JPS61169302A - Pneumatic tire - Google Patents

Pneumatic tire

Info

Publication number
JPS61169302A
JPS61169302A JP60009195A JP919585A JPS61169302A JP S61169302 A JPS61169302 A JP S61169302A JP 60009195 A JP60009195 A JP 60009195A JP 919585 A JP919585 A JP 919585A JP S61169302 A JPS61169302 A JP S61169302A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
pitch
design
index
noise
tire
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP60009195A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH075002B2 (en
Inventor
Tomohiko Kogure
知彦 小暮
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd filed Critical Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd
Priority to JP60009195A priority Critical patent/JPH075002B2/en
Publication of JPS61169302A publication Critical patent/JPS61169302A/en
Publication of JPH075002B2 publication Critical patent/JPH075002B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60CVEHICLE TYRES; TYRE INFLATION; TYRE CHANGING; CONNECTING VALVES TO INFLATABLE ELASTIC BODIES IN GENERAL; DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS RELATED TO TYRES
    • B60C11/00Tyre tread bands; Tread patterns; Anti-skid inserts
    • B60C11/03Tread patterns
    • B60C11/0318Tread patterns irregular patterns with particular pitch sequence

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Tires In General (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To aim at reducing noise and enhancing the comfortability provided a tire having tread design constituting elements which are arrayed at variable pitches, by specifying the ratio of a maximum design index and a minimum design index in each pitch. CONSTITUTION:Tread design constituting elements Ea each composed of a main groove 10, auxiliary grooves 20 and sipings 30 are arrayed in accordance with a variable pitch arranging method. Further, the ratio between a maximum index Gpmax and a minimum index Gpmin among design indices Gp which are expressed by the equation I relating to the tread design constituting elements Ea in pitches PA, PB, PC is set in a range from 1.05-1.30. With this arrangement, it is possible to restrain abnormal abrasion and vibration in order to enhance the effect of dispersion of noise energy, thereby it is possible to aim at reducing noise and at enhancing the comfortability.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は空気入りタイヤに関し、さらに詳しくは、タイ
ヤ転勤に伴ってトレッドデザインが発生する騒音(パタ
ーンノイズ)を、できるだけ広い周波数域に分散せしめ
ることにより騒音を低減し得るようにした空気入リタイ
ヤであって、自動車の居住性を向上すると共に、騒音公
害を抑制することに利用される。
[Detailed Description of the Invention] [Field of Industrial Application] The present invention relates to pneumatic tires, and more specifically, to dispersing noise (pattern noise) generated by the tread design due to tire rotation into as wide a frequency range as possible. This is a pneumatic tire that can reduce noise, and is used to improve the comfort of automobiles and suppress noise pollution.

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

従来、パターンノイズの分散は、バリュアブルピッチ配
列法により、トレッドデザインのデザイン要素を何種類
かの異なるくり返しくピソチ)fR位とし、それらを周
方向に適当にランダム化された順序に配列して行なって
きた。
Conventionally, pattern noise has been dispersed using the variable pitch arrangement method, in which the design elements of the tread design are set at several different repeating pitches (fR) and arranged in an appropriately randomized order in the circumferential direction. It's here.

これは、無線工学等で用いられている周波数変調理論に
基づくものであり、各デザイン要素が発生するパルス的
振動の時間間隔を変化させて特定の周波数に騒音が集中
しないようにする手法である。
This is based on the frequency modulation theory used in radio engineering, etc., and is a method of changing the time interval of pulse-like vibrations generated by each design element to prevent noise from concentrating on a specific frequency. .

また、この手法については、くり返しピッチの最長と最
短の比率αが大きい程、騒音分散の効果が高いと言われ
ている。
Furthermore, it is said that this method has a higher noise dispersion effect as the ratio α between the longest and shortest repetition pitches increases.

しかし、現実的には極端に、くり返しピッチの最長/最
短の比率αを大きくとると、くり返し単位の最短のもの
が小さくなりすぎ、すなわち、最も小さいデザイン要素
が小さくなりすぎ、異常摩耗や振動発生の原因となった
りして騒音の分散効果にも限度がある。(α=1.5が
実用限)しかも、騒音改善の市場要求は近年ますます高
りつつあり、従来のバリアプルピッチ配列法では不十分
であるというのが現状である。
However, in reality, if the ratio α of the longest/shortest repeating pitch is extremely large, the shortest repeating unit becomes too small, in other words, the smallest design element becomes too small, causing abnormal wear and vibration. There is also a limit to the noise dispersion effect. (α=1.5 is the practical limit) Moreover, the market demand for noise improvement has been increasing more and more in recent years, and the current situation is that the conventional barrier pull pitch arrangement method is insufficient.

〔発明の目的〕[Purpose of the invention]

本発明は上述した問題点を解消すべく実験し検討した結
果、導かれたものである。
The present invention was developed as a result of experiments and studies to solve the above-mentioned problems.

従って本発明の目的は、トレッドデザインをバリアプル
ピッチ配列法によって配列すると共に、各ピッチエレメ
ントのデザイン指数(主溝・補助溝・カーフの体積と接
地中によって定まる指数)を工夫することにより、従来
のタイヤと比較して異常摩耗や振動発生を伴うことなく
騒音エネルギーの分散効果を高めて騒音を低減せしめ、
自動車の居住性を向上すると共に、騒音公害を抑制する
ことができる空気入りタイヤを提供することにある。
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to arrange the tread design using the barrier pull pitch arrangement method, and to devise the design index of each pitch element (an index determined by the volume of the main groove, auxiliary groove, and kerf and during contact with the ground). Compared to conventional tires, this product improves the dispersion effect of noise energy and reduces noise without causing abnormal wear or vibration.
An object of the present invention is to provide a pneumatic tire that can improve the comfort of an automobile and suppress noise pollution.

〔発明の構成〕[Structure of the invention]

すなわち本発明は、タイヤの踏面に主溝、補助溝、サイ
プ等トレッドデザイン構成要素をバリアプルピッチ配列
法に基づいて配置した空気入りタイヤであって、各ピッ
チ内における前記トレッドデザイン構成要素の下記式で
表されるデザイン指数Gpのうち、最も高いデザイン指
数Gpa+axと、最も低いデザイン指数Qpminと
の比率Gpmax/ Gpn+inをβとすると、この
βの値を、 β=1.05〜1.30 の範囲内に設定したことを特徴とする空気入りタイヤを
、その要旨とするものである。
That is, the present invention is a pneumatic tire in which tread design components such as main grooves, auxiliary grooves, and sipes are arranged on the tread surface of the tire based on the barrier pull pitch arrangement method, and the tread design components in each pitch are arranged as follows: Among the design indices Gp expressed by the formula, if the ratio Gpmax/Gpn+in between the highest design index Gpa+ax and the lowest design index Qpmin is β, then the value of β is β=1.05 to 1.30. The gist is a pneumatic tire that is characterized by being set within this range.

但し サフィックス p:各ピッチ。however Suffix p: Each pitch.

i:ピッチpに含まれる各溝要素。i: Each groove element included in pitch p.

j:ピッチpに含まれる各サイプ要素。j: Each sipe element included in pitch p.

W : JIS標準条件下のタイヤ接地中。W: Tires are in contact with the ground under JIS standard conditions.

P:ピッチの周方向長さ。P: Circumferential length of pitch.

サフィックス W:巾、D:深さ、L:長さ。Suffix W: Width, D: Depth, L: Length.

G:溝要素。G: Groove element.

S:サイプ要素。S: Sipe element.

Gmax  :最大主溝深さ。Gmax: Maximum main groove depth.

C本発明に至った経緯〕 従来のバリアプルピッチ配列法における、各ピッチのデ
ザイン要素の設計は、くり返しピッチの長いものから短
いものまで、略相似形になるように主溝・補助溝・サイ
プ(細い切り込み溝)等を設計している、すなわち、長
いピッチに比較して短いピッチにおいては、比較的に溝
巾を狭めたリサイズの長さを縮めたりして、結局、後述
する各ピッチのデザイン指数は、どのピッチもほぼ近い
値となり、最も高いデザイン指数を有するピッチと、最
も低いデザイン指数を有するピッチの比率βは1.0〜
1.05の範囲である。
C. How the present invention was achieved] In the conventional barrier pull pitch arrangement method, the design elements of each pitch are designed so that the main grooves, auxiliary grooves, and sipes have approximately similar shapes, from the long pitch to the short repeat pitch. In other words, for short pitches compared to long pitches, the groove width is relatively narrowed and the length of the resize is shortened, and in the end, each pitch is The design index has almost similar values for all pitches, and the ratio β of the pitch with the highest design index and the pitch with the lowest design index is 1.0 ~
It is in the range of 1.05.

ここに各ピッチのデザイン指数Gpは次のように定義さ
れる。
Here, the design index Gp of each pitch is defined as follows.

・・・・・・(1) 但し サフィックス p:各ピッチ・ −1:ピッチpに含まれる各溝要素。・・・・・・(1) however Suffix p: Each pitch -1: Each groove element included in pitch p.

j:ピッチpに含まれる各サイプ要素。j: Each sipe element included in pitch p.

W : JIS標準条件下のタイヤ接地中。W: Tires are in contact with the ground under JIS standard conditions.

P:ピッチの周方向長さ。P: Circumferential length of pitch.

サフィックス W:巾、D=深さ、し=長さ。Suffix W: Width, D = Depth, Shi = Length.

G:1!要素。G:1! element.

S:サイプ要素。S: Sipe element.

Gmaに :最大主溝深さ。Gma: Maximum main groove depth.

本発明の発明者は、バリュアプルピ、チ配列法に加えて
、各ピッチのデザイン要素をピッチの長さと比例しない
ように定め、各ピッチの剛性の不均一性をより強くさせ
ることが騒音分散に効果あるだろうことに着目し、各ピ
ッチのデザイン指数のうち最大のものと最小のものとの
比率βをパラメータとした実験を実施した。
The inventor of the present invention has determined that, in addition to the Valua Pulpi and Chi arrangement method, the design elements of each pitch are set so as not to be proportional to the length of the pitch, and the non-uniformity of the stiffness of each pitch is strengthened, which is effective for noise dispersion. Focusing on this fact, we conducted an experiment using the ratio β between the maximum and minimum design indices for each pitch as a parameter.

実験は165 SR13のサイズのスチールラジアルタ
イヤにおいて、ピッチの最長/最短の比率αを1.3に
固定し、サイズの深さ、長さ及び巾を種々のピッチで変
化させ、各ピッチのデザイン指数Gpの最大/最小比β
を1.0から1.4まで変化させて行なった。
The experiment was conducted using a steel radial tire with a size of 165 SR13, fixing the longest/shortest pitch ratio α to 1.3, changing the depth, length, and width of the size at various pitches, and determining the design index of each pitch. Gp maximum/minimum ratio β
The test was carried out by changing the value from 1.0 to 1.4.

騒音の測定は、JASOC606−73rタイヤ騒音試
験法」に準じたもので実施した。
Noise measurements were carried out in accordance with JASOC606-73r Tire Noise Test Method.

この結果、第2図に示す如く各ピンチのデザイン指数は
均一であるより不均一にした方が騒音低減に有利である
ことが、判明した。
As a result, it has been found that it is more advantageous for noise reduction to make the design index of each pinch non-uniform than to make it uniform, as shown in FIG.

また、βΦ値は1.05以上で、明確な効果があられれ
βΦ値が大きいほど良いことがわかる。
Further, it can be seen that a clear effect is obtained when the βΦ value is 1.05 or more, and the larger the βΦ value is, the better it is.

しかし、βが大きすぎると、すなわち、最大の剛性をも
つピンチと最小の剛性をもつものとの差が大きいほど、
タイヤの摩耗形態が異常をきたす、あるいは、摩耗時の
騒音が悪化する等の不都合が生じ、大きくともβ=18
3が限度である。従って、βは1.05〜1.3の間、
望ましくは1.1〜1.2の間が良いことを知見するに
至った。
However, if β is too large, that is, the difference between the pinch with the maximum stiffness and the one with the minimum stiffness is large,
Problems such as abnormal tire wear patterns or worsening noise during wear may occur, and β = 18 at most.
3 is the limit. Therefore, β is between 1.05 and 1.3,
It has been found that a value between 1.1 and 1.2 is preferable.

さらに、各ピッチ間のデザイン指数の差をつける場合は
、ピッチの長さの大小にほぼ比例してデザイン指数の大
小をつける方法、ピッチ長さとは無関係にランダムにデ
ザイン指数の変化をつける方法、特定のピンチにのみデ
ザイン指数を変化させる方法等いずれの場合も有効であ
ることが判った。
Furthermore, when creating a difference in the design index between each pitch, there are two methods: one is to increase the design index approximately in proportion to the length of the pitch, the other is to vary the design index randomly regardless of the pitch length. It has been found that the method of changing the design index only in a specific pinch is effective in both cases.

次に、本発明者はピッチの最も短いデザイン要素が小さ
くなりすぎると摩耗形態の異常、摩耗時の騒音悪化の問
題が発生することにかんがみて、最小ピッチのデザイン
指数を高く保ちデザインの剛性を高める方法について検
討を進めた。
Next, in view of the fact that if the design element with the shortest pitch becomes too small, problems such as abnormal wear patterns and aggravation of noise during wear will occur, the inventor kept the design index of the minimum pitch high to increase the rigidity of the design. We continued to consider ways to increase this.

すなわち、デザイン指数の最小となるピッチは、最短ピ
ッチ長さを有しないピッチとし、むしろ、最短ピッチに
おいては最も高いデザイン指数を与える実験をした。
That is, an experiment was conducted in which the pitch with the minimum design index was a pitch that did not have the shortest pitch length, and rather, the shortest pitch had the highest design index.

デザイン指数の最大/最小比はβ=1.15に固定し、
最短ピッチ以外のピッチにおけるデザイン指数の最大と
、最短ピッチにおけるデザイン指数の比率β5hinを
、ピッチ長の最大/最小比αと共に変化させた実験を行
なった。
The maximum/minimum ratio of the design index is fixed at β = 1.15,
An experiment was conducted in which the ratio β5hin of the maximum design index at pitches other than the shortest pitch and the design index at the shortest pitch was varied together with the maximum/minimum pitch length ratio α.

この結果、第3図に示すように、デザイン指数の最小値
を最短ピッチに与えた場合(図中O印)、αを太き(す
るほど騒音は、周波数変調理論に従って低減する。しか
し、αが1.3以上では及びデザイン剛性(要素長さが
短く、かつ、デザイン指数が小)の低さの為、異常摩耗
・摩耗時の騒音悪化が顕著となり実用に供せない。
As a result, as shown in Figure 3, when the minimum value of the design index is given to the shortest pitch (marked O in the diagram), the thicker α is, the more the noise is reduced according to frequency modulation theory.However, α If it is 1.3 or more, the design rigidity (the element length is short and the design index is small) is low, and the noise deteriorates significantly during abnormal wear and abrasion, making it impossible to put it into practical use.

しかし、一方、デザイン指数の最小値を最短ピッチ以外
に与え、最短ピッチはデザイン指数が最大となるように
(βlll1n小さく)シておけば、αが1.8まで実
用に供することができ、結果的にβ5hin =1.1
5の場合(図中O印)のα=1.4よりβ@in =0
.90の場合(図中・印)のα−1,8の方が騒音低減
に有効となる。
However, on the other hand, if the minimum value of the design index is given to a pitch other than the shortest pitch, and the shortest pitch is set so that the design index becomes the maximum (βllll1n smaller), α can be put to practical use up to 1.8. β5hin = 1.1
5 (marked O in the figure), β@in = 0 from α = 1.4
.. In the case of 90 (marked in the figure), α-1,8 is more effective in reducing noise.

このように、最短ピッチのデザイン指数を、他の最大の
デザイン指数より高くし、ピッチ長の最大/最小比αを
従来、実用に供せなかった範囲より(β−1,0でα=
1.5が限度)大きくすれば、より騒音の低減がはかれ
ることが判明した。β−inを0.95以下、望ましく
は0.9以下にしてαを1.3〜1.8、望ましくは1
.5〜1.65とすれば良いことを知見した。
In this way, the design index of the shortest pitch is set higher than the other maximum design index, and the maximum/minimum ratio α of the pitch length is set from a range that could not be put to practical use (β-1, 0, α=
It was found that the noise can be further reduced by increasing the value (1.5 is the limit). β-in is 0.95 or less, preferably 0.9 or less, and α is 1.3 to 1.8, preferably 1.
.. It was found that it is sufficient to set the value to 5 to 1.65.

すなわち、最短ピッチの剛性が従来以上に低い場合は、
αの上限が従来のものより低くなってしまうことが判っ
た。
In other words, if the stiffness of the shortest pitch is lower than before,
It was found that the upper limit of α was lower than that of the conventional method.

〔実施例の説明〕[Explanation of Examples]

以下本発明を実施例により図面を参照して具体的に説明
する。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be specifically described by way of examples with reference to the drawings.

第1図は本発明の実施例からなる空気入りタイヤの要部
を示す平面視説明図である。
FIG. 1 is an explanatory plan view showing the main parts of a pneumatic tire according to an embodiment of the present invention.

図においてEは本発明の実施例からなる空気入りタイヤ
で、タイヤの踏面Tに主溝10.補助溝20及びサイプ
30からなるトレッドデザイン構成要素Eaをバリエア
プルピッチ配列法に基づいて配置することにより構成さ
れている。
In the figure, E denotes a pneumatic tire according to an embodiment of the present invention, with main grooves 10. It is constructed by arranging tread design components Ea consisting of auxiliary grooves 20 and sipes 30 based on a barrier air pull pitch arrangement method.

そして本発明においては、特に、各ピッチPAIP、、
  P、内における前記トレッドデザイン構成要素の前
記(1)式で表されるデザイン指数Gpのうち、最も高
いデザイン指数G ptaaxと、最も低いデザイン指
数Gpminとの比率Gp+sax/ Gpminをβ
とすると、このβの値を、 β=1.05〜1.30 の範囲内に設定しである。
In the present invention, in particular, each pitch PAIP,
The ratio Gp+sax/Gpmin between the highest design index Gptaax and the lowest design index Gpmin among the design indexes Gp expressed by the formula (1) of the tread design components in P, is β
Then, the value of β is set within the range of β=1.05 to 1.30.

さらに具体的には、第1図及び下記第1表(a)。More specifically, FIG. 1 and Table 1 (a) below.

第1表(b)に示す通りである。As shown in Table 1 (b).

第1表中) Gpmax=4.42 at C Gpmin=3.47 at A β=4.42/3.47= 1.27 βwin =3.85/4.42= 0.87上述した
ように本実施例においては、バリュアブルピッチ配列方
に基づいてタイヤのトレッドデザインを形成する場合、
各ピッチPム+  Pl+Poのデザイン指数Gpに変
化を与えると共に、最短ピッチのデザイン指数を他ピッ
チより高めることでピッチ長の最大/最小比αを高める
ことが可能となり騒音を大幅に低減することができるよ
うにしである。
(in Table 1) Gpmax = 4.42 at C Gpmin = 3.47 at A β = 4.42/3.47 = 1.27 βwin = 3.85/4.42 = 0.87 In the embodiment, when forming a tire tread design based on a variable pitch arrangement method,
By changing the design index Gp of each pitch Pm+Pl+Po and increasing the design index of the shortest pitch compared to other pitches, it is possible to increase the maximum/minimum pitch length ratio α, and it is possible to significantly reduce noise. It is possible to do so.

〔実験例〕[Experiment example]

本実験例は、第4図、第2表(a)、第2表(b)。 This experimental example is shown in FIG. 4, Table 2 (a), and Table 2 (b).

第3表に示す従来タイヤ、及び第1図、第1表(a)、
第1表中)、第3表に示す本発明タイヤ(1)、第3表
に示す本発明タイヤ(2)、第3表に示す比較例タイヤ
(1)、第3表に示す比較例タイヤ(2)を用いて、新
品タイヤの騒音、 10000 km走行後のタイヤの
騒音及び異常摩耗を調べた。
Conventional tires shown in Table 3, and Figure 1, Table 1 (a),
(in Table 1), the present invention tire (1) shown in Table 3, the present invention tire (2) shown in Table 3, the comparative example tire (1) shown in Table 3, the comparative example tire shown in Table 3 (2) was used to investigate the noise of new tires, the noise of tires after running 10,000 km, and abnormal wear.

なお、従来タイヤは具体的には、第4図及び下記第2表
(a)、第2表(b)に示す通りである。
The conventional tires are specifically as shown in FIG. 4 and Table 2 (a) and Table 2 (b) below.

実験の結果、第3表に示す実験結果を得た。As a result of the experiment, the experimental results shown in Table 3 were obtained.

第2表(a) 従来パターン 第2表(b) Gpmax=3.70 at B Gpmin=3.65 at A&C β =3.70/3.65= 1.01βwin =3
.70/3.65= 1.01この第3表の右側に示す
実験結果から、(al  本発明タイヤ(1)は、αが
1.63と大きくてもβ= 1.27、βll1inを
0.87としたことから耐騒音性が向上し、かつ他の問
題もない。
Table 2 (a) Conventional pattern Table 2 (b) Gpmax=3.70 at B Gpmin=3.65 at A&C β =3.70/3.65= 1.01βwin =3
.. 70/3.65 = 1.01 From the experimental results shown on the right side of Table 3, (al) Even if α is as large as 1.63, β = 1.27 and βll1in are 0. 87, the noise resistance is improved and there are no other problems.

(bl  本発明タイヤ(2)は、従来タイヤよりβを
太きく 1.19としたため耐騒音性が向上している。
(bl) The tire (2) of the present invention has a thicker β of 1.19 than the conventional tire, and therefore has improved noise resistance.

(C)  比較例タイヤ(1)は、βが1.39と大き
すぎるため、摩耗時騒音と摩耗形態に問題がある。
(C) Comparative Example Tire (1) has problems with noise during wear and wear pattern because β is too large at 1.39.

(d+  比較例タイヤ(2)は、β=1.0(従来)
の場合にαを太きく 1.55としたため1、摩耗時騒
音に改良効果がなく、摩耗形態に問題がある。
(d+ Comparative tire (2) has β=1.0 (conventional)
In the case of 1, since α is set to a large value of 1.55, there is no improvement effect on the noise during wear, and there is a problem with the form of wear.

なお、αが1.8を超えると異常摩耗が発生する恐れが
あるので好ましくない。
Note that if α exceeds 1.8, abnormal wear may occur, which is not preferable.

結局αは1.8を限度として大きくし、βminを0.
95より小さくしβは1.3を限度として大きくするこ
とにより最も優れた騒音性を有し、かつ、他の問題が生
じないものが得られることが判った。
In the end, α is increased to a maximum of 1.8, and βmin is set to 0.
It has been found that by making β smaller than 95 and increasing β to a maximum of 1.3, it is possible to obtain a product that has the best noise properties and does not cause other problems.

〔発明の効果〕〔Effect of the invention〕

本発明は上述したように構成したから、従来のタイヤと
比較して異常摩耗や振動発生を伴うことなく騒音エネル
ギーの分散効果を高めて騒音を低減せしめることができ
、自動車の居住性を向上すると共に、騒音公害を抑制す
ることができる。
Since the present invention is constructed as described above, compared to conventional tires, it is possible to enhance the noise energy dispersion effect and reduce noise without causing abnormal wear or vibration generation, thereby improving the comfort of automobiles. At the same time, noise pollution can be suppressed.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は本発明の実施例からなる空気入りタイヤの要部
を示す平面視説明図、第2図はGpmax/Gpn+i
nすなわちβと音圧レベルとの関係を示す図、第3図は
Pmax / Pa1nすなわちαと音圧レベルとの関
係を示す図であり、また第4図は従来タイヤの要部を示
す平面視説明図である。 lO・・・主溝、20・・・補助溝、30・・・サイプ
FIG. 1 is a plan view explanatory diagram showing the main parts of a pneumatic tire according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a diagram showing Gpmax/Gpn+i.
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the relationship between n, that is, β, and the sound pressure level. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the relationship between Pmax/Pa1n, that is, α, and the sound pressure level. FIG. 4 is a plan view showing the main parts of a conventional tire. It is an explanatory diagram. lO...Main groove, 20...Auxiliary groove, 30...Sipe.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 タイヤの踏面に主溝、補助溝、サイプ等トレッドデザイ
ン構成要素をバリュアブルピッチ配列法に基づいて配置
した空気入りタイヤであって、各ピッチ内における前記
トレッドデザイン構成要素の下記式で表されるデザイン
指数Gpのうち、最も高いデザイン指数Gpmaxと最
も低いデザイン指数Gpminとの比率Gpmax/G
pminをβとすると、このβの値を、 β=1.05〜1.30 の範囲内に設定したことを特徴とする空気入りタイヤ。 ▲数式、化学式、表等があります▼ 但し サフィックスp:各ピッチ。 i:ピッチpに含まれる各溝要素。 j:ピッチpに含まれる各サイプ要素。 W:JIS標準条件下のタイヤ接地巾。 P:ピッチの周方向長さ。 サフィックスw:巾、D:深さ、L:長さ。 G:溝要素。 S:サイプ要素。 Gmax:最大主溝深さ。
[Scope of Claims] A pneumatic tire in which tread design components such as main grooves, auxiliary grooves, and sipes are arranged on the tread surface of the tire based on a variable pitch arrangement method, wherein the tread design components within each pitch are as follows: Among the design indices Gp expressed by the formula, the ratio between the highest design index Gpmax and the lowest design index Gpmin Gpmax/G
A pneumatic tire characterized in that, where pmin is β, the value of β is set within the range of β=1.05 to 1.30. ▲There are mathematical formulas, chemical formulas, tables, etc.▼ However, the suffix p: each pitch. i: Each groove element included in pitch p. j: Each sipe element included in pitch p. W: Tire contact width under JIS standard conditions. P: Circumferential length of pitch. Suffix w: width, D: depth, L: length. G: Groove element. S: Sipe element. Gmax: Maximum main groove depth.
JP60009195A 1985-01-23 1985-01-23 Pneumatic tire Expired - Lifetime JPH075002B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP60009195A JPH075002B2 (en) 1985-01-23 1985-01-23 Pneumatic tire

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP60009195A JPH075002B2 (en) 1985-01-23 1985-01-23 Pneumatic tire

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS61169302A true JPS61169302A (en) 1986-07-31
JPH075002B2 JPH075002B2 (en) 1995-01-25

Family

ID=11713725

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP60009195A Expired - Lifetime JPH075002B2 (en) 1985-01-23 1985-01-23 Pneumatic tire

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH075002B2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01289705A (en) * 1988-05-17 1989-11-21 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire with reduced noise
JPH02127103A (en) * 1988-11-04 1990-05-15 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Tire for automobile
JPH02127105A (en) * 1988-11-04 1990-05-15 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Tire for automobile
JPH03159804A (en) * 1989-11-16 1991-07-09 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Tread pattern of pneumatic tire
WO2007114430A1 (en) * 2006-03-31 2007-10-11 Bridgestone Corporation Pneumatic tire

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS582844A (en) * 1981-06-29 1983-01-08 Fujitsu Ltd Inspecting method for photomask

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS582844A (en) * 1981-06-29 1983-01-08 Fujitsu Ltd Inspecting method for photomask

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01289705A (en) * 1988-05-17 1989-11-21 Bridgestone Corp Pneumatic tire with reduced noise
JPH02127103A (en) * 1988-11-04 1990-05-15 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Tire for automobile
JPH02127105A (en) * 1988-11-04 1990-05-15 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Tire for automobile
JPH03159804A (en) * 1989-11-16 1991-07-09 Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd Tread pattern of pneumatic tire
WO2007114430A1 (en) * 2006-03-31 2007-10-11 Bridgestone Corporation Pneumatic tire
US8151842B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2012-04-10 Bridgestone Corporation Pneumatic tire

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH075002B2 (en) 1995-01-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1637356B1 (en) Pneumatic tire and method of designing tread pattern of the tire
US5062461A (en) Pneumatic tire having a tread pattern for reducing noise
JPH04237609A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP4925660B2 (en) tire
US7360568B2 (en) Tire having narrowing sipes
JPS5878801A (en) Pneumatic tyre of bias structure with low noise
JP2805472B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
EP0324605A2 (en) Pneumatic tires
JPS61169302A (en) Pneumatic tire
NZ213344A (en) Tyre tread with radially outwardly diverging transverse grooves: groove walls inclined at different angles to suppress noise
JPH07132709A (en) Low noise heavy load use pneumatic tire
US7387696B2 (en) Tire tread design and the construction method thereof
JPS63188505A (en) Low noise pneumatic tire
JPS6175003A (en) Low noise tire
JPH03159804A (en) Tread pattern of pneumatic tire
JP2816863B2 (en) Pneumatic radial tires for passenger cars
JPS63141804A (en) Pneumatic tire
JPH06106915A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2000071718A (en) Pneumatic tire
JP3397450B2 (en) Pneumatic tire
JP2860548B2 (en) Pneumatic tires for passenger cars
JPH1178423A (en) Pneumatic tire
KR100258296B1 (en) A tread pattern structure of a pneumatic tire
JPH03136908A (en) Pneumatic tire with reduced noise characteristics
JPH09272311A (en) Pneumatic tire for heavy load

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term