RU2496158C2 - Method of explosion reaction implementation, including nuclear or thermonuclear reaction - Google Patents

Abstract

FIELD: blasting operations.

SUBSTANCE: explosion reaction is implemented by periodic charge explosion inside durable sealed case absorbing explosion energy which is diverted from case for further use. Charge is exploded inside solid metal body melted by explosion, and melted metal formed inside sealed body is discharged regularly to free the case for next explosion cycle.

EFFECT: invention allows to optimise explosion reaction aggregate size, for nuclear or thermonuclear reactions as well.

1 cl, 9 dwg

Description

The invention relates to energy.

There is a known solution to generating energy in explosive combustion boilers - see “SCIENCE AND LIFE”, No. 7, 2002. The main goal of this solution is to obtain an almost unlimited source of energy using deuterium for this. Deuterium - an isotope of hydrogen with one "extra" neutron in the nucleus - environmentally friendly, cheap and affordable in unlimited quantities, fuel, because it is released from ordinary water. There is so much of it in one ton of water that it can replace 250 tons of oil. Accordingly, attention to it is increased. Scientists from the Russian Federal Nuclear Center - the All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Technical Physics (RFNC-VNIITF) of Snezhinsk (formerly Chelyabinsk-70) are proposing to explode small thermonuclear charges. According to them, this can save the world from energy starvation and environmental disaster. Snezhintsy ready to design and build a power plant for explosive deuterium energy (VDE) - "explosive combustion boiler" (FAC). This is such a reinforced concrete barrel with a diameter of about 150 and a height of 200 meters, the wall thickness is 35 meters. Inside, it is lined with 20-centimeter steel, and on top it is covered with soil more than a hundred meters thick. In this facility, referred to in the KVS 10 project, inside a protective layer of liquid sodium, using deuterium explosions with a capacity of up to 10 kilotons of TNT, 37 gigawatts of thermal energy can be produced every half hour, which is equivalent to 25 million tons of oil equivalent per year. The FAC developers, justifying this decision, cite the well-known factors of the rational and effective use of explosive technologies, which have long preceded the FAC not by theoretical calculations and reasoning, but by wide and proven life is undeniably profitable and useful practice. We move on cars, in the womb of which dozens of explosions occur every second, creating a pressure much greater than in the FAC. Powerful explosions for peaceful purposes are also not news. The development of the concept of explosive deuterium energy was preceded by the creation of RFNC - VNIITF experts under the guidance of academicians E.I. Zababakhina, E.N. Avrorina and B.V. Litvinov’s “pure” deuterium charges. After all, the scientific and technical potential of the institute was originally aimed not only at creating weapons. For industrial applications, for example, a dozen types of nuclear charges were developed, nine of which were repeatedly used for seismic sounding and extinguishing gas fires, burial of toxic waste and preventing methane explosions in coal mines, for many other projects. Overburden work and loosening of minerals required the creation of charges with even greater “purity” in the generated radioactive “fragments” (and they were created) than are required for the operation of the FAC.

However, the entire complex of unprecedentedly attractive and seemingly even uncompetitive advantages of the PIC runs into an insurmountable, first of all, psychological barrier, which is a universal fear of nuclear and thermonuclear explosions. Therefore, we can safely say that in the foreseeable future, only because of this factor, it is useless to talk about the merits of the FAC, where it is supposed to carry out explosions with power measured in tens of kilotons in TNT, which is equivalent to an hourly repetition of the explosions in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. If, nevertheless, to try to talk about all the other tactical, technical and technological features of the PIC (which scientists and specialists have generally analyzed from all possible sides), the conclusion about the futility of the PIC in this century becomes even more significant.

For several decades, research and development work has been carried out in the diametrically opposite direction (in contrast to FAC) to solve the problem of controlled thermonuclear fusion. In particular, we are talking about inertial fusion. And finally, we are informed, THERE IS A CONTROLLED THERMOAT !!!

10/19/2010 newsland.ru. For the first time in the world, a controlled thermonuclear reaction was carried out and a power factor of 30 was obtained !!! * The National Ignition Facility (NIF) device for controlled thermonuclear energy received the most prestigious award of 2010 for the best scientific project. The National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA) and the Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) announced that the National Controlled Thermonuclear Reaction (NIF) Facility recently completed its first integrated fusion control experiment. In the test, a laser system with 192 laser beams launched 1 megajoule of laser energy into a cryogenic layered capsule of deuterium and tritium, receiving energy with a factor of thirty at the output (the allocation costs thirty times more). NIF is now starting its next phase of work in order to achieve even higher energy output results. The installation has 30 meters of height and the same diameter, located in a building with a total area of three football fields. It focuses 192 ultra-high-power ultraviolet laser beams on a small beryllium capsule of about 2 mm in diameter containing heavy hydrogen isotopes. The tremendous temperatures and pressures created inside the capsule by such an action are comparable to the conditions in the bowels of the stars. In this case, the fusion reaction of the nuclei of hydrogen atoms with the formation of helium nuclei is started. During such a merger, a huge amount of energy is released equal to the energy equivalent of the mass defect. The energy effect of such a reaction is approximately 100 times higher than the cost of creating heavy-duty laser radiation. The machine continues the physical ideology coming from the American Shiva, in which the laser radial rays created a “special point” simulating uniform pressure from all sides in the bowels of the star. By focusing the laser beams in NIF (which can roughly be translated as the National Program for the Controlled Thermonuclear Reaction) during a short pulse, 1.8 to 4 mega joules of energy are supplied to a capsule with fuel in a deep vacuum at a temperature close to absolute zero. In other words, in a time of one 20 billion second, a power of 500 trillion watts is supplied to the capsule. This power should be enough to instantly evaporate the capsule shell, raise the temperature to 100 million degrees and create a blast wave that compresses the vapor of deuterium and tritium. In this case, the density of hydrogen atoms exceeds the density of lead by 100 times. Under these conditions, a dosed reaction of the synthesis of hydrogen atoms into helium atoms begins. A thermonuclear microexplosion of hydrogen is carried out with a volume smaller than a match head with an output of 20 MJ of thermonuclear energy (20 MJ is the equivalent of the energy consumed by two million 100-watt incandescent lamps in one second). The machine is capable of serving capsules with the rhythm of several capsules per hour. Now the question is how to bring this amount to a few per second (for large capacities). It took 12 years to assemble a giant laser system, which allows to achieve the most powerful laser radiation on Earth. The significance of this event is difficult to overestimate. Unless with the advent of fire in human life. A little more - and gas, oil and coal will cease to be energy monopolists, and along with them the political forces that have settled them will cease to be such ... We will wait for changes, and they are just around the corner. Author: Volodya Chernomor (Fedorov) * A powerful leap of the West into the future. - Saturday, 10.16.2010.

Information about the success of Americans is widely and thoroughly discussed and analyzed by scientists and specialists. Moreover, the advertising factor in this story can be seen very clearly. Not to mention that it is necessary to justify, and even more so justify, the further multibillion-dollar costs of such scientific pleasures, which the United States can afford. However, a year has passed after this event, and the initial indescribable enthusiasm begins to fade in the light of critical conclusions and conclusions, which come down in general to the point at which controlled thermonuclear fusion began more than 60 years ago. Those. to the fact that an attractive idea with brilliant simplicity is consistently and inexorably turning into an insoluble ball of contradictions, from which there is still no real way out. And the aforementioned achievement of the Americans, upon closer examination, turns into a super-expensive toy, separated from real industrial energy by an insurmountable abyss with a mass of technical and technological obstacles. Therefore, when there is a delight from a thirty-fold excess of energy output compared with the energy spent on fusion in a deuterium-tritium pea with a diameter of two millimeters, we must not forget about what the gigantic installation of 192 lasers cost. Despite the fact that the rhythmic and reliable operation of this installation in the required mode (now the question is to bring this amount to several per second to obtain high powers), it is unlikely that it will be possible to ensure reliable and efficient operation of the most powerful lasers in this mode in of our century, say knowledgeable people. Moreover, this is only one of the many persistent scientific, technical and technological obstacles that return to their circles the excitement of the American result in solving the problem of controlled fusion. So the burning of the thermonuclear pea in the Livermore National Laboratory does not add any optimism in solving the problem of unlimited energy production from deuterium. For, in comparison with the ITERA project, which is ongoing for several decades and does not guarantee success in the 21st century (as scientists and experts have said more than enough), the American thermonuclear pea, in the opinion of experts who know the subject, is still less encouraging humanity. Although naturally, only the time and results of future research and development in this topic will give a final conclusion, confirming or refuting current forecasts.

However, we do not want to wait for the results of searches and studies for at least several decades, during which the debate about the prospects or complete collapse of the available methods for solving the problem of controlled thermonuclear fusion will continue.

The technical result of the invention is the solution to this problem.

The technical result is achieved by the fact that in the method of carrying out an explosive reaction, including nuclear or thermonuclear, by periodically blasting the charge inside a strong sealed enclosure that receives and receives the heat generated from the explosion, which is removed from the enclosure for its required use, according to the invention, the explosion of the charge is carried out inside a massive metal body, melted as a result of this explosion, with the resulting molten metal inside a sealed enclosure The mustache is periodically released from this enclosure, freeing it for the next explosive reaction cycle.

The invention and its positivity are illustrated in the drawing, presented in nine figures. Let's start with the first three figures, which set out the main feature of the proposed solution. The principal sequence of procedures for this solution is as follows.

There is a strong sealed enclosure 1, inside of which a socket 2 is arranged with an outlet channel 3 from it. A massive metal body 4 is placed inside the nest 2 with an explosive device 5 located inside it. The type of explosive device can be any, let’s say more about this. The purpose of the explosive device is completely similar to the solutions presented above, where the thermal energy generated after the explosion must be sensed and received by a rigid body, inside which the explosion is carried out. But in our solution, the peculiarity of this well-known technological procedure is that the predominant perception of the energy of the explosion should be carried out by a massive metal body 4. This perception should be such that after the explosion the heat from this explosion was consumed to melt the body 4, and such a melting, which will exceed the melting point as much as possible. Those. we are talking about how to maximize the temperature of the melt of the body 4, without bringing it to a boil, which eliminates the evaporation of the metal, which would increase the pressure in the volume of the socket 2.

Let us consider in more detail what happens in our method. To do this, we operate on more specific factors involved and emerging in this decision. In particular, we accept, for example, the following conditions.

The body 4 is made of lead in the form of a cube with a volume of one cubic meter, although it can have any other shape, such as a cylinder, etc. So, we have a lead body 4 weighing 11340 kilograms. Melting point 327, boiling point 1750 degrees Celsius. We take the temperature of the lead melt after the explosion of an explosive device 5 of 1500 degrees Celsius. To ensure the receipt of such a melt, it is required to spend 510300000 calories of heat. This provides a thermonuclear fusion reaction of deuterium weighing 2.87 grams, which corresponds to a calorific value of 17860 kilograms of oil. Thus, we obtain a lead melt with a temperature of 1500 degrees Celsius, which in turn transfers this thermal energy to the housing 1, from which heat is taken by any known technological method, with the further use of this thermal energy for the required need. For example, to obtain water vapor that will rotate turbines of thermal power plants, or to obtain hot water used for heating and hot water supply of buildings for any purpose. The minimum temperature of the melt 4 will depend on this, at which it should be discharged through the exhaust channel 3 from the housing 1, then filling it with the next lead body 4 for the next technological cycle described above. From the melt 4, released from the housing 1, in the process and after the required cooling of this melt, a new body 4 is made, loaded into the housing 1. We described in more detail and illustrated in specific numerical parameters the proposed method of the thermonuclear process, which allows (unlike existing methods) provide the main positives of thermonuclear fusion, eliminating the above negatives of the known technologies of this energy process. The presented considerations characterize the main essence of the proposed solution, which (like any new business) requires the necessary and sufficient search developments and research. But all these developments and studies are primarily the task of the optimal choice of the most appropriate and effective complex combinations of already accumulated and studied technological and constructive scientific and engineering developments that are required to implement our method. Which, however, not only does not exclude, but also most likely implies the emergence of new solutions that will require appropriate patent protection. This applies not only to the potential of intellectual activity of the scientific and engineering community around the world, but also applies to our plans to continue this topic, which is the most relevant and increasingly important on a global scale.

For example, a very important question remains as to what an explosive device 5 should be. We speak out in this regard in the most general way, referring to the achieved level of development in this area. In particular, when we move away from the scale of the FAC, requiring charges of the order of 10 kilotons, and at the same time allowing the most simple and convenient use of charges many times more than the American thermonuclear pea, one should be aware of the actual charges in our method can and should be discussed. In order not to invent anything from ourselves, we illustrate the current situation with a number of information from the Internet.

Unlike ballistic missiles, the launches of which are shown on TV and which are even carried along the country's central square to intimidate enemies, small and invisible tactical atomic bombs are one of the most secret weapons. And one of the most dangerous. Officials reluctantly acknowledge the presence of mini-nuclear charges, although unofficial sources say that nuclear bombs placed in a shopping bag have long been a reality.

Recall physics. For an atomic explosion to occur, a critical mass is needed — a mass sufficient to cause a chain reaction of the decay of the nuclei of the atoms of a substance. The mass of the charge (and therefore the power of the explosion) cannot be less than critical. Here are the critical masses for fissile materials: uranium - 45 kilograms, plutonium - 11 kilograms, americium - 4 kilograms, California - 3 grams. The critical mass can be reduced by strong compression of the substance, the choice of the form of charge (the optimal one is the ball), the use of an additional neutron source (nuclear “fuse”), a neutron reflector (for example, a shell of gold or beryllium) and, finally, using a mixture of different fissile substances (for example, plutonium with california). If you choose plutonium or a mixture of uranium or plutonium with californium as a combat substance, take into account the dimensions and weight of the electronics, neutron source and other fillings, it turns out that the mini-bomb will weigh about 30 kilograms and fit in a suitcase.

Even atomic grenades can be created from pure americium, and atomic bullets from California. The prospects for using such weapons are amazing - the standard Makarov pistol, equipped with atomic cartridges, will destroy the city block, and by emptying the Kalashnikov store, the soldier will wipe a small town off the face of the Earth.

In 1961, the American Airborne Forces, as well as sabotage units, received the Davy Crocket smooth recoilless guns system, which included a light 120-mm M28 gun and a heavy 155-mm M29 gun. Both of them fired an XM-388 shell with a nuclear warhead W-54Y1 with a capacity of 0.01 kt.

The USSR responded to the “Davy Crockett” with the creation of a complex of two 230-mm recoilless Rezed guns on the BTR-60PA chassis. The unmanaged 9M-24 solid-propellant solid-propellant rocket could fly six kilometers.

However, the nuclear arsenals of the leading powers were not limited to the listed ammunition. Even nuclear charges were created and tested for ... small arms!

The new bullets were intended not only for large-caliber (12.7 and 14.3 mm) machine guns, but also for the 7.62 mm Kalashnikov PKS machine gun. Perhaps this was due to the use of not a traditional uranium or plutonium nuclear weapon, but the transuranium element of California and its isotope with an atomic weight of 252. The charge of this substance in the form of a rivet or dumbbell was in the pool, and behind it was a small explosive charge. When hit by a target, a specially designed detonator initiated an explosive, it crushed California, and an explosion occurred. Also, to compensate for the significantly increased mass of the bullet, a special powder was developed, which left the ballistics of the machine gun unchanged.

However, the big drawback of such an ammunition was its heat release - because the shorter the half-life of a radioactive element, the more it emits heat. When a bullet with a California charge was heated, the latter worsened the characteristics of the explosive charge, which, with strong heating, could also detonate. In this regard, atomic cartridges were stored in a special refrigerator - a thick (15 cm) copper plate with cells for cartridges, between which liquid ammonia circulated through the tubes. Due to the fact that the entire installation consumed 200 watts of electricity and weighed about 110 kilograms, it needed a car or other vehicle to move it. However, if the bullet was outside the refrigerator for 60 minutes, it, according to safety requirements, was subject to mandatory disposal. In all other cases, she either returned to the refrigeration unit, or she was shot at the enemy. However, due to difficulties in operation and storage, and most importantly in the synthesis of California, this project has not been developed.

As you can see, for the implementation of the proposed method, the military in fact have already developed and investigated the required explosive devices. Moreover, the feasibility and effectiveness of these developments for the proposed method for carrying out an explosive reaction almost completely eliminates the above negatives and inconveniences that the military has to deal with. In fact, we can choose any level of blast power for our peaceful energy needs. The dimensions of explosive devices are more than acceptable for our technology. Moreover, unlike the military, we can significantly increase the effectiveness of the explosive devices they developed. In particular, in comparison with military conditions, eliminating almost all the difficulties in delivering and placing an explosive device in the required place (i.e. inside block 4), we have an extremely important advantage. Namely, a military explosive device can be used in a rational combination with thermonuclear peas or with the required set of such peas, creating the most effective opportunities for joint explosive action, which is a miniaturization of a nuclear thermonuclear explosion. Those. it means that military explosive devices, with appropriate interaction with thermonuclear peas, or even the required mass with a thermonuclear charge, become the initiating factor for the implementation of the thermonuclear charge reaction.

In fact, imagine that as a fusion of a thermonuclear reaction we take a miniature military nuclear device with a capacity of 0.01 kilotons of TNT, i.e. 10 tons of TNT. How can one take the thermonuclear charge of deuterium? Let's say we take it with the same capacity of 10 tons. Total, the total capacity of the explosive device is 20 tons of TNT. What should lead body 4 be like in order to cope with the thermal energy of the indicated 20-ton TNT equivalent and turn this body into a melt with a temperature of 1500 degrees Celsius? It turns out that it is necessary to make a lead body in the form of a cube with a face size of 3.25 meters, inside which the above explosive device with a capacity of 20 tons of TNT will be placed. In a constructive and technological sense, a completely feasible task without any difficulties, and even more so, undesirable and burdensome factors, such as gigantic constructive piles for the explosion of a tiny American thermonuclear pea, transforming the whole idea of thermonuclear fusion into a multiply unprofitable event.

Speaking about our method of carrying out an explosive reaction, one cannot remain silent about the problems of creating a durable building 1, inside which this implementation takes place. In order to eliminate doubts and even attempts to doubt the positive solution of this device, we address probable opponents to the above-mentioned solutions of both KBC and the American monster reactor, in which the thermonuclear reaction of a two-millimeter capsule is carried out. For, in our method, its scientific and engineering concept itself eliminates the causes that determine the cyclical nature of the analogue and prototype. Since in our solution, unlike the FAC and the American reactor, a technological optimum is provided that eliminates the flagrant irrationality and inexpediency of all known attempts to get to controlled thermonuclear fusion. The above numerical analysis can be continued in any direction - either by reducing the parameters of the metal body 4, or by increasing them. And this does not at all create intractable, and even more unsolved problems. Moreover, we reasoned on the example of lead. If we turn to other metals, such as aluminum, copper, iron and others, the proposed solution can be even more efficient and compact. As for safety, there are no reasons at all to go beyond the existing and mass-functioning energy facilities such as TPPs operating on organic energy carriers, not to mention nuclear power plants.

All of the above, however, does not reduce the proposed method to primitivism and simplification, as traditional TPPs and nuclear power plants are not primitive and simplified. So the creation of a reliable and safe building 1 is a task of great science and high technology, requiring awareness and application of all the best and most effective in the field of energy with the implementation of the most serious search developments and research. Take, for example, the factor of creating a metal melt in case 1, the temperature of which is much higher than the melting temperature of this metal. Has anything like this been decided so far? Moreover, in such a statement of the problem! We dare to assert - it was not decided. We also affirm that the proposed solution for the melting of the body 4 inside the body 1 directs the lion's share of the energy of the explosion of the explosive device 5 precisely to the melting and heating of the metal of the body 4, which accordingly reduces the force effect of this explosion on the structure of the body 1. This, however, does not completely eliminate the force the impact of this explosion on the body. Therefore, clarification of these circumstances and features should be the main goal of the upcoming search engine development and research. But in any case, you can guarantee maximum reliability and safety of such a case. For we do not go beyond the achieved scientific and engineering level, the creation of structures working in conditions of high pressures and temperatures. Moreover, our method favors the work of such structures, since the most favorable conditions for the removal of heat from the housing 1 are provided, while using traditional heat carriers, the main of which was and remains water. So that the temperature regime of the housing 1 can be ensured in any desired mode, when the operational safety of the housing 1 is maximum due to the maximum efficiency of removing heat from the melt 4. We do not discuss the materials required for the construction of the proposed technological complex, considering, as already noted that the achieved level of scientific and engineering development and research in the field of energy allows us to solve this problem in the most appropriate and effective way.

We examined the main technological features of the proposed method on the example of the circuit shown in figure 1, figure 2 and figure 3. However, the technological principle shown has many options for its implementation with the appropriate use of the required structural support for this. One of these options is shown in figures 2, 3 and 4. The meaning of this option is that the housing 1 is made in conjunction with the camera 6, which has an outlet channel 7. The operation of the housing 1 is completely carried out according to the scheme described above and illustrated on figures 1, 2 and 3. But in this embodiment, the housing 1 is made with the camera 6 as a single structural object, and the inner space of the housing 1 is connected to the inner space of the chamber 6 by a channel 3, allowing the melt from the housing 1 to be gravity-fed to the chamber 6. Those. filling the chamber 6 with melt 4 increases the accumulation of heat obtained from the explosion of the explosive device 5. Which, in turn, simplifies and increases the efficiency of further use of this heat, since the design and technological capabilities of this important process are expanded many times, which is the general procedure for moving heat from building 1 to further consumers of the resulting energy resource. Even more important in this important advantage of the presented option is that the appearance of the chamber 6 in the technological scheme allows to repeatedly increase the throughput of the housing 1, which is the generator of thermal energy. All taken together greatly increases the power of the presented technological complex for generating thermal energy, the parameters and constructive development of which can be similarly increased in the required manner.

In particular, this is shown in figures 7, 8 and 9, where the chamber 6 is made of two sections connected by a channel 7. This technological option fully retains the main features of the proposed method, as illustrated above in figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. But these positive aspects of the method significantly increase, due to the possibility of a more complete and rational use of thermal energy contained in the melt 4. The fact that the melt 4 can be cooled in the most efficient way, lowering its temperature to the melting point, about finally releasing the melt from the presented technological device through channel 8. That is a system of interconnected vessels of molten metal is created, where not only the most favorable and most effective possibilities of heat extraction from this melt are provided, but also the conditions are created when, in order to maintain the required tightness of the entire structural and technological system of the proposed method, it is possible to create channels for the passage of molten metal in this a system that does not require special locking devices. Moreover, the channels 3, 7 and 8 shown are just a special case to illustrate the principle of the proposed method, and the variation of their device is practically unlimited, as the possibilities for the general structural design of the proposed method for generating thermal energy are unlimited. As for the technological and constructive solution for periodically filling the housing 1 with a massive metal body 4, we do not state this factor and do not analyze it, considering (as for other design and technological circumstances) today's scientific and engineering level to guarantee a rational and effective solution to this problem .

Concluding the presentation of the essential features of the proposed method, we repeat the statement that in this solution all the latest scientific and engineering achievements can be used to ensure the implementation of the proposed method with the greatest efficiency. For example, it is unnecessary to even remind you that the proposed technology can and should be fully automated based on existing information capabilities. Not to mention the fact that the consequence and the main requirement of this automation is environmental safety that is incomparable with all types of thermal power plants and nuclear power plants, eliminating waste from the generation of thermal energy. Opponents will argue that mininuclear and nuclear thermonuclear charges cannot be considered non-waste. But the amount of this waste is many orders of magnitude smaller in comparison with traditional technologies, and it is clear that the ecological neutralization of this minimum of harmful effects is being solved today, given the level of development and research of transmutation of nuclear materials. In this regard, we must repeat that the proposed technology is the starting point for its further development and improvement, as a result of which even the indicated minimum of radioactive complications and even more dangers may not remain at all. In particular, we are talking about improving the explosive process inside the housing 1. That is, ideally, the desire for thermonuclear fusion to be carried out in pure form with the absolute absence of any initiating nuclear explosive components. It is clear that the proposed thermal energy generation technology assumes and ensures the creation and construction of a fundamentally new type of thermal power plants, the positives and unprecedented advantages of which do not need to be specifically stated. It is equally important that our solution is quite suitable for the reconstruction of existing power plants, both thermal power plants and nuclear power plants.

Summing up all that has been said and repeating once again, we emphasize and affirm that this work opens up a fundamentally new direction in the energy sector and will be supplemented with new technological and design findings that require their patent protection. Which will be done in the near future. It is also necessary to emphasize an equally important factor regarding the type of explosive device 5, which melts a metal body 4 inside the body 1, as a result of which this body turns into a metal melt 4. In particular, we pay special attention to the name of the invention.

Explosive Method reactions, including nuclear or thermonuclear. This means, as already noted, that the type of explosive device and the type of explosive can be different. For, the technological positivity of the proposed method is preserved with any type of explosive device or explosive used in it. Another thing is that the choice of such a device and, accordingly, explosives should be taken with maximum efficiency from all possible points of view. That is why the proposed method for carrying out an explosive reaction is not limited only to a nuclear or thermonuclear reaction, assuming that situations where the creation of explosive devices are possible are not excluded, for a number of reasons no less effective and expedient than the use of nuclear or thermonuclear explosive devices. Relevant exploratory studies in this direction are being carried out and they will also be submitted for patent protection.

And in conclusion, an important circumstance.

The proposed solution, as well as the considered analogue and prototype, provide a uniform technological sequence of explosive reactions. It is clear that the frequency of these explosions depends on many factors taken during the development of the corresponding project, in which the main parameter is the power of the generated heat-generating object. So, in this regard, the proposed solution has an extraordinary and unprecedented advantage. An advantage in the sense that it is possible to choose the most rational and effective cyclical implementation of the proposed method. Neither the analog nor the prototype have this quality at all, because they are tied to gigantomania, which is almost impossible to vary. Not to mention that such energy giants have tremendous inertia, which will keep the entire economy using the energy of such monsters in the energy grip. In our case, the energy flexibility of the proposed technology is not limited to anything. For, even creating an energy object of any capacity, it can be constructed from the required number of blocks directly generating thermal energy. Therefore, the applicability and the possibility of distributing the proposed solution can vary from the smallest energy needs available in any economic environment, to the unlimited requests of major social and industrial consumers.

Claims (1)

A method for carrying out an explosive reaction, including a nuclear or thermonuclear one, by periodically blasting a charge inside a strong sealed enclosure that receives and receives heat generated from the explosion, which is removed from the enclosure for its required use, characterized in that the charge is blown inside a massive metal body melted as a result of this explosion, while the resulting molten metal inside the sealed enclosure is periodically released from this enclosure, about vobozhdaya it for the next cycle of the explosive reaction.

Images