JPS62235550A - Defect inspection - Google Patents
Defect inspectionInfo
- Publication number
- JPS62235550A JPS62235550A JP61078012A JP7801286A JPS62235550A JP S62235550 A JPS62235550 A JP S62235550A JP 61078012 A JP61078012 A JP 61078012A JP 7801286 A JP7801286 A JP 7801286A JP S62235550 A JPS62235550 A JP S62235550A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- image
- normal part
- pseudo
- original
- normal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 11
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000008602 contraction Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 18
- 239000003758 nuclear fuel Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E30/00—Energy generation of nuclear origin
- Y02E30/30—Nuclear fission reactors
Landscapes
- Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)
- Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
「産業上の利用分野」
この発明は、たとえば核燃料用ペレット等の欠陥検査方
法に関するものである。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION "Field of Industrial Application" The present invention relates to a method for inspecting defects in, for example, nuclear fuel pellets.
「従来の技術 1
従来この種の検査は、被検査物の外表面をV&像して2
値化画像を作成し、その画像を処理することによって機
械的に行うことが多い。``Conventional technology 1'' Conventionally, this type of inspection was performed using a V& image of the outer surface of the object to be inspected.
This is often done mechanically by creating a digitized image and processing that image.
たとえば、第2図に示すような核燃料用ペレット!の外
周面の検査を行う場合、まず第3図(イ)に示すように
、この核燃料用ペレット1の外周面に撮影光をあててそ
の反射光を受光し、各部位からの反射光の強さを所定の
しきい値によって2値化して、第3図(ロ)に示すよう
な周面全体の2値化展開画像2を作成する。この時、ペ
レット1の外表面に欠け等の欠陥部1aがあった場合に
は、その欠陥部1aでは撮影光が乱反射して正常部1b
とは明るさが異なることから、作成された画像2中にお
いては、ベレットlの欠陥部1aが欠陥部3として、ま
たベレットlの正常部1bが正常部4として写し出され
ることになる。For example, nuclear fuel pellets as shown in Figure 2! When inspecting the outer peripheral surface of a nuclear fuel pellet 1, first, as shown in Figure 3 (a), a photographic light is applied to the outer peripheral surface of the nuclear fuel pellet 1 and the reflected light is received, and the intensity of the reflected light from each part is measured. The area is binarized using a predetermined threshold value to create a binarized expanded image 2 of the entire circumferential surface as shown in FIG. 3 (b). At this time, if there is a defective part 1a such as a chip on the outer surface of the pellet 1, the photographing light is diffusely reflected at the defective part 1a and the normal part 1b
Since the brightness is different from that, in the created image 2, the defective part 1a of the pellet l will be shown as the defective part 3, and the normal part 1b of the pellet l will be shown as the normal part 4.
そして、この画像2からその欠陥部3あるいは正常部4
の大きさを、予め設定した画像処理プログラムによって
計測し、その計測結果を判定基準に照らし合イつ仕るこ
とにより、ベレットlの合否を機械的に判定するように
している。すなわち、欠陥部3の大きさが所定値以上で
ある場合、あるいは正常部4の大きさが所定値以下であ
る場合に、そのベレットlを不良品として判定ずろよう
にしている。Then, from this image 2, the defective part 3 or the normal part 4 is
The size of the pellet is measured using a preset image processing program, and the measurement results are compared against criteria to mechanically determine whether or not the pellet L is acceptable. That is, if the size of the defective portion 3 is greater than or equal to a predetermined value, or if the size of the normal portion 4 is less than or equal to a predetermined value, the pellet 1 is determined to be defective.
「発明か解決しようとする問題点」
ところが上記従来の方法においては、ベレットlの欠陥
部1aの形状によっては正確な判定を行えないことがあ
る。"Problems to be Solved by the Invention" However, in the conventional method described above, accurate determination may not be possible depending on the shape of the defective portion 1a of the pellet l.
たとえば、欠陥部la中に正常部1bとほぼ平行となっ
ている部分があった場合には、その部分では第4図(イ
)に示すように乱反射が起こらず、正常部1bと同様に
正規に反射することがある。この場合、この部分の画像
は正常部4と同じ明るさとなり、第4図(ロ)に示すよ
うに、疑似正常部5(本来は欠陥部であるにも拘わらず
、画像中においては正常部として現れる部分)として欠
陥部3中に島の状態で現れてくる。For example, if there is a part in the defective part la that is almost parallel to the normal part 1b, diffuse reflection will not occur in that part as shown in Figure 4 (a), and it will be normal like the normal part 1b. may be reflected. In this case, the image of this part has the same brightness as the normal part 4, and as shown in FIG. (a portion that appears as an island) appears in the defective portion 3 in the form of an island.
このような場合、従来一般の画像処理プログラムでは、
上記のような疑似正常部5と本来の正常部4とを区別す
ることができず、そのような疑似正常部5をも正常部4
と判断してしまっていた。In such cases, conventional general image processing programs
It is not possible to distinguish between the above-mentioned pseudo-normal area 5 and the original normal area 4, and such pseudo-normal area 5 is also classified as normal area 4.
I had decided that.
そしてその結果、不良品であるベレットに対して良品で
あるとの誤判定をしてしまうことかあった。As a result, a defective pellet may be incorrectly determined to be a good product.
このため従来においては、このような誤判定を避けるた
めに検査員によるチェックを行わねばならず、検査の自
動化、効率向上を図ることが困難であるという問題があ
った。For this reason, in the past, in order to avoid such erroneous determinations, checks had to be performed by inspectors, making it difficult to automate inspections and improve efficiency.
この発明は上記の事情に鑑みてなされたもので、疑似正
常部による影響を除外して、正確な判定を行うことので
きる検査方法を提供することを目的とする。The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and it is an object of the present invention to provide an inspection method that can exclude the influence of pseudo-normal parts and make accurate determinations.
「問題点を解決するための手段」
この発明は、被検査物の外表面を撮像して2値化画像を
作成し、その2値化画像に現された欠陥部または正常部
の大きさを計測することによって、前記被検査物外表面
の欠け等の欠陥部の大きさを検査するに際し、前記2値
化画像に対して収縮処理および膨張処理を順次行うこと
により、もとの画像の欠陥部中に存していた疑似正常部
を消失させた修正画像を作成し、その修正画像における
欠陥部または正常部の大きさを計測することを特徴とし
ている。"Means for Solving the Problems" This invention images the outer surface of an object to be inspected to create a binarized image, and calculates the size of a defective part or a normal part appearing in the binarized image. When inspecting the size of defects such as chips on the outer surface of the object to be inspected by measuring, by sequentially performing contraction processing and expansion processing on the binarized image, defects in the original image can be detected. This method is characterized by creating a corrected image in which the pseudo-normal parts that existed in the part disappear, and then measuring the size of the defective part or the normal part in the corrected image.
「実施例」
以下、この発明の実施例について第1図を参照して説明
する。"Example" Hereinafter, an example of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG.
第1図(イ)〜(ホ)は、第4図(ロ)に示したような
、欠陥部3中に疑似正常部5が島の状態で存している画
像2から、本来の正常部4のみの大きさ、あるいは疑似
正常部5を除く本来の欠陥部3全体の大きさを計測する
ための画像処理の手順を模式%式%
まず、第1図(イ)に示す画像2に対して収縮処理を行
って、この画像2全体を収縮させる。°これにより、(
ロ)に示すように、正常部4がもとの大きさく図中破線
で示す)から収縮するとともに、疑似正常部5も同様に
収縮する。そして、(ハ)に示すように疑似正常部5が
完全に消失するに至るまで、収縮処理を所定回数続ける
。なお、この収縮処理を行う回数は、予想される疑似正
常部5の大きさを勘案して予め設定しておけば良い。Figures 1 (a) to (e) show that the original normal area is different from the image 2 in which the pseudo-normal area 5 exists as an island in the defect area 3, as shown in Figure 4 (b). The image processing procedure for measuring only the size of 4 or the size of the entire original defective part 3 excluding the pseudo-normal part 5 is shown in a schematic % formula % First, for image 2 shown in FIG. Then, the entire image 2 is shrunk by performing a shrinking process. ° This results in (
As shown in b), the normal part 4 shrinks from its original size (indicated by the broken line in the figure), and the pseudo-normal part 5 also shrinks in the same way. Then, as shown in (c), the contraction process is continued a predetermined number of times until the pseudo-normal part 5 completely disappears. Note that the number of times this contraction process is performed may be set in advance in consideration of the expected size of the pseudo-normal part 5.
それから、(ニ)、(ホ)に示すように、上記で行った
収縮処理の回数分、膨張処理を行って、画像2全体をも
との大きさに戻す。これにより、本来の正常部4はもと
の大きさに戻るものの、上記の収縮処理の過程で消失し
た疑似正常部5はもはや復元することがなく、もとの画
像2から疑似正常部5のみが除外された修正画像6が得
られる。Then, as shown in (d) and (e), expansion processing is performed as many times as the contraction processing performed above to return the entire image 2 to its original size. As a result, although the original normal part 4 returns to its original size, the pseudo-normal part 5 that disappeared during the shrinkage process described above will no longer be restored, and only the pseudo-normal part 5 will be restored from the original image 2. A corrected image 6 is obtained in which .
そして、この修正画@!6から、従来と同様にしてその
欠陥部3あるいは正常部4の大きさを計測し、その計測
結果を判定基準に照らし合わ仕ることにより、このベレ
ットの合否の判定を行う。And this revised image @! 6, the size of the defective part 3 or the normal part 4 is measured in the same manner as in the past, and the result of the measurement is compared with the criteria to judge whether the pellet is acceptable or not.
以上の手順によれば、計測に先立って疑似正常部5が消
失しているから、従来のように疑似正常部5を正常部4
と誤認することはなく、本来の欠陥部3あるいは正常部
4のみを計測して合否の判定を正確に行うことができる
。したがって、検査の信頼性が向上するとともに、従来
においては必要であった検査員によるチェックを省くこ
とができる。According to the above procedure, since the pseudo-normal area 5 has disappeared prior to measurement, the pseudo-normal area 5 is replaced with the normal area 4 as in the conventional method.
It is possible to accurately determine pass/fail by measuring only the original defective part 3 or normal part 4 without making any misunderstanding. Therefore, the reliability of the inspection is improved, and the check by an inspector, which was necessary in the past, can be omitted.
なお、この発明は上記のような核燃料用ペレットの周面
の検査に適用するのみならず、その端面の検査にら、さ
らには、核燃料用ペレット以外ノ一般の材料の画像処理
による検査に対しても同様に適用できることは勿論であ
る。The present invention is applicable not only to the inspection of the circumferential surface of nuclear fuel pellets as described above, but also to the inspection of the end faces thereof, and further to the inspection of general materials other than nuclear fuel pellets by image processing. Of course, it can also be applied in the same way.
「発明の効果」
以上で詳細に説明したように、この発明によれば、画像
を収縮させた後再び膨張させることによって疑似正常部
を消失させた修正画像を作成し、この修正画像から欠陥
部あるいは正常部を計測するようにしたので、合否の判
定を正確に行うことができ、また、検査の自動化、迅速
化を図ることが可能であるという効果を奏する。"Effects of the Invention" As explained in detail above, according to the present invention, a corrected image is created in which the pseudo-normal areas disappear by shrinking the image and then expanding it again, and from this corrected image, the defective areas are Alternatively, since the normal part is measured, it is possible to accurately determine pass/fail, and it is also possible to automate and speed up the test.
第1図(イ)〜(ホ)は、この発明の実施例の検査方法
の手順を模式的に示す図である。
第2図は核燃料用ペレットの形状を示す斜視図である。
第3図(イ)は核燃料用ペレットの外周面の撮像状態を
示す断面図、第3図(ロ)は2値化された画像を示す図
、第4図(イ)は疑似正常部が現れる場合の撮像状態を
示す断面図、第4図(ロ)は疑似正常部が現れた画像を
示す図である。
■・・・・・・核燃料用ペレット(被検査物)、la・
・・・・・欠陥部、2・・・・・・2値化画像、3・・
・・・・欠陥部、4・・・・・・正常部、5・・・・・
・疑似正常部、6・・・・・・修正画像。FIGS. 1A to 1E are diagrams schematically showing the procedure of an inspection method according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a perspective view showing the shape of nuclear fuel pellets. Figure 3 (a) is a cross-sectional view showing the imaging state of the outer peripheral surface of a nuclear fuel pellet, Figure 3 (b) is a diagram showing a binarized image, and Figure 4 (a) shows a pseudo-normal area. FIG. 4(b) is a cross-sectional view showing the imaging state in this case, and is a diagram showing an image in which a pseudo-normal area appears. ■・・・・・・Pellet for nuclear fuel (object to be inspected), la・
...Defect part, 2...Binarized image, 3...
...Defect part, 4...Normal part, 5...
・Pseudo-normal part, 6... Corrected image.
Claims (1)
2値化画像に現された欠陥部または正常部の大きさを計
測することによって、前記被検査物外表面の欠け等の欠
陥部の大きさを検査するに際し、前記2値化画像に対し
て収縮処理および膨張処理を順次行うことにより、もと
の画像の欠陥部中に存していた疑似正常部を消失させた
修正画像を作成し、その修正画像における欠陥部または
正常部の大きさを計測することを特徴とする欠陥検査方
法。By capturing an image of the outer surface of the object to be inspected and creating a binarized image, and measuring the size of the defective part or normal area appearing in the binarized image, chips etc. on the outer surface of the object to be inspected can be detected. When inspecting the size of the defective area, the pseudo-normal area that existed in the defective area of the original image was eliminated by sequentially performing contraction processing and expansion processing on the binarized image. A defect inspection method characterized by creating a corrected image and measuring the size of a defective part or a normal part in the corrected image.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP61078012A JPS62235550A (en) | 1986-04-04 | 1986-04-04 | Defect inspection |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP61078012A JPS62235550A (en) | 1986-04-04 | 1986-04-04 | Defect inspection |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPS62235550A true JPS62235550A (en) | 1987-10-15 |
Family
ID=13649875
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP61078012A Pending JPS62235550A (en) | 1986-04-04 | 1986-04-04 | Defect inspection |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPS62235550A (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH06147855A (en) * | 1992-11-10 | 1994-05-27 | Hiyuu Burein:Kk | Image inspection method |
JP2005083775A (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2005-03-31 | Seirei Ind Co Ltd | Grain classifier |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS59192945A (en) * | 1983-04-15 | 1984-11-01 | Hitachi Ltd | Detecting method of pattern defect |
-
1986
- 1986-04-04 JP JP61078012A patent/JPS62235550A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS59192945A (en) * | 1983-04-15 | 1984-11-01 | Hitachi Ltd | Detecting method of pattern defect |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH06147855A (en) * | 1992-11-10 | 1994-05-27 | Hiyuu Burein:Kk | Image inspection method |
JP2005083775A (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2005-03-31 | Seirei Ind Co Ltd | Grain classifier |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20130035876A1 (en) | Detecting defects on a wafer | |
KR900003995A (en) | Inspection method of soldered part by X-ray transmission image and built-in structure of electronic parts on the device and substrate | |
JP3265595B2 (en) | Image processing method and apparatus | |
JPH0575062B2 (en) | ||
JPS62235550A (en) | Defect inspection | |
JP3283356B2 (en) | Surface inspection method | |
JP2990820B2 (en) | Surface defect inspection equipment | |
JPS62229050A (en) | Surface detect inspection of object | |
JP3314217B2 (en) | Appearance inspection device | |
JPH079402B2 (en) | Defect inspection method for pellet end face for nuclear fuel | |
JP4474006B2 (en) | Inspection device | |
JPS62229053A (en) | Defect inspection of pellet end face for nuclear fuel | |
JPH0820368B2 (en) | Defect inspection method of pellet end face for nuclear fuel | |
JP3218875B2 (en) | Three-dimensional object shape inspection device | |
JP3232249B2 (en) | Inspection method for missing pins of PGA substrate | |
JPS58744A (en) | Inspecting method of bottle or the like | |
JPH01214743A (en) | Optical apparatus for checking | |
JPH0723845B2 (en) | Defect detection method | |
JPH01207878A (en) | Contour inspection device | |
JP3409695B2 (en) | Surface defect inspection method | |
JP2576768B2 (en) | Printed circuit board pattern inspection equipment | |
JP3348059B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing semiconductor device | |
KR0165319B1 (en) | Testing method of processing margin in photo lithography process | |
JPS62148838A (en) | Defect recognizing method | |
US10475178B1 (en) | System, method and computer program product for inspecting a wafer using a film thickness map generated for the wafer |