US20040031076A1 - Transformation system in camelina sativa - Google Patents

Transformation system in camelina sativa Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040031076A1
US20040031076A1 US10/416,091 US41609103A US2004031076A1 US 20040031076 A1 US20040031076 A1 US 20040031076A1 US 41609103 A US41609103 A US 41609103A US 2004031076 A1 US2004031076 A1 US 2004031076A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
camelina sativa
transformation
plant
explants
agrobacterium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/416,091
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Viktor Kuvshinov
Anne Kanerva
Kimmo Koivu
Eija Pehu
Svetlana Kuvshinova
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unicrop Ltd
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Assigned to UNICORP LTD reassignment UNICORP LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ANNE, KANERVA, EIJA, PEHU, KIMMO, KOIVU, KUVSHINOV, VIKTOR, SVETLANA, KUVSHINOVA
Publication of US20040031076A1 publication Critical patent/US20040031076A1/en
Assigned to GREAT PLAINS OIL AND EXPLORATION, LLC reassignment GREAT PLAINS OIL AND EXPLORATION, LLC SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: UNICROP OY
Assigned to UNICROP OY reassignment UNICROP OY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ANISSIMOV, ANDREI, KANERVA, ANNE, KOIVU, KIMMO, KUVSHINOV, VIKTOR
Priority to US12/288,791 priority Critical patent/US7910803B2/en
Priority to US12/290,379 priority patent/US20090151023A1/en
Priority to US13/385,329 priority patent/US20120192318A1/en
Priority to US14/173,716 priority patent/US20140223607A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8201—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
    • C12N15/8202—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation by biological means, e.g. cell mediated or natural vector
    • C12N15/8205—Agrobacterium mediated transformation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to plant biotechnology and plant cell transformation. More particularly the invention relates to a method for genetically transforming Camelina sativa using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of a plant tissue explant and subsequent regeneration of the transformed cells into whole Camelina sativa plants. It further relates to the use of an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method of Camelina sativa for producing homologous or heterologous recombinant products including for example proteins, enzymes and oil products and for assessing and screening the properties, and effects of DNA sequences and recombinant DNA constructs in plants.
  • transgenic plants allow the introduction of genes of any origin into the target species providing novel products for e.g. agricultural, horticultural, nutritional and chemical applications. Furthermore, transgenic plants provide more information about basic plant biology, gene function and regulation. In many plant species, traditional plant breeding is limited due to the fact that the existing gene pool is narrow and prevents further development. Alteration of single characteristics can be time-consuming and even impossible without changing any other properties.
  • Major applications of genetic transformation focus on the improvement of for example disease resistance, insect resistance, herbicide tolerance, modified quality characteristics such as modification of oil and protein compositions as well as on improving stress tolerance and modifying growth characteristics. In other applications transgenic plants are used as bioreactors for producing foreign proteins or plant secondary metabolites.
  • Agrobacterium-mediated gene transformation is the most widely used method to transfer genes in plants using either Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rhizogenes.
  • Several Agrobacterium-mediated systems and methods for transforming plants and plant cells have been disclosed for example in WO 84/02920, EP 289478, U.S. Pat. No. 5,352,605, U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,619, U.S. Pat. No. 5,416,011, U.S. Pat. No. 5,569,834, U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,179, U.S. Pat. No. 6,018,100, and
  • the present invention relates to plant biotechnology and plant cell transformation. More particularly the invention relates to a method for genetically transforming Camelina sativa using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of a plant tissue explant and subsequent regeneration of the transformed cells into whole Camelina sativa plants. It further relates to the use of an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method of Camelina sativa for producing homologous or heterologous recombinant products including for example proteins, enzymes and oil products and for assessing and screening the properties, and effects of DNA sequences and recombinant DNA constructs in plants.
  • transgenic plants allow the introduction of genes of any origin into the target species providing novel products for e.g. agricultural, horticultural, nutritional and chemical applications. Furthermore, transgenic plants provide more information about basic plant biology, gene function and regulation. In many plant species, traditional plant breeding is limited due to the fact that the existing gene pool is narrow and prevents further development. Alteration of single characteristics can be time-consuming and even impossible without changing any other properties.
  • Major applications of genetic transformation focus on the improvement of for example disease resistance, insect resistance, herbicide tolerance, modified quality characteristics such as modification of oil and protein compositions as well as on improving stress tolerance and modifying growth characteristics. In other applications transgenic plants are used as bioreactors for producing foreign proteins or plant secondary metabolites.
  • Agrobacterium-mediated gene transformation is the most widely used method to transfer genes in plants using either Agrobacterium tumefaciens or Agrobacterium rhizogenes.
  • Several Agrobacterium-mediated systems and methods for transforming plants and plant cells have been disclosed for example in WO 84/02920, EP 289478, U.S. Pat. No. 5,352,605, U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,619, U.S. Pat. No. 5,416,011, U.S. Pat. No. 5,569,834, U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,179, U.S. Pat. No. 6,018,100, and
  • Camelina sativa (gold of pleasure or false flax), one of the most important oil crops in Europe during bronze and iron age, has been grown in Europe for centuries. It was especially used as lamp oil, but also in edible products. Oil products obtained from Camelina sativa have been used for producing food spreads as described in the patent U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,476.
  • Camelina sativa (L. Crantz) belongs to the family Brassicaceae in the tribe Sisymbrieae and both spring- and winter forms are in production. It is a low-input crop adapted to low fertility soils. Results from long-term experiments in Central Europe have shown that the seed yields of Camelina sativa are comparable to the yields of oil seed rape.
  • Camelina sativa seeds Due to the high oil content of Camelina sativa seeds varying about 30-40%, there has been a renewed interest in Camelina sativa oil.
  • Camelina sativa seeds have a high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids, about 50-60% with an excellent balance of useful fatty acids including 30-40% of alpha-linolenic acid, which is an omega-3 oil. Omega-3 oils resemble marine oils and are rarely found in other oil crops.
  • Camelina sativa seed contains a high amount of tocopherols (appr. 600 ppm) with a unique oxidative stability.
  • the oil is low in glucosinolates (Mattpianus and Zubr, Industrial Crops and Products 12:9-18, 2000).
  • a quality problem for food and feed uses of Camelina sativa is that it contains relatively high amount of erucic acid (2-4%) and 11-eicosenoic acid (gondoic acid). Erucic acid is poorly digested and causes myocardial lesions in animals. Said problem causing erucic and 11-eicosenoic acids can be removed from the oil and used for other non-nutritional applications, which include the use of high-eruric acid containing oils as lubricants. Industrial applications might require prominence of such fatty acid of singular importance.
  • Camelina sativa is a minor crop species, very little has been done in terms of its breeding aside from testing different accessions for agronomic traits and oil profiles.
  • a mutation breeding experiment to induce variation in the fatty acid profiles has reported three to four fold differences (Buchsenschutz-Northdurft et al., 3rd European Symposium on Industrial Crops and Products, France, 1996).
  • Application of tissue culture techniques to Camelina sativa are restricted to two approaches.
  • Camelina sativa has been used in a somatic fusion with other Brassica species (Narasimhulu et al., Plant Cell Rep. 13:657-660, 1994; Hansen, Crucifer.
  • Present invention provides a genetic transformation system for Camelina sativa, which would address rapid improvement of this crop for different end-uses, which include the production of homologous and heterologous recombinant DNA products.
  • homologous recombinant products comprise e.g. unique protein or oil products which are specific for Camelina sativa, whereas heterologous products include foreign proteins, enzymes, etc.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention is to provide a novel model plant for replacing e.g. Arabidopsis and tobacco.
  • a further embodiment is to provide transgenic Camelina sativa plants, plant tissue, plant cells and cell lines and seed.
  • the objectives of the present invention are achieved by the method of the present invention, which enables the use of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for genetic transformation of Camelina sativa explants.
  • Camelina sativa has characteristics which make it suitable for use in efficient genetic transformation and subsequent production of heterologous and homologous gene products.
  • Camelina sativa germinates and grows rapidly and already after 10 days from germination explants can be excised from plantlets.
  • Genetically transformed Camelina sativa plants can be transfered to greenhouse after four weeks from transformation event.
  • the transformation efficiency of Camelina sativa is high compared to other plants including Brassica species.
  • the rapid growth of Camelina sativa enables that the transformation method can be scaled up for future applications.
  • Transformation of Camelina sativa is effective even without selection avoiding the use of a selectable marker gene, which makes the transformation of Camelina sativa attractive for applications, since possible harmful effects of the marker genes used in cloning vectors is a concern in genetically engineered plants.
  • the present invention provides a novel method to genetically transform Camelina sativa using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
  • the method and the products and means utilized in said method are as defined in the claims of the present invention and they provide an efficient, reliable and convenient transformation system for producing Camelina sativa crop with improved properties using transgenic improvement and recombinant DNA technologies.
  • the present invention is related to transgenic Camelina sativa plants obtainable with the method of the present invention as defined in the claims by optionally sterilizing one or more seeds of Camelina sativa and germinating and growing said seeds into plants, providing explants of Camelina sativa plants, contacting the explants of Camelina sativa with an Agrobacterium vector comprising at least one recombinant DNA construct, an optional selectable marker gene and an optional enhancer, allowing the transformation to take place on a cell culture medium optionally supplemented with at least one hormone and/or growth factor, selecting the transformed tissue of Camelina sativa on a medium optionally containing at least one selective component, inducing the regeneration of one or more shoots from the transformed explants on a cell culture medium optionally containing at least one hormone and/or growth factor and growing the shoots into whole Camelina sativa plants.
  • the invention is also related to transgenic Camelina sativa plant tissue obtainable with the method defined in the claims.
  • the invention further relates to transgenic Camelina sativa plant cells or cell lines obtainable with the method defined in the claims.
  • the invention is also related to transgenic Camelina sativa seed obtainable with the method defined in the claims.
  • FIG. 1 shows in vitro cultured Camelina sativa plant.
  • FIG. 2 shows regenerated shoots of Camelina sativa on leaf segment explants.
  • FIG. 3 a depicts GUS expression in callus tissue of Camelina sativa. The arrowheads point to GUS stained inclusions.
  • FIG. 3 b depicts GUS expression in callus tissue of Camelina sativa. The arrowheads point to GUS stained inclusions.
  • FIG. 4 shows results of PCR amplification of a transgenic insertion.
  • the PCR was carried out using specific primers developed for the central part of uidA gene.
  • the length of the DNA sequence between the primers is about 700 nucleotides and thus the size of the amplification product is also 700 nucleotides.
  • Samples on the gel are marked as follows: NT, non-transgenic Camelina sativa (negative control); T, transgenic GUS positive line of Camelina sativa expressing uidA gene; +, uidA gene sequence cloned in pBluescript vector as positive control.
  • M is a one kilobase (1 kb) marker ladder (Fermentas).
  • FIG. 5 shows Camelina sativa plantlets grown in greenhouse conditions. The plantlets are transgenic shoots recovered and rooted after in vitro selection of transformed explants of Camelina sativa.
  • the terms used have the meaning they generally have in the fields of conventional plant breeding, plant biochemistry and production of transgenic plants, including recombinant DNA technology as well as agriculture and horticulture. Some terms, however, are used with a somewhat deviating or broader meaning in this context. Accordingly, in order to avoid uncertainty caused by terms with unclear meaning some of the terms used in this specification and in the claims are defined in more detail below.
  • GUS ⁇ -glucuronidase (uidA reporter gene)
  • nptII gene encoding for neomycin phosphotransferase II
  • Camelina sativa belongs to the family of Brassicaceae in the tribe Sisymbriae. The seed yields of Camelina sativa are comparable to the seed yields of oil seed rape. Useful varieties of Camelina sativa are for example var. Calina and var. Calinca which are hereby mentioned but not claimed.
  • Agrobacterium means Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Agrobacterium rhizogenes or another Agrobacterium species useful for genetic transformation of plants to produce genetically modified plants.
  • Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a naturally occuring bacterium which when containing a circular Ti (Tumor inducing) plasmid is able to form crown gall disease in many species of dicotyledonous plants. Crown gall occurs when a wound is invaded by Agrobacterium.
  • Agrobacterium tumefaciens natively has the ability to transfer a portion of its DNA called T-DNA, into the genome of the plant cells. In Agrobacterium-mediated transformation T-DNA is replaced with a foreign set of genes, thus, making the bacterium capable of transferring the foreign genes into the genome of the plant cell.
  • Agrobacterium tumefaciens can be one of the three different strains of Agrobacterium used in the transformation of Camelina sativa or an equivalent strain suitable for the transformation.
  • the strain LB4404 carries the plasmid pAL4404, the strain C58C1 carries the plasmid pGV3850 and the strain EHA105 carries the plasmid pTiBo542.
  • Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation in the present invention means that Agrobacterium is used as a vector which is able to transfer foreign gene(s) to Camelina sativa cells.
  • the T-DNA portion of the Ti plasmid is replaced with the foreign gene and, after the Agrobacterium infection, transferred into the plant chromosomal DNA.
  • transgenic plant means a plant, especially Camelina sativa plant, which is obtained using the method disclosed in the present invention.
  • the optionally sterilized seeds of Camelina sativa are germinated and grown to plants, which provide explants for use in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method.
  • An Agrobacterium strain containing an Agrobacterium vector comprising at least one recombinant DNA construct and an optional selectable marker gene is allowed to transform Camelina sativa cells in a cell culture medium optionally supplemented with at least one hormone and/or growth factor.
  • Selection on a medium optionally containing at least one selective component is followed by the regeneration of one or more shoots or roots from the transformed explants on a cell culture medium optionally containing at least one hormone and/or growth factor.
  • the shoots are grown into whole transgenic Camelina sativa plants.
  • explant means a part or a piece which is taken from a plant, in this this context from Camelina sativa. These pieces or tissue explants can be excised from hypocotyl, cotyledon, stem, leaf or other plant organs and can be used for in vitro culture and for transformation experiments.
  • in vitro explant means a Camelina sativa explant excised from hypocotyl, cotyledon, stem, leaf or other plant organs originating from plants grown in vitro preferably under sterile conditions on culture media.
  • An “explant” or “in vitro explant” can be a leaf segment.
  • leaf segment means a piece of leaf from preferably in vitro grown Camelina sativa.
  • the leaves of in vitro grown Camelina sativa can be rather small in size for example 2-4 cm long and 0.5-1 cm wide. Accordingly, narrow leaves are cut across the leaf while larger leaves are also cut in half along the central vein.
  • the term “recombinant DNA construct” means a DNA sequence including linear or circular vector, plasmid or insert created by ligating or joining together pieces of DNA that are not normally contiguous in nature.
  • the construct which is transfered into the plant cell, comprises a specific gene of interest, which is desired to be introduced into the germline of the plant, and an optional selectable marker gene that confers upon the plant cell a resistance to a chemical selective component (selection agent).
  • selectable marker gene means an optionally used gene in plant transformation such as the gene for neomycin phosphotransferase (npt II), which expresses an enzyme conferring resistance to the antibiotic kanamycin and the related antibiotics neomycin, paromomycin, gentamicin, and G418, or the gene for hygromycin phosphotransferase (hpt), which expresses an enzyme conferring resistance to hygromycin.
  • Other selectable marker genes include genes encoding herbicide resistance, metal resistance or sensitivity, for example Cu-resistance or sensitivity, genes utilizing special carbohydrate sources or other metabolites including for example mannose or other selection systems.
  • selection of the transformed tissue of Camelina sativa means that the transformed tissue is grown on a medium containing a substrate allowing the selection of transformed tissues which carry a marker gene.
  • Preferred selective substances are antibiotics, for example hygromycin or kanamycin, but other selection systems such as herbicides, metal resistance or sensitivity, including e.g. Cu-resistance or sensitivity and special carbohydrate sources or other metabolites are applicable.
  • the use of a marker gene e.g. hpt or nptII is optional, since possible harmful effects of the marker genes used with plant cloning vectors is one area of concern with genetically engineered plants.
  • Antibiotic selection begins preferably immediately after transformation and the result of the selection can be seen in 1-2 weeks, when the explants begin to form callus.
  • MS medium or equivalent or “MS medium or equivalent” means that preferably Murashige and Skoog's growth medium, that is MS medium, is used in the method of the present invention (Murashige and Skoog, Physiol Plant. 15:472-493, 1962). Any other medium suitable for the purposes of the present invention can also be used including for example the B5 medium.
  • the growth medium can be in liquid form or made solid or semisolid using an appropriate amount of agar or gelrite for example 0.7 g/l. The concentration of the medium can optionally varies from half strength to 2 ⁇ strength.
  • the term “inoculation with Agrobacterium” means that the Camelina sativa explants are inoculated with bacteria by placing them in Agrobacterium suspension to enable the transformation of Camelina sativa with Agrobacterium. Before inoculation an overnight culture of Agrobacterium has been diluted in a Murashige and Skoog (MS) solution or another suitable growth medium to enable the transformation of Camelina sativa with Agrobacterium.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • co-cultivation means that Camelina sativa explants are placed preferably on solid Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent medium supplemented with at least one hormone, such as cytokinin or auxin, and optionally with acetosyringone for co-cultivation. Explants are co-cultivated with Agrobacterium for time sufficient to enable the transformation, for example 2 days. During this step, the Agrobacterium transfers the foreign gene construct into Camelina sativa cells. The co-cultivated segments are then washed and placed on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent for callus and shoot regeneration.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • shoot and root regeneration means the induction of the formation of shoots and roots from the transformed explants where shoots appear on the explants after growing the explants on culture medium allowing shoot regeneration, preferably Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent, supplemented with hormones and/or growth factors allowing shoot and root regeneration, preferably cytokinin such as 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and auxin such as ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and an effective amount of substance capable of preventing the growth of contaminants, such as antibiotics carbenicillin or more preferably ticarcillin/clavulanic acid for time sufficient for shoots to appear.
  • cytokinin such as 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP)
  • auxin such as ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)
  • an effective amount of substance capable of preventing the growth of contaminants such as antibiotics carbenicillin or more preferably ticarcillin/clavulanic acid for time sufficient for shoots to appear.
  • the term “growing the shoots into a whole Camelina sativa plant” means that the regenerated transgenic shoots are grown and rooted for about 2-3 weeks on a half strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent medium without hormones or optionally supplemented with auxins.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • hormones and especially “plant hormones” or “growth factors” mean organic compounds or molecules originating in certain parts or organs of a plant, which compounds when transported to another tissue elicit a certain response. Plant hormones are active preferably in small concentrations and can be used in different combinations. The major classes of plant hormones are auxin, gibberellins, cytokinins, ethylene, and abscisic acid, each of which has many effects. Also a variety of other compounds including oligosaccharins, batasins and brassinosteroids function as hormones in plants.
  • “Hormones”, “plant hormones” and “growth factors” can be used as substances or means in the transformation method to enchance the transformation, selection, regeneration, growth or other functions.
  • auxins can stimulate cellular elongation, differentiation of vascular tissue, fruit development, formation of adventitious roots and production of ethylene.
  • Naturally occuring and synthetic auxins include for example indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 4-chloro-IAA, phenylacetic acid, ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), dimethylallylaminopurine (2iP) and other auxins.
  • Gibberellins can stimulate extensive growth of intact plants, the transition from juvenile to adult growth, bolting of biennials, fruit formation, and germination of some cereal grains. More than 80 gibberellins have been isolated from various fungi and plants including GA 3 .
  • Cytokinins can stimulate cellular division, expansion of cotyledons, and growth of lateral buds. Cytokinins also delay senescence of detached leaves and, in combination with IAA, may influence formation of roots and shoots. Cytokinins include naturally occuring and artificial substances such as kinetin, zeatin, zeatin riboside, dihydrozeatin, isopentenyl adenine and 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP).
  • BAP 6-benzylaminopurine
  • Ethylene is a gaseous hormone that can influence fruit ripening, abscission, sex expression, and the radial expansion of cells. Ethylene can also function as a “wound hormone”. High amounts of ethylene are harmful, whereas low amounts promote rooting. Increased aeration of in vitro cultures removes ethylene.
  • Abscisic acid is an inhibitor that can cause stomata to close, affects dormancy of some seeds, and, in general, counteracts the stimulatory effects of other hormones. These effects may occur because ABA is calcium antagonist.
  • a system for carrying out Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation in Camelina sativa means a system which in a packaged combination is intended for commercial use.
  • Said system comprises Camelina sativa seeds, suitable DNA sequences and/or DNA constructs, suitable media with optional additives and instructions for using the transformation system.
  • the Camelina sativa seeds can be cultivated to provide the seedlings from which explants are taken.
  • the DNA sequence is a homologous or heterologous additional foreign gene or part of a gene, as such, which encodes a desired product.
  • the DNA sequences can also be provided as a DNA construct, in which case the foreign gene is functionally linked with one ore more optional sequences, which are responsible for certain functions or capable of regulating said functions. Examples of such sequences are promoters or signal sequences.
  • the DNA construct may comprise optional sequence allowing selection of explants of Camelina sativa carrying the transgenic inserts.
  • the packaged combination can be provided with or without the media needed in the transformation
  • assessing the efficacy of plant transformation means the investigation of the rate of transgenic inclusions in transformed explants and is assessed by recording by visible means including GUS expression, PCR methods, Southern analysis or equivalent methods.
  • homologous or heterologous recombinant products means proteins, peptides, metabolites, oils, carbohydrates, polymers, or other products, which can be produced using Agrobacterium mediated transformation system in Camelina sativa.
  • Homologous recombinant DNA products are produced when DNA sequences or genes native to Camelina sativa are used, whereas heterologous products are produced with DNA sequences or genes which are not naturally occuring in Camelina sativa.
  • the “homologous and heterologous recombinant products” can originate from bacteria, viruses, fungi, plants and animals, including human proteins and peptides which require processing.
  • Brassica species have been used as common model plants in plant breeding and molecular biology, but because they are prone to pests like Meligethes aeneus, an alternative plant related to them would be useful.
  • Camelina sativa would provide such a new model plant, which is not sensitive to the pest.
  • Camelina sativa has a relatively small genome, including only 20 chromosomes, which simplifies its use in genetic studies.
  • Classically for example tobacco and Arabidopsis have been used as model plants and especially compared to Arabidopsis, Camelina sativa provides more plant material for further experiments.
  • the present invention thus provides an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method of Camelina sativa.
  • the starting material for the transformation is Camelina sativa seed.
  • Camelina sativa plants producing seed are grown in greenhouse conditions, since field grown plants produce seed contaminated with bacteria, which later prevents successful transformation with Agrobacterium.
  • Camelina sativa seeds have a 0.5-1 mm thick hygroscopic polysaccharide surface around the seed protecting the seed for example against fungal and bacterial spores and requiring more effective surface sterilization compared to many other species. Seeds were first optionally sterilized and subsequently germinated and grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent plant growth medium.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • leaf segments of 2-3 weeks, but preferably 10-20 days old Camelina sativa plants preferably grown in vitro were used in the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
  • Leaf segments were excised and then placed on cultivation medium, preferebly Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent medium, supplemented with hormones, such as cytokinins and/or auxins or other hormones and sucrose or other sugar source and cultivated on said medium for 24 hours.
  • cultivation medium preferebly Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent medium, supplemented with hormones, such as cytokinins and/or auxins or other hormones and sucrose or other sugar source and cultivated on said medium for 24 hours.
  • hormones such as cytokinins and/or auxins or other hormones and sucrose or other sugar source
  • the Camelina sativa explants were inoculated by immersing explants in liquid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent medium or water containing Agrobacterium carrying the selected transformation vector with at least one gene foreign to said Camelina sativa.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • the explants were placed on solid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent supplemented with hormones, such as cytokinins or auxins, and optionally with acetosyringone for co-cultivation.
  • Explants were co-cultivated with Agrobacterium for 2 days (48 hours) or a time sufficient to enable the transformation. During this step, the Agrobacterium transfered the foreign gene construct into Camelina sativa cells.
  • the co-cultivated segments were then washed and placed on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium agar or equivalent medium for callus and shoot regeneration.
  • Optional antibiotic selection begins preferably immediately after transformation and the result of the selection can be seen in 1-2 weeks, when explants begin to form callus. Selection was carried out using optional antibiotics such as kanamycin, hygromycin or other selective agents for optionally 4-20 days or longer. An efficient transformation was also obtained without selection with antibiotics.
  • optional antibiotics such as kanamycin, hygromycin or other selective agents for optionally 4-20 days or longer. An efficient transformation was also obtained without selection with antibiotics.
  • the leaf segments had also produced callus and shoots and roots.
  • the regenerated, transgenic shoots were grown and rooted for about 2-3 weeks on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or equivalent medium, which is hormone-free or optionally supplemented with auxins, including, but not limited to, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 4-chloro-IAA, phenylacetic acid, ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and/or 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D).
  • IAA indole-3-acetic acid
  • NAA ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid
  • 2,4-D 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
  • the invention is also related to a system for carrying out Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation comprising a test kit in a packaged combination including one or more optionally sterilized seeds to provide seedlings from which explants of Camelina sativa are obtainable, an Agrobacterium vector, at least one DNA sequence encoding a desired gene product as such or in a recombinant DNA construct comprising Agrobacterium and/or plasmids and at least one DNA sequence encoding the desired gene product functionally combined with sequences responsible for or capable of regulating said functions, and optionally at least one sequence allowing selection of explants of Camelina sativa with a culture of Agrobacterium carrying the said recombinant DNA construct, one or more cell culture mediums supplemented or non-supplemented optionally with at least one hormone and/or growth factor and/or at least one selective component which is capable of selecting plant cells transformed with the said construct.
  • the system also comprises the means and the method for obtaining whole transgenic Camelina sativa
  • Agrobacterium vectors Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58C1 containing the plasmid pGV3850 (Zambryski et al., EMBO J. 2:2143-2150, 1983), strain EHA105 (Hood et al., Transgenic Res. 2:208-218, 1993) with the plasmid pTiBo542 and strain LBA4404 with pAL4404 (Hoekema et al., Nature 303:179-180, 1983) were tested for transformation of Camelina sativa.
  • the uidA marker gene ( ⁇ -glucuronidase, GUS) containing an intron (uidA-int) (Vancanneyt et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 220:245-250, 1990) was cloned into all vectors containing T-DNA region as listed above.
  • the uidA-intron-containing gene was used to prevent bacterial GUS expression and enabled the testing of GUS-activity at an early stage of transformation.
  • the co-integrative pHTT294 vector essentially similar to pHTT370 (Elomaa et al., Bio/Technology 11:508-511, 1993) carrying the uidA-intron-containing gene under the CaMV 35S promoter (Datla et al., Plant Sci. 94:139-149, 1993), was transferred to an Agrobacterium strain C58C1. Binary pGPTV-HPT and pGPTV-KAN vectors (Becker et al., Plant. Mol. Biol.
  • composition of Murashige and Skoog (MS) plant growth medium Salts: g/l Vitamins: mg/l NH 4 NO 3 1.65 Thiamine 0.1 KNO 3 1.9 Pyridoxine 0.1 MgS0 4 x7H 2 O 0.37 Nicotinic acid 0.5 KH 2 P0 4 0.17 Myo-inositol 100 CaCl 2 x2H 2 O 0.44 Glycine 2.0
  • Agrobacterium vectors Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58C1 containing the plasmid pGV3850 (Zambryski et al., EMBO J. 2:2143-2150, 1983), strain EHA105 (Hood et al., Transgenic Res. 2:208-218, 1993) with the plasmid pTiBo542 and strain LBA4404 with pAL4404 (Hoekema et al., Nature 303:179-180, 1983) were tested for transformation of Camelina sativa.
  • the uidA marker gene ( ⁇ -glucuronidase, GUS) containing an intron (uidA-int) (Vancanneyt et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 220:245-250, 1990) was cloned into all vectors containing T-DNA region as listed above.
  • the uidA-intron-containing gene was used to prevent bacterial GUS expression and enabled the testing of GUS-activity at an early stage of transformation.
  • the co-integrative pHTT294 vector essentially similar to pHTT370 (Elomaa et al., Bio/Technology 11:508-511, 1993) carrying the uidA-intron-containing gene under the CaMV 35S promoter (Datla et al., Plant Sci. 94:139-149, 1993), was transferred to an Agrobacterium strain C58C1. Binary pGPTV-HPT and pGPTV-KAN vectors (Becker et al., Plant. Mol. Biol.
  • composition of Murashige and Skoog (MS) plant growth medium Salts: Vitamins: g/l mg/l NH 4 N0 3 1.65 Thiamine 0.1 KNO 3 1.9 Pyridoxine 0.1 MgS0 4 x7H 2 0 0.37 Nicotinic acid 0.5 KH 2 P0 4 0.17 Myo-inositol 100 CaCl 2 x2H 2 0 mg/l g/l H 3 B0 3 6.2 Sucrose 2.0 MnSO 4 x4H 2 0 22.3 Agar 7.0 ZnSOx7H 2 0 8.6 KJ 0.83 pH 5.6 Na 2 MoO 4 x2H 2 O 0.25 CuSO 4 x5H 2 O 0.025 CoCl 2 x2H 2 0 0.025
  • the surfaces of the explants were dried on filter paper and placed on the Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent medium for selection and shoot regeneration.
  • the medium was supplemented with the same hormones and antibiotics than for transgenic tissue selection (kanamycin, hygromycin) and Agrobacterium growth inhibitors.
  • whole explant is preferably transfered onto Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent medium supplemented with cytokinins [1 mg/ml 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP)] to stimulate further growth of shoots.
  • cytokinins 1 mg/ml 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP)
  • Petri dishes were sealed with porous paper tape.
  • Recovered transgenic shoots were grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent medium without hormones or optionally supplemented with 0.1-0.2 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) for stimulation of rooting, stem elongation and micropropagation.
  • NAA ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid
  • Camelina sativa plants produce seed heavily contaminated and were practically improper for use in the transformation, because leaf explants contained bacteria which prevented successful transformation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
  • To achieve good starting material seed producing Camelina sativa plants were grown in greenhouse conditions. The seeds, which had been developed and matured in greenhouse were free of contaminations after surface sterilization.
  • Camelina sativa seeds have a hygroscopic polysaccharide surface, which forms a 0.5-1 mm barrier around the seed. This barrier protects the seed against fungal and bacterial spores. This particular characteristics of Camelina sativa seed surface requires more effective surface sterilization of seeds compared to many other species.
  • Sterilized seeds were germinated and grown for 2-3 weeks or preferably 10-20 days on Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent medium without sucrose and hormones. The green leaves served as a source for explants for the transformation.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • Transformation efficiencies of different Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains were measured as a proportion of blue inclusions in callus one week after inoculation of leaf segments (FIGS. 3 a , 3 b ). TABLE 2 Transformation efficiencies of different Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains.
  • First column GUS positives/all explants
  • Second column intensive transformation. Blue inclusions Intensively Transformation Agrobacterium all explants transformed % (intensive) LBA4404pGPTV-HPT 35/50 7/50 70% (14) EHA105pGPTV-HPT 24/50 48% (0) C58C1pGV3850 pHTT294 33/50 4/50 66% (8)
  • the 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), gibberellins as well as silver nitrate treatments did not have an effect on shoot regeneration.
  • the best regeneration was achieved with a certain ratio of auxin and cytokinin hormones.
  • the best shoot regeneration of leaf segments of Camelina sativa variety cv. Calena was achieved with the hormone combination of 1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.2 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), while the optimal combination for Camelina sativa variety cv. Calinca was 0.7 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.3 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA).
  • Recovered shoots had a tendency for inflorescence formation and had problems with rooting.
  • recovered shoots were cultivated subsequently on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent medium optionally supplemented with auxins (e.g. indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) 1 mg/l).
  • auxins e.g. indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) 1 mg/l.
  • IAA indole-3-acetic acid
  • Another way was to regenerate shoots and roots simultaneously with the hormone combination of 0.5-1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.2-0.7 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA).
  • BAP 6-benzylaminopurine
  • NAA ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid
  • cefotaxime (Claforan) (500 mg/l), carbenicillin (200 mg/l), ticarcillin/clavulonic acid (Duchefa) (100 mg/ml) or vancomycin (200 mg/ml) were used.
  • the selection markers i.e. the hpt and nptII genes in transformation constructs provided the plants with resistance to hygromycin and kanamycin, respectively. It had been found that the application of a selection pressure (15-20 mg/l, preferably 10-20 mg/l of antibiotic) preferably for 4-10 days after washing of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens from explants is optimal. First regenerative primordia form on the calli already 10 days after cutting of the leaf segments, and selection of transformed tissues should be performed before that. It was found in preliminary experiments that 5-15 mg/l antibiotic prevented morphogenesis of explants. Selection of transformed tissue using 5-10 mg/l hygromycin or kanamycin was not enough. On the other hand, the concentrations of the antibiotic higher than 20-30 mg/l killed the explants too fast for any shoots to recover.
  • the histological GUS assay was performed on transformed callus and leaf tissue. To prevent GUS expression in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the uidA gene containing the intron was used in transformation experiments. It enabled the testing of GUS activity almost immediately after co-cultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Usually, GUS assay was made 4-7 days after co-cultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens during the optimization of transformation (FIG. 3). The assay was also performed on regenerated primordia and shoots as well as leaf segments of recovered plants.
  • Narrow leaves of in vitro grown Camelina sativa plants were cut only across the leaf blade, whereas large leaves were additionally cut in half along the central vein.
  • the leaf segments were cultivated for 24 hours on Murashige and Skoog (MS) 0.7% agar medium supplemented with 1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.2 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). All the Murashige and Skoog (MS) culture media were supplemented with 2% sucrose and all in vitro cultures were kept at temperatures of 25° C. (day) and 18° C. (night) under the photoperiod of 16 h.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • a fresh colony of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58C1pGV3850 carrying binary pGPTV-KAN vector (Becker et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 20:1195-1197, 1992) containing uidA-int gene under 35S promoter and selectable marker gene nptII, was inoculated in 3 ml of liquid YEB medium supplemented with 25 mg/l rifampicin (Rif) and 50 mg/l kanamycin (Kan). The bacteria were grown overnight with shaking at 28° C.
  • the first leaves (no cotyledons) of in vitro grown Camelina sativa were cut into segments across the leaf and were placed on pre-cultivation plates containing 0.7% MS agar medium supplemented with 2% sucrose, 0.7 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.3 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). All dishes were sealed with porous paper tape (Micropore 3M).
  • the explants were dried on the filter paper and transferred onto selection medium containing 0.7% Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium supplemented with 2% sucrose, 0.7 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), 0.3 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 15 mg/l kanamycin and 50 mg/l ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (Duchefa).
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • BAP 6-benzylaminopurine
  • NAA ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid
  • 15 mg/l kanamycin 15 mg/l kanamycin
  • 50 mg/l ticarcillin/clavulanic acid Duchefa
  • the explants were transferred onto plates containing 0.7% MS agar medium supplemented with 2% sucrose, 0.7 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), 0.3 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and 50 mg/l ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (Duchefa) for shoot and root regeneration for 10-14 days.
  • Tall (3 cm high) plates were sealed with porous paper tape to increase aeration. Simultaneous regeneration of shoots and roots is preferable for effective recovery of transgenic Camelina sativa plants.
  • Explants forming 0.5-1 cm long leaves (shoots) and roots were transferred on 0.7% Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium containing 2-3% sucrose and 100 mg/l ticarcillin/clavulanic acid without hormones or optionally supplemented with 1 mg/ml 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) for 5-7 days.
  • explants were transferred to fog system (mist chamber) in greenhouse for consecutive growth.
  • a fresh colony of C58C1pGV3850 with interned Ti DNA from pHTT-HPT (Elomaa et al., Bio/Technology 11:508-511, 1993) vector containing GUS gene under 35S promoter and hpt selectable marker was inoculated in 3 ml of liquid YEB supplemented with 25 mg/l rifampicin (Rif) and 100 mg/l spectinomycin (Spe) or streptomycin (Str). The bacteria were grown overnight with shaking at 28° C.
  • the first leaves (no cotyledons) were cut into segments across the leaf and placed onto the pre-cultivation plates containing 0.7% Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium with 2% sucrose supplemented with 1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.5 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). All plates were sealed with porous paper tape (Micropore 3M).
  • the plant explants were immersed in liquid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 2% sucrose and inoculated with a ⁇ fraction (1/10) ⁇ dilution of the overnight culture of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Redundant liquid on the explants was removed on sterilized filter paper. The explants were co-cultivated with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens for two days at 28° C. in dim light.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • the explants were washed with water containing 100 mg/l ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (Duchefa). Ticarcillin (Tc) has less negative effect on shoot and root regeneration compared to cefotaxime (Claforan) and carbenicillin. On the other hand it is more effective growth inhibitor of Agrobacterium tumefaciens than vancomycin.
  • the explants were dried on the filter paper.
  • the explants were placed onto selection medium plates containing 7% Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium with 2% sucrose supplemented with 1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), 0.5 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and 50 mg/l ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (Duchefa) 0.5 mg/l for shoot and root regeneration for 2-3 weeks.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • BAP 6-benzylaminopurine
  • NAA 0.5 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid
  • Duchefa ticarcillin/clavulanic acid
  • the strain C58C1pGV3850 was the most effective for transformation of Camelina sativa. 100% of the explants were transformed. The average proportion of tissue in each explant showing GUS expression was more than 30%. This is the highest level of transformation that was registered by present inventors. The transformation efficiency enables to obtain transgenic plats without antibiotic or other selection of transgenic plants.
  • the histological GUS assay was performed on transformed callus and leaf tissue. To prevent GUS expression in Agrobacteria the uidA gene containing an intron was used in transformation experiments. It enabled the testing of GUS activity even immediately after co-cultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Usually, GUS assay was made 4-7 days after co-cultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens during the optimization of transformation (FIG. 3). The assay was also performed on regenerated primordia and shoots as well as leaf segments of recovered plants.
  • Total genomic DNA was isolated from leaf tissue of transgenic and non-transgenic Camelina sativa plants using DNeasy Plant Mini Kit according to the supplier's instructions (Qiagen). The presence of the uidA and hpt gene in the GUS positive plants was determined by PCR analysis using 24 nucleotides long primers specific to the coding sequences of uidA and hpt genes. PCR reaction mix contained approximately 1 ng/ ⁇ l of template DNA and DyNAzyme polymerase (Finnzymes) was used for amplification. PCR program conisted of: 94° for 2 min; 30 cycles of 94° C. for 30 sec, 48° C. for 30 sec and 72° C. for 2 min.
  • Total genomic DNA was isolated from leaf tissue of Camelina sativa plants using DNeasy Plant Midi Kit according to the supplier's instructions (Qiagen). Three ⁇ g of DNA from GUS positive Camelina sativa plants was digested with EcoRI and BamHI restriction enzymes. These enzymes cut out a 2 kb uidA gene fragment from the T-region of pGPTV-KAN (-HPT) inserted in the plant genome. Digested DNA samples were separated in a 0.7% agarose (Promega) gel overnight at 15 mA current and transferred to positively charged nylon membrane (Boehringer Mannheim) using vacuum blotter.
  • RNA probes were synthesized using T3 RNA polymerase on the pBluescript vector carrying uidA or hpt gene sequence and labeled with digoxigenin-11-UTP.
  • the membrane was hybridized and developed according to the supplier's instructions (Boehringer Mannheim, The DIG user's guide for filter hybridization).
  • the membrane was prehybridized at 50° C. for 2 h and hybridized at 50° C. in a “DIG Easy Hyb” hybridization solution (Boehringer Mannheim) overnight with a digoxigenin-UTP labeled RNA probe.
  • the concentration of RNA probe was 100 ng/ml.
  • FIG. 1 shows in vitro cultured Camelina sativa plant.
  • FIG. 2 shows regenerated shoots of Camelina sativa on leaf segment explants.
  • FIG. 3 a depicts GUS expression in callus tissue of Camelina sativa. The arrowheads point to GUS stained inclusions.
  • FIG. 3 b depicts GUS expression in callus tissue of Camelina sativa. The arrowheads point to GUS stained inclusions.
  • FIG. 4 shows results of PCR amplification of a transgenic insertion.
  • the PCR was carried out using specific primers developed for the central part of uidA gene.
  • the length of the DNA sequence between the primers is about 700 nucleotides and thus the size of the amplification product is also 700 nucleotides.
  • Samples on the gel are marked as follows: NT, non-transgenic Camelina sativa (negative control); T, transgenic GUS positive line of Camelina sativa expressing uidA gene; +, uidA gene sequence cloned in pBluescript vector as positive control.
  • M is a one kilobase (1 kb) marker ladder (Fermentas).
  • FIG. 5 shows Camelina sativa plantlets grown in greenhouse conditions. The plantlets are transgenic shoots recovered and rooted after in vitro selection of transformed explants of Camelina sativa.
  • the terms used have the meaning they generally have in the fields of conventional plant breeding, plant biochemistry and production of transgenic plants, including recombinant DNA technology as well as agriculture and horticulture. Some terms, however, are used with a somewhat deviating or broader meaning in this context. Accordingly, in order to avoid uncertainty caused by terms with unclear meaning some of the terms used in this specification and in the claims are defined in more detail below.
  • nptII gene encoding for neomycin phosphotransferase II
  • Camelina sativa belongs to the family of Brassicaceae in the tribe Sisymbriae. The seed yields of Camelina sativa are comparable to the seed yields of oil seed rape. Useful varieties of Camelina sativa are for example var. Calina and var. Calinca which are hereby mentioned but not claimed.
  • Agrobacterium means Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Agrobacterium rhizogenes or another Agrobacterium species useful for genetic transformation of plants to produce genetically modified plants.
  • Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a naturally occuring bacterium which when containing a circular Ti (Tumor inducing) plasmid is able to form crown gall disease in many species of dicotyledonous plants. Crown gall occurs when a wound is invaded by Agrobacterium.
  • Agrobacterium tumefaciens natively has the ability to transfer a portion of its DNA called T-DNA, into the genome of the plant cells. In Agrobacterium-mediated transformation T-DNA is replaced with a foreign set of genes, thus, making the bacterium capable of transferring the foreign genes into the genome of the plant cell.
  • Agrobacterium tumefaciens can be one of the three different strains of Agrobacterium used in the transformation of Camelina sativa or an equivalent strain suitable for the transformation.
  • the strain LB4404 carries the plasmid pAL4404, the strain C58C1 carries the plasmid pGV3850 and the strain EHA105 carries the plasmid pTiBo542.
  • Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation in the present invention means that Agrobacterium is used as a vector which is able to transfer foreign gene(s) to Camelina sativa cells.
  • the T-DNA portion of the Ti plasmid is replaced with the foreign gene and, after the Agrobacterium infection, transferred into the plant chromosomal DNA.
  • transgenic plant means a plant, especially Camelina sativa plant, which is obtained using the method disclosed in the present invention.
  • the optionally sterilized seeds of Camelina sativa are germinated and grown to plants, which provide explants for use in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method.
  • An Agrobacterium strain containing an Agrobacterium vector comprising at least one recombinant DNA construct and an optional selectable marker gene is allowed to transform Camelina sativa cells in a cell culture medium optionally supplemented with at least one hormone and/or growth factor.
  • Selection on a medium optionally containing at least one selective component is followed by the regeneration of one or more shoots or roots from the transformed explants on a cell culture medium optionally containing at least one hormone and/or growth factor.
  • the shoots are grown into whole transgenic Camelina sativa plants.
  • explant means a part or a piece which is taken from a plant, in this this context from Camelina sativa. These pieces or tissue explants can be excised from hypocotyl, cotyledon, stem, leaf or other plant organs and can be used for in vitro culture and for transformation experiments.
  • in vitro explant means a Camelina sativa explant excised from hypocotyl, cotyledon, stem, leaf or other plant organs originating from plants grown in vitro preferably under sterile conditions on culture media.
  • An “explant” or “in vitro explant” can be a leaf segment.
  • leaf segment means a piece of leaf from preferably in vitro grown Camelina sativa.
  • the leaves of in vitro grown Camelina sativa can be rather small in size for example 2-4 cm long and 0.5-1 cm wide. Accordingly, narrow leaves are cut across the leaf while larger leaves are also cut in half along the central vein.
  • the term “recombinant DNA construct” means a DNA sequence including linear or circular vector, plasmid or insert created by ligating or joining together pieces of DNA that are not normally contiguous in nature.
  • the construct which is transfered into the plant cell, comprises a specific gene of interest, which is desired to be introduced into the germline of the plant, and an optional selectable marker gene that confers upon the plant cell a resistance to a chemical selective component (selection agent).
  • selectable marker gene means an optionally used gene in plant transformation such as the gene for neomycin phosphotransferase (npt II), which expresses an enzyme conferring resistance to the antibiotic kanamycin and the related antibiotics neomycin, paromomycin, gentamicin, and G418, or the gene for hygromycin phosphotransferase (hpt), which expresses an enzyme conferring resistance to hygromycin.
  • Other selectable marker genes include genes encoding herbicide resistance, metal resistance or sensitivity, for example Cu-resistance or sensitivity, genes utilizing special carbohydrate sources or other metabolites including for example mannose or other selection systems.
  • selection of the transformed tissue of Camelina sativa means that the transformed tissue is grown on a medium containing a substrate allowing the selection of transformed tissues which carry a marker gene.
  • Preferred selective substances are antibiotics, for example hygromycin or kanamycin, but other selection systems such as herbicides, metal resistance or sensitivity, including e.g. Cu-resistance or sensitivity and special carbohydrate sources or other metabolites are applicable.
  • the use of a marker gene e.g. hpt or nptII is optional, since possible harmful effects of the marker genes used with plant cloning vectors is one area of concern with genetically engineered plants.
  • Antibiotic selection begins preferably immediately after transformation and the result of the selection can be seen in 1-2 weeks, when the explants begin to form callus.
  • MS medium or equivalent or “MS medium or equivalent” means that preferably Murashige and Skoog's growth medium, that is MS medium, is used in the method of the present invention (Murashige and Skoog, Physiol Plant. 15:472-493, 1962). Any other medium suitable for the purposes of the present invention can also be used including for example the B5 medium.
  • the growth medium can be in liquid form or made solid or semisolid using an appropriate amount of agar or gelrite for example 0.7 g/l. The concentration of the medium can optionally varies from half strength to 2 ⁇ strength.
  • the term “inoculation with Agrobacterium” means that the Camelina sativa explants are inoculated with bacteria by placing them in Agrobacterium suspension to enable the transformation of Camelina sativa with Agrobacterium. Before inoculation an overnight culture of Agrobacterium has been diluted in a Murashige and Skoog (MS) solution or another suitable growth medium to enable the transformation of Camelina sativa with Agrobacterium.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • co-cultivation means that Camelina sativa explants are placed preferably on solid Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent medium supplemented with at least one hormone, such as cytokinin or auxin, and optionally with acetosyringone for co-cultivation. Explants are co-cultivated with Agrobacterium for time sufficient to enable the transformation, for example 2 days. During this step, the Agrobacterium transfers the foreign gene construct into Camelina sativa cells. The co-cultivated segments are then washed and placed on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent for callus and shoot regeneration.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • shoot and root regeneration means the induction of the formation of shoots and roots from the transformed explants where shoots appear on the explants after growing the explants on culture medium allowing shoot regeneration, preferably Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent, supplemented with hormones and/or growth factors allowing shoot and root regeneration, preferably cytokinin such as 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and auxin such as ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and an effective amount of substance capable of preventing the growth of contaminants, such as antibiotics carbenicillin or more preferably ticarcillin/clavulanic acid for time sufficient for shoots to appear.
  • cytokinin such as 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP)
  • auxin such as ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)
  • an effective amount of substance capable of preventing the growth of contaminants such as antibiotics carbenicillin or more preferably ticarcillin/clavulanic acid for time sufficient for shoots to appear.
  • the term “growing the shoots into a whole Camelina sativa plant” means that the regenerated transgenic shoots are grown and rooted for about 2-3 weeks on a half strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent medium without hormones or optionally supplemented with auxins.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • hormones and especially “plant hormones” or “growth factors” mean organic compounds or molecules originating in certain parts or organs of a plant, which compounds when transported to another tissue elicit a certain response. Plant hormones are active preferably in small concentrations and can be used in different combinations. The major classes of plant hormones are auxin, gibberellins, cytokinins, ethylene, and abscisic acid, each of which has many effects. Also a variety of other compounds including oligosaccharins, batasins and brassinosteroids function as hormones in plants. “Hormones”, “plant hormones” and “growth factors” can be used as substances or means in the transformation method to enchance the transformation, selection, regeneration, growth or other functions.
  • auxins can stimulate cellular elongation, differentiation of vascular tissue, fruit development, formation of adventitious roots and production of ethylene.
  • Naturally occuring and synthetic auxins include for example indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 4-chloro-IAA, phenylacetic acid, ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), dimethylallylaminopurine (2iP) and other auxins.
  • Gibberellins can stimulate extensive growth of intact plants, the transition from juvenile to adult growth, bolting of biennials, fruit formation, and germination of some cereal grains. More than 80 gibberellins have been isolated from various fungi and plants including GA 3 .
  • Cytokinins can stimulate cellular division, expansion of cotyledons, and growth of lateral buds. Cytokinins also delay senescence of detached leaves and, in combination with IAA, may influence formation of roots and shoots. Cytokinins include naturally occuring and artificial substances such as kinetin, zeatin, zeatin riboside, dihydrozeatin, isopentenyl adenine and 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP).
  • BAP 6-benzylaminopurine
  • Ethylene is a gaseous hormone that can influence fruit ripening, abscission, sex expression, and the radial expansion of cells. Ethylene can also function as a “wound hormone”. High amounts of ethylene are harmful, whereas low amounts promote rooting. Increased aeration of in vitro cultures removes ethylene.
  • Abscisic acid is an inhibitor that can cause stomata to close, affects dormancy of some seeds, and, in general, counteracts the stimulatory effects of other hormones. These effects may occur because ABA is calcium antagonist.
  • a system for carrying out Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation in Camelina sativa means a system which in a packaged combination is intended for commercial use.
  • Said system comprises Camelina sativa seeds, suitable DNA sequences and/or DNA constructs, suitable media with optional additives and instructions for using the transformation system.
  • the Camelina sativa seeds can be cultivated to provide the seedlings from which explants are taken.
  • the DNA sequence is a homologous or heterologous additional foreign gene or part of a gene, as such, which encodes a desired product.
  • the DNA sequences can also be provided as a DNA construct, in which case the foreign gene is functionally linked with one ore more optional sequences, which are responsible for certain functions or capable of regulating said functions. Examples of such sequences are promoters or signal sequences.
  • the DNA construct may comprise optional sequence allowing selection of explants of Camelina sativa carrying the transgenic inserts.
  • the packaged combination can be provided with or without the media needed in the transformation
  • assessing the efficacy of plant transformation means the investigation of the rate of transgenic inclusions in transformed explants and is assessed by recording by visible means including GUS expression, PCR methods, Southern analysis or equivalent methods.
  • homologous or heterologous recombinant products means proteins, peptides, metabolites, oils, carbohydrates, polymers, or other products, which can be produced using Agrobacterium mediated transformation system in Camelina sativa.
  • Homologous recombinant DNA products are produced when DNA sequences or genes native to Camelina sativa are used, whereas heterologous products are produced with DNA sequences or genes which are not naturally occuring in Camelina sativa.
  • the “homologous and heterologous recombnant products” can originate from bacteria, viruses, fungi, plants and animals, including human proteins and peptides which require processing.
  • Brassica species have been used as common model plants in plant breeding and molecular biology, but because they are prone to pests like Meligethes aeneus, an alternative plant related to them would be useful.
  • Camelina sativa would provide such a new model plant, which is not sensitive to the pest.
  • Camelina sativa has a relatively small genome, including only 20 chromosomes, which simplifies its use in genetic studies.
  • Classically for example tobacco and Arabidopsis have been used as model plants and especially compared to Arabidopsis, Camelina sativa provides more plant material for further experiments.
  • the present invention thus provides an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method of Camelina sativa.
  • Camelina sativa seed The starting material for the transformation is Camelina sativa seed. Camelina sativa plants producing seed are grown in greenhouse conditions, since field grown plants produce seed contaminated with bacteria, which later prevents successful transformation with Agrobacterium. Camelina sativa seeds have a 0.5-1 mm thick hygroscopic polysaccharide surface around the seed protecting the seed for example against fungal and bacterial spores and requiring more effective surface sterilization compared to many other species. Seeds were first optionally sterilized and subsequently germinated and grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent plant growth medium.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • leaf segments of 2-3 weeks, but preferably 10-20 days old Camelina sativa plants preferably grown in vitro were used in the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
  • Leaf segments were excised and then placed on cultivation medium, preferebly Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent medium, supplemented with hormones, such as cytokinins and/or auxins or other hormones and sucrose or other sugar source and cultivated on said medium for 24 hours.
  • cultivation medium preferebly Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent medium, supplemented with hormones, such as cytokinins and/or auxins or other hormones and sucrose or other sugar source and cultivated on said medium for 24 hours.
  • hormones such as cytokinins and/or auxins or other hormones and sucrose or other sugar source
  • the Camelina sativa explants were inoculated by immersing explants in liquid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent medium or water containing Agrobacterium carrying the selected transformation vector with at least one gene foreign to said Camelina sativa.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • the explants were placed on solid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent supplemented with hormones, such as cytokinins or auxins, and optionally with acetosyringone for co-cultivation.
  • Explants were co-cultivated with Agrobacterium for 2 days (48 hours) or a time sufficient to enable the transformation. During this step, the Agrobacterium transfered the foreign gene construct into Camelina sativa cells. The co-cultivated segments were then washed and placed on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium agar or equivalent medium for callus and shoot regeneration.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • Optional antibiotic selection begins preferably immediately after transformation and the result of the selection can be seen in 1-2 weeks, when explants begin to form callus. Selection was carried out using optional antibiotics such as kanamycin, hygromycin or other selective agents for optionally 4-20 days or longer. An efficient transformation was also obtained without selection with antibiotics.
  • optional antibiotics such as kanamycin, hygromycin or other selective agents for optionally 4-20 days or longer. An efficient transformation was also obtained without selection with antibiotics.
  • the leaf segments had also produced callus and shoots and roots.
  • the regenerated, transgenic shoots were grown and rooted for about 2-3 weeks on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or equivalent medium, which is hormone-free or optionally supplemented with auxins, including, but not limited to, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 4-chloro-IAA, phenylacetic acid, ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and/or 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D).
  • IAA indole-3-acetic acid
  • NAA ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid
  • 2,4-D 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
  • the invention is also related to a system for carrying out Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation comprising a test kit in a packaged combination including one or more optionally sterilized seeds to provide seedlings from which explants of Camelina sativa are obtainable, an Agrobacterium vector, at least one DNA sequence encoding a desired gene product as such or in a recombinant DNA construct comprising Agrobacterium and/or plasmids and at least one DNA sequence encoding the desired gene product functionally combined with sequences responsible for or capable of regulating said functions, and optionally at least one sequence allowing selection of explants of Camelina sativa with a culture of Agrobacterium carrying the said recombinant DNA construct, one or more cell culture mediums supplemented or non-supplemented optionally with at least one hormone and/or growth factor and/or at least one selective component which is capable of selecting plant cells transformed with the said construct.
  • the system also comprises the means and the method for obtaining whole transgenic Camelina sativa
  • Agrobacterium vectors Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58C1 containing the plasmid pGV3850 (Zambryski et al., EMBO J. 2:2143-2150, 1983), strain EHA105 (Hood et al., Transgenic Res. 2:208-218, 1993) with the plasmid pTiBo542 and strain LBA4404 with pAL4404 (Hoekema et al., Nature 303:179-180, 1983) were tested for transformation of Camelina sativa.
  • the uidA marker gene ( ⁇ -glucuronidase, GUS) containing an intron (uidA-int) (Vancanneyt et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 220:245-250, 1990) was cloned into all vectors containing T-DNA region as listed above.
  • the uidA-intron-containing gene was used to prevent bacterial GUS expression and enabled the testing of GUS-activity at an early stage of transformation.
  • the co-integrative pHTT294 vector essentially similar to pHTT370 (Elomaa et al., Bio/Technology 11:508-511, 1993) carrying the uidA-intron-containing gene under the CaMV 35S promoter (Datla et al., Plant Sci. 94:139-149, 1993), was transferred to an Agrobacterium strain C58C1. Binary pGPTV-HPT and pGPTV-KAN vectors (Becker et al., Plant. Mol. Biol.
  • composition of Murashige and Skoog (MS) plant growth medium Salts: Vitamins: g/l mg/l NH 4 N0 3 1.65 Thiamine 0.1 KNO 3 3 1.9 Pyridoxine 0.1 MgS0 4 x7H 2 O 0.37 Nicotinic acid 0.5 KH 2 P0 4 0.17 Myo-inositol 100 CaCl 2 x2H 2 0 0.44 Glycine 2.0 mg/l mg/l H 3 B0 3 6.2 Sucrose 2.0 MnSO 4 x4H 2 0 22.3 Agar 7.0 ZnSO 4 x7H 2 0 8.6 KJ 0.83 pH5.6 Na 2 MoO 4 x2H 2 O 0.25 CuSO 4 x5H 2 O 0.025 CoCl 2 x2H 2 0 0.025
  • Leaf segments of in vitro grown Camelina sativa plants were cultivated for 24 hours on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent medium supplemented with 0.7% agar. All MS culture media were supplemented with 2% sucrose and all in vitro cultures were kept at temperatures of 25° C. (day) and 18° C. (night) under 16 h photoperiod. Subsequently, the explants were immersed for 1-3 min in Murashige and Skoog (MS) solution or an equivalent which had been inoculated with a dilution (e.g. 1/10 vol/vol) of an overnight culture of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
  • a dilution e.g. 1/10 vol/vol
  • the surfaces of the explants were dried on filter paper and placed on the Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent medium for selection and shoot regeneration.
  • the medium was supplemented with the same hormones and antibiotics than for transgenic tissue selection (kanamycin, hygromycin) and Agrobacterium growth inhibitors.
  • whole explant is preferably transfered onto Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent medium supplemented with cytokinins [1 mg/ml 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP)] to stimulate further growth of shoots.
  • cytokinins 1 mg/ml 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP)
  • Petri dishes were sealed with porous paper tape.
  • Recovered transgenic shoots were grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent medium without hormones or optionally supplemented with 0.1-0.2 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) for stimulation of rooting, stem elongation and micropropagation.
  • NAA ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid
  • transgenic plants which showed stable GUS expression and grew well after selection were grown in the greenhouse (FIG. 5) They were then used for PCR and Southern blot analysis to confirm the transformation event at the DNA level.
  • Camelina sativa plants produce seed heavily contaminated and were practically improper for use in the transformation, because leaf explants contained bacteria which prevented successful transformation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
  • To achieve good starting material seed producing Camelina sativa plants were grown in greenhouse conditions. The seeds, which had been developed and matured in greenhouse were free of contaminations after surface sterilization.
  • Camelina sativa seeds have a hygroscopic polysaccharide surface, which forms a 0.5-1 mm barrier around the seed. This barrier protects the seed against fungal and bacterial spores. This particular characteristics of Camelina sativa seed surface requires more effective surface sterilization of seeds compared to many other species.
  • the sterilization experiments were performed as shown in Table 1. The Camelina sativa seeds were immersed in 70% ethanol for 1 min and treated with Na-hypochlorite solution with an addition of Tween-20 (1 drop per 100 ml).
  • Sterilized seeds were germinated and grown for 2-3 weeks or preferably 10-20 days on Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium or an equivalent medium without sucrose and hormones. The green leaves served as a source for explants for the transformation.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • Transformation efficiencies of different Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains were measured as a proportion of blue inclusions in callus one week after inoculation of leaf segments (FIGS. 3 a , 3 b ).
  • the 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), gibberellins as well as silver nitrate treatments did not have an effect on shoot regeneration.
  • the best regeneration was achieved with a certain ratio of auxin and cytokinin hormones.
  • the best shoot regeneration of leaf segments of Camelina sativa variety cv. Calena was achieved with the hormone combination of 1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.2 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), while the optimal combination for Camelina sativa variety cv. Calinca was 0.7 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.3 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA).
  • Recovered shoots had a tendency for inflorescence formation and had problems with rooting.
  • recovered shoots were cultivated subsequently on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or an equivalent medium optionally supplemented with auxins (e.g. indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) 1 mg/l).
  • auxins e.g. indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) 1 mg/l.
  • IAA indole-3-acetic acid
  • Another way was to regenerate shoots and roots simultaneously with the hormone combination of 0.5-1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.2-0.7 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA).
  • BAP 6-benzylaminopurine
  • NAA ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid
  • cefotaxime (Claforan) (500 mg/l), carbenicillin (200 mg/l), ticarcillin/clavulonic acid (Duchefa) (100 mg/ml) or vancomycin (200 mg/ml) were used.
  • the selection markers i.e. the hpt and nptII genes in transformation constructs provided the plants with resistance to hygromycin and kanamycin, respectively. It had been found that the application of a selection pressure (15-20 mg/l, preferably 10-20 mg/l of antibiotic) preferably for 4-10 days after washing of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens from explants is optimal. First regenerative primordia form on the calli already 10 days after cutting of the leaf segments, and selection of transformed tissues should be performed before that. It was found in preliminary experiments that 5-15 mg/l antibiotic prevented morphogenesis of explants. Selection of transformed tissue using 5-10 mg/l hygromycin or kanamycin was not enough. On the other hand, the concentrations of the antibiotic higher than 20-30 mg/l killed the explants too fast for any shoots to recover.
  • the histological GUS assay was performed on transformed callus and leaf tissue. To prevent GUS expression in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the uidA gene containing the intron was used in transformation experiments. It enabled the testing of GUS activity almost immediately after co-cultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Usually, GUS assay was made 4-7 days after co-cultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens during the optimization of transformation (FIG. 3). The assay was also performed on regenerated primordia and shoots as well as leaf segments of recovered plants.
  • Narrow leaves of in vitro grown Camelina sativa plants were cut only across the leaf blade, whereas large leaves were additionally cut in half along the central vein.
  • the leaf segments were cultivated for 24 hours on Murashige and Skoog (MS) 0.7% agar medium supplemented with 1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.2 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). All the Murashige and Skoog (MS) culture media were supplemented with 2% sucrose and all in vitro cultures were kept at temperatures of 25° C. (day) and 18° C. (night) under the photoperiod of 16 h.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • the explants were immersed for 1-3 min in Murashige and Skoog (MS) solution inoculated with a dilution (e.g. ⁇ fraction (1/10) ⁇ v/v) of the overnight culture of Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404. Redundant liquid on the stem segments was removed using filter paper and the explants were placed on Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium supplemented with auxin and cytokinin for co-cultivation with bacteria for 2 days. The explants were washed with water containing claforan [cefotaxime) (700 mg/l)] or carbenicillin (700 mg/ml).
  • a dilution e.g. ⁇ fraction (1/10) ⁇ v/v
  • the surfaces of the explants were dried on filter paper and the explants were placed on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with hormones [0.7 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), 0.25 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)] and 200 mg/l carbenicillin or claforan and 15 mg/ml hygromycin. Two to three weeks old shoots (FIG.
  • a fresh colony of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58C1pGV3850 carrying binary pGPTV-KAN vector (Becker et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 20:1195-1197, 1992) containing uidA-int gene under 35S promoter and selectable marker gene nptII, was inoculated in 3 ml of liquid YEB medium supplemented with 25 mg/l rifampicin (Rif) and 50 mg/l kanamycin (Kan). The bacteria were grown overnight with shaking at 28° C.
  • the first leaves (no cotyledons) of in vitro grown Camelina sativa were cut into segments across the leaf and were placed on pre-cultivation plates containing 0.7% MS agar medium supplemented with 2% sucrose, 0.7 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.3 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). All dishes were sealed with porous paper tape (Micropore 3M). A 30 ⁇ l aliquot of overnight culture of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens was inoculated in 3 ml of fresh YEB medium supplemented with rifampicin (Rif) and kanamycin (Kan).
  • the explants were dried on the filter paper and transferred onto selection medium containing 0.7% Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium supplemented with 2% sucrose, 0.7 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), 0.3 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 15 mg/l kanamycin and 50 mg/l ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (Duchefa).
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • BAP 6-benzylaminopurine
  • NAA ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid
  • 15 mg/l kanamycin 15 mg/l kanamycin
  • 50 mg/l ticarcillin/clavulanic acid Duchefa
  • the explants were transferred onto plates containing 0.7% MS agar medium supplemented with 2% sucrose, 0.7 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), 0.3 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and 50 mg/l ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (Duchefa) for shoot and root regeneration for 10-14 days.
  • Tall (3 cm high) plates were sealed with porous paper tape to increase aeration. Simultaneous regeneration of shoots and roots is preferable for effective recovery of transgenic Camelina sativa plants.
  • Explants forming 0.5-1 cm long leaves (shoots) and roots were transferred on 0.7% Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium containing 2-3% sucrose and 100 mg/l ticarcillin/clavulanic acid without hormones or optionally supplemented with 1 mg/ml 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) for 5-7 days.
  • explants were transferred to fog system (mist chamber) in greenhouse for consecutive growth.
  • a fresh colony of C58C1pGV3850 with interned Ti DNA from pHTT-HPT (Elomaa et al., Bio/Technology 11:508-511, 1993) vector containing GUS gene under 35S promoter and hpt selectable marker was inoculated in 3 ml of liquid YEB supplemented with 25 mg/l rifampicin (Rif) and 100 mg/l spectinomycin (Spe) or streptomycin (Str). The bacteria were grown overnight with shaking at 28° C.
  • the first leaves (no cotyledons) were cut into segments across the leaf and placed onto the pre-cultivation plates containing 0.7% Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium with 2% sucrose supplemented with 1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and 0.5 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA). All plates were sealed with porous paper tape (Micropore 3M).
  • the plant explants were immersed in liquid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 2% sucrose and inoculated with a ⁇ fraction (1/10) ⁇ dilution of the overnight culture of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Redundant liquid on the explants was removed on sterilized filter paper. The explants were co-cultivated with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens for two days at 28° C. in dim light.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • the explants were placed onto selection medium plates containing 7% Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar medium with 2% sucrose supplemented with 1 mg/l 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), 0.5 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and 50 mg/l ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (Duchefa) 0.5 mg/l for shoot and root regeneration for 2-3 weeks.
  • MS Murashige and Skoog
  • BAP 6-benzylaminopurine
  • NAA 0.5 mg/l ⁇ -naphthaleneacetic acid
  • Duchefa ticarcillin/clavulanic acid
  • the strain C58C1pGV3850 was the most effective for transformation of Camelina sativa. 100% of the explants were transformed. The average proportion of tissue in each explant showing GUS expression was more than 30%. This is the highest level of transformation that was registered by present inventors. The transformation efficiency enables to obtain transgenic plats without antibiotic or other selection of transgenic plants.
  • the histological GUS assay was performed on transformed callus and leaf tissue. To prevent GUS expression in Agrobacteria the uidA gene containing an intron was used in transformation experiments. It enabled the testing of GUS activity even immediately after co-cultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Usually, GUS assay was made 4-7 days after co-cultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens during the optimization of transformation (FIG. 3). The assay was also performed on regenerated primordia and shoots as well as leaf segments of recovered plants.
  • Total genomic DNA was isolated from leaf tissue of transgenic and non-transgenic Camelina sativa plants using DNeasy Plant Mini Kit according to the supplier's instructions (Qiagen). The presence of the uidA and hpt gene in the GUS positive plants was determined by PCR analysis using 24 nucleotides long primers specific to the coding sequences of uidA and hpt genes. PCR reaction mix contained approximately 1 ng/ ⁇ l of template DNA and DyNAzyme polymerase (Finnzymes) was used for amplification. PCR program conisted of: 94° for 2 min; 30 cycles of 94° C. for 30 sec, 48° C. for 30 sec and 72° C. for 2 min.
  • Total genomic DNA was isolated from leaf tissue of Camelina sativa plants using DNeasy Plant Midi Kit according to the supplier's instructions (Qiagen). Three ⁇ g of DNA from GUS positive Camelina sativa plants was digested with EcoRI and BamHI restriction enzymes. These enzymes cut out a 2 kb uidA gene fragment from the T-region of pGPTV-KAN (-HPT) inserted in the plant genome. Digested DNA samples were separated in a 0.7% agarose (Promega) gel overnight at 15 mA current and transferred to positively charged nylon membrane (Boehringer Mannheim) using vacuum blotter.
  • RNA probes were synthesized using T3 RNA polymerase on the pBluescript vector carrying uidA or hpt gene sequence and labeled with digoxigenin-11-UTP.
  • the membrane was hybridized and developed according to the supplier's instructions (Boehringer Mannheim, The DIG user's guide for filter hybridization).
  • the membrane was prehybridized at 50° C. for 2 h and hybridized at 50° C. in a “DIG Easy Hyb” hybridization solution (Boehringer Mannheim) overnight with a digoxigenin-UTP labeled RNA probe.
  • the concentration of RNA probe was 100 ng/ml.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Processing Of Color Television Signals (AREA)
US10/416,091 2000-11-13 2001-11-12 Transformation system in camelina sativa Abandoned US20040031076A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/288,791 US7910803B2 (en) 2000-11-13 2008-10-23 Transformation in Camelina sativa
US12/290,379 US20090151023A1 (en) 2000-11-13 2008-10-30 Transformation system for Camelina sativa
US13/385,329 US20120192318A1 (en) 2000-11-13 2012-02-14 Transformation system for Camelina sativa
US14/173,716 US20140223607A1 (en) 2000-11-13 2014-02-05 Transformation system in camelina sativa

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI20002478 2000-11-13
FI20002478A FI110009B (fi) 2000-11-13 2000-11-13 Camelina sativan transformaatiojärjestelmä
PCT/FI2001/000978 WO2002038779A1 (fr) 2000-11-13 2001-11-12 Systeme de transformation dans camelina sativa

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/FI2001/000978 A-371-Of-International WO2002038779A1 (fr) 2000-11-13 2001-11-12 Systeme de transformation dans camelina sativa

Related Child Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/288,791 Division US7910803B2 (en) 2000-11-13 2008-10-23 Transformation in Camelina sativa
US12/290,379 Continuation-In-Part US20090151023A1 (en) 2000-11-13 2008-10-30 Transformation system for Camelina sativa
US13/385,329 Continuation-In-Part US20120192318A1 (en) 2000-11-13 2012-02-14 Transformation system for Camelina sativa
US13/385,329 Division US20120192318A1 (en) 2000-11-13 2012-02-14 Transformation system for Camelina sativa

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040031076A1 true US20040031076A1 (en) 2004-02-12

Family

ID=8559479

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/416,091 Abandoned US20040031076A1 (en) 2000-11-13 2001-11-12 Transformation system in camelina sativa
US12/288,791 Expired - Fee Related US7910803B2 (en) 2000-11-13 2008-10-23 Transformation in Camelina sativa
US13/385,329 Abandoned US20120192318A1 (en) 2000-11-13 2012-02-14 Transformation system for Camelina sativa
US14/173,716 Abandoned US20140223607A1 (en) 2000-11-13 2014-02-05 Transformation system in camelina sativa

Family Applications After (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/288,791 Expired - Fee Related US7910803B2 (en) 2000-11-13 2008-10-23 Transformation in Camelina sativa
US13/385,329 Abandoned US20120192318A1 (en) 2000-11-13 2012-02-14 Transformation system for Camelina sativa
US14/173,716 Abandoned US20140223607A1 (en) 2000-11-13 2014-02-05 Transformation system in camelina sativa

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (4) US20040031076A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP1334199B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE516357T1 (fr)
AU (1) AU2002214078A1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2427117A1 (fr)
FI (1) FI110009B (fr)
WO (1) WO2002038779A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2009117555A1 (fr) * 2008-03-21 2009-09-24 Targeted Growth, Inc. Procédé de trempage floral permettant la transformation de camélina

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2758247A1 (fr) * 2009-06-15 2010-12-23 Huttenbauer, Samuel, Jr. Camelina sativa resistant aux herbicides
US20120266268A1 (en) * 2009-09-25 2012-10-18 Washington State University Genetic manipulation of the at-hook domain in plant ahl genes to modulate cell growth
AU2012242991B2 (en) 2011-04-11 2017-03-02 Targeted Growth, Inc. Identification and the use of KRP mutants in plants
BR112014025265A2 (pt) 2012-04-12 2017-07-11 Rothamsted Res Ltd produção de ácidos graxos poli-insaturados ômega-3 de cadeia longa
AU2013334670B2 (en) 2012-10-23 2017-02-16 Montana State University Production of high quality Durum wheat having increased amylose content
CA2942826A1 (fr) 2013-03-14 2014-09-25 Evolutionary Genomics, Inc. Identification et utilisation de genes de la tomate controlant la tolerance au sel/a la secheresse et le gout sucre du fruit
EP3552482B1 (fr) 2013-10-29 2022-06-29 Biotech Institute, LLC Sélection, production, traitement et utilisation de cannabis spécial
EP2868748A1 (fr) * 2013-10-31 2015-05-06 Locusia Oy Procédé de production de protéines dans des plantes doubles haploïdes
CN104067801B (zh) * 2014-06-17 2016-04-13 长江大学 一种移栽烟草苗动态优势根区的判断方法
WO2015196100A1 (fr) * 2014-06-20 2015-12-23 Donald Danforth Plant Science Center Constructions et procédés pour la biosynthèse de la galanthamine
US11859196B2 (en) 2016-03-15 2024-01-02 National Research Council Of Canada Modulating drought tolerance in Brassicaceae using the Kanghan gene family
CA3017594A1 (fr) 2016-03-15 2017-09-21 National Research Council Of Canada Modulation des reponses au stress abiotique des plantes a l'aide de la famille des genes kanghan
WO2022093977A1 (fr) 2020-10-30 2022-05-05 Fortiphyte, Inc. Résistance aux agents pathogénes chez des plantes
US11483992B2 (en) 2020-11-16 2022-11-01 Sustainable Oils, Inc. Camelina sativa variety “SO-70”
US11470796B2 (en) 2020-11-16 2022-10-18 Sustainable Oils, Inc. Camelina sativa variety “SO-90”
US11632924B2 (en) 2020-12-02 2023-04-25 Sustainable Oils, Inc. Camelina sativa variety “SO-110”
US11632923B2 (en) * 2020-12-02 2023-04-25 Sustainable Oils, Inc. Camelina sativa variety “SO-100”
WO2024052856A1 (fr) 2022-09-09 2024-03-14 Friedrich Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Éléments régulateurs chez des plantes et leurs utilisations

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5463174A (en) * 1986-05-29 1995-10-31 Calgene Inc. Transformation and foreign gene expression in Brassica species
US20020083491A1 (en) * 2000-06-07 2002-06-27 Charles Peele Method of using DNA episomes to suppress gene expression in plants

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5750871A (en) 1986-05-29 1998-05-12 Calgene, Inc. Transformation and foreign gene expression in Brassica species
FI104907B (fi) * 1997-09-18 2000-04-28 Univ Helsinki Licensing Rypsin Agrobacterium-välitteinen transformaatio
US6117476A (en) 1999-01-04 2000-09-12 Shaul Eger Healthy food spreads

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5463174A (en) * 1986-05-29 1995-10-31 Calgene Inc. Transformation and foreign gene expression in Brassica species
US20020083491A1 (en) * 2000-06-07 2002-06-27 Charles Peele Method of using DNA episomes to suppress gene expression in plants

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2009117555A1 (fr) * 2008-03-21 2009-09-24 Targeted Growth, Inc. Procédé de trempage floral permettant la transformation de camélina
US20110145950A1 (en) * 2008-03-21 2011-06-16 TARGETED GROWTH ,Inc. Floral dip method for transformation of camelina
US8779238B2 (en) * 2008-03-21 2014-07-15 Global Clean Energy Holdings, Inc. Floral dip method for transformation of camelina

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FI20002478A (fi) 2002-05-14
FI110009B (fi) 2002-11-15
ATE516357T1 (de) 2011-07-15
EP1334199B1 (fr) 2011-07-13
US20090151028A1 (en) 2009-06-11
CA2427117A1 (fr) 2002-05-16
AU2002214078A1 (en) 2002-05-21
FI20002478A0 (fi) 2000-11-13
EP1334199A1 (fr) 2003-08-13
US7910803B2 (en) 2011-03-22
US20140223607A1 (en) 2014-08-07
US20120192318A1 (en) 2012-07-26
WO2002038779A1 (fr) 2002-05-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7910803B2 (en) Transformation in Camelina sativa
US20090151023A1 (en) Transformation system for Camelina sativa
US6858777B2 (en) Methods for stable transformation of plants
US5981840A (en) Methods for agrobacterium-mediated transformation
US5405765A (en) Method for the production of transgenic wheat plants
US20060260012A1 (en) Method of transforming soybean
US8697445B2 (en) Method for plant regeneration of okra
US5789656A (en) Transgenic plants belonging to the species Cucumis melo
US20060130185A1 (en) Plant transformation and selection
Yancheva et al. Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and recovery of transgenic fig (Ficus carica L.) plants
US6255559B1 (en) Methods for producing genetically modified plants, genetically modified plants, plant materials and plant products produced thereby
US6455761B1 (en) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of turnip rape
JP4228044B2 (ja) シバ属植物の再分化植物体及び形質転換植物体
EP1114169A1 (fr) Procedes permettant de produire des plantes genetiquement modifiees, materiaux de plantes, et produits de plantes obtenus a partir ou par modification genetique
Akashi et al. High-frequency embryogenesis from cotyledons of bird's-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and its effective utilization in Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation
Khatun et al. An improved Agrobacterium mediated transformation and regeneration protocol for successful genetic engineering and genome editing in eggplant
US20040210958A1 (en) A Novel Culture Method for Corn Transformation
Barghchi et al. High-frequency transformation from cultured cotyledons of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes “C24” and “Landsberg erecta”
Li et al. Transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogaea)
RU2229793C1 (ru) Способ получения трансгенных растений сорго
Notini Understanding hormonal and temporal factors associated with tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Micro-Tom) acquisition of competence: key concepts for in vitro shoot regeneration
PUGLIESI et al. II. 7 Transgenic Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)
Hanafy et al. Transformation of Faba Bean
Abrie Regeneration and biotransformation of some members of the Cucurbitaceae.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: UNICORP LTD, FINLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KUVSHINOV, VIKTOR;KIMMO, KOIVU;ANNE, KANERVA;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:014471/0985

Effective date: 20030423

AS Assignment

Owner name: GREAT PLAINS OIL AND EXPLORATION, LLC, OHIO

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:UNICROP OY;REEL/FRAME:020845/0078

Effective date: 20080331

Owner name: GREAT PLAINS OIL AND EXPLORATION, LLC,OHIO

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:UNICROP OY;REEL/FRAME:020845/0078

Effective date: 20080331

AS Assignment

Owner name: UNICROP OY, FINLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KUVSHINOV, VIKTOR;KANERVA, ANNE;KOIVU, KIMMO;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020989/0135

Effective date: 20080512

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION