RU2754651C1 - Method for assessing level of fitness health - Google Patents

Abstract

FIELD: sports medicine.

SUBSTANCE: invention relates to sports medicine, namely to functional diagnostics, concerns a method for assessing fitness health, which can be used in the process of physical education of young people, with organized and independent fitness classes, physical lessons and sports, as well as with the organization of physical lessons and health activities in fitness - clubs, health centers, medical and physical dispensaries, etc., for persons from 18 to 70 years old. Initially, systolic pressure, body weight, heart rate, vital capacity, dynamometry and strength index are measured. Additionally, the percentage of body fat, the percentage of active cell mass, the percentage of total body water, and basal metabolism are measured. The coefficients of these indicators are determined in the range from 2 to 5 in accordance with the centile intervals and the body composition index is calculated. The time of holding the breath on inspiration is measured and the index of the I.S. Skibinskaya is calculated. Diastolic blood pressure is measured. Pulse blood pressure is determined. The coefficient of endurance is calculated. Physical fitness testing is carried out according to the results of four motor tests, taking into account age and gender, which characterize the degree of development of the main physical qualities and which are included in the All-Russian Physical Culture and Sports Complex "Ready for Labor and Defense". After that, for the five obtained control indicators SI, BCI, IS, CM, DR, PhT scores from 2 to 5 are determined. The strength index is scored according to centile intervals. Physical fitness is assessed according to the standards of the stage corresponding to age and gender. The level of fitness health is defined as the average of the sum of the points scored over the five benchmarks.

EFFECT: invention improves the accuracy and objectivity of determining fitness health.

1 cl, 6 tbl

Description

The proposed invention relates to sports medicine, namely to functional diagnostics, concerns a method for assessing fitness health, which can be used in the process of physical education of young people, with organized and independent fitness classes, physical culture and sports, as well as with the organization of physical culture and health-improving activities in fitness clubs, health centers, medical and physical dispensaries, etc., for persons from 18 to 70 years old. It will allow expanding and improving the quality of complex diagnostics of the functional state and physical fitness of persons engaged in fitness, physical culture and sports.

Fitness health is defined as the state of physical well-being of the body, conditioned by physical abilities (cardiorespiratory endurance, flexibility, coordination, agility, muscle strength and strength endurance), as well as body composition, which have a direct scientifically based effect on health. The concept of "fitness health" was formed in modern conditions under the influence of the mass enthusiasm of the population for fitness on the basis of the concept of "physical health", expanding and deepening it. To characterize fitness health, modern research and assessment methods are needed, which also include analysis of body composition.

There are many ways to assess the functional state of those who go in for physical culture and sports.

There is a known method for assessing the effect of physical training on the human body (RU 2157088 C1, A61B 5/00, A61B 5/02, publ. 10.10.2000), in which it is proposed to determine the functional, motor-power, anthropometric ratings, figure ratings, health and general rating. The functional rating is determined using the time of holding the breath during inhalation and exhalation, pulse, blood pressure before and after exercise, pulse while standing, lying down and during the recovery period. The motor-strength rating is determined taking into account the obtained distance from the wall to the calf of the leg with one knee firmly pressing against the chest, the height of the maximum leg lift, the number of push-ups, and the time of holding the trunk. Anthropometric rating is determined using data on the amount of fat and muscle tissue in the body, height and body weight. The figure rating is determined using the data on deviations in the amount of subcutaneous fat and in girth. The health rating and overall rating are determined using the above ratings. And the assessment of the effect of physical training on the body is carried out by increasing the indicators of the health rating and the overall rating relative to the initial level.

Determination of the percentage of fat in body mass is an advantage of this method, but it is assessed using a more accessible, but less accurate method - caliperometry. Also, the disadvantage is the duration of testing and the presence of rather complex mathematical calculations to obtain the result.

A known method for assessing the effectiveness of a health-improving training program (RU 2313274 C1, class A61B5 / 00, A61B5 / 11, A61B5 / 22, A61N1 / 01, A61B5 / 02, A61B5 / 107, publ. 27.12.2007), according to the rules, which determine the dynamics of the most informative indicators: the percentage of fat and muscle mass, vital and strength index, physical performance according to the PWC ₁₇₀ test; normalization of the type of reaction and a decrease in the recovery time after the Martine stress test, improvement of well-being, the realization of the set goal and the desire to continue training, each indicator is assigned a point, after which the total efficiency score is determined.

To the disadvantages of the above method, which evaluates the impact of the training program, can be attributed to the lack of testing of physical qualities, as well as the fact that the study of the composition of the body is assessed only by two parameters.

A known method for assessing the reserves of physical health and working capacity of the population (RU 2147208 C1, class A61B5 / 02, A61B5 / 0205, A61B5 / 11, A61B5 / 021, A61B5 / 024, publ. 10.04.2000). According to this method, it is proposed to determine heart rate, blood pressure, VC in the passive phase of diagnosis, and to determine the recovery of the pulse in the recovery phase, while in the active phase to measure the flexibility of the spine, strength endurance of the muscles of the arms, shoulder girdle and abdominal press. The assessment is carried out by obtaining a generalized indicator in the form of an index of physical condition. The disadvantages of this method is the lack of body weight indicators in the formula, and even more so the body composition, which makes it difficult to fully assess the physical condition and reserve capabilities of the body and, therefore, reduces the information content of the diagnosis.

The closest way, which is chosen as a prototype, is a method for quantitative assessment of physical health (FZ) according to G. L. Apanasenko (On the possibility of a quantitative assessment of human health // Hygiene and Sanitation. 1985. No. 6. P.55-57), which has long been widely used as a method for rapid assessment of physical health. The author has developed an assessment scale that allows you to give a point assessment of the level of health according to the simplest, but informative from the point of view of physical health, morphological and functional indicators:

- length (DT) and body weight (MT), which are used to calculate the weight-growth index (GRP) GRP = MT / DT;

- vital capacity of the lungs (VC), calculate the vital index (LI) VH = VC / MT;

- the muscular strength of the right hand (DPK), calculate the power index (SI) SI = DPK / MTx100%;

- systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), calculate the Robinson index (IR) IR = SBHHR / 100);

- the recovery time of the pulse after the load in the form of 20 squats in 30 seconds (HRHR).

The data obtained are compared with the table, the score for each indicator is determined, the total score is displayed and the level of physical health is determined (table 1).

Table 1

Physical health assessment scale by the method of G.L. Apanasenko

indicators PHYSICAL HEALTH short below the average average above the average high MT / DT
(g / cm) men ≥ 501 451-500 401-450 375-400 ≤ 375 women ≥ 451 401-450 375-400 400-351 ≤ 350 scores -2 -1 0 0 0 VC / MT
(ml / kg) men ≤ 50 51-55 56-60 61-65 ≥ 66 women ≤ 40 41-45 46-50 51-56 ≥ 57 scores 0 1 2 4 5 DPK / MT
(kg / kg) men ≤ 60 61-65 66-70 71-80 ≥ 81 women ≤ 40 41-50 51-55 56-60 ≥ 61 scores -1 0 1 2 3 HRxSAD / 100 men ≥ 111 95-110 85-94 70-84 ≤ 69 women ≥ 111 95-110 85-94 70-84 ≤ 69 scores -2 0 2 3 4 recovery time
Heart rate after 20
squats men 3 2-3 1.30-1.50 1.00-1.29 0.59 women 3 2-3 1.30-1.50 1.00-1.29 0.59 scores -2 1 3 5 7 Overall level assessment
health, the amount of points -6 1 7 12 16

The main advantage of this method is the simplicity of its implementation with a minimum set of measuring instruments, which allows it to be widely used in mass surveys of the population.

The disadvantage of this method is the bias of the weight-growth rate, when the parameters of the body composition are not taken into account. Also to the disadvantages the above method can be attributed to the absence of testing of physical qualities in assessing physical health, and the fact that this technique does not take into account the age characteristics of the surveyed.

The objective of the claimed invention is to develop a method for determining the level of fitness health, based on measuring a complex of anthropometric and bioimpedance indicators, as well as testing the level of physical fitness according to the results of exercises from the VFSK RLD.

The technical result of the proposed method is to improve the accuracy and objectivity of determining the level of fitness health.

The task is achieved by the fact that in the method for assessing the level of fitness health, which includes measuring systolic pressure of SBP, body weight MT, heart rate, heart rate, vital capacity of the lungs VC, dynamometry of the duodenum and calculating the power index SI by the formula: SI = DPK / MTx100% , additionally measure the percentage of body fat LMT, in%, the percentage of active cell mass of the ACM, in%, the percentage of total water in the body of OM, in%, the basal metabolism of the OSB, the coefficients of these indicators are determined in the range from 2 to 5 in in accordance with the centile intervals of the CI and calculate the index of the body composition of the ICST according to the formula: ICST = (k _AKM + k _LMT + k _OB + k _OSS ) / 4, where k _LMT is the coefficient of body fat mass, k _AKM is the coefficient of active cell mass, k _AKM - coefficient of total water, k _OSS - coefficient of basal metabolism, measure the time of holding the breath during inhalation prSh and calculate the index of the Skibinskaya IS according to the formula: IS = (VLCх10хпрШ) / HR, I measure t diastolic blood pressure DBP, determine the pulse arterial pressure PAP according to the formula: PAP = SBP-DBP, calculate the endurance coefficient KV by the formula: KV = (HRx10) / PAP, conduct physical readiness testing (FP) based on the results of four motor tests taking into account age and sex, characterizing the degree of development of the main physical qualities and included in the WFSK TRP, after that, the five obtained control indicators SI, IKST, IS, KV, FP determine points from 2 to 5, while the SI power index determines the points in accordance with centile intervals CI: 2 points - unsatisfactory 1.2 CI, 3 points - satisfactory 3.4 CI, 4 points - good 5.6 CI, 5 points - excellent 7.8 CI, for the ICST body composition index the number of points is determined by the following criteria: 2 points - unsatisfactory ICST = 2-2.4, 3 points - satisfactory ICST = 2.5-3.4, 4 points - good ICST = 3.5-4.4, 5 points - excellent ICST = 4 , 5-5, the Skibinskaya IS index has points are determined according to the following criteria: 2 points - unsatisfactory IS = 10 or less, 3 points - satisfactory IS = 11-20, 4 points - good IS = 21-40, 5 points - excellent IS = 41 or more, endurance coefficient of CV the number of points is determined according to the following criteria: 2 points - unsatisfactory CV = 26 or more, 3 points - satisfactory CV = 19-25, 4 points - good CV = 13-18, 5 points - excellent CV = 12 or less, in physical fitness FP results are assessed according to the standards of the step corresponding to age and sex, with the characteristic: "gold badge" - grade 5, "silver badge" - grade 4, "bronze badge" - grade 3, failure to meet the standards - grade 2, the final grade of FP is calculated as the average of the sum of four marks for four exercises and is determined according to the following criteria: 2 points - unsatisfactory 2.0-2.4, 3 points - satisfactory 2.5-3.4, 4 points - good 3.5-4.4 , 5 points - excellent 4.5-5.0, the level of fitness health of the F-Z is determined as the average of the sum of the collected b Alls for five control indicators according to the formula: F-Z = (IKST + SI + IS + KV + FP) / 5, the assessment of the level of fitness health is carried out according to the following criteria: low level of fitness health - 2-2.4 points,

the average level of fitness health - 2.5-3.4 points, a good level of fitness health - 3.5-4.4 points, a high level of fitness health - 4.5-5 points.

The proposed method is carried out as follows.

To do this, first, anthropometry is performed: measurement of body weight (MT), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate (HR), vital capacity of the lungs (VC), dynamometry of the right hand (DPK), Stange test (prSh) ...

Additionally, a study of bioimpedance indicators of the body composition (BSC) is carried out, including the percentage of body fat mass (BMI, in%), active cell mass (ACM, in%), total water in the body (OS, in%), basal metabolism ( Special).

Then the coefficients of these indicators are determined in the range from 2 to 5 in accordance with the centile intervals (CI). To do this, first determine the centile intervals (CI) according to the normative tables developed on the basis of the centile method, which makes it possible to objectively and realistically characterize the distribution of individual indicators in a concise form.

The essence of the centile method is as follows: an ordered variation series covering the entire range of fluctuations of a feature is divided into 100 intervals, hits in which have equal probabilities. The sizes of such centile intervals in absolute units of measurement are not the same. To characterize the distribution, not all 100 are given, but only seven fixed centiles: 3 (5) th, 10 th, 25 th, 50 th, 75 th, 90 th and 95 (97) th. For example, the 3rd centile is such a value of the studied trait, less than which it is observed in 3% of the sample variants. The value of the trait less than the 10th centile is found in 10% of the sample variants, etc. The 50th centile is the median of the row. The intervals between centiles are called centile intervals (CI) (corridors, channels). Depending on the number of the CI, reflecting the location of the individual characteristic of the subject in the row, a value judgment and a medical report are formulated. Thus, the centile scales were developed for morphofunctional and bioimpedance indicators (SI, LMC%, ACM%, RH%, OVB) based on the results of preventive medical examinations at the Health Center of 1446 men and 1660 women 18-70 years old (RU No. 2695022 C1, publ. 07/19/2019). The scales show the maximum and minimum values of each feature. The oscillation range is divided into 8 DIs. Centile scales of morphofunctional and bioimpedance indices distribution are presented in Tables 2-4.

For the indicators of body composition (BMI%, ACM%, RH%, OVB), centile intervals (CI) are determined according to the tables "Centile scales for assessing the indicators of the component composition of the body of men and women 18-70 years old" (Tables 3-4).

To equalize the significance of certain CIs, they determine the coefficients (k) in the range from 2 to 5, which reflect the degree of correspondence of the physiological characteristics of the trait with respect to age and gender, in accordance with Table 5.

Table 5

The ratio of bioimpedance indicators to their centile intervals and coefficients

No. Component indicators
body composition The ratio of centile intervals and
coefficients k = 5 k = 4 k = 3 k = 2 1 LMC,% 2.3 qi 4.5 qi 1, 6 QI 7.8 qi 2 AKM,% 7, 8 QI 5, 6 QI 3, 4 qi 1.2 qi 3 RH,% 5, 6 QI 4.7 qi 2.3 qi 1, 8 tsi 4 Basic metabolism, kcal 2.3 qi 1.4 qi 5, 6 QI 7.8 qi

The component composition index (ICST) is calculated by the formula:

ICST = (k _AKM + k _LMC + k _ОВ + k _ОВОб ) / 4, where

k _LBM - coefficient of body fat mass;

k _AKM - coefficient of active cell mass;

k _AKM - coefficient of total water;

k _Osob - coefficient of basal metabolism.

The time of holding the breath during inhalation is measured, and the index of the Skibinskaya IS is calculated using the formula:

IS = (YLх10хпрШ) / HR.

Diastolic arterial pressure of DBP is measured, pulse arterial pressure of DBP is determined by the formula:

PAD = GARDEN-DAP.

Calculate the coefficient of endurance KV by the formula:

CV = (HRx10) / PAD.

Physical fitness testing (FP) is carried out according to the results of four motor tests (taking into account age and gender), which characterize the degree of development of the main physical qualities and are included in the WFSK RLD. For example, for students 18-25 years old: running 100 m, 2 km, 3 km (min, s); lean forward from a standing position on a gymnastic bench (cm); pull-up from a hang on a high bar - for young men (number of times); flexion and extension of the arms while lying on the floor (number of times); lifting the torso from a supine position - for girls (number of times in 1 min).

Thus, to assess the level of fitness health (F-Z), five control indicators are calculated:

- power index (SI);

- coefficient of endurance (CV);

- Skibinskaya index (IS);

- body composition index (ICST);

- assessment of physical fitness (FP).

After that, the five obtained control indicators SI, IKST, IS, KV, FP are determined by points from 2 to 5.

The power index (SI) is assessed in accordance with the CI (table 2):

unsatisfactory -1.2 qi,

satisfactory - 3.4 qi,

good - 5.6 qi,

excellent - 7.8 CI.

The body composition index (BIC) is assessed in stages.

The body composition index was calculated as the average of the sum of the determined ICST coefficients = (k _ACM + k _LMT + k _OB + k _OV ) / 4, and the result was characterized in points.

Interpretation of ICST results:

2 points - unsatisfactory ICST = 2-2.4;

3 points - satisfactory ICST = 2.5-3.4;

4 points - good ICST = 3.5-4.4;

5 points - excellent ICST = 4.5-5.

The Skibinskaya index (IS) was assessed:

unsatisfactory IC = 10 or less,

satisfactory IS = 11-20,

good IC = 21-40,

excellent IS = 41 or more.

Endurance coefficient (CV) was assessed:

unsatisfactory CV = 26 or more,

satisfactory CV = 19-25,

good CV = 13-18,

excellent CV = 12 or less.

Physical fitness (FP) was assessed according to the results of four motor tests, taking into account age and gender, characterizing the degree of development of the main physical qualities and included in the EFSK RLD.

The results were evaluated according to the standards of the level corresponding to age and sex, with the characteristic:

"Gold badge" - score 5,

"Silver badge" - score 4,

"Bronze badge" - score 3,

failure to comply with standards - score 2.

The final AF score was calculated as the average of the sum of four scores for four exercises:

unsatisfactory - 2.0-2.4,

satisfactory - 2.5-3.4,

good - 3.5-4.4,

excellent - 4.5-5.0.

To determine the level of fitness health, the points scored for 5 control indicators were summed up and their average value was calculated using the formula:

F-Z = (IKST + SI + IS + KV + FP) / 5.

The results were interpreted as:

low level of fitness health - 2-2.4 points,

average level of fitness health - 2.5-3.4 points,

good level of fitness health - 3.5-4.4 points,

high level of fitness health - 4.5-5 points.

Below are examples of a specific implementation of the proposed method for assessing the level of fitness health.

For example, extracts from examination cards at the Health Center were taken. Comparative data of the research stages using the GLApanasenko method and the claimed method are summarized in Table 6. The first column of the table defines the research stages, including the collection of indicators, a description of the applied formula, calculation, result, conclusion and comment. In the second and third columns, the specific implementation of these stages is presented: in the second, an assessment of physical health by the method of G. L. Apanasenko, and in the third, an assessment of fitness health by the claimed method. For each survey result, a commentary is provided justifying the information content and objectivity of the claimed method.

Table 6

Research stages Prototype -
Method G.L. Apanasenko The claimed method -
Fitness health assessment Girl 18 years old (survey card No. 313) collection
indicators DT - 168 cm
MT - 45.0 kg
VC - 4.1 l
WPC - 27.0 kg
GARDEN - 108 mm Hg
Heart rate - 62 beats / min
HR recovery time - 0.5 min MT - 45.0 kg
VC - 4.1 l
WPC - 27.0 kg
GARDEN - 108 mm Hg
DBP - 57 mm Hg
Heart rate - 62 beats / min
Stange test - 64 sec
RH - 56.72%
AKM - 53.39%
LMT - 21.13%
Wasp.ob - 1305 kcal
Running 100 meters - 16.3 seconds
2 km running - 11.05 min
Push-up - 13 times
Flexibility exercise - 18 cm applied
formula GRP = MT / DT
LI = VC / MT
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IR = SADxHSS / 100
HRHR = HR recovery time
FZ = GRP + ZhI + SI + IR + HRHSS ICST = (k _AKM + k _LMC + k _ОВ + k _ОВОб ) / 4
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IS = (YLх10ХпрШ) / HR
CV = (HRx10) / PAD
FP = (100m run + 2km run + push-up + flexibility) / 4
F-Z = (IKST + SI + IS + KV + FP) / 5 Payment GRP = 45000/168 = 267.9 = 0 points
LI = 4100/45 = 91.1 = 5 points
SI = 27.0 / 45.0x100% = 60.0 = 2 points
IR = 108x62 / 100 = 66.96 = 4 points
HRHR = 0.5 min = 7 points FZ = 0 + 5 + 2 + 4 + 7 = 18 ОВ - 56.72% = 6cy, k = 5
AKM - 53.39% = 7qi, k = 5
LMT - 21.13% = 3qi, k = 5
Wasp - 1305 kcal = 2cy, k = 5
ICST = (5 + 5 + 5 + 5) / 4 = 20/4 = 5 = 5 points
SI = 27.0 / 45.0x100% = 60.0 = 8qi = 5 points
IS = (4.1x10x64) / 62 = 42.3 = 5 points
CV = (62x10) / (108-57) = 12.2 = 5 points
Running 100 m - 16.3 sec = 5
2 km run - 11.05 min = 4
Push-ups - 13 times = 4
Flexibility exercise - 18 cm = 5
FP = (5 + 4 + 4 + 5) / 4 = 18/4 = 4.5 = 5 points
Ф-З = (5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5) / 5 = 25/5 = 5 result 18 points 5 points conclusion Physical health is high Fitness health level - high a comment Estimates determined in two ways are equivalent, but in our opinion, the result of measuring fitness health is more informative, because reveals the component composition of the body and assesses physical qualities, showing excellent physical fitness Woman 45 years old (survey card No. 641) collection
indicators DT - 168 cm
MT - 71.0 kg
VC - 3.7 l
WPC - 35.0 kg
GARDEN - 118 mm Hg
Heart rate - 57 beats / min
HR recovery time - 1.3 min MT - 71.0 kg
VC - 3.7 l
WPC - 35.0 kg
GARDEN - 118 mm Hg
DBP - 80 mm Hg
Heart rate - 57 beats / min
Stange test - 66 sec
RH - 57.15%
AKM - 51.70%
LMT - 27.12%
Wasp.ob - 1400 kcal
Running 60 m - 11.5 sec
2 km running - 15.35 min
push-up - 10 times
Flexibility exercise - 12 cm applied
formula GRP = MT / DT
LI = VC / MT
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IR = SADxHSS / 100
HRHR = HR recovery time
FZ = GRP + ZhI + SI + IR + HRHSS ICST = (k _AKM + k _LMC + k _ОВ + k _ОВОб ) / 4
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IS = (YLх10ХпрШ) / HR
CV = (HRx10) / PAD
FP = (60m run + 2km run + push-up + flexibility) / 4
F-Z = (IKST + SI + IS + KV + FP) / 5 Payment GRP = 71000/168 = 422.6 = -1 point
LI = 3700 / 71.0 = 52.1 = 4 points
SI = 35.0 / 71.0x100% = 49.3 = 0 points
IR = 118x57 / 100 = 67.3 = 4 points
HRHR = 1.3 min = 3 points
ФЗ = -1 + 4 + 0 + 4 + 3 = 10 RH - 57.15% = 5tsi, k = 5
AKM - 51.70% = 5qi, k = 4
LMT - 27.12% = 4cy, k = 4
Wasp.ob - 1400 kcal = 3cy, k = 5
ICST = (5 + 4 + 4 + 5) / 4 = 18/4 = 4.5 = 5 points
SI = 35.0 / 71.0x100% = 49.3 = 5qi = 4 points
IS = (3.7x10x66) / 57 = 42.8 = 5 points
CV = (57x10) / (118-80) = 15.0 = 4 points
Running 60 m - 11.5 sec = 5
2 km running - 15.35 min = 4
push-up - 10 times = 5
Flexibility exercise - 12 cm = 5
FP = (5 + 4 + 5 + 5) / 4 = 19/4 = 4.75 = 5 points
F-Z = (5 + 4 + 5 + 4 + 5) / 5 = 23/5 = 4.6 = 5 result 10 points 5 points conclusion Physical health - average Fitness health level - high a comment The estimates determined in two ways differ, if the results of the prototype method indicate an average level of physical health, then according to the fitness health estimates, good physical fitness is determined, which is not investigated using the method of G.L. Apanasenko. The weight-growth index determines pre-obesity in the subject, while according to the claimed method, excess weight can be determined due to well-developed muscle mass, and not fat. Also, the disadvantage of the technique of G.L. Apanasenko is that it does not take into account the age characteristics of the organism. Therefore, the assessment of the level of fitness health using the analysis of the composition of the body, as well as taking into account age characteristics, gives a more objective result. Man 57 years old (survey card No. 645) collection
indicators DT - 164 cm
MT - 66.0 kg
VC - 4.9 l
WPC - 41.0 kg
GARDEN - 123 mm Hg
Heart rate - 58 beats / min
HR recovery time - 0.5 min MT - 66.0 kg
VC - 4.9 l
WPC - 41.0 kg
GARDEN - 123 mm Hg
DBP - 66 mm Hg
Heart rate - 58 beats / min
Stange test - 87 sec
RH - 56.77%
AKM - 56.65%
LMT - 22.44%
Wasp.ob - 1408 kcal
Exercise on the press - 25 times
2 km running - 12.33 min
Pull-up - 14 times
Flexibility exercise - 6 cm applied
formula GRP = MT / DT
LI = VC / MT
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IR = SADxHSS / 100
HRHR = HR recovery time
FZ = GRP + ZhI + SI + IR + HRHSS ICST = (k _AKM + k _LMC + k _ОВ + k _ОВОб ) / 4
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IS = (VLCх10хпрШ) / HR
CV = (HRx10) / PAD
FP = (press + run2km + pull-up + flexibility) / 4
F-Z = (IKST + SI + IS + KV + FP) / 5 Payment GRP = 66000/164 = 402.4 = 0 points
LI = 4900 / 66.0 = 74.2 = 5 points
SI = 41.0 / 66.0x100% = 62.1 = 0 points
IR = 123x58 / 100 = 71.34 = 3 points
HRHR = 0.5 min = 7 points
ФЗ = 0 + 5 + 0 + 3 + 7 = 15 ОВ - 56.77% = 3cy, k = 3
AKM - 56.65% = 5qi, k = 4
LMT - 22.44% = 4cy, k = 4
Wasp - 1408 kcal = 1cy, k = 4
ICST = (3 + 4 + 4 + 4) / 5 = 15/4 = 3.75 = 4 points
SI = 41.0 / 66.0x100% = 62.1 = 7qi = 5 points
IS = (4.9x10x87) / 58 = 73.5 = 5 points
CV = (58x10) / (123-66) = 10.2 = 5 points
Exercise on the press - 25 times = 5
Running 2 km - 12.33 min = 4
Pull-ups - 14 times = 5
Flexibility exercise - 6 cm = 5
FP = (5 + 4 + 5 + 5) / 4 = 19/4 = 4.75 = 5 points
F-Z = (4 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 5) / 5 = 24/5 = 4.8 = 5 result 15 points 5 points conclusion The level of physical health is above average Fitness health level - high a comment Assessments of fitness health are slightly higher than according to the method of G. L. Apanasenko, due to the determination of the composition of the body with the identification of high indicators of muscle mass, not fat. Also, the assessment of good physical fitness increases the final result. The SI normative scale in the method of G.L. Apanasenko, developed in the 80s, does not correspond to modern standards and has overestimated requirements. Therefore, assessing the level of fitness health gives a more objective result. Woman 55 years old (survey card No. 643) collection
indicators DT - 158 cm
MT - 67.0 kg
VC - 2.9 l
WPC - 22.0 kg
GARDEN - 128 mm Hg
Heart rate - 76 beats / min
HR recovery time - 1 min MT - 67.0 kg
VC - 2.9 l
WPC - 22.0 kg
GARDEN - 128 mm Hg
DBP - 81 mm Hg
Heart rate - 76 beats / min
Stange test - 47 sec
RH - 47.86%
AKM - 44.11%
LMT - 34.62%
Wasp.ob - 1333 kcal
Exercise on the press - 14 times
2 km running - 17.41 min
push-up - 4 times
Flexibility exercise - 15 cm applied
formula GRP = MT / DT
LI = VC / MT
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IR = SADxHSS / 100
HRHR = HR recovery time
FZ = GRP + ZhI + SI + IR + HRHSS ICST = (k _AKM + k _LMC + k _ОВ + k _ОВОб ) / 4
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IS = (VLCх10хпрШ) / HR
CV = (HRx10) / PAD
FP = (press + run2km + push-up + flexibility) / 4
F-Z = (IKST + SI + IS + KV + FP) / 5 Payment GRP = 67000/158 = 424.1 = -1 point
LI = 2900 / 67.0 = 43.3 = 1 point
SI = 22.0 / 67.0x100% = 32.8 = -1 point
IR = 128x76 / 100 = 97.28 = 0 points
HRHR = 1 min = 5 points
ФЗ = -1 + 1 + (- 1) + 0 + 5 = 4 ОВ - 47.86% = 1cy, k = 2
AKM - 44.11% = 1cy, k = 2
LMT - 34.62% = 6qi, k = 3
Wasp - 1333 kcal = 1cy, k = 4
ICST = (2 + 2 + 3 + 4) / 4 = 11/4 = 2.75 = 3 points
SI = 22.0 / 67.0x100% = 32.8 = 2qi = 2 points
IS = (2.9x10x47) / 76 = 17.9 = 3 points
CV = (76x10) / (128-81) = 16.2 = 3 points
Exercise on the press - 14 times = 4
Running 2 km - 17.41 min = 3
push-up - 4 times = 3
Flexibility exercise - 15 cm = 5
FP = (4 + 3 + 3 + 5) / 4 = 15/4 = 3.7 = 4 points
Ф-З = (3 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 4) / 5 = 15/5 = 3 = 3 points result 4 points 3 points conclusion Physical health is below average Fitness health level - satisfactory a comment Assessment of fitness health is slightly higher than physical health by the method of G.L. Apanasenko, which gives a more objective result, because physical fitness is also evaluated. The disadvantage of the technique of G.L. Apanasenko is that it does not take into account the age characteristics of the organism. Male, 27 years old (survey card No. 711) collection
indicators DT - 185 cm
MT - 68.0 kg
VC - 5.6 l
WPC - 44.0 kg
GARDEN - 122 mm Hg
Heart rate - 95 beats / min
HR recovery time - 1 min MT - 68.0 kg
VC - 5.6 l
WPC - 44.0 kg
GARDEN - 122 mm Hg
DBP - 62 mm Hg
Heart rate - 95 beats / min
Stange test - 90 sec
RH - 60.35%
AKM - 57.42%
LMT - 17.55%
Wasp.ob - 1743 kcal
Running 100 meters - 13.8 seconds
3 km running - 13.22 min
pull-up - 15 times
Flexibility exercise - 8 cm applied
formula GRP = MT / DT
LI = VC / MT
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IR = SADxHSS / 100
HRHR = HR recovery time
FZ = GRP + ZhI + SI + IR + HRHSS ICST = (k _AKM + k _LMC + k _ОВ + k _ОВОб ) / 4
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IS = (YLх10ХпрШ) / HR
CV = (HRx10) / PAD
FP = (100m run + 3km run + pull-up + flexibility) / 4
F-Z = (IKST + SI + IS + KV + FP) / 5 Payment GRP = 68000/185 = 367.6 = 0 points
LI = 5600 / 68.0 = 82.4 = 5 points
SI = 44.0 / 68.0x100% = 64.7 = 0 points
IR = 122x95 / 100 =
115.9 = -2 points
HRHR = 1 min = 5 points
ФЗ = 0 + 5 + 0 + (- 2) + 5 = 10 RH - 60.35% = 5tsi, k = 5
AKM - 57.42% = 5qi, k = 4
LMT - 17.55% = 3cy, k = 5
Wasp - 1743 kcal = 4qi, k = 4
ICST = (5 + 4 + 5 + 4) / 4 = 18/4 = 4.5 = 5 points
SI = 44.0 / 68.0x100% = 64.7 = 5qi = 4 points
IS = (5.6x10x90) / 95 = 53.1 = 5 points
CV = (95x10) / (122-62) = 15.8 = 4 points
Running 100 m - 13.8 sec = 5
Running 3 km - 13.22 min = 4
pull-up - 15 times = 5
Flexibility exercise - 8 cm = 4
FP = (5 + 4 + 5 + 4) / 4 = 18/4 = 4.5 = 5 points
F-Z = (5 + 4 + 5 + 4 + 5) / 5 = 23/5 = 4.6 = 5 result 10 points 5 points conclusion Physical health - average Fitness health level - high a comment The SI normative scale in the method of G.L. Apanasenko, developed in the 80s, does not correspond to modern standards and has overestimated requirements.
The cardiorespiratory system according to the method of G.L. Apanasenko is assessed separately, and the cardiovascular system is assessed only by two parameters - SBP and heart rate. The fitness health methodology examines the cardiorespiratory system using the Skibinskaya index, where the indicators of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems are used interconnectedly. In this case, CV is calculated using three parameters of the cardiovascular system (SBP, DBP, HR), also in interrelation. According to the assessments of fitness health, good physical fitness is determined, which is not investigated using the method of G.L. Apanasenko. Young man 18 years old (survey card No. 322) collection
indicators DT - 180 cm
MT - 82.0 kg
VC - 5.2 l
WPC - 55.0 kg
GARDEN - 117 mm Hg
Heart rate - 74 beats / min
HR recovery time - 1 min MT - 82.0 kg
VC - 5.2 l
WPC - 55.0 kg
GARDEN - 117 mm Hg
DBP - 70 mm Hg
Heart rate - 74 beats / min
Stange test - 72 sec
RH - 58.05%
AKM - 56.65%
LMT - 18.43%
Wasp.ob - 1655 kcal
Running 100 meters - 13.3 seconds
3 km running - 12.44 min
pull-up - 13 times
Flexibility exercise - 14 cm applied
formula GRP = MT / DT
LI = VC / MT
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IR = SADxHSS / 100
HRHR = HR recovery time
FZ = GRP + ZhI + SI + IR + HRHSS ICST = (k _AKM + k _LMC + k _ОВ + k _ОВОб ) / 4
SI = DPK / MTx100%
IS = (VLCх10хпрШ) / HR
CV = (HRx10) / PAD
FP = (100m run + 3km run + pull-up + flexibility) / 4
F-Z = (IKST + SI + IS + KV + FP) / 5 Payment GRP = 82000/180 = 455.6 = -1 point
LI = 5200 / 82.0 = 63.4 = 4 points
SI = 55.0 / 82.0x100% = 67.1 = 1 point
IR = 117x74 / 100 = 86.6 = 2 points
HRHR = 1 min = 5 points
ФЗ = -1 + 4 + 1 + 2 + 5 = 11 points RH - 58.05% = 5cy, k = 5
AKM - 56.65% = 6qi, k = 4
LMT - 18.43% = 4qi, k = 4
Wasp - 1655 kcal = 3qi, k = 5
ICST = (5 + 4 + 4 + 5) / 4 = 18/4 = 4.5 = 5 points
SI = 55.0 / 82.0x100% = 67.1 = 7qi = 5 points
IS = (5.2x10x72) / 74 = 50.6 = 5 points
CV = (74x10) / (117-70) = 15.7 = 4 points
Running 100 meters - 13.3 seconds = 5
Running 3 km - 12.44 min = 4
pull-up - 13 times = 5
Flexibility exercise - 14 cm = 5
FP = (5 + 4 + 5 + 5) / 4 = 19 / 44.75 = 5 points
F-Z = (5 + 5 + 5 + 4 + 5) / 5 = 24 / 54.8 = 5 result 11 points 5 points conclusion Physical health - average Fitness health level - high a comment The estimates determined in two ways differ, if the results of the prototype method indicate an average level of physical health, then according to the fitness health estimates, good physical fitness is determined, which is not investigated using the method of G.L. Apanasenko. According to the prototype method, the weight-height indicator reveals pre-obesity in the subject, while according to the claimed method, excess weight can be determined due to well-developed muscle mass, and not fat. Therefore, the assessment of the level of fitness health using the analysis of the composition of the body gives a more objective result.

The advantage of the proposed method lies in the fact that it uses the indicators of CST, and the characteristics of physical fitness is carried out according to the results of the exercises from the VFSK RLD.

A comparative analysis of the proposed solution and the prototype showed that the proposed method differs from the known one in that, to establish the level of human fitness health, a set of specific factors that have not been previously used in such assessment methods are additionally determined: the body composition index, calculated by the values of the percentage of fat, active cell mass and total water in the body, basal metabolism; power index; endurance coefficient; Skibinskaya index and indicators of exercise performance from the RLD complex.

Thus, the technical result from the use of the proposed method, which consists in increasing the accuracy and objectivity of determining fitness health in the complex diagnosis of the functional state of persons involved in fitness, physical culture and sports, is achieved by measuring the complex of anthropometric and bioimpedance indicators, as well as testing the level of physical readiness for exercises from VFSK TRP.

Monitoring fitness health, as an indicator of the quality of life of a modern person, where sports style has become one of the leading components of lifestyle, allows you to track changes in the body during training and adjust the nature, focus and volume of physical activity. The inclusion of exercises from the VFSK TRP into the methodology contributes to its popularization, both among young people and among the adult population.

Claims (49)

A method for assessing the level of fitness health, including measuring the systolic pressure of SBP, body weight MT, heart rate, heart rate, vital capacity of the lungs, dynamometry of the duodenum and calculating the power index SI according to the formula: SI = DPK / MTx100%, characterized in that it is additionally measured the content of body fat LMT,%, the content of the active cell mass of the ACM,%, the content of total water in the body, OM,%, the basal metabolism of the OSB, the coefficients of these indicators are determined in the range from 2 to 5 in accordance with the centile intervals of the CI according to tables 3, 4 and 5, contained in the description, and calculate the index of the component composition of the ICST body according to the formula: IKST = (kАКМ + kЖМТ + kОВ + kОсОб) / 4, where kLBM - coefficient of body fat mass, kАКМ - coefficient of active cell mass, kАКМ - coefficient of total water, kОсОб - coefficient of basal metabolism, carry out the Shtange test, measuring the time of holding the breath during inhalation prSh, and calculate the index of the Skibinskaya IS according to the formula: IS = (VLCх10хпрШ) / HR, diastolic arterial pressure of DBP is measured, pulse arterial pressure of DBP is determined by the formula: PAD = GARDEN-DAP, calculate the coefficient of endurance KV by the formula: CV = (HRx10) / PAD, physical readiness testing (FP) is carried out according to the results of four movement tests, taking into account age and gender, included in the WFSK RLD, selected from the group: 60 m run, 100 m run, 2 km run, 3 km run, push-ups, pull-ups, jump from seats, flexibility exercises, abs; after that, scores from 2 to 5 are determined for the five obtained control indicators SI, ICST, IS, KV, FP, while the SI power index determines the scores in accordance with the centile intervals of the CI: 2 points - unsatisfactory 1.2 CI, 3 points - satisfactory 3.4 CI, 4 points - good 5.6 CI, 5 points - excellent 7.8 CI, for the ICST body composition index, the number of points is determined according to the following criteria: 2 points - unsatisfactory 2-2.4, 3 points - satisfactory 2.5-3.4, 4 points - good 3.5-4.4, 5 points - excellent 4.5-5, for the Skibinskaya IS index, the number of points is determined according to the following criteria: 2 points - unsatisfactory 10 or less, 3 points - satisfactory 11-20, 4 points - good 21-40, 5 points - excellent 41 and more, for the KV endurance coefficient, the number of points is determined according to the following criteria: 2 points - unsatisfactory 26 or more, 3 points - satisfactory 19-25, 4 points - good 13-18, 5 points - excellent 12 or less, in physical fitness of FP, the results are assessed according to the standards of the stage corresponding to age and gender, with the characteristic: "Golden insignia" - grade 5, "Silver insignia" - grade 4, "Bronze insignia" - grade 3, failure to comply with standards - score 2, The final AF score is calculated as the average of the sum of four scores for four exercises and is determined according to the following criteria: 2 points - unsatisfactory 2.0-2.4, 3 points - satisfactory 2.5-3.4, 4 points - good 3.5-4.4, 5 points - excellent 4.5-5.0, determine the indicator of fitness health F-Z as the average of the sum of points scored for five control indicators according to the formula: F-Z = (IKST + SI + IS + KV + FP) / 5, and assess fitness health levels as: low level with F-Z 2 - 2.4 points, average level at F-Z 2.5-3.4 points, good level with F-Z 3.5-4.4 points, high level with F-Z 4.5-5 points.