KR20210037920A - Manufacturing method of drinking water composition for laying hen and drinking water composition thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for manufacturing a drinking water additive for laying hens, wherein the productivity of laying hens is improved and odorous gas of chicken manure is reduced by diluting the drinking water additive for laying hens, obtained by mixing a hot water extract of Mentha canadensis and Geranium thunbergii, in water and feeding the same to laying hens. The method comprises: a pre-treatment step of collecting Mentha canadensis and Geranium thunbergii, removing roots thereof, and washing and drying stems and leaves thereof; a hot water extraction step of mixing the Mentha canadensis and Geranium thunbergii that have undergone the pre-treatment step and performing a process of hot water extraction at the same time; and a post-treatment step of mixing the hot water extract that has passed through the hot water extraction step with mineral water to make an extract mixture.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0002] The manufacturing method of a negative additive for laying hens and a negative additive for laying hens manufactured thereby TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method for preparing a negative water additive for laying hens and a negative additive for laying hens prepared thereby, and more particularly, a negative water for laying hens to obtain an extract mixture obtained by mixing a hot water extract of mint and brown grass and mineral water. It relates to a method for preparing additives and a negative additive for laying hens prepared thereby.

Due to the frequent outbreak of bird flu and the problem of misuse of various antibiotics, technology to strengthen the immunity of laying hens through natural plants is attracting attention.

Accordingly, the applicant of the present invention measured ABTS radical scavenging activity and DPPH radical scavenging activity to determine the antioxidant activity as shown in Table 1 for 24 materials that can be supplied and supplied in Korea as natural plants and can be used as food grade. Both of these were selected from the excellent Lamiaceae perennial plants, Mentha arvensis var. piperascens and Geranium thunbergii, to be used as feed additives.

However, as a conventional technology for feed additives, a conventional technology including mint (domestic registration patent No. 10-1727112) and a conventional technology including current grass (domestic registration patent No. 10-1309583) have been introduced. In all of the prior art, as a small fraction of a number of materials, mint or brown grass is added.

In addition, there is a possibility that a number of useful components of each material may be lost by going through a solidification process to be added to the feed, and the process is complicated, resulting in an increase in manufacturing cost, and it is judged that there is a limit to commercialization.

In order to differentiate it from the prior art, the applicant tried to maximize immunity by using only two materials, mint and brown grass, but when the two materials are processed into powder and added to feed, eating disorders of laying hens occur due to off-flavor. Thus, the problem of hindering the growth rate has emerged.

Therefore, if extracts of the two materials are prepared in liquid form and then diluted in drinking water, they can be administered to the laying hens without eating disorders, and precise dosing control is possible by controlling the amount of dilution, especially after mixing the two materials. When the hot water extraction process is employed, it is determined that the manufacturing cost can be lowered through the simplification of the process, and the present invention has been disclosed.

KR 10-1727112 B1 2017.04.10. KR 10-1309583 B1 2013.09.11.

The problem to be solved in the present invention is an extraction mixture obtained by mixing hot water extract of peppermint and brown grass with mineral water, and a method for producing a negative additive for laying hens in which productivity is improved and odor gas of chicken meal is reduced, and a negative additive for laying hens produced thereby. To provide.

The method for producing a negative additive for laying hens according to the present invention for solving the above problems is a pretreatment step of removing the roots by collecting mint and brown grass, washing and drying the stems and leaves, and mixing the mint and brown grass after the pretreatment step at the same time. It is characterized by comprising a hot water extraction step of performing a process of extracting hot water, and a post-treatment step of mixing the hot water extract subjected to the hot water extraction step with mineral water to form an extraction mixture.

In addition, the method for producing a negative additive for laying hens of the present invention, in the hot water extraction step, the amount of water, extraction temperature, and extraction time of the hot water extraction process are 25 times the amount of water, the extraction temperature is 90°C, and the extraction time is 2 hours. Characterized in that.

In addition, the method for producing a negative additive for laying hens of the present invention is characterized in that in the hot water extraction step, peppermint and brown grass are mixed in a weight ratio of 4:1.

In addition, in the method for producing a negative additive for spawning systems of the present invention, the extraction mixture is characterized in that the hot water extract and mineral water are mixed in a ratio of 0.1 hot water extract and 0.1 mineral water based on the weight of 100 mixed negative water.

By diluting the negative additive for laying hens prepared by the method for preparing a negative additive for laying hens of the present invention in water and feeding them to the laying hens, the productivity of the laying hens can be improved and the odor gas of the chicken meal can be reduced.

1 is a photograph of a laying hen and a laying hen under test for testing the feeding effect of a negative additive for laying hens according to the present invention.
Figure 2 is a block diagram of a method for preparing a negative additive for a spawning system according to the present invention.

Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

The manufacturing method of the present invention consists of a pre-treatment step (S10), a hot water extraction step (S20), and a post-treatment step (S30).

Specifically, the pretreatment step (S10) consists of a process of removing the roots by collecting mint and brown grass, and washing and drying the stems and leaves.

The hot water extraction step (S20) is a step of performing a process of simultaneously extracting hot water by mixing peppermint and brown vinegar passed through the pretreatment step (S10), and the amount of water, extraction temperature, and extraction time of the hot water extraction process are described in Example 1 below. As a basis, the amount of water is 25 times, the extraction temperature is 90℃, and the extraction time is 2 hours.

The post-treatment step (S30) consists of a process of mixing the hot water extract that has passed through the hot water extraction step (S20) with mineral water to make a mixed solution (hereinafter referred to as “extracted mixture”).

Meanwhile, a process of sterilizing and packaging the product may be added for transportation and sale.

In the farm, the extract mixture is added to negative water and used, and the mixture of the extract mixture and negative water is referred to as "mixed negative water".

In the extraction mixture, the hot water extract and mineral water are mixed in a ratio of 0.1 hot water extract and 0.1 mineral water based on the following Example 2, based on the weight of 100 mixed drinking water.

By diluting and feeding the obtained extract mixture, that is, a negative additive for laying hens at a certain ratio in the negative water of the laying hens, it is possible to improve productivity and reduce odor gas of chicken meal.

In the following, qualitative data according to a specific embodiment of the present invention is described, but this is only a description of a representative embodiment of the present invention and does not limit the scope of the present invention.

<Example 1> Hot water extraction condition test

First, the extraction yield according to the amount of water was measured at 90° C. for 2 hours after mixing raw materials (total of 20 g) in the amount of rice: peppermint = 1:4, and the results are shown in [Table 1] below.

Extraction solvent Water volume (times) Temperature(℃) Time(h) yield(%)

water 15

90

2 14.7 20 16.0 25 16.8 30 18.1

As described above, the extraction yield of the mixed extract is 30 times ＞ 25 times ＞ 20 times ＞ 15 times in the extraction water content evaluation as above, and it can be seen that the yield increases as the extraction water content increases.

In addition, the content of the index component according to the amount of water was analyzed, and the results are shown in [Table 2] below.

Water quantity
(ship) Index component content (mg/100g extract powder) Quercetin Camperol Coffee acid Losmarinic acid total 15 4.40 57.84 30.31 101.25 193.81 20 4.35 59.95 28.51 106.45 199.25 25 5.48 93.44 27.67 104.12 230.71 30 8.08 100.82 25.32 94.80 229.01

As described above, the total sum of the index components according to the amount of extracted water is 25 times ≥ 30 times ＞ 20 times ＞ 15 times.If the amount of water extracted is 25 times or more, the extraction of other components increases without increasing the content of the index component, resulting in an increase in extraction yield. It is estimated to increase.

Therefore, as a result of this experiment, the amount of water extracted was selected to be 25 times.

Next, the extraction yield was measured by changing the extraction time at 90°C after selecting the amount of extraction water to be 25 times, mixing the raw materials with the amount of the current: peppermint = 1:4 (total 20g), and measuring the extraction yield accordingly. Same as ].

Extraction solvent Water volume (times) Temperature(℃) Time(h) yield(%)
water
25
90 One 14.3 2 17.0 3 17.1

As described above, in the extraction time evaluation, the extraction yield of the mixed extract increased in the order of 3 hours ≥ 2 hours> 1 hour, and the extraction yield increased as the extraction time increased, but the extraction yields of 2 hours and 3 hours were almost similar.

In addition, the content of the index component according to the extraction time was analyzed, and the results are shown in [Table 4] below.

time
(h) Index component content (mg/100g extract powder) Quercetin Camperol Coffee acid Losmarinic acid total One 9.40 100.82 19.69 98.71 228.62 2 8.59 97.13 23.68 112.00 241.40 3 8.60 92.45 26.55 118.73 246.34

As described above, the sum of the index components according to the extraction time was 3 hours, 2 hours and 1 hour. As the extraction time increased, the sum of the index components also increased, but the sum of the index components was not significantly different between 2 and 3 hours.

As a result, when considering the efficiency of the process, the extraction time was selected as 2 hours.

<Example 2> 16-week feeding test of laying hens according to the feeding of negative additives for laying hens (test location: laying hens at the animal farm attached to Sunchon National University)

1. Test method

By disclosing 108 8-week-old laying hens, they were divided into 6 treatment groups classified into the following control groups (C1, C2) and added groups (T1 ~ T4), and then a feeding test for 16 weeks was conducted to determine the productivity of the laying hens. Weight), egg production rate, blue rate}, feed intake, economy, chicken manure odor gas {NH ₃ , H ₂ S, SO ₂ values after 48 hours} and chicken manure pH {value after 48 hours} were analyzed.

Here, the egg weight was calculated by measuring the weight of all the collected eggs and dividing by the number of eggs to calculate the average egg weight.

Control (C1). As negative water, only purified water is supplied to the laying hens.

Control (C2). Commercially available powdered immunity enhancers are supplied to laying hens.

Addition group 1 (T1). Mixed drinking water including the extract mixture obtained by mixing 0.1 hot water extract and 0.1 mineral water with respect to the weight of mixed drinking water is supplied to the laying hens.

Addition group 2 (T2). Mixed drinking water including an extract mixture obtained by mixing hot water extract in a ratio of 0.05 and mineral water in a ratio of 0.05 to the weight of mixed drinking water is supplied to the laying hens.

Addition group 3 (T3). Mixed drinking water including an extract mixture obtained by mixing hot water extract in a ratio of 0.05 and mineral water in a ratio of 0.1 to the weight of 100 mixed drinking water is supplied to the laying hens.

Addition group 4 (T4). Mixed drinking water including the extract mixture obtained by mixing 0.1 hot water extract and 0.05 mineral water based on the weight of 100 mixed drinking water is supplied to the laying hens.

<Specification test result>

The results are shown in the tables below, and the unit of each item is the weight; g, scattering rate; %, blue rate; %, feed intake; g, economics; Won/day, chicken manure odor gas; ppm, fowl pH; is the pH.

Treatment group C0 C1 T1 T2 T3 T4 Vive 60.59 60.66 59.78 61.42 60.73 59.82 Spawning rate 84.85 86.37 89.66 89.49 82.78 86.46 Blue rate 1.13 0.98 0.95 1.14 1.70 1.02

Treatment group C0 C1 T1 T2 T3 T4 Feed intake 114.68 116.06 116.79 117.60 111.45 110.34

Treatment group C0 C1 T1 T2 T3 T4 Economics 51.84 53.85 54.35 54.73 51.86 51.35

Treatment group C0 C1 T1 T2 T3 T4 Odor gas NH ₃ 124.44 111.46 68.52 128.07 63.62 125.52

Treatment group C0 C1 T1 T2 T3 T4 Odor gas H ₂ S 0.03 0.69 0.35 0.23 0.79 0.95

Treatment group C0 C1 T1 T2 T3 T4 Odor gas SO ₂ 0.61 0.56 0.43 0.8 0.68 0.77

Treatment group C0 C1 T1 T2 T3 T4 Poultry pH 8.78 8.73 8.67 8.69 8.45 8.78

2. Analysis of specification test results

Among the results of synthesizing the productivity results of laying hens fed with natural liquid feed additives, in egg weight, the highest was 61.42 g in T2 and the lowest was 59.78 g in T1.

In terms of spawning rate, T1 was the highest with 89.66%, and T3 was the lowest with 82.78%, showing a significant difference.

The blue rate was the highest at 1.70% at T3 and the lowest at 0.95% at T1, showing a significant difference.

The feed intake was the highest at 117.60g at T2 and the lowest at 110.34g at T4, showing a significant difference.

In the result of economic analysis, the overall daily feed cost was the highest at T2 at 54.73 won, and the lowest at T4 at 51.35 won, showing a significant difference.

In the overall result of analyzing ammonia in chicken manure, on average, the highest was 125.52 ppm in T4, and the lowest was 63.62 ppm in T3, showing a significant difference.

In the overall results of analysis of hydrogen sulfide in chicken manure, on average, T4 was the highest at 0.95 ppm and C1 was the lowest at 0.03 ppm, showing a significant difference.

In the overall results of analysis of sulfur dioxide in chicken manure, on average, the highest was 0.80 ppm in T2, and the lowest was 0.43 ppm in T1, showing a significant difference.

In the overall result of analysis of chicken manure pH, the highest value was 8.58 at T4 at 0 hours, and the lowest at 8.02 at T3 showed significant difference (p<0.05). After 48 hours, C1 and T4 showed the highest value of 8.78, and T3 showed the lowest value of 8.45, showing a significant difference.

As a result, by supplying negative additives, which is an extract mixture, to the laying hens, there was an improvement effect such as productivity improvement and reduction of odor gas of chicken manure. Appeared to be.

Although the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above, the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and it should be understood that the scope of the present invention extends to the scope substantially equal to the embodiment of the present invention. Various modifications may be made by those of ordinary skill in the technical field to which the present invention pertains within the scope not departing from the spirit of the invention.

Claims (5)

Pre-treatment step (S10) of collecting mint and brown grass to remove roots and washing and drying stems and leaves;
Hot water extraction step (S20) of performing a process of simultaneously extracting hot water by mixing the peppermint and brown vinegar passed through the pretreatment step (S10); And
A post-treatment step (S30) of mixing the hot water extract passed through the hot water extraction step (S20) with mineral water to prepare an extraction mixture;
Method for producing a negative additive for laying hens, characterized in that consisting of. The method of claim 1,
In the hot water extraction step (S20), the amount of water, extraction temperature, and extraction time of the hot water extraction process are 25 times the amount of water, the extraction temperature is 90°C, and the extraction time is 2 hours. Way. The method of claim 1,
In the hot water extraction step (S20), mint and brown grass are mixed in a weight ratio of 4:1. The method of claim 3,
The extraction mixture is a method for producing a negative additive for laying hens, characterized in that the hot water extract and mineral water are mixed in a ratio of 0.1 hot water extract and 0.1 mineral water with respect to the weight of 100 mixed drinking water. A negative additive for laying hens prepared by the method of any one of claims 1 to 4.

Images