JP4301844B2 - Disaster countermeasure simulation device - Google Patents

Description

[0001]
[Technical field to which the invention belongs]
The present invention relates to a disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus, and more particularly to a disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus that makes it possible to simulate on a computer the assumption of disaster occurrence, countermeasures at the time of disaster, and the development of disasters and evaluation of the effects of countermeasures. It is. The present invention further relates to a disaster countermeasure simulation method executed in the simulation on the computer and a computer-readable storage medium storing a procedure for causing the computer to execute the method.
[0002]
[Prior art]
For disasters involving a wide range of disaster-affected areas such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, plant accidents, etc., disasters are assumed to occur in advance and disaster countermeasure related departments take measures to evaluate the convergence of disasters and the transition of countermeasure effects Countermeasure rehearsals are being conducted.
[0003]
Such graphical training is also called a disaster countermeasure game (Disaster Imagination Game). The purpose of this training is to grasp in advance the matters necessary for the most efficient rescue and recovery in the event of a real disaster and to remove the obstacles. As a result, local governments and related organizations in the country participate. When conducting training on the diagram, give a map of a common disaster area to participants (referred to as players) of related organizations in advance, and a disaster countermeasure supervisor (referred to as a controller) Communicate the situation. Depending on the situation, the player must know the detailed damage situation, execute secondary disaster prevention measures, guide residents' evacuation, etc., and provide disaster countermeasure commands (commands) necessary for systematic rescue and recovery. We try to minimize damage by issuing one after another.
[0004]
Patent document 1 is a document disclosing the prior art comparatively close to this invention. The invention disclosed in the document relates to a system for performing disaster prevention drills through a network, and simulates disasters according to disaster locations and scales, and provides disaster training scenarios via the network for each position of training participants. It is characterized by that.
[0005]
Patent Document 2 is also an invention relating to disaster simulation, but the process through which residents pass through the condemned route extracted based on road information, disaster information, etc. is calculated and displayed in a simple manner, leading to an emergency situation. This will contribute to the response. The invention described in Patent Document 3 is intended to apply a heuristic search method in order to obtain a path plan of a moving body in a battle simulation, and has a different application field from the present invention. One of the background arts of the invention is shown.
[0006]
According to the conventional method related to disaster simulation, the notification of the occurrence of a disaster from the controller and the command issued by each player are written on a piece of paper, and the piece of paper is given to the necessary related department to receive the result written on the piece of paper. Later, all the pieces of paper were collected, and finally the disaster countermeasure commands and results issued by the player in response to the occurrence of the disaster were arranged over time, so that the countermeasures were not missing, the procedure was appropriate, and as a result The extent to which such damage has occurred is evaluated.
[0007]
FIG. 1 conceptually shows how disaster countermeasure training on a diagram is performed by a conventional method. At the time of training, the controller gives the players of each relevant organization a status grant card that describes the event that caused the disaster, such as an earthquake, and each relevant organization starts executing the necessary measures within their respective responsibilities. To do. The player's countermeasure command is transmitted to the controller, and the controller returns a result (also referred to as a result) for the countermeasure command. Disaster countermeasure training progresses by repeating this process. When a series of disaster countermeasures is completed, ex-post evaluation is performed. At this time, the status of disasters and countermeasures are reproduced while reproducing the commands and results written on the paper in order, and the suitability of the countermeasures is evaluated.
[0008]
[Patent Document 1]
JP 2002-162893 A
[Patent Document 2]
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 5-19667
[Patent Document 3]
JP-A-5-204889
[0009]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, in the case of the conventional method as described above, since the command and the result are all written on a piece of paper, the controller shows the relationship between the command and the transition of the disaster on time during the training on the diagram. Can not be grasped. Even in the ex-post evaluation, it is difficult to accurately grasp the time series based on the commands and results written on the paper. Furthermore, in order to actually evaluate how the transition of the disaster will change if a part of the command is changed, the entire training on the diagram must be reexecuted. Is a problem.
[0010]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In view of the above-mentioned problems of conventional disaster countermeasure simulation training, the present invention enables the controller and, if necessary, the player to recognize the transition of the disaster on time, and it has also progressed during the ex-post evaluation. To provide a disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus that is easy and accurate to grasp, and that can greatly reduce the labor required for disaster countermeasure simulation training as a whole, a storage medium containing the method and a program that causes a computer to execute the method With the goal.
[0011]
Specifically, the present invention relates to a controller computer capable of storing a set disaster scenario,
At least one player computer capable of receiving at least one disaster countermeasure command and outputting a result of the command;
A disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus comprising communication means for enabling data exchange between the controller computer and the at least one player computer,
The disaster scenario includes basic information and detailed information about the disaster,
The controller computer transmits only disaster basic information to the player computer to input a disaster countermeasure command,
A disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus is proposed in which the result output by the player computer is obtained based on basic information and detailed information referred to in response to a command and in accordance with a preset procedure.
[0012]
Basic information is information given from the controller to the player at the start of the disaster response simulation. “Earth epicenter XX, north latitude XX has a large magnitude 7 earthquake” or “Seismic intensity 6 in the target area. `` Observation of seismic motions '' etc., and in principle, the content is the same type of information that is provided to related organizations as the first report in the event of a disaster, but the content depends on the purpose of the training Can be changed.
[0013]
On the other hand, detailed information is information that is set in advance for details of the disaster. However, the controller does not transmit the information to the player in advance, and takes measures necessary for the player to grasp the information. This is the first information that is presented in the form of results. For example, the occurrence of a large-scale earthquake is shown to the player in advance as basic information by the controller, but as a result of the earthquake, the area where the fire occurred immediately after the earthquake, the location of the road that became inaccessible, the collapsed bridge Presence / absence etc. is preset as a simulation scenario, but the controller does not indicate it to the player in advance, and the player is activated by the command by issuing a command to order investigation by a helicopter, for example It is information that can be grasped as a result of a command only after a scenario is referred to according to a procedure and necessary calculations and references are performed.
[0014]
Since the disaster scenario includes the basic information and the detailed information as described above, the player can perform the disaster countermeasure simulation in a state that is extremely close to the time of the actual disaster. Further, the detailed information may be hierarchized so that the detail level of the result and the time required for the response differ depending on the type of the survey command. For example, a fire investigation by a helicopter is quick, but it is impossible to grasp the presence or absence of human damage, while a fire investigation by dispatching a rescue team takes time, but detailed information on human damage can be answered. And so on.
[0015]
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus includes a plurality of player computers, each player computer can output a result for a command input to the player computer, and the controller The computer can output a command input to all player computers and a result for the command.
[0016]
With such a configuration, the player can output and grasp the results for the commands at any time, and the controller can also grasp the commands input by the players and the results of the commands at any time.
[0017]
According to a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, both the controller computer and the player computer store the preset procedure for obtaining the result for the disaster countermeasure command based on the disaster scenario, Each player computer transmits a command input to the computer to the controller computer, and the player computer and the controller computer each calculate a result based on the preset procedure.
[0018]
When the apparatus according to the present invention is configured as described above, the controller computer and the player computer can calculate the results independently when a command is given. Therefore, between the controller computer and the player computer, Disaster countermeasure simulation can proceed in parallel simply by sending and receiving commands. Therefore, the amount of data to be transmitted / received between computers can be reduced.
[0019]
According to a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus includes a plurality of player computers, and a command input to each player computer is also transmitted to other player computers. Each player computer calculates a result, and the player computer calculates the result of the command input to the player computer without outputting the result of the command input to the other player computer.
[0020]
When a simulation is conducted with multiple institutions participating, if a specific engine (assumed to be the first engine) issues a fire position detection command by a helicopter, the first engine will fire as a result. Origin location information is provided, but this information is not known at this point to other organizations (assuming they are second organizations). Similarly, the second engine is informed only when a fire position detection command is issued by a helicopter or a command for inquiring the first engine about the fire occurrence position is issued.
However, the processing by the computer may be different from whether or not the information is displayed at that time. In other words, since the fact that the first engine issued a helicopter fire position detection command has been transmitted to the computer of the second engine, the computer of the second engine has a disaster scenario that it owns at that time. Based on the above, that is, it is also possible to obtain the fire occurrence position information by performing exactly the same calculation as that of the computer of the first engine, but keep it without displaying it. In this case, when the second engine issues a command for inquiring the first engine about the fire occurrence position information, the computer of the second engine outputs the fire occurrence position information acquired in advance. By doing so, it is possible to reduce the amount of data transmitted and received and to prevent the computer of the first engine from being killed by a command issued by the second engine.
[0021]
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, only one of the controller computer and the player computer stores the preset scenario for obtaining a result for the disaster countermeasure command based on the disaster scenario. Each player computer transmits a command input to the computer to the controller computer, and only one of the player computer and the controller computer calculates a result based on the preset procedure. , To communicate the results to the other.
[0022]
For example, when only the controller computer stores a preset scenario, the result of the command is always calculated or referred to by the controller computer and transmitted to the player computer. By doing so, it is possible to reduce the burden of calculation or storage capacity on the player's computer, and even when the entire scenario is updated, changes in the scenario stored in the player computer are minimized. Can be reduced and maintenance can be reduced.
[0023]
Each computer can store scenarios and preset procedures to reduce the amount of data sent and received between computers, or a specific computer can store scenarios and preset procedures to compute other computers It is possible to select whether to reduce the memory load in consideration of restrictions on communication capacity and computing capacity of the entire system.
[0024]
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus can store a history composed of a series of inputted commands and the results thereof, and can change a specific inputted command and thereafter. This simulation can be continued.
[0025]
In the case of ex-post evaluation, if the validity of a specific command becomes a problem, it may be necessary to know what results were obtained if another command was executed instead of the command. . In such a case, according to the apparatus having the above-described function, the progress before the command change can be used as it is, and only the progress after the command change can be calculated, so that the time can be reduced. Or you can change the result of a specific command and check the results.
[0026]
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the disaster scenario stored in the disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus includes data for identifying a disaster event, data for identifying an initial damage situation due to the disaster event, and disaster And data for identifying measures for countermeasures.
[0027]
The disaster scenario includes all data that may be used in disaster response simulations, but in the preferred embodiment these include, for example, data for identifying disaster events that specify, for example, the magnitude and location of earthquakes. And data for identifying the initial damage situation caused by disasters such as road disconnection due to an earthquake and the position of a collapsed building, and data on disaster countermeasures such as fire fighting activities. In particular, the scenario has data to identify measures for disaster countermeasures, in response to fire fighting commands by fire departments in the city, fires will spread slowly, fire fighting action commands by wide-area fire departments Is essential when using scenarios where the subsequent development (change as a function of time) differs depending on the type of command that represents the means for disaster countermeasures.
[0028]
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the disaster countermeasure command may include a countermeasure before the occurrence of a disaster and a countermeasure after the occurrence of the disaster.
[0029]
Considering earthquakes as an example, earthquake warnings may be issued prior to the occurrence of an earthquake, and in such cases, evaluate the effectiveness of placing disaster relief units in the affected areas in advance. In such a case, it is effective to include measures before the occurrence of a disaster in the command.
[0030]
According to one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the result includes at least one of data indicating a damage situation, a human damage situation, and a physical damage situation obtained as a result of the investigation action.
[0031]
These outcomes can change over time, and as described for the difference between a helicopter survey and a search team survey, even for commands that investigate the same damage situation, Results may vary by type.
[0032]
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the basic information includes map information of a target area, weather information around the current location of the player, and the detailed information includes damage occurrence information around the current location of the player, and is set in advance. The procedure is to calculate damage occurrence information over time according to input information including player action information.
[0033]
According to still another preferred embodiment, the disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus inputs a command by means for specifying a location according to a map on the screen displayed by the computer and means for specifying a command to be executed on the screen displayed by the computer. Configured to be able to.
[0034]
With such a configuration, it is possible to visually grasp the progress of the disaster according to the reality.
[0035]
According to one preferred embodiment, the outcome is an output of the outcome calculated over time.
[0036]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be specifically described with reference to examples.
FIG. 2 is a diagram schematically showing an example of a device configuration when disaster countermeasure training is performed by the disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus according to the present invention. For example, the disaster countermeasure headquarters established in the prime minister's residence corresponds to the controller, and the controller computer may be physically one computer. The computer and the image processing server are each preferably composed of a group of computers each consisting of one or several computers.
[0037]
On the other hand, players are targeted for necessary organizations and local public bodies depending on the scale and content of the disaster. These include, for example, the Defense Agency, the National Police Agency, the Fire Department, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, the Cabinet Secretariat, the Cabinet Office, and the Japan Coast Guard. Prefectural offices, etc., and there are medium and large players composed of a plurality of computers and small players composed of a single computer according to the size of each organization. .
[0038]
The computer for the controller and the computer for the player are all connected to each other through a dedicated line, a dedicated channel, a telephone line or the Internet, and can at least transmit and receive basic disaster information and commands on time. Therefore, the personnel who participate in the training as a controller and a player can physically gather in one place and use each computer to execute disaster countermeasure simulations, while being geographically separated from each other. It is also possible to execute disaster countermeasure simulation by transmitting and receiving data only to each other.
[0039]
First, it is necessary to create a disaster scenario before starting the disaster countermeasure simulation based on the present invention. Scenarios that should be created in advance include, for example, the location of the epicenter, the magnitude of the earthquake, the time of occurrence of the earthquake, the seismic intensity at each location, similar data on foreshocks and aftershocks, and the year that is assumed as the start date and end date of disaster countermeasures. This includes one or more of setting the month and day, the weather conditions for the expected training day, the occurrence of a fire due to an earthquake, road disconnection points, bridge damage points, personnel and equipment arrangements of related organizations, etc. The disaster scenario further includes, among these data, for example, only the seismic intensity of the disaster countermeasure target area as basic information and all other information as detailed information. Basic information is information that is given when the disaster countermeasure simulation is started from the controller to the player, whereas detailed information is a preset scenario, but the player issues a command. It is obtained for the first time as its effect. For example, since the fire department is given only the seismic intensity of the area, it is necessary to issue an inquiry command to the Japan Meteorological Agency, for example, in order to know the location of the epicenter and the magnitude of the earthquake.
[0040]
As will be described in detail later, at least some of the above information is adaptive, that is, the subsequent development is set in a different format depending on the contents of the countermeasure command. For example, for fire, the initial fire occurrence position and fire intensity are given, but the rate of fire spread is defined as a function of time with the weather conditions and the contents of the fire extinguishing command as variables. And so on. In addition, it is possible to set a time until restoration by a dissemination command for an out-of-road location.
[0041]
Also in the setting work of these scenarios, the work efficiency can be improved by enabling input from the screen using images. For example, instead of inputting north latitude and east longitude, the location of the earthquake is determined by clicking on a specific location using a map displayed on the screen.
[0042]
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of work related to scenario setting. As shown in FIG. 3, in order to set a scenario, after starting the system, first, a time series axis is input. For example, input of training start date and end date. Next, the basic values such as the location and personnel of the Self-Defense Forces, the police, the fire department, etc., the location of the hospital, and the capacity are set. Next, data for identifying disaster events such as the location of the epicenter, the magnitude of the earthquake, and the seismic intensity at each location are entered. In addition, enter the location and scale of road breaks, slope failures, bridge damage, fire occurrence, etc., the number of inhabitants, etc., and further define the events that change over time, such as the spread of fire and the occurrence of storm surges Enter speed, fire spread area, etc. After that, as a reference, you can simulate the magnitude of damage if no measures are taken. In these operations, as shown in FIG. 3, so-called GUI (image user interface) using a screen is used to improve input efficiency.
[0043]
FIG. 4 is an example of a scenario editing screen. As shown in the screen, weather conditions, disaster selection, etc. are performed on a basic time axis, and further, disaster event details are set on the disaster event setting screen. Both are intended to reduce the input work itself and to intuitively grasp the input contents using the GUI.
[0044]
When the scenario setting is completed, the player can then take proactive measures before the disaster occurs. Advance measures include grasping the situation, formulating advance implementation plans, evacuation of residents, advance dispatch of rescue teams, and evacuation of hospital patients. These preparatory measures are inappropriate to be performed when a disaster such as a plant accident cannot be predicted, but may be predicted in advance when natural disasters such as earthquakes and typhoons are targeted. It is important to confirm the effectiveness of these measures.
[0045]
FIG. 5 is a flowchart schematically showing the procedure before the occurrence of the disaster. As shown in the figure, the interaction with the image is used for the input, thereby reducing the input effort and facilitating the visual grasp.
[0046]
When the above preparation is completed, the controller presents or transmits basic information to each player and declares the start of disaster countermeasure simulation. 6 and 7 show an example of the flow of simulation after the occurrence of a disaster.
[0047]
When a disaster or event occurs, each institution first issues an inquiry command to another institution using a dedicated menu, and tries to grasp the situation that any institution knows at that time. Commands such as inquiring other organizations about the epicenter and magnitude of the earthquake correspond to this. The system may be configured so that the command is actually transmitted to the partner organization through a telephone line, etc., and the result is created and returned there. Processing may be performed according to a scenario set in advance by a computer of the institution on the side, and a result scheduled for the scenario may be displayed. The former can perform more realistic simulations, and the latter can reduce the amount of data transmitted and received, and can perform simulations even when the partner organization is not participating in the simulation. There is.
[0048]
In the next stage of sharing information among participating institutions, further activities will be conducted to collect necessary information. For example, a command that takes out a helicopter and grasps the location of the fire occurred. Also in this case, the input work itself can be simplified by specifying a target area on the map displayed on the screen and selecting a command. There are multiple methods of grasping the fire target area, such as dispatching helicopters and personnel, and in the case of reconnaissance by helicopter, fire information in a wide area can be obtained in a short time, but detailed information such as the number of injured people Different results or results are prepared for each command. For example, detailed information can be obtained although it takes time to dispatch personnel.
[0049]
FIG. 8 shows an example of result information displayed as a result of the execution command of the reconnaissance activity by the aircraft. When the flight route for reconnaissance is indicated on the map using an input device such as a mouse, the building damage area and the fire area in the area are displayed on the map.
[0050]
If an emergency situation is detected as a result of reconnaissance, emergency response will be implemented. Commands such as prohibiting traffic and giving instructions on detours at bridge breakage locations correspond to this. At the same time that the prohibition display is displayed at the bridge breakage location, the competent authority grasps the data, so it becomes possible to answer the inquiry prohibition command from other agencies.
[0051]
In the next stage of emergency response, full-fledged units will be deployed. The deployment of the unit includes a command for dispatching a rescue unit to the affected area, a command for dispatching a fire brigade for fire fighting, a command for evacuating residents by the police, and a command for restoration work by the SDF. The results of these commands all appear as a function of time, and in response to the dispatch of rescue teams to the disaster area, the time required for the rescue team to arrive in the disaster area is necessary for relief activities in the disaster area. Time is taken into account. For fire brigade dispatch commands, the time lapse of fire spread or extinguishing is a function of fire intensity, weather conditions and the size and equipment of the fire brigade dispatched.
[0052]
FIG. 9 is an example of a screen that displays the results together with the deployment of the units by the unit dispatch command. As a result of inputting a command for dispatching troops and an instruction command for evacuation from the map, the deployed units and the results of recovery and rescue are displayed on the map.
[0053]
Through the steps of these measures, players, that is, related organizations can communicate with each other, exchange information, and request support as necessary. For providing information and requesting support to other players, it is preferable to create a command using a dedicated screen.
[0054]
Although the flow after the occurrence of a disaster has been described as an order, the order described above is merely an example, and actual command transmission does not necessarily have to be performed in the order described above. If necessary, the rescue team can be dispatched to the affected area first, and then an information provision command can be sent to other organizations immediately thereafter. It is also possible to send the same command multiple times, such as repeatedly collecting information by reconnaissance.
[0055]
FIG. 10 is an example of information displayed on the controller screen during the execution of the disaster countermeasure simulation. The commands entered by each player and the results thereof are individually displayed, and the progress of disaster countermeasures combining the commands and results of all the players can be displayed in real time. Furthermore, it is possible to display the progress of the disaster, etc. at any time and the status of the deployment of the unit, or the target can be focused on fire or human damage.
[0056]
As a result of implementing the above countermeasures, the disaster countermeasure simulation ends when a predetermined end date / time is reached or a predetermined result such as complete extinction of a fire is obtained.
[0057]
After the simulation is over, a reflection meeting will be held while reproducing the contents of the simulation. As shown in FIG. 11, it is preferable that the reflection meeting is performed by gathering the controller and the player at the same physical location, but can also be performed at different locations, for example, at the location where the simulation is performed. . In the review meeting, while presenting the basic information and detailed information stored in the computer, the commands issued by the player and the results were reproduced in succession, and whether the damage was minimized or not, etc. Evaluate for validity.
[0058]
The disaster countermeasure simulation device not only stores basic information, detailed information, and all commands, but also how the disaster will occur if a command different from the command entered at the time of simulation is entered after an arbitrary point in time. It is also possible to simulate how it has been developed. It is also possible to simulate the development when only specific commands are replaced and other commands are the same as those at the time of simulation. This feature is useful for searching for better commands, such as when the effect of a particular command is questionable.
[0059]
Even in the reflection meeting, when presenting a player's plan, displaying damage, etc., the screen display function is used to the fullest to help visual and intuitive understanding.
[0060]
FIG. 12 shows a display example when the damage situation obtained as a reference when the disaster countermeasure is not performed and the damage situation obtained as a result of the disaster countermeasure are simultaneously displayed and compared. Further, FIG. 13 and FIG. 14 respectively show a display example of a unit movement history for evaluating whether or not there is a problem in cooperation between units or a unit movement, and a unit deployment display for evaluating a fire fighting activity. It is shown. Further, FIG. 15 is a screen for comparing the number of deaths, which is a final damage index depending on the presence or absence of disaster countermeasures by the player.
[0061]
【The invention's effect】
As is clear from the above description, when the disaster simulation apparatus according to the present invention is used, the controller and, if necessary, the player can recognize the transition of the disaster on time, and at the time of the ex-post evaluation. However, the process can be easily and accurately grasped, and the labor required for the disaster countermeasure simulation training as a whole can be greatly reduced. The same effect can be obtained by the disaster countermeasure simulation method provided by the present invention and a storage medium containing a program for causing a computer to execute the method.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a drawing schematically showing a state of training on a disaster map currently being conducted.
FIG. 2 is a drawing schematically showing a state of disaster training based on the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a flow of scenario setting work.
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of a screen display during scenario editing work.
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the contents of scenario creation and player preparation until a disaster occurs.
FIG. 6 is a diagram (first half) showing a flow of simulation after the occurrence of a disaster.
FIG. 7 is a diagram (second half) showing the flow of simulation after the occurrence of a disaster.
FIG. 8 is a display example of implementation details and result information of air reconnaissance.
FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a display example of unit development and result information.
FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a simulation grasp screen by a controller.
FIG. 11 is a diagram showing a flow of a review meeting after the simulation is completed.
FIG. 12 is a diagram comparing the number of evacuees with and without disaster countermeasures.
FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a movement history of a unit.
FIG. 14 is a diagram showing the development of a fire fighting activity unit.
FIG. 15 is a diagram showing a comparison of the number of deaths depending on the presence or absence of disaster countermeasures.

Claims (12)

A controller computer that can store the configured disaster scenario;
A plurality of player computers capable of receiving at least one disaster countermeasure command and outputting a result of the command;
A disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus comprising communication means that enables data exchange between the controller computer and the plurality of player computers,
The disaster scenario includes basic information and detailed information about the disaster,
The basic information is information that is given from the controller computer to the player computer at the start of the disaster countermeasure simulation, and is provided to the related organizations as the first report when a disaster occurs,
The detailed information is information set in advance regarding the details of the disaster, but when the player takes measures necessary for the player to grasp the information without transmitting the information to the player in advance. This is the first information that is presented in the form of results,
The controller computer transmits only disaster basic information to the player computer to input a disaster countermeasure command,
Results for outputting the player computer, based on the detailed information to be referred in accordance with the basic information and commands, and state, and are not obtained according to the procedure set in advance,
Further, the disaster countermeasure command includes a command for inquiring a result obtained according to the preset procedure based on the basic information and detailed information referred to according to a command input by another player computer. der Ru disaster recovery simulation device. Each player computer can output a result of a command input to the player computer, and the controller computer can output a command input to all the player computers and a result of the command. The disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus according to claim 1.   Each of the controller computer and the player computer stores the preset procedure for obtaining a result for the disaster countermeasure command based on the disaster scenario, and each player computer has a command input to the computer. The disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the player computer and the controller computer each calculate a result based on the preset procedure. The command input to each player computer is also transmitted to the other player computers, the controller computer and the player computer calculate the results respectively, and the player computer outputs the results of the commands input to the other player computers. The disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the result of the command input to the player computer is calculated without outputting the output.   Only one of the controller computer and the player computer stores the preset procedure for obtaining the result for the disaster countermeasure command based on the disaster scenario, and each player computer inputs to the computer The transmitted command is transmitted to the controller computer, and only one of the player computer and the controller computer calculates the result based on the preset procedure, and transmits the result to the other. The disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus according to claim 1 or 2.   6. A process comprising a series of input commands and their results can be stored, and a specific simulation can be changed to continue a subsequent simulation. The disaster countermeasure simulation device described.   The disaster scenario may include data for identifying a disaster event, data for identifying an initial damage situation due to a disaster event, and data for identifying a means for disaster countermeasures. The disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus according to any one of 1 to 6.   The disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the disaster countermeasure command can include a countermeasure before the occurrence of a disaster and a countermeasure after the occurrence of the disaster.   The disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the result includes at least one of data indicating a damage situation, a human damage situation, and a physical damage situation obtained as a result of the investigation action. The basic information includes map information of the target area, weather information around the current location of the player, the detailed information includes damage occurrence information around the current location of the player , and the preset procedure includes action information of the player. The disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 9, which is a procedure for calculating damage occurrence information over time according to input information.   The disaster countermeasure simulation according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein a command is input by means for specifying a location according to a map on a screen displayed by a computer and means for specifying a command to be executed on the screen displayed by the computer. apparatus.   The disaster countermeasure simulation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the result is an output of a result calculated with the passage of time.

Images