US20020079602A1 - Method of increasing the boundary layer strength on surfaces of workpieces made of brittle hard materials - Google Patents

Method of increasing the boundary layer strength on surfaces of workpieces made of brittle hard materials Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20020079602A1
US20020079602A1 US09/929,267 US92926701A US2002079602A1 US 20020079602 A1 US20020079602 A1 US 20020079602A1 US 92926701 A US92926701 A US 92926701A US 2002079602 A1 US2002079602 A1 US 2002079602A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
workpiece
tool
boundary layer
surface area
predetermined
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09/929,267
Inventor
Hans-Wulf Pfeiffer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Angewandten Forschung eV
Original Assignee
Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Angewandten Forschung eV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from PCT/DE1997/002955 external-priority patent/WO1998026910A1/en
Application filed by Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Angewandten Forschung eV filed Critical Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Angewandten Forschung eV
Priority to US09/929,267 priority Critical patent/US20020079602A1/en
Assigned to FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTER FROSCHUNG reassignment FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTER FROSCHUNG ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PFEIFFER, HANS-WULF
Publication of US20020079602A1 publication Critical patent/US20020079602A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23PMETAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; COMBINED OPERATIONS; UNIVERSAL MACHINE TOOLS
    • B23P9/00Treating or finishing surfaces mechanically, with or without calibrating, primarily to resist wear or impact, e.g. smoothing or roughening turbine blades or bearings; Features of such surfaces not otherwise provided for, their treatment being unspecified
    • B23P9/04Treating or finishing by hammering or applying repeated pressure
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24CABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C1/00Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
    • B24C1/10Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods for compacting surfaces, e.g. shot-peening
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B28WORKING CEMENT, CLAY, OR STONE
    • B28BSHAPING CLAY OR OTHER CERAMIC COMPOSITIONS; SHAPING SLAG; SHAPING MIXTURES CONTAINING CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL, e.g. PLASTER
    • B28B11/00Apparatus or processes for treating or working the shaped or preshaped articles
    • B28B11/08Apparatus or processes for treating or working the shaped or preshaped articles for reshaping the surface, e.g. smoothing, roughening, corrugating, making screw-threads
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16CSHAFTS; FLEXIBLE SHAFTS; ELEMENTS OR CRANKSHAFT MECHANISMS; ROTARY BODIES OTHER THAN GEARING ELEMENTS; BEARINGS
    • F16C33/00Parts of bearings; Special methods for making bearings or parts thereof
    • F16C33/02Parts of sliding-contact bearings
    • F16C33/04Brasses; Bushes; Linings
    • F16C33/043Sliding surface consisting mainly of ceramics, cermets or hard carbon, e.g. diamond like carbon [DLC]
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16CSHAFTS; FLEXIBLE SHAFTS; ELEMENTS OR CRANKSHAFT MECHANISMS; ROTARY BODIES OTHER THAN GEARING ELEMENTS; BEARINGS
    • F16C33/00Parts of bearings; Special methods for making bearings or parts thereof
    • F16C33/30Parts of ball or roller bearings

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to method of increasing the boundary layer strength of workpieces manufactured of brittle, hard materials.
  • Ceramic materials satisfy the aforementioned requirements in particular, which are used, for instance, in the production of bearings such as rolling bearings and friction bearings. In addition to the wear phenomena, which are only slight, the high temperature resistance of ceramic materials plays an important role in the application of such materials.
  • boundary layer strength determines particularly the wear of these materials or the stress and strain to which the materials are subjected.
  • a particularly high degree of boundary layer strength of the individual workpieces is desirable especially for the application as components in mechanical engineering and in terotechnology, which consist of partly or fully ceramic rolling bearings, friction bearings as well as of ceramic elements or ceramic protective layers for which a high resistance to different kinds of wear is required, such as sliding abrasion, wear by blast jet, rolling abrasion or cavitation erosion.
  • Thermal hardening must be considered to be one of the thermal methods, where the object to be hardened is initially heated and subsequently cooled as shortly thereafter as possible by a so-called “quenching operation.” Such hardening methods are preferably applied on glass in an approach to achieve selective superficial tensions in the glass material for a substantial increase of the breaking strength of glass, e.g., optical glasses or automotive windowpanes.
  • thermal hardening on brittle, hard materials encounters substantial difficulties in the case of ceramic materials, because normally so-called thermo shock damage occurs on the ceramic surface, which results in the formation of surface cracks which substantially counteract a possible increase of the boundary layer strength. For this reason practically implementable thermal methods of hardening brittle, hard materials, particularly high-tech ceramics, are not known at present.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,573,023 (“the '023 patent”) teaches to treat the surface of a relatively brittle, hard material by shot peening. Concerning the material group of ceramic materials and also glass, the '023 patent teaches to confine the brittle, hard material to a temperature-controllable environment, and elevating the temperature to a level in which material flow is accommodated during the shot peening process (See Col. 2, lines 4-10). Therefore, the '023 patent does not disclose a method for improving the strength of a ceramic without first elevating the temperature of the ceramic prior to applying the mechanical force.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,128,083 (“the '083 patent”) discloses a method for modifying the surface of hard engineering ceramic materials, and for sealing the micro surface defects and cracks in the surface of the ceramic material (See Col. 1, lines 30-34).
  • the '083 patent as in the '023 patent, also requires controlling the atmosphere in which the process is carried out and elevating the temperature to a range of 0.3 Tm to 0.5 Tm (See Col. 2, lines 26-43). Therefore, the '083 patent does not disclose a method for improving the strength of a ceramic without first elevating the temperature of the ceramic prior to applying the mechanical force.
  • JP041145367 discloses the process of shot peening an alumina article whereby outstanding toughness and breaking strength is obtained.
  • the abstract describes a method to enhance the surface toughness of objects made of alumina sintered from and containing a specified amount of Zirconia, which is a transformation toughening material showing a phase transformation induced, for example, by shot peening.
  • This special material, Zirconia is a very specialized compound, which changes structure from a tetragonal to a monoclinic structure accompanied by an expansion of volume. This expansion takes place at the surface of the object, which leads to internal stresses. Zirconia is the only known compound that shows this effect. Therefore, the Abstract of JP041145367 does not disclose a method for improving the strength of a ceramic without providing an object comprising Zirconia prior to applying the mechanical force.
  • the present invention is therefore based on the problem of providing a method of increasing the boundary layer strength on surfaces of workpieces made of brittle, hard materials in such a form that the surface strength of brittle, hard materials can be substantially increased by a simple, low-cost processing method. It is the aim to increase the resistance of ceramic workpiece elements used in terotechnology.
  • a method for increasing the boundary layer strength of workpieces manufactured of ceramic materials comprising the steps of: providing a workpiece; providing a round contour tool; contacting the workpiece with the tool within a predetermined surface area; producing a plastic deformation on the predefined surface area; and generating internal compressive strain within the workpiece in the vicinity of the predetermined surface area wherein the temperature of the workpiece is not elevated above room temperature and the workpiece does not comprise Zirconia.
  • a method for increasing the boundary layer strength of workpieces manufactured of ceramic materials comprising the steps of contacting a workpiece with a tool within a predetermined surface area, wherein the temperature of the workpiece is not elevated above room temperature and the workpiece does not comprise Zirconia.
  • a method of increasing the boundary layer strength on the surfaces of workpieces made of brittle, hard materials is so designed that the workpiece surface is contacted with a tool within a predetermined, narrowly limited surface area, in which a tool produces an exclusively plastic deformation of the surface area and generates internal compressive strain within the workpiece in the vicinity of the surface.
  • the present invention is based on the unforeseen finding that an increase of the boundary layer strength by mechanical treatment on the surface is possible on brittle, hard materials, without the necessity of elevating the temperature of the brittle, hard material. It was also found to be possible to increase of the boundary layer strength by mechanical treatment on the surface of brittle, hard materials, without the necessity of utilizing Zirconia, a very specialized compound, to comprise the brittle, hard material. It was possible, for instance, to demonstrate that a workpiece made of silicon nitrite could be processed by plastic deformation on its surface with application of shot-peening methods in such a way that an increase of the boundary layer strength of 15% could be achieved.
  • the mechanical method of increasing the boundary layer strength of brittle, hard materials, particularly ceramic materials is based on the fact that regions in the vicinity of the surface are subjected to local plastic deformation produced by an appropriate tool and that internal superficial compressive strain is generated that can counteract the loads occurring in operation, such as those prevailing when rolling bearings made of ceramic materials, for instance, are employed.
  • Essential to the performance of the mechanical surface treatments is during the generation of plastic deformations on the surface, the generation of any simultaneous damage in the form of brittle fracture processes in the ceramic surfaces will be avoided, which would produce a strength-reducing effect greater than the strength-increasing effect by “plastification.”
  • the material-specific contour limit depends on the shape of the tool for the contact area between the tool and the surface of the workpiece to be processed and on the depth of impression the tool should not exceed.
  • the laterally shifted local surface treatment may be repeated in order to achieve the desired effect by, for instance, selectively applying plastic deformation all over the surface.
  • the above-described requirement is met when the tool presents a suitable geometry, preferably a round contour and a tool diameter that must not exceed a critical value, which depends on the material of the workpiece to be processed.
  • the critical values for the sphere diameters range from about 0.1 mm to a maximum of 4 mm.
  • Typical critical value diameters preferably range from about 0.1 mm to 1 mm. It is imperative that the critical values not be exceeded in order to avoid generation of damage in the form of brittle fracture processes in the predetermined surface during the process.
  • the critical diameter which is decisive for sphere dimensioning, defines also the predetermined narrowly limited surface area within which the plastic deformation must take place on the surface of the workpiece of brittle, hard material, which is to be machined.
  • the kinetic momentum acting upon the workpiece surface plays an important role.
  • the tool geometry as well as the adjustment of the momentum with which the tool hits against the workpiece surface to be machined must be so adjusted that the desired plastic deformation will occur before brittle fraction, which should preferably not occur, which means that the amount of the momentum to be applied should be so dimensioned that the extent of a possibly occurring detrimental brittle fracture will be restricted in such a way that the positive influence of plastic deformation on the boundary layer strength will be predominant.
  • the number of admissible repeated sphere impressions per contact area is determined in a dynamic ball thrust test, without damage occurring on the workpiece surface however with simultaneous plastic deformation of the surface. In this manner, the admissible degree of coverage is defined; i.e., the number of tool impressions per contact area.
  • the region on the workpiece of brittle, hard material is treated, for instance, by a shot-peening method. Endangered corners and edges of the workpiece that should not be treated must be protected from damage by means of suitable masks.
  • the spherical elements impinging on the workpiece surface may be cast onto the workpiece surface with an adjustable kinetic momentum by means of compressed air in a blasting installation or by means of an airless blasting drive so that any point on the workpiece surface to be machined will be hit once or several times.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Compositions Of Oxide Ceramics (AREA)

Abstract

A method for increasing the boundary layer strength of a workpiece made of brittle, hard material by applying a plastic deformation to a narrowly limited surface area, in order to generate internal compressive strain within a workpiece where the temperature of the workpiece is not elevated prior to the application of mechanical force.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The application is a continuation in part of copending application Ser. No. 09/319,433 for a “Method of Increasing the Boundary Layer Strength on Surfaces of Workpieces Made of Brittle Hard Materials” filed Jul. 27, 1999.[0001]
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to method of increasing the boundary layer strength of workpieces manufactured of brittle, hard materials. [0002]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The requirement of a maximum in process reliability in material-processing installations and the ever increasing pressure of cost in the field of maintenance and servicing of units in installation and purchase of new units are the principle reasons for the grown demands on bearing technology, for instance in agitating or stirring machinery and in pumps. Pumps should be useable over a wide range of temperatures and with a variety of lubricants, which could result in contamination. Additional requirements arise in view of suitability for dry running and media lubrication, along with the required long service life and low-cost cost/performance ratio. [0003]
  • Ceramic materials satisfy the aforementioned requirements in particular, which are used, for instance, in the production of bearings such as rolling bearings and friction bearings. In addition to the wear phenomena, which are only slight, the high temperature resistance of ceramic materials plays an important role in the application of such materials. [0004]
  • One essential aspect regarding the application of brittle, hard materials, which encompass the ceramic materials such as silicon nitrides, is their boundary layer strength, which determines particularly the wear of these materials or the stress and strain to which the materials are subjected. A particularly high degree of boundary layer strength of the individual workpieces is desirable especially for the application as components in mechanical engineering and in terotechnology, which consist of partly or fully ceramic rolling bearings, friction bearings as well as of ceramic elements or ceramic protective layers for which a high resistance to different kinds of wear is required, such as sliding abrasion, wear by blast jet, rolling abrasion or cavitation erosion. [0005]
  • The prevailing understanding as far as the material characteristics of highly brittle materials such as those enumerated above is such, however, that these materials are rated as “exhausted” in terms of their physical properties and that a further increase of their strength beyond the natural strength structure would not be possible and could be implemented only by the application of even more expensive raw materials and manufacturing techniques. [0006]
  • Even though methods are known to increase the boundary layer strength of brittle, hard materials, the achievable success that is obtained with them is not satisfactory. In detail, these methods include thermal and/or chemical treatment processes for influencing the surface characteristics of brittle, hard materials. [0007]
  • Thermal hardening must be considered to be one of the thermal methods, where the object to be hardened is initially heated and subsequently cooled as shortly thereafter as possible by a so-called “quenching operation.” Such hardening methods are preferably applied on glass in an approach to achieve selective superficial tensions in the glass material for a substantial increase of the breaking strength of glass, e.g., optical glasses or automotive windowpanes. However, such an application of thermal hardening on brittle, hard materials encounters substantial difficulties in the case of ceramic materials, because normally so-called thermo shock damage occurs on the ceramic surface, which results in the formation of surface cracks which substantially counteract a possible increase of the boundary layer strength. For this reason practically implementable thermal methods of hardening brittle, hard materials, particularly high-tech ceramics, are not known at present. [0008]
  • Another possibility to increase the boundary layer strength of ceramics consists in the chemical change of the boundary layer or skin by diffusion treatment with appropriate media or materials. This method, too, has so far been employed only on glass or partly crystalline glass material while the attempt to treat high-tech ceramics by means of “chemical hardening” processes positively for an increase of their boundary layer strength has so far failed. This is because of the very high temperatures and the long periods of treatment necessary to effectuate the hardening process. [0009]
  • Mechanical methods must be fundamentally mentioned, too, as a third alternative for increasing the boundary layer strength in brittle, hard materials, such as those known in many forms for the treatment of metal workpieces. For instance, metal components are provided with internal superficial compressive strain by means of suitable tools for a mechanical consolidation of the boundary layers, which is a means for increasing the surface strength of such metal components. An appropriate increase of the strength in brittle, hard materials by a mechanical treatment of the skin or boundary layer has so far neither been known nor been applied in practice without elevating the temperature of the brittle, hard material. Rather, it is presumed that due to the brittle characteristics the mechanical stress produced on the boundary layer of brittle, hard materials rather results in damage—not an increase of the strength at the surface when the temperature of the brittle, hard material is not elevated. [0010]
  • One conceivable known method of increasing the boundary layer strength of metal components is the shot-peening method, for instance, which results in a plastic deformation of the surface of the components to be processed. In lines 14 and 15 on page 5 of the German patent DE 43 11 319 A1 it is stated express is verbis, for instance, that the increase of the boundary layer strength which can be achieved on metal components with the application of shot blasts of steel balls is not obtained on ceramic materials because the components would simply be too brittle for resisting the blast energy. [0011]
  • In general, brittle, hard materials such as ceramics are denied to have the ability to undergo a plastic deformation at room temperature. For instance, from the article by J. Kriegesmann “Was ist neu an den Mechanokeramikwerkstoffen?” [What's new about the mechanoceramic materials?], published in the trade journal “Keramische Zeitschrift,” Vol. 39, No. 1, 1997, page 32, left column, the following passage is quoted: “In opposition to metals fracturing occurs already within the elastic range of the stress-strain diagram, however. The mechanical materials characteristic of ceramic materials is hence brittle, which appears to be extremely inexpedient for a mechanical application. If, as a matter of fact, an elastic energy is transmitted to a ceramic material this material tends, in its turn, too, to reduce this energy. Ceramic material, however, has only the capability of achieving this effect by fracturing.”[0012]
  • Another quotation is evident from the special issue in the honor of Prof. Eckard Macherauch, ISBN 3-88355-176-7, third paragraph on page 611: “In many cases ceramic materials display a practically purely elastic behavior and are subject to catastrophic fracturing in response to over-critical loads.”[0013]
  • Moreover, the following opinion becomes apparent from the contribution by Dr. Pruemmer, “Mooeglichkeiten zur Festigkeitssteigerung von keramischen Werkstoffen durch Oberflaechendruckeigenspannungen” [Possibilities of increasing the strength of ceramic materials by internal superficial compressive strain], published in the trade journal “Keramische Zeitschrift,” Vol. 38, No. 9, 1986, right column on page 512: “A compaction of ceramic materials to the extent which is achieved on metallic materials surfaces by cutting processes, grinding and shot-peening, can, as a matter of nature, not be expected in ceramic materials.”[0014]
  • Finally, in a article by F. Kroupa in response to a contribution to “International Conference on Advanced Materials and Technologies,” Jun. 13 to 16, 1995, Prague (CZ), it is stated: “However, all ceramic materials known to date have insufficient dislocation mobility or maneuverability and the transition temperatures are very high.”[0015]
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,573,023 (“the '023 patent”) teaches to treat the surface of a relatively brittle, hard material by shot peening. Concerning the material group of ceramic materials and also glass, the '023 patent teaches to confine the brittle, hard material to a temperature-controllable environment, and elevating the temperature to a level in which material flow is accommodated during the shot peening process (See Col. 2, lines 4-10). Therefore, the '023 patent does not disclose a method for improving the strength of a ceramic without first elevating the temperature of the ceramic prior to applying the mechanical force. [0016]
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,128,083 (“the '083 patent”) discloses a method for modifying the surface of hard engineering ceramic materials, and for sealing the micro surface defects and cracks in the surface of the ceramic material (See Col. 1, lines 30-34). The '083 patent, as in the '023 patent, also requires controlling the atmosphere in which the process is carried out and elevating the temperature to a range of 0.3 Tm to 0.5 Tm (See Col. 2, lines 26-43). Therefore, the '083 patent does not disclose a method for improving the strength of a ceramic without first elevating the temperature of the ceramic prior to applying the mechanical force. [0017]
  • The Abstract of JP041145367 discloses the process of shot peening an alumina article whereby outstanding toughness and breaking strength is obtained. However, the abstract describes a method to enhance the surface toughness of objects made of alumina sintered from and containing a specified amount of Zirconia, which is a transformation toughening material showing a phase transformation induced, for example, by shot peening. This special material, Zirconia, is a very specialized compound, which changes structure from a tetragonal to a monoclinic structure accompanied by an expansion of volume. This expansion takes place at the surface of the object, which leads to internal stresses. Zirconia is the only known compound that shows this effect. Therefore, the Abstract of JP041145367 does not disclose a method for improving the strength of a ceramic without providing an object comprising Zirconia prior to applying the mechanical force. [0018]
  • It is desired to provide a method for improving the strength of a ceramic by applying the mechanical force without having to elevate the temperature of the ceramic [0019]
  • It is also desired to provide a method for improving the strength of a ceramic by applying the mechanical force, where the object to be strengthened does not comprise Zirconia. [0020]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is therefore based on the problem of providing a method of increasing the boundary layer strength on surfaces of workpieces made of brittle, hard materials in such a form that the surface strength of brittle, hard materials can be substantially increased by a simple, low-cost processing method. It is the aim to increase the resistance of ceramic workpiece elements used in terotechnology. [0021]
  • In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a method has been provided for increasing the boundary layer strength of workpieces manufactured of ceramic materials comprising the steps of: providing a workpiece; providing a round contour tool; contacting the workpiece with the tool within a predetermined surface area; producing a plastic deformation on the predefined surface area; and generating internal compressive strain within the workpiece in the vicinity of the predetermined surface area wherein the temperature of the workpiece is not elevated above room temperature and the workpiece does not comprise Zirconia. [0022]
  • In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method has been provided for increasing the boundary layer strength of workpieces manufactured of ceramic materials comprising the steps of contacting a workpiece with a tool within a predetermined surface area, wherein the temperature of the workpiece is not elevated above room temperature and the workpiece does not comprise Zirconia. [0023]
  • The invention and its particular features and advantages will become more apparent from the following detailed description.[0024]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • A method of increasing the boundary layer strength on the surfaces of workpieces made of brittle, hard materials is so designed that the workpiece surface is contacted with a tool within a predetermined, narrowly limited surface area, in which a tool produces an exclusively plastic deformation of the surface area and generates internal compressive strain within the workpiece in the vicinity of the surface. [0025]
  • The present invention is based on the unforeseen finding that an increase of the boundary layer strength by mechanical treatment on the surface is possible on brittle, hard materials, without the necessity of elevating the temperature of the brittle, hard material. It was also found to be possible to increase of the boundary layer strength by mechanical treatment on the surface of brittle, hard materials, without the necessity of utilizing Zirconia, a very specialized compound, to comprise the brittle, hard material. It was possible, for instance, to demonstrate that a workpiece made of silicon nitrite could be processed by plastic deformation on its surface with application of shot-peening methods in such a way that an increase of the boundary layer strength of 15% could be achieved. [0026]
  • The mechanical method of increasing the boundary layer strength of brittle, hard materials, particularly ceramic materials, is based on the fact that regions in the vicinity of the surface are subjected to local plastic deformation produced by an appropriate tool and that internal superficial compressive strain is generated that can counteract the loads occurring in operation, such as those prevailing when rolling bearings made of ceramic materials, for instance, are employed. Essential to the performance of the mechanical surface treatments is during the generation of plastic deformations on the surface, the generation of any simultaneous damage in the form of brittle fracture processes in the ceramic surfaces will be avoided, which would produce a strength-reducing effect greater than the strength-increasing effect by “plastification.”[0027]
  • The aforementioned requirement is satisfied when first, the plastic deformation is restricted to a predetermined laterally narrowly limited surface area and second, the tool presents a defined contour in the region of the contact area that, when described in general terms, must be rated as nonsharp-edged. [0028]
  • The material-specific contour limit depends on the shape of the tool for the contact area between the tool and the surface of the workpiece to be processed and on the depth of impression the tool should not exceed. The laterally shifted local surface treatment may be repeated in order to achieve the desired effect by, for instance, selectively applying plastic deformation all over the surface. [0029]
  • The above-described requirement is met when the tool presents a suitable geometry, preferably a round contour and a tool diameter that must not exceed a critical value, which depends on the material of the workpiece to be processed. The critical values for the sphere diameters range from about 0.1 mm to a maximum of 4 mm. Typical critical value diameters preferably range from about 0.1 mm to 1 mm. It is imperative that the critical values not be exceeded in order to avoid generation of damage in the form of brittle fracture processes in the predetermined surface during the process. The critical diameter, which is decisive for sphere dimensioning, defines also the predetermined narrowly limited surface area within which the plastic deformation must take place on the surface of the workpiece of brittle, hard material, which is to be machined. [0030]
  • In addition to the geometric dimensioning of the tools used to machine the surface of the workpieces to be processed—and as an alternative of shot-peening also hammers, nails and rollers should be mentioned—the kinetic momentum acting upon the workpiece surface, particularly in the shot-peening method, plays an important role. The tool geometry as well as the adjustment of the momentum with which the tool hits against the workpiece surface to be machined must be so adjusted that the desired plastic deformation will occur before brittle fraction, which should preferably not occur, which means that the amount of the momentum to be applied should be so dimensioned that the extent of a possibly occurring detrimental brittle fracture will be restricted in such a way that the positive influence of plastic deformation on the boundary layer strength will be predominant. [0031]
  • For determining the process parameters required for successful operation preferably two preliminary experiments must be performed: On a plate of the material to be treated the dependence of the compression yielding point and the brittle fracture limit on the tool geometry is determined. To this end the static ball thrust test is employed, for instance, which is described e.g. in the article by T. Hollstein et al. “Vollkeramische Baelzlager aus Siliziumnitrit: Anwendung, Auslegung und Optimierung” [Fully ceramic rolling bearings made of silicon nitrite: application, designing and optimization], in: VDI-Reports No. 1151, 1995, pages 3 to 10. A material having at least the same hardness as the workpiece to be treated is selected as tool material. A rounded shape as smooth as possible is selected as tool shape for the contact area between the tool and the workpiece. This preliminary experiment furnishes the required tool geometry and the admissible amount of momentum to be introduced. [0032]
  • In a second step, the number of admissible repeated sphere impressions per contact area is determined in a dynamic ball thrust test, without damage occurring on the workpiece surface however with simultaneous plastic deformation of the surface. In this manner, the admissible degree of coverage is defined; i.e., the number of tool impressions per contact area. [0033]
  • Subsequent to the determination of the above-described process parameter, the region on the workpiece of brittle, hard material is treated, for instance, by a shot-peening method. Endangered corners and edges of the workpiece that should not be treated must be protected from damage by means of suitable masks. [0034]
  • The spherical elements impinging on the workpiece surface may be cast onto the workpiece surface with an adjustable kinetic momentum by means of compressed air in a blasting installation or by means of an airless blasting drive so that any point on the workpiece surface to be machined will be hit once or several times. [0035]
  • Although the invention has been described with reference to a particular arrangement of parts, features and the like, these are not intended to exhaust all possible arrangements or features, and indeed many other modification and variation will be ascertainable to those of skill in the art. [0036]

Claims (18)

What is claimed is:
1. A method the increasing the boundary layer strength of workpieces manufactured of ceramic materials comprising the steps of:
providing a workpiece, the temperature of which is not elevated above room temperature and which does not comprise Zirconia;
providing a tool which has at least a partially rounded contour with a predetermined diameter;
contacting the workpiece with the tool within a predetermined surface area, said predetermined surface area being less than the total surface area of the workpiece and being selected based upon the composition of the workpiece;
producing a plastic deformation on the predefined surface area; and
generating internal compressive strain within the workpiece in the vicinity of the predetermined surface area;
wherein the predetermined diameter for the tool does not exceed a critical value ranging from about 0.1 mm to about 4 mm, the critical value depending upon the composition of the workpiece selected such that, upon contacting the workpiece with the tool, generation of damage in the form of brittle fracture processes in the predetermined surface is substantially avoided.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the critical values preferably ranges from about 0.1 mm to about 1 mm.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the tool has an inherent momentum and is directed onto the workpiece surface at rest, on which the boundary layer of the workpiece is deformed by introduction of the momentum of the tool.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the workpiece surface is subjected to plastic deformation all over its surface by repeated blows of the tool or by the application of a plurality of tools acting upon the workpiece surface.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the tool consists of a plurality of spheres, which are driven onto the workpiece surface by means of a blasting installation, operated on compressed air or on an airless blasting means.
6. The method of claim 6 wherein the material of the sphere consists of the same or a similar material as that of the workpiece to be machined on its surface.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the tool comprises a hammer.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the tool comprises a nail.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the tool comprises a roller.
10. A method of increasing the boundary layer strength of workpieces manufactured of ceramic materials comprising the steps of:
contacting a workpiece in which, the temperature has not been elevated above room temperature and does not comprise Zerconia, with a tool having a predetermined diameter and has at least a partially rounded contour within a predetermined surface area, said predetermined surface area being less than the total surface area of the workpiece and being selected based upon the composition of the workpiece;
wherein the predetermined diameter for the round contour tool does not exceed a critical value ranging from about 0.1 mm to about 4 mm, the critical value depending upon the composition of the workpiece selected such that upon contacting the workpiece with the round contour tool, generation of damage in the form of brittle fracture processes in the predetermined surface is substantially avoided.
11. The method of claim wherein the critical values preferably ranges from about 0.1 mm to about 1 mm.
12. The method of claim 10 wherein the tool has an inherent momentum and is directed onto the workpiece surface at rest, on which the boundary layer of the workpiece is deformed by introduction of the momentum of the tool.
13. The method of claim 10 wherein the workpiece surface is subjected to plastic deformation all over its surface by repeated blows of the tool or by the application of a plurality of tools acting upon the workpiece surface.
14. The method of claim 10 wherein the tool consists of a plurality of spheres, which are driven onto the workpiece surface by means of a blasting installation, operated on compressed air or on an airless blasting means.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein the material of the sphere consists of the same or a similar material as that of the workpiece to be machined on its surface.
16. The method of claim 10 wherein the tool comprises a hammer.
17. The method of claim 10 wherein the tool comprises a nail.
18. The method of claim 10 wherein the tool comprises a roller.
US09/929,267 1997-12-18 2001-08-14 Method of increasing the boundary layer strength on surfaces of workpieces made of brittle hard materials Abandoned US20020079602A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/929,267 US20020079602A1 (en) 1997-12-18 2001-08-14 Method of increasing the boundary layer strength on surfaces of workpieces made of brittle hard materials

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/DE1997/002955 WO1998026910A1 (en) 1996-12-18 1997-12-18 Method for increasing boundary layer solidity on surfaces of workpieces manufactured from hard brittle materials
DEPCT/DE97/02955 1997-12-18
US31943399A 1999-07-27 1999-07-27
US09/929,267 US20020079602A1 (en) 1997-12-18 2001-08-14 Method of increasing the boundary layer strength on surfaces of workpieces made of brittle hard materials

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US31943399A Continuation-In-Part 1997-12-18 1999-07-27

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020079602A1 true US20020079602A1 (en) 2002-06-27

Family

ID=23242214

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/929,267 Abandoned US20020079602A1 (en) 1997-12-18 2001-08-14 Method of increasing the boundary layer strength on surfaces of workpieces made of brittle hard materials

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20020079602A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007124396A2 (en) * 2006-04-21 2007-11-01 Ormond, Llc Treating an object having an amount of ceramic material
EP1805344B1 (en) * 2004-10-16 2011-03-16 MTU Aero Engines AG Method for producing a component covered with a wear-resistant coating
EP2693157A1 (en) * 2012-07-30 2014-02-05 Imerys S.A. Ballistic armor
US9050642B2 (en) 2011-09-27 2015-06-09 Ormond, Llc Method and apparatus for surface enhancement
US9365908B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2016-06-14 Ormond, Llc Method and apparatus for non-contact surface enhancement

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6153023A (en) * 1996-07-12 2000-11-28 Sintokogio, Ltd. Hardened metal product produced by shot peening with shot having high hardness

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6153023A (en) * 1996-07-12 2000-11-28 Sintokogio, Ltd. Hardened metal product produced by shot peening with shot having high hardness

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1805344B1 (en) * 2004-10-16 2011-03-16 MTU Aero Engines AG Method for producing a component covered with a wear-resistant coating
WO2007124396A2 (en) * 2006-04-21 2007-11-01 Ormond, Llc Treating an object having an amount of ceramic material
WO2007124396A3 (en) * 2006-04-21 2008-02-07 Ormond Llc Treating an object having an amount of ceramic material
US9365908B2 (en) 2011-09-07 2016-06-14 Ormond, Llc Method and apparatus for non-contact surface enhancement
US9050642B2 (en) 2011-09-27 2015-06-09 Ormond, Llc Method and apparatus for surface enhancement
EP2693157A1 (en) * 2012-07-30 2014-02-05 Imerys S.A. Ballistic armor

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Wakuda et al. Effect of workpiece properties on machinability in abrasive jet machining of ceramic materials
Wakuda et al. Material response to particle impact during abrasive jet machining of alumina ceramics
Farrahi et al. An investigation into the effect of various surface treatments on fatigue life of a tool steel
Prevéy et al. Low cost corrosion damage mitigation and improved fatigue performance of low plasticity burnished 7075-T6
US5878496A (en) Method of manufacturing a component
Hassan et al. Further improvements in some properties of shot peened components using the burnishing process
Groche et al. Potential of mechanical surface treatment for mould and die production
US20080081208A1 (en) Method and apparatus for improving the distribution of compressive stress
CN101215680A (en) Aluminum alloy die-casting die steel surface shot blasting strengthening treatment method
JP2014531010A (en) Method for manufacturing track element of bearing assembly and track element
Krechetov et al. The study of multiradius roller running process
US20080257458A1 (en) Method for Case Hardening a Component by Means of Oil Jets and Device for Carrying Out Said Method
US20020079602A1 (en) Method of increasing the boundary layer strength on surfaces of workpieces made of brittle hard materials
Ben Fredj et al. Fatigue life improvements of the AISI 304 stainless steel ground surfaces by wire brushing
WO2007124396A2 (en) Treating an object having an amount of ceramic material
Karunathilaka et al. Effect of contact pressure applied on tool surface during cold forging on fatigue life of tool steel
EP0946343B1 (en) Method for increasing boundary layer solidity on surfaces of workpieces manufactured from hard brittle materials
JP2010269436A (en) Manufacturing method for ceramic ball and rolling element consisting of the ball
JPH10100069A (en) Shot peening method and treated article
JP4541062B2 (en) Functional member and manufacturing method thereof
CN111070106A (en) Surface treatment method for improving fatigue resistance of particle reinforced metal matrix composite
JP4186626B2 (en) Manufacturing method of rolling sliding member
US20060018782A1 (en) Media mixture for improved residual compressive stress in a product
Yazdania et al. Enhancement of fatigue strength of SAE 1045 steel by tempering treatment and shot peening
SU952975A1 (en) Method for surface hardening of products

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PFEIFFER, HANS-WULF;REEL/FRAME:012531/0402

Effective date: 20010828

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION