US20040096329A1 - System for a turbine with a gaseous or liquideous working medium - Google Patents

System for a turbine with a gaseous or liquideous working medium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040096329A1
US20040096329A1 US10/473,224 US47322403A US2004096329A1 US 20040096329 A1 US20040096329 A1 US 20040096329A1 US 47322403 A US47322403 A US 47322403A US 2004096329 A1 US2004096329 A1 US 2004096329A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
turbine
rotation
hinge member
angular frequency
hinge
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/473,224
Inventor
Staffan Engstrom
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nordic Windpower Ltd
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Assigned to NORDIC WINDPOWER AB reassignment NORDIC WINDPOWER AB ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ENGSTROM, STAFFAN
Publication of US20040096329A1 publication Critical patent/US20040096329A1/en
Assigned to NORDIC WINDPOWER LIMITED reassignment NORDIC WINDPOWER LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NORDIC WINDPOWER AB
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D1/00Wind motors with rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor 
    • F03D1/06Rotors
    • F03D1/065Rotors characterised by their construction elements
    • F03D1/0658Arrangements for fixing wind-engaging parts to a hub
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70Wind energy
    • Y02E10/72Wind turbines with rotation axis in wind direction

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a system for a turbine with a gaseous or liquideous working medium, in particular a wind turbine for a wind turbine generator.
  • the turbine comprises a shaft, which is rotatable at a certain angular frequency, a hub, on which at least one turbine blade is attached, and a hinge member, disposed between the shaft and the hub.
  • the hinge member comprises a bearing and spring elements, together forming a rigidity against movements in the hinge member.
  • the turbine blade has a mass inertia factor relatively to the hinge member and is adapted to move through the gaseous or liquideous flow, which has a flow direction essentially perpendicular to the rotational plane of said turbine blade and has a varying velocity in said direction, such that the system is exposed to disturbance forces.
  • the invention also relates to a wind turbine generator with such a system.
  • wind turbine generators have rigid hubs, which means that the blades of the wind turbine have a rigid connection with the hub.
  • the function in acceptable when the number of blades is at least three, since three symmetrically arranged blades, to a certain extent, are capable of levelling out the imbalance forces that are created due to irregularities in the wind field.
  • a reduction of the number of blades to two is desirable, since this means a considerable reduction of the blade cost as well as other advantages, such as a less complicated assembly.
  • the yearly energy yield for the two-bladed turbine, calculated for a certain turbine diameter is only reduced with 2-3%.
  • a two-bladed, rigid hub wind turbine is exposed to considerable imbalance forces even during normal operation causing fatigue in the components of the turbine. This must be compensated by increased dimensions of all the main components, such that this two-bladed solution, due to the excessive cost, is no longer justified. As a consequence, this type of wind turbine is no longer manufactured.
  • the teetered hub became the solution of the problems of the two-bladed, rigid hub wind turbine. It is characterised by the two blades being rigidly fixed to a hub, which is hinged to the turbine shaft.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,565,929 discloses an example of a turbine, which is able to teeter ⁇ 7° until making contact with the teeter stops. The function is satisfactory during normal conditions, which means that the fatigue behaviour is advantageous. However, during extreme wind conditions with high turbulence and wind shear, such contacts with the teeter stops may occur that result in more severe moments than in a rigid hub wind turbine. Thus, it is the extreme load cases that are critical. None of the turbines with this simple type of teeter hub have reached any widespread use.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide a system for a turbine, in particular a system for a wind turbine for a wind turbine generator, which minimises the effects of the imbalance forces caused by the irregularities in the wind field, and thus the risk of fatigue, and of the extreme loads in the structure.
  • the invention is based on the understanding that a wind turbine, e.g. a two bladed wind turbine, with a teeter hinge having a certain rigidity, in theory may be looked upon as a mass-spring system according to classical mechanics.
  • the wind field comprises both a systematic variation, wind shear, which means that the mean wind speed is higher during the upper part of the revolution of the turbine, and a stochastic variation, turbulence. It is obvious that the wind shear creates one load cycle for each revolution of the turbine in a, with the turbine, co-rotating system of coordinates. Also the less significant tower shadow (the air stream that is disturbed by the tower), creates the same variation. On further consideration it should be realised that also the turbulence will create components of the same frequency, since the turbine blades move swiftly (50-100 m/s) compared with the wind (about 5-25 m/s) and its irregularities. Each turbine blade will thus hit a specific irregularity of the wind several times, which means that the resulting disturbance also in this case will have a frequency ⁇ disturbance which is equal to the rotational angular frequency ⁇ rotation , i.e.
  • the majority of today's wind turbines operate at a rotational speed (angular frequency), which normally varies with a few per cent, depending on the slip of the inductor generator generally used. This value may increase up to about ten per cent with a special generator design. Instead of fixed speed, the wind turbine operates within a rotational speed range. There are also generators with dual windings which operate within two different rotational speed ranges. It is possible to control the rotational speed to any value, usually a low at low wind speeds and a high at high wind speeds, by applying specific electric equipment.
  • the rotational angular frequency of the turbine ⁇ rotation shall be construed in the present invention as the highest rotational speed range which is used during normal, main circuit connected operation. This is possible since the high rotational speeds normally is used when the wind speeds are fairly high or high and the wind turbine has a high output power, which constitute the operation conditions that are decisive for the dimensioning of the turbine.
  • the mass inertia factor of the turbine J turbine relatively to the teeter axis may be calculated.
  • the contribution from the hub, however, is insignificant.
  • the mass inertia factor of the turbine may be approximated as the mass inertia factor of the blades.
  • the hinge member is assumed to be of the type, in which the movement is counteracted by springs, which makes it possible to calculate a spring constant k for the hinge member.
  • the spring constant constitutes a value of the rigidity of the hinge member. According to classic mechanics, the eigenfrequency ⁇ resonance of the turbine in relation to the hinge may be calculated as
  • a wind turbine with a teeter hinge having a certain rigidity additionally has the advantage that the states during extreme turbulence and wind shear, which happen a few times during the operational life of a wind turbine, can be handled with reasonable loads and teeter angles.
  • the degree of criticality depends on the relations between the disturbing frequency, the mass inertia factor of the turbine and the rigidity of the teeter hinge. In the construction phase, these values may be selected without restrictions.
  • the disturbing frequency is equal to the rotational speed.
  • the mass inertia factor of the turbine is mainly determined by the mass distribution and by the geometry of the blades. For a specific blade geometry, the mass inertia factor may be influenced by the choice of construction materials and by adding ballast material.
  • the rigidity of the teeter hinge is determined by the stiffness of the different hinge elements, which normally are made of rubber or some other elastomeric material. Thus, it is relatively easy to change the rigidity, also in an existing teeter hinge, by exchanging the rubber elements to new ones with a different Young's modulus and possibly with a modified geometry.
  • the hub is constructed such that the operation is either supercritical or subcritical.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates how a system consisting of a mass, a spring and a damper in general reacts on disturbances of different frequencies
  • FIG. 2 shows the principal structure of a wind turbine generator with a horizontal axis wind turbine
  • FIG. 3A shows a side elevation, partly as a sectional view, of a teeter hub according to the invention and FIG. 3B shows the teeter hub as shown in FIG. 3A in a front elevation view.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates how a system consisting of a mass, a spring and a damper in general reacts on disturbances of different frequencies.
  • the amplification i.e. the ratio of the amplitude of the system to the amplitude of the disturbance, is shown as a function of the ratio of the disturbing frequency to the eigenfrequency of the system (X-direction in FIG. 1).
  • Point A indicates a state in which the disturbing frequency ⁇ disturbance is low relatively to the eigenfrequency of the teeter hinge ⁇ resonance , i.e. the operation is subcritical according to classical mechanics, corresponding to an ideal hub with a relatively high degree of rigidity.
  • the response is slightly larger than the disturbance, i.e.
  • the amplification is slightly larger than 1.
  • point B the disturbing frequency and the eigenfrequency are equal, i.e. the operation is critical.
  • the amplification of the disturbance is large.
  • Point C indicates a state in which the disturbing frequency is higher than the eigenfrequency, i.e. the operation is supercritical.
  • the response is lower than in point A and significantly lower than in point B.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates that operation in the range of point B, in which there is a significant amplification of the disturbance, should be avoided.
  • FIG. 2 shows the general structure of a wind turbine generator with a horizontal axis wind turbine.
  • Two aerodynamically shaped turbine blades ( 1 ) are connected to the hub ( 2 ) with a fixed or pivotal (along the longitudinal axis) connection.
  • the hub ( 2 ) is connected to the turbine shaft ( 3 ), which is supported by the bearings ( 4 ).
  • the turbine shaft ( 3 ) is connected to the gearbox ( 5 ), which transforms the low rotation speed of the turbine to a rotation speed conformable to the generator ( 6 ).
  • the components of the machinery are supported by the machinery bed ( 7 ), which is connected to the yaw bearing ( 8 ).
  • the yaw bearing ( 8 ) is rotatable on the tower ( 10 ) by means of the yaw mechanism ( 9 ).
  • the tower is connected to solid ground by a foundation (not shown).
  • the various functions may be more or less integrated with each other, which however does not affect the following description.
  • the hub ( 2 ) is a teetered hub, which implies that the two turbine blades ( 1 ) are rigidly connected to the hub ( 2 ).
  • the hub ( 2 ) is hinged to the turbine shaft ( 3 ) and may teeter an angle A, as shown, in each direction.
  • the number of blades is normally two, but in one preferred embodiment the structure principle is applied to a turbine with one blade, and with the missing blade compensated by a counter weight.
  • FIG. 3 shows a teeter hub according to the invention.
  • the blades ( 1 ) are connected to the hub ( 2 ), which normally is a cast structure and is connected to the turbine shaft ( 3 ) by means of a hinge member.
  • the hinge member includes a bearing ( 12 ), which normally is composed of two or four symmetrically disposed bearing elements.
  • the spring elements ( 13 ) counteract the teeter movement and may be combined with dampers, either by selecting a spring material with some damping properties, or by providing dampers of some other type (not shown).
  • the active part of both the bearing ( 12 ) and the spring elements ( 13 ) are preferably made of elastomeric material.
  • the bearing ( 12 ) and the spring elements ( 13 ) together form a hinge member ( 12 , 13 ) having a specific rigidity in relation to the axis of the hinge member and hence the bearing.
  • the bearing ( 12 ) and the spring elements ( 13 ) have been integrated into one unit, e.g. a so-called flex-beam.
  • the spring constant of the spring elements ( 13 ) may include the impact of these elements.
  • additional advantages may be achieved by making the spring ( 13 ) progressive (i.e. the spring constant increases with the dimensional change) or pre-stressed.
  • a special type of progressive spring is achieved when there is a play between the spring element and the co-acting element, which results in a spring constant that is zero during the initial part of the teeter movement.
  • the structural parameters should by selected such that operation is avoided in the range in which the disturbing frequency is close to the critical frequency, i.e. the eigenfrequency of the teeter hinge.
  • the parameters are selected such that the disturbing frequency either is lower than 0.9 times the eigenfrequency or higher than 1.1 times the eigenfrequency.
  • the disturbing frequency is normally higher than 0.1 times the eigenfrequency and lower than 10 times the eigenfrequency.
  • Preferred embodiments as described above illustrate how the invention may be applied on wind turbines with one or two blades.
  • the man skilled in the art may easily apply the invention on wind turbines with several blades and on neighbouring application areas, such as propellers for airplanes and ships, fans, turbines for other gaseous or liquideous working media, etc.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wind Motors (AREA)
  • Hydraulic Turbines (AREA)
  • Engine Equipment That Uses Special Cycles (AREA)

Abstract

This invention relates to a system for a turbine with a gaseous or liquideous working medium, in particular a wind turbine for a wind turbine generator. The turbine comprises a shaft (3), which is rotatable at a certain angular frequency, a hub (2), on which at least one turbine blade (1) is attached, and a hinge member (12, 13) disposed between said shaft (3) and hub (2). The hinge member comprises a bearing (12) and spring elements (13), together forming a rigidity (k) against movements in the hinge member (12, 13). The turbine blade (1) has a mass inertia factor relatively to the hinge member (12, 13) and is adapted to move through said gaseous or liquideous flow, which has a flow direction essentially perpendicular to the rotational plane of said turbine blade (1), and has a varying flow velocity in said direction such that the system is exposed to disturbance forces. An essential component of the disturbance forces has a disturbance frequency (Ωdisturbance) which is composed of said angular frequency (Ωrotation) and the rigidity (k) of said hinge member (12, 13), the mass inertia factor (Jturbine) of said turbine blade (1) and the angular frequency (Ωrotation) of said shaft (3) in the system has been selected such that the system is supercritical or subcritical. The invention also related to a wind turbine generator with such a system.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to a system for a turbine with a gaseous or liquideous working medium, in particular a wind turbine for a wind turbine generator. The turbine comprises a shaft, which is rotatable at a certain angular frequency, a hub, on which at least one turbine blade is attached, and a hinge member, disposed between the shaft and the hub. The hinge member comprises a bearing and spring elements, together forming a rigidity against movements in the hinge member. The turbine blade has a mass inertia factor relatively to the hinge member and is adapted to move through the gaseous or liquideous flow, which has a flow direction essentially perpendicular to the rotational plane of said turbine blade and has a varying velocity in said direction, such that the system is exposed to disturbance forces. The invention also relates to a wind turbine generator with such a system. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Conventionally, wind turbine generators have rigid hubs, which means that the blades of the wind turbine have a rigid connection with the hub. The function in acceptable when the number of blades is at least three, since three symmetrically arranged blades, to a certain extent, are capable of levelling out the imbalance forces that are created due to irregularities in the wind field. A reduction of the number of blades to two is desirable, since this means a considerable reduction of the blade cost as well as other advantages, such as a less complicated assembly. The yearly energy yield for the two-bladed turbine, calculated for a certain turbine diameter, is only reduced with 2-3%. However, a two-bladed, rigid hub wind turbine is exposed to considerable imbalance forces even during normal operation causing fatigue in the components of the turbine. This must be compensated by increased dimensions of all the main components, such that this two-bladed solution, due to the excessive cost, is no longer justified. As a consequence, this type of wind turbine is no longer manufactured. [0002]
  • The teetered hub became the solution of the problems of the two-bladed, rigid hub wind turbine. It is characterised by the two blades being rigidly fixed to a hub, which is hinged to the turbine shaft. U.S. Pat. No. 4,565,929 discloses an example of a turbine, which is able to teeter ±7° until making contact with the teeter stops. The function is satisfactory during normal conditions, which means that the fatigue behaviour is advantageous. However, during extreme wind conditions with high turbulence and wind shear, such contacts with the teeter stops may occur that result in more severe moments than in a rigid hub wind turbine. Thus, it is the extreme load cases that are critical. None of the turbines with this simple type of teeter hub have reached any widespread use. [0003]
  • In order to solve the problems caused by the extreme loads, it has been proposed to control the teeter movement by combining the teeter stops with damping. One example is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,354,175, in which it is proposed to limit the teeter movement by a controllable hydraulic damping. None of these hub types have been used extensively, which is due to a lack of knowledge of how a hub should be designed in order to prevent a serious increase of the disturbance forces in the system under certain conditions. [0004]
  • BASIC IDEA OF THE INVENTION
  • The object of the present invention is to provide a system for a turbine, in particular a system for a wind turbine for a wind turbine generator, which minimises the effects of the imbalance forces caused by the irregularities in the wind field, and thus the risk of fatigue, and of the extreme loads in the structure. [0005]
  • The invention is based on the understanding that a wind turbine, e.g. a two bladed wind turbine, with a teeter hinge having a certain rigidity, in theory may be looked upon as a mass-spring system according to classical mechanics. [0006]
  • The wind field comprises both a systematic variation, wind shear, which means that the mean wind speed is higher during the upper part of the revolution of the turbine, and a stochastic variation, turbulence. It is obvious that the wind shear creates one load cycle for each revolution of the turbine in a, with the turbine, co-rotating system of coordinates. Also the less significant tower shadow (the air stream that is disturbed by the tower), creates the same variation. On further consideration it should be realised that also the turbulence will create components of the same frequency, since the turbine blades move swiftly (50-100 m/s) compared with the wind (about 5-25 m/s) and its irregularities. Each turbine blade will thus hit a specific irregularity of the wind several times, which means that the resulting disturbance also in this case will have a frequency ω[0007] disturbance which is equal to the rotational angular frequency ωrotation, i.e.
  • ωdisturbancerotation   (1)
  • In the following this frequency is denominated the disturbance frequency. [0008]
  • It should be noted that this condition is valid in a, with the turbine, co-rotating system of co-ordinates, which is relevant for those forces that affect the turbine. In a system of co-ordinates that is fixed to the nacelle or tower the disturbance frequency is proportional to the result of the multiplication of the number of blades and the rotational frequency. [0009]
  • The majority of today's wind turbines operate at a rotational speed (angular frequency), which normally varies with a few per cent, depending on the slip of the inductor generator generally used. This value may increase up to about ten per cent with a special generator design. Instead of fixed speed, the wind turbine operates within a rotational speed range. There are also generators with dual windings which operate within two different rotational speed ranges. It is possible to control the rotational speed to any value, usually a low at low wind speeds and a high at high wind speeds, by applying specific electric equipment. The rotational angular frequency of the turbine ω[0010] rotation shall be construed in the present invention as the highest rotational speed range which is used during normal, main circuit connected operation. This is possible since the high rotational speeds normally is used when the wind speeds are fairly high or high and the wind turbine has a high output power, which constitute the operation conditions that are decisive for the dimensioning of the turbine.
  • The mass inertia factor of the turbine J[0011] turbine relatively to the teeter axis may be calculated. The contribution from the hub, however, is insignificant. Thus, the mass inertia factor of the turbine may be approximated as the mass inertia factor of the blades. The hinge member is assumed to be of the type, in which the movement is counteracted by springs, which makes it possible to calculate a spring constant k for the hinge member. The spring constant constitutes a value of the rigidity of the hinge member. According to classic mechanics, the eigenfrequency ωresonance of the turbine in relation to the hinge may be calculated as
  • ωresonance={overscore (k/Jturbin )}  (2)
  • From now on this is called the eigenfrequency of the teeter hinge. It should be noted that, for clarity, the stabilising impact on teeter movements of the centrifugal force, i.e. increase of rigidity due to the centrifugal force, has not been analysed here. [0012]
  • In order to elucidate the general reaction of such a mass-spring-system on disturbances of varying frequencies, the amplification, i.e. the ratio of the amplitude of the system to the amplitude of the disturbance, has been studied. A moderate damping has been added to the system, in correspondence with an actual state in which the air will dampen the teetering movement of the blades and the hinge member may be furnished with damping elements. [0013]
  • The study reveals that a low disturbance frequency ω[0014] disturbance in relation to the eigenfrequency of the teeter hinge ωresonance, i.e. the operation is subcritical according to classical mechanics, gives a system response that is slightly larger than the disturbance, i.e. the amplification is just exceeding 1, corresponding to an ideal hub with a relatively high degree of rigidity. It is further revealed that the amplification is large when the disturbing frequency and the eigenfrequency of the system are equal, i.e. the operation is critical. It is likely that earlier attempts to use teetering hubs with counteracting springs have given this effect. When the disturbing frequency is higher than the eigenfrequency, i.e. the operation is supercritical, the amplification is significantly lower.
  • The cases mentioned above illustrate the conditions during normal operation. A wind turbine with a teeter hinge having a certain rigidity additionally has the advantage that the states during extreme turbulence and wind shear, which happen a few times during the operational life of a wind turbine, can be handled with reasonable loads and teeter angles. [0015]
  • The conditions during normal operation primarily determine the fatigue of the materials of the structure, while the extreme operation states are decisive for the extreme loads. A hub with a certain rigidity presents an improved balance between the fatigue load cases and the extreme load cases. [0016]
  • The study as described above illustrates that operation in the range of large amplification of the disturbance, i.e. when the disturbing frequency and the eigenfrequency are equal, should be avoided. These results have been confirmed by simulations in the time domain with a reasonably comprehensive computer turbine model, said model correctly taking mass distribution, stationary and instationary aerodynamics, hinges, rigidity, damping, wind distribution, increase of rigidity due to the centrifugal force, etc, into consideration for wind turbines at different wind speeds. The simulations has revealed that the moment in the hub becomes as much as ten times larger when the rigidity of the hub has the critical value as compared with a higher or lower value. [0017]
  • As mentioned above, the degree of criticality depends on the relations between the disturbing frequency, the mass inertia factor of the turbine and the rigidity of the teeter hinge. In the construction phase, these values may be selected without restrictions. The disturbing frequency is equal to the rotational speed. The mass inertia factor of the turbine is mainly determined by the mass distribution and by the geometry of the blades. For a specific blade geometry, the mass inertia factor may be influenced by the choice of construction materials and by adding ballast material. The rigidity of the teeter hinge is determined by the stiffness of the different hinge elements, which normally are made of rubber or some other elastomeric material. Thus, it is relatively easy to change the rigidity, also in an existing teeter hinge, by exchanging the rubber elements to new ones with a different Young's modulus and possibly with a modified geometry. [0018]
  • To summerize, in accordance with the invention, the hub is constructed such that the operation is either supercritical or subcritical. By putting the invention into practise, the loads decrease considerably and both technical and economical advantages are achieved. [0019]
  • SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the appended drawings, in which [0020]
  • FIG. 1 illustrates how a system consisting of a mass, a spring and a damper in general reacts on disturbances of different frequencies, [0021]
  • FIG. 2 shows the principal structure of a wind turbine generator with a horizontal axis wind turbine, [0022]
  • FIG. 3A shows a side elevation, partly as a sectional view, of a teeter hub according to the invention and FIG. 3B shows the teeter hub as shown in FIG. 3A in a front elevation view.[0023]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 illustrates how a system consisting of a mass, a spring and a damper in general reacts on disturbances of different frequencies. The amplification (Y-direction in FIG. 1), i.e. the ratio of the amplitude of the system to the amplitude of the disturbance, is shown as a function of the ratio of the disturbing frequency to the eigenfrequency of the system (X-direction in FIG. 1). Point A indicates a state in which the disturbing frequency ω[0024] disturbance is low relatively to the eigenfrequency of the teeter hinge ωresonance, i.e. the operation is subcritical according to classical mechanics, corresponding to an ideal hub with a relatively high degree of rigidity. The response is slightly larger than the disturbance, i.e. the amplification is slightly larger than 1. In point B, the disturbing frequency and the eigenfrequency are equal, i.e. the operation is critical. The amplification of the disturbance is large. Point C indicates a state in which the disturbing frequency is higher than the eigenfrequency, i.e. the operation is supercritical. The response is lower than in point A and significantly lower than in point B.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates that operation in the range of point B, in which there is a significant amplification of the disturbance, should be avoided. [0025]
  • FIG. 2 shows the general structure of a wind turbine generator with a horizontal axis wind turbine. Two aerodynamically shaped turbine blades ([0026] 1) are connected to the hub (2) with a fixed or pivotal (along the longitudinal axis) connection. The hub (2) is connected to the turbine shaft (3), which is supported by the bearings (4). The turbine shaft (3) is connected to the gearbox (5), which transforms the low rotation speed of the turbine to a rotation speed conformable to the generator (6). The components of the machinery are supported by the machinery bed (7), which is connected to the yaw bearing (8). The yaw bearing (8) is rotatable on the tower (10) by means of the yaw mechanism (9). The tower is connected to solid ground by a foundation (not shown). The various functions may be more or less integrated with each other, which however does not affect the following description.
  • In FIG. 2 is indicated that the hub ([0027] 2) is a teetered hub, which implies that the two turbine blades (1) are rigidly connected to the hub (2). The hub (2) is hinged to the turbine shaft (3) and may teeter an angle A, as shown, in each direction.
  • The number of blades is normally two, but in one preferred embodiment the structure principle is applied to a turbine with one blade, and with the missing blade compensated by a counter weight. [0028]
  • FIG. 3 shows a teeter hub according to the invention. As above, the blades ([0029] 1) are connected to the hub (2), which normally is a cast structure and is connected to the turbine shaft (3) by means of a hinge member. The hinge member includes a bearing (12), which normally is composed of two or four symmetrically disposed bearing elements. The spring elements (13) counteract the teeter movement and may be combined with dampers, either by selecting a spring material with some damping properties, or by providing dampers of some other type (not shown). The active part of both the bearing (12) and the spring elements (13) are preferably made of elastomeric material.
  • The bearing ([0030] 12) and the spring elements (13) together form a hinge member (12,13) having a specific rigidity in relation to the axis of the hinge member and hence the bearing. In a preferred embodiment, the bearing (12) and the spring elements (13) have been integrated into one unit, e.g. a so-called flex-beam. In this case, as well as when neighbouring components (primarily the turbine blades) have some inherent softness, the spring constant of the spring elements (13) may include the impact of these elements.
  • In preferred embodiments additional advantages may be achieved by making the spring ([0031] 13) progressive (i.e. the spring constant increases with the dimensional change) or pre-stressed. A special type of progressive spring is achieved when there is a play between the spring element and the co-acting element, which results in a spring constant that is zero during the initial part of the teeter movement.
  • As described above, the structural parameters should by selected such that operation is avoided in the range in which the disturbing frequency is close to the critical frequency, i.e. the eigenfrequency of the teeter hinge. In preferred embodiments, the parameters are selected such that the disturbing frequency either is lower than 0.9 times the eigenfrequency or higher than 1.1 times the eigenfrequency. In addition, according to preferred embodiments, the disturbing frequency is normally higher than 0.1 times the eigenfrequency and lower than 10 times the eigenfrequency. Thus, the range between 0.1 and 0.9 times the eigenfrequency generates especially interesting preferred embodiments, in view of the requirements to avoid large extreme loads as described above. [0032]
  • As described above, the invention and the preferred embodiments of the invention as described imply essential technical and economical advantages when applied on one- and two-bladed wind turbine generators in particular. [0033]
  • Preferred embodiments as described above illustrate how the invention may be applied on wind turbines with one or two blades. However, the man skilled in the art may easily apply the invention on wind turbines with several blades and on neighbouring application areas, such as propellers for airplanes and ships, fans, turbines for other gaseous or liquideous working media, etc. [0034]

Claims (11)

1. A turbine adapted for a gaseous or liquideous working medium, in particular a wind turbine for a wind turbine generator, comprising
a shaft (3), which is rotatable at a certain angular frequency (ωrotation),
a hub (2), on which at least one turbine blade (1) is attached, and
a hinge member (12, 13) disposed between said shaft (3) and said hub (2) and comprising a bearing (12) and spring elements (13), together forming a rigidity (k) against movements in the hinge member (12, 13),
said turbine blade (1) having a mass inertia factor (Jturbine) relatively to the hinge member (12, 13) and being adapted to move through said gaseous or liquideous flow, which has a flow direction essentially perpendicular to the rotational plane of said turbine blade (1), and has a varying flow velocity in this direction, such that the turbine is exposed to disturbance forces whose essential component has a disturbance frequency (ωdisturbance) which is composed of said angular frequency (ωrotation), and
that said hinge member (12, 13) forms a teeter hinge having an eigenfrequency (ωresonance), that is calculated at ωresonance={square root}{square root over (kiJturbin)},
characterised in that
the rigidity (k) of said hinge member (12, 13),
the mass inertia factor (Jturbine) of said turbine blade (1) and
the angular frequency (ωrotation)
have been selected such that the condition ωrotation≠{square root}{square root over (k/Jturbin)} is fulfilled.
2. A turbine according to claim 1, characterised in that the ratio of the angular frequency (ωrotation) to the eigenfrequency of the teeter hinge (ωresonance) is 0.9 at most.
3. A turbine according to claim 2, characterised in that the ratio of the angular frequency (ωrotation) to the eigenfrequency of the teeter hinge (ωresonance) is at least 0.1.
4. A turbine according to claim 3, characterised in that the ratio of the angular frequency (ωrotation) to the eigenfrequency of the teeter hinge (ωresonance) is at least 1.1.
5. A turbine according to claim 4, characterised in that the ratio of the angular frequency (ωrotation) to the eigenfrequency of the teeter hinge (ωresonance) is 10.0 at most.
6. A turbine according to any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that said hinge member (12, 13) includes dampers.
7. A turbine according to any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that said spring elements (13) are progressive.
8. A turbine according to any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that said spring elements (13) are pre-stressed.
9. A wind turbine generator with a turbine according to any one of the preceding claims.
10. A method to design a turbine adapted for a gaseous or liquideous working medium, in particular a wind turbine for a wind turbine generator, said turbine comprising a shaft (3), which is rotatable at a certain angular frequency (ωrotation), a hub (2), on which at least one turbine blade (1) is attached, and a hinge member (12, 13) disposed between said shaft (3) and said hub (2) and comprising a bearing (12) and spring elements (13), together forming a rigidity (k) against movements in the hinge member (12, 13), said turbine blade (1) having a mass inertia factor (Jturbine) relatively to the hinge member (12, 13) and being adapted to move through said gaseous or liquideous flow, which has a flow direction essentially perpendicular to the rotational plane of said turbine blade (1) and has a varying flow velocity in this direction, such that the turbine is exposed to disturbance forces whose essential component has a disturbance frequency (ωdisturbance) which is composed of said angular frequency (ωrotation), and that said hinge member (12, 13) forms a teeter hinge having an eigenfrequency (ωresonance) , that is calculated at ωresonance={square root}{square root over (k/Jturbin)},
characterised in that the rigidity (k) of said hinge member (12, 13),
the mass inertia factor (Jturbine) of said turbine blade (1), and
the angular frequency (ωrotation) are selected such that the condition ωrotation≠{square root}{square root over (k/Jturbin)} is fulfilled.
11. A method according to claim 10, characterised in that the rigidity (k) of said hinge (12, 13) is selected such that the condition ωrotation≠{square root}{square root over (k/Jturbin)} is fulfilled at normal angular frequency (ωrotation).
US10/473,224 2001-03-30 2002-03-28 System for a turbine with a gaseous or liquideous working medium Abandoned US20040096329A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0101150A SE521358C2 (en) 2001-03-30 2001-03-30 Turbine intended for a gaseous or liquid working medium, especially a wind turbine in a wind turbine
SE0101150-1 2001-03-30
PCT/SE2002/000619 WO2002079643A1 (en) 2001-03-30 2002-03-28 System for a turbine with a gaseous or liquideous working medium

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040096329A1 true US20040096329A1 (en) 2004-05-20

Family

ID=20283619

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/473,224 Abandoned US20040096329A1 (en) 2001-03-30 2002-03-28 System for a turbine with a gaseous or liquideous working medium

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US20040096329A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1373719B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2004526093A (en)
AT (1) ATE354022T1 (en)
DE (1) DE60218141T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2282406T3 (en)
PT (1) PT1373719E (en)
SE (1) SE521358C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2002079643A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060066111A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Shashikanth Suryanarayanan Vibration damping system and method for variable speed wind turbines
US20060138780A1 (en) * 2002-08-08 2006-06-29 Peter Flamang Modular wind turbine transmission
US20090250939A1 (en) * 2008-04-08 2009-10-08 Curme Oliver D Wind-driven generation of power
US20090317250A1 (en) * 2008-03-24 2009-12-24 Nordic Windpower Turbine and system for generating power from fluid flow and method therefor
US20110142627A1 (en) * 2009-12-16 2011-06-16 Perkinson Robert H Teeter mechanism for a multiple-bladed wind turbine
US8203230B2 (en) * 2010-06-29 2012-06-19 General Electric Company Yaw bearing system

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4585151B2 (en) * 2001-07-26 2010-11-24 富士重工業株式会社 Wind generator operation control method

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4557666A (en) * 1983-09-29 1985-12-10 The Boeing Company Wind turbine rotor
US4557660A (en) * 1982-12-06 1985-12-10 Fanuc Ltd. Robot hand
US4565929A (en) * 1983-09-29 1986-01-21 The Boeing Company Wind powered system for generating electricity
US4913411A (en) * 1987-12-14 1990-04-03 Ltv Energy Products Co. High-capacity elastomeric combination journal-thrust bearing
US5354175A (en) * 1992-03-16 1994-10-11 Northern Power Systems, Inc. Wind turbine rotor hub and teeter joint
US5584655A (en) * 1994-12-21 1996-12-17 The Wind Turbine Company Rotor device and control for wind turbine
US5660527A (en) * 1995-10-05 1997-08-26 The Wind Turbine Company Wind turbine rotor blade root end
US6327957B1 (en) * 1998-01-09 2001-12-11 Wind Eagle Joint Venture Wind-driven electric generator apparatus of the downwind type with flexible changeable-pitch blades

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL1005000C2 (en) * 1997-01-14 1998-07-15 Aerpac Special Products B V Wind turbine.
PT1503075E (en) * 1999-06-16 2007-06-26 Neg Micon As Damping of oscillations in wind turbines
DE19930751A1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2001-01-04 Franz Mitsch Process for reducing vibrations in wind turbines

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4557660A (en) * 1982-12-06 1985-12-10 Fanuc Ltd. Robot hand
US4557666A (en) * 1983-09-29 1985-12-10 The Boeing Company Wind turbine rotor
US4565929A (en) * 1983-09-29 1986-01-21 The Boeing Company Wind powered system for generating electricity
US4913411A (en) * 1987-12-14 1990-04-03 Ltv Energy Products Co. High-capacity elastomeric combination journal-thrust bearing
US5354175A (en) * 1992-03-16 1994-10-11 Northern Power Systems, Inc. Wind turbine rotor hub and teeter joint
US5584655A (en) * 1994-12-21 1996-12-17 The Wind Turbine Company Rotor device and control for wind turbine
US5660527A (en) * 1995-10-05 1997-08-26 The Wind Turbine Company Wind turbine rotor blade root end
US6327957B1 (en) * 1998-01-09 2001-12-11 Wind Eagle Joint Venture Wind-driven electric generator apparatus of the downwind type with flexible changeable-pitch blades

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060138780A1 (en) * 2002-08-08 2006-06-29 Peter Flamang Modular wind turbine transmission
US20060066111A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Shashikanth Suryanarayanan Vibration damping system and method for variable speed wind turbines
US7309930B2 (en) * 2004-09-30 2007-12-18 General Electric Company Vibration damping system and method for variable speed wind turbines
US20090317250A1 (en) * 2008-03-24 2009-12-24 Nordic Windpower Turbine and system for generating power from fluid flow and method therefor
US8109722B2 (en) 2008-03-24 2012-02-07 Nordic Windpower Ltd. Turbine and system for generating power from fluid flow and method therefor
US20090250939A1 (en) * 2008-04-08 2009-10-08 Curme Oliver D Wind-driven generation of power
US20090249707A1 (en) * 2008-04-08 2009-10-08 Curme Oliver D Supporting a wind-driven electric generator
US20110142627A1 (en) * 2009-12-16 2011-06-16 Perkinson Robert H Teeter mechanism for a multiple-bladed wind turbine
US8770934B2 (en) * 2009-12-16 2014-07-08 Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Teeter mechanism for a multiple-bladed wind turbine
US8203230B2 (en) * 2010-06-29 2012-06-19 General Electric Company Yaw bearing system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
SE0101150L (en) 2002-10-01
SE521358C2 (en) 2003-10-28
DE60218141D1 (en) 2007-03-29
SE0101150D0 (en) 2001-03-30
EP1373719A1 (en) 2004-01-02
ES2282406T3 (en) 2007-10-16
WO2002079643A1 (en) 2002-10-10
ATE354022T1 (en) 2007-03-15
EP1373719B1 (en) 2007-02-14
DE60218141T2 (en) 2007-10-31
PT1373719E (en) 2007-05-31
JP2004526093A (en) 2004-08-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6629815B2 (en) Peripheral turbine support system
US4582013A (en) Self-adjusting wind power machine
EP2097642B1 (en) A method for damping edgewise oscillations in one or more blades of a wind turbine, an active stall controlled wind turbine and use hereof
Murtagh et al. Passive control of wind turbine vibrations including blade/tower interaction and rotationally sampled turbulence
CA1201982A (en) Horizontal axis wind energy conversion system with aerodynamic blade pitch control
US4456429A (en) Wind turbine
EP1478849B1 (en) Passive speed and power regulation of a wind turbine
US9903339B2 (en) Vertical axis wind turbine with variable pitch mechanism
US4439105A (en) Offset-axis windmill having inclined power shaft
US20040076518A1 (en) Tilt stabilized / ballast controlled wind turbine
CN111810355A (en) Blade torsion vibration damping device and method for horizontal-axis wind generating set
CA1140473A (en) Wind turbine of cross-flow type
US20140050580A1 (en) Wind turbine with actuating tail and method of operation
WO2002079647A1 (en) Hub for a turbine and a wind power plant comprising such a hub
EP1373719B1 (en) System for a turbine with gaseous or liquid working medium
US20120007366A1 (en) Variable area vertical axis wind turbine
Chen et al. Experimental investigation of aerodynamic damping effects on a semi-submersible floating offshore wind turbine
JPS59147879A (en) Down wind type wind force generator
CN212296705U (en) Blade torsion damping device of horizontal-axis wind generating set
CA1134277A (en) Fluid operated apparatus or turbine
Hohenemser et al. On the design of horizontal axis two-bladed hinged wind turbines
Bottrell Passive cyclic pitch control for horizontal axis wind turbines
Stillman et al. Vibratory Load Reduction on a Quad-Rotor Wind Turbine Using Tuned Mass Dampers
Templin Design characteristics of the 224 kW Magdalen Islands VAWT
Velazquez et al. Gyroscopic effects of horizontal axis wind turbines using stochastic aeroelasticity via spinning finite elements

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NORDIC WINDPOWER AB, SWEDEN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ENGSTROM, STAFFAN;REEL/FRAME:014928/0119

Effective date: 20030929

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO PAY ISSUE FEE

AS Assignment

Owner name: NORDIC WINDPOWER LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORDIC WINDPOWER AB;REEL/FRAME:021592/0753

Effective date: 20080922