RU2685848C1 - Method of assessing the preparedness level of anti-aircraft snipers squad at training aids - Google Patents

Abstract

FIELD: military equipment.SUBSTANCE: invention relates to simulator technologies, in particular to methods for assessing results of exercises on training aids (TA), and can be used for assessment of firing results of separation of self-gunners-gunners when training them on TA. Method is based on formation of assessment for I-th firing of each anti-aircraft sniper taking into account its category Q (first, second, third) and possibility of correction of assessment for I-th firing. Further, the N-th number of firings of each anti-aircraft sniper is taken into account, the arithmetic mean value of the results of the N-th number of firings of each anti-aircraft sniper is formed, and based on the obtained result, the value of the preparedness level of each anti-aircraft sniper is formed. Then assessment of separation of anti-aircraft snipers squad for I-st shooting is made with due allowance for level of difficulty of exercise, after that evaluation of results of I-th firing of separation of anti-aircraft snipers squad is corrected. N-th number of firing of automatic gunners is taken into account, average arithmetic value of results of N-th number of firings of marksmen of anti-aircraft snipers squad is formed, value of preparedness level of detachment of anti-aircraft snipers squad is formed. Results of firing anti-aircraft sniper, as well as of anti-aircraft snipers squad in whole, are documented, level of readiness of detachment of anti-aircraft snipers squad is analyzed to determine further actions of separation of anti-aircraft snipers squad.EFFECT: providing automated assessment of preparedness level of infantry anti-aircraft snipers (low, medium, high) taking into account the level of complexity of proposed for the exercises on TA (low, medium, high) depending on their category (first, second, third) and current level of preparedness (low, medium, high); invention increases reliability of assessment of firing of anti-aircraft snipers squad and enables to generate necessary control actions for them during further preparation.1 cl, 2 dwg

Description

The invention relates to the field of training technologies, in particular to methods of evaluating the results of the exercises on the training equipment (TCB) and can be used to evaluate the results of firing of the department of anti-aircraft gunners when training them on the TCB.

There is a method of automated training and assessment of the level of crew training, which consists in a preliminary demonstration before the trainees of the correct actions and subsequent automatic monitoring of the correctness of these actions with the repetition of the demonstration of the correct actions at the request of the trainees. At the same time, the assessment of the quality of crew training is assessed automatically in accordance with the frequency of trainee's circulation of the prompts and the significance of the mistakes made by them (RF patent for invention No. 93030183, G09B 9/04, publ. 10.02.1997).

This method does not take into account the level of preparedness of students, as well as the level of complexity of the exercises proposed for implementation. It should be noted that when assessing the crew for the objectiveness of the assessment and to take into account the results of the activities of each crew member, it is necessary to take into account the current level of preparedness of each specialist when giving marks to a group of students.

There is a method of assessing the level of preparedness of the student, which consists in the fact that to test the level of preparedness using a binary scale of marks, which consists of two parts - basic and creative, and the base scale of marks includes a gradation from 1.0 to 5.0 points, and a creative scale marks has the following gradation: 5.1; 5.2; 5.3; 5.4; 5.5; 5.6; 5.7; 5.8; 5.9 points (patent of the Russian Federation for invention No. 2003133150, G09B 19/00, publ. 04/27/2005).

The disadvantages of this method in relation to the evaluation of the department of anti-aircraft gunners are: the subjectivism of the leader of the class in determining the value of the final grade; lack of criteria for issuing a final grade; the need to carry out the assessment of knowledge and skills, manual skills; the level of preparedness of each individual student is not taken into account; does not take into account the level of complexity of the exercises proposed for execution. It should be noted that this method is not very suitable for assessing a group of students, because It does not take into account the parameters of this group and the grade given by the class leader will not be sufficiently substantiated.

The closest to the claimed technical solution is the method of evaluating the department of anti-aircraft gunners, implemented in the existing universal complex simulator 9F859 "Cone" [Operation Guide. 9F859.00.000. Re. 2016] This method is based on fixing the results of executing the i-th firing of the N-th number of firing by each anti-aircraft gunner with the subsequent formation of the evaluation value for the result of the firing, adjusting the evaluation value for the result of this firing when the 1st and 2nd category, taking into account the N-th number of firing and determining the n successfully completed firing, the formation of K values of the level of preparedness of each anti-aircraft gunner (preparedness ratio), based on the definition of the ratio n successfully performed simulator shots to N total number of shots performed:

Then, the value of the evaluation of the separation of anti-aircraft gunners according to the criteria described in the Course of Shooting for the N-e number of results of shooting of all anti-aircraft gunners in the department, documenting estimates of the results of shooting.

The described method adopted for the prototype of the invention.

The disadvantage of the prototype is: the approach to assessing the level of preparedness carried out by the instructor on the basis of successfully completed single firing, which will be of a subjective nature. This circumstance imposes additional requirements for instructor qualifications. The disadvantage of the prototype should be attributed to the fact that the resulting value of the assessment of the level of preparedness is quantitative in nature and does not reflect the qualitative characteristic of the actions of the gunner, trained in the TCF, and gives only an approximate assessment of the level of preparedness. It should be noted that at present this method is not automated and manually by the formula (1). The disadvantage of the prototype is also the lack of consideration of the level of complexity of the exercise proposed for the separation of anti-aircraft gunners, depending on the current level of preparedness of an individual anti-aircraft gunner (arrows in anti-aircraft gunners at the initial stage of training can be with different levels of preparedness). The disadvantages of the method include the lack of automatic documentation of the level of preparedness of both the individual anti-aircraft gunner and the department as a whole in order to analyze the further training of these specialists.

The objective of the invention is an automated assessment of the level of preparedness of the department of anti-aircraft gunners (low, medium, high), taking into account the level of complexity proposed for the exercises on the TCF (low, medium, high) depending on the category (first, second, third) and the current level of preparedness (low, medium, high) data of anti-aircraft gunners. The present invention will increase the reliability of the assessment of the shooting of the department of anti-aircraft gunners and will allow to form for them the necessary control actions in the process of further preparation.

The solution of the considered problem is achieved by the fact that, unlike the well-known technical solution, in the method of estimating the level of preparedness of the squad of anti-aircraft gunners on the TCB form estimates for the i-th firing of each anti-aircraft gunner taking into account its category Q (first, second, third), correct the estimates for the i-th firing of each anti-aircraft gunner, take into account the N-oe number of firing of each anti-aircraft gunner, form an arithmetic average of the results of the N-th number of firing of each anti-aircraft gunner, form the value of the level n preparedness of each anti-aircraft gunner, form an assessment of the separation of anti-aircraft gunners for the i-th shooting, taking into account the level of difficulty of the exercise, correct the assessment of the results of the i-th shooting of the department of anti-aircraft gunners, take into account the N-oe number of firing of the department of anti-aircraft gunners, form an arithmetic mean the results of the N-th number of firing divisions of anti-aircraft gunners, form the value of the level of preparedness of the department of anti-aircraft gunners, document the results of firing of each anti-aircraft gunner, as well as from divisions of anti-aircraft gunners in general, analyze the level of preparedness of the department of anti-aircraft gunners.

FIG. 1 shows the structure of a method for estimating the level of preparedness of an anti-aircraft gunner unit when firing at the training unit, FIG. 2 - module for the formation of the evaluation of the separation of anti-aircraft gunners for the i-th firing of N-the number of firing.

,

,

, (по шкалам «неудовлетворительно» - 2; «удовлетворительно» - 3; «хорошо» - 4; «отлично» - 5), а также качественные составляющие результатов стрельбы: время t_вp.cтp выполнения операций (процедур) боевой работы и факт пропуска цели Х_n.ц (если он имел место).The method is implemented as follows. In accordance with the exercise proposed for execution on the control panel, the results of the i-th firing are recorded (point 1 of fig. 1). The quantitative values of private estimates are recorded.

,

,

(on scales “unsatisfactory” - 2; “satisfactory” - 3; “good” - 4; “excellent” - 5), as well as the qualitative components of the shooting results: time t _bp. execution of operations (procedures) of combat work and the fact skip target X _n.c (if it occurred).

j-то стрелка-зенитчика за i-ю стрельбу по алгоритму, разработанному на основании требований Курса стрельб. В данном алгоритме весь процесс оценивания результата i-й стрельбы стрелка-зенитчика основывается на факте поражения или не поражения цели. Если цель поражена, при условии, что время выполнения стрельбы меньше или равно 6 с, то выставляется оценка «отлично» - 5. Если же при поражении цели время на стрельбу затрачено больше 6 с, но меньше или равное 8 с, выставляется оценка «хорошо» - 4. Если время на поражение цели превышает 8 с, то выставляется оценка «удовлетворительно» - 3. При пуске ракеты, (т.е. при выполнении всех операций боевой работы от момента обнаружения цели (получения целеуказания (ЦУ) до момента вылета ракеты из трубы), но не поражении цели, в любом случае выставляется оценка «удовлетворительно», т.к. условная вероятность встречи зенитной управляемой ракеты (ЗУР) с целью и условная вероятность поражения одной цели одной ЗУР не зависят от действий стрелка-зенитчика. Далее происходит учет ошибок первой и второй категории, при совершении которых в процессе боевой работы в составе отделения (стрельба по нескольким целям различными стрелками-зенитчиками) должна выставляться соответствующая оценка. К ошибкам 1-й категории относятся ошибки, приводящие к невыполнению боевой задачи, за наличие которых выставляется оценка «неудовлетворительно» (ошибки 1-й категории недопустимы). К ошибкам 2-й категории относятся ошибки, каждая из которых приводит к снижению итоговой оценки отделения на 1 балл.All these results in the form of numerical codes are transmitted to the module for forming the value of the final assessment of the results of the N-th number of firing by individual anti-aircraft gunners (point 2 of Fig. 1), in which the formation of the assessment takes place

j-arrow of anti-aircraft gunner for the i-th firing according to the algorithm developed on the basis of the requirements of the Course of firing. In this algorithm, the entire process of evaluating the result of the i-th shooting of the gunner is based on the fact of hitting or not hitting the target. If the target is hit, provided that the firing time is less than or equal to 6 s, then the mark is “excellent” - 5. If the target is hit, the shooting time is longer than 6 s, but less than or equal to 8 s, the mark is “good "- 4. If the time to hit a target exceeds 8 s, then a rating of" satisfactory "is set - 3. When a rocket is launched, (i.e., when performing all operations of combat work from the moment the target is detected (target designation) missiles from the pipe), but not hitting the target, in any case, an assessment “Satisfactory”, since the conditional probability of an anti-aircraft guided missile meeting (SAM) with a target and the conditional probability of hitting one target of a single missile defense system do not depend on the actions of the anti-aircraft gunner. Next, the errors of the first and second categories are taken into account. the work in the squad (shooting at several targets by various anti-aircraft gunners) must be given an appropriate assessment. Errors of category 1 include errors leading to the non-fulfillment of the combat mission, for which enka "unsatisfactory" (error category 1 are not allowed). Errors of the 2nd category are errors, each of which leads to a decrease in the final grade of the department by 1 point.

j-го стрелка-зенитчика за i-ю стрельбу, которая транслируется в модуль формирования оценки

за i-ю стрельбу с учетом категории Q_j j-го стрелка-зенитчика. Категория j-го стрелка-зенитчика Q_j определяется индивидуальными особенностями каждого из них и определенным текущим уровнем их подготовленности. Для каждого стрелка-зенитчика определены следующие категории: в конце курса боевой подготовки (первая категория), в процессе боевой подготовки (вторая категория) и с утерянными навыками (третья категория).Then the final grade is formed.

j-th arrow of anti-aircraft gunner for the i-th shooting, which is broadcast in the module of formation of assessment

for the i-th shooting, taking into account the category Q _{j of the} j-th anti-aircraft gunner. The category of the j-th anti-aircraft gunner Q _j is determined by the individual characteristics of each of them and a certain current level of their preparedness. The following categories are defined for each anti-aircraft gunner: at the end of the combat training course (first category), in the course of combat training (second category), and with lost skills (third category).

, когда отдельные операции боевой работы выполнены с ошибками и автоматизировано не оцениваются на УТС. Эти оценки используются для формирования оценки отделения стрелков-зенитчиков за i-ю стрельбу.In the assessment adjustment blocks for the i-th shooting of the j-th anti-aircraft gunner of the module under consideration, the possibility of the head’s adjustment of the values of the final marks is taken into account

when separate operations of combat work are performed with errors and are not automated at TCB. These assessments are used to form an estimate of the anti-aircraft gunners department for the i-th firing.

Statistical accumulation of the results of firing at an air target (CC) by anti-aircraft gunners is carried out in the units for recording the results of performing the N-th number of firing in the form of a matrix describing the set of obtained final grades for the entire series of firing. This matrix, in the form of the arithmetic average of the final corrected estimates of X _av ., _Is transmitted to the formation unit of the assessment value of the level of readiness of the jth anti-aircraft gunner Y _j as a coefficient from 0 to 1. Then this value Y _{j is} converted into the value of the preparedness level of an individual arrow anti-aircraft gunner _U.n (high, medium, low) according to the following criteria:

where: U _yn - level of preparedness of the j-th anti-aircraft gunner;

U _в , U _с , U _н - high, medium and low level of preparedness of the j-th anti-aircraft gunner.

, скорректированных оценок

, оценки уровней подготовленности отдельных стрелков-зенитчиков {Y_j} транслируются в модуль анализа и документирования результатов стрельб отделения стрелков-зенитчиков для последующей обработки.Total values

adjusted estimates

, assessments of the level of preparedness of individual anti-aircraft gunners {Y _j } are translated into the module for analyzing and documenting the results of firing of the anti-aircraft gunners department for further processing.

каждого отдельного j-го стрелка-зенитчика за каждую i-ю стрельбу N-гo количества стрельб поступают в модуль формирования оценки отделения стрелков-зенитчиков за i-ю стрельбу из N-гo количества стрельб, в котором с учетом уровня сложности выбранного упражнения Z_отд из базы данных упражнений формируются оценки

отделения стрелков-зенитчиков за каждую i-ю стрельбу (пункт 3 фиг. 1). Основу данного модуля составляет блок нечеткого вывода (фиг. 2), в котором оценка отделению стрелков-зенитчиков за i-ю стрельбу складывается из оценок, полученных каждым стрелком-зенитчиком

с учетом сложности выполняемого упражнения Z_отд, а так же с учетом ошибок, при совершении которых в процессе боевой работы в составе отделения (стрельба по нескольким целям различными стрелками-зенитчиками) должна выставляться оценка «неудовлетворительно» - учет ошибок 1-й категории {r₁}; или снижаться на 1 балл - учет ошибок 2-й категории {r₂}.Supervisor-adjusted lessons for final grades

each j-th gunners for each i-th fire N-WASTE amount firing fed into the module formation evaluation branch gunners for the i-th firing of N-WASTE amount of firings in which, given the complexity level of the selected exercise Z _Dep from the exercise database, estimates are generated

offices of anti-aircraft gunners for each i-th shooting (point 3 of Fig. 1). The basis of this module is a block of fuzzy output (Fig. 2), in which the assessment of the separation of anti-aircraft gunners for the i-th shooting consists of the estimates obtained by each anti-aircraft gunner

taking into account the complexity of the exercise Z _Dep , as well as taking into account the mistakes, in the commission of which during the combat work in the squad (shooting at several targets with various anti-aircraft gunners), a rating of “unsatisfactory” should be given - taking into account errors of the 1st category {r ₁ }; or decrease by 1 point - accounting for errors of the 2nd category {r ₂ }.

отделению стрелков-зенитчиков за i-ю стрельбу.Fixing categories of errors and their number for the execution of the i-th shooting allows you to create a final grade

Department of anti-aircraft gunners for the i-th shooting.

транслируется в модуль анализа и документирования результатов стрельб отделения стрелков-зенитчиков для последующей обработки. Руководитель занятия имеет возможность скорректировать эту оценку с учетом недостатков, выявленных в процессе боевой работы отделения стрелков-зенитчиков (которые не могут быть учтены с помощью средств автоматизированной оценки (САО) УТС) в модуле корректировки инструктором оценки результатов i-й стрельбы отделения стрелков-зенитчиков

(пункт 4 фиг. 1).Evaluation of the separation of anti-aircraft gunners for the i-th shooting

It is transmitted to the module for analyzing and documenting the results of firing of the anti-aircraft gunners department for further processing. The head of the lesson has the opportunity to adjust this assessment taking into account the shortcomings identified during the combat work of the anti-aircraft gunners unit (which cannot be taken into account using the TCF automated assessment system) in the instructor’s adjustment module for evaluating anti-aircraft gunners

(point 4 of fig. 1).

так же передается в модуль анализа и документирования результатов стрельб отделения стрелков-зенитчиков для последующей обработки.Corrected evaluation of the results of the i-th firing of the anti-aircraft gunners department

It is also transmitted to the module for analyzing and documenting the results of firing of the anti-aircraft gunner unit for further processing.

(пункт 5 фиг. 1) происходит статистическое накопление результатов выполнения N-гo количества стрельб по ВЦ и формирование среднего арифметического значения оценок отделения стрелков-зенитчиков

, за счет обратной связи, которая срабатывает после поступления на данный модуль значения очередной скорректированной оценки отделения стрелков-зенитчиков за i-ю стрельбу. Далее происходит выбор очередного упражнения при выполнении i-й стрельбы N-гo количества стрельб.Further, in the module for accounting for the N-th number of firing of the department of anti-aircraft gunners and the formation of

(point 5 of Fig. 1) there is a statistical accumulation of the results of the execution of the N-th number of firing at the CC and the formation of the arithmetic average of the estimates of the anti-aircraft gunners department

, due to the feedback, which is triggered after the value of the next adjusted estimate of the anti-aircraft gunners department for the i-th firing is received by this module. Next, the next exercise is selected when performing the i-th shooting of the N-th number of firing.

транслируется на модуль формирования значения оценки уровня подготовленности отделения стрелков-зенитчиков (пункт 6 фиг. 1). Здесь с учетом значения

, формируется значение оценки уровня подготовленности отделения стрелков-зенитчиков Y_отд в виде коэффициента от 0 до 1 после чего это значение преобразовывается в значение уровня подготовленности отделения стрелков-зенитчиков (высокий, средний, низкий) по критерию (2).The value of the arithmetic average estimates of the department of anti-aircraft gunners for the N-oe number of firing

It is transmitted to the module for the formation of the value of the assessment of the level of preparedness of the anti-aircraft gunner unit (point 6 of FIG. 1). Here, given the value

The value of the assessment of the level of preparedness of the department of anti-aircraft gunners Y _ret in the form of a coefficient from 0 to 1 is formed, after which this value is converted into the value of the level of preparedness of the department of anti-aircraft gunners (high, medium, low) by criterion (2).

The value of assessing the level of preparedness of the department of anti-aircraft gunners Y _ot comes to the module for selecting a set of control actions that, in the form of exercise codes defining the type, number and level of complexity of training tasks, will be offered for performing the separation of anti-aircraft gunners in their further training with subsequent evaluation of the results shooting

The invention will allow automated, more objectively (justified) and at a new qualitative level to carry out assessment of the activity, as well as the level of preparedness of the anti-aircraft gunners department using the fuzzy sets toolkit, as well as improve the accuracy of the anti-aircraft gunners department shooting and create the necessary control actions for them in the process of further preparation. In addition, the invention will more effectively organize the process of training anti-aircraft gunners. With the help of the presented method, it is possible to obtain not only a quantitative value of the assessment of the level of preparedness, but also to take into account the quality of the actions of the anti-aircraft gunner who is studying at the TCB. Also, the invention allows to take into account the complexity of the exercise proposed by the separation of anti-aircraft gunners for execution, depending on the current level of preparedness of individual anti-aircraft gunners (as part of the anti-aircraft department, anti-aircraft gunners can be with different current level of preparedness). It should be noted that the invention allows to automatically document the value of the assessment of the level of preparedness, both of an individual anti-aircraft gunner and the department as a whole, in order to adjust their further training.

All this, ultimately, will help increase the level of preparedness of the unit of anti-aircraft gunners, and, therefore, will increase the effectiveness of fire in general.

Claims (1)

The method of assessing the level of preparedness of the department of anti-aircraft gunners when firing at the training center, including fixing the results of the i-th shooting from the N-th number of firing by each anti-aircraft gunner, forming an evaluation value for the result of the firing, adjusting the evaluation value for the result of this shooting when the fact errors of the 1st and 2nd categories, taking into account the Nth number of firing and determining n successfully completed firing, manually determining the K value of the level of readiness of each anti-aircraft gunner (coefficient preparedness level), based on determining the ratio of n successfully completed firing on the simulator to N, the total number of firing performed using the formula (1), manually determining the value of the assessment of separation of anti-aircraft gunners according to the criteria described in the shooting course for Ne the number of shooting results of all anti-aircraft gunners in the squad, automatic documentation of the results of shooting of individual anti-aircraft gunners, manual documentation of the results of shooting of anti-aircraft gunners in the department, characterized in that automatically generate estimates for the i-th shooting taking into account the category Q (first, second, third) of each anti-aircraft gunner, adjust the estimates for the i-second shooting of each anti-aircraft gunner, automatically take into account Ne the number of shots of each anti-aircraft gunner, automatically form the arithmetic average the value of the results of the N-th number of firing of each gunner, automatically form the value of the level of preparedness of each gunner, automatically form an estimate of the department of gunners-zenitchi for the i-th firing, taking into account the level of difficulty of the exercise, correct the assessment of the results of the i-th firing of the anti-aircraft gunner unit, automatically take into account Ne the number of firing units for the anti-aircraft gunner unit, automatically generate the arithmetic average of the results of the N-th number of firing unit for the anti-aircraft gunners unit, automatically form the value of the level of preparedness of the anti-aircraft gunners department, automatically document and analyze the results of the shooting of the anti-aircraft gunners department, and comfort level of preparedness department gunners to determine further action department gunners.

Images