US20020104548A1 - Monofilament tape - Google Patents

Monofilament tape Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20020104548A1
US20020104548A1 US09/728,127 US72812700A US2002104548A1 US 20020104548 A1 US20020104548 A1 US 20020104548A1 US 72812700 A US72812700 A US 72812700A US 2002104548 A1 US2002104548 A1 US 2002104548A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
core
sheath
percent
poly
polymer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09/728,127
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Vipul Bhupendra Dave
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kenvue Brands LLC
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=24925538&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20020104548(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US09/728,127 priority Critical patent/US20020104548A1/en
Assigned to MCNEIL-PPC, INC. reassignment MCNEIL-PPC, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DAVE, VIPUL BHUPENDRA
Priority to EP01998677A priority patent/EP1366224B1/en
Priority to PCT/US2001/043166 priority patent/WO2002044448A1/en
Priority to AU2002219794A priority patent/AU2002219794A1/en
Priority to BRPI0116460-0A priority patent/BR0116460B1/pt
Priority to JP2002546791A priority patent/JP4149262B2/ja
Priority to DE60131102T priority patent/DE60131102T2/de
Priority to CA002436936A priority patent/CA2436936C/en
Publication of US20020104548A1 publication Critical patent/US20020104548A1/en
Priority to US10/287,204 priority patent/US6742528B2/en
Priority to AU2007231730A priority patent/AU2007231730B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C15/00—Devices for cleaning between the teeth
    • A61C15/04—Dental floss; Floss holders
    • A61C15/041—Dental floss
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01F—CHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F8/00—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof
    • D01F8/04—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof from synthetic polymers
    • D01F8/06—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof from synthetic polymers with at least one polyolefin as constituent
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01F—CHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F8/00—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof
    • D01F8/04—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof from synthetic polymers
    • D01F8/12—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof from synthetic polymers with at least one polyamide as constituent
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01F—CHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F8/00—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof
    • D01F8/04—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof from synthetic polymers
    • D01F8/14—Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof from synthetic polymers with at least one polyester as constituent

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a monofilament tape, which may be used as a dental floss.
  • the floss is easy to slide between the teeth, effective at cleaning, gentle to the gums, and capable of carrying more flavor than comparable flosses.
  • dental floss is recommended by virtually all dental health practitioners. Dental flossing has been shown to be effective in removing interdental plaque according to the Council on Dental Therapeutics. Despite these facts, only about 12% of the United States population use floss regularly. Of those who do use floss, consumers prefer flosses which are shred and fray resistant, pass easily between tight teeth, are gentle to the gums, refreshen the mouth, clean effectively, and are easy to use. Mouth freshening is controlled through the use of coatings, which typically comprise flavors, mouth fresheners, cleaning agents, polishing agents and the like. The more coating the floss substrate can carry, the better the floss may be at mouth freshening and cleaning.
  • Monofilament flosses made from poly(tetrafluoroethylene)/(“PTFE”) provide most of the attributes discussed above, except for the ability to carry more flavor and other additives, and ease of handling. Many consumers feel that PTFE monofilament floss does not clean as well as conventional multi-filament flosses. In addition, the cost of PTFE floss is relatively high, mainly due to the high resin cost. Therefore, there is a need to replace PTFE with lower cost materials that will provide the above-mentioned consumer preferred attributes.
  • Bicomponent fibers are fibers which are made from two different polymers. Bicomponent fibers are also known as “conjugate”, “composite” or “hetero” fibers. The main advantage of using this technology is to combine polymers with different properties in a single filament. Bicomponent fibers are commonly classified by their cross-sectional structures such as core-sheath; side-by-side; islands-in-the-sea; and pie-shaped.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,845,652 discloses the preparation of core-sheath bicomponent fibers using different materials and yarn constructions.
  • the sheath polymers are thermoplastic elastomers, such as Pebax® and Hytrel® Brand polymers, and the core polymer is nylon.
  • the specific examples set forth in the patent are based on 70/30 core-sheath fibers made from nylon/Pebax® 2533; nylon/Hytrel® 3078 and nylon/nylon having e.g., 144 filaments; a denier ranging from 580-730; no twist and tensile strengths of 3.4-5 g/d.
  • the patent discloses the aspects of forming bulkable floss by utilizing different materials, mainly by using side-by-side bicomponent fibers. It also teaches methods of obtaining self-bulking and tension-induced bulkable floss.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,904,152 discloses a multifilament floss which has multiple cores made from nylon with either a Hytrel® or Pebax® Brand thermoplastic elastomeric polymer as the sheath.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,875,797 discloses a multicomponent, co-extruded, monofilament dental floss comprising a core comprising a first material such as nylon.
  • the core is embedded in a sheath comprising a second material such as a thermoplastic elastomeric polymer.
  • the floss has a continuous outer surface.
  • the monofilament floss is prepared by using core-sheath technology and a die assembly during the co-extrusion process.
  • Typical flosses disclosed in this patent have a denier of 600-700 and comprise 34 filaments with a 70/30 ratio of core polymer/sheath polymer.
  • the disclosed flosses have a tenacity of 3-4.5 g/d and an elongation of at least 300% .
  • the present invention provides an article comprising a bicomponent monofilament tape, said bicomponent monofilament tape comprising at least about 60 individual core fibers comprising a first polymer, said individual core fibers being embedded in and substantially completely surrounded by a fused sheath comprising a second polymer.
  • the present invention provides a process which includes the steps of providing at least about 60 bicomponent core-sheath fibers and fusing the sheaths to form a monofilament tape.
  • the bicomponent monofilament tape of the invention is made from the fusion of the sheaths of bicomponent core-sheath fibers.
  • the bicomponent core-sheath fibers may be made by any process known in the art, including, but not limited to, using a co-extrusion melt spinning or solution spinning process. Co-extrusion of bicomponent fibers can be defined as extruding two polymers through the same spinneret with both polymers contained within the same filament with a distinct boundary between them.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a suitable process for making bicomponent fibers.
  • the polymers utilized to form the core and the sheath are placed in single screw extruders ( 1 A) and ( 1 B).
  • the polymers are heated and melted in the extruders, then passed through a spinneret ( 2 ) to form a plurality of co-extruded bicomponent fibers ( 3 ).
  • the co-extruded bicomponent fibers are drawn by at least one roller ( 4 ).
  • the co-extruded bicomponent fibers ( 3 ) are cooled in the region between the spinneret and the roller ( 4 ).
  • the cooling may be provided by means known in the art, such as, but not limited, to chilled air ( 5 ).
  • the viscosities of the two polymers at the spinneret are preferably matched in order to prevent extrudate dogleg, which is the undesirable bending of the co-extruded bicomponent fiber ( 3 ) as it exits the spinneret ( 2 ). Matching of the viscosities may be achieved through the selection of polymeric components and the control of the temperature of the polymers in the single screw extruders ( 1 A) and ( 1 B) and the spinneret ( 2 ).
  • a spin finish may be applied by a roller ( 6 ) disposed in the cooling region ( 5 ) between the spinneret ( 2 ) and the first roller ( 4 ).
  • Suitable spin finishes include, but are not limited to, Fasavin®2830 and Fasavin® 2758, which are commercially available through Zschimmer and Schwarz.
  • Roller ( 4 ) draws the plurality of bicomponent fibers exiting spinneret ( 2 ), i.e. the fibers are drawn, or stretched, as they pass through cooling zone ( 5 ) toward first roller ( 4 ).
  • the effect of this drawing or stretching step is two-fold: first the fibers are reduced in diameter (i.e., their denier is reduced) and secondly, their tensile strength is increased.
  • the term “denier” refers to the weight in grams per 9000 meters of fiber.
  • roller ( 4 ) typically rotates at a rate of from about 100 meters per minute to about 2000 meters per minute, preferably from about 400 meters per minute to about 1000 meters per minute.
  • a second roller ( 7 ) is used in conjunction with the first roller ( 4 ).
  • the second roller ( 7 ) rotates at substantially the same speed as first roller ( 4 ).
  • the plurality of bicomponent fibers ( 3 ) are collated as they leave the lower region of the cooling zone and then come into contact with the lower surface of roller ( 4 ).
  • the collated bicomponent fibers ( 3 A) leave roller ( 4 ) and then come into contact with the lowermost surface (as seen in FIG. 1) of roller ( 7 ).
  • the fibers continue to pass around roller ( 7 ) in a counterclockwise direction until they reach the uppermost surface (as seen in FIG. 1) of roller ( 7 ).
  • the fibers are then conducted across the gap between rollers ( 4 ) and ( 7 ) and are brought into contact with the uppermost surface (as seen in FIG. 1) of roller ( 4 ).
  • One wrap of the collated fibers is completed as the collated bundle of co-extruded fibers again reaches the point at which it first contacted roller ( 4 ) as it initially left cooling zone ( 5 ).
  • the collated fiber bundle ( 3 A) leaves the lower surface (as seen in FIG. 1) of roller ( 7 ) and proceeds toward roller ( 8 ).
  • roller ( 8 ) is set to rotate at a faster speed than that of roller ( 4 ) and ( 7 ), as a result of which the co-extruded bicomponent fibers ( 3 ) in the collated bundle ( 3 A) are further drawn, i.e., as is well know in the art, their denier is further reduced and their tensile strength is further increased.
  • collated fiber bundle ( 3 A) wraps several times around roller ( 8 ) after which it passes to roller ( 9 ).
  • Fiber bundle ( 3 A) wraps several times around roller ( 9 ) before proceeding to roller ( 10 ).
  • Rollers ( 8 ) and ( 9 ) typically rotate at a speed of 100 meters to 3000 meters per minute, preferably at a speed of 1500 meters to 2500 meters per minute. Roller ( 9 ) should be operated at at least the same speed as roller ( 8 ). If desired, roller ( 9 ) can be operated at a faster speed than roller 8 , in which case the denier of the fibers will be further reduced and their tensile strength further increased.
  • collated fiber bundle ( 3 A) passes to roller ( 10 ) after leaving roller ( 9 ).
  • Roller ( 10 ) is rotated at a speed which is lower than that of roller ( 9 ), as a result of which the fibers are allowed to relax.
  • the fiber bundle ( 3 A) passes several times around roller ( 10 ) and then passes under idle roller ( 11 ).
  • the fiber bundle ( 3 A) is then taken up on roller ( 12 ) to await further processing.
  • any of the rollers ( 4 ), ( 7 ), ( 8 ), ( 9 ), and ( 10 ) may be heated.
  • the temperatures of the heated rollers ( 4 ), ( 7 ), ( 8 ), ( 9 ), and ( 10 ) may range from about 30° C., to about 80° C., preferably from about 50° C. to about 75° C.
  • the bicomponent fibers utilized in the present invention are core-sheath fibers.
  • the bicomponent fibers utilized in this invention may have cross-sectional shapes such as round; trilobal; cross; and others known in the art.
  • the melting point of the polymer constituting the sheath component of the core-sheath bicomponent fibers must be lower than the melting point of the polymer constituting the core component.
  • Suitable polymers for the core include polyamides such as, but not limited to, nylon 6, nylon 11, nylon 12, and nylon 66; polyesters such as, but not limited to, poly(ethylene terephthalate) (“PET”) and poly(butylene terephthalate) (“PBT”); polyolefins such as, but not limited to, polypropylene and polyethylene; and fluorinated polymers, such as, but not limited to, poly(vinylidene fluoride) and mixtures thereof. Nylon 6 and polypropylene are preferred.
  • Suitable polymers for the sheath include polyolefins such as, but not limited to, polyethylene (“PE”) and polypropylene; polyesters such as, but not limited to, polycaprolactone (“PCL”); poly(ether-amides) such as, but not limited to, Pebax® 4033 SA and Pebax® 7233 SA (Trademark of Elf Atochem); poly(ether-esters) such as, but not limited to, Hytrel® 4056 (Trademark of DuPont) and Riteflex® poly(ether-ester) polymers available through Hoechst-Celanese; elastomers made from polyolefins, for example Engage® elastomers available through DuPont Dow; poly(ether-urethane) such as, but not limited to, Estane® poly(ether-urethane) polymers available from BF Goodrich; poly(ester urethane) such as, but not limited to, Estane® available through BF Goodrich;
  • the ratio of the two components of the core-sheath fibers may be varied. All ratios used herein are based on volume percents. The ratio may range from about 10 percent core and about 90 percent sheath to about 90 percent core and about 10 percent sheath, preferably from about 20 percent core and about 80 percent sheath to about 80 percent core and about 20 percent sheath, more preferably from about 30 percent core and about 70 percent sheath to about 70 percent core and about 30 percent sheath.
  • the sheaths of the bicomponent fibers are fused.
  • fused means that the bicomponent fibers comprising collated bundle ( 3 A) are exposed to a sufficient temperature for a sufficient period of time so that the sheaths of the individual core-sheath filaments ( 3 ) are completely melted and flow together to form a substantially continuous matrix of sheath material.
  • the time and temperature conditions under which the fusion process takes place are, as would be understood by one skilled in the art, a function of the melting point of the particular polymer comprising the sheath material of the individual core-sheath fibers.
  • the bicomponent monofilament tape of the present invention comprises a plurality of individual core fibers of polymeric material embedded in and substantially completely surrounded by fused sheath material. Fusion can be achieved, for example, by preheating fiber bundle 3 A and then calendaring the preheated bundle. Calendaring is the passage of the fibers between the nip of two heated rollers separated by a specific gap which is set to control the thickness and width of the tape.
  • the flexibility of the finished monofilament bicomponent tape can be controlled by the selection of suitable materials for core and sheath, by the ratio of sheath material to core material, and by the number and denier of the core-sheath filament in fiber bundle 3 A.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of a process for converting co-extruded bicomponent fibers into the monofilament tape of the present invention.
  • the co-extruded bicomponent fibers ( 3 ) prepared as described above are pulled by a take-up roller ( 20 ).
  • the number of fibers ( 3 ) is at least about 60, typically from about 150 to about 500, preferably from about 200 to about 450, more preferably from about 300 to about 400.
  • the co-extruded bicomponent fibers ( 3 ) are pulled through the nip of heated rollers ( 21 A) and ( 21 B) by the roller ( 20 ), to thereby fuse the sheaths of the individual bicomponent fibers, thus forming a monofilament tape in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.
  • the temperature of the rollers ( 21 A) and ( 21 B) may range from about 40° C. to about 90° C., preferably from about 40° C. to about 85° C.
  • the fibers ( 3 ) may be pulled from the supply roll ( 12 ) (FIG. 2) over at least one heated roller ( 22 A) prior to calendaring.
  • the fibers ( 3 ) are pulled over a second heated roller ( 22 B) prior to calendaring at rolls ( 21 A/ 21 B).
  • the temperature of the heated rollers ( 22 A) and ( 22 B) may range from about 40° C. to about 170° C.
  • the fibers ( 3 ) may then enter at least one oven ( 23 A) prior to calendaring.
  • the fibers enter a second oven ( 23 B) prior to calendaring.
  • the temperature of the ovens may range from about 110° C. to about 180° C., preferably from about 115° C. to about 170° C.
  • the monofilament tape may be pulled over at least one roller ( 24 ) at ambient temperature to aid in cooling the tape.
  • the thickness of the monofilament tape may range from about 0.013 mm to about 0.15 mm, preferably from about 0.025 mm to about 0.07 mm.
  • the combination of the soft sheath polymer and the strength provided by the core fibers allows balancing the floss properties to provide the desired suppleness and gentleness to the gums.
  • the sheath material can be selected such that it has high coefficient of friction and critical surface free energy so that the tape can be coated at higher amounts of wax and other additives to provide ease of handling and other desirable properties.
  • the monofilament tape is coated with a coating composition containing wax, flavor, and other additives to form a dental floss.
  • a coating composition containing wax, flavor, and other additives to form a dental floss.
  • the amount of wax, flavor, and other additives typically coated on fibers to make floss is known in the art.
  • the coating composition is added at from 15 weight percent to 60 weight percent, based on the weight of the monofilament tape.
  • Suitable flavors include, but are not limited to, natural and synthetic flavor oils, such as mint and cinnamon.
  • the flavor oils may be used as is, or may be encapsulated or supported on a carrier such as starch or modified starch.
  • additives include, but are not limited to, sweeteners such as bulk sweeteners, including sorbital and mannitol, and intense sweeteners including aspartame and sodium saccharin, as taught by U.S. Pat. No. 6,080,481, hereby incorporated by reference for the disclosure relating to waxes and sweeteners; abrasives, such as silica; dentrifices, such as a fluoride or fluoride containing compound; chemotherapeutic agents; cleaners, such as peroxides; and whiteners. Examples of suitable additives are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,908,039, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
  • Monofilament tapes in accordance with the teachings of the present invention were prepared using the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 2.
  • the monofilament tapes of this Example 1 comprised a plurality of polyester core fibers embedded in a substantially continuous matrix of polyethylene sheath material.
  • Each tape was prepared from a plurality of commercially available bicomponent fibers having a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) core and a polyethylene (PE) sheath.
  • PET polyethylene terephthalate
  • PE polyethylene
  • the starting bicomponent fibers had deniers ranging from about 1.64 to about 2.8 denier per filament.
  • the volume ratio of PE sheath material to PET core material in the starting bicomponent fibers ranged from 20/80 PE/PET to 60/40 PE/PET.
  • the specific gravity of the PE polymer at 210° C.
  • the finished monofilament tapes identified as Samples 5-7 in Table 1 had a denier of 700, which was obtained by using 304 starting bicomponent fibers each having a denier of about 2.3.
  • Finished monofilament tapes identified as Samples 8-10 in Table 1 had a denier of 600, which was obtained by processing 304 starting bicomponent fibers each having a denier of about 2.
  • the finished monofilament tape identified as Sample 11 in Table 1 had a denier of about 500, which was obtained by using 304 starting bicomponent fibers each having a denier of about 1.64.
  • the 11 monofilament tapes in accordance with the invention and as reported in Table 1 were made using the apparatus illustrated in FIG. 2.
  • the starting bundle 3 A of bicomponent fibers was taken from supply roll 12 .
  • Rollers ( 22 A) and ( 22 B) were spaced apart about 12 inches. Both rollers were held at a temperature of 120-125° C. and rotated at a speed of about 80 meters per minute.
  • Oven ( 23 A) was about 8 feet in length, spaced about 12 inches from roll ( 22 B), and held at a temperature of 130° C.
  • Oven ( 23 B) was 6 feet long and was also held at a temperature of 130° C. The distance between the two ovens was about 6 inches.
  • a calendar was located closely adjacent the exit of oven ( 23 B) and consisted of a pair of vertically stacked rollers 21 A and 21 B, both rollers being held at a temperature of about 70° C. and rotated at about 80 meters/minute. There was a slight gap between calendar rolls ( 21 A) and ( 21 B), this gap corresponding substantially to the desired thickness of the finished monofilament tape. Roll 24 was held at ambient temperature and was rotated at about 80 meters per minute. The tape exiting the nip of rolls ( 21 A), ( 21 B) was wrapped around roll 24 about 3-4 turns before proceeding to take up roll 20 operating at about 80 meters/minute. The distance between stacked calendar rolls ( 21 A), ( 21 B) and the exit of oven ( 23 B) was about 6 inches.
  • the starting bundle 3 A of bicomponent fibers was led from supply roll 12 and wrapped about 6 turns around roll 22 A before proceeding to roll 22 B.
  • the fibers were wrapped about 4 turns around roll 22 B before being drawn through ovens ( 23 A), ( 23 B).
  • oven ( 23 B) After exiting oven ( 23 B), the fiber bundle passed through the nip of calendar rolls ( 21 A), ( 21 B), then for 3-4 turns around roll 24 before being wound up on take-up roll 20 .
  • the residence time of the bundle of fibers on rolls ( 21 A), ( 21 B) was about 8 seconds.
  • the residence time in ovens ( 23 A), ( 23 B) totaled approximately 3-4 seconds.
  • the monofilament tapes were analyzed for mechanical properties. The results are shown in the three right-hand columns of Table 1. The deniers of the various finished monofilament tapes are shown in Table 1 as well.
  • the tenacity was measured for both the bundle of bicomponent fibers and the monofilament tape.
  • the tenacity of the monofilament tape was consistently higher than the tenacity of the bundle of bicomponent fibers by about 6-10%.
  • Two samples, 12 and 12A had a finished denier of 600.
  • Sample 12 was made from a bundle of 152 individual PE/PET bicomponent fibers each having a denier of about 3.95, whereas Sample 12A was made from a bundle of 304 individual PE/PET bicomponent fibers each having a denier of about 2.
  • Samples 13 and 13A had a finished denier of 650 and were made, respectively, from starting fiber bundles having 152 fibers (each about 4.2 denier/filament) and 304 fibers (each about 2.1 denier/filament).
  • Samples 14 and 14A had a finished denier of 700.
  • Sample 14 was made from a starting bundle of 152 bicomponent fibers each having a denier of about 4.6, while Sample 14A was made from a starting bundle of 304 bicomponent fibers each having a denier of about 2.3.
  • the bicomponent fibers were substantially circular in cross-section and comprised a polyethylene (PE) sheath and a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) core at a volume ratio of 45 PE/55 PET.
  • PE polyethylene
  • PET polyethylene terephthalate
  • the monofilament tapes had sufficient tenacity and strength to be used as dental flosses.
  • the monofilament tapes made from 152 bicomponent fibers were stronger than corresponding tapes prepared from 304 bicomponent fibers of the same deniers.
  • experiments were conducted with different amounts of PE were conducted with different amounts of PE. The results are summarized in Table 3. TABLE 3 Sample % PE B. Load (lbs) Tenacity (g/d) 15 35 7.4 5.6 16 40 7 5.3 17 45 6.5 5
  • a series of polyolefin/polyester core-sheath monofilament tapes was prepared using the extrusion equipment and coextrusion process described above with reference to FIG 1 .
  • the core material was polypropylene (“PP”) and the sheath material was polycaprolactone (“PCL”).
  • the PCL used in this Example 2 is commercially available and was obtained from Union Carbide under the designation Tone® 767.
  • Tone® 767 The specific gravity of PP at 250° C. is 0.75.
  • the PP-PCL core-sheath fibers were prepared from 80/20 to 50/50 core-sheath ratios; 175 to 350 fibers; 0.4 mm to 0.8 mm hole size; 500 to 800 denier (1.4 to 4.6 denier per fiber); 2.5 to 6 draw ratio; ambient to 50° C. draw temperature and 2 to 5.5 g/d tenacity. Fusing of the PCL sheath material to form the monofilament tape occurred between zone 5 and roller 12 in the apparatus shown in FIG. 1. The monofilament tapes were analyzed for their mechanical properties. The results are shown in Tables 4A, 4B, 5, 6A, and 6B.
  • a series of polyamide-polyester core-sheath bicomponent fibers was prepared as described above.
  • nylon 6 (B-3) was the core and PCL (Tone® 767) was the sheath.
  • the specific gravity of nylon 6(B-3) at 265° C. is 1.
  • the core-sheath fibers were prepared at 80/20 to 35/65 core-sheath ratios at about 640 denier (1.8 denier per fiber) and processed at ambient to 50° C. draw temperature, 2.5 to 4 draw ratios; and 2.5 to 5 g/d tenacity.
  • the fibers fused on-line, i.e., between zone 5 and roller 12 in the apparatus shown in FIG.
  • a series of polyamide-poly(ether-amide) core-sheath bicomponent fibers was prepared as described above.
  • nylon 6 (B-3) was the core and Pebax® 4033 poly(ether-amide) commercially available through Elf Atochem was the sheath.
  • the specific gravity of Pebax® 4033 was 1.05 at 240° C.
  • the specific gravity of nylon 6(B-3) was 1.0 at 265° C.
  • the fibers were made from 80/20 to 35/65 core-sheath ratios at 600-650 denier (1.7 to 1.85 deniers per fiber) at 2.3 draw ratio, 50° C. to 90° C. draw temperature and 3.5 to 5 g/d tenacity.
  • the fibers did not fuse on-line, and post-treatment similar to Example 1 was required to fuse the Pebax® 4033 to form the final monofilament tape.
  • the final monofilament tapes were analyzed for mechanical properties. The results are shown in Tables 8 and 9. TABLE 8 Sheath Ten- Sam- Pebax ® Core Breaking acity Elong.
  • Polyester-Poly(ether-ester) (Core-sheath)
  • polyester-poly(ether-ester) core-sheath bicomponent fibers was prepared as described above.
  • PBT and PET were the core materials
  • Hytrel® 4056 poly(ether-ester) commercially available through DuPont was the sheath material.
  • the fibers were drawn according to the following sequence:
  • Undrawn fibers ⁇ first set of heated rollers (30-40 meters per minute; 50° C.) ⁇ hot water bath (70° C.) ⁇ second set of heated rollers (100-135 meters per minute; 50° C.) ⁇ steam oven ⁇ third set of ambient rollers (100-120 meters per minute) ⁇ take-up device.
  • PET-PE Core-sheath
  • a dental floss was made by applying a coating of Multiwax W-445 (Witco) microcrystalline wax to uncoated monofilament tape which had the following characteristics:
  • the floss was made as follows: The monofilament tape was unwound from the supply spool, tensioned with a tensioner and passed through an eyelet. The wax coating, which was heated to 190° F., was applied to the monofilament tape via a die that was injected with the requisite amount of coating material. The monofilament tape was then passed through a chilled air tunnel and cooled to 37° F., and the resultant floss was rewound onto a take-up roll using conventional winding equipment. The floss contained a wax coating add-on of 18-20% based on the weight of the uncoated monofilament tape.
  • a dental floss was prepared by the method described above with microcrystalline wax at an add-on of 18-20% based on the weight of the monofilament tape.
  • the uncoated monofilament tape had the following characteristics: 65/35 nylon 6/Pebax® 4033 core/sheath ratio; 650 denier; 350 filaments; 1.85 denier/filament; 0.05 mm thickness; 6.7 lbs breaking load; 4.7 g/d tenacity; 60% elongation at break.
  • a dental floss was prepared by the method described above [Example 6-(a)] with microcrystalline wax at an add-on of 18-20% based on the weight of the uncoated monofilament tape.
  • the uncoated monofilament tape had the following properties: 65/35 polypropylene/PCL core/sheath ratio; 640 denier; 350 filaments; 1.82 denier/filament; 0.05 mm thickness; 6.5 lbs breaking load; 4.6 g/d tenacity; 27% elongation at break.
  • the above-mentioned monofilament tapes were also coated in the similar manner with the following compositions: microcrystalline wax—75-85 %; spray-dried flavor—15-25%; and sodium saccharin—1%.
  • the total add-on of the compositions was 35-45% based on the weight of the uncoated monofilament tape.
  • Pebax® 4033/Nylon 6 monofilament tape did not feel waxy even when the add-on was as high as 44%.
  • the high level of coating composition add-ons i.e., 35-45% makes it possible to more easily provide dental floss having increased levels of flavorants (thus providing “high flavor impact”), abrasives, active ingredients and other additives known in the art.
  • the dental flosses were tested for various properties including how the floss slides between teeth, shred resistance, strength, ease of use, effectiveness at cleaning, gentleness to gums, and clean feeling to mouth. The results are reported on a scale of from 0 to 10, with 0 being poor and 10 being excellent. The results are shown in Table 11.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Multicomponent Fibers (AREA)
  • Artificial Filaments (AREA)
  • Woven Fabrics (AREA)
  • Yarns And Mechanical Finishing Of Yarns Or Ropes (AREA)
US09/728,127 2000-12-01 2000-12-01 Monofilament tape Abandoned US20020104548A1 (en)

Priority Applications (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/728,127 US20020104548A1 (en) 2000-12-01 2000-12-01 Monofilament tape
CA002436936A CA2436936C (en) 2000-12-01 2001-11-29 Monofilament tape
DE60131102T DE60131102T2 (de) 2000-12-01 2001-11-29 Monofilamentband
AU2002219794A AU2002219794A1 (en) 2000-12-01 2001-11-29 Monofilament tape
PCT/US2001/043166 WO2002044448A1 (en) 2000-12-01 2001-11-29 Monofilament tape
EP01998677A EP1366224B1 (en) 2000-12-01 2001-11-29 Monofilament tape
BRPI0116460-0A BR0116460B1 (pt) 2000-12-01 2001-11-29 artigo que compreende uma fita de monofilamentos de dois componentes e fio dental.
JP2002546791A JP4149262B2 (ja) 2000-12-01 2001-11-29 モノフィラメント・テープ
US10/287,204 US6742528B2 (en) 2000-12-01 2002-11-04 Monofilament tape
AU2007231730A AU2007231730B2 (en) 2000-12-01 2007-10-29 Monofilament tape

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/728,127 US20020104548A1 (en) 2000-12-01 2000-12-01 Monofilament tape

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/287,204 Continuation US6742528B2 (en) 2000-12-01 2002-11-04 Monofilament tape

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020104548A1 true US20020104548A1 (en) 2002-08-08

Family

ID=24925538

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/728,127 Abandoned US20020104548A1 (en) 2000-12-01 2000-12-01 Monofilament tape
US10/287,204 Expired - Lifetime US6742528B2 (en) 2000-12-01 2002-11-04 Monofilament tape

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/287,204 Expired - Lifetime US6742528B2 (en) 2000-12-01 2002-11-04 Monofilament tape

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (2) US20020104548A1 (enExample)
EP (1) EP1366224B1 (enExample)
JP (1) JP4149262B2 (enExample)
AU (2) AU2002219794A1 (enExample)
BR (1) BR0116460B1 (enExample)
CA (1) CA2436936C (enExample)
DE (1) DE60131102T2 (enExample)
WO (1) WO2002044448A1 (enExample)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050279378A1 (en) * 2004-06-16 2005-12-22 Lorch Leonard G Dental floss
US20080230087A1 (en) * 2007-03-21 2008-09-25 Stephen John Blanchard Dental tape and process for obtaining a dental tape
US20080274657A1 (en) * 2004-03-31 2008-11-06 Hirohumi Yashiro Woven Fabric and Articles Made by Using the Same
US20090120455A1 (en) * 2007-11-08 2009-05-14 Ochs Harold D Multi-Ribbed Dental Tape
US20090120454A1 (en) * 2007-11-08 2009-05-14 Ochs Harold D Multi-Ribbed Dental Tape
US20100119804A1 (en) * 2008-11-13 2010-05-13 Van Malderen Dominique Method for spinning polyether block amides, and fibers obtained according to this method, as well as products made with these fibers
US20100180912A1 (en) * 2007-11-08 2010-07-22 Ochs Harold D Coated multi-ribbed dental tape
US20160194788A1 (en) * 2013-08-09 2016-07-07 Toray Industries, Inc. Elastic monofilament
US20210145555A1 (en) * 2019-11-19 2021-05-20 Sunstar Americas, Inc. Dental floss

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10244778B4 (de) * 2002-09-26 2006-06-14 Trevira Gmbh Exzentrische Polyester-Polyethylen-Bikomponentenfaser
BRPI0508388A (pt) * 2004-03-03 2007-08-07 Kraton Polymers Res Bv fibra bicomponente, artigo, e, processo para produzir a fibra bicomponente
DE102004032099A1 (de) * 2004-07-01 2006-01-26 Coltène/Whaledent GmbH + Co. KG Retraktionsfaden mit verbesserter Saugfähigkeit
EP1705277A1 (de) * 2005-03-22 2006-09-27 Colbond B.V. Vlieslaminat
US7438777B2 (en) 2005-04-01 2008-10-21 North Carolina State University Lightweight high-tensile, high-tear strength bicomponent nonwoven fabrics
US20070055015A1 (en) * 2005-09-02 2007-03-08 Kraton Polymers U.S. Llc Elastomeric fibers comprising controlled distribution block copolymers
US7975707B1 (en) 2007-12-26 2011-07-12 Medibotics Llc Dental floss or tape whose cross-sectional size can be adjusted after insertion
US20100055233A1 (en) * 2008-08-29 2010-03-04 A. Schulman, Inc Optimized Flavored Polymeric Compositions
AU2015218538B2 (en) * 2008-08-29 2017-10-12 A. Schulman, Inc. Methods of enhancing the flavor of polymeric compositions and flavored articles
AU2013205831B2 (en) * 2008-08-29 2015-07-30 A. Schulman, Inc. Optimized flavored polymeric compositions
BR112020006050A2 (pt) * 2017-09-29 2020-10-06 Dow Global Technologies Llc fibras bicomponentes e não tecidos das mesmas, tendo melhor desempenho elástico
DE102024100671A1 (de) * 2024-01-10 2025-07-10 Perlon Gmbh Kunststoff-Filament und Verfahren zu seiner Herstellung

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4583564A (en) * 1985-06-27 1986-04-22 Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc. Dental floss
US5601775A (en) * 1995-03-24 1997-02-11 Alliedsignal Inc. Process for making an abrasion resistant quasi monofilament
US5875797A (en) * 1995-06-06 1999-03-02 Gillette Canada Inc. Dental floss
US5908039A (en) * 1998-07-24 1999-06-01 Mcneil-Ppc, Inc. Dental floss having improved fray and shred resistance

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080274657A1 (en) * 2004-03-31 2008-11-06 Hirohumi Yashiro Woven Fabric and Articles Made by Using the Same
US7281541B2 (en) 2004-06-16 2007-10-16 Lorch Leonard G Dental floss
US20050279378A1 (en) * 2004-06-16 2005-12-22 Lorch Leonard G Dental floss
US7854235B2 (en) 2007-03-21 2010-12-21 Mcneil-Ppc, Inc. Dental tape and process for obtaining a dental tape
US20080230087A1 (en) * 2007-03-21 2008-09-25 Stephen John Blanchard Dental tape and process for obtaining a dental tape
US20090120455A1 (en) * 2007-11-08 2009-05-14 Ochs Harold D Multi-Ribbed Dental Tape
US20100180912A1 (en) * 2007-11-08 2010-07-22 Ochs Harold D Coated multi-ribbed dental tape
US20090120454A1 (en) * 2007-11-08 2009-05-14 Ochs Harold D Multi-Ribbed Dental Tape
US8061371B2 (en) 2007-11-08 2011-11-22 Mcneil-Ppc, Inc. Multi-ribbed dental tape
US8522796B2 (en) 2007-11-08 2013-09-03 Mcneil-Ppc, Inc Coated multi-ribbed dental tape
US8539966B2 (en) 2007-11-08 2013-09-24 Mcneil-Ppc, Inc. Multi-ribbed dental tape
US20100119804A1 (en) * 2008-11-13 2010-05-13 Van Malderen Dominique Method for spinning polyether block amides, and fibers obtained according to this method, as well as products made with these fibers
US20160194788A1 (en) * 2013-08-09 2016-07-07 Toray Industries, Inc. Elastic monofilament
CN105765118A (zh) * 2013-08-09 2016-07-13 东丽株式会社 弹性单丝
CN105765118B (zh) * 2013-08-09 2021-03-26 东丽株式会社 弹性单丝
US20210145555A1 (en) * 2019-11-19 2021-05-20 Sunstar Americas, Inc. Dental floss

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1366224A1 (en) 2003-12-03
CA2436936C (en) 2009-07-14
JP4149262B2 (ja) 2008-09-10
AU2007231730A1 (en) 2007-11-22
CA2436936A1 (en) 2002-06-06
AU2002219794A1 (en) 2002-06-11
US20030150473A1 (en) 2003-08-14
EP1366224B1 (en) 2007-10-24
DE60131102D1 (de) 2007-12-06
BR0116460A (pt) 2003-10-07
BR0116460B1 (pt) 2011-09-20
JP2004524876A (ja) 2004-08-19
US6742528B2 (en) 2004-06-01
DE60131102T2 (de) 2008-07-24
WO2002044448A1 (en) 2002-06-06
AU2007231730B2 (en) 2009-11-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2007231730B2 (en) Monofilament tape
US5904152A (en) Dental floss
US6027592A (en) Dental floss
US5875797A (en) Dental floss
US5845652A (en) Dental floss
JP2004524876A5 (enExample)
WO1996039117A9 (en) Dental floss
US6251410B1 (en) Flattened tubular monofilament dental floss
EP0927003B1 (en) Dental floss
US12065766B2 (en) Trilobal yarns for application on dental floss, dental floss including the same and use of trilobal yarns in the manufacture of dental floss
MXPA99004203A (en) Dental floss
MXPA97009132A (en) Seda den
MXPA98010771A (en) Thin thread with termoplast coating

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MCNEIL-PPC, INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DAVE, VIPUL BHUPENDRA;REEL/FRAME:011456/0510

Effective date: 20001201

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION