US20020048578A1 - Antibody variants - Google Patents

Antibody variants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20020048578A1
US20020048578A1 US09/125,460 US12546098A US2002048578A1 US 20020048578 A1 US20020048578 A1 US 20020048578A1 US 12546098 A US12546098 A US 12546098A US 2002048578 A1 US2002048578 A1 US 2002048578A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
antibody
therapeutic
fragment
binding
cell
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09/125,460
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Herman Waldmann
Lisa K Gilliland
Masahide Tone
Mark R Frewin
Louise Walsh
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Oxford University Innovation Ltd
Original Assignee
Oxford University Innovation Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Oxford University Innovation Ltd filed Critical Oxford University Innovation Ltd
Assigned to ISIS INNOVATION LIMITED reassignment ISIS INNOVATION LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: WALDMANN, HERMAN, TONE, MASAHIED, WALSH, LOUISE, FREWIN, MARK R., GILLILAND, LISA K.
Publication of US20020048578A1 publication Critical patent/US20020048578A1/en
Priority to US11/180,631 priority Critical patent/US8440190B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
    • C07K16/46Hybrid immunoglobulins
    • C07K16/461Igs containing Ig-regions, -domains or -residues form different species
    • C07K16/464Igs containing CDR-residues from one specie grafted between FR-residues from another
    • C07K16/465Igs containing CDR-residues from one specie grafted between FR-residues from another with additional modified FR-residues
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P37/00Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P37/00Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
    • A61P37/02Immunomodulators
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
    • C07K16/18Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans
    • C07K16/28Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants
    • C07K16/2893Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants against CD52
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K38/00Medicinal preparations containing peptides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/20Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by taxonomic origin
    • C07K2317/24Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by taxonomic origin containing regions, domains or residues from different species, e.g. chimeric, humanized or veneered
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K2319/00Fusion polypeptide

Definitions

  • This invention relates to modified antibodies for inducing immunological tolerance in human beings or animate.
  • Antibodies, or immunoglobulins comprise two heavy chains linked together by disulphide bonds and two light chains, each light chain being linked to a respective heavy chain by disulphide bonds.
  • Each heavy chain has at one end a variable domain followed by a number of constant domains.
  • Each light chain has a variable domain at one end and a constant domain at its other end, the light chain variable domain being aligned with the variable domain of the heavy chain and the light chain constant domain being aligned with the first constant domain of the heavy chain.
  • the constant domains in the light and heavy chains are not involved directly in binding the antibody to antigen.
  • variable domains of each pair of light and heavy chains form the antigen binding site.
  • the variable domains of the light and heavy chains have the same general structure; each domain comprises four framework regions, whose sequences are relatively conserved, connected by three complementarity determining regions (CDRs).
  • CDRs complementarity determining regions
  • the CDRs are held in close proximity by the framework regions. CDRs from adjacent light and heavy chain variable domains together contribute to the formation of the antigen binding site.
  • Antibodies directed to specifically chosen antigens have been used in the treatment of various conditions.
  • Campath-1 monoclonal antibodies mAb
  • mAb campath-1 monoclonal antibodies
  • the target antigen, CD52 is a GPI-anchored glycoprotein of lymphocytes and monocytes (and parts of the male reproductive system).
  • CD52 has an exceptionally short peptide sequence of 12 amino acids and a single, complex, N-linked oligosaccharide at Asn3 (Hale et al, 1990; Xia et al, 1991).
  • CD52 is a good target for antibody-mediated killing and is therefore an effective cell surface molecule for various therapeutic regimens in which reduction in lymphocytes is an objective (e.g. removal of cells from donor bone marrow to prevent graft-versus-host disease, treatment of leukemia and lymphoma, and immuno-suppression).
  • anti-idiotypic component inhibits the binding of the Ab to its target while both the anti-Id and the anti-isotypic component (directed against the constant regions) act to accelerate antibody clearance.
  • a major concern is the neutralizing effect of the antiglobulin response.
  • antiglobulin responses in general, anti-Id responses interfere with the clinical potency of a therapeutic Ab by forming Ab aggregates that are rapidly cleared from the circulation, reducing the chance for interaction with target antigen.
  • antiglobulin sera contain anti-Id antibodies. This has been demonstrated for a number of therapeutic mAb and is especially noted after repeated treatments.
  • the resulting protein had low antigen-binding titre and modelling of the humanized V-region showed that residue 27 in the VH framework sequence was critical for preserving the loop structure of CDR1. This residue was changed from the residue found in NEW (Ser) back to the rat residue Phe which resulted in restoration of antigen binding. During the modelling, an additional change (NEW residue Ser to the rat residue Thr) was also suggested. However, in functional assays this substitution had no effect on antigen binding, but the double mutant (Ser27 to Phe27 and Ser30 to Thr30) expressed the most protein and therefore was used to produce therapeutic humanized Campath-1 Ab, designated Campath-1H (Reichmann et al, 1988).
  • the humanized Campath-1 antibody consists of human residues at all positions except those encoding the 3 CDRs of the light chain, the 3 CDRs of the heavy chain, and residues Phe27 and Thr30 in VH of the heavy chain.
  • One strategy to further reduce the immunogenicity of Campath-1H might be to re-graft the 6 CDR loops onto well-characterized human germline framework regions.
  • the majority of the humanized V regions so far have used rearranged V-genes as acceptor framework sequence. This was the case for Campath-1H as framework sequences from myeloma proteins were used to provide acceptor sequences for both VH and VL.
  • Rearranged V-genes often contain somatic mutations, acquired during the process of affinity maturation. These will be unique to the individual from which the rearranged genes were derived and therefore may be seen as foreign in another individual.
  • Another approach is to induce tolerance to the potentially foreign peptides contained within the Campath-1H V-region.
  • the antiglobulin response is itself a B-cell response which is CD4+ T-cell dependent.
  • Isaacs and Waldmann (1994) demonstrated that mice deprived of CD4+ T-cells were unable to respond to a foreign cell-binding mAb (rat anti-mouse CD8 mAb).
  • CD4+ T-cell depletion was carried out by adult thymectomy combined with administration of a depleting CD4 mAb. In these mice, the response to subsequently administered mAb or SRBC was measured.
  • CD4+ T-cell deficient mice failed to make either an antiglobulin response or an anti-SRBC response, demonstrating that the anti-Ig response, like the anti-SRBC response, is classically CD4+ T-cell dependent.
  • the adminstered Ab in order to generate T-cell help and to get the appropriate T-cell response, the adminstered Ab must be processed as a protein antigen and presented, presumably in the context of an MHC class II molecule, by a suitable antigen presenting cell. Therefore, two main strategies can be adopted to decrease the immunogenicity of a humanized V-region.
  • class II-binding peptides are not yet characterized to a sufficient degree to be identified by scanning protein sequences. This is in part due to the heterogeneous nature of class II peptides.
  • Naturally processed peptides isolated from MHC class II molecules are generally larger in size, variable in length and have both ragged ends at C- and N-termini in comparison to processed peptides isolated from MHC class I molecules.
  • class I-derived peptides are mostly of uniform length of 8-9 amino acid residues
  • MHC class II-associated peptides range from 12-24 amino acids (Rudensky et al., 1991; Hunt et al, 1992; Rudensky and Janeway, 1993).
  • Class I-derived peptides have sequence motifs with specific anchor residues in certain positions allowing their side chains to fit in the binding pockets of the peptide-binding groove, and the peptide-binding groove is closed at both ends.
  • class II peptides are bound in an extended conformation that projects from both ends of an “open-ended” antigen-binding groove; a prominent non-polar pocket into which an anchoring peptide side chain fits near one end of the binding groove (Brown et al., 1993).
  • a variant of the hybridoma that expressed the myeloma L-chain and the specific anti-CD8 H-chain but no anti-CD8 L-chain was obtained.
  • a clone expressing the relevant L-chain only was also obtained in this manner. That clone was then fused to a hybridoma expressing an irrelevant specificity (anti-human CD3) and a variant was selected that expressed the relevant anti-CD8 L-chain with the irrelevant anti-CD3 H-chain. Because proteins are processed into peptides prior to presentation to T-cells, helper peptides from antigen-specific Hand L-chains would be “seen” by T-cells, regardless of their partner chain.
  • Campath-1 is a cell-binding mAb, and an effective tolerogen for use with it, such as a non-cell-binding form of the therapeutic mAb would therefore be advantageous.
  • an effective tolerogen for use with it such as a non-cell-binding form of the therapeutic mAb would therefore be advantageous.
  • the same goes for other therapeutic antibodies which have cell-binding properties, and non-cell-binding variants thereof.
  • the invention therefore provides an antibody which is a modified version of a therapeutic antibody with affinity for a cell-surface antigen, said antibody having reduced affinity for the antigen compared with the therapeutic antibody as a result of a modification or modifications to the antibody molecule, wherein the antibody is capable of inducing immunological tolerance to the therapeutic antibody.
  • the affinity of the antibody according to the invention for the antigen is reduced to 50% or less of the affinity of the therapeutic antibody for the antigen. More preferably, the affinity is reduced to 10% or less, or to 1% or less of the affinity of the therapeutic antibody.
  • the affinity needs to be sufficiently reduced to allow the antibody according to the invention to act as a tolerogen with respect to the therapeutic antibody.
  • non-cell-binding variant is used herein to refer to antibodies according to the invention, although antibodies according to the invention may still have some binding affinity for the cell surface antigen.
  • the ability of the antibody according to the invention to induce immunological tolerance to a therapeutic cell-binding antibody relies on the presence in the non-cell-binding antibody of at least one epitope also present in the therapeutic antibody, which induces an immune response in the intended patient.
  • the non-cell-binding antibody is preferably capable of tolerising to anti-idiotypic responses, at least to the V domain hypervariable regions of the therapeutic antibody and preferably also to the framework regions.
  • the tolerising antibody has an amino acid sequence similar to the therapeutic antibody in those regions.
  • the differences are restricted to any amino acid substitution(s) required to sufficiently reduce antigen binding affinity in the non-cell-binding antibody.
  • the non-cell-binding antibody is capable of inducing tolerance to the constant regions of the therapeutic antibody.
  • the constant domains of the non-cell-binding antibody are similar to those of the therapeutic antibody, having for example >90% or >95% or >99% amino acid sequence identity.
  • the constant domains of the non-cell-binding antibody and the therapeutic antibody are identical and are thus matched allotypically.
  • the invention further provides fragments of an antibody described herein, the fragments having tolerance-inducing capability.
  • Such fragments include monovalent and divalent fragments such as Fab, Fab′, and F(ab′) 2 fragments.
  • single chain antibodies are also included.
  • the preferred features of such fragments are as described herein in relation to non-cell-binding antibodies according to the invention.
  • the non-cell-binding fragments may be for use with corresponding therapeutic antibody fragments, or with therapeutic antibody molecules.
  • the reduced binding affinity of the non-cell-binding antibodies may be achieved in a variety of ways.
  • an alteration in the CDRs comprising one or two or more amino acid substitutions reduces binding affinity.
  • amino acid substitutions in other parts of the antibody molecule may be used to reduce binding affinity.
  • amino acid substitutions in the framework regions are known to significantly affect binding affinity (Reichmann et al 1988).
  • Another alternative is a monovalent form of the therapeutic antibody.
  • Monovalent antibodies have reduced binding affinity compared to their bivalent counterparts.
  • Monovalent forms may be for example Fab fragments, or single chain antibodies, or any other genetically engineered antibody fragments retaining a single binding site.
  • Monovalent variants can also be produced by mutating the cysteine residue which participates in interchain (H-H) disulphide formation (e.g., cys ⁇ ser or cys ⁇ ala).
  • H-H interchain
  • the monovalent antibody is either incapable of binding Fc receptors, or incapable of binding complement component C1q, or both. Either or both of these properties can be introduced by suitable mutations (see e.g., Morgan et al., WO 94/29351, published Dec. 22, 1994 and Winter et al., EP 0 307 434 B1).
  • the non-cell-binding antibodies or fragments according to the invention may thus be one of a variety of types of antibodies or fragments, including genetically engineered antibodies or antibody fragments.
  • the antibodies or fragments will generally be from a mixture of origins.
  • they may be chimeric e.g. human constant regions with rat variable domains; or humanised or CDR grafted or otherwise reshaped (see, e.g., Cabilly et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567; Cabilly et al., European Patent No. 0 125 023 B1; Boss et al., U.S. Pat. No.
  • Campath-1H is considered humanised although it contains two amino acid substitutions in the framework regions.
  • the antibody according to the invention is as close as possible to the therapeutic antibody on which it is based.
  • Administration of such a “minimal mutant” prior to injection of the cell-binding therapeutic mAb can be used to tolerise to all T- and most B-cell epitopes in the therapeutic mAb.
  • Classic experiments indicate that tolerance is maintained more effectively by T- cells than by B-cells. But since most B-cell responses including the anti-Id response require T-cell help, even if a B-cell is responsive to a given antigen, antibody production will be determined by the state of responsiveness of the T-cells (Chiller et al, 1971).
  • non-cell-binding variant which contains the minimum differences needed to reduce its affinity for the cell-surface antigen sufficiently to enable it to be used as a tolerogen.
  • techniques such as X-ray crystallography, computer modeling and site-directed mutagenesis, and also genetic methods such as phage display, it will be possible to design suitable non-cell-binding variants for any cell-binding therapeutic antibody.
  • the antibody according to the invention is preferably in biologically pure form, desirably being at least 95% (by weight) free of other biological materials.
  • cell-surface antigen means an antigen which is found on cell surfaces, but not necessarily exclusively on cell surfaces.
  • therapeutic antibody is used herein to refer to an antibody which may be administered to humans or animals to have a desired effect in particular in the treatment of disease.
  • therapeutic antibodies will generally be monoclonal antibodies and will generally have been genetically engineered.
  • the invention comprises a composition for administration to a patient comprising an antibody as described herein, together with a physiologically acceptable diluent or carrier.
  • the invention provides a host cell or cell line which expresses an antibody as herein described and use of such a host cell or cell line for the production of such an antibody.
  • Additional aspects of the invention include the use of an antibody as described herein in the manufacture of medicament for the induction of tolerance, in particular tolerance to a therapeutic antibody.
  • FIG. 1 shows the Campath-1H heavy chain minimal mutant constructs prepared as described in the Examples.
  • FIG. 2 shows the PCR mutagenesis strategy for preparing the mutant constructs of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3 shows pGEM9zf containing wild type Campath-1H heavy chain, and substitution of mutant fragments in the heavy chain.
  • FIG. 4 shows a schematic representation of one embodiment of a monovalent non-cell-binding therapeutic antibody.
  • amino acid residues which are involved in binding to target antigen are identified. Relative to the number of residues that comprise the VL and VH domains, those that are directly involved in interactions with antigen are small in number (Novotny et al, 1983). And although the Ab-combining site is made up of 6 hypervariable loops, 1 or 2 of those loops may dominate in that interaction. If a key residue or residues can be identified, it/they can be changed by site-directed mutagenesis to a residue that will reduce (reduce or abolish) antigen-binding. Because these residues will most likely be found within the hypervariable loop structures and not in the framework sequence supporting those loops, small changes may not significantly disrupt the overall structure of the Ab.
  • the CDR loops are modelled by identification of structurally similar loop templates (often loops with the same length and similar sequence have similar backbone conformations). These CDR sequences often fall into canonical loop motifs (excluding H3, between 50 and 95% of murine VL (kappa) and VH have loop sequences consistent with classified canonical motifs). Canonical loop backbones can then be spliced onto the model of the framework and CDR side-chain conformations can be modelled based on conformations of residues found at corresponding positions in other loops of the same canonical structure. Finally the model is often refined using computer programs that minimize troublesome stereochemical constraints.
  • Comparative model building is becoming widely used as the size of the structural database increases, providing a greater range of structural templates. Also, the greater range of computer programs available ensures that models are becoming increasingly accurate.
  • the solved crystal structure of Campath-1H was very close to the structure predicted by molecular modelling. We could predict from the modelling data that mutations 1 and 2 described in the Examples were likely to have a detrimental effect on binding to CD52. The crystal structure confirmed these predictions and also predicted that mutation 3 could disrupt binding to CD52.
  • Alanine scanning mutagenesis (mutating each residue sequentially to Ala) through those regions could identify the key residue(s) involved in antigen-binding (Cunningham and Wells, 1989). If changing a single residue to Ala reduced but did not destroy binding, that position could be targetted for more drastic mutations (for example, a substitution that created in a charge difference) to further reduce binding, if desired.
  • Alternative methods for obtaining non-cell-binding versions of therapeutic antibodies include genetic techniques such as phage display using error prone PCR (Gram et al, 1992) and cycling of V-region genes (e.g. as sFv constructs) through a bacterial mutator strain (e.g. mutD5) (Low et al., 1996). Such genetic methods can provide powerful screening systems.
  • Campath-1H is not limited to antibodies based on Campath-1H. It is anticipated that other cell-binding therapeutic antibodies, especially those which would be given in repeated doses, will become more widely accepted using this strategy.
  • the peIB leader sequence was used to direct protein expression to the periplasm, where association of L-chain and truncated H-chain occurs (Hoogenboom et al, 1991).
  • these Fab fragments were assayed for binding to immobilized CD52, it was found that swapping the (VH) CDR2 of NEW into the humanized Campath-1 Fab completely destroyed binding to CD52.
  • Replacing (VH) CDR3 reduced binding to CD52 8-fold while replacing (VH) CDR1 and (VL) CDR3 reduced binding 3-fold. No change in binding was detected when (VL) CDR1 or (VL) CDR2 were replaced.
  • VH CDR2 contained a key residue(s) necessary for antigen-binding.
  • DNA encoding the “wild-type” humanized Campath-1H-chain was used as PCR template for site-directed mutagenesis. This heavy chain sequence encodes human protein at all positions except the three VH CDR regions and positions 27 and 30 of the first framework region.
  • H2 is the actual loop structure (Chothia and Lesk, 1987) that is found within the 19 amino acid VH CDR2 denoted “hypervariable” by Kabat et al's definition (Kabat et al, 1987) (see FIG. 1). It is known that a few key residues in the loop and/or framework regions determine relatively few CDR loop conformations and canonical loop motifs have been identified for most CDR including VH CDR2 (Chothia and Lesk, 1987). Since it is the loop structures that stick out from the V-region ⁇ -barrel framework to make contact with antigen, mutations in the loop would have the greatest chance of destroying antigen binding whilst preserving Ab structure. In general, we restricted the changes to the H2 loop except for H-chain mut6 which contained an additional mutation in the residue immediately preceeding H2 as discussed in more detail below.
  • Mutation 1 is a single charge difference at residue 52b from Lys to Asp. It was predicted from the molecular modelling of Campath-1H Ab, and supported by the crystal structure, that the side chain of this residue is pointing out of the Ag binding pocket, towards the approach of antigen. Since the positive charge of the Lys is thought to interact with the negatively charged phosphate groups of the GPI anchor of CD52, it is possible that this single mutation will destroy antigen-binding.
  • Mutation 2 is a single charge difference at residue 52a from Asp to Lys. It was predicted from the molecular modelling of Campath-1H Ab that this change could interfere with antigen-binding.
  • Mutation 3 is a single charge difference at residue 53 from Lys to Asp. From the crystal structure of Campath-1H Ab, it is clear that the majority of this residue side chain is solvent accessible and therefore may be involved in the interaction with the negatively charged phosphate groups of the GPI anchor of CD52, as for mutation 1.
  • Mutation 4 is a double mutation encompassing the individual substitutions of mutant 1 and 3 (Lys52b and Lys53 to Asp).
  • Mutation 5 is a triple mutation encompassing the individual substitutions of mutant 1, 2 and 3 (three charge differences: Asp52a to Lys; Lys52b and Lys53 to Asp).
  • Mutation 6 is a triple mutation encompassing the individual substitutions of mutant 1 and 2 (two charge differences Asp52a to Lys; Lys52b to Asp), and an additional mutation of Arg52 to Ala.
  • Residue 52 has been shown to differ between 3 different Campath-1 Ab of high, low and moderate affinity and may be therefore directly involved in affinity maturation. This in turn might suggest a role in antigen binding.
  • oligonucleotide primers 1 B and 2 A (FIG. 2).
  • PCR was carried out on “wild-type” Campath-1 heavy chain DNA using a 5′ primer annealing to the leader sequence and containing an upstream HindIII site (primer 1 A) and primer 1 B to generate a 200 bp fragment.
  • primer 2 B annealing to CH1 and containing a BstXI site followed by an EcoRI site
  • primer 2 A a 440 bp fragment was generated. These fragments were gel purified and then combined in a single PCR reaction.
  • Primer 1 A and primer 2 B were added after the first cycle (thus allowing the 2 pieces of overlapping DNA to anneal before amplification). Following PCR, the fragments were gel purified and digested with HindIII and EcoRI and were transferred into intermediate sequencing vectors (PUC19 or pGEM3zf) for verification of sequence.
  • a unique PstI site located in the Campath-1H VH and a unique BstXI site in the CH1 region allowed the mutant V-regions (and partial CH1 sequence) to be isolated as PstI-BstXI fragments such that the mutation(s) were encoded in six different DNA cassettes flanked by PstI and BstXI sites.
  • the original heavy chain construct in intermediate vector pGEM9zf was cut with PstI and BstXI and the fragment was removed.
  • the remaining DNA (encoding the Campath-1H heavy chain leader sequence and the V-region upsteam of the PstI site, plus the CH1 region downstream of the BstXI site followed by the hinge, CH2, CH3 in pGEM9zf) was gel purified (FIG. 3). Ligations were then set up in which each of the DNA cassettes containing the mutation(s) described above was joined to the gel purified pGEM9zf/PstI-BstI cut Campath-1H heavy chain DNA.
  • HindIII cut mammalian expression vector pBAN-2 This vector is derived from the pNH316 vector that contains a neomycin selectable marker under the control of the mouse metallothionein promoter and the strong human ⁇ -actin promoter/polyadenylation signals for expression of the desired gene product (Page and Sydenham, 1991). As these fragments were introduced into a single HindIII restriction site, orientation of each fragment was checked by DNA sequencing.
  • DNA encoding the humanized “wild type” Campath-1H light chain was isolated from an intermediate vector as a HindIII to EcoRI fragment. This fragment was gel purified and then ligated into HindIII-EcoRI cut mammalian expression vector pRDN-1.
  • This vector is derived from the pLD9 vector that contains a “crippled” dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) selectable marker (the enhancer element of the SV40 promoter has been removed to allow for increased levels of gene expression in the presence of methotrexate) and the strong human ⁇ -actin promoter/polyadenylation signals for expression of the desired gene product (Page and Sydenham, 1991).
  • dhfr dihydrofolate reductase
  • the expression system used to produce high levels of humanized Campath-1H Ab in the past is the widely used mammalian expression system featuring gene amplification by the use of dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) deficient Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and the use of strong ⁇ -actin promoters for selection and amplification of the desired gene products (Page and Sydenham, 1991).
  • dhfr dihydrofolate reductase
  • CHO Chinese hamster ovary
  • TF1 mock (“empty” pRDN-1 plus “empty” pBAN-2)
  • TF2 Light chain only (Light-chain/pRDN-1 plus “empty” pBAN-2)
  • TF3 Light chain/pRDN-1 plus H chain mutant 1/pBAN-2
  • TF4 Light chain/pRDN-1 plus H chain mutant 2/pBAN-2
  • TF5 Light chain/pRDN-1 plus H chain mutant 3/pBAN-2
  • TF6 Light chain/pRDN-1 plus H chain mutant 4/pBAN-2
  • TF7 Light chain/pRDN-1 plus H chain mutant 5/pBAN-2
  • TF8 Light chain/pRDN-1 plus H chain mutant 6/pBAN-2
  • TF9 Light chain/pRDN-1 plus H chain “wild-type”/pBAN-2 DNA (20 ⁇ g of light chain/pRDN-1 plus 20 ⁇ g of heavy chain/pBAN-2) was mixed in a sterile eppendorf, ethanol precipitated, and rinsed twice with 70% ethanol. DNA pellets were resuspended in sterile Tris-EDTA.
  • the DNA was diluted with 60 ⁇ l of 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) in a 5 ml polystyrene tube.
  • 120 ⁇ l of DOTAP liposomal transfection reagent (Boehringer Mannheim) was diluted with 80 ⁇ l of 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4).
  • the DNA/HEPES was added to the diluted DOTAP, mixed gently, and left at room temperature for 15 min.
  • Culture medium (IMDM+5% FCS+HT) was aspirated from a T75 flask containing dhfr deficient CHO cells growing at approximately 50% confluency.
  • the DNA/DOTAP was then added to the flask along with 10 ml fresh culture medium.
  • the flask was cultured for 24 h at 37° C. in 5% CO 2 .
  • the DNA/DOTAP was then aspirated from the flask and the cells were given 15 ml fresh culture medium. After a further 24 h, selection was initiated by removing the culture medium and adding selection medium (IMDM+5% dialysed FCS+1 mg/ml G418).
  • the cells were cultured at 37° C. in 5% CO 2 and fresh selection medium was added as necessary. Culture supernatants were then tested by ELISA for the presence of antibody as described below.
  • Microtitre plates were coated with 50 ⁇ l/well anti-human Ig Fc (Sigma, catalogue number I-2136) in PBS at 2.5 ⁇ g/ml overnight at 4° C. The coating Ab was removed and the plates were blocked by addition of 100 ⁇ l/well blocking buffer (PBS+1% BSA+5% FCS+1% heat-inactivated normal rabbit serum (NRS) overnight at 4° C. The transfection supernatants were added (50 ⁇ l/well) for at least 1 h at room temperature. The wells were washed with PBS/0.5% Tween-20 (PBS/Tween).
  • PBS/Tween PBS/0.5% Tween-20
  • Biotinylated sheep anti-human Ig (Amersham, catalogue number RPN 1003) diluted 1/5000 in blocking buffer or biotinylated goat anti-human kappa light chain (Sigma, catalogue number B-1393) diluted 1/1000 in blocking buffer was added (50 ⁇ l/well) for 1 h at room temperature.
  • the wells were washed with PBS/Tween and 50 ⁇ l/well ExtrAvidin-peroxidase (Sigma, catalogue number E-2886) was added for 30 min at room temperature.
  • the wells were washed once more and 100 ⁇ l/well of substrate o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Sigma, catalogue number P-7288) was added. Colour change was measured at 492 nM using a Multiskan Plus microtitre plate reader.
  • Microtitre plates were coated with 50 ⁇ l/well anti-mouse Ig Fc (Sigma, catalogue number M4280) in PBS at 2.5 ⁇ g/ml overnight at 4° C. The coating Ab was removed and the plates were blocked by addition of 100 ⁇ l/well blocking buffer (PBS+1% BSA+5% FCS+1% heat-inactivated NRS) overnight at 4° C. Purified recombinant Campath-1 Ag-fusion protein (sequence encoding the CD52 peptide backbone fused to sequence encoding mouse CH2 and CH3 domains, and purified on a protein A column) was then added at 4 ⁇ g/ml to each well (50 ⁇ l/well) in PBS overnight at 4° C.
  • the wells were then washed with PBS/Tween and the transfection supernatants were added (50 ⁇ l/well) for at least 1 h at room temperature.
  • the wells were washed with PBS/Tween and biotinylated sheep anti-human Ig (Amersham, catalogue number RPN 1003) diluted 1/5000 in blocking buffer was added (50 ⁇ l/well) for 1 h at room temperature.
  • the wells were washed with PBS/Tween and 50 ⁇ l/well ExtrAvidin-peroxidase (Sigma, catalogue number E-2886) was added for 30 min at room temperature.
  • the wells were washed once more and 100 ⁇ l/well of substrate o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Sigma, catalogue number P-7288) was added. Colour change was measured at 492 nM.
  • Wild-type purified Campath-1H Ab binds strongly to recombinant Campath-1 Ag-fusion protein in ELISA assays.
  • the wild-type Ab can be titrated down in concentration until binding is just detectable. This may be referred to as “1 Ab binding unit”.
  • a suitable non-binding mutant of the wild-type will not show detectable binding at many times this concentration e.g. 100 times, or 1000 times, or preferably 10,000 times this concentration of wild-type Campath-1H Ab.
  • transgenic mice are used.
  • transgenic mice expressing human CD52 behind a murine CD2 promoter to mimic the expression of CD52 on T-cells can be used.
  • mice To create such mice, a 2.8 kb genomic fragment containing the 2 exons of the human CD52 gene as well as 4.5 kb upstream and 3′ flanking sequence of the human CD2 gene can be introduced into the genome of transgenic mice. It is thought that strong control regions are present 3′ to the human CD2 gene that determine the high levels and tissue-specific expression of the gene (Greaves et al, 1989).
  • four CD52/CBA founders were established that transmitted the transgene. Indeed, when peripheral blood staining of their offspring was analysed by fluorescence activated cell sorting and 2-colour staining, it was shown that the cells expressing mouse CD3 (T-cells) also expressed human CD52 (D. Kioussis, unpublished data). These mice were bred to homozygosity and greater than 95% of their T-cells express high levels of human CD52 on the cell surface.
  • mice produce a vigorous anti-globulin response (titre of 1/1000 or greater) to wild-type Campath-1H at doses of 1 to 10 mg/mouse.
  • This anti-globulin response includes an anti-Id component as the CDR loops are rat sequence.
  • the effectiveness of the minimal mutants to tolerize to subsequent challenge of wild-type Campath-1H Ab may be assessed in the following ways:
  • an amount (e.g. 500 mg) of the non-cell-binding form of the therapeutic antibody would be administered to a patient awaiting treatment with the therapeutic antibody.
  • the non-cell-binding antibody as administered is freshly deaggregated (for example by passage through a fine filter).
  • the foreigness of the protein will be less than that of polyclonal HGG or of the mixed chain Ab molecules in mice.
  • the therapeutic mAb is humanized, only the CDR loops (and in some cases, some framework positions) are comprised of rodent sequence. It therefore may be possible to tolerize with a deaggregated minimal mutant in the absence of CD4 mAb.
  • CD4 administration was required, a humanized therapeutic CD4 is available (CAMPATH-9; Gorman et al, 1991). The studies in transgenic animals should address these details.
  • the monovalent form is a single-chain Fv [formed by the VL, a short peptide linker (such as those reviewed in Huston et al, 1991) and the mutated VH] genetically fused with the sequence encoding the hinge-CH2-CH3 of human IgG1.
  • This construct is expressed in association with a truncated heavy chain (hinge-CH2-CH3 only; Routledge et al, 1991) such that a protein is expressed that is composed essentially of a single Ab-combining site and a functional Ig Fc domain.
  • the immunogenicity of the different peptide linkers is expected to be negligible given their small size (generally 14 to 18 residues in length) and abundance of small residues (eg Gly and Ser) making up the linkers.
  • small size generally 14 to 18 residues in length
  • small residues eg Gly and Ser
  • a popular choice is the 15-residue linker (Gly 4 Ser) 3 in which the serine residues confer extra hydrophilicity on the peptide backbone (to inhibit its intercalation between the variable domains during folding) and which is otherwise free of side chains that might complicate domain folding (Huston et al, 1988).
  • SFv have been expressed in mammalian cells from a number of different antibodies and have been shown to fold into the correct conformation for antigen-binding by functional activity (Gilliland et al, 1996).
  • the Fc portion is a preferred feature which should ensure serum half-life comparable to the minimal mutant and to the wild-type therapeutic Ab, whilst monovalency will ensure that binding to CD52 is greatly reduced due to the decrease in avidity.
  • Section A1 We have already shown from the CDR-swapping experiments (section A1) that the Campath-1 Ab binds poorly to CD52 in a monovalent form.
  • the smaller size may be a bonus: in classical tolerance experiments, it was found that the smaller the molecule, the better it was at inducing tolerance (Parish and Ada, 1969; Anderson, 1969; Miranda et al, 1973). By combining monovalency with a non-cell-binding mutant, a highly effective tolerogen may be obtained.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
US09/125,460 1996-02-20 1997-02-20 Antibody variants Abandoned US20020048578A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/180,631 US8440190B2 (en) 1996-02-20 2005-07-14 Antibody variants

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB9603507.6A GB9603507D0 (en) 1996-02-20 1996-02-20 Antibody variants
GB9603507.6 1996-02-20

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/180,631 Division US8440190B2 (en) 1996-02-20 2005-07-14 Antibody variants

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020048578A1 true US20020048578A1 (en) 2002-04-25

Family

ID=10789047

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/125,460 Abandoned US20020048578A1 (en) 1996-02-20 1997-02-20 Antibody variants
US11/180,631 Expired - Fee Related US8440190B2 (en) 1996-02-20 2005-07-14 Antibody variants

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/180,631 Expired - Fee Related US8440190B2 (en) 1996-02-20 2005-07-14 Antibody variants

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (2) US20020048578A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP0970127B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP4574750B2 (fr)
AT (1) ATE373016T1 (fr)
AU (1) AU723366B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2246715C (fr)
DE (1) DE69738138T2 (fr)
ES (1) ES2294793T3 (fr)
GB (1) GB9603507D0 (fr)
NZ (1) NZ331299A (fr)
WO (1) WO1997031024A1 (fr)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004009638A1 (fr) * 2002-07-23 2004-01-29 Isis Innovation Limited Anticorps therapeutiques a effets secondaires reduits
WO2005114215A2 (fr) * 2004-05-19 2005-12-01 Avidex Ltd Procede d'amelioration des recepteurs des lymphocytes t (trc)
US20100189651A1 (en) * 2009-01-12 2010-07-29 Cytomx Therapeutics, Llc Modified antibody compositions, methods of making and using thereof
US20100221212A1 (en) * 2009-02-23 2010-09-02 Cytomx Therapeutics, Llc Proproteins and methods of use thereof
US8518404B2 (en) 2007-08-22 2013-08-27 The Regents Of The University Of California Activatable binding polypeptides and methods of identification and use thereof
US10800850B2 (en) 2000-10-09 2020-10-13 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Therapeutic antibodies

Families Citing this family (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ES2176484T3 (es) * 1995-08-18 2002-12-01 Morphosys Ag Bancos de proteinas/(poli)peptidos.
US6037454A (en) * 1996-11-27 2000-03-14 Genentech, Inc. Humanized anti-CD11a antibodies
ATE384792T1 (de) 1998-11-18 2008-02-15 Genentech Inc Antikörpervarianten mit höheren bindungsaffinitäten im vergleich zu parentalen antikörpern
US7465790B2 (en) 2000-10-09 2008-12-16 Isis Innovation, Inc. Therapeutic antibodies
WO2004087210A1 (fr) * 2003-03-31 2004-10-14 Kirin Beer Kabushiki Kaisha Methode d'induction de differenciation et de proliferation de cellules t regulatrices par un anticorps anti-cd52 et composition medicinale associee
EP1863531A1 (fr) * 2005-03-19 2007-12-12 Medical Research Council Ameliorations dans ou concernant le traitement et la prevention d'infections virales
PE20070207A1 (es) * 2005-07-22 2007-03-09 Genentech Inc Tratamiento combinado de los tumores que expresan el her
US20100197896A1 (en) * 2007-05-16 2010-08-05 Leung Shui-On Functional humanization of complementarity determining regions (cdrs)
CA2939492C (fr) 2009-05-13 2019-03-19 Genzyme Corporation Immunoglobulines anti-cd52 humain
CN102449149B (zh) 2009-05-29 2014-04-23 莫佛塞斯公司 集合及其使用方法
ES2696548T3 (es) 2010-11-19 2019-01-16 Morphosys Ag Una colección de secuencias de anticuerpos y su uso
GB201109238D0 (en) * 2011-06-01 2011-07-13 Antitope Ltd Antibodies
US9494597B2 (en) * 2012-04-02 2016-11-15 Ab Biosciences, Inc. Human control antibodies and uses therefor
SG11201406943XA (en) 2012-04-27 2014-12-30 Cytomx Therapeutics Inc Activatable antibodies that bind epidermal growth factor receptor and methods of use thereof
SG11201508358RA (en) 2013-04-09 2015-11-27 Boston Biomedical Inc 2-acetylnaphtho[2,3-b]furan -4,9-dione for use on treating cancer
WO2015066279A2 (fr) 2013-10-30 2015-05-07 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Anticorps activables se liant au récepteur du facteur de croissance épidermique et méthodes d'utilisation de ceux-ci
WO2015089283A1 (fr) 2013-12-11 2015-06-18 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Anticorps qui se lient à des anticorps activables et leurs procédés d'utilisation
US20160120158A1 (en) * 2014-11-03 2016-05-05 The Johns Hopkins University Compositions and methods for the study and treatment of acute kidney injury
US20180140572A1 (en) 2015-06-03 2018-05-24 Boston Biomedical, Inc. Compositions comprising a cancer stemness inhibitor and an immunotherapeutic agent for use in treating cancer
WO2018102427A1 (fr) 2016-11-29 2018-06-07 Boston Biomedical, Inc. Dérivés de naphthofurane, préparation et procédés d'utilisation associés
CA3062656A1 (fr) 2017-05-17 2018-11-22 Boston Biomedical, Inc. Methodes pour le traitement du cancer

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ATE95068T1 (de) * 1988-02-12 1993-10-15 British Tech Group Modifizierte antikoerper.
US5846534A (en) 1988-02-12 1998-12-08 British Technology Group Limited Antibodies to the antigen campath-1
US5858725A (en) 1990-10-10 1999-01-12 Glaxo Wellcome Inc. Preparation of chimaeric antibodies using the recombinant PCR strategy
WO1994004679A1 (fr) 1991-06-14 1994-03-03 Genentech, Inc. Procede pour fabriquer des anticorps humanises
DK0610447T3 (da) * 1991-10-15 1999-08-23 Btg Int Ltd CDw52-specifikt antistof til behandling af T-cellemedieret inflammation af leddene
GB9125768D0 (en) * 1991-12-04 1992-02-05 Hale Geoffrey Therapeutic method

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10800850B2 (en) 2000-10-09 2020-10-13 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Therapeutic antibodies
WO2004009638A1 (fr) * 2002-07-23 2004-01-29 Isis Innovation Limited Anticorps therapeutiques a effets secondaires reduits
AU2003260686B2 (en) * 2002-07-23 2009-11-26 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Therapeutic antibodies with reduced side effects
WO2005114215A2 (fr) * 2004-05-19 2005-12-01 Avidex Ltd Procede d'amelioration des recepteurs des lymphocytes t (trc)
WO2005114215A3 (fr) * 2004-05-19 2006-03-16 Avidex Ltd Procede d'amelioration des recepteurs des lymphocytes t (trc)
US20090054257A1 (en) * 2004-05-19 2009-02-26 Medigene Limited Method of improving t cell receptors
US7608410B2 (en) 2004-05-19 2009-10-27 Immunocore Limited Method of improving T cell receptors
US10077300B2 (en) 2007-08-22 2018-09-18 The Regents Of The University Of California Activatable binding polypeptides and methods of identification and use thereof
US8518404B2 (en) 2007-08-22 2013-08-27 The Regents Of The University Of California Activatable binding polypeptides and methods of identification and use thereof
US8529898B2 (en) 2007-08-22 2013-09-10 The Regents Of The University Of California Activatable binding polypeptides and methods of identification and use thereof
US8541203B2 (en) 2007-08-22 2013-09-24 The Regents Of The University Of California Activatable binding polypeptides and methods of identification and use thereof
US9169321B2 (en) 2007-08-22 2015-10-27 The Regents Of The University Of California Activatable binding polypeptides and methods of identification and use thereof
US11028162B2 (en) 2007-08-22 2021-06-08 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods for manufacturing activatable binding polypeptides comprising matrix metalloprotease cleavable moieties
US20100189651A1 (en) * 2009-01-12 2010-07-29 Cytomx Therapeutics, Llc Modified antibody compositions, methods of making and using thereof
US8513390B2 (en) 2009-01-12 2013-08-20 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Modified antibody compositions, methods of making and using thereof
US8563269B2 (en) 2009-01-12 2013-10-22 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Modified antibody compositions, methods of making and using thereof
US9453078B2 (en) 2009-01-12 2016-09-27 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Modified antibody compositions, methods of making and using thereof
US10059762B2 (en) 2009-01-12 2018-08-28 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Anti-EGFR activatable antibodies
US10875913B2 (en) 2009-01-12 2020-12-29 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Methods of treatment using activatable anti-EGFR antibodies
US10118961B2 (en) 2009-01-12 2018-11-06 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Modified antibody containing the cleavable peptide with the amino acid sequence TGRGPSWV
US9644016B2 (en) 2009-02-23 2017-05-09 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Soluble notch receptor proproteins and methods of use thereof
US10513549B2 (en) 2009-02-23 2019-12-24 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Cleavage-activatable interferon-alpha proprotein
US20100221212A1 (en) * 2009-02-23 2010-09-02 Cytomx Therapeutics, Llc Proproteins and methods of use thereof
US8399219B2 (en) 2009-02-23 2013-03-19 Cytomx Therapeutics, Inc. Protease activatable interferon alpha proprotein

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE373016T1 (de) 2007-09-15
JP4574750B2 (ja) 2010-11-04
DE69738138D1 (de) 2007-10-25
US20060018898A1 (en) 2006-01-26
ES2294793T3 (es) 2008-04-01
GB9603507D0 (en) 1996-04-17
EP0970127B1 (fr) 2007-09-12
CA2246715C (fr) 2008-08-05
AU1885197A (en) 1997-09-10
DE69738138T2 (de) 2008-06-05
WO1997031024A1 (fr) 1997-08-28
CA2246715A1 (fr) 1997-08-28
JP2000506723A (ja) 2000-06-06
AU723366B2 (en) 2000-08-24
NZ331299A (en) 2000-05-26
EP0970127A1 (fr) 2000-01-12
US8440190B2 (en) 2013-05-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8440190B2 (en) Antibody variants
US6984383B1 (en) Method of transplanting cells by contacting donor cells with B7-1-and B7-2-specific immunoglobulins
EP1442061B1 (fr) Reduction de l'antigenicite des immunoglobulines par correction de charpente
US5846534A (en) Antibodies to the antigen campath-1
US7524498B2 (en) Human immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of cancer
AU618989B2 (en) Improvements in or relating to antibodies
Jolliffe Humanized antibodies: enhancing therapeutic utility through antibody engineering
US7125689B2 (en) Method for rendering streptokinase less immunogenic to a human
US7531175B2 (en) Methods for modulation of immune responses using humanized immunoglobulins reactive with B7-1 molecules
KR20010043470A (ko) Cd23에 대한 항체, 이의 유도체 및 이들의 치료적 용도
KR20120111932A (ko) 항-인간 cd52 면역글루불린
JPH10509876A (ja) Cd38に対する擬人化抗体
WO1991010722A2 (fr) Immunoglobuline chimerique pour recepteurs de cd4
Routledge et al. Reshaping antibodies for therapy
Mark et al. Derivation of therapeutically active humanized and veneered anti-CD18 antibodies
Harris Humanising Monoclonal Antibodies

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ISIS INNOVATION LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WALDMANN, HERMAN;GILLILAND, LISA K.;TONE, MASAHIED;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:009569/0490;SIGNING DATES FROM 19980812 TO 19980902

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION