TWI442253B - System and method for correcting element structures of a drawing - Google Patents

Description

Component structure graphic wisdom correction system and method

The invention relates to a component structure graphic wisdom correction system and method.

In the design of stamping dies, the component structure is the most commonly used and the most important standard structure. There are many types of component structure graphics, and the information of each component structure graphic is not the same. In the existing mold design software, many standard insertion systems that provide component structure graphics can well complete the automatic generation operation of the component structure.

However, the standardized insertion system of the existing component structure graphic only provides the generation and insertion of the component structure. When the designer modifies the generated component structure, the system cannot verify the correctness of the component structure modified by the designer. . After the designer has modified the component structure graphic, it can only be tested by personal work experience. There is no reliable and perfect solution to ensure the results of the inspection. Especially when minor modifications are made, the naked eye cannot detect these small details. The difference, therefore, caused a large number of component structures to be mistaken after manual modification, which made designers and processors very distressed.

In view of the above, it is necessary to provide a component structure graphic intelligence correction system capable of automatically checking and correcting the component structure pattern in the mold design image modified by the designer.

In view of the above, it is necessary to provide a component structure graphic wisdom correction method, which can automatically verify and correct the component structure pattern in the mold design image modified by the designer.

A component structure graphic intelligence correction system includes a computer host and a database connected to the computer host, the computer host includes: an acquisition module for acquiring information of all component structure graphics in the database; and a classification module All component structure graphics are classified according to attribute information in the component structure graphic information; and a module is selected for selecting one type of component structure graphic from the classified component structure graphic; the correction module is used for the When the selected component structure graphic does not correspond in the three views, the corresponding relationship of the selected component structure graphic in the three views is corrected, and when the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect, the correction is corrected. The squared angle is the actual squared angle in the three views. When the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect, the direction of the structure is corrected to the actual structural direction in the three views, and when the selected component is selected When the design parameters in the attribute information of the structure graphic are incorrect, correct the design parameter to the actual design in the three views. Number; and when prompted module for, when the selected element structure pattern design accuracy is not reached the design accuracy of the attribute information, the graphical user prompts element structure selected to meet the requirements of accuracy.

A component structure graphic wisdom correction method, the method comprising the steps of: acquiring information of all component structure graphics in the database; classifying all component structure graphics according to attribute information in the component structure graphic information; A component structure graphic is selected in the component structure graphic; when the selected component structure graphic does not correspond in the three views, the corresponding relationship of the selected component structure graphic in the three views is corrected; otherwise, when the selected component structure graphic is When the three views correspond, go directly to the next step; when the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect, correct the squared angle to the actual squared angle in the three views, otherwise, When the orientation angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct, the process proceeds directly to the next step; when the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect, the direction of the structure is corrected to be the actual in the three views. Structure direction, otherwise, the structural side of the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic When correct, go directly to the next step; when the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are incorrect, correct the design parameter to the actual design parameters in the three views, otherwise, when the selected component structure graphic When the design parameters in the attribute information are correct, the process proceeds directly to the next step; and when the design accuracy of the selected component structure pattern does not reach the design precision in the attribute information, the accuracy of the component structure pattern selected by the user is not met.

Compared with the prior art, the component structure graphic wisdom correction system and method provided by the invention can automatically verify and correct the component structure graphics in the mold design image modified by the designer, and ensure the mold design files in each The correctness of the component structure graphic improves the work efficiency of the designer.

As shown in FIG. 1, it is a system architecture diagram of a preferred embodiment of the component structure graphic intelligence correction system of the present invention. The system mainly includes a computer host 1, a database 2, a display 3, a keyboard 4, and a mouse 5. The computer host 1 is used to classify all component structures in the database 2, and automatically check and correct related data of each component structure. The database 2 is connected to the computer host 1 for storing information on all component structure graphics in the mold design file. The host 1 is connected with a display 3, a keyboard 4 and a mouse 5 for inputting and outputting related materials during the component structure correction process.

As shown in FIG. 2, it is a functional module diagram of the computer host 1 in FIG. The computer host 1 includes an acquisition module 10, a classification module 12, a selection module 14, a determination module 16, a correction module 18, and a prompt module 20.

The obtaining module 10 is configured to acquire information about all component structure graphics in the database 2. The information of the component structure graphic includes, but is not limited to, attribute information of the component structure graphic.

The classification module 12 is configured to classify all component structure graphics according to attribute information in the component structure graphic information. The classified component structure patterns include, but are not limited to, a fixed pin type component structure pattern, a spring type element structure pattern, a pillar type element structure pattern, and a punch type element structure pattern.

The selection module 14 is configured to select a type of component structure graphic from the classified component structure graphics.

The determining module 16 is configured to determine whether the selected component structure graphic corresponds to the three views. The three views include a front view, a bottom view, and a right view of the graphic. When the selected component structure graph has the same X-axis coordinate value at any point in the main view and the X-axis coordinate value of the point in the lower view, and the selected component structure graph has a Y-axis coordinate value at any point in the main view and When the Y-axis coordinate value of the point is the same in the right view, it is judged that the selected component structure graphic corresponds in the three views; when the selected component structure graphic is at any point in the main view, the X-axis coordinate value is in the lower view. The X-axis coordinate value of the point is not the same, or the selected component structure pattern is determined by the Y-axis coordinate value of any point in the main view and the Y-axis coordinate value of the point in the right view. Does not correspond in the three views.

The correction module 18 is configured to correct the correspondence between the selected component structure graphics in the three views when the selected component structure graphics do not correspond in the three views. Corresponding relationship of the correction element structure pattern refers to correcting the X-axis coordinate value of the selected element structure pattern at any point in the main view and the X-axis coordinate value of the point in the lower view, and selecting the selected element structure The Y-axis coordinate value of the graph at any point in the main view is the same as the Y-axis coordinate value correction for that point in the right view.

The determining module 16 is further configured to determine whether the correcting angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct. When the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is different from the actual squared angle in the three views, it is determined that the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect; when the selected When the squared angle in the attribute information of the component structure graphic is the same as the actual squared angle in the three views, it is judged that the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct.

The correction module 18 is further configured to correct the squared angle to an actual squared angle in the three views when the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is incorrect.

The determining module 16 is further configured to determine whether the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct. When the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is different from the actual structural direction in the three views, it is determined that the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect; when the selected component structure graphic When the squared angle in the attribute information is the same as the actual structure direction in the three views, it is judged that the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct.

The correction module 18 is further configured to correct the structural direction to an actual structural direction in the three views when the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect.

The determining module 16 is further configured to determine whether the design parameter in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct. When the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are different from the actual design parameters in the three views, and the actual design parameters can be found in the database 2, the selected component structure graphic is determined. The design parameters in the attribute information are incorrect; when the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are the same as the actual design parameters in the three views, or the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic and When the actual design parameters in the three views are different, but the actual design parameters are not found in the database 2, it is judged that the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are correct.

The correction module 18 is further configured to correct the design parameter to an actual design parameter in the three views when the design parameter in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect.

The determining module 16 is further configured to determine whether the design accuracy of the selected component structure graphic reaches the design precision in the attribute information.

The prompting module 20 is configured to prompt the user that the accuracy of the selected component structure graphic does not meet the requirements when the design precision of the selected component structure graphic does not reach the design precision in the attribute information.

The determining module 16 also uses the design precision of the selected component structure graphic to achieve the design precision in the attribute information, or when the design precision of the selected component structure graphic does not reach the design precision in the attribute information, the prompt module After the user 20 indicates that the accuracy of the component structure pattern selected by the user does not meet the requirements, it is determined whether all the component structure graphics of the class are completely corrected.

As shown in FIG. 3, it is a flowchart of a preferred embodiment of the method for correcting the structure of the component structure of the present invention. First, in step S10, the acquisition module 10 acquires information of all component structure graphics in the database 2. The information of the component structure graphic includes, but is not limited to, attribute information of the component structure graphic.

In step S12, the classification module 12 classifies all the component structure graphics according to the attribute information in the component structure graphic information. The classified component structure patterns include, but are not limited to, a fixed pin type component structure pattern, a spring type element structure pattern, a pillar type element structure pattern, and a punch type element structure pattern.

In step S14, the selection module 14 selects a type of component structure graphic from the classified component structure graphics.

In step S16, the determining module 16 determines whether the selected component structure graphic corresponds in the three views. When the selected component structure graph has the same X-axis coordinate value at any point in the main view and the X-axis coordinate value of the point in the lower view, and the selected component structure graph has a Y-axis coordinate value at any point in the main view and When the Y-axis coordinate value of the point is the same in the right view, it is judged that the selected component structure graphic corresponds in the three views; when the selected component structure graphic is at any point in the main view, the X-axis coordinate value is in the lower view. The X-axis coordinate value of the point is not the same, or the selected component structure pattern is determined by the Y-axis coordinate value of any point in the main view and the Y-axis coordinate value of the point in the right view. Does not correspond in the three views.

In step S18, when the selected component structure pattern does not correspond in the three views, the correction module 18 corrects the corresponding relationship of the selected component structure graphics in the three views.

In step S20, the determining module 16 determines whether the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct. When the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is different from the actual squared angle in the three views, it is determined that the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect; when the selected When the squared angle in the attribute information of the component structure graphic is the same as the actual squared angle in the three views, it is judged that the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct.

In step S22, when the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is incorrect, the correction module 18 corrects the squared angle to the actual squared angle in the three views.

In step S24, the determining module 16 determines whether the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct. When the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is different from the actual structural direction in the three views, it is determined that the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect; when the selected component structure graphic When the squared angle in the attribute information is the same as the actual structure direction in the three views, it is judged that the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct.

In step S26, when the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect, the correction module 18 corrects the structural direction to be the actual structural direction in the three views.

In step S28, the determining module 16 determines whether the design parameter in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct. When the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are different from the actual design parameters in the three views, it is determined that the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are incorrect; when the selected component structure graphic When the design parameters in the attribute information are the same as the actual design parameters in the three views, it is judged that the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are correct.

In step S30, when the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are incorrect, the correction module 18 corrects the design parameter to the actual design parameter in the three views.

In step S32, the determining module 16 determines whether the design precision of the selected component structure graphic reaches the design precision in the attribute information.

In step S34, when the design precision of the selected component structure graphic does not reach the design precision in the attribute information, the prompting module 20 prompts the user that the accuracy of the component structure graphic selected does not meet the requirements.

Step S36, when the design precision of the selected component structure graphic reaches the design precision in the attribute information, or when the design precision of the selected component structure graphic does not reach the design precision in the attribute information, the prompt module 20 prompts the user to select After the accuracy of the component structure pattern does not meet the requirements, the judging module 16 judges whether all the component structure patterns of the categories are all corrected.

In step S16, when the selected component structure pattern corresponds in the three views, the process proceeds to S20 to determine whether the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is correct.

In step S20, when the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is correct, the process proceeds to S24 to determine whether the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is correct.

In step S24, when the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern is correct, the process proceeds to S28 to determine whether the design parameter in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct.

In step S28, when the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure pattern are correct, the process goes to S32 to determine whether the design accuracy of the selected component structure graphic reaches the design precision in the attribute information.

In step S36, when the element structure pattern correction of all the categories is not completed, the process returns to S14 to select a class of element structure patterns from the classified element structure patterns.

Computer host. . . 1

Get the module. . . 10

Classification module. . . 12

Select the module. . . 14

Judging the module. . . 16

Correction module. . . 18

Prompt module. . . 20

Get information about all component structure graphics in the database. . . S10

All component structure diagram lines are classified according to the attribute information in the component structure graphic information. . . S12

Selecting a class of component structure graphics from the classified component structure graphics. . . S14

Whether the three views of the component structure graph correspond to this. . . S16

Correct the correspondence between the structure graphs of the components in the three views. . . S18

Is the orientation angle in the property information correct? . . S20

Corrects the squared angle in the attribute information of the component structure graph. . . S22

Whether the structure direction in the attribute information is correct. . . S24

Correct the structural direction in the attribute information of the component structure graph. . . S26

Whether the design parameters in the attribute information are correct. . . S28

Correct the design parameters of the component structure graphics. . . S30

Whether the design accuracy meets the requirements. . . S32

The user is prompted. . . S34

Whether all component structure of all categories is corrected. . . S36

1 is a hardware architecture diagram of a preferred embodiment of a component structure graphic intelligence correction system of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a functional module diagram of the computer host in FIG. 1.

3 is a flow chart of a preferred embodiment of the method for correcting the structure of the component structure of the present invention.

Get information about all component structure graphics in the database. . . S10

All component structure diagram lines are classified according to the attribute information in the component structure graphic information. . . S12

Selecting a class of component structure graphics from the classified component structure graphics. . . S14

Whether the three views of the component structure graph correspond to this. . . S16

Correct the correspondence between the structure graphs of the components in the three views. . . S18

Is the orientation angle in the property information correct? . . S20

Corrects the squared angle in the attribute information of the component structure graph. . . S22

Whether the structure direction in the attribute information is correct. . . S24

Correct the structural direction in the attribute information of the component structure graph. . . S26

Whether the design parameters in the attribute information are correct. . . S28

Correct the design parameters of the component structure graphics. . . S30

Whether the design accuracy meets the requirements. . . S32

The user is prompted. . . S34

Whether all component structure of all categories is corrected. . . S36

Claims (5)

A component structure graphic intelligence correction system includes a computer host and a database connected to the computer host, the computer host includes: an acquisition module for acquiring information of all component structure graphics in the database; and a classification module All component structure graphics are classified according to attribute information in the component structure graphic information; and a module is selected for selecting one type of component structure graphic from the classified component structure graphic; the correction module is used for the When the selected component structure graphic does not correspond in the three views, the corresponding relationship of the selected component structure graphic in the three views is corrected, and when the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect, the correction is corrected. The squared angle is the actual squared angle in the three views. When the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect, the direction of the structure is corrected to the actual structural direction in the three views, and when the selected component is selected When the design parameters in the attribute information of the structure graphic are incorrect, correct the design parameter to the actual design in the three views. Number; and when prompted module for, when the selected element structure pattern design accuracy is not reached the design accuracy of the attribute information, the graphical user prompts element structure selected to meet the requirements of accuracy. For example, the component structure graphic intelligence correction system described in claim 1 of the patent scope further includes: a judgment module, configured to: when the selected component structure graphic design precision reaches the design precision in the attribute information, or the prompt module It is suggested that the accuracy of the component structure pattern selected by the user does not reach the design precision in the attribute information, and it is judged whether all the component structure graphics of all categories are corrected. The component structure graphic intelligence correction system according to claim 1, wherein the correspondence relationship between the correction component structure figures refers to an X-axis coordinate value of the selected component structure graphic at any point in the main view and in the lower view. The X-axis coordinate value of the point is corrected the same, and the Y-axis coordinate value of the selected element structure pattern at any point in the main view is corrected to the Y-axis coordinate value of the point in the right view. A component structure graphic wisdom correction method, the method comprising the steps of: acquiring information of all component structure graphics in the database; classifying all component structure graphics according to attribute information in the component structure graphic information; A component structure graphic is selected in the component structure graphic; when the selected component structure graphic does not correspond in the three views, the corresponding relationship of the selected component structure graphic in the three views is corrected; otherwise, when the selected component structure graphic is When the three views correspond, go directly to the next step; when the squared angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect, correct the squared angle to the actual squared angle in the three views, otherwise, When the orientation angle in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is correct, the process proceeds directly to the next step; when the structural direction in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic is incorrect, the direction of the structure is corrected to be the actual in the three views. Structure direction, otherwise, the structural side of the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic When correct, go directly to the next step; when the design parameters in the attribute information of the selected component structure graphic are incorrect, correct the design parameter to the actual design parameters in the three views, otherwise, when the selected component structure graphic When the design parameters in the attribute information are correct, the process proceeds directly to the next step; and when the design accuracy of the selected component structure pattern does not reach the design precision in the attribute information, the accuracy of the component structure pattern selected by the user is not met. The method for correcting the component structure graphic wisdom according to claim 4, wherein the method further comprises the steps of: when the design precision of the selected component structure graphic reaches the design precision in the attribute information, or prompts the user to select the component structure graphic. After the accuracy of the component does not meet the requirements, it is judged whether all the component structure patterns of all the categories are completely corrected; when there is still no correction of the component structure pattern, the process returns to the step of selecting a type of component structure pattern from the classified component structure graphics.