NZ236263A - Rock crusher with two crush points - Google Patents

Description

o PATENTS FORM NO. 5 Fee No. 4: $200.00 PATENTS ACT 1953 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION After Provisional No: 236263 ✓ Dated: 29th November 1990 i fe.

' -\; ROCK CRUSHER We Boyd Motors Limited, a New Zealand company of Frankton Road, Waihi, New Zealand hereby declare the invention for which we pray that a patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed to be partictdarly described in and by the following statement: 236263 BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION This invention relates to a rock crusher and to a method of rock crushing. It should be appreciated that the term rock is used throughout the specification as meaning any hard material able to be crushed or ground.

Rock crushers come in a variety of types and sizes and can range from rock crushers used to crush large boulders into gravel to laboratory ore crushers that crush ore samples to particles under 2mm in diameter.

One type of traditional rock crusher has a fixed jaw plus a sloped jaw, the upper part of the sloped jaw being driven by a cam towards and away from 10 the fixed jaw. There is little movement at the base of the driven jaw which is anchored by toggle plates.

Another type of rock crusher has a swing jaw whereby the two jaws are pivotably mounted at the top of the jaws and driven simultaneously towards and away from each other. The movement of the jaws in both of these rock 15 crushers exert a crushing action on the ore introduced into them.

Unfortunately, these rock crushers have problems associated with them. One major problem is obtaining a sufficiently fine sample. Presently the ore to be crushed will need to be passed through existing crushers in the order of six times or so to be reduced to the desired size.

Another problem is that the toggle plates used wear considerably. Furthermore toggle plates cannot be readily oiled and are therefore uncomfortably noisy.

A further problem, particularly associated with swing jaw crushers, when used for laboratory work is that the crushed material tends to wad between 25 the jaws, that is, the fine particles tend to pack together. Not only are these 2 236263 wadded soft samples unsuitable for the purpose required they cause considerable strain on the cam shafts that drive the jaws. The strain on the cam shafts is due to the cams attempting to push the jaws together to compress the uncompressable wadded particles.

It is an object of the present invention to address the above problems.

Further objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description which is given by way of example only.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a rock crusher with at least two jaws, the jaws being driven at different ends to each other wherein the non-driven end of at least one jaw is sufficiently free to allow vertical movement of that jaw with respect to the other jaw.

According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a 15 rock crusher with at least two jaws wherein at least one of the jaws is biased against a roller.

Reference to the term roller throughout this specification shall mean a device capable of circular motion.

According to yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a 20 rock crusher with at least two jaws wherein the lower part of each of the jaws comprise substantially straight grinding surfaces.

According to a different aspect of the present invention there is provided a rock crusher wherein the operation of the upper and lower ends of the jaws is timed with respect to each other. 3 236263 According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of reducing rocks to a smaller size characterised by the step of first crushing the rocks to an initial size and then subjecting the crushed rocks to a crushing and grinding action to reduce the rocks to a smaller size.

A method of crushing rocks characterised by the step of introducing the rocks to the jaws of a rock crusher, wherein the rock crusher jaws have an upper portion and a lower portion wherein there is a vertical component in movement of the lower portion of both jaws.

According to an alternative aspect of the present invention there is 10 provided a jaw for a rock crusher comprised of an upper portion and a lower portion, both portions being angled with respect to each other. generati description of the invention The applicant believes that providing a crushing plus a grinding action of the jaws for a rock crusher reduces the rock placed within the rock 15 crusher to a finer size than was previously obtainable with rock crushers that merely crushed without grinding.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the two jaws are symmetrical about a vertical axis. The upper parts of the jaws may diverge from each other forming a in cross-section substantially funnel shape. The lower 20 parts of the jaws may be substantially parallel to each other. It is envisaged that the upper parts of the jaws will do the bulk crushing of the rock or ore and that the lower parts of the jaws would have a crushing action plus a grinding action.

In most embodiments, it is envisaged that the surfaces of the jaw be 25 substantially smooth, however in some embodiments there may be 4 236263 included a roughened surface which could vary according to the type of rocks to be crushed. The surface may even be of a composition which aids in the direction of the ore downwards, perhaps for instance there may be included, downwardly sloping teeth.

To ensure that the lower parts of the jaw have a grinding action, it is necessary for the jaws to have a substantially vertical movement with respect to each other. The toggle plates in previous devices did allow some vertical movement but a considerable part of the movement was transformed to radial motion. Toggle plates are also subjected to 10 considerable wear and are very noisy when the rock crusher is in operation.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the applicant does not have toggle plates at the non-driven end of the jaw but has instead rollers. In preferred embodiments there would be a roller at each non-driven end of 15 the jaws, however it should be appreciated that in some embodiments only one non-driven end of a single jaw would be biased against a roller. A roller has number of advantages over toggle plates as it allows maximum vertical movement of the jaw biased against it as well as having minimal wear and being considerably less noisy than toggle plates.

The jaws may be biased against the rollers by a number of means. In one embodiment the jaws may be biased with a tension spring.

One method of crushing rocks in accordance with the present invention is described below.

The upper part of one jaw may be driven as well as the lower part of the 25 other jaw. One means for driving the jaws may be by use of eccentric cams, although other driving means may of course be used. The upper 236263 parts of the jaws may act to crush the ore being introduced into the rock crusher whereas the lower parts of the jaw will be used to crush and grind the ore previously crushed above to fine particles of the desired size. It is envisaged that the shapes of the jaws and the action of the cams will cause 5 the upper parts of the jaws to move together and away from each other in a substantially horizontal motion. The lower parts of the jaws would also move towards and away from each other but as well would have a vertical motion as a result of the non-driven ends of the jaws being free to move on the rollers. The vertical motion of the lower parts of the jaws acts to grind 10 the ore introduced between the jaws in addition to the crushing action caused by the horizontal movement.

In some embodiments it may be difficult for the lower parts of the jaw to cope with the amount of material emerging from the upper parts of the jaw, if the upper and lower parts of the jaw are being driven at the same 15 rate. In one embodiment of the present invention, the lower part of the jaw will be driven at a rate twice that of the upper part of the jaw. Other ratios of the rates may be used.

It is considered important that the timing of the motion of the upper part of the jaw compared to the lower part of the jaw is accurate. The lower jaws 20 may in some embodiments have two crush points where the jaws come together so that for every crush of the upper half of the jaw, the lower half may crush twice. The timing of the jaws may be achieved by a number of means and in one embodiment this may be achieved by the use of a toothed drive belt on the driving means for the jaws. It is preferable that the 25 timing is such that as one jaw moves upwards, the other jaw comes down thus giving a maximum possible frictional surface area between which the jaws can interact and grind the ore. 6 236263 Tests on a rock crusher in accordance with the present invention have shown that it can crush ore to the desired size with one pass of the ore through the crusher in comparison with the six or so passes required in traditional rock crushers. The use of rollers in the present invention means that it suffers less wear than traditional rock crushers and that it is considerably less noisy.

Another advantage of using rollers instead of toggle plates is that the jaws can be easily opened out for cleaning of the jaws. In the past, toggle plates prevent this from being readily achievable. By having jaws tensioned against rollers means that the jaws can be readily readjusted. For instance, one or more of the rollers may be positioned on a shaft with an adjusting bolt which can move the roller(s) and hence the jaw(s) to an appropriate distance from the other jaw when the jaws are substantially stationary. twtatt.pt> description of the invention Aspects of the present invention will now be discussed by way of example only with reference to the accompanying figures in which.

Figure 1: is a diagrammatic side view of a rock crusher in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, and Figure 2 with Figures 2a & 2b: shows the relative crushing of the upper part and lower part of the jaws to each other, and 0 36263 Figure 3: illustrates one means by which the absolute distance between the jaws can be adjusted.

With respect to Figure 1, there is illustrated a rock crusher generally 5 indicated by arrow 1 comprising a first jaw 2 and a second jaw 3. In the present embodiment, the desired ore particle size is 2mm or under as this rock crusher crushes ore for laboratory sampling.

The upper parts 4 and 5 of jaws 2 and 3 respectively are slightly corrugated and have their planar surfaces angled at approximately 20° to each other. 10 The lower parts 6 and 7 of the jaws 2 and 3 respectively are also flat and planar, but positioned substantially parallel to each other. The length of the jaws is approximately 390mm and the distance between the upper parts 4 and 5 of the jaws 2 and 3 is approximately 120mm.

A cam 8 drives the upper part 4 of the jaw 2. The cam 8 has a 50mm shaft 15 and a 55mm eccentric bush which acts to move the cam 8 a total distance of 5mm. The cam 8 is situated within a cam block 9.

The cam 10 which is on the lower part 7 of the jaw 3 has a diameter of 50mm and a 52mm eccentric bush. This moves the lower part 7 of the jaw 3 in and out a distance of 2mm. The cam 10 is situated within a cam block 20 11.

The first jaw 2 is tensioned against a free roller 12 with a spring 13. The pivot point of the jaw 2 on the roller 12 is indicated by arrow 14.

Referring specifically to Figure 3, the roller 12 (as is roller 21) revolves on shaft 15. Shaft 15 has flats 16. The shaft 15 passes through a slot 17 and 25 movement of the shaft 15 in the slot 17 causes the roller 12 to likewise move. 8 236263 Adjacent the slot 17 is a block 18 with a threaded aperture 19. Passing through the threaded aperture 19 is a bolt 20, the end of which butts the roller shaft 15. To move the position of the first jaw with respect to the second jaw, the lock nut 25 is released and bolt 20 is turned causing the 5 roller 12 to move. The jaw 2 which is biased against the roller 12 is also moved.

In some embodiments (not shown) there may be a quick release system consisting a shaft and cams with an air ram to allow the jaw 2 to swing away from jaw 3 to assist in the cleaning of the jaws.

The second jaw 3 is tensioned against a roller 21 by a spring 22. The upper part 5 of the jaw 3 is essentially fixed in a horizontal direction which means that its motion on the roller 21 is substantially vertical as shown by the arrows. Adjusting the position of the roller 21 in a similar manner to roller 12 will alter the angle between the lower jaw parts 6 and 7. This can 15 change the crushing points of these surfaces.

The cam 8 rotates at a speed of 350 revolutions per minute whereas the cam 10 rotates at 700 revolutions per minute giving a timing ratio between the upper parts 4 and 5 and lower parts 6 and 7 of 1:2. This timing ratio may be different in other jaws, perhaps 1:4 and can depend upon the geometry of 20 the upper parts of the jaws compared with the lower parts of the jaws. The rotational speed of the cams 8 and 10 may also be varied.

It can be seen from the arrows in Figure 1 that the direction of movement of the jaw to each other is both horizontal giving a crushing action and vertical giving a grinding action, particularly with respect to the lower 25 parts of the jaws 6 and 7. 9 ? 36263 Figure 2 illustrates the relative positions of the upper parts 4 and 5 and the lower parts 6 and 7 of the jaws 2 and 3 to each other during a typical cycle. It should be appreciated that the timing of the jaws 2 and 3 to each other can be critical to the operation of the rock crusher. In this embodiment the 5 timing of the jaws 2 and 3 is achieved by a toothed belt drive (not shown) which runs the cams 8 and 10. A double ended drive motor is used to drive each end of the cams 8 and 10 to reduce torsional strain on the cam shaft which occurs if only one end of the cams is driven. This also keeps an even pressure on the bearings at all times.

Figure 2A illustrates the first part of the cycle. The upper part 4 of the jaw 2 is driven by cam 8 to move a total distance of 5mm towards the upper part 5 of the jaw 3. The pivot point is indicated by arrow 14. This motion acts to crush larger rock samples between the upper parts of the jaws 4 and 5. At the same time as the upper jaws 4 and 5 are moving towards each other, 15 the lower part 6 of jaw 4 pivots about point 14 and the lower part 7 of jaw 3 is driven forward by cam 10. This gives a crushing point on the lower parts 6 and 7 as indicated by arrow 23. At the same time, the jaw 3 has a substantially vertical motion from its interaction with roller 21 which imparts a grinding motion between the lower jaw parts 6 and 7. As the 20 lower jaw part 6 moves downwards the lower jaw part 7 moves upwards and vice versa giving a maximum possible grinding effect.

In the second part of the cycle, the upper part 4 of the jaw 2 is moving away from the upper part 5 of the jaw 3 as a result of the action of the cam 8. The lower part 6 of the jaw 4 still pivots around pivot point 14. The pivoting 25 action along with the timed driving action of the cam 10 on the lower part 7 of the jaw 3 causes a second crush point 24 at the bottom of the jaws 2 and 3. 23 S and 7. This is achieved by the ratio of speed of the cams 8 and 10 to each other, the shapes of the jaws 2 and 3, the relevant pivot points resulting from the placement of the rollers 12 and 21 and the timing of the action of the jaws to each other which is brought about by the use of a toothed belt drive. Not only do the lower parts 6 and 7 of the jaws crush twice as fast as the upper parts 4 and 5, the substantially parallel flat surfaces of the lower parts 6 and 7 of the jaws and the vertical movement of the jaws 2 and 3 means that the lower parts 6 and 7 also have a grinding action. These features along with the downward pressure of jaw 2 on the ore ensure that ore introduced to the rock crusher need only be passed through the rock crusher once to get reduction of the ore to particles of the desired size.

Aspects of the present invention have been discussed by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modification and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope as defined in the claims. 11 ► 1

Claims (14)

23 6 2 WHAT IT CLAIMS IS:

1. A rock crusher with at least two jaws, the jaws being driven at different ends to each other wherein the non-driven end of at least one 5 jaw is sufficiently free to allow vertical movement of that jaw with respect to the other jaw, the arrangement and construction of the rock crusher being such that the lower portion of the jaws when in operation have at least two crush points.

2. A rock crusher as claimed in claim 1 wherein at least one of the jaws 10 is biased against a roller.

3. A rock crusher as claimed in either claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the upper parts of the jaws diverge from each other so that in cross-section the jaws form a substantially funnel shape.

4. A rock crusher as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the 15 lower parts of the jaws comprise substantially flat and straight grinding surfaces.

5. A rock crusher as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the operation of the upper and lower ends of the jaws is timed with respect to each other. 20

6. A rock crusher as claimed in claim 5 wherein the timing of the operation of the upper and lower end portions of the jaws to each other is controlled by a toothed belt connected to the driving means of the upper and lower jaw portions.

7. V,^A rock crusher as claimed in either claim 5 or claim 6 wherein the j \ Jti 25, ^timing of the jaws is such that as one jaw moves upwards, the other , 1994 •)/ ' - j %i# 12 ?Je?8 jaw moves downwards, thus giving a maximum possible frictional surface area between which the jaws can interact and grind the rocks.

8. A rock crusher as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein a non-driven end of one of the jaws is biased against a roller. 5

9. A rock crusher as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein the driving means for the jaws is in the form of eccentric cams.

10. A rock crusher as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein there is provided means to adjust the position of the jaws with respect to each other when the jaws are in a stationary position. 10

11. A method of crushing rocks characterised by the step of introducing the rocks to the jaws of a rock crusher, wherein the rock crusher jaws have an upper portion and a lower portion and there is a vertical component in the movement of the lower portion of both jaws, wherein the lower portion of the jaws has two crush points when in operation. 15

12. A method of crushing rocks as claimed in claim 11 wherein the movement of the upper portion of at least one of the jaws has a horizontal component.

13. A rock crusher substantially as herein described with reference to and as illustrated by the accompanying drawings. 20

14. A rock crusher with at least two jaws, including at least one jaw substantially as herein described with reference to and as illustrated by the accompanying drawings. ^ * A method of crushing rocks substantially as herein described with reference to and as illustrated by the accompanying drawings. BOYD MOTORS LIMITED by their Attorneys r" JAMES & WELLS /■'<V i ar 9sep;??3S