 Secr Social Service Brit Fracture fixation aooaratus
US4341206A (en) * 1978-12-19 1982-07-27 Synthes Ag Device for producing a hole in a bone
US4203692A (en) * 1978-12-20 1980-05-20 Jensen Roger S Self-centering hole saw adapter
FR2460657B1 (en) 1979-07-12 1984-01-20 Anvar
US4333469A (en) 1979-07-20 1982-06-08 Telectronics Pty. Ltd. Bone growth stimulator
US4327736A (en) 1979-11-20 1982-05-04 Kanji Inoue Balloon catheter
US4293962A (en) 1980-02-14 1981-10-13 Zimmer Usa, Inc. Bone plug inserting system
US4289123A (en) 1980-03-31 1981-09-15 Dunn Harold K Orthopedic appliance
US4405319A (en) 1980-04-08 1983-09-20 Renal Systems, Inc. Porous titanium coating for blood access device
GB2076657A (en) 1980-05-31 1981-12-09 Atkins Brian Norman Apparatus for external fixation of part of the human or animal skeletal structure
CA1146301A (en) 1980-06-13 1983-05-17 J. David Kuntz Intervertebral disc prosthesis
US4352610A (en) * 1980-07-07 1982-10-05 The Boeing Company Method and tool for generating holes in composite materials
DE3031905A1 (en) 1980-08-23 1982-03-04 Steinmueller Gmbh L & C burner system
GB2083754B (en) 1980-09-15 1984-04-26 Rezaian Seyed Mahmoud Spinal fixator
US4362161A (en) 1980-10-27 1982-12-07 Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. Cranial drill
US4414979A (en) 1981-02-23 1983-11-15 Telectronics Pty. Ltd. Monitorable bone growth stimulator
US4488549A (en) 1981-08-25 1984-12-18 University Of Exeter Pressurization of cement in bones
EP0077159A1 (en) * 1981-10-14 1983-04-20 Brian Norman Atkins Vertebrae spreader
US4547390A (en) 1982-03-12 1985-10-15 Medical Biological Sciences, Inc. Process of making implantable prosthesis material of modified polymeric acrylic (PMMA) beads coated with PHEMA and barium sulfate
US4535485A (en) 1982-03-12 1985-08-20 Medical Biological Sciences, Inc. Polymeric acrylic prothesis
US4542539A (en) 1982-03-12 1985-09-24 Artech Corp. Surgical implant having a graded porous coating
JPH0332534B2 (en) * 1982-04-13 1991-05-13 Pola Kasei Kogyo Kk
US4438769A (en) 1982-04-15 1984-03-27 Pratt Clyde R Medical staple device
EP0097879B1 (en) 1982-06-29 1990-10-17 Gelsen, Karl-Heinz Drilling machine
US4549547A (en) 1982-07-27 1985-10-29 Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Implantable bone growth stimulator
GB2126094A (en) 1982-08-26 1984-03-21 Brian Norman Atkins Device for holding the bones of the wrist and forearm after setting or during arthrodesis of the wrist
US4545374A (en) 1982-09-03 1985-10-08 Jacobson Robert E Method and instruments for performing a percutaneous lumbar diskectomy
US4600000A (en) 1982-09-16 1986-07-15 Edwards Charles C External fixation system
US4552200A (en) 1982-09-30 1985-11-12 Southwire Company Control in continuous casting to enhance feeding
EP0120893A4 (en) 1982-10-01 1985-06-06 Keith William Jeffcoat Electric healing device.
US4535374A (en) 1982-11-04 1985-08-13 Amcodyne Incorporated Whitney-type head loading/unloading apparatus
US4777939A (en) * 1983-03-09 1988-10-18 George Kees Research & Development Co., Inc. Retractor structure
US4490421A (en) 1983-07-05 1984-12-25 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Balloon and manufacture thereof
JPS6031706A (en) 1983-07-30 1985-02-18 Ikeda Bussan Co Headrest apparatus
JPS6043984A (en) 1983-08-20 1985-03-08 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Video tape recorder
US4554914A (en) 1983-10-04 1985-11-26 Kapp John P Prosthetic vertebral body
US4553273A (en) 1983-11-23 1985-11-19 Henry Ford Hospital Vertebral body prosthesis and spine stabilizing method
US4696290A (en) 1983-12-16 1987-09-29 Acromed Corporation Apparatus for straightening spinal columns
US4611581A (en) 1983-12-16 1986-09-16 Acromed Corporation Apparatus for straightening spinal columns
US4604995A (en) 1984-03-30 1986-08-12 Stephens David C Spinal stabilizer
DE3414514A1 (en) 1984-04-13 1985-10-24 Biotronik Mess & Therapieg Einschraubpfanne for a hip replacement
US4608052A (en) 1984-04-25 1986-08-26 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Implant with attachment surface
US4619264A (en) 1984-06-14 1986-10-28 Singh Om P Method and apparatus for treatment of fresh fractures, delayed unions and non-unions of living bone
GB8423039D0 (en) 1984-09-12 1984-10-17 Univ Manchester Bone drill
US4602638A (en) 1984-10-03 1986-07-29 Eddie Adams Apparatus and method for invasive electrical stimulation of bone fractures
CA1264674A (en) 1984-10-17 1990-01-23 Paul Ducheyne Porous flexible metal fiber material for surgical implantation
ES283078Y (en) 1984-11-30 1985-12-16 Otero Vich Jose M. Oseo insert for cervical interbody fusion
US4877020A (en) 1984-11-30 1989-10-31 Vich Jose M O Apparatus for bone graft
FR2576779B1 (en) 1985-02-07 1988-10-07 Tornier Sa Connecting device between a bone implant and the tool for its implementation
US4698375A (en) 1985-02-19 1987-10-06 The Dow Chemical Company Composites of unsintered calcium phosphates and synthetic biodegradable polymers useful as hard tissue prosthetics
US4592346A (en) 1985-04-08 1986-06-03 Jurgutis John A Orthopedic staple
FR2581336B1 (en) 1985-05-02 1989-05-05 Collomb Jean Cle to screw in a piece whose head has an indentation and a threaded bore
US4599086A (en) 1985-06-07 1986-07-08 Doty James R Spine stabilization device and method
JPH0655213B2 (en) 1985-12-27 1994-07-27 京セラ株式会社 Lumbar spine between the block
DE3608163A1 (en) 1986-03-12 1987-09-24 Walter A Dr Med Laabs Device for dynamically/rigidly locking the distal and proximal parts of fractured bones
US4696308A (en) * 1986-04-09 1987-09-29 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Core sampling apparatus
US4677883A (en) 1986-06-09 1987-07-07 Lee Wen Hsin Cork screw
GB8620937D0 (en) 1986-08-29 1986-10-08 Shepperd J A N Spinal implant
US4769881A (en) 1986-09-02 1988-09-13 Pedigo Irby R High precision tens apparatus and method of use
US4713004A (en) 1986-09-04 1987-12-15 Vent Plant Corporation Submergible screw-type dental implant and method of utilization
US4793363A (en) * 1986-09-11 1988-12-27 Sherwood Medical Company Biopsy needle
US4710075A (en) 1986-10-01 1987-12-01 Boehringer Mannheim Corporation Adjustable drill gauge
US5116304A (en) 1987-01-28 1992-05-26 Cadwell Industries, Inc. Magnetic stimulator with skullcap-shaped coil
CA1283501C (en) 1987-02-12 1991-04-30 Thomas P. Hedman Artificial spinal disc
US4714469A (en) * 1987-02-26 1987-12-22 Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. Spinal implant
US4790303A (en) 1987-03-11 1988-12-13 Acromed Corporation Apparatus and method for securing bone graft
DE8704901U1 (en) 1987-04-02 1987-07-23 Kluger, Patrick, Dr.Med., 3590 Bad Wildungen, De
US4781591A (en) 1987-04-06 1988-11-01 Allen James P Endosteal implant and method for performing implantation thereof
US5071406A (en) 1987-05-06 1991-12-10 Jang G David Limacon geometry balloon angioplasty catheter systems
US4863477A (en) 1987-05-12 1989-09-05 Monson Gary L Synthetic intervertebral disc prosthesis
GB2207380B (en) * 1987-07-21 1992-01-02 Jurg Gottfried Staubli Chisel
US4779012A (en) 1987-08-12 1988-10-18 Honeywell Inc. Track-and-hold amplifier
DE3878156T2 (en) * 1987-10-21 1993-05-27 Smith & Nephew Richards Inc A surgical instrument.
US4874001A (en) 1987-11-02 1989-10-17 Konsepts Beauty Supply, Inc. Manicurist's bit
FR2624719B1 (en) 1987-12-18 1990-05-11 Zimmer Sa drilling probe, in particular for positioning and fixing a medullary nail
US4851008A (en) 1988-02-01 1989-07-25 Orthomet, Inc. Bone implant prosthesis with substantially stress-free outer surface
US4865603A (en) 1988-02-04 1989-09-12 Joint Medical Products Corporation Metallic prosthetic devices having micro-textured outer surfaces
DE3809793A1 (en) 1988-03-23 1989-10-05 Link Waldemar Gmbh Co Surgical instrument set
US5423842A (en) 1988-05-16 1995-06-13 Michelson; Gary K. Spinal microknife
US4848327A (en) 1988-05-23 1989-07-18 Perdue Kevin D Apparatus and procedure for blind alignment of fasteners extended through transverse holes in an orthopedic locking nail
CA2164859C (en) 1993-06-10 2005-11-29 Gary Karlin Michelson Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants
US4960420A (en) 1988-08-23 1990-10-02 Marlowe Goble E Channel ligament clamp and system
US4912144A (en) * 1988-10-11 1990-03-27 Arco Chemical Technology, Inc. Ductile, blow-moldable composition containing a styrene-methylmethacrylate copolymer having pendant carboxy ester groups
US4961740B1 (en) 1988-10-17 1997-01-14 Surgical Dynamics Inc V-thread fusion cage and method of fusing a bone joint
US4968316A (en) 1988-12-12 1990-11-06 Hergenroeder Patrick T Arthroscopic ankle joint distraction method
US4955885A (en) 1988-12-21 1990-09-11 Zimmer, Inc. Surgical slider instrument and method of using instrument
US4969888A (en) 1989-02-09 1990-11-13 Arie Scholten Surgical protocol for fixation of osteoporotic bone using inflatable device
CA1318469C (en) 1989-02-15 1993-06-01 Acromed Corporation Artificial disc
US5030236A (en) 1989-06-19 1991-07-09 Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. Apparatus for enhancing biointegration of bony and endoprosthesis structures
DE8910673U1 (en) * 1989-09-07 1989-12-07 Fa. Robert Schroeder, 5600 Wuppertal, De
US4936848A (en) 1989-09-22 1990-06-26 Bagby George W Implant for vertebrae
DE8912648U1 (en) 1989-10-23 1990-11-22 Mecron Medizinische Produkte Gmbh, 1000 Berlin, De
US5055104A (en) * 1989-11-06 1991-10-08 Surgical Dynamics, Inc. Surgically implanting threaded fusion cages between adjacent low-back vertebrae by an anterior approach
US5059193A (en) 1989-11-20 1991-10-22 Spine-Tech, Inc. Expandable spinal implant and surgical method
JP2917357B2 (en) * 1990-02-07 1999-07-12 ミノルタ株式会社 Copier magnetic powder-containing member
US5029573A (en) 1990-03-30 1991-07-09 Chow James C System for endoscopic surgery
EP0478181A1 (en) * 1990-09-25 1992-04-01 Inter Tec Engineering Co.,Ltd. Seed peeling apparatus
US5108422A (en) 1990-10-22 1992-04-28 United States Surgical Corporation Skin fastener
DE4036804A1 (en) 1990-11-19 1992-05-21 Univ Halle Wittenberg Instruments for decompression of cervical narrow spinal channel - act to remove dorsal edge points of vertebrae and ventral bridge building of damaged segments
US5098435A (en) * 1990-11-21 1992-03-24 Alphatec Manufacturing Inc. Cannula
US5049150A (en) * 1990-12-27 1991-09-17 Zimmer, Inc. Tool for gripping a bone fragment
US5217479A (en) 1991-02-14 1993-06-08 Linvatec Corporation Surgical cutting instrument
US5171278A (en) 1991-02-22 1992-12-15 Madhavan Pisharodi Middle expandable intervertebral disk implants
US5123926A (en) 1991-02-22 1992-06-23 Madhavan Pisharodi Artificial spinal prosthesis
DE69209494D1 (en) 1991-02-22 1996-05-02 Pisharodi Madhavan Implant made of an expandable intervertebral disc
JPH0694087B2 (en) * 1991-07-05 1994-11-24 株式会社関西工具製作所 Drilling tool
US5306307A (en) 1991-07-22 1994-04-26 Calcitek, Inc. Spinal disk implant
US5242443A (en) 1991-08-15 1993-09-07 Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc. Percutaneous fixation of vertebrae
US5146933A (en) 1991-09-20 1992-09-15 Dow Corning Wright Corporation Implantable prosthetic device and tethered inflation valve for volume
US5313962A (en) 1991-10-18 1994-05-24 Obenchain Theodore G Method of performing laparoscopic lumbar discectomy
US5263953A (en) 1991-12-31 1993-11-23 Spine-Tech, Inc. Apparatus and system for fusing bone joints
GB9200214D0 (en) 1992-01-06 1992-02-26 Zimmer Limited Apparatus for use in fusion of adjacent bodies
US5258031A (en) 1992-01-06 1993-11-02 Danek Medical Intervertebral disk arthroplasty
US5269772A (en) 1992-01-24 1993-12-14 Wilk Peter J Laparoscopic cannula assembly and associated method
EP0561068B1 (en) 1992-02-20 1999-03-03 Neomedics, Inc. Implantable bone growth stimulator
US5171279A (en) * 1992-03-17 1992-12-15 Danek Medical Method for subcutaneous suprafascial pedicular internal fixation
DE59206917D1 (en) 1992-04-21 1996-09-19 Sulzer Medizinaltechnik Ag Artificial disc body
US5324295A (en) 1992-04-24 1994-06-28 Shapiro Michael R Drill guide for surgical pins
DE4220215C2 (en) 1992-06-20 1994-09-22 S & G Implants Gmbh Implant for fixing adjacent vertebrae
US5246458A (en) 1992-10-07 1993-09-21 Graham Donald V Artificial disk
US5314427A (en) 1992-10-13 1994-05-24 Marlowe Goble E Channel ligament clamp
DE4236553A1 (en) * 1992-10-29 1994-05-05 Hawera Probst Kg Hartmetall rock drill
US5364399A (en) 1993-02-05 1994-11-15 Danek Medical, Inc. Anterior cervical plating system
FR2703580B1 (en) 1993-03-03 1997-10-17 Gilles Robert Cage cervical interbody.
US5352229A (en) 1993-05-12 1994-10-04 Marlowe Goble E Arbor press staple and washer and method for its use
DE4318700C1 (en) 1993-06-04 1994-11-17 S & G Implants Gmbh Implant to stiffen adjacent vertebrae
US5314432A (en) * 1993-08-05 1994-05-24 Paul Kamaljit S Lumbar spinal disc trocar placement device
US5425772A (en) 1993-09-20 1995-06-20 Brantigan; John W. Prosthetic implant for intervertebral spinal fusion
US5443514A (en) 1993-10-01 1995-08-22 Acromed Corporation Method for using spinal implants
US5484737A (en) * 1994-12-13 1996-01-16 Electronics & Telecommunications Research Institute Method for fabricating bipolar transistor
US5632747A (en) * 1995-03-15 1997-05-27 Osteotech, Inc. Bone dowel cutter
US5989289A (en) * 1995-10-16 1999-11-23 Sdgi Holdings, Inc. Bone grafts
DE69728424D1 (en) * 1996-10-23 2004-05-06 Sdgi Holdings Inc Spacer for invertebrates
US5867728A (en) * 1996-12-17 1999-02-02 Compaq Computer Corp. Preventing corruption in a multiple processor computer system during a peripheral device configuration cycle
FR2767675B1 (en) * 1997-08-26 1999-12-03 Materiel Orthopedique En Abreg and ancillary interbody implant preparation adapted to allow its installation
EP1681021A3 (en) * 1998-06-09 2009-04-15 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Abrading element for preparing a space between adjacent vertebral bodies
US6074423A (en) * 1998-11-02 2000-06-13 Lawson; Kevin Jon Safer more X-ray transparent spinal implant
US6283966B1 (en) * 1999-07-07 2001-09-04 Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc. Spinal surgery tools and positioning method
US6152661A (en) * 1999-08-17 2000-11-28 Thrasher; Charles M. Wood coring bit
US6641582B1 (en) * 2000-07-06 2003-11-04 Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc. Bone preparation instruments and methods
US6840941B2 (en) * 2001-10-31 2005-01-11 Depuy Acromed, Inc. Vertebral endplate chisel

Patent Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US62123A (en) * 1867-02-19 Improved drift
US493730A (en) * 1893-03-21 Trephine
US1137585A (en) * 1915-02-05 1915-04-27 Thornton Craig Jr Dental appliance.
US2243718A (en) * 1938-11-05 1941-05-27 Moreira Francisco Elias Godoy Surgical drill
US2372622A (en) * 1943-01-28 1945-03-27 Courtaulds Ltd Manufacture and production of artificial threads, filaments, and the like
US2543780A (en) * 1946-12-09 1951-03-06 Herbert E Hipps Bone graft apparatus
US2537070A (en) * 1948-12-27 1951-01-09 Puy Mfg Company Inc De Surgical appliance and method for fixation of bone fragments
US2677369A (en) * 1952-03-26 1954-05-04 Fred L Knowles Apparatus for treatment of the spinal column
US2789558A (en) * 1953-09-17 1957-04-23 Leslie V Rush Medullary in driver and extractor
US2832343A (en) * 1955-04-12 1958-04-29 Mose Clara Emilie Marie Dilators
US2878809A (en) * 1958-01-23 1959-03-24 Richards Mfg Company Surgical drill attachment
US3128768A (en) * 1961-11-24 1964-04-14 Rosemount Eng Co Ltd Surgical drill
US3298372A (en) * 1963-12-17 1967-01-17 Feinberg Maurice Surgical hydrocephalus shunt sleeve for placement in a vertebra
US3426364A (en) * 1966-08-25 1969-02-11 Colorado State Univ Research F Prosthetic appliance for replacing one or more natural vertebrae
US3948262A (en) * 1969-04-01 1976-04-06 Alza Corporation Novel drug delivery device
US3720959A (en) * 1970-08-26 1973-03-20 G Hahn Mandibular prosthetic apparatus
US3709219A (en) * 1970-11-27 1973-01-09 W Halloran Bone compression device
US3719186A (en) * 1971-04-22 1973-03-06 Univ Alabama In Birmingham Surgical instrument for placement of bone pins and holes therefor
US3867950A (en) * 1971-06-18 1975-02-25 Univ Johns Hopkins Fixed rate rechargeable cardiac pacemaker
US3867728A (en) * 1971-12-30 1975-02-25 Cutter Lab Prosthesis for spinal repair
US4070514A (en) * 1973-06-05 1978-01-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Method of fabricating graphite for use as a skeletal prosthesis and product thereof
US3942535A (en) * 1973-09-27 1976-03-09 G. D. Searle & Co. Rechargeable tissue stimulating system
US3867932A (en) * 1974-01-18 1975-02-25 Donald R Huene Assembly for inserting rigid shafts into fractured bones
US3875595A (en) * 1974-04-15 1975-04-08 Edward C Froning Intervertebral disc prosthesis and instruments for locating same
US4016651A (en) * 1974-09-25 1977-04-12 Kyoto Ceramic Co., Ltd. Device for implanting an artificial endosseous element of ceramics and an implant method for use of the device
US3952334A (en) * 1974-11-29 1976-04-27 General Atomic Company Biocompatible carbon prosthetic devices
US4086701A (en) * 1975-04-07 1978-05-02 Kyoto Ceramic Kabushiki Kaisha Device for implanting an artificial endosseous element of ceramics and an implant method for use of the same
US4082097A (en) * 1976-05-20 1978-04-04 Pacesetter Systems Inc. Multimode recharging system for living tissue stimulators
US4142517A (en) * 1976-07-23 1979-03-06 Contreras Guerrero De Stavropo Apparatus for extracting bone marrow specimens
US4259072A (en) * 1977-04-04 1981-03-31 Kyoto Ceramic Co., Ltd. Ceramic endosseous implant
US4258716A (en) * 1978-02-06 1981-03-31 The University Of Melbourne Microsurgical instruments
US4181457A (en) * 1978-02-10 1980-01-01 Holmes Horace D Tapping tool for making vibration resistant prevailing torque fastener
US4262369A (en) * 1978-06-21 1981-04-21 Christiane Roux Artificial joints, in particular coxo-femoral joints
USRE31865E (en) * 1978-06-21 1985-04-16 Artificial joints, in particular coxo-femoral joints
US4423721A (en) * 1978-09-04 1984-01-03 Schwarzkopf Development Corporation Device for insertion and extraction of medullary nails
US4197850A (en) * 1978-11-03 1980-04-15 Pacesetter Systems, Inc. Implantable human tissue stimulator with memory protect means
US4492226A (en) * 1979-10-10 1985-01-08 Vsesojuzny Nauchno-Issledovatelsky I Ispytatelny Institut Meditsinskoi Tekhniki Device for uniting bone fragments
US4450834A (en) * 1979-10-18 1984-05-29 Ace Orthopedic Manufacturing, Inc. External fixation device
US4328593A (en) * 1979-12-22 1982-05-11 Institut Straumann Ag Universal joint prosthesis with cap
US4309777A (en) * 1980-11-13 1982-01-12 Patil Arun A Artificial intervertebral disc
US4507115A (en) * 1981-04-01 1985-03-26 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Medical capsule device
US4501269A (en) * 1981-12-11 1985-02-26 Washington State University Research Foundation, Inc. Process for fusing bone joints
US4439152A (en) * 1982-03-04 1984-03-27 Small Irwin A Method of jawbone abutment implant for dental prostheses and implant device
US4497320A (en) * 1983-02-14 1985-02-05 Rudolph Beaver, Inc. Surgical blade unit
US4997434A (en) * 1983-02-16 1991-03-05 Seedhom Bahaa B Prosthetic ligaments and instruments for use in the surgical replacement of ligaments
US4570623A (en) * 1983-06-02 1986-02-18 Pfizer Hospital Products Group Inc. Arched bridge staple
US4570624A (en) * 1983-08-10 1986-02-18 Henry Ford Hospital Universal guide for inserting parallel pins
US4655777A (en) * 1983-12-19 1987-04-07 Southern Research Institute Method of producing biodegradable prosthesis and products therefrom
US4653486A (en) * 1984-04-12 1987-03-31 Coker Tom P Fastener, particularly suited for orthopedic use
US4566466A (en) * 1984-04-16 1986-01-28 Ripple Dale B Surgical instrument
US4736738A (en) * 1984-07-09 1988-04-12 Matej Lipovsek Instrument kit and procedure for performing posterior lumbar interbody fusion
US4665920A (en) * 1984-11-28 1987-05-19 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Skeletal tissue stimulator and a low voltage oscillator circuit for use therein
US5084050A (en) * 1984-12-14 1992-01-28 Klaus Draenert Implant for bone reinforcement and for anchoring bone screws, implants and implant parts
US4721103A (en) * 1985-01-31 1988-01-26 Yosef Freedland Orthopedic device
US4636526A (en) * 1985-02-19 1987-01-13 The Dow Chemical Company Composites of unsintered calcium phosphates and synthetic biodegradable polymers useful as hard tissue prosthetics
US4634720A (en) * 1985-02-19 1987-01-06 The Dow Chemical Company Process for the preparation of hard tissue prosthetics
US4661536A (en) * 1985-02-19 1987-04-28 The Dow Chemical Company Process for the preparation of hard tissue prosthetics
US4636217A (en) * 1985-04-23 1987-01-13 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Anterior spinal implant
US4743260A (en) * 1985-06-10 1988-05-10 Burton Charles V Method for a flexible stabilization system for a vertebral column
US4653509A (en) * 1985-07-03 1987-03-31 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Guided trephine samples for skeletal bone studies
US4645503A (en) * 1985-08-27 1987-02-24 Orthomatrix Inc. Moldable bone-implant material
US4733995A (en) * 1985-09-13 1988-03-29 Stellram S.A. Milling cutter for machining T-shaped grooves
US4743256A (en) * 1985-10-04 1988-05-10 Brantigan John W Surgical prosthetic implant facilitating vertebral interbody fusion and method
US4664567A (en) * 1986-02-06 1987-05-12 Bijur Lubricating Corp. Drill bit
US4903882A (en) * 1986-03-10 1990-02-27 Long Gregory T Driving tool for an electrical staple
US4913143A (en) * 1986-05-28 1990-04-03 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Trephine assembly
US4805602A (en) * 1986-11-03 1989-02-21 Danninger Medical Technology Transpedicular screw and rod system
US4820305A (en) * 1986-11-03 1989-04-11 Harms Juergen Place holder, in particular for a vertebra body
US4834757A (en) * 1987-01-22 1989-05-30 Brantigan John W Prosthetic implant
US5304132A (en) * 1987-05-06 1994-04-19 Jang G David Limacon geometry balloon angioplasty catheter systems and method of making same
US4904261A (en) * 1987-08-06 1990-02-27 A. W. Showell (Surgicraft) Limited Spinal implants
US4904260A (en) * 1987-08-20 1990-02-27 Cedar Surgical, Inc. Prosthetic disc containing therapeutic material
US5282856A (en) * 1987-12-22 1994-02-01 Ledergerber Walter J Implantable prosthetic device
US4830000A (en) * 1987-12-31 1989-05-16 Aspen Laboratories, Inc. Surgical drill
US4911718A (en) * 1988-06-10 1990-03-27 University Of Medicine & Dentistry Of N.J. Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer
US5484437A (en) * 1988-06-13 1996-01-16 Michelson; Gary K. Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants
US5015247A (en) * 1988-06-13 1991-05-14 Michelson Gary K Threaded spinal implant
US5505732A (en) * 1988-06-13 1996-04-09 Michelson; Gary K. Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants
US4913144A (en) * 1988-08-03 1990-04-03 D.A.O. S.R.L. Adjustable staple
US5105819A (en) * 1988-09-01 1992-04-21 Kon-Tron Elektronik AG Ultrasound endoscope device
US5102414A (en) * 1988-12-10 1992-04-07 Imz Fertigungs-Und Vertriebsgesellschaft Fur Dentale Technologie Mbh Implantable fixing device for extraoral applications
US5015255A (en) * 1989-05-10 1991-05-14 Spine-Tech, Inc. Spinal stabilization method
US5489308A (en) * 1989-07-06 1996-02-06 Spine-Tech, Inc. Spinal implant
US5108395A (en) * 1989-09-18 1992-04-28 Societe De Fabrication De Materiel Orthopedique - Sofamor Implant for anterior dorsolumbar spinal osteosynthesis, intended for the correction of kyphoses
US5393036A (en) * 1989-11-17 1995-02-28 Sheridan; Thomas L. Continuously engaged tangential driving tool
US5197971A (en) * 1990-03-02 1993-03-30 Bonutti Peter M Arthroscopic retractor and method of using the same
US4987904A (en) * 1990-03-22 1991-01-29 Wilson James T Method and apparatus for bone size gauging
US5279292A (en) * 1991-02-13 1994-01-18 Implex Gmbh Charging system for implantable hearing aids and tinnitus maskers
US5192327A (en) * 1991-03-22 1993-03-09 Brantigan John W Surgical prosthetic implant for vertebrae
US5112336A (en) * 1991-05-14 1992-05-12 Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. Drill guide and template for prosthetic devices
US5395317A (en) * 1991-10-30 1995-03-07 Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc. Unilateral biportal percutaneous surgical procedure
US5183471A (en) * 1992-01-24 1993-02-02 Wilk Peter J Laparoscopic cannula
US5396880A (en) * 1992-04-08 1995-03-14 Danek Medical, Inc. Endoscope for direct visualization of the spine and epidural space
US5306309A (en) * 1992-05-04 1994-04-26 Calcitek, Inc. Spinal disk implant and implantation kit
US5192293A (en) * 1992-07-06 1993-03-09 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Drill guide for orbital implant
US5408422A (en) * 1992-12-08 1995-04-18 Yozan Inc. Multiplication circuit capable of directly multiplying digital data with analog data
US5292252A (en) * 1992-12-14 1994-03-08 Impla-Med, Inc. Stimulator healing cap
US5489307A (en) * 1993-02-10 1996-02-06 Spine-Tech, Inc. Spinal stabilization surgical method
US5397364A (en) * 1993-10-12 1995-03-14 Danek Medical, Inc. Anterior interbody fusion device

Cited By (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7993347B1 (en) 1993-06-10 2011-08-09 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Guard for use in performing human interbody spinal surgery
US20080255564A1 (en) * 1993-06-10 2008-10-16 Karlin Technology, Inc. Bone cutting device
US8348979B2 (en) 2006-12-29 2013-01-08 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Cervical distraction method
US7824431B2 (en) 2006-12-29 2010-11-02 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Cervical distraction method
US8834530B2 (en) 2006-12-29 2014-09-16 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Cervical distraction method
US9622873B2 (en) 2006-12-29 2017-04-18 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Cervical distraction method
US9005288B2 (en) 2008-01-09 2015-04-14 Providence Medical Techonlogy, Inc. Methods and apparatus for accessing and treating the facet joint
US9333086B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2016-05-10 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Spinal facet cage implant
US8361152B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2013-01-29 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Facet joint implants and delivery tools
US8425558B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2013-04-23 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools
US8512347B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2013-08-20 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Cervical distraction/implant delivery device
US8623054B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2014-01-07 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools
US8753347B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2014-06-17 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools
US8753377B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2014-06-17 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools
US8753345B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2014-06-17 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools
US9622874B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2017-04-18 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Cervical distraction/implant delivery device
US8267966B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2012-09-18 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Facet joint implants and delivery tools
US8834472B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2014-09-16 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools
US9622791B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2017-04-18 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools
US9381049B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2016-07-05 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Composite spinal facet implant with textured surfaces
US9629665B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2017-04-25 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools
US9011492B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2015-04-21 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Facet joint implants and delivery tools
US8828062B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2014-09-09 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Vertebral joint implants and delivery tools
US10039649B2 (en) 2008-06-06 2018-08-07 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Composite spinal facet implant with textured surfaces
US20100228350A1 (en) * 2009-03-04 2010-09-09 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal nucleus replacement implants
US8292962B2 (en) * 2009-03-04 2012-10-23 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal nucleus replacement implants
US9814599B2 (en) 2009-07-09 2017-11-14 R Tree Innovations, Llc Inter-body implantation system and method
US9877844B2 (en) 2009-07-09 2018-01-30 R Tree Innovations, Llc Inter-body implant
US8828082B2 (en) 2009-07-09 2014-09-09 R Tree Innovations, Llc Inter-body implant
US20110098705A1 (en) * 2009-10-23 2011-04-28 Chappuis James L Devices and Methods for Temporarily Retaining Spinal Rootlets within Dural Sac
US8979748B2 (en) * 2009-10-23 2015-03-17 James L. Chappuis Devices and methods for temporarily retaining spinal rootlets within dural sac
USD745156S1 (en) 2012-10-23 2015-12-08 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Spinal implant
USD732667S1 (en) 2012-10-23 2015-06-23 Providence Medical Technology, Inc. Cage spinal implant

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US20040034358A1 (en) 2004-02-19 application
US7264622B2 (en) 2007-09-04 grant
JP4134248B2 (en) 2008-08-20 grant
JP2007275618A (en) 2007-10-25 application
US7326214B2 (en) 2008-02-05 grant
US20040068259A1 (en) 2004-04-08 application
EP1092395A2 (en) 2001-04-18 application
CA2164859C (en) 2005-11-29 grant
CA2521196A1 (en) 1994-12-22 application
US7399303B2 (en) 2008-07-15 grant
US20030153916A1 (en) 2003-08-14 application
ES2216817T3 (en) 2004-11-01 grant
US7887565B2 (en) 2011-02-15 grant
DK703757T3 (en) grant
US20060036247A1 (en) 2006-02-16 application
US7993347B1 (en) 2011-08-09 grant
JP2005040611A (en) 2005-02-17 application
CA2357536C (en) 2004-09-28 grant
DE69433088T2 (en) 2004-07-08 grant
US20060142762A1 (en) 2006-06-29 application
DK1092395T3 (en) 2004-07-05 grant
EP1093760A2 (en) 2001-04-25 application
CA2164859A1 (en) 1994-12-22 application
CA2521196C (en) 2007-04-17 grant
US20060058793A1 (en) 2006-03-16 application
DE69433702T2 (en) 2005-03-31 grant
DK1093760T3 (en) 2005-03-29 grant
DE69433702D1 (en) 2004-05-13 grant
EP1508307A1 (en) 2005-02-23 application
ES2206468T3 (en) 2004-05-16 grant
US6436098B1 (en) 2002-08-20 grant
JP4000134B2 (en) 2007-10-31 grant
US20080255564A1 (en) 2008-10-16 application
DE69433088D1 (en) 2003-10-02 grant
EP1093760B1 (en) 2004-11-17 grant
CA2357536A1 (en) 1994-12-22 application
DE69434145T2 (en) 2005-10-27 grant
EP1092395A3 (en) 2001-05-16 application
EP1093760A3 (en) 2001-05-02 application
ES2231110T3 (en) 2005-05-16 grant
US20020198532A1 (en) 2002-12-26 application
US6875213B2 (en) 2005-04-05 grant
DE69434145D1 (en) 2004-12-23 grant
US20040073217A1 (en) 2004-04-15 application
DK0703757T3 (en) 2003-12-29 grant
EP1092395B1 (en) 2004-04-07 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7361193B2 (en) Devices and techniques for a posterior lateral disc space approach
US5015255A (en) Spinal stabilization method
US7033362B2 (en) Instruments and techniques for disc space preparation
US5797917A (en) Anterior spinal instrumentation and method for implantation and revision
US6582437B2 (en) Devices and methods for implanting fusion cages
US7909832B2 (en) Retractor for percutaneous surgery in a patient and method for use thereof
US7637953B2 (en) Interbody fusion grafts and instrumentation
US7625379B2 (en) Methods and instrumentation for inserting intervertebral grafts and devices
US3848601A (en) Method for interbody fusion of the spine
US6740091B2 (en) Lordotic spinal implant
US20040249388A1 (en) Distractor with opening
US20040059333A1 (en) Systems, methods, devices and device kits for fixation of bones and spinal vertebrae
US20020019637A1 (en) Devices and techniques for a posterior lateral disc space approach
US20010016741A1 (en) Methods and instrumentation for vertebral interbody fusion
US6595995B2 (en) Methods and instruments for interbody fusion
US20040176853A1 (en) Apparatus and method for spinal fusion using posteriorly implanted devices
US4059115A (en) Surgical instrument for operation of anterior fenestrated spondylodessis in vertebral osteochondrosis
US6565574B2 (en) Distractor for use in spinal surgery
US6004326A (en) Method and instrumentation for implant insertion
US7588574B2 (en) Kits for enabling axial access and procedures in the spine
US20060229627A1 (en) Variable angle spinal surgery instrument
US6540753B2 (en) Instrumentation for implant insertion
US5968098A (en) Apparatus for fusing adjacent bone structures
US20020026192A1 (en) Posterior oblique lumbar arthrodesis
US20050038511A1 (en) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) implant, surgical procedure and instruments for insertion of spinal implant in a spinal disc space

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: KARLIN TECHNOLOGY, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICHELSON, GARY KARLIN;REEL/FRAME:021338/0353

Effective date: 19930610

Owner name: WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC., INDIANA

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:SDGI HOLDINGS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021334/0878

Effective date: 20060428

Owner name: SDGI HOLDINGS, INC., DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KARLIN TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:021343/0873

Effective date: 20050517