KR20160001940A - Mine disaster management system and management method using the same - Google Patents

Mine disaster management system and management method using the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR20160001940A
KR20160001940A KR1020140080450A KR20140080450A KR20160001940A KR 20160001940 A KR20160001940 A KR 20160001940A KR 1020140080450 A KR1020140080450 A KR 1020140080450A KR 20140080450 A KR20140080450 A KR 20140080450A KR 20160001940 A KR20160001940 A KR 20160001940A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
questionnaire
file
risk
evaluation score
type
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020140080450A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Inventor
이성민
김선명
이연희
Original Assignee
영동대학교 산학협력단
이성민
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 영동대학교 산학협력단, 이성민 filed Critical 영동대학교 산학협력단
Priority to KR1020140080450A priority Critical patent/KR20160001940A/en
Publication of KR20160001940A publication Critical patent/KR20160001940A/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/02—Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/26—Government or public services

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

According to an embodiment of the present invention, a mine disaster management method comprises: a first transmission step of enabling a management server to transmit a survey file including a first survey chart having each process performed in the mine, a dangerous element corresponding to the process, and a first evaluation score for the dangerous element and a second survey chart having a dangerous degree and a first evaluation index corresponding to the dangerous degree; a second transmission step of enabling a worker terminal to transmit a response file including a first response file including the first survey chart in which the first evaluation score is inputted based on the first evaluation index after receiving the survey file; and a dangerous process determination step of enabling the management server to determine a dangerous process by comparing the total values in which the first evaluation scores in the first survey chart of the first response file are added in each process.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD [0001] The present invention relates to a mine disaster management system and a management method using the same,

The present invention relates to a mine disaster management system and a management method using the same, and more particularly, to a mine disaster management system that determines a risk process of a mine and determines priorities and priorities of the determined risk processes, And a management method using the same. 2. Description of the Related Art

It is widely known that most of the limestone mines in Korea are operated by open-pit mining, and therefore, they are operated with various difficulties such as serious environmental problems as well as direct and indirect social problems such as various complaints of the residents in the surrounding area . In recent years, limestone mines have made various efforts to develop sustainable mines while reducing such environmental, social and managerial problems. For example, mine mining or mooring of facilities (separation, sorting, etc.) can be considered as part of such efforts.

However, when mine mines or facilities are mangled in this way, it is necessary to review safety and safety of newly constructed underground large spaces as well as existing mine development spaces (tunnels) Disaster management for various risks is additionally needed to ensure the safety of workers.

The disasters in the mine are gradually decreasing trends. However, due to the nature of the work environment, it is easy to lead to personal injury in the event of a disaster, and direct or indirect damage can increase. For example, in Korea in August 2012 and August 2013, there was a collapse in the limestone mine in Jeongseon and Gangneung, resulting in the death or disappearance of workers who were working. In China, an annual death due to a mine accident It has reached 6,000 people and last year there were about 1,300 deaths (Yonhapnews, 2013).

In this way, disaster disasters such as the casualties caused by various causes have always occurred in the existing mine development process, and the disaster management for the newly constructed underground large space is being managed in consideration of the increasing tendency of the direct and indirect damage It is indispensable situation.

Korean Patent Publication No. 10-2012-0076494 (Jul.

The present invention provides a mine disaster management system capable of minimizing damage and maintaining continuity of work in the event of a disaster, and a management method using the same.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a mine disaster management system having an optimal site suitability and a management method using the same.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, a mine disaster management system includes: a first questionnaire table having an evaluation score of 1 for each of the processes in the mine and the risk factors corresponding to the process; A server memory in which a questionnaire file including a first questionnaire file having a second questionnaire table having an evaluation index 1 corresponding to the degree of risk is stored; and a server memory for storing the questionnaire file in the server memory, A management server including a transferable server processor; And

And a worker terminal for transmitting a response file including a first response file including the first questionnaire table in which the evaluation score 1 is selected based on the evaluation index 1 of the questionnaire file transmitted from the management server do.

The server processor may further include a risk process determining unit for determining a risk process by comparing the first questionnaire table of the first response file with a total value obtained by adding the evaluation score 1 to each process.

The questionnaire file includes a third questionnaire table having an evaluation score of 2 corresponding to the type of damage caused by the disaster, a second questionnaire table having a significance degree and a fourth questionnaire table having an evaluation index of 2 corresponding to the importance, Survey files can be included.

The response file may include a second response file having a third questionnaire table in which the evaluation score 2 is selected based on the evaluation score 2.

The server processor may further include a damage type evaluating unit comparing the magnitude of the relative value calculated by comparing the evaluation score 2 of the damage type on a one-to-one basis to determine an important damage type.

And the damage type evaluation unit may calculate a total of the relative values corresponding to the damage types.

The server processor may include a weight calculation unit for calculating the relative weight and the weight to calculate the individual weight and the average weight. In this case, the individual load value is a value obtained by dividing the relative value by the total, and the average weight may be an average of the individual load values.

The questionnaire file includes a third questionnaire file having a fifth questionnaire table having an item of the damage type corresponding to the related task, which is a task preceded and followed by the dangerous process determined by the risk process determining unit, and a third questionnaire file can do.

The response file may include a third response file having the fifth questionnaire table in which the item value is selected and input.

Wherein the server processor calculates an average value of the item values in the fifth questionnaire table and calculates a total weight for each business unit by adding individual weights for each business unit multiplied by the average value of the damage type to the average value; As shown in FIG.

According to another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a mine disaster management method comprising the steps of: each management server performing a process in a mine; a first questionnaire having an evaluation score of 1 for a risk element corresponding to the process; A first transmission step of transmitting a questionnaire file including a first questionnaire file including a second questionnaire table having an evaluation index 1 corresponding to the degree of risk and the degree of risk; A second transmission step of, after receiving the questionnaire file, transmitting a response file including a first response file including the first questionnaire table in which the evaluation score 1 is selected based on the evaluation index 1 ; And a risk process determination step of the management server comparing the total score obtained by adding the evaluation score 1 to each of the processes in the first questionnaire table of the first response file to determine a risk process.

The questionnaire file includes a third questionnaire table having an evaluation score of 2 corresponding to the type of damage caused by the disaster, a second questionnaire table having a significance degree and a fourth questionnaire table having an evaluation index of 2 corresponding to the importance, Survey files can be included.

The response file may include a second response file having a third questionnaire table in which the evaluation score 2 is selected based on the evaluation score 2.

The mine disaster management method may further include a damage type determination step of comparing the magnitude of the relative value calculated by comparing the evaluation score 2 of the damage type one by one and determining the important damage type.

The mine disaster management method may further include calculating a total sum of the relative values corresponding to the damage type and calculating the individual weights and the average weights by calculating the relative value and the total amount .

In this case, the individual load value is a value obtained by dividing the relative value by the total, and the average weight may be an average of the individual load values.

The questionnaire file includes a third questionnaire file having a fifth questionnaire table having an item of the damage type corresponding to the related task, which is a task preceded and followed by the dangerous process determined by the risk process determining unit, and a third questionnaire file can do.

The response file may include a third response file having the fifth questionnaire table in which the item value is selected and input.

Wherein the mine disaster management method calculates an average value of the item values in the fifth questionnaire table and calculates a total weighting value for each business unit by summing the individual weights of the business units multiplied by the average value of the damage type The method may further comprise:

The mine disaster management method comprising: a third transmission step of the management server transmitting the risk process determined in the risk process determination step; And a fourth transmission step of transmitting related tasks to the management server, which are tasks preceding and following the dangerous process selected and input by the administrator terminal.

Effects of the mine disaster management system and the management method using the same according to the present invention are as follows.

First, there is an advantage that damage can be minimized and continuity of work can be maintained in the event of a disaster.

Second, it has the advantage of having optimal site suitability by assessing business impacts and managing disasters.

1 is a schematic block diagram of a mine disaster management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary configuration of a worker terminal to which the present invention is applied.
FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary configuration of a management server to which the present invention is applied.
4 is a control flowchart of a mine disaster management method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The embodiments of the present invention can be modified in various forms, and the scope of the present invention should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments described below. The embodiments are provided to explain the present invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention belongs. Accordingly, the shape of each element shown in the drawings may be exaggerated to emphasize a clearer description.

It is to be understood that when an element is referred to as being "connected" or "connected" to another element, it may be directly connected or connected to the other element, . On the other hand, when an element is referred to as being "directly connected" or "directly connected" to another element, it should be understood that there are no other elements in between.

1 is a schematic block diagram of a mine disaster management system according to an embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 1, a management server 200 is connected to an operator terminal 100 and an administrator terminal 300 through an external communication network 150. The management server 200 transmits the questionnaire file to the worker terminal 100 via the communication network 150 and the worker terminal 100 transmits the response file to the management server 200. [ The management server 200 transmits the risk process to be described later to the administrator terminal 300 via the communication network 150 and the administrator terminal 300 transmits the related service to be described later to the management server 200. [

FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary configuration of a worker terminal to which the present invention is applied.

Referring to FIG. 2, the worker terminal 100 includes a terminal processor 110, a user interface 120, a terminal memory 130, and a terminal communication unit 150. At this time, the worker terminal 100 may be a computer, a smart phone, a notebook, a netbook, or the like.

The terminal processor 110 controls overall control of the worker terminal 100 and in particular the terminal processor 110 controls the user interface 120, the terminal memory 130 and the terminal communication unit 140. The terminal processor 110 transmits the response file generated by the operator to the questionnaire file transmitted from the management server 200 and transmitted to the management server 200 through the terminal communication unit 140 and the communication network 150. [

The user interface 120 serves as an interface between the worker terminal 100 and the worker, and includes an input unit 121 and a display unit 123. The input unit 121 includes a key board and a key pad. The display unit 123 displays a questionnaire file and the like to the operator. The operator uses the input unit 121 to receive a request from the management server 200 You can select and enter the sent survey file.

The terminal memory 130 stores data used in the worker terminal 100. In particular, the terminal memory 130 stores a questionnaire file transmitted from the management server 200, a response file generated by the operator selecting and inputting the questionnaire file, and the like .

The terminal communication unit 140 is responsible for communication with the management server 200 through the external communication network 150 and is responsible for transmission and reception through the external communication network 150.

When the dangerous process is transmitted from the management server 200, the administrator terminal 300 selectively inputs related tasks, which are tasks preceding and following the dangerous process, and transmits the selected tasks to the management server 200. The configuration of the operator terminal 100 can be similarly applied to the administrator terminal 300, and thus the description of the configuration of the administrator terminal 300 will be omitted.

FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary configuration of a management server to which the present invention is applied. Referring to FIG. 3, the management server 200 includes a server processor 210, a server memory 220, and a server communication unit 230 for determining business priorities for mine disaster management.

The server memory 220 may store the questionnaire file generated by the questionnaire file management unit 211, the response file transmitted from the worker terminal 100, and the data transmitted from the administrator terminal 300. The questionnaire file may include a first questionnaire file, a second questionnaire file, and a third questionnaire file, and the answer file may include a first answer file, a second answer file, and a third answer file.

The first questionnaire file includes a first questionnaire table and a second questionnaire table. The first questionnaire table includes each process in the mine, the risk factors corresponding to the process, and the score 1 of the risk factors, as shown in Table 1 below. The second questionnaire table includes the degree of risk and the evaluation index 1 corresponding to the degree of risk as shown in Table 2 below. The operator selects and inputs the evaluation score 1 of the first questionnaire table by referring to the evaluation index 1 of the second questionnaire table.

fair Risk factor Score 1


The first step (blowing, drilling)



One Accidents caused by poor safety equipment 2 Simultaneous puncturing and charging explosion 3 Explosion by unexploded 4 Delayed explosion due to carelessness 5 Roof depression due to explosion vibration 6 Inattention due to carelessness 7 Accidents caused by scattered dust 8 Rocks falling near weakened ground

Second step (mining)


One Ceiling depression and fallout 2 Collapse due to improper column 3 Overdrawing due to excessive excavation 4 Collapse by groundwater and surface water 5 Rockfall in the soft zone 6 Accident caused by sudden irrigation

The third process (loading, transportation)
One Accidents caused by poor safety equipment 2 Accident caused by sudden machine operation and maintenance 3 Worker crash 4 Traffic accident during work

Fourth step (shredding, sorting)
One Accident caused by carelessness of operator 2 Accidents due to violation of safety regulations 3 Accident by ore crushing from crusher 4 Accident caused by automatic system error

Step 5 (Maintenance)
One Health risks due to poor working conditions 2 Fire Diffusion Risk 3 Accident caused by bad electrical wiring 4 Accident caused by no safety device

Rating index 1 One 2 3 4 5 Degree of danger Very high height usually lowness Very low

The second questionnaire file includes a third questionnaire table and a fourth questionnaire table. The third questionnaire table includes the damage type due to the disaster and the evaluation score 2 corresponding to the damage type, as shown in Table 3 below. The fourth questionnaire table includes an importance score and an evaluation score 2 corresponding to the importance as shown in Table 4 below.

Type of damage Score 2 Type 1 (property damage) Type 2 (personal injury) Type 3 (social damage) Type 4 (interdepartmental business interruption) Type 5 (suspension of external linkage business)

Rating index 2 One 2 3 4 5 Criticality Generally important Slightly important Essentially important Very important Absolutely important

The third questionnaire file includes a fifth questionnaire table having related tasks, tasks preceding and following the dangerous process, and item values of the type of damage corresponding to the task concerned. At this time, related work may include safety management, regular and emergency management, gemstone procurement, crushing and screening, product management, and linked work management.

The first response file includes the first questionnaire table in which the worker selects and inputs the evaluation score 1 using the evaluation index 1 of the second questionnaire table. That is, referring to Table 5 below, it can be seen that the evaluation score 1 is selected and input by the operator.

fair Risk factor Score 1


The first step (blowing, drilling)



One Accidents caused by poor safety equipment 3 2 Simultaneous puncturing and charging explosion 5 3 Explosion by unexploded 5 4 Delayed explosion due to carelessness 5 5 Roof depression due to explosion vibration 5 6 Inattention due to carelessness 2 7 Accidents caused by scattered dust 3 8 Rocks falling near weakened ground 3

Second step (mining)


One Ceiling depression and fallout 3 2 Collapse due to improper column 4 3 Overdrawing due to excessive excavation 5 4 Collapse by groundwater and surface water 4 5 Rockfall in the soft zone 3 6 Accident caused by sudden irrigation 5

The third process (loading, transportation)
One Accidents caused by poor safety equipment 2 2 Accident caused by sudden machine operation and maintenance 2 3 Worker crash 2 4 Traffic accident during work 2

Fourth step (shredding, sorting)
One Accident caused by carelessness of operator 2 2 Accidents due to violation of safety regulations 2 3 Accident by ore crushing from crusher 2 4 Accident caused by automatic system error 4

Step 5 (Maintenance)
One Health risks due to poor working conditions 3 2 Fire Diffusion Risk 4 3 Accident caused by bad electrical wiring 4 4 Accident caused by no safety device 3

The second response file includes a third questionnaire table in which an evaluation score 2 is selected and inputted by the operator. That is, referring to Table 6 below, it can be seen that the evaluation score 2 is selected and input by the operator.

Type of damage Score 2 Type 1 (property damage) One Type 2 (personal injury) 2 Type 3 (social damage) 3 Type 4 (interdepartmental business interruption) 4 Type 5 (suspension of external linkage business) 5

The third response file includes a fifth questionnaire table in which an item value is selected and input by the administrator.

The server processor 210 controls the overall control of the management server 200 and controls the server memory 220 and the server communication unit 230 in particular. The server processor 210 analyzes the response file received from the worker terminal 100 and derives the related business priorities. The server processor 210 includes a questionnaire file management unit 211, a risk process determination unit 213, a damage type evaluation unit 215, A weight calculation unit 217 and a priority determination unit 219. [

The questionnaire file management unit 211 may generate a questionnaire file including the first questionnaire file, the second questionnaire file, and the third questionnaire file, and may store the questionnaire file in the server memory 220. [ The saved questionnaire file is transmitted to the worker terminal 100 by the server communication unit 230 of the server processor 210.

The dangerous process determination unit 213 analyzes the first response file transmitted from the worker terminal 100 to determine the dangerous process. The management server 200 determines the risk process by comparing the sum of the sum of the evaluation scores for each process in the first questionnaire table of the first response file. For example, as shown in [Table 5], it can be seen that the total score of the fourth step (fracture, classification) is 10, which is smaller than other processes. Therefore, the fourth process is determined as a hazardous process. At this time, the dangerous process determining unit 213 transmits the second questionnaire file to the worker terminal 100, and transmits the dangerous process to the administrator terminal 300. [

The damage type evaluation unit 215 analyzes the second response file transmitted from the worker terminal 100 to determine an important damage type. For example, as shown in Table 6 below, the management server 200 calculates a relative value by comparing (dividing) the evaluation scores of each damage type on a one-to-one basis by using the second response file, Determine the type of critical damage by comparing sizes. In addition, the management server 200 calculates the total of the relative values for each type of damage.

Looking at Table 7 below, it can be seen that Type 2 (personal injury) is about 4.76 times more important than Type 1 (property damage). In other words, it can be seen that type 2 is determined to be the most important type of damage with the greatest importance.

type Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 Type 1 1.00 0.21 3.40 3.60 1.20 Type 2 4.76 1.00 4.40 4.60 4.40 Type 3 0.29 0.23 1.00 1.00 0.28 Type 4 0.28 0.22 1.00 1.00 0.27 Type 5 0.83 0.23 3.53 3.66 1.00 sum 7.17 1.88 13.33 13.86 7.16

The weight calculation unit 217 calculates the individual weights A, B, C, D, and E and the average weight W using the relative value and the total calculated by the damage type evaluation unit 215. [ In this case, the individual weight for each type is (relative value / total), and the average weight W is an average value of the individual load values A, B, C, D and E. For example, as shown in Table 8 below, the individual weights of type 1 are 0.14, 0.11, 0.26, 0.26, and 0.17, and the average weight is (0.14 + 0.11 + 0.26 + 0.26 + 0.17) / 5? 0.19. Therefore, comparing the average weights of each type, it can be seen that the average weight of type 2 (human injury) is relatively high from the minimum of about 2.6 times to the maximum of about 7 times, compared with the average weight of the other types.

type Type 1 (A) Type 2 (B) Type 3 (C) Type 4 (D) Type 5 (E) Average Weight (W) Type 1 0.14 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.17 0.19 Type 2 0.66 0.53 0.33 0.33 0.61 0.49 Type 3 0.04 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.07 Type 4 0.04 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.07 Type 5 0.12 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.14 0.18 sum 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

The priority determining unit 219 calculates an average value of each item value in the fifth questionnaire table and calculates the total weight per business unit by adding individual weights by business units multiplied by the average weight of each type. The management server 200 can smoothly maintain business continuity even in the event of a disaster by determining business priorities in descending order of the total weight value. For example, as shown in Table 9 below, the total weight in the safety management (K) = (A * F) + (B * G) + (C * H) + ). In other words, it is shown that the total workload management with total weight of 0.68 is the most important work to be considered in order to maintain business continuity in the event of a disaster, and the total weight of gemstone procurement work is 0.41 Respectively.

Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 Total weight Job ranking Average Weight (W) 0.19 (A) 0.49 (B) 0.07 (C) 0.07 (D) 0.18 (E) safety management 0.15 (F) 0.23 (G) 0.46 (H) 0.23 (I) 0.15 (J) 0.22 (K) 5 Regular and emergency management 0.15 0.23 0.31 0.23 0.00 0.18 6 Gemstone procurement 0.46 0.38 0.85 0.85 0.08 0.41 2 Crushing and screening 0.31 0.23 0.77 0.77 0.08 0.29 3 Product Management 0.31 0.23 0.77 0.77 0.00 0.28 4 Manage linked tasks 0.85 0.77 0.85 1.00 0.08 0.68 One

The server memory 220 stores data used in the management server 100. In particular, the server memory 220 stores a questionnaire file, a response file transmitted from the worker terminal 100, a response file transmitted from the administrator terminal 300, .

The server communication unit 230 communicates with the operator terminal 100 and the administrator terminal 300 through the external communication network 150 and is responsible for transmission and reception through the external communication network 150.

4 is a control flowchart of a mine disaster management method according to an embodiment of the present invention.

First, the management server 200 transmits the first questionnaire file to the worker terminal 100 (S10). The first questionnaire file includes a first questionnaire table as shown in Table 1 and a second questionnaire table as shown in Table 2 above.

Next, the worker terminal 100 transmits the first response file including the first questionnaire table in which the worker inputs the evaluation score 1, as shown in Table 5, to the management server 200 (S20).

Next, the management server 200 analyzes the first response file transmitted from the worker terminal 100 in step S20, and determines a dangerous process (S30). The management server 200 determines the risk process by comparing the sum of the sum of the evaluation scores 1 for each process in the first questionnaire table of the first response file. For example, as shown in Table 5, it can be seen that the sum of evaluation scores of the fourth process (crushing, classification) is 10, which is smaller than other processes. Therefore, the fourth process is determined as a hazardous process.

Next, the management server 200 transmits the second questionnaire file to the worker terminal 100 (S40). As shown in Table 3, the second questionnaire file includes a third questionnaire table including an evaluation score 2 for the type of damage caused by the disaster and the damage type, and a fourth questionnaire table including the evaluation index 2, as shown in Table 4 .

Next, the worker terminal 100 transmits a second response file including the third questionnaire table in which the evaluation score 2 is selected and inputted by the operator to the management server 200 (S50) as shown in Table 6.

The management server 200 analyzes the second response file transmitted from the worker terminal 100 in step S50 and determines an important damage type (S60). For example, as shown in Table 6, the management server 200 calculates a relative value obtained by comparing (dividing) the evaluation score 2 of each damage type on a one-to-one basis by using the second response file, To determine the type of critical damage. In addition, the management server 200 calculates the total of the relative values for each type of damage.

Looking at Table 6 above, it can be seen that Type 2 (personal injury) is about 4.76 times more important than Type 1 (property damage). In other words, it can be seen that type 2 is determined to be the most important type of damage with the greatest importance.

Next, the management server 200 calculates the individual weights A, B, C, D, and E and the average weight W using the relative value and the total calculated in step S60 (S70). In this case, the individual weight for each type is (relative value / total), and the average weight W is an average value of the individual load values A, B, C, D and E. For example, as shown in Table 8, the individual weights of type 1 are 0.14, 0.11, 0.26, 0.26, and 0.17, and the average weight is (0.14 + 0.11 + 0.26 + 0.26 + 0.17) / 5? 0.19. Therefore, comparing the average weights of each type, it can be seen that the average weight of type 2 (human injury) is relatively high from the minimum of about 2.6 times to the maximum of about 7 times, compared with the average weight of the other types.

Next, the management server 200 transmits the risk process determined in step S30 to the administrator terminal 300 (S80).

Next, the administrator terminal 300 transmits the related tasks, which are the tasks preceding and following the dangerous process selected and input by the administrator, to the management server 200 (S90). At this time, related work may include safety management, regular and emergency management, gemstone procurement, crushing and screening, product management, and linked work management.

In step S80, the management server 200 may transmit the risk process to the worker terminal 300. At this time, in step S90, the worker terminal 100 transmits the related job to the management server 200 do.

Next, the management server 200 transmits a third questionnaire file including the fifth questionnaire table including the related task and the damage type item value for the related task to the worker terminal 100 (S100).

Next, the worker terminal 100 transmits a third response file including the fifth questionnaire table in which the item values are selected and input to the fifth questionnaire table by the operator, to the management server 200 (S110).

Next, the management server 200 calculates an average value of each item value in the fifth questionnaire table, and calculates the total weight per business unit by summing the individual weights by business units multiplied by the average weight of each type. The management server 200 can smoothly maintain business continuity even in the event of a disaster by determining business priorities in descending order of the total weight value. For example, as shown in Table 9, the total weight in the safety management (K) = (A * F) + (B * G) + (C * H) + ). In other words, it is shown that the total workload management with total weight of 0.68 is the most important work to be considered in order to maintain business continuity in the event of a disaster, and the total weight of gemstone procurement work is 0.41 Respectively.

As a result, the mine disaster management system according to the present embodiment and the management method using the same determine the risk process of the mine and determine the priority of the business between the determined and preceding tasks of the determined process, thereby minimizing the damage And maintain business continuity.

Although the present invention has been described in detail by way of preferred embodiments thereof, other forms of embodiment are possible. Therefore, the technical idea and scope of the claims set forth below are not limited to the preferred embodiments.

100: worker terminal 110: terminal processor
120: user interface 130: terminal memory
140: terminal communication unit 150: communication network
200: management server 210: server processor
220: server memory 230: server communication section
300: administrator terminal

Claims (9)

A first questionnaire table having an evaluation score of 1 for each of the processes in the mine, the risk factors corresponding to the processes, and the risk factors, and a second questionnaire table having the degree of risk and the evaluation index 1 corresponding to the degree of risk A server memory for storing a questionnaire file including a first questionnaire file,
A management server including a server processor capable of generating the questionnaire file, storing the questionnaire file in the server memory, and transmitting the questionnaire file; And
And a worker terminal for transmitting a response file including a first response file including the first questionnaire table in which the evaluation score 1 is selected based on the evaluation index 1 of the questionnaire file transmitted from the management server Mine disaster management system.
The server processor
And a risk process determining unit for determining a risk process by comparing the sum of the evaluation score 1 for each process with the first questionnaire table of the first response file. The method according to claim 1,
The questionnaire file includes a third questionnaire table having an evaluation score of 2 corresponding to the type of damage caused by the disaster, a second questionnaire table having a significance degree and a fourth questionnaire table having an evaluation index of 2 corresponding to the importance, Includes survey files,
Wherein the response file includes a second response file having a third questionnaire table in which the evaluation score 2 is selected based on the evaluation score 2,
Wherein the server processor further comprises a damage type evaluation unit for comparing the magnitude of the relative value calculated by comparing the evaluation score of the damage type one by one and determining the important damage type. The method of claim 2,
Wherein the damage type evaluation unit calculates a total of the relative values corresponding to the damage type,
Wherein the server processor includes a weight calculation unit for calculating the relative weight and the weight by calculating the relative value and the total weight,
Wherein the individual load value is a value obtained by dividing the relative value by the total, and the average weight is an average of the individual load values. The method of claim 3,
The questionnaire file includes a third questionnaire file having a fifth questionnaire table having an item of the damage type corresponding to the related task, which is a task preceded and followed by the dangerous process determined by the risk process determining unit, and a third questionnaire file In addition,
Wherein the response file includes a third response file including the fifth questionnaire table in which the item value is selected and input,
Wherein the server processor calculates an average value of the item values in the fifth questionnaire table and calculates a total weight for each business unit by adding individual weights for each business unit multiplied by the average value of the damage type to the average value; Wherein the mine disaster management system further comprises: Wherein the management server comprises a first questionnaire table having an evaluation score of 1 for each of the processes performed in the mine and corresponding to the process, the risk factor, and a second questionnaire table having a rating level of 1 corresponding to the degree of risk and the degree of risk, A first transmission step of transmitting a questionnaire file including a first questionnaire file having a questionnaire table;
A second transmission step of, after receiving the questionnaire file, transmitting a response file including a first response file including the first questionnaire table in which the evaluation score 1 is selected based on the evaluation index 1 ; And
And a risk process determining step of the management server comparing the sum of the evaluation score 1 for each process to the first questionnaire table of the first response file to determine a risk process, . The method of claim 5,
The questionnaire file includes a third questionnaire table having an evaluation score of 2 corresponding to the type of damage caused by the disaster, a second questionnaire table having a significance degree and a fourth questionnaire table having an evaluation index of 2 corresponding to the importance, Includes survey files,
Wherein the response file includes a second response file having a third questionnaire table in which the evaluation score 2 is selected based on the evaluation score 2,
Wherein the mine disaster management method further includes a damage type determination step of determining an important damage type by comparing the magnitude of the relative value calculated by comparing the evaluation score 2 of the damage type one to one. The method of claim 6,
The mine disaster management method
Calculating a total sum of the relative values corresponding to the damage type, computing the relative value and the total, and calculating individual weights and average weights,
Wherein the individual load value is a value obtained by dividing the relative value by the total, and the average weight is an average of the individual load values. The method of claim 7,
The questionnaire file includes a third questionnaire file having a fifth questionnaire table having an item of the damage type corresponding to the related task, which is a task preceded and followed by the dangerous process determined by the risk process determining unit, and a third questionnaire file In addition,
Wherein the response file includes a third response file including the fifth questionnaire table in which the item value is selected and input,
The mine disaster management method
Calculating a total weight for each business unit by calculating an average value of the item values in the fifth questionnaire table and adding the individual weights for each business unit obtained by multiplying the average value by the average weight of the damage type; Mine disaster management method. The method of claim 8,
The mine disaster management method
A third transmission step of the management server transmitting the risk process determined in the risk process determination step; And
And a fourth transmission step of transmitting, to the management server, related tasks, which are tasks preceding and following the dangerous process selected and input by the administrator terminal.
KR1020140080450A 2014-06-30 2014-06-30 Mine disaster management system and management method using the same KR20160001940A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020140080450A KR20160001940A (en) 2014-06-30 2014-06-30 Mine disaster management system and management method using the same

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020140080450A KR20160001940A (en) 2014-06-30 2014-06-30 Mine disaster management system and management method using the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20160001940A true KR20160001940A (en) 2016-01-07

Family

ID=55168677

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020140080450A KR20160001940A (en) 2014-06-30 2014-06-30 Mine disaster management system and management method using the same

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR20160001940A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101893341B1 (en) * 2017-03-29 2018-08-31 대한민국 Method of constructing risk register
KR20190040848A (en) * 2017-10-11 2019-04-19 양경옥 Method and Apparatus for Safety Information Generation by Reading Schedule Bar Charts in Construction and Industrial Project
KR20190040847A (en) * 2017-10-11 2019-04-19 양경옥 Method and Apparatus for Safety Information Generation by Reading Daily Job-site Work Reports in Construction and Industrial Project
CN111967141A (en) * 2020-07-21 2020-11-20 中煤科工开采研究院有限公司 Impact risk static evaluation method and system, storage medium and computing device
KR20210105030A (en) 2020-02-18 2021-08-26 우석대학교 산학협력단 Business impact analysis method for identifying the core business
KR20220115211A (en) 2021-02-10 2022-08-17 우석대학교 산학협력단 Risk assessment method for functional continuity

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20120076494A (en) 2010-11-26 2012-07-09 주식회사 휴텍이일 Mine safety surveilance system

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20120076494A (en) 2010-11-26 2012-07-09 주식회사 휴텍이일 Mine safety surveilance system

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101893341B1 (en) * 2017-03-29 2018-08-31 대한민국 Method of constructing risk register
KR20190040848A (en) * 2017-10-11 2019-04-19 양경옥 Method and Apparatus for Safety Information Generation by Reading Schedule Bar Charts in Construction and Industrial Project
KR20190040847A (en) * 2017-10-11 2019-04-19 양경옥 Method and Apparatus for Safety Information Generation by Reading Daily Job-site Work Reports in Construction and Industrial Project
KR20210119353A (en) * 2017-10-11 2021-10-05 양경옥 Method and Apparatus for Safety Information Generation by Reading Daily Job-site Work Reports in Construction and Industrial Project
KR20210119931A (en) * 2017-10-11 2021-10-06 양경옥 Method and Apparatus for Safety Information Generation by Reading Daily Job-site Work Reports in Construction and Industrial Project
KR20210154793A (en) * 2017-10-11 2021-12-21 양경옥 Apparatus for Safety Information Generation by Reading Schedule Bar Charts in Construction and Industrial Project
KR20210154794A (en) * 2017-10-11 2021-12-21 양경옥 Method for Safety Information Generation by Reading Schedule Bar Charts in Construction and Industrial Project
KR20210105030A (en) 2020-02-18 2021-08-26 우석대학교 산학협력단 Business impact analysis method for identifying the core business
CN111967141A (en) * 2020-07-21 2020-11-20 中煤科工开采研究院有限公司 Impact risk static evaluation method and system, storage medium and computing device
CN111967141B (en) * 2020-07-21 2023-12-19 中煤科工开采研究院有限公司 Impact danger static evaluation method and system, storage medium and computing device
KR20220115211A (en) 2021-02-10 2022-08-17 우석대학교 산학협력단 Risk assessment method for functional continuity

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR20160001940A (en) Mine disaster management system and management method using the same
Komljenovic et al. Injuries in US mining operations–A preliminary risk analysis
Sari et al. Stochastic modeling of accident risks associated with an underground coal mine in Turkey
Zhang et al. Geotechnical risk management to prevent coal outburst in room-and-pillar mining
Onder Evaluation of occupational injuries with lost days among opencast coal mine workers through logistic regression models
KR20170006095A (en) Safety managing system and method for construction site and industries
Goh et al. Investigating the adequacy of horizontal lifeline system design through case studies from Singapore
Joughin et al. A risk evaluation model for support design in Bushveld Complex underground mines: Part I-Description of the model
Boudreau-Trudel et al. Introduction of innovative equipment in mining: impact on occupational health and safety
Kosała et al. Analysis of noise pollution in an andesite quarry with the use of simulation studies and evaluation indices
PERMANA RISK ASSESSMENT AS A STRATEGY TO PREVENT OF MINE ACCIDENTS IN INDONESIAN MINING.
Vongpisal et al. Construction accidents in Thailand: Statistical data analysis
WO2016002977A1 (en) Mine disaster management system and management method using same
Anggraini et al. Development of work breakdown structure standard for safety planning on stadium construction work based on risk
Chen et al. Cause analysis of construction safety accidents in China using association rules
KR101957982B1 (en) Security activity smart tool box meeting system using beacon tag
Kirsch et al. Reflections on mining and mortality
KR102360573B1 (en) BIM-based Risk Assessment of Structural Occurrence Disaster for Construction Site Safety Management
Kecojevic et al. Hazard identification for equipment-related fatal incidents in the US underground coal mining
Mason Occupational fatalities resulting from falls in the oil and gas extraction industry, United States, 2005–2014
Mandal Implementation of DGMS guidelines for ergonomics risk assessment of mining operations
Taylor et al. Understanding the ALARP Concept: Its Origin and Application
Bueno et al. Influence of the flexibility of beams and slabs in static response and dynamic properties
PERMANA et al. MINING ACCIDENT ANALYSIS IN INDONESIA (PRIMA SYSTEM).
Vlachos Certifiable risk management & business continuity approach in mining industry

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A201 Request for examination
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
E90F Notification of reason for final refusal
E701 Decision to grant or registration of patent right