KR20140117639A - Bulkhead for ship - Google Patents

Bulkhead for ship Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR20140117639A
KR20140117639A KR1020147023937A KR20147023937A KR20140117639A KR 20140117639 A KR20140117639 A KR 20140117639A KR 1020147023937 A KR1020147023937 A KR 1020147023937A KR 20147023937 A KR20147023937 A KR 20147023937A KR 20140117639 A KR20140117639 A KR 20140117639A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
ribs
buckling
partition wall
face
portions
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020147023937A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Other versions
KR101492785B1 (en
Inventor
나리아키 나카야스
료오이치 간노
고오지 한야
유우지 후나츠
게이이치 사토오
Original Assignee
신닛테츠스미킨 카부시키카이샤
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 신닛테츠스미킨 카부시키카이샤 filed Critical 신닛테츠스미킨 카부시키카이샤
Publication of KR20140117639A publication Critical patent/KR20140117639A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of KR101492785B1 publication Critical patent/KR101492785B1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B3/00Hulls characterised by their structure or component parts
    • B63B3/14Hull parts
    • B63B3/56Bulkheads; Bulkhead reinforcements
    • B63B3/60Bulkheads; Bulkhead reinforcements with curved or corrugated plating

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Body Structure For Vehicles (AREA)
  • Filling Or Discharging Of Gas Storage Vessels (AREA)

Abstract

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to provide a marine bulkhead capable of preventing the buckling of a bulkhead by suppressing the increase in the weight of the bulkhead as much as possible while securing a proof against the compression load in the vertical direction necessary for the bulkhead.
A plurality of face members extending in the vertical direction and formed in a plate shape along the width direction of the partition wall are alternately projected on the front face side and the rear face side of the partition wall There is provided a ship bulkhead provided with a rib at a buckling risk point A in a range of 95% or more and 100% or less from an upper end of a height in the vertical direction of each of the face material portions in the ship bulkhead.

Figure P1020147023937

Description

{BULKHEAD FOR SHIP}

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention [0001] The present invention relates to a bulkhead made of a metal back plate for partitioning a ship's porthole, and more particularly, To a bulkhead for ships having a high buckling strength against compression load.

For example, in a ship such as a bulk carrier that carries an ore or the like to be a raw material of iron or a non-ferrous metal, a dock is partitioned by a bulkhead formed of a metal plate, and a plurality of dock spaces are formed. As a partition wall for partitioning the hold, a plurality of face members extending in the vertical direction and formed in a flat plate shape along the width direction of the partition wall are alternately arranged on the front surface side and the rear surface side of the partition wall surface It is general that a partition wall having a protruded waveform is adopted.

However, when the ore or the like is transported, the ore space is filled with ore in the forward route toward the destination, while in the return route, the seawater is in a state of being loaded to adjust the hull of the ship It is normal. Therefore, a bending moment acts on the bulkhead partitioning the pail for a long time by a shipment such as ore or seawater. In particular, when loading seawater, it is common to intermittently load seawater on a plurality of docks in order to balance the weight of the hull. In such a case, the partition wall is in a state in which a substantially vertical compression load acts by the bending moment, so that there is a possibility that the partition wall buckles when an excessive compressive load acts on the partition wall by seawater or the like.

Therefore, in order to strengthen the buckling strength of the partition, it is necessary to increase the plate thickness of the metal plate itself forming the partition, or to increase the thickness of the metal plate itself, for example, as described in Patent Document 1, The concave portion of the concave portion is covered with a metal plate, and concrete is filled in the concave portion to improve the proof strength of the partition. However, in the case of increasing the plate thickness of the metal plate forming the partition, or adopting the means as in Patent Document 1, it is possible to improve the proof stress as the entire partition, but the problem that the weight of the partition itself increases significantly there was. In recent ships, weight reduction of the hull is regarded as one of the most important problems and there is a tendency to conserve resource materials. Therefore, there is a problem in increasing the plate thickness and employing the technique of Patent Document 1.

In order to reduce the weight of the partition, for example, as described in Patent Document 2, a rib is provided in a member (web portion) for coupling the protruding face portion in the front-rear direction of the partition, and the bending stiffness Is proposed. However, when the means as in Patent Document 2 is employed, it is possible to increase the bending rigidity of the web portion. However, it is general that the deformation performance is not required in the partition member and the proof stress is expected in general. The bending stiffness is often determined by the buckling strength of the face member portion. Therefore, there is a problem that employing the same technology as that of Patent Document 2 is not effective in reducing the weight of the partition wall.

In addition, when a bending moment is applied to a partition wall defining a ship by a shipment such as ore or seawater, the bending moment acts largely with respect to the upward and downward directions, as compared with the central portion in the vertical direction of the partition. That is, the compressive load generated in the flange portion of the partition is not constant in the longitudinal direction. Patent Literature 1 and Patent Literature 2 do not take into account the action distribution of bending moment (or compression load) peculiar to such a ship's pier. Conventional techniques improve the buckling strength of the bulkhead and reduce the weight of the bulkhead efficiently There is a problem that it can not be realized at the same time.

Japanese Patent Publication No. 2006-507984 Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 62-227889

An object of the present invention is to provide a marine bulkhead capable of preventing buckling of a bulkhead by suppressing the increase in the weight of the bulkhead as much as possible while securing a proof against the compression load in the vertical direction necessary for the bulkhead. Specifically, by adopting such a method as improving the buckling resistance against a range suitable for the proof strength of the bulkhead in accordance with the action distribution of the peculiar bending moment of the ship different from that of the column in the building field, etc., And improvement of the buckling strength at the same time.

In order to solve the above-described problems, according to the present invention, there is provided a partition wall made of a metal back plate for partitioning a ship's hold, comprising a plurality of face members extending in the vertical direction and formed in a plate shape along the width direction of the partition, Wherein the ribs are provided at at least a buckling risk point A in a range of 95% or more and 100% or less from an upper end of the height of each of the face materials in the vertical direction, / RTI >

In the ship bulkhead, ribs may also be provided at least at a buckling risk area B in a range of 90% or more and less than 95% from the top part and a buckling risk area C in a range of 0% or more and 10% or less from the top part.

In addition, ribs may be provided on the marine bulkhead at at least a buckling danger zone D in the range of 30% or more and 70% or less from the upper end.

Further, in the marine bulkhead, the rib may be provided only in the buckling danger region. The buckling danger zone here refers to at least one of the buckling risk areas A to D. [

Further, the ribs may be provided over the entire length in the vertical direction of each face material portion.

Further, in at least a part of the buckling risk regions, the load of the flange portion may be configured so as to be less than a maximum generated stress in the range of the buckling risk portion in a state where the rib is not provided.

Further, the ribs provided at the buckling hazardous portions A and B may have a tapered shape that widens toward the downward direction in the vertical direction.

The ribs provided on the buckling danger portion C may have a tapered shape that widens toward the upper side in the vertical direction.

The rib may be formed in a flat plate shape, and the plate surface of the rib may be fixed so as to be perpendicular to the plate surface of the face plate portion.

The protruding length of the rib from the plate surface of the face plate portion may be not less than 2 times and not more than 15 times the plate thickness of the face plate portion.

Further, the rib may be disposed on the side of the plate opposite to the projecting direction of the face material portion.

The plate thickness of the rib may be 6 mm or more and 24 mm or less.

The rib may be provided only within a range of 60% of the width centered on the widthwise center of the partition in the width direction of the partition.

According to the present invention, by providing the ribs extending in the vertical direction on the flange portions of the corrugated bulkhead formed of the metal thick plates, it is possible to improve the proof against the compressive load acting on the flange portions, As a result, it is possible to improve the proof stress against the compression load of the entire part of the partition, and to secure easily and stably the required proof stress as the partitions, so that the buckling of the partitions can be prevented.

In addition, it is possible to easily manufacture the barrier ribs and to prevent the increase in the weight of the barrier ribs, by providing a relatively simple structure as compared with the prior art in which ribs are provided on each face plate portion. Further, since the rigidity can be improved as the bulkhead of the ship, it is possible to reduce the plate thickness of the bulkhead within a range in which the rigidity required for the bulkhead can be ensured, which can contribute to weight reduction of the hull.

Further, by adopting such a method as improving the buckling strength against a suitable range in accordance with the proof strength of the buckle in accordance with the action distribution of the bending moment peculiar to the ship, it is possible to simultaneously realize weight saving and buckling strength improvement .

1 is a front view showing a part of a state in which a ship bulkhead according to a first embodiment of the present invention is fixed to a pier.
2 is a cross-sectional view of a marine bulkhead according to a first embodiment of the present invention.
3 is a perspective view of a first embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is an explanatory view of the water pressure acting on the partition wall 1A provided between the pod 2-1 and the pod 2-2 which are adjacent to each other.
5 is an explanatory diagram showing the distribution of the bending moment M generated in the partition 1A between the hold 2-1 and the hold 2-2.
6 is a graph showing a distribution curve of the bending moments if the space height L 0 between the dock and the deck 5.0m, 13.0m the height L of the dock.
Fig. 7 is a front view showing a part of a state in which a ship bulkhead according to a second embodiment of the present invention is fixed to a hoop, in which (a) is a buckling danger portion A only, (b) ) Indicates a case where ribs are installed in the buckling risk areas A to D.
Fig. 8 is a perspective view showing a part of a state in which a ship bulkhead according to a second embodiment of the present invention is fixed to a hoop, in which (a) is a buckling danger portion A only, (b) ) Indicates a case where ribs are installed in the buckling risk areas A to D.
Fig. 9 is an explanatory view showing a case where the rib is provided only at a specific portion of the flange portion. Fig. 9 (a) shows a buckling danger portion A only, To D are provided with ribs.
Fig. 10 is a schematic view showing a case where tapered ribs are provided at the buckling hazardous portions A to C, respectively.
Fig. 11 is a view of the finite element analysis relating to the widthwise distribution of the stress generated in an arbitrary partition wall 1A when the seawater is filled with seawater, and is an overall view of the partition wall 1A.
Fig. 12 is a finite element analysis result concerning the widthwise distribution of the stress generated in an arbitrary partition wall 1A when the seawater is filled with seawater, and is an enlarged view of a portion where stress is generated.
Fig. 13 is a view of the analysis result of Fig. 11, in which the mesh lines of the finite element model are erased.
Fig. 14 is a view of the analysis result of Fig. 12, in which the mesh lines of the finite element model are erased.
15 is a cross-sectional view of a ship bulkhead in Reference Example 1 of the present invention.
Fig. 16 is a cross-sectional view showing an example in which an improvement is provided for welding to the ship bulkhead in Fig. 13;
17 is a cross-sectional view of a ship bulkhead in Reference Example 2 of the present invention.
18 is a graph showing the experimental results of the embodiment.
Fig. 19 is an explanatory view showing an example of dimensions of an analytical model in the embodiment; Fig. 19 (a) is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a part of the partition, and Fig. 19 is a front view of the partition.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In the present specification and drawings, elements having substantially the same functional configuration are denoted by the same reference numerals, and redundant description will be omitted.

(First Embodiment)

1 to 3 illustrate a first embodiment of a ship bulkhead according to the present invention. In the ship bulkhead 1A of the first embodiment, a ship holds a ship in a direction perpendicular to the traveling direction of the ship Called straddle partition wall is partitioned and fixed on the partition wall stool 2b in the pod 2 provided with an opening 2a for loading and unloading the pod as shown in Fig.

This partition wall 1A is formed by a metal back plate and includes a plurality of face plate portions 3A and 4A in the form of a flat plate extending alternately from the front face side to the rear face side of the wall face of the partition wall And extends over the whole width in the width direction (left and right direction) of the hold 2. Ribs 5A extending in the vertical direction are provided on the face plates 3A, 4A, respectively.

Further, in the present invention, the metal thick plate forming the partition wall has a thickness of 15 to 30 mm or 12 to 35 mm or 10 to 40 mm, and various metals such as a steel plate or a thick steel plate are used.

Each of the face plates 3A and 4A is for improving the proof stress of the entire partition 1A. In the present embodiment, the metal plate is alternately arranged on the front face side and the rear face side of the partition wall face at regular intervals The front surface side surface portion 3A protruding toward the front surface side of the partition wall and the rear surface side surface portion 4A projecting toward the rear surface side of the partition wall are formed by bending.

Each of the face material portions 3A and 4A has a plate shape having a plate surface along the width direction (left and right direction) of the partition wall 1A. All the face material portions 3A and 4A are arranged so as to be parallel to each other , And extends from the lower end portion to the upper end portion of the partition wall 1A.

The front face side face material portion 3A and the rear face side face material portion 4A are provided between the adjacent face material portions, specifically between the front face side face material portion 3A and the rear face side face material portion 4A adjacent thereto, Like web portion 6 extending in the vertical direction is formed to connect the upper surface of the web portion 6 and the lower surface portion of the web portion. The web portion 6 is inclined with respect to the width direction of the partition 1A as viewed in a plan view and has a length near the immediate vicinity of the front side face portion 3A and the rear face side face portion 4A And the ends are connected to each other.

Thereby, the partition wall 1A is formed such that the waveform is formed over the entire width when viewed from a plane where the front face side portion 3A and the rear face side face portion 4A are alternately arranged.

The ribs 5A reinforce the respective face plates 3A and 4A so that the bearing capacity of the face plates 3A and 4A against the compression load in the vertical direction due to the bending moment generated by the ship, .

As described above, a bending moment acts on the partition wall for partitioning the pail by a shipment such as ore or seawater for a long period of time. Particularly, in the vertical direction of the partition wall, a state in which a compressive load caused by the bending moment acts Therefore, when an excessive compressive load is applied to the bulkhead by the shipment, the bulkhead may buckle.

As a result, each of the face members is reinforced by the ribs, and the proof stress of the face member against the compressive load in the vertical direction acting on the face member is improved. As a result, , Thereby preventing buckling of the bulkhead.

Specifically, the rib 5A of the present embodiment has a plate thickness equal to that of the metal backing plate forming the face plates 3A, 4A and the web 6 formed as members separate from the face plate members 3A, 4A The plate surface 5Aa is arranged so as to be orthogonal to the plate surfaces of the face plates 3A and 4A and integrally joined and fixed to the face plates 3A and 4A by various joining means such as welding .

In the present embodiment, the plate thickness of the ribs 5A is made equal to the thickness of the metal plate forming the face plates 3A, 4A and the web 6, respectively.

Here, the rib 5A can basically arbitrarily set various settings such as its width (i.e., protrusion length from the face plate portion). As an arbitrary setting method, for example, the length of the rib 5A or the length of the protrusion 5A such that the moment of inertia of the rib 5A is sufficiently large with respect to the moment of inertia of the face members 3A and 4A The protruding length of the rib 5A is set to be a sufficiently large value with respect to the thickness of the rib 5A when the shape of the rib 5A is determined or the thickness of the rib 5A is made equal to the thickness of the face plates 3A, And the like.

In the present embodiment, the ribs 5A are arranged over the entire length in the vertical direction of each face material portion, and each face material portion is stably reinforced from the lower end portion to the upper end portion of the face material portions 3A, 4A, So that the buckling can be reliably prevented with respect to the entire face material portion.

In addition, among the ribs 5A, those disposed on the front surface-side surface material portion 3A are disposed on the side opposite to the projecting direction of the front surface-side surface material portion 3A, that is, on the rear surface side of the partition 1A And protrudes in the direction toward the rear surface of the partition 1A. On the other hand, those disposed on the rear surface-side face portion 4A are disposed on the opposite side to the projecting direction of the rear surface-side face portion 4A, that is, on the front surface side of the partition 1A, 1A projecting in the front side direction. As a result, the space of the recessed portion of the partition wall 1A is effectively utilized, and the respective face material portions are reinforced.

The ribs 5A are all disposed at the center in the width direction (lateral direction) of the face material portions 3A and 4A and extend in the vertical direction along the axial lines of the face material portions 3A and 4A .

The ship bulkhead 1A having the above configuration is configured such that flat plate ribs 5A extending in the vertical direction are provided on each of the face plates 3A and 4A in the corrugated bulkhead formed of the metal back plate, It is possible to improve the proof stress of the flange portions 3A and 4A against the compressive load acting on the flange portions 3A and 4A and also the proof stress of the entire partition wall 1A against the compressive load. As a result, it is possible to secure easily and stably the proof stress against the compression load required for the partition wall, so that the buckling of the partition can be surely prevented.

In addition, by making the comparatively simple structure that the plate-like ribs 5A are joined and fixed to the face plates 3A and 4A, it is possible to easily manufacture the barrier ribs, to secure the necessary strength for the barrier ribs, Increase can be suppressed.

Further, by increasing the proof strength as the partition wall of the ship by means of the ribs 5A, it is possible to reduce the thickness of the partition wall as much as possible within a range in which the required proof strength can be ensured. Accordingly, have. For example, in the case of attempting to secure a proof against a compressive load of the same degree as a rib-like corrugated wall having a high strength by increasing the thickness of the metal thick plate, the proof strength of the face plate portion is improved by the rib, It is possible to reduce the weight of the entire partition wall, which contributes to the weight reduction of the hull.

(Second Embodiment)

In the first embodiment, the case where the rib 5A is provided over the entire length in the longitudinal direction (lower end to upper end) of the face plates 3A and 4A has been described. However, the inventors of the present invention thought that there is room for improvement of a further layer with respect to the range in which the ribs 5A are provided, and conducted an intensive study on the range in which the ribs 5A are provided.

The inventors of the present invention conducted a detailed analysis on the distribution of bending moments generated in the height direction of the flange portion of the partition wall when the seawater was filled with the seam, It is possible to realize both the weight reduction of the partition wall 1A and the buckling strength at the same time by making the range of the ribs 5A suitable according to the relationship between the proof stress and the bending moment generated in the face plates 3A, I got the knowledge of the purpose. Therefore, in the present embodiment, this knowledge will be described and a case where the rib 5A is provided in a suitable range of the face plates 3A, 4A will be described.

4 is an explanatory view of the water pressure acting on the partition wall 1A provided between the pod 2-1 and the pod 2-2 which are adjacent to each other. 4, the height of the dock (2-1, 2-2) to L, if the space height between the dock and the deck to L 0, and one of the docks (2-1) water is charged only , The water pressure w at the position of the depth h from the deck of the partition wall 1A is expressed by the following formula (1).

w =? g? h (1)

Here, ρ is the specific gravity of sea water (= 1.025), and g is gravitational acceleration (= 9.81 m / s 2 ).

Then, the water pressure w as shown in Fig. 4 acts on all portions of the partition 1A, and a bending moment M is generated in the longitudinal direction of the partition 1A. (= M / Z) [N / mm < 2 >] is generated in the face plate portion of the partition 1A in accordance with the sectional performance (section modulus Z) of the partition 1A by generating this bending moment M , Buckling occurs when the compressive stress? Exceeds the proof stress of the flange portion of the partition 1A.

5 is an explanatory diagram showing the distribution of the bending moment M generated in the partition 1A between the pail 2-1 and the pail 2-2. The two distribution curves (solid line and broken line in Fig. 5) shown in Fig. 5 indicate the case where seawater is filled in the reservoir 2-1 and the reservoir 2-2 is empty, And the seawater 2-2 is charged with seawater, respectively. These two distribution curves have an extreme value in the vicinity of the central portion of the partition 1A and are symmetrical with each other across the partition 1A.

(Hereinafter, referred to as M (x)), the distribution curve of the bending moment M generated in the partition 1A shown in Fig. 5 is expressed by the distance from the upper end of the partition 1A as x (2).

M (x) = ρg / 60 {10x 3 + 30L 0 x 2 - (30L 0 L + 9L 2) x + L 2 (5L 0 + 2L)} ... (2)

1) of the first embodiment, the partition wall 1A has a structure in which the length in the vertical direction (that is, the height) is short in a predetermined region (for example, in the vicinity of the end portion in the width direction of the ship) have. The bending moment M generated in the partitioning wall 1A is smaller than the vertical dimension of the partitioning wall 1A because the size of the float adjacent to the partitioning wall does not change from other portions even in the case of the partitioning wall 1A having a short vertical length. Is calculated based on the distance x from the upper end of the partition wall with reference to the upper end portion when the direction length (height) is longest. That is, the bending moment M generated in the partition wall 1A is calculated on the basis of the above formula (2) at any part of the ship. The lower end portion of the partition 1A is located at the upper end of the partition wall stub 2b shown in Fig.

As can be seen from the bending moment distribution curve M (x) shown in Fig. 5, different stresses are generated in the partition wall 1A by the height direction (vertical direction). More specifically, the greatest stress is generated at the lower end of the partition 1A and a large stress is subsequently generated at the upper end of the partition 1A. Subsequently, the generation stress in the vicinity of the center of the partition 1A is large, (Specifically, about 25% from the upper end portion of the partition 1A and about 75% from the upper end thereof). The ribs 5A of the face plates 3A and 4A of the partition 1A are installed according to the degree of resistance of the partition 1A without the ribs 5A You can see that the range to do is different.

More specifically, in the case where the proof stress of the partition wall 1A is smaller than the maximum stress occurring in the range only in the vicinity of the lower portion of the partition wall 1A (hereinafter referred to as case 1), at least the lower portions of the face materials 3A, (Hereinafter also referred to as a buckling risk area A) of the rib 5A.

The range of the buckling hazard area A beyond the buckling hazard area A near the lower part of the partition wall 1A and the range near the upper part of the partition wall 1A (Hereinafter also referred to as "buckling risk portion B") exceeding the buckling risk portion A in the vicinity of the lower portion of at least the face material portions 3A, 4A in addition to the buckling risk portion A It is necessary to provide the ribs 5A in the range near the upper portions of the face plates 3A and 4A (hereinafter also referred to as a buckling danger region C).

In the case where the proof stress of the partition wall 1A is smaller than the maximum stress occurring in the range in the vicinity of the central portion of the partition wall 1A except for the buckling danger portions A to C (hereinafter, case 3) It is necessary to provide the ribs 5A in at least a range in the vicinity of the central portion of the flange portions 3A and 4A (hereinafter also referred to as buckling danger portion D) in addition to the portions A to C.

That is, in the case 1, the ribs 5A must be provided at least in the buckling risk area A. In case 2, the ribs 5A must be provided at least at the buckling risk areas A to C. In the case 3, at least buckling risk areas A to D The rib 5A must be provided.

In the recent shipbuilding field, since the weight of the ship and the saving of the resource material are the most important tasks, the range in which the ribs 5A are provided in the face plates 3A and 4A is as narrow as possible desirable. Therefore, it is preferable to provide the ribs 5A only in the buckling risk area A in case 1, and it is preferable to provide the ribs 5A only in the buckling risk areas A to C in case 2, It is preferable to provide the second electrode 5A. When the weight of the ship is not taken into consideration, the ribs 5A may be provided over the entire length in the longitudinal direction (vertical direction) of the face plates 3A and 4A as described in the first embodiment, In this case, there is an advantage that buckling is unlikely to occur even when stresses other than the predetermined stress are generated in the partition 1A.

Next, concrete ranges of the buckling risk portions A to D in a ship of generally used dimensions will be described. The height L 0 between the pontoons and the deck is 5.0 m and the height L of the pontoons is 13.0 m. By substituting these numerical values into the above equation (2), a distribution curve of the bending moment in the height direction generated in the partition wall 1A of the ship is obtained. A specific range of the buckling risk areas A to D can be determined from the distribution curve of the bending moments thus obtained.

6 is a graph showing a bending moment distribution curve in the case where the height L 0 of the space between the porthole and the deck is 5.0 m and the height L of the porthole is 13.0 m. In FIG. 6, two distribution curves (solid lines and broken lines in the figure) as well as FIG. 5 show the case where one of the floats is filled with seawater and the other floats are empty.

According to the graph of FIG. 6, the case 1 has a bending moment value of 0.8 or more on the axis of abscissa, and the range in which the rib 5A is to be installed (that is, ) Is about 95% or more and 100% or less (when the upper end portion is set to 0%) from the upper end portion in the vertical direction height.

6, the case 2 has a bending moment value of 0.45 or more and less than 0.8, and the range in which the rib 5A is to be installed (that is, the buckling risk areas B and C) (Buckling risk area B) of 90% or more and less than 95% (buckling risk area B) from the upper end of the face material portions 3A and 4A in the vertical direction height and the vertical direction height of the face material portions 3A and 4A (Buckling danger zone C) from 0% to 10% from the upper end.

With respect to the case 3, the range in which the ribs 5A are to be installed (i.e., the range including the buckling risk areas A to D) is set to be greater than the proof stress of the partition wall 1A and the weight increase , And may be properly determined. For example, in consideration of a range in which the value of the bending moment on the abscissa axis in Fig. 6 is 0.2 or more, the range in which the ribs 5A are to be provided is about 0% or more from the upper end in the vertical direction height of the face plates 3A, Or less, about 30% or more and about 70% or less, and about 80% or more and about 100% or less. In addition, if the installation range of the rib 5A is excessively large, the total weight of the partition wall 1A is increased, and the load of the welding operation is increased and the deformation amount of the member is increased by welding, The advantage of being small is reduced. From this point of view, the range in which the ribs 5A are to be provided is set to be about 80% or less (inclusive of the buckling risk areas A to D) of the length of the face material portions 3A and 4A in the entire partition wall 1A . 6, in the vicinity of the central portion of the height in the vertical direction of the partition 1A, the bending moment due to the water pressure increases as the center portion is closer to the center, . ≪ / RTI >

When the buckling risk area D is set to a range of 30% or more and 70% or less from the upper end of the face plates 3A, 4A in the vertical direction outside the buckling risk areas A to C, for example, In the range of 0.2 or more, the ribs 5A must be provided at least in the buckling risk areas A to D. [ As described above, the installation range of the ribs 5A at this time is in the range of about 0% to 20%, about 30% to 70%, and about 80% from the upper end of the height direction of the face plates 3A, , More preferably from about 0% to about 15%, from about 30% to about 70%, and from about 85% to about 100% of the total height (I.e., about 70% or less of the total height). Further, only the buckling risk areas A to D (i.e., about 60% of the total height) may be used.

The rib 5A is provided so as to cover the whole area of the partition wall 1A from the viewpoint of lightening the partition wall 1A and increasing load such as welding work, Or less than about 50% of the length in the vertical direction of the printed circuit boards 3A and 4A. In other words, referring to FIG. 6, it is effective to provide the rib 5A in a range where the value of the bending moment due to water pressure is not less than about 0.35.

6, a range of about 22% (for example, 20 to 25%) from the upper end of the face material portions 3A and 4A in the vertical direction height, and a range of about 80% ), The value of the bending moment is almost zero. It is therefore possible to adopt a configuration in which the ribs 5A are not provided in the range of about 22% from the upper end of the face plates 3A and 4A in the vertical direction and in the range of about 80%.

As described above, in the case where the proof stress of the partition 1A is relatively large (case 1) in the state where the rib 5A is not provided, about 95% to 100 It is necessary to provide the ribs 5A in the range of not more than 5%. Further, in the case (case 2) where the proof stress of the partition wall 1A is not in the state where the rib 5A is not provided (case 2), more than 90% to less than 95% of the upper end of the face material portions 3A, It is necessary to provide the ribs 5A in the range of 0% to 10% from the upper end of the height of the face plates 3A, 4A in the vertical direction. When the strength of the partition 1A is relatively small (case 3) in a state where the ribs 5A are not provided, it is preferable that the load applied to the partition members 3A and 4A is 30% or more It is necessary to provide the ribs 5A in the range of not more than 5%.

Hereinafter, the case where the rib 5A is provided only at a specific portion will be described. Fig. 7 is a schematic front view of a ship bulkhead according to a second embodiment of the present invention. Fig. 7 (a) is a buckling hazard area A only, And ribs 5A are provided on the ribs 5A. Fig. 8 is a schematic perspective view of a ship bulkhead according to a second embodiment of the present invention. Fig. 8 (a) is a buckling risk area A, Fig. 8 (b) Shows a case in which the ribs 5A are provided in the buckling risk areas A to D. [ Fig. 9 is a schematic sectional view of a ship bulkhead according to a second embodiment of the present invention. Fig. 9 (a) is a buckling hazard area A only, And the ribs 5A are provided on the ribs 5A to 5D.

According to the knowledge based on Figs. 4 to 6, according to the present embodiment, the partition 1A provided with the rib 5A is formed only at a specific portion as shown in Figs. As described above, the case sections (cases 1 to 3) are performed in accordance with the proof stress of the partition 1A and the ribs 5A must be provided for each case to define the range of the partition 1A, 5A can be set to a minimum range according to the proof stress of the partition wall 1A. Thus, the resource material used as the rib 5A can be saved and the weight of the ship can be reduced. Naturally, the buckling strength of the partition 1A is also effectively improved because the buckling strength of the partition 1A is obtained in advance and the rib 5A is provided in a suitable range according to the load.

In the case where the rib 5A is not provided in a portion of the buckling risk regions A to D and the load 5b is damaged when the load of the buckling danger portion is lower than the maximum generated stress at the buckling danger portion, The ribs 5A may be provided. When the strength of the buckling dangerous portion is less than the maximum generated stress in the buckling dangerous portion, an effect such as a reduction in the weight of the steel material is expected by providing the rib 5A at the buckling dangerous portion. When the strength of the buckling hazard portion exceeds the maximum generated stress in the buckling danger portion, the rib 5A is installed intermittently with respect to the buckling danger portion by installing only the most dangerous portion It is possible to avoid an increase in the design cost and the manufacturing cost due to such a problem.

(Third Embodiment)

In the first embodiment, the plate surface shape of the rib 5A is shown to be, for example, substantially rectangular, but the plate surface shape of the rib 5A in the present invention is not limited to this. Therefore, the inventors of the present invention have found that the plate surface shape of the ribs 5A is not necessarily uniform (see Figs. 5 and 6), since the bending moments generated in the face plates 3A and 4A when the seawater is filled with seawater are not uniform It can not be said that the rectangle is optimal, and a suitable plate surface shape of the rib 5A is carefully examined with reference to Fig. 6 to reach the present embodiment.

As shown in Fig. 6, the bending moments generated in the face parts 3A and 4A are not uniformly distributed in the longitudinal direction (height direction). Specifically, the bending moments generated in the buckling risk area A and the buckling risk area B of the face plates 3A, 4A described in the second embodiment increase as they are directed downward. On the other hand, the bending moment generated in the buckling dangerous portion C of the face plates 3A, 4A increases as it goes upward.

Therefore, in the present embodiment, the plate surface shape of the ribs 5A provided on the buckling danger portions A and B of the face plates 3A and 4A is formed into a tapered shape having a wide width toward the downward direction in the vertical direction ), And the plate surface shape of the rib 5A provided on the buckling danger portion C is tapered so as to be wider toward the upper side in the vertical direction. Fig. 10 is a schematic view showing a case where tapered ribs 5A are provided in the buckling hazardous portions A to C, respectively.

The inclination angles of the ribs 5A provided at the buckling hazardous portions A to C are preferably determined appropriately in accordance with the bending moment distribution generated in the respective ranges.

Here, an example of a method of determining the tilt angle of a specific taper will be described. First, in each of the buckling risk areas A to C, the required rib height at a position where the bending moment to be generated becomes the maximum is calculated. On the other hand, in each of the buckling risk areas A to C, the rib height at the position where the generated bending moment is minimum (basically, the rib height is 0 mm) is calculated. In each of the buckling risk areas A to C, the rib height at the position where the calculated bending moment becomes the maximum and the rib height at the position where the bending moment is minimum are linearly compensated, The inclination angle of the tapered shape of the rib 5A to be installed is determined.

10 shows a case in which tapered ribs 5A are provided in both the buckling risk areas A to C. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and only a predetermined buckling risk area may be tapered A configuration in which the rib 5A is provided or a configuration in which a tapered rib 5A is provided over the entire length of the partition 1A is also considered. The range in which the ribs 5A are to be provided is, for example, a range according to the case classification described as case 1 to case 3 in the second embodiment, and is preferably changed appropriately according to the proof stress of the partition 1A.

As described above, by making the plate surface shape of the ribs 5A provided at the buckling risk portions A to C of the face plates 3A and 4A to be tapered with a predetermined gradient angle, the buckling load required for the partition wall 1A is The weight of the rib is reduced compared with the case where the plate surface shape is substantially rectangular or the like while saving, and the saving of the resource material is realized.

Although the embodiment of the present invention has been described above, the present invention is not limited to the illustrated embodiment. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims and that they are also within the technical scope of the present invention.

For example, in the first embodiment, it has been described that the protruding length (width) of the ribs 5A from the face plate portions 3A and 4A can be set arbitrarily. However, in the present invention, It is also possible to set the length appropriately. Specifically, the protruding length of the ribs 5A is preferably not less than 2 times and not more than 15 times the plate thickness of the face plates 3A and 4A. Hereinafter, this reason will be briefly described.

It is preferable that the projecting length of the ribs 5A from the face plates 3A and 4A is at least twice the plate thickness of the face plates 3A and 4A. If the thickness is less than twice the plate thickness, the welding operation of the ribs 5A becomes difficult, and problems such as an increase in the welding work load and a deformation of the member due to the welding are increased. On the other hand, it is preferable that the projection length of the ribs 5A be 15 times or less than the plate thicknesses of the face plates 3A and 4A. If the projection length of the ribs 5A is excessive, the effect of improving the buckling strength is saturated Or the like, the member becomes surplus and the weight is increased, and the rib 5A is pushed into the inner space of the dock, thereby deteriorating the function of the dock as the dock.

In the above embodiment, the ribs 5A are provided on all of the face plates 3A and 4A constituting the ship partition wall 1A, but the present invention is not limited thereto. Here, the present inventors considered that the stress (bending moment) generated in the width direction of the partition wall 1A is not uniform, and studied how the stress is applied in the width direction of the partition wall 1A.

Figs. 11 to 14 are explanatory views for analyzing the widthwise distribution of the stress generated in an arbitrary partition wall 1A when seawater is filled in the reservoir, Fig. 11 is an overall view of the partition wall 1A, Fig. 3 is an enlarged view of a portion where stress occurs. 13 and 14 are the same. In Fig. 11 to Fig. 14, the Y direction in the drawing is the width direction of the partition wall, and the color tint in the figure shows the stress distribution. The portion with a strong color has a more stressed portion .

As shown in Fig. 11 to Fig. 14, the stress generated in the partition 1A is large in the widthwise central portion of the partition 1A and small in stress toward the widthwise ends. This is because the both end portions of the partition wall 1A are installed in a state that they are fixed to the hold.

From the analysis results shown in Figs. 11 to 14, stresses are generated in the width direction of the partition wall 1A because the width (width length) of the partition wall around the central portion in the width direction of the partition wall 1A %. Therefore, for example, when the rib 5A is provided on the partition 1A, it is possible to provide only the range in which the stress is generated, It is preferable to arrange the ribs within the range of 60%. The ribs 5A can be arbitrarily set. As shown in Figs. 11 to 14, as the ribs 5A are closer to the central portion in the width direction of the partition 1A, May be set within a range of 20% or 40% of the width length centered on the widthwise center portion of the partition 1A, for example.

In the first embodiment, the ribs 5A are made of the same metal sheet as the face plates, and have substantially the same thickness. However, the ribs 5A in the present invention are not limited to the face plates, The plate thickness may be different from the face plate portion or the like. Specifically, the thickness of the rib 5A in the present invention is preferably 6 mm or more and 24 mm or less. 6 mm to 24 mm of the plate thickness range of the ribs 5A is a plate thickness range used as the thickness of the bulkhead plate of a general ship. For example, Structural Rules Japan Marine Association ".

(Reference Example 1)

Next, a modified form of the present invention will be described as Reference Example 1 with reference to the drawings.

In the first embodiment, the plate-shaped rib 5A, which is a member separate from the face plates 3A and 4A, is provided on the rib 5A for providing the ribs 5A for reinforcement against the compression load in the vertical direction of the partition 1A, The plate surface 5Aa of the rib 5A is joined and fixed so as to be perpendicular to the plate surface of the face plates 3A and 4A. However, in Reference Example 1 described below, And the whole of the partitions including the ribs is formed.

That is, Fig. 15 shows a form of Reference Example 1 of the present invention. The partition 1B of this Reference Example 1 is formed in a flat plate shape extending in the vertical direction and projecting in the width direction of the partition 1B, A first flange portion 9, 10 constituting a half portion of a face material portion protruding to the front face side of the partition wall 1B, that is, a front face side face material portion 3B, Which is formed in a flat plate shape protruding in a direction opposite to the first flange portion 9 and the second flange portion 9 constituting a half portion of the rear face side face material portion 4B (Left and right direction) of the shape members 11 and 12 of the same shape formed of the metal back plate having the first,

The flange portions 3B and 4B of the partition 1B are arranged such that the first flange portions 9 and 10 and the second flange portions 7 and 8 of the pair of adjacent shape members 11 and 12 So that the corrugated partition wall 1B is extended over the whole width of the pail.

Each of the shape members 11 and 12 has an end portion in the width direction immediately adjacent to the first flange portion 9 and the second flange portion 7 opposite to each other and extending in the vertical direction, And are connected to each other by the web parts 11a and 11b.

The first flange portions 9 and 10 and the second flange portions 7 and 8 are formed on the front ends of the first flange portions 9 and 10 and the second flange portions 7 and 8 in the width direction, And flat plate-shaped lip portions 9a, 10a, 7a, 8a extending in the vertical direction are formed respectively. The first flange portion 9 and the second flange portion 7, the web portion 11a and the lip portions 9a and 7a are formed on the frame member 11 and the first flange portion 10 And the second flange portion 8, the web portion 12a, and the lip portions 10a and 8a are integrally formed.

The proximal end portions of the respective lip portions 9a, 10a and 7a and 8a are connected to the distal end portions of the corresponding flange portions 9, 10 · 7 and 8, respectively, and the distal end portions of the first flange portions 9 and 10 The respective lip portions 9a and 10a are formed so as to be opposed to the direction of the second flange portions 7 and 8 of the first flange portions 9 and 10 or the projecting direction of the front surface- (That is, the rear side of the partition wall).

On the other hand, the lip portions 7a and 8a of the second flange portions 7 and 8 are arranged in the direction of the first flange portion side of the second flange portions 7 and 8, (I.e., the front side direction of the partition wall) opposite to the projecting direction of the partition wall.

Each of the lip portions 9a, 10a, 7a and 8a is a half portion of the rib 5B which reinforces the face plates 3B and 4B against the compression load in the vertical direction. 10a of the first flange portions 9 and 10 and the respective lip portions 7a and 8a of the second flange portions 7 and 8 of the adjacent pair of the shape members 11 and 12 face each other Are mutually overlapped and bonded to each other in positions to form the ribs 5B.

In this reference example, the plate surfaces opposed to the respective lip portions 9a, 10a of the first flange portions 9, 10 of the adjacent pair of the shape members 11, 12 and the plate surfaces of the second flange portions 7, 8 of the pair of members 11 and 12 are welded to each other so that the first flange portions 9 and 10 of the pair of members 11 and 12 and the second flange portions 7 And 8 are connected to each other. As a result, the ribs 5B are formed, the shapes 11 and 12 are joined together, and the face plates 3B and 4B are formed simultaneously.

15, the shape member 11 constituting the left half portion of the front face side face portion 3B and the right half portion of the rear face side face portion 4B in the figure is formed of a front face side face portion The front side and the rear side of the shape member 12 are reversed) of the shape member 12 constituting the right half portion of the frame member 3B and the left half portion of the rear face side member portion 4B, (11, 12) basically have the same cross sectional shape.

The first flange portions 9 and 10 and the second flange portions 7 and 8 of the shape members 11 and 12 are set to have the same width, Is located at the center in the width direction of the front face side portion 3B and the rear face side face portion 4B.

The ship bulkhead 1B having the above-described configuration can basically have the same effects as those of the first embodiment described above.

However, the ribs 5B of the flange portions 3B and 4B are formed such that the respective lip portions 9a and 10a of the first flange portions 9 and 10 of the pair of adjacent shape members 11 and 12, Since the first and second flange portions 7 and 8 are formed by joining the respective lip portions 7a and 8a of the first flange portions 7 and 8 to each other, that is, by the two lip portions, The reinforcing effect is higher than in the case of the first embodiment. Therefore, the proof stress against the compression load necessary as the partition can be more stably secured, and the buckling of the partition can be reliably prevented.

The partition wall 1B of the present embodiment has the first flange portions 9 and 10 and the second flange portions 7 and 8 of the pair of adjacent shape members 11 and 12 formed in a predetermined shape, It is relatively easy to form the entirety of the barrier ribs.

In the reference example 1, the lip portions 9a, 10a of the first flange portions 9, 10 protrude in a direction opposite to the projecting direction of the front surface side member portion 3B, The lip portions 7a and 8a of the support portions 7 and 8 protrude in a direction opposite to the projecting direction of the rear face side face material portion 4B so that the ribs 5B are projected in the projecting direction of the face material portions 3B and 4B As shown in Fig.

However, the arrangement position of the ribs with respect to each face material portion may be formed either on the front surface side or the rear surface side of the partition wall in any of the front surface side material portion and the rear surface side surface material portion, By changing the protruding direction of the lip portion, it is possible to appropriately set the arrangement position of the ribs.

In the above embodiment, the lip portions 9a, 10a of the first flange portions 9, 10 of the pair of shape members 11, 12 adjacent to each other or the second flange portions 7, The lip portions of the respective first flange portions or the lip portions of the respective second flange portions are projected in directions opposite to each other so that the proximal end portions of the lip portions 7a, The ribs may be formed on both the front surface side and the rear surface side of the face material portion by joining the portions to each other.

In the reference example 1, the partition walls 1B are formed by the shape members 11 and 12 of the same shape so that the ribs 5B are all disposed at the center in the width direction of the face material portions 3B and 4B However, the ribs may be arranged at a position offset from the center of the face plate portion by using a plurality of non-identical shape members having different widths of the first angular flange portion and the second angular flange portion.

15, each of the lip portions 9a, 10a, 7a, 8a is bent substantially at right angles from the distal end portions of the respective flange portions 9, 10, 7, 8 so that the lip portions 9a, 10a, 7a, and 8a are protruded in a direction perpendicular to the plate surfaces of the flange portions 9, 10, 7, and 8, respectively.

However, as shown in FIG. 16, for example, an improvement 13 (see FIG. 16) provided between the first flange portions 9 and 10 and the second flange portions 7 and 8 to be welded between the flange portions 10a, 7a, 8a are formed so as to form an inclined surface 14 for improving formation on the base end sides of the respective lip portions 9a, 10a, 7a, 8a, and then the respective lip portions 9a, 10a, 10, 7, 8 in the direction orthogonal to the flat surfaces of the flange portions 9, 10, 7, 8.

15 and 16, the protruding length of the rib 5B is not less than twice the thickness of the face plates 3B and 4B and not more than 15 times the plate thickness of the face plates 3B and 4B, as described in the modification of the above embodiment. Or less. The thickness of the face members 3B and 4B at this time may be based on the sum of the thicknesses of the lip portions 7a and 8a (or the lip portions 9a and 10a).

(Reference Example 2)

The first flange portion 9 and the second flange portion 7 constituting a part of the rear face side face material portion 4B and the second flange portion 7 constituting a part of the rear face side face material portion 4B, 12 of the pair of shape members 11 and 12 adjacent to each other and the first angular flange portions 9 and 12 of the adjacent pair of the shape members 11 and 12 are formed by using plural mold members 11 and 12 provided with the respective lip portions 9a, 10a, 7a, The ribs 5B of the face plates 3B and 4B are respectively formed by the lip portions 9a and 10a of the flange portions 10 and 10 and the lip portions 7a and 8a of the second angular flange portions 7 and 8 .

In the reference example 2 described below, however, it is preferable that the ribs are provided on the first flange portion or the second flange portion of only one of the pair of adjacent shape members, and the rib portion of the flange portion alone .

That is, Fig. 17 shows a configuration of Reference Example 2 of a marine bulkhead of the present invention. The partition 1C of this Reference Example 2 is formed in a flat plate shape that extends in the vertical direction and protrudes in the width direction of the partition wall A first flange portion 15 and a second flange portion 15 constituting a half portion of a front face side face portion 3C projecting toward the front face side of the partition wall 1C and a second flange portion 15 extending in the vertical direction, A flange portion 13 which is formed in a flat plate shape protruding in a direction opposite to the first flange portion 15 and forms a flange portion protruding to the rear face side of the partition wall 1C, that is, a half portion of the rear face side flange portion 4C, A plurality of the same shape members 17 and 18 formed of a metal back plate having a plurality of rectangular plates 14 and 14 are arranged in a line shape in the width direction (left and right direction).

The flange portions 3C and 4C of the partition wall 1C are arranged such that the first flange portions 15 and 16 of the pair of adjacent members 17 and 18 and the second flange portions 13 and 14 of the partition member 1C So that the corrugated partition wall 1C is extended over the entire width of the hold.

The end portions of each of the frame members 17 and 18 in the width direction near the first flange portions 15 and 16 and the second flange portions 13 and 14 face each other, Shaped web portions 17a and 18a and the first flange portions 15 and 16 and the second flange portions 13 and 14 and the web portions 17a and 18a are integrally formed .

The first flange portion 16 of one of the first flange portions 15 and 16 of the pair of shape members 17 and 18 forming the respective front surface side face portions 3C A plate-like lip portion 16a projecting in a direction orthogonal to the plate surface of the first flange portion 16 and extending in the vertical direction is integrally provided with the first flange portion 16 at the tip end in the width direction have.

The second flange portion 13 of one of the frame members 17 among the second flange portions 13 and 14 of the pair of frame members forming the rear face side face member 4C is provided with a front end portion Like lip portion 13a projecting in a direction perpendicular to the plate surface of the second flange portion 13 and extending in the vertical direction is provided integrally with the second flange portion 13. [

In this reference example 2, the proximal end portions of the lip portions 13a and 16a are connected to the distal end portions of the flange portions 13 and 16, respectively. The lip portion 16a to be the rib 5C of the front side face portion 3C is formed in the direction of the first flange portion 16 on the side of the second flange portion 13, (That is, the rear side of the partition wall) opposite to the projecting direction of the partition wall 3C.

On the other hand, with regard to the lip portion 13a which becomes the rib 5C of the rear face side face material portion 4C, the direction of the second flange portion 13 on the side of the first flange portion 15, And protrudes toward a direction opposite to the projecting direction of the portion 4C (i.e., the front side direction of the partition wall).

The mold members 17 and 18 are welded to the base end portion of the lip portion of the mold member having the lip portion and the end portion of the flange portion of the mold member having no lip portion, The first flange portions 15 and 16 and the second flange portions 13 and 14 are bonded to each other.

More specifically, in the front surface side face portion 3C, the base end portion of the lip portion 16a of the first flange portion 16 of the shape member 18 and the base end portion of the first flange portion 15 of the shape member 17 The front end portion of the flange portion 13 of the second flange portion 13 of the shape member 17 and the tip end portion of the lip portion 13a of the second flange portion 13 of the shape member 17 and the tip end portion of the second flange portion 14 of the shape member 18, Respectively. The joining of the first flange portions 15 and 16 and the second flange portions 13 and 14 of the pair of shape members 17 and 18 and the formation of the face material portions 3C and 4C And is performed at the same time.

At this time, each of the lip portions 16a and 13a is formed as a rib of each of the front face side portion 3C and each rear face side face portion 4C so as to be a rib of each of the face material portions 3C and 4C, Directional compression load.

As shown in Fig. 17, in the reference example 2, a shape member 17 constituting the left half portion of the front face side face portion 3C and the right half portion of the rear face side face portion 4C in the figure, The shape member 18 constituting the right half portion of the front face side face portion 3C and the left half portion of the rear face side face portion 4C is vertically reversed (that is, the front face side and the rear face side of the shape member 18 Reversed], and each shape has basically the same cross-sectional shape. Since the first flange portions 15 and 16 and the second flange portions 13 and 14 of each of the frame members 17 and 18 are set to have the same width as each of the rib portions 13a and 16a, 5C are located at approximately the center in the width direction of the front face side portion 3C and the rear face side face portion 4C, respectively.

The ship bulkhead having the above-described configuration can basically have the same effects as those of the first embodiment described above. In this reference example 2, the ribs 13a and 16a serving as the ribs 5C may be formed as a flange portion of one of the pair of frame members 17 and 18 forming the face member portions 3C and 4C, That is, the first flange portion 16 in the case of the front face side portion 3C and the second flange portion 13 in the case of the rear face side face portion 4C, It is advantageous in that it is relatively easy to form the partition wall as compared with the reference example 1 described above.

In the reference example 2, the position of the rib 5C with respect to the face members 3C and 4C is not limited to the face member 3C on the front face side or the face member 4C on the rear face side, And the position of the ribs can be appropriately set by changing the projecting direction of the ribs.

In the reference example 2, the partition walls are formed by the substantially same shape members 17 and 18 so that the ribs 5C are all disposed substantially in the center in the width direction of the face material portions 3C and 4C However, it is also possible to use a plurality of non-identical shape members having different widths of the first flange portions 15 and 16 and the second flange portions 13 and 14 so that the ribs are positioned at a position offset from the center of the face plate portion It is the same as that in Reference Example 1 described above.

In the example shown in Fig. 17, the lip portions 13a and 16b are bent at substantially right angles from the front end portions of the flange portions 13 and 16 so that the plate surfaces of the lip portions 13a and 16a And the flange portions 14 and 15 that are joined to the proximal end side of the lip portions 13a and 16a are formed in a flat plate shape having a constant plate thickness. However, in order to form an improvement to be provided for welding between the proximal end portion of the lip portion to be joined and the distal end portion of the flange portion, the proximal end portion of the lip portion is bent so as to form an inclined surface for improvement, It is possible to protrude in the direction orthogonal to the flat surface, or to form a slope for improvement in the front end portion of the flange to be joined.

<Examples>

(Example 1)

In order to confirm the effect of the present invention, a ship bulkhead having the structure according to the first embodiment of the present invention, that is, as shown in Figs. 1 to 3, A partition wall having a structure in which the partition wall is fixed at right angles to the plate surface of the face plate portion and a partition wall having no rib according to the present invention, Respectively.

Concretely, an experiment was conducted in which a vertical compressive load was applied to one face material portion forming the partition wall, the relationship between the load and the deformation amount in the vertical direction was examined, and the proof stress against the compressive load was compared .

(Hereinafter referred to as &quot; present invention &quot;) of the present invention and a face material portion of a conventional bulkhead (hereinafter referred to as &quot; comparative example &quot;) were all made of the same steel material having a height of 8000 mm, a width of 1050 mm, Mm was used.

Further, the rib in the present invention is a steel plate having a thickness of 14.5 mm and a projecting length (length in the short direction) of 100 mm.

In the test, the flange members according to the present invention and the comparative example were simply supported in four sides, and then a load was applied from the upper end side to the lower side of each flange member, so that a compression load in the vertical direction was applied to the flange member, And the amount of deformation in the vertical direction (axial direction of the face member) of the face member portion was measured.

The results are shown in Fig. In the graph of Fig. 18, the plotted points of the black dot represent the present invention and the plot points of the white dot represent the comparative example, respectively.

As a result, in the case of the comparative example, it was found that buckling did not occur up to about 4600 kN in the case of the present invention example, whereas the vicinity of the load exceeding about 2700 kN was the yield point.

Thus, it can be seen that the marine bulkhead having the structure according to the present invention has significantly higher strength against the compression load in the vertical direction as compared with the conventional one, The reinforcement effect was demonstrated.

(Example 2)

In the second embodiment, the validity of the rib installation in the partition of the present invention was confirmed, and the appropriate installation range of the rib was examined based on the analysis of the finite element method in consideration of the dimensions of the actual vessel. Table 1 shows the results of the review. The following description is based on Table 1.

Figure pct00001

Here, the height to the deck shown in Table 1 is L 0 + L shown in FIG. 4, and the height of the partition is L shown in FIG. The danger zones A, B, C, and D correspond to the buckling danger zones A, B, C, and D described in the second embodiment or the like, and others indicate zones other than the danger zones A to D. Specifically, the upper end of the partition wall is set to 0, the dangerous portion A is in the range of 95 to 100%, the dangerous portion B is in the range of 90 to 95%, the dangerous portion C is in the range of 0 to 10% 70%, and the others show a range of 10 to 30% and a range of 70 to 90%, and the presence or absence of the ribs in each range is shown in the table. In addition to the presence or absence of ribs for other ranges, the installation range for ribs is also described.

The presence or absence of buckling in the table indicates a case where the symbol ◯ indicates a case where buckling does not occur, and a case where a buckling has occurred. The analysis in this embodiment is based on a state in which seawater is filled in one of the seats with the partition wall therebetween and the other seats are empty.

Fig. 19 is an explanatory view showing an example of dimensions of a partition wall or the like used in the analysis in this embodiment, Fig. 19 (a) is a cross-sectional view enlarged a part of the partition wall, Fig. 19 to be. However, the dimensions of the analysis model shown in Fig. 19 (b) are merely examples, and each dimension is appropriately changed in accordance with the analysis conditions as shown in Table 1. [ Table 1 also shows the shape of the ribs (rib thickness, rectangular height, taper shape), the angle between the ribs and the face piece portion, and the arrangement direction of the ribs. In some cases, Thereby changing the angle of the face plate portion and the arrangement direction of the ribs.

The review cases 44 in Table 1 indicate basic conditions in which buckling does not occur in a state where ribs are not provided. The review cases 1 to 43, 45, and 46 show various conditions And each condition). The review cases 1 to 43 correspond to the embodiments of the present invention, and the review cases 44 to 46 correspond to the comparative example. Each of Review Cases 1 to 46 will be described below.

Examination cases 1 to 17 show the analysis results in the case where ribs are provided in all of the hazardous areas A to D with the height to the deck, the height of the partitions, and the dimensions of the partitions shown in Table 1. In the review cases 1 to 17, ribs are provided in addition to the dangerous parts A to D and other ranges in the ranges shown in Table 1.

As shown in Table 1, Examination Cases 1 to 3 are analysis results for three kinds of partitions different in height to the deck and height of the partitions. In these Review Cases 1 to 3, the ratios of the height to the deck and the height of the partition are the same. At this time, buckling does not occur in Review Cases 1 to 3 (occurrence of buckling: no, symbol in the table). The rib installation ranges in the other ranges except the danger zones A to D are different for each of the review cases 1 to 3, but the presence or absence of buckling is not affected.

In addition, the review cases 4 and 5 change the depth a of the partitions relative to the other cases, and the review cases 6 and 7 change the web width b. In these review cases 4 to 7, all the ribs are provided in the dangerous parts A to D. Here, in the review cases 4 to 7, the buckling does not occur in the partition wall. This indicates that buckling is prevented by providing the ribs even if there is a range in which the depth a of the partition wall or the width b of the partition wall is changed and the proof stress of the partition wall is smaller than the maximum stress to be generated.

In addition, the review cases 8 to 17 are different from the other cases in the width c of the face plate portion, the web plate thickness tw, and the plate thickness tf of the face plate portion in the partition wall. These review cases 8 to 17 are conditions in which the ribs are all provided in the hazardous areas A to D. In these review cases 8 to 17, buckling does not occur in the partition wall. That is, by providing the ribs in all of the hazardous portions A to D, the occurrence of buckling is prevented.

The examination cases 18 to 24 have changed the range in which the ribs are provided in the partitions, the examination cases 18 to 20 have the ribs only in the dangerous part A, the examination case 21 has the ribs only in the dangerous parts A to C The construction and review cases 22 to 24 have a structure in which ribs are provided only in the dangerous portions A to D. [ In these review cases 18 to 24, no buckling occurs in the partition wall.

In the review cases 25 to 31, the thickness of the rib and the height of the rectangular shape were changed under the conditions shown in Table 1. [ These review cases 25 to 31 are all provided with ribs in the hazardous areas A to D. Under these conditions, buckling does not occur in the bulkhead.

In the review cases 32 to 37, the height of the lower end of the rib and the height of the upper end of the rib are determined under the conditions shown in Table 1, and a tapered shape is given to a predetermined range of the installed ribs. These review cases 32 to 37 are conditions in which ribs are provided in all of the dangerous portions A to D, and a tapered shape is given to a part of the ribs provided there. Under these conditions, buckling does not occur on the bulkhead.

In the review cases 38 to 40, the angle &amp;thetas; between the rib and the face plate portion is set to 70 deg. These review cases 38 to 40 are conditions in which the ribs are installed in all of the danger zones A to D. [ Under these conditions, buckling does not occur on the bulkhead. The angle? Between the rib and the flange portion is preferably 90 degrees as described in the above embodiment. However, for example, as shown in these cases 38 to 40, the angle? (For example, 70 DEG), it is possible to reduce the amount of protrusion of the ribs in the inner space of the hold, thereby improving the usability of the space.

The review cases 41 to 43 are cases in which the ribs are arranged in a direction opposite to the direction in which the face plate portion is projected, which is different from other cases. These review cases 41 to 43 are conditions in which ribs are installed in all of the hazardous areas A to D. [ Under these conditions, buckling does not occur on the bulkhead.

On the other hand, the review case 44 shows a condition in which no ribs are provided, and the present invention is not applied. In addition, the examination cases 45 and 46 have ribs provided only at the dangerous portions A to C, respectively. In the structures of the review cases 45 and 46, buckling occurs in the partition wall (occurrence of buckling: yes, the sign in the table).

As shown in Table 1, when the review case 13 and the review case 45 are compared with each other, the ribs are provided in all of the hazardous portions A to D in the structure of the review case 13, In the configuration, the ribs are installed in the dangerous portions A to C, and the ribs are not provided in the dangerous portion D. In the structure of the review case (13), buckling does not occur in the partition wall (indicated by a mark in the table), whereas in the structure of the review case (45), buckling occurs in the partition wall. It can be seen from the comparison of the two cases that buckling occurs in the dangerous portion D when the ribs are not provided in the dangerous portion D in the structure of the review case 13.

That is, in the structures of Review Cases 13 and 45, the proof stress of the face plate portion in the dangerous portion D is lower than the maximum generated stress in the dangerous portion D range in a state where no rib is provided. In this case, it has been shown that the buckling strength of the partition wall can be improved by providing ribs in the dangerous portion D, and the required strength as a ship bulkhead can be secured easily and stably.

Likewise, when the examination case 14 and the examination case 46 shown in Table 1 are compared with each other, the ribs are provided in all of the dangerous portions A to D in the structure of the examination case 14, Ribs are provided at the portions A to C, and no ribs are provided at the dangerous portion D. In the structure of the review case 14, buckling occurs in the partition wall, whereas buckling of the partition wall occurs in the structure of the review case 46. It can be seen from the comparison between the two cases that buckling occurs in the dangerous portion D when the rib 14 is not provided in the dangerous portion D in the structure of the review case 14.

The comparison of the review case 14 and the review case 46 reveals that buckling strength of the partition wall is improved by providing ribs at the dangerous portion D. Specifically, by providing ribs in a predetermined range (dangerous portion D) in the buckled portion in the state where the ribs are not provided, buckling in the above range is avoided, and the required proof stress is secured for the ship bulkhead.

As described above, when ribs are provided on the partition walls having various conditions shown in Review Cases 1 to 43, the occurrence of buckling is prevented, and the required strength as a ship bulkhead can be secured easily and stably. It was found that buckling can be prevented.

Particularly, in the review cases 18 to 21, it was found that the buckling of the partitions is prevented even when ribs are provided only in a predetermined range of the partitions (for example, the dangerous part A). In addition, according to the comparison between the review cases 13 and 14 and the review cases 45 and 46, even if the respective conditions such as dimensions are the same, if the ribs are not provided in the predetermined range (dangerous portion D) And it was found that the buckling was prevented by installing the ribs, and it was confirmed that the ribs were installed in a specific range.

&Lt; Industrial applicability >

The present invention can be applied to a bulkhead made of a metal plate separating a pail of a ship, and more particularly, to a method of manufacturing a bulkhead, comprising the steps of: applying a bending moment generated on a bulkhead by a load acting in the longitudinal direction of the bulkhead, The present invention can be applied to marine bulkheads having a high buckling strength against the generated compressive load.

1A, 1B, 1C:
2 (2-1, 2-2): Dock
3A, 3B, 3C: front face side face portion
4A, 4B, 4C: rear face side face portion
5A, 5B, 5C: ribs
7, 8, 13, 14: the second flange portion
9, 10, 15, 16: the first flange portion
7a to 10a, 13a, 16a:
11, 12, 17, 18:

Claims (13)

A bulkhead comprising a metal back plate for partitioning a ship's pail,
A marine partition wall having a corrugated shape having a plurality of face portions extending in the vertical direction and formed in a plate shape along the width direction of the partition wall alternately protruding on the front face side and the rear face side of the partition wall,
Wherein the ribs are provided at least at a buckling risk point A in a range of 95% or more and 100% or less from an upper end of the height of each face material portion in the vertical direction.
The ship according to claim 1, further comprising a buckling danger portion B at least in the range of 90% or more and less than 95% from the upper end portion and a buckling danger portion C in the range of 0% or more and 10% . The ship bulkhead according to claim 2, wherein a rib is provided at at least a buckling danger zone (D) in the range of 30% or more and 70% or less from the upper end. The ship bulkhead according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the ribs are provided only in the buckling danger region. The marine partition wall according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the ribs are installed over the entire length in the vertical direction of each face material portion. The buckling machine according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein, in at least a part of the buckling risk portions, the load of the face portion is set so that the maximum generated stress in the buckling danger portion range Marine bulkheads underestimated. The ship bulkhead according to any one of claims 2 to 6, wherein the ribs provided at the buckling danger portions A and B have a tapered shape that widens in a downward direction in the vertical direction. The ship bulkhead according to any one of claims 2 to 7, wherein the ribs provided on the buckling danger portion C have a tapered shape that widens toward the upper side in the vertical direction. The ship bulkhead according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the ribs are formed in a flat plate shape, and the plate surface of the ribs is fixed so as to be perpendicular to the plate surface of the face material portion. The ship bulkhead according to claim 9, wherein a protruding length of the rib from the plate surface of the face material portion is not less than 2 times and not more than 15 times the plate thickness of the face material portion. The ship bulkhead according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the ribs are disposed on a plate surface opposite to the projecting direction of the face material portion. The ship bulkhead according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the plate thickness of the rib is 6 mm or more and 24 mm or less. The marine partition wall according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the ribs are provided only within a range of 60% of a width centered on a widthwise central portion of the partition wall in the width direction of the partition wall.
KR1020147023937A 2013-03-01 2013-03-01 Bulkhead for ship KR101492785B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2013/055689 WO2014132444A1 (en) 2013-03-01 2013-03-01 Ship bulkhead

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20140117639A true KR20140117639A (en) 2014-10-07
KR101492785B1 KR101492785B1 (en) 2015-02-12

Family

ID=50396746

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020147023937A KR101492785B1 (en) 2013-03-01 2013-03-01 Bulkhead for ship

Country Status (4)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5440743B1 (en)
KR (1) KR101492785B1 (en)
CN (1) CN104768843B (en)
WO (1) WO2014132444A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20160091013A (en) * 2015-01-23 2016-08-02 에스티엑스조선해양 주식회사 Bulkhead and ship with the same

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101750802B1 (en) 2015-09-03 2017-06-26 삼성중공업 주식회사 Offshore structure
CN106275243B (en) * 2016-09-30 2019-02-19 广船国际有限公司 A kind of groove profile wall construction of ship oil tank
CN107539423B (en) * 2017-08-01 2019-06-21 中国船舶工业集团公司第七0八研究所 A kind of big spacing deck deck transverse and groove profile longitudinal bulkhead connection structure
CN108438140B (en) * 2018-03-28 2020-06-23 广船国际有限公司 Variable cross-section trough-shaped wall assembly and ship comprising same
CN114261480B (en) * 2022-01-26 2023-03-14 广船国际有限公司 Roll-on-roll-off ship ramp structure and roll-on-roll-off ship

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5123995U (en) * 1974-08-12 1976-02-21
JPS6068893U (en) * 1983-10-19 1985-05-16 三菱重工業株式会社 hull structure
JPS60164487U (en) * 1984-04-11 1985-10-31 石川島播磨重工業株式会社 Ship bulkhead structure
JPS60261790A (en) * 1984-06-07 1985-12-25 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Lateral bulkhead of liquid cargo transporting ship
JP3750715B2 (en) * 2000-01-21 2006-03-01 日立造船株式会社 Shear reinforcement structure of footing caisson
JP2006257634A (en) 2005-03-15 2006-09-28 Ps Mitsubishi Construction Co Ltd Corrugated-steel-plate web girder
JP2008110739A (en) 2006-10-31 2008-05-15 Mitsui Eng & Shipbuild Co Ltd Collision-resistant hull structure and method for improving collision resistance of vessel and hull

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20160091013A (en) * 2015-01-23 2016-08-02 에스티엑스조선해양 주식회사 Bulkhead and ship with the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPWO2014132444A1 (en) 2017-02-02
CN104768843A (en) 2015-07-08
JP5440743B1 (en) 2014-03-12
WO2014132444A1 (en) 2014-09-04
KR101492785B1 (en) 2015-02-12
CN104768843B (en) 2016-07-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101492785B1 (en) Bulkhead for ship
JP6013430B2 (en) Pillar structure of car carrier
KR101258929B1 (en) Vessel having welding corrugated plate type bulkhead
CN104527920B (en) Hybrid transverse bulkhead construction package and the ship comprising the component
KR102605869B1 (en) Lashing bridge
KR101322553B1 (en) Container vessel having a carrier structure
KR20130129642A (en) Upper stool vertical web of a container ship
JP5010570B2 (en) Ice-resistant reinforcement structure of the hull
JP2008110739A (en) Collision-resistant hull structure and method for improving collision resistance of vessel and hull
JP6813424B2 (en) Hull structure and ship
KR20140078867A (en) Bilge keel for rolling control of ship
KR20140084492A (en) Tank for reducing rolling
JP4712673B2 (en) Ship and its bow structure
KR102179904B1 (en) Container Ship
JP6594815B2 (en) Hull structure
KR100650607B1 (en) Double hull vessel with the partly horizontal stringers and the partly longitudinal girders
KR101743581B1 (en) Reinforced structure for emergency towing system of ship
JP4253662B2 (en) Upper deck structure of tanker manifold
JP3885064B2 (en) Vertical corrugated bulkhead structure for chemical product tankers
KR20120044879A (en) Container loading structure for ship
KR101270969B1 (en) Marine cargo assembly and method of making the same
JP4002246B2 (en) Bulk carrier deck structure
KR102605872B1 (en) Lashing bridge
JP2013018320A (en) Oil tank structure of tanker
KR20110056013A (en) In hold stiffener structure for seawater ballast tanks of sea-going vessel and sea-going vessel have the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A201 Request for examination
A302 Request for accelerated examination
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
E701 Decision to grant or registration of patent right
GRNT Written decision to grant
FPAY Annual fee payment

Payment date: 20180119

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Annual fee payment

Payment date: 20190117

Year of fee payment: 5