US11932672B2 - Fermentation process - Google Patents

Fermentation process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US11932672B2
US11932672B2 US16/955,720 US201816955720A US11932672B2 US 11932672 B2 US11932672 B2 US 11932672B2 US 201816955720 A US201816955720 A US 201816955720A US 11932672 B2 US11932672 B2 US 11932672B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
nucleic acid
promoter
acid sequence
bba
bacteriocin
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US16/955,720
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20210070812A1 (en
Inventor
Philippe Gabant
Mohamed El Bakkoury
Laurence Van Melderen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Syngulon SA
Universite Libre de Bruxelles ULB
Original Assignee
Syngulon SA
Universite Libre de Bruxelles ULB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Syngulon SA, Universite Libre de Bruxelles ULB filed Critical Syngulon SA
Assigned to SYNGULON S.A. reassignment SYNGULON S.A. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EL BAKKOURY, Mohamed, GABANT, PHILIPPE
Assigned to Université Libre de Bruxelles reassignment Université Libre de Bruxelles ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: VAN MELDEREN, LAURENCE
Publication of US20210070812A1 publication Critical patent/US20210070812A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US11932672B2 publication Critical patent/US11932672B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
    • C07K14/24—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Enterobacteriaceae (F), e.g. Citrobacter, Serratia, Proteus, Providencia, Morganella, Yersinia
    • C07K14/245—Escherichia (G)
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11—DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • C12N15/113—Non-coding nucleic acids modulating the expression of genes, e.g. antisense oligonucleotides; Antisense DNA or RNA; Triplex- forming oligonucleotides; Catalytic nucleic acids, e.g. ribozymes; Nucleic acids used in co-suppression or gene silencing
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/70—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for E. coli
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2800/00—Nucleic acids vectors
    • C12N2800/10—Plasmid DNA
    • C12N2800/101—Plasmid DNA for bacteria
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2800/00—Nucleic acids vectors
    • C12N2800/20—Pseudochromosomes, minichrosomosomes
    • C12N2800/204—Pseudochromosomes, minichrosomosomes of bacterial origin, e.g. BAC

Definitions

  • Embodiments herein relate to a method for producing a product of interest with a microbial host using an auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule comprising a first nucleic acid sequence whose genetic activity confers an advantage to the host, optionally wherein the genetic activity of said first nucleic acid molecule is controlled.
  • Antibiotics are widely used as selection agents for the production of a product of interest in microbial cells.
  • antibiotics such as large-scale spreading of antibiotics in the environment.
  • sequence coding for the resistance of the antibiotic in the DNA constructs represent an energetic burden for the cell and therefore negatively affects the yield of the product. This energetic burden is particularly relevant when the resistance-conferring gene is a large gene, when it is expressed at a high level and/or when it is expressed constitutively.
  • a method for producing a product of interest with a microbial host comprising the steps of:
  • Step a) comprises providing a microbial host comprising an auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule comprising a first nucleic acid sequence whose genetic activity confers an advantage to the host, optionally wherein the genetic activity of said first nucleic acid sequence is controlled.
  • the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule can be provided in a microbial host (e.g., a microbial cell as described herein).
  • the host or a predecessor of the host may have been previously transformed with the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule.
  • step a) comprises providing a microbial cell host comprising an auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule comprising a first nucleic acid sequence whose genetic activity confers an advantage to the host, optionally wherein the genetic activity of said first nucleic acid sequence is controlled.
  • the microbial host is transformed with the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule under conditions allowing only host that has received said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule to survive, thus providing a microbial host comprising an auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule.
  • the method further comprises transforming the microbial host with said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule prior to or during step a) under conditions allowing only host that has received said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule to survive, thus providing the microbial host comprising the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule.
  • the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule transformed into the microbial host optionally comprises the second nucleic acid sequence of step b).
  • the microbial host comprising the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule can subsequently be cultured according to step c).
  • an auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule comprising a first nucleic acid sequence.
  • An auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule can exist free of the genome and may be derived from or comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of a plasmid, or episome, minichromosome, or alike. This feature is attractive as a higher number (from one to hundreds of copies or from 10 to 50 copies depending on the plasmid used) of copies of such nucleic acid molecule can be introduced and maintained into the microbial cell host.
  • any host can be used in the methods of embodiments herein.
  • an auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule usually comprises an origin of replication, a first nucleic acid sequence which is of interest and a regulatory region.
  • a first nucleic acid sequence encoding an immunity modulator acts as a selectable marker to maintain the presence and function of the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid in the host cell.
  • the first nucleic acid sequence encoding the immunity modulator maintains the presence of the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid so that a product can be produced.
  • the product can alter the environment in which the host is present, for example by fermenting a substance in the environment to produce one or more new substances.
  • genetic drift is minimized by providing selective pressure against auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acids that have acquired mutations, and do not produce a functional immunity modulator, produce an immunity modulator with reduced function, and/or produced lower levels of immunity modulator than an auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid that has not acquired the mutation(s).
  • the first nucleic acid molecule represented by the first nucleic acid sequence is able to exhibit a genetic activity, said genetic activity confering an selective advantage to the microbial host cell wherein it is present and wherein this genetic activity is expressed.
  • This genetic activity is provided by the product encoded by the first nucleic acid molecule.
  • this genetic activity can be controlled or is expressed constitutively at a low level or is tunable or is under the control of a weak constitutive promoter. The control of said activity is believed to provide an advantage to limit the burden of energy for the host.
  • an advantage to limit the energy burden of the host may be obtained when the genetic activity is expressed constitutively at a low level or is tunable or is under the control of a weak constitutive promoter.
  • the concept “conferring an advantage” may be replaced by “conferring immunity to a bacteriocin” or “conferring resistance to a bacteriocin”.
  • the first nucleic acid sequence encodes an immunity modulator as described herein, and thereby confers an advantage to the host.
  • the product of interest comprises an enzyme that is useful in an industrial process, for example a fermentation process.
  • the fermentation process can ferment at least one compound in the culture medium.
  • the product of interest comprises an industrially useful molecule, for example a carbohydrate, a lipid, an organic molecule, a nutrient, a fertilizer, a biofuel, a cosmetic (or precursor thereof), a pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical product (or precursor thereof), or two or more of any of the listed items.
  • a genetic activity may mean any activity that is caused by or linked with the presence of the first nucleic acid molecule in a microbial host.
  • the advantage of said activity may be the ability to survive or survive and grow under given conditions (pH, temperature, presence of a given molecule such as a bacteriocin or combination of two or more bacteriocins as described herein, . . . ). Accordingly the advantage of said activity may be assessed by determining the number of microbial cells/hosts comprising the auto-replicative extrachromosomal nucleic acid molecule.
  • the assessment may be carried out at the end of and/or during the optional transforming step (but prior to culturing step c), or prior to steps a) and culturing step c)) and/or prior to culturing step c).
  • the number of microbial host cells comprising the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule present has not been decreased and may be increased by at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95% or more compared to the number of initial microbial cells/host when the cells are being cultured under conditions allowing the microbial host that has received said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule to survive (e.g., by possessing immunity to one or more
  • the control of a genetic activity may mean either an increase or decrease of activity of a nucleic acid molecule (i.e. first and/or second nucleic acid molecule). Accordingly, the control of a genetic activity can be controlled or is expressed constitutively at a low level or is tunable or is under the control of a weak constitutive promoter.
  • the coding product for which genetic activity is regulated/controlled comprises, consists essentially of, or consists of an immunity modulator or is involved in the production of a product of interest. In some embodiments, genetic activity is regulated/controlled at the level of gene expression.
  • genetic activity is regulated at the transcriptional level, for example by activating or repressing a promoter.
  • promoters in this context are inducible promoters.
  • promoters in this context are weak promoters. Without being limited by theory, weak promoters of some embodiments can be amendable to up- or down-regulating the level of transcription so that the advantage conferred to the host (e g immunity modulator activity) is sensitive to changes in levels and/or activity of the gene product(s) under the control of the promoter.
  • the promoter comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of the P24 promoter represented by SEQ ID NO:707 and/or the ProC promoter represented by SEQ ID NO: 708 and/or the P24 LacO hybrid promoter.
  • the P24LacO hybrid promoter is a tunable/controlled promoter.
  • gene activity is regulated/controlled at the post-transcriptional level, for example through regulation of RNA stability.
  • genetic activity is regulated/controlled at the translational level, for example through regulation of initiation of translation.
  • genetic activity is regulated/controlled at the post-translational level, for example through regulation of polypeptide stability, post-translational modifications to the polypeptide, or binding of an inhibitor to the polypeptide.
  • genetic activity is increased.
  • activity of at least one of an immunity modulator and/or the coding product of the second nucleic acid molecule is involved in the production of a product of interest is increased.
  • genetic activity can be increased by directly activating genetic activity, or by decreasing the activity of an inhibitor of genetic activity.
  • genetic activity is activated by at least one of: inducing promoter activity, inhibiting a transcriptional repressor, increasing RNA stability, inhibiting a post-transcriptional inhibitor (for example, inhibiting a ribozyme or antisense oligonucleotide), inducing translation (for example, via a regulatable tRNA), making a desired post-translational modification, or inhibiting a post-translational inhibitor (for example a protease directed to a polypeptide encoded by the gene).
  • a compound present in a desired environment induces a promoter.
  • the presence of iron in culture medium can induce transcription by an iron-sensitive promoter as described herein.
  • a compound present in a desired culture medium inhibits a transcriptional repressor.
  • the presence of tetracycline in an environment can inhibit the tet repressor, and thus allow activity from the tetO promoter.
  • a compound found only outside of a desired culture medium induces transcription.
  • genetic activity is decreased.
  • genetic activity can be decreased by directly inhibiting genetic activity, or by decreasing the activity of an activator of genetic activity.
  • genetic activity is reduced, but some level of activity remains. In some embodiments, genetic activity is fully inhibited.
  • genetic activity is decreased by at least one of inhibiting promoter activity, activating a transcriptional repressor, decreasing RNA stability, activating a post-transcriptional inhibitor (for example, expressing a ribozyme or antisense oligonucleotide), inhibiting translation (for example, via a regulatable tRNA), failing to make a required post-translational modification, inactivating a polypeptide (for example by binding an inhibitor or via a polypeptide-specific protease), or failing to properly localize a polypeptide.
  • a post-transcriptional inhibitor for example, expressing a ribozyme or antisense oligonucleotide
  • inhibiting translation for example, via a regulatable tRNA
  • inactivating a polypeptide for example by binding an inhibitor or via a polypeptide-specific protease
  • genetic activity is decreased by removing a gene from a desired location, for example by excising a gene using a FLP-FRT or cre-lox cassette, homologous recombination or CRIPR-CAS9 activity or through loss or degradation of a plasmid.
  • a gene product e.g. a polypeptide
  • a product produced by a gene product e.g. the product of an enzymatic reaction
  • inhibits further gene activity e.g. a negative feedback loop.
  • the advantage conferred to a microbial host by the genetic activity of the first nucleic acid molecule is the ability to survive or survive and grow in a medium comprising a bacteriocin (or a mix of bacteriocins).
  • bacteriocin encompasses a cell-free or chemically synthesized version of such a polypeptide.
  • a “bacteriocin,” and variations of this root term, may also refer to a polypeptide that had been secreted by a host cell.
  • a bacteriocin therefore encompasses a proteinaceous toxin produced by bacteria to inhibit the growth of similar or closely related bacterial strain(s).
  • a bacteriocin also encompasses a synthetic variant of a bacteriocin secreted by a host cell.
  • Synthetic variant of a bacteriocin may be derived from the bacteriocin secreted by a host cell in any way as long as the synthetic variant still exhibits at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 901 ⁇ of the activity of the corresponding bacteriocin secreted by a host cell.
  • a “bacteriocin” can neutralize at least one cell other than the individual host cell in which the polypeptide is made, including cells clonally related to the host cell and other microbial cells.
  • a cell that expresses a particular “immunity modulator” is immune to the neutralizing effects of a particular bacteriocin or group of bacteriocins.
  • bacteriocins can neutralize a cell producing the bacteriocin and/or other microbial cells, so long as these cells do not produce an appropriate immunity modulator.
  • a bacteriocin can exert cytotoxic or growth-inhibiting effects on a plurality of other microbial organisms.
  • a bacteriocin is produced by the translational machinery (e.g. a ribosome, etc.) of a microbial cell.
  • a bacteriocin is chemically synthesized.
  • bacteriocins can be derived from a polypeptide precursor.
  • the polypeptide precursor can undergo cleavage (for example processing by a protease) to yield the polypeptide of the bacteriocin itself.
  • a bacteriocin is produced from a precursor polypeptide.
  • a bacteriocin comprises, consists essentially of, or consists of a polypeptide that has undergone post-translational modifications, for example cleavage, or the addition of one or more functional groups.
  • Neutralizing activity of bacteriocins can include arrest of microbial reproduction, or cytotoxicity.
  • Some bacteriocins have cytotoxic activity (e.g. “bacteriocide” effects), and thus can kill microbial organisms, for example bacteria, yeast, algae, synthetic micoorganisms, and the like.
  • Some bacteriocins can inhibit the reproduction of microbial organisms (e.g. “bacteriostatic” effects), for example bacteria, yeast, algae, synthetic micoorganisms, and the like, for example by arresting the cell cycle.
  • bacteriocins A number of bacteriocins have been identified and characterized (see tables 1.1 and 1.2.). Without being limited by any particular theory, exemplary bacteriocins can be classified as “class I” bacteriocins, which typically undergo post-translational modification, and “class II” bacteriocins, which are typically unmodified. Additionally, exemplary bacteriocins in each class can be categorized into various subgroups, as summarized in Table 1.1, which is adapted from Cotter, P. D. et al. “Bacteriocins—a viable alternative to antibiotics” Nature Reviews Microbiology 11: 95-105, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
  • bacteriocins can effect neutralization of a target microbial cell in a variety of ways.
  • a bacteriocin can permeabilize a cell wall, thus depolarizing the cell wall and interfering with respiration.
  • Table 1.1 Classification of Exemplary Bacteriocins.
  • bacteriocins can be used in accordance with embodiments herein. Exemplary bacteriocins are shown in Table 1.2. In some embodiments, at least one bacteriocin comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of a polypeptide sequence of Table 1.2 is provided. As shown in Table 1.2, some bacteriocins function as pairs of molecules. As such, it will be understood that unless explicity stated otherwise, when a functional “bacteriocin” or “providing a bacteriocin,” or the like is discussed herein, functional bacteriocin pairs are included along with bacteriocins that function individually. With reference to Table 1.2, “organisms of origin” listed in parentheses indicate alternative names and/or strain information for organisms known to produce the indicated bacteriocin.
  • Embodiments herein also include peptides and proteins with identity to bacteriocins described in Table 1.2.
  • identity is meant to include nucleic acid or protein sequence homology or three-dimensional homology.
  • a vast range of functional bacteriocins can incorporate features of bacteriocins disclosed herein, thus providing for a vast degree of identity to the bacteriocins in Table 1.2.
  • a bacteriocin has at least 50% identity, for example, at least 50%, 51%, 52%, 53%, 54%, 55%, 56%, 57%, 58%, 59%, 60%, 61%, 62%, 63%, 64%, 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% identity to any one of the polypeptides of Table 1.2.
  • Percent identity may be determined using the BLAST software (Altschul, S. F., et al. (1990) “Basic local alignment search tool.” J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410, accessible on the world wide web at blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) with the default parameters.
  • bacteriocins in Table 1.2 are naturally-occurring, the skilled artisan will appreciate that variants of the bacteriocins of Table 1.2, naturally-occurring bacteriocins other than the bacteriocins of Table 1.2 or variants thereof, or synthetic bacteriocins can be used according to some embodiments herein. In some embodiments, such variants have enhanced or decreased levels of cytotoxic or growth inhibition activity on the same or a different microorganism or species of microorganism relative to the wild type protein. Several motifs have been recognized as characteristic of bacteriocins.
  • a synthetic bacteriocin comprises an N-terminal sequence with at least 50% identity to SEQ ID NO: 2, for example at least 50%, 51%, 52%, 53%, 54%, 55%, 56%, 57%, 58%, 59%, 60%, 61%, 62%, 63%, 64%, 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% identity to SEQ ID NO: 2.
  • a synthetic bacteriocin comprises a N-terminal sequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 2.
  • some class lib bacteriocins comprise a GxxxG motif (x means any amino acid). Without being limited by any particular theory, it is believed that the GxxxG motif can mediate association between helical proteins in the cell membrane, for example to facilitate bacteriocin-mediated neutralization through cell membrane interactions.
  • the bacteriocin comprises a motif that facilitates interactions with the cell membrane.
  • the bacteriocin comprises a GxxxG motif.
  • the bacteriocin comprising a GxxxG motif can comprise a helical structure.
  • “bacteriocin” as used herein also encompasses structures that have substantially the same effect on microbial cells as any of the bacteriocins explicitly provided herein.
  • fusion polypeptides comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of two or more bacteriocins or portions thereof can have neutralizing activity against a broader range of microbial organisms than either individual bacteriocin.
  • a hybrid bacteriocin, Ent35-MccV GKYYGNGVSCNKKGCSVDWGRAIGIIGNNSAANLATGGAAGWKSGGGASGR DIAMAIGTLSGQFVAGGIGAAAGGVAGGAIYDYASTHKPNPAMSPSGLGGTIK QKPEGIPSE AWNYAAGRLCNWSPNNLSDVCL, SEQ ID NO: 3
  • displays antimicrobial activity against pathogenic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria displays antimicrobial activity against pathogenic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Acuna et al.
  • Ent35-MccV fusion bacteriocin comprises, from N-terminus to C-terminus, an N-terminal glycine, Enterocin CRL35, a linker comprising three glycines, and a C-terminal Microcin V.
  • bacteriocins can comprise fusions of two or more polypeptides having bacteriocin activity.
  • a fusion polypeptide of two or more bacteriocins is provided.
  • the two or more bacteriocins comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of polypeptides from Table 1.2, or modifications thereof.
  • the fusion polypeptide comprising of two or more bacteriocins has a broader spectrum of activity than either individual bacteriocin, for example having neutralizing activity against more microbial organisms, neutralizing activity under a broader range of environmental conditions, and/or a higher efficiency of neutralization activity.
  • a fusion of two or more bacteriocins is provided, for example two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, or ten bacteriocins.
  • two or more bacteriocin polypeptides are fused to each other via a covalent bond, for example a peptide linkage.
  • a linker is positioned between the two bacteriocin polypeptides.
  • the linker comprises, consists essentially of, or consists of one or more glycines, for example about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 glycines.
  • the linker is cleaved within the cell to produce the individual bacteriocins included in the fusion protein.
  • a bacteriocin as provided herein is modified to provide a desired spectrum of activity relative to the unmodified bacteriocin.
  • the modified bacteriocin may have enhanced or decreased activity against the same organisms as the unmodified bacteriocin.
  • the modified bacteriocin may have enhanced activity against an organism against which the unmodified bacteriocin has less activity or no activity.
  • lactis 153 A1 Streptococcus lactis 154 Lacticin 3147 Lantibiotic Lactococcus lactis subsp.
  • lactis 155 A2 Streptococcus lactis 156 Lacticin 481 Lantibiotic Lactococcus lactis subsp.
  • lactis 157 (Lactococcin ( Streptococcus lactis ) DR) 158 Lacticin Q Unclassified Lactococcus lactis 159 160 Lacticin Z Unclassified Lactococcus lactis 161 162 Lactobin-A class IIB Lactobacillus amylovorus 163 (Amylovorin- L471) 164 Lactocin-S Lantibiotic Lactobacillus sakei L45 165 166 Lactococcin 972 Unclassified Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis 167 ( Streptococcus lactis ) 168 Lactococcin-A Unclassified Lactococcus lactis subsp.
  • cremoris 169 Streptococcus cremoris 170 Lactococcin-B Unclassified Lactococcus lactis subsp.
  • cremoris 171 Streptococcus cremoris 172 Lactocyclicin Q Unclassified Lactococcus sp. QU 12 173 174 Laterosporulin Unclassified Brevibacillus sp.
  • lactis 219 ( Streptococcus lactis ) 220 Nisin F Lantibiotic Lactococcus lactis 221 222 Nisin Q Lantibiotic Lactococcus lactis 223 224 Nisin U Lantibiotic Streptococcus uberis 225 226 Nisin Z Lantibiotic Lactococcus lactis subsp.
  • lactis 227 Streptococcus lactis ) 228 Nukacin ISK-1 Lantibiotic Staphylococcus warneri 229 230 Paenicidin A Lantibiotic Paenibacillus polymyxa ( Bacillus 231 polymyxa ) 232 Pediocin PA-1 class IIA/YGNGV Pediococcus acidilactici 233 (Pediocin ACH) 234 Penocin A class IIA/YGNGV Pediococcus pentosaceus (strain 235 ATCC 25745/183-1w) 236 Pep5 Lantibiotic Staphylococcus epidermidis 237 238 Piscicolin 126 class IIA/YGNGV Carnobacterium maltaromaticum 239 ( Carnobacterium piscicola ) 240 Plantaricin 1.25 Unclassified Lactobacillus plantarum 241 ⁇ 242 Plantaricin 423 class IIa Lactobacillus plantarum 243
  • lactis 349 Streptococcus lactis ) 350 Ancovenin Lantibiotic Streptomyces sp. (strain A647P-2) 351 352 Actagardine Lantibiotic Actinoplanes liguriae 353 (Gardimycin) 354 Curvaticin FS47 Unclassified Lactobacillus curvatus 355 356 Bavaricin-MN class IIA/YGNGV Lactobacillus sakei 357 358 Mutacin B- Lantibiotic Streptococcus mutans 359 Ny266 360 Mundticin class IIA/YGNGV Enterococcus mundtii 361 362 Bavaricin-A class IIA/YGNGV Lactobacillus sakei 363 364 Lactocin-705 Class IIb Lactobacillus paracasei 365 366 Leucocin-B Unclassified Leuconostoc mesenteroides 367 368 Leucocin C class IIA/YGNGV Le
  • an anti-fungal activity (such as anti-yeast activity) is desired.
  • a number of bacteriocins with anti-fungal activity have been identified.
  • bacteriocins from Bacillus have been shown to have neutralizing activity against yeast strains ⁇ see Adetunji and Olaoye (2013) Malaysian Journal of Microbiology 9: 130-13, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety)
  • an Enterococcus faecalis peptide WLPPAGLLGRCGRWFRPWLLWLQ SGAQY KWLGNLFGLGPK, SEQ ID NO: 1
  • WLPPAGLLGRCGRWFRPWLLWLQ SGAQY KWLGNLFGLGPK SEQ ID NO: 1
  • bacteriocins from Pseudomonas have been shown to have neutralizing activity against fungi such as Curvularia lunata, Fusarium species, Helminthosporium species, and Biopolaris species (Shalani).
  • subtilis In Bacillus subtilis and Other Gram-Positive Bacteria: Biochemistry, Physiology, and Molecular Genetics ed Sonenshein et al., pp. 897-916, American Society for Microbiology, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) and alirin B1 ⁇ see Shenin et al. (1995) Antibiot Khimioter 50: 3-7, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) from 5. subtilis have been shown to have antifungal activities. As such, in some embodiments, for example embodiments in which neutralization of a fungal microbial organism is desired, a bacteriocin comprises at least one of botrycidin AJ1316 or alirin B1.
  • bacteriocin activity in a culture of cyanobacteria is desirable.
  • bacteriocins are provided to neutralize cyanobacteria.
  • bacteriocins are provided to neutralize invading microbial organisms typically found in a cyanobacteria culture environment. Clusters of conserved bacteriocin polypeptides have been identified in a wide variety of cyanobacteria species. For example, at least 145 putative bacteriocin gene clusters have been identified in at least 43 cyanobacteria species, as reported in Wang et al.
  • cyanobacteria bacteriocins are shown in Table 1.2 as SEQ ID NO's 420, 422, 424, 426, 428, 30, 432, 434, 436, 438, 440, 442, 444, 446, 448, and 450.
  • a bacteriocin may work via different mechanisms on a microbial cell as explained herein, a bacteriocin may be said to be active when the number of microbial host has decreased by at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95% or more compared to the number of initial microbial host when the microbial hosts are being cultured with a medium comprising a bacteriocin.
  • This culture step may have a duration of at least 12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 60 hours, 72 hours or more before assessing the activity of the bacteriocin by counting the number of microbial hosts present.
  • the activity may be assessed by counting the cells under the microscope or by any known microbial techniques.
  • a bacteriocin is active when the growth has been arrested in at least a specified number or percentage of microbial hosts, for example at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, or at least 95% of the microbial hosts arrested compared to the initial population of microbial hosts when the microbial hosts are being cultured with a medium comprising a bacteriocin.
  • the bacteriocin is B17 or C7 represented by an amino acid sequence comprising or consisting of SEQ ID NO: 198 or 200 respectively.
  • B17 and C7 have been experimentally confirmed to be selection agents simple to produce, easy to use and stable in culture medium in accordance with some embodiments herein (See Example 1).
  • Some of methods, uses, compositions, hosts, and nucleic acids of embodiments herein also encompass the use a bacteriocin having at least 50% identity to SEQ ID NO: 198 or 200, for example at least 50%, 51%, 52%, 53%, 54%, 55%, 56%, 57%, 58%, 59%, 60%, 61%, 62%, 63%, 64%, 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% identity to SEQ ID NO: 198 or 200.
  • Such variants of B17 or C7 may be used in methods, uses, compositions, hosts, and nucleic acids of embodiments herein as long as they exhibit at least a substantial activity of B17 or C7.
  • “substantial” means, for example, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 705, at least 80%, at least 90%, or at least 100% or more of the activity of B17 or C7 having SEQ ID NO: 198 or 200. The activity of a bacteriocin has been described earlier herein.
  • bacteriocin B17 or C7 inventors were able to prepare culture medium comprising said bacteriocin in a concentration which allows one to carry out the methods and uses of embodiments herein, i.e. to observe or visualize an advantage of the expression of said genetic activity.
  • the quantity of bacteriocin in said medium or agar plate is such that the number of host that does not comprise said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal has been decreased by at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95% or more compared to the number of initial microbial cells/host when the cells are being cultured under conditions allowing the microbial host that has received said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule to survive and to grow.
  • This assessment step may have a duration of at least 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 60 hours, 72 hours, 84 hours, 96 hours, 108 hours, 120 hours or more.
  • Said culture medium may be sterilized without losing substantial bacteriocin activity.
  • substantially means, for example, more than 50%, more than 60%, more than 70%, more than 80%, more than 90% of the bacteriocin activity present in the culture medium before sterilization.
  • lactis 473 Streptococcus lactis ) 474 Lactococcin-A immunity modulator Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris 475 ( Streptococcus cremoris ) 476 Colicin-D immunity modulator (Microcin-D Escherichia coli 477 immunity modulator) 478 Colicin-E5 immunity modulator (ImmE5) (Microcin- Escherichia coli 479 E5 immunity modulator) 480 Colicin-E6 immunity modulator (ImmE6) (Microcin- Escherichia coli 481 E6 immunity modulator) 482 Colicin-E8 immunity modulator in ColE6 Escherichia coli 483 (E8Imm[E6]) 484 Colicin-E9 immunity modulator (ImmE9) (Microcin- Escherichia coli 485 E9 immunity modulator) 486 Colicin-M immunity modulator (Microcin-M Escherichia
  • cremoris 499 Streptococcus cremoris ) 500 Pediocin PA-1 immunity modulator (Pediocin Pediococcus acidilactici 501 ACH immunity modulator) 502 Putative carnobacteriocin-BM1 immunity modulator Carnobacterium maltaromaticum 503 ( Carnobacterium piscicola ) 504 Putative carnobacteriocin-B2 immunity modulator Carnobacterium maltaromaticum 505 (Carnocin-CP52 immunity modulator) ( Carnobacterium piscicola ) 506 Nisin immunity modulator Lactococcus lactis subsp.
  • PA-1 immunity modulator Pediocin Pediococcus acidilactici 501 ACH immunity modulator
  • 502 Putative carnobacteriocin-BM1 immunity modulator Carnobacterium maltaromaticum 503 ( Carnobacterium piscicola ) 504 Putative carnobacteriocin
  • lactis 507 Streptococcus lactis 508 Trifolitoxin immunity modulator Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii 509 510 Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis Bacillus subtilis (strain 168) 511 protein AlbD 512 Putative ABC transporter ATP-binding protein AlbC Bacillus subtilis (strain 168) 513 (Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis protein AlbC) 514 Antilisterial bacteriocin subtilosin biosynthesis Bacillus subtilis (strain 168) 515 protein AlbB 516 Colicin-E7 immunity modulator (ImmE7) (Microcin- Escherichia coli 517 E7 immunity modulator) 518 Pyocin-S1 immunity modulator Pseudomonas aeruginosa 519 520 Pyocin-S2 immunity modulator Pseudomonas aeruginosa (strain ATCC 521 15692
  • bacteriocins of Table 2 While the sequence providing immunity to a bacteriocin of Table 2 are naturally-occurring, the skilled artisan will appreciate that variants of such molecules, naturally-occurring molecules other than the ones of Table 2, or synthetic ones can be used according to some embodiments herein.
  • Exemplary bacteriocins to which molecules can confer immunity are identified in Table 2.
  • immunomodulator or “molecule conferring or providing immunity to a bacteriocin” encompasses not only to structures expressly provided herein, but also structures that have substantially the same effect as the “immunity modulator” structures described herein, including fully synthetic immunity modulators, and immunity modulators that provide immunity to bacteriocins that are functionally equivalent to the bacteriocins disclosed herein.
  • Exemplary polynucleotide sequences encoding the polypeptides of Table 2 are indicated in Table 2.
  • the genetic code is degenerate, and moreover, codon usage can vary based on the particular organism in which the gene product is being expressed, and as such, a particular polypeptide can be encoded by more than one polynucleotide.
  • a polynucleotide encoding a bacteriocin immunity modulator is selected based on the codon usage of the organism expressing the bacteriocin immunity modulator.
  • a polynucleotide encoding a bacteriocin immunity modulator is codon optimized based on the particular organism expressing the bacteriocin immunity modulator.
  • a vast range of functional immunity modulators can incorporate features of immunity modulators disclosed herein, thus providing for a vast degree of identity to the immunity modulators in Table 2.
  • an immunity modulator has at least about 50% identity, for example, at least 50%, 51%, 52%, 53%, 54%, 55%, 56%, 57%, 58%, 59%, 60%, 61%, 62%, 63%, 64%, 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% identity to any one of the polypeptides of Table 2.
  • resistance or immunity to a bacteriocin may mean the number of microbial cells at the end of a culturing step with a bacteriocin has not been decreased, and in some embodiments has been increased of at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95% or more compared to the number of initial microbial cells when the cells are being cultured with a medium comprising a bacteriocin.
  • This culture step may have a duration of at least 12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 60 hours, 72 hours, 84 hours, 96 hours, 108 hours, 120 hours or more before assessing the activity of the bacteriocin by counting the number of microbial cells present.
  • a nucleic acid molecule suitable for methods, uses, compositions, hosts, and nucleic acids of some embodiments herein and whose encoding product confers immunity is McbG (Immunity to the bacteriocin B17), which is represented by SEQ ID NO: 699. McbG has been experimentally confirmed to be useful as a selectable marker either constitutively or inducibly in accordance with some embodiments herein (See Example 3).
  • MccE IImmunity to the bacteriocin C7 which is represented by SEQ ID NO: 700 or its c-terminal portion, represented by SEQ ID NO: 701.
  • MccE had been used as a vector selection marker in strains sensitive to microcines/bacteriocins (See Example 2).
  • Methods, uses, compositions, hosts, and nucleic acids of some embodiments also encompass the use of a nucleic acid molecule whose encoding product confers immunity to bacteriocin B17 and/or C7 and having at least 50% identity to SEQ ID NO: 699, 700, or 701, for example at least 50%, 51%, 52%, 53%, 54%, 55%, 56%, 57%, 58%, 59%, 60%, 61%, 62%, 63%, 64%, 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%,
  • McbG and/or MccE may be used in methods, uses, compositions, hosts, and nucleic acids of embodiments herein as long as they exhibit at least a substantial activity of McbG (respectively MccE).
  • substantially means, for example, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, or at least 100% or more of the activity of McbG (respectively MccE) having SEQ ID NO: 699, 700 or 701.
  • the immunity conferred by the encoding product of McbG (respectively MccE) has been described earlier herein.
  • MccE which is represented by SEQ ID NO: 701 is sufficient to confer resistance to bacteriocin C7.
  • Part means in this context, for example, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90% or more of the original nucleic acid molecule.
  • This is quite attractive and surprising that such a short nucleic acid molecule can confer resistance to a bacteriocin. It is expected that an auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule comprising such short nucleic acid molecule does not form any burden for the microbial cell.
  • a further suitable nucleic acid molecule for methods, uses, compositions, hosts, and nucleic acids of some embodiments herein, and whose product provides immunity to a bacteriocin is a single nucleic acid molecule whose single product provides immunity to at least two distinct bacteriocins.
  • such product of such nucleic acid molecule provides immunity to B17 and C7 or to ColV and C7 or to ColV and B17 or to B17, C7 and ColV.
  • a nucleic acid encoding ColV is identified as SEQ ID NO: 65 and a corresponding coding amino acid sequence is identified as SEQ ID NO: 64.
  • a nucleic acid molecule whose product provides immunity to B17 and C7 is represented by a sequence having at least 50% identity to SEQ ID NO: 715 or 716 for example at least 50%, 51%, 52%, 53%, 54%, 55%, 56%, 57%, 58%, 59%, 60%, 61%, 62%, 63%, 64%, 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% identity to SEQ ID NO: 715 or 716.
  • SEQ ID NO: 715 is a nucleic acid molecule of McbG fused to MccE.
  • SEQ ID NO: 716 is a nucleic acid molecule of McbG fused to the C-terminal part of MccE as earlier described herein.
  • a nucleic acid molecule whose product provides immunity to ColV and C7 is represented by a sequence having at least 50% identity to SEQ ID NO: 717 or 718 for example at least 50%, 51%, 52%, 53%, 54%, 55%, 56%, 57%, 58%, 59%, 60%, 61%, 62%, 63%, 64%, 65%, 66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% identity to SEQ ID NO: 717 or 718.
  • SEQ ID NO: 717 is a nucleic acid molecule of Cvi fused to MccE.
  • SEQ ID NO: 718 is a nucleic acid molecule of Cvi fused to the C-terminal part of MccE as earlier described herein.
  • identity variants of the core sequence may be used in methods, uses, compositions, hosts, and nucleic acids of embodiments herein as long as they exhibit at least a substantial activity of the molecule they derived from as earlier described herein.
  • each of these nucleic acid molecules described herein whose product confers immunity to a single or to more than one or to at least two bacteriocins may be operably linked to a promoter as described herein.
  • the promoter is a weak promoter.
  • the weak promoter is the proC promoter represented by SEQ ID NO: 708 or the P24 promoter represented by SEQ ID NO: 707, which has been experimentally confirmed (See, e.g. Example 3).
  • Suitable constructs useful in methods, uses, compositions, hosts, and nucleic acids of embodiments herein can comprise a first nucleic acid molecule whose product confers immunity to a bacteriocin, and these constructs may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of SEQ ID NO: 702, 703, 710, 711, 704, 705, 712, 713 or 714.
  • SEQ ID NO: 702, 703, 710, 711, 704, 705, 712, 713 or 714 Each of these constructs has been extensively described in the experimental part of the application, which notes that each of these constructs was actually constructed and confirmed to be suitable in accordance with some embodiments herein (See, e.g., Examples 1 and 2 and 3).
  • the bacteriocin added to the culture medium is a B17 and/or a C7 and/or a ColV as identified herein
  • the method may allow the production of any product of interest.
  • the product of interest is a microbial biomass, the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule, the transcript of said second nucleic sequence, a polypeptide encoded by said second sequence or a metabolite produced directly or indirectly by said polypeptide.
  • the product of interest is purified at the end of the culturing step c). This may be carried out using techniques known to the skilled person. Since the energetic burden associated with the presence of the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule has been minimized, the yield of the product of interest is expected to be optimal.
  • the method may use any suitable microbial cells, for example as hosts.
  • Suitable microbial cells are listed in the part of the specification entitled general descriptions. Suitable microbial cells per se and for use in methods, uses, compositions, and hosts of embodiments herein include, but are not limited to: a bacterium (for example, a Gram negative bacterium, for example an E. coli species), a yeast, a filamentous fungus or an algae.
  • the microbial cell is a synthetic microbial cell.
  • the first nucleic acid sequence present on the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule may be operably linked to a promoter.
  • said promoter is a weak promoter.
  • said promoter is a constitutive promoter.
  • said promoter is inducible.
  • said promoter is a weak constitutive promoter.
  • said promoter is a weak inducible promoter. The inducibility of said promoter is a way of controlling the presence of the genetic activity of the first nucleic acid sequence. Promoters are well known in the art. A detailed description is provided in the part of the specification dedicated to the general descriptions.
  • a promoter can be used to drive the transcription of one or more coding sequences.
  • said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule comprises a second nucleic acid sequence that is involved in the production of a product of interest, wherein the genetic activity of said second nucleic acid sequence is controlled independently from the one of the first sequence.
  • control of the genetic activity of said second nucleic acid sequence is not independent from the control of the genetic activity of the first sequence.
  • a second promoter drives expression of said second nucleic acid sequence being involved in the production of a product of interest as described herein.
  • a first promoter drives expression of an immunity modulator polynucleotide as described herein.
  • a promoter that could be used herein may be not native to a nucleic acid molecule to which it is operably linked, i.e. a promoter that is heterologous to the nucleic acid molecule (coding sequence) to which it is operably linked.
  • a promoter of some embodiments is heterologous to a coding sequence to which it is operably linked
  • a promoter is homologous, e.g., endogenous to a microbial cell.
  • a heterologous promoter (to the nucleotide sequence) is capable of producing a higher steady state level of a transcript comprising a coding sequence (or is capable of producing more transcript molecules, i.e.
  • promoters can drive transcription at all times (“constitutive promoters”). Some promoters can drive transcription under only select circumstances (“conditional promoters” or “inducible promoter”), for example depending on the presence or absence of an environmental condition, chemical compound, gene product, stage of the cell cycle, or the like.
  • an appropriate promoter can be selected, and placed in cis (i.e. or is operably linked with) with a sequence to be expressed.
  • Exemplary promoters with exemplary activities are provided in Table 3.1-3.11 herein.
  • Some promoters are compatible with particular transcriptional machinery (e.g. RNA polymerases, general transcription factors, and the like).
  • promoters are identified for some promoters described herein, it is contemplated that according to some embodiments herein, these promoters can readily function in microorganisms other than the identified species, for example in species with compatible endogenous transcriptional machinery, genetically modified species comprising compatible transcriptional machinery, or fully synthetic microbial organisms comprising compatible transcriptional machinery.
  • the promoters of Tables 3.1-3.11 herein are publicly available from the Biobricks foundation. It is noted that the Biobricks foundation encourages use of these promoters in accordance with BioBrickTM Public Agreement (BPA).
  • BPA BioBrickTM Public Agreement
  • any of the “coding” polynucleotides described herein is generally amenable to being expressed under the control of a desired promoter.
  • a first nucleic acid sequence is under the control of a first promoter.
  • a second nucleic acid sequence involved in the production of a product of interest is under the control of a second promoter.
  • translation initiation for a particular transcript is regulated by particular sequences at 5′ end of the coding sequence of a transcript.
  • a coding sequence can begin with a start codon configured to pair with an initiator tRNA.
  • Met a start codon
  • an initiator tRNA can be engineered to bind to any desired triplet or triplets, and accordingly, triplets other than AUG can also function as start codons in certain embodiments.
  • sequences near the start codon can facilitate ribosomal assembly, for example a Kozak sequence ((gcc)gccNccAUGG, SEQ ID NO: 542, in which N represents “A” or “G”) or Internal Ribosome Entry Site (IRES) in typical eukaryotic translational systems, or a Shine-Dalgarno sequence (GGAGGU, SEQ ID NO: 543) in typical prokaryotic translation systems.
  • a transcript comprising a “coding” polynucleotide sequence for example a first nucleic acid sequence, or second nucleic acid sequence involved in the production of a fermentation product, comprises an appropriate start codon and translational initiation sequence.
  • each polynucleotide sequence comprises an appropriate start codon and translational initiation sequence(s).
  • a translational intiator tRNA is regulatable, so as to regulate initiation of translation of an immunity modulator or industrially useful molecule.
  • aureus 556 BBa_I751501 plux-cI hybrid promoter 557 BBa_I751502 plux-lac hybrid promoter 558 BBa_I761011 CinR, CinL and glucose controlled promotor 559 BBa_J06403 RhIR promoter repressible by CI 560 BBa_J102001 Reverse Lux Promoter 561 BBa_J64000 rhlI promoter 562 BBa_J64010 lasI promoter 563 BBa_J64067 LuxR + 3OC6HSL independent R0065 564 BBa_J64712 LasR/LasI Inducible & RHLR/RHLI repressible Promoter 565 BBa_K091107 pLux/cI Hybrid Promoter 566 BBa_K091117 pLas promoter 567 BBa_K091143 pLas/cI Hybrid Promoter 568 BBa_K091146 pLas/L
  • T7 SEQ ID NO: Name Description 668 BBa_I712074 T7 promoter (strong promoter from T7 bacteriophage) 669 BBa_I719005 T7 Promoter 670 BBa_J34814 T7 Promoter 671 BBa_J64997 T7 consensus ⁇ 10 and rest 672 BBa_K113010 overlapping T7 promoter 673 BBa_K113011 more overlapping T7 promoter 674 BBa_K113012 weaken overlapping T7 promoter 675 BBa_R0085 T7 Consensus Promoter Sequence 676 BBa_R0180 T7 RNAP promoter 677 BBa_R0181 T7 RNAP promoter 678 BBa_R0182 T7 RNAP promoter 679 BBa_R0183 T7 RNAP promoter 680 BBa_Z0251 T7 strong promoter 681 BBa_Z0252
  • a promoter may be a synthetic promoter.
  • Suitable promoters for methods, uses, compositions, hosts, and nucleic acids of some embodiments herein have been described earlier herein e.g., proC represented by SEQ ID NO: 708 which has been experimentally confirmed in accordance with some embodiments herein (See Example 2) and P24 represented by SEQ ID NO: 707 which has been experimentally confirmed in accordance with some embodiments herein (See Example 3).
  • a suitable inducible promoter is the P24 LacO hybrid promoter, which is repressed in the presence of Lad and active in presence of IPTG. This promoter has been experimentally confirmed in accordance with some embodiments herein (See Example 3).
  • a variant, fully synthetic or synthetic or engineer promoter is said to be active or functional and can therefore be used in methods, uses, compositions, hosts, and nucleic acids of embodiments herein when tested in a control or reference plasmid being operably linked with a nucleic acid molecule encoding a transcript, a detectable amount of said transcript molecule is present when said plasmid is present in a cell.
  • a variant, fully synthetic or synthetic or engineer promoter may have at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, or at least 100% of the activity of the promoter it derives from.
  • the method comprises transforming said microbial host with said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule under conditions allowing the host that has received said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule to survive.
  • the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule can be provided in a microbial cell (e.g., if the microbial cell, or a predecessor thereof was transformed with the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule), and as such, in some embodiments, the transformation step is not needed in the method. The transforming step can be performed prior to the culturing of step c).
  • the transforming step is provided prior to step a) so as to provide the host cell comprising the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule.
  • the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule used in the transforming step further comprises the second nucleic acid of optional step b).
  • a microorganism is genetically modified to comprise said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule comprising a first nucleic acid sequence and optionally a molecule involved in the production of a product of interest.
  • Polynucleotides or nucleic acid molecules can be delivered to microorganisms.
  • a microbial cell is positively selected for by the genetic activity of the first nucleic acid sequence corresponding to at least one given condition allowing the cell that has received the said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule to survive and said conditions can be environmental conditions.
  • Environmental conditions may be a culture medium.
  • a cassette for inserting one or more desired distinct first nucleic acid sequences is provided.
  • Exemplary cassettes include, but are not limited to, a Cre/lox cassette or FLP/FRT cassette.
  • a microbial cell comprises more than one (more than two, more than three, . . . ) different auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule comprising a first nucleic acid sequence as described herein, meaning that said cell can exhibit more than one (more than two, more than three, . . . ) genetic activity, each genetic activity conferring an advantage to the cell. If a first promoter is present in each of the different auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule, each of said first promoters may be different or identical.
  • plasmid conjugation can be used to introduce a desired plasmid from a “donor” microbial cell to a recipient microbial cell.
  • plasmid conjugation can genetically modify a recipient microbial cell by introducing a conjugation plasmid from a donor microbial cell to a recipient microbial cell.
  • conjugation plasmids that comprise the same or functionally same set of replication genes typically cannot coexist in the same microbial cell.
  • plasmid conjugation “reprograms” a recipient microbial cell by introducing a new conjugation plasmid to supplant another conjugation plasmid that was present in the recipient cell.
  • plasmid conjugation is used to engineer (or reengineer) a microbial cell with a particular combination of first nucleic acid molecules (which can code for immunity modulators in some embodiments).
  • first nucleic acid molecules which can code for immunity modulators in some embodiments
  • plasmid conjugation comprising different combinations of first acid sequence (which can code for immunity modulators in some embodiments) is provided.
  • the plasmids can comprise additional genetic elements as described herein, for example promoters, translational initiation sites, and the like.
  • the variety of conjugation plasmids is provided in a collection of donor cells, so that a donor cell comprising the desired plasmid can be selected for plasmid conjugation.
  • a particular combination of immunity modulators is selected, and an appropriate donor cell is conjugated with a microbial cell of interest to introduce a conjugation plasmid comprising that combination into a recipient cell.
  • the recipient cell is a “newly engineered” cell, for example to be introduced into or for initiating a culture.
  • the method further comprises optional step b) wherein said auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule comprises a second nucleic acid sequence that is involved in the production of said product of interest, wherein the genetic activity of said second nucleic acid sequence is controlled independently from the one of the first sequence.
  • control independently has its customary and ordinary meanings as understood by one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, including meaning that distinct ways are used for controlling the genetic activity of the first and the second nucleic acid sequences. Ways of controlling the genetic activity of a nucleic acid sequence have been already described in detail herein.
  • step a) (which optionally includes transforming as described herein) and optional step b) is followed by step c), which comprises culturing said transformed microbial host under conditions allowing said transformed microbial host to express the first nucleic acid sequence to a given level to maintain the auto-replicative extra-chromosomal molecule into the growing microbial population.
  • step c optionally controlling the second sequence coding for said product of interest.
  • step c) at least part of step c) conditions are such that the first nucleic acid sequence does not exhibit said genetic activity.
  • Part of step c) means, for example, at least 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80% or 90% or up to 100% of the duration of step c).
  • This embodiment of the method is quite attractive as part of step c) is carried out without the presence of the genetic activity of the first nucleic acid sequence. The presence of said genetic activity forms an energetic burden for the microbial host cell and is not always needed in order to keep a suitable production level of a product of interest. It is envisaged in some embodiments to have part of step c) without genetic activity of the first nucleic acid sequence followed by a part with said activity. These two parts may be repeated one or more time during step c).
  • a microbial cell may be cultured in any suitable microbial culture environment.
  • Microbial culture environments can comprise a wide variety of culture media, for example feedstocks.
  • the selection of a particular culture medium can depend upon the desired application. Conditions of a culture medium include not only chemical composition, but also temperature, amounts of light, pH, CO 2 levels, and the like.
  • the culture medium can comprise a bacteriocin.
  • a compound that induces the activity of the bacteriocin is present outside of the feedstock, but not in the feedstock.
  • a genetically engineered or transformed microorganism as described herein is added to a culture medium that comprises at least one feedstock.
  • the culture medium comprises a compound that induces the activity or expression of an immunity modulator.
  • feedstock has is customary and ordinary meaning as understood by one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, and encompasses material that can be consumed, fermented, purified, modified, or otherwise processed by microbial organisms, for example in the context of industrial processes. As such, “feedstock” is not limited to food or food products. As used herein a “feedstock” is a category of culture medium. Accordingly, as used herein “culture medium” includes, but it is not limited to feedstock. As such, whenever a “culture medium” is referred to herein, feedstocks are also expressly contemplated.
  • a microbial cell or microbial host or microbial host cell or synthetic microbial host cell comprising an auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule is provided, comprising a first nucleic acid sequence whose genetic activity confers an advantage to a microbial host wherein the genetic activity of said first nucleic acid sequence is controlled, and optionally comprising a second nucleic acid sequence that is directly or indirectly involved in the production of a product of interest.
  • an auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule comprising a first nucleic acid sequence whose genetic activity confers an advantage to a microbial host wherein the genetic activity of said first nucleic acid sequence is controlled, and optionally comprising a second nucleic acid sequence that is directly or indirectly involved in the production of a product of interest.
  • microbial organism As used herein, “microbial organism,” “microorganism,” “microbial cell” or “microbial host” and variations of these root terms (such as pluralizations and the like) have their customary and ordinary meanings as understood by one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, including any naturally-occurring species or synthetic or fully synthetic prokaryotic or eukaryotic unicellular organism, as well as Archae species. Thus, this expression can refer to cells of bacterial species, fungal species, and algae. Exemplary microorganisms that can be used in accordance with embodiments herein include, but are not limited to, bacteria, yeast, filamentous fungi, and algae, for example photosynthetic microalgae.
  • microorganism genomes can be synthesized and transplanted into single microbial cells, to produce synthetic microorganisms capable of continuous self-replication (see Gibson et al. (2010), “Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome,” Science 329: 52-56, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety).
  • the microorganism is fully synthetic.
  • a desired combination of genetic elements, including elements that regulate gene expression, and elements encoding gene products for example immunity modulators, poison, antidote, and industrially useful molecules also called product of interest
  • product of interest can be assembled on a desired chassis into a partially or fully synthetic microorganism.
  • Bacillus species for example Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus subtilis , and Bacillus licheniformis
  • Paenibacillus species Streptomyces species, Micrococcus species, Corynebacterium species, Acetobacter species, Cyanobacteria species, Salmonella species, Rhodococcus species, Pseudomonas species, Lactobacillus species, Enterococcus species, Alcaligenes species, Klebsiella species, Paenibacillus species, Arthrobacter species, Corynebacterium species, Brevibacterium species, Thermus aquaticus, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Clostridium thermocellus
  • yeast species and strains can be used in accordance with embodiments herein, and genetically modified variants, or synthetic yeast based on a “chassis” of a known species can be provided.
  • Exemplary yeast with industrially applicable characteristics include, but are not limited to Saccharomyces species (for example, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bayanus, Saccharomyces boulardii ), Candida species (for example, Candida utilis, Candida krusei ), Schizosaccharomyces species (for example Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Schizosaccharomyces japonicas ), Pichia or Hansenula species (for example, Pichia pastoris or Hansenula polymorphd ) species, and Brettanomyces species (for example, Brettanomyces claussenii ).
  • Saccharomyces species for example, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bayanus, Saccharomyces boulardii
  • algae species and strains can be used in accordance with embodiments herein, and genetically modified variants, or synthetic algae based on a “chassis” of a known species can be created.
  • the algae comprises, consists essentially of, or consists of photosynthetic microalgae.
  • filamentous fungal species and strains can be used in accordance with embodiments herein, and genetically modified variants, or synthetic filamentous fungi based on a “chassis” of a known species can be provided.
  • Exemplary filamentous fungi with industrially applicable characteristics include, but are not limited to an Acremonium, Agaricus, Alternaria, Aspergillus, Aureobasidium, Botryosphaeria, Ceriporiopsis, Chaetomidium, Chrysosporium, Claviceps, Cochliobolus, Coprinopsis, Coptotermes, Corynascus, Cryphonectria, Cryptococcus, Diplodia, Exidia, Filibasidium, Fusarium, Gibberella, Holomastigotoides, Humicola, Irpex, Lentinula, Leptospaeria, Magnaporthe, Melanocarpus, Meripilus, Mucor,
  • Species include Acremonium cellulolyticus, Aspergillus aculeatus, Aspergillus awamori, Aspergillus foetidus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus japonicus, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, Chrysosporium inops, Chrysosporium keratinophilum, Chrysosporium lucknowense, Chrysosporium merdarium, Chrysosporium pannicola, Chrysosporium queenslandicum, Chrysosporium tropicum, Chrysosporium zona turn, Fusarium bactridioides, Fusarium cerealis, Fusarium crookwellense, Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium graminum, Fusarium heterosporum, Fusarium negundi, Fu
  • Antibiotic and variations of this root term, have their customary and ordinary meanings as understood by one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, including a metabolite, or an intermediate of a metabolic pathway which can kill or arrest the growth of at least one microbial cell.
  • Some antibiotics can be produced by microbial cells, for example bacteria.
  • Some antibiotics can be synthesized chemically. It is understood that bacteriocins are distinct from antibiotics, at least in that bacteriocins refer to gene products (which, in some embodiments, undergo additional post-translational processing) or synthetic analogs of the same, while antibiotics refer to intermediates or products of metabolic pathways or synthetic analogs of the same.
  • Sequence identity has its customary and ordinary meanings as understood by one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, including a relationship between two or more amino acid (polypeptide or protein) sequences or two or more nucleic acid (polynucleotide) sequences, as determined by comparing the sequences. Usually, sequence identities or similarities are compared over the whole length of the sequences compared. In the art, “identity” can also refer to the degree of sequence relatedness between amino acid or nucleic acid sequences, as the case may be, as determined by the match between strings of such sequences. “Similarity” between two amino acid sequences can be determined by comparing the amino acid sequence and its conserved amino acid substitutes of one polypeptide to the sequence of a second polypeptide. “Identity” and “similarity” can be readily calculated by various methods, known to those skilled in the art. In some embodiments, sequence identity is determined by comparing the whole length of the sequences as identified herein.
  • Some methods to determine identity are designed to give the largest match between the sequences tested. Methods to determine identity and similarity are codified in publicly available computer programs. Computer program methods to determine identity and similarity between two sequences include e.g. the BestFit, BLASTP, BLASTN, and FASTA (Altschul, S. F. et al., J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410 (1990), publicly available from NCBI and other sources (BLAST Manual, Altschul, S., et al., NCBI NLM NIH Bethesda, MD 20894).
  • An algorithm used can be EMBOSS (accessible on the world wide web at www(dot)ebi(dot)ac(dot)uk/emboss/align).
  • Parameters for amino acid sequences comparison using EMBOSS can include gap open 10.0, gap extend 0.5, Blosum 62 matrix.
  • Parameters for nucleic acid sequences comparison using EMBOSS can include gap open 10.0, gap extend 0.5, DNA full matrix (DNA identity matrix).
  • amino acids having aliphatic side chains is glycine, alanine, valine, leucine, and isoleucine; a group of amino acids having aliphatic-hydroxyl side chains is serine and threonine; a group of amino acids having amide-containing side chains is asparagine and glutamine; a group of amino acids having aromatic side chains is phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan; a group of amino acids having basic side chains is lysine, arginine, and histidine; and a group of amino acids having sulphur-containing side chains is cysteine and methionine.
  • Suitable conservative amino acids substitution groups include: valine-leucine-isoleucine, phenylalanine-tyrosine, lysine-arginine, alanine-valine, and asparagine-glutamine Substitutional variants of the amino acid sequence disclosed herein are those in which at least one residue in the disclosed sequences has been removed and a different residue inserted in its place. In some embodiments, the amino acid change is conservative.
  • Suitable conservative substitutions for each of the naturally occurring amino acids include: Ala to ser; Arg to lys; Asn to gln or his; Asp to glu; Cys to ser or ala; Gln to asn; Glu to asp; Gly to pro; His to asn or gln; Ile to leu or val; Leu to ile or val; Lys to arg; gln or glu; Met to leu or ile; Phe to met, leu or tyr; Ser to thr; Thr to ser; Trp to tyr; Tyr to trp or phe; and, Val to ile or leu.
  • homologous has its customary and ordinary meanings as understood by one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, including when used to indicate the relation between a given (recombinant) nucleic acid or polypeptide molecule and a given host organism or host cell, it can be understood to mean that in nature the nucleic acid or polypeptide molecule is produced by a host cell or organisms of the same species, optionally of the same variety or strain. If homologous to a host cell, a nucleic acid sequence encoding a polypeptide will typically be operably linked to another promoter sequence than in its natural environment.
  • the term “homologous” has its customary and ordinary meanings as understood by one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, and can refer to one single-stranded nucleic acid sequence that may hybridize to a complementary single-stranded nucleic acid sequence.
  • the degree of hybridization may depend on a number of factors including the amount of identity between the sequences and the hybridization conditions such as temperature and salt concentration as earlier presented.
  • the region of identity can be greater than about 5 bp, the region of identity can be greater than 10 bp.
  • two nucleic acid or polypeptides sequences are said to be homologous when they have more than 80% identity.
  • heterologous has its customary and ordinary meanings as understood by one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, including when used with respect to a nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) or protein, it can refer to a nucleic acid or protein (also named polypeptide or enzyme) that does not occur naturally as part of the organism, cell, genome or DNA or RNA sequence in which it is present, or that is found in a cell or location or locations in the genome or DNA or RNA sequence that differ from that in which it is found in nature.
  • Heterologous nucleic acids or proteins are not endogenous to the cell into which it is introduced, but has been obtained from another cell or synthetically or recombinantly produced.
  • nucleic acids encode proteins that are not normally produced by the cell in which the DNA is transcribed or expressed.
  • exogenous RNA encodes for proteins not normally expressed in the cell in which the exogenous RNA is present.
  • Heterologous nucleic acids and proteins may also be referred to as foreign nucleic acids or proteins. Any nucleic acid or protein that one of skill in the art would recognize as heterologous or foreign to the cell in which it is expressed is herein encompassed by the term heterologous nucleic acid or protein.
  • heterologous also applies to non-natural combinations of nucleic acid or amino acid sequences, i.e. combinations where at least two of the combined sequences are foreign with respect to each other.
  • operably linked has its customary and ordinary meanings as understood by one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, and can refer to a linkage of polynucleotide elements (or coding sequences or nucleic acid sequence or nucleic acid molecule) in a functional relationship.
  • a nucleic acid sequence is “operably linked” when it is placed into a functional relationship with another nucleic acid sequence.
  • a promoter or enhancer is operably linked to a coding sequence if it affects the transcription of the coding sequence.
  • Operably linked means that the nucleic acid sequences being linked are typically contiguous and, where necessary to join two protein coding regions, contiguous and in reading frame.
  • promoter has its customary and ordinary meanings as understood by one of skill in the art in view of this disclosure, and can refer to a nucleic acid fragment that functions to control the transcription of one or more nucleic acid molecules, located upstream with respect to the direction of transcription of the transcription initiation site of the nucleic acid molecule, and is structurally identified by the presence of a binding site for DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, transcription initiation sites and any other DNA sequences, including, but not limited to transcription factor binding sites, repressor and activator protein binding sites, and any other sequences of nucleotides known to one of skill in the art to act directly or indirectly to regulate/control the amount of transcription from the promoter.
  • a “constitutive” promoter is a promoter that is active under most environmental and developmental conditions.
  • An “inducible” promoter is a promoter that is active under environmental or developmental regulation.
  • the verb “to comprise” and its conjugations is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded.
  • the verb “to consist” may be replaced by “to consist essentially of” meaning that an auto-replicative extra-chromosomal nucleic acid molecule, a microbial host (or a method) as defined herein may comprise additional component(s) (or additional steps) than the ones specifically identified, said additional component(s) (or additional steps) not altering the unique characteristic of the invention.
  • reference to an element by the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the element is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements.
  • the indefinite article “a” or “an” thus usually means “at least one”.
  • SEQ ID NO: 4-698, 720-759 Sequences in tables 1-3 (half DNA/half protein as indicated in the tables)
  • SEQ ID NO: 719 vector pUC-ColV
  • FIG. 1 Construction: pSyn2-McbE/F: containing the gene McbE and F under Ptac.
  • FIG. 2 Construction: pSyn2-McbG: containing the gene McbG under Ptac.
  • FIG. 3 Construction: pMcbG 1.1: containing the gene McbG under P24.
  • FIG. 4 Construction: pMcbG 1.0: containing the gene McbG under P24 LacO.
  • FIG. 5 pBACT5.0 vector
  • FIG. 6 pBACT2.0 vector
  • FIG. 7 pBACT5.0-mcherry vector
  • FIG. 8 Tuning promoter. In the absence of inductor (upper part), repressor can bind to operator and prevent expression of selection gene. In the presence of inductor (lower part), repressor cannot bind to operator allowing expression of selection gene.
  • FIG. 9 Comparison of overexpression of protein X in E. coli with KanR (pKan-pLac) and with 2 immunities against microcines C7 and ColV (pBACT6.0-pLac). 5 mg of total extract was analysed in SDS-PAGE.
  • FIG. 10 Comparison of overexpression of iota-carrageenase protein in E. coli with KanR (pKan-T7prom) and with 2 immunities against microcines C7 and ColV (pBACT5.0-T7prom). 5 mg of total extract was analysed in SDS-PAGE.
  • FIG. 11 Comparison of overexpression of lambda-carrageenase protein in E. coli with KanR (pKan-T7prom) and with 2 immunities against microcines C7 and ColV (pBACT5.0-T7prom). 5 mg of total extract was analysed in SDS-PAGE.
  • mice B17 The vector used for producing Mic B17 is described in the table below.
  • the vector used for producing Mic C7 is Pp70. This vector is based on pBR322 and bears a ⁇ 6000 bp DNA fragment with the mcc gene cluster (as described in Zukher I et al, Nucleic Acids Research, 2014, Vol. 42, No. 19 11891-11902).
  • the vector used for producing ColV is pUC-ColV (SEQ ID NO: 719). This vector is based on pUC57 and bear a ⁇ 5000 bp DNA fragment with the ColV gene cluster. The strains harbouring these recombinant vectors were grown in LB medium at 37° C.
  • the fermented medium was centrifuged and the supernatant flit red on a 0.2 micron filter.
  • the bacteriocin activity present in the supernatant was estimated by the size of the diffusion inhibition growth on a plate containing a sensitive strain.
  • Bacteriocins B17, C7 and ColV produced by fermentation in laboratory are selection agents simple to produce, easy to use and stable in culture medium. These properties are similar to the ones of antibiotics used as classical selection agent.
  • the literature has made it possible to determine the elements necessary for the production of the host against the production of its own bacteriocin, also in the case of B17 bacteriocin: McbG for B17, represented by SEQ ID NO: 699 and pumps (McbE and McbF for B17, represented by SEQ ID NO: 703). These genes are known to be necessary (or more precisely involved in protection against the action of bacteriocin B17).
  • the literature for the B17 locus does not identify which is or is the sufficient element to give resistance.
  • MccE which is represented by SEQ ID NO: 701 is sufficient to confer resistance to bacteriocin C7.
  • SEQ ID NO: 710 represents the construct proC-McbG-CterMccE
  • SEQ ID NO: 711 represents the construct proC-Cvi-CterMccE
  • Example 3 Can we Generate a Selectable Marker Using Little or No Energy from the Bacteria from McbG?
  • McbG gene was cloned under a weak promoter P24 (SEQ ID NO: 707).
  • the P24 promoter was described in Braatsch S et al, Biotechniques. 2008 Sep.; 45(3):335-7.
  • strains used are the following:
  • ⁇ DE3 ⁇ sBamHIo ⁇ EcoRI-B int::(lacI::PlacUV5::T7 gene1) i21 ⁇ nin5
  • the BL21(DE3) strain was transformed with vector pMcbG1.0 or pMcbG1.1 (see FIG. 3 or 4 ). After transformation, transformants were selected on plates containing B17. Isolated colonies were re-grown and the plasmid they contained was analyzed by gel electrophoresis after treatment with relevant restriction enzymes.
  • McbG a weak transcription of McbG is sufficient to give the resistance to B17.
  • this selection marker is inducible via the P24 LacO promoter and that the vectors containing this gene gives the phenotype of resistance only in presence of IPTG.
  • McbG gene it is possible to use the McbG gene as a selectable marker either constitutively or inducibly. Thus, it is shown that constitutive expression at a low level and inducible expression according to the need during the process, allows to reduce the energy burden for the producing cell, without loss of the plasmid from the producing cell.
  • SEQ ID NO: 714 represents the construct used for producing the m-cherry protein. This construct is depicted in FIG. 7 .
  • the m-cherry protein was produced and visualised as the bacterial colony turns red on petri dish in the presence of IPTG.
  • FIG. 9 shows the comparison of overexpression of protein X in E. coli with KanR (pKan-pLac) and with 2 immunities against microcines C7 and ColV (pBACT6.0-pLac). 5 mg of total extract was analysed in SDS-PAGE.
  • FIG. 10 shows the comparison of overexpression of iota-carrageenase protein in E. coli with KanR (pKan-T7prom) and with 2 immunities against microcines C7 and ColV (pBACT5.0-T7prom). 5 mg of total extract was analysed in SDS-PAGE.
  • the vector used is based on the pBACT5.0 vector (SEQ ID NO: 712).
  • FIG. 11 shows the comparison of overexpression of lambda-carrageenase protein in E. coli with KanR (pKan-T7prom) and with 2 immunities against microcines C7 and ColV (pBACT5.0-T7prom). 5 mg of total extract was analysed in SDS-PAGE. The vector used is based on the pBACT5.0 vector (SEQ ID NO: 712).
  • the weak constitutive proC promoter used in this example allows to reduce the energy burden for the host.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
US16/955,720 2017-12-19 2018-12-19 Fermentation process Active 2040-01-24 US11932672B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP17208600 2017-12-19
EP17208600 2017-12-19
EP17208600.1 2017-12-19
PCT/EP2018/085941 WO2019121983A1 (en) 2017-12-19 2018-12-19 Fermentation process

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20210070812A1 US20210070812A1 (en) 2021-03-11
US11932672B2 true US11932672B2 (en) 2024-03-19

Family

ID=60781747

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/955,720 Active 2040-01-24 US11932672B2 (en) 2017-12-19 2018-12-19 Fermentation process

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US11932672B2 (ko)
EP (1) EP3728292A1 (ko)
JP (1) JP2021506328A (ko)
KR (1) KR20200116084A (ko)
CN (1) CN111757890A (ko)
BR (1) BR112020012543A2 (ko)
WO (1) WO2019121983A1 (ko)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BR122021015417B1 (pt) 2013-08-19 2022-11-08 Syngulon Sa Célula microbiana geneticamente engenheirada que compreende um ácido nucleico que codifica uma bacteriocina
JP2021506328A (ja) 2017-12-19 2021-02-22 シンギュロン・ソシエテ・アノニム 発酵プロセス
JP2022545085A (ja) * 2019-08-19 2022-10-25 ベイラー ユニバーシティ ガイド抗菌ペプチドのプロバイオティクス送達
WO2021064250A2 (en) * 2019-10-04 2021-04-08 University Of Plymouth Antimicrobial peptides
WO2021154872A1 (en) * 2020-01-27 2021-08-05 General Probiotics, Inc. Compositions including probiotic bacteria for the expression and secretion of enterocins to control clostridia perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis in livestock and related methods
WO2023041435A1 (en) * 2021-09-14 2023-03-23 Syngulon S.A. Bacteriocin for applications against mycobacterium
CN114478722B (zh) * 2022-02-09 2023-07-21 淮北师范大学 一种细菌素Bacin A1及其应用

Citations (41)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0556790A (ja) 1991-02-26 1993-03-09 Imperial Chem Ind Plc <Ici> ベクター、非相同ポリペプチドを表現することのできる宿主、その製法、ポリペプチドの製法及び複製可能なプラスミド表現ベヒクル
WO1994003616A2 (fr) 1992-07-31 1994-02-17 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Vecteur de clonage et/ou de sequençage
US5300431A (en) 1991-02-26 1994-04-05 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Positive selection vector for the bacteriophage P1 cloning system
US5549895A (en) 1993-05-17 1996-08-27 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Method and colicin composition for inhibiting Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in food products
WO1997013401A1 (en) 1995-10-13 1997-04-17 Purdue Research Foundation Method for the production of hybrid plants
WO1997014805A2 (en) 1995-10-17 1997-04-24 Biostar, Inc. Methods for production of recombinant plasmids
US5631153A (en) 1989-08-22 1997-05-20 University Of Utah Cells and non-human organisms containing predetermined genomic modifications and positive-negative selection methods and vectors for making same
US5670370A (en) 1986-03-26 1997-09-23 Gx Biosystems A/S Biological containment
US5855732A (en) 1994-11-22 1999-01-05 Nec Corporation Outer lead bonding apparatus and method of bonding lead to substrate
WO1999002555A1 (en) 1997-07-09 1999-01-21 The Governors Of The University Of Alberta Novel bacteriocins, transport and vector system and method of use thereof
US5888732A (en) 1995-06-07 1999-03-30 Life Technologies, Inc. Recombinational cloning using engineered recombination sites
WO1999021977A1 (en) 1997-10-24 1999-05-06 Life Technologies, Inc. Recombinational cloning using nucleic acids having recombination sites
WO1999058652A2 (en) 1998-05-07 1999-11-18 Gx Biosystems A/S Cytotoxin-based biological containment
US6143557A (en) 1995-06-07 2000-11-07 Life Technologies, Inc. Recombination cloning using engineered recombination sites
WO2001031039A1 (en) 1999-10-25 2001-05-03 Invitrogen Corporation Methods of manipulating and sequencing nucleic acid molecules using transposition and recombination
WO2001042509A1 (en) 1999-12-10 2001-06-14 Invitrogen Corporation Use of multiple recombination sites with unique specificity in recombinational cloning
EP1111061A1 (en) 1999-12-20 2001-06-27 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Double selection vector
US6271359B1 (en) 1999-04-14 2001-08-07 Musc Foundation For Research Development Tissue-specific and pathogen-specific toxic agents and ribozymes
WO2002012474A2 (de) 2000-08-03 2002-02-14 Mpb Cologne Gmbh Verfahren zur selektion auf wirtszellen mit eliminierten dna-sequenzen
WO2002066657A1 (en) 2001-02-23 2002-08-29 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Method for the selection of recombinant clones comprising a sequence encoding an antidote protein to a toxic molecule
US6528285B1 (en) 1997-11-06 2003-03-04 Texel Non RCR leuconostoc plasmid capable of being transferred into lactic acid bacteria, use as cloning and expressing tool
WO2004022745A2 (en) 2002-09-03 2004-03-18 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Reversible, parallel and multitask cloning method and kit
US20050130308A1 (en) 1992-07-31 2005-06-16 Philippe Bernard Cloning and/or sequencing vector
US20050260585A1 (en) 2002-03-19 2005-11-24 Cedric Szpirer Poison/antidote genetic systems for the selection of genetically modified eucaryote cells or organisms
WO2009011940A2 (en) 2007-04-06 2009-01-22 University Of Maryland, Baltimore Microcin h47 plasmid selection system
WO2010060057A1 (en) 2008-11-22 2010-05-27 Southern Illinois University Edwarsville Bacteriocin based methods to control lactic acid bacterial growth
US20100330041A1 (en) 2009-05-27 2010-12-30 Bayrock Dennis P Viral-based antimicrobial agent use in ethanol production
EP2543255A1 (en) 2011-07-04 2013-01-09 CSK Food Enrichment B.V. Anti-listerial mixed culture and method for producing cheese
US20130115658A1 (en) 2002-09-03 2013-05-09 Cédric Szpirer Reversible, parallel and multitask cloning method and kit
US8476048B2 (en) 2010-12-17 2013-07-02 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Xylose utilizing zymomonas mobilis with improved ethanol production in biomass hydrolysate medium
JP2014502501A (ja) 2010-12-21 2014-02-03 フジフィルム・ダイオシンス・バイオテクノロジーズ ・ユーケイ・リミテッド 発現プロセス
US8697426B2 (en) 2012-06-15 2014-04-15 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Contaminant control in Zymomonas fermentation using virginiamycin
US20140148379A1 (en) 2012-11-28 2014-05-29 Mei Liu Control of Unwanted Bacteria in Fermentation Systems with Bacteriocin
US20140178956A1 (en) 2012-12-20 2014-06-26 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Stabilized chlorine dioxide for contamination control in zymomonas fermentation
US20150050253A1 (en) 2013-08-19 2015-02-19 Syngulon Sa. Controlled growth of microorganisms
WO2019046577A1 (en) 2017-08-31 2019-03-07 Syngulon Sa METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF BACTERIOCIN AND ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDES
WO2019121983A1 (en) 2017-12-19 2019-06-27 Syngulon S.A. Fermentation process
WO2019236761A1 (en) 2018-06-06 2019-12-12 Syngulon Sa Engineering antimicrobial peptides
US20220017573A1 (en) 2018-11-22 2022-01-20 Syngulon S.A. Peptides for inducing bacteriocin synthesis and methods to identify and/or select and/or optimize the same
WO2022104321A1 (en) 2020-11-10 2022-05-19 Syngulon Sa. Modulating antimicrobial peptide half-life
WO2022104320A1 (en) 2020-11-10 2022-05-19 Syngulon Sa. Control of microorganisms in microbial communities

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997008553A1 (en) * 1995-08-22 1997-03-06 The Regents Of The University Of California Targeting of proteins to the cell wall of gram-positive bacteria

Patent Citations (63)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5670370A (en) 1986-03-26 1997-09-23 Gx Biosystems A/S Biological containment
US5631153A (en) 1989-08-22 1997-05-20 University Of Utah Cells and non-human organisms containing predetermined genomic modifications and positive-negative selection methods and vectors for making same
US5300431A (en) 1991-02-26 1994-04-05 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Positive selection vector for the bacteriophage P1 cloning system
JPH0556790A (ja) 1991-02-26 1993-03-09 Imperial Chem Ind Plc <Ici> ベクター、非相同ポリペプチドを表現することのできる宿主、その製法、ポリペプチドの製法及び複製可能なプラスミド表現ベヒクル
US5910438A (en) 1992-07-31 1999-06-08 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Cloning and/or sequencing vector
WO1994003616A2 (fr) 1992-07-31 1994-02-17 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Vecteur de clonage et/ou de sequençage
US20050130308A1 (en) 1992-07-31 2005-06-16 Philippe Bernard Cloning and/or sequencing vector
US6180407B1 (en) 1992-07-31 2001-01-30 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Cloning and/or sequencing vector
US7176029B2 (en) 1992-07-31 2007-02-13 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Cloning and/or sequencing vector
US5549895A (en) 1993-05-17 1996-08-27 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Method and colicin composition for inhibiting Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in food products
US5855732A (en) 1994-11-22 1999-01-05 Nec Corporation Outer lead bonding apparatus and method of bonding lead to substrate
US6171861B1 (en) 1995-06-07 2001-01-09 Life Technologies, Inc. Recombinational cloning using engineered recombination sites
US6270969B1 (en) 1995-06-07 2001-08-07 Invitrogen Corporation Recombinational cloning using engineered recombination sites
US6143557A (en) 1995-06-07 2000-11-07 Life Technologies, Inc. Recombination cloning using engineered recombination sites
US5888732A (en) 1995-06-07 1999-03-30 Life Technologies, Inc. Recombinational cloning using engineered recombination sites
WO1997013401A1 (en) 1995-10-13 1997-04-17 Purdue Research Foundation Method for the production of hybrid plants
US5922583A (en) 1995-10-17 1999-07-13 Biostar Inc. Methods for production of recombinant plasmids
WO1997014805A2 (en) 1995-10-17 1997-04-24 Biostar, Inc. Methods for production of recombinant plasmids
WO1999002555A1 (en) 1997-07-09 1999-01-21 The Governors Of The University Of Alberta Novel bacteriocins, transport and vector system and method of use thereof
WO1999021977A1 (en) 1997-10-24 1999-05-06 Life Technologies, Inc. Recombinational cloning using nucleic acids having recombination sites
US6528285B1 (en) 1997-11-06 2003-03-04 Texel Non RCR leuconostoc plasmid capable of being transferred into lactic acid bacteria, use as cloning and expressing tool
US7595186B2 (en) 1998-05-07 2009-09-29 Université Libre de Bruxelles Cytotoxin-based biological containment
US7595185B2 (en) 1998-05-07 2009-09-29 Université Libre de Bruxelles Cytotoxin-based biological containment
WO1999058652A2 (en) 1998-05-07 1999-11-18 Gx Biosystems A/S Cytotoxin-based biological containment
US7183097B1 (en) 1998-05-07 2007-02-27 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Cytotoxin-based biological containment
US6271359B1 (en) 1999-04-14 2001-08-07 Musc Foundation For Research Development Tissue-specific and pathogen-specific toxic agents and ribozymes
WO2001031039A1 (en) 1999-10-25 2001-05-03 Invitrogen Corporation Methods of manipulating and sequencing nucleic acid molecules using transposition and recombination
WO2001042509A1 (en) 1999-12-10 2001-06-14 Invitrogen Corporation Use of multiple recombination sites with unique specificity in recombinational cloning
WO2001046444A1 (en) 1999-12-20 2001-06-28 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Double selection vector
EP1111061A1 (en) 1999-12-20 2001-06-27 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Double selection vector
WO2002012474A2 (de) 2000-08-03 2002-02-14 Mpb Cologne Gmbh Verfahren zur selektion auf wirtszellen mit eliminierten dna-sequenzen
DE10038573A1 (de) 2000-08-03 2002-02-21 Mpb Cologne Gmbh Molecular Pla Verfahren zur Selektion auf Wirtszellen mit eliminierten DNA-Sequenzen
US20040115811A1 (en) 2001-02-23 2004-06-17 Philippe Gabant Method for the selection of recombination clones comprising a sequence encoding an antidote protein to a toxic molecule
US8470580B2 (en) 2001-02-23 2013-06-25 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Method for the selection of recombination clones comprising a sequence encoding an antidote protein to a toxic molecule
US20130280810A1 (en) 2001-02-23 2013-10-24 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Method for the selection of recombinant clones comprising a sequence encoding an antidote protein to toxic molecule
US8877504B2 (en) 2001-02-23 2014-11-04 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Method for the selection of recombinant clones comprising a sequence encoding an antidote protein to toxic molecule
WO2002066657A1 (en) 2001-02-23 2002-08-29 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Method for the selection of recombinant clones comprising a sequence encoding an antidote protein to a toxic molecule
US20050260585A1 (en) 2002-03-19 2005-11-24 Cedric Szpirer Poison/antidote genetic systems for the selection of genetically modified eucaryote cells or organisms
US8318497B2 (en) 2002-09-03 2012-11-27 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Reversible, parallel and multitask cloning method and kit
US20130115658A1 (en) 2002-09-03 2013-05-09 Cédric Szpirer Reversible, parallel and multitask cloning method and kit
WO2004022745A2 (en) 2002-09-03 2004-03-18 Universite Libre De Bruxelles Reversible, parallel and multitask cloning method and kit
WO2009011940A2 (en) 2007-04-06 2009-01-22 University Of Maryland, Baltimore Microcin h47 plasmid selection system
WO2010060057A1 (en) 2008-11-22 2010-05-27 Southern Illinois University Edwarsville Bacteriocin based methods to control lactic acid bacterial growth
US20100330041A1 (en) 2009-05-27 2010-12-30 Bayrock Dennis P Viral-based antimicrobial agent use in ethanol production
US8476048B2 (en) 2010-12-17 2013-07-02 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Xylose utilizing zymomonas mobilis with improved ethanol production in biomass hydrolysate medium
JP2014502501A (ja) 2010-12-21 2014-02-03 フジフィルム・ダイオシンス・バイオテクノロジーズ ・ユーケイ・リミテッド 発現プロセス
EP2543255A1 (en) 2011-07-04 2013-01-09 CSK Food Enrichment B.V. Anti-listerial mixed culture and method for producing cheese
US8697426B2 (en) 2012-06-15 2014-04-15 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Contaminant control in Zymomonas fermentation using virginiamycin
US20140148379A1 (en) 2012-11-28 2014-05-29 Mei Liu Control of Unwanted Bacteria in Fermentation Systems with Bacteriocin
US20140178956A1 (en) 2012-12-20 2014-06-26 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Stabilized chlorine dioxide for contamination control in zymomonas fermentation
US11427800B2 (en) 2013-08-19 2022-08-30 Syngulon Sa Controlled growth of microorganisms
US20150050253A1 (en) 2013-08-19 2015-02-19 Syngulon Sa. Controlled growth of microorganisms
US9333227B2 (en) 2013-08-19 2016-05-10 Syngulon Sa. Controlled growth of microorganisms
US10188114B2 (en) 2013-08-19 2019-01-29 Syngulon Sa Controlled growth of microorganisms
US20230193191A1 (en) 2013-08-19 2023-06-22 Syngulon Sa Controlled growth of microorganisms
WO2019046577A1 (en) 2017-08-31 2019-03-07 Syngulon Sa METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF BACTERIOCIN AND ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDES
US11492651B2 (en) 2017-08-31 2022-11-08 Syngulon Sa Methods and compositions for making bacteriocins and antimicrobial peptides
WO2019121983A1 (en) 2017-12-19 2019-06-27 Syngulon S.A. Fermentation process
WO2019236761A1 (en) 2018-06-06 2019-12-12 Syngulon Sa Engineering antimicrobial peptides
US20210238645A1 (en) 2018-06-06 2021-08-05 Syngulon Sa. Engineering antimicrobial peptides
US20220017573A1 (en) 2018-11-22 2022-01-20 Syngulon S.A. Peptides for inducing bacteriocin synthesis and methods to identify and/or select and/or optimize the same
WO2022104320A1 (en) 2020-11-10 2022-05-19 Syngulon Sa. Control of microorganisms in microbial communities
WO2022104321A1 (en) 2020-11-10 2022-05-19 Syngulon Sa. Modulating antimicrobial peptide half-life

Non-Patent Citations (145)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
(1992) Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, Keystone Symposia on Molecular & Cellular Biology, 104.
Abremski, et al. (1984) Bacteriophage P1 Site-specific Recombination. J. Bio. I. Chem. 259(3):1509-1514.
Acuna, et al., FEBS Open Bio, 2: 12-19, 2012.
Adetunji and Olaoye, Malaysian Journal of Microbiology 9: 130-13, 2013.
Aizenman, et al. (1996) An Escherichia coli chromosomal "addiction module" regulated by 3′, 5′-bispyroohosohate: A modayk for programmed bacterial cell death. Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. 93:6059-6063.
Allison et al., Functional analysis of the Gene Encoding Immunity to Lactacin F, lafi, and its use as a Lactobacillus-Specific, Food-Grade Genetic Marker, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 62, No. 12, pp. 4450-4460, 1996.
Altschul, S.F., et al., "Basic local alignment search tool", J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410, 1990.
Backman, et al., (1983), "Tetracycline Resistance Determined by pBR322 is Mediated by one Polypeptide." Gene 26. pp. 197-203.
Bacteriocin, Wikipedia, http://en.wikpedia.org/wiki/Bacteriocin Printed on Oct. 3, 2014.
Bahassi, et al. (1995) F plasmid CcdB killer protein: ccd8 gene mutants coding for non-cy1otoxic proteins which retain their regulatory functions. Molecular Microbiology 15(6:1031-1037.
Bahassi, et al. (1995) F plasmid CcdB killer protein: ccd8 gene mutants coding for non-cy1otoxic proteins which retain their regulatory functions. Molecular Microbiology 15(6\:1031-1037.
Basanta, A. et al. Developement of Bacteriocinogenic Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Heterologously Expressing and Secreting the Leaderless Enterocin L50 Peptides L50A and L50B fro1n Enterococcz1s faeciurn L50, Applied And Environmental Microbiology, vol. 75, No. 8 p. 2382-2392, 200.
Baum, "Tn5401, a New Class II Transposable Element from Bacillus thuringiensis," Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 176. No. 10, May 1994, pp. 2835-2845.
Baunonis, et al. (1993) Genomic Targeting with Purified Cre Recombinase. Nucleic Acids Research 21 (9):2025-2029.
Bech et al., "Sequence of the reLB transcription unit from Escherichia coli and Identification of the reLB gene," The EMBO Journal, vol. 4, No. 4 00.1059-1066 1985.
Bernard (1996) Positive Selection of Recombinant DNA by CcdB. BioTechniques 21(2)320-323.
Bernard et al., 1992 "Cell killing, by the F plasmid CcdB protein involves poisoning of DNA-topoisomerase II complexes," J. Mol. Biol. 226:735-745.
Bernard, et al. (1991) The 41 carboxy-terminal residues of the miniF plasmid CcdA protein are sufficient to antagonize the killer activity of the CcdB protein. Mol. Gen Genet 226:297-304.
Bernard, P., et al. (1994) Positive-Selection Vectors Using the F Plasmid cedB Killer Gene. Gene 148, pp. 71-74.
Bex, et al. (1983) Mini-F encoded proteins: identification of a new 10.5 kilodalton species. The EMBO Journal,2(11):1853-1861.
Biswas, et al. (1993) High-Efficiency Gene Inactivation and Replacement System for Gram-Positive Bacteria. J. Bacteriology 175(11):3628-3635.
Bochner, et al. (1980) Positive Selection for loss of Tetracycline Resistance. J. Bacteriology 143(2):923-933.
Borrero J. et al., Cloning, Production, and Functional Expression of the Bacteriodn Enterocin A, Produced by Enterococcus faecium 'TI 36, by the Yeasts Pichia pastoris, Kluyveromyces lactis, Flansenula polyn1orpha, and Arxula adeninivorans, Applied and Environmental Mkrobiology, vol. 78, No. 16, p. 5956-5961, 2012.
Boyd (1993) Turbo Cloning: A Fast, Efficient Method for Cloning PCR Products and Other Blunt-Ended DNA Fragments into Plasmids. Nucleic Acids Research 21(4):817-821.
Bravo, et al. (1988) Killing of Escherichia coli cells modulated by components of the stability system ParD of plasmid R1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 215:146-151.
Brede et al., Identification Of The Propionicin F Bacteriocin Immunity Gene (Pcfi) And Development Of A Food0Grade Cloning System For Propionibacterium Freudenreichii, Applied And Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, No. 23, pp. 7542-7547, 2007.
Bubeck, et al. (1993) Rapid Cloning by Homologous Recombination in vivo. Nucleic Acids Research 21(15):3601-3602.
Bult, "Complete Genome Sequence of the Methanogenic Archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii," Science, vol. 273 Aug. 23, 1996.00.1058-1073.
Burns, et al. (1984) Positive Selection Vectors: A Small Plasmid Vector Useful for the Direct Selection of Sau2A-aenerated overlapping DNA Fragments. Gene 27:323-325.
Campelo et al., "A bacteriocin gene cluster able to enhance plasmid maintenance in Lactococcus lactis", Microbial Cell Factories 2014, 13:77. Accessible on the world wide web at www.microbialcellfactories.com/content/13/1/77. 9 oaqes.
Cole et al., "Deciphering the Biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the Complete Genome Sequence," Nature vol. 393, Jun. 11, 1998 Do.537-544.
Cotter, P. D. et al., "Bacteriocins-a viable alternative to antibiotics", Nature Reviews Microbiology 11:95-105, 2013.
Couturier, et al. (1998) Bacterial death by DNA gyrase poisoning. Trends in Microbiology 6(7):269-275.
Craine, (1982) Novel Selection for Tetracycline-or Chloramphenicol-Sensitive Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriology 151(1):487-490.
Cui et al., "Class IIa Bacteriocins: Diversity and New Developments", Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 13, pp. 16668-16707, 2012.
Daw et al., "Bacteriocins: Nature, Function and Structure", Micron, vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 467-479, 1996.
D'Souza, S.F., "Microbial biosensors", Biosensors & Bioelectronics, vol. 16, 2001, pp. 337-353.
Duquesne et al., Microcins, Gene-Encoded Antibacterial Peptides From Enterobacteria, The Journal Of The Royal Society Of Chemistry, vol. 24, pp. 708-734, 2007.
Ebert et al. "A Moloney MLV-Rat Somatotropin Fusion Gene Produces Biologically Active Somatotropin in a transgenic pig." Molecular Endocrinology. 2:277-283, 1988.
Fang et al., Use of mchl Encoding Immunity to the antimicrobial peptide microcin H47 as a Plasmid Selection Marker in Attenuated Bacterial Live Vectors, Infection and Immunity, vol. 76, No. 10, pp. 4422-4430, 2008.
Fleischmann et al., "Whole-Genome Random Sequencing and Assembly of Haemophilus Influenza Rd," Science, Vo1.269. 00.496-512 Jul. 28, 1995.
Gabant et al., 1997 "Bifunctional lacZ a-ccdB genes for selective cloning of PCR products," Biotechniques 23:938-941.
Gabant et al., 1998 "Direct selection cloning vectors adapted to the genetic analysis of gram-negative bacteria and their plasmids," Gene 207:87-92.
Gabant et al., 2000 "New positive selection system based on the parD (kislkid) system of the R1 plasmid," Biotechniques 28:784-788.
Gabant et al., 2001 "Use of poison/antidote systems for selective cloning," in Plasmid Biology 2000: International, Symposium on Molecular Bioloy of Bacterial Plasmids, Meeting Abstracts, 00.135-170, Plasmid 45:160-161.
Gajic et al., "Novel Mechanism of Bacteriocin Secretion and Immunity Carried Out by Lactococcal Multidrug Resistance Proteins*", The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Sep. 5, 2003, vol. 278, No. 36, DD. 34291-34298.
Gerard et al., Bactericidal Activity of Colicin V Is Mediated by an Inner Membrane Protein, SdaC, of Escherichia coli, Journal Of Bacteriology, vol. 187, No. 6, pp. 1945-1950, Mar. 2005.
Gerdes (2000) Toxin-Antitoxin modules may regulate synthesis of macromolecules during nutritional stress. Journal of Bacteriology 182:561-572.
Gerdes, et al. "RNA antitoxins." (2007) Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 10, p. 117-124.
Gibson et al., "Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome", Science, vol. 329, pp. 52-56, 2010.
Goni-Moreno, et al., "Multicellular Computing Using Conjugation for Wiring", PLoS One 8(6): e65986, 2013.
Gossen, J. A., et al. (1992) Application of Galactose-Sensitive E.coli Strains as Selective Hosts for LacZ Plasmids. Nucleic Acids Res. 20.0.3254.
Gotfredsen, et al., "The Escherichia coli relBE genes belong to a new toxin-antitoxin gene family" Molecular Microbiology (1998) 29(4): 1065-1076.
Green and Sambrook, "Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual", Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 4th edition, 2012.
Gronenborn (1978) Methylation of single-stranded DNA in vitro introduces new restriction endonuclease cleavage sites. Nature, 272:375-377.
Gronlund et al., "Toxin-Antitoxin Systems Homologous with relBE of Escherichia coli Plasmid P307 are Ubiquitous in Prokaryotes," Journal of Molecular Biology, Vo1.285, No. 4, Jan. 29, 1999, pp. 1401-1415.
Guilfoyle, R.A., and I.M. Smith (1994) "A Direct Selection Strategy for Stotgun Cloning and Sequencing in the Bacteriophage M13." Nucleic Acids Res.22, pp. 100-107.
Guzman et al. 1995 "Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAO promoter," J. Bacteriol. 177:4121-4130.
Hammer et al. "Genetic Engineering of Mammalian Embryos." J. Anim. Sci. 63:269-278, 1986.
Hartley et al., DNA cloning using in vitro site-specific recombination: Genome Res. 10:1788-1795, 2000.
Hasan et al., Gene, vol. 56, pp. 145, 1987.
Hebsgaard, S.M., et al. (1996) "Splice Site Prediction in Arabidopsis thaliana Pre-mRNA by Combining Local and Global Sequence information." Nucleic Acids Research, 24(17) 3439-3452.
Henrich et al. 1986 "Use of the lysis gene of bacteriophage X174 for the construction of a positive selection vector," Gene 42:345-349.
Herrero, M., et al., (1990) "Transposon Vectors Containing Non-Antibiotic Resistance Selection markers for Cloning and Stable Chromosomal Insertion of Foreign Genes in Gram-Negative Bacteria." J. Bact. 172,11, pp. 6557-6567.
Holt, et al. (1993) A Novel Phage λ Replacement Cre-lox Vector that has Automatic Subcloning Capabilities, Gene 133:95-97.
Inglis, et al., "The Role of Bacteriocins as Selfish Genetic Elements". Biology Letters, Issue 9, vol. Jun. 3, 2013. Published Apr. 24, 2013, DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.1173. 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 11, 2019 in International Application No. PCT/EP2018/085941.
Ioannou, et al. (1994) A new bacteriophage P1-derived vector for the propagation of large human DNA fragments, Nature Genetics 6:84-89.
Jaramillo, A., "Synthetic Biology—Engineered stable ecosystems". Nature Microbiology, vol. 2, No. 17119, pp. 1-2, Jul. 25, 2017.
Jensen et al., 1995 "Comparison of ccd of F, parDE of RP4, and parD of R1 using a novel conditional replication control system of plasmid R1," Molecular Microbiology 17:211-220.
Jensen et al., 1995 Programmed cell death in bacteria: protect plasmid stabilization systems, Molecular Microbiology 17:205-210.
Kaneko et al., "Sequence Analysis of the Genome of the Unicellular Cyanobacterium synechocystis sp. Strain PCC6803. II. Sequence Determination of the Entire Genome and Assignment of Potential Protein-Coding Regions " DNA Research, vol. 3, 00.109-136.1996.
Karoui, et al. (1983) Ham22, a mini-F mutation which is lethal to host cell and promotes recA-dependent induction of lambdoid prophage. The EMBO Journal. 2(11): 1863-1868.
Kobayashi, M., et al., Promoter selectivity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: effect of base substitutions in the promoter-35 region on promoter strength. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:7367-7372, 1990.
Kristoffersen et al. "Bacterial Toxin-Antitoxin Gene Systems as Containment Control in Yeast Cells" Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66 No. 12, Dec. 2000, p. 5524-5526.
Kuhn et al. 1986 "Positive-selection vectors utilizing lethality of the EcoRI endonuclease," Gene 44:253-263.
Landy, Arthur, 1989 Dynamic, structural, and regulatory aspects of A site-specific recombination: Annu. Rev. Biochem 58:913-949.
Lehnherr, et al. (1993) Plasmid Addiction Genes of Bacteriophage P1: doc, which cause cell death on curing of prophage, and phd, which prevents host death when prophage is retained. J. Mol. Biol. 233:414-428.
LIU (1989) DNA Topoisomerase poisons as antitumor drugs. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58:351-375.
Maki, et al.(1992) Modulation of DNA Supercoiling Activity of Escherichia coli DNA Gyrase by F Plasmid Proteins, The Journal of Biological Chemistry vol. 267(17):12244-12251.
Maloy, et al. (1981) Selection for Loss of Tetracycline Resistance by Escherichia coli, Journal of Bacteriology, 145(2):1110-1112.
Manning, P.A., "Nucleotide Sequence encoding the Mannose-fucose-resistant Hemagglutinin of Vibrio Cholerae 01 and Construction of a Mutant," EMBL Sequence Database, Aug. 7, 1993. pp.1-7.
Maxwell, et al. (1986) Mechanistic aspects of DNA Topoisomerases. Advan. Protein Chem. 38:69-107.
McAuliffe et al., "Identification and overexpression of Itnl, a novel gene which confers immunity to the two-component lantibiotic lacticin 3147", Microbiology, 2000, vol. 146, pp. 129-138.
McBride, et al., "Contamination management in Low Cost Open Algae Ponds for Biofuels Production", Industrial Biotechnology, vol. 10, pp. 221-227, 2014.
Messing, et al. (1977) Filamentous coliphage M13 as a cloning vehicle: Insertion of a HindII Fragment of the lac regulatory region in M13 replicative form in vitro. Proc Nail. Acad. Sci. 74(9):3642-3646.
Miki, et al. (1984) Control of Cell Division by Sex Factor F in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Bioi. 174:627-646.
Moreadith et al. "Gene Targeting in Embryonic Stem Cells: The new Physiology and metabolism." J. Mol. Med. 75:208-216 1997.
Mori, Hirotada, et al., "Prophage A Induction Caused by Mini-F Plasmid Genes." (1984) Mol Gen Genet 196:185-193.
Mullins et al. "Perspective Series: Molecular Medicine in Genetically Engineered Animals." J. Clin. Invest. 98 (Suppl.): 837-S40, 1996.
Murphy, et al. (1991), pAZd39: A New Type of cDNA Expression Vector for Low Background, High Efficiency Directional Cloning. Nucleic Acids Research 19(12):3403-3408.
Muyrers et al. 2001 "Techniques: recombinogenic engineering—new 'options for cloning and manipulating DNA," Trends in Biochem. Sci. 26:325-331.
Nilsson, et al. (1983) An Improved Positive Selection Plasmid Vector Constructed by Oligonucleotide Mediated Mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Research 11 (22):8019-8029.
Nomura M., "Colicins and Related Bacteriocins", Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 21, pp. 257-284, Oct. 1967.
Norrander, et al. (1983) Construction of improved M13 vectors using oligodeoxynucleotide-directed mutagenesis. Gene 26:101-106.
Office Action with English Translation in Japanese Patent Application No. 2020-535048, dated May 17, 2023 in 19 pages.
Ogura, et al. (1983) Mini-F plasmid genes that couple host cell division to plasmid proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:4784-4788.
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food on a Request from the Commission Related to the use of Nisin (E 234) as a food additive. Question No. EFSA-Q-2005-031. Adopted on Jan. 26, 2006. The EFSA Journal (2006) 314, pp. 1-16.
Pag et al., "Molecular Analysis of Expression of the Lantibiotic Pep5 Immunity Phenotype", Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Feb. 1999, vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 591-598.
Peakman, et al. (1992) Highly Efficient Generation of Recombinant Baculoviruses by Enzymatically Mediated Site-Specific in vitro Recombination. Nucleic Acids Research 20(3):495-500.
Pecota, et al. "Combining the hok/sok, parDE, and pnd Postsegregational Killer Loci to Enhance Plasmid Stability." (1997) Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 63, p. 1917-1924.
PGT-N28 Vector DNA (catalog #N3728) New England Biolabs Online Catalog, Jun. 2, 1999, p. 1, www.neb.comlneb/products/nucleicJ307-28.html the whole document.
Pierce et al. 1992 "A positive selection vector for cloning high molecular weight DNA by the bacteriophage P1 system: improved cloning efficacy," PNAS USA 89:2056-2060.
PKO Scrambler Series Gene Targeting Vectors for Knockout Mice. Stratagene Online Catalog, Jan. 1998, pp. 1-3; www.stratagene.com/cellbio/toxicology/pko.htm, the whole document.
Pomares et al., "Potential Applicability of Chymotrypsin-Susceptible Microcin J25 Derivatives to Food Preservation", Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 75, No. 17, pp. 5734-5738, Sep. 2009.
Reeves et al., Engineering Escherichia coli into a Protein Delivery Systemn for Mammalian Cells ACS Synth. Biol. 2015, 4 ,644-654.
Riley et al., "Bacteriocins: Evolution, Ecology, and Application", Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 2002, vol. 56, pp. 117-137.
Roberts, et al. (1992) Definition of a Minimal Plasmid Stabilization System from the Broad-Host-Range Plasmid RK2. Journal of Bacteriology Dec. 1992:8119-8132.
Roberts, et al. (1994) The parDE operon of the broad-host-range plasmid RK2 specifies growth inhibition associated with plasmid loss. J. Mol. Biol. 18; 237 (1): 35-51.
Roca, et al. (1992) A Hit-and-Run System for Targeted Genetic Manipulations in Yeast. Nucleic Acid Research 20(17):4671-4672.
Ruiz-Echevarria et al. (1991) Structural and functional comparison between the stability systems ParD of plasmid R1 and Ccd of plasmid. F. Mol. Gen. Genet 225:355-362.
Ruiz-Echevarria et al. 1995 A mutation that decreases the efficiency of plasmid R1 replication leads to the activation of parD, a killer stability system of the plasmid: FEMS Microb. Letters 130: 129-136.
Ruiz-Echevarria, et al. (1991) The kis and kid genes of the parD maintenance system of plasmid R1 form an operon that is autoregulated at the level of transcription by the co-ordinated action of the Kis and Kid proteins. Molecular Microbiology 5(11):2685-2693.
Sadler, et al. (1980) Plasmids containing many tandem copies of a synthetic lactose operator. Gene 8:279-300.
Salmon et al., "The Antidote and Autoregulatory Functions of the F Plasmid CcdA Protein: a Genetic and biochemical Survey" Molecular and General Genetics vol. 244, pp. 530-538. 1994.
Sambrook, et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 4.12 A.9-A.13.
Saul, et al., "Nucleotide Sequence and Replication Characteristics of RepFIB, a Basic Replicon of IncF Plasmids," Journal of Bacteriology. vol. 171 No. 5 00.2697-2707, May 1989.
Schlieper et al. 1998 "A positive selection vector for cloning of long polymerase chain reaction fragments based on a lethal mutant of the crp gene of Escherichia coli," Anal. Biochem. 257:203-209.
Schoeman, H. et al., the Development of Bactericidal Yeast Strains by Expressing the Pediococcus acidilactici Pediocin Gene (pedA) in Saccharo1nyces cerevisiae, Yeast, vol. 15, 647-656, 1999.
Seamark R.F. "Progress and Emerging Problems in Livestock Transgenesis: a Summary perspective." Repod. Fert. Dev. 6:653-657, 1994.
Shalani and Srivastava (2008) The Internet Journal of Microbiology. vol. 5 No. 2. DOI: 10.5580127dd—accessible on the worldwide web at archive.ispub.comljournallthe-internet-journal-of-microbiology/volume-5-number-2/screening-for-antifungal-activity-of-pseudomonas-fluorescens-against-phytopathogenic-fungi.html#sthash.dOYs03UO.1DKuT1US.dpuf.
Shekh and Roy, BMC Microbiology 12: 132, 2012.
Shenin et al., "Characteristics of Alirin B1, the major component of a fungicidal substance produced by Bacillus subtilis 10-VIZR". Antibiot Khimioter 1995 vol. 50: pp. 3-7.
Sierra et al. 1998 "Functional interactions between chpB and parD, two homologous conditional killer systems found in the Escherichia coli chromosome and in plasmid R1," FEMS Microb. Letters 168:51-58.
Simons, R. W., et al. (1987) "Improved Single and Multicopy Lac-Based Cloning Vectors for Protein and Operon Fusions." Gene 53 Do.85-96.
Smith, et al. (1985) Modification and Selection of Human Interleukin 2 Produced in Insect Cells by Baculovirus Expression Vector. Nalt Acad. Sci. 82:8404-8408.
Smith, et al. (1997) The poison-antidote stability system of the broad-host-range Thiobacilus ferroxidans plasmid pTF-FC2. Molecular Microbioloav 26(5):961-970.
Takala et al., A Food-Grade Cloning Vector For Lactic Acid Bacteria Based On The Nisin Immunity Gene nisl, Appl Microbiology Biotechnology, vol. 59, pp. 467-471, 2002.
Thisted, et al., "Mechanism of Post-segregational Killing by the hok/sok System of Plasmid R1; Sok Antisense RNA Regulates hok Gene Expression Indirectly Through the Overlapping mok Gene." (1992) J. Mol. Biol., vol. 223, p. 41-54.
Tomb et al., "The Complete Genome Sequence of the Gastric Pathogen Helicobacter Pylori," Nature. vol. 388 Aug. 7, 1997 pp. 539-547.
Trudel et al., (1996), pGATA: a positive selection vector based on the toxicity of the transcription factor GATA-1 to bacteria: BioTechniques 20:684-693.
Tsuchimoto et al. (1988) Two Genes, pelK and peml, responsible for stable maintenance of resistance plasmid R100. J. of Bateriol., 170(4):1461-1466.
Tsuchimoto et al., "The Stable Maintenance System pem of Plasmid R100: Degradation of Peml Protein May Allow PemK Protein To Inhibit Cell Growth." Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 174, No. 13, pp. 4205-4211 Jul. 1992.
Tsuchimoto, et al. (1993) Autoregulation by cooperative binding of the Peml and PemK proteins to the promoter region of the pem operon. 237:81-88.
Union Nationale des Groupements de Distillateurs D'Alcool, "Kamoran", 2005.
Van Melderen, et al., "Bacterial Toxin-Antitoxin Systems: More Than Selfish Entities?", PLoS Genetics, vol. 5, No. 3, Mar. 2009, pp. 1-6.
Van Reeth, T., et al. (1998) "Positive Selection Vectors to Generate Fused Genes for the Expression of His-Tagged Proteins." BioTechniques. 25(5):898-904.
Vernet, T., et al. (1985) "A Direct-Selection Vector Derived from pColE3-CA38 and adapted for Foreign Gene Expression." Gene 34:87-93.
Wang et al., Genome Mining Demonstrates the Widespread Occurrence of Gene Clusters Encoding Bacteriocins in Cyanobacteria. PLoS One 6(7): e22384, 2011.
Wang, (1985), DNA Topoisomerases. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 54:665-697.
Wright et al., "Building-in biosafety for synthetic biology", Microbiology, vol. 159, pp. 1221-1235, 2013.
Yanisch-Perron, et al. (1985) Improved M13 phage closing vectors and host strains: Nucleotide sequence of the M13mp18 and DUC19 vectors. Gen, 33:103-119.
Yarmolinsky (1995) Programmed cell death in bacterial populations. Science, 267:836-837.
Yu et al. 2000 "An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli," PNAS USA 97:5978-5983.
Zuber, P et al., "Peptide Antibiotics", in Sonenshein ed, "Bacillus subtilis and Other Gram-Positive Bacteria", 1993 American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C. pp. 897-916.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3728292A1 (en) 2020-10-28
US20210070812A1 (en) 2021-03-11
JP2021506328A (ja) 2021-02-22
CN111757890A (zh) 2020-10-09
WO2019121983A1 (en) 2019-06-27
BR112020012543A2 (pt) 2021-02-23
KR20200116084A (ko) 2020-10-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11932672B2 (en) Fermentation process
US10188114B2 (en) Controlled growth of microorganisms
Masuda et al. Identification and characterization of leucocyclicin Q, a novel cyclic bacteriocin produced by Leuconostoc mesenteroides TK41401
Abdullah-Al-Mahin et al. Improvement of multiple-stress tolerance and lactic acid production in Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 under conditions of thermal stress by heterologous expression of Escherichia coli dnaK
Callewaert et al. Characterization and production of amylovorin L471, a bacteriocin purified from Lactobacillus amylovorus DCE 471 by a novel three-step method
Steiner et al. An agr quorum sensing system that regulates granulose formation and sporulation in Clostridium acetobutylicum
Abriouel et al. Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins
Yim et al. Isolation of fully synthetic promoters for high‐level gene expression in Corynebacterium glutamicum
Anné et al. Protein secretion biotechnology in Gram-positive bacteria with special emphasis on Streptomyces lividans
Masuda et al. Characterization and identification of weissellicin Y and weissellicin M, novel bacteriocins produced by Weissella hellenica QU 13
Badoei-Dalfard et al. Screening and isolation of an organic solvent tolerant-protease from Bacillus sp. JER02: Activity optimization by response surface methodology
Diep et al. Data mining and characterization of a novel pediocin-like bacteriocin system from the genome of Pediococcus pentosaceus ATCC 25745
EP3380496B1 (en) Enhanced protein production and methods thereof
Meng et al. Expression of a novel bacteriocin—the plantaricin Pln1—in Escherichia coli and its functional analysis
US20200181595A1 (en) Bacillus Licheniformis Host Cell
Chen et al. Cloning and heterologous expression of a bacteriocin sakacin P from Lactobacillus sakei in Escherichia coli
Kim et al. Identification and characterization of a bacteriocin produced by an isolated Bacillus sp. SW1-1 that exhibits antibacterial activity against fish pathogens
US20220348615A1 (en) Production of bacteriocins
Promchai et al. Rapid production of extracellular thermostable alkaline halophilic protease originating from an extreme haloarchaeon, Halobacterium salinarum by recombinant Bacillus subtilis
EP3555320B1 (en) Methods and strain
Liu et al. The yajC gene from Lactobacillus buchneri and Escherichia coli and its role in ethanol tolerance
US10273490B2 (en) Erythritol production in cyanobacteria
EP3883949A1 (en) Peptides for inducing bacteriocin synthesis and methods to identify and/or select and/or optimize the same
Miller et al. Mechanism for temperature-dependent production of piscicolin 126
Weixler Establishment of Corynebacterium glutamicum for the heterologous production of bacteriocins

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SMAL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

AS Assignment

Owner name: UNIVERSITE LIBRE DE BRUXELLES, BELGIUM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VAN MELDEREN, LAURENCE;REEL/FRAME:053447/0235

Effective date: 20200729

Owner name: SYNGULON S.A., BELGIUM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GABANT, PHILIPPE;EL BAKKOURY, MOHAMED;REEL/FRAME:053447/0789

Effective date: 20200729

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: APPLICATION DISPATCHED FROM PREEXAM, NOT YET DOCKETED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT RECEIVED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE