JPWO2014069639A1 - Deodorant composition and method for producing the same - Google Patents

Abstract

(A) a silicone resin powder, (B) a cationic surfactant, (C) a multi-chain nonionic surfactant, and (D) ethanol, wherein the component (B) is (B1 ) Comprising at least one compound selected from benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, cetylpyridinium chloride, and decalinium chloride and (B2) an alkyltrialkylammonium salt, wherein the component (B1) and the component (B2) The mass ratio (B1) / (B2) is 0.03 to 35, and the mass ratio (B2) / (C) between the component (B2) and the component (C) is 0.1 to 40. Deodorant composition.

Description

  The present invention relates to a deodorant composition and a method for producing the same.

  In the cosmetics field, there is an increasing demand for cosmetics that can give a smooth feeling. Conventionally, in water-based cosmetics, powders are blended for the purpose of imparting a smooth feeling when the cosmetics are applied to the skin.

In the water-based cosmetic, it has been proposed to add a cationic surfactant in order to further impart a deodorizing effect (see, for example, Patent Document 1). A water-based cosmetic containing such a powder requires shaking in order to disperse the powder during use.
However, there is a problem that foaming occurs due to the influence of the cationic surfactant when shaken, and emptying occurs when discharged with a dispenser or a trigger container, thereby deteriorating usability.

  Therefore, it is possible to suppress foaming when shaken, has excellent usability, has a high deodorizing effect and its sustainability, has no sticky feeling, and has a good feeling of use that has a superior feeling of smoothness and At present, it is strongly desired to provide the manufacturing method.

JP 2011-126862 A

  An object of the present invention is to solve the above-described problems and achieve the following objects. That is, the present invention can suppress foaming when shaken, has a high deodorizing effect and its sustainability, has no sticky feeling, has a good feeling of use that is excellent in the sustainability of a smooth feeling, and further powder An object of the present invention is to provide a deodorant composition having good redispersibility and a method for producing the same.

Means for solving the above-described problems are as follows. That is,
<1> contains (A) silicone resin powder, (B) a cationic surfactant, (C) a multi-chain nonionic surfactant, and (D) ethanol,
The component (B) is (B1) at least one compound selected from benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, cetylpyridinium chloride, and decalinium chloride, and (B2) an alkyltrialkyl represented by the following general formula (I) Made of ammonium salt,
The mass ratio (B1) / (B2) between the component (B1) and the component (B2) is 0.03 to 35, and the mass ratio between the component (B2) and the component (C) ( B2) / (C) is a deodorant composition characterized by 0.1-40.
However, in the general formula (I), ^{R 1} represents an alkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon ^atoms, R 2, ^{R 3,} and ^{R 4} each independently represent an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, X ⁻ represents a counter ion, and the counter ion is a halogen ion.
<2> The content of the component (B1) is 0.02% by mass to 0.7% by mass, and the content of the component (B2) is 0.02% by mass to 0.7% by mass. <1> The deodorant composition described in 1.
<3> The component (C) is at least one selected from polyoxyethylene hydrogenated castor oil, polyoxyethylene glyceryl isostearate, and polyoxyethylene glyceryl triisostearate, which are HLB 9 to 14,
The deodorant composition according to any one of <1> to <2>, wherein the content of the component (C) is 0.007% by mass to 0.3% by mass.
<4> The deodorant composition according to any one of <1> to <3>, wherein the component (A) is a (vinyl dimethicone / methicone silsesquioxane) cross polymer.
<5> (E) The deodorant composition according to any one of <1> to <4>, further including an antiperspirant component.
<6> The method for producing a deodorant composition according to any one of <1> to <5>, comprising the following steps 1 to 3.
Step 1: A step of adding the component (A) to a mixture of the component (B1) and purified water and uniformly dispersing the mixture to obtain a mixture 1.
Step 2: Separately, to the component (D), add the component (B2), the component (C), and the other components as necessary, dissolve uniformly, and then add the remaining purified water. Mixing to obtain a mixture 2;
Step 3: A step of adding the mixture 1 to the mixture 2 with stirring and mixing.

  According to the present invention, the conventional problems can be solved, the object can be achieved, foaming at the time of shaking can be suppressed, it has a high deodorizing effect and its sustainability, and has no stickiness. It is possible to provide a deodorant composition having a good feeling of use that is excellent in the sustainability of the smooth feeling and having a good redispersibility of the powder, and a method for producing the same.

(Deodorant composition)
The deodorant composition of the present invention comprises a silicone resin powder (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “component (A)”) and a cationic surfactant (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “component (B)”). And a multi-chain nonionic surfactant (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “component (C)”) and ethanol (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “component (D)”). Contains a sweat component (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “(E) component”), and further contains other components as necessary.

<(A) component: Silicone resin powder>
The component (A) is a compound having a siloxane skeleton, and the structure thereof is not particularly limited and may be appropriately selected depending on the intended purpose. For example, a linear structure, a cyclic structure, a branched structure , Network structures, cross-linked structures, and copolymers thereof.

  In the component (A), the siloxane skeleton may be substituted with one or more substituents such as a polyether group, an epoxy group, an amino group, a carboxyl group, an aralkyl group, a methyl group, and a phenyl group.

  Examples of the shape of the component (A) include a spherical shape, a rod shape, a plate shape, and an indefinite shape. Among these, a spherical shape is preferable in that it is excellent in sustainability of a smooth feeling. In the present invention, the spherical shape is not limited to a true sphere, but may have an elliptical cross section, but a true sphere is preferred.

Among these, the component (A) includes (1) polymethylsilsesquioxane, which is a network polymer of methylsilsesquioxane, and (2) dimethicone crosslinked in a three-dimensional structure (dimethicone / vinyl dimethicone). Cross polymers, (3) (vinyl dimethicone / methicone silsesquioxane) cross polymers in which the surface of a silicone rubber powder is coated with a silicone resin are preferred.
The method for producing polymethylsilsesquioxane (1) is obtained by hydrolyzing methylsilsesquioxane and then precipitating as fine particles by a dehydration condensation reaction.
As the method for producing the (dimethicone / vinyl dimethicone) cross polymer of (2), a silicon atom-bonded hydrogen atom-containing diorganopolysiloxane, an organopolysiloxane having a silicon atom-bonded vinyl group, and a platinum catalyst are added and reacted. It is assumed that the resulting product is obtained by making fine particles into a spherical shape.
As the method for producing the (vinyl dimethicone / methicone silsesquioxane) cross polymer of (3), an alkaline substance and methyltrimethoxysilane are added to an aqueous dispersion of silicone rubber spherical fine particles, followed by hydrolysis and condensation reaction. After that, it is obtained by drying and crushing into fine particles.

There is no restriction | limiting in particular as a volume average particle diameter of the said (A) component, Although it can select suitably according to the objective, 3 micrometers-30 micrometers are preferable. When the volume average particle diameter is less than 3 μm or more than 30 μm, the sustainability of the smooth feeling may be insufficient.
The volume average particle diameter can be measured with a laser diffraction / scattering particle size distribution analyzer (for example, LS 13 320, manufactured by Beckman Coulter, Inc.).

There is no restriction | limiting in particular as an acquisition method of the said (A) component, What was synthesize | combined suitably may be used and a commercial item may be used.
Examples of the polymethylsilsesquioxane include Tospearl 145A (volume average particle diameter 4.5 μm), Tospearl 2000B (volume average particle diameter 6 μm), Tospearl 1110A (volume average particle diameter 11 μm) (above, Momentive Performance (Made by Materials Co., Ltd.).
Examples of the (dimethicone / vinyl dimethicone) crosspolymer include Trefil E-506S (volume average particle diameter of 3 μm, manufactured by Toray Dow Corning).
Examples of the (vinyl dimethicone / methicone silsesquioxane) crosspolymer include, for example, KSP-100 (volume average particle diameter 5 μm), KSP-101 (volume average particle diameter 12 μm), KSP-102 (volume average particle diameter 30 μm). (Above, manufactured by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.).
Among these, KSP-100, KSP-101, and KSP-102 are preferable in terms of excellent durability of the smooth feeling, and KSP-100 is particularly preferable from the viewpoint that clogging is unlikely to occur in a dispenser or a trigger container.

  As content of the said (A) component, 0.05 mass%-10 mass% are preferable, and 0.2 mass%-5 mass% are more preferable. If the content of the component (A) is less than 0.05% by mass, a sticky feeling may be generated, and the sustainability of the smooth feeling may be insufficient. It will cause a feeling of poorness and will be easily removed from the skin, so the sustainability of the smooth feeling will be reduced, and bubbles will form when filled in a dispenser, trigger container, etc., and empty when discharged. It may cause a hit and the usability may deteriorate.

<(B) component: Cationic surfactant>
The cationic surfactant as the component (B) is at least one compound selected from benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, cetylpyridinium chloride, and decalinium chloride (hereinafter referred to as “component (B1)”). And an alkyltrialkylammonium salt represented by the following general formula (I) (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “component (B2)”). By using the component (B1) and the component (B2) in combination, the deodorizing effect and the durability of the deodorizing effect are particularly excellent.

-(B1) component-
By adding at least one compound selected from benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, cetylpyridinium chloride, and decalinium chloride as the component (B1) to the deodorant composition, antibacterial properties and deodorization against body odor-causing bacteria An effect can be obtained.
Among these, benzalkonium chloride and cetylpyridinium chloride are preferable, and benzalkonium chloride is particularly preferable because of its excellent deodorizing effect.

  There is no restriction | limiting in particular as an acquisition method of the said (B1) component, What was synthesize | combined suitably may be used and a commercial item may be used.

The content of the component (B1) is preferably 0.01% by mass to 1% by mass, more preferably 0.02% by mass to 0.7% by mass, and 0.05% by mass to 0.3% by mass. Particularly preferred.
If the content of the component (B1) is less than 0.01% by mass, the deodorizing effect and its sustainability may be insufficient. If it exceeds 1% by mass, significant foaming may occur, There may be a sticky feeling. On the other hand, when the component (B1) is within the more preferable range, there is no further stickiness, and when it is within the particularly preferable range, it is advantageous in that a high deodorizing effect can be obtained.

-(B2) component-
By blending the deodorant composition with an alkyltrialkylammonium salt represented by the following general formula (I) as the component (B2), antibacterial and deodorizing effects against body odor-causing bacteria can be obtained, Using the component (B1) and the component (B2) together is advantageous in that the effect can be further improved. The component (B2) is also advantageous in that the retention of the component (A) is improved, and the durability of the smooth feeling is improved.
The component (B2) is an alkyltrialkylammonium salt excluding the component (B1).
However, in the general formula (I), ^{R 1} represents an alkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon ^atoms, R 2, ^{R 3,} and ^{R 4} each independently represent an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, X ⁻ represents a counter ion, and the counter ion is a halogen ion.

R ¹ is an alkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon atoms, and an alkyl group having 12 to 18 carbon atoms is preferable from the viewpoint of antibacterial properties, its durability, and the deodorizing effect. Specific examples of R ¹ include octyl group, decyl group, dodecyl group, tetradecyl group, cetyl group, stearyl group, behenyl group and the like.

Specific examples of R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ include a methyl group, an ethyl group, a propyl group, and a butyl group. R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ may be the same or different. Among these, the R ² , R ³ , and R ⁴ are preferably methyl groups.

Specific examples of X ⁻ include halogen ions such as chloride ions and bromide ions, and chloride ions are particularly preferable.

  There is no restriction | limiting in particular as an acquisition method of the said (B2) component, What was synthesize | combined suitably may be used and a commercial item may be used.

  Examples of the component (B2) include stearyl trimethyl ammonium chloride, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, cetyl trimethyl ammonium chloride, behenyl trimethyl ammonium chloride, dodecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride, and tetradecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride. These may be used alone or in combination of two or more. Among these, stearyltrimethylammonium chloride, cetyltrimethylammonium chloride, and behenyltrimethylammonium chloride are preferable in terms of excellent antibacterial and deodorizing effects, and stearyltrimethylammonium chloride is more preferable in terms of excellent deodorizing effects and durability of a smooth feeling. preferable.

  As content of the said (B2) component, 0.01 mass%-1 mass% are preferable, and 0.02 mass%-0.7 mass% are more preferable. When the content of the component (B2) is less than 0.01% by mass, the deodorizing effect and the durability thereof, the durability of the smooth feeling may be insufficient. May cause bubbling or stickiness. On the other hand, when the component (B2) is within the more preferable range, it is advantageous in that a high deodorizing effect can be obtained.

  The total content of the component (B1) and the component (B2) (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “content of the component (B)”) is not particularly limited and is appropriately selected depending on the purpose. However, 0.1% by mass to 1.2% by mass is preferable, and 0.1% by mass to 0.8% by mass is more preferable. When the content of the component (B) is within the more preferable range, it is advantageous in that a high deodorizing effect and its sustainability can be obtained.

<Mass ratio (B1) / (B2)>
The mass ratio (B1) / (B2) between the component (B1) and the component (B2) is 0.03 to 35, preferably 0.1 to 14. If the mass ratio (B1) / (B2) is less than 0.03, the deodorizing effect and its sustainability may be reduced, and noticeably foaming or stickiness may occur. The effect and its persistence may be reduced. On the other hand, when the mass ratio (B1) / (B2) is within the preferable range, it is advantageous in that the deodorizing effect is excellent.

<(C) component: a multi-chain nonionic surfactant>
The multi-chain nonionic surfactant as the component (C) is a nonionic surfactant having a three-branched structure such as a glycerin skeleton.
The multi-chain nonionic surfactant as the component (C) is preferably an HLB 9-16 multi-chain nonionic surfactant, and more preferably HLB 9-14 from the viewpoint of suppressing foaming.

In the present invention, the HLB value is indicated by IOB × 10 in the organic conceptual diagram. The IOB in the organic conceptual diagram refers to the ratio of the inorganic value (IV) to the organic value (OV) in the organic conceptual diagram, that is, “inorganic value (IV) / organic value (OV)”. The organic conceptual diagram was proposed by Satoshi Fujita, and details thereof are described in “Pharmaceutical Bulletin”, 1954, vol. 2, 2, pp. 163-173, “Area of Chemistry”, 1957, vol. 11, 10, pp. 719-725, "Fragrance Journal", 1981, vol. 50, pp. 79-82, “Organic Conceptual Diagram: Basics and Applications” (by Yoshio Koda, Sankyo Publishing, 1984).
Specifically, the source of all organic compounds is methane (CH ₄ ), and the other compounds are all regarded as derivatives of methane, and each of the carbon numbers, substituents, transformation parts, rings, etc. has a certain numerical value. The values are set, and the scores are added to obtain an organic value and an inorganic value, and these values are plotted on a diagram with the organic value on the X axis and the inorganic value on the Y axis.

  Examples of the component (C) include polyoxyethylene (hereinafter abbreviated as “POE”) hydrogenated castor oil, POE sorbitan fatty acid ester, POE glyceryl isostearate, POE glyceryl triisostearate, and POE glyceryl isostearate. Castor oil and the like. These may be used alone or in combination of two or more. Among these, POE hydrogenated castor oil, POE glyceryl isostearate and POE glyceryl triisostearate are preferable, and POE hydrogenated castor oil and POE glyceryl isostearate are more preferable in that foaming can be suppressed.

  When the component (C) has a polyoxyethylene group, the average added mole number of ethylene oxide (hereinafter sometimes abbreviated as “EO”) is not particularly limited and may be appropriately selected depending on the purpose. However, 8-80 are preferable and 10-60 are more preferable. When the number of carbon atoms is less than 8, the dispersibility of the component (A) may be deteriorated and the usability may be deteriorated. When the number of carbon atoms exceeds 80, the action of suppressing foaming may be weakened.

There is no restriction | limiting in particular as an acquisition method of the said (C) component, What was synthesize | combined suitably may be used and a commercial item may be used.
Specific examples of the commercially available product of the component (C) include EMALEX HC-20 (HLB9, POE (20) hydrogenated castor oil, EMALEX HC-30 (HLB11, polyoxyethylene (30) hydrogenated castor oil) under the trade name. , EMALEX HC-40 (HLB12 polyoxyethylene (40) hydrogenated castor oil), EMALEX HC-50 (HLB13, polyoxyethylene (50) hydrogenated castor oil) EMALEX HC-60 (HLB14, polyoxyethylene (60) hydrogenated castor Oil), POE hydrogenated castor oil such as EMALEX HC-80 (HLB15, polyoxyethylene (80) hydrogenated castor oil); EMALEX ET-8020 (HLB14, polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan oleate), EMALEX ET-2020 (HLB15, Po POE sorbitan fatty acid esters such as oxyethylene (20) sorbitan palm fatty acid ester), EMALEX ET-8040 (HLB16, polyoxyethylene (40) sorbitan oleate); EMALEX GWIS-110 (HLB10, polyoxyethylene isostearate (10 ) Glyceryl), EMALEX GWIS-125 (HLB14, polyoxyethylene isostearate (25) glyceryl), EMALEX GWIS-150 (HLB16, polyoxyethylene isostearate (50) glyceryl), etc .; POE glyceryl isostearate; EMALEX GWIS-330 (HLB10, polyoxyethylene (30) glyceryl triisostearate), EMALEX GWIS-360 (HLB13, TO POE glyceryl triisostearate such as polyoxyethylene (60) glyceryl lyisostearate); EMALEX RWIS-140 (HLB11, polyoxyethylene (40) hydrogenated castor oil), EMALEX RWIS-150 (HLB12, polyoxyisostearate) Isostearic acid POE hydrogenated castor oil (manufactured by Nippon Emulsion Co., Ltd.) such as ethylene (50) hydrogenated castor oil).
The number in parentheses after the POE indicates the average added mole number of EO.

  Among these, POE hydrogenated castor oils such as EMALEX HC-20, EMALEX HC-30, EMALEX HC-40, EMALEX -50, EMALEX HC-60, EMALEX HC-80; EMALEX GWIS-110, EMALEX GWIS-125, etc. Polyoxyethylene glyceryl isostearate; polyoxyethylene (60) glyceryl triisostearate such as EMALEX GWIS-330, EMALEX GWIS-360 is preferred, EMALEX HC-20, EMALEX HC-30, EMALEX HC-40, EMALEX HC-50 POE hydrogenated castor oil such as EMALEX HC-60; polyoxy isostearic acid such as EMALEX GWIS-110 and EMALEX GWIS-125 Ethylene glyceryl is more preferable.

  As content of the said (C) component, it is 0.001 mass%-0.5 mass%, 0.007 mass%-0.3 mass% are preferable, 0.01 mass%-0.2 mass% Is more preferable. When the content of the component (C) is less than 0.001% by mass, remarkable foaming may occur or the sustainability of the smooth feeling may be insufficient. When the deodorant composition is foamed, foaming occurs in the dispenser or trigger container, causing empty shots when discharged, so that the powder does not uniformly adhere to the skin, and this reduces the durability of the dry feeling. Sometimes. On the other hand, when the content of the component (C) exceeds 0.5% by mass, in the feeling of use, the persistence of the smooth feeling may be lowered due to the aggregation of the powder, and stickiness may occur. On the other hand, when the content of the component (C) is within the more preferable range, it is advantageous in that foaming can be suppressed and a sticky feeling does not occur.

<Mass ratio (B2) / (C)>
The mass ratio (B2) / (C) between the component (B2) and the component (C) is 0.1 to 40, preferably 0.3 to 35. When the mass ratio (B2) / (C) is less than 0.1, the powder is agglomerated, and the durability of the smooth feeling and the deodorizing effect are deteriorated, and remarkable foaming occurs. If it exceeds 40, remarkable foaming may occur, and the durability of the smooth feeling may be reduced. When the deodorant composition is foamed, foaming occurs in the dispenser or trigger container, causing empty shots when discharged, the powder does not uniformly adhere to the skin, and the durability of the dry feeling decreases. On the other hand, when the mass ratio (B2) / (C) is within the preferred range, it is advantageous in that remarkable foaming can be suppressed and the durability of the smooth feeling is excellent.

<(D) component: ethanol>
As said (D) component, absolute ethanol, 95 volume% ethanol (standard value 95 volume%-95.5 volume%), etc. are mentioned.
As content of the ethanol as said (D) component, 27 mass%-75 mass% are preferable as absolute ethanol, and 37 mass%-75 mass% are more preferable. When the content of the component (D) is less than 27% by mass, remarkable foaming may occur. Also, a feeling of stickiness may occur in the feeling of use, and the sustainability of the smooth feeling may be reduced. When content of the said (D) component exceeds 75 mass%, the sustainability of a deodorizing effect will fall and skin irritation | stimulation etc. may arise. Moreover, from a viewpoint of the redispersibility of powder, 27 mass%-56 mass% are preferable. In addition, content of the said (D) component is a total content of the absolute ethanol containing ethanol brought in from these components, when (B2) component and arbitrary plant extracts are mix | blended.
The content (mass%) in terms of absolute ethanol when 95% by volume ethanol is used should be obtained from the following formula 1 (Independent Administrative Institution Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Document 038-1309.pdf) and formula 2. Can do.
Ethanol mass% = volume% × 0.79422 (specific gravity of 100% by volume at 15 ° C.) / D (specific gravity at 15 ° C.) Formula 1
= (95 x 0.79422) /0.81639
= 92.42
-Absolute ethanol content (mass%) = 95 vol% ethanol content (mass%) x 92.42 / 100 Formula 2

<(E) component: antiperspirant component>
It is preferable that the deodorant composition further contains an antiperspirant component from the viewpoint of further enhancing the durability of the deodorizing effect.
Examples of the antiperspirant component of the component (E) include aluminum / zirconium chlorohydrate, aluminum citrate, aluminum sulfate, aluminum phenolsulfonate, zinc p-phenolsulfonate, zinc oxide, aluminum chloride, and chlorohydroxyaluminum. Is mentioned. These may be used alone or in combination of two or more. Of these, zinc p-phenol sulfonate and chlorohydroxyaluminum are preferred because they are excellent in deodorizing effect and their sustainability, and the sustainability of the smooth feeling.

  The content of the component (E) is preferably 0.2% by mass to 15% by mass, and more preferably 2% by mass to 10% by mass. When the content of the component (E) is less than 0.2% by mass, the durability of the deodorizing effect and the durability of the smooth feeling may be insufficient. May occur and the sustainability of the smooth feeling may be reduced. On the other hand, when the content of the component (E) is within the more preferable range, it is advantageous in that the deodorizing effect and the smooth feeling are excellent.

<Other ingredients>
The deodorant composition may contain other components as long as the effects of the present invention are not impaired. There is no restriction | limiting in particular as said other component, According to the objectives, such as a dosage form, it can select suitably, For example, refreshing agents, such as 1-menthol, 1-menthyl glyceryl ether, 1-menthyl lactate; Polymers such as polymers, cationic polymers, amphoteric polymers and nonionic polymers; polyhydric alcohols; silicone oils such as cyclic silicones, polyether-modified silicones, dimethylpolysiloxanes and amino-modified silicones; anionic surfactants, C) Nonionic surfactants other than the component, surfactants such as amphoteric surfactants; Anti-inflammatory agents such as hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin and glycyrrhizic acid 2K; Bactericides other than the component (B); Triclosan; Phenol; Trichlorocarbanilide; Chlorhexyl hydrochloride Emissions; piroctone olamine; plant extracts, such as Clara extract; and l- amino acids arginine and the like. These may be used alone or in combination of two or more.

  Also as content of the said other component, unless the effect of this invention is impaired, there is no restriction | limiting in particular, According to the objective, it can select suitably.

<Manufacturing method>
Examples of the method for producing the deodorant composition include the component (D), the component (A), the component (B1), the component (B2), the component (C), and the other components as necessary. The method of adding the component of, and making it melt | dissolve uniformly, and adding and mixing purified water etc. are mentioned (manufacturing method 1).
Also, the deodorant composition can be obtained by the following production method 2. In particular, the production method 2 is preferable from the viewpoint of redispersibility of the powder.
Step 1: A step of adding the component (A) to a mixture of the component (B1) and purified water and uniformly dispersing the mixture to obtain a mixture 1.
Step 2: Separately, to the component (D), add the component (B2), the component (C), and the other components as necessary, dissolve uniformly, and then add the remaining purified water. Mixing to obtain a mixture 2;
Step 3: A step of adding the mixture 1 to the mixture 2 with stirring and mixing.

<Application>
The deodorant composition is a non-aerosol spray container that is sprayed by shaking at the time of use, and when used in a dispenser or trigger container, it can suppress foaming and has excellent usability, and has a high deodorizing effect and its sustainability. Since there is no sticky feeling and the durability of the smooth feeling is excellent, it can be suitably used for, for example, a deodorant spray, a water mist, an antiperspirant deodorant mist, and the like.
There is no restriction | limiting in particular as a container which accommodates the said deodorant composition, Although it can select suitably according to the objective, It is preferable that it is a non-aerosol spray container.
In order to improve the redispersibility of the powder and the anti-caking effect, a stirring ball may be inserted. There is no restriction | limiting in particular as a stirring ball | bowl, According to the objective, it can select suitably. Examples of the material of the container include stainless steel, glass, and plastic, and stainless steel is preferable from the viewpoint of effects. As the shape of the container, a spherical shape having a diameter of 4 mm to 10 mm is preferable, and a spherical shape having a diameter of 5 mm to 7 mm is particularly preferable from the viewpoint of effect.

  EXAMPLES The present invention will be specifically described below with reference to examples of the present invention, but the present invention is not limited to these examples.

(Examples 1 to 45, Comparative Examples 1 to 10)
Deodorant compositions having the compositions and blending amounts shown in Tables 1 to 8 below were prepared by the following method. The component (A), the component (B1), the component (B2), the component (C), and the fragrance were added to the component (D) and dissolved uniformly, and then purified water was added and mixed.
In addition, about (D) component, since the ethanol content of the used raw material was 95.3 volume%, content as absolute ethanol was computed using the following formula | equation. In addition, content of the absolute ethanol brought in from (B2) component and arbitrary components is included in content of the said (D) component. The upper row shows the content of 95.3% by volume ethanol, and the lower row shows the content when converted to absolute ethanol. This content includes the content of absolute ethanol brought in from the component (B2) and any component. It is the total content of absolute ethanol. About content, the 2nd decimal place was rounded off and the 1st decimal place was described.
-Mass% of ethanol = 95.3 x 0.79422 / 0.81523
= 92.84
-Absolute ethanol content (mass%) = 95.3 vol% ethanol content (mass%) x 92.84 / 100
About components other than (D) component, content converted into the pure part was shown.

(Comparative Example 11)
A deodorant composition having the composition and blending amount shown in Table 8 below was prepared by the following method. (D) Component (A), (B1) component, (B2) component, (C ′) component, and a fragrance were added and dissolved uniformly, and then purified water was added and mixed to prepare. In addition, about (D) component, the same calculation as the above was performed using the same ethanol as Examples 1-45 and Comparative Examples 1-10, and the total content of absolute ethanol converted into absolute ethanol was shown. About components other than (D) component, content converted into the pure part was shown.

(Examples 46 to 51)
A deodorant composition having the composition and blending amount shown in Table 9 below was prepared by the following method. Add component (A), component (B1), component (B2), component (C), component (E), and fragrance to component (D), dissolve uniformly, then add purified water and mix Prepared. In addition, about (D) component, the same calculation as the above was performed using the same ethanol as Examples 1-45 and Comparative Examples 1-10, and the total content of absolute ethanol converted into absolute ethanol was shown. About components other than (D) component, content converted into the pure part was shown.

  For the deodorant compositions of Examples 1 to 51 and Comparative Examples 1 to 11, according to the following evaluation methods, “deodorizing effect”, “persistence of deodorizing effect”, “no foaming”, “sustainability of smooth feeling”, and Evaluation was made on “no stickiness”. The results are shown in Tables 1-9.

<Evaluation of deodorization effect (after 30 minutes) and persistence of deodorization effect (after 8 hours)>
Each deodorant composition of Examples and Comparative Examples is put into a trigger type spray container [trigger: Z-305 (manufactured by Mitani Valve Co., Ltd.), polyethylene terephthalate bottle: F-1223 (manufactured by Yoshino Kogyo Co., Ltd.)] for a total of 10 Four pushes (approx. 1.2 g / push) were sprayed (applied) on the neck, chest, armpit, and arms of one male and female subjects, and a dedicated shirt was worn.
The shirts were collected 30 minutes and 8 hours after wearing the dedicated shirts, and the strength of body odor adhering to the shirts was sensory-evaluated by five professional panelists.
The sensory evaluation was based on the following scoring criteria by comparing body odors between the non-application-side half of the shirt and the application-side half. Next, the average score of 10 subjects was calculated and evaluated based on the following evaluation criteria.
Each subject was prohibited from using other deodorant compositions from 3 days before the sensory evaluation, and had an unscented body soap the day before the sensory evaluation.
[Criteria]
4 points: Compared with the odor on the non-application side, the application side does not smell at all. 3 points: Compared with the odor on the non-application side, almost no odor on the application side. 2 points: Compared with the odor on the non-application side. The application side is slightly weak in odor 1 point: Compared with the odor on the non-application side, the application side is equivalent or more odor [evaluation criteria]
◎: 3.5 points or more, 4.0 points or less ○: 3.0 points or more, less than 3.5 points △: 2.0 points or more, less than 3.0 points ×: Less than 2.0 points

<Evaluation of no foaming>
20 mL of each of the deodorant compositions of Examples and Comparative Examples was placed in a 100 mL Epton tube with a stopper and a scale, and was shaken 20 times for 10 seconds, about 20 cm up and down, and an average of 2 times / second. After shaking, leave for 30 seconds, and measure the volume from the boundary between the foam and liquid to the top of the foam (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “foam volume”) by observing the scale of the Epton tube. And evaluated based on the following evaluation criteria.
[Evaluation criteria]
◎: Bubble volume is less than 10 mL ○: Bubble volume is 10 mL or more and less than 15 mL △: Bubble volume is 15 mL or more and less than 20 mL ×: Bubble volume is 20 mL or more

<Evaluation of the sustainability of smooth feeling>
Each deodorant composition of Examples and Comparative Examples is put into a trigger type spray container [trigger: Z-305 (manufactured by Mitani Valve Co., Ltd.), polyethylene terephthalate bottle: F-1223 (manufactured by Yoshino Kogyo Co., Ltd.)] for a total of 20 Four pushes (approx. 1.2 g / push) were sprayed (applied) on the neck, chest, armpit and arms of one half of a male and female professional panel. Eight hours after application, each application part was subjected to a sensory evaluation as to whether or not there was a feeling of smoothness compared to the non-application part. Based on the results of this sensory evaluation, evaluation was performed based on the following evaluation criteria.
[Evaluation criteria]
◎: More than 16 people responded that “the coated part has a more smooth feeling than the uncoated part” ○: More than 11 people answered that the “applied part has a more smooth feeling than the uncoated part” 15 or less △: A person who replied that “the coated part is more sloppy than the non-coated part” was answered by 6 or more and 10 or less. X: “The coated part was sloppy than the non-coated part” Less than 5 people

<Evaluation of lack of stickiness>
Each deodorant composition of Examples and Comparative Examples is put into a trigger type spray container [trigger: Z-305 (manufactured by Mitani Valve Co., Ltd.), polyethylene terephthalate bottle: F-1223 (manufactured by Yoshino Kogyo Co., Ltd.)] for a total of 20 Four pushes (approx. 1.2 g / push) were sprayed (applied) on the neck, chest, armpit and arms of one half of a male and female professional panel. One minute after application, each application part was subjected to a sensory evaluation as to whether or not there was a sticky feeling compared to the non-application part. Based on the results of this sensory evaluation, evaluation was performed based on the following evaluation criteria.
[Evaluation criteria]
◎: 5 or less respondents who answered that the application part was more sticky than the non-application part ○: 6 or more persons who answered that the application part was more sticky than the non-application part 10 or less △: A person who replied that “the coated part was more sticky than the non-coated part”, 11 or more and 15 or less ×: “The coated part was more sticky than the non-coated part” More than 16 people

(Example 52)
<Deodorant water spray>
A deodorant water spray having the following composition and blending amount was prepared by the following method. After adding (A) component, (B1) component, (B2) component, (C) component, (E) component, and other components other than purified water to (D) component, and making it melt | dissolve uniformly, Purified water was added and mixed (Production Method 1). In addition, about (D) component, the same calculation as the above was performed using the same ethanol as Examples 1-45 and Comparative Examples 1-10, and the total content of absolute ethanol converted into absolute ethanol was shown. For any plant extract, the tangible content is shown. (D) About components other than a component and a plant extract, content converted into pure part was shown.
About the obtained deodorant water spray, according to the same evaluation method as in Examples 1 to 51, “deodorizing effect”, “persistence of deodorizing effect”, “non-foaming”, “sustainability of smooth feeling”, and “stickiness” The “feel” was evaluated.
[Composition and blending amount]
Silicone resin powder A [component (A)]: 2.0% by mass
・ Benzalkonium chloride [component (B1)]: 0.1% by mass
Stearyltrimethylammonium chloride [component (B2)]: 0.3% by mass
-POE (60) hydrogenated castor oil [component (C)]: 0.01% by mass
-Zinc paraphenolsulfonate [component (E)]: 0.3% by mass
・ 1-Menthol: 0.1% by mass
・ Isopropylmethylphenol: 0.1% by mass
・ Clara extract: 0.1% by mass
L-Arginine: 0.001% by mass
-Fragrance: 0.3% by mass
Ethanol (95.3% by volume) [(D) component]: 45.0% by mass
(Total content of absolute ethanol: 42.1% by mass)
・ Purified water: Balance Total: 100% by mass
(B1) + (B2): 0.4% by mass
(B1) / (B2): 0.3
(B2) / (C): 30
[Evaluation results]
・ Deodorization effect (after 30 minutes): ◎
・ Durability of deodorization effect (after 8 hours): ◎
・ No foaming: ◎
・ Sustainability of smooth feeling: ◎
・ No stickiness: ◎

(Example 53)
<Antiperspirant Deodorant Mist>
An antiperspirant deodorant mist having the following composition and blending amount was prepared by the following method. After adding (A) component, (B1) component, (B2) component, (C) component, (E) component, and other components other than purified water to (D) component, and making it melt | dissolve uniformly, Purified water was added and mixed (Production Method 1). In addition, about (D) component, the same calculation as the above was performed using the same ethanol as Examples 1-45 and Comparative Examples 1-10, and the total content of absolute ethanol converted into absolute ethanol was shown. For any plant extract, the tangible content is shown. (D) About components other than a component and a plant extract, content converted into pure part was shown.
About the obtained antiperspirant deodorant mist, according to the same evaluation method as in Examples 1 to 51, “deodorizing effect”, “persistence of deodorizing effect”, “no foaming”, “sustainability of smooth feeling”, and “ The “stickiness” was evaluated.
[Composition and blending amount]
Silicone resin powder B [component (A)]: 3.0% by mass
・ Benzalkonium chloride [component (B1)]: 0.05% by mass
Stearyltrimethylammonium chloride [component (B2)]: 0.3% by mass
-Isostearic acid POE (25) glyceryl [component (C)]: 0.01% by mass
Chlorhydroxyaluminum [(E) component]: 10% by mass
・ Propylene glycol monostearate: 0.5% by mass
Polyoxypropylene (12) butyl ether: 3.0% by mass
-Vinyl acetate / vinyl pyrrolidone copolymer: 0.3% by mass
Hypericum extract: 0.1% by mass
・ Mulberry extract: 0.1% by mass
-Fragrance: 0.1% by mass
Ethanol (95.3% by volume) [(D) component]: 60.0% by mass
(Total content of absolute ethanol: 56.0% by mass)
・ Purified water: Balance Total: 100% by mass
(B1) + (B2): 0.35 mass%
(B1) / (B2): 0.2
(B2) / (C): 30
[Evaluation results]
・ Deodorization effect (after 30 minutes): ◎
・ Durability of deodorization effect (after 8 hours): ◎
・ No foaming: ◎
・ Sustainability of smooth feeling: ◎
・ No stickiness: ◎

(Example 54)
<Antiperspirant Deodorant Mist>
An antiperspirant deodorant mist having the following composition and blending amount was prepared by the following method. After adding (A) component, (B1) component, (B2) component, (C) component, (E) component, and other components other than purified water to (D) component, and making it melt | dissolve uniformly, Purified water was added and mixed (Production Method 1). In addition, about (D) component, the same calculation as the above was performed using the same ethanol as Examples 1-45 and Comparative Examples 1-10, and the total content of absolute ethanol converted into absolute ethanol was shown. About components other than (D) component, content converted into the pure part was shown.
About the obtained antiperspirant deodorant mist, according to the same evaluation method as in Examples 1 to 51, “deodorizing effect”, “persistence of deodorizing effect”, “no foaming”, “sustainability of smooth feeling”, and “ The “stickiness” was evaluated.
[Composition and content]
Silicone resin powder C [component (A)]: 1.0% by mass
・ Benzalkonium chloride [component (B1)]: 0.1% by mass
Stearyltrimethylammonium chloride [component (B2)]: 0.3% by mass
-POE (20) hydrogenated castor oil [component (C)]: 0.01% by mass
-Isostearic acid POE (25) glyceryl [component (C)]: 0.01% by mass
Chlorhydroxyaluminum [(E) component]: 10% by mass
Hydroxypropyl β cyclodextrin: 0.5% by mass
Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane: 1.0% by mass
-Fragrance: 0.1% by mass
Ethanol (95.3% by volume) [(D) component]: 60.0% by mass
(Total content of absolute ethanol: 55.9% by mass)
・ Purified water: Balance Total: 100% by mass
(B1) + (B2): 0.4% by mass
(B1) / (B2): 0.3
(B2) / (C): 15
[Evaluation results]
・ Deodorization effect (after 30 minutes): ◎
・ Durability of deodorization effect (after 8 hours): ◎
・ No foaming: ◎
・ Sustainability of smooth feeling: ◎
・ No stickiness: ◎

  As a result of putting stirring balls (made of stainless steel, spherical, diameter 6 mm) into Examples 1 to 54 and confirming all the above effects, the same evaluation results as in Examples 1 to 54 were obtained.

  The deodorant compositions shown in Tables 10 and 11 below were prepared by the following production method. The obtained composition was evaluated in the same manner as described above. The redispersibility of the powder was evaluated by the following method. In addition, the following Examples 55-60 are the same compositions as the said Examples 1, 4, 5 and 43-45, and were prepared with the manufacturing method 2. FIG. Moreover, what prepared Example 1, 4, 5 and 43-45 by the manufacturing method 1 was described in Reference Examples 1-6. In addition, about (D) component, the same calculation as the above was performed using the same ethanol as Examples 1-45 and Comparative Examples 1-10, and the total content of absolute ethanol converted into absolute ethanol was shown. About components other than (D) component, content converted into the pure part was shown. The results are shown in Table 10 and Table 11.

<Evaluation of redispersibility of powder>
120 mL of each deodorant composition of Examples and Reference Examples was placed in a trigger type spray container [Trigger: Z-305 (manufactured by Mitani Valve Co., Ltd.), polyethylene terephthalate bottle: F-1223 (manufactured by Yoshino Kogyo Co., Ltd.)], A sample stored at a low temperature of 10 ° C. for 1 month is used as a measurement sample. After returning the sample to room temperature, the container is turned to the side and shaken repeatedly under the condition of reciprocating once per second with a swing width of 15 cm, and the number of times of shaking until the powder on the bottom surface of the container is completely dispersed (hereinafter, “The number of dispersions”) was measured. It was visually determined that the powder was completely dispersed. Five tests were carried out for each composition, the average value of the number of dispersions was calculated, and evaluated based on the following evaluation criteria.
[Evaluation criteria]
A: The average value of the number of dispersions is less than 5 times. ○: The average value of the number of times of dispersion is 5 times or more and less than 25 times. Δ: The average value of the number of times of dispersion is 25 times or more and less than 50 times.

(Examples 55 to 60)
Manufacturing method 2:
Step 1: The component (A) was added to a mixture of the component (B1) and purified water and dispersed uniformly to obtain a mixture 1.
Step 2: Separately, to the component (D), add the component (B2), the component (C), and the other components as necessary, dissolve uniformly, and then add the remaining purified water. Mixtures were obtained.
Step 3: The mixture 1 was added to the mixture 2 with stirring and mixed.

(Reference Examples 1-6)
Manufacturing method 1:
After the (A) component, the (B1) component, the (B2) component, the (C) component, and the other components as necessary are added to the (D) component and uniformly dissolved Purified water was added and mixed.

  Each component used in Examples 1 to 60, Comparative Examples 1 to 11, and Reference Examples 1 to 6 is as shown in Table 12 below.

  The deodorant composition of the present invention, when used in a dispenser or trigger container that is shaken and sprayed at the time of use, has excellent usability, can suppress foaming, has a high deodorizing effect and its durability, and has no stickiness. Since it is excellent in the durability of the smooth feeling, it can be suitably used for, for example, a deodorant spray, a water spray, and the like.

Claims (6)

(A) a silicone resin powder, (B) a cationic surfactant, (C) a multi-chain nonionic surfactant, and (D) ethanol,
The component (B) is (B1) at least one compound selected from benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, cetylpyridinium chloride, and decalinium chloride, and (B2) an alkyltrialkyl represented by the following general formula (I) Made of ammonium salt,
The mass ratio (B1) / (B2) between the component (B1) and the component (B2) is 0.03 to 35, and the mass ratio between the component (B2) and the component (C) ( B2) / (C) is 0.1-40, Deodorant composition characterized by the above-mentioned.
However, in the general formula (I), ^{R 1} represents an alkyl group having 8 to 22 carbon ^atoms, R 2, ^{R 3,} and ^{R 4} each independently represent an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, X ⁻ represents a counter ion, and the counter ion is a halogen ion.   The deodorant according to claim 1, wherein the content of the component (B1) is 0.02 mass% to 0.7 mass%, and the content of the component (B2) is 0.02 mass% to 0.7 mass%. Composition. (C) The component is at least one selected from polyoxyethylene hydrogenated castor oil, polyoxyethylene glyceryl isostearate, and polyoxyethylene glyceryl triisostearate, which are HLB 9-14,
The deodorant composition according to any one of claims 1 to 2, wherein a content of the component (C) is 0.007% by mass to 0.3% by mass.   The deodorant composition according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the component (A) is a (vinyl dimethicone / methicone silsesquioxane) crosspolymer.   (E) The deodorant composition according to any one of claims 1 to 4, further comprising an antiperspirant component. It is a manufacturing method of the deodorant composition in any one of Claim 1 to 5, Comprising: The manufacturing method of the deodorant composition characterized by including the following processes 1-3.
Step 1: A step of adding the component (A) to a mixture of the component (B1) and purified water and uniformly dispersing the mixture to obtain a mixture 1.
Step 2: Separately, to the component (D), add the component (B2), the component (C), and the other components as necessary, dissolve uniformly, and then add the remaining purified water. Mixing to obtain a mixture 2;
Step 3: A step of adding the mixture 1 to the mixture 2 with stirring and mixing.