200928828 _ 九、發明說明： 【發明所屬之技術領域】 本發明涉及一種元件結構圖形智慧校正系統及方法。 【先前技術】 在衝壓模具設計中，元件結構係最常用也係最重要的 一種標準結構。元件結構圖形的種類非常繁多，並且每一 種元件結構圖形的資訊也不盡相同。在現有的模具設計軟 體中，很多提供了元件結構圖形的標準插入系統，可以很 _ 好的完成元件結構的自動化生成操作。 p 但是，現有的元件結構圖形的標準化插入系統的只係 提供了元件結構的生成和插入，當設計人員對生成的元件 結構進行修改後，該系統便無法檢驗設計人員修改後元件 結構的正確與否。設計人員在元件結構圖形進行修改後， 只能係憑藉個人的工作經驗進行檢驗，沒有可靠完善的方 案來保證檢驗的結果，特別係只係進行細小修改的時候， 肉眼根本無法檢驗出這些細小的差別，因此，導致了大量 〇 元件結構在經過人工修改後出現錯誤，使得設計人員和加 工人員都為此非常苦惱。 【發明内容】 鑒於以上内容，有必要提供一種元件結構圖形智慧校 正系統，能夠自動檢驗並校正經過設計人員修改後的模具 設計圖檔中的元件結構圖形。 鑒於以上内容，有必要提供一種元件結構圖形智慧校 正方法，能夠自動檢驗並校正經過設計人員修改後的模具 200928828 ，設計圖财的元件結構圖形。 ， —種元件結構_智慧校正系統，包括電腦主媳μ 該電腦主機相連的資料 括電細主機及與 用於声取所、，十、：μ 該電腦主機包括：獲取模組， ,"’I讀庫巾所有元件結構®形的資訊；分類模 元件結構圖形進行分二訊中的屬性資訊將所有 元件結構圖形中選取—類於從所述分類後的 者所、取類兀件結構圖形；校正模組，用於 戶711件結構圖形在三視圖中的沒有對應時，校正 斤=的兀件結構圖形在三視时的對 =::形的屬性資訊中的襬正角度不增= =角度為三視圖中實際的擺正角度，當所選取的元件 、·、。構圖形的屬性資訊中的結構方向不正確時，校正該 二向為三視圖中實際的結構方向，及當所選取的元;; ❹ Γ的屬性資訊中的設計參數不正確時，校補設計2 為三視圖中實際的設計參數；及提示模組，用於當所選取 的讀結構圖形的設計精度沒有達到屬性資訊中的 度時，提示用戶所選取的S件結構圖形的精度不符合要/ .二種元件結構圖形智慧校正方法，該方法包括如下+ 2獲取貝料庫中所有凡件結構圖形的資訊；根據所述元 件結構圖形資財的屬性資訊將财元件結_形進行八 類；從所述分類後的元件結構圖形中選取一類元件結構= 形，當所選取的元件結構圖形在三視圖中沒有對應時，校 正所選取的7〇件結構圖形在三視圖中的對應關係，否則， 當所選取的元件結構圖形在三視圖中對應時，直接進入下 6 200928828 度不正確彳選取的％件結構®形的屬性資财的擺正角 度，否則校正該擺正肖度為三視圖巾實際的擺正角 ί产正㈣續選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的擺正 二=’直接進入下-步驟;當所選取的元件結構圖 =:訊中的結構方向不正確時，校正該結構方向為 圖中Λ際的結構方向，否則，當所選取的元件姓構圖 訊中的結構方向正確時，直接進入下； 〇 ❹ ;=::Γ形的屬性資訊中的設計參數不正確 冬所三視圖中實際的設計參數，否則， 二二推70件結構圖形的屬性#訊中的設計參數正確 奸产當闕取的元件結翻形的設 梢度4相屬性資”的設計精 取的元件結構圖形的精度不符合要求。徒丁用戶所選 相較於習知技術’本糾所提供的元件 ，糸統及方法，能夠自動檢驗並校正經過料人員^ =具:計圖檔中的元件結構圖形，保證了模具設計圖 y各几件結構圖形的正確性，提高了設計人員的工作效 【實施方式】 如m所示，縣發料件結構卿智慧校正系统較佳 實施方式㈣統架構圖。該系統主要包括電腦主⑽、資料 庫2、顯不器3、鍵盤4及滑鼠5。該電腦主機i用於將資料庫 中2中所有元件m祕行分m，料類元件結構_關資料 自動進行檢驗並校正。該資料庫埃該電腦主朗目連，'用 200928828 - 於存儲模具設計圖檔中所有元件結構圖形的資訊。所述主 , 機1連接有顯示器3、鍵盤4及滑鼠5 ’用於在元件結構校正 過程中相關資料的輸入及輸出。 如圖2所示，係圖1中電腦主機1的功能模組圖。所述電 腦主機1包括獲取模組10、分類模組12.、選取模組14、判斷 模組16、校正模組18及提示模組20。 所述獲取模組1〇用於獲取資料庫2中所有元件結構圖 形的資訊。所述元件結構圖形的資訊包括，但不限於，元 ❹ 件結構圖形的屬性資訊。 所述分類模組12用於根據所述元件結構圖形資訊中的 屬性資訊將所有元件結構圖形進行分類。分類後的元件結 構圖形包括，但不限於，固定銷類元件結構圖形、彈簧類 元件結構圖形、導柱類元件結構圖形及沖頭類元件結構圖 形。 所述選取模組14用於從所述分類後的元件結構圖形中 選取一類元件結構圖形。 ❾ 所述判斷模組16用於判斷上述選取的元件結構圖形在 三視圖中是否對應。所述三視圖包括圖形的主視圖、下視 圖及右視圖。當所選取的元件結構圖形在主視圖中任意點 的X軸座標值和在下視圖中該點的X軸座標值相同，並且所 選取的元件結構圖形在主視圖中任意點的y軸座標值和在 右視圖中該點的γ軸座標值相同時，判斷所選取的元件結 構圖形在三視圖中對應；當所選取的元件結構圖形在主視 圖中任意點的X轴座標值和在下視圖中該點的X軸座標值 200928828 不相同，或者所選取的元件結構圖形在主視圖中任意點的 Y轴座標值和在右視圖中該點的γ袖座標值不相同時，判斷 所選取的元件結構圖形在三視圖中不對應。 所述校正模組18用於當所選取的元件結構圖形在三視 圖中的沒有對應時，校正所選取的元件結構圖形在三視圖 中的對應關係。所述校正元件結構圖形的對應關係係指將 所選取的元件結構圖形在主視圖中任意點的X軸座標值和 在下視圖中該點的X軸座標值校正相同，及將所選取的元 ❹件結構圖形在主視圖中任意點的Y軸座標值和在右視圖中 該點的Y軸座標值校正相同。 所述判斷模組16還用於判斷所選取的元件結構圖形的 屬性資訊:的擺正角度是否正確。當所選取的元件結構圖 形的屬性育訊中的擺正角度和三視圖中實際的擺正角声不 ^時，判斷所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的ς正 確’·當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的擺 肖度和二視圖中實際的擺正角度相同時 兀件結構圖形的屬性資訊令的擺正角度正碑。^的 所述校正模組18還用於當所選取 思 性資訊，的擺正角度不正碹眸仵、，，。構圖形的屬 中實際的擺正角度。 、x正該擺正角度為三視圖 所述判斷模組16還用於判斷所 屬性資訊令的結構方向是否正確。告所、:構圖形的 形的屬性資訊令的結構方向和三田t取的元件結構圖 相同時，判斷所選取的元件 I際的結構方向不 圖也的屬性資訊中的結構 200928828 方向不正確；當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的擺 正角度和三視圖中實際的結構方向相同時，判斷所選取的 元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的結構方向正確。 所述校正模組18還用於當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬 性資訊中的結構方向不正確時，校正該結構方向為三視圖 中實際的結構方向。 所述判斷模組16還用於判斷所選取的元件結構圖形的 屬性資訊中的設計參數是否正確。當所選取的元件結構圖 D 形的屬性資訊中的設計參數和三視圖中實際的設計參數不 相同時，並且所述實際的設計參數在資料庫2中可以查找到 時，判斷所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的設計參數 不正確；當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的設計參 數和三視圖中實際的設計參數相同，或者當所選取的元件 結構圖形的屬性資訊中的設計參數和三視圖中實際的設計 參數不相同時，但是所述實際的設計參數在資料庫2中查找 不到時，判斷所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的設計 © 參數正確。 所述校正模組18還用於當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬 性資訊中的設計參數不正確時，校正該設計參數為三視圖 中實際的設計參數。 所述判斷模組16還用於判斷所選取的元件結構圖形的 設計精度是否達到屬性資訊中的設計精度。 所述提示模組2 0用於當所選取的元件結構圖形的設計 精度沒有達到屬性資訊中的設計精度時，提示用戶所選取 200928828 的元件結構圖形的精度不符人要长 精度件結構_設計 構圖形的設計精度沒有達到二:資=所選取的元件結 Ζ組20提示用戶所選取的元件結構圖=== =判斷所述所有類別料件結構圖形是否““完 ❹200928828 _ IX. DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION: TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a component structure graphic intelligence correction system and method. [Prior Art] In the design of stamping dies, the component structure is the most commonly used and most important standard structure. There are many types of component structure graphics, and the information of each component structure graphic is also different. In the existing mold design software, many standard insertion systems that provide component structure graphics can be used to automate the generation of component structures. p However, the standardization of the existing component structure graphics system only provides the generation and insertion of the component structure. When the designer modifies the generated component structure, the system cannot verify the correct structure of the component after modification by the designer. no. After the designer has modified the component structure graphic, it can only be tested by personal work experience. There is no reliable and perfect solution to ensure the results of the inspection. Especially when minor modifications are made, the naked eye cannot detect these small defects. The difference, therefore, caused a lot of defects in the structure of the 〇 component after manual modification, which made designers and processors very distressed. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In view of the above, it is necessary to provide a component structure graphic intelligence correction system capable of automatically checking and correcting component structure patterns in a mold design image modified by a designer. In view of the above, it is necessary to provide a component structure graphic wisdom correction method, which can automatically inspect and correct the mold modified by the designer 200928828, and design the component structure graphic of the graphic. , a component structure _ smart correction system, including the computer main 媳 μ The computer connected to the data including the fine host and used for the sound collection, 10, : μ The computer host includes: acquisition module, , " 'I read the information of all the component structures of the library towel; the classification module structure graphics are divided into two pieces of attribute information to select all the component structure graphics - from the classification of the class, take the class structure Graphic; correction module, used for 711 pieces of structure graphics in the three views, when there is no correspondence in the three views, the correction of the structure of the block structure in the three-view time =:: the shape of the attribute information in the shape of the square is not increased = = Angle is the actual squared angle in the three views, when the selected component, ·,. When the structural direction in the attribute information of the graphic is not correct, the two directions are corrected to the actual structural direction in the three views, and when the selected element is;; the design parameters in the attribute information of the ❹ 不 are incorrect, the correction design 2 is the actual design parameters in the three views; and the prompting module is used to prompt the user to select the accuracy of the S-shaped structural figure that does not meet the requirements when the design accuracy of the selected read structure graphic does not reach the degree in the attribute information. Two kinds of component structure graphic wisdom correction method, the method includes the following + 2 to obtain information of all the parts structure graphics in the bedding library; according to the attribute information of the component structure graphic wealth, the financial component is formed into eight types; Selecting a type of component structure = shape from the classified component structure graphic, and correcting the corresponding relationship of the selected 7-dimensional structural graphic in the three views when the selected component structure graphic does not correspond in the three views; otherwise When the selected component structure graphic corresponds in the three views, directly enter the next 6 200928828 degrees incorrectly selected % of the structure of the shape of the shape of the property wealth pendulum Angle, otherwise correct the squareness of the three-dimensional towel to the actual pendulum angle ί production positive (four) continued selection of the component structure graphic attribute information in the square two = 'direct entry to the next step; when the selected component structure Figure =: When the direction of the structure in the signal is not correct, correct the direction of the structure to the direction of the structure in the figure. Otherwise, when the structure direction of the selected component name frame is correct, go directly to the next; 〇❹ ;= :: The design parameters in the shape information of the Γ shape are incorrect. The actual design parameters in the view of the winter three, otherwise, the attribute of the structure of the 70 pieces of the structure of the structure is correct. The accuracy of the component structure pattern of the design of the shape-setting 4 phase attribute does not meet the requirements. The components selected by the user, the system and the method can be automatically selected by the user. Inspect and calibrate the material personnel ^ = with: the component structure graphic in the plan file, to ensure the correctness of the several structural drawings of the mold design drawing y, improve the work efficiency of the designer [implementation] As shown in m, County issue The preferred embodiment of the structure of the smart correction system (four) system architecture. The system mainly includes the computer main (10), database 2, display 3, keyboard 4 and mouse 5. The computer host i is used to 2 in the database All components m secret line is divided into m, material component structure _ off data is automatically checked and corrected. The database is the main computer company, "Use 200928828 - to store information on all component structure graphics in the mold design file. The main machine 1 is connected with a display 3, a keyboard 4 and a mouse 5' for inputting and outputting related data during the component structure correction process. As shown in FIG. 2, the function module of the computer host 1 in FIG. The computer host 1 includes an acquisition module 10, a classification module 12. a selection module 14, a determination module 16, a correction module 18, and a prompt module 20. The acquisition module 1 is used to acquire data. Information about all component structure graphics in library 2. The information of the component structure graphic includes, but is not limited to, attribute information of the element structure graphic. The classification module 12 is configured to classify all component structure graphics according to attribute information in the component structure graphic information. The classified component structure pattern includes, but is not limited to, a fixed pin type component structure pattern, a spring type element structure pattern, a pillar type element structure pattern, and a punch type element structure pattern. The selection module 14 is configured to select a type of component structure graphic from the classified component structure graphic. The determining module 16 is configured to determine whether the selected component structure graphic corresponds in the three views. The three views include a front view, a bottom view, and a right view of the graphic. When the selected component structure graph has the same X-axis coordinate value at any point in the main view and the X-axis coordinate value of the point in the lower view, and the selected component structure graph has a y-axis coordinate value at any point in the main view and When the γ-axis coordinate value of the point is the same in the right view, it is judged that the selected component structure graphic corresponds in the three views; when the selected component structure graphic is at the X-axis coordinate value of any point in the main view and in the lower view The X-axis coordinate value 200928828 of the point is not the same, or the selected component structure figure determines the selected component structure when the Y-axis coordinate value of any point in the main view is different from the γ-slot coordinate value of the point in the right view. The graphics do not correspond in the three views. The correction module 18 is configured to correct the correspondence between the selected component structure graphics in the three views when the selected component structure graphics do not correspond in the three views. Corresponding relationship between the structural elements of the correction component means that the X-axis coordinate value of the selected component structure graphic at any point in the main view is corrected to be the same as the X-axis coordinate value of the point in the lower view, and the selected element is selected. The block structure graph has the same Y-axis coordinate value for any point in the main view and the Y-axis coordinate value for that point in the right view. The determining module 16 is further configured to determine whether the attribute angle of the selected component structure graphic is correct. When the squared angle in the attribute learning of the selected component structure graph and the actual squared angle sound in the three views are not satisfied, it is judged that the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is correct. When the pendulum of the attribute information of the component structure graphic is the same as the actual pendulum angle of the two views, the attribute information of the component structure graphic makes the squared angle of the monument. The correction module 18 is also used to correct the angle of the square when the selected information is selected. The actual squared angle of the genus of the graphic. The x-positive angle is a three-view. The judging module 16 is further configured to determine whether the structural direction of the attribute information order is correct. The structure of the attribute information of the shape of the graphic is the same as the structure of the component of the Mita T. When the structure direction of the selected component I is not the same, the structure of the property information 200928828 is incorrect. When the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is the same as the actual structure direction in the three views, it is determined that the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct. The correction module 18 is further configured to correct the structural direction to the actual structural direction in the three views when the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect. The determining module 16 is further configured to determine whether the design parameter in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct. When the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure diagram D and the actual design parameters in the three views are different, and the actual design parameters can be found in the database 2, the selected components are judged. The design parameters in the attribute information of the structure graphic are incorrect; when the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are the same as the actual design parameters in the three views, or in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic When the actual design parameters are different from the three views, but the actual design parameters are not found in the database 2, it is judged that the design © parameter in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct. The correction module 18 is further configured to correct the design parameter to an actual design parameter in the three views when the design parameter in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect. The determining module 16 is further configured to determine whether the design precision of the selected component structure graphic reaches the design precision in the attribute information. The prompting module 20 is configured to prompt the user to select the accuracy of the component structure graphic of the 200928828 when the design precision of the selected component structure graphic does not reach the design precision in the attribute information. The design accuracy of the shape does not reach two: 资 = selected component Ζ group 20 prompts the user to select the component structure diagram === = determine whether the structure graph of all categories of materials is "completed
實施係本發明71件結_騎驗正方法較佳 |先’步_，獲取额雨取資 訊包括，：不了結構圖形的資訊。所述元件結構圖形的資 5 -不限於，70件結構®形的屬性資訊。 步驟S12，分類模組12根據所述元件結構圖形資訊中 处構==财元件結難料行分類。分賴的元件 、，，口稱園形包括，但不限於，阆 - 固疋銷類兀件結構圖形、彈簧 圖兀4結構®形、導柱類元件結_形及沖賴元件結 圖形。 步驟S14 ’選取核組14從所述分類後的元件結構圖形 中選取一類元件結構圖形„ 一步驟S16 ’判斷模組16判斷所選取的元件結構圖形在 圖中疋否對應。當所選取的元件結構圖形在域圖中 任意點的X軸座標值和在下視圖中該點Μ軸座標值相 同’並且所選取的元件結構圖形在主視圖中任意點的Y轴 座標值和在右視圖中該點的γ軸座標值相同時，判斷所選 取的元件結構圖形在三視圖中對應；當所選取的元件結構 11 200928828 -圖形在主視圖甲任意點的雜座標值和在下視圖中該點的 .X軸座標值不相同，或者所選取的元件結構圖形在主視圖 令任意點的γ軸座標值和在右視圖中該點的¥軸座標值不 相同時，判斷所選取的元件結構圖形在三視圖令不對應。 步驟S1S，當所選取的元件結構圖形在三視圖中的沒 =應時’校iL馳職正所選取的元件結構 圖中的對應關係。 祝 ❹ ^S2()’判斷模組16判斷所選取的树結 = 二的擺正角度是否正確。當所選取的元件結構圖 n拉胃对的擺正角度和三視圖中實際的擺正角戶不 =時，判斷所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中= =不正確’當所選取的元件結構圖 正角度和三視圖中實際的擺正角度相同時，判::、= 凡件結構圖形的屬性資財的擺正角度正確。^The implementation of the present invention is 71 knots. The method of riding the test is better. The first step is to obtain the information of the amount of rain. The element structure graphic is not limited to the attribute information of 70 pieces of structure®. In step S12, the classification module 12 classifies the faulty rows according to the structure of the component structure graphic information. The components, and the shape of the singularity include, but are not limited to, the 阆-solid-pin type 结构 structure pattern, the spring 兀4 structure о shape, the guide column element _ shape, and the rushing element junction pattern. Step S14' The selection core group 14 selects a type of component structure pattern from the classified component structure pattern. "One step S16" determines that the module 16 determines whether the selected component structure pattern corresponds in the figure. When the selected component The X-axis coordinate value of the structure graph at any point in the domain diagram is the same as the coordinate value of the point axis in the lower view' and the selected component structure graph has the Y-axis coordinate value at any point in the main view and the point in the right view. When the γ-axis coordinate values are the same, it is judged that the selected component structure graphic corresponds in three views; when the selected component structure 11 200928828 - the coordinate value of the graphic at any point in the main view A and the .X of the point in the lower view The coordinate value of the axis is not the same, or the selected component structure graphic determines the selected component structure graphic in three views when the γ axis coordinate value of any point in the main view is different from the value of the ¥ axis coordinate of the point in the right view. Step S1S, when the selected component structure graph is not in the three views = the corresponding relationship in the component structure diagram selected by the school iL. Zhu Xi ^S2() The judging module 16 judges whether the selected tree knot = two is correct or not. When the selected component structure diagram n the stomach right angle and the actual square angle in the three views are not =, the judgment center In the attribute information of the selected component structure graph == incorrect 'When the positive angle of the selected component structure diagram is the same as the actual squared angle in the three views, judge::, = the attribute of the structure of the workpiece is squared The angle is correct. ^
Q 2您，當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬 擺正角度不正確時，校正模組做正該擺正角产A中的 中實際的擺正角度。 擺正角度為三視圖 μ步驟S24 ’判斷模組16判斷所選取的 屬性資訊中的結構方向是否正確 構圖形的 形的屬性資訊中的姓槿方^ 所選取的元件結構圖 ，，判斷所選取的元件結構圖形上：方向不 ::不正確；當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬二 =結構 和三視圖中實際的結構方向相同時，判的擺 牛結構圖形的屬性資訊t的結構方向正確。k取的 12 200928828 .步驟S26，當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的 結構方向不正確時，校正模組18校正該結構方向為三視圖 中實際的結構方向。 步驟S28，判斷模組16判斷所選取的元件結構圖形的 屬性資訊中的設計參數是否正確。當所選取的元件結構圖 形的屬性資訊中的設計參數和三視圖中實際的設計參數不 相同時，判斷所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的設計 參數不正確；當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的設 _ 計參數和三視圖中實際的設計參數相同時，判斷所選取的 元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的設計參數正確。 步驟S30,當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的 設計參數不正確時，校正模組18校正該設計參數為三視圖 中實際的設計參數。 步驟S32，判斷模組16判斷所選取的元件結構圖形的 設計精度是否達到屬性資訊中的設計精度。 步驟S34，當所選取的元件結構圖形的設計精度沒有 G 達到屬性資訊中的設計精度時，提示模組20提示用戶所選 取的元件結構圖形的精度不符合要求。 步驟S36，當所選取的元件結構圖形的設計精度達到 屬性資訊中的設計精度，或者當所選取的元件結構圖形的 設計精度沒有達到屬性資訊中的設計精度時，提示模組20 提示用戶所選取的元件結構圖形的精度不符合要求後，判 斷模組16判斷所述所有類別的元件結構圖形是否全部校正 完成。 13 200928828 在步驟S16中’當所選取的元件結構圖形在三視圖中 對應時，轉至S2〇判斷所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊 中的擺正角度是否正確的步驟。 在步驟S20中，當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊 中的擺正角度正確時，轉至S24判斷所選取的元件結構圖 形的屬性貧訊中的結構方向是否正確的步驟。 ❹Q 2 You, when the selected square structure angle of the selected component structure is not correct, the correction module performs the actual squared angle in the positive angle A. The squared angle is a three-view μ step S24. The determining module 16 determines whether the structural direction in the selected attribute information is correct, and the component structure map selected by the last name in the attribute information of the shape is determined. The structure of the component structure is: the direction is not:: incorrect; when the selected component structure graphic belongs to the second structure and the actual structure direction is the same in the three views, the structural information t of the pendulum structure graphic is correct. . k taken 12 200928828. In step S26, when the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is incorrect, the correction module 18 corrects the structural direction to the actual structural direction in the three views. In step S28, the determining module 16 determines whether the design parameter in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct. When the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are different from the actual design parameters in the three views, it is determined that the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are incorrect; when the selected component structure graphic When the setting parameter in the attribute information is the same as the actual design parameter in the three views, it is judged that the design parameter in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct. In step S30, when the design parameter in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect, the correction module 18 corrects the design parameter to the actual design parameter in the three views. In step S32, the determining module 16 determines whether the design precision of the selected component structure graphic reaches the design precision in the attribute information. In step S34, when the design precision of the selected component structure pattern does not reach the design precision in the attribute information, the prompt module 20 prompts the user that the accuracy of the component structure pattern selected by the user does not meet the requirements. Step S36, when the design precision of the selected component structure graphic reaches the design precision in the attribute information, or when the design precision of the selected component structure graphic does not reach the design precision in the attribute information, the prompt module 20 prompts the user to select After the accuracy of the component structure pattern does not meet the requirements, the judging module 16 judges whether all the component structure patterns of the categories are all corrected. 13 200928828 In step S16, when the selected component structure pattern corresponds in the three views, the process proceeds to S2 to determine whether the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is correct. In step S20, when the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is correct, the process proceeds to S24 to determine whether the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is correct. ❹
Q j步驟S24中，當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊 中的結構方向正確時，轉至S28判斷所選取的元件結構圖 形的屬性貧訊中的設計參數是否正確的步驟。 在步驟S28中，當所選取的元件結構圖形的屬性資訊 中=設計參數正猶，轉錦2·所躲的元件結構圖 形的设計精度是料到屬性資訊巾的設計精度。 在步·36中，當所述所有類別的元件結構圖形校正 時’返回至514從所述分類後的元件結構圖形中 k取一類7L件結構圖形的步驟。 【圖式簡單說明】 式的元縣_料毅4_佳實施方 圖2係圖1中電腦主機的功能模組圖。 式的形智慧校正方法較佳實施方 【主要元件符號說明】 電腦主機 獲取模組 1 10 14 200928828 分類模組 12 選取模組 14 判斷模組 16 校正模組 18 提示模組 20 獲取資料庫中所有元件結構圖形的資訊 S10 根據所述元件結構圖形資訊中的屬性資訊將所有元件結構 圖行分類 S12Q j In step S24, when the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is correct, the process proceeds to S28 to determine whether the design parameter in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is correct. In step S28, when the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic = design parameter is normal, the design precision of the component structure pattern that is hidden is the design precision of the attribute information towel. In step 36, when all of the component structure patterns are corrected, the process returns to 514 a step of taking a 7L piece structure pattern from the classified component structure pattern k. [Simple diagram of the diagram] The type of Yuan County _ material Yi 4_ good implementation party Figure 2 is the functional module diagram of the computer host in Figure 1. The preferred method of shape-wise wisdom correction method [main component symbol description] computer host acquisition module 1 10 14 200928828 classification module 12 selection module 14 judgment module 16 correction module 18 prompt module 20 obtain all the data in the database The information of the component structure graphic S10 classifies all the component structure diagram lines according to the attribute information in the component structure graphic information.
從所述分類後的元件結構圖形中選取一類元件結構圖形 S14 該類元件結構圖形的三視圖是否對應 S16 校正該類元件結構圖形在三視圖中的對應關係 S18 屬性資訊中的擺正角度是否正確 S20 校正該類元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的擺正角度S22 屬性資訊中的結構方向是否正確 S24 校正該類元件結構圖形的屬性資訊中的結構方向S26 屬性資訊中的設計參數是否正確 S28 校正該類元件結構圖形的設計參數 S30 設計精度是否符合要求 S32 提示用戶 S34 所有類別的元件結構是否全部校正完成 S36 15Selecting a class of component structure graphic S14 from the classified component structure graphic, whether the three views of the component component structure graphic correspond to S16, correcting the correcting angle of the corresponding relationship of the component structure graphic in the three views S18 property information is correct S20 Corrects the squared angle in the attribute information of the component structure graphic S22 Is the structure direction in the property information correct? S24 Corrects the structural direction in the attribute information of the component structure graphic S26 Is the design parameter in the property information correct? S28 Correct the Design parameters of class component structure graphic S30 Design accuracy meets requirements S32 Prompt user S34 Whether all component structure of all categories is corrected S36 15