US20020029495A1 - Resilient, all-surface soles for footwear - Google Patents

Resilient, all-surface soles for footwear Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20020029495A1
US20020029495A1 US09/948,597 US94859701A US2002029495A1 US 20020029495 A1 US20020029495 A1 US 20020029495A1 US 94859701 A US94859701 A US 94859701A US 2002029495 A1 US2002029495 A1 US 2002029495A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
sole
resilient
footwear
stud
anchor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09/948,597
Inventor
Sidney Kastner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=25488031&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20020029495(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US09/948,597 priority Critical patent/US20020029495A1/en
Publication of US20020029495A1 publication Critical patent/US20020029495A1/en
Priority to AT02256110T priority patent/ATE376781T1/en
Priority to DE60223210T priority patent/DE60223210T2/en
Priority to EP02256110A priority patent/EP1290958B1/en
Priority to RU2002123916/12A priority patent/RU2298392C2/en
Priority to JP2002264575A priority patent/JP4112321B2/en
Priority to CNB021416842A priority patent/CN1253117C/en
Priority to US10/613,575 priority patent/US6915595B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43FOOTWEAR
    • A43CFASTENINGS OR ATTACHMENTS OF FOOTWEAR; LACES IN GENERAL
    • A43C15/00Non-skid devices or attachments
    • A43C15/005Nails, pins
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43FOOTWEAR
    • A43CFASTENINGS OR ATTACHMENTS OF FOOTWEAR; LACES IN GENERAL
    • A43C15/00Non-skid devices or attachments
    • A43C15/02Non-skid devices or attachments attached to the sole

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to improvements in resilient, all-surface soles that are applied to or or are integral part of footwear. More specifically, it relates to improvements in such soles as described, illustrated and claimed in my U.S. Pat. No. 5,634,283, which was issued on Jun. 3, 1997.
  • Gold shoe normally have soles with metal spikes or studs that extend at right angles to the bottom surface of the sole, so that when the golf shoes are worn on sod, the spikes readily penetrate the sod to a depth such that, when the golfer exerts downward pressure on the shoe sole, the footwear remains in a fixed position relative to the sod despite substantial torque that is applied by the golfer during his swing.
  • a footwear sole formed from a resilient material such as rubber and having a plurality of metal studs mounted in the sole, each stud or spike having an anchoring poortion embedded in the resilient sole, a tip portion extending outwardly from the sole surface, and a shaft portion joining the tip and the anchor of the stud.
  • the studs will extend outwardly from the sole a distance sufficient to enable the wearer to obtain purchase on that softer surface due to penetration of the studs into the surface.
  • the sole comprises utilizing studs that have an anchoring portion interior of the sole and adapting that portion of the sole that engages the anchoring portion of the stud to the specific conditions toward which the stud is designed.
  • the resilience of the rubber will vary through the depth of the sole as that depth is measured from the bottom, work-contacting surface of the sole to that sole surface that contacts the upper of the footwear.
  • the sole is formed so that the resilience thereof varies between the bottom and upper surfaces of the sole. Such variation can be uniform, that is, more resilient at the bottom, work-contacting surface of the sole and least resilient at the portion of the sole that contact the shoe upper.
  • the sole is formed from layers of rubber, a more resilient zone being located at the bottom of the sole and even at the uppermost zone, with a less resilient, i.e., harder zone being formed at a central location to lend stability to the shoe..
  • the more resilient zone can be located between the two, harder zones of rubber.
  • another embodiment of my invention is based on the formation of a groove in the bottom, work contacting surface of the sole.
  • Such groove is annular in shape and surrounds the tip of a stud that projects from the bottom surface.
  • the stud has a degree of resilience, itself, the groove permits the stud to flex to the side when excess pressure is directed against it, rather than have the additional pressure on the study force the stud into a hard underlying surface which it will then tend to scar.
  • the soles can be formed in a single molding operation in which the resilient material, such as natural or synthetic rubber, has its composition varied from one surface of the sheet from which the soles are formed to the other surface.
  • the sole can be molded from individual sheets. For example, two sheets of less resilient and one sheet or more resilient can be formed and cut to size, and the more resilient layer sandwiched between the harder layers and molded to them. Production efficiencies may determine which methods of forming the desired structures prove more effective.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view generally showing the exterior of footwear having an all-surface sole according to my invention
  • FIG. 2 is an enlarged sectional view illustrating the sole construction according to one preferred embodiment of my invention
  • FIG. 3 is an enlarge sectional view illustrating another preferred embodiment of a sole construction according to my invention.
  • FIG. 4 is an enlarged sectional view of a third, preferred embodiment
  • FIG. 5 is another section illustrating a variant of the embodiment of FIG. 4, and
  • FIG. 6 is still another sectional view showing a variation that comprises a combination of previously illustrated preferred embodiments.
  • Sole 10 may be permanently attached to shoe 11 or may be removable therefrom and placed, either with another, similar sole after excessive wear, or with another sole that has different characteristics.
  • sole 10 has a bottom, work-contacting surface 12 , from which protrude a plurality of metal studs 13 .
  • the upper surface 14 of the sole is not seen in FIG. 1, but lies in juxtaposition to the upper of the shoe 11 .
  • the pattern in which the studs 13 are arranged is predetermined and is not considered to be part of the present invention.
  • each stud 13 is formed with an anchoring portion 15 , a tip portio 16 , and a cylindrical or conical shank or shaft portion 17 so that it will remain substantially in place in relation to the resilient material of the sole in which it is encased.
  • the tip 16 may be of a variety of shapes so long as its function of engaging a surface on which the wearer of the footwear 11 places it is maintained.
  • the tip portion 16 is shown as cylindrical, but may also be conical with the apex of the cone projecting outwardly from the bottom surface 12 of the sole 10 .
  • the shaft 17 serves the function of connecting the tip and anchor of a stud. Indeed, the tip portion may simply be constituted as the extremity of the shaft 18 .
  • Portions of intermediate density lie between the zones 20 and 21 , and are indicated by reference numeral 22 .
  • the density and resilience of the sole 10 decreases from the sole bottom surface 12 to the sole upper surface 14 , and in this embodiment it is preferred that such decrease be uniform in its extent, that is, that the resilience of the sole uniformly increase as one moves from the bottom surface 12 to the upper surface 14 of the sole 10 .
  • the anchoring portion 16 of the stud 13 is embedded in the rubber sole approximately halfway between the bottom and top sole surfaces. In this position the anchor 15 is located at a part of the thickness of the sole that is of lesser density and greater resilience than that portion 20 adjoining bottom surface 12 .
  • the stud 13 will be able to be retracted more easily when the user of the footwear 22 steps on a hard surface than if the resilience of the sole were uniform throughout its depth. Yet the hardness of the rubber at the bottom surface of the sole will still be of greater density, and therefore provide greater wear resistance and sturdiness to the footwear. However, retraction of the stud will still be adequate if the wearer of the shoe is of light weight, for example.
  • FIG. 3 shows a different, preferred embodiment.
  • harder rubber layers are disposed adjoining both surfaces of the sole 10 .
  • a relatively hard layer 25 is located at the bottom surface 12 of the sole and, similarly, hard layer 26 is located at the upper surface 14 of the sole.
  • those relatively hard layers have between them a softer, more resilient layer or zone 27 , which in effect is sandwiched between the more dense layers.
  • the reason for the layering of more and less resilient zones in the FIG. 3 embodiment is to enable the stud 13 to be retracted more easily into the sole 10 , while still maintaining a relatively firm sole bottom surface that will resist undue wear.
  • the shaft 17 of stud 13 extends through the less resilient portion 27 and into the more resilient portion 27 , in which the anchor 15 of stud 13 is located.
  • the stud is more readily retractable because it anchor portion 15 is encased within the more resilient zone 17 .
  • the less resilient outer layer 25 adjoining the bottom surface 12 of the sole 10 is in contact with the work, i.e., the surface on which the wearer is striding. In this manner ease of retractability of the stud or spike is enhanced while the wear resistance of the footwear is the same as if the denser bottom layer of the sole extended throughout the entirety of the sole.
  • FIG. 4 of the drawings Still another embodiment of my invention is illustrated in FIG. 4 of the drawings.
  • the sole 30 is formed of a single zone of rubber, and a cleat portion 31 extends downwardly and forms, in part, the bottom surface of the sole.
  • a stud 32 Encased within the body of the sole is a stud 32 , comprised of an anchor 33 and a tip 34 joined by a shaft 35 that extends substantially perpendicular to the horizontal axis of the sole 30 .
  • the groove 37 that surrounds the tip and forms an annular opening about the tip 34 and in this case a lower portion of the shaft 35 .
  • the shaft of the stud 32 is usually formed from metal, providing such an annular recess 37 enables some flexing of the stud when it contacts a hard surface, and such flexing permits unwanted scarification of that surface in addition to the resilience imparted by the stud anchor 33 embedded in the resilient sole 30 .
  • FIG. 5 shows another preferring embodiment of my invention that is similar to that of FIG. 4.
  • the sole 40 is formed from two layers of rubber, an upper or inner layer 41 and an outer, work contacting zone or layer 42 .
  • a stud 43 is provided, which stud includes an anchor 44 joined by a shaft 45 to a stud tip 46 .
  • the tip 46 is surrounded by annular recess 47 to permit some flexing of the tip and associated shank 45 .
  • outer layer or zone 42 is of harder, more wear resistance material, while inner layer 41 is more resilient. So, as the anchoring portion 44 of stud 43 is backed by more resilient zone 41 , the stud can be retracted far more easily than if it had to press against the harder, less resilient zone 42 .
  • sole 50 is formed from a relatively hard upper layer 51 of rubber or other material, to which is adhered a relatively resilient layer 52 . Then a cleat 53 formed of relatively hard rubber protrudes downwardly from the resilient layer 52 .
  • the stud 54 extends with its tip 55 in hard layer 53 and shaft 56 passing through that hard layer into zone 52 in which its anchor 57 is encompassed.
  • the stud 54 can be retracted with a fair degree of ease, as its anchor need only compress a part of the more resilient layer 52 while both the work contacting cleat 53 and the upper layer 51 of the sole 50 are formed from a less resilient material adapted to provide great wear resistance and rigidity to the sole in its entirety.
  • the annular recess 57 permits some flexibility of the tip and tip 55 and shaft 56 of the stud 54 .
  • the soles disclosed herein can be made by molding in one piece or, where the sole is formed from layers of materials of difference degrees of resilience, by separately forming each layer and then fusing the layers together.
  • the hardness of the synthetic or natural rubber compounds utilized will vary as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,634,283, from between about 65 to 90 Durometer Shor A. Where greater hardness and less resilience are desired, the sole hardness will be at a maximum, whereas where much more resilience is desired, the Shor Durometer hardness will be at a minimum.

Landscapes

  • Footwear And Its Accessory, Manufacturing Method And Apparatuses (AREA)

Abstract

A resilient shoe sole having a less resilient outer layer and a more resilient inner layer, and retractable studs anchored in the inner, more resilient layer. The bottom surface of the sole has annular grooves formed around the tip portions of the studs to permit those portions to flex when pressure is applied to the bottom surface, as during walking on a hard surface.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to improvements in resilient, all-surface soles that are applied to or or are integral part of footwear. More specifically, it relates to improvements in such soles as described, illustrated and claimed in my U.S. Pat. No. 5,634,283, which was issued on Jun. 3, 1997. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • As more fully disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,634,283, on which I am the named inventor and the disclosure of which is hereby fully incorporated herein by referende, it has long been a challenge to those of skill in the art of designing footwear to devise footwear having soles that enable the wearer to have traction on surfaces that may be classified as slippery, e.g., ice or wet sod. With regard to the lastter surfaces, golf shoes are a common expedient. Gold shoe normally have soles with metal spikes or studs that extend at right angles to the bottom surface of the sole, so that when the golf shoes are worn on sod, the spikes readily penetrate the sod to a depth such that, when the golfer exerts downward pressure on the shoe sole, the footwear remains in a fixed position relative to the sod despite substantial torque that is applied by the golfer during his swing. [0002]
  • It will be apparent, however, that while shoes having soles with spikes extending outwardly from them are quite useful when one is walking on sod, or even a surface such as ice or compacted snow, when one then stands on a hard, smooth surface into which the spikes can make no substantial penetration, such spiked footwear can be a hazard to the wearer as well as the hard surface, which can be defaced and scratched by the shoe spikes. [0003]
  • In order to address this problem my prior patent disclosed and claimed a footwear sole formed from a resilient material such as rubber and having a plurality of metal studs mounted in the sole, each stud or spike having an anchoring poortion embedded in the resilient sole, a tip portion extending outwardly from the sole surface, and a shaft portion joining the tip and the anchor of the stud. When the footwear is worn, the studs are retracted inwardly from the surface of the sole so that on a hard surface, the tip portions of the studs will be located at the relatively hard surface and will not penetrate it. However, when the wearer is standing on a relatively soft surface, such as sod or wet ice, the studs will extend outwardly from the sole a distance sufficient to enable the wearer to obtain purchase on that softer surface due to penetration of the studs into the surface. [0004]
  • While that invention is broadly utilitarian, i[0005] 6 does not address problems that may arise in specific situations. Thus, where a woman's shoe is to be made with such a sole, it is apparent that pressure on the resilient sole will be less than that exerted by a shoe where the wearer is a 300-lb. man. Moreover, if the sole is formed from rubber or other material of a high degree of resilience such tht when the shoe is worn by a light-weight person the studs will nevertheless retract to the bottom surface of the sole, the sole formed from such soft rubber may not present a firm support to the wearer. In addition, even when there is an optimum balance between the resilience of the sole and the weight of the wearer, there still may be some scarification of a hard surface when the wearer i of the shoes slides his or her feet across that surface.
  • It is, therefore, one object of the present invention to provide a studded sole for footwear in which the resilience of the sole at its bottom, work-contacting surface is not necessarily determinative of the resistance of the sole to retraction of the studs while the footwear is being worn. [0006]
  • Expressed otherwise, it is an object of my invention to overcome the problem of adapting a studded, resilient sole to varying surface and weights of the wearer so that the studs will readily engage surfaces on which they are designed to penetrate, but nevertheless enable the wearer to utilize the shoes or other footwear on a hard surface, such as a tile floor, without unduly marring that surface. [0007]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In one broad aspect of my invention, it comprises utilizing studs that have an anchoring portion interior of the sole and adapting that portion of the sole that engages the anchoring portion of the stud to the specific conditions toward which the stud is designed. This requires that the sole not have a uniform resilience or density, because it is not formed from rubber or other material that is uniformly resilient. Thus, the resilience of the rubber will vary through the depth of the sole as that depth is measured from the bottom, work-contacting surface of the sole to that sole surface that contacts the upper of the footwear. [0008]
  • In one specific embodiment the sole is formed so that the resilience thereof varies between the bottom and upper surfaces of the sole. Such variation can be uniform, that is, more resilient at the bottom, work-contacting surface of the sole and least resilient at the portion of the sole that contact the shoe upper. In another embodiment the sole is formed from layers of rubber, a more resilient zone being located at the bottom of the sole and even at the uppermost zone, with a less resilient, i.e., harder zone being formed at a central location to lend stability to the shoe.. Yet in another embodiment the more resilient zone can be located between the two, harder zones of rubber. It is in this softer zone of rubber that the anchoring portion of a stud is located; in this manner an easily retractable stud is formed although the work contacting surface of the sole is relatively hard, so that the sole may be worn on a hard, indoor surface without unduly scuffing it. [0009]
  • In order to provide for the same, general purpose, another embodiment of my invention is based on the formation of a groove in the bottom, work contacting surface of the sole. Such groove is annular in shape and surrounds the tip of a stud that projects from the bottom surface. As the stud has a degree of resilience, itself, the groove permits the stud to flex to the side when excess pressure is directed against it, rather than have the additional pressure on the study force the stud into a hard underlying surface which it will then tend to scar. [0010]
  • With respect to processes for the manufacture of soles that have varying degrees of resilience through their depths, the soles can be formed in a single molding operation in which the resilient material, such as natural or synthetic rubber, has its composition varied from one surface of the sheet from which the soles are formed to the other surface. Alternatively, the sole can be molded from individual sheets. For example, two sheets of less resilient and one sheet or more resilient can be formed and cut to size, and the more resilient layer sandwiched between the harder layers and molded to them. Production efficiencies may determine which methods of forming the desired structures prove more effective. [0011]
  • These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent when considered in connection with preferred embodiments of my invention as described in the specification hereinafter and as illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which: [0012]
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view generally showing the exterior of footwear having an all-surface sole according to my invention; [0013]
  • FIG. 2 is an enlarged sectional view illustrating the sole construction according to one preferred embodiment of my invention; [0014]
  • FIG. 3 is an enlarge sectional view illustrating another preferred embodiment of a sole construction according to my invention; [0015]
  • FIG. 4 is an enlarged sectional view of a third, preferred embodiment; [0016]
  • FIG. 5 is another section illustrating a variant of the embodiment of FIG. 4, and [0017]
  • FIG. 6 is still another sectional view showing a variation that comprises a combination of previously illustrated preferred embodiments.[0018]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Referring now to the drawings, and in particular to FIG. 1 thereof, what is shown in an all-surface sold [0019] 10 in place on footwear 11. Sole 10 may be permanently attached to shoe 11 or may be removable therefrom and placed, either with another, similar sole after excessive wear, or with another sole that has different characteristics.
  • As generally shown, sole [0020] 10 has a bottom, work-contacting surface 12, from which protrude a plurality of metal studs 13. The upper surface 14 of the sole is not seen in FIG. 1, but lies in juxtaposition to the upper of the shoe 11. The pattern in which the studs 13 are arranged is predetermined and is not considered to be part of the present invention.
  • The structure of a stud [0021] 13, which is preferably made of metal, is best seen in FIGS. 2 and 3. As is the case with the studs of my U.S. Pat. No. 5,634,283, each stud 13 is formed with an anchoring portion 15, a tip portio 16, and a cylindrical or conical shank or shaft portion 17 so that it will remain substantially in place in relation to the resilient material of the sole in which it is encased. The tip 16 may be of a variety of shapes so long as its function of engaging a surface on which the wearer of the footwear 11 places it is maintained. Thus, the tip portion 16 is shown as cylindrical, but may also be conical with the apex of the cone projecting outwardly from the bottom surface 12 of the sole 10. The shaft 17 serves the function of connecting the tip and anchor of a stud. Indeed, the tip portion may simply be constituted as the extremity of the shaft 18.
  • What is important to certain embodiments of my resilient, all-surface sole is the nature of the composition of the sole [0022] 10. In my patent it is disclosed, but not limited to being uniform and made from a resilient material, e.g., natural or synthetic rubber. In the embodiment of FIG. 2 the material from which the sole is formed is of the same general, resilient nature, but the sole is not uniform in substance or resiliency. The rubber body of the sole is harder, that is, of less resilience, at a location adjoining the bottom, work contacting surface 12 of the sole 10. More dense, less resilient zones of the sole are indicated by reference number 20 and adjoin bottom surface 12. Less dense portions are indicated by reference number 21 and adjoin upper sole surface 14. Portions of intermediate density lie between the zones 20 and 21, and are indicated by reference numeral 22. As a consequence, in that illustrated embodiment the density and resilience of the sole 10 decreases from the sole bottom surface 12 to the sole upper surface 14, and in this embodiment it is preferred that such decrease be uniform in its extent, that is, that the resilience of the sole uniformly increase as one moves from the bottom surface 12 to the upper surface 14 of the sole 10.
  • In the FIG. 2 embodiment it will also been seen that the [0023] anchoring portion 16 of the stud 13 is embedded in the rubber sole approximately halfway between the bottom and top sole surfaces. In this position the anchor 15 is located at a part of the thickness of the sole that is of lesser density and greater resilience than that portion 20 adjoining bottom surface 12. In this structure the stud 13 will be able to be retracted more easily when the user of the footwear 22 steps on a hard surface than if the resilience of the sole were uniform throughout its depth. Yet the hardness of the rubber at the bottom surface of the sole will still be of greater density, and therefore provide greater wear resistance and sturdiness to the footwear. However, retraction of the stud will still be adequate if the wearer of the shoe is of light weight, for example.
  • The illustration of FIG. 3 shows a different, preferred embodiment. Here harder rubber layers are disposed adjoining both surfaces of the sole [0024] 10. Thus, a relatively hard layer 25 is located at the bottom surface 12 of the sole and, similarly, hard layer 26 is located at the upper surface 14 of the sole. However, those relatively hard layers have between them a softer, more resilient layer or zone 27, which in effect is sandwiched between the more dense layers.
  • The reason for the layering of more and less resilient zones in the FIG. 3 embodiment is to enable the stud [0025] 13 to be retracted more easily into the sole 10, while still maintaining a relatively firm sole bottom surface that will resist undue wear. Thus, in this embodiment of my invention the shaft 17 of stud 13 extends through the less resilient portion 27 and into the more resilient portion 27, in which the anchor 15 of stud 13 is located. In this manner the stud is more readily retractable because it anchor portion 15 is encased within the more resilient zone 17. Still, the less resilient outer layer 25 adjoining the bottom surface 12 of the sole 10 is in contact with the work, i.e., the surface on which the wearer is striding. In this manner ease of retractability of the stud or spike is enhanced while the wear resistance of the footwear is the same as if the denser bottom layer of the sole extended throughout the entirety of the sole.
  • Still another embodiment of my invention is illustrated in FIG. 4 of the drawings. Here the sole [0026] 30 is formed of a single zone of rubber, and a cleat portion 31 extends downwardly and forms, in part, the bottom surface of the sole. Encased within the body of the sole is a stud 32, comprised of an anchor 33 and a tip 34 joined by a shaft 35 that extends substantially perpendicular to the horizontal axis of the sole 30. What is believed to be unique vis-a-vis my prior patent, however, is the groove 37 that surrounds the tip and forms an annular opening about the tip 34 and in this case a lower portion of the shaft 35. As the shaft of the stud 32 is usually formed from metal, providing such an annular recess 37 enables some flexing of the stud when it contacts a hard surface, and such flexing permits unwanted scarification of that surface in addition to the resilience imparted by the stud anchor 33 embedded in the resilient sole 30.
  • FIG. 5 shows another preferring embodiment of my invention that is similar to that of FIG. 4. The difference here is that the sole [0027] 40 is formed from two layers of rubber, an upper or inner layer 41 and an outer, work contacting zone or layer 42. A stud 43 is provided, which stud includes an anchor 44 joined by a shaft 45 to a stud tip 46. Here, too, the tip 46 is surrounded by annular recess 47 to permit some flexing of the tip and associated shank 45. In the FIG. 5 embodiment outer layer or zone 42 is of harder, more wear resistance material, while inner layer 41 is more resilient. So, as the anchoring portion 44 of stud 43 is backed by more resilient zone 41, the stud can be retracted far more easily than if it had to press against the harder, less resilient zone 42.
  • Finally, the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 6 employs another combination of hard or more resilient layers of rubber. In this embodiment sole [0028] 50 is formed from a relatively hard upper layer 51 of rubber or other material, to which is adhered a relatively resilient layer 52. Then a cleat 53 formed of relatively hard rubber protrudes downwardly from the resilient layer 52. The stud 54 extends with its tip 55 in hard layer 53 and shaft 56 passing through that hard layer into zone 52 in which its anchor 57 is encompassed. In this structure the stud 54 can be retracted with a fair degree of ease, as its anchor need only compress a part of the more resilient layer 52 while both the work contacting cleat 53 and the upper layer 51 of the sole 50 are formed from a less resilient material adapted to provide great wear resistance and rigidity to the sole in its entirety. In this embodiment as well, the annular recess 57 permits some flexibility of the tip and tip 55 and shaft 56 of the stud 54.
  • With regard to the manufacture of the soles disclosed herein, they can be made by molding in one piece or, where the sole is formed from layers of materials of difference degrees of resilience, by separately forming each layer and then fusing the layers together. The hardness of the synthetic or natural rubber compounds utilized will vary as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,634,283, from between about 65 to 90 Durometer Shor A. Where greater hardness and less resilience are desired, the sole hardness will be at a maximum, whereas where much more resilience is desired, the Shor Durometer hardness will be at a minimum. Nevertheless, such variation in hardness are doubtless within the skill of those in this art, and I do not wish to be limited as to any specific hardness or resilience employed, other than as such hardness or resilience in one part of the sole may be contrasted with those factors in another layer of the sole. [0029]
  • It will be apparent to those of skill in this art that certain modifications and alterations to the preferred embodiments of my invention described and illustrated herein will be found obvious without departing from the spirit of the invention. Exemplarily, the provision or deletion of a cleat from the bottom surface of the sole is an obvious expedient. It is desired, therefore, that all such alterations and modifications be included within the purview of the invention, which is to be limited only by the scope, including equivalents, of the following, appended claims. [0030]

Claims (12)

I claim:
1. A resilient, all-surface sole for footwear, said sole having a bottom, work contacting surface and an upper surface and being formed from a resilient material of substantial thickness located between said surfaces and being subject to compressive deformation, comprising:
a plurality of studs mounted in said sole, each of said studs having an anchor portion embedded in said resilient material, a tip portion extending slightly beyond the plane of said bottom surface of said sole, and a shaft connecting said anchor portion and said tip portion,
said resilient material being non-uniform in its degree of resilience and being less resilient at an exterior portion at said bottom surface of said sole and more resilient at an interior portion of said sole,
said anchor portion being embedded in said sole at said more resilient portion, so that when said footwear is worn and compressive deformation is applied to said bottom surface of said sole, said tip portion is caused to retract within said sole by force directed by said stud anchor against said more resilient interior portion while said less resilient exterior portion of said sole provides wear resistance when said bottom surface of said sole contacts hard surfaces as said footwear is worn.
2. A sole as claimed in claim 1, in which said resilient material is in the form of layers, a less resilient layer being located at a lower portion of said sole and terminating in said bottom, work contacting surface of said sole and a more resilient layer being located at an upper portion of said sole adjacent said less resilient layer.
3. A sole as claimed in claim 2, in which said anchor portion of said stud is positioned at said more resilient layer.
4. A sole as claimed in claim 2, in which said anchor poortion of said stud is positioned at the juncture of said less resilient and said more resilient layers.
5. A sole as claimed in claim 1, in which said resilient material is in the form of layers, a first, less resilient layer being located at a lower portion of said sole and terminating in said bottom, work contacting surface of said sole, a more resilient layer located at contiguous with said less resilient layer and extending upwardly therefrom, and a second, less resilient layer contiguous with said more resilient layer, said first and second less resilient layers being adhered to and sandwiching said more resilient layer between them.
6. A sole as claimed in claim 5, in which said stud anchor is embedded in said more resilient layer.
7. A sole as claimed in claim 5, in which said stud anchor is positioned at the juncture of said first less resilient layer and said more resilient layer.
8. A resilient, all-surface sole for footwear, said sole having a bottom, work contacting surface and an upper surface and being formed from a resilient material of substantial thickness located between said surfaces and being subject to compressive deformation, comprising:
a plurality of studs mounted in said sole, each of said studs having an anchor portion embedded in said resilient material, a tip portion extending slightly beyond the plane of said bottom surface of said sole, and a shaft connecting said anchor portion and said tip portion, said tip portions of said studs being formed from metal and having a limited ability to flex without bending or breaking,
said bottom surface of said sole being formed with recesses at the locations where said tip portions extend outwardly from the plane of said bottom surface, so that when said footwear is worn and compressive deformation is applied to said bottom surface of said sole, said tip portions are caused to retract within said sole by force directed by said stud anchors against a resilient interior portion of said sole and said tip portions flex in said recesses formed at said locations where said tip portions extend beyond said sole surface.
9. A resilient, all-surface sole for footwear as claimed in claim 8, in which said recesses are annular in shape, each recess surrounding its tip portion at said sole surface.
10. A resilient, all-surface sole for footwear as claimed in claim 9, in which said recesses extend into said sole surface at least the entire depth of said tip portion.
11. A resilient, all-surface sole for footwear as claimed in claim 9, in which said recesses extend into said sole surface to a depth of the entire tip portion of said stud and a part of said stud shaft.
12. A resilient, all-surface sole for footwear, said sole having a bottom, work contacting surface and an upper surface and being formed from a resilient material of substantial thickness located between said surfaces and being subject to compressive deformation, comprising:
a plurality of studs mounted in said sole, each of said studs having an anchor portion embedded in said resilient material, a tip portion extending slightly beyond the plane of said bottom surface of said sole, and a shaft connecting said anchor portion and said tip portion,
said resilient material being non-uniform in its degree of resilience and being less resilient at an exterior portion at said bottom surface of said sole and more resilient at an interior portion of said sole,
said anchor portion being embedded in said sole at said more resilient portion, said bottom surface of said sole being formed with a recess at the location where said tip portion extends outwardly from the plane of said bottom surface
so that when said footwear is worn and compressive deformation is applied to said bottom surface of said sole, said tip portion is caused to retract within said sole by force directed by said stud anchor against said more resilient interior portion and said tip portion flexes in said recess formed at said location where said tip portion extends beyond said sole surface while said less resilient exterior portion of said sole provides wear resistance when said bottom surface of said sole contacts a hard surface as said footwear is worn.
US09/948,597 2000-09-08 2001-09-10 Resilient, all-surface soles for footwear Abandoned US20020029495A1 (en)

Priority Applications (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/948,597 US20020029495A1 (en) 2000-09-08 2001-09-10 Resilient, all-surface soles for footwear
AT02256110T ATE376781T1 (en) 2001-09-10 2002-09-03 ELASTIC SOLES FOR SHOES ON ALL SURFACES
DE60223210T DE60223210T2 (en) 2001-09-10 2002-09-03 On all surfaces elastic soles for shoes
EP02256110A EP1290958B1 (en) 2001-09-10 2002-09-03 Resilient all-surface soles for footwear
RU2002123916/12A RU2298392C2 (en) 2001-09-10 2002-09-09 Flexible integral sole for shoes (versions)
JP2002264575A JP4112321B2 (en) 2001-09-10 2002-09-10 Elastic all-surface sole for footwear
CNB021416842A CN1253117C (en) 2001-09-10 2002-09-10 Elastic full surface sole for shoes
US10/613,575 US6915595B2 (en) 2001-09-10 2004-03-22 Resilient, all-surface soles for footwear

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US23099600P 2000-09-08 2000-09-08
US09/948,597 US20020029495A1 (en) 2000-09-08 2001-09-10 Resilient, all-surface soles for footwear

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/613,575 Continuation US6915595B2 (en) 2001-09-10 2004-03-22 Resilient, all-surface soles for footwear

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020029495A1 true US20020029495A1 (en) 2002-03-14

Family

ID=25488031

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/948,597 Abandoned US20020029495A1 (en) 2000-09-08 2001-09-10 Resilient, all-surface soles for footwear
US10/613,575 Expired - Fee Related US6915595B2 (en) 2001-09-10 2004-03-22 Resilient, all-surface soles for footwear

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/613,575 Expired - Fee Related US6915595B2 (en) 2001-09-10 2004-03-22 Resilient, all-surface soles for footwear

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (2) US20020029495A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1290958B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4112321B2 (en)
CN (1) CN1253117C (en)
AT (1) ATE376781T1 (en)
DE (1) DE60223210T2 (en)
RU (1) RU2298392C2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120159816A1 (en) * 2010-12-27 2012-06-28 Han-Ching Wu Anti-slip spike structure
US20150230561A1 (en) * 2013-12-17 2015-08-20 Kahtoola, Inc. Footwear traction devices and systems and mechanisms for making durable connections to soft body materials
US9622545B2 (en) * 2015-01-26 2017-04-18 Joneric Products, Inc. Dual-molded layer overshoe
IT201800021307A1 (en) * 2018-12-28 2020-06-28 Progress Plast S N C Di Bordin Lino & C PERFECTED NON-SLIP NAIL SOLE
US11684123B2 (en) 2019-12-01 2023-06-27 Kahtoola, Inc. Footwear traction device and method of using the same

Families Citing this family (41)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003030670A1 (en) * 2001-10-10 2003-04-17 Cole Charles D Iii Apparatus and methods for imbedded rubber outer
US7234250B2 (en) * 2005-02-07 2007-06-26 Stacy Renee Fogarty Convertible traction shoes
US20080066348A1 (en) * 2005-02-07 2008-03-20 Select Sole, Llc Footwear with retractable members
US20070113424A1 (en) * 2005-11-23 2007-05-24 Michael Bell Overshoes with raised inner surface portions and slip resistant sole portions for use on primary footwear
US9795181B2 (en) * 2007-10-23 2017-10-24 Nike, Inc. Articles and methods of manufacture of articles
US9572402B2 (en) 2007-10-23 2017-02-21 Nike, Inc. Articles and methods of manufacturing articles
US9788603B2 (en) * 2007-10-23 2017-10-17 Nike, Inc. Articles and methods of manufacture of articles
US8256145B2 (en) * 2008-09-26 2012-09-04 Nike, Inc. Articles with retractable traction elements
US8079160B2 (en) * 2008-09-26 2011-12-20 Nike, Inc. Articles with retractable traction elements
CN102421316B (en) 2009-04-02 2015-11-25 耐克创新有限合伙公司 traction elements
US8616892B2 (en) 2009-04-02 2013-12-31 Nike, Inc. Training system for an article of footwear with a traction system
US20100269374A1 (en) * 2009-04-22 2010-10-28 Chin-Long Hsieh Sole structure and method of making the same
US8632342B2 (en) 2009-05-28 2014-01-21 Nike, Inc. Training system for an article of footwear
US8573981B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2013-11-05 Nike, Inc. Training system for an article of footwear with a ball control portion
US8578631B2 (en) * 2009-08-25 2013-11-12 Gene A. Francello Extendable spikes for shoes
US8453354B2 (en) * 2009-10-01 2013-06-04 Nike, Inc. Rigid cantilevered stud
DE202009016139U1 (en) * 2009-11-30 2010-03-18 X-Technology Swiss Gmbh sole
US8745897B2 (en) * 2009-12-08 2014-06-10 Lacrosse Footwear, Inc. Traction enhancing devices for footwear assemblies
US8533979B2 (en) * 2010-02-18 2013-09-17 Nike, Inc. Self-adjusting studs
US8322051B2 (en) 2010-02-23 2012-12-04 Nike, Inc. Self-adjusting studs
US9210967B2 (en) 2010-08-13 2015-12-15 Nike, Inc. Sole structure with traction elements
US8529267B2 (en) 2010-11-01 2013-09-10 Nike, Inc. Integrated training system for articles of footwear
GB2486895B (en) * 2010-12-27 2013-09-18 Han-Ching Wu Improved anti-slip spike structure
US8713819B2 (en) 2011-01-19 2014-05-06 Nike, Inc. Composite sole structure
US9504293B2 (en) 2011-04-18 2016-11-29 Nike, Inc. Outsole with extendable traction elements
US9138027B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2015-09-22 Nike, Inc. Spacing for footwear ground-engaging member support features
US9220320B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2015-12-29 Nike, Inc. Sole arrangement with ground-engaging member support features
US8966787B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2015-03-03 Nike, Inc. Orientations for footwear ground-engaging member support features
US8806779B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2014-08-19 Nike, Inc. Shaped support features for footwear ground-engaging members
US9402442B2 (en) 2012-04-27 2016-08-02 Nike, Inc. Sole structure and article of footwear including same
RU2492781C1 (en) * 2012-05-11 2013-09-20 Павел Андреевич Белов Anti-icing overshoes
US9032645B2 (en) 2012-07-30 2015-05-19 Nike, Inc. Support features for footwear ground engaging members
US9320316B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-04-26 Under Armour, Inc. 3D zonal compression shoe
US10524543B2 (en) * 2013-11-15 2020-01-07 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear with self-cleaning cleats
DE202014102743U1 (en) 2014-06-13 2014-06-24 Han-Ching Wu Anti-slip safety device
US10010133B2 (en) 2015-05-08 2018-07-03 Under Armour, Inc. Midsole lattice with hollow tubes for footwear
US10010134B2 (en) 2015-05-08 2018-07-03 Under Armour, Inc. Footwear with lattice midsole and compression insert
US20180070680A1 (en) * 2016-09-15 2018-03-15 Tingley Rubber Corporation Traction Studs And Outsoles
CN110475491A (en) * 2016-12-27 2019-11-19 夹持力技术公司 On-slip shoes
US11089839B1 (en) 2018-01-15 2021-08-17 Anthony Louis Chechile Sport shoe of the self-cleaning variety with a compressible cleaning structure
RU2743113C1 (en) * 2020-02-11 2021-02-15 Георгий Яковлевич Пустовой Shoe sole with anti-slip holes

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US19205A (en) * 1858-01-26 Heel-spttb to prevent slipping on ice
US2258734A (en) * 1939-06-22 1941-10-14 David R Brady Peg for athletic shoes
US2424226A (en) * 1940-11-01 1947-07-22 Dufour Eric Nonslipping rubber sole
DE801897C (en) * 1949-01-18 1951-01-25 Adolf Dassler Fa Racing shoe with thorns
US3170251A (en) * 1963-05-03 1965-02-23 Patrick Raymond Antiskid attachment for shoes
US3747238A (en) * 1972-04-10 1973-07-24 J Jankauskas Studded footwear
JPS5637362Y2 (en) * 1978-08-16 1981-09-02
US4466205A (en) * 1983-01-10 1984-08-21 Corbari George V Safety stud
AT388488B (en) * 1985-06-18 1989-06-26 Hartjes Rudolf GOLF SHOE
US4747220A (en) * 1987-01-20 1988-05-31 Autry Industries, Inc. Cleated sole for activewear shoe
JPH0462107U (en) * 1990-10-11 1992-05-28
NZ242909A (en) * 1991-06-04 1994-12-22 Ishikawa Giken Gomu Kk Rubber spike pin projects within tread open mounting recess
US5634283A (en) 1995-05-03 1997-06-03 Kastner; Sidney Resilient, all-surface sole
IT1275516B (en) * 1995-07-12 1997-08-07 Vibram Spa SPORTY SOLE WITH INCREASED STABILITY IN ONE PIECE
IT1287224B1 (en) * 1996-03-29 1998-08-04 D B A S R L SOLE FOR FOOTWEAR
US6029377A (en) * 1997-06-19 2000-02-29 Bridgestone Sports, Co., Ltd. Athletic shoe
US6698110B1 (en) * 2002-10-28 2004-03-02 Timothy A. Robbins Spiked shoe having a spike cleaning cushion

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120159816A1 (en) * 2010-12-27 2012-06-28 Han-Ching Wu Anti-slip spike structure
US8695234B2 (en) * 2010-12-27 2014-04-15 Han-Ching Wu Anti-slip spike structure
US20150230561A1 (en) * 2013-12-17 2015-08-20 Kahtoola, Inc. Footwear traction devices and systems and mechanisms for making durable connections to soft body materials
US10004298B2 (en) * 2013-12-17 2018-06-26 Kahtoola, Inc. Footwear traction devices and systems and mechanisms for making durable connections to soft body materials
US11918083B2 (en) * 2013-12-17 2024-03-05 Kahtoola, Inc. Footwear traction devices and systems and mechanisms for making durable connections to soft body materials
US9622545B2 (en) * 2015-01-26 2017-04-18 Joneric Products, Inc. Dual-molded layer overshoe
IT201800021307A1 (en) * 2018-12-28 2020-06-28 Progress Plast S N C Di Bordin Lino & C PERFECTED NON-SLIP NAIL SOLE
WO2020135947A1 (en) * 2018-12-28 2020-07-02 Progress Plast S.N.C. Di Bordin Lino & C. Anti-skid spiked sole
US11684123B2 (en) 2019-12-01 2023-06-27 Kahtoola, Inc. Footwear traction device and method of using the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE60223210D1 (en) 2007-12-13
ATE376781T1 (en) 2007-11-15
EP1290958A3 (en) 2003-10-22
DE60223210T2 (en) 2008-02-28
JP4112321B2 (en) 2008-07-02
CN1408295A (en) 2003-04-09
JP2003093103A (en) 2003-04-02
CN1253117C (en) 2006-04-26
EP1290958A2 (en) 2003-03-12
RU2298392C2 (en) 2007-05-10
EP1290958B1 (en) 2007-10-31
US20040134102A1 (en) 2004-07-15
US6915595B2 (en) 2005-07-12
RU2002123916A (en) 2004-03-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6915595B2 (en) Resilient, all-surface soles for footwear
US8789296B2 (en) Self-adjusting studs
US5634283A (en) Resilient, all-surface sole
US8322051B2 (en) Self-adjusting studs
US4607440A (en) Outsole for athletic shoe
US9949529B2 (en) Article of footwear with sole structure having frusto-conical structures
KR101860242B1 (en) Cleated footwear with flexible cleats
JP4435415B2 (en) Multi-layer outsole
US7866064B2 (en) Interchangeable pod system
US4044479A (en) Shell sole
US6138386A (en) Composite cleat for athletic shoe
US6662475B2 (en) Reversible heel
EP0980655A2 (en) Improved high heel footwear structure
JP3343202B2 (en) Sports shoes
JP6881759B2 (en) Sole, shoes and non-slip members
JPH0476684B2 (en)
JPS635524Y2 (en)
CA2193437C (en) Resilient, all-surface sole
JP2023131620A (en) Sole, and shoe having sole

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION