KR101975418B1 - Method and device for training a conditioned speaking - Google Patents

Abstract

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus is an input unit for receiving a test execution time from a user, a random unit for randomly setting the order of the predetermined sentences constituting the content and each of the randomly changed sentences And a recording unit for recording the user's answer to the random unit, wherein the random unit randomly changes the order of preset sentences when the test execution time is input from the user.

Description

Speaking condition reflection training apparatus and method {Method and device for training a conditioned speaking}

The present invention relates to foreign language learning. More specifically, the invention is directed to an apparatus and method for practicing reflexively speaking.

The present invention relates to a method and system for conditional reflexive practice of foreign language sentence-forming ability, which is characterized by developing a reflexive ability to form sentences immediately within a limited time.

The ultimate goal of any language is to learn the language so that learners have no difficulty listening, speaking, reading and writing. The learner should be able to produce sentences through conditional reflexive training, rather than speaking the language through the process of being understood and analyzed by the head.

KR 2004-0090235

The present invention discloses an apparatus capable of training speaking reflexively. The user performs the training by himself until the preset target time is reached, and then spontaneously tests the training result even in the absence of supervisor to train the speaking conditionally within the preset target time and within the target time. We would like to propose a device that allows students to measure training outcomes that meet the student's stated objectives fairly, even without a supervisor.

In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus receives a time suitable for passing the test from the educator. Preferably, a time suitable for passing the test may be set in advance.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus input unit for receiving a test execution time from the user; A sentence shuffler which randomly sets the order of preset sentences constituting the content; A recording unit for recording the user's answer to each of the randomly changed sentences; An answer providing unit providing an answer to each of the randomly changed sentences in the order of the randomly set order after the test execution time has elapsed; and an answer recorded by the user after checking the answer provided by the answer providing unit; Self-scoring unit for checking the wrong portion by itself and submitting to the terminal or server; In this case, the sentence shuffler randomly changes the order of the predetermined sentences immediately when the test execution time is input from the user, The self scoring unit provides an input unit next to each of the randomly changed sentences, and the input unit includes a window for inputting a tag and a window for describing contents, and the window for entering a tag includes a preset tag value. Is input, implemented or used by the user to select any of a plurality of tags Is implemented to create and enter a tag value directly, and the window in which the contents can be entered is implemented so that the user inputs the wrong contents, and the terminal or the server accumulates a history of the wrong portion submitted through the self scoring unit. Save the data, analyze the contents of the wrong part, and classify the information into the predetermined tag unit, and the terminal displays accumulated incorrect answers classified into the predetermined tag unit on the screen and submits an incorrect answer next to the wrong sentence. The number of times is displayed together, and the part associated with the preset tag in each sentence is highlighted.

Speaking condition reflection training apparatus changes the sentences randomly each time the learner performs the learning, and then records the answer to the test from the learner. In this case, the learner may set a target time for performing the test by himself / herself every time the learning is performed. Learners can autonomously repeat training, set target time for test execution, and shorten time.

According to an embodiment of the present invention, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus includes an input unit for receiving a test execution time from a user, a sentence mixing unit for randomly setting the order of predetermined sentences constituting the content; and the random order is changed And a recording unit for recording the user's answer to each of the sentences, wherein the sentence mixing unit randomly changes the order of the predetermined sentences immediately after the test execution time is input from the user.

Preferably, the recording unit is characterized in that to perform recording only during the test execution time received.

Preferably, the recording unit may perform recording even if the input test execution time elapses.

The answer providing unit may provide an answer to each of the randomly changed sentences in the order of the randomly set order when the test execution time has elapsed.

Preferably, when the content is at least one, the test execution time input by the user for each content is stored, and when the test execution time input by the user for each content is at least one time, the user inputs The test execution time is recorded and stored in order.

As another preferred embodiment of the present invention, a speaking condition reflection training apparatus includes an input unit for receiving a test start input from a user; A sentence shuffler that randomly sets a predetermined sequence of sentences constituting content when the test start input is received; and a recording unit that records a response of the user to each of the randomly changed sentences for a predetermined time; ; A test paper submitter which transmits a test paper including the answer of the user recorded by the recording unit to a terminal or a server when the preset time elapses; and after the preset time elapses or after the user's answer is transmitted, And an answer providing unit providing the user with an answer for each of the randomly changed sentences in the randomly set order.

Preferably, the self-scoring unit for checking the answer provided by the answer providing unit and the self-recorded answer and the wrong part to submit to the terminal or the server; characterized in that it further comprises.

Preferably, after checking the answers provided by the answer provider, the self-recorded answer and the recording time and the wrong part by repeating the training until there is nothing wrong, and check whether the successful passing within the predetermined target time do. Thereafter, the user may perform a test using a test button or a test interface provided by the speaking condition reflex training device.

In this case, the recording starts as soon as the test button is pressed, and at the same time, the user displays a questionnaire whose randomly changed order of sentences of the content that the user has autonomously trained. It is difficult for the user to commit cheating because the order of the sentences is changed randomly, and the test must be completed within a given time, so that the test can be passed only if the training is reflexively.

Preferably, the terminal or the server is characterized in that cumulatively storing the history for the wrong portion submitted through the self scoring unit.

Preferably, the terminal or server, if the user submits at least one or more test papers for the same content, wrong recovery number providing unit for displaying the number of incorrect parts submitted for each of the sentences constituting the same content; It further comprises.

Preferably, the terminal or the server accumulatively stores the history of the wrong part submitted through the self-scoring unit, analyzes the contents of the wrong part, and classifies it into a predetermined tag unit, and the predetermined tag unit The wrong answer classification unit for classifying and displaying the wrong portion as characterized in that it further comprises.

In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus input unit for receiving a test execution time from the user; A sentence shuffler which randomly sets the order of preset sentences constituting the content; A recording unit for recording the user's answer to each of the randomly changed sentences; A target deviation providing unit displaying a difference value between a target recording time preset for each content and at least one or more test execution times input by the user for each content; And a mean value providing unit for comparing and displaying a predetermined target recording time for each content and an average value of recording times recorded by the recording unit by a predetermined number of times in the most recent order for each of the contents. When the test execution time is input from the user, the order of the predetermined sentences is randomly changed.

Preferably, the content is content for language learning, characterized in that the content is generated based on at least one or more of the difficulty of language learning, grammar for language learning, language learning topics or user input.

Speaking condition reflex training apparatus of the present invention provides a user with an environment to practice conditionally reflexive when practicing the speaking. In addition, the user can set the learning target time according to their own learning level, can be compared with the time required for passing the test, and can learn the sentence reflexively through repetitive self-directed practice.

In addition, the user can score for themselves whether the content they speak is correct, can answer the answer, record the wrong content, and often find out what is wrong. In addition, only the content that is frequently wrong can be studied separately by conditional reflection.

The speaking condition reflex training apparatus of the present invention provides a test environment for a user to submit a self scoring result by himself. At the same time, in order to prevent the user from misleadingly scoring results, the user's test papers, or recorded files, are stored separately on a third external server, providing the possibility for third parties to verify that the user scored falsely. There is an effect that can be prevented.

Figure 1 is a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the internal configuration of the speaking condition reflection training apparatus.
Figure 2 shows an embodiment of learning to perform the speaking practice of speaking the contents of the Hangul in English as a preferred embodiment of the present invention training apparatus.
3 (a) and 4 (a) illustrate an example in which a random order of predetermined sentences constituting content is randomly set in the random unit according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
3 (b) and 4 (b) show one example of providing an answer in an order of randomly setting sentences in a random part in an answer provider.
5 is a view showing an example in which a speaking condition reflection training apparatus is implemented as another preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 illustrates an example of an interface provided by an answer provider as a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
7 to 9 illustrate an example of a self scoring unit presented to a user as a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of providing a terminal with a result of scoring in the self scoring unit of FIG. 9 as a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
11 is a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the wrong answer classification unit and the incorrect number of times in the wrong score classification unit for the results scored in the self-scoring unit of Figure 9 by tag, and records the wrong number of sentences per sentence to the user terminal One embodiment provided is shown.
12 illustrates an example of a system in which a speaking condition reflection training apparatus communicates with an external device in a wired or wireless manner as an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 13 illustrates an example in which an incorrect classifier is implemented in a server or various terminals.
FIG. 14 illustrates an example of cumulatively providing incorrect answers classified by a wrong answer classification unit in a speaking condition reflection training apparatus according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 15 illustrates an example of randomly practicing incorrect answers classified by a wrong answer classification unit in a speaking condition reflection training apparatus.
16 is a preferred embodiment of the present invention, shows a history of the actual time and the target time that the user must pass in the speaking condition reflection training apparatus.
FIG. 17 shows a history of a target time to be passed by a user and actual practice time in a speaking condition reflection training apparatus as another preferred embodiment of the present invention.
18 to 20 illustrate another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, in which a user views Korean and English together through a speaking condition reflection training apparatus and sets a target time for each sentence to practice.

Figure 1 is a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the internal configuration of the speaking condition reflection training apparatus. Figure 2 shows an embodiment of learning to perform the speaking practice of speaking the contents of the Hangul in English as a preferred embodiment of the present invention training apparatus.

Speaking condition reflection training apparatus 100 is a terminal for performing voice, video, text or data communication using the communication network (10). A browser for communicating with the server 200 via a communication network, a memory for storing programs and protocols, a microprocessor for executing and controlling various programs, and the like may be provided.

Speaking condition reflection training apparatus 100 can be implemented in the form of a portable terminal or a fixed terminal. Here, the portable terminal is a portable electronic device that can be easily carried, such as a video telephone, a mobile phone, a smart phone, a WCDMA terminal, a universal mobile telecommunication service (UMTS) terminal, a personal digital assistant (PDA), and a portable multimedia (PMP). Player), DMB (Digital Multimedia Broadcasting) terminal, E-Book, portable computer (Notebook, Tablet, etc.) or a smart watch (Smart Watch). The fixed terminal may be a desktop, a personal computer, a smart TV, or the like.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus 100 may provide learning by arbitrarily changing the order of at least one sentence constituting one content. In addition, the user may set the learning target time for the content himself to perform the learning. The user can shorten the learning target time while repeating the content.

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus 100 may solve the problem of habitual memory due to repetition that may occur when the user repeatedly learns the content. To this end, as a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus 100 includes at least the content that constitutes the content at the moment when the user sets a learning target time for learning the content or the moment the user starts recording the content. Randomly change the order of one or more sentences to help you learn conditionally.

Looking at each component of the speaking condition reflection training apparatus (100, 200) with reference to Figs.

In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus 100 includes input units 110 and 210, a random unit 120, a recording unit 130, and an answer providing unit 140. In addition, as a preferred embodiment, it may further include a self-receiving point portion (see Figs. 2, 250) and incorrect note portion (Figs. 2, 260).

The input units 110 and 210 may be keyboards, remote keyboards, remote devices, touch screens, microphones, and the like. The user inputs a test execution time for learning content to be learned by the input unit 110 or 210.

When the test execution time, for example, 3 minutes and 40 seconds, is input from the user, the random unit 220 randomly sets a predetermined sequence (S220) of preset sentences constituting the content automatically or manually.

An example of randomly setting the order of preset sentences constituting the content in the random unit 120 or 220 will be described with reference to FIGS. 3A and 4A. The random units 120 and 220 may be implemented to randomly change a predetermined order of sentences when a test execution time is input from a user. In this case, the recording units 130 and 230 may be implemented so that recording starts automatically immediately after the random order of the sentences set by the random units 120 and 220 is changed randomly.

As another embodiment, the random units 120 and 220 may be manually implemented to randomly change the order of preset sentences only when there is an input such as a button input or a touch input from the user.

In this case, the recording units 130 and 230 may be implemented so that recording starts automatically immediately after the random order of the sentences set by the random units 120 and 220 is changed randomly. Alternatively, the recording may be manually implemented so that recording starts only when the user presses or touches the "recording time" button 231.

The recording units 130 and 230 are recorded only until the test execution time input by the user through the input units 110 and 210. When recording is performed earlier than the test execution time input by the user, the user may press or touch the stop button 232. In this case, the recording time actually recorded by the user may be recorded as the test execution time.

When the user completes recording for the content to be learned through the recording units 130 and 230 or when the test execution time input by the user through the input units 110 and 210 has elapsed, the user provides an answer to the learned content. I can receive it.

In this case, the user may be provided with an answer in a passive manner such as pressing or touching the answer provider 240, or completing recording for the content to be learned through the recording units 130 and 230, or the user When the test execution time input through the input unit 110 or 210 elapses, a setting may be selected to automatically receive an answer.

3 (b) to 4 (b) illustrate an example in which an answer is provided by an answer provider (FIGS. 2 and 240) as an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the answer providing unit provides an answer in the order of randomly mixing the sentences of the content in the random section.

FIG. 3 (b) shows an example of an answer provided to the user when the sentences of the content are randomly mixed as shown in FIG. 3 (a). FIG. 4 (b) shows an example of an answer provided to the user when the sentences of content are randomly mixed as shown in FIG. 4 (a) in the random unit.

The answer provider may provide an answer for the learning content as a text 341 or a voice file 342 as in the embodiment of FIG. 3 (b). In addition, the answer providing unit may also provide an answer to the learning content as a text 441 or a voice file 442 and simultaneously provide a user-recorded recording file 443 as shown in the embodiment of FIG. Can be.

5 is a view showing an example in which a speaking condition reflection training apparatus is implemented as another preferred embodiment of the present invention.

The speaking condition reflection training apparatus may show an input unit, a random unit, a recording unit, a test paper presentation unit, and an answer providing unit. In FIG. 5, the functions of the random unit, the recording unit, and the answer providing unit are substantially the same as or similar to those of the embodiments described with reference to FIGS. 1 to 4. Other input units 550 and 552 and a test paper submitter (not shown) are as follows.

Speaking condition reflection training apparatus inputs a test start input to perform a test through the input unit (Fig. 5, 550). The speaking condition reflection training apparatus may further be implemented to confirm whether or not to perform a test to the user in the form of popup window 552. If there is an input 553 to additionally perform a test from the user, the target time is automatically reset to a preset value or a value set by the administrator. Administrators include users. If the user does not intend to perform the test, an input 554 for notifying the user may be input.

When the speaking condition reflection training apparatus receives a test start input from the user (FIGS. 5, 550, 552, and 553), the speaking condition reflection training apparatus automatically resets the target time to a preset value. Referring to FIG. 6, after the user inputs a test start input, the target time is reset to 480 seconds.

In addition, the actual time recorded by the user through the recording unit 630 is displayed as "00:04:48" took 4 minutes and 48 seconds. In addition, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus provides an indicator 632 indicating that the user passed the test within 60% of the target time 480 seconds required for the test passing.

If the target time 480 seconds have elapsed or if the user's recording time is shorter than "00:04:48", the speaking condition reflection training apparatus is provided with at least one terminal or server through a test paper presentation unit (not shown). To the external device, transmit the test paper containing the user's answer, that is, the recorded file. The terminal includes a user terminal. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the recording file stored in the external server may be used as evidence and may be used as a basis for determining and notifying the pass and fail.

When the test paper is transmitted to the terminal or server, the self-scoring unit 640 is activated in the speaking condition reflection training apparatus. The user may click or touch the activated self scoring unit 640. In FIG. 6, the self scoring unit 640 is implemented in a form of “correct answer check”.

When the user clicks on the self scoring unit 640, the menu mode is shown to the user. The menu mode includes a mode (642) for checking the correct answer while listening to my recording, a mode (644) for checking the native speaker's voice, and a mode (644) for listening to the native speaker's voice. In addition, it should be noted that various modes may be added or modified.

7 to 9 illustrate an example of a self scoring unit presented to a user as a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 7, the self scoring unit 740 provides a "correct" button 742 and an "incorrect" button 744 for the user to make a post by themselves. If the answer is correct, the user presses the "answer" button 742 to activate it. Similarly, if the answer is wrong, the user activates it by pressing the "incorrect" button. In this case, even if a user does not separately count the number of correct answers and incorrect answers, the number of correct answers and incorrect answers can be determined automatically.

Referring to FIG. 8, the self scoring unit 840 may provide an input unit 846 next to each sentence. Although it does not match the answer provided by the answer provider, if the correct answer can be entered in the input unit 846. Or, in the case of a correct answer, the input unit 846 may be described as a correct answer. In the same way, if the answer is incorrect, the input unit 846 may describe it as an incorrect answer.

Referring to FIG. 9, the self scoring unit 940 provides an input unit 941 next to each sentence, and the input unit 941 includes a window 942 for inputting a tag and a window 943 for describing contents. Include. In the window 942 for inputting a tag, a predetermined tag value is input, and a user may select any one of a plurality of tags. For example, a predetermined tag value may be input in the form of “tense”, “article”, “expression”, “grammar”, “other”, etc., and the user may select any of these values. In addition, it is possible to modify the user to create a tag value directly.

In a window 943 in which contents can be written, contents related to a tag can be described. For example, when the tag "tense" is selected, the window 943 in which the content can be described is described as "start-> started", so that the wrong part can be described.

FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of providing a terminal with a result of scoring in the self scoring unit of FIG. 9 as a preferred embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 10, only one embodiment provided to the terminal is described, but it should be noted that the transmission is possible to the server.

The server or the terminal may receive cumulatively the result scored by the self scoring unit. In addition, when a user performs a plurality of tests on the same content and scores a plurality of times through the self scoring unit, the server or the terminal may store a history thereof.

In addition, after analyzing the content of the wrong part in the history stored through the incorrect classification unit (not shown), it is classified in a predetermined tag unit, and may be displayed by classifying the wrong part in a predetermined tag unit. An example of the incorrect classification unit implemented in the user terminal is described with reference to FIG. 10 (1010, 1020). Another example of the incorrect classification unit implemented in the server or various terminals is described with reference to FIG. 13.

In addition, when a user submits at least one or more test papers for the same content through the incorrect answer providing unit (not shown), the number of incorrect parts may be displayed for each of the sentences constituting the same content. The incorrect number recovery providing unit is referred to FIG. 11 (1120 and 1121).

Referring to FIG. 10, after the test with the contents of FIG. 6, the score was scored through the self-grading unit. As a result, three of six problems were matched and three problems were incorrect. In addition, two of the incorrect answers of the three questions in the incorrect answer classification unit is a "article", one problem is classified as a "tense" related error and informs the user.

In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the incorrect classification unit may classify the incorrect answers into tag units by using the tag provided in the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 9. In addition, it is possible to classify wrong answers by tag using various methods such as machine learning.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus may further provide detailed information for each error classified by tag. In FIG. 10, when the tag “article” 1010 is clicked, the wrong sentence is notified in relation to “article” (FIGS. 11 and 1110) as shown in FIG. 11. In addition, when a user provides a plurality of incorrect answers for a particular sentence, the incorrect number of times providing unit displays the wrong number of times, for example, "provide two incorrect answers" (1120).

Similarly, clicking on the tag “tense” 1020 in FIG. 11 informs the wrong sentence in relation to “tense” (FIGS. 11 and 1111), as shown in FIG. 11. In addition, when a user provides a plurality of incorrect answers for a particular sentence, the incorrect number of times providing unit displays the wrong number of times, for example, "four times incorrect answer" (1120).

FIG. 12 illustrates an example of a system in which the speaking condition reflection training apparatus 1200 communicates with external devices 1210, 1220, 1230, and 1240 in a wired or wireless manner. The external device includes a server 1210, a notebook 1220, a smartphone 1230, a smart watch 1240, and the like.

FIG. 13 illustrates an example in which an incorrect classifier is implemented in a server or various terminals according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

The incorrect answer classification unit 1300 classifies the incorrect answer by tag unit in the transmission answer sent by the user self-grading. In addition, each chapter may be further classified as an incorrect answer associated with the corresponding tag.

Referring to FIG. 13, the incorrect answer classification unit 1300 uses a user's self-scoring result, of which nine sentences 1330 are incorrect answers related to "article" (1320), and eight sentences 1332 are "grammar". It can be identified that the incorrect answer (1332) associated with. Further, in association with the table of contents, the number of times 1340 and 1342 in which the user submits an incorrect answer with respect to the "article" may be further provided.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of cumulatively providing incorrect answers classified by a wrong answer classification unit in a speaking condition reflection training apparatus according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Speaking condition reflection training apparatus may be provided to select the tag 1420 in the incorrect classification unit 1410. Referring to FIG. 14, when the user selects the tag “article” 1420 in the wrong answer classification unit 1410, the incorrect answers accumulated in relation to the “article” among the test papers submitted by the user are provided. In addition, when the incorrect sentence is submitted multiple times for the same sentence, the number of incorrect answers submitted (1440, 1442, 1446) may be displayed together next to the sentence.

According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, when the tag 1420 is selected, portions associated with the tag 1420 are highlighted in each sentence constituting the content (1430 and 1432). For example, if the tag "article" is selected, "a", "the", and further "unrelated" are highlighted.

FIG. 15 illustrates an example of randomly practicing incorrect answers classified by a wrong answer classification unit in a speaking condition reflection training apparatus.

Speaking condition reflection training apparatus may be provided to practice learning by selecting the incorrect answer (1510) of the tag unit classified by the incorrect answer classification unit in the learning content. When the user selects an incorrect answer classified by the tag "article" in the incorrect answer classification unit (1510), a practice window (S1510) for randomly practicing the sentences classified in Figure 14 is provided.

16 is a preferred embodiment of the present invention, shows a history of the actual time and the target time that the user must pass in the speaking condition reflection training apparatus.

In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, each content has a predetermined target time (1612, 1622, 1632, 1642) (1610, 1620, 1630, 1640). The user may repeatedly learn to learn within the predetermined target time periods 1612, 1622, 1632, and 1642 for each content 1610, 1620, 1630, and 1640.

Referring to FIG. 16, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus provides a number of times a user learns each content.

For example, it can be seen that the student has learned (1614) eight times of "C-2 weeks sentence pre-learning-first part." Learn "C-2 week sentence precedence-second part" 6 times, "C-2 week sentence precedence-third part" 9 times and "C-2 week sentence precedence-fourth part" 3 times It can be seen that.

In addition, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus provides a history 1616 for the date on which the user learned each content and the target time for learning each content.

Referring to the content of "C-2 Week Preceding Study-First Part" (1610), the user recorded the first 2 minutes 30 seconds, the second 2 minutes 32 seconds, and the third 1 minute 59 seconds on January 2. The history 1616 may record a short time, which is a target time directly input by the user or a time actually recorded by the user. Alternatively, only the target time directly input by the user may be recorded.

In addition, the user recorded 2 minutes 15 seconds at 1 time, 1 minute 50 seconds at 2 times, and 1 minute 30 seconds at 3 times. Thereafter, 1 minute 40 seconds and 1 minute 35 seconds were recorded on January 11, respectively.

The history 1616 can intuitively display the best record of the user's record as well as the record of the time when the user recorded the content (1618). In addition, the latest average value of the user may be provided using the preset number of times based on the last recording time (1619).

As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus may provide a user with a table of contents as shown in FIG.

The user can check his or her records by checking the contents table of contents, and can also check contents that require further effort.

Referring to FIG. 16, in the case of the content of "C-2 weeks sentence first learning-first hunk" (1610), the latest average value is Avg 1 minute 35 seconds (1619) "C-2 weeks sentence first learning-first hunk" (1610) It can be seen that the target time target for the content is within 1 minute 40 seconds 1612.

In this case, an icon "P" 1650 indicating that the user can pass the corresponding content is activated. In addition, a recording icon " R " 1660 is also displayed to help the user to immediately perform the exercises.

On the other hand, the content of the "C-2 week sentence precedence learning-second part" (1620) content has a recent average value of Avg 2 minutes 57 seconds, the target time preset for the "C-2 week sentence precedence learning-second part" (1610) content It can be seen that the target exceeds 1 minute 40 seconds (1622).

In this case, the icon "P" 1650 indicating that the user can pass the corresponding content is deactivated. In addition, a recording icon " R " 1660 is also displayed to help the user perform additional exercises immediately.

FIG. 17 shows a history of a target time to be passed by a user and actual practice time in a speaking condition reflection training apparatus as another preferred embodiment of the present invention.

The speaking condition reflection training apparatus may display the entire contents table, or may display only the history of the contents learned by the user.

* Referring to FIG. 17, the speaking condition reflection training apparatus includes content contents 1710, a preset target time 1712 for passing each content, a user's latest average time 1720, a user's maximum time 1730, and Provide history 1740.

The user may intuitively check the target recording time 1750 and his average time 1760 displayed in the history 1740 as a graph. The history 1740 may display a deviation between the target recording time 1750 and its average time 1760 through the target deviation providing unit (not shown). When the difference between the at least one test execution time or the average value of the plurality of test execution times inputted for each content is large (S1780), it may be distinguished from the case where the target is stably entered within the target time (S1782).

The user may refer to the history, and content having a larger gap between the target recording time 1750 and the average time 1760 of the target recording time than the content that has stably entered within the target time, for example, "C-2 weeks sentence pre-learning-second part". Identify the lack of parts and practice more.

FIG. 18 shows an example in which a user views Korean and English together and practice each sentence within a target time of 14 seconds through the speaking condition reflection training apparatus 1800 as another preferred embodiment of the present invention. Speaking condition reflection training apparatus 1800 provides a search box 1810, to support to search for a desired sentence of a plurality of sentences.

19 is a preferred embodiment of the present invention, by using the speaking condition reflection training device 1900, the user is watching the Hangul and English together, reading along with his voice within a predetermined target time set for each sentence to speak An example of practicing is shown.

The user may perform shadowing, which is a method of learning English (1921, 1922), using the following popup window 1920 supported by sentence, and practice pronunciation, intonation, and speed of native speakers.

FIG. 20 illustrates an example of performing a test 2010 by presetting different target times 2020 for each sentence constituting content in the speaking condition reflection training apparatus 2000 as an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. do.

Although the present invention has been described with reference to the embodiments shown in the drawings, this is merely exemplary, and it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications and equivalent other embodiments are possible. Therefore, the true technical protection scope of the present invention will be defined by the technical spirit of the appended claims.

Claims (5)

An input unit configured to receive a test execution time from a user to perform speaking condition reflection training on the content;
A sentence shuffler configured to randomly change the order of preset sentences constituting content when a test execution time is input from a user;
A recording unit for recording the user's answer to each of the randomly changed sentences;
An answer providing unit providing an answer to each of the randomly changed sentences in the order of the randomly set order when the test execution time elapses; and
After checking the answer provided by the answer provider, the self-scoring unit for checking the wrong answer and their own recording to submit to the terminal or server; Includes,
The self scoring unit provides an input unit next to each of the randomly changed sentences, and the input unit includes a window for inputting a tag and a window for describing contents, and the window for entering a tag includes a preset tag value. The input is implemented so that the user selects any one of the plurality of tags or the user directly creates and inputs a tag value, and the window in which the content can be entered is implemented so that the user inputs wrong contents. ,
The terminal or the server accumulatively stores the history of the wrong part submitted through the self scoring unit, analyzes the contents of the wrong part, and classifies it into the predetermined tag unit, and the terminal uses the predetermined tag unit. The accumulated cumulative incorrect answers are displayed on the screen, the number of incorrect answers is displayed beside the wrong sentence, and the parts associated with the preset tag in each sentence are highlighted and displayed.
The terminal shows a history of a target time to be passed by the user and the actual practiced time for each of the preset sentences constituting the content, and provides the user with a date for learning the content and a target time for learning the content. Provides a history, the history intuitively displays the best recording of the user's recording as well as a record of the time the user recorded the content,
Contents in which the user has a large difference from the average value by distinguishing and displaying a case where the difference between the average value of at least one test execution time or a plurality of test execution times is large and a stable entry within the target time for each content. Is further configured to perform learning, wherein the history provides a user's latest average value using a preset number of times based on the last recording time, and is also displayed in text or graph form. Reflex training device. delete delete delete The method of claim 1,
When the test paper including the answer of the user is completed transmission to the terminal or the server, the self scoring unit is activated
When the user clicks on the self scoring unit, a menu mode is shown.
The menu mode includes a mode for checking the correct answer while listening to my recording, a mode for checking the native speaker's voice, and a mode for checking the correct answer while listening to the native speaker's voice,
The self-grading unit provides a correct answer button and an incorrect answer button to allow the user to score points for each sentence, and the user activates by pressing the correct answer button if the answer is correct, and activates by pressing the wrong answer button if the answer is wrong. Speaking condition reflection training device.

Images