MD767Z - Process for treating vines - Google Patents
Process for treating vines Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- MD767Z MD767Z MDS20130188A MDS20130188A MD767Z MD 767 Z MD767 Z MD 767Z MD S20130188 A MDS20130188 A MD S20130188A MD S20130188 A MDS20130188 A MD S20130188A MD 767 Z MD767 Z MD 767Z
- Authority
- MD
- Moldova
- Prior art keywords
- plants
- grapevine
- growth
- chamaedroside
- treatment
- Prior art date
Links
Landscapes
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Invenţia se referă la viticultură, şi anume la un procedeu de tratare a plantelor de viţă-de-vie. The invention relates to viticulture, namely to a method of treating grapevine plants.
Cea mai apropriată soluţie de obiectul revendicat reprezintă procedeul de tratare extraradiculară a plantelor de viţă-de-vie cu 8...12 zile până la înflorirea în masă cu soluţie apoasă de glicozida steroidică 3-O-[β-D-glucopiranozil(1→2)-β-D-glucopiranozil]-26-O(β-D-glucopiranozil)-(25R)-furost-5-en-3ß,22α,26-triol (preparatul Mestim) în concentraţii de 0,001...0,010% [1]. The most appropriate solution to the claimed object is the process of extra-radicular treatment of grapevine plants 8...12 days before mass flowering with an aqueous solution of the steroid glycoside 3-O-[β-D-glucopyranosyl(1→2)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-26-O(β-D-glucopyranosyl)-(25R)-furost-5-en-3ß,22α,26-triol (Mestim preparation) in concentrations of 0.001...0.010% [1].
Dezavantajul acestui procedeu constă în eficacitatea joasă. The disadvantage of this process is its low efficiency.
Problema pe care o rezolvă invenţia constă în optimizarea creşterii şi sporirea roadei plantelor de viţă-de-vie şi a calităţii ei. The problem that the invention solves consists in optimizing the growth and increasing the yield of grapevine plants and its quality.
Procedeul, conform invenţiei, include tratarea extraradiculară a plantelor cu 8…12 zile până la înflorirea în masă cu soluţie apoasă de 0,0001…0,005% de glicozida fenolică 3,4-dihidroxi-β-feniletoxi-O-α-L-ramnopiranozil(1→3)-4-O-cafeoil-α-L-arabinopiranozidă cu un consum de 0,25…0,30 L/plantă sau 500…600 L/ha. The process, according to the invention, includes extra-radicular treatment of plants 8…12 days before mass flowering with an aqueous solution of 0.0001…0.005% of the phenolic glycoside 3,4-dihydroxy-β-phenylethoxy-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl(1→3)-4-O-caffeoyl-α-L-arabinopyranoside with a consumption of 0.25…0.30 L/plant or 500…600 L/ha.
Rezultatul constă în optimizarea creşterii şi sporirea roadei plantelor de viţă-de-vie, precum şi ameliorarea raportului dintre conţinutul de zaharuri şi acizi în boabe. The result is the optimization of the growth and increase of the yield of grapevine plants, as well as the improvement of the ratio between the sugar and acid content in the berries.
Glicozida fenolică 3,4-dihidroxi-β-feniletoxi-O-α-L-ramnopiranozil(1→3)-4-O-cafeoil-α-L-arabinopiranozidă, numită în continuare Chamaedrozidă, a fost obţinută prin următorul procedeu: partea aeriană de Veronica chamaedrys L. (0,6 kg) (selecţionată pe câmpul experimental al Institutului de Genetică şi Fiziologie a Plantelor de doctorul habilitat în biologie V. Florea) uscată la aer liber a fost mărunţită şi degresată cu cloroform ( 2 ori x 1L). Extractele obţinute au fost unite, evaporate până la soluţie apoasă, care a fost extrasă cu butanol ( 4 ori x 200 ml). Extractele butanolice au fost concentrate în condiţii de vid până la rest vâscos. Ca rezultat s-a obţinut masa sumei de glicozide de 2,8% din masa materiei prime iniţiale uscate. Prin aplicarea filtrării pe gel Sephadex, G=50, G=25 şi cromatografiere pe coloană cu silicagel L 40/100 µm suma de glicozide a fost separată în fracţii a câte 2…3 substanţe. Controlul asupra separării a fost efectuat prin cromatografierea în strat subţire de silicagel. Fracţiunile cu Rf 0,47 au fost unite şi supuse separării pe HPLC. S-au obţinut 0,1 g de Chamaedrozidă, ce constituie 0,01% din greutatea produsului vegetal iniţial uscat [MD 3865 C2 2009.03.31]. The phenolic glycoside 3,4-dihydroxy-β-phenylethoxy-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl(1→3)-4-O-caffeoyl-α-L-arabinopyranoside, hereinafter called Chamaedroside, was obtained by the following process: the aerial part of Veronica chamaedrys L. (0.6 kg) (selected on the experimental field of the Institute of Plant Genetics and Physiology by the doctor habilitated in biology V. Florea) dried in the open air was crushed and degreased with chloroform (2 times x 1L). The extracts obtained were combined, evaporated to an aqueous solution, which was extracted with butanol (4 times x 200 ml). The butanol extracts were concentrated under vacuum conditions to a viscous residue. As a result, the mass of the sum of glycosides was obtained of 2.8% of the mass of the initial dry raw material. By applying Sephadex gel filtration, G=50, G=25 and column chromatography with silica gel L 40/100 µm the amount of glycosides was separated into fractions of 2…3 substances each. The control over the separation was carried out by thin layer chromatography on silica gel. The fractions with Rf 0.47 were combined and subjected to HPLC separation. 0.1 g of Chamaedroside was obtained, which constitutes 0.01% of the weight of the initial dry vegetable product [MD 3865 C2 2009.03.31].
Exemplu de realizare a invenţiei Example of embodiment of the invention
Experienţele au fost efectuate în condiţii de câmp, în viile Colegiului de Viticultură şi Vinificaţie din Stăuceni, în anii 2011-2012. În calitate de obiect de studiu au servit plantele de viţă-de-vie, soiul Aligote. Cu 8...12 zile până la înflorirea în masă plantele au fost tratate cu soluţii apoase de substanţe biologic active după următoarea schemă: un lot de plante au fost tratate extraradicular cu soluţii apoase de Chamaedrozidă în concentraţii de 0,0001, 0,001, 0,005 şi 0,01% (invenţia), fiind organizate variante corespunzătoare; alt lot de plante au fost tratate cu soluţie apoasă de Mestim în concentraţie de 0,001% (cea mai apropiată soluţie); în calitate de martor au servit plantele stropite cu apă. Experienţa a fost montată pe teren cu amplasarea randomizată a variantelor în blocuri, în 3 repetări, cu câte 15 plante în fiecare repetare a variantei respective. Consumul de soluţie a constituit 0,25…0,3 L/plantă sau 500…600 L/ha. Pentru relevarea reacţiei plantelor la tratamentul cu substanţele biologic active în studiu au fost determinaţi următorii indici: creşterea lăstarilor şi gradul de maturare a ţesuturilor lor, recolta de pe un butuc, masa unui strugure, masa a 100 de boabe, volumul a 100 de boabe, conţinutul în zaharuri şi aciditatea boabelor. Rezultatele obţinute sunt prezentate în tabelele 1-4. The experiments were carried out in field conditions, in the vineyards of the College of Viticulture and Winemaking in Stăuceni, in 2011-2012. The grapevine plants of the Aligote variety served as the object of study. 8...12 days before mass flowering, the plants were treated with aqueous solutions of biologically active substances according to the following scheme: one batch of plants was treated extra-radicularly with aqueous solutions of Chamaedrozide in concentrations of 0.0001, 0.001, 0.005 and 0.01% (the invention), corresponding variants being organized; another batch of plants was treated with an aqueous solution of Mestim in a concentration of 0.001% (the closest solution); the plants sprayed with water served as the control. The experiment was set up on the field with the randomized placement of variants in blocks, in 3 repetitions, with 15 plants in each repetition of the respective variant. The solution consumption was 0.25…0.3 L/plant or 500…600 L/ha. To reveal the reaction of plants to the treatment with the biologically active substances under study, the following indices were determined: shoot growth and the degree of maturation of their tissues, the harvest from a stump, the mass of a grape, the mass of 100 berries, the volume of 100 berries, the sugar content and the acidity of the berries. The results obtained are presented in tables 1-4.
Datele prezentate în tabelul 1 scot în evidenţă o influenţă diferită a substanţelor biologic active în studiu asupra creşterii lăstarilor pe parcursul fenofazelor perioadei de vegetaţie activă a plantelor de viţă-de-vie, precum şi în raport cu martorul. În condiţiile climaterice din anul 2011, favorabile pentru creşterea şi dezvoltarea plantelor de viţă-de-vie, aplicarea preparatului Mestim (cea mai apropiată soluţie) a exercitat acţiune stimulatoare asupra proceselor de creştere a lăstarilor în fenofaza înflorire-începutul creşterii boabelor şi efect de inhibare a acestor procese în perioada ulterioară până la sfârşitul vegetaţiei active. Tratarea plantelor cu Chamaedrozidă a produs un efect slab pronunţat de stimulare a creşterii lăstarilor pe parcursul întregii perioade de vegetaţie. Peste 2 săptămâni după tratarea plantelor (la 22 iunie 2011) lungimea lăstarilor, în procente faţă de lungimea iniţială la momentul tratării, a constituit: în varianta martor ̶ 143,9%; Mestim ̶ 155,6%; Chamaedrozidă în concentraţie de 0,0001% ̶ 145,4; 0,001% ̶ 142,1; 0,005% ̶ 148,1%. La sfârşitul vegetaţiei active (20 octombrie) lungimea lăstarilor, în procente faţă de lungimea lor la începutul fenofazei de creştere a boabelor (22 iunie), a constituit la plantele din varianta: martor ̶ 141,4%; Mestim ̶ 130,7%; Chamaedrozidă în concentraţie de 0,0001% ̶ 144,7; 0,001% ̶ 153,1; 0,005% ̶ 151,5%, iar faţă de lungimea iniţială (la momentul tratării) a constituit 203,5; 203,3; 210,4; 217,4 şi 224,2% respectiv. La plantele din toate variantele s-a constatat un grad înalt de maturare a ţesuturilor lăstarilor - peste 80% din lungimea totală. The data presented in Table 1 highlight a different influence of the biologically active substances under study on shoot growth during the phenophases of the active vegetation period of grapevine plants, as well as in relation to the control. Under the climatic conditions of 2011, favorable for the growth and development of grapevine plants, the application of the Mestim preparation (the closest solution) exerted a stimulating action on the processes of shoot growth in the flowering-beginning of berry growth phenophase and an inhibitory effect on these processes in the subsequent period until the end of active vegetation. Treatment of plants with Chamaedrozide produced a weakly pronounced effect of stimulating shoot growth during the entire vegetation period. After 2 weeks after the treatment of the plants (on June 22, 2011) the length of the shoots, in percentages compared to the initial length at the time of treatment, was: in the control variant ̶ 143.9%; Mestim ̶ 155.6%; Chamaedrozide in concentration of 0.0001% ̶ 145.4; 0.001% ̶ 142.1; 0.005% ̶ 148.1%. At the end of the active vegetation (October 20) the length of the shoots, in percentages compared to their length at the beginning of the phenophase of grain growth (June 22), was in the plants of the variant: control ̶ 141.4%; Mestim ̶ 130.7%; Chamaedrozide in concentration of 0.0001% ̶ 144.7; 0.001% ̶ 153.1; 0.005% - 151.5%, and compared to the initial length (at the time of treatment) it was 203.5; 203.3; 210.4; 217.4 and 224.2% respectively. In plants from all variants, a high degree of maturation of shoot tissues was observed - over 80% of the total length.
Tabelul 1 Table 1
Creşterea lăstarilor şi gradul de maturare a ţesuturilor la plantele viţei-de-vie tratate cu substanţe biologic active, s. Aligote, a. 2011 Shoot growth and tissue maturation degree in grapevine plants treated with biologically active substances, Aligote village, 2011
Variante Lungimea lăstarilor La tratare După tratare La sfârşitul vegetaţiei, 20 octombrie 7 iunie, (A) 22 iunie (B) Lungimea totală (C) Partea maturată (E) cm cm B/A, % cm C/B, % C/A, % cm E/C, % Martor 86,5± 1,6 124,5 ± 4,0 143,9 176,0 ± 8,2 141,4 203,5 142,3 ± 12,8 80,8 Chamaedrozidă, 0,0001% 84,2 ± 8,5 122,4 ± 12,6 145,4 177,2 ± 22,1 144,7 210,4 143,7 ± 22,9 81,1 Chamaedrozidă, 0,001% 79,9 ± 5,6 113,5 ± 6,4 142,1 173,7 ± 19,1 153,1 217,4 146,6 ± 20,4 84,4 Chamaedrozidă, 0,005% 85,0 ± 3,5 125,9 ± 6,1 148,1 190,7 ± 28,5 151,5 224,2 160,6 ± 24,9 84,3 Mestim, 0,001% 83,4 ± 4,3 129,8 ± 5,7 155,6 169,6 ± 13,3 130,7 203,3 136,2 ± 8,0 80,3Variants Shoot length At treatment After treatment At the end of vegetation, October 20 June 7, (A) June 22 (B) Total length (C) Matured part (E) cm cm B/A, % cm C/B, % C/A, % cm E/C, % Control 86.5± 1.6 124.5 ± 4.0 143.9 176.0 ± 8.2 141.4 203.5 142.3 ± 12.8 80.8 Chamaedrozide, 0.0001% 84.2 ± 8.5 122.4 ± 12.6 145.4 177.2 ± 22.1 144.7 210.4 143.7 ± 22.9 81.1 Chamaedrozide, 0.001% 79.9 ± 5.6 113.5 ± 6.4 142.1 173.7 ± 19.1 153.1 217.4 146.6 ± 20.4 84.4 Chamaedroside, 0.005% 85.0 ± 3.5 125.9 ± 6.1 148.1 190.7 ± 28.5 151.5 224.2 160.6 ± 24.9 84.3 Mestim, 0.001% 83.4 ± 4.3 129.8 ± 5.7 155.6 169.6 ± 13.3 130.7 203.3 136.2 ± 8.0 80.3
Conform datelor din tabelul 2 aplicarea atât a Mestimului, cât şi a Chamaedrozidei în condiţiile climaterice nefavorabile (secetă, arşiţă) ale anului 2012, care s-au manifestat practic în toată perioada de vegetaţie a plantelor de viţă-de-vie, a avut o acţiune slab pronunţată inhibatoare asupra creşterii lăstarilor în raport cu plantele martor, însă a condiţionat un grad mai înalt al maturării ţesuturilor lor. According to the data in Table 2, the application of both Mestim and Chamaedrozide in the unfavorable climatic conditions (drought, heat) of 2012, which occurred practically throughout the entire vegetation period of grapevine plants, had a weakly pronounced inhibitory action on shoot growth compared to control plants, but conditioned a higher degree of maturation of their tissues.
Tabelul 2 Table 2
Creşterea lăstarilor şi gradul de maturare a ţesuturilor la plantele viţei-de-vie tratate cu substanţe biologic active, s. Aligote, a. 2012 Shoot growth and tissue maturation degree in grapevine plants treated with biologically active substances, Aligote village, 2012
Variante Lungimea lăstarilor La tratare, 25 mai, (A) La sfârşitul vegetaţiei, 4 noiembrie Lungimea totală (B) Partea maturată (C) cm cm B/A, % cm C/B, % Martor 44,7 ± 3,1 60,11 ± 2,0 134,5 43,8 ± 1,2 72,9 Chamaedrozidă, 0,0001% 47,7 ± 2,0 58,2 ± 1,9 122,1 45,2 ± 1,4 77,7 Chamaedrozidă, 0,001% 42,7 ± 5,2 55,8 ± 7,8 130,7 44,4 ± 6,7 79,6 Chamaedrozidă, 0,005% 53,4 ± 2,4 66,4 ± 2,8 126,5 49,6 ± 4,0 74,7 Chamaedrozidă, 0, 01% 48,3 ± 2,11 60,2 ± 1,3 124,6 45,9 ± 0,7 76,2 Mestim, 0,001% 51,1 ± 3,52 63,9 ± 2,8 125,1 49,4 ± 3,7 77,3Variants Shoot length At treatment, May 25, (A) At the end of vegetation, November 4 Total length (B) Mature part (C) cm cm B/A, % cm C/B, % Control 44.7 ± 3.1 60.11 ± 2.0 134.5 43.8 ± 1.2 72.9 Chamaedroside, 0.0001% 47.7 ± 2.0 58.2 ± 1.9 122.1 45.2 ± 1.4 77.7 Chamaedroside, 0.001% 42.7 ± 5.2 55.8 ± 7.8 130.7 44.4 ± 6.7 79.6 Chamaedroside, 0.005% 53.4 ± 2.4 66.4 ± 2.8 126.5 49.6 ± 4.0 74.7 Chamaedrozid, 0.01% 48.3 ± 2.11 60.2 ± 1.3 124.6 45.9 ± 0.7 76.2 Mestim, 0.001% 51.1 ± 3.52 63.9 ± 2.8 125.1 49.4 ± 3.7 77.3
Datele experimentale obţinute denotă că aplicarea preparatului propus contribuie la optimizarea coraportului proceselor de creştere şi celor reproductive, asigurând manifestarea optimală a potenţialului productiv şi calitativ al plantelor. The experimental data obtained show that the application of the proposed preparation contributes to optimizing the correlation of growth and reproductive processes, ensuring the optimal manifestation of the productive and qualitative potential of plants.
Pe fondalul evaluării normale a proceselor de creştere şi maturare a ţesuturilor lăstarilor, recolta (kg la un butuc) a constituit în anul 2011 în varianta martor - 6,13; la plantele tratate conform celei mai apropiate soluţii - 7,7, iar la plantele tratate cu preparatul propus - de la 7,94 până la 8,9 kg (tab. 3), fiind mai ridicată în variantele Chamaedrozidă 0,001...0,01%, cu 36,7…45,2% în raport cu plantele martor şi cu 10…15% în raport cu plantele tratate cu Mestim. Against the background of the normal assessment of the processes of growth and maturation of shoot tissues, the harvest (kg per bush) in 2011 was 6.13 in the control variant; 7.7 in the plants treated with the closest solution, and from 7.94 to 8.9 kg in the plants treated with the proposed preparation (Table 3), being higher in the Chamaedrozide 0.001...0.01% variants, by 36.7...45.2% compared to the control plants and by 10...15% compared to the plants treated with Mestim.
Tabelul 3 Table 3
Productivitatea şi calitatea roadei plantelor de viţă-de-vie în funcţie de activitatea substanţei biologic active. Productivity and quality of grapevine fruit depending on the activity of the biologically active substance.
Soiul Aligote, a. 2011 Aligote variety, 2011
Variante Recolta de la o plantă, kg Masa unui strugure, g Masa a 100 de boabe, g Volumul a 100 de boabe, cm3 Zaharita-tea, % Acidita-tea, g/L Martor 6,13 ± 1,41 124,8±2,73 160,87±7,61 153,00±12,52 17,1±0,07 7,8±0,04 Chamaedrozidă, 0,0001% 7,94 ± 1,10 108,76± 6,67 166,97±2,93 153,67±4,49 20,0±0,10 7,2±0,06 Chamaedrozidă, 0,001% 8,38 ± 1,11 117,4 ± 7,82 134,70±2,41 123,67±3,48 18,7±0,07 7,6±0,04 Chamaedrozidă, 0,005% 8,90 ± 1,5 125,1 ± 4,58 154,70±2,31 134,00±3,06 20,0±0,10 7,3±0,04 Chamaedrozidă, 0, 01% 8,55 ± 0,52 125,75 ± 8,15 148,33±0,92 137,67±4,10 18,8±0,10 7,5±0,06 Mestim, 0,001% 7,7 ± 1,38 123,8 ±8,51 158,31±3,31 148,67±5,49 18,5 ±0,15 7,4±0,04Variants Harvest from one plant, kg Mass of one grape, g Mass of 100 berries, g Volume of 100 berries, cm3 Sugar content, % Acidity, g/L Control 6.13 ± 1.41 124.8 ± 2.73 160.87 ± 7.61 153.00 ± 12.52 17.1 ± 0.07 7.8 ± 0.04 Chamaedroside, 0.0001% 7.94 ± 1.10 108.76 ± 6.67 166.97 ± 2.93 153.67 ± 4.49 20.0 ± 0.10 7.2 ± 0.06 Chamaedroside, 0.001% 8.38 ± 1.11 117.4 ± 7.82 134.70±2.41 123.67±3.48 18.7±0.07 7.6±0.04 Chamaedroside, 0.005% 8.90±1.5 125.1±4.58 154.70±2.31 134.00±3.06 20.0±0.10 7.3±0.04 Chamaedrozid, 0.01% 8.55 ± 0.52 125.75 ± 8.15 148.33±0.92 137.67±4.10 18.8±0.10 7.5±0.06 Mestim, 0.001% 7.7 ± 1.38 123.8 ±8.51 158.31±3.31 148.67±5.49 18.5±0.15 7.4±0.04
Anul 2012 s-a caracterizat prin condiţii nefavorabile pentru formarea şi creşterea boabelor şi a ciorchinelui practic pe parcursul întregii perioade de vegetaţie, ce au avut un impact negativ asupra productivităţii viţei-de-vie. Recolta de pe un butuc a constituit în varianta martor - 3,47 kg; la plantele tratate conform celei mai apropiate soluţii - 4,0, iar la plantele tratate cu preparatul propus - de la 3,1 până la 4,7 kg (tab. 4); recolta plantelor din variantele Chamaedrozidă 0,0001...0,005% a depăşit cu 18,2…35,4% recolta plantelor martor şi cu 2,5…17,5% a plantelor tratate cu Mestim. The year 2012 was characterized by unfavorable conditions for the formation and growth of berries and bunches practically throughout the entire vegetation period, which had a negative impact on the productivity of the vine. The harvest from one stump was in the control variant - 3.47 kg; in plants treated according to the closest solution - 4.0, and in plants treated with the proposed preparation - from 3.1 to 4.7 kg (tab. 4); the harvest of plants from the Chamaedrozida 0.0001...0.005% variants exceeded by 18.2...35.4% the harvest of control plants and by 2.5...17.5% of plants treated with Mestim.
Tabelul 4 Table 4
Productivitatea şi calitatea roadei plantelor de viţă-de-vie în funcţie de activitatea substanţei biologic active Productivity and quality of grapevine fruit depending on the activity of the biologically active substance
Soiul Aligote, a. 2012 Aligote variety, 2012
Variante Recolta de la o plantă, kg Masa unui strugure, g Masa a 100 de boabe, g Volumul a 100 de boabe, cm3 Zaharita-tea, % Acidita-tea, g/l Martor 3,47 ± 1,20 56,6 ± 3,12 89,54±3,96 71,33 ±4,67 18,5±0,57 5,9±0,07 Chamaedrozidă, 0,0001% 4,70 ± 0,32 54,1 ± 5,65 88,00±5,74 86,00 ± 4,16 19,7±0,10 5,4±0,31 Chamaedrozidă, 0,001% 4,10 ± 1,10 51,0 ± 8,08 91,21±2,90 80,33 ± 7,67 19,2±047 5,2±0,41 Chamaedrozidă, 0,005% 4,65 ± 0,61 60,0 ± 10,6 87,00±2,04 78,00 ± 4,16 19,7±0,27 5,4±0,15 Chamaedrozidă, 0, 01% 3,10 ± 0,30 41,2 ± 4,42 100,11±8,07 83,33 ± 2,91 19,8±0,10 6,1±0,07 Mestim, 0,001% 4,00 ± 0,54 51,9 ± 10,8 91,64±3,63 76,33 ± 6,12 19,1±0,40 5,4±0,20Variants Harvest from one plant, kg Mass of one grape, g Mass of 100 berries, g Volume of 100 berries, cm3 Sugar content, % Acidity, g/l Control 3.47 ± 1.20 56.6 ± 3.12 89.54±3.96 71.33 ±4.67 18.5±0.57 5.9±0.07 Chamaedroside, 0.0001% 4.70 ± 0.32 54.1 ± 5.65 88.00±5.74 86.00 ± 4.16 19.7±0.10 5.4±0.31 Chamaedroside, 0.001% 4.10 ± 1.10 51.0 ± 8.08 91.21±2.90 80.33 ± 7.67 19.2±047 5.2±0.41 Chamaedroside, 0.005% 4.65 ± 0.61 60.0 ± 10.6 87.00±2.04 78.00 ± 4.16 19.7±0.27 5.4±0.15 Chamaedroside, 0.005% 01% 3.10 ± 0.30 41.2 ± 4.42 100.11±8.07 83.33 ± 2.91 19.8±0.10 6.1±0.07 Mestim, 0.001% 4.00 ± 0.54 51.9 ± 10.8 91.64±3.63 76.33 ± 6.12 19.1±0.40 5.4±0.20
Datele experimentale prezentate în tabele denotă impactul pozitiv, inclusiv în condiţii nefavorabile de mediu, a Chamaedrozidei în concentraţii de 0,0001...0,005% asupra creşterii normale a lăstarilor şi maturării ţesuturilor lor, sporind roada şi ameliorând calitatea şi coraportul dintre conţinutul de zahar şi acizi în boabe. The experimental data presented in the tables denote the positive impact, including under unfavorable environmental conditions, of Chamaedrozide in concentrations of 0.0001...0.005% on the normal growth of shoots and the maturation of their tissues, increasing the yield and improving the quality and the ratio between the sugar and acid content in the berries.
1. MD 3138 G2 2006.09.30 1. MD 3138 G2 2006.09.30
Claims (1)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDS20130188A MD767Z (en) | 2013-11-07 | 2013-11-07 | Process for treating vines |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDS20130188A MD767Z (en) | 2013-11-07 | 2013-11-07 | Process for treating vines |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| MD767Y MD767Y (en) | 2014-05-31 |
| MD767Z true MD767Z (en) | 2014-12-31 |
Family
ID=50882635
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDS20130188A MD767Z (en) | 2013-11-07 | 2013-11-07 | Process for treating vines |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| MD (1) | MD767Z (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD1012Z (en) * | 2015-09-09 | 2016-10-31 | Институт Генетики, Физиологии И Защиты Растений Академии Наук Молдовы | Process for treatment of grape-vine |
| MD1192Z (en) * | 2017-02-06 | 2018-04-30 | Институт Генетики, Физиологии И Защиты Растений Академии Наук Молдовы | Glycoside preparation from Veronica officinalis L. plants with fungicidal action on Alternaria alternata |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD1089G2 (en) * | 1997-05-07 | 1999-05-31 | Институт Генетики И Физиологии Растений Академии Наук Молдовы | Vine cultivation process |
| MD3138G2 (en) * | 2006-02-20 | 2007-04-30 | Институт Физиологии Растений Академии Наук Республики Молдова | Process for vine cultivation |
| MD3865C2 (en) * | 2008-12-19 | 2009-10-31 | Институт Генетики, Физиологии И Защиты Растений Академии Наук Молдовы | 3,4-dihydroxy-b-phenylethoxy-O-a-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-4-O-cafeoyl-a-L-arabinopyranoside as compound increasing the seed productivity |
-
2013
- 2013-11-07 MD MDS20130188A patent/MD767Z/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD1089G2 (en) * | 1997-05-07 | 1999-05-31 | Институт Генетики И Физиологии Растений Академии Наук Молдовы | Vine cultivation process |
| MD3138G2 (en) * | 2006-02-20 | 2007-04-30 | Институт Физиологии Растений Академии Наук Республики Молдова | Process for vine cultivation |
| MD3865C2 (en) * | 2008-12-19 | 2009-10-31 | Институт Генетики, Физиологии И Защиты Растений Академии Наук Молдовы | 3,4-dihydroxy-b-phenylethoxy-O-a-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1→3)-4-O-cafeoyl-a-L-arabinopyranoside as compound increasing the seed productivity |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| MD767Y (en) | 2014-05-31 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Sitton et al. | Decreased cytokinin production in the roots as a factor in shoot senescence | |
| Ibrahim et al. | Effect of foliar spray with potassium humate and green tea extract on some of the vegetative characteristics of guava (Psidium guajava L. cv. Local) seedlings | |
| Myburgh | Responses of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultanina to water deficits during various pre-and post-harvest phases under semi-arid conditions | |
| Yadava | Effect of growth retardants on floral biology, fruit set and fruit quality of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) | |
| MD767Z (en) | Process for treating vines | |
| Alam et al. | Regeneration of shoot from nodal explants of Cucumis sativus considering different hormonal concentration | |
| Chanana et al. | High quality grapes can be produced in Punjab | |
| Abd El-Razek et al. | Response of ‘Le Conte'Pear Trees to Garlic Extract and GA as Budbreak Dormancy Agents | |
| Ruta et al. | Field performance of micropropagated and mycorrhizal early globe artichoke plants | |
| Kishor et al. | Effect of plant bioregulators and chemicals on fruit physico-chemical traits of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa | |
| Kusuma et al. | Aeration volume and inoculum density using in bioreactor to optimized biomass production and secondary metabolites in Gynura procumbens (Lour.) Merr | |
| Ranganna et al. | Effect of plant growth regulators on fruit set and yield of summer crop in acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) cv. Balaji | |
| KR102110505B1 (en) | Extract of ginseng for enriched chlorogenic acid and ginsenoside | |
| Belal | Effect of some biostimulants of growth, yield and berry quality of King Ruby grapevines | |
| SM | Effect of Compost Tea or some Botanical Extracts on the Fruit Quality of Pomegranate Trees at Upper Egypt | |
| Seraji et al. | Effect of foliar application of zinc and boron from different sources on growth, yield and quality of custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) cv. Arka Sahan | |
| Sayed et al. | Improving quality of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) fruits CVS. Khalas and Sagae under different climate by spraying of date palm pollen grains extract | |
| Nigania et al. | Role of humic acid and salicylic acid on quality parameters and K/Na ratio of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under salt and water stress | |
| Supe et al. | Effect of different chemicals on leaf shedding of pomegranate'Bhagwa' | |
| Ghazali et al. | Optimization of Callus Induction Using Different Plant Hormone and Light Condition | |
| Mustafa | Plant Growth Regulators and Their Effect on Fenugreek Growth | |
| Shekhawat et al. | Direct organogenesis for mass propagation of Peperomia pellucida L. an epiphytic medicinal herb | |
| MD1012Z (en) | Process for treatment of grape-vine | |
| RU2840137C1 (en) | Method of producing seedless fruits of sea-buckthorn | |
| Bhosale et al. | Studies on foliar application of plant growth regulators and chemicals on yield & quality of pomegranate cv. Phule Bhagwa Super |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FG9Y | Short term patent issued | ||
| KA4A | Patent for invention lapsed due to non-payment of fees (with right of restoration) |