KR102110259B1 - Method and system for creating related SStandard Operating Procedure - Google Patents

Abstract

Disclosed are a method for generating a linked standard operating procedure (SOP), and a system thereof. The method for generating a linked SOP comprises the steps of: allowing the system for generating a linked SOP to display a plurality of SOP flow charts including a first SOP and a second SOP; allowing the system for generating a linked SOP to generate and add a connection object, which is to be connected to an object to be connected, wherein the object is at least one of objects on the second SOP, on the first SOP; and allowing the system for generating a linked SOP to generate a link between the connection object and the object to be connected, wherein a precedence relation between a first unit SOP corresponding to the connection object of a first agency corresponding to the first SOP and a second unit SOP corresponding to the object to be connected of a second agency corresponding to the second SOP is defined in accordance with the link. The method for generating a linked SOP and the system thereof enable task performers to train an electronic SOP scenario as necessary.

Description

Method and system for creating related SStandard Operating Procedure}

The present invention relates to a method and a system capable of performing disaster response training using an electronic standardized SOP (Standard Operating Procedure).

In particular, by using flow charted SOPs, linkage between individual SOPs is provided, so that multiple organizations that have been performing individual trainings according to individual SOPs can perform integrated training with close interaction through one integrated SOP. It relates to a method and its system.

The term SOP broadly means that the steps and actions to be performed for each step are arranged or defined so as to guarantee the quality in processing a process or task in a work order or process. More specifically, SOP is a provision that defines the response procedure between disaster response organizations from the stage of pre-determined business procedures and disaster reporting to on-site action, response activities, and emergency recovery for disaster-responsive response activities between disaster-related organizations at the disaster site. Can be.

In this specification, SOP means not only a disaster, but a series of response procedures prescribed by at least one organization or organization having a plurality of people to respond to a specific event. The specific event may be a disaster, and there may be various examples such as an emergency situation, an emergency situation, or a predetermined situation artificially occurring.

In order to manage such SOP, conventionally, each response step or step-by-step action procedure has been stipulated by paper documents. However, in the case of managing the SOP with a paper document like this, each agent prints out a large amount of the SOP information as a paper document (for example, a mission notebook, etc.) and holds it, so that each agent has a large amount of the SOP or corresponds to himself. There was a problem to be familiar with SOP.

In order to solve this problem, there have been attempts to automatically manage the SOP by electronically documenting or DB, and as an example, Korean Patent Publication (10-2011-0099905) has been known. However, the above-mentioned Korean published patent is only to electronically document the SOP, thereby effectively distributing the situation to the relevant agencies according to the type of disaster.

In addition, very quick response is required to minimize damage in the event of a disaster. However, in a disaster situation, there are a number of unexpected factors, and different response procedures must be performed accordingly, so the response procedure for a disaster situation is very complex and inevitable. There is a problem that it is difficult to quickly grasp the response procedures according to various unexpected factors or situations.

Accordingly, there is an urgent need for a system and method to easily grasp and quickly perform a series of response procedures for a disaster situation. In order to solve this problem, the present applicant has disclosed the Korean Registered Patent (Registration No. 10-1513983, "SOP scenario driving system and method for providing the same", hereinafter 'previous patent').

On the other hand, the prior patent or the prior art related to SOP is described in consideration that the corresponding procedure according to the SOP is performed by any one individual institution.

However, in response to disasters, a plurality of organizations (eg, disaster-causing agencies and disaster relief agencies) usually participate, and these agencies respond to each other according to their respective SOPs, or any one of them has an SOP. There are cases that do not. However, in this case, there is a problem that it is difficult to organically respond to each institution participating in the disaster response.

Therefore, there is a need for a technical idea that can be defined by easily linking response procedures / SOPs so that multiple organizations can perform disaster response while organically interacting with each other by linking response procedures or SOPs performed individually. .

The present invention is an invention devised to solve the problems of the prior art, and the technical problem to be achieved by the present invention is to visualize a response procedure to be performed when a specific event such as a disaster occurs in the form of a flowchart. It is to provide a system and method for enabling efficient training by linking training with a flow chart.

It is also to provide a method and a system for linking individual SOPs to each other based on a visualized flow chart.

According to a method according to an aspect of the present invention, the linked SOP generation system analyzes the task content for each object included in each of the first SOP corresponding to the first organization and the second SOP corresponding to the second organization, the linked SOP The generation system identifies the first linkage object and the second linkage object, which are objects that can be linked to each other from each of the first SOP and the second SOP, based on the analysis result of the task contents for each object, and the linked SOP generation system Generating a link link between the specific first link object and the second link object, and task contents of each of the first link object and the second link object on the link link generated by the link SOP generation system And setting a link object corresponding to the link object, wherein the link object is the first linkage object and the second linkage. The information about the time corresponding to the assignment information of each object and a time object that contains the information of the object.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, as well as the situation in which the SOP scenario is driven according to the actual standard response procedure, the SOP scenario that is digitized as necessary by allowing the mission performers or equipment to simulate the training in an environment similar to the actual situation It has the effect of allowing you to train.

In addition, by enabling easy linkage between individual SPOs defined to be performed by individual organizations based on a flow chart, there is an effect of enabling an organic response between organizations participating in the disaster response.

In addition, for the efficiency and intuitive control of training, there is an effect that the SOP flowchart can be linked to the selection of training. In particular, among SOP scenarios, even if SOP for training is not always started from the beginning of the SOP scenario, effective training is possible even if training is started at any time.

It also has the effect of allowing managers to selectively and effectively train desired performers and / or equipment in SOP scenarios.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In order to better understand the drawings cited in the detailed description of the present invention, a brief description of each drawing is provided.
1 is a view showing a schematic configuration of a system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a view showing an object corresponding to each unit SOP displayed by the system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a diagram illustrating an example of a flowchart corresponding to an SOP scenario displayed by a system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
4 (a) to 4 (c) are views for explaining an example in which the shape of each object included in a flowchart is changed as a procedure for responding to an event progresses.
5 is a view for explaining a link object connecting the correspondence between organizations.
6 is a view for explaining a switching object that connects the corresponding procedures between SOP scenarios.
FIG. 7 is a diagram for explaining a method of displaying a unit SOP included in a SOP scenario of the present invention in a system according to an embodiment.
8 is a diagram conceptually showing an example of a system supporting a training mode according to the technical idea of the present invention.
9 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of an SOP scenario according to an embodiment of the present invention and a task of a unit SOP corresponding to each object.
10 is a diagram for explaining an example in which disaster response training is controlled through an SOP flow chart according to an embodiment of the present invention.
11 is a diagram illustrating an example in which a virtual scenario is generated according to an embodiment of the present invention.
12 is a diagram illustrating an example in which sensor data for training is simulated according to an embodiment of the present invention.
13 is a view for explaining an example in which the system according to an embodiment of the present invention can be operated in either a training mode or a normal mode.
14 is a diagram illustrating an example of a linked SOP according to an embodiment of the present invention.
15 to 16 are diagrams for explaining a concept for generating a linked SOP according to an embodiment of the present invention.

The present invention can be applied to various transformations and may have various embodiments, and specific embodiments will be illustrated in the drawings and described in detail in the detailed description. However, this is not intended to limit the present invention to specific embodiments, and should be understood to include all conversions, equivalents, and substitutes included in the spirit and scope of the present invention. In the description of the present invention, when it is determined that detailed descriptions of related well-known technologies may obscure the subject matter of the present invention, detailed descriptions thereof will be omitted.

Terms such as first and second may be used to describe various components, but the components should not be limited by the terms. The terms are used only for the purpose of distinguishing one component from other components.

The terms used in the present application are only used to describe specific embodiments, and are not intended to limit the present invention. Singular expressions include plural expressions unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

In this specification, terms such as “include” or “have” are intended to indicate that a feature, number, step, operation, component, part, or combination thereof described in the specification exists, or one or more other. It should be understood that features or numbers, steps, operations, components, parts or combinations thereof are not excluded in advance.

In addition, in the present specification, when one component 'transmits' data to another component, the component may directly transmit the data to the other component, or through at least one other component It means that the data may be transmitted to the other components. Conversely, when one component 'directly transmits' data to another component, it means that the data is transmitted from the component to the other component without passing through the other component.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numerals in each drawing denote the same members.

1 is a view showing a schematic configuration of a linked SOP generation system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, in order to implement a method for generating a linked SOP according to an embodiment of the present invention, a linked SOP generation system (hereinafter, 'system', 100) may be provided.

The system 100 may be installed in a system (for example, a situation room or a control room server) operated by a predetermined institution (or organization) that defines and performs SOP to implement the technical idea of the present invention.

The system 100 may drive a SOP scenario corresponding to the event when a predetermined event such as fire or pollutant leakage occurs.

The SOP scenario is information on each response step and action and / or procedure for each response step defined in the SOP to be performed when the event occurs (hereinafter referred to as 'unit SOP' in this specification). And information on sequential relationships between SOPs of each unit.

Each unit SOP may have a precedence relationship, which may mean that the succeeding unit SOP is performed after the preceding unit SOP is completed.

Meanwhile, the SOP scenario may be stored in advance in a predetermined DB (Database) in the form of a file. In one embodiment, the SOP scenario may be an xml (extensible markup language) format file. The format of the file in which the SOP scenario is stored may vary, and the SOP scenario may be digitized in any format.

When the system 100 drives the SOP scenario, the system 100 may interpret the SOP scenario file and perform a predetermined procedure or function defined in the SOP scenario as described below.

The system 100 may drive a predetermined SOP scenario by a driving command of a person in charge, but when receiving an event occurrence signal from a predetermined detection device (not shown) such as a fire detection sensor or a pollutant detection sensor, the user The SOP scenario corresponding to the event may be automatically driven without a separate command.

During the SOP scenario, the system 100 communicates with a terminal (for example, 210) of mission personnel to perform a unit SOP in the event generation zone 200, and transmits a mission message to be performed by the mission personnel. It is possible to transmit or receive predetermined information to confirm that the mission has been completed. In addition, if necessary, the system 100 may transmit a message through an area 200 in which an event corresponding to the SOP scenario has occurred or a predetermined internal broadcasting facility 150 installed in an organization that should respond to the event. . In addition, the system 100, if necessary, a predetermined device (e.g., report of the fire department, the National Emergency Management Agency, the National Police Agency, the city hall, etc.) to cooperate with the response of the event (300; for example, depending on the type of disaster) ) And / or the terminal 310 of the person in charge.

In addition, the system 100 may be installed on a predetermined server of the institution operating the SOP, or may be implemented as a physical device for the system 100 independently of the server.

Meanwhile, the system 100 may provide a general (control) mode and a training mode.

The general (control) mode may mean a mode that actually prepares for a disaster by actually performing control and / or monitoring through sensors and other control facilities (CCTV, microphone, etc.) installed in a predetermined institution or monitoring area. have.

On the other hand, the training mode may mean a mode in which a SOP scenario matching the event can be simulated by assuming a virtual event (a disaster situation).

And the training mode provided by the system 100 may be performed based on the SOP flow chart showing the SOP scenario as described above.

When training is performed based on the SOP flow chart, not only can the progress of the training be checked using the SOP flow chart, but also the start time (unit SOP to start) and / or end of the training using the SOP flow chart The time point (unit SOP to end), the subject of the training, and / or may mean that the equipment to participate in the training can be specified.

Through this, in addition to simply performing any one SOP scenario from start to finish, the manager has an effect of easily specifying and training a mission, mission performer, or equipment requiring intensive training.

The system 100 may include a display module 110, a control module 120, a SOP DB 140, and a training module 150. The system 100 may further include an authorization module 130.

Depending on the embodiment of the present invention, some of the above-described components may not necessarily correspond to components essential to the implementation of the present invention. In addition, according to the embodiment, the system 100 is more than this Of course, it may include many components.

The system 100 may include hardware resources and / or software necessary to implement the technical idea of the present invention, and does not necessarily mean one physical component or one device. That is, the system 100 may mean a logical combination of hardware and / or software provided to implement the technical idea of the present invention, and if necessary, are installed in devices spaced apart from each other to perform respective functions. It may be implemented as a set of logical components for implementing the technical idea of the present invention. Further, the system 100 may refer to a set of components that are separately implemented for each function or role for implementing the technical idea of the present invention. For example, the display module 110, the control module 120, the authorization module 130, the training module 150, and / or the SOP DB 140 may be located in different physical devices, and the same physical It may be located on the device. In addition, depending on the implementation example, each module such as the display module 110, the control module 120, the authorization module 130, the training module 150, and / or the SOP DB 140 is also connected to different physical devices. It is also possible to realize the functions performed by the respective modules by organically combining configurations located in different physical devices.

In addition, in this specification, the module may mean a functional and structural combination of hardware for performing the technical idea of the present invention and software for driving the hardware. For example, the module may mean a logical unit of a predetermined code and a hardware resource for performing the predetermined code, and does not necessarily mean a physically connected code or a type of hardware. It can be easily deduced from the average expert in the technical field of the present invention.

The control module 120 includes other components (for example, the display module 110, the authorization module 130, the training module 150, and / or) included in the system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention. Alternatively, functions and / or resources of the SOP DB 140 may be controlled.

The SOP DB 140 may store SOP scenarios defining standard response procedures when a predetermined event occurs.

In the present specification, DB may be implemented as at least one table, or may be used in a sense further including a separate DBMS (Database Management System) for searching, storing, and managing information stored in the DB. In addition, it can be implemented in various ways such as a linked-list, a tree, and a relational DB, and includes all data storage media and data structures capable of storing information to be stored in the DB. Can be used.

The SOP scenario may include information about a plurality of unit SOPs and information about sequential relationships between each unit SOP.

Meanwhile, each unit SOP may have a type (attribute), and the type of the unit SOP may be any one of a mission type, a judgment type, an internal context propagation type, an external context propagation type, and an internal and external context propagation type.

The task type unit SOP may include information regarding a given task. Here, the term mission may mean an action or procedure to be performed by a response agent or a response team (also referred to as a mission performer) to perform the task. The mission information may include an overview of the mission, at least one detailed mission information, information about a response agent or response team designated to perform each detailed mission, information about a person in charge or team overseeing the mission, and the like. In addition to actions and procedures, additional information (eg, the shortest path, belongings, etc.) for efficiently performing the actions and procedures may be further included.

The determination type unit SOP may include information about a predetermined condition. The information on the condition may include information on a situation in which the determination of yes / no is required, information on a judgment criterion, and may further include additional information on matters to be considered for reference when determining. Alternatively, if the SOP to proceed according to a predetermined value (eg, sensor data) is different, the information on the condition may include information on a subsequent SOP to proceed for each value.

Unit SOP of internal situation propagation type, external situation propagation type, internal and external situation propagation type, the content of the message to be propagated, information about the object to be propagated, and propagation means (for example, propagation through in-house broadcasting, SMS message propagation, FAX It may include information about radio waves through, transmission of messages to dedicated programs, etc.).

The SOP scenario may be prepared in various ways and stored in the SOP DB 140. In particular, it may be created through dedicated SOP scenario creation software, but is not limited thereto, and may be created / modified through a general-purpose document editing application such as a text editor.

On the other hand, the display module 110 is to display the object corresponding to each unit SOP included in the SOP scenario and the sequential relationship between each unit SOP to a predetermined user terminal (for example, the terminal of the person who conducts the SOP) Can be. That is, the display module 110 may display each unit SOP corresponding to the SOP scenario in the form of a flowchart.

The shape of the object displayed by the display module 110 may be determined by a type of a unit SOP corresponding thereto, an example of which is illustrated in FIG. 2. 2 is a diagram illustrating an object corresponding to each unit SOP displayed by the system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

(사각형) 형태일 수 있으며, 판단 타입인 경우에는 외각이

(마름모) 형태, 내부상황전파 타입인 경우에는 외곽이

(제1방향이 제2방향보다 긴 사다리꼴) 형태, 외부상황전파 타입인 경우에는

(상기 제2방향이 상기 제1방향보다 긴 사다리꼴) 형태, 내외부상황전파 타입인 경우에는

형일 수 있다.Referring to FIG. 2, the object corresponding to the unit SOP of the mission type has an outer shell.

(Square) It can be in the form, and in case of judgment type, the outer shell

(Rhombus) In the case of the type, internal situation propagation type, the outer

(Trapezoid with the first direction longer than the second direction)

(The second direction is a trapezoid longer than the first direction) In the case of a type, inside and outside situation propagation type

It can be older brother.

Of course, depending on the implementation example, the shape of the object corresponding to the type of each unit SOP may be different from FIG. 2, and various modifications may be possible.

3 is a diagram illustrating an example of a flowchart corresponding to an SOP scenario displayed by the system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The example of FIG. 3 represents a case where each object is assumed to have a shape defined in FIG. 2. In addition, FIG. 3 shows a case in which the unit SOP corresponding to the mission 1 (2) and the message 1 propagation 3 is completed, and the unit SOP corresponding to the mission 2 (4) is in progress.

The display module 110 does not necessarily display only objects corresponding to the unit SOP, and may display objects 1 and 14 indicating the start and end of the SOP scenario shown in FIG. 3, and links as described below. Objects and transition objects may be further displayed.

Of course, information about the task corresponding to each unit SOP (mission performer, task content, propagation target, etc.) is transmitted to the predetermined terminal (eg, the terminal of the administrator, the display device of the control room, etc.) by the display module 110. Of course it can be displayed. In addition, the unit SOP currently being performed in practice or training may be displayed to be distinguished from other unit SOPs.

Referring to FIG. 3, an object corresponding to a series of unit SOPs may be displayed on the user terminal.

The display module 110 may display the outline, title, or representative detailed task of the unit SOP corresponding to each object, so that the conductor can grasp the content of the object. In particular, in the case of the mission type, it is possible to further display information about an agent or team to perform the mission. For example, it can be confirmed that task 2 (4) of FIG. 3 further includes a team (team 2) to perform the task in addition to the task name.

In addition, the display module 110 may connect each object with an indicator (for example, an arrow) according to the sequential relationship defined in the SOP scenario to easily grasp the sequential relationship between unit SOPs. As described above, the sequential relationship between unit SOPs may mean a relationship in which a subsequent unit SOP is performed after the preceding unit SOP is completed.

On the other hand, the sequential relationship does not necessarily correspond 1: 1, and in some cases, it may be a 1: many or a majority: 1. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, the trailing unit SOP of task 2 (4) is the internal propagation 6 of task 3 (5) and message 2, and the preceding unit SOP of task 7 (13) is condition 1 (10) and / or mission 6 (12).

1: In the case of unit SOPs having multiple relationships, when the preceding unit SOP is completed, all of the plurality of trailing units may be performed, and according to an implementation example or a predetermined execution setting, some of the plurality of trailing unit SOPs selected by the user Only unit SOP may be performed. In addition, in the case of unit SOPs having a relationship of multiple: 1, the succeeding unit SOP may be performed after all the preceding unit SOPs are completed, but according to an implementation example or a predetermined execution setting, when only some of the plurality of preceding unit SOPs are completed The trailing unit SOP may be performed.

On the other hand, the control module 120 may perform a task set in the unit SOP that is the turn to be performed among the plurality of unit SOPs. Here, the work may be set for each unit SOP when the SOP scenario is prepared, and may mean a function performed by the control module 120. The task performed by the control module 120 or the task performed by the control module 120 and the task performed by the task performer may be a task corresponding to the corresponding unit SOP.

A task type unit SOP may be configured to transmit a task message to a terminal of a given task execution subject or to transmit the task message to a predetermined internal broadcasting facility. On the other hand, the control module 120 may perform a task set in the task type unit SOP and wait until the task type unit SOP is completed. Thereafter, when a completion signal is input from the user or when a completion signal is received from the terminal of the task performer, it is determined that the unit SOP of the waiting task type is completed, and the operation set in the subsequent unit SOP can be performed. For example, when the unit SOP corresponding to the task 5 (5) of FIG. 3 is completed, the user may select a circle on the border of the task 5 (9) and input the completion signal of the corresponding unit SOP.

The determination type unit SOP may be set to determine whether a predetermined condition is satisfied. In one embodiment, when the control module 120 performs the unit SOP of the judgment type, the information on the condition is displayed on the user terminal displaying the SOP scenario or the terminal of the person in charge to determine the condition You can send information about the condition and wait for the user's input or the return signal from the person in charge, and receive the input for yes or no from the user, or the return signal for yes or no from the person in charge. , It can be judged whether the condition is satisfied. For example, the user may select one of the two circles on the border of condition 1 (10) in FIG. 3 and input a signal corresponding to yes or no.

The operation of outputting an internal propagation message to the internal broadcasting facility may be set for the unit SOP of the internal situation propagation type. In one embodiment, the control module 120 may determine that the corresponding unit SOP is completed immediately after transmitting the internal radio message set in the corresponding unit SOP to the internal broadcasting facility, or after a predetermined period has elapsed after the transmission.

 The unit SOP of the external situation propagation type may be set to output an external propagation message to a predetermined external terminal. In one embodiment, the control module 120 may determine that the corresponding unit SOP is completed immediately after outputting the external radio message to the external terminal, or after a predetermined period of time has elapsed.

Unit SOPs of the internal and external context propagation type may be set to transmit an internal propagation message to a predetermined internal broadcasting facility and output the external propagation message to a predetermined external terminal. In one embodiment, the control module 120 may determine that the corresponding unit SOP is completed immediately after outputting an external radio message to an external terminal and sending an internal radio message, or after a predetermined period has elapsed.

Meanwhile, when the unit SOP in which the work is performed is completed, the control module 120 determines the next unit SOP to be performed based on the sequential relationship between each unit SOP, and when the SOP scenario ends, the process of performing the unit SOP is performed. You can repeat until

Meanwhile, each object may display information regarding the execution state of each unit SOP corresponding thereto. In one embodiment, the execution state is the 'before execution' state, which is the state prior to being performed by the control module 120, and is still in progress' before the unit SOP corresponding to the unit module SOP is completed. It may be either a 'state' or a 'completed' state, but depending on the embodiment, there may be more types of execution states. For example, there may be a state that is not executed and is 'skip' to the next unit SOP.

The status of each unit SOP may change as the SOP scenario progresses, and the display module 110 changes the shape of an object corresponding to the status of each unit SOP or a special corresponding to the state of the object. You can add visual effects. For example, before the unit SOP is executed, the background of the object may be displayed in a transparent / white color, such as the mission 4 (7) of FIG. 3 or the message 3 external propagation (8), and when the unit SOP is executed, FIG. 3 As in Mission 2 (4), a thick visual effect may be added. The object corresponding to the already completed unit SOP, such as message 1 propagation 3 in FIG. 3, may be added with a visual effect in which the background is filled with a predetermined color (or pattern).

Meanwhile, as the SOP scenario progresses, the display module 110 may change the shape of an arrow connecting each object.

4 (a) to 4 (c) are diagrams for explaining an example in which the display module 110 changes the shape of each object included in a flowchart as a procedure for responding to an event progresses.

Figure 4 (a) is a diagram showing only the part of the object from the message 1 propagation (3) to mission 4 (7) of FIG. That is, FIG. 4 (a) shows a case in which the operation set in the task 2 (4) is performed after the unit SOP corresponding to the message 1 propagation 3 is completed, and is waiting for the completion of the unit SOP corresponding to the task 2 (4). Shows. In the situation as shown in FIG. 4 (a), when the unit SOP corresponding to the task 2 (4) is completed, the control module 120 propagates the unit SOP and message 2 corresponding to the task 3 (5), which is the succeeding unit SOP. The unit SOP corresponding to (6) can be performed.

Then, the display module 110 may change the shape of the object corresponding to the performed unit SOP to a first deformation shape or add a predetermined first visual effect, an example of which is illustrated in FIG. 4 (b). . As shown in FIG. 4 (b), the display module 110 may deform the borders of the mission 3 (5-1) and the message 2 propagation (6-1) into a thick form. On the other hand, when the performed unit SOP is completed, the display module 110 may change the shape of the object corresponding to the completed unit SOP to a second deformation shape or add a predetermined second visual effect. As shown in FIG. 4 (b), a visual effect of filling the background of task 2 (4-1) with a predetermined color (or pattern) may be added.

Subsequently, when the unit SOP corresponding to the task 3 (5-1) of FIG. 4 (b) and the unit SOP corresponding to the message 2 propagation 6-1 are completed, the control module 120 is a task that is a trailing unit SOP. A unit SOP corresponding to 4 (7) may be performed, and the display module 110 may transmit task 3 (5-2) and message 2 corresponding to the completed unit SOP as shown in FIG. 4 (c). The background of (6-2) can be changed, and the border of task 4 (7-1) corresponding to the performed unit SOP can be changed to a thick form.

In the above example, the example of changing the border of the object or changing the background has been described, but the scope of the present invention is not limited to this, and any kind of modification that can be visually distinguished from the object before the change is possible. Those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention pertains will readily understand.

According to the technical idea of the present invention as described above, the system 100 visualizes the SOP procedure in the form of a flowchart, and visually expresses a task to be performed later or a task currently in progress differently. B. It has the effect of making it possible for mission performers to easily understand complicated SOP procedures and to quickly track progress.

On the other hand, it may be necessary to perform a unit SOP that is not yet in order to be performed in order due to an emergency situation or other factors. To this end, the control module 120 may perform the unit SOP corresponding to the unit SOP selected by the user as well as the unit SOP that is in turn to be executed in the order defined in the SOP scenario. That is, when any one of the objects corresponding to each of the plurality of displayed unit SOPs is selected by the user, the control module 120 performs a task set in the unit SOP corresponding to the selected object, and the selected unit SOP When is completed, a unit SOP to be performed next may be determined based on a sequential relationship between each unit SOP. For example, in a situation as shown in FIG. 3, when the user selects the secondary response 9, the control module 120 may perform a unit SOP corresponding to the secondary response 9 . In this case, it is considered that all preceding unit SOPs are completed, and the background of all objects from the start (1) to the fire department support request (8) is changed, and the border of the secondary response (9) can be displayed with a thick visual effect. have. On the other hand, depending on the implementation example, a plurality of unit SOPs may be performed simultaneously, and in this case, a visual effect of thickening the border to the secondary counter 9 in the state of FIG. 3 may be added.

According to the above-described embodiment, when an emergency situation occurs, it is possible to easily cope with the situation by allowing the conductor to select and perform a suitable unit SOP.

Meanwhile, a procedure in one SOP scenario may be performed by multiple organizations. For example, there may be a case in which some of the procedures of the SOP scenario should be performed by the first organization and the other part by the second organization. In this case, the SOP scenario may further include information for connecting a response procedure between different organizations.

(원형)의 형태일 수 있지만 이에 한정되는 것은 아니며, 다양한 형태 중 하나일 수 있다.In this case, the display module 110 may further display a link object for expressing the connection of the correspondence between organizations to visualize the connection of the correspondence between organizations, which will be described with reference to FIG. 5. do. As in the example of Figure 5, the link object

It may be in the form of (circular), but is not limited thereto, and may be in one of various forms.

5 illustrates a first SOP procedure 412-1 to be performed by the first organization and a second SOP procedure 412-2 to be performed by the second organization. For convenience of description, objects corresponding to the unit SOP included in the first SOP procedure 412-1 and the second SOP procedure are omitted.

On the other hand, the display module 110 is a link to express the connection relationship between a predetermined preceding unit SOP included in the first SOP procedure 412-1 and a predetermined succeeding unit SOP included in the second SOP procedure 412-2. The objects 413 and 414 may be further displayed. In addition, the display module 110 includes a leader line connecting the preceding unit SOP and the link object 413 included in the first SOP procedure, a link object 413, a leader line connecting the link object 414, and a link object 414. By further displaying a leader line connecting the trailing unit SOP, it is possible to express the connection relationship between the leading unit SOP and the trailing unit SOP to be performed in different organizations. In addition, when the operation set in the preceding unit SOP included in the first SOP procedure 412-1 is completed, the control module 120 follows the succeeding unit SOP included in the second SOP procedure 412-2. It can be determined by the unit SOP to be performed.

In another embodiment, unlike in FIG. 5, the display module 110 may display only the SOP procedure corresponding to the current unit SOP and the link object 413 connected to the current ongoing SOP procedure. For example, when the first SOP procedure 412-1 is in progress, the display module 110 displays only the first SOP procedure 412-1 and the link object 413, and the link object 414 and the first The 2SOP procedure 412-2 may not be displayed.

Subsequently, the procedure continues to complete the unit SOP in the first SOP procedure 412-1 connected to the link object 413, and the unit SOP in the second SOP procedure 412-2 connected to the link object 414 is recalled. When performed by the control module 120, the display module 110 may display a second SOP procedure 412-2, which is an ongoing SOP procedure, and a link object 414 connected thereto.

On the other hand, in the event of a fire, there may be a case where secondary damage occurs due to a flame, for example, an event such as pollutant leakage. Therefore, a specific SOP scenario needs to be linked with other SOP scenarios. To this end, specific SOP scenarios may further include connection information with other SOP scenarios.

형태의 외곽을 가지는 도형으로 표현될 수 있지만 이에 한정되는 것은 아니며, 다양한 형태 중 하나일 수 있다.In this case, the display module 110 may further display a switching object representing the connection of the corresponding procedure between the SOP scenarios to visualize the connection of the corresponding procedure between the SOP scenarios, which will be described with reference to FIG. 6. Shall be As in the example of Figure 6, the transition object

It may be expressed as a figure having an outline of a shape, but is not limited thereto, and may be one of various shapes.

6 shows a first SOP scenario 410 corresponding to a first event and a second SOP scenario 420 corresponding to a second event. For convenience of description, objects corresponding to the unit SOP included in the first SOP scenario 410 and the second SOP scenario 420 are omitted, and are briefly expressed in box shapes 412 and 422.

On the other hand, the display module 110 is a conversion object 417 to express the connection relationship between a predetermined preceding unit SOP included in the first SOP scenario 410 and a predetermined succeeding unit SOP included in the second SOP scenario 420. Can be further displayed. In addition, the display module 110 includes a leader line connecting the preceding unit SOP and the conversion object 417 included in the first SOP scenario, a conversion object 417, a leader line connecting the conversion object 421, and a conversion object 421. By further displaying a leader line connecting the trailing unit SOP, it is possible to express the connection relationship between the leading unit SOP and the trailing unit SOP included in different SOP scenarios. In addition, when the operation set in the preceding unit SOP included in the first SOP scenario 410 is completed, the control module 120 performs the next unit SOP to be performed next in the second SOP scenario 420. You can decide.

In another embodiment, unlike in FIG. 6, the display module 110 includes an object corresponding to the unit SOP included in the SOP scenario corresponding to the current unit SOP and a conversion object 417 connected to the current SOP scenario. Only can be displayed. For example, when the first SOP scenario 410 is in progress, the display module 110 displays only the unit SOP and the conversion object 417 included in the first SOP scenario 410, and the conversion object 421 and The unit SOP included in the second SOP scenario 420 may not be displayed.

Subsequently, as the procedure continues, the preceding unit SOP in the first SOP scenario 420 connected to the switching object 417 is completed, and the succeeding unit SOP in the second SOP scenario 420 connected to the switching object 421 is the control module. When performed by (120), the display module 110 may display an object corresponding to the unit SOP included in the second SOP scenario 420, which is a currently in progress SOP scenario, and a switching object 421 connected thereto. .

On the other hand, if the SOP scenario includes a very large number of unit SOPs, or if multiple organizations need to perform the SOP scenario, the SOP scenario can be very complex and massive. Also, for example, there may be a case where the SOP scenario corresponding to a fire includes procedures for different types of fire, such as oil fires, electric fires, and general fires. As such, if a single SOP scenario includes a large number of unit SOPs, if the unit SOPs included in the SOP scenario are displayed at once, it may be very difficult to identify and track the SOP scenario.

Therefore, in the case of a group SOP in which a part of the unit SOPs included in the SOP scenario is grouped into one group, the system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention is an object corresponding to each unit SOP included in the group SOP. Although all of them can be displayed, it can be simplified and displayed as one group object, which will be described with reference to FIG. 7.

7 is a diagram for explaining a method of displaying the unit SOP included in the SOP scenario of the present invention in a system 100 according to an embodiment. In the example of FIG. 7, unit SOPs are grouped into three groups (510 to 530).

When the SOP scenario is driven, the display module 110 may display an object corresponding to all unit SOPs included in the SOP scenario, as shown in FIG. 7 (a).

와 같은 모양을 가질 수 있지만, 구현 예에 따라서는 다른 모양도 가능할 수 있다.However, according to an embodiment, when the SOP scenario is driven, the display module 110 may display only objects corresponding to a unit SOP belonging to a specific group 510, as shown in FIG. 7 (b). In addition, instead of displaying the unit SOP corresponding to the remaining groups 520 and 530, the group objects 521 and 522 corresponding to the remaining groups may be displayed. The group object is as shown in Figure 7 (b)

Although it may have the same shape, other shapes may be possible depending on the implementation example.

Hereinafter, displaying an object corresponding to all unit SOPs included in a specific group is referred to as an unfolded display, and displaying a group object instead of an object corresponding to a unit SOP of a specific group as a folded display. Let's call it title.

When the folding command is input from the user, the display module 110 may display the group of unit SOPs displayed in the expanded form in the folded form, and when the expanded command is input from the user, display the group object displayed in the folded form. It can be displayed in an unfolded form.

Meanwhile, when the SOP scenario includes a plurality of groups, the display module 110 may display only the group including the currently performing unit SOP in an expanded form, and the remaining groups may be displayed in a folded form. Of course, even in this case, if there is an explicit expansion command of the user, the corresponding group can be displayed in the expansion form.

Meanwhile, there may be a case where two terminals simultaneously execute the same SOP scenario. For example, when a person in charge of command is absent in a predetermined disaster situation, the SOP scenario may be driven by a subordinate or temporary person to temporarily command the disaster situation, and then the person in charge of management returns to There may be cases where the same SOP scenario is driven. As described above, when the same SOP scenario is driven by two or more terminals, if a mission instruction is issued from all terminals, the mission performer may experience confusion, so the present invention can provide a technical idea to prevent this.

To this end, the authority module 130 may obtain or return control authority for the SOP scenario. The authority module 130 may request control authority to the other terminal when there is control authority to another terminal driving the SOP scenario, and obtain control authority when approving the request to the other terminal. . In addition, the authorization module may return the control authority possessed by approving it when another terminal requests control authority.

Meanwhile, when the control authority for the SOP scenario is obtained, the authority module 130 may control the control module 120 to perform a task set in the unit SOP. If the authority module 130 does not acquire control authority, the control module 120 cannot perform the operation set in the unit SOP, but the display module 110 is described above even if there is no control authority. Since all operations can be performed, the progress of the SOP scenario can be monitored even in a terminal without control authority.

On the other hand, the functions performed by the system 100 as described above may be performed when actually controlling a specific facility or facility and responding to a disaster, but may be used to train response to such a disaster as described above. It might be.

That is, the system 100 may provide a training mode for training a response to a disaster. To this end, the system 100 may further include a training module 150.

The training module 150 is a field device (for example, a device provided in the field, a terminal of a task performer, etc.) or a control device (a server, a computer provided in the control room, etc.) corresponding to the task process so that the corresponding process of the task process is performed. Sensors, other equipment required for control, etc.) can be simulated. That is, the training module 150 may perform a series of tasks such that a task corresponding to each of a predetermined unit SOP or a plurality of unit SOPs is performed in the training mode. For example, simulating a field device may mean transmitting or receiving information to be transmitted to the field device or information to be received in the training mode in the actual situation. The simulation of the control device may mean that the operation to be performed by the control device in the actual situation is also performed in the training mode.

The training module 150 may perform a task necessary to train a task process, that is, a series of tasks corresponding to at least one unit SOP. The mission process may be the entirety of a particular SOP scenario, but it may also be a selected part of it. This mission process can be specified by the control module 120.

The control module 120 may specify any one of objects included in a predetermined SOP flow chart to specify the mission process.

For example, the third object O3 corresponding to the third unit SOP included in the SOP flow chart shown in FIG. 9A may be specified by the control module 120. In this case, the specified object will be defined as a selection object.

The selection object may be selected by the administrator, or may be selected as a default by predetermined rules. For example, the control module 120 may display a terminal SOP flow chart of the administrator, and receive any one of objects included in the displayed SOP flow chart.

Then, the selected object may be specified as a selection object.

According to another example, the selection object may be automatically selected by the control module 120. For example, the control module 120 may automatically select the first unit SOP of the SOP scenario as a selection object. For example, when the mission process is defined to include unit SOPs included from the selection object to the last unit SOP, when the control module 120 wants to train the entire specific SOP scenario, the first unit SOP is automatically specified as the selection object. You may. In addition, the control module 120 specifies a selection object through a predetermined criterion according to a situation (eg, an environmental situation such as temperature, humidity, or the context of predetermined information collected by the system 100 through a network). The rule may be predefined, and the selection object may be specified adaptively to the context through the rule.

When a selection object is specified, the task process may be defined as tasks corresponding to at least one unit SOP including a unit SOP corresponding to the selection object. According to an example, only one unit SOP corresponding to the selection object may be defined as the mission process. Depending on the implementation example, the unit SOP corresponding to the selection object to the final unit SOP of the corresponding SOP scenario may be defined as SOPs corresponding to the mission process.

When the task process is specified as described above, the task of the SOP corresponding to the task process may be simulated by the training module 150.

After all, in the training mode, it is assumed that an event occurs when a real disaster occurs (e.g., the detection of a pollutant leak, the concentration of a specific material exceeds a reference value, fire detection, etc.) A series of processes may be performed to allow all or part of the SOP scenario to be performed at the time of occurrence, to be actually performed by the task performer of each of the system 100 and unit SOPs.

This training mode will be described in detail with reference to FIGS. 8 to 13.

8 is a diagram conceptually illustrating an example of a disaster response system supporting a training mode according to the technical idea of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 8, the system 1000 according to the technical concept of the present invention may operate in either a training mode or a general (control) mode. When operating in the general (control) mode, the function can be performed as a disaster response system rather than a disaster response training system, but the system 1000 operates in a general (control) mode as well as a training mode for convenience of explanation. ) Will be referred to as the system 100.

The system 100 may operate in a training mode or a general (control) mode according to the administrator's selection. In addition, the system 100 may display whether it is currently in the training mode or the normal (control) mode in a predetermined manner. An example of this may be as shown in FIG. 13.

13 is a view for explaining an example in which the system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention can be operated in one of a training mode or a normal mode. As shown in FIG. 13, the system 100 is In addition to being able to select a mode through a predetermined UI, information about the current mode (eg, training mode) may be displayed.

In FIG. 13, the SOP scenario is shown on the right side in an explanatory form, not in a flow chart form, and on the left side, image information of facilities related to disaster or training is shown. In addition, the unit SOP indicated in red (eg, 1. unit SOP) may be a unit SOP currently undergoing training. However, the SOP scenario corresponding to the training mode may be shown in the form of an SOP flow chart unlike that shown in FIG. 13. In addition, a current SOP in the SOP flow chart may be displayed differently from other SOPs.

Meanwhile, as described above, disaster response training may be performed based on the SOP flow chart. When disaster response training is performed based on an SOP flow chart, it may mean that training to be performed is specified through an SOP flow chart or a task performer or equipment to be trained is specified through the SOP flow chart.

In this way, when a task, a task performer, and a device to be performed are specified through the SOP flow chart, the manager can effectively determine the content to be trained, or the person to be trained, and the equipment. This is because the SOP flow chart is a useful tool for intuitively grasping the entire SOP scenario, and it is relatively easy to identify unit SOPs that are considered to be important or susceptible to vulnerability when dealing with disasters.

An example of this will be described with reference to FIGS. 9 and 10.

9 is a diagram illustrating a specific example of an SOP scenario according to an embodiment of the present invention and a task of a unit SOP corresponding to each object. In addition, FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining an example in which disaster response training is controlled through an SOP flow chart according to an embodiment of the present invention.

First, as illustrated in FIG. 9A, an SOP flow chart corresponding to a predetermined SOP scenario (eg, a fire event scenario) may be displayed on the manager's terminal (or control equipment, etc.). As described above, the SOP flow chart may include a series of objects (eg, O1 to O10) as shown.

Also, as shown in FIG. 9B, the display module 110 may further display information (eg, SOP1 to SOP10) for a task corresponding to each of the objects (eg, O1 to O10). .

Then, the control module 120 may specify a predetermined selection object. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 10, the control module 120 may specify an object (eg, O3) corresponding to the third unit SOP, which is the third object of the SOP flow chart, as a selection object.

The method in which the control module 120 specifies the selection object may be selected from the administrator terminal as described above or set as a default (eg, the first unit SOP of the SOP scenario) or adaptively specified according to context. have.

For example, the context may include various situations suitable for determining which unit SOP to train. For example, if the external natural environment such as temperature and humidity meets the first criterion, training is performed from the first unit SOP of a specific SOP scenario, and if the second criterion is met, the third unit SOP of the specific SOP scenario or other SOP scenario You can perform training.

Or, if the natural environment meets the first standard, the unit SOP assigned a task to a certain first mission performer (e.g., a worker at a specific facility, a specific rank or a position manager) in a given SOP scenario It may be specified as a selection object, and if the second criterion is met, a unit SOP assigned a task to the second mission performers may be specified as a selection object. Of course, when there are a plurality of selection objects to be specified, any one or a plurality of them may be finally specified as a selection object.

Alternatively, if a specific situation corresponds to the first criterion, a unit SOP in which a predetermined first facility or training equipment (equipment used for training such as field equipment, sensors, or control equipment) is operated may be specified as a selection object, If the second criterion is satisfied, a unit SOP in which a predetermined second facility is operated may be specified as a selection object.

Alternatively, the control module 120 may explicitly receive information about a predetermined mission performer (eg, a first mission performer) or a facility (eg, a first facility).

In any case, if a task performer or facility is specified, the control module 120 may extract a unit SOP corresponding to the specified task performer or facility based on information on the SOP stored in the SOP DB 140.

When a plurality of unit SOPs are extracted, at least one of the unit SOPs extracted by the administrator's selection or by a certain criterion may be determined as a selection object.

Once the selection object is specified, a mission process can be specified. The mission process may be specified according to the selection object, for example, only a unit SOP corresponding to the selection object may be a unit SOP included in the mission process. Alternatively, the unit SOP corresponding to the selection object is the best row unit SOP included in the mission process, and the last unit SOP may be automatically specified as the last unit SOP (or predetermined unit SOP) of the corresponding SOP scenario.

Then, training corresponding to each unit SOP included in the mission process may be simulated by the training module 150.

After all, according to the technical idea of the present invention, not only can the entire task be trained from the beginning to the end of a specific SOP scenario, but also the task, the task performer, and the equipment can be efficiently selected and intensive training can be achieved. .

For example, when the third object is specified as the selection object as shown in FIG. 10, it may be a case that the preceding unit SOP (eg, O1 to O2) of the selection object O3 exists.

In this case, according to an example, the control module 120 is a task corresponding to the selection object O3 and the lower SOP (eg, O4 to O10) of the selection object excluding the preceding unit SOP (eg, O1 to O2). Can be specified as the mission process.

That is, according to the technical idea of the present invention, it is possible to support performing training from an arbitrary position (SOP step) without necessarily training from the beginning of a specific SOP scenario.

To this end, the training module 150 not only simulates a task corresponding to a task process (eg, O3 to O10), but also provides information on the preceding unit SOP (eg, O1 to O2) excluded from training. The task performer of the unit SOP (eg, O1 to O2) or the task performer of the unit SOP corresponding to the selection object O3 may be notified. That is, information indicating that the task of the preceding unit SOP may be notified to the task performer of the unit SOP corresponding to the selection object O3. And, it may be informed that these tasks are assumed to have been performed. Through this, the mission performer of the unit SOP corresponding to the selection object O3 can clearly recognize information on the unit SOP treated as being trained even if it is not actually trained, so that the training can be performed without a hitch. . This is because it is common for missions to have continuity, so it may be important to become familiar with information about missions that should have been performed previously.

Of course, if necessary, the task performers of the preceding unit SOPs (eg, O1 to O2) may be notified of information on the task and / or that the task is assumed to have been performed. Because the task performer of the preceding unit SOP (eg, O1 to O2) may reappear as the task performer of the following unit SOP, in this case, the progress of the training must be recognized in advance so that the actual training can be performed at any position in the specific SOP scenario. Even if it starts, it may be because training without a hitch is possible.

On the other hand, among the information to be notified to the task performer of the preceding unit SOP (for example, O1 to O2) or the selection object O3, there may be a case where information on the assumption situation that the current training is supposed to include should be included. . This may be useful, for example, when there is a unit SOP of a judgment type among the preceding unit SOPs. This will be described with reference to FIG. 11.

11 is a diagram illustrating an example in which a virtual scenario is generated according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 11, a hatched object may be specified as a selection object among objects included in the SOP flow chart shown in FIG. 11 by the control module 120.

In this case, it can be seen that among the preceding unit SOPs of the selection object, for example, an object of a judgment type (rhombus type) is included.

In this case, the object of the judgment type may have a SOP scenario proceed to the selection object or another object according to a specific condition. For example, the object of the judgment type advances the scenario to the left trailing unit SOP when the value of the predetermined sensor is 10 or less, and if the value of the sensor exceeds 10, the scenario follows the right trailing unit SOP, that is, the unit SOP corresponding to the selected object. It can be assumed to proceed.

In this case, the task performer of the selected object needs to clearly recognize what kind of situation is assumed and progressed in the unit SOP corresponding to the object of the judgment type. For example, a situation in which the numerical value of the sensor is greater than 10 may be a situation that a task performer of the selected object needs to know, or specifically, a situation in which it is assumed that the situation (eg, 12 to 13, etc.) is more specifically specified among 10 or more. Can be. In any case, there may be a case where a task performer of the selected object can perform a clearer task only by knowing which assumption situation the task he is currently performing is performed. In this case, the training module 150 assumes The situation may be specified in a predetermined manner to notify the task performer of the selected object.

Through this, even if you do not train from the beginning of a specific SOP scenario, there is an effect that training can be performed without any hitch.

On the other hand, according to the technical idea of the present invention, although training may be specified through the SOP flow chart as described above, training may be started by simulating sensor data of a predetermined sensor.

An example of this will be described with reference to FIG. 12.

12 is a diagram illustrating an example in which sensor data for training is simulated according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 12, as shown in FIG. 12, various sensors (eg, chemicals) are installed in a target facility to be controlled by the system 100, that is, a target facility to be subjected to disaster response according to the SOP scenario when a disaster occurs. Material detection sensor, heat detection sensor, etc.) may be installed in a number.

Needless to say, the system 100 may store spatial information of the facility, information about a location where sensors are installed, and information about a type of sensor.

Then, when the system 100 operates in the training mode, training may be started by simulating such a sensor in a desired situation rather than specifying training using the SOP flow chart as described above.

For example, the training module 150 may specify one or more of sensors (eg, fire sensors) installed in the facility. The sensor may be directly selected by the administrator, or when a specific area or a specific device is specified, sensors capable of sensing a fire in a specific area or a specific device may be automatically specified.

Then, the training module 150 may simulate the occurrence of a sensing event (an event that senses fire) that initiates a predetermined SOP scenario (eg, SOP scenario in case of fire) through a specified sensor. In other words, you can simulate a sensor to identify the disaster you want to train.

Then, the training module 150 can automatically simulate the corresponding SOP scenario according to the specified SOP scenario, the SOP scenario to be performed when the specified sensor is generated is automatically identified through the SOP DB 140. .

Of course, in order to confirm the course of response training as necessary, the administrator's terminal may display a SOP flow chart corresponding to the SOP scenario, and the object corresponding to the currently in progress SOP is displayed differently from other objects. The manager can easily observe and / or control the training situation.

On the other hand, as described above, depending on the situation, it may be necessary to perform linked tasks or systematic and cooperative tasks between different agencies. In this case, even if there are individual SOPs defining the duties of each of the above organizations, it may be difficult to systematically perform the missions between different organizations with these SOPs alone.

To this end, according to the present invention, a technical idea is disclosed in which individual SOPs between different institutions can be organically linked to each other.

This concept will be described with reference to FIGS. 14 to 16.

14 is a diagram illustrating an example of a linked SOP according to an embodiment of the present invention.

As illustrated in FIG. 14, the system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention may generate linked SOPs using different individual SOPs, that is, first and second SOPs.

The associated SOP may be generated by defining at least one link associated with each other between the first SOP and the second SOP as illustrated in FIG. 14.

That is, in FIG. 5 or FIG. 6, rather than simply creating a link defining a sequential relationship between two SOPs having a sequential trailing relationship, an organic linkage between missions is created between two organizations having completely different task performance procedures. Linked SOPs can be created by defining on the SOP chart.

For example, the first SOP may be an SOP in which a task to be performed in a predetermined situation is firstly defined by the first organization, and the second SOP may be an SOP in which a second organization is defined in a stage to be performed in the above situation.

And in the same situation, the mission of the first organ may have a unit mission that affects the performance of the second organ, and similarly, the mission of the second organ may have a unit mission that affects the performance of the first organ. Can be.

However, in the related art, individual SOPs of a plurality of institutions are defined in consideration of only the duties of each corresponding institution, and for this reason, there is a problem that the procedure is not organic when a plurality of institutions simultaneously perform an integrated mission in a specific situation. In addition, when there are common elements (eg, mission performers, mission performance contents, or mission performance equipment) among institutions, there are cases where it is difficult to effectively deal with the situation due to the lack of smooth procedures or order between the missions of different organizations. .

Therefore, there is a need for a technical idea to organically link individual SOPs between different institutions defined individually.

To this end, the system 100 provides a technical idea to organically link the first SOP and the second SOP, which are separate SOPs of two different organizations, as shown in FIG. 14.

The system 100 may generate a link link linking the two SOPs to link the first SOP and the second SOP.

The link may be a link that defines a connection relationship between any one object (or a plurality of objects) included in the first SOP and any one object (or a plurality of objects) included in the second SOP.

As described above, a pair of objects linked by linkage links and included in different individual SOPs (that is, first and second SOPs) will be defined as linked objects.

For example, in FIG. 14, linked objects connected by the first linkage link 21 may be the first linkage object 20 and the second linkage object 20-1. In addition, the first association object 20 may be a unit object included in the first SOP, and the second association object 20-1 may be a unit object included in the second SOP.

In addition, the linked objects connected by the second linkage link 31 may be the third linkage object 30 and the fourth linkage object 30-1. In addition, the third linkage object 30 may be a unit object included in the first SOP, and the fourth linkage object 30-1 may be a unit object included in the second SOP.

In addition, the link 21 and 31 may have a directionality, and accordingly, a trailing relationship between missions of different agencies may be defined.

In order to define the linkage objects and linkages, the control module 120 may analyze the task content defined for each unit object in each individual SOP, that is, the first SOP and the second SOP. The task content may be information in which tasks corresponding to unit objects are defined.

In addition, candidate association objects that can be association objects may be extracted based on the analysis result.

In order to extract these candidate association objects, the control module 120 may parse the task contents defined in each object.

According to an example, there is a case where a corresponding mission performer (including a mission performing organization) is included in the mission content or a corresponding mission equipment is included in the mission content even though the object is included in the SOP of different organizations among the mission contents. Can be.

An example of this will be described with reference to FIGS. 15 to 16.

15 to 16 are diagrams for explaining a concept for generating a linked SOP according to an embodiment of the present invention.

15, for example, the first SOP may be a SOP for schools, and the second SOP may be a SOP for fire departments.

At this time, for example, the first SOP may include an object in which the mission content of 'reporting a fire to a fire department or a firefighter' is defined. In addition, the 2SOP may include an object of 'receiving a fire report from a school' or 'receiving a fire report from a school (teacher or student) to propagate to a specific mission team'.

In this way, each other's mission performer (an opponent organization) can extract a pair of objects included in the mission content as a linked object.

According to another embodiment, as shown in FIG. 16, the first SOP may have an object with a task description of 'performing a specific task as soon as the fire truck arrives', and the second SOP may receive an' report of the fire truck within 10 minutes after receiving it. There may be an object with the contents of the mission 'Make it dispatch'.

As such, when the corresponding mission equipment (here, the fire truck) is included in the mission contents of the objects of different engines, the control module 120 may extract two objects as linked objects.

In order to extract linked objects based on mission equipment, the same mission equipment does not have to be included in the mission content. For example, two objects having close relations with each other may previously define each object on different SOPs included in the mission content as a corresponding mission equipment. For example, when fire hoses and fire hydrants (or water faucets) are included in objects included on different SOPs, the mission contents defined in the two objects may be closely related to each other, and in this case, they may be linked objects. have.

Accordingly, the corresponding mission equipment in this specification may already refer to the same mission equipment as well as mission equipment defined to be closely related to each other.

In this way, the mission performers (organs) corresponding to each other extract objects on different SOPs defined in the mission contents as linkage objects, or objects on different SOPs whose corresponding mission equipment is defined in the mission contents closely cooperate between the two organizations. There may be a high probability of being among these required missions.

Therefore, the control module 120 may automatically connect the connection objects specified in this way through the connection link. In addition, the directionality at this time may be determined according to the ancestor relationship of mission performance between the linked objects. For example, in FIG. 15, since a fire is received after the fire is reported, a link having the same directionality as in FIG. 15 may be generated, and in FIG. 16, the fire engine may arrive only when the fire engine is dispatched, so the connection with the directionality as in FIG. Links may be created by the control module 120.

The control module 120 extracts and extracts words (eg, report, acceptance, dispatch, arrival, etc.) for knowing the preceding and following relationships when the associated objects are extracted to determine the preceding and following relationships between the related objects. Based on the word, it can automatically determine the leading and trailing relationships. Depending on the embodiment, it may be possible to perform learning capable of determining a preceding / relational relationship between natural language expressions through NLP (Natural Language Processing). An average expert in the technical field of the present invention will be able to easily infer that the preceding and following relationship between two missions related to each other can be determined in various ways.

On the other hand, object pairs extracted through analysis of the task contents as described above may not necessarily be specified as a linked object.

To this end, the control module 120 may extract a pair of possible objects of linked objects as candidate linked objects through analysis of the task contents as described above. In addition, whether each pair of candidate association objects needs to be actually defined as an association object may be finally specified as an association object by selection of a user (eg, the system 100 administrator).

Accordingly, the fact that the control module 120 specifies the association object may mean a case in which all or part of the candidate association object pairs are finally specified as the association object by the user's selection or determination.

Meanwhile, as illustrated in FIG. 16, a predetermined link object may be defined on the link link. For example, the link object may be a time-lapse object representing a time-lapse.

In other words, there may be a number of cases in which a time difference occurs between two missions that are closely related to two different agencies, and in such a case, the time difference can be visually confirmed on the associated SOP. It can be particularly important to be able to predict the desired time interval.

For example, as shown in FIG. 15, there may be a case where the start time of the execution of the linked objects is the same or there is almost no time difference.

However, as shown in FIG. 16, there may exist linkage objects that can start a mission of another institution only when a unit mission of one institution is performed. In this case, it may be very desirable to define the expected or recommended time intervals on the preceding or following mission. For example, as shown in FIG. 16, the control module 120 between a fourth linking object (eg, fire truck dispatch) included in the second SOP and a third linking object (eg, performing a specific mission when the fire truck arrives) included in the first SOP ) When establishing a linkage link and defining a time-lapse object as a link object on the linkage link, predefining the expected or recommended time-path information, the institution corresponding to the first SOP (for example, a school) is third Not only can the task execution time of the linked object be predicted, but also the target time of task execution can be defined by an organization corresponding to the second SOP (for example, a fire department), so it can be very effective for linked task execution of two different organizations.

The time-lapse information (eg, 10 minutes) to be defined in the time-lapse object may be defined by a user of the system 100 according to a doctor or situation (eg, distance) of two institutions, and the control module 120 The time-lapse object can be set on the link link using the information input by the user.

Although the case where the link object set on the link link according to an embodiment is a time-lapse object is exemplarily described, the link link is a link that virtually or substantially links the tasks between different individual agencies, so that the link objects are between the tasks between the two agencies. Any information or requirements suitable for association may be defined as the link object.

For example, instead of the time-lapse object shown in FIG. 16, information describing the characteristics of a specific school corresponding to the first SOP (for example, the specific school has information that only a fire truck having a specific size or less can enter or exit due to the size of the front door) A link object that defines the linkage of missions, such as reference information that can refer to the characteristics of the counterpart organization, such as information that entry is easier) may be defined on the linkage link.

As such, linkage links are defined, and the result of setting the link object on each linkage link as necessary may be as illustrated in FIG. 14.

When the linked SOP as shown in FIG. 14 is generated by the system 100, the linked SOP can be provided to both the first and second agencies in situations where the first and second SOPs should be performed.

Each individual agency can then easily identify which related tasks are being performed by other agencies at some point in their performance stages, and can easily predict at what point other organizations will be able to perform their associated tasks. It has the effect.

Meanwhile, according to an implementation example, the system 100 may include a processor and a memory storing a program executed by the processor. The processor may include a single-core CPU or a multi-core CPU. The memory may include high-speed random access memory and may also include non-volatile memory, such as one or more magnetic disk storage devices, flash memory devices, or other non-volatile solid-state memory devices. Access to memory by the processor and other components can be controlled by a memory controller. Here, when the program is executed by a processor, the system 100 according to the present exemplary embodiment may be configured to perform the above-described method.

On the other hand, the method according to an embodiment of the present invention is implemented in the form of program instructions that can be read by a computer and stored in a computer-readable recording medium. It can be stored in a readable recording medium. The computer-readable recording medium includes all kinds of recording devices in which data readable by a computer system are stored.

The program instructions recorded on the recording medium may be specially designed and configured for the present invention, or may be known and available to those skilled in the software art.

Examples of computer-readable recording media include magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tapes, optical media such as CD-ROMs, DVDs, and floptical disks. Hardware devices specifically configured to store and execute program instructions such as magneto-optical media and ROM, RAM, flash memory, and the like are included. In addition, the computer-readable recording medium can be distributed over network coupled computer systems so that the computer-readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.

Examples of program instructions include machine language codes such as those produced by a compiler, as well as high-level language codes that can be executed by a device that processes information electronically using an interpreter or the like, for example, a computer.

The hardware device described above may be configured to operate as one or more software modules to perform the operation of the present invention, and vice versa.

The above description of the present invention is for illustration only, and those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains can understand that the present invention can be easily modified into other specific forms without changing the technical spirit or essential features of the present invention. will be. Therefore, it should be understood that the embodiments described above are illustrative in all respects and not restrictive. For example, each component described as a single type may be implemented in a distributed manner, and similarly, components described as distributed may be implemented in a combined form.

The scope of the present invention is indicated by the following claims rather than the above detailed description, and all changes or modifications derived from the meaning and scope of the claims and their equivalent concepts should be interpreted to be included in the scope of the present invention. .

Claims (10)

The linked SOP generation system corresponds to the first SOP corresponding to the first institution and the second SOP corresponding to the second institution, wherein the first SOP and the second SOP are individually defined SOPs respectively corresponding to different institutions-included in each Analyzing task contents for each object;
Specifying, by the linked SOP generation system, a first linking object and a second linking object, which are objects that can be linked to each other from each of the first SOP and the second SOP, based on an analysis result of the task contents for each object;
Generating, by the linkage SOP generation system, a link link between the specific first linkage object and the second linkage object; And
And setting a link object corresponding to the respective mission contents of the first linkage object and the second linkage object on the linkage link generated by the linkage SOP generation system,
The link object,
It includes a time-lapse object that includes the content of the time-lapse corresponding to the mission content of each of the first linkage object and the second linkage object as the content of the object,
The step of specifying the first linkage object and the second linkage object may include:
Further extracting a pair of an object that includes a task performer corresponding to each other or a task equipment corresponding to each other in the task contents of the objects included in each of the first SOP and the second SOP as candidate first linking objects and candidate second linking objects. Includes,
A method of generating linked SOPs, wherein the first linkage object and the second linkage object are specified among the extracted candidate first linkage objects and candidate second linkage objects.
delete The method of claim 1, wherein the step of generating the linkage link between the first linkage object and the second linkage object specified by the linkage SOP generation system comprises:
Further comprising the step of determining the directionality of the link link based on the sequential relationship between the mission content of the first linkage object and the mission content of the second linkage object,
A linked SOP generating method for generating the linked link to correspond to the determined directionality.
delete A computer program installed in a data processing apparatus and stored in a computer-readable recording medium for performing the method according to claim 1.
A plurality of SOPs (Standard Operating) including a first SOP corresponding to a first institution and a second SOP corresponding to a second institution, wherein the first SOP and the second SOP are individually defined SOPs respectively corresponding to different institutions Procedure) SOP DB is stored;
A display module for displaying a flow chart of each of the plurality of SOPs;
Analyzing mission information for each object included in each of the first SOP and the second SOP, and based on an analysis result of the task contents for each object, a first linkage that is an object that can be linked to each other from each of the first SOP and the second SOP. An object and a second linkage object are specified, and a linkage link between the specific first linkage object and the second linkage object is generated, and the task of each of the first linkage object and the second linkage object is generated on the generated linkage link. It includes a control module for setting the link object corresponding to the contents,
The link object,
It includes a time-lapse object that includes the content of the time-lapse corresponding to the mission content of each of the first linkage object and the second linkage object as the content of the object,
The control module,
The task pair corresponding to the task content of the objects included in each of the first SOP and the second SOP, or a pair of objects including task equipment corresponding to each other, is extracted as a candidate first linking object and a candidate second linking object,
A linked SOP generation system in which the first linkage object and the second linkage object are specified among the extracted candidate first linkage objects and candidate second linkage objects.
delete According to claim 6, The control module,
A linkage SOP generation system that determines the directionality of the linkage based on the sequential relationship between the mission content of the first linkage object and the mission content of the second linkage object, and generates the linkage to correspond to the determined directionality.
delete As a linked SOP generation system,
Processor; And
And a memory for storing computer programs executed by the processor,
The computer program, when executed by the processor, the associated SOP generation system to perform the method according to any one of claims 1 or 3.

Images