KR20190043119A - Disaster Countermeasures Training method capable to make training scene and system thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

Disclosed are a disaster countermeasure training method capable of generating a training scene and a system thereof. According to an aspect of the present invention, the disaster countermeasure training method comprises the following steps. A disaster countermeasure training system specifies a location of a disaster occurrence and a type of disaster. The disaster countermeasure training system generates a training scene including at least one training mission corresponding to the type of the disaster and the location of the disaster occurrence specified by the disaster countermeasure training system. The disaster countermeasure training system simulates the training scene generated by the disaster countermeasure training system and performs the at least one training mission included in the training scene.

Description

Disaster Countermeasures Training Method and System for Disaster Countermeasure Training Method and System

The present invention relates to a method and system for performing a disaster response training using an electronic standardized operating procedure (SOP).

SOP means that a process or a task is processed in a wide range of work order or process, so that the quality of the process or work can be guaranteed. More narrowly, the SOP is defined as a procedure for dealing with disaster response agencies in a pre-defined business process, from the disaster reporting stage to on-site dispatch, response activities, and emergency recovery, .

The SOP in this specification refers not only to a disaster, but also to a series of countermeasures defined by at least one organization or institution in which a plurality of personnel exists, in order to correspond to a specific event. The specific event may be a disaster, various situations such as an emergency situation, an emergency situation, or a predetermined situation that occurs artificially.

In order to manage such SOPs, conventionally, paper documents have been prescribed for each corresponding step or step-by-step action procedure. However, in the case of managing the SOP by the paper document, it is necessary for each agent to print out a large amount of SOP information as a paper document (for example, a mission book, etc.) There was a problem to be familiar with SOP.

In order to solve such a problem, there has been an attempt to automatically manage SOPs by electronic documenting or DB. One such example is disclosed in Korean Patent Publication (10-2011-0099905). However, the above-mentioned Korean patent discloses electronic documenting of the SOP, and thus, it is effectively propagating the situation to the related organizations according to the type of the disaster when the disaster occurs.

In addition, in the event of a disaster, rapid response is required to minimize damage. However, since there are a number of erroneous factors in the disaster situation and different countermeasures must be performed accordingly, the procedure for responding to the disaster situation is very complicated and vast. Therefore, even when the electronic document of the SOP is simply managed There is a problem that it is difficult to quickly grasp the process of responding to various incidents or situations.

Therefore, a system and a method are needed to easily identify and quickly perform a series of response procedures for a disaster situation. In order to solve such a problem, the present applicant has disclosed a Korean registered patent (Registration No. 10-1513983, " SOP scenario drive system and method for providing the same, hereinafter referred to as 'prior patent').

However, the applicant's previous patent has a problem in that the task is performed only when an event in which an actual SOP scenario is to be executed occurs, and accordingly, how efficient and targeted training is possible in the case of training all or a part of the SOP scenario There is still a demand for.

Disclosure of Invention Technical Problem [8] Accordingly, the present invention has been made keeping in mind the above problems occurring in the prior art, and an object of the present invention is to provide a method and system for visualizing a corresponding procedure to be performed when a specific event such as a disaster occurs, And to provide a system and method for enabling efficient training by linking a flowchart and a training.

In addition, the present invention provides a system and method for enabling a more effective and necessary training to be concentrated by creating a training course including training missions so that a virtual training can be performed, and exercising the training using the training training result.

A disaster response training method capable of generating a training god to implement the technical idea of the present invention is characterized in that the disaster response training system includes a disaster occurrence location and a disaster type, Generating a training scene that includes at least one training mission corresponding to the disaster response training system; simulating the training session generated by the disaster response training system to perform the at least one training mission included in the training session; .

Wherein the disaster response training system comprises generating a training scene comprising at least one training mission corresponding to the particular type of disaster and the location, Generating at least one candidate training mission related to an object in the disaster response training system and specifying at least one of the candidate training missions generated by the disaster response training system as the training mission.

Wherein the disaster response training system includes generating a training scene that includes at least one training mission corresponding to the particular disaster type and the location, wherein the disaster response training system is responsive to the occurrence location and the corresponding Searching the SOP in the SOP DB and generating at least one candidate training mission corresponding to the corresponding SOP in which the disaster response training system is searched.

Wherein the disaster response training method capable of generating the training scene includes the steps of the disaster response training system selecting one of a plurality of sites to be managed from the terminal of the administrator, To the terminal of the manager, and the disaster response training system selects a specific location in the site from the terminal of the administrator through the image information as the occurrence location .

Wherein the step of generating at least one candidate training mission corresponding to the sought correspondence SOP of the disaster response training system comprises the steps of the component to be used in the training mission in accordance with the context described in the corresponding SOP, And generating the candidate training mission by specifying an action to be taken through the candidate training mission.

The candidate training missions corresponding to the corresponding SOPs may have a connection training mission to be performed between the SOP training missions described in the SOP context and a plurality of SOP training missions.

The connection training mission may be characterized by a path between training positions of each of the plurality of SOP training missions.

Wherein the disaster response training method capable of generating the training scene comprises: training execution data of the training performed by the trainee in the disaster response training system; the training execution data includes at least one of the time required for each training mission, The method further comprises changing attributes of the training mission or the training god based on the training performance data collected by the disaster response training system.

According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a disaster response training method capable of generating a training god, the disaster response training system including a disaster response training system for identifying a disaster occurrence location and a disaster type, Generating a training scene that includes at least one corresponding training mission, wherein the disaster response training system includes training gods that include at least one training mission corresponding to the particular disaster type and location, scene in the disaster response training system comprises the steps of: the disaster response training system searching in the SOP DB for a corresponding SOP corresponding to the occurrence location and the type of the disaster; and the disaster response training system searching for a candidate discipline mission corresponding to the discovered corresponding SOP And generating at least one.

The disaster response training method capable of generating the training scene described above can be implemented by a computer program stored in the recorded medium.

The system for realizing the technical idea of the present invention is characterized in that the system for specifying the occurrence location and the disaster type of the disaster, the training for generating a training scene including at least one training mission corresponding to the specific disaster type and the occurrence location A generating module and a training module for simulating the training god generated to allow the trainee to perform the at least one training mission included in the training god.

Wherein the training generation module generates at least one candidate training mission related to the object in the influence area determined according to the type of the disaster based on the occurrence position and specifies at least one of the generated candidate training missions as the training mission have.

The training generation module may search the SOP DB for a corresponding SOP corresponding to the generation position and the type of the disaster, and may generate at least one candidate training mission corresponding to the searched corresponding SOP.

The training generation module may generate the candidate training mission by specifying a component to be used for the training mission and an action to be taken through the component according to the context described in the corresponding SOP.

Wherein the training module collects training performance data of training performed by a trainer, the training performance data includes at least one of a time required for each mission, a failure rate for each mission, and a new training time, May change the attributes of the training mission or training god based on the collected training performance data.

A system according to another aspect of the present invention includes a SOP DB and a training generation module, wherein the disaster response training system identifies the location and the type of a disaster and identifies the particular type of disaster and the location And generating a training scene comprising at least one corresponding training mission, wherein a corresponding SOP corresponding to the location and the type of the disaster is searched in the SOP DB, and the training corresponding to the searched corresponding SOP Create at least one mission.

According to one embodiment of the present invention, it is possible to simulate the training by simulators or equipment in real-like environments as well as situations where SOP scenarios are driven according to the actual standard correspondence procedure, so that an electronicized SOP scenario It has the effect of being able to train.

It also has the effect of allowing SOP flow charts to be linked to training choices for training efficiency and intuitive control. In particular, even if the SOP for training is not always started from the beginning of the SOP scenario in the SOP scenario, efficient training is enabled even if the training is started at an arbitrary point in time.

It also has the effect of allowing the manager to train the desired performers and / or equipment selectively and effectively on the SOP scenario.

It also has the effect of creating the training that the manager deems necessary and training it intensively.

In particular, according to one embodiment, the generated training can be performed more realistically using the virtual reality, and the training mission associated with the SOP can be easily generated when the training mission is generated.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS A brief description of each drawing is provided to more fully understand the drawings recited in the description of the invention.
1 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of a disaster response training system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a view showing an object corresponding to each unit SOP displayed in the disaster response training system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary SOP scenario displayed in the disaster response training system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
4A to 4C are diagrams for explaining an example in which the shape of each object included in the flowchart is changed as a procedure for handling an event proceeds.
FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining a link object connecting association procedures between organizations. FIG.
6 is a diagram for explaining a conversion object that links corresponding procedures between SOP scenarios.
FIG. 7 is a view for explaining a method of displaying a unit SOP included in the SOP scenario of the present invention in a disaster response training system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 8 is a diagram conceptually showing an example of a disaster response system supporting a training mode according to the technical idea of the present invention.
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a specific example of the SOP scenario according to an embodiment of the present invention and a task of a unit SOP corresponding to each object.
10 is a view for explaining an example in which disaster response training is controlled through an SOP flowchart according to an embodiment of the present invention.
11 is a view for explaining an example in which a hypothetical scenario is generated according to an embodiment of the present invention.
12 is a view for explaining an example in which sensor data for training is simulated according to an embodiment of the present invention.
13 is a view for explaining an example in which a disaster response training system according to an embodiment of the present invention can be operated in one of a training mode and a general mode.
14 to 16 are diagrams illustrating a process of generating a training scene in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
17 is a diagram for explaining a process in which a training mission is associated with an SOP according to an embodiment of the present invention.
18 to 21 are diagrams illustrating a process of generating a training scene in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The present invention is capable of various modifications and various embodiments, and specific embodiments are illustrated in the drawings and described in detail in the detailed description. It is to be understood, however, that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments, but includes all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

The terms first, second, etc. may be used to describe various components, but the components should not be limited by the terms. The terms are used only for the purpose of distinguishing one component from another.

The terminology used in this application is used only to describe a specific embodiment and is not intended to limit the invention. The singular expressions include plural expressions unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

In this specification, the terms "comprises" or "having" and the like refer to the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, or combinations thereof, But do not preclude the presence or addition of features, numbers, steps, operations, components, parts, or combinations thereof.

Also, in this specification, when any one element 'transmits' data to another element, the element may transmit the data directly to the other element, or may be transmitted through at least one other element And may transmit the data to the other component. Conversely, when one element 'directly transmits' data to another element, it means that the data is transmitted to the other element without passing through another element in the element.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the embodiments of the present invention with reference to the accompanying drawings. Like reference symbols in the drawings denote like elements.

1 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of a disaster response training system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, a disaster response training system 100 may be provided to implement a disaster response training system providing method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

The disaster response training system 100 may be installed in a system operated by a predetermined organization (or an organization) that defines and performs the SOP (for example, a control room or a control room server) to implement the technical idea of the present invention.

The disaster response training system 100 may drive an SOP scenario corresponding to the event when a predetermined event such as a fire or a pollutant outflow occurs.

The SOP scenario includes information about each corresponding step and corresponding action and / or procedure (hereinafter, referred to as 'unit SOP' in this specification) defined in the SOP to be performed when the event occurs And information on a posterior relationship between each unit SOP.

Each unit SOP may have a posterior relationship, which may mean that the trailing unit SOP is performed after the preceding unit SOP is completed.

Meanwhile, the SOP scenario may be stored in advance in a predetermined database (database) in the form of a file. In one embodiment, the SOP scenario may be a file in the xml (extensible markup language) format. The format of the file in which the SOP scenario is stored may vary and the SOP scenario may be electronicized in any format.

When the disaster response training system 100 drives the SOP scenario, the disaster response training system 100 interprets the SOP scenario file and performs a predetermined procedure or function defined in the SOP scenario as described below .

The disaster response training system 100 may drive a predetermined SOP scenario according to a drive command of a person in charge, but in case of receiving an event occurrence signal from a predetermined detection device (not shown) such as a fire detection sensor or a pollutant detection sensor It is possible to automatically drive the SOP scenario corresponding to the event without a separate command of the user.

The disaster response training system 100 communicates with a terminal (for example, 210) of the mission personnel who should perform the unit SOP in the event occurrence zone 200 during the SOP scenario, It may send a mission message or receive certain information that can confirm that the mission is completed. In addition, the disaster response training system 100 may send a message through a predetermined internal broadcasting facility 150 installed in an area 200 where an event corresponding to the SOP scenario is generated, can do. In addition, the disaster response training system 100 may include a predetermined device (for example, a fire alarm system, a police station, a city hall, etc.) of an external organization 300 (E.g., a device that receives a notification, etc.) and / or a terminal 310 of a contact person.

In addition, the disaster response training system 100 may be installed in a predetermined server of an organization that operates the SOP, or may be implemented as a physical device for the disaster response training system 100 independently of the server.

Meanwhile, the disaster response training system 100 may provide a normal (control) mode and a training mode.

The general (control) mode may mean a mode in which actual control and / or monitoring is actually performed through sensors and other control facilities (CCTV, microphone, etc.) installed in a predetermined institution or monitoring area to prepare for actual occurrence of a disaster have.

On the other hand, the training mode may be a mode for simulating the SOP scenario corresponding to the event by assuming a virtual event (disaster situation).

And the training mode provided by the disaster response training system 100 can be performed based on the SOP flowchart showing the SOP scenario as described above.

The training based on the SOP flow chart means that not only the progress of the training can be confirmed using the SOP flowchart but also the start point of the training (unit SOP to be started) and / The time (the unit SOP to be terminated), the subject of the training, and / can mean that the equipment to be trained can be specified.

This allows an administrator to easily identify and train tasks, tasks, or equipment that require intensive training, in addition to performing just one SOP scenario through training from start to finish.

Meanwhile, the disaster response training system 100 may provide a function that a trainee can generate a training scene to perform.

The administrator can generate the training scene using predetermined interfaces provided by the disaster response training system 100 through the administrator terminal. The training god includes at least one training mission to be performed by the trainer, which can be a sort of training unit that the trainer must perform through a series of training missions.

The trainee can perform the training intended by the training god, that is, at least one training mission, by selecting the training god to perform.

A training mission can mean a unit mission to be performed by a trainee. As will be described later, the training mission can be defined as an action to be taken by the user and / or a component to be used for the action. For example, a specific training mission can be defined as an action that propagates the situation to a particular person using a component called a telephone. Another training mission may be defined as an action that shoots a digestive juice using a component called a fire extinguisher.

The training session or the training mission may be generated by the administrator, irrespective of the SOP, or the training mission may be automatically generated in connection with the SOP. The fact that a training mission is automatically generated means that at least some of the components and / or actions defining the training mission are automatically determined, meaning that all information or parameters for defining the training mission are automatically determined It does not.

In any case, the disaster response training system 100 can generate training gods, which can be used by a trainer to perform training.

According to one example, the generated training god may be simulated on a VR basis to enhance realistic or realistic training effects. For example, a trainer may wear a VR device (e.g., a head mount or other user-utilized device) to train a training scene created by an administrator, and the disaster response training system 100 may include training So that the god can be simulated.

The disaster response training system 100 may include a display module 110, a control module 120, a SOP DB 140, a training module 150, and a training generation module 160. The disaster response training system 100 may further include an authorization module 130.

In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, some of the components described above may not necessarily be components that are essential to the implementation of the present invention, and in addition, the disaster response training system 100, Of course, may include more components.

The disaster response training system 100 may include hardware resources and / or software necessary to implement the technical idea of the present invention, and may mean one physical component or one device It is not. That is, the disaster response training system 100 may mean a logical combination of hardware and / or software provided to implement the technical idea of the present invention. If necessary, May be implemented as a set of logical structures for implementing the technical idea of the present invention. In addition, the disaster response training system 100 may mean a set of configurations separately implemented for each function or role for implementing the technical idea of the present invention. For example, the display module 110, the control module 120, the authority module 130, the training module 150, the training generation module 160, and / or the SOP DB 140 may be connected to different physical devices Or may be located in the same physical device. Also, depending on the implementation, each of the display module 110, the control module 120, the authority module 130, the training module 150, the training generation module 160, and / or the SOP DB 140 The modules may also be located in different physical devices, and configurations located in different physical devices may be organically coupled to each other to realize the functions performed by the respective modules.

In this specification, a module may mean a functional and structural combination of hardware for carrying out the technical idea of the present invention and software for driving the hardware. For example, the module may refer to a logical unit of a predetermined code and a hardware resource for executing the predetermined code, and it does not necessarily mean a physically connected code or a kind of hardware But can be easily deduced to the average expert in the field of the present invention.

The control module 120 may include other components included in the disaster response training system 100 such as the display module 110, the authorization module 130, the training module 150, The training generation module 160, and / or the SOP DB 140, etc.).

The SOP DB 140 may store an SOP scenario that defines a standard corresponding procedure when a predetermined event occurs.

In this specification, the DB may be implemented as at least one table, and may also include a separate DBMS (Database Management System) for searching, storing, and managing information stored in the DB. In addition, it can be implemented in various ways such as a linked-list, a tree, and a relational DB, and includes all data storage media and data structures capable of storing information to be stored in the DB Can be used.

The SOP scenario may include information on a plurality of unit SOPs and information on a posterior relationship between unit SOPs.

Meanwhile, each unit SOP can have a type (attribute), and the type of the unit SOP can be any one of a mission type, a judgment type, an internal situation propagation type, an external situation propagation type, and an internal and external situation propagation type.

The unit SOP of the mission type may include information on a predetermined mission. Here, the term " mission " may mean an action or a procedure to be executed by the corresponding agent or the corresponding team (also referred to as the mission officer) to perform the mission. Information about the mission may include an overview of the mission, at least one detailed mission, and information about the response or response team designated to perform each detailed mission, information about the person or team responsible for the mission, (For example, shortest path, belongings, etc.) for efficiently performing the above actions and procedures, as well as actions and procedures.

The unit SOP of the judgment type may include information on a predetermined condition. The information on the condition may include information on a situation requiring judgment of Yes / No, information on the criterion of judgment, and may further include additional information on matters to be considered as reference in the judgment. Alternatively, the information on the condition may include information on a trailing SOP to be performed on the basis of a predetermined numerical value (for example, sensor data) when the SOP to be processed differs.

The unit SOP of the internal situation propagation type, the external situation propagation type, the external situation propagation type, the unit SOP of the propagation type, the information about the propagation object, the propagation means (for example, propagation through internal broadcasting, , Transmission of a message to a dedicated program, and the like).

The SOP scenario may be created in various ways and stored in the SOP DB 140. In particular, it may be created through dedicated SOP scenario creation software, but it is not limited thereto and may be created / modified through a general-purpose document editing application such as a text editor.

On the other hand, the display module 110 displays the relation between the object corresponding to each unit SOP included in the SOP scenario and each unit SOP on a predetermined user terminal (for example, a terminal of a person who co-ordinates the SOP) . That is, the display module 110 may display each unit SOP corresponding to the SOP scenario in the form of a flowchart.

The type of object displayed by the display module 110 may be determined by the type of unit SOP corresponding thereto, an example of which is shown in FIG. 2 is a view showing an object corresponding to each unit SOP displayed in the disaster response training system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

2, an object corresponding to the unit SOP of the mission type may be in the form of an outer angle (square), in the case of a judgment type, an outer angle (rhombus), in case of an inner status propagation type, A trapezoid with a longer direction than the second direction), an external situation propagation type (the second direction is a trapezoid with a longer length than the first direction), and a case with an internal and external situation propagation type.

Of course, according to an embodiment, the shape of the object corresponding to the type of each unit SOP may be different from that of FIG. 2, and various modifications may be possible.

3 is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary SOP scenario displayed in the disaster response training system according to an embodiment of the present invention. The example of FIG. 3 shows a case where each object is assumed to have the form defined in FIG. 3 shows a case in which the unit SOP corresponding to the mission 1 (2) and the message 1 propagation 3 is completed, and the unit SOP corresponding to the mission 2 (4) is in progress.

The display module 110 does not necessarily display only the objects corresponding to the unit SOP but may display the objects 1 and 14 indicating the start and end of the SOP scenario shown in FIG. Objects, and conversion objects.

Of course, it is also possible for the display module 110 to transmit information (e.g., mission attendant, mission contents, radio waves, etc.) about the mission corresponding to each unit SOP to a predetermined terminal Of course, be displayed. Also, the unit SOP currently being performed in practice or training may be displayed so as to be distinguished from other unit SOPs.

Referring to FIG. 3, an object corresponding to a series of unit SOPs may be displayed on the user terminal.

The display module 110 may display an outline, title, or representative task of the corresponding unit SOP for each object so that the conductor can grasp the contents of the object. In particular, in the case of mission types, more information can be displayed about the person or team performing the task. For example, in Task 2 (4) in FIG. 3, it can be confirmed that, in addition to the mission name, it further includes a team (Team 2) to perform the mission.

In addition, the display module 110 may connect each object with an indicator (e.g., an arrow) according to a posterior relationship defined in the SOP scenario so that the display module 110 can easily grasp the posterior relationship between the unit SOPs. The relationship between the unit SOPs may mean a relationship in which the unit SOPs that follow the succeeding unit SOPs are performed as described above.

On the other hand, the posterior relationship does not necessarily correspond to 1: 1, but may be 1: many or many: 1. 3, the trailing unit SOP of Mission 2 (4) is Mission 3 (5) and the internal propagation 6 of Message 2, and the leading unit SOP of Mission 7 (13) is Condition 1 (10) and / or Mission 6 (12).

1: In the case of unit SOPs having a large number of relations, a plurality of following units may be performed when the preceding unit SOP is completed, and a plurality of following units may be performed according to an implementation or a predetermined execution setting. Only the unit SOP may be performed. Also, in the case of unit SOPs having a relationship of multiple: 1, the trailing unit SOP may be performed after all preceding unit SOPs are completed, but depending on the implementation or predetermined execution setting, when only a part of the plurality of preceding unit SOPs is completed A trailing unit SOP may be performed.

Meanwhile, the control module 120 may perform tasks set in the unit SOPs to be performed in the plurality of unit SOPs. Here, the task may be set for each unit SOP when the SOP scenario is created, and may mean a function performed by the control module 120. The task performed by the control module 120, the task performed by the control module 120, and the task performed by the task performer may be tasks corresponding to the unit SOP.

In the unit SOP of the mission type, a task of transmitting a mission message to a terminal of a predetermined mission performing entity or an operation of propagating the mission message to a predetermined internal broadcasting facility may be set. Meanwhile, the control module 120 may perform the task set in the unit SOP of the mission type and wait until the unit SOP of the mission type is completed. Thereafter, when receiving a completion signal from the user or receiving a completion signal from the terminal of the mission attendant, it can be determined that the unit SOP of the waiting mission type is completed and the task set in the trailing unit SOP can be performed. For example, if the unit SOP corresponding to task 5 (5) in FIG. 3 is completed, the user can select a circle in the border of task 5 (9) and input a completion signal of the corresponding unit SOP.

An operation for determining whether or not a predetermined condition is satisfied may be set in the unit SOP of the judgment type. In one embodiment, when the unit SOP of the determination type is performed, the control module 120 displays information about the condition to the user terminal displaying the SOP scenario, And receives a user's input or a return signal from the agent terminal, receives an input corresponding to Yes or No from the user, or receives a return signal corresponding to Yes or No from the agent's terminal , It can be judged whether or not the corresponding condition is satisfied. For example, the user may select one of the two circles in the border of condition 1 (10) of FIG. 3 to input a signal corresponding to yes or no.

The unit SOP of the internal situation propagation type may be set to output an internal propagation message to the internal broadcasting facility. In one embodiment, the control module 120 may determine that the unit SOP is completed immediately after the internal broadcast message set in the unit SOP is transmitted to the internal broadcasting facility, or after the predetermined period of time has elapsed.

 The unit SOP of the external situation propagation type may be set to output an external propagation message to a predetermined external terminal. In one embodiment, the control module 120 may determine that the unit SOP has been completed immediately after the output of the external propagation message to the external terminal, or after a predetermined period has elapsed.

The unit SOP of the internal and external situation propagation type may set an operation of sending an internal propagation message to a predetermined internal broadcasting facility and outputting an external propagation message to a predetermined external terminal. In one embodiment, the control module 120 may output an external propagation message to the external terminal, and may determine that the unit SOP is completed immediately after the internal propagation message is transmitted or after a predetermined period of time has elapsed.

Meanwhile, the control module 120 determines a unit SOP to be performed next based on the posterior relationship between unit SOPs when the unit SOP on which the task has been completed is completed, and performs the process of performing the unit SOP when the SOP scenario ends Can be repeated.

On the other hand, each object can display information on the execution state of each unit SOP corresponding thereto. In one embodiment, the execution state may be a 'pre-execution' state before being performed by the control module 120, a 'pre-execution' state before the unit SOP that has been performed by the control module 120, State or a " completed " state, but there may be more kinds of performance states depending on the embodiment. For example, there may be a 'skipped' state in the next unit SOP that is not executed.

The state of each unit SOP may be changed as the SOP scenario progresses. The display module 110 may change the shape of the corresponding object as the state of each unit SOP is changed, or may change the shape of the object corresponding to the specific state A visual effect can be added. For example, before the unit SOP is executed, the background of the object may be displayed in transparent / white color, such as task 4 (7) or message 3 external propagation 8 in FIG. 3, A visual effect with a thick border can be added as in Task 2 (4). 3, a visual effect in which the background is filled with a predetermined color (or pattern) may be added to the object corresponding to the already completed unit SOP.

Meanwhile, the display module 110 may change the shape of an arrow connecting each object as the SOP scenario progresses.

FIGS. 4A to 4C are diagrams for explaining an example in which the display module 110 changes the shape of each object included in the flow chart as a procedure for responding to events proceeds.

Fig. 4 (a) shows only the object portion from the message 1 radio wave 3 to the mission 4 (7) in Fig. That is, FIG. 4 (a) shows a case where the task set in task 2 (4) is performed after completion of the unit SOP corresponding to the message 1 propagation (3), and the completion of the unit SOP corresponding to task 2 . 4 (a), when the unit SOP corresponding to the task 2 (4) is completed, the control module 120 transmits the unit SOP corresponding to the task 3 (5), which is the trailing unit SOP, It is possible to perform a unit SOP corresponding to Equation (6).

Then, the display module 110 may change the shape of the object corresponding to the performed unit SOP to the first deformed shape or add a predetermined first visual effect, for example, as shown in FIG. 4 (b) . The display module 110 may transform the frame of the task 3 (5-1) and the message 2 radio wave 6-1 into a thick shape as shown in FIG. 4 (b). On the other hand, when the unit SOP is completed, the display module 110 may change the shape of the object corresponding to the completed unit SOP to a second deformed shape or add a second visual effect. As shown in Fig. 4 (b), a visual effect in which the background of Mission 2 (4-1) is filled with a predetermined color (or pattern) can be added.

When the unit SOP corresponding to the task 3 (5-1) of FIG. 4 (b) and the unit SOP corresponding to the message 2 radio wave 6-1 are completed, the control module 120 transmits the task 4 (7), and the display module 110 may execute the task 3 (5-2) corresponding to the completed unit SOP and the message 2 (2-2) corresponding to the completed unit SOP as shown in FIG. 4 (c) (6-2), and change the border of task 4 (7-1) corresponding to the executed unit SOP to a thick form.

In the above example, the edge of the object is changed or the background is changed. However, the scope of the present invention is not limited to this, and any kind of modification that can be visually distinguished from the object before modification is possible Those skilled in the art will readily understand the present invention.

According to the technical idea of the present invention as described above, the disaster response training system 100 visualizes the SOP procedure in the form of a flowchart, and displays the task to be performed later or the present on-going task visually. It has the effect of enabling the person in charge of the general supervisor or the commissioner to easily understand the complicated SOP procedure and quickly grasp the progress.

On the other hand, there may be a need for unit SOPs to be performed which are not in turn to be performed in order, either due to a sudden outbreak situation or due to other factors. To this end, the control module 120 may perform unit SOPs corresponding to unit SOPs selected by the user as well as unit SOPs to be executed according to the order defined in the SOP scenario. That is, when one of the objects corresponding to each of the plurality of displayed unit SOPs is selected by the user, the control module 120 performs a task set in the unit SOP corresponding to the selected object, The unit SOP to be performed next can be determined based on the posterior relationship between the unit SOPs. For example, in the situation shown in FIG. 3, when the user selects the secondary response 9, the control module 120 may perform a unit SOP corresponding to the secondary response 9 . In this case, the background of all the objects from the start (1) to the fire station support request (8) is changed, and the visual effect is displayed such that the border of the secondary correspondence (9) have. On the other hand, according to the embodiment, a plurality of unit SOPs may be concurrently performed. In this case, a visual effect such that the border becomes thicker in the secondary correspondence 9 in the state of FIG. 3 may be added.

According to the above-described embodiment, when an emergency situation occurs, a conductor can select and execute an appropriate unit SOP so that it is possible to cope with situations easily.

On the other hand, the procedures in one SOP scenario may be performed by several organizations. For example, some of the procedures of the SOP scenario need to be performed by the first organization, while others may have to be performed by the second organization. In this case, the SOP scenario may further include information for linking a correspondence procedure between different organizations.

In this case, the display module 110 may further display a link object for expressing a connection of a correspondence procedure between the organizations in order to visualize the connection of the correspondence procedure between the organizations, which will be described with reference to FIG. 5 do. As in the example of FIG. 5, the link object may be in the form of (circle), but is not limited to, and may be in one of a variety of forms.

FIG. 5 shows a first SOP procedure 412-1 to proceed in the first organization, and a second SOP procedure 412-2 to proceed in the second organization. For convenience of explanation, the objects corresponding to the unit SOP included in the first SOP procedure 412-1 and the second SOP procedure are omitted.

In order to express the connection relationship between the predetermined unit SOP included in the first SOP procedure 412-1 and the predetermined unit SOP included in the second SOP procedure 412-2, Objects 413 and 414 can be further displayed. The display module 110 further includes a leader line connecting the lead unit SOP and the link object 413 included in the first SOP procedure, a link object 413, a leader line connecting the link object 414 and a link object 414 By displaying further leader lines connecting the trailing unit SOPs, it is possible to express the connection between the leading unit SOP and the trailing unit SOP to be performed in different organizations. In addition, when the task set in the preceding unit SOP included in the first SOP procedure 412-1 is completed, the control module 120 next updates the next unit SOP included in the second SOP procedure 412-2 The unit SOP to be performed can be determined.

In another embodiment, unlike FIG. 5, the display module 110 may display only the link object 413 associated with the current ongoing SOP procedure and the current ongoing SOP procedure. For example, when the first SOAP procedure 412-1 is in progress, the display module 110 displays only the first SOAP procedure 412-1 and the link object 413, and displays only the link object 414, The 2SOP procedure 412-2 may not display.

The subsequent procedure is continued to complete the unit SOP in the first SOP procedure 412-1 associated with the link object 413 so that the unit SOP in the second SOP procedure 412-2 connected to the link object 414 When executed by the control module 120, the display module 110 may display a second SOP procedure 412-2, which is an ongoing SOP procedure, and a linked object 414 connected thereto.

On the other hand, in the event of a fire, there may be a case where a secondary event such as a flame or the like occurs, for example, an event such as a leakage of pollutants. Therefore, a specific SOP scenario needs to be interlocked with other SOP scenarios. To this end, the specific SOP scenario may further include connection information with other SOP scenarios.

In this case, the display module 110 may further display a conversion object representing a connection of a corresponding procedure between the SOP scenarios in order to visualize the connection of the corresponding procedure between the SOP scenarios. . As in the example of FIG. 6, the conversion object may be represented by a figure having an outline of the shape, but not limited thereto, and may be one of various shapes.

Figure 6 shows a first SOAP scenario 410 corresponding to a first event and a second SOAP scenario 420 corresponding to a second event. For convenience of description, the objects corresponding to the unit SOPs included in the first and the second SOP scenarios 410 and 420 are omitted and represented by the box shapes 412 and 422, respectively.

The display module 110 displays the conversion object 417 in order to express a connection relationship between a predetermined unit SOP included in the first SOP scenario 410 and a predetermined SOP included in the second SOP scenario 420. [ Can be displayed. The display module 110 further includes a leader line for connecting the preceding unit SOP included in the first SOP scenario with the switchover object 417, a switchover object 417, a leader line for connecting the switchover object 421 and a switchover object 421 By displaying further leader lines connecting the trailing unit SOPs, it is possible to express the connection between the leading unit SOP and the trailing unit SOP included in different SOP scenarios. In addition, when the task set in the preceding unit SOP included in the first SOP scenario 410 is completed, the control module 120 transmits the next SOP scenario S 420 included in the second SOP scenario 420 to the next SOP .

6, the display module 110 displays an object corresponding to the unit SOP included in the SOP scenario corresponding to the current unit SOP and a conversion object 417 associated with the currently active SOP scenario, Lt; / RTI > For example, when the first SOAP scenario 410 is in progress, the display module 110 displays only the unit SOP and the conversion object 417 included in the first SOAP scenario 410, The unit SOP included in the second SOAP scenario 420 may not be displayed.

Subsequently, the procedure continues to complete the preceding unit SOP in the first SOAP scenario 420 associated with the conversion object 417, and the succeeding unit SOP in the second SOAP scenario 420 connected to the conversion object 421, The display module 110 may display an object corresponding to the unit SOP included in the second SOP scenario 420, which is the current SOP scenario, and the conversion object 421 connected thereto .

On the other hand, if the SOP scenario includes a very large number of unit SOPs or if the corresponding SOP scenario needs to be performed by various organizations, the SOP scenario can be very complicated and vast. Also, for example, there may be cases where SOP scenarios corresponding to fires include procedures for different kinds of fires such as oil fires, electric fires, and general fires. If a single SOP scenario includes a large number of unit SOPs, it may be very difficult to identify and track the corresponding SOP scenarios if the unit SOPs included in the SOP scenario are displayed at a time.

Therefore, in the disaster response training system according to an embodiment of the present invention, in the case of a group SOP in which some of the unit SOPs included in the SOP scenario are grouped into one group, an object corresponding to each unit SOP included in the group SOP All of the objects may be displayed, but they may be simplified and displayed as one group object, which will be described with reference to FIG.

FIG. 7 is a view for explaining a method of displaying a unit SOP included in the SOP scenario of the present invention in a disaster response training system according to an embodiment of the present invention. In the example of FIG. 7, unit SOPs are grouped into three groups 510 to 530.

When the SOP scenario is activated, the display module 110 may display an object corresponding to all unit SOPs included in the SOP scenario, as shown in FIG. 7 (a).

However, according to the embodiment, when the SOP scenario is activated, the display module 110 can display only the objects corresponding to the unit SOPs belonging to the specific group 510, as shown in FIG. 7 (b) And the group objects 521 and 522 corresponding to the remaining groups can be displayed instead of displaying the unit SOP corresponding to the remaining groups 520 and 530. The group object may have the same shape as shown in FIG. 7 (b), but other shapes may be possible depending on the implementation.

Hereinafter, display of objects corresponding to all unit SOPs included in a specific group is referred to as display in an expanded form, and display of group objects instead of objects corresponding to unit SOPs of a specific group is displayed in a folded form .

When a fold command is input from a user, the display module 110 can display a group of unit SOPs displayed in a unfolded form in a collapsed form. When the unfold command is input from a user, the display module 110 displays a group object Can be displayed in expanded form.

Meanwhile, when the SOP scenario includes a plurality of groups, the display module 110 may display only the group including the unit SOP currently being executed in the unfolded form, and display the remaining groups in the folded form. Of course, in this case, if there is a user's explicit unfolding command, the group can be displayed in the unfolded form.

On the other hand, there may be a case where two terminals simultaneously perform the same SOP scenario. For example, if a person in charge of supervising the command in a given disaster situation is absent, the SOP scenario may be driven so that a subordinate representative or a temporary supervisor can temporarily direct the disaster situation, and then the general supervisor returns There may be cases in which the same SOP scenario is driven. In this way, when two or more terminals are driving the same SOP scenario, if a mission instruction is issued to all the terminals, the mission attendant may be confused, so that the present invention can provide a technical idea for preventing the same.

To this end, the rights module 130 may obtain or return control rights for the SOP scenario. The authority module 130 may request the control authority to the other terminal when the other terminal driving the SOP scenario has the control authority and may acquire the control authority when granting the request to the other terminal . In addition, the authority module may return the control authority that the other terminal has by approving the control authority.

Meanwhile, the authority module 130 may control the control module 120 to perform a task set in the unit SOP when the control authority for the SOP scenario is acquired. If the control module 120 fails to acquire the control right, the control module 120 can not perform the task set in the unit SOP. However, even if the display module 110 does not have the control right, It is possible to monitor the progress of the SOP scenario even in a terminal having no control authority.

On the other hand, the functions performed by the disaster response training system 100 as described above may be performed when actually controlling a specific facility or facility and responding to a disaster. However, as described above, .

That is, the disaster response training system 100 may provide a training mode for training a response in the event of a disaster. To this end, the disaster response training system 100 may further include a training module 150.

The training module 150 may be adapted to perform a corresponding training of the mission process so that the on-the-spot device corresponding to the mission process (e.g., a device provided at the site, a terminal of the mission attendant, Sensors, equipment needed for other controls, etc.), or training equipment (e.g., head-mounted display devices, wearable sensors, equipment suitable for performing other training missions, etc.). That is, the training module 150 may perform a series of tasks to perform a task corresponding to each of a predetermined unit SOP or a plurality of unit SOPs in the training mode. Alternatively, a series of tasks can be performed so that training can be performed in units of training generated by an administrator, rather than in SOP-based training.

For example, simulating a field device may mean that information to be transmitted to the field device or information to be received in a real situation is transmitted or received even in the training mode. Simulating the control device may mean that the control device is to perform the operation in the training mode in the actual situation.

The training module 150 may perform the tasks necessary to train a series of tasks corresponding to the mission process, i.e., at least one unit SOPs. The mission process may be the entirety of a particular SOP scenario, but it may be a selected one of them. Such a mission process may be specified by the control module 120. [ Or the training module 150 may perform the necessary process to train the trainee on a per-training basis.

The control module 120 may specify any one of the objects included in the predetermined SOP flow chart to specify the mission process.

For example, a third object O3 corresponding to the third unit SOP included in the SOP flowchart shown in FIG. 9A may be specified by the control module 120. [ In this case, the specified object is defined as the selected object.

The selection object may be selected by the manager or may be selected by default according to a predetermined rule. For example, the control module 120 may display a terminal SOP flow chart of the administrator and select any one of the objects included in the displayed SOP flow chart.

Then, the selected object may be specified as a selected object.

According to another example, the selection object may be automatically selected by the control module 120. [ For example, the control module 120 may automatically select the first unit SOP of the SOP scenario as the selected object. For example, when the mission process is defined to include the unit SOPs included in the selection object to the last unit SOP, when the control module 120 wants to train the entire specific SOP scenario, the first unit SOP is automatically specified as the selection object You may. In addition, the control module 120 may control the selection object (s) 110 based on a predetermined criterion according to a situation (for example, an environmental condition such as temperature or humidity, or a context such as predetermined information collected through the network by the disaster response training system 100) May be defined in advance, and the selected object may be specified adaptively to the context through this rule.

When the selected object is specified, the mission process may be defined as the tasks corresponding to at least one unit SOP including the unit SOP corresponding to the selected object. According to an example, only one unit SOP corresponding to the selected object may be defined as the mission process. According to the embodiment, the unit SOP corresponding to the selected object to the final unit SOP of the corresponding SOP scenario may be defined as the SOPs corresponding to the mission process.

Once such a mission process is specified, the mission of the SOP corresponding to the mission process can be simulated by the training module 150. [

As a result, in the training mode, it is assumed that a specific event (for example, a detection of a pollutant leakage, a concentration of a specific substance is above a reference value, a fire detection, etc.) A series of processes may be performed so that all or a part of the SOP scenario to be performed at the time of occurrence is actually performed by the mission attendant of the disaster response training system 100 and the unit SOPs.

This training mode will be described in detail with reference to FIG. 8 to FIG.

FIG. 8 is a diagram conceptually showing an example of a disaster response system supporting a training mode according to the technical idea of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 8, the system 1000 according to the technical idea of the present invention can operate in either a training mode or a normal (control) mode. In the case of operating in the normal (control) mode, it is possible to perform the function as a disaster response system instead of the disaster response training system. However, for convenience of explanation, the system 1000 ) As a disaster response training system (100).

The disaster response training system 100 may operate in a training mode or a general (control) mode according to the administrator's selection. In addition, the disaster response training system 100 may indicate whether the user is in a training mode or a normal (control) mode in a predetermined manner. Such an example may be as shown in Fig.

FIG. 13 is a view for explaining an example in which a disaster response training system according to an embodiment of the present invention can be operated in one of a training mode and a general mode. As shown in FIG. 13, the disaster response training system 100 may not only be able to select a mode through a predetermined UI, but may also display information on the current mode (e.g., training mode).

In Fig. 13, the SOP scenario is shown in the explanatory form instead of the flow chart form on the right side, and image information of facilities related to the disaster or the training is shown on the left side. Also, a unit SOP indicated in red (for example, 1. unit SOP) may be a unit SOP in which the current training is being performed. However, the SOP scenario corresponding to the training mode may be shown in the form of an SOP flowchart unlike that shown in FIG. And the current unit SOP may be displayed differently from other unit SOPs in the corresponding SOP flow chart.

Meanwhile, as described above, the disaster response training can be performed based on the SOP flowchart. The fact that disaster response training is performed based on the SOP flow chart can mean that the training to be performed is specified through the SOP flowchart or that the mission attendant or equipment to train is specified through the SOP flow chart.

In this way, it is very effective to intuitively judge the contents to be trained by the manager, the person to train, and the equipment when the task, the duty person, and the equipment to be performed through the SOP flowchart are specified. Because the SOP flow chart is a useful tool for intuitively grasping the entire SOP scenario, it is relatively easy to identify the unit SOPs that are deemed important or vulnerable to actual disaster response.

Such an example will be described with reference to Figs. 9 and 10. Fig.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a specific example of the SOP scenario according to an embodiment of the present invention and a task of a unit SOP corresponding to each object. 10 is a diagram for explaining an example in which disaster response training is controlled through an SOP flowchart according to an embodiment of the present invention.

First, as shown in FIG. 9A, an SOP flowchart corresponding to a predetermined SOP scenario (for example, a scenario when a fire occurs) may be displayed on a terminal (or a control device) of an administrator. As described above, the SOP flow chart can include a series of objects (e.g., O1 to O10) as shown.

It should be noted that the display module 110 may further display information (e.g., SOP1 to SOP10) for a mission corresponding to each of the objects (e.g., O1 to O10) as shown in FIG. 9B .

Then, the control module 120 can specify a predetermined selection object. For example, the control module 120 may specify an object (e.g., O3) corresponding to a third unit SOP, which is the third object in the SOP flowchart, as a selection object, as shown in FIG.

The manner in which the control module 120 specifies the selected object may be selected from the administrator terminal as described above or set to a default (e.g., the initial unit SOP of the SOP scenario), or may be adaptively specified according to the context have.

For example, the context may include various situations suitable for determining which unit SOP to train. For example, if the external environmental condition such as temperature and humidity corresponds to the first criterion, training is performed from the first unit SOP of the specific SOP scenario. If the second criterion is satisfied, the third unit SOP of the specific SOP scenario or other SOP scenario Training can be carried out.

Or a unit SOP in which a mission is assigned to predetermined first mission performers (for example, those who work in a specific facility, a specific position, or a duty person in charge of a position) in a predetermined SOP scenario if the natural environment meets a first standard And if the second criterion is satisfied, the unit SOP assigned with the task to the second mission performers may be specified as the selected object. Of course, when there are a plurality of selection objects to be specified, one or more of them may be finally specified as a selection object.

Or a unit SOP in which a predetermined first facility or training equipment (equipment used for training, such as a field device, a sensor, or a control facility) is operated may be specified as a selection object if the specific situation corresponds to a first criterion, If the second criterion is satisfied, a unit SOP in which a predetermined second facility is operated may be specified as a selected object.

Or the control module 120 may explicitly receive information about a given mission performer (e.g., first mission performer) or facility (e.g., first facility).

In any case, if the mission attendant or facility is specified, the control module 120 can extract a unit SOP corresponding to the specified mission attendant or facility based on the information about the SOP stored in the SOP DB 140. [

When a plurality of unit SOPs are extracted, at least one of the unit SOPs extracted by a manager's selection or based on a certain criterion can be determined as a selected object.

Once the selected object is specified, the mission process can be specified. The task process may be specified according to the selected object. For example, only the unit SOP corresponding to the selected object may be a unit SOP included in the mission process. Or the unit SOP corresponding to the selected object is the best row unit SOP included in the mission process, and the last unit SOP may be automatically specified as the last unit SOP (or a predetermined unit SOP) of the corresponding SOP scenario.

The training corresponding to each of the unit SOPs included in the mission process may then be simulated by the training module 150. [

As a result, according to the technical idea of the present invention, not only the entire task can be trained from the beginning to the end of the specific SOP scenario even in the training, but also the effect that the mission, the performer, and the equipment can be efficiently selected and the intensive training can be performed .

For example, if the third object is specified as a selection object as shown in FIG. 10, the preceding unit SOP (for example, O1 to O2) of the selection object O3 may exist.

In this case, according to an example, the control module 120 may assign a task corresponding to the selected object O3 excluding the preceding unit SOP (e.g., O1 through O2) and a lower SOP of the selected object (e.g., O4 through O10) Can be specified by the mission process.

That is, according to the technical idea of the present invention, it is possible to support training from an arbitrary position (SOP step) without necessarily training from the beginning of a specific SOP scenario.

For this, the training module 150 not only simulates a task corresponding to a mission process (e.g., O3 to O10), but also information on the preceding unit SOP (e.g., O1 to O2) It is possible to notify the mission attendant of the unit SOP (e.g., O1 to O2) or the mission attendant of the unit SOP corresponding to the selected object (O3). That is, information indicating that the mission of the unit SOP corresponding to the selected object O3 is the mission of the preceding unit SOP may be informed. It may also be notified that these tasks are assumed to have been performed. Accordingly, even if the mission attendant of the unit SOP corresponding to the selected object O3 is not actually trained, the information on the unit SOP deemed to have been trained can be clearly recognized so that the training can be performed smoothly . Because it is common for a mission to have continuity in most cases, it may be important to be aware of information about the missions that should have been done previously.

Of course, if necessary, it may be notified to the mission attendants of the preceding unit SOPs (e.g., O1 to O2) that the information about the mission and / or the assumption that the mission has been performed. This is because the task performer of the lead unit SOP (for example, O1 to O2) may reappear as the task performer of the trailing unit SOP, and in this case, the progress of the training must be recognized in advance so that the actual training is performed at an arbitrary position Even if it starts, it is possible to train without any hitches.

On the other hand, there may be a case where information about a hypothetical assumption of a current training is to be included among information to be notified to a task performer of a preceding unit SOP (e.g., O1 to O2) or a selected object (O3) . This case may be useful, for example, when there is a unit SOP of the decision type among the preceding unit SOPs. This will be described with reference to FIG.

11 is a view for explaining an example in which a hypothetical scenario is generated according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 11, among the objects included in the SOP flowchart shown in FIG. 11, the shaded object may be specified by the control module 120 as a selected object.

In this case, it can be seen that among the preceding unit SOPs of the selected object, for example, an object of a judgment type (rhombus shape) is included.

In this case, the object of the judgment type may proceed to the selected object or another object according to a specific condition. For example, if the value of the predetermined sensor is 10 or less, the scenario proceeds with the left-behind unit SOP. If the value of the sensor is greater than 10, the right-following unit SOP, that is, the unit SOP corresponding to the selected object, . ≪ / RTI >

In this case, it is necessary for the mission attendant of the selected object to clearly recognize the situation in which the current training is performed in the unit SOP corresponding to the object of the determination type. For example, it may be a situation that the sensor's value exceeds 10, a situation that the mission attendant of the selected object needs to know, or specifically a situation in which it is assumed that the situation (for example, 12 to 13, etc.) . In any case, there may be a case where the mission observer of the selected object can perform a clear mission by knowing what kind of assumption the mission currently performing by him / her is based on. In this case, It is possible to specify the situation in a predetermined manner and notify the mission attendant of the selected object.

Thus, even if training is not started from the beginning of a specific SOP scenario, there is an effect that training such as practice can be performed smoothly.

On the other hand, according to the technical idea of the present invention, the training can be specified through the SOP flowchart as described above, but the training can be started by simulating sensor data of a predetermined sensor.

Such an example will be described with reference to FIG.

12 is a view for explaining an example in which sensor data for training is simulated according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 12, as shown in FIG. 12, the facility to be subjected to a disaster response according to the SOP scenario is monitored by the disaster response training system 100, A chemical sensor, a heat sensor, etc.) may be installed.

In addition, the disaster response training system 100 may store information on the spatial information of the facility, information on locations where the sensors are installed, and information on the types of sensors.

Then, when the disaster response training system 100 operates in the training mode, the training may be started by simulating such a sensor to a desired situation, rather than specifying the training using the SOP flowchart as described above.

For example, the training module 150 may identify one or more of the sensors (e.g., fire sensors) installed in the facility. The specification of such a sensor may be directly selected by the administrator, or the sensors may be automatically specified to detect a specific region or a specific device when a specific region or a specific device is specified.

Then, the training module 150 can simulate the occurrence of a sensing event (an event that senses a fire occurrence) that initiates a predetermined SOP scenario (for example, an SOP scenario when a fire occurs) through the specified sensor. That is, you can simulate a sensor to identify the disaster you want to train.

Then, the training module 150 can automatically specify a SOP scenario to be performed when a sensing event of a specified sensor is generated through the SOP DB 140, and can simulate a corresponding training according to the specified SOP scenario .

Of course, an SOP flowchart corresponding to the SOP scenario may be displayed on the terminal of the manager to confirm the process of the correspondence training as needed, and the object corresponding to the unit SOP currently in progress may be displayed differentiated from other objects The administrator can easily observe and / or control the training situation.

Meanwhile, in addition to the training in SOP units using the SOP flowchart as described above, the disaster response training system 100 may allow the training to be performed in units of training units defined by the administrator.

That is, regardless of the SOP, an administrator may arbitrarily create a training scene that is considered necessary for training, or a training scene may be created according to a context defined in the SOP. For example, the training scene may include some of the tasks to be performed by a particular person included in a certain unit SOP, and may include at least one task from each of the different SOPs, that is, training including a plurality of training missions God may be created. The generated training god can be simulated as a virtual reality (VR) so that training can be performed in a virtual environment similar to the actual situation.

This generation of the training god may be performed by the training generation module 160.

The training generation module 160 may generate a training scene corresponding to the location of the disaster and the type of the disaster. In other words, a suitable mission to be performed in a disaster type (for example, fire, gas, short circuit, etc.) and a location where a disaster occurred (for example, warehouse, specific facility, can do.

When a training god is thus created, the trainer can train the training god. To this end, the training module 150 may simulate a training scene. According to one example, the training module 150 may simulate a virtual environment in which trainees can perform each of the training missions using pre-prepared VR equipment so that training can be performed in a virtual reality, And can be simulated to be reflected in the virtual environment.

The training generation module 160 may generate training gods by defining at least one training mission. Of course, the training god may be defined as at least one training mission and attribute information of the training god (e.g., goals to achieve, information for other training gods, etc.).

Each training mission can mean a mission that the trainer must perform. Each of these training missions may be defined as a component and / or an action. Depending on the implementation, no components are required, and the training missions may be defined only by actions. A component may refer to an object to be used in a training mission or an object in a training mission. An action can mean an action that a trainee should perform.

Although the administrator may define such a training mission, in some embodiments, the training generation module 160 may automatically generate a predetermined candidate training mission, and if at least one of the generated candidate training missions is selected, May be specified as a training mission to be included in the predetermined training course.

In order to generate the candidate training mission, the training generation module 160 may refer to the SOP, or may simply generate the disaster type and the generated location without referring to the SOP.

According to an example, the training generation module 160 may automatically generate a candidate training mission according to a disaster type (e.g., fire) and a location of occurrence (e.g., a specific facility). The generated candidate training mission may be a mission to move to a fire extinguisher or other equipment located closest to the location where it occurred, and / or an action to perform a specific action using a fire extinguisher or other equipment.

In addition, the candidate training mission may vary depending on whether an object (e.g., equipment, facility, etc.) exists in a predetermined region (hereinafter, referred to as an 'influence region') based on the generation position. For example, the candidate training missions generated by the training generation module 160 may be different if there is a warehouse with a combustible material near the fire occurrence location, and otherwise.

Therefore, if the location of occurrence of the disaster is specified, the training generation module 160 searches for an object located within a predetermined influence region (for example, 100 meters, 500 meters, etc.) from the corresponding occurrence position and performs a candidate training mission Can be generated.

The affected area may also vary depending on the type of the disaster. For example, in the case of fire, the influence region can be set within 100 meters based on the generation position, and in the case of leakage of harmful substances such as gas, the influence region can be set within 1 kilometer based on the generation position.

Meanwhile, the training generation module 160 may generate a candidate training mission using the SOP corresponding to the type of the disaster and the occurrence location as described above.

Such an example will be described with reference to FIG.

17 is a diagram for explaining a process in which a training mission is associated with an SOP according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 17, the training generation module 160 included in the disaster response training system 100 may specify a disaster type and / or occurrence location (S100). For example, the disaster type and / or location of occurrence can be designated by the administrator. In some embodiments, if the SOP can be specified only by the type of the disaster, only the type of the disaster may be specified. In any case, information for specifying a SOP corresponding to the occurrence of a disaster and a disaster occurring in any case can be specified (S100), and the training generation module 160 searches the SOP DB 140 to extract a corresponding SOP (S110, S120).

And analyze the searched corresponding SOP to generate at least one candidate training mission corresponding to the corresponding SOP (S130, S140). The candidate training mission corresponding to the corresponding SOP may be an SOP training mission, but depending on the embodiment, there may be a connection training mission. This will be described later. Then, all or some of the generated candidate training missions may be specified as training missions to be included in a predetermined training god.

To create a candidate training mission corresponding to the corresponding SOP, the training generation module 160 may analyze the context contained in the corresponding SOP and identify the components and actions from the analyzed context. And specific components and actions can be defined as candidate training missions. For example, a corresponding SOP can be searched according to a predetermined disaster type and a generation position. The context of the corresponding SOP may be, for example, the [assignment] shown in FIG. 9B.

For example, if the SOP of a fire alarm and a manpower support request is a corresponding SOP, the training generation module 160 may specify an alarm device as a component through a context of 'fire alarm' You can create one training mission by specifying it as an action.

In addition, the training generation module 160 specifies a device (e.g., a telephone, a radio, etc.) necessary for a human resource support request as a component through a context of 'human resource support request', defines a human resource request through a specific component as an action, You can create a training mission.

The training mission corresponding to the contents described in the context of the corresponding SOP can be defined as the SOP training mission.

The training creation module 160 may then generate an SOP training mission based on the SOP. In addition, depending on the embodiment, a connection training mission may be generated.

The connection training mission is not defined in the context of the SOP, but may refer to a training mission defined by the training creation module 160.

For example, in the above example, the first training mission corresponding to the 'fire alarm' may be the SOP training mission, and the second training mission corresponding to the 'manpower support request' may also be the SOP training mission.

However, according to an embodiment, the training generation module 160 may generate a trainer's movement for the second training mission as a separate training mission after the first training mission. That is, in the case of this training mission, it may not be defined in the SOP, but it may be a training mission defined to give the training person a very specific training mission, and this training mission may be defined as a connection training mission.

In general, the connection training missions can be performed in different training missions, that is, the missions to be performed by the trainer between the SOP training missions (for example, according to the path between locations where each of the SOP training missions is to be performed Missions) can be defined, but not necessarily limited thereto.

A series of processes in which the training generation module 160 generates the training scene will be described with reference to the following drawings.

14 to 16 are diagrams illustrating a process of generating a training scene in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 18 to 21 are diagrams illustrating a process of generating a training scene in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 14, the training generation module 160 may provide an interface as shown in FIG. 14 to an administrator terminal.

The interface shown in Fig. 14 shows an interface for receiving the name, storage location, and disaster type of training god to generate training god (simulation god). The description of the training god may also be defined by the manager as shown.

14 shows a case where a predetermined site (for example, a unit area of a disaster management object such as a 'Gwanggyo branch office') is selected in advance. However, the training generation module 160 may receive a disaster management object (For example, a branch office, a branch office, a business place, etc.) among the regions.

Then, as shown in FIG. 15, two-dimensional or three-dimensional modeling information corresponding to the selected site, that is, image information may be provided to the administrator terminal.

The administrator can specify a specific position of the site as a location of occurrence of a disaster by using the image information.

For example, the UI indicated by the number 2 in the interface shown in FIG. 15 may be a UI for setting a disaster, and a disaster occurrence location and other disaster attributes may be defined through the UI.

This example may be as shown in Fig.

For example, as shown in Fig. 16, the administrator can designate a disaster occurrence location (e.g., a firing point) by using the UI (e.g., drag and drop or setting x, y, z coordinate values). And other disaster attributes (eg, the size of the fire, the degree of smoke, the beginning and end of the fire, etc.).

Referring again to FIG. 15, the UI indicated by 3 may be a UI for setting the situation of a trainee. Through the third UI, the position that the trainee is at the beginning of the training and the component that the trainee has can be defined.

Such an example is as shown in Fig.

As shown in FIG. 18, the administrator can designate a position that exists at the start of the training of the trainee by dragging and dropping the UI to the image information or setting x, y, and z values.

As shown in FIG. 18, a component (for example, a mobile phone) possessed by a user as a user characteristic can be set. For example, in the case of carrying a cellular phone, the trainee can be simulated as being able to propagate the situation to a specific person without using other components.

Referring again to FIG. 15, the UI indicated by 4 may be a UI for setting a component to be used for training. Through the UI # 4, the attributes (e.g., location, number, etc.) of the components to be used in the trainer training mission can be defined.

One such example is shown in Fig.

As shown in FIG. 19, the administrator can designate the position of the component by dragging and dropping the UI to the image information or setting the x, y, and z values.

It is needless to say that the type of the component (for example, a fire-fighting device, a cargo, etc.) can be selected as shown in FIG.

Meanwhile, the UI # 5 shown in FIG. 15 may be a UI for defining a training mission directly by an administrator, and an example of defining a training mission through the UI may be as shown in FIG.

As shown in FIG. 20, the administrator can individually define attributes (specific actions, components, execution time, other descriptions, etc.) of the training missions through the interface provided by the training generation module 160.

Of course, FIG. 20 shows a case where the manager individually sets up a training mission. However, as described above, the training generating module 160 automatically generates a candidate training mission, and at least one of them is specified as a training mission As described above.

Once the training mission is defined and the training god defined, the training module 150 can simulate the training of the trainee.

Such an example may be as shown in FIG.

As shown in FIG. 21, the training module 150 may control a predetermined training device (e.g., VR device) to simulate the training scene defined in the training generating module 160. 21 shows a virtual environment experienced by the trainer through a training device (e.g., a head mount device or the like), and the bottom of FIG. 21 illustrates the actual training environment of the trainee.

In the example shown in FIG. 21, each of the training missions can be, but is not limited to, predetermined object picking / dialing, fire extinguisher operation, object movement, and various training can be simulated.

In addition, according to the embodiment, various devices for simulating a training mission, for example, a device (or a sense, etc.) for simulating movement of a user, various devices capable of simulating a user's hand movement or simulating a user's posture, It is possible to simulate the action of the user while communicating with the mobile terminal 150.

On the other hand, the training module 150 may collect training performance data when the training is performed by the trainee. According to one example, the training execution data may include at least one of the time required for the training mission, the failure rate for each training mission, and the new training time. Other training A variety of training performance data may be collected that show the training results of the whole or individual training missions.

The training generation module 160 may then change training gods or individual training missions based on such training performance data. For example, the attributes of the training mission or training god (e.g., component type, location, number, required time, etc.) can be changed.

That is, collecting training performance data may change the training god currently defined to be more realistic or more appropriate than coping with a disaster. The fact that the training generation module 160 changes the attribute of the training scene means that the training generation module 160 can recommend not only the case where the attribute of the training scene is automatically changed but also the attribute change to the administrator, And the case where the attribute is finally changed when approved by the administrator.

On the other hand, according to an embodiment, the disaster response training system 100 may include a processor and a memory for storing a program executed by the processor. The processor may include a single-core CPU or a multi-core CPU. The memory may include high speed random access memory and may include non-volatile memory such as one or more magnetic disk storage devices, flash memory devices, or other non-volatile solid state memory devices. Access to the memory by the processor and other components can be controlled by the memory controller. Here, when the program is executed by a processor, the program may cause the disaster response training system 100 according to the present embodiment to perform the disaster response training system providing method described above.

Meanwhile, the disaster response training system providing method according to an embodiment of the present invention may be implemented as a computer-readable program command and stored in a computer-readable recording medium. The target program may also be stored in a computer-readable recording medium. A computer-readable recording medium includes all kinds of recording apparatuses in which data that can be read by a computer system is stored.

Program instructions to be recorded on a recording medium may be those specially designed and constructed for the present invention or may be available to those skilled in the art of software.

Examples of the computer-readable recording medium include magnetic media such as a hard disk, a floppy disk and a magnetic tape, optical media such as CD-ROM and DVD, a floptical disk, And hardware devices that are specially configured to store and execute program instructions such as magneto-optical media and ROM, RAM, flash memory, and the like. The above-mentioned medium may also be a transmission medium such as a light or metal wire, wave guide, etc., including a carrier wave for transmitting a signal designating a program command, a data structure and the like. The computer readable recording medium may also be distributed over a networked computer system so that computer readable code can be stored and executed in a distributed manner.

Examples of program instructions include machine language code such as those produced by a compiler, as well as devices for processing information electronically using an interpreter or the like, for example, a high-level language code that can be executed by a computer.

The hardware devices described above may be configured to operate as one or more software modules to perform the operations of the present invention, and vice versa.

It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing description of the present invention is for illustrative purposes only and that those of ordinary skill in the art can readily understand that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics of the present invention. will be. It is therefore to be understood that the above-described embodiments are illustrative in all aspects and not restrictive. For example, each component described as a single entity may be distributed and implemented, and components described as being distributed may also be implemented in a combined form.

It is intended that the present invention covers the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. .

Claims (17)

Identifying the location and disaster type of the disaster;
Generating a training scene wherein the disaster response training system includes at least one training mission corresponding to the particular disaster type and the location of occurrence;
And simulating the training scene generated by the disaster response training system to allow the trainee to perform the at least one training mission included in the training scene.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the disaster response training system comprises generating a training scene that includes at least one training mission corresponding to the particular disaster type and location,
The disaster response training system generating at least one candidate training mission related to an object within a predetermined impact region based on the occurrence location; And
And identifying at least one of the candidate training missions generated by the disaster response training system as the training missions.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the disaster response training system comprises generating a training scene that includes at least one training mission corresponding to the particular disaster type and location,
Searching the SOP DB for the corresponding SOP corresponding to the location and the type of the disaster; And
Wherein the disaster response training system generates at least one candidate training mission corresponding to the sought correspondent SOP.
The disaster response training method according to claim 1,
The disaster response training system selecting one of a plurality of sites to be managed from an administrator terminal; And
Providing video information corresponding to the site selected by the disaster response training system to the terminal of the administrator; And
Further comprising the step of the disaster response training system selecting a specific location in the site from the terminal of the administrator through the image information as the occurrence location.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the generating the at least one candidate training mission corresponding to the corresponding SOP searched by the disaster response training system comprises:
Wherein the disaster response training system includes generating a candidate training mission by identifying a component to be used in the training mission and an action to be taken through the component in accordance with the context described in the corresponding SOP, Generative disaster response training methods.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the candidate training mission corresponding to the corresponding SOP comprises:
SOP training missions listed in the SOP context; And
A disaster response training method capable of generating a training session in which there are connection training missions to be made between multiple SOP training missions.
7. The method of claim 6,
Wherein the plurality of SOP training missions are determined by a path between training positions of each of the plurality of SOP training missions.
The disaster response training method according to claim 1,
Collecting the training execution data of the training performed by the trainee in the disaster response training system, the training execution data including at least one of the time required for the training mission, the failure rate for each training mission, and the new training time required;
Further comprising changing attributes of the training mission or training training based on the training performance data collected by the disaster response training system.
Identifying the location and disaster type of the disaster;
Wherein the disaster response training system comprises generating a training scene that includes at least one training mission corresponding to the particular disaster type and the location of occurrence,
Wherein the disaster response training system comprises generating a training scene that includes at least one training mission corresponding to the particular disaster type and location,
Searching the SOP DB for the corresponding SOP corresponding to the location and the type of the disaster; And
Wherein the disaster response training system generates at least one candidate training mission corresponding to the sought correspondent SOP.
A computer program installed in a data processing apparatus and stored in a recorded medium for performing the method of any one of claims 1 to 9.
A training generation module that specifies a location of a disaster and a type of a disaster, and generates a training scene including at least one training mission corresponding to the specific disaster type and the occurrence location; And
And a training module for simulating the training god generated to allow the trainee to perform the at least one training mission included in the training god.
12. The method according to claim 11,
Generating at least one candidate training mission related to an object in the influence area determined according to the type of the disaster based on the occurrence position, and specifying at least one of the generated candidate training missions as the training mission.
12. The method according to claim 11,
Discovery a corresponding SOP corresponding to the location and type of disaster in the SOP DB and generate at least one candidate training mission corresponding to the searched corresponding SOP.
14. The method of claim 13,
And generating a candidate training mission by specifying a component to be used in the training mission and an action to be taken through the component according to the context described in the corresponding SOP.
15. The apparatus of claim 14,
Training performance data of training performed by a trainer; the training performance data includes at least one of a time required for each training mission, a failure rate for each training mission,
The training generation module includes:
Wherein the attributes (component location, action, number of components, etc.) of the training mission or the training ground are changed based on the collected training performance data.
SOP DB; And
A training generation module,
The training generation module includes:
Wherein the disaster response training system specifies a location and a disaster type of the disaster, and generates a training scene including at least one disaster type corresponding to the specific disaster type and the location of the disaster,
Discovery a corresponding SOP corresponding to the location and the type of disaster in the SOP DB and generate at least one of the training missions corresponding to the searched corresponding SOP.
As a disaster response training system,
A processor; And
A memory for storing a computer program executed by the processor,
The computer program, when executed by the processor, causes the disaster response training system to perform the method of any one of claims 1 to 9.

Images