JPWO2020217415A1 - Information processing device - Google Patents

Abstract

To facilitate consideration of various approaches to improving food hygiene. The analysis operation reception unit 402 receives the designated operation for designating the attribute to be analyzed, and transmits the designated data indicating the designated attribute to the server device 10. The analysis processing unit 107 extracts the inspection result of the analysis target indicated by the designated data, aggregates the extracted inspection result, and calculates the evaluation rate. The analysis processing unit 107 generates a statistic table showing the statistics calculated based on the calculated evaluation rate and a graph showing the time-series change of the evaluation rate. The analysis processing unit 107 outputs evaluation data showing the generated statistic table and time series graph as evaluation information to the analyst terminal 40. The analysis image display unit 401 displays the evaluation information indicated by the output evaluation data.

Description

The present invention relates to food hygiene management.

As a technique related to food hygiene management, Patent Document 1 states that the inspection results of the state of hygiene management of business establishments handling food and their employees are worse than the predetermined standard values determined according to the importance. A technique for notifying a predetermined notification destination of an alert when it is a result is disclosed.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2012-216115

Due to the mandatory HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point), it is expected that many food-related businesses will increase hygiene management operations including HACCP. For example, in order to continuously monitor and record each process until the product is provided, various items related to food safety are inspected. The results of the inspection are useful information for considering matters to be improved in future food hygiene, but some improvements for food hygiene should be individually addressed by each business operator, and each Some areas and groups to which the business belongs should work in unison.
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to facilitate examination of food hygiene improvement measures from various perspectives.

In order to achieve the above object, the present invention specifies a storage unit that stores inspection results related to food hygiene in association with any of a plurality of attributes to be inspected, and an attribute of any of the plurality of attributes. Then, the information processing apparatus including the evaluation information output unit which outputs the evaluation information indicating the evaluation of the food hygiene, which is represented based on the aggregated value of the inspection result stored in association with the attribute, is provided.

Further, the evaluation information output unit may output information indicating a change in the value calculated based on the aggregated value in time series as the evaluation information.

Further, when a change having a predetermined feature appears in the information indicating the change in the time series, the attribute output unit may be provided to output the attribute changed at the time when the change appears.

Further, when the evaluation information output unit outputs a predetermined value calculated based on the aggregated value as the evaluation information, the value calculated by giving a different weight to each inspection result that is the basis of the aggregated value. May be output as the evaluation information.

In addition, the storage unit includes a result output unit that outputs the inspection result to the first user device that is permitted to display the inspection result, and the storage unit receives the first input information transmitted from the first user device. , May be stored in association with the output inspection result.

In addition, an information output unit that outputs the first input information to the second user device that is permitted to display the first input information is provided, and the storage unit is a second user device that has been transmitted from the second user device. 2 The input information may be stored in association with the output first input information.

Further, the storage unit may store the first input information in association with the inspection result only when the first input information includes a photograph.

Further, the evaluation information output unit may output the evaluation information to a display means for displaying the inspection items used for the inspection of the inspection target.

According to the present invention, it is possible to facilitate examination of food hygiene improvement measures from various perspectives.

Diagram showing an example of the overall configuration of the inspection support system according to the embodiment Diagram showing an example of the hardware configuration of the server device Diagram showing an example of the hardware configuration of the inspection terminal Diagram showing an example of the hardware configuration of the operator terminal and the analyst terminal Diagram showing the functional configuration realized by each device Diagram showing an example of memorized inspection items Diagram showing an example of the displayed operation image Diagram showing examples of extracted inspection items Diagram showing an example of the displayed inspection list Diagram showing an example of the inspection list in the state where the input operation is performed Diagram showing an example of inspection result table Diagram showing an example of the displayed aggregation results Diagram showing an example of stored test results and attributes Diagram showing an example of the displayed test results A diagram showing an example of an inspection result table that reflects the improvement results Diagram showing an example of the displayed inspection image Diagram showing an example of the displayed test results A diagram showing an example of an inspection result table that reflects the comments of inspectors Diagram showing an example of the displayed analysis image Diagram showing an example of the displayed evaluation information Diagram showing an example of the displayed evaluation information Diagram showing an example of the output evaluation information Diagram showing an example of the output evaluation information Diagram showing an example of the output evaluation information Diagram showing an example of the output evaluation information The figure which shows an example of the operation procedure of each device in inspection processing The figure which shows an example of the operation procedure of each device in the presentation process The figure which shows an example of the operation procedure of each apparatus in an analysis process. Diagram showing an example of accumulated attributes A diagram showing an example of a graph showing changes in the evaluation rate over time

1 ... Inspection support system, 10 ... Server device, 20 ... Inspection terminal, 30 ... Business terminal, 40 ... Analyst terminal, 101 ... Item storage unit, 102 ... Item extraction unit, 103 ... Inspection image generation unit, 104 ... Inspection Image output unit, 105 ... Inspection history storage unit, 106 ... Authentication unit, 107 ... Analysis processing unit, 201 ... Inspection image display unit, 202 ... Designated operation reception unit, 203 ... List management unit, 204 ... Input operation reception unit, 205 ... Aggregation processing unit, 301 ... Inspection image display unit, 302 ... List management unit, 303 ... Input operation reception unit, 304 ... Authentication operation reception unit, 401 ... Analysis image display unit, 402 ... Analysis operation reception unit.

[1] Example FIG. 1 shows an example of the overall configuration of the inspection support system 1 according to the embodiment. The inspection support system 1 is a system that supports inspection work, which is one of the work related to the management of food hygiene (maintaining a safe state in which food does not harm health) in facilities that handle food. Inspection work is the work of inspecting whether the state of food hygiene in facilities, etc. meets the standards required for the safety of people who ingest food (for example, the standards set by HACCP), and food hygiene. Inspections are conducted for various inspection items that affect.

The inspection support system 1 includes a network 2, a server device 10, an inspection terminal 20, a business operator terminal 30, and an analyst terminal 40. The network 2 is a communication system including a mobile communication network, the Internet, and the like, and relays data exchange between devices accessing the own system. The server device 10, the operator terminal 30, and the analyst terminal 40 access the network 2 by wired communication (may be wireless communication), and the inspection terminal 20 accesses the network 2 by wireless communication.

The inspection terminal 20 is a terminal used by an inspector who performs inspection work, and is a so-called mobile terminal that can be carried like a smartphone or a tablet terminal. The inspector causes the inspection terminal 20 to display an inspection list which is a list of inspection items at the facility to be inspected, and inputs and records the implementation status of each inspection item in the inspection terminal 20. The inspector is, for example, an employee who works at the facility to be inspected or an employee of a business operator who supports food hygiene management and is in charge of the inspection work.

Although only one inspection terminal 20 is shown in FIG. 1, when there are many facilities to be inspected or when the facilities to be inspected are wide and a plurality of inspection terminals are to be inspected at the same time, a plurality of inspection terminals 20 are used. Multiple inspections are performed in parallel using each inspector. The server device 10 performs a process of managing information related to inspection by one or a plurality of inspection terminals 20. The server device 10 is an example of the "information processing device" of the present invention. The information related to the inspection is the above-mentioned inspection items and the inspection results for each inspection item.

For example, when an inspector inspects a facility to be inspected, the server device 10 transmits an inspection list including inspection items necessary for the facility to the inspection terminal 20. When the inspection work is completed, the inspection result is transmitted from the inspection terminal 20 to the server device 10. The server device 10 stores the transmitted inspection result, performs a process of viewing the inspection result as a past history, a process of analyzing a tendency of the inspection result, and the like.

The business operator terminal 30 is a terminal used by a business operator who conducts business at a facility to be inspected, and is, for example, a personal computer. Employees of the business operator can operate the business operator terminal 30 to view the inspection results stored in the server device 10. The analyst terminal 40 is a terminal used by an analyst whose job is to have the server device 10 analyze and utilize the tendency of the inspection result described above, and is, for example, a personal computer. The analyst can operate the analyst terminal 40 to cause the server device 10 to perform a desired analysis process.

FIG. 2 shows an example of the hardware configuration of the server device 10. The server device 10 is a computer including a processor 11, a memory 12, a storage 13, a communication device 14, and a bus 15. The processor 11 operates, for example, an operating system to control the entire computer. The processor 11 includes a central processing unit (CPU) including an interface with peripheral devices, a control device, an arithmetic unit, and registers.

The processor 11 reads a program, data, and the like from at least one of the storage 13 and the communication device 14 into the memory 12, and executes various processes according to the read program and the like. The memory 12 is a computer-readable recording medium such as a ROM (Read Only Memory) and a RAM (Random Access Memory). The storage 13 is a recording medium that can be read by a computer such as a hard disk drive.

The communication device 14 is hardware (transmission / reception device) for communicating between computers via at least one of a wired network and a wireless network. Each device such as the processor 11 and the memory 12 is connected by a bus 15 for communicating information. The bus 15 may be configured by using a single bus, or may be configured by using a different bus for each device.

FIG. 3 shows an example of the hardware configuration of the inspection terminal 20. The inspection terminal 20 is a computer including a processor 21, a memory 22, a storage 23, a communication device 24, an input device 25, an output device 26, and a bus 27. The processor 21 and the like in which the hardware having the same name is shown in FIG. 2 are the same type of hardware as in FIG. 2, although there are differences in performance, specifications, and the like.

The input device 25 is an input device (for example, a switch, a button, a sensor, etc.) that receives an input from the outside. The input device 25 includes an imaging device (such as a digital camera) for taking a picture. The output device 26 is an output device (for example, a display, a speaker, an LED lamp, etc.) that outputs to the outside. In the inspection terminal 20, the input device 25 and the output device 26 include a structure in which a part or all of them are integrated (a touch screen in which a display and a touch panel are integrated).

FIG. 4 shows an example of the hardware configuration of the operator terminal 30 and the analyst terminal 40. The operator terminal 30 and the analyst terminal 40 are computers including a processor 31, a memory 32, a storage 33, a communication device 34, an input device 35, an output device 36, and a bus 37. The processor 21 and the like in which the hardware having the same name is shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 are the same type of hardware as those in FIGS. 2 and 3 although there are differences in performance and specifications.

The business terminal 30 and the analyst terminal 40 may be mobile terminals like the inspection terminal 20, or may be stationary computers having a fast processing speed and a large screen. In the latter case, the input device 35 includes a keyboard, a mouse, and the like, and the output device 36 includes a display dedicated to displaying the screen.

Each function in each device included in the inspection support system 1 is performed by the processor by loading predetermined software (program) on the hardware such as each processor and memory, and the communication by each communication device is controlled. It is achieved by controlling at least one of reading and writing of data in memory and storage.

FIG. 5 shows a functional configuration realized by each device. The server device 10 includes an item storage unit 101, an item extraction unit 102, an inspection image generation unit 103, an inspection image output unit 104, an inspection history storage unit 105, an authentication unit 106, and an analysis processing unit 107. .. The inspection terminal 20 includes an inspection image display unit 201, a designated operation reception unit 202, a list management unit 203, an input operation reception unit 204, and an aggregation processing unit 205.

The business terminal 30 includes an inspection image display unit 301, a list management unit 302, an input operation reception unit 303, and an authentication operation reception unit 304. The analyst terminal 40 includes an analysis image display unit 401 and an analysis operation reception unit 402. Although only one inspection terminal 20, a business operator terminal 30, and an analyst terminal 40 are shown in FIG. 5, two or more terminals having a common functional configuration may be provided.

The item storage unit 101 stores inspection items that may be used in the inspection list described above. Since the inspection items included in the inspection list may differ depending on the facility to be inspected, a wide range of inspection items are prepared in this embodiment, and can be appropriately selected from them. For example, the food hygiene standards for restaurants to obtain a business license from a health center may differ depending on the municipality.

Therefore, it is necessary to set the inspection items so that it is possible to confirm whether or not each restaurant meets the standards set by the local government in the area where each restaurant is located. However, in this embodiment, the inspection items according to the area can be selected. It has become like. In addition, food hygiene standards for obtaining a business license from a health center may differ depending on the type of business, such as restaurant business, coffee shop business, food manufacturing industry, and food sales industry.

In addition, stores that belong to a group (corporate group or union group, etc.), such as chain stores that have stores in several regions and businesses that belong to unions, must meet the unified food hygiene standards for each group regardless of region. May be obligatory. In that case, it is necessary to make it an inspection item that can confirm whether or not it meets the criteria of the group. In this embodiment as well, inspection items can be selected according to the type of industry or group. In addition to the above-mentioned areas and the like, inspection items according to various inspection criteria such as inspections based on HACCP and inspections incorporating the concept of HACCP may be selected.

The item storage unit 101 stores in advance inspection items that may be required to be inspected on the assumption that there are various criteria as described above. Here, the inspection item is a word representing a question, a questionnaire, etc. used at the time of inspection, and indicates a sentence or phrase in a predetermined language or its intention by a symbol or the like. Either one of the languages and symbols may be used, or both may be used. In addition, when the symbol is used, it is suitable for making the inspection item invisible to the surrounding people.

In this embodiment, the inspection items are displayed in Japanese words, but the language, symbols, and the like may be pronounced by voice. Examples of inspection items include, for example, "I am using a sink dedicated to hand washing", "Is XX always done?", "Is the temperature above XX degrees?", "Humidity is in the range of XX to XX." The content to be inspected is expressed in sentences such as "Is it in?"

Inspection results are input for inspection items, and the input results are stored (details will be described later). The test result may be represented by 2 choices of "Yes" and "No", or 3 or more choices by increasing other choices, or by numerical values or symbols indicating the degree such as 5 steps and 10 steps. You may. In this embodiment, the inspection item answered "Yes" indicates that the inspection result was "OK", and the inspection item answered "No" indicates that the inspection result was "NG". Two choices are adopted.

FIG. 6 shows a list of inspection items stored in this embodiment. Here, each inspection item is represented by symbols and numbers such as "K-1", "K-2", "K-3", etc., but what is actually memorized is a question, etc. It is a sentence indicating. As shown in FIG. 6, the item storage unit 101 stores the attributes of the inspection target in association with each inspection item. The inspection target indicates what the question of the inspection item, the questionnaire, etc. are about. That is, each inspection item has some related inspection target.

Since various inspection targets can be used, many inspection items may be required. Therefore, in the inspection support system 1, a large number of inspection items can be organized by defining a word for specifying the inspection target (hereinafter referred to as "attribute") and associating the inspection item with the defined attribute. It is supposed to be. The inspection target is specified by, for example, an attribute indicating a physical object such as equipment, a place, and a person to be inspected, and an attribute indicating the content of the inspection such as hand washing, clothes, date management, storage condition, and temperature condition.

In addition, what is to be inspected may be determined by the type of industry, region, group (corporate group, union group, etc.) to which the facility to be inspected belongs, so the inspection target is those industries, regions, groups, etc. It can also be specified by the attribute indicating. In the inspection support system 1, these attributes for specifying the inspection target are defined as one or a plurality of attributes of the inspection target described above.

In each of the above examples, the attributes of the inspection target having some commonality are indicated by the words expressing the commonality, but the attributes of the inspection target having some commonality are not limited to the commonality. It may be indicated by any irrelevant word (eg, just a symbol). Further, the attributes of inspection objects having no commonality (for example, inspection objects randomly selected) may be indicated by arbitrarily defined words (simple symbols, etc.). In either case, the inspection items can be organized by associating one or a plurality of attributes of the inspection target related to the inspection item with the inspection item.

In addition, each attribute can be further sorted into arbitrary categories, and each category is given an arbitrary name (hereinafter referred to as "category name"). In this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 6, attributes such as employees, ingredients, utensils / tableware, storage status, and environment are sorted by the category name "major item", and attributes such as hand washing and clothes are "medium items". It is sorted by the division name.

In this embodiment, the major items and the middle items are inspection targets that have something in common with each other (for example, "employee" is an inspection target related to an employee, and "hand wash" is an inspection target related to hand washing). It is a classification name to sort. The inspection items associated with the attributes sorted as large items and medium items have a common inspection target, so it is easy to inspect all at once (for example, the inspection item of the large item "foodstuff" is a foodstuff. Can be inspected together at the place where they are stored).

In addition, the attributes indicating the area ("A city", etc.), the industry type ("restaurant", etc.), and the group ("B group", etc.) are the "region", "industry", and "group", respectively. It is sorted by the classification name. Region, industry, and group are classification names that classify attributes according to the type of group to which the facility to be inspected belongs. As mentioned above, groups may have their own standards of food hygiene that must be met in order to do business.

Therefore, each attribute of region, industry and group is associated with the inspection items necessary to confirm that the corresponding food hygiene standards are satisfied. For example, in the example of FIG. 6, the inspection item “K1-3” is one of the inspection items required for the attribute of the area “A city” to meet the food hygiene standards set by the city A. Is associated with.

In addition, the attribute of the industry "restaurant" is associated with the inspection item "K1-6" which is one of the inspection items necessary to meet the food hygiene standards set for restaurants. ing. In addition, the attribute of the group "B group" is changed to the inspection item "K2-3" which is one of the inspection items required to meet the food hygiene standards required for stores under the B group. It is associated.

In addition, each category name includes the attributes "all" and "N / A". "All" means that all the attributes of the corresponding division name are included (in the case of "region", the attributes of all regions including "A city" are included). That is, for example, the inspection item associated with the attribute of the area "all" is required regardless of the area to which the facility to be inspected belongs.

In the example of FIG. 6, for example, in the case of the attribute of the division name of "area", only one attribute of "A city" or all the attributes of "all" are associated with the inspection items. Not exclusively. For example, as regional attributes, two attributes such as "city A and city C" or three or more attributes may be associated with the inspection item. By doing so, it is possible to represent the necessary inspection items in common in multiple regions.

Further, "N / A" means that the attribute of the corresponding division name does not exist (that is, not applicable). That is, for example, the inspection item "K2-3" is associated with the attribute of the group "B group", but the region and the type of industry are associated with "N / A". This means that if the store is under the umbrella of Group B, the inspection item "K2-3" needs to be inspected regardless of the area or industry.

The inspection item "K2-3" is not associated with the attributes of "region" and "industry", but for example, it corresponds to both the attribute of the region "A city" and the attribute of the industry "restaurant". There may be attached inspection items. The inspection item means, for example, an inspection item necessary to meet the food hygiene standards set by City A for restaurants. Similarly, there may be inspection items to which the attributes of "region", "industry", and "group" are all associated.

As described above, the item storage unit 101 has a plurality of inspection items related to food hygiene and any one of the attributes of the inspection target related to each of the plurality of inspection items (if there are a plurality of attributes of the inspection target related to the inspection item). The above attributes) are associated with each other and stored. The item storage unit 101 is an example of the “storage unit” of the present invention. "Multiple attributes" here means "employees" and "ingredients" classified into "major items", "hand wash" and "clothes" classified into "medium items", and "regions". "All" and "A city" are classified, "All" and "Restaurant" are classified into "Industry", and "All" and "B group" are classified into "Group".

The inspection terminal 20 performs an operation for displaying an inspection list representing a list of inspection items stored in the item storage unit 101. The inspection image display unit 201 of the inspection terminal 20 displays various images related to the inspection. The inspection image display unit 201 displays, for example, an operation image for accepting an operation for displaying the inspection list.

FIG. 7 shows an example of the displayed operation image. In the example of FIG. 7, the inspection image display unit 201 has the character string "Please specify the attribute to be inspected.", The facility name input field A1, the area attribute designation field A2, and the industry attribute. The inspection screen including the designation field A3 of the above, the designation field A4 of the attribute of the group, and the generation button B1 of the inspection list is displayed. The inspection image display unit 201 notifies the designated operation reception unit 202 of the display range of the input field, each designated field, and the button.

The designated operation reception unit 202 accepts the operation to the notified display range as a designated operation for designating the attribute to be inspected. The operation for each designated field may be an operation of inputting a character string or an operation of selecting one of the pull-down attribute candidates. It is assumed that the operation of specifying the attribute in the designated field (“A city” and “restaurant” are specified in the example of FIG. 7) and the operation of pressing the generation button B1 are performed.

The designated operation reception unit 202 accepts these operations as attribute designation operations, and transmits the input facility name and attribute data indicating the designated attribute to the server device 10. When the item extraction unit 102 of the server device 10 receives the transmitted attribute data, the item extraction unit 102 extracts the inspection items stored in the item storage unit 101 in association with the attributes indicated by the received attribute data. The item extraction unit 102 extracts a group of inspection items that differ depending on the designated attribute.

FIG. 8 shows an example of the extracted inspection items. For example, when "restaurant in city A" is specified as an attribute, the item extraction unit 102 uses "K1-3" associated with "city A" and "K1-6" associated with "restaurant". The inspection item group including the inspection item "" is extracted. Further, when "Coffee shop in city A" is specified as an attribute, the item extraction unit 102 includes "K1-3" associated with "city A" but is associated with "restaurant". Extract the inspection item group that does not include "-6".

Further, when "restaurant in city C" is specified as an attribute, the item extraction unit 102 does not include "K1-3" associated with "city A" but is associated with "restaurant". A group of inspection items including "K1-6" is extracted. Further, the item extraction unit 102 does not include "K1-6" associated with "restaurant" when "coffee shop under group B of city A" is specified as an attribute, but "city A" An inspection item group including the associated "K1-3" and the "K2-3" associated with the "group B" is extracted.

Further, when "a coffee shop under the group B of city C" is specified as an attribute, the item extraction unit 102 is associated with "K1-3" and "restaurant" associated with "city A". An inspection item group including "K2-3" associated with "Group B" is extracted, although "K1-6" is not included. The item extraction unit 102 extracts each inspection item associated with the attribute "all" by including it in any inspection item group.

In addition, in the item extraction unit 102, for example, when there is an inspection item associated with "A city, C city", the item extraction unit 102 may specify "A city" or "C city". Extract inspection items. On the other hand, in the item extraction unit 102, for example, when there are inspection items associated with "A city" and "restaurant", even if only "A city" is designated, only "restaurant" is designated. In this case, the inspection item is not extracted, and the inspection item is extracted when both "A city" and "restaurant" are specified.

The item extraction unit 102 issues a facility ID corresponding to the facility name indicated by the received attribute data, associates the facility name and the facility ID with each other, and stores them in the own device. After that, the data of each facility is managed in association with the facility ID. When the item extraction unit 102 extracts the inspection item as described above, the item extraction unit 102 supplies the extracted inspection item to the inspection image generation unit 103 together with the facility ID to be inspected.

The inspection image generation unit 103 is a function of generating an inspection image related to a food hygiene inspection, and for example, generates an inspection list representing the supplied inspection items as an inspection image. The inspection image generation unit 103 is, for example, a list including an HTML (HyperText Markup Language) document representing a design for displaying a facility name and an inspection list on a browser, and an inspection result table for storing input results for each inspection item. By generating the data, the inspection list is generated.

The inspection image generation unit 103 supplies the generated list data to the inspection image output unit 104. The inspection image output unit 104 is a function of outputting the inspection image generated by the inspection image generation unit 103. For example, by outputting the supplied list data to the inspection terminal 20 which is the attribute designation source. , Outputs an inspection image called an inspection list. When the list management unit 203 of the inspection terminal 20 receives the output list data, the list management unit 203 stores and manages the inspection list and the inspection result table indicated by the received list data.

The list management unit 203 supplies the HTML document indicated by the stored list data to the inspection image display unit 201. The inspection image display unit 201 displays the facility name and the inspection list indicated by the supplied HTML document as inspection images.
FIG. 9 shows an example of the displayed inspection list. In the example of FIG. 9, the inspection image display unit 201 has the major items "employee" tab T1, "foodstuff" tab T2, "equipment / tableware" tab T3, "storage status" tab T4, and "storage status" tab T4. The inspection list including the tab T5 of "environment" and the tab T6 of "judgment" described later is displayed with the tab T1 open.

The display area C1 of the "employee" includes a display area D1 of the middle item "hand wash", a display area D2 of "clothes", a display area D3 of "visual inspection of fingers", and the like. Inspection items such as "K-1" and "K-2" are displayed in the display area of each middle item. When the display area C1 is scrolled, the display area of the middle item and the inspection item that are not displayed are displayed. On the left side of the inspection item, an NG button E1, a photo button E2, a comment button E3, and an OK button E4 that accept an input operation of the inspection result are displayed.

FIG. 10 shows an example of an inspection list in a state where an input operation is performed. When the NG button E1 is pressed, an "x" mark (a mark indicating that the inspection result is NG) is displayed, and when the OK button E4 is pressed, an "○" mark (indicating that the inspection result is OK) is displayed. Mark) is displayed. When the photo button E2 is pressed, the photo input field E5 is displayed. The photo input field E5 is an area to which a photograph of the site to be inspected is attached.

When the photo input field E5 is tapped, for example, the imaging device of the inspection terminal 20 is activated to take a picture by the user's operation, and the taken picture is displayed in the picture input field E5. It should be noted that when the photo input field E5 is tapped, the photographed photograph stored in the inspection terminal 20 may be imported.

When the comment button E3 is pressed, the comment input field E6 and the comment example sentence list E7 are displayed. A comment may be manually input in the comment input field E6, or a comment may be input by selecting an example sentence included in the comment example sentence list E7. The inspection image display unit 201 notifies the input operation reception unit 204 of the display range of each button and each input field.

The input operation receiving unit 204 accepts an operation to the notified display range as an input operation of the inspection result. When the input operation receiving unit 204 receives the input operation, the input operation receiving unit 204 supplies the result of the received input operation to the inspection image display unit 201, and the inspection image display unit 201 displays the result of the input operation. Further, the input operation reception unit 204 also supplies the result of the received input operation to the list management unit 203.

The list management unit 203 reflects the result of the supplied input operation as an inspection result in the stored inspection result table.
FIG. 11 shows an example of the inspection result table. In the inspection result table, "facility ID", "number of inspections", "inspection items", "NG", "OK", "photograph", "comment" and "input date and time" are stored in association with each other. ..

The "facility ID" and "number of inspections" are stored when the inspection image generation unit 103 generates an inspection result table. In the example of FIG. 11, since the inspection result table of the corresponding facility ID is generated for the first time, "1" times are stored as "inspection times". The input of "NG" is represented by "x", and the input of "OK" is represented by "○". The photo is represented by the file name of the image data, and the comment is represented by the file name of the text data. The input date and time is represented by the date, but it may be represented up to the detailed time.

The aggregation processing unit 205 performs aggregation processing of inspection results with reference to the inspection results stored in the inspection result table. The aggregation process is a process of calculating a value obtained by totaling the number of common inspection results (for example, OK inspection results) as an aggregation value. In addition, the aggregation process also includes a process of calculating another value based on the calculated aggregated value. Specifically, the aggregation processing unit 205 aggregates the inspection results of OK and calculates the ratio of the aggregated value of OK to the total number of inspection items (hereinafter referred to as “evaluation rate”) for each major item and for the whole. I do.

The higher the evaluation rate, the more work that should be carried out for hygiene management is being carried out, and it can be used as an index indicating that safer food supply can be expected. In the calculation of the evaluation rate, the aggregation processing unit 205 handles the inspection results of each inspection item with weights rather than uniform. For example, when there are 50 inspection items, if they are treated uniformly, the evaluation rate will decrease by 2% for each NG.

On the other hand, by weighting each inspection item, the evaluation rate is calculated such that, for example, if the inspection item with high importance is NG, it decreases by 3%, and if the inspection item with low importance is NG, it decreases by 1%. To. The importance means, for example, that the inspection item having a greater influence on food hygiene has a higher importance. By weighting with the importance added, the reliability of the evaluation rate as the above index can be improved as compared with the case where the importance is not added.

When the operation of pressing the tab T6 of the "determination" shown in FIG. 9 is performed, the inspection image display unit 201 requests the aggregation processing unit 205 to perform aggregation processing. The inspection image display unit 201 displays the total result supplied in response to the request.
FIG. 12 shows an example of the displayed aggregation result. The inspection image display unit 201 displays a result table F1 showing the evaluation rate for each major item and a radar chart F2 showing the evaluation rate for each major item.

In addition, the inspection image display unit 201 indicates the overall evaluation rate as "comprehensive evaluation", and is a character string of "excellent store" which is a name determined according to the comprehensive evaluation and "S" of the evaluation rank determined according to the comprehensive evaluation. Is displayed. These names and evaluation ranks are, for example, "excellent store" and "S", "excellent store" and "A", "good store" and "B", "improvement point" and "improvement point" according to the value of the comprehensive evaluation. It is defined as "C".

When the operation of pressing the confirmation button B2 displayed on the inspection screen is performed, the input operation reception unit 204 accepts this operation as a confirmation operation for confirming the input of the inspection result, and the list management unit 203 shows the inspection result table. The result data is transmitted to the server device 10. The inspection history storage unit 105 of the server device 10 stores the inspection result table indicated by the transmitted result data, and accumulates the inspection results stored in the stored inspection result table as the inspection history.

Further, the inspection history storage unit 105 stores the above-mentioned inspection result (inspection result regarding food hygiene) in association with any one of a plurality of attributes to be inspected. The inspection history storage unit 105 inquires of the item extraction unit 102, for example, the attribute specified for the inspection target identified by the facility ID. The item extraction unit 102 supplies the inspection history storage unit 105 with the attributes used when extracting the inspection items for the corresponding facility ID. The inspection history storage unit 105 stores the inspection result in association with the supplied attribute.

FIG. 13 shows an example of the stored test results and attributes. In the example of FIG. 13, the inspection history storage unit 105 stores the inspection result shown in FIG. 12 in association with the attribute of the area “A city” and the attribute of the industry of “restaurant”. Since the attribute of the group is not stored, it is expressed as "None". In addition, since the accumulated inspection results include the facility ID and the number of inspections, it is possible to know which facility is the number of inspection results.

In the above example, the inspection image generation unit 103 has generated an inspection list representing the inspection items of a plurality of major items in advance, but an inspection list may be generated for each major item. For example, when the item extraction unit 102 receives the attribute data, it extracts only the inspection items associated with the "employee" displayed in the initial state as shown in FIG. The inspection list showing the inspection items extracted in this way can also be displayed as shown in FIG.

Then, for example, when an operation of selecting the tab T2 of the “foodstuff” is performed, the designated operation reception unit 202 accepts the operation as an operation of designating the attribute “foodstuff”. Then, the item extraction unit 102 extracts only the inspection items associated with the “foodstuff”, and the inspection list representing the inspection items of the “foodstuff” is displayed. As described above, the inspection list generation method includes a first method of generating an inspection list of all major items in advance and a second method of generating a corresponding inspection list when a major item is specified. is there.

Regardless of which method is used, the inspection image output unit 104 lists the inspection items stored in association with the attribute to be inspected (any of a plurality of attributes) when the attribute to be inspected is specified. Outputs the inspection list expressed as. In the case of the first method, when the "region", "industry", and "group" are specified, an inspection list representing the inspection items associated with the specified attributes is newly generated and output.

On the other hand, when a "major item" is specified on the inspection screen shown in FIG. 9, an inspection list that has already been generated and output is displayed on the screen as an inspection list of inspection items associated with the specified major item. expressed. On the other hand, in the case of the second method, when any of "region", "industry", "group" and "major item" is specified, the inspection representing the inspection item associated with the specified attribute is displayed. A new list is generated and output.

In this way, the inspection image output unit 104 may output the inspection list using the inspection terminal 20 as a display means and immediately display the inspection list, or output the inspection list using the inspection terminal 20 as a storage means. The inspection list may be displayed later. In either case, an inspection list showing the required inspection items is output simply by specifying the attributes to be inspected, so it is necessary for food hygiene management compared to the case where the required inspection items are individually selected. The use of inspection items can be facilitated.

The inspection results accumulated in the inspection history storage unit 105 can be confirmed by the business operator who conducts the business at the facility where the inspection was performed. The inspection image display unit 301, the list management unit 302, and the input operation reception unit 303 of the business terminal 30 have the same functions as the inspection image display unit 201, the list management unit 203, and the input operation reception unit 204 of the inspection terminal 20. The inspection list output from the server device 10 is displayed, and the input operation is accepted.

However, the business operator is authenticated so that the inspection results of other business operators will not be viewed. When requesting the inspection result from the server device 10, the authentication operation reception unit 304 of the business operator terminal 30 accepts the authentication operation for authenticating that the business operator has accumulated the inspection result. The authentication operation is, for example, an operation of inputting a facility ID and a password. The facility name or business operator name may be used instead of the facility ID, or biometric authentication may be used.

The authentication operation reception unit 304 transmits the authentication data indicating the authentication information (facility ID, password, etc.) input by the authentication operation to the server device 10. It is assumed that the authentication information of each business operator has been registered in advance and stored in the server device 10. The authentication unit 106 of the server device 10 authenticates that the operator can view the inspection result when the authentication information indicated by the transmitted authentication data is stored in the own device.

The authentication unit 106 notifies the business terminal 30 that the authentication is not possible if the authentication information is not stored in the own device. When authenticated, the authentication unit 106 supplies the facility ID included in the authentication information to the inspection history storage unit 105. The inspection history storage unit 105 supplies the inspection image generation unit 103 with the inspection results accumulated in association with the supplied facility ID. The inspection image generation unit 103 generates an inspection list representing the supplied inspection results.

The inspection image output unit 104 outputs list data indicating the generated inspection list to the business operator terminal 30. The business terminal in this case is a device for which display of inspection results is permitted, and is an example of the "first user device" of the present invention. Further, the inspection image output unit 104 is an example of the "result output unit" of the present invention. The inspection image display unit 301 of the business operator terminal 30 displays the inspection result indicated by the output list data.

FIG. 14 shows an example of the displayed inspection result. In the example of FIG. 14, the inspection image display unit 301 displays the photo input field E5 and the comment input field E6 of the inspection item “K3-1” whose inspection result was NG in the display area of the “instrument / tableware” tab. doing. Further, the inspection image display unit 301 has a new button group (NG button, OK button, etc.), a new photo input field E15, and a new photo input field E15 as input fields after improvement under the photo input field E5 and the comment input field E6. A new comment input field E16 and a comment example sentence list E17 are displayed.

When an employee of a business operator makes an improvement on an inspection item judged to be NG, he / she can enter a photo or a comment in the input field after the improvement. The aggregated results shown in FIG. 12 may or may not reflect the newly input improvement results. When reflecting, the business terminal 30 may be provided with a function common to the aggregation processing unit 205. In either case, when the confirmation button B2 is pressed, the list management unit 302 transmits the result data indicating the inspection result table reflecting the improvement result to the server device 10.

FIG. 15 shows an example of an inspection result table that reflects the improvement results. In the example of FIG. 15, the inspection result of the inspection item "K1-2" is stored in two lines, the original NG inspection result is stored in the first line, and the OK inspection result is stored in the second line. Has been done. Since it is not possible to show to a third party whether or not the improvement has been achieved simply by making it OK, it is desirable to require the input of a photo or the input of both a photo and a comment.

Therefore, for example, the list management unit 302 does not output the result data when a photograph and a comment (may be only a photograph) are not input to the improved inspection item, and the inspection image display unit 301 sets the photograph. And a message prompting you to enter a comment may be displayed. The inspection history storage unit 105 stores the inspection results stored in the inspection result table indicated by the transmitted result data as the inspection history.

At that time, since the inspection result table includes the facility ID and the number of inspections, the inspection history storage unit 105 integrates and accumulates the new inspection results with the original inspection results having the same facility ID and the number of inspections. To do. In this way, the inspection history storage unit 105 stores the new input information transmitted from the business operator terminal 30 in association with the original inspection result output by the inspection image output unit 104. The new input information is an example of the "first input information" of the present invention, and the inspection history storage unit 105 is an example of the "storage unit" of the present invention.

By reflecting the improvement result in the inspection result as described above, the improvement result can be recorded without waiting for the next inspection. In addition, by recording the time of improvement, it is possible to motivate the business operator to improve faster. However, self-inspection by a business operator may lack accuracy because it is not an inspection expert or a party. Therefore, further confirmation may be made by a professional inspector.

In this embodiment, for example, when the inspection history storage unit 105 receives the result data from the business operator terminal 30, the received result data is supplied to the inspection image generation unit 103. The inspection image generation unit 103 generates an inspection image for transmitting that the improvement result has been input at the facility with the facility ID indicated by the supplied result data, and the inspection image output unit 104 generates the generated inspection image. Is output to, for example, the inspection terminal 20 that has inspected the corresponding facility ID and the number of inspections. The output destination of the inspection image may be the terminal of another person in charge, the e-mail address of the person in charge, or the account of SNS (Social Networking Service).

FIG. 16 shows an example of the displayed inspection image. In the example of FIG. 16, the inspection image display unit 201 of the inspection terminal 20 inputs a character string indicating that the improvement result has been input, such as "The following inspection results have input of the improvement result." And the improvement result are input. The inspection image G11 including the character string indicating that the facility name of the facility is "Restaurant R" and the number of inspections is "1 time" and the improvement result display button B11 is displayed.

Upon receiving the inspection image G11, the inspection image display unit 201 displays, for example, a pop-up image on the display surface of its own device, and displays the inspection image G11 when the pop-up image is selected (push-type notification). The inspection image display unit 201 may display the inspection image G11 when the inspector performs an operation of displaying the inspection screen for performing another inspection or the like for the first time after receiving the inspection image G11 (inspection image G11). Pull-type notification).

Further, the inspection image display unit 201 may display a pop-up image every time a certain period of time elapses (for example, every week), not every time the inspection image is received. In that case, the inspection image display unit 201 displays the inspection images received during a certain period of time side by side. When the operation of pressing the display button B11 is performed, the inspection image generation unit 103, the inspection image output unit 104, and the inspection history storage unit 105 of the server device 10 cooperate in the same manner as in the above example and are displayed together with the display button B11. List data indicating the inspection result associated with the facility ID is output to the inspection terminal 20.

Here, in this embodiment, it is assumed that the inspection terminal 20 is permitted to display all the inspection results. That is, the inspection image output unit 104 outputs the input information to the inspection terminal 20 which is permitted to display the input information input in the business terminal 30. The inspection image output unit 104 in this case is an example of the "information output unit" of the present invention. The inspection image display unit 201 of the inspection terminal 20 displays the inspection result indicated by the output list data.

FIG. 17 shows an example of the displayed inspection result. In the example of FIG. 17, the inspection image display unit 201 displays the character string “inspector comment” and the comment input field E26 under the photo input field E15 and the comment input field E16 shown in FIG. The inspector can check the photograph in the photo input field E15 and the comment in the comment input field E16, and input a comment if there is a point to be supplemented or corrected. In the example of FIG. 17, the comment of the inspector is added to the comment input field E26 different from the comment of the improvement result, but the comment of the improvement result may be corrected by inputting to the comment input field E16. ..

After the inspector inputs the comment, when the operation of pressing the confirmation button B2 shown in FIG. 12 is performed, the list management unit 203 transmits the result data indicating the inspection result table reflecting the inspector's comment to the server device 10.
FIG. 18 shows an example of an inspection result table that reflects the comments of the inspector. In the example of FIG. 18, the inspection result of the inspection item “K1-2” is three lines, and the text data indicating the inspector's comment is stored in the third line.

In this way, the inspection history storage unit 105 corresponds to the new input information transmitted from the inspection terminal 20 to the original input information output by the inspection image output unit 104 (input information input in the business operator terminal 30). Attach and memorize. The inspection terminal 20 in this case is an example of the "second user device" of the present invention, and the input information input by the inspection terminal 20 is an example of the "second input information" of the present invention.

By adding comments by the inspector as described above, it is possible to improve the objectivity of the inspection results for the improvement activities carried out by the business operator as compared with the case where the comments are not added. It is assumed that comments by inspectors will be made without going to the site. It may be possible to judge the improvement status from the comments of the business operator without going to the site, but it is still desirable that the information input by the business operator includes a photo.

Therefore, the inspection history storage unit 105 may store the input information in association with the inspection result only when the input information input in the business operator terminal 30 includes a photograph. For example, if the confirmation button B2 is pressed even though the input information after improvement does not include a photo, the photo data is stored in the second line of the inspection result in the two lines of the same inspection item as shown in FIG. The inspection data that has not been performed is transmitted from the business terminal 30.

When the inspection history storage unit 105 receives the result data of the state, the inspection image generation unit 103 and the inspection image output unit 104 generate and output the request image requesting the attachment of the photographic data without storing the inspection result. Instruct. The inspection image generation unit 103 and the inspection image output unit 104 output the instructed request image, and the inspection image display unit 301 displays the request image, so that the employee of the business operator can be prompted to input a photograph. Further, by not memorizing the input information after the improvement when there is no photo, the reliability of the input information after the improvement can be improved as compared with the case where the input information after the improvement is memorized regardless of the presence or absence of the photo.

Next, the functions related to the analysis of test results will be described. The analysis image display unit 401 of the analyst terminal 40 displays an image related to the analysis of the inspection result. The analysis image display unit 401 displays, for example, an image for designating an analysis target.
FIG. 19 represents an example of the displayed analysis image. In the example of FIG. 19, the analysis image display unit 401 displays an analysis screen including the character string "Please specify the analysis target.", The facility name / facility ID input field A11, and the analysis information display button B3. doing.

Further, the analysis image display unit 401 also displays the area input field A21, the industry input field A22, the group input field A23, and the analysis information display button B4 on the analysis screen. The analysis operation reception unit 402 accepts operations on each input field and button as an analysis operation related to analysis of inspection results. In the example of FIG. 19, the analysis operation reception unit 402 accepts the input of the facility IDs “ID001”, “ID002”, and “ID003” into the facility name / facility ID input field A11.

When the analysis operation reception unit 402 accepts the operation of pressing the analysis information display button B3 in the state of FIG. 19, it receives designated data indicating the facility ID (may be the facility name) input in the facility name / facility ID input field A11. It is transmitted to the server device 10. Upon receiving the transmitted designated data, the analysis processing unit 107 of the server device 10 performs an analysis process for analyzing the inspection result of the analysis target indicated by the received designated data.

First, the analysis processing unit 107 extracts the inspection result of the analysis target indicated by the designated data from the inspection result accumulated in the inspection history storage unit 105. The analysis processing unit 107 aggregates the extracted inspection results for each analysis target, and based on the aggregated values, for example, the evaluation rate for each inspection (the number of inspection items that was "OK" with respect to the total number of inspection items). Ratio) is calculated. At that time, the analysis processing unit 107 calculates the evaluation rate by weighting the inspection results of each inspection item in the same manner as the aggregation processing unit 205 described above.

In addition, the analysis processing unit 107 calculates statistics such as the average value, the maximum value, and the minimum value of the calculated evaluation rates. In addition, the analysis processing unit 107 generates a graph showing changes in the calculated evaluation rate over time. The evaluation values, statistics, and generated graphs calculated as described above are all evaluation information indicating the evaluation of food hygiene in the analysis target. When the analysis processing unit 107 generates the evaluation information, the analysis processing unit 107 outputs the evaluation data indicating the generated evaluation information to the analyst terminal 40. The analysis image display unit 401 of the analyst terminal 40 displays the evaluation information indicated by the output evaluation data.

FIG. 20 (FIGS. 20A and 20B) shows an example of the displayed evaluation information. In FIG. 20A, the analysis image display unit 401 shows the latest value, the average value, the maximum value, and the minimum value of the evaluation rates of the facility IDs “ID001”, “ID002”, and “ID003” specified in the example of FIG. A statistic table showing the values is displayed as evaluation information. Further, in FIG. 20B, the analysis image display unit 401 displays a graph showing changes in the evaluation rate in those facilities over time as evaluation information.

In the example of FIG. 20, for example, a facility with ID 002 having a minimum value of 95% and an average value of 98% is analyzed to be stable in food hygiene. In addition, the facility with ID001 has been improved until the previous inspection and the evaluation rate is higher than that of the facility with ID002, but the evaluation rate has dropped sharply in the latest inspection, and it is expected that there is some cause. In addition, the facilities with ID003 were sluggish at less than 90% until the last two times, but the latest two times are expected to be 95% or more and some improvement measures have been taken.

When the analysis target is specified by the attribute on the analysis screen of FIG. 19, the analysis operation reception unit 402 transmits the designated data indicating the specified attribute to the server device 10. Here, as described in the explanation of FIG. 13, the inspection history storage unit 105 stores the inspection result in association with the attribute of the inspection target. The analysis processing unit 107 extracts the inspection results stored in association with the attributes indicated by the designated data, and generates and outputs, for example, the same evaluation information as in the example of FIG.

FIG. 21 (FIGS. 21A, 21B, 21C, 21D) shows an example of the output evaluation information. For example, FIG. 21A shows a statistic table when areas such as “A city”, “C city”, and “D city” are designated as attributes. FIG. 21B shows a statistic table when industries such as “restaurant”, “coffee shop”, and “food factory” are designated as attributes. In FIG. 21C, a statistic table is shown when groups such as “B”, “E”, and “F” are designated as attributes.

Further, FIG. 21D shows a statistic table when a group of regions and industries such as "City A restaurant", "City A coffee shop" and "City C restaurant" is designated as an attribute. In this way, a plurality of attributes may be specified as analysis targets. As described above, when any of the plurality of attributes is specified, the analysis processing unit 107 is evaluated based on the aggregated value of the inspection results stored in the inspection history storage unit 105 in association with the attribute. Output information. The analysis processing unit 107 is an example of the “evaluation information output unit” of the present invention.

By outputting the evaluation information for each attribute specified as described above, for example, it is possible to identify and refer to areas and groups where food hygiene efforts are progressing, compared to the case where the evaluation information for each attribute is not output. It is possible to facilitate the examination of food hygiene improvement measures from various perspectives, such as identifying industries that have problems in food hygiene efforts and analyzing the causes.

In the example of FIG. 21, the analysis processing unit 107 outputs only the statistic table as evaluation information, but as in the example of FIG. 20, a graph showing the time-series change of the evaluation rate may be output as evaluation information. .. The facility ID specified in the example of FIG. 20 is also one of the plurality of attributes to be inspected. That is, the analysis processing unit 107 may output information indicating changes in the value (for example, evaluation rate) calculated based on the aggregated value in time series as evaluation information. As a result, it is possible to grasp the tendency of improvement and deterioration of the management status of food hygiene.

Further, the analysis processing unit 107 outputs the evaluation rate as evaluation information in this embodiment. The evaluation rate is calculated based on the aggregated value of the inspection results, but as described above, it is calculated by giving different weights to each inspection result that is the basis of the aggregated value. The evaluation rate is an example of the "predetermined value" of the present invention. Also in this case, the evaluation rate in consideration of the importance of the inspection item can be calculated, and as described above, the reliability of the evaluation rate itself can be improved as compared with the case where the importance is not added.

Based on the above configuration, the server device 10 and the inspection terminal 20 perform an inspection process for displaying an inspection list and accumulating inspection results.
FIG. 22 shows an example of the operation procedure of each device in the inspection process. The operation procedure of FIG. 22 is started, for example, when the inspector operates the inspection terminal 20 to display the operation image shown in FIG. 7.

First, the inspection terminal 20 (designated operation receiving unit 202) accepts a designated operation for designating an attribute to be inspected (step S11). Next, the inspection terminal 20 (designated operation reception unit 202) transmits attribute data indicating the designated attribute to the server device 10 (step S12). The server device 10 (item extraction unit 102) extracts the inspection items stored in the item storage unit 101 in association with the attributes indicated by the transmitted attribute data (step S13).

Subsequently, the server device 10 (inspection image generation unit 103) generates list data including an inspection list representing the extracted inspection items as a list and an inspection result table (step S14). Then, the server device 10 (inspection image output unit 104) outputs the generated list data to the inspection terminal 20 (step S15). The inspection terminal 20 (list management unit 203) stores the output list data (step S16).

Next, the inspection terminal 20 (inspection image display unit 201) displays the inspection list indicated by the stored list data (step S17). Subsequently, the inspection terminal 20 (input operation reception unit 204) receives an input operation of the inspection result (step S21). Next, the inspection terminal 20 (list management unit 203) reflects the result of the input operation as an inspection result in the inspection result table (step S22).

Subsequently, the inspection terminal 20 (aggregation processing unit 205) refers to the inspection results stored in the inspection result table and performs the aggregation processing of the inspection results (step S23). Next, the inspection terminal 20 (inspection image display unit 201) displays the result of the aggregation process (step S24). Subsequently, the inspection terminal 20 (input operation reception unit 204) accepts a confirmation operation for confirming the input of the inspection result (step S31).

Next, the inspection terminal 20 (list management unit 203) transmits the result data indicating the inspection result table to the server device 10 (step S32). The server device 10 (inspection history storage unit 105) stores the inspection results stored in the inspection result table indicated by the transmitted result data in association with the attributes to be inspected (step S33). After step S33, a presentation process for presenting the accumulated inspection results to the business operator is performed.

FIG. 23 shows an example of the operation procedure of each device in the presentation process. The operation procedure of FIG. 23 is started, for example, when an employee of the business operator performs an authentication operation on the business operator terminal 30. First, when the business operator terminal 30 (designated operation reception unit 202) receives the authentication operation (step S31), the business terminal 30 transmits the authentication data to the server device 10 (step S32). The server device 10 (authentication unit 106) authenticates the business operator based on the transmitted authentication data (step S33).

Subsequently, the server device 10 (inspection image generation unit 103) generates list data including an inspection list and an inspection result table showing the inspection results of the authenticated business operator as a list (step S34). Next, the server device 10 (inspection image output unit 104) outputs the generated list data to the inspection terminal 20 (step S35). The business operator terminal 30 (list management unit 302) stores the output list data (step S36).

Next, the business operator terminal 30 (inspection image display unit 301) displays the inspection list indicated by the stored list data (step S37). Subsequently, the business operator terminal 30 (input operation reception unit 303) receives the input information after the improvement, that is, the input operation of the improvement result (step S41). Next, the business operator terminal 30 (list management unit 302) reflects the input improvement result in the inspection result table (step S42).

Subsequently, the business operator terminal 30 (input operation reception unit 303) accepts a confirmation operation for confirming the input of the improvement result (step S43). Next, the business operator terminal 30 (list management unit 302) transmits the result data indicating the inspection result table reflecting the improvement result to the server device 10 (step S44). The server device 10 (inspection history storage unit 105) stores the improvement results stored in the inspection result table indicated by the transmitted result data in association with the original inspection results (step S45).

After step S33, in addition to the presentation process, an analysis process for analyzing the accumulated test results is performed.
FIG. 24 shows an example of the operation procedure of each device in the analysis process. The operation procedure of FIG. 24 is started, for example, when the person in charge of analysis causes the analyst terminal 40 to display the analysis screen.

First, the analyst terminal 40 (analysis operation reception unit 402) accepts a designated operation for designating an attribute to be analyzed (step S51), and transmits designated data indicating the designated attribute to the server device 10 (step S52). .. The server device 10 (analysis processing unit 107) extracts the inspection result of the analysis target indicated by the transmitted designated data (step S53). Next, the server device 10 (analysis processing unit 107) aggregates the extracted inspection results and calculates the evaluation rate (step S54).

Subsequently, the server device 10 (analysis processing unit 107) generates a statistic table showing the statistic calculated based on the calculated evaluation rate (step S55). Next, the server device 10 (analysis processing unit 107) generates a graph showing the time-series change of the calculated evaluation rate (step S56). Then, the server device 10 (analysis processing unit 107) outputs evaluation data indicating the generated statistic table and time series graph as evaluation information to the analyst terminal 40 (step S57). The analyst terminal 40 (analysis image display unit 401) displays the evaluation information indicated by the output evaluation data (step S58).

[2] Modifications The above-mentioned examples are merely examples of the implementation of the present invention, and may be modified as follows. Further, the examples and the respective modifications may be carried out in combination as necessary.

[2-1] Attributes The attributes to be inspected are not limited to those described above. For example, the facility ID and the number of inspections shown in FIGS. 11 and 13 are also attributes to be inspected. By designating the facility ID and the number of inspections, it is possible to output and analyze the evaluation information of the inspection results of a specific facility at a specific time. Further, by designating a plurality of facility IDs, evaluation information in a plurality of facilities can be compared and analyzed.

In addition, for example, a person having a specific role in the facility to be inspected (store manager, chef, etc.) or an auditing company that supervises the food hygiene of the facility may be used as an attribute to be inspected. These are attributes that affect the implementation status of food hygiene management as in the areas described in the examples, and by specifying these attributes, the effect of each attribute on the evaluation rate (for example, improvement of the evaluation rate). Contribution to or the cause of the decrease in evaluation rate) can be analyzed.

[2-2] Analysis processing The analysis processing unit 107 may perform an analysis processing different from that of the examples. For example, when a change having a predetermined feature appears in a graph showing a time-series change in the evaluation rate, the analysis processing unit 107 performs a process of identifying an attribute that has similarly changed at the time when the change appears as an analysis process. You may.

In this modification, the inspection history storage unit 105 stores the attributes “store manager”, “chef”, and “audit company” in association with the inspection results, in addition to the above-mentioned attributes. For example, when an inspector confirms with the business operator at the time of inspection and inputs it together with the inspection result, these attributes are accumulated in association with each inspection result. For example, the attributes accumulated in association with the facility ID of a certain store S will be described with reference to FIG.

FIG. 25 shows an example of the accumulated attributes. In the example of FIG. 25, the attributes in the five inspections from the four previous inspections to the latest inspection are accumulated. The "manager" was "Mr. G" five times, but the "chef" was "Mr. I" four times ago, but changed to "Mr. I" three times ago, and the "auditing company" was up to two times ago. It was "Company J", but it has been replaced by "Company K" from one time ago. A graph showing the time-series change of the evaluation rate of the store S is shown in FIG.

FIG. 26 shows an example of a graph showing changes in the evaluation rate over time. In the example of FIG. 26, the evaluation rate was 95% or more from 4 times before to 2 times before, but it decreased sharply to nearly 85% before 1 time, and the latest evaluation rate was less than 90%. It has become. The analysis processing unit 107 determines such a rapid decrease as a predetermined feature. Specifically, for example, the analysis processing unit 107 determines that a characteristic of a sharp decrease appears when the evaluation rate decreases by 10% or more from the average value of the past three times.

Since the analysis processing unit 107 shows a sharp decrease from 2 times before to 1 time before, as an attribute changed from 2 times before to 1 time before, in the example of FIG. 25, from "Company J" to "K". Identify the attribute "Auditing Company" that has changed to "Company". The analysis processing unit 107 outputs analysis result data indicating the specified attribute as an analysis result to the analyst terminal 40. In the example of FIG. 26, the analysis result data showing the graph of the evaluation rate is output together with the attributes specified by the analysis processing unit 107.

The specified attribute is represented by the character string "The auditing company has changed from company J to company K between the two times before and the one before." As described above, when the change having a predetermined feature appears in the information (for example, a graph) indicating the change in the evaluation rate in the time series, the analysis processing unit 107 outputs the attribute changed at the time when the change appears. .. The analysis processing unit 107 of this modification is an example of the “attribute output unit” of the present invention.

By outputting the analysis result data as described above, it is possible to grasp the factors that may have strongly influenced the change in the implementation status of food hygiene management (change of audit company in the example of FIG. 26). It should be noted that the predetermined feature appearing in the graph showing the time-series change of the evaluation rate is not limited to the above-mentioned rapid decrease. For example, it may be a rapid increase. Even in that case, it is possible to grasp and refer to the factors that may have rapidly improved the implementation status of food hygiene management.

Further, for example, even if the decrease width is small, a case where the decrease continues three times in a row or a case where the decrease continues three times in a row may be a predetermined feature. In that case, the analysis processing unit 107 identifies the attribute that changed at the time when the change started three times in a row. Further, the analysis processing unit 107 may change in any way when it is 90% or more, but when it is less than 90%, it may specify the changed attribute as if a predetermined feature appears when it is continuously reduced twice. Good.

In that case as well, the analysis processing unit 107 identifies the attribute that changed at the time when the two consecutive changes started. In either case, it is possible that the implementation status of food hygiene management was changed in that way by outputting the attributes that changed when the unfavorable change appeared in the evaluation rate or when the favorable change appeared. It is possible to grasp the elements and use them to improve the implementation status or to refer to improvement activities in other inspection targets.

[2-3] Attribute designation method In the embodiment, "region", "industry" and "group" were designated as attributes on the inspection screen shown in FIG. 6, but at this point, "major item" and "medium item" May be specified. In that case, the inspection image output unit 104 outputs an inspection list narrowed down to the designated large items and medium items. For example, if a store employee does not inspect all the inspection items at once and takes several days to inspect, it is possible to customize the inspection list narrowed down to the inspection items to be performed on the day each inspection. it can.

Further, in the embodiment, the inspector operates the inspection terminal 20 to specify the attribute, but the method of specifying the attribute is not limited to this. For example, since an employee of a facility to be inspected performs an inspection, an inspection company may lend the inspection terminal 20 to the employee. In that case, the worker of the inspection company may operate the inspection terminal 20 in advance to specify the attribute so that the inspection list can be displayed.

Further, when the terminal owned by the employee is used as the inspection terminal 20, another terminal owned by the inspection company may be operated to specify the attribute so that the inspection list can be displayed. In this case, the access information (URL (Uniform Resource Locator), user ID, password, etc.) for displaying the inspection list of the corresponding inspection target is transmitted to the employee, and the employee uses the transmitted access information. Display the inspection list on the inspection terminal 20.

Further, the attribute of the inspection target may be indirectly specified by associating the name or the like (name or ID) of the facility to be inspected with the attribute in advance and inputting the name or the like of the facility. For example, the server device 10 stores the names of the facilities of all the stores belonging to the B group shown in FIG. 6 in association with the B group. Then, when the name or the like of the corresponding facility is input, the item extraction unit 102 determines that the B group to which the facility such as the input name belongs is designated as an attribute and extracts the inspection item.

[2-4] Machine inspection Each inspection item may be inspected by a machine (computer) instead of a person. In that case, the server device has, for example, an inspection function that analyzes a photograph and inspects food hygiene. The inspection function stores, for example, photographs of various states of the inspection target (place, equipment, food, etc.) in advance in association with "OK" or "NG".

Then, the inspection function refers to, for example, the photograph of the inspection target included in the inspection result stored in the inspection history storage unit 105, and the calculated feature amount of the stored photographs is similar to the photograph of the inspection target. Identify things. The inspection function determines "OK" if the specified photo is associated with "OK", and determines "NG" if the specified photo is associated with "NG". Further, the inspection function may further learn a method of determining the inspection result (so-called machine learning) with reference to the inspection result performed by a person.

As a machine learning method, the inspection function uses, for example, a neural network, a deep learning with a deeper layer thereof, an SVM (Support Vector Machine), a cluster analysis, or a Bayesian network. In addition, when the technology of artificial intelligence (AI) is developed, the test function may judge the test result by using the artificial intelligence technology that has learned the method of judging the test.

In addition, instead of mechanically inspecting all the inspection items, the inspection items may be shared between humans and mechanical inspections. In addition, a person may check and inspect the inspection items that have been mechanically inspected, and by doing so, the inspection function may learn the inspection tendency of the inspector. In either case, the inspector must take the necessary images at the inspection site and interview the employees, so the inspector inspects to secure time for other tasks. You can use the function.

[2-5] Device for Realizing Each Function The device for realizing each function shown in FIG. 5 is not limited to the above-mentioned device. For example, the inspection terminal 20 or the analyst terminal 40 may realize the functions realized by the server device 10. In that case, the inspection terminal 20 is an example of the "information processing device" of the present invention. Further, the server device 10 may realize a part of the functions realized by the inspection terminal 20 (for example, the aggregation processing unit 205).

On the contrary, the inspection terminal 20 or the analyst terminal 40 may realize a part of the functions realized by the server device 10 (for example, the analysis processing unit 107). In that case, the inspection terminal 20 or the analyst terminal 40 acquires the inspection results and attributes stored in the server device 10 and temporarily stores them in the memory of its own device to generate and output evaluation information. The inspection terminal 20 or the analyst terminal 40 in this case is also an example of the "information processing device" of the present invention.

Further, the functions realized by the server device 10 may be shared and realized by two or more devices, or the functions realized by the inspection terminal 20, the operator terminal 30, and the analyst terminal 40 may be realized by one terminal each. It may be realized by sharing with the above devices. Further, the operation executed by each function may be divided and executed by two or more functions. For example, separate functions may execute operations such as extraction, aggregation, and calculation of inspection results performed by the analysis processing unit 107. In either case, it is sufficient that each function shown in FIG. 5 is realized in the entire inspection support system 1.

[2-6] Aggregation processing and analysis processing The aggregation processing (processing for calculating the evaluation rate) performed by the aggregation processing unit 205 overlaps with the analysis processing performed by the analysis processing unit 107. Therefore, the analysis processing unit 107 may perform the aggregation processing by removing the aggregation processing unit 205 from the inspection terminal 20. In that case, when the "determination" tab T6 is selected, the list management unit 203 transmits the result data indicating the inspection result table stored at that time to the server device 10.

The analysis processing unit 107 performs aggregation processing based on the inspection result indicated by the received result data, and supplies the calculated evaluation value to the inspection image generation unit 103. The inspection image generation unit 103 generates an image showing the aggregation result shown in FIG. 12, and the inspection image output unit 104 outputs the generated image. The inspection image display unit 201 displays an image showing the output total result. In this modification, the inspection image output unit 104 outputs the evaluation rate, which is the evaluation information, to the display means for displaying the inspection items used for the inspection of the inspection target, that is, the inspection terminal 20.

The inspection terminal 20 is brought to the inspection site and supports the inspection while displaying the inspection items. By outputting the evaluation information to the inspection terminal 20, the evaluation information of the inspection result can be shown to the employees at the site on the spot of the inspection. During the inspection work, awareness of food hygiene is increasing, so by letting the evaluation information know the level of our efforts for food hygiene in that state, we will provide evaluation information later. Compared to seeing, it is possible to increase the motivation for subsequent improvement activities.

As shown in FIG. 11, the list management unit 203 of the inspection terminal 20 also stores the inspection result in association with the facility ID and the number of inspections, which are the attributes of the inspection target. Further, when the determination tab T6 is selected, the aggregation processing unit 205 assumes that the facility ID of the facility under inspection is specified, and uses the evaluation information calculated based on the aggregated value of the inspection results as shown in FIG. A certain evaluation rate is output to a display which is a display means provided in the own terminal via the inspection image display unit 201.

Then, in the embodiment, the aggregation processing unit 205 sets the evaluation rate on the display means for displaying the inspection items used for the inspection of the inspection target, that is, the display of the inspection terminal 20, in the same manner as the inspection image output unit 104 described above. It is outputting. That is, it can be said that the list management unit 203 is an example of the "storage unit" of the present invention, and the aggregation processing unit 205 is an example of the "evaluation information output unit" of the present invention. Also in the embodiment, the evaluation information of the inspection result can be shown to the employees at the site on the spot of the inspection, and the motivation for the improvement activity can be increased.

[2-7] Inspection result In the embodiment, the inspection history storage unit 105 stores the information input by the inspector as the inspection result, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the inspection history accumulating unit 105 may accumulate the measured values acquired from the system for recording the measured values (temperature, humidity, etc.) of the sensor provided in the equipment such as the refrigerator as the inspection result. The measured value of the sensor may be directly transmitted from the sensor to the server device 10.

In addition, the inspection history storage unit 105 may accumulate food inspection information acquired from a system that records the results of microbiological inspections and physicochemical inspections of foods handled at the facility to be inspected as inspection results. When acquiring inspection results from an external system, the timing tends to be different from the accumulation of inspection results by the inspector (uploading of the inspection results), so it is desirable to define the conditions for associating with the inspection results by the inspector.

For example, the inspection history storage unit 105 may always associate the inspection result acquired from the external system with the latest inspection result by the inspector, or when a certain period of time has passed after storing the inspection result by the inspector, It may be associated with the next inspection result that has not been acquired yet (for example, the inspection result of the first half year before and after the inspection by the inspector is associated with the inspection result by the inspector). In either case, information such as temperature acquired by the external system can be recorded to reinforce the inspection result.

[2-8] Category of Invention The present invention provides an information processing system (inspection) including each information processing device in addition to the above-mentioned information processing devices such as a server device 10, an inspection terminal 20, a business operator terminal 30, and an analyst terminal 40. Support system 1 can be regarded as an example). Further, the present invention can be regarded as an information processing method for realizing the processing performed by each information processing device, and also as a program for operating a computer that controls each information processing device. The program regarded as the present invention may be provided in the form of a recording medium such as an optical disk in which the program is stored, or may be downloaded to a computer via a network such as the Internet, and the downloaded program may be installed and used. It may be provided in the form of

In order to achieve the above object, the present invention has a plurality of attributes classified into two or more categories of regions, industries or groups, and inspection items satisfying the food hygiene standards defined for the attributes. The item storage unit that stores the inspection item, the list output unit that outputs the inspection list representing the inspection item corresponding to the specified attribute when the attribute is specified, and the output inspection list are used. a result storage unit for storing the results of inspection of each test item were made Te, when two or more attributes are specified, the aggregate value of the test result of the test item corresponding redundantly in the two or more attributes Provided is an information processing apparatus including an evaluation information output unit that outputs evaluation information indicating the evaluation of food hygiene, which is represented based on the above.

In addition, a result output unit that outputs the inspection result to the first user device that is permitted to display the inspection result is provided, and the result storage unit is the first input information transmitted from the first user device. May be stored in association with the output inspection result.

In addition, an information output unit that outputs the first input information to the second user device that is permitted to display the first input information is provided, and the result storage unit has been transmitted from the second user device. The second input information may be stored in association with the output first input information.

Further, the result storage unit may store the first input information in association with the inspection result only when the first input information includes a photograph.

Moreover, the evaluation information output unit may output the evaluation information to the display means for displaying the pre-dangerous査項eyes.

Claims (8)

A storage unit that stores inspection results related to food hygiene in association with any of a plurality of attributes to be inspected.
When any of the plurality of attributes is specified, the evaluation information output indicating the evaluation of the food hygiene, which is represented based on the aggregated value of the inspection results stored in association with the attribute, is output. An information processing device equipped with a unit. The information processing device according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation information output unit outputs information indicating a change in a value calculated based on the aggregated value in a time series as the evaluation information. The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, further comprising an attribute output unit that outputs an attribute that has changed at the time when the change with a predetermined feature appears in the information indicating the change in the time series. When the evaluation information output unit outputs a predetermined value calculated based on the aggregated value as the evaluation information, the evaluation information output unit outputs a value calculated by giving different weights to each inspection result that is the basis of the aggregated value. The information processing apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 3, which is output as evaluation information. It is provided with a result output unit that outputs the inspection result to the first user device that is permitted to display the inspection result.
The information processing device according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the storage unit stores the first input information transmitted from the first user device in association with the output inspection result. It is provided with an information output unit that outputs the first input information to the second user device that is permitted to display the first input information.
The information processing device according to claim 5, wherein the storage unit stores the second input information transmitted from the second user device in association with the output first input information. The information processing device according to claim 5 or 6, wherein the storage unit stores the first input information in association with the inspection result only when the first input information includes a photograph. The information processing device according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the evaluation information output unit outputs the evaluation information to a display means for displaying an inspection item used for the inspection of the inspection target.

Images