US20010052973A1 - Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss - Google Patents

Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20010052973A1
US20010052973A1 US09/299,782 US29978299A US2001052973A1 US 20010052973 A1 US20010052973 A1 US 20010052973A1 US 29978299 A US29978299 A US 29978299A US 2001052973 A1 US2001052973 A1 US 2001052973A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
dependent loss
polarization dependent
passive optical
optical component
signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US09/299,782
Other versions
US6449033B2 (en
Inventor
Marlene A. Marro
William E. Schmitt
Mark A. Summa
Gregory E. Williams
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Corning Inc
Original Assignee
Corning Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Corning Inc filed Critical Corning Inc
Priority to US09/299,782 priority Critical patent/US6449033B2/en
Assigned to CORNING INCORPORATED reassignment CORNING INCORPORATED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SUMMA, MARK A., MARRO, MARLENE A., SCHMITT, WILLIAM E., WILLIAMS, GREGORY E.
Priority to KR1020017013635A priority patent/KR20010113894A/en
Priority to AU54392/00A priority patent/AU5439200A/en
Priority to CN00806621A priority patent/CN1348543A/en
Priority to EP00939283A priority patent/EP1173741A1/en
Priority to PCT/US2000/009501 priority patent/WO2000065324A1/en
Priority to MXPA01010869A priority patent/MXPA01010869A/en
Priority to CA002368255A priority patent/CA2368255A1/en
Priority to JP2000614013A priority patent/JP2002543377A/en
Priority to TW089107957A priority patent/TW463031B/en
Publication of US20010052973A1 publication Critical patent/US20010052973A1/en
Publication of US6449033B2 publication Critical patent/US6449033B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M11/00Testing of optical apparatus; Testing structures by optical methods not otherwise provided for
    • G01M11/30Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides
    • G01M11/31Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides with a light emitter and a light receiver being disposed at the same side of a fibre or waveguide end-face, e.g. reflectometers
    • G01M11/3181Reflectometers dealing with polarisation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M11/00Testing of optical apparatus; Testing structures by optical methods not otherwise provided for
    • G01M11/30Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides
    • G01M11/33Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides with a light emitter being disposed at one fibre or waveguide end-face, and a light receiver at the other end-face
    • G01M11/337Testing of optical devices, constituted by fibre optics or optical waveguides with a light emitter being disposed at one fibre or waveguide end-face, and a light receiver at the other end-face by measuring polarization dependent loss [PDL]

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to measuring the polarization dependent loss (PDL) of an optical device, and particularly to an apparatus and method that substantially eliminates the PDL noise associated with the measurement system such that a component PDL can be more accurately measured.
  • PDL polarization dependent loss
  • the fundamental mode of the fiber is the solution to the wave equation that satisfies the boundary conditions at the core-cladding interface.
  • the electric field associated with the fundamental mode is assumed to be a transverse field, with the polarization components being linearly polarized along mutually orthogonal x and y directions.
  • the state of polarization refers to the distribution of light energy between these two modes.
  • a device or component may exhibit loss as a function of the polarization mode.
  • the difference in the loss between the two polarization modes represents the polarization dependent loss (PDL) of the device.
  • the PDL of an optical component is a critical parameter that is often used to characterize an optical device being incorporated into an optical fiber network. As optical systems become more complex, system designers are requiring that components and devices meet stricter PDL tolerances because of the cumulative nature of PDL. A device having a PDL of 0.01 dB can have a significant impact in a system that consists of many devices and spans a considerable distance. To meet this need, measurement systems must be able to accurately measure the PDL of such devices.
  • a 2 ⁇ 2 3 dB coupler is used to make the PDL measurement of a reflective optical device.
  • a first port is connected to a polarization controller and a laser light source and a second port is connected to a power detector.
  • a third port is connected to the device under test (DUT) and the fourth port is terminated.
  • the laser light and polarization controller inject a randomly polarized light signal into the coupler. The light signal is directed out of the third port and into the DUT, where it is reflected back into the third port. After propagating in the coupler, the reflected signal is directed out of the second port and into the detector which detects the PDL.
  • This system has a major drawback.
  • the coupler itself has a PDL in the range between 0.05 db and 0.1 dB. Since the PDL of the coupler is higher than the PDL of many of the devices now being deployed in photonic systems, the measurement apparatus is unable to measure the true PDL of the device under test because it is hidden within the PDL noise of the system.
  • an automated system is provided to measure the PDL of optical devices operating in the forward transmission mode.
  • a light source and a polarization controller are used to provide a signal having four predetermined and unique polarization states.
  • the microprocessor based system causes an actuator to cycle the polarization controller through the four polarization states while a detector is positioned at the output of the DUT to read the intensity of each state.
  • These values are used by a processor to compute the values for each element in a Meuller matrix and to compute a Stokes vector to represent the polarized input signal.
  • These values are then used to compute the PDL of the DUT.
  • the test set has a residual PDL of less than 0.001 dB, which is an improvement.
  • Automated systems can be beneficial, provided that the savings generated by the functionality of the system are more than the attendant software, reliability, and maintainability costs which can be considerable.
  • automated systems are software intensive and it is often the case that the cost of software development exceeds the cost of the hardware.
  • drawback of this system For a sophisticated system that is so highly automated, it lacks versatility since it is unable to measure devices that work in the backward reflection mode, such as gratings. This in turn leads to an unpleasant choice: purchase or develop a second system for measuring the PDL of reflective devices, or redesign and modify the system in order to accomodate reflective devices. Both solutions involve added expense.
  • the PDL measurement apparatus must be versatile, having the ability to measure the PDLs of both reflective devices and those that function in the forward transmission mode.
  • the present invention for an apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss features several fiber optic couplers combined in tandem and oriented such that the PDL noise of the measurement system is reduced to a negligible level.
  • the PDL of the measurement system is virtually eliminated.
  • the simplicity of this concept is compelling because it provides a measurement system that accurately measures the PDL of optical components yet in an inexpensive way. It is also a versatile system. It measures the PDL of optical devices that operate in a reflection mode or in a forward transmission mode.
  • One aspect of the present invention is an apparatus for measuring a polarization dependent loss of an optical device under test using a randomly polarized light signal, the apparatus generates a test input signal that is directed into the optical device under test.
  • the apparatus comprises: a first passive optical element connected to the light source, wherein the first passive optical element has a first polarization dependent loss; and a second passive optical element connected to the first passive optical element and having a second polarization dependent loss that is substantially equal to the first polarization dependent loss.
  • the second passive optical element is disposed relative to the first passive optical element such that the second polarization dependent loss substantially cancels the first polarization dependent loss and outputs the test input signal with a polarization dependent loss equal to a first minimum value.
  • the present invention includes a method for measuring a polarization dependent loss of an optical device using an apparatus that includes a light source for emitting a light signal that is randomly polarized, a first passive optical element connected to the light source, wherein the first passive optical element has a first polarization dependent loss.
  • the method for measuring includes the steps of: providing a second passive optical element having a second polarization dependent loss that is substantially equal to the first polarization dependent loss and connected to the first passive optical element at a relative position such that the second polarization dependent loss substantially cancels the first polarization dependent loss; directing the light signal into the first passive optical component such that the second passive optical component produces a test input signal, wherein the test input signal has a polarization dependent loss substantially equal to a first minimum value; directing the test input signal into the optical device; and measuring an output signal of the optical device to thereby determine the polarization dependent loss.
  • the present invention includes a method for calibrating an apparatus used for measuring a polarization dependent loss of an optical device
  • the apparatus includes a light source for emitting a light signal that is randomly polarized and a first passive optical element having a first polarization dependent loss.
  • the method for calibrating comprising the steps of: providing a second passive optical element having a second polarization dependent loss that is substantially equal to the first polarization dependent loss and connected to the first passive optical element; directing the light signal into the first passive optical component to thereby create a calibration signal that exits the second passive optical component; and rotating the second passive optical component until a first calibration polarization dependent loss of the calibration signal equals a first minimum value.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a first embodiment of the present invention that measures PDL in a forward transmission mode
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the calibration assembly used for calibrating the present invention for forward transmission mode measurements
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an alternate embodiment of the present invention that measures PDL in a reflection mode
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the calibration assembly for calibrating the present invention for backward reflection mode measurements.
  • FIG. 1 An exemplary embodiment of the apparatus for measuring polarization dependent loss of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1, and is designated generally throughout by reference numeral 10 .
  • the present invention for an apparatus for measuring polarization dependent loss includes a first passive optical element 12 and a second passive optical component 14 .
  • the PDLs of these elements are substantially equal.
  • the second passive optical component 14 is connected to the first passive optical component 12 and rotated with respect to the first passive component 12 .
  • the PDL of the measurement system is virtually eliminated.
  • the noise floor is lowered to near zero and the PDL of the optical device-under-test (DUT) can be accurately measured.
  • the system is relatively inexpensive to implement and offers needed versatility because it measures the PDL of optical devices that operate in a reflection mode or in a forward transmission mode. Thus, it provides one solution for both types of measurements.
  • a first embodiment of the present invention operating in the forward transmission mode includes light source 20 connected to passive optical component 12 .
  • Passive optical component 12 is connected to passive optical component 14 .
  • the second passive optical component 14 is rotated with respect to the first passive component 12 until the PDL of the second passive optical component cancels the PDL of the first passive optical component.
  • the rotation of the second passive optical component 14 is effected as a part of the calibration of apparatus 10 and will be discussed below.
  • An output of passive optical component 14 is connected to the DUT.
  • the output of the DUT is connected to measurement element 30 .
  • the DUT being tested in the first embodiment can be any optical device that operates in a forward transmission mode, such as couplers, Mach-Zehnders, and other such devices.
  • Light source 20 consists of a narrow band light source 22 connected to polarization controller 24 .
  • Narrow band light source 22 is selected to operate in either the 0.8 ⁇ m, 1.3 ⁇ m, or 1.55 ⁇ m optical communication wavelength bands depending on the DUT and the intended use of the DUT.
  • Narrow band light source 22 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a HP8168F laser. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to the narrow band light source 22 depending on apparatus cost restraints, wavelength, and device availability. For example, any laser with a narrow spectral line width is suitable. Also, light source 22 can be implemented by replacing the laser with a combination of a broadband light source, such as a light emitting diode, and a narrowband filter.
  • Polarization controller 24 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example an HP8169A manufactured by Hewlett-Packard.
  • Passive optical component 12 and passive optical component 14 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a 2 ⁇ 2 3 dB coupler for each passive component. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to passive components 12 and 14 of the present invention depending on the number of ports needed. For example, 1 ⁇ 2 3 dB couplers can also be used. The only requirement is that the PDL of coupler 14 be matched to the PDL of coupler 12 . Passive optical component 14 can also be implemented using a 1 ⁇ 1 device such as a manual polarization controller.
  • Measurement element 30 consists of a detector 32 and a processor 34 .
  • the detector 32 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example an HP 81524A/B detector. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to detector 32 depending on the desired level of complexity of the measurement apparatus 10 .
  • any suitable power meter can be used to detect the intensity of the light signal exiting the DUT.
  • the processor 34 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a personal computer or a workstation using a standard computer communications interface, such as an IEEE-488 interface. Intensity values of the light exiting the DUT are measured bydetector 32 and transmitted to processor 34 . The PDL of the device is calculated and displayed.
  • the present invention for an an apparatus for measuring polarization dependent loss 10 may further include a calibration unit 40 for calibrating the PDL measurements in a forward transmission mode.
  • Calibration unit 40 includes rotatable stage assembly 42 which positions passive optical component 14 relative to passive optical component 12 .
  • Rotatable stage assembly 42 is connected to and driven by motor 44 .
  • Motor 44 is controlled by the measurement element 30 , which functions as a loop controller in calibration unit 40 .
  • Measurement element 30 is connected to passive optical component 14 , to form a closed control loop.
  • Rotatable stage assembly 42 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a rotation stage assembly manufactured by Newport. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to stage assembly 40 depending on cost and precision requirements. For example, Newfocus also manufactures rotation stage assemblies.
  • Motor 44 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a stepper motor that drives rotatable assembly 42 in incremental steps. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to stage assembly 40 depending on cost and measurement needs. For example, a continuous drive motor having variable speeds could also be used.
  • the measurement software routine and the calibration software routine are portions of a software program resident in the memory of the processor 34 .
  • Coupler 12 is a 2 ⁇ 2 3 dB coupler having a PDL of 0.029 dB and an achromatic spectral response in the 1.5 ⁇ m optical communications band.
  • Coupler 14 is a 2 ⁇ 2 3 dB coupler having a PDL of 0.032 dB and an achromatic spectral response in the 1.5 ⁇ m optical communications band.
  • the minimum value of the residual PDL is 0.003 dB.
  • couplers 12 and 14 could have been selected such that their PDLs were matched to a thousandth of a dB. This would reduce the residual PDL to less than 0.001 dB.
  • Measurement element 30 uses the measured PDL value as an error signal to drive motor 44 and rotate stage 42 .
  • stage assembly 42 rotates coupler 14 with respect to coupler 12
  • the measured residual PDL changes and measurement element 30 drives motor 44 and stage 42 until the PDL is nulled or reaches a minimum value. If couplers 12 and 14 are perfectly matched the residual PDL will be lowered to near zero. If couplers 12 and 14 are not perfectly matched, there will be a minimum value. In the above example, the residual PDL has a minimum value of 0.003 dB. Thus, measurement element 30 compares this value with the measured value to ensure that the measured value is nulled or minimized.
  • laser 22 emits a narrow band signal having a center wavelength within the 1.5 ⁇ m band.
  • Polarization controller 24 randomizes the light through all states of polarization and the resultant light signal is directed into coupler 12 .
  • the light signal propagates through couplers 12 and 14 .
  • the calibration has the effect of eliminating the PDL noise inherent in coupler 12 and coupler 14 .
  • the test input signal that exits coupler 14 and is directed into the DUT only carries a neglible amount of PDL.
  • the test signal propagates in the DUT and the output of the DUT is directed into measurement element 30 .
  • Measurement element 30 calculates the composite PDL of the DUT output signal using equation (1), above.
  • the PDL of the DUT is calculated using the equation:
  • PDL equals the PDL of the DUT
  • CPDL refers to the composite PDL
  • RPDL is the residual PDL. If the PDL of coupler 12 and the PDL of coupler 14 are not perfectly matched, the test input signal will carry the residual PDL noise even after calibration. Since PDLs are additive, this residual PDL noise must be subtracted from the composite PDL measured at the output of the DUT.
  • the present invention operates in both a forward transmission mode and a backward reflection mode.
  • it can detect and measure the PDL of a Mach-Zehnder in both a forward transmission mode and a backward reflection mode. It can also measure the PDL of reflecting devices such as gratings and the like.
  • Apparatus 10 includes light source 20 connected to coupler 12 . Coupler 12 is connected to port 140 of coupler 14 . As discussed above, coupler 14 is rotated with respect to coupler 12 until the PDL of coupler 14 cancels the PDL of coupler 12 . The rotation of the coupler 14 is effected as a part of the calibration routine that was discussed above.
  • Port 142 of coupler 14 is connected to the DUT. Thus, the reflected signal is directed back into port 142 and exits port 144 of coupler 14 .
  • Port 144 is connected to passive optical component 16 .
  • Passive optical component 16 is rotated with respect to coupler 14 in the same way as coupler 14 is rotated with respect to coupler 12 .
  • Passive optical component 16 is rotated with respect to coupler 14 until the PDL of passive optical component 16 cancels the PDL of coupler 14 .
  • the rotation of the passive optical component 16 is effected as a part of the calibration of the second embodiment apparatus 10 , and will be discussed below.
  • An output of passive optical component 16 is connected to measurement element 30 .
  • Measurement element 30 may also include detector 36 which detects the light exiting the DUT in a forward transmission mode. Detector 36 is connected to processor 34 . Thus, measurement element 30 is able to calculate the PDL in a forward and backward transmission mode simultaneously.
  • Passive optical component 16 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a 2 ⁇ 2 3 dB coupler. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to passive optical component 16 of the present invention depending on the number of ports needed. For example, 1 ⁇ 2 3 dB couplers can also be used. Any off-the shelf coupler is suitable. The only requirement is that the PDL of coupler 16 be matched to the PDL of coupler 14 . Passive optical component 16 can also be implemented using a 1 ⁇ 1 device such as a manual polarization controller. Light source 20 , coupler 12 , coupler 14 , and measurement element 30 were discussed above with respect to the first embodiment.
  • the second embodiment of the present invention may further include a calibration unit 40 for calibrating the backward reflection PDL measurement.
  • Calibration unit 40 which includes stage assembly 42 , motor 44 , and measurement element 30 is identical to calibration unit 40 discussed above with respect to the forward transmission PDL measurement and the method of calibrating is likewise identical to the method of calibrating the forward transmission PDL measurement discussed above.
  • Coupler 12 is a 2 ⁇ 2 3 dB coupler having a PDL of 0.029 dB and an achromatic spectral response in the 1.5 ⁇ m optical communications band.
  • Coupler 14 is a 2 ⁇ 2 3 dB coupler having a PDL of 0.032 dB and an achromatic spectral response in the 1.5 ⁇ m optical communications band.
  • the minimum value of the residual PDL between the coupler 12 and coupler 14 is 0.003 dB.
  • Coupler 16 is a 2 ⁇ 2 3 dB coupler having a PDL of 0.026 dB and an achromatic spectral response in the 1.5 ⁇ m optical communications band.
  • the minimum value of the residual PDL between the coupler 14 and coupler 16 is 0.006 dB.
  • couplers 12 and 14 or, 14 and 16 could have been selected such that their PDLs were matched to a thousandth of a dB. Selecting the couplers in this way would reduce the residual PDLs to less than 0.001 dB.
  • the calibration of the second embodiment is depicted in FIG. 4.
  • the calibration of coupler 14 was discussed above with respect to the first embodiment, and is identical for the second embodiment.
  • the calibration of the second embodiment also includes the step of calibrating coupler 16 .
  • laser 22 emits a narrow band signal having a center wavelength within the 1.5 ⁇ m band.
  • Polarization controller 24 randomizes the light through all states of polarization and the resultant calibration signal is directed into port 142 of coupler 14 to simulate a reflected signal.
  • the calibration signal propagates through couplers 14 and 16 and is detected by measurement element 30 .
  • Measurement element 30 calculates the residual PDL using equation (1) given above.
  • couplers 14 and 16 are perfectly matched a residual PDL measured by measurement element 30 will be lowered to near zero. If couplers 12 and 14 are not perfectly matched, there will be a minimum value. In this case, the residual PDL between coupler 14 and coupler 16 is 0.006 dB. Once the PDL is nulled or minimized, coupler 16 is fixed in place for the measurement of the DUT.
  • Coupler 14 is connected to the DUT.
  • laser 22 emits a narrow band signal and polarization controller 24 randomizes the light through all states of polarization and the resultant light signal is directed into coupler 12 .
  • the light signal propagates through couplers 12 and 14 .
  • the calibration has the effect of eliminating the PDL noise inherent in coupler 12 and coupler 14 .
  • the test input signal that exits coupler 14 and is directed into the DUT only carries a neglible amount of PDL.
  • the test signal is reflected by the DUT and directed into port 142 of coupler 14 .
  • Coupler 14 directs the light signal into coupler 16 from port 144 .
  • a test output signal exits coupler 16 and is directed into measurement element 30 .
  • Measurement element 30 calculates the PDL of the DUT reflected signal using equation (1), above.
  • the PDL of the DUT is calculated using equation (2).

Abstract

An apparatus for measuring polarization dependent loss is disclosed featuring several fiber optic couplers combined in tandem and oriented such that the PDL noise of the measurement system is reduced to a negligible level. By matching the PDLs of the couplers and vectorally subtracting opposite phases of polarization, the PDL of the measurement system is virtually eliminated. Thus, the PDL noise floor is lowered to near zero and the PDL of the optical device-under-test (DUT) can be accurately measured. The system is relatively inexpensive to implement and offers needed versatility because it measures the PDL of optical devices that operate in a reflection mode or in a forward transmission mode. Thus, it provides one PDL measurement solution for both types of devices.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention [0001]
  • The present invention relates generally to measuring the polarization dependent loss (PDL) of an optical device, and particularly to an apparatus and method that substantially eliminates the PDL noise associated with the measurement system such that a component PDL can be more accurately measured. [0002]
  • 2. Technical Background [0003]
  • In a single mode fiber, the fundamental mode of the fiber is the solution to the wave equation that satisfies the boundary conditions at the core-cladding interface. There are two solutions to the wave equation that correspond to the fundamental mode, both of which have the same propagation constant. These two solutions are referred to as the polarization modes. The electric field associated with the fundamental mode is assumed to be a transverse field, with the polarization components being linearly polarized along mutually orthogonal x and y directions. As light propagates in a fiber or in a component, the energy of the light is divided between the two polarization modes. The state of polarization refers to the distribution of light energy between these two modes. A device or component may exhibit loss as a function of the polarization mode. The difference in the loss between the two polarization modes represents the polarization dependent loss (PDL) of the device. The PDL of an optical component is a critical parameter that is often used to characterize an optical device being incorporated into an optical fiber network. As optical systems become more complex, system designers are requiring that components and devices meet stricter PDL tolerances because of the cumulative nature of PDL. A device having a PDL of 0.01 dB can have a significant impact in a system that consists of many devices and spans a considerable distance. To meet this need, measurement systems must be able to accurately measure the PDL of such devices. [0004]
  • In one approach that has been considered, a 2×2 3 dB coupler is used to make the PDL measurement of a reflective optical device. At one end, a first port is connected to a polarization controller and a laser light source and a second port is connected to a power detector. At the other end, a third port is connected to the device under test (DUT) and the fourth port is terminated. The laser light and polarization controller inject a randomly polarized light signal into the coupler. The light signal is directed out of the third port and into the DUT, where it is reflected back into the third port. After propagating in the coupler, the reflected signal is directed out of the second port and into the detector which detects the PDL. This system has a major drawback. The coupler itself has a PDL in the range between 0.05 db and 0.1 dB. Since the PDL of the coupler is higher than the PDL of many of the devices now being deployed in photonic systems, the measurement apparatus is unable to measure the true PDL of the device under test because it is hidden within the PDL noise of the system. [0005]
  • In another approach that has been considered, an automated system is provided to measure the PDL of optical devices operating in the forward transmission mode. A light source and a polarization controller are used to provide a signal having four predetermined and unique polarization states. The microprocessor based system causes an actuator to cycle the polarization controller through the four polarization states while a detector is positioned at the output of the DUT to read the intensity of each state. These values are used by a processor to compute the values for each element in a Meuller matrix and to compute a Stokes vector to represent the polarized input signal. These values are then used to compute the PDL of the DUT. The test set has a residual PDL of less than 0.001 dB, which is an improvement. Automated systems can be beneficial, provided that the savings generated by the functionality of the system are more than the attendant software, reliability, and maintainability costs which can be considerable. For example, automated systems are software intensive and it is often the case that the cost of software development exceeds the cost of the hardware. Herein lies the drawback of this system. For a sophisticated system that is so highly automated, it lacks versatility since it is unable to measure devices that work in the backward reflection mode, such as gratings. This in turn leads to an unpleasant choice: purchase or develop a second system for measuring the PDL of reflective devices, or redesign and modify the system in order to accomodate reflective devices. Both solutions involve added expense. [0006]
  • Thus, a need exists for a reliable and relatively inexpensive apparatus for accurately measuring the PDL of an optical device. At the same time, the PDL measurement apparatus must be versatile, having the ability to measure the PDLs of both reflective devices and those that function in the forward transmission mode. [0007]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention for an apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss features several fiber optic couplers combined in tandem and oriented such that the PDL noise of the measurement system is reduced to a negligible level. By matching the PDLs of the couplers and vectorally subtracting opposite phases of polarization, the PDL of the measurement system is virtually eliminated. The simplicity of this concept is compelling because it provides a measurement system that accurately measures the PDL of optical components yet in an inexpensive way. It is also a versatile system. It measures the PDL of optical devices that operate in a reflection mode or in a forward transmission mode. [0008]
  • One aspect of the present invention is an apparatus for measuring a polarization dependent loss of an optical device under test using a randomly polarized light signal, the apparatus generates a test input signal that is directed into the optical device under test. The apparatus comprises: a first passive optical element connected to the light source, wherein the first passive optical element has a first polarization dependent loss; and a second passive optical element connected to the first passive optical element and having a second polarization dependent loss that is substantially equal to the first polarization dependent loss. The second passive optical element is disposed relative to the first passive optical element such that the second polarization dependent loss substantially cancels the first polarization dependent loss and outputs the test input signal with a polarization dependent loss equal to a first minimum value. [0009]
  • In another aspect, the present invention includes a method for measuring a polarization dependent loss of an optical device using an apparatus that includes a light source for emitting a light signal that is randomly polarized, a first passive optical element connected to the light source, wherein the first passive optical element has a first polarization dependent loss. The method for measuring includes the steps of: providing a second passive optical element having a second polarization dependent loss that is substantially equal to the first polarization dependent loss and connected to the first passive optical element at a relative position such that the second polarization dependent loss substantially cancels the first polarization dependent loss; directing the light signal into the first passive optical component such that the second passive optical component produces a test input signal, wherein the test input signal has a polarization dependent loss substantially equal to a first minimum value; directing the test input signal into the optical device; and measuring an output signal of the optical device to thereby determine the polarization dependent loss. [0010]
  • In another aspect, the present invention includes a method for calibrating an apparatus used for measuring a polarization dependent loss of an optical device, the apparatus includes a light source for emitting a light signal that is randomly polarized and a first passive optical element having a first polarization dependent loss. The method for calibrating comprising the steps of: providing a second passive optical element having a second polarization dependent loss that is substantially equal to the first polarization dependent loss and connected to the first passive optical element; directing the light signal into the first passive optical component to thereby create a calibration signal that exits the second passive optical component; and rotating the second passive optical component until a first calibration polarization dependent loss of the calibration signal equals a first minimum value. [0011]
  • Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the invention as described herein, including the detailed description which follows, the claims, as well as the appended drawings. [0012]
  • It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are merely exemplary of the invention, and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the invention as it is claimed. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate various embodiments of the invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operation of the invention.[0013]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a first embodiment of the present invention that measures PDL in a forward transmission mode; [0014]
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the calibration assembly used for calibrating the present invention for forward transmission mode measurements; [0015]
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an alternate embodiment of the present invention that measures PDL in a reflection mode; and [0016]
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the calibration assembly for calibrating the present invention for backward reflection mode measurements.[0017]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. An exemplary embodiment of the apparatus for measuring polarization dependent loss of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1, and is designated generally throughout by [0018] reference numeral 10.
  • In accordance with the invention, the present invention for an apparatus for measuring polarization dependent loss includes a first passive [0019] optical element 12 and a second passive optical component 14. The PDLs of these elements are substantially equal. The second passive optical component 14 is connected to the first passive optical component 12 and rotated with respect to the first passive component 12. By matching the PDLs of couplers 12 and 14, and vectorally subtracting opposite phases of the PDL through rotation, the PDL of the measurement system is virtually eliminated. Thus, the noise floor is lowered to near zero and the PDL of the optical device-under-test (DUT) can be accurately measured. The system is relatively inexpensive to implement and offers needed versatility because it measures the PDL of optical devices that operate in a reflection mode or in a forward transmission mode. Thus, it provides one solution for both types of measurements.
  • As embodied herein, and depicted in FIG. 1, a first embodiment of the present invention operating in the forward transmission mode includes [0020] light source 20 connected to passive optical component 12. Passive optical component 12 is connected to passive optical component 14. As discussed above, the second passive optical component 14 is rotated with respect to the first passive component 12 until the PDL of the second passive optical component cancels the PDL of the first passive optical component. The rotation of the second passive optical component 14 is effected as a part of the calibration of apparatus 10 and will be discussed below. An output of passive optical component 14 is connected to the DUT. The output of the DUT is connected to measurement element 30. The DUT being tested in the first embodiment can be any optical device that operates in a forward transmission mode, such as couplers, Mach-Zehnders, and other such devices.
  • [0021] Light source 20 consists of a narrow band light source 22 connected to polarization controller 24. Narrow band light source 22 is selected to operate in either the 0.8 μm, 1.3 μm, or 1.55 μm optical communication wavelength bands depending on the DUT and the intended use of the DUT.
  • Narrow [0022] band light source 22 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a HP8168F laser. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to the narrow band light source 22 depending on apparatus cost restraints, wavelength, and device availability. For example, any laser with a narrow spectral line width is suitable. Also, light source 22 can be implemented by replacing the laser with a combination of a broadband light source, such as a light emitting diode, and a narrowband filter. Polarization controller 24 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example an HP8169A manufactured by Hewlett-Packard.
  • Passive [0023] optical component 12 and passive optical component 14 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a 2×2 3 dB coupler for each passive component. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to passive components 12 and 14 of the present invention depending on the number of ports needed. For example, 1×2 3 dB couplers can also be used. The only requirement is that the PDL of coupler 14 be matched to the PDL of coupler 12. Passive optical component 14 can also be implemented using a 1×1 device such as a manual polarization controller.
  • [0024] Measurement element 30 consists of a detector 32 and a processor 34. The detector 32 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example an HP 81524A/B detector. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to detector 32 depending on the desired level of complexity of the measurement apparatus 10. For example, any suitable power meter can be used to detect the intensity of the light signal exiting the DUT. The processor 34 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a personal computer or a workstation using a standard computer communications interface, such as an IEEE-488 interface. Intensity values of the light exiting the DUT are measured bydetector 32 and transmitted to processor 34. The PDL of the device is calculated and displayed.
  • In accordance with the invention, and as depicted in FIG. 2, the present invention for an an apparatus for measuring polarization [0025] dependent loss 10 may further include a calibration unit 40 for calibrating the PDL measurements in a forward transmission mode. Calibration unit 40 includes rotatable stage assembly 42 which positions passive optical component 14 relative to passive optical component 12. Rotatable stage assembly 42 is connected to and driven by motor 44. Motor 44 is controlled by the measurement element 30, which functions as a loop controller in calibration unit 40. Measurement element 30 is connected to passive optical component 14, to form a closed control loop.
  • [0026] Rotatable stage assembly 42 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a rotation stage assembly manufactured by Newport. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to stage assembly 40 depending on cost and precision requirements. For example, Newfocus also manufactures rotation stage assemblies.
  • [0027] Motor 44 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a stepper motor that drives rotatable assembly 42 in incremental steps. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to stage assembly 40 depending on cost and measurement needs. For example, a continuous drive motor having variable speeds could also be used.
  • One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the measurement software routine and the calibration software routine are portions of a software program resident in the memory of the [0028] processor 34.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • The invention will be further clarified by the following example which is intended to be exemplary of the invention. [0029] Coupler 12 is a 2×2 3 dB coupler having a PDL of 0.029 dB and an achromatic spectral response in the 1.5 μm optical communications band. Coupler 14 is a 2×2 3 dB coupler having a PDL of 0.032 dB and an achromatic spectral response in the 1.5 μm optical communications band. Thus, the minimum value of the residual PDL is 0.003 dB. Of course, couplers 12 and 14 could have been selected such that their PDLs were matched to a thousandth of a dB. This would reduce the residual PDL to less than 0.001 dB.
  • During calibration, [0030] laser 22 emits a narrow band signal having a center wavelength within the 1.5 μm band. Polarization controller 24 randomizes the light through all states of polarization and the resultant calibration signal is directed into coupler 12. The calibration signal propagates through couplers 12 and 14 and is detected by measurement element 30. Measurement element 30 calculates the residual PDL using the equation: PDL = Log 10 [ P out max 8 P in ] - Log 10 [ P out mn P in ] ( 1 )
    Figure US20010052973A1-20011220-M00001
  • [0031] Measurement element 30 uses the measured PDL value as an error signal to drive motor 44 and rotate stage 42. Thus, as stage assembly 42 rotates coupler 14 with respect to coupler 12, the measured residual PDL changes and measurement element 30 drives motor 44 and stage 42 until the PDL is nulled or reaches a minimum value. If couplers 12 and 14 are perfectly matched the residual PDL will be lowered to near zero. If couplers 12 and 14 are not perfectly matched, there will be a minimum value. In the above example, the residual PDL has a minimum value of 0.003 dB. Thus, measurement element 30 compares this value with the measured value to ensure that the measured value is nulled or minimized. This information would also be available for diagnostic purposes to evaluate the performance of the calibrating assembly 40. Once the PDL is nulled, coupler 14 is fixed in place and the measurement routine is performed. At this point, measurement element 30 is replaced by the DUT and the output of the DUT is connected to measurement element 30, as depicted in FIG. 1.
  • Subsequently, [0032] laser 22 emits a narrow band signal having a center wavelength within the 1.5 μm band. Polarization controller 24 randomizes the light through all states of polarization and the resultant light signal is directed into coupler 12. The light signal propagates through couplers 12 and 14. As discussed above, the calibration has the effect of eliminating the PDL noise inherent in coupler 12 and coupler 14. Thus, the test input signal that exits coupler 14 and is directed into the DUT only carries a neglible amount of PDL. The test signal propagates in the DUT and the output of the DUT is directed into measurement element 30. Measurement element 30 calculates the composite PDL of the DUT output signal using equation (1), above. The PDL of the DUT is calculated using the equation:
  • PDL=CPDL−RPDL  (2)
  • wherein PDL equals the PDL of the DUT, CPDL refers to the composite PDL, and RPDL is the residual PDL. If the PDL of [0033] coupler 12 and the PDL of coupler 14 are not perfectly matched, the test input signal will carry the residual PDL noise even after calibration. Since PDLs are additive, this residual PDL noise must be subtracted from the composite PDL measured at the output of the DUT.
  • In an alternate embodiment of the invention, as embodied herein and as shown in FIG. 3, the present invention operates in both a forward transmission mode and a backward reflection mode. Thus, it can detect and measure the PDL of a Mach-Zehnder in both a forward transmission mode and a backward reflection mode. It can also measure the PDL of reflecting devices such as gratings and the like. [0034] Apparatus 10 includes light source 20 connected to coupler 12. Coupler 12 is connected to port 140 of coupler 14. As discussed above, coupler 14 is rotated with respect to coupler 12 until the PDL of coupler 14 cancels the PDL of coupler 12. The rotation of the coupler 14 is effected as a part of the calibration routine that was discussed above. Port 142 of coupler 14 is connected to the DUT. Thus, the reflected signal is directed back into port 142 and exits port 144 of coupler 14. Port 144 is connected to passive optical component 16. Passive optical component 16 is rotated with respect to coupler 14 in the same way as coupler 14 is rotated with respect to coupler 12. Passive optical component 16 is rotated with respect to coupler 14 until the PDL of passive optical component 16 cancels the PDL of coupler 14. The rotation of the passive optical component 16 is effected as a part of the calibration of the second embodiment apparatus 10, and will be discussed below. An output of passive optical component 16 is connected to measurement element 30. Measurement element 30 may also include detector 36 which detects the light exiting the DUT in a forward transmission mode. Detector 36 is connected to processor 34. Thus, measurement element 30 is able to calculate the PDL in a forward and backward transmission mode simultaneously.
  • Passive [0035] optical component 16 may be of any suitable well-known type, but there is shown by way of example a 2×2 3 dB coupler. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the pertinent art that modifications and variations can be made to passive optical component 16 of the present invention depending on the number of ports needed. For example, 1×2 3 dB couplers can also be used. Any off-the shelf coupler is suitable. The only requirement is that the PDL of coupler 16 be matched to the PDL of coupler 14. Passive optical component 16 can also be implemented using a 1×1 device such as a manual polarization controller. Light source 20, coupler 12, coupler 14, and measurement element 30 were discussed above with respect to the first embodiment.
  • In accordance with the invention, and as depicted in FIG. 4, the second embodiment of the present invention may further include a [0036] calibration unit 40 for calibrating the backward reflection PDL measurement. Calibration unit 40 which includes stage assembly 42, motor 44, and measurement element 30 is identical to calibration unit 40 discussed above with respect to the forward transmission PDL measurement and the method of calibrating is likewise identical to the method of calibrating the forward transmission PDL measurement discussed above.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • The second embodiment of the invention will be further clarified by the following example which is intended to be exemplary of the invention. [0037] Coupler 12 is a 2×2 3 dB coupler having a PDL of 0.029 dB and an achromatic spectral response in the 1.5 μm optical communications band. Coupler 14 is a 2×2 3 dB coupler having a PDL of 0.032 dB and an achromatic spectral response in the 1.5 μm optical communications band. Thus, the minimum value of the residual PDL between the coupler 12 and coupler 14 is 0.003 dB. Coupler 16 is a 2×2 3 dB coupler having a PDL of 0.026 dB and an achromatic spectral response in the 1.5 μm optical communications band. Thus, the minimum value of the residual PDL between the coupler 14 and coupler 16 is 0.006 dB. Of course, couplers 12 and 14 or, 14 and 16 could have been selected such that their PDLs were matched to a thousandth of a dB. Selecting the couplers in this way would reduce the residual PDLs to less than 0.001 dB.
  • The calibration of the second embodiment is depicted in FIG. 4. The calibration of [0038] coupler 14 was discussed above with respect to the first embodiment, and is identical for the second embodiment. The calibration of the second embodiment also includes the step of calibrating coupler 16. During the calibration of coupler 16, laser 22 emits a narrow band signal having a center wavelength within the 1.5 μm band. Polarization controller 24 randomizes the light through all states of polarization and the resultant calibration signal is directed into port 142 of coupler 14 to simulate a reflected signal. The calibration signal propagates through couplers 14 and 16 and is detected by measurement element 30. Measurement element 30 calculates the residual PDL using equation (1) given above. Thus, if couplers 14 and 16 are perfectly matched a residual PDL measured by measurement element 30 will be lowered to near zero. If couplers 12 and 14 are not perfectly matched, there will be a minimum value. In this case, the residual PDL between coupler 14 and coupler 16 is 0.006 dB. Once the PDL is nulled or minimized, coupler 16 is fixed in place for the measurement of the DUT.
  • As depicted in FIG. 3, [0039] light source 20 is disconnected from coupler 14 and connected to coupler 12. Coupler 14 is connected to the DUT. Subsequently, laser 22 emits a narrow band signal and polarization controller 24 randomizes the light through all states of polarization and the resultant light signal is directed into coupler 12. The light signal propagates through couplers 12 and 14. As discussed above, the calibration has the effect of eliminating the PDL noise inherent in coupler 12 and coupler 14. Thus, the test input signal that exits coupler 14 and is directed into the DUT only carries a neglible amount of PDL. The test signal is reflected by the DUT and directed into port 142 of coupler 14. Coupler 14 directs the light signal into coupler 16 from port 144. A test output signal exits coupler 16 and is directed into measurement element 30. Measurement element 30 calculates the PDL of the DUT reflected signal using equation (1), above. The PDL of the DUT is calculated using equation (2).
  • It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. [0040]

Claims (29)

What is claimed is:
1. An apparatus for measuring a polarization dependent loss of an optical device under test using a randomly polarized light signal, said apparatus generating a test input signal that is directed into said optical device under test, said apparatus comprising:
a first passive optical element connected to said light source, wherein said first passive optical element has a first polarization dependent loss; and
a second passive optical element connected to said first passive optical element and having a second polarization dependent loss that is substantially equal to said first polarization dependent loss, said second passive optical element being disposed relative to said first passive optical element such that the second polarization dependent loss substantially cancels the first polarization dependent loss and outputs the test input signal with a polarization dependent loss equal to a first minimum value.
2. The apparatus according to
claim 1
, wherein the light source further comprises:
a laser light source for emitting a narrowband light signal; and
a polarization controller connected to said laser light source and the first passive optical element, wherein said polarization controller randomly polarizes said narrowband light signal to thereby produce the light signal.
3. The apparatus according to
claim 1
, wherein the light source further comprises:
a broadband light source for emitting a broadband light signal;
a narrowband filter connected to said broadband light source for filtering said broadband light signal to thereby produce a narrowband light signal; and
a polarization controller connected to said narrowband filter and the first passive optical element, wherein said polarization controller randomly polarizes said narrowband light signal to thereby produce the light signal.
4. The apparatus according to
claim 1
, further comprising:
a measurement element connected to the output of the optical device under test for measuring the device output signal and calculating the optical device under test polarization dependent loss; and
a calibration assembly connected to the second passive optical component for calibrating a measurement in a forward transmission mode, said calibration device rotates the second passive optical component in response to a calibration signal to thereby cause the second polarization dependent loss to substantially cancel the first polarization dependent loss.
5. The apparatus according to
claim 4
, wherein the measurement element further comprises:
a light detector connected to the device under test; and
a computing device connected to said light detector, said computing device includes a software program having a measurement routine and a calibration routine.
6. The apparatus according to
claim 1
, wherein the first passive optical component and the second passive optical component are couplers.
7. The apparatus according to
claim 1
, wherein the first minimum value equals the absolute value of the first polarization dependent loss minus the second polarization dependent loss.
8. The apparatus according to
claim 7
, wherein the first minimum value is less than 0.001 dB.
9. The apparatus according to
claim 1
, wherein the test input signal is reflected by the optical device into the second passive optical component to thereby generate a test output signal that is directed into an output of the second passive optical component.
10. The apparatus according to
claim 9
, further comprising:
a third passive optical component connected to the output of the second passive optical component and having a third polarization dependent loss substantially equal to said second polarization loss, said third passive optical component being disposed relative to the second passive optical component such that the third polarization dependent loss cancels the second polarization dependent loss to thereby cause the test output signal to have a polarization dependent loss substantially equal to a second minimum value.
11. The apparatus according to
claim 10
, wherein the second minimum value equals the absolute value of the second polarization dependent loss minus the third polarization dependent loss.
12. The apparatus according to
claim 11
, wherein the second minimum value is less than 0.001 dB.
13. The apparatus according to
claim 10
, wherein the first passive optical component, the second passive optical component, and the third passive optical component are couplers.
14. The apparatus according to
claim 10
, further comprising:
a measurement element connected to the third passive optical component for measuring the test output signal and calculating an optical device under test polarization dependent loss; and
a calibration assembly connected to the second passive optical component and the third passive optical device for calibrating a measurement in a forward transmission mode and a backward reflection mode.
15. The apparatus according to
claim 14
, wherein the measurement device further comprises:
a light detector connected to the device under test; and
a computing device connected to said light detector, said computing device includes a software program having a measurement routine and a calibration routine.
16. The apparatus according to
claim 15
, wherein the measurement device calculates a test output signal polarization dependent loss by solving:
PDL = Log 10 [ P out max P in ] - Log 10 [ P out mn P in ]
Figure US20010052973A1-20011220-M00002
wherein PDL is said test output signal polarization dependent loss in decibels, Pout max is the maximum power of the test output signal, Pout min is the minimum power of the test output signal, and Pin is the power of the test input signal.
17. The apparatus according to
claim 16
, wherein the optical device under test polarization dependent loss equals the test output signal polarization dependent loss minus the second minimum value.
18. The apparatus according to
claim 14
, wherein the calibration assembly further comprises:
a rotatable stage assembly for rotating the second passive optical component in the forward transmission calibration mode and the third passive optical component in the backward reflection calibration mode; and
a motor assembly for actuating said rotatable stage assembly in response to a signal from the measurement element, wherein said rotatable stage, said motor assembly, and the measurement element form a control loop during the forward transmission calibration mode and the backward reflection calibration mode.
19. The apparatus according to
claim 18
, wherein the measurement element drives the motor to cause the second passive optical component to rotate with respect to said first passive optical element until the polarization dependent loss of the calibration signal is substantially equal to the first minimum value.
20. The apparatus according to
claim 19
, wherein the first minimum value equals the absolute value of the first polarization dependent loss minus the second polarization dependent loss.
21. The apparatus according to
claim 18
, wherein the measurement element drives the motor causing the third passive optical component to rotate with respect to said second passive optical element until the polarization dependent loss of the calibration signal is substantially equal to the second minimum value.
22. The apparatus according to
claim 18
, wherein the the measurement element is optically connected to the second passive optical component in the forward transmission calibration mode and optically connected to the third passive optical component in the backward reflection calibration mode to thereby measure a calibration signal power and generate an error signal based on said calibration signal power, wherein the measurement element drives the motor assembly until said error signal equals a first minimum value in the forward transmission calibration mode and a second minimum value in the backward reflection calibration mode.
23. A method for measuring a polarization dependent loss of an optical device, in an apparatus including a light source for emitting a light signal that is randomly polarized, a first passive optical element connected to said light source, wherein said first passive optical element has a first polarization dependent loss, said method for measuring comprising the steps of:
providing a second passive optical element having a second polarization dependent loss that is substantially equal to the first polarization dependent loss and connected to the first passive optical element at a relative position such that said second polarization dependent loss substantially cancels the first polarization dependent loss;
directing the light signal into the first passive optical component such that said second passive optical component produces a test input signal, wherein said test input signal has a polarization dependent loss substantially equal to a first minimum value;
directing said test input signal into the optical device; and
measuring an output signal of the optical device to thereby determine the polarization dependent loss.
24. The method according to
claim 23
, wherein the first minimum value equals the absolute value of the first polarization dependent loss minus the second polarization dependent loss.
25. The method according to
claim 23
, further comprising the steps of:
providing a third passive optical element having a third polarization dependent loss that is substantially equal to the second polarization dependent loss and connected to the second passive optical element at a rotated position such that said third polarization dependent loss substantially cancels the second polarization dependent loss;
directing a test output signal into the second passive optical component, wherein said test output signal is generated by reflecting the test input signal off of the optical device under test;
measuring said test output signal at an output of said third passive optical component to thereby generate test output measurements; and
calculating the polarization dependent loss using said test output measurements.
26. A method for calibrating an apparatus used for measuring a polarization dependent loss of an optical device, said apparatus including a light source for emitting a light signal that is randomly polarized and a first passive optical element having a first polarization dependent loss, said method for calibrating comprising the steps of:
providing a second passive optical element having a second polarization dependent loss that is substantially equal to the first polarization dependent loss and connected to the first passive optical element;
directing the light signal into the first passive optical component to thereby create a calibration signal that exits said second passive optical component; and
rotating said second passive optical component until said second polarization dependent loss substantially cancels the first polarization dependent loss and a first calibration polarization dependent loss of said first calibration signal equals a first minimum value.
27. The method according to
claim 26
, wherein the first minimum value equals the absolute value of the first polarization dependent loss minus the second polarization dependent loss.
28. The method according to
claim 26
, further comprising the steps of:
providing a third passive optical element having a third polarization dependent loss that is substantially equal to the second polarization dependent loss and connected to the second passive optical element;
directing the light signal into the second passive optical component such that a second calibration signal exits said third passive optical component; and
rotating said third passive optical component until until said third polarization dependent loss substantially cancels the second polarization dependent loss and a second calibration polarization dependent loss of said second calibration signal equals a second minimum value.
29. The method according to
claim 28
, wherein the second minimum value equals the absolute value of the second polarization dependent loss minus the third polarization dependent loss.
US09/299,782 1999-04-26 1999-04-26 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss Expired - Fee Related US6449033B2 (en)

Priority Applications (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/299,782 US6449033B2 (en) 1999-04-26 1999-04-26 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss
MXPA01010869A MXPA01010869A (en) 1999-04-26 2000-04-07 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss.
JP2000614013A JP2002543377A (en) 1999-04-26 2000-04-07 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss
CN00806621A CN1348543A (en) 1999-04-26 2000-04-07 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss
EP00939283A EP1173741A1 (en) 1999-04-26 2000-04-07 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss
PCT/US2000/009501 WO2000065324A1 (en) 1999-04-26 2000-04-07 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss
KR1020017013635A KR20010113894A (en) 1999-04-26 2000-04-07 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss
CA002368255A CA2368255A1 (en) 1999-04-26 2000-04-07 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss
AU54392/00A AU5439200A (en) 1999-04-26 2000-04-07 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss
TW089107957A TW463031B (en) 1999-04-26 2000-04-25 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/299,782 US6449033B2 (en) 1999-04-26 1999-04-26 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20010052973A1 true US20010052973A1 (en) 2001-12-20
US6449033B2 US6449033B2 (en) 2002-09-10

Family

ID=23156289

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/299,782 Expired - Fee Related US6449033B2 (en) 1999-04-26 1999-04-26 Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US6449033B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1173741A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2002543377A (en)
KR (1) KR20010113894A (en)
CN (1) CN1348543A (en)
AU (1) AU5439200A (en)
CA (1) CA2368255A1 (en)
MX (1) MXPA01010869A (en)
TW (1) TW463031B (en)
WO (1) WO2000065324A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030039005A1 (en) * 2001-08-27 2003-02-27 Roberts Kim B. Measurement of polarization dependent loss in an optical transmission system
US8059958B1 (en) 2008-10-10 2011-11-15 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Measurement of polarization dependent loss in an optical transmission system
US10601504B2 (en) 2017-09-27 2020-03-24 Fujitsu Limited Method and apparatus for monitoring polarization dependent loss, receiver and communication system

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100380255B1 (en) 2001-03-16 2003-04-18 도남시스템주식회사 Apparatus and method for measurement of polarization-dependent loss using repeated fast polarization scrambling
EP1202039A1 (en) * 2001-07-27 2002-05-02 Agilent Technologies, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) Calibration and/or verification of a measurement setup
JP2003185525A (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-07-03 Ando Electric Co Ltd Polarization dependant loss measuring device
AU2002325885A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-09-29 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Determining measuring uncertainty or error of a pdl-tester
US6690454B2 (en) * 2002-04-29 2004-02-10 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Method, apparatus and system for testing one or more waveguides of an optical device
US6650406B1 (en) * 2002-09-09 2003-11-18 Jds Uniphase Inc. Polarization dependent loss measurement in photonic devices
US20040070759A1 (en) * 2002-10-14 2004-04-15 Anderson Duwayne R. Vector representation of polarization dependent loss
US7633607B2 (en) * 2004-09-01 2009-12-15 Luna Innovations Incorporated Method and apparatus for calibrating measurement equipment
CN100547953C (en) * 2006-12-12 2009-10-07 武汉光迅科技股份有限公司 The method of measurement of polarized dependent loss PDL
KR100956485B1 (en) * 2008-02-05 2010-05-07 엘에스전선 주식회사 Apparatus for connecting optical fiber and system for measuring quality of optical fiber thereof
CN101667880B (en) * 2009-10-10 2013-05-01 武汉邮电科学研究院 Polarization multiplexing system for overcoming crosstalk between two polarization channels caused by optical fiber PDL
US8681422B2 (en) * 2011-12-14 2014-03-25 Nistica, Inc. Optical processing device employing a digital micromirror device (DMD) and having reduced wavelength dependent loss
CN103954435B (en) * 2014-04-30 2016-05-25 武汉光迅科技股份有限公司 Device and the detection method thereof of a kind of detected phase delay and Polarization Dependent Loss
CN109269778B (en) * 2018-11-02 2020-04-28 天津津航技术物理研究所 High-precision testing method for deep cut-off narrow-band filter

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5409545A (en) 1993-03-04 1995-04-25 Environmental Sampling Supply, Inc. Apparatus and method for cleaning containers
JPH0763669A (en) 1993-08-23 1995-03-10 Sun Tec Kk Polarization dependent loss measuring device, light source device for measuring polarization dependent loss and light reception device for measuring polarization dependent loss
US5371597A (en) 1993-11-23 1994-12-06 At&T Corp. System and method for measuring polarization dependent loss
US5408545A (en) * 1994-01-19 1995-04-18 Dicon Fiberoptics Depolarizer for fiber optic applications and method using same
US5440117A (en) * 1994-01-21 1995-08-08 Jds Fitel Inc. Rotating waveplate system with averaging of the detected signal to compensate for polarization dependence
US5481391A (en) 1994-02-17 1996-01-02 At&T Corp. Optical fiber system and method for overcoming the effects of polarization gain anisotropy in a fiber amplifier
US5619325A (en) 1995-04-04 1997-04-08 Advantest Corporation Optical system for ellipsometry utilizing a circularly polarized probe beam
DE19680643T1 (en) * 1995-06-30 1997-07-24 Furukawa Electric Co Ltd Method and device for measuring and determining the state of polarization, the polarization properties and the polarization mode dispersion
JP2882328B2 (en) * 1995-12-15 1999-04-12 日本電気株式会社 Low polarization dependent optical fiber connection structure
US5617200A (en) 1995-12-27 1997-04-01 Corning Incorporated Pulse method for measurement of relative secondary path intensities in optical waveguide systems
US5641956A (en) 1996-02-02 1997-06-24 F&S, Inc. Optical waveguide sensor arrangement having guided modes-non guided modes grating coupler
JPH09297063A (en) 1996-05-01 1997-11-18 Advantest Corp Method and device for analyzing polarization dependency
JPH1010359A (en) * 1996-06-21 1998-01-16 Ando Electric Co Ltd Optical coupler
JPH10123358A (en) * 1996-10-21 1998-05-15 Ando Electric Co Ltd Optical coupler
US5896196A (en) * 1997-08-15 1999-04-20 Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation Plasma mixing glow discharge device for analytical applications

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030039005A1 (en) * 2001-08-27 2003-02-27 Roberts Kim B. Measurement of polarization dependent loss in an optical transmission system
US7305183B2 (en) * 2001-08-27 2007-12-04 Nortel Networks Limited Measurement of polarization dependent loss in an optical transmission system
US8059958B1 (en) 2008-10-10 2011-11-15 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Measurement of polarization dependent loss in an optical transmission system
US10601504B2 (en) 2017-09-27 2020-03-24 Fujitsu Limited Method and apparatus for monitoring polarization dependent loss, receiver and communication system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MXPA01010869A (en) 2002-05-14
US6449033B2 (en) 2002-09-10
TW463031B (en) 2001-11-11
EP1173741A1 (en) 2002-01-23
KR20010113894A (en) 2001-12-28
AU5439200A (en) 2000-11-10
CA2368255A1 (en) 2000-11-02
CN1348543A (en) 2002-05-08
WO2000065324A1 (en) 2000-11-02
JP2002543377A (en) 2002-12-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6449033B2 (en) Apparatus and method for measuring polarization dependent loss
JP3335205B2 (en) Optical system calibration method
US5078489A (en) Method and apparatus for measuring optical attenuation of an optical medium
JP4769411B2 (en) Polarized lightwave reflectometry and system
JPH026724A (en) Method and apparatus for testing optical transmission medium
JP3457548B2 (en) Polarization independent reflectometry and polarization independent reflectometer
EP0926479B1 (en) Optical loss measurement
US20030223073A1 (en) System and method for removing the relative phase uncertainty in device characterizations performed with a polarimeter
US5357333A (en) Apparatus for measuring the effective refractive index in optical fibers
EP1191320B1 (en) Measurement of polarization dependent characteristic of optical components
JPH08248259A (en) Method and device for assembling optical parts
JPH04337437A (en) Fresnel reflection detection system
US6917750B2 (en) System and method for characterizing optical devices
US6650406B1 (en) Polarization dependent loss measurement in photonic devices
US7202944B2 (en) Determining measuring uncertainty or error of a PDL-tester
Takada Improvement in signal-to-noise ratio of Rayleigh backscattering measurement using optical low coherence reflectometry
JP3187518B2 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting optical axis of polarization-maintaining optical fiber
Mai et al. Fiber optic test equipment-Evaluation of OTDR dead zones and ORLM return loss
US6631003B1 (en) Uncorrelated michelson interferometer
Hui et al. Backscatter Signature Generator For OTDR Calibration
CN115628885A (en) Calibration system for multimode optical fiber return loss measuring equipment
JPH0252210B2 (en)
Singh et al. A fiber-optic attenuator calibration system using high frequency substitution method
JP2002131181A (en) Loss measuring device for photodetector element
Braun et al. Precision Reflectometer with Spurious-Free Enhanced Sensitivity

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CORNING INCORPORATED, NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MARRO, MARLENE A.;SCHMITT, WILLIAM E.;SUMMA, MARK A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:009990/0693;SIGNING DATES FROM 19990521 TO 19990526

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20060910