RU2003133150A - METHOD FOR EVALUATING TRAINED TRAINING LEVEL - Google Patents

METHOD FOR EVALUATING TRAINED TRAINING LEVEL Download PDF

Info

Publication number
RU2003133150A
RU2003133150A RU2003133150/12A RU2003133150A RU2003133150A RU 2003133150 A RU2003133150 A RU 2003133150A RU 2003133150/12 A RU2003133150/12 A RU 2003133150/12A RU 2003133150 A RU2003133150 A RU 2003133150A RU 2003133150 A RU2003133150 A RU 2003133150A
Authority
RU
Russia
Prior art keywords
evaluating
training level
level
trained training
preparedness
Prior art date
Application number
RU2003133150/12A
Other languages
Russian (ru)
Inventor
Николай Николаевич Семчук (RU)
Николай Николаевич Семчук
Original Assignee
Новгородский государственный университет им. Ярослава Мудрого (RU)
Новгородский государственный университет им. Ярослава Мудрого
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Новгородский государственный университет им. Ярослава Мудрого (RU), Новгородский государственный университет им. Ярослава Мудрого filed Critical Новгородский государственный университет им. Ярослава Мудрого (RU)
Priority to RU2003133150/12A priority Critical patent/RU2003133150A/en
Publication of RU2003133150A publication Critical patent/RU2003133150A/en

Links

Landscapes

  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)

Claims (2)

1. Способ оценки уровня подготовленности обучаемого, включающий проверку знаний, умений и навыков в пределах стандарта содержания образования, отличающийся тем, что для проверки уровня подготовленности используют бинарную шкалу отметок, которая состоит из двух частей - базовой и творческой, причем базовая шкала отметок включает градацию от 1,0 до 5,0 балла, а творческая шкала отметок имеет следующую градацию: 5,1; 5,2; 5,3; 5,4; 5,5; 5,6; 5,7; 5,8; 5,9 балла.1. A method of assessing the level of preparedness of a student, including checking knowledge, skills and abilities within the standard of educational content, characterized in that to check the level of preparedness they use a binary grading scale, which consists of two parts - basic and creative, and the basic grading scale includes gradation from 1.0 to 5.0 points, and the creative scale of marks has the following gradation: 5.1; 5.2; 5.3; 5.4; 5.5; 5.6; 5.7; 5.8; 5.9 points. 2. Способ по п.1, отличающийся тем, что в случае необходимости повышения точности оценки, в качестве значимых используют более мелкие доли балла.2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that if it is necessary to increase the accuracy of the assessment, smaller fractions of the score are used as significant.
RU2003133150/12A 2003-11-12 2003-11-12 METHOD FOR EVALUATING TRAINED TRAINING LEVEL RU2003133150A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
RU2003133150/12A RU2003133150A (en) 2003-11-12 2003-11-12 METHOD FOR EVALUATING TRAINED TRAINING LEVEL

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
RU2003133150/12A RU2003133150A (en) 2003-11-12 2003-11-12 METHOD FOR EVALUATING TRAINED TRAINING LEVEL

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
RU2003133150A true RU2003133150A (en) 2005-04-27

Family

ID=35635794

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
RU2003133150/12A RU2003133150A (en) 2003-11-12 2003-11-12 METHOD FOR EVALUATING TRAINED TRAINING LEVEL

Country Status (1)

Country Link
RU (1) RU2003133150A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2685848C1 (en) * 2018-07-09 2019-04-23 Федеральное государственное казенное военное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Военная академия войсковой противовоздушной обороны Вооруженных Сил Российской Федерации имени Маршала Советского Союза А.М. Василевского" Министерства обороны Российской Федерации Method of assessing the preparedness level of anti-aircraft snipers squad at training aids

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2685848C1 (en) * 2018-07-09 2019-04-23 Федеральное государственное казенное военное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Военная академия войсковой противовоздушной обороны Вооруженных Сил Российской Федерации имени Маршала Советского Союза А.М. Василевского" Министерства обороны Российской Федерации Method of assessing the preparedness level of anti-aircraft snipers squad at training aids

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Maloof et al. Team study training in the college biology laboratory
Niss Issues and problems of research on the teaching and learning of applications and modelling
RU2003133150A (en) METHOD FOR EVALUATING TRAINED TRAINING LEVEL
Lamy et al. The effects of New Jersey’s Abbott preschool program on young children’s school readiness
Gray Jr et al. Advanced Placement human geography: The first five years
Valladolid Development and Validation of Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) for Identifying Students with Reading Difficulties.
Lamy et al. The effects of the Michigan School Readiness Program on young children’s abilities at kindergarten entry
Lamy et al. The effects of West Virginia’s Early Education Program on young children’s school readiness
RU2004130017A (en) METHOD FOR DETERMINING A TEEN'S POSITION FOR SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR AND METHOD FOR PREVENTING SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR
He et al. Assessing the correlation between VST, perception for the ability of reading comprehension and practical reading comprehension performance
Jang Levels of language anxiety relative to proficiency levels
RU2003133148A (en) LEARNING METHOD
Feith SMART Goals Fitness Unit.
Schneider The Trouble with SIOP®.
Alimova THE CREDIT-MODULE SYSTEM OF TRAINING IN ASSESSING STUDENTS'KNOWLEDGE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF PRACTICAL PROCESSES AS WELL AS THE CONVENIENCE CREATED BY THE CREDIT-MODULE SYSTEM
Tomova et al. THE MOTIVATION AND THE EMPATHY IN THE CONTEXT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND THEIR ROLE FOR THE FORMING OF QUALIFIED TEACHERS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT
MEREUŢĂ et al. THE INFLUENCE OF SOMATIC PARAMETERS ON THE CONTROL PARAMETERS DETERMINED DURING THE MGM TEST.
Шутова A standard test as a way of control in a foreign language
Bishop Maths Attacker
Phoenix Time to reassess the role of assessment?
Masters AO Shifting the focus of NAPLAN
EA202191976A1 (en) INTEGRATED SYSTEM AND METHODOLOGY BASED ON INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE, LEARNING THEORIES AND PEDAGOGICAL APPROACHES
Heiden Measuring efficiency of the WriteReader-app
Buckingham Psychological Analysis of the Fundamentals of Arithmetic
Silbey Brain Quest Third Grade Math