US20010014705A1 - Fillers for improved epoxy laminates - Google Patents

Fillers for improved epoxy laminates Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20010014705A1
US20010014705A1 US09/735,984 US73598400A US2001014705A1 US 20010014705 A1 US20010014705 A1 US 20010014705A1 US 73598400 A US73598400 A US 73598400A US 2001014705 A1 US2001014705 A1 US 2001014705A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
talc
laminate
talc particles
laminates
particles
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US09/735,984
Other versions
US6322885B2 (en
Inventor
Aroon Tungare
Scott Richgels
Jeffrey Kamala
Peggy Conn
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Isola Laminate Systems Corp
Original Assignee
Isola Laminate Systems Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=24486319&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20010014705(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Isola Laminate Systems Corp filed Critical Isola Laminate Systems Corp
Priority to US09/735,984 priority Critical patent/US6322885B2/en
Publication of US20010014705A1 publication Critical patent/US20010014705A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6322885B2 publication Critical patent/US6322885B2/en
Assigned to GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION reassignment GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ISOLA USA CORP.
Assigned to ISOLA USA CORP. reassignment ISOLA USA CORP. ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT Assignors: ISOLA LAMINATE SYSTEMS CORP.
Assigned to ISOLA USA CORP. reassignment ISOLA USA CORP. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION
Assigned to OBSIDIAN, LLC reassignment OBSIDIAN, LLC SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ISOLA USA CORP.
Assigned to GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ISOLA USA CORP.
Assigned to UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ISOLA USA CORP.
Assigned to ISOLA USA CORP. reassignment ISOLA USA CORP. RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST Assignors: OBSIDIAN, LLC
Assigned to WILMINGTON TRUST FSB, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment WILMINGTON TRUST FSB, AS COLLATERAL AGENT ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 18746/0030 AND 18746/0040 Assignors: GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P.
Assigned to GOLDMAN SACHS LENDING PARTNERS, LLC reassignment GOLDMAN SACHS LENDING PARTNERS, LLC SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ISOLA USA CORP.
Assigned to ISOLA USA CORP. reassignment ISOLA USA CORP. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
Assigned to ISOLA USA CORP. reassignment ISOLA USA CORP. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: WILMINGTON TRUST FSB
Assigned to JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ISOLA USA CORP.
Assigned to ISOLA USA CORP. reassignment ISOLA USA CORP. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GOLDMAN SACHS LENDING PARTNERS LLC
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC reassignment CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H05ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05KPRINTED CIRCUITS; CASINGS OR CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS OF ELECTRIC APPARATUS; MANUFACTURE OF ASSEMBLAGES OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS
    • H05K1/00Printed circuits
    • H05K1/02Details
    • H05K1/03Use of materials for the substrate
    • H05K1/0313Organic insulating material
    • H05K1/0353Organic insulating material consisting of two or more materials, e.g. two or more polymers, polymer + filler, + reinforcement
    • H05K1/0373Organic insulating material consisting of two or more materials, e.g. two or more polymers, polymer + filler, + reinforcement containing additives, e.g. fillers
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08KUse of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients
    • C08K3/00Use of inorganic substances as compounding ingredients
    • C08K3/34Silicon-containing compounds
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H05ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05KPRINTED CIRCUITS; CASINGS OR CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS OF ELECTRIC APPARATUS; MANUFACTURE OF ASSEMBLAGES OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS
    • H05K2201/00Indexing scheme relating to printed circuits covered by H05K1/00
    • H05K2201/02Fillers; Particles; Fibers; Reinforcement materials
    • H05K2201/0203Fillers and particles
    • H05K2201/0206Materials
    • H05K2201/0209Inorganic, non-metallic particles
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H05ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05KPRINTED CIRCUITS; CASINGS OR CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS OF ELECTRIC APPARATUS; MANUFACTURE OF ASSEMBLAGES OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS
    • H05K2201/00Indexing scheme relating to printed circuits covered by H05K1/00
    • H05K2201/02Fillers; Particles; Fibers; Reinforcement materials
    • H05K2201/0203Fillers and particles
    • H05K2201/0206Materials
    • H05K2201/0239Coupling agent for particles
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/25Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component and including a second component containing structurally defined particles
    • Y10T428/258Alkali metal or alkaline earth metal or compound thereof
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/25Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component and including a second component containing structurally defined particles
    • Y10T428/259Silicic material
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/31504Composite [nonstructural laminate]
    • Y10T428/31511Of epoxy ether

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to the laminates which are widely used to make printed circuit boards.
  • the invention is applied to the composite material used as a substrate for such circuit boards, particularly those made with glass fiber reinforced epoxy resins.
  • FR-2 phenolic resin impregnated paper
  • FR-3 is a paper composite which has been impregnated with epoxy resins rather than phenolic resins.
  • CEM-1 is a composite which is more expensive than the FR-2 and FR-3 materials, but which provides improved electrical and physical properties.
  • an epoxy resin is used to coat paper as in FR-3, but the core is covered with glass fiber reinforced epoxy resins outer layers.
  • FR-4 is made with a fabric of glass fiber yarns impregnated with epoxy resins.
  • the present invention has application to all types of laminates, but in particular to FRX laminates.
  • Inorganic fillers are disclosed in U.S. Pat No. 5,264,065 to be useful in controlling the coefficient of thermal expansion in the Z-axis of laminates, generally using 30 to 100 parts of filler per hundred of resin. Such fillers have been used in laminates for other and related purposes, such as to limit resin flow and to improve punchability according to the Japanese patent publications (JP 222,950 (1989), JP 199,643 (1982) and 7,044 (1984), JP 97,633 (1989), JP 120,330 (1990)) discussed in the '065 U.S. patent.
  • JP 222,950 (1989), JP 199,643 (1982) and 7,044 (1984), JP 97,633 (1989), JP 120,330 (1990) discussed in the '065 U.S. patent.
  • zinc oxide is disclosed as an additive for improving thermal conductivity.
  • JP 133,440 (1990) “burned” talc is disclosed to improve dimensional stability of laminates.
  • the talc was heated to 1000° C.-2000° C. to remove the water of crystallization.
  • Talcs heated to below 1000° C. were stated to lack the desired improved dimensional stability.
  • the present inventors have been concerned with problems arising from the use of epoxy resins having relatively high glass transition temperatures (Tg), particularly about 150° C. or higher. These resins have advantages not available with those having lower Tg values, but they tend to be more brittle and more difficult to work mechanically. They produce epoxy resin dust when laminates are punched, cut, or drilled during fabrication of printed circuit boards. Dust is undesirable for various reasons, but particularly because it affects the precision with which circuit patterns can be made.
  • Tg glass transition temperatures
  • the present invention provides a means to significantly reduce the amount of dust produced, with the attendant advantages in manufacturing printed circuit boards.
  • the invention also provides laminates which may be more readily drilled. Typically, laminates are stacked and drilled at the same time for efficiency. If the holes are not drilled cleanly, reworking or rejecting the board may be necessary. Alternatively, the drilling process may be modified, but this may reduce the speed with which the laminates are drilled.
  • An additional advantage of the invention is that the epoxy resin has lower coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) in the Z direction, which reduces circuit failures due to differential thermal expansion. These advantages are attained by including minor quantities of talc in the epoxy resin. However, it has been found that not all talcs can be used for some cause a substantial reduction in electrical strength.
  • the invention in one aspect is a method of improving laminates, in particular those made with epoxy resins having a Tg of 150° C. or higher, by incorporating in the epoxy resin layers up to about 20 wt. % of talc particles, preferably about 10 to 15 wt. %, which have a maximum particle size of about 40 ⁇ m.
  • the talc should be relatively pure and approximate the theoretical formula 3 MgO ⁇ 4 SiO 2 ⁇ H 2 O with less than about 0.01 wt. % (100 wt. ppm) water extractable anions.
  • Particularly useful are Montana platy talc particles (>96 wt. % talc). They may be either untreated or have a surface treatment such as a silane. It is an important characteristic of the talc particles of the invention that they do not cause a significant reduction of electrical strength relative to laminates which contain no talc.
  • the invention is a laminate for printed circuit boards which comprises a reinforcing material in an epoxy resin matrix, particularly those having a Tg of 150° C. or more, and containing up to 20 wt. % of talc particles having a maximum particle size of about 40 ⁇ m and which do not significantly reduce electrical strength relative to laminates which contain no talc.
  • a preferred talc is Montana platy talc, which has a relatively high purity (>96 wt. % talc) and approaches the theoretical composition 3MgO ⁇ 4 SiO 2 ⁇ H 2 O with less than about 0.01 wt. % (100 wt.ppm) water extractable anions.
  • the talc may be surface-treated, e.g. with a silane.
  • the solid particles must be compatible with the components of epoxy varnishes formulated for application to paper and glass fiber, for example, they should be resistant to aggressive solvents such as DMF and acetone.
  • the particles should be of a size which permits good dispersion through the varnish and they should not be too large relative to the distance between the circuit lines. They should not agglomerate and their density should be similar to that of epoxy resin so that they neither tend to settle nor float on the surface. It is important that the particles not degrade the electrical properties of the resin, particularly the electrical strength required of laminates. They should not have a significant effect on high temperature tests which laminates must meet, such as solder float. The inventors have found that not all solid particles satisfy these requirements and have discovered certain talcs which provide enhanced performance when used in laminates, but which do not degrade electrical properties.
  • Talc is a naturally occurring mineral having a theoretical formula 3 MgO ⁇ 4 SiO 2 ⁇ H 2 O. Since it is a natural material, the composition varies. Of talcs mined in the U.S., those from Montana are considered to be among the purest, (e.g. ⁇ 96 wt. % talc), while many others contain significant amounts of impurities, which may affect their ability to be used in certain applications. This appears to be the case in the present application, as will be seen in the examples below, where the electrical performance of laminates can be degraded by less pure talcs.
  • talcs A major use of talcs is as reinforcing fillers in plastics, where they provide improved stiffness and creep resistance. They have been suggested for use in the laminates which are important components in printed circuit boards, along with many other types of particulate fillers, as has been noted above. However, the present inventors have found that all talcs are not equally useful.
  • talc deposits After being mined, talc deposits are processed to purify them and to reduce them to fine particles.
  • Commercial products may have a maximum particle size of about 70 ⁇ m, with finer materials having particles no larger than about 10 ⁇ m.
  • Pure talc is very soft and it has a hardness of 1 on the Moh scale.
  • the particles have various crystal forms which are characteristic of the locations in which they are found.
  • Most of the commercial talcs have platelike crystals and are termed “platy talcs”.
  • the preferred talcs of the present invention are of this type.
  • talcs are considered to be non-conductors of electricity, the present inventors have found that not all talcs appear to be equal in this respect. For use in printed circuit boards certain electrical properties are important and some talcs have been found to fail the required electrical breakdown tests, as will be seen in the examples below.
  • talc One type of talc which has been suggested for use in electrical laminates in JP 133440 (1990) is termed a “burnt talc” and reference is made to heating talc at 1,000°-2,000° C. This apparently causes a change the physical structure of the talc and improves dimensional stability of the laminates.
  • the talcs used in the present invention are not of this type.
  • talc particles When used in electrical laminates, talc particles should be fine since the laminates are thin and the distances between the copper circuit lines can be very small.
  • the maximum particle size should be no greater than about 40 ⁇ m. We are not aware of any lower limit on the maximum particle size, except as it may affect the handling and mixing of the talc particles into the epoxy resin before it is applied to the reinforcing material.
  • the Nytal 400 contains much more calcium and significant amounts of chlorine, sodium, and potassium, which may have contributed to the loss of electrical strength in laminates made with this talc.
  • Conventional electrical laminates are made by impregnating reinforcing materials, such as layers of paper, glass fiber mats, or woven glass fiber yarns, with an epoxy resin formulation and then B-staging the impregnated material.
  • B-staging means that the epoxy resin is partially cured so that it is not tacky and can be handled and stored for some time before being used to make a finished laminate.
  • Such materials are often called “prepregs”.
  • the prepregs When assembled with copper foils and other layers of prepreg or fully cured composites, the prepregs can be cured under heat and pressure to complete the curing process (C-staged).
  • Adding talc particles has been found to provide the needed improvement to the epoxy laminates, when the amount added is up to about 20 wt % of the laminate based on the resin content. Greater amounts could affect the physical properties adversely.
  • the amount used should be between about 10 and 15 parts per hundred (phr) based on the resin content.
  • the maximum particle size should be about 40 ⁇ m. Larger particles will be difficult to distribute uniformly throughout the epoxy resin and would be expected to weaken the structure if too large There is no minimum acceptable size of the particles known to the present inventors.
  • Epoxy resin formulations comprise the resins themselves plus curing agents, chain extenders, catalysts, and additives as required.
  • the invention is directed particularly to compositions which when cured have a glass transition temperature (Tg) of about 150° C. or higher which tend to be more brittle than the epoxy resins used in common FR4 laminates and, consequently, more difficult to drill and prone to dust formation during processing of printed circuit boards.
  • Tg glass transition temperature
  • the invention may have application to epoxy resins having a lower Tg or to other polymers where difficulty is experienced with drilling or punching laminates owing to brittleness.
  • the talc particles may be added to the epoxy resin formulation by any convenient method. However, since the formulation will usually be somewhat viscous, obtaining a uniform distribution of the particles may require high shear mixing to avoid agglomeration of the particles.
  • Laminates having a thickness of 0.059′′ (1.5 mm) were made from the above formulation using a glass yarn fabric (7628 Clark-Schwebel). The coated fabric was cured at 171° C. for 3 minutes to produce a prepreg. Then 1 oz /ft 2 (35 ⁇ m thick) copper foil was applied to each face of the prepreg and the laminate cured at 177° C. for 70 minutes. To determine the drillability of the laminates, standard drilling parameters used for less brittle 130° C. Tg laminates were used and four laminates were drilled in a stack. The above laminate drilled burr-free on only 1 out of 3 drilling trials, indicating that the laminates made with a nominal 150° C. Tg epoxy resin could not be drilled satisfactorily using drill practices found acceptable for 130° C. Tg epoxy resins.
  • Laminates having a thickness of 0.008′′ (0.2 mm) were made from the above formulation and when tested under IPC test TM650 2.5.6.2 were found to exhibit Electrical Strength exceeding 1250 volts/mil (49212 volts/mm) when measured under D48/50 conditioning (48 hrs. immersed in water at 50° C.) .
  • the Military Specification for minimum performance is 750 volts/mil (29528 volts/mm).
  • Example 2 To the formulation of Example 1 was added a relatively less pure talc, Nytal 400 (a New York talc from R. T. Vanderbilt Company), which contains about 7 wt. % CaO and has a maximum particle size of 20 ⁇ m XUS 19041 Resin 331.5 g PM Glycol Ether 54.0 g 2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.1 g Dicyandiamide 2.1 g Durite SD-357B 2.1 g Nytal 400 30.0 g
  • Example 4 To the control formulation of Example 1 was added a pure Montana platy talc for comparison with the less pure talc of Example 2. This talc contains only about 0.1-0.3 wt. % CaO.
  • XUS 19041 Resin 350.0 lbs. PM Glycol Ether 70.0 lbs. 2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.217 lbs. Dicyandiamide 2.217 lbs. Durite SD-357B 3.801 lbs. 1731 (1) 31.7 lbs.
  • the beneficiated Montana platy talc results in improved drilling performance as well as good electrical performance.
  • EXAMPLE 5 A series of laminate samples were made using a formula corresponding generally to those of the previous examples, but differing in the talcs included, in order to determine the relationship between the extractable anion content and the electrical strength of the laminates.
  • XUS 19041 Resin 75.31 wt % PM Glycol Ether 16.12 wt % 2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 0.48 wt % Dicyandiamide 0.48 wt % Durite SD-357B 0.8 wt % Talc 6.81 wt %
  • the “Dusting” test measures the amount of dust loss that occurs when the prepreg is sheared a certain number of times. More specifically, panels 5′′ ⁇ 5′′ (127 mm ⁇ 127 mm) were weighed and then were cut into 0.5′′ (12.7 mm) wide strips using a paper cutter. The cut edges were brushed to remove loose particles and weighed again. The difference in weight was designated the “dust” produced by cutting the panels.
  • EXAMPLE 6 (Comparative) A formulation without talc was made into laminates and tested for the amount of dust made in the test described above.
  • XUS 19041 Resin 331.5 g PM Glycol Ether 48.0 g 2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.1 g Dicyandiamide 2.1 g Durite SD-357B 2.1 g
  • Laminates made from the above formulation were found to exhibit a dust loss of 1.17% as measured via the “Dusting” test.
  • Example 4 The purer talc of Example 4 was used in the formulation and laminates made and tested as before.
  • XUS 19041 Resin 350.0 lbs. PM Glycol Ether 70.0 lbs. 2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.217 lbs. Dicyandiamide 2.217 lbs. Durite SD-357B 3.801 lbs. 1731 31.7 lbs.
  • Example 8 The formulation of Example 8 was repeated, except that a surface-treated Montana platy talc was used.
  • XUS 19041 Resin 350.0 lbs. PM Glycol Ether 70.0 lbs. 2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.217 lbs. Dicyandiamide 2.217 lbs. Durite SD-357B 3.801 lbs.
  • Polytalc 262 (1) 31.7 lbs.
  • Laminates made with the above formulation were found to exhibit a dust loss of 1.61% as measured via the “Dusting” test.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Compositions Of Macromolecular Compounds (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Abstract

Epoxy laminates incorporate up to 20 wt. % talc particles, particularly pure Montana platy talc particles having a maximum particle size of about 40 μm providing improved drilling performance, reduced dust formation, and improved Z-direction CTE, particularly when the epoxy resin has a Tg of about 150° C. or higher. The talc is selected from those which do not significantly reduce the electrical strength of the laminate relative to those which contain no talc particles. Characteristically, the talcs will have less than 5 wt. % impurities and less than 0.01 wt. % (100 wt.ppm) water extractable anions.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates generally to the laminates which are widely used to make printed circuit boards. In one application, the invention is applied to the composite material used as a substrate for such circuit boards, particularly those made with glass fiber reinforced epoxy resins. [0001]
  • The generally recognized types of laminates are discussed in [0002] Printed Circuits Handbook, Coombs ed., Third Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1988. The lowest cost materials typically use phenolic resin impregnated paper (FR-2) and are used where the cost is more important than the electrical and physical performance. FR-3 is a paper composite which has been impregnated with epoxy resins rather than phenolic resins. CEM-1 is a composite which is more expensive than the FR-2 and FR-3 materials, but which provides improved electrical and physical properties. For CEM-1 an epoxy resin is used to coat paper as in FR-3, but the core is covered with glass fiber reinforced epoxy resins outer layers. FR-4 is made with a fabric of glass fiber yarns impregnated with epoxy resins. The present invention has application to all types of laminates, but in particular to FRX laminates.
  • Inorganic fillers are disclosed in U.S. Pat No. 5,264,065 to be useful in controlling the coefficient of thermal expansion in the Z-axis of laminates, generally using 30 to 100 parts of filler per hundred of resin. Such fillers have been used in laminates for other and related purposes, such as to limit resin flow and to improve punchability according to the Japanese patent publications (JP 222,950 (1989), JP 199,643 (1982) and 7,044 (1984), JP 97,633 (1989), JP 120,330 (1990)) discussed in the '065 U.S. patent. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,960,634 zinc oxide is disclosed as an additive for improving thermal conductivity. In JP 133,440 (1990) “burned” talc is disclosed to improve dimensional stability of laminates. The talc was heated to 1000° C.-2000° C. to remove the water of crystallization. Talcs heated to below 1000° C. were stated to lack the desired improved dimensional stability. [0003]
  • The present inventors have been concerned with problems arising from the use of epoxy resins having relatively high glass transition temperatures (Tg), particularly about 150° C. or higher. These resins have advantages not available with those having lower Tg values, but they tend to be more brittle and more difficult to work mechanically. They produce epoxy resin dust when laminates are punched, cut, or drilled during fabrication of printed circuit boards. Dust is undesirable for various reasons, but particularly because it affects the precision with which circuit patterns can be made. [0004]
  • The present invention provides a means to significantly reduce the amount of dust produced, with the attendant advantages in manufacturing printed circuit boards. The invention also provides laminates which may be more readily drilled. Typically, laminates are stacked and drilled at the same time for efficiency. If the holes are not drilled cleanly, reworking or rejecting the board may be necessary. Alternatively, the drilling process may be modified, but this may reduce the speed with which the laminates are drilled. An additional advantage of the invention is that the epoxy resin has lower coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) in the Z direction, which reduces circuit failures due to differential thermal expansion. These advantages are attained by including minor quantities of talc in the epoxy resin. However, it has been found that not all talcs can be used for some cause a substantial reduction in electrical strength. [0005]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention in one aspect is a method of improving laminates, in particular those made with epoxy resins having a Tg of 150° C. or higher, by incorporating in the epoxy resin layers up to about 20 wt. % of talc particles, preferably about 10 to 15 wt. %, which have a maximum particle size of about 40 μm. The talc should be relatively pure and approximate the theoretical formula 3 MgO4 SiO[0006] 2H2O with less than about 0.01 wt. % (100 wt. ppm) water extractable anions. Particularly useful are Montana platy talc particles (>96 wt. % talc). They may be either untreated or have a surface treatment such as a silane. It is an important characteristic of the talc particles of the invention that they do not cause a significant reduction of electrical strength relative to laminates which contain no talc.
  • In another aspect the invention is a laminate for printed circuit boards which comprises a reinforcing material in an epoxy resin matrix, particularly those having a Tg of 150° C. or more, and containing up to 20 wt. % of talc particles having a maximum particle size of about 40 μm and which do not significantly reduce electrical strength relative to laminates which contain no talc. A preferred talc is Montana platy talc, which has a relatively high purity (>96 wt. % talc) and approaches the theoretical composition 3MgO4 SiO[0007] 2H2O with less than about 0.01 wt. % (100 wt.ppm) water extractable anions. Optionally, the talc may be surface-treated, e.g. with a silane.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The addition of solid particles to epoxy resin compositions has been suggested to lower the cost of laminates and to gain other advantages. Inorganic particles such as clays, talc, etc. typically are less expensive than epoxy resins and have been suggested as fillers. Ideally, solid particles could improve toughness of brittle materials by preventing the propagation of cracks. They have the disadvantage that they may be abrasive and cause additional wear to cutting and punching tools used in the manufacture of circuit boards. [0008]
  • For use in epoxy resins there are a number of requirements which should be met. First, the solid particles must be compatible with the components of epoxy varnishes formulated for application to paper and glass fiber, for example, they should be resistant to aggressive solvents such as DMF and acetone. The particles should be of a size which permits good dispersion through the varnish and they should not be too large relative to the distance between the circuit lines. They should not agglomerate and their density should be similar to that of epoxy resin so that they neither tend to settle nor float on the surface. It is important that the particles not degrade the electrical properties of the resin, particularly the electrical strength required of laminates. They should not have a significant effect on high temperature tests which laminates must meet, such as solder float. The inventors have found that not all solid particles satisfy these requirements and have discovered certain talcs which provide enhanced performance when used in laminates, but which do not degrade electrical properties. [0009]
  • Talc
  • Talc is a naturally occurring mineral having a theoretical formula 3 MgO4 SiO[0010] 2H2O. Since it is a natural material, the composition varies. Of talcs mined in the U.S., those from Montana are considered to be among the purest, (e.g. <96 wt. % talc), while many others contain significant amounts of impurities, which may affect their ability to be used in certain applications. This appears to be the case in the present application, as will be seen in the examples below, where the electrical performance of laminates can be degraded by less pure talcs.
  • A major use of talcs is as reinforcing fillers in plastics, where they provide improved stiffness and creep resistance. They have been suggested for use in the laminates which are important components in printed circuit boards, along with many other types of particulate fillers, as has been noted above. However, the present inventors have found that all talcs are not equally useful. [0011]
  • After being mined, talc deposits are processed to purify them and to reduce them to fine particles. Commercial products may have a maximum particle size of about 70 μm, with finer materials having particles no larger than about 10 μm. Pure talc is very soft and it has a hardness of 1 on the Moh scale. The particles have various crystal forms which are characteristic of the locations in which they are found. Most of the commercial talcs have platelike crystals and are termed “platy talcs”. The preferred talcs of the present invention are of this type. [0012]
  • While talcs are considered to be non-conductors of electricity, the present inventors have found that not all talcs appear to be equal in this respect. For use in printed circuit boards certain electrical properties are important and some talcs have been found to fail the required electrical breakdown tests, as will be seen in the examples below. [0013]
  • One type of talc which has been suggested for use in electrical laminates in JP 133440 (1990) is termed a “burnt talc” and reference is made to heating talc at 1,000°-2,000° C. This apparently causes a change the physical structure of the talc and improves dimensional stability of the laminates. The talcs used in the present invention are not of this type. [0014]
  • When used in electrical laminates, talc particles should be fine since the laminates are thin and the distances between the copper circuit lines can be very small. We prefer that the maximum particle size should be no greater than about 40 μm. We are not aware of any lower limit on the maximum particle size, except as it may affect the handling and mixing of the talc particles into the epoxy resin before it is applied to the reinforcing material. [0015]
  • As will be seen in the examples, it has been found that relatively pure talc which approaches the theoretical formula 3MgO4 SiO[0016] 2H2O does not significantly reduce the electrical strength as measured by IPC test TM650 2.5.6.2. A laminate made with a less pure talc fails the test. The reasons for this result have not been completely established, but the purity of the talc is believed to be an important factor, particularly the amount of water extractable anions it contains.
  • A comparison of two talcs was made to determine the differences in impurities and structure which may correlate to the electrical strength of the laminates. In an elemental analysis done by XRF (X-Ray Fluoresence) using a Philips PW1400 Spectrometer an impure talc (Nytal 400, R. J. Vanderbilt Company, Inc.) was compared with a pure talc (1731, Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc.), with the following results. [0017]
    Si % Mg % Ca % Fe % Al % Mn % K % Ti %
    1731 52.8 24.7 1.1 3.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1
    Nytal 400 40.0 24.3 16.7 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.1
    Cl % S % Na % Cr % Sr %
    1731 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Nytal 400 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1
  • It can be seen that the Nytal 400 contains much more calcium and significant amounts of chlorine, sodium, and potassium, which may have contributed to the loss of electrical strength in laminates made with this talc. [0018]
  • The samples were also examined by XRD (X-Ray Diffaction) using a Philips PW3710 Diffractomer. The results showed that the 1731 talc had a talc structure [Mg[0019] 3Si4O10(OH)2] with minor amounts of magnesium silicate hydroxide [Mg3Si2O5(OH)4]. However, the Nytal 400 was found to contain a mixture of talc with calcium magnesium silicate hydroxide [Ca2 Mg5Si8O22(OH)2], magnesium silicate hydroxide [Mg3Si2O5(OH)4], and a minor amount of sodium calcium magnesium silicate hydroxide.
  • Further analysis was carried out to determine the water exactable anions in the two talcs, since these could contribute to a loss in electrical strength. A sample of talc was extracted in pure water at 60° C. for 15 minutes and the water was analyzed using Ion Chromatography (Dionex DX-300). The results were as follows: [0020]
    Extractable, %
    Chloride Nitrite Nitrate Phosphate
    1731 0.0021 0.00034 0.00048 0.0034
    Nytal 400 0.0031 0.00032 0.00046 0.0284
  • The higher level of extractable chloride is consistent with the difference in chlorine content found in the XRF analysis. Soluble chlorides have been blamed for loss of electrical properties in other applications and consequently, the difference in extractable chlorides found in the two talcs samples is believed to be a potential cause for loss of electrical strength in laminates containing Nytal 400 talc. The much higher level of phosphates may be related to the large calcium content of Nytal 400 and they also are believed to contribute to the deterioration of electrical performance. Consequently, it is believed that the talcs should contain less than 0.01 wt. % (100 wt.ppm) water extractable anions. [0021]
  • Use of Talc Particles in Laminates
  • Conventional electrical laminates are made by impregnating reinforcing materials, such as layers of paper, glass fiber mats, or woven glass fiber yarns, with an epoxy resin formulation and then B-staging the impregnated material. B-staging means that the epoxy resin is partially cured so that it is not tacky and can be handled and stored for some time before being used to make a finished laminate. Such materials are often called “prepregs”. When assembled with copper foils and other layers of prepreg or fully cured composites, the prepregs can be cured under heat and pressure to complete the curing process (C-staged). [0022]
  • During the fabrication of printed circuit boards, there are many occasions when a laminate is cut, drilled, and punched, all of which operations create epoxy resin dust. Such dust is undesirable for many reasons. It will be appreciated that manufacturing of dense electronic circuits will be adversely affected by dust which accumulates on the board and which may affect the electrical continuity of the circuits or interfere with their construction. Drilling can also be a problem, particularly when resins are used which have a glass transition temperature (Tg) above that of the typical FR-4 laminate (about 130° C.). Such resins tend to be more brittle and difficult to drill cleanly. It becomes necessary to reduce the “chipload”, i.e., the length of the hole drilled for each revolution of the drill bit, and consequently productivity is reduced. The inventors have sought and have found a method for improving the manufacturing process and reducing dusting of higher Tg epoxy resins, while at the same time reducing the problems associated with drilling. [0023]
  • Adding talc particles has been found to provide the needed improvement to the epoxy laminates, when the amount added is up to about 20 wt % of the laminate based on the resin content. Greater amounts could affect the physical properties adversely. Preferably, the amount used should be between about 10 and 15 parts per hundred (phr) based on the resin content. The maximum particle size should be about 40 μm. Larger particles will be difficult to distribute uniformly throughout the epoxy resin and would be expected to weaken the structure if too large There is no minimum acceptable size of the particles known to the present inventors. [0024]
  • Epoxy resin formulations comprise the resins themselves plus curing agents, chain extenders, catalysts, and additives as required. The invention is directed particularly to compositions which when cured have a glass transition temperature (Tg) of about 150° C. or higher which tend to be more brittle than the epoxy resins used in common FR4 laminates and, consequently, more difficult to drill and prone to dust formation during processing of printed circuit boards. However, the invention may have application to epoxy resins having a lower Tg or to other polymers where difficulty is experienced with drilling or punching laminates owing to brittleness. [0025]
  • The talc particles may be added to the epoxy resin formulation by any convenient method. However, since the formulation will usually be somewhat viscous, obtaining a uniform distribution of the particles may require high shear mixing to avoid agglomeration of the particles. [0026]
  • In the examples which follow an epoxy resin formulation was applied to a fabric made of glass yarn and then fully cured to make laminates. These laminates were subjected to tests for drillability and dusting and the Z-axis thermal expansion. The electrical strength was found to be affected by the addition of talc to the epoxy resins and it was discovered that the purity of the talc was important if electrical strength of the laminate was to be maintained. [0027]
    EXAMPLE 1
    (Comparative)
    A resin formulation was made without the addition of talc.
    XUS 19041(1) 331.5 g
    PM Glycol Ether 48.0 g
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.1 g
    Dicyandiamide 2.1 g
    Durite SD-357B(2) 2.1 g
  • Laminates having a thickness of 0.059″ (1.5 mm) were made from the above formulation using a glass yarn fabric (7628 Clark-Schwebel). The coated fabric was cured at 171° C. for 3 minutes to produce a prepreg. Then 1 oz /ft[0028] 2(35 μm thick) copper foil was applied to each face of the prepreg and the laminate cured at 177° C. for 70 minutes. To determine the drillability of the laminates, standard drilling parameters used for less brittle 130° C. Tg laminates were used and four laminates were drilled in a stack. The above laminate drilled burr-free on only 1 out of 3 drilling trials, indicating that the laminates made with a nominal 150° C. Tg epoxy resin could not be drilled satisfactorily using drill practices found acceptable for 130° C. Tg epoxy resins.
  • Laminates having a thickness of 0.008″ (0.2 mm) were made from the above formulation and when tested under IPC test TM650 2.5.6.2 were found to exhibit Electrical Strength exceeding 1250 volts/mil (49212 volts/mm) when measured under D48/50 conditioning (48 hrs. immersed in water at 50° C.) . The Military Specification for minimum performance is 750 volts/mil (29528 volts/mm). [0029]
  • It was concluded that the above laminates did not drill well, but had good electrical performance. [0030]
    EXAMPLE 2
    To the formulation of Example 1 was added a relatively less
    pure talc, Nytal 400 (a New York talc from R. T. Vanderbilt
    Company), which contains about 7 wt. % CaO and has a maximum
    particle size of 20 μm
    XUS 19041 Resin 331.5 g
    PM Glycol Ether 54.0 g
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.1 g
    Dicyandiamide 2.1 g
    Durite SD-357B 2.1 g
    Nytal 400 30.0 g
  • Again, 0.059″ (1.5 mm) laminates were made from the above formulation and were drilled in stacks. As before, the standard drilling parameters used for 130° C. Tg laminates were used and the laminates were drilled when stacked four high. [0031]
  • The above laminate drilled burr-free on all 3 drilling trials, indicating that the addition of the talc improved the drilling properties of the 150° C. Tg epoxy resin. [0032]
  • When 0.008″ (0.2 mm) laminates made from the above formulation were tested, they were found to exhibit Electrical Strength between 600 to 700 volts/mil (23622-27559 volts/mm) in the IPC test of Example 1, which is below the Military Specification for minimum performance of 750 volts/mil (29528 volts/mm). [0033]
  • It was concluded that the addition of the impure talc improved drilling of the above laminates, but produced unacceptable electrical performance. [0034]
    EXAMPLE 3
    (Comparative)
    To the control formulation of Example 1 was added an
    epoxidized rubber for comparison.
    XUS 19041 Resin 331.5 g
    PM Glycol Ether 48.0 g
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.1 g
    Dicyandiamide 2.1 g
    Durite SD-357B 2.1 g
    Epon 58005(1) 7.5 g
  • The 0.059″ (1.5 mm) laminates made from the above formulation were drilled three times as before, using standard drilling parameters for 130° C. Tg laminates. [0035]
  • The laminates drilled burr-free on 2 out of 3 drilling trials, indicating that substitution of the epoxidized rubber had a beneficial effect on drilling performance, although it is considered inferior to the use of talc. In addition, the talc is much less expensive and would be preferred for that reason. [0036]
    EXAMPLE 4
    To the control formulation of Example 1 was added a pure
    Montana platy talc for comparison with the less pure talc of Example 2.
    This talc contains only about 0.1-0.3 wt. % CaO.
    XUS 19041 Resin 350.0 lbs.
    PM Glycol Ether 70.0 lbs.
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.217 lbs.
    Dicyandiamide 2.217 lbs.
    Durite SD-357B 3.801 lbs.
    1731(1) 31.7 lbs.
  • Again, 0.059″ (1.2 mm) laminates made from the above formulation were drilled three times using standard drilling parameters for 130° C. Tg laminates were used. [0037]
  • The above laminates drilled burr-free on all 3 drilling trials, indicating superior performance of this talc. [0038]
  • When 0.008″ (0.2 mm) laminates made from the above formulation were tested, they exhibited Electrical Strength exceeding 1300 volts/mil (51,181 volts/mm) in the IPC test of Example 1, indicating that the electrical strength had not been reduced from that of Example 1. [0039]
  • Thus, the beneficiated Montana platy talc, of which 1731 is an example, results in improved drilling performance as well as good electrical performance. [0040]
    EXAMPLE 5
    A series of laminate samples were made using a formula
    corresponding generally to those of the previous examples,
    but differing in the talcs included, in order to determine the
    relationship between the extractable anion content and the
    electrical strength of the laminates.
    XUS 19041 Resin 75.31 wt %
    PM Glycol Ether 16.12 wt %
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 0.48 wt %
    Dicyandiamide 0.48 wt %
    Durite SD-357B 0.8 wt %
    Talc 6.81 wt %
  • Using Nytal 400 and 1731 alone and in mixtures the electrical strength was measured in the each laminate, which are reported in the table below, along with the calculated water extractable anions. [0041]
    % Water
    Talc volts/mil (volts/mm) Extractable Anions
    100% Nytal 400  625 (24,812 volts/mm) 0.03228
     75% Nytal 400/  678 (26,916 volts/mm) 0.02578
     25% 1731
     50% Nytal 400/  720 (28,584 volts/mm) 0.01930
     50% 1731
     25% Nytal 400/  904 (35,889 volts/mm) 0.01281
     75% 1731
    100% 1731 1348 (53,515 volts/mm) 0.00632
    100% Talkum H-CH15(1) 1382 (54,865 volts/mm) 0.00803
  • It is evident that the electrical strength measurements correlate well with the extractable anions. Another talc which has low extractable anions and which does not reduce the electrical strength is included to confirm the correlation. [0042]
  • With the addition of finely powdered talc to the 150° C. Tg resin formulation at approximately 10 phr levels, quite unexpectedly, we have observed a reduction in the dusting of the prepreg as measured by the “Dusting Test.” The “Dusting” test measures the amount of dust loss that occurs when the prepreg is sheared a certain number of times. More specifically, panels 5″× 5″ (127 mm×127 mm) were weighed and then were cut into 0.5″ (12.7 mm) wide strips using a paper cutter. The cut edges were brushed to remove loose particles and weighed again. The difference in weight was designated the “dust” produced by cutting the panels. [0043]
    EXAMPLE 6
    (Comparative)
    A formulation without talc was made into laminates and tested
    for the amount of dust made in the test described above.
    XUS 19041 Resin 331.5 g
    PM Glycol Ether 48.0 g
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.1 g
    Dicyandiamide 2.1 g
    Durite SD-357B 2.1 g
  • The above control formulation was found to exhibit a dust loss between 2.5 to 3.0% as measured via the “Dusting” test. [0044]
    EXAMPLE 7
    A similar formulation was made using the relatively less pure
    talc of Example 2.
    XUS 19041 Resin 364.7 lbs.
    PM Glycol Ether 59.4 lbs.
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.31 lbs.
    Dicyandiamide 2.31 lbs.
    Durite SD-357B 2.31 lbs.
    Nytal 400 33.0 lbs.
  • Laminates made from the above formulation were found to exhibit a dust loss of 1.17% as measured via the “Dusting” test. [0045]
  • EXAMPLE 8
  • The purer talc of Example 4 was used in the formulation and laminates made and tested as before. [0046]
    XUS 19041 Resin 350.0 lbs.
    PM Glycol Ether 70.0 lbs.
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.217 lbs.
    Dicyandiamide 2.217 lbs.
    Durite SD-357B 3.801 lbs.
    1731 31.7 lbs.
  • The laminates made with the above formulation were found to exhibit a dust loss of 1.28% as measured via the “Dusting” test. [0047]
  • EXAMPLE 9
  • The formulation of Example 8 was repeated, except that a surface-treated Montana platy talc was used. [0048]
    XUS 19041 Resin 350.0 lbs.
    PM Glycol Ether 70.0 lbs.
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.217 lbs.
    Dicyandiamide 2.217 lbs.
    Durite SD-357B 3.801 lbs.
    Polytalc 262(1) 31.7 lbs.
  • The laminates made from the above formulation were found to exhibit a dust loss of 1.69% as measured via the “Dusting” test. [0049]
  • EXAMPLE 10
  • The formulation of Examples 8 and 9 was made with the substitution of a silane-treated Montana platy talc. [0050]
    XUS 19041 Resin 350.0 lbs.
    PM Glycol Ether 70.0 lbs.
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.217 lbs.
    Dicyandiamide 2.217 lbs.
    Durite SD-357B 3.801 lbs.
    Vertal 710(1) 31.7 lbs.
  • Laminates made with the above formulation were found to exhibit a dust loss of 1.61% as measured via the “Dusting” test. [0051]
  • As shown in the above Examples 6-10, finely powdered talc when used as a filler results in lowering the dust loss during shearing of prepreg. The reduction in dust loss appears to be independent of the talc used. [0052]
  • With the addition of finely powdered talc to the 1 50° C. Tg resin formulation at approximately 10 phr levels, we have observed a significant reduction in the Z-direction coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of 0.059″ (1.2 mm) rigid laminates over the control formulation that does not contain talc. A reduction in the Z-direction CTE is a highly desirable attribute as it results in improved reliability of plated through holes in circuit boards. A lower Z-direction CTE implies a lower mis-match in CTE between the laminate and copper. This results in less differential expansion and less stress build-up between the copper/laminate interface in the plated through hole. [0053]
    Example 11
    XUS 19041 Resin 331.5 g
    PM Glycol Ether 48.0 g
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 2.1 g
    Dicyandiamide 2.1 g
    Durite SD-357B 2.1 g
  • When 0.059″ (1.2 mm) laminates made from the above formulation were measured for Z-axis thermal expansion using the Thermo-Mechanical Analyzer (TMA). The data obtained as follows: [0054]
    CTE (ppm/° C.)
    <Tg  65
    >Tg 290
    20° to 288° 190
  • EXAMPLE 12
  • The pure Montana platy talc of Example 4 and 7 was added. [0055]
    XUS 19041 Resin 1326 lbs.
    PM Glycol Ether 264 lbs.
    2MI (2-methyl imidazole) 8.4 lbs.
    Dicyandiamide 8.4 lbs.
    Durite SD-357B 8.4 lbs.
    1731 120.0 lbs.
  • The 0.059″ (1.2 mm) laminates made from the above formulation were treated as in Example 10. The Z-direction thermal expansion measured using the Thermo-Mechanical Analyzer (TMA) was as follows: [0056]
    CTE (ppm/° C.)
    <Tg  53
    >Tg 254
    20° to 288° 166
  • It is evident from Examples 10-12 that with the addition of 1731 talc there is a significant reduction in the net Z-direction (out -of-plane) coefficient of thermal expansion. [0057]

Claims (20)

1. A method of improving laminates made with epoxy resins comprising incorporating in said resins more than zero and up to about 20 wt. % of talc particles which do not significantly reduce electrical strength of said laminate relative to laminates containing none of said talc particles.
2. The method of
claim 1
wherein said talc particles have the formula 3MgO4SiO2H2O with less than about 5 wt. % impurities.
3. The method of
claim 2
wherein said talc particles consist of Montana platy talc.
4. The method of
claim 1
wherein said talc particles have a maximum particle size of 40 μm.
5. The method of
claim 1
wherein said talc particles have less than 0.01 wt. % water extractable anions.
6. The method of
claim 1
wherein said talc particles are surface-treated.
7. The method of
claim 6
wherein said talc particles are surface-treated with a silane.
8. The method of
claim 1
wherein said laminate contains about 10 to 15 wt. % of said talc particles based on the resin content.
9. The method of
claim 1
wherein said laminates have improved drillability relative to laminates containing none of said talc particles.
10. The method of
claim 1
wherein said laminate produce less dust when cut, drilled, or punched relative to laminates containing none of said particles.
11. A laminate for use in printed circuit boards comprising a cured epoxy resin containing more than zero and up to 20 wt. % of talc particles which do not significantly reduce electrical strength of said laminate relative to laminates containing no talc particles.
12. A laminate of
claim 11
wherein said talc particles have the formula 3MgO4SiO2H2O with less than 5 wt. % impurities.
13. A laminate of
claim 12
wherein said particles are a Montana platy talc.
14. A laminate of
claim 11
wherein said talc particles have a maximum particle size of 40 μm.
15. A laminate of
claim 11
wherein said talc particles are surface-treated.
16. A laminate of
claim 15
wherein said talc particles are surface-treated with a silane.
17. A laminate of
claim 11
wherein said laminate contains about 10 to 15 wt. % of said talc particles based on the resin content.
18. A laminate of
claim 12
wherein said talc particles contain less than 0.01 wt. % water extractable anions.
19. A laminate of
claim 11
characterized by having improved drillability relative to laminates containing none of said talc particles.
20. A laminate of
claim 11
characterized by production of less dust when cut, drilled, or punched relative to laminates containing none of said talc particles.
US09/735,984 1996-03-22 2000-12-13 Talc particles as fillers for improved epoxy laminates Expired - Lifetime US6322885B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/735,984 US6322885B2 (en) 1996-03-22 2000-12-13 Talc particles as fillers for improved epoxy laminates

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/620,525 US6187852B1 (en) 1996-03-22 1996-03-22 Fillers for improved epoxy laminates
US09/735,984 US6322885B2 (en) 1996-03-22 2000-12-13 Talc particles as fillers for improved epoxy laminates

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/620,525 Continuation US6187852B1 (en) 1996-03-22 1996-03-22 Fillers for improved epoxy laminates

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20010014705A1 true US20010014705A1 (en) 2001-08-16
US6322885B2 US6322885B2 (en) 2001-11-27

Family

ID=24486319

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/620,525 Expired - Lifetime US6187852B1 (en) 1996-03-22 1996-03-22 Fillers for improved epoxy laminates
US09/735,984 Expired - Lifetime US6322885B2 (en) 1996-03-22 2000-12-13 Talc particles as fillers for improved epoxy laminates

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/620,525 Expired - Lifetime US6187852B1 (en) 1996-03-22 1996-03-22 Fillers for improved epoxy laminates

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (2) US6187852B1 (en)
EP (1) EP0864248B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE300858T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2540597A (en)
DE (1) DE69733803T2 (en)
TW (1) TW413659B (en)
WO (1) WO1997035457A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100281964A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2010-11-11 Dow Global Technologies Inc. Device and method for assessing the machinability of laminates
US20120055704A1 (en) * 2010-09-06 2012-03-08 Taiwan Union Technology Corporation Epoxy resin blend
WO2016123526A1 (en) * 2015-01-29 2016-08-04 Imerys Talc America, Inc. Engineered minerals for use as polycarbonate fillers, and methods of using the same to reinforce polycarbonates

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7507471B1 (en) * 1995-10-10 2009-03-24 Isola Usa Corp Reducing dusting of epoxy laminates
US8105690B2 (en) * 1998-03-03 2012-01-31 Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc Fiber product coated with particles to adjust the friction of the coating and the interfilament bonding
AU6391499A (en) * 1998-10-13 2000-05-01 Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. Glass fiber-reinforced prepregs, laminates, electronic circuit boards and methods for assembling a fabric
US20070111578A1 (en) * 2005-11-15 2007-05-17 Langon Alfred J Socket adapter mold
EP2053163A1 (en) * 2007-10-26 2009-04-29 SAPPI Netherlands Services B.V. Coating formulation for offset paper and paper coated therewith
CN101368077B (en) * 2008-10-09 2011-11-30 腾辉电子(苏州)有限公司 Epoxy resin adhesive liquid
SG10201601382XA (en) 2011-02-24 2016-03-30 Isola Usa Corp Ultrathin laminates
JP6672953B2 (en) 2016-03-29 2020-03-25 味の素株式会社 Resin sheet

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
USRE30843E (en) * 1971-05-10 1982-01-05 Epoxy tape
USRE34164E (en) * 1974-03-30 1993-01-19 Aluminum Company Of America Synthetic hydrotalcite
US4214026A (en) * 1978-08-24 1980-07-22 Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Sheet molding material
JPS55142645A (en) * 1979-04-24 1980-11-07 Shin Kobe Electric Machinery Laminated board
JPS57199643A (en) 1981-06-01 1982-12-07 Nikkan Ind Laminated board
JPS597044A (en) 1982-07-05 1984-01-14 ニツカン工業株式会社 Laminated board
US4632798A (en) * 1983-07-27 1986-12-30 Celanese Corporation Encapsulation of electronic components with anisotropic thermoplastic polymers
JPS60203642A (en) * 1984-03-28 1985-10-15 Shin Kobe Electric Mach Co Ltd Manufacture of composite laminate board
US4719250A (en) * 1984-06-18 1988-01-12 Hoechst Celanese Corporation Encapsulation of electronic components
JPH0197633A (en) 1987-10-09 1989-04-17 Sumitomo Bakelite Co Ltd Manufacture of laminated plate for printed circuit
JPH01222950A (en) 1988-03-03 1989-09-06 Hitachi Chem Co Ltd Laminated plate
JPH02120330A (en) 1988-10-28 1990-05-08 Shin Kobe Electric Mach Co Ltd Production of laminate
JPH02133440A (en) 1988-11-15 1990-05-22 Matsushita Electric Works Ltd Production of electrical laminate
US4960634A (en) 1990-03-14 1990-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation Epoxy composition of increased thermal conductivity and use thereof
US5264065A (en) 1990-06-08 1993-11-23 Amp-Akzo Corporation Printed circuits and base materials having low Z-axis thermal expansion
JPH0592438A (en) * 1991-10-02 1993-04-16 Matsushita Electric Works Ltd Production of laminated sheet
JPH05138808A (en) * 1991-11-16 1993-06-08 Toshiba Chem Corp Copper clad laminated sheet
US5362457A (en) * 1992-08-13 1994-11-08 Aluminum Company Of America Direct synthesis of anion substituted hydrotalcite
JPH0724955A (en) * 1993-07-07 1995-01-27 Toshiba Chem Corp Copper-clad laminate
US5776424A (en) * 1994-04-29 1998-07-07 Aluminum Company Of America Two powder synthesis of hydrotalcite and hydrotalcite-like compounds with monovalen inorganic anions

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100281964A1 (en) * 2008-01-09 2010-11-11 Dow Global Technologies Inc. Device and method for assessing the machinability of laminates
US8322201B2 (en) 2008-01-09 2012-12-04 Dow Global Technologies Llc Device and method for assessing the machinability of laminates
US20120055704A1 (en) * 2010-09-06 2012-03-08 Taiwan Union Technology Corporation Epoxy resin blend
WO2016123526A1 (en) * 2015-01-29 2016-08-04 Imerys Talc America, Inc. Engineered minerals for use as polycarbonate fillers, and methods of using the same to reinforce polycarbonates
US10316186B2 (en) 2015-01-29 2019-06-11 Imerys Talc America, Inc. Engineering minerals for use as polycarbonate fillers, and methods of using the same to reinforce polycarbonates

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69733803T2 (en) 2006-06-08
WO1997035457A1 (en) 1997-09-25
TW413659B (en) 2000-12-01
EP0864248A1 (en) 1998-09-16
US6322885B2 (en) 2001-11-27
US6187852B1 (en) 2001-02-13
ATE300858T1 (en) 2005-08-15
DE69733803D1 (en) 2005-09-01
AU2540597A (en) 1997-10-10
EP0864248B1 (en) 2005-07-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3251949B2 (en) Improved substrate material for printed wiring board and method of manufacturing the same
EP1650248B1 (en) Resin composition for printed wiring board, prepreg, laminate, and printed wiring board made with the same
US6187852B1 (en) Fillers for improved epoxy laminates
US9718941B2 (en) Thermosetting resin composition, prepreg, laminate, metal foil-clad laminate, and circuit board
JPH0484489A (en) Laminate lined with metallic foil whose surface is smooth
EP0384940A1 (en) Epoxy resin compositions
KR20130045857A (en) Resin composition, prepreg and laminate
WO1994021703A1 (en) Epoxy resin mixtures
EP2502956B1 (en) Prepreg, laminate, metal-foil-clad laminate, circuit board, and circuit board for led mounting
CN102504332A (en) Inorganic filler and electric material containing same
EP0952917B1 (en) Laminate for printed circuit boards
EP0537005B1 (en) Process for making thermoset polyphenylene oxide/epoxy laminates
US6280839B1 (en) Nonhygroscopic thermally stable aluminum hydroxide
US8470938B2 (en) Resin composition for printed wiring board, prepreg, and laminate obtained with the same
US20110082239A1 (en) Thermosetting epoxy composition with low expansibility
JPS6059795A (en) Laminated board for printed circuit
DE3026709A1 (en) EPOXY RESIN MATERIAL, THEREFORE IMPREGNATED FIBERGLASS FILMS AND INSULATING SUBSTRATES MADE THEREOF
US7910202B2 (en) Reducing dusting of epoxy laminates
CA2400787A1 (en) Electronic supports and methods and apparatus for forming apertures in electronic supports
EP0428863A2 (en) Epoxy resin mixtures
CN113736219A (en) Resin composition, prepreg, circuit substrate and printed circuit board
JP2924966B2 (en) Printed circuit laminate
JPH06112611A (en) Laminated board for printed circuit
JPH0571157B2 (en)
JPS60158215A (en) Epoxy resin composition for laminate

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, CONNECTICUT

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ISOLA USA CORP.;REEL/FRAME:014709/0082

Effective date: 20040602

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: ISOLA USA CORP., ARIZONA

Free format text: ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ISOLA LAMINATE SYSTEMS CORP.;REEL/FRAME:016195/0165

Effective date: 20040528

AS Assignment

Owner name: ISOLA USA CORP., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:017663/0130

Effective date: 20060421

AS Assignment

Owner name: OBSIDIAN, LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ISOLA USA CORP.;REEL/FRAME:018039/0759

Effective date: 20060421

AS Assignment

Owner name: GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P., AS COLLATERAL

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ISOLA USA CORP.;REEL/FRAME:018746/0030

Effective date: 20061218

Owner name: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, CONN

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ISOLA USA CORP.;REEL/FRAME:018731/0465

Effective date: 20061218

AS Assignment

Owner name: ISOLA USA CORP., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OBSIDIAN, LLC;REEL/FRAME:018757/0675

Effective date: 20061218

AS Assignment

Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST FSB, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, MINNESO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 18746/0030 AND 18746/0040;ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P.;REEL/FRAME:022562/0670

Effective date: 20090415

Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST FSB, AS COLLATERAL AGENT,MINNESOT

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 18746/0030 AND 18746/0040;ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P.;REEL/FRAME:022562/0670

Effective date: 20090415

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

AS Assignment

Owner name: GOLDMAN SACHS LENDING PARTNERS, LLC, NEW JERSEY

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ISOLA USA CORP.;REEL/FRAME:025077/0427

Effective date: 20100930

Owner name: ISOLA USA CORP., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:025077/0167

Effective date: 20100930

Owner name: ISOLA USA CORP., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST FSB;REEL/FRAME:025077/0145

Effective date: 20100930

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: ISOLA USA CORP., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS LENDING PARTNERS LLC;REEL/FRAME:031751/0828

Effective date: 20131129

Owner name: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW YO

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ISOLA USA CORP.;REEL/FRAME:031752/0404

Effective date: 20131129

AS Assignment

Owner name: CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC, NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC;REEL/FRAME:042467/0299

Effective date: 20170510